Study Guide

Objective

The student
- know the basic types of the tissues in the human body
- know the central structure and functions of the human body
- understand the physiology of the organs in human body
- are familiar with cell biology
- will be able to apply their knowledge to nursing care

Content

Nervous system regulates physiological processes
Structure and function of the sense organs
Endocrine system regulates body metabolism and organ functions
Function of different organ systems, such as blood circulation, respiration, digestion and the urinary system
Lymphatic system
Reproductive system
Fluid- and acid-base balance

Location and time

Campus Alere, Vaasa

Materials

- Peate I. and Nair M. (2017) Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology: For Nursing and Healthcare Students. (Book available online via the Tritonia library, from Ebook central (Tritonia, LibGuides, Yrkeshögskolan Novia, Nursing, E-books or via the Finna portal, Tritonia))
- Peate I. and Nair M. (2015) Anatomy and Physiology for Nurses at a Glance. Wiley Blackwell. (Book available in the Tritonia library and via Ebook central)

Additional books for further reading:
- Tortora Gerard J. & Derrickson Bryan H. (2009 or newer version) Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (12th ed or newer) Volume 1 & 2. John Wiley & Sons.
- Tortora Gerard J. (2006). A brief Atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy, and selected medical images. John Wiley & Sons.

Teaching methods

Lectures and exam

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Objective

The student
- are familiar with the common transmission routes of pathogenic microbes
- understands the pathological picture of common infectious diseases
- know the basic aseptic methods
- master the terminology of basic clinical microbiology
- understand the immune response in health and disease
- understands the importance of immunology and pathology in health care
- can account for the immune system's physiology
- understands the mechanisms of the diseases

Content

Different microbe groups causing disease in man
Different modes for microbe transmission
Human microbiota and explain its impact on human health
Microbes causing common human infectious diseases
Antimicrobial resistance and explain the resistance in bacteria
Basic aseptic methods, aseptic technique, hand hygiene
Basics of pathology
Basics of pathophysiology

Location and time

Autumn 2024, 1.10-31.12 at Novia campus Alere in Vasa

Materials

Lecture material: Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology.
Murray, Rosenthal, Pfaller. Medical microbiology. 8th edition. Elsevier 2016
Murray. Basic Medical Microbiology. Elsevier 2017
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30263032/
Apurba S. Sastry & Sandhya, Bhat. Essentials of medical microbiology. 2018. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/novia-ebooks/reader.action?docID=6286659&ppg=20
Huether, McCane, Brasher, Rote. Understanding pathophysiology. 2017
Kumar, Cotran, Robbins. Basic pathology.
Phillips, Murray & Crocker. The Biology of Disease. Blackwell Science.
ebook: Lippincott, Springhouse. Just the facts: Pathophysiology
Khanacademy Health and medicine
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/health-and-medicine

Teaching methods

Lectures, assignments, individual studies, exam.

Exam schedules

Exam: 12.12.2024
Re-examination (General re-takes): 17.1.2025 and 7.3.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

5 credits is 5 x 27 hours of work for the student, 135 h work.

Further information

CONTENT
A CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Microbes and microbiology
Microbiota (Microbiome)
Spreading of microbes and modes for transmission
Microbes, infection and disease
Antimicrobial resistance
Clinical microbiology (bacteriology, virology, mycology, protozoology)
B IMMUNOLOGY
The immune system
Immunisation and immunity
C PATHOLOGY
Aetiology
Inflammation
Pathophysiology of disease

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on the exam. Assignments must be passed.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology.

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Objective

The student
- obtains knowledge of laboratory tests and specimen collection
- obtains knowledge about, pain, elimination , and demonstrate skills in helping a client with urinary and fecal problems (ss. catheterization and ostomy care)
- obtains knowledge about altered nutrition and demonstrate skills in enteral nutrition,
- understands the importance of diagnostic investigations, laboratory tests and ECG and be able to assist with these procedures
- understands sustainable development according to economics and environment
- obtains knowledge about patient safety, ethics and cultural aspects in different nursing contexts

Content

Pain: assessment, identification, evaluation, alleviation of pain without medication
Diagnostic testing, common blood tests and specimen collection
ECG
Urinary catheterization
Ostomy care
PEG, nasogastric tube, enteral nutrition
Proper handling of sharps instruments

Location and time

Spring 2025
Students who participates must be present at Vaasa Campus.

Materials

Bergman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen .G. 2022. (10th ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.

Hess, C. 2013. Clinical guide to Skin & Wound Care. 7th Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins.

For laboratory work: Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

Lectures
Workshops, Clinical practice in class + independent training
Demonstration
Self studies


Only available for students with prior nursing studies, such as Novias open path students and Degree students from year 2024.

Completion alternatives

Moodle exam
Practice in class: pass or fail
Examination; approved video/ clinical examination
Approved assignments
Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
Mandatory attendance at workshops

Student workload

4 x 27 h = 108

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Pass/fail

Qualifications

First Aid and Basic Nursing

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of and demonstrate decision-making skills and critical thinking in internal medicine and surgical nursing
- demonstrates skills in assessing, implementing and evaluating the internal medicine and surgical nursing process in different clinical settings
- demonstrates a holistic perspective of nursing care in case studies
- demonstrates skills in assessing, implementing and evaluating the nursing process in internal medicine and surgical field
- has knowledge about health technology related to the medical/surgical field
- has knowledge about patient safety, ethical and cultural issues in different nursing contexts

Content

Common clinical interventions and methods in internal medicine nursing
Common clinical interventions and methods in surigcal nursing
Common intraoperative nursing and postoperative and surgical nursing skills
Nursing care for patients with altered electrolyte- and fluid balance
Managing the fluid balance, focusing on intravenous and blood infusions, drainage and catheters
Blood transfusions, CVC, PICC, arterial cannula
Medication technology and health technology in internal medicine and surgical field
Skills in assessing, implementing and evaluating the nursing process in internal medicine and surgical field
Patient safety, ethical and cultural issues in medical/ surgical field
ABCD, ISBAR
Resuscitation

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Wicker, Paul. Perioperative Practice at a Glance, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2015. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1895109.

Berman, A. & Snyder, S. 2022. Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts. process and Practice. Unit 8, Chapter 37.

Boyd, C. 2013. Clinical Skills for Nurses. Student Survival Skills. Wiley-Blackwell
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/reader.action?docID=7103667&query=Clinical%20skills

LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, P. (2015). Medical-Surgical Nursing – Critical Thinking in Patient Care. 6 th Ed. Pearson. New Jersey. Unit 2, Chapter 4: Nursing care of patients having surgery.

Bauldoff, G., Gubrud-Howe, P. M., Carno, M., & LeMone, P. (2020). LeMone & Burke's medical-surgical nursing: Clinical reasoning in patient care (Seventh edition.). Pearson Education.

E-book Ebrary: Stone, Julian & Fawcett, W. (2013). At a Glance : Anaesthesia at a Glance (1). Wiley-Blackwell.

https://www.veripalvelu.fi/en/

https://view.taiqa.com/librismedia/verivalmisteiden-kayton-opas-fi#/page=1

Terveysportti

+ other recommended literature

Teaching methods

Lessons
Clinical training in class, practical exercises
Case-studies

Exam schedules

Practical examination in resuscitation, pass/fail
Practical examination February 2024, pass/fail
Virtual test in Bloodtransfusion; Verensiirron verkkokurssi or Blodtransfusionens ABO, pass/fail
Moodle test

Student workload

4 x 27 h = 108 h

Further information

If you fail in practical exam resuscitation, re-take is arranged
If you fail in the practical exam in the rest of the course, you will make a movie

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Compulsory attendance at workshops and approved practical examinations and virtual tests

Qualifications

Clinical Nursing 1

Objective

The student:
- is prepared to implement the nursing process in acute and intensive nursing care
- is prepared to support the patient and his/her family in acute and intensive nursing care situations
- can outline and apply the theory of intensive and emergency care to nursing and consider the specific caring needs of the patient who is critically ill, or suffers from trauma.
- demonstrates skills in assessing, implementing and evaluating the nursing process in acute and intensive nursing care settings
- is familiar with the health technology of intensive and acute care settings and prepared to perform first aid in hospital settings
- can perform resuscitation in various settings.
- has knowledge about health technology related to the acute and intensive nursing field
- has knowledge about patient safety, ethical and cultural issues in the acute and intensive nursing field

Content

Priority in acute and intensive care (ABCD)
Assessing, implementing and evaluating the nursing process in acute and intensive nursing care settings
Patients in pain, chock, multiple health problems and for patients with trauma or multiple injuries
Support the patient and his/her family in acute and intensive nursing care situations
Common problems in critical and acute care, and implementation in simulated situations
Health technology
First aid in hospital settings
Resuscitation in various settings.
Patient safety, ethical and cultural issues
NEWS; PEWS, PPE+D,
Stress management skills

Location and time

Autum 2024

Check your tuudo for further information

Materials

Price, A., Smith, S. & Challiner, A. 2016. Ward-based Critical Care. A Guide for Health Professionals. 2nd Edition.

Holbery, N & Newcombe, P. 2016. Emergency Nursing at a Glance.

WHO, Emergency & Trauma Care Training Course. https://www.who.int/surgery/publications/s16382e.pdf

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021. https://www.cprguidelines.eu/

The teacher's material available on moodle

Teaching methods

Theory
Workshops
Case study
Blended learning
Guest lecture

Exam schedules

Exam
Workshop Mandatory

Student workload

This course is 3 ECT, = 81 hours
(1 ECT 27h work for students)


Theory lessions in class 16h (4h x 4)

Lesion 1, Introduction and guest lecture from emergency unit and ICU
Lesion 2, arteria canula, CVK & Swan-ganz
Lesion 3, ECG, Cpap, Bipap, Optiflow, kapno.
Lesion 4, Acute care (ABCDEF, triage)


Workshop (3h x 5 / group) MANDATORY!

Workshop 1, Arteria cannula (preparations, set sterile tables, assist doctor and make a pressure set)
Workshop 2, Different types of medicine used at emergency and ICU (dilution and mixture)
Workshop 3, Intubation (preparation, medicine, assist doctor and respiratior)
Workshop 4, Oral care + trachea care and suction from tube and mouth
Workshop 5, Spira, Optiflow, Cpap, Bipap
Workshop 6, Braininjury and case study


Workshop togather with doctors from vcs (4hours/group) MANDATORY
4h Group 1
4h Group 2
4h Group 3

3h Exam

43 h Own study

Content scheduling

- Priority (ABCD)
- Assessing, implementing and evaluating the nursing process.
- How to help patients in pain, chock, multiple health problems and for patients with trauma or multiple injuries
- Support the patient and his/her family.
- Health technology
- Patient safety, ethical and cultural issues
- NEWS; PEWS, PPE+D
- Stress management skills

Further information

Preknowlage for this course
Medical Nursing Care
Surgical Nursing Care


All workshops are manadatory

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam (1-5)

Workshops (passed/failed)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Criteria for evaluation of Workshop:
The student has participated in 2 workshops

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Criteria for evaluation of Workshop:
The student has participated in 2 workshops

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of Workshop:
The student has participated in 2 workshops

Qualifications

For DP in Nursing:
NU22CN03 Practice: Medical Nursing Care OR
NU22CN04: Practice: Surgical Nursing Care

Education for nurse on the Swedish program:
Basic Care
Basics in care, Health-promoting care and Clinical care belong to Vocational studies
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
VÅV22PR06 Practice: Optional context 1

Further information

Only for degree students
The language of education is English

The teaching is in English
Examination tasks can be written in Swedish

Objective

The student
- has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
- has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
- has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
- understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs
- understands the nurses role, duties and responsibilities regarding drug therapy
- understands the medication plan and can guide the patient

Content

Clinical Pharmacology
Self medication
Medication technology
Medication plan
Polyfarmaci
Nurses role and responsibilities

Location and time

Autumn 2023

Materials

E-book; Gersch, C., Heimgartner, N., Rebar, C. & Willis, L. 2016. Pharmacology Made incredibly Easy.
Downie, G. 2008. Pharmacology and Medicines Managements for Nurses. (4 th Ed). London: Churchill Livingstone
Articles and material according to teachers advice

