Health Technology and Service DesignLaajuus (2 cr)
Code: VÅV21KV03
Credits
2 op
Objective
Student
- has insights into the various uses of health and welfare technology in healthcare
- can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
- can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective
- has basic knowledge of service design in social and health care
Content
Health technology as a resource in healthcare
Service design
Qualifications
No prior knowledge
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
Enrollment
01.12.2022 - 16.04.2023
Timing
17.04.2023 - 07.05.2023
Number of ECTS credits allocated
2 op
Mode of delivery
Contact teaching
Unit
Faculty of Health and Welfare
Teaching languages
- Svenska
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Nursing
- Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing
- Degree Programme in Midwifery
Teachers
- Camilla Mattjus
Teacher in charge
Camilla Mattjus
Groups
-
UBM21D-VBarnmorska (YH), h21, dagstudier, Vasa
-
UHV21D-VHälsovårdare (YH), h20, dagstudier, Vasa
Objective
Student
- has insights into the various uses of health and welfare technology in healthcare
- can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
- can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective
- has basic knowledge of service design in social and health care
Content
Health technology as a resource in healthcare
Service design
Location and time
UAS Novia, Alere, Vaasa
Spring 2023
Materials
Studymaterial and recommended literature on Moodle
Teaching methods
Lectures, assignments and selfstudy modules
Completion alternatives
2 cr = 54h
Lectures in class/ endseminars 12h
Time for assignments and selfstudies 42h
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
Assessment methods and criteria
Graded from 0-5
Qualifications
No prior knowledge