Teaching methods

Online course ( 100%) with introduction on webex
Lectures /videos, material to read
Workshops online
Individual selfstudies

Exam schedules

Assignment with absolute deadline
Schedulded online test

Student workload

27h/cr
Total course 54 h workload for students

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
Late handins lowers the grade


Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) will reject course

Content scheduling

Task every week

Further information

Online course, need good internet connection and download of Novia software

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

Assignments and workshops Approved/ resigned
Online test ( multiple choice) 0-5 /0 % needed for passing ( algorithm calculates result)

Qualifications

Drug therapy and Pharmacology 2

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with the organization of home care in Finland, and be able to define home care in different settings
- is aware of patient- and staff safety during home visits
- can take care of the patient in a home environment while considering professionalism, confidentiality and courtesy.
- can apply evidence-based nursing care, and the nursing process, in home- and community nursing care
- can work in different settings in community nursing care
- is able to evaluate, prioritize and guide the patient in community nursing care
- knows how to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national guidelines and classification system
- applies critical thinking and decision-making in the specific nursing context
- applies ethical, sustainable and cultural aspects in the specific nursing context

Content

Organization of home care in Finland, and be able to define home care in different settings
Patient safety in home and community care
Use different guidance methods: oral and written guidance, using telephone and digital tools
Health technology in community care
Home care, home hospitals, community nursing care
Information and service guidance

"

Location and time

Fall semester 9.9..2024 - 13.12.2024

Materials

information about recommended literature is available on moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures
Group work
Exam
Practical Workshops

Student workload

1 credit 27h
4 credits 108h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
The methodological literature is not used.
Reflections are not performed.
The technical design is lacking.
Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
The literature is referenced
Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
The technical design is satisfactory.
Refers concepts and basic principle
Students have justifiable knowledge

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The questions are answered.
The methodological literature is applied.
The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
The technical design is good
Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
The literature is analyzed and applied.
The reflection is scientifically analytical.
The technical design is commendable.
Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
Makes versatile use of literature
Students have excellent knowledge

Qualifications

Clinical Nursing 1
Basic Nursing Care 1

Objective

The student will be able to:
- independently participate in a multiprofessional and multicultural nursing team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
- communicate with patients and colleagues in the language used at the workplace and follow the general rules and routines in the working environment
- implement evidence-based nursing care and employ the nursing process in advanced nursing care situations
- master clinical nursing methodsand implement nursing activities
- demonstrate cultural competence in nursing care
- perform safe drug adminstration

Content

Practice in patient-centered nursing care

Location and time

Supervised Clinical Practice in different hospitals during fall semester 2024

Materials

Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
Moodle - Practice Documents for Nursing 2021

Teaching methods

Supervised Clinical practice
Practice seminars

Exam schedules

Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars
Approved internship from clinical supervisor and teacher

International connections

It is possible to do the clinical training abroad. The student can do it trough NordPlus or Erasmus networks or find a hospital themselves. A learning agreement must be signed by all three partners before the internship can start.

Completion alternatives

Approved internships
Participation in internship seminar
Approved practice assignments

Student workload

40 h/week during clinical training of what 38 h/week at clinical settings
6 weeks of practice = 228 h at practice, 12 h written assignment

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See the Plan for Clinical Studies for course specific competencies.

The competencies the Student needs to reach in Vasa Central hospital
Can admit and discharge patients from the ward
Can define / map the patient's care needs, care planning, implementation of the care and
evaluate the care (according to FinCC)
Can be responsible for safe drug handling
Can use HaiPro
Can report the report both orally and in writing, participate in rounds, inform and supervise
patients and relatives
Can act according to ISBAR in non-emergency situations and in emergency situations
Have an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and relatives and consider their
cultural affiliation
Can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
Have the ability to independently acquire new evidence-based knowledge
Can handle complicated occupational assignments under supervision within own
nursing context
Can independently make decisions under supervision regarding the patient's care process
Can be responsible for safe drug treatment under supervision
Demonstrate the ability to supervise and teach patients (and relatives)
Promises to conscientiously follow the commitments the work gives and remembers
professional secrecy
https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/globalassets/studerande_opiskelijat/handbok-for-studerandehandledning-pa-vasa-centralsjukhus-21.12.2018.pdf

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Clinical Practice 40 h / week in six weeks.
Mandatory attendance 100%
Mandatory attendance at practice seminars
Approved practice assignments

Qualifications

Presentation of Thesis and Maturity Exam
Nursing Care in Home and Community
Pediatrics, Maternity and Adult Nursing Care
Elderly Care Management
Acute and Intensive Nursing Care

Further information

Only for degree students
Not possible to validate
Can be done abroad and as an exchange student

Objective

The student
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
- has basic knowledge of pharmacology
- masters the aseptic of drug treatment
- masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
- has skills in injection technique
- can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
- has insight into recipe theory
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
- masters drug billing at a basic level

Content

Legislation
Pharmacology
Aseptic, sustainability and route of administration
Recipe theory
Patient guidance and documentation
Drug calculation
Injection administration
Proper handling of sharps instruments

Location and time

According to the schedule

Materials

All recommended literature will be found on Moodle at the start of the course

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, videos, assignments, written exam

Exam schedules

The course examinationdates will be seen at Moodle

Student workload

3cr = 81h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Web based tasks must be approved, theory exam at least 50% correct and drug calculations 100% correct to pass the course.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Calculation 100% correct to pass the course

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is gradedpass/fail

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Objective

The student
- has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
- has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
- masters advanced drug calculations

Content

Advanced drug treatment
Cytostatic treatment
Epidural pain relief
Fluid treatment
Blood transfusion
Patient guidance and documentation
Advanced drug calculations

Location and time

Lectures in class according to schedule

Materials

E book ( includes drug calculation):
Medical-surgical nursing made incredibly easy!://ezproxy.novia.fi:2268/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5122323
In swedish : Finnish legistlation about safe pharmacotherapy 2021
Drug calculation excersies online
https://testandcalc.com/quiz/index.asp
Documents and task according to instructions

Teaching methods

Blended learning
Assignments and tests online
Drug calculation workshops on campus/online

Exam schedules

Exam i drug calculation in class after workshops
online test and assignments according to deadlines i moodle

Student workload

27h/cr

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Calculation 100% correct to pass the course

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

onlinetest grades 0-5
assignment passed/failed
calculation test 100% correct answers according to national instructions for drug calculation
Assigments handed in after deadline/ course finished lower grade
4 week too late, Assignments = 0

Qualifications

Drug therapy and Pharmacology 1

Objective

The Student:
- has insights into entrepreneurship in social and health care
- knows what company establishment means
- develops skills in planning and implementing business plans
- develops understanding of entrepreneurship and social innovations
- has the prerequisites to cooperate in inter professional activities

Content

- entrepreneurship in the social, health and beauty industries
- practical entrepreneurship
- the process of becoming an approved service provider in social and health care
- business plan
- social innovations
- strategies to strengthen collaboration
- inter professional learning

Location and time

This course will run continuously for one year, from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025.

Materials

Study materials and recommended reading are available on Moodle

Teaching methods

Web-based lectures with elements of guest speakers and study visits.

Exam schedules

Examinations will be held at least twice each semester.
Written assignment.

Student workload

3 cp = 81h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass:
- have submitted the tasks on time
- have carried out tasks according to instructions and have included all parts of the assignment
- can reflect and justify own views
- participated in study visits and guest lectures OR submitted alternative assignments
according to instructions

Fail:
-Undone / failed tasks

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

Education for nurses: VÅV22U02 Leadership, entrepreneurship and innovation
Nursing: NU22NR04 Innovation, Leadership and Entrepreneurship in Nursing

Objective

The student:
- knows the profession of a nurse and its special features
- develops an international perspective on nursing history and become familiar with nursing models, concepts, theories and traditions of caring/nursing science
- is familiar with ethical theories, codes of ethics, ethical decision-making and ethical issues.
- has fundamental knowledge, and an understanding, of cultural differences, as well as the need for cultural sensitivity in all contact with people.
- adopts an approach to nursing care based on critical thinking and evidencebased practice and desicion-making process
- understands the necessity of an evidence-based practice
- has knowledge of the nursing process
- knows how to correctly document and report nursing care according to the national health care system "

Content

Nursing as a profession
International perspective on nursing history and philosophy
Nursing models, concepts, theories and traditions of caring/nursing science
Ethical theories, values and ethical guidelines, codes of ethics, ethical decision-making and ethical issues.
Cultural differences and cultural sensitivity
Cultural awareness, and respect for individual uniqueness
Nursing care based on critical thinking and evidence based practice and decision-making process
Assess, plan and implement nursing care based on the patient’s needs
Evaluate nursing care
Finnish Care Classification FinCC
Document and report nursing care according to the national health care system (ISBAR)

Location and time

Lectures at Novia campus. Autumn 2024, 23.9-24.11.

Materials

Berman, A., Snyder, S. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Person, New-Jersy. 2012, pp. 161-335.
Boström, A.-M., Rudman, A., Ehrenberg, A., Gustavsson, J. P., & Wallin, L. (2013). Factors associated with evidence-based practice among registered nurses in Sweden: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1–12.

Chen, S., Chang, H., & Pai, H. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203.

Gonzol, K., & Newby, C. (2013). Facilitating Clinical Reasoning in the Skills Laboratory: Reasoning Model Versus Nursing Process-Based Skills Checklist. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 34(4), 265–267.

Hinno, S., Partanen, P., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2012). The professional nursing practice environment and nurse-reported job outcomes in two European countries: a survey of nurses in Finland and the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.26 Issue( 1), 133-143.

Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2004). Evidence-based practice – an incomplete model of the relationship between theory and professional work. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 187–196.

Miller, L. L., Ward, D., & Young, H. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Nursing. Generations, 34(1), 72–77. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=53063435&site=ehost-live

Parvan, K., Hosseini, F. A., Jasemi, M., & Thomson, B. (2021). Attitude of nursing students following the implementation of comprehensive computer-based nursing process in medical surgical internship: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 21(1), 1–12.

Extra
Salmela, S., Koskinen, C. & Eriksson, K. 2017. Nurse Leaders as Managers of Ethical Sustainable Caring Cultures. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(4), 871– 882.


Salmela, S. & Nyström, L. The human being in need of nursing care – patient, customer or fellow human being? International Journal of Caring Sciences. Accepted for publication.


Nyholm, L. & Koskinen, C. 2017. Understanding and safeguarding dignity in patient care. Nursing Ethics, 24(4), 408– 418.

Teaching methods

Theory lessons
Individual work
Group work

Exam schedules

Hand in your individually task; 23.10

Hand in your submitted group task; 6.11

19. 11 Online-Exam in Moodle (failed- passed)

Re-exam

Completion alternatives

Introduction (first lecture) is mandatory

Seminar (groupwork) is mandatory; 11.11

Tentamina is mandatory; 19.11

Student workload

1 credit = 27 hour. This course 5 credit = 135 hours.

Theory lessons online 20h
Individually work 20h
Group work 27h
Searching of articles 8h
Own work (finishing assessment, reading for the exam ) 57h
Seminary 4h
Tentamina 3h

Content scheduling

Introduction:
Information about course and assignments
History of nurses
Article search (Gun Vestman)

Other course content:
Models vs theories
Nursing process, FinCC and ISBAR
Ethics in Healthcare
Caring and nursing

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

For an approved performance you need to hand in individual task and group task and get approved in exam.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Objective

The student:
- can understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases aimed at the satisfaction of needs of a concrete type
- can introduce him-/herself and others, as well as ask and answer questions about personal circumstances, such as living arrangements, friends, and possessions
- can interact with others in a simple way, provided that the other person talks slowly and clearly and is prepared to help "

Content

Basic Finnish Level A1

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Information on Moodle

Teaching methods

- Interactive lessons ( attendance 75 %)
- Lectures
- Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
- Assignments
- Own work
- Oral and written exam

Exam schedules

Oral and written exam at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Objective

The student
- has oral and written skills in Finnish for nurses. The level is the same as in Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4

Content

Basic Professional Level B1
Nursing vocabulary

Materials

Information in Moodle.

Teaching methods

No teaching in class.
Only exam.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Qualifications

Finnish Level A1

Objective

The student:
- can perform basic care and take care of a clients basical needs
- adapts safe and sustainable working methods such as asepsis and ergonomics
- knows how to assess and evaluate patient´s vital signs
- demonstrates knowledge and perform skills in basic care, and in promoting physiological health
- obtains knowledge of first aid, and be prepared to act in accordance with the requirements of the acute situation
- understands patient safety and sustainability in different nursing contexts
- is aware of ethical and cultural issues in different nursing contexts

Content

Assess and evaluate vital signs
Aseptic technique and routine safety precautions
Patient is isolated due to illness reasons
Patient’s hygiene, activity, exercise, sleep
Nutritional matters (malnutrition), weight monitoring, measure and monitoring nutrition
Oxygen therapy
Ergonomic working methods and show skills in moving and handling patients, kinesthetic
Skin integrity and different types of wounds, as well as perform skills in wound care
First aid
Patient safety and sustainability, waste management

Location and time

Spring 2025
Students who participate need to be present in Vaasa, Campus.

Materials

Bergman, A. & Snyder, S. & Frandsen .G. 2022. (10th ed) Kozier & Erb´s. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, process and practice.

Austin, M., Crawford, R., Klaassen, B. & Armstrong, V. J. (2016). First aid manual: The authorised manual of St John Ambulance, St Andrew's First Aid and the British Red Cross (Revised 10th edition.). Dorling Kindersley.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2017. Ensiapu. Suomen punainen risti. Otavan Kirjanpaino Oy. Keuruu.
Korte, H. & Myllyrinta. K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu.

Moodle: Teachers notes

Boyd, Claire. (2013). Student Survival Skills. Clinical Skills for Nurses. Wiley-Blackwell.
Timby, Barabara Kuhn. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 Ed. Lippincott. Williams & Wilkins. USA

Teaching methods

Contact-teaching at Novia. Lectures. Practical training in class ( Obligatory), demonstration, workshops, compulsory attendance
First Aid compulsory attendance
Only available for students with prior nursing studies, such as Novias open path students and Degree students from year 2024.

Exam schedules

Moodle exam

Completion alternatives

Basic Nursing;
Moodel exam
Clinical examination

First Aid;( obligatory)
Clinical examination: 90 % correct compressions (CPR) time: 2 minutes

Student workload

4x27h

Further information

After completed course in First Aid 1 you can bye an electronic First Aid card (Red Cross). Costs 13 euro/card

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Pass/fail

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Objective

The student:
- is prepared to assess caring needs that are specific for the elderly and geriatric patient
- has basic knowledge of health promotion, the prevention of diseases and disabilities in older adults, and use this knowledge for patient guidance.
- has knowledge of specific diseases linked to older adults and their etiology.
- has knowledge of specific issues regarding pharmacology and nutrition in elderly care, and prepare for the practice of safe drug administration
- is prepared to care for the elderly patient in all nursing contexts
- understands the concept of habilitation and rehabilitation from a social, physical and psychological perspective
- is familiar with rehabilitation and habilitation at different ages and persons with special needs
- understands the organization and management of rehabilitation and habilitation in nursing, both nationally and internationally, and be able to apply it to patient guidance and nursing care.
- recognizes different patient organizations acting in the field of rehabilitation and habilitation
- knows how to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national guidelines and classification system
- applies critical thinking and decision-making in the specific nursing context
- applies ethical and cultural aspects in the specific nursing context

Content

Specific caring needs for the elderly patient
Health promotion, the prevention of diseases and disabilities in older adults, and use this knowledge for patient guidance.
Specific diseases for the older adults
Memory disorders and nursing care of persons with memory disorders
Pharmacology and nutrition in elderly care
Habilitation and rehabilitation of the elderly person
Rehabilitation and habilitation at different ages and persons with special needs
Patient organizations
person-centered care
Pain assessment
Gerotechnology
Acute gerontology

Location and time

Autumn 21.8-5.11

Materials

National and international guidelines and recommendations on Moodle
D’Onofrio,G., Greco, A. & Sancarlo, D. 2018. Gerontology.
Palermo, S. 2021. Frailty in the Elderly: Understanding and Managing Complexity

Mars, L. 2020. Dementia. Handbook and Resource Guide. Grey House Publishing
Literature search is included in the course and is used as literature for assignment

Literature recommendations are available in moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures
Groupwork

Completion alternatives

Written assignments in groups and pair work submitted
Exam (Geriatrics)
Seminar and introduction: obligatory
Retake: dates on Moodle

Student workload

1c = 27h
5c= 135h

Lectures (14,5h), at Campus
Individiual studies and group work.(117,5 h)
Seminar (3h) at Campus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Qualifications

Clinical Nursing 1
First Aid and Basic Nursing

Objective

The student:
- is prepared to assess caring needs that are specific for the elderly and geriatric patient
- has basic knowledge of health promotion, the prevention of diseases and disabilities in older adults, and use this knowledge for patient guidance.
- has knowledge of specific diseases linked to older adults and their etiology.
- has knowledge of specific issues regarding pharmacology and nutrition in elderly care, and prepare for the practice of safe drug administration
- is prepared to care for the elderly patient in all nursing contexts
- understands the concept of habilitation and rehabilitation from a social, physical and psychological perspective
- is familiar with rehabilitation and habilitation at different ages and persons with special needs
- understands the organization and management of rehabilitation and habilitation in nursing, both nationally and internationally, and be able to apply it to patient guidance and nursing care.
- recognizes different patient organizations acting in the field of rehabilitation and habilitation
- knows how to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national guidelines and classification system
- applies critical thinking and decision-making in the specific nursing context
- applies ethical and cultural aspects in the specific nursing context

Content

Specific caring needs for the elderly patient
Health promotion, the prevention of diseases and disabilities in older adults, and use this knowledge for patient guidance.
Specific diseases for the older adults
Memory disorders and nursing care of persons with memory disorders
Pharmacology and nutrition in elderly care
Habilitation and rehabilitation of the elderly person
Rehabilitation and habilitation at different ages and persons with special needs
Patient organizations
person-centered care
Pain assessment
Gerotechnology
Acute gerontology

Location and time

Spring 20.1-20.4 2025

Materials

National and international guidelines and recommendations on Moodle
Literature recommendations are available in moodle
Literature search is included in the course and is used as literature for assignment

Teaching methods

Lectures
Groupwork
Introduction and seminars are compulsory

Exam schedules

Information in Moodle

Completion alternatives

Written assignments in groups and pair work submit
Exam (Geriatrics)
Seminar and introduction: obligatory
Retake: dates on Moodle

Student workload

1c = 27h
5c= 135h

Lectures (23h ), at Campus
Individiual studies and group work.(109h)
Seminar (3h) at Campus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject. Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows sufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Qualifications

Clinical Nursing 1
First Aid and Basic Nursing

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge about epidemiology and relate it to different geographical areas and health risks specific for different areas
- has knowledge about tropical diseases and their etiology
- is aware of the modes of transmission, prevention, treatment and care related to extremely contagious diseases
- know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
- has deeper understanding of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
- has knowledge about the epidemiology of infectious diseases and tropical diseases
- has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
- have skills about guidance and preparation of vaccinations, knowledge about vaccination techniques and evaluation after a vaccination
- have knowledge about vaccinations, advantages with vaccinations and side effects of vaccinations
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

Content

Epidemiology and relate it to different geographical areas and health risks specific for different areas
Tropical diseases and their aetiology
Modes of transmission, prevention, treatment and care related to extremely contagious diseases
Vaccination both nationally and internationally
Common national and global infectious diseases
Epidemiology of infectious diseases and tropical diseases
Medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
Skills for vaccinations
THL course about vaccinations
By 2030, end the epidemics of AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and neglected tropical diseases and combat hepatitis, water-borne diseases and other communicable diseases. (https://kestavakehitys.fi/en/agenda2030/goal-3)
https://kestavakehitys.fi/en/agenda2030/goal-10

Location and time

January - June 2025

Materials

All materials are found on Moodle

Teaching methods

Online

Exam schedules

Examination includes three assignments and/or an online exam. Detailed instructions and guidelines are available on Moodle.

Student workload

3 credit points = 81h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Qualifications

For DP in Nursing:
NU22CN03 Practice: Medical Nursing Care
NU22CN04: Practice: Surgical Nursing Care

Education for nurse on the Swedish program:
Basic Care
Basics in care, Health-promoting care and Clinical care belong to Vocational studies
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
VÅV22PR06 Practice: Optional context 1

Further information

Only for degree students
The language of education is English

The teaching is in English
Examination tasks can be written in Swedish

Objective

The student
• has basic knowledge of the central concepts and understanding of the group mentoring process.
• will gain an understanding of their professional development process.
• becomes familiar with various strategies and methods for their own professional development.
• will acquire increased knowledge and understanding of Finnish working life within their profession.
• gains an understanding of reflection in the development process.

Content

Introduction and background to the group mentoring program
Description of implementation
Group mentorship meetings
Reflection journal

Location and time

Autumn 2024-Spring 2025

Materials

See Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions,group mentor meetings, seminars

Employer connections

Group mentor from the nursing field

Exam schedules

January 2025

Further information

Only for second year Degree Students

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass: The student attended the lectures and actively participated in all discussions and exercises. The student meets the requirements of the course Group Mentorship in Nursing Profession

Fail: the student has not fulfilled the aim of the course and has not actively participated in the course

Further information

For second-year students

Objective

The student:
- develops a holistic view of the human being and become familiar with health promotion throughout the life span
- understands the process of natural ageing (physical, mental and social changes)
- can support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
- understands the concept of health and lifestyle and be able to apply that to disorders linked to lifestyle
- knows the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
- has basic knowledge of preventive care, treatment and sustainability at the most common national and global infectious diseases
- is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
- has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
- understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases
- can apply nutrition and care recommendations for different age and target groups for prevention and treatment for national diseases
- is familiar with diets related to illness and disease
- can to guide patients concerning nutritional issues
- be able to apply evidence-based nursing care and the nursing process to nursing care related to nutritional problems

Content

Health promotion and guidance in health promotion
Connection between life style and health and illness
Functional capacity of human being
Different aspects of measuring health: subjective and objective measurements
Essential nutrients and their dietary sources, food recommendations
Normal digestion, absorption and the metabolism of vitamins, carbohydrates, proteins and lipids
Eating disorders and therapies related to these
Common special diets

Fundamental concepts of epidemiology, health and illness
Screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care.
Vaccination both nationally, internationally and legislation in Finland
Composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
Preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
Medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions

Location and time

Novia , Vasa
Autumn w.39-50

Materials

Health Promotion
Snelling A. 2014 Introduction to Health Promotion.John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated (E-Book)
Wills, J & Leach , R. Fundamentals of Health Promotion for Nurses (E-Book)
Bergmann, K .E & Bergmann, R. 2003. Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in the Family. (E-Book)
Up-to -date articles


Nursing Theorists:
Alligood, M.R 2018. Nursing Theorists and their work, Ninth Edition. U.S.A Elsevier.
Pender, Nola.J, Murdaugh, C & Parsons A.2011. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice.Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson cop. 2011.

Epidemiology:
Gordis, L. 2014. Epidemiology. Fifth Edition. Elsevier.
Porta, M. A Dictionary of Epidemiology, sixth edition.2014.Oxford University Press, Incorporated (E-Book)
Up-to date articles


Nutrition:
Sharma, S ,Barasi M , Sheehy T & Kolahdooz F. Nutrition at a Glance.2016 .John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (E-Book)
Up-to date articles

www.stm.fi
www.thl.fi

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussion, group work, self studies.
Some lectures are online.

Lectures are going to be on the time scheduled and
the content of the course will be published on Moodle.

Exam schedules

Workshops /Seminars on the last lecture of the course. Approved assignments during the course .
Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams X and X

Student workload

27 h/cr , 4 cr =108 h
Individual work to do, several self studies, to read relevant literature and to cooperate with other students in group work, written assignment during the course. Seminars last day of the course XX

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Objective

The student:
- knows the basics of leadership and methods for development in health care
- can account for work collective agreements and worker protection
- understands and can participate in quality development of care work
- understand the importance of employee competence and the work community
- can prioritize tasks
- can use care science and interdisciplinary knowledge in decision-making as a team leader
- understand the importance of welfare economics, cost-effectiveness and sustainable development
- understand the importance of developing working methods in accordance with changes in the social and health care industry.
- can supervise work colleagues and students
- knows the nurse's career opportunities
- can function according to the principles of internal leadership in an interprofessional environment
- has knowledge of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship in social and health care

Content

Organizational models and leadership theories
Quality assurance
The leader's responsibilities
Employeeship
Self-leadership
Team building
Conflict management
Cost efficiency and sustainability
Development and innovation in care work
Continuous learning
Supervision of staff and students
Entrepreneurship
Internal and external entrepreneurship

Location and time

Autumn 2024
Campus Alere

Materials

Stanley, D. 2016. Clinical Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare. Values into Action.
+ recommended literature at Moodle

Teaching methods

Compulsory introduction and seminar
Lectures
Group work
Case studies
Self study

Completion alternatives

Case study
Online exam
Group work

Student workload

1 cr = 27h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

Case study for the part of occupational safety, evaluated 0-5
Exam for the part of leading, managing and delegating in nursing care, evaluated 0-5
Discussion assignment fail/pass

Qualifications

Medical Nursing Care
Surgical Nursing Care

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with concepts related to culture, health and nursing and Nordic Well Fare
- can recognize phenomena like racism and xenophobia, and understand how they can affect good nursing care
- is aware of cultural safety, cultural blindness and cultural imposition and be able to apply that knowledge to the nursing process
- has knowledge about trends in global health
- recognizes the organizations working for global issues in health care
- understands the challenges of working in difficult areas
- has knowledge about nursing care and understands the nurses role in crises and during disasters
- has insight about humanitarian aid in the world
- has insight in the nursing care in disaster areas

Content

Concepts related to culture, health and nursing and Nordic Well Fare
Racism and xenophobia, and understand how they can affect good nursing care
Cultural safety, cultural blindness and cultural imposition and be able to apply that knowledge to the nursing process
Trends in global health
Social determinants of health
Major global challenges impacting health
Health inequality from health inequity
Organizations working for global issues in health care
Challenges of working in difficult areas
Red Cross
WHO
https://kestavakehitys.fi/en/agenda2030/goal-3

Location and time

January - June2025

Materials

Materials available on moodle

Teaching methods

Blended learning

Exam schedules

May/June 2025

Completion alternatives

Two small assignments + Escape Game

Student workload

3 credits = 81h

Further information

The course language is English, and groups will be mixed from different classes.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

The 2 small assignments are either Pass/Fail
Escape game is compulsory

Qualifications

For DP in Nursing:
NU22CN03 Practice: Medical Nursing Care
NU22CN04: Practice: Surgical Nursing Care

Education for nurse on the Swedish program:
Basic Care
Basics in care, Health-promoting care and Clinical care belong to Vocational studies
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
VÅV22PR06 Practice: Optional context 1

Further information

Only for degree students
The language of education is English

The teaching is in English
Examination tasks can be written in Swedish

Objective

The student:
- can plan their study path and learn to study in a digital learning environment
- can produce academic text and information and communicate professionally in English language
- can to adopt critical thinking and incorporate the idea of lifelong learning
- is familiar with sustainable development from an economical, ecological and social perspective

Content

Teaching methods, rules and norms at Novia UAS
Prepare to participate in various teaching arrangements and settings
Peppi, Moodle, library service and other platforms used at Novia UAS
Critical thinking and incorporate the idea of lifelong learning
Sustainable development from an economical, ecological and social perspective
Academic writing and presentation of written assignments

Location and time

Alere, Novia
Beginning of the semester 2024
This course is conducted at the Campus

Materials

intra.novia.fi
Degree regulations in Novia UAS
Peppi
-Novia UAS's writing instructions
-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

Teaching methods

Information and orientation about studies in Novia UAS
Online assignments
Lectures, discussions, oral and written tasks both individually and in groups.

Exam schedules

Information about deadlines can be found on Moodle.

Completion alternatives

Compulsory attendance
-oral presentation (video recorded)
-written assignments (according to the UAS's guidelines)

Student workload

3 x 27 h = 81 hours

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Pass/Fail

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Objective

The student:
- can identify health problems and major mental health disorders related to mental health and addictive behavior
- can use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients with mental health disorders, and apply the specific features of mental health to all nursing contexts
- can use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients with addiction and substance abuse disorders
- can explain nursing implications for medication and other treatments prescribed for the specific nursing context
- can apply the specific features of addiction and substance abuse to all nursing contexts
- can apply insights into altered mental health and addictive behavior onto all nursing contexts.
- knows how to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national guidelines and classification system
- applies critical thinking and decision-making in the specific nursing context
- applies ethical and cultural aspects in the specific nursing context
- obtains knowledge of the organization and management of mental health care on a national level, including the specific legislation concerning mental health care
- can apply psychiatric first aid in all nursing contexts

Content

Nursing care of the patient with mental health disorders
Nursing care of the patient with addiction and substance use disorders
Organization and management of mental health care on a national level, including the specific legislation concerning mental health care
Common mental health disorders.
Medication used in mental health care
Psychiatric first aid
Legislation and social control onto substance abuse
Interventions and methods used in mental health nursing
Preventive working methods
Specific features of different groups of substance abusers
Documentation in mental health nursing
Victims of violence

Location and time

Moodle platform
24.03.2025 - 31.10.2025

Materials

According to instructions om Moodle

Teaching methods

Online studies on moodle

Exam schedules

Deadline will be presented on the moodlepage

Completion alternatives

Tasks,Tests and Assignments on Moodle

Student workload

27h/cr

Further information

The course is divided in sections with tasks, tests and assignments. Follow the given instructions in the sections.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

Criteria on Moodle
Grades: Approved/Failed
and Grades from 0-5
An average number of all tasks, tests and assignments is counted as final grade

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

For the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

For the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
For written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

For the exam:
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
For written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

Qualifications

Clinical Nursing 1

Objective

The student
• has knowledge of the central concepts and understanding of the mentoring process.
• will gain a deeper understanding of their professional development process.
• becomes familiar with and evaluate various strategies and methods for their own professional development.
• will acquire increased knowledge and understanding of Finnish working life within their profession.
• gains a deeper understanding of the significance of reflection in the development process.

Content

Introduction and background to the mentoring program
Description of implementation
Mentorship meetings
Individual development plan
Reflection journal

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

See Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, mentor meetings, seminars

Employer connections

Mentors from the nursing field

Exam schedules

December 2024

Completion alternatives

-

Further information

Only for degree students in the degree program in nursing. The student must have completed a minimum of 120 credits and at least one of these practices: Practice: Medical Nursing Care or Practice: Surgical Nursing Care.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Pass/failed

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass: the student has been present at the lectures and actively participated in all discussions and exercises. The student meets the requirements of the course Mentorship in Your Own Profession

Fail: the student has not fulfilled the aim of the course and has not actively participated in the course

Qualifications

Only for degree students are in the degree program. The student must have completed a minimum of 120 credits and/or one or more internships.

Objective

The students
- can produce simple instructions and nursing documentation
- can orally discuss patient care, nursing procedures, medical conditions
- knows common vocabulary used in nursing
- can cope in simple conversations with patients

Materials

The material is on Moodle.

Teaching methods

Homework
Helthcare text
Exercises in class
Diskussions
Presentations

Exam schedules

Oral and written exam in the end of the course.

Student workload

3 credits or 81 hours

Further information

Preparing the texts at home.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

Knowledge about nursing and Finnish for Beginners.

Objective

The student:
- has insight in the fundamental philosophical theories underpinning nursing research
- has insight in nursing theories that influence nursing research and nursing care
- has insight in the tradition and development of Caring Science - its history and future
- has insight in in the basic knowledge of ontology, epistemology and the ethos of Caring Science into different modules of clinical caring and nursing.
- can define qualitative research and can describe common qualitative research methods in nursing care
- understands ethics in nursing research
- can explain analysis and interpretation methods with qualitative data
- can describe techniques used to evaluate research
- understands how to use qualitative research findings in evidence based nursing care
- understands the research process and master the different phases of the process

Content

Fundamental philosophical nursing theories,
Research process in nursing care
Qualitative research methods in nursing care

Location and time

Novia Alere, partly online
Autumn 24 and spring 25

Materials

Alligood, M.R. ed. 2018. Nursing theorists and their work. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. (2014 version is available as e-book)

Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing . 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book) chapters 1-3,7-9,12,13, 25 ,28, 30, 34, 38.

Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health
eller
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2018. Essentials of nursing research. appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.) . Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, seminars

Exam schedules

Time table for examination:
Time of examination is given during introduction lecture
Possibility to two retakes on two later dates
Presentation on seminar

International connections

6x4h= 24 lectures, individual presentation, The theory chosen in the assignment can be used in the thesis.
8 h participation in conference
seminars 4h per student in 3 groups (12h all together)
2h exam
63 h own work, reading, doing assignment, preparing for seminar and online exam

1 cr=27h, 5cr= 153h work for students

Completion alternatives

Validation according to general instructions on validation in Novia

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

0-5

Qualifications

Evidence Based Nursing

Objective

The student:
- can apply evidence-based nursing care, and the nursing process in oncological, palliative care and care in the end- of life, including the family
- knows how to prioritize the patient’s needs for in oncological, palliative care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national guidelines and classification system
- applies critical thinking and decision-making in oncological, and palliative care
- applies ethical and cultural aspects in oncological, palliative care and end-of life

Content

Palliative care: legal bases and key elements, pain relief, suffering and related symptoms,
End-of life care: recognition and communication, existential and psychosocial support, family support
Nurses role in the terminal care and palliative care
Oncological nursing care
Interventions, medication effects and methods in oncological nursing care

Location and time

Fall semester 2024

Materials

Recommended literature in Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures
Work shop- Escape game- Compulsory
Simulation- Compulsory
Group work
Exam

Completion alternatives

Introduction, compulsory
Palliative care Escape game, compulsory
Simulations, compulsory

Student workload

1sp= 27h
3cr= 81h

Further information

Feedback on the assignments is given generally during seminars and through grades on Peppi. Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
Novias instruction for writing must be used In the assignments

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

The exam is graded 0-5
Group work is graded 0-5

Qualifications

Clinical Nursing 1
First Aid and Basic Nursing

Objective

The student:
- obtain knowledge of health care- and social welfare structures and services, both nationally and internationally
- become familiar with the treatment- and service chains and design of social- and health care
- understand the principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice.
- be able to apply theoretical knowledge to nursing care in order to guide the patient in matters concerning rights to health care and social services.
- understand the importance of confidentiality and sustainability in all phases of the nursing process, and be able to act in accordance with such principles
- prepare to promote patient safety in all phases of the nursing process
- knows and understand how to work according to the data security and data protection

Content

Health care- and social welfare structures and organization by the public, private and third sector in Finland
Treatment and service chains and design of social- and health care
Principles of service profession
Basic principles of health legislation in Finland
Normative, resource and information guidance governing health care services
Autonomy and right to self determination
Electronic services as a part of the service system
Wellbeing at work as a nurse
EU´s General Data Protection Regulations and Directive
Data Protection Act
Information Security and data protection in different nursing contexts

Location and time

2.9.2024 - 20.10.2024
Campus Alere

Materials

Presented on the moodle page

Teaching methods

Lectures, Group assignment, individual online exam

Completion alternatives

Written assignments
Online test

Student workload

1c=27h
3c=81h


Lectures (9h), at Campus. First lecture is mandatory
Individual studies (67h) Individiual studies and group work.
Seminar (6h). at Campus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
The methodological literature is not used.
Reflections are not performed.
The technical design is lacking.
Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
The literature is referenced
Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
The technical design is satisfactory.
Refers concepts and basic principle
Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The questions are answered.
The methodological literature is applied.
The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
The technical design is good
Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
The literature is analyzed and applied.
The reflection is scientifically analytical.
The technical design is commendable.
Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
Makes versatile use of literature
Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Objective

The student:
- can describe conditions for and challenges with the work regarding patient and client safety within the social and health care areas of activity
- know the laws and recommendations regarding and the supervision of patient and client safety in Finland
- know how digital systems ensure patient safety by predicting risks, risk management, reporting and follow-up
- describe opportunities and challenges in ensuring client and patient safety when using digital e-Health services
- describe what a safety culture entails when healthcare is digitized
- reflect on ethical positions for the patient / client in the digital world

Content

Patient safety today and tomorrow
Welfare technology as a tool that supports patient and client safety
Security for the patient and the client in the digital world

Location and time

Spring 2025 campus Vaasa, the course will be via WebEx

Materials

In this course, Moodle acts as a platform where all the material is available: instructional videos, lecture materials, a list of the course objectives and content, and instructions for assignments
References:
Jones, K. P., Cachaper, G. A., Danley, K., Morgan, M. K., Maduro, R. S., McGee, G. W., Danley, S. C., & Zimbro, K. S. (2023). Equitable Nurse Assignments Within the Context of Census-Driven Staffing Models. MEDSURG Nursing, 32(2), 101–117.

Riaz, T., Akram, M., Rashid, A., Ansari, R., Laila, U., Bankole, M. M., Kayode, A. A. A., Ozdemir, F. A., Sołowski, G., Alinia-Ahandani, E., Altable, M., Adetuyi, B. O., Akhter, N., Akhtar, N., Ghauri, A. O., Egbuna, C., Sfera, A., & Parmar, P. (2023). Creating culture of safety: Risk management in healthcare and nursing. International Archives of Integrated Medicine, 10(8), 15–21.

Brown, C., & Brown, M. (2023). Blood and blood products transfusion errors: what can we do to improve patient safety? British Journal of Nursing, 32(7), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.7.326

LENBURG, C. B., KLEIN, C., ABDUR-RAHMAN, V., SPENCER, T., & BOYER, S. (2009). THE COPA MODEL: A Comprehensive Framework Designed to Promote Quality Care and Competence for Patient Safety. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 30(5), 312–317.

Yilmaztürk, N., Kose, İ., & Cece, S. (2023). The effect of digitalization of nursing forms in ICUs on time and cost. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01333-6

Tuppal, C. P., Vega, P. D., & Tuppal, S. M. P. (2022). Towards a theory of communion‐in‐caring. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 36(2), 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13049

Vasilica, C., Wynn, M., Davis, D., Charnley, K., & Garwood-Cross, L. (2023). The digital future of nursing: making sense of taxonomies and key concepts. British Journal of Nursing, 32(9), 442–446. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.32.9.442

Raja, M., Kymre, I. G., Bjerkan, J., Galvin, K. T., & Uhrenfeldt, L. (2023). National digital strategies and innovative eHealth policies concerning older adults’ dignity: a document analysis in three Scandinavian countries. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09867-w

Teaching methods

lectures, group discussion and seminar

Student workload

27 hours are equal to 1 ECTS

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is assessed according to the scale 1-5. It is the assignments that are assessed, but e.g. a lively and reflective participation in the discussions can raise the grade.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Did not achive any of the criteria

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.

In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.

To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

Qualifications

Patient Safety and Service design in Social and Health Care

Objective

The student:
- obtains knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for children, adolescents and their families
- obtains knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to neonatal care
- obtains knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
- is able to use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients, with consideration to the age-specific needs of the patient
- has knowledge about children with special and development needs and can apply their knowledge in the nursing care
- can prioritize the patient´s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national classification system
- understand ethics and different cultural needs and learn to treat the patient, and the family, with dignity
- has insight in patient guidance of the child and their families

Content

Most central diseases in children and young people
Importance of child and family-centered care
Pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
Identify, evaluate and care for children and adolescent's pain
In simulated situations identify and analyze care needs in children and adolescents
Special and development needs in children, children with special needs (npf)
Neonatal care

Location and time

Spring 2025, at Campus Alere, Novia

Materials

See Moodle

Teaching methods

Blended learning and workshops

Exam schedules

Simulations x3 (mandatory)
Theoretical assignment and/or exam (to be confirmed)
Pediatric pharmacology and drug calculation

Student workload

3 cr = 81h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

riteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student cannot account for the literature nor reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has not followed the instructions for written assignment and shows no knowledge about other student's written assignments. The student has not mastered the substance of his/her work.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Qualifications

First Aid and Basic Nursing
Clinical Nursing 1

Objective

The student:
- knows how to apply the nursing process to surgical nursing care
- knows the different phases of the perioperative period
- knows the different types of anesthesia
- understands the principles of safety control and know how to implement them in nursing care
- has basic knowledge of radiation protection for health professionals outlined in ST 1.7 ( Säteilysuojelukoulutus terveydenhuollossa )
- knows the nurse’s role when supporting the patient in the x-ray-situation
- understands sustainable development according to economics and environment
- has knowledge about patient safety, ethics and cultural aspects in different nursing contexts

Content

Various types of surgery according to the purpose, degree of urgency and degree of risk
Nursing process in perioperative care
Preoperative assessment, evaluation and preparations of the patient
Intraoperative care of the patient
Anesthetic care and methods
Postoperative care
Complications related to surgery
X-ray diagnostics and safety control (1 Cu)
Radiation protection
Health technology in perioperative care

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Wicker, Paul. Perioperative Practice at a Glance, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2015. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1895109.

Wicker, Paul, and Sara Dalby. Rapid Perioperative Care, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2016. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4694611.

Berman, A. & Snyder, S. 2016. Kozier & Erb´s Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts. process and Practice. Unit 8, Chapter 37.

LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, P. (2015). Medical-Surgical Nursing – Critical Thinking in Patient Care. 6 th Ed. Pearson. New Jersey. Unit 2, Chapter 4: Nursing care of patients having surgery.

Timby, B. 2013. Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concepts. 10 th Ed. Wolters Kluvert Health. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. USA.

Cristensen, B. & Kockrow, E. (2011). Adulth Health Nursing. 6th Ed. Mosby Elsevier. St. Louis

E-book Ebrary: Stone, Julian & Fawcett, W. (2013). At a Glance : Anaesthesia at a Glance (1). Wiley-Blackwell.

Terveysportti

+ other recommended literature

Teaching methods

Close- education at Novia: Lectures and workshops

Exam schedules

Written examination at Novia in Perioperative Nursing
Retake
The date for on-line exam i Radiation safety will be decided under the first lecture in the subject.

Completion alternatives

Perioperative care: Written exam

Radiation safety: virtual exam

Student workload

3 credits= 81 h

Radiation therapy 1c

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

Radiation safety on-line exam: Pass/ Fail

Qualifications

First Aid and Basic Nursing
Drug therapy and pharmacology 2

Objective

The student:
- recognize PCC as a part of nursing and other health care providers' obligation
- recognize interdisciplinary collaboration and its impact on patient well-being
- will be aware of ethical concerns related to values and norms of care context
- recognize challenges in implementing PCC
- will be to take part in discussion about ethical dilemmas related to end of life

Content

PCC as a part of nursing and other health care providers
PCC in geriatric care and end of life
PCC in public health
PCC in emergency
Interdisciplinary collaboration and its impact on patient well-being
Ethical concerns related to values and norms of care context
Challenges in implementing PCC
Ethical dilemmas related to end of life

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Qualifications

Practice: Basic Nursing Care 1

Further information

The course is conducted as an intensive course within a Nordplus network

Objective

The student:
- takes part in a multi-professional team and creates a natural caring relationship with the patient
- communicates with patients and colleagues mainly at basic level in Swedish or Finnish, even though the main supervision is in English
- follows general rules and routines in the working environment
- can under supervision perform, implement and evaluate basic care
- is familiar with the specific needs of a patient
- can demonstrate evidence-based nursing methods and interventions in basic care
- develops respect for the patients' integrity and autonomy
- understands and can demonstrate aseptic and safe working methods
- can verbally report nursing activities and the patient´s condition
- understand the fundamentals of rehabilitation and demonstrate an ability to support the patient in the rehabilitation process
- shows evidence-based knowledge about common diseases and develops an understanding of the pharmacological treatment of the patient
- can perform safe drug administration under supervision
- has knowledge about patient safety

Content

Clinical practice in patient-centered nursing care under the supervision
Patient safety/THL 1 cu

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Qualifications

Swedish Level A1 or Finnish Level A1
Drug therapy and Pharmacology 1
First Aid and Basic Nursing
Clinical Nursing 1

Further information

Only for degree students

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with the specific caring needs of a disabled or an elderly patient and has good insights into the organization of care for persons with special needs and elderly patients in our society
- can carry out the nursing process in both elderly nursing care or nursing care for the client with special needs
- takes part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient/client
- communicates, at least on a basic level, in Swedish and/or Finnish with the patient, and be able to follow the general rules and routines in a working environment
- demonstrates respect for the patient´s integrity and autonomy, understand the fundamentals of rehabilitation and demonstrate an ability to support the patient in the rehabilitation process
- performs safe drug administration under supervision
- has safe working methods

Content

Clinical practice in patient-centered nursing care under supervision

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Qualifications

Practice: Basic Nursing Care 1

Further information

The student must find the practice place her/himself
Only for degree students

Objective

The student:
- takes part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
- communicates with patients and colleagues in Swedish or Finnish, the main supervision will be carried out in Swedish or Finnish
- follows the general rules and routines in a working environment
- independently assess the elderly patient´s caring needs, plan for interventions, as well as take part in the implementation of the plan and the evaluation of the given nursing care
- makes decisions concerning the eldery patient´s individual nursing care, under supervision and with increasing independence
- implements the nursing process for elderly patients with multiple diseases and understand holisitic care
- can perform safe drug administration
- documents and gives verbal reports of given nursing care, under supervision and with increasing independence
- understands the administration of a ward, perform necessary procedures when receiving a patient
- demonstrates ability to guide colleagues and students
- demonstrate skills to work in a team and as a team leader

Content

Practice in patient-centered nursing care

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Qualifications

All core, professional and alternative vocational studies must be completed
Practice: Primary Nursing Care
Practice: Optional Context
Presentation of Thesis and Maturity Exam

Further information

Only for degree students
Not possible to validate
Can be done abroad and as an exchange student

Objective

The student:
- takes part in a multiprofessional team and creates a natural caring relationship with the patient
- understands Swedish or Finnish at an intermediate level when communicating with patients and colleagues. The main supervision is Swedish or Finnish
- developing individual communication skills with patients and colleagues In Swedish or Finnish
- demonstrates respect for the patient´s integrity and autonomy
- demonstrates the ability to support the patient in the rehabilitation process
- understands the importance of aseptic working methods
- demonstrates safe working methods
- under supervision and with increasing independence be able to assess the patient´s caring needs,
- understands the nursing plan for the medical patient
- can implement nursing activities in medical nursing care
- can document and report nursing activities and the patient´s condition in Swedish or Finnish
- be able to implement the underlying principles of medical nursing care at different wards
- develops evidence-based knowledge about common diseases and an understanding of the pharmacological treatment of the patient
- can perform safe drug administration under supervision
- can under the supervision and with increasing independence be able to perform safe oral- and intravenous drug administration, follow up on the effects, and act in accordance with the situation
- can perform necessary procedures when receiving and discharging a patient

Content

Practice in patient-centered nursing care

Location and time

Workshops autumn 2025
Practice spring or autumn 2025

Materials

See Moodle for more information:
About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
About assignments

Teaching methods

Practice in patient-centered nursing care in the medical field
Workshops 1,5 sp at Novia before the practice
Practice seminars

Employer connections

Practice 40 h/week (38h at the practice place and 2h for your assignments from school) for 6 weeks.
Approved assignments and seminars.

Exam schedules

Practice 40 h/week for 5 weeks.
Approved assignments and seminars

Completion alternatives

Only for degree students.
Not possible to validate.

Student workload

1 credit 27h, this course is 9 credits 243h.

38 h/ week and 5 weeks = 190h

Further information

Prior knowledge

Practice: Basic Nursing Care 1
Clinical Nursing 2
Clinical Pharmacology
2 of the course below:
Responses to Altered Hematological, Cardiovascular and Sensory Function
Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Function and Urinary Elimination
Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal, Neurologic and Respiratory Function

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved/Rejected
See separate framework for evaluation in moodle.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Passed performance in clinical studies:

A Satisfactorily achieved the objectives of the internship section.

B Interest and motivation
• can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop professional skills
• follows the work list and keeps agreed times
• can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work step

C Knowledge and skills
• mostly works according to plan and has a basic accuracy in important work steps
• can perform tasks under supervision
• has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn
• can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
• can make decisions related to work tasks at a basic level
• knows the value base and considers the professional ethical principles

D Cooperation and treatment
• can communicate and respond to patients/clients/customers
• can collaborate with others in the work team

Qualifications

Practice: Basic Nursing Care 1
Clinical Nursing 2
Clinical Pharmacology
2 of the course below:
Responses to Altered Hematological, Cardiovascular and Sensory Function
Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Function and Urinary Elimination
Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal, Neurologic and Respiratory Function

Further information

Only for degree students
Not possible to validate

Objective

The student:
- participates in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
- follows general rules and routines in the working environment
- communicates with patients and colleagues in Swedish or Finnish, the main supervision will be carried out in Swedish or Finnish
- applies evidence-based knowledge to mental health nursing
- identifies mental disorders and addictive behavior
- implements the nursing process in mental health
- shows respect for the patient´s integrity and autonomy
- can inform, advice and guide the patient in issues related to mental health and addictive behavior, and will be able to provide psychiatric first aid
- can support the patient´s family in their care for the patient
- performs safe drug administration

Content

Practice in patient-centered nursing care

Location and time

Part 1 - Workshop (1,5cr): Autumn 2024
NU22-group 1: week 46, 47 or 48 (2 days)
NU22-group 2: week 46, 48 or 49 (2 days)

Part 2 - Clinical Practice (7,5cr), spring 2025

Teaching methods

Part 1: Workshop
Part 2: Clinical Practice

Completion alternatives

Compulsory attendance at Workshops
Clinical practice
Approved clinical practice
Written assignments
Participation i seminars

Student workload

38h/week in Clinical practice; 5 weeks => 190h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
B Interest and motivation
• is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
• follows the work list and respects agreed times
• can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
C Knowledge and skills
• mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
• can perform tasks under supervision
• has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
• can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
• makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
• is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
D Collaboration and response
• can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
• can work with others within the work team

Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
B Interest and motivation
• has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
• does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
C Knowledge and skills
• does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
• has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
• lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
• has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
D Collaboration and response
• possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
• shows an unprofessional attitude

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Compulsory attendance in workshop
Approved Clinical practice
Approved written assignments
Participation in practice information and practice seminar

Qualifications

Practice: Medical Nursing Care
Practice: Surgical Nursing Care
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Nursing

Further information

Only for degree students
Not possible to validate
Can be done abroad and as an exchange student

Objective

The student:
- takes part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
- communicates with patients and colleagues in Swedish or Finnish
- follows the general rules and routines in a working environment
- can independently assess the patient´s caring plan for interventions, as well as take part in the implementation of the plan and the evaluation of the given nursing care
- makes decisions concerning the patient´s individual nursing care, under supervision and with increasing independence
- implements the nursing process for patients with multiple diseases and understand holistic care
- can perform safe drug administration
- documents and gives verbal reports of given nursing care, under supervision and with increasing independence
- knows the administration of a ward
- performs necessary procedures when receiving and discharging a patient
- can guide team members in nursing care
- can work as an expert in nursing care

Content

Practice in patient-centered nursing care

Location and time

Supervised Clinical Practice in different hospitals during fall semester 2025

Materials

Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
Moodle

Teaching methods

Supervised Clinical practice
Practice seminars

Exam schedules

Compulsory attendance at Practice seminars
Approved internship from clinical supervisor and teacher

International connections

It is possible to do the clinical training abroad. The student can do it trough NordPlus or Erasmus networks or find a hospital themselves. A learning agreement must be signed by all three partners before the internship can start.

Completion alternatives

Approved internships
Participation in internship seminar
Approved practice assignments

Student workload

40 h/week during clinical training of what 38 h/week at clinical settings
6 weeks of practice = 228 h at practice, 12 h written assignment

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See the Plan for Clinical Studies for course specific competencies.

The competencies the Student needs to reach in Vasa Central hospital
Can admit and discharge patients from the ward
Can define / map the patient's care needs, care planning, implementation of the care and
evaluate the care (according to FinCC)
Can be responsible for safe drug handling
Can use HaiPro
Can report the report both orally and in writing, participate in rounds, inform and supervise
patients and relatives
Can act according to ISBAR in non-emergency situations and in emergency situations
Have an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and relatives and consider their
cultural affiliation
Can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
Have the ability to independently acquire new evidence-based knowledge
Can handle complicated occupational assignments under supervision within own
nursing context
Can independently make decisions under supervision regarding the patient's care process
Can be responsible for safe drug treatment under supervision
Demonstrate the ability to supervise and teach patients (and relatives)
Promises to conscientiously follow the commitments the work gives and remembers
professional secrecy
https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/globalassets/studerande_opiskelijat/handbok-for-studerandehandledning-pa-vasa-centralsjukhus-21.12.2018.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Clinical Practice 40 h / week in six weeks, 228 h at practice + 12 h for assignment
Mandatory attendance 100%
Mandatory attendance at practice seminars
Approved practice assignments

Qualifications

All core, professional and alternative vocational studies must be completed
Practice: Primary Nursing Care
Practice: Optional Context
Presentation of Thesis and Maturity Exam

Further information

Only for degree students
Not possible to validate
Can be done abroad and as an exchange student

Objective

The student:
- participates in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
- communicates with patients and colleagues in Swedish or Finnish, the main supervision will be carried out in Swedish or Finnish
- follows general rules and routines in the working environment
- applies evidence-based knowledge to primary health care and home nursing care
- implements the nursing process in primary health care and home nursing care
- shows respect for the patient´s integrity and autonomy when caring for the patient in a home environment
- understands aseptic working methods in a home environment
- can support the patient´s family in their care for the patient
- can perform safe drug administration
- demonstrates skills to in using digital services and health technology in primary care
- demonstrates skills to inform and guide the patient/client to different services
- understands the nurses role in the service chain

Content

Clinical practice under supervision

Teaching methods

Practical Workshops

Further information

The workshops are compulsory

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Qualifications

Practice: Medical Nursing Care
Practice: Surgical Nursing Care
Community Nursing
Thesis Plan and Seminar

Further information

Only for degree students
Not possible to validate
Can be done abroad and as an exchange student

Objective

The student:
- takes part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
- understands Swedish or Finnish at an intermediate level when communicating with patients and colleagues. The main supervision is Swedish or Finnish
- developing individual communication skills with patients and colleagues In Swedish or Finnish
- demonstrates respect for the patient´s integrity and autonomy
- demonstrates the ability to support the patient in the rehabilitation process
- understands the importance of aseptic working methods
- demonstrates safe working methods
- under supervision and with increasing independence be able to assess the patient´s caring needs,
- understads the nursing plan for the surgical patient
- can implement nursing activities in surgical nursing care
- can document and report nursing activities and the patient´s condition in Swedish or Finnish
- be able to implement the underlying principles surgical nursing care at different wards
- develops evidence-based knowledge about common diseases, and an understanding of the pharmacological treatment of the patient
- can perform safe drug administration under supervision
- can under supervision and with increasing independence be able to perform safe oral- and intravenous drug administration, follow up the effects and act in accordance with the situation
- can perform necessary procedures when receiving and discharging a patient

Content

Practice in patient-centered nursing care

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
See Moodle for more information:

About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
About assignments

Teaching methods

Practice in patient-centered nursing care in the surgical field
Workshops 1,5 sp at Novia before the practice
Practice seminars

Employer connections

Practice 40 h/week (38h at the practice place and 2h for your assignments from school) for 5 weeks.
Approved assignments and seminars

Exam schedules

Practice 40 h/week for 5 weeks.
Approved assignments and seminars

Completion alternatives

Only for degree students.
Not possible to validate.

Student workload

1 credit = 27h, this course is 9 credits 243h.

38 h/ week and 5 weeks = 190h

Further information

Prior knowledge

Practice: Basic Nursing Care 1
Clinical Nursing 2
Clinical Pharmacology
2 of the course below:
Responses to Altered Hematological, Cardiovascular and Sensory Function
Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Function and Urinary Elimination
Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal, Neurologic and Respiratory Function

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Passed performance in clinical studies:

A Satisfactorily achieved the objectives of the internship section.

B Interest and motivation
• can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop professional skills
• follows the work list and keeps agreed times
• can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work step

C Knowledge and skills
• mostly works according to plan and has a basic accuracy in important work steps
• can perform tasks under supervision
• has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn
• can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
• can make decisions related to work tasks at a basic level
• knows the value base and considers the professional ethical principles

D Cooperation and treatment
• can communicate and respond to patients/clients/customers
• can collaborate with others in the work team

Qualifications

Practice: Basic Nursing Care 1
Clinical Nursing 2
Clinical Pharmacology
2 of the course below:
Responses to Altered Hematological, Cardiovascular and Sensory Function
Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Function and Urinary Elimination
Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal, Neurologic and Respiratory Function

Further information

Only for degree students
Not possible to validate

Objective

The student:
- takes part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
- understands Swedish or Finnish at an intermediate level when communicating with patients and colleagues. The main supervision is Swedish or Finnish
- developing individual communication skills with patients and colleagues In Swedish or Finnish
- demonstrates respect for the patient´s integrity and autonomy
- demonstrates the ability to support the patient in the rehabilitation process
- understands the importance of aseptic working methods
- demonstrates safe working methods
- under supervision and with increasing independence be able to assess the patient´s caring needs,
- understads the nursing plan for the surgical patient
- can implement nursing activities in surgical nursing care
- can document and report nursing activities and the patient´s condition in Swedish or Finnish
- be able to implement the underlying principles surgical nursing care at different wards
- develops evidence-based knowledge about common diseases, and an understanding of the pharmacological treatment of the patient
- can perform safe drug administration under supervision
- can under supervision and with increasing independence be able to perform safe oral- and intravenous drug administration, follow up the effects and act in accordance with the situation
- can perform necessary procedures when receiving and discharging a patient

Content

Practice in patient-centered nursing care

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Jobiili https://www.jobiili.fi
Vasa Centralsjukhus https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/
Terveysportti https://www.terveysportti.fi/terveysportti/koti
See Moodle for more information:

About any health checks, tests and vaccinations: Finnish Student Health Service
About assignments- see in moodle

Teaching methods

Practice in patient-centered nursing care in the surgical field
Workshops 1,5 sp at Novia before the practice
Practice seminars

Employer connections

Practice 40 h/week (38h at the practice place and 2h for your assignments from school) for 5 weeks.
Approved assignments and seminars

Exam schedules

Practice 40 h/week for 5 weeks.
Approved assignments and seminars

Completion alternatives

Only for degree students.
Not possible to validate.

Student workload

1 credit = 27h, this course is 9 credits 243h.

38 h/ week and 5 weeks = 190h

Further information

Prior knowledge

Practice: Basic Nursing Care 1
Clinical Nursing 2
Clinical Pharmacology
2 of the course below:
Responses to Altered Hematological, Cardiovascular and Sensory Function
Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Function and Urinary Elimination
Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal, Neurologic and Respiratory Function

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Passed performance in clinical studies:

A Satisfactorily achieved the objectives of the internship section.

B Interest and motivation
• can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop professional skills
• follows the work list and keeps agreed times
• can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work step

C Knowledge and skills
• mostly works according to plan and has a basic accuracy in important work steps
• can perform tasks under supervision
• has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn
• can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
• can make decisions related to work tasks at a basic level
• knows the value base and considers the professional ethical principles

D Cooperation and treatment
• can communicate and respond to patients/clients/customers
• can collaborate with others in the work team

Qualifications

Practice: Basic Nursing Care 1
Clinical Nursing 2
Clinical Pharmacology
2 of the course below:
Responses to Altered Hematological, Cardiovascular and Sensory Function
Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal and Endocrine Function and Urinary Elimination
Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal, Neurologic and Respiratory Function

Further information

Only for degree students
Not possible to validate

Objective

The student:
- can produce a Bachelor Thesis project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
- can apply a nursing theoretical perspective in different nursing contexts
- can act as an opponent for another degree project
- can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

Content

Collect and analyze data for the thesis, with consideration to the necessary ethical issues linked to the study
Describe a nursing theory
Describe methods of data analysis
Describe and discuss the nursing research
Present, discuss and defend the approved thesis at a seminar
Critically examine another thesis presented at the Thesis seminar
Carry out an approved maturity exam

Location and time

Spring and Autumn 2024

Materials

see course NU21TH01,

Teaching methods

Increasingly independent work, with the help of a supervisor
- collect and describe background information for the study
- desribe a theoretical framework for the study
- describe methods of data analysis
- collect data for the thesis, with consideration to the necessary ethical issues linked to the study
- present the methodological part of the thesis and show examples of the results at an intermediary seminar
Lecture and seminars

Employer connections

Presentation at intermediary seminar in September 2024 and presentation of the final thesis in December 2024

Completion alternatives

Approved manuscript for intermediary seminar, attendance at intermediary seminar and proved manuscript for the thesis presentation . pass/fail in the maturity exam

Student workload

12 ECTS= 324 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Pass/Fail
See practical guide to thesis writing
The manuscript for Intermediary seminar shall include following chapters:
Introduction
Background of the study
Theoretical framework
Aim, purpose
Method
Sampling/material
Data collection
Data analysis
Ethical issues
Examples of the result

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

See practical guide for thesis writing for grades 0-5 for final thesis.

Qualifications

Thesis Plan and Seminar

Further information

Only for degree students

Objective

The student:
- can produce a Bachelor Thesis project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
- can apply a nursing theoretical perspective in different nursing contexts
- can act as an opponent for another degree project
- can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

Content

Collect and analyze data for the thesis, with consideration to the necessary ethical issues linked to the study
Describe a nursing theory
Describe methods of data analysis
Describe and discuss the nursing research
Present, discuss and defend the approved thesis at a seminar
Critically examine another thesis presented at the Thesis seminar
Carry out an approved maturity exam

Location and time

Spring and Autumn 2025

Materials

see course NU21TH01,

Teaching methods

Increasingly independent work, with the help of a supervisor
- collect and describe background information for the study
- desribe a theoretical framework for the study
- describe methods of data analysis
- collect data for the thesis, with consideration to the necessary ethical issues linked to the study
- present the methodological part of the thesis and show examples of the results at an intermediary seminar
Lecture and seminars

Employer connections

Presentation at intermediary seminar in September 2024 and presentation of the final thesis in December 2025

Completion alternatives

Approved manuscript for intermediary seminar, attendance at intermediary seminar and proved manuscript for the thesis presentation . pass/fail in the maturity exam

Student workload

12 ECTS= 324 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Pass/Fail
See practical guide to thesis writing
The manuscript for Intermediary seminar shall include following chapters:
Introduction
Background of the study
Theoretical framework
Aim, purpose
Method
Sampling/material
Data collection
Data analysis
Ethical issues
Examples of the result

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

See practical guide for thesis writing for grades 0-5 for final thesis.

Qualifications

Thesis Plan and Seminar

Further information

Only for degree students

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with the most common methods of quantitative data collection and analysis used in nursing research

Content

Common methods of quantitative data collection and analysis
Simple statistical calculations and tests

Location and time

Novia, Alere
Spring 2025

Materials

Quantitative methods: the following literature is recommended: Denise F. Polit & Cheryl Tatano Beck. 2008. Nursing Research. Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluver., as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises, independent work

Exam schedules

The written assignment must be submitted before the final course date.

Completion alternatives

Written assignment (graded according to the scale 0-5)

Student workload

1cr = 27h
2cr = 54h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

Based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

Qualifications

Evidence Based Nursing

Objective

The student:
- can apply physical assessment into the specific nursing context
- can identify health problems related to gastrointestinal, endocrine and urinary disorders
- can use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care to patients in the specific nursing context.
- can explain nursing implications for medication and other treatments prescribed for the specific nursing context
- can apply insights into altered gastrointestinal end endocrine functions and urinary elimination onto all nursing contexts.
- knows how to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national guidelines and classification system
- applies critical thinking and decision-making in the specific nursing context
- applies ethical and cultural aspects in the specific nursing context

Content

Nursing care of the patient with gastrointestinal problems
Nursing care of the patient with urinary elimination disorders
Nursing care of the patient with endocrine disorders
Risk factors and symptoms of the various types of diabetes
Nutrition and medication related to diabetes
Oncological nursing care related to the special field
Medications
Physical assessment

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Responses to Altered Gastrointestinal Functions:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2020. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 21,23-25; 537 - 545, 588 - 730.
Responses to Altered Urinary Eliminations:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2020. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 26-28; 731 - 823 and Chapter 48: p 1657-1672 (from testicular torsion - prostate cancer)
Responses to altered Endocrine Function
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff,G. & Gubrud, R. 2020. Medical-Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Chapter 18, 19, 20

Berman, A., Snyder, S., Frandsen, G., & Kozier, B. (2022). Kozier & Erb’s Fundamentals of Nursing, Global Edition: Vol. Tenth edition, Global edition. Pearson. UNIT 3 The Nursing Process

Teaching methods

Contact teaching at Novia: lectures, case studies, workshops and physical assessment practice ( mandatory )

Exam schedules

Written exam at Novia
Retake

Completion alternatives

Written exam

Student workload

5 credits= 135 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Qualifications

First Aid and Basic Nursing
Clinical Nursing 1

Objective

The student:
- can apply physical assessment into the specific nursing context
- can identify health problems related to cardiovascular, lymphatic, vascular or hematologic disorders
- can use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care to patients in the specific nursing context.
- can explain nursing implications for medication and other treatments prescribed for the specific nursing context
- can apply insights into altered hematological, cardiovascular and vascular functions onto all nursing contexts.
- can apply insights into altered integumentary- and eye and ear functions to all nursing contexts
- knows how to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national guidelines and classification system
- applies critical thinking and decision-making in the specific nursing context
- applies ethical and cultural aspects in the specific nursing context

Content

Nursing care of the patient with common cardiovascular and vascular disorders
Nursing care of the patient with common hematological and lymphatic disorders
Nursing care of the patient with common sensory disorders
Medication and other treatments
Health problems involving the skin, hair and nails, eyes and ears
Impairment in the function of the eyes, ears or the integumentary system
Physical assessment
Oncological nursing care related to the special field

Location and time

Autumn 2023

Materials

LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Critical thinking in Patient Care. 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 29, 30, 31,33, 45, 46

CVD references
Alexander, MF., Fawcett, JN., Runciman, PJ. Nursing Practice. Hospital and Home. Elsever. 2012: pp. 7-72.
Thaler, MS- The Only EKG Book You’ll Ever Need. The 9th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2015 (you can use the previous additions as well)
Hematology:
Alexander, M., Fawcett, J. & Runciman, P. 2012. Nursing Practice. Hospital and Home. Elsever. Ch 11, 479 - 523.

Teaching methods

Lectures, work shops, simulations, discussion and individual/group work

Exam schedules

Written examination
Participation in workshops and simulations
Assignments

Completion alternatives

Written examination

Student workload

1 ECTS=27 h

Further information

Compulsory attendance at workshops, simulations and seminars

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

Grade 0-5

Qualifications

First Aid and Basic Nursing
Clinical Nursing 1

Objective

The student:
- can apply physical assessment into the specific nursing context
- can identify health problems related to musculoskeletal, neurologic and respiratory disorders
- can use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care to patients in the specific nursing context.
- can explain nursing implications for medication and other treatments prescribed for the specific nursing context
- can apply insights into altered musculoskeletal, neurologic and respiratory function onto all nursing contexts.
- knows how to prioritize the patient’s needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national guidelines and classification system
- applies critical thinking and decision-making in the specific nursing context
- applies ethical and cultural aspects in the specific nursing context

Content

Nursing care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
Nursing care of the patient with neurologic disorders
Nursing care of the patient with respiratory disorders
Oncological nursing care related to the special field
Medications
Physical assessment

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Responses to Altered Musculoskeletal Functions:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 38-40; 1219 - 1329.

Responses to Altered Respiratory Function:
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 34-37; 1066 - 1217.

Responses to Altered Neurological Function
LeMone, P., Burke, K., Bauldoff, G. & Gubrud, R. 2015. Medical – Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care 6th ed. Pearson. Chapter 41, 42, 44

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstration, workshops, assignments
Compulsory attendance at workshops at Campus

Exam schedules

Autumn 2024

Completion alternatives

Written examination, assignments
100 % participation in Workshops

Student workload

5 x 27 h = 135 h

Further information

Compulsory attendance at Workshops

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

Grade 0 - 5

Qualifications

First Aid and Basic Nursing
Clinical Nursing 1

Objective

The student:
- understands and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases aimed at meeting specific needs
- can introduce him-/herself and others, as well as ask and answer questions about personal circumstances, such as living arrangements, friends, and possessions
- can interact with others in a simple way, provided that the other person talks slowly and clearly and is prepared to help

Content

Basic Swedish

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Information on Moodle

Teaching methods

The student
- Has basic understanding in oral and written Swedish
- Is familiar with the main structures of the language and has acquired a basic vocabulary
- Can use Swedish in everyday situations

During the course we will focus on:
- Oral and written exercises
- Swedish everyday vocabulary
- Reading and listening comprehensions
- Grammar/language structures
- Exams

Exam schedules

Oral and written exam at the end of the course.

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Oral and written exams
Short essay
Individual oral assignment

Student workload

3 x 27 h = 81 hours

Content scheduling

-

Further information

-

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Grade: pass/fail.
According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Objective

The student
- has oral and written skills in Swedish for nurses. The level is the same as in Civil Service Language Proficiency Certificate with a satisfactory mark or the National Certificate of Language Proficiency at Level 3–4.

Content

Basic Professional Level B1
Nursing vocabulary

Materials

Information can be found in Moodle.

Teaching methods

No teaching in class.
Only exam.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate framework for evaluation

Qualifications

Swedish Level A1

Objective

The student:
- can independently produce a work plan for the Bachelor Thesis, based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
can assess research ethics aspects in their degree thesis

Content

Thesis plan
Research process

Location and time

Novia, Alere and online supervision in small group
Spring 2025

Materials

Polit, D.F. & Beck, C. T. 2017. Nursing research. Generating and Assessing evidence for Nursing practice (10 th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health

Gerrish, K. & Lathlean, J. eds. 2015. The research process in nursing . 7th ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Malden, MA, USA : Wiley Blackwell (also available as e book)

Finnish national board on research integrity (Tenk). 2012. Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland. Available at: https://www.tenk.fi/en

O'Leary, Z. 2009. The essential guide to doing your research project. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Teaching methods

Independent planning and writing of thesis work plan
Presentation in individual or small group seminars

Employer connections

Compulsory content:
Thesis title page
Table of content
Introduction (1page)
Background (description of subject/topic) (3-5pages)
(introduction and background should include at least 6-8 references of which 5 are scientific)
Aim
Method (data collection method based on 2 references/discuss method of selection) (2-3 pages)
Ethical considerations (based on references) (1 page)
Time table
Reference list

Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excluding title page, table of content and reference list)

See also practical guide

Exam schedules

Accepted thesis plan, individual or in small groups presentations during April-May
See also practical guide on Moodle.

Completion alternatives

Validation according to general instructions for validation in Novia
3 smaller assignments during the course (see Moodle)
1) literature search, review
2) read in depth 1 thesis write a summary, reflect,
3) data collection, interview

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

pass / fall

Qualifications

Nursing Research and Theory
Quantitative Research

Further information

Only for degree students

Objective

The course is a simple first introduction to the Finnish language in order to inspire to further studies in the language. It is advised that the student proceeds with Finnish A1 3 p after completing this course.

Content

Easy to understand information and simple study material about the language, oral exercises to record and simple digital tests.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

All assignments and tests must be completed in time and approved to pass the course.

Qualifications

No prequisities.

Objective

The course is a simple first introduction to the Finnish language in order to inspire to further studies in the language. It is advised that the student proceeds with Finnish A1 3 p after completing this course.

Content

Easy to understand information and simple study material about the language, oral exercises to record and simple digital tests.

Teaching methods

Online course

The course is intended for students with NO PREVIOUS knowledge in Finnish. Previous studies will be checked.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

All assignments and tests must be completed in time and approved to pass the course.

Qualifications

No prequisities.

Objective

The course is a simple first introduction to the Swedish language in order to inspire to further studies in the language.It is recommended to proceed with Swedish A1 after completing the course.

Content

Easy to understand information and simple study material about the language, oral exercises to record and simple digital tests.

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

All material in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Online-course

Exam schedules

No exam.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The course is approved when all assignments are completed, submitted and approved before the course ends.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

All assignments and tests must be completed in time and approved to pass the course.

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is approved when all assignments are completed, submitted and approved before the course ends.

Qualifications

No prerequsities

Objective

The course is a simple first introduction to the Swedish language in order to inspire to further studies in the language.It is recommended to proceed with Swedish A1 after completing the course.

Content

Easy to understand information and simple study material about the language, oral exercises to record and simple digital tests.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

All material in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Online-course

The course is intended for students with NO PREVIOUS knowledge in Swedish. Previous studies will be checked.

Exam schedules

No exam.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The course is approved when all assignments are completed, submitted and approved before the course ends.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

All assignments and tests must be completed in time and approved to pass the course.

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is approved when all assignments are completed, submitted and approved before the course ends.

Qualifications

No prerequsities

Objective

This optional course is tailored for those who want to improve their Swedish language skills while learning important nursing practices. Through a combination of language training and practical exercises in various nursing methods, participants will develop both their language and nursing skills.

Target group: This course is aimed at students who have a basic knowledge of Swedish and who wish to practise both language and nursing skills before their first clinical training.

At the end of the course, participants are expected to have improved their linguistic confidence and be able to perform various nursing methods in Swedish with increased precision and efficiency.

This course offers a unique opportunity not only to improve language skills but also to integrate them into a professional nursing context.

Content

1. Language Training: The focus is on improving participants' communication skills in Swedish in various healthcare-related situations, such as receiving patients, giving instructions, and reporting to colleagues.

2. Nursing Methods: Through practical exercises and simulations, participants will learn various nursing methods, including wound care, catheterisation, and basic care. This also includes understanding and using medical terminology in Swedish.

3. Culture and Ethics in Healthcare: The course also addresses cultural and ethical aspects related to healthcare in Finland, including patient encounters, respect for different cultural backgrounds, and understanding patients' rights.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

According to the lecturer.

Teaching methods

Method: The course uses a mix of classroom teaching, practical exercises, and simulations to create an interactive and engaging learning environment.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Pass - Fail

Qualifications

Clinical Nursing 1
Swedish Level A1

Further information

The course is recommended for students in semester 2.

Objective

Student
- can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
- can assess, plan, implement and evaluate primary care for patients of different ages
- is prepared to care for patients of different ages in acute primary care
- has the ability to make decisions and based on them prioritize the patient's care
- can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
- can in a simulated situation be responsible for a safe drug treatment in primary and home care

Content

Nursing assessment
Physical assessment
ABCD, ISBAR
Care planning, documentation
Supervise patients in primary care

Location and time

Spring 2025
7.1-2.2

Materials

Se Moodle och kursens förverkligande

Teaching methods

Case studies
Group work
Pedagogic frame
Project learning
Learning by doing

Completion alternatives

Compulsory introduction
Compulsory workshops
Case studies
Group work

Student workload

1 cr = 27h
3cr= 81h

26h in class
55h self sudies

Further information

The course is partly online

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject. Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions but her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows sufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.

Qualifications

Education for nurse:
Basic Care
Basics in care, Health-promoting care and Clinical care belong to Vocational studies
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
VÅV22PR06 Practice: Optional context 1

For DP in Nursing:
NU22CN03 Practice: Medical Nursing Care
NU22CN04: Practice: Surgical Nursing Care

Further information

The language of education is Swedish
Examination tasks can be written in English
Only for degree students

Objective

Nursing Swedish 2 is an advanced course designed for students with basic knowledge of Swedish. The course is designed to help students develop their language skills within the healthcare context in Swedish. Through reading, assignments, dialogues, and interactive exercises, participants will deepen their knowledge of medical terminology and enhance their communication abilities in various healthcare-related situations.

Upon completion of the course, students are expected to have improved their language skills within the healthcare context and be ready to communicate effectively in Swedish in diverse medical situations.

Content

Medical Terminology: Students will learn and apply advanced medical terminology related to various medical conditions and healthcare methods.

Reading and Text Comprehension: By reading and analysing texts related to medical practice and patient care, students will develop their reading comprehension skills and expand their medical vocabulary.

Dialogues and Role-plays: By participating in dialogues and role-plays, students will practice their oral skills and learn to communicate effectively with patients, colleagues, and healthcare personnel in Swedish.

Interactive Exercises: Through the use of interactive exercises and simulations, students will apply their knowledge in realistic healthcare scenarios and prepare for work in healthcare settings in Swedish

Location and time

Spring 2025.

Materials

According to the lecturer.

Teaching methods

The course uses a combination of traditional classroom teaching, group discussions, and practical exercises to create an engaging and interactive learning environment.

Exam schedules

More information on Moodle.

Completion alternatives

The course focuses on applying language skills in realistic healthcare scenarios. Through role-plays, simulations, and practical exercises, students have the opportunity to immediately apply their language skills in various medical contexts.

Oral and written examination tasks are included in the course.

Student workload

81 h.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Assessment methods and criteria

Pass/Fail

Qualifications

Swedish A1
Nursing Swedish
Clinical Nursing 1

Objective

The student:
- can use welfare technology taking into account existing ethical guidelines
- have digital skills
- has foresight regarding various future welfare technology solutions in international nursing
- can ensure that all people can live in prosperity and have meaningful lives by making economic, social and technological progress in harmony with nature

Content

Basic level of welfare technologies
Key concepts found in welfare technologies such as eHealth, mHealth, information and communication technologies (ICT), telecare and telemedicine
Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Internet of Things (IoT), quantified self as well as robotics.
eHealth literacy and the digital gap and the latest global trends within welfare technologies

Location and time

Online, opens 28.4.2025

Materials

See Moodle

Teaching methods

Online

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Qualifications

For DP in Nursing:
NU22CN03 Practice: Medical Nursing Care
NU22CN04: Practice: Surgical Nursing Care

Education for nurse on the Swedish program:
Basic Care
Basics in care, Health-promoting care and Clinical care belong to Vocational studies
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
VÅV22PR06 Practice: Optional context 1

Further information

Only for degree students
The language of education is English

The teaching is in English
Examination tasks can be written in Swedish

Objective

The student:
- obtains knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to maternity care and can recognize normal pregnancy, delivery and puerperium
- identifies health problems involving the reproductive system and breasts
- use the nursing process as a framework for providing individualized care for patients with sexual-reproductive dysfunction
- can prioritize the patient's needs for nursing care, act correctly on those, and document them based on the national classification system
- can prepare for guiding the patient in health promotion and prevention of complications
- can identify the risk factors and complications related to STI
- applies insights into altered sexual-reproductive functions to all nursing contexts
- can care for patients with gynecological infections, tumors, bleeding disturbances, early pregnancy complications
- knows and can give advice about family planning and family nursing care
- has awareness of sexual aspects including infertility in the human being
- treats the patient with respect and dignity
- understands different cultural needs and learn to treat the patient, and the family, with dignity

Content

Normal and altered sexual-reproductive functions
Normal pregnancy, birth and postpartum
Gynecology and obstetrics, gynecological disorders
Immediate first aid/care in complications during pregnancy, birth and postpartum and refer patients without delay to maternity care facilities
Reproductive system and breasts
Risk factors and complications related to STI
Gynecological infections, tumors, bleeding disturbances, early pregnancy complications
Family planning
Sexual aspects including infertility in the human being

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
Spring 2025

Materials

MATERNITY CARE
Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live

National Institute for health and Welfare= THL. 2023. We're having a baby - a guidebook for expecting and looking after a baby. Available at: https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/146505/URN_ISBN_978-952-408-059-0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y



Gynaecological care:
LeMone, P., Burke, M., Bauldoff,G., Gubrud, R. & Carno, M-A. 2020 (or older). In: Medical-Surgical Nursing. Clinical Reasoning in Patient Care. 7th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. chapter 47,49-50 pp 1740-1760, 1789-1854. (not male system)

Berman, A,. Snyder S. 2022. (or older editions). Kozier & Erb's Fundamentals of Nursing Concepts, Process and Practice. 11th ed. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Pearson Education Limited. chapter 29, 40,6,22-625, 642-645,1025-1046. Older version available as e-book On ebsco e-book collection. Gynecologic nursing.

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstration, video, tutorials, written exam, practice, individual assignments, group discussions, group work, workshop

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

Maternity care and gynaecological care:
Written exam last lecture in school + retakes on two general retakes
Deadline on assignment about sexuality in Moodle.

International connections

Discussion in class with students from other cultures

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia instructions
Written exam
Deadline for sexuality assignment in Moodle

Student workload

1cr= 27h
4cr= 4x27h=108h

3cr= written exam
1 cr= doing assignment and taking part in practical exercises, workshop

Content scheduling

.

Further information

Content of the course will be written in the Moodle course.
The sexuality part will not be included in the exam.
Group works are voluntary, but content is included in exam.
The first exam will be in class but online on Moodle on your computer, you need to use Safe exam browser.

For students that have done the online course on campus online with similar content you have three options:
1) do only the online course 3cr, not this course.
2) online course 3cr + 1 cr from this course
lectures are recommended, do the assignment on sexuality and the groupworks and workshops totally 4cr.
You need to show the teacher the certificate of the passed online course.
3) online course 3cr + all this course 4cr = 7 cr.

AI is not allowed in this course = RED according to Novia recommendations

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment methods and criteria

Written exam: grades 0-5
Assignment and workshop: pass or fail

51-60% of points = grade 1
61-70%= grade 2
etc.

Qualifications

First Aid and Basic Nursing
Clinical Nursing 1

Objective

This course aims to provide students with the opportunity to practice and improve their Swedish language skills through participation in authentic activities and environments. By engaging in various contexts such as nursing homes, schools, and other community settings, participants will have a unique opportunity to apply their language skills in real-life situations.

Target group: The course is designed for students who want to improve their Swedish language skills through practical application in authentic settings.

Objective: Upon completion of the course, participants are expected to have increased their confidence in using Swedish in various contexts and improved their ability to communicate effectively in real-life situations.

This course offers an exciting opportunity to integrate language training into authentic and meaningful contexts while also contributing to society in various ways.

Content

Interaction with the Elderly: Participants will visit nursing homes to take part in activities such as Bingo, chair exercise, and other social events. This provides them with the opportunity to communicate with elderly people in Swedish while contributing to their well-being.

School Visits for First Aid: By visiting schools, participants will have the opportunity to teach basic first aid to pupils in Swedish. This not only gives them the chance to practice the language in an educational setting but also to share important knowledge with others.

Practical Language Use: In addition to planned activities, participants will be encouraged to use Swedish in everyday situations throughout the course, such as ordering food at restaurants, shopping at stores, or interacting with locals.

Materials

According to the lecturer.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

See separate framework for evaluation

Qualifications

Swedish A1
Clinical Nursing 1

Further information

Compulsory attendance at exercises and visits to retirement homes/schools.

Objective

The student:
- can use welfare technology taking into account existing ethical guidelines
- have digital skills
- has foresight regarding various future welfare technology solutions in international nursing
- can ensure that all people can live in prosperity and have meaningful lives by making economic, social and technological progress in harmony with nature

Content

Basic level of welfare technologies
Key concepts found in welfare technologies such as eHealth, mHealth, information and communication technologies (ICT), telecare and telemedicine
Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Internet of Things (IoT), quantified self as well as robotics.
eHealth literacy and the digital gap and the latest global trends within welfare technologies

Location and time

Online, opens 28.4.2025

Materials

See Moodle

Teaching methods

Online

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for assignment:
The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' assignments. The student has followed the instructions for the assignment. She/He have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views

Assessment criteria for written assignment:
The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

Qualifications

For DP in Nursing:
NU22CN03 Practice: Medical Nursing Care
NU22CN04: Practice: Surgical Nursing Care

Education for nurse on the Swedish program:
Basic Care
Basics in care, Health-promoting care and Clinical care belong to Vocational studies
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2
VÅV22PR06 Practice: Optional context 1

Further information