Study Guide

Objective

The student:
-shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
-master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
literature
-has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
-is aware of cultural differences in communication

Content

Working life related documents
Professional communication in working life

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

Student:
- can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

Content

The research process
Work plan

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
According to schedule feed-back of research plan for thesis.

Teaching methods

Individual assignment
Research plan for thesis

Employer connections

Topics for thesis.

Exam schedules

See Moodle.

Completion alternatives

Approved research plan for thesis.

Student workload

27 h/cr = 81 h

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved: Approved research plan
Unapproved: Unapproved research plan

Qualifications

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

The course VÅV22UV01 Research Methodology and Care Theory must be completed in parallel with VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1.

Objective

Student:
- can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

Content

The research process
Work plan

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
According to schedule feed-back of research plan for thesis.

Teaching methods

Individual assignment
Research plan for thesis

Employer connections

Topics for thesis.

Exam schedules

See Moodle.

Completion alternatives

Approved research plan for thesis.

Student workload

27 h/cr = 81 h

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved: Approved research plan
Unapproved: Unapproved research plan

Qualifications

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

The course VÅV22UV01 Research Methodology and Care Theory must be completed in parallel with VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1.

Objective

Student:
- can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

Content

The research process
Intermediate seminar

Location and time

Seminar according to the time schedule in January-February 2026 på Alere
Supervision according to individual schedule

Materials

According to the subject for thesis and literature for research method is free of choice
See VÅV22UV01

Teaching methods

Individual work under supervision
Seminar for presentation of parts of thesis, discussion and supervision

Employer connections

The thesis can be ordered from a health organization

Exam schedules

See time schedule, seminar i January-Februry 2026

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

See Novia instructions for validation

Student workload

The hours counted for the course is 162 (6 cu) and contains mainly independent work but individual supervision is available during the course

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass/Fail
According to criteria in the practical guide

Content scheduling

October to January-February

Further information

Approved work, consisting of theoretical framework to thesis, description of methodology used, collected datamaterial and the analysis of data has begun.
Use Instructions for writing a thesis and word template available on Novia homepage

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

The theoretical framework for thesis i suitable for the content and can be approved. The methodology is described and the data collection is almost done. The analysis of the data has begun. The thesis work is under construction.

Qualifications

VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

Objective

The student:
- demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
- demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

Content

Finnish (oral and written)

Location and time

Autumn 2025.

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Objective

Student:
- knows basic knowledge and science theory
- can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
- can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
- understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
- know different research methods and how they are used
- has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
- can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
- can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
- is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

Content

Research methodology, research process and care theory
Qualitative methods
Quantitative methods

Location and time

Autumn 2025
Alere, Novia + online

See time scedule

Materials

Qualitative methodology:
Alligood, M. (2022). Nursing Theorists and their work. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. (eller tidigare upplagor)

Birkler, J. (2022). Vetenskapsteori en grundbok. Stockholm: Liber.

Carlsson, T. & Georgsson, S. (2021). Forsknignsetik. Ingår i Oscarsson M & Gerorgsson S. (red.). Etik för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur, s 293- 308.

Forsknignsetiska delegationens dokument tenk.fi

Henricson, M. red. (2023). Vetenskapliglig teori och metod. Från idé till examination inom vård och hälsovetenskaper. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (eller tidigare upplagor)

Lundgren I, et al. (Eds.). (2022). Theories and perspectives for midwifery a Nordic view. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Wiklund Gustin, L. (2012). Omvårdnadsteorier i klinisk praxis. Natur och kultur.

+ annan valfri relevant litteratur.


Quantitative methodology:
som bredvidläsning rekommenderas
Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik,
samt av examinator anvisad litteratur

Teaching methods

Qualitative methods: lectures, written assignments, individual work and group work, tutorials, written exam.

Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

Compulsory presence

Employer connections

The students make an interview on a common topic that is agree on in class.

Exam schedules

Deadlines for assignments and written exam in Moodle

Completion alternatives

Qualitative methods:
4 assignments pass/ fail, see more details in Moodle
+ written exam 0-5
Validation according to Novia's general instructions.

Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)

See Novia's instructions for validation

Student workload

7 credits correspond to 189 hours of work for students.

Qualitative methodology 5cr:
Introduction 2h, lecture on interview including exercises 4h, research process 8h, qualitative content analysis including exercises 8h, midwifery, nursing or public health theory theory: recorded lectures in Moodle, tutorials and individual and group work to be submitted in Moodle.

Quantitative research methodology is 1.5 cr which is equivalent to 40.5 hours work of which 8 are scheduled lectures and seminars and the rest is the students' own work. assignment is submitted on a agreed date after the lectures.

Content scheduling

-

Further information

The course is arranged with midwifery students and the public health nurse students together.
More information about content in Moodle course
Compulsory presence on some parts mentioned in Moodle.

General feedback to the whole group, individual feedback on request.
Use Novia instructions for thesis in the assignments.
AI is not allowed to use unless it is explicitly encouraged.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

For written assignment 1-4 the grading is Pass/Fail
See details in Moodle
For exam grades 0-5
Max 20 points
11-12=1
13-14=2
15-16=3
17-18= 4
19-20=5
Questions in Moodle

Quantiative assignment is graded 1-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

A written assignment is failed when it doesn't fulfill the requirements for a passed grade. The requirements for passed grade are available at the Moodlepage (course realization) designed for the course
The examination is evaluated based on the answers given and if not the points all together reaches 50% of maximum the examination is failed.

The quantitative assignment is evaluated similarly, according to the relative proportion of correct answers.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

50-69% correct answers

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

70-89% correct answers

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

90-100% correct answers

Qualifications

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

Objective

Student:
- has evidence based knowledge of birth complications
- has the skills to be able to support the expectant parents during a birth with complications
- has the knowledge and ability to handle care individually and interprofessionally in the event of childbirth complications
- has in-depth knowledge of and can apply fetal monitoring
- has in-depth knowledge of suturing and masters various suturing techniques
- masters documentation and reporting during childbirth
- understands the importance of safe working methods in maternity care

Content

Instrumental delivery
Sectio
Breech delivery
Acute conditions during childbirth
Gemini
Foetus mortus
Fetal monitoring
Suturing
Documentation and reporting

Location and time

Spring term 2026

Materials

Paananen et al, Kätilötyö
Lindgren et al, Reproduktiv hälsa.
Backenbottenutbildning.se
ctg-utbildning.se
Käypähoito
Vårdhandboken
Moodle course Änglatröst
Articles according to the lecturers' instructions

Teaching methods

Lectures and discussions
Moodle course Änglatröst
Bäckenbottenutbildning.se
ctg-utbildning.se
Practical skills training, simulations
Individual assignments
Clinical Examination
Written exam

Completion alternatives

Written exam
Clinical examination
CTG-utbildning.se

Student workload

27h/cr, 3 cr = 81 h

Further information

External lecturer:
Gynecologist Päivi Kivelä - ctg
Hospital chaplain Ann-Sofi Nylund

Mandatory attendance at course introduction, clinical simulations and at lessons with external lecturers

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

For passing the course, the following are required:
Certificate of completed course "ctg-utbildning"
Approved written exam
Approved clinical examination
Presence at all mandatory lessons

General feedback on exam answers is given to the whole class at the same time, for individual feedback the teacher is contacted.
Feedback on practical skills is given directly in the situation.

Qualifications

BM22BK04 Intrapartum Care 1
BM22PR03 Intrapartum Midwifery 1

Objective

The student:
- masters the basics of providing first aid
- can act in crisis and disaster situations

Content

First aid
Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

Location and time

Hösten 2025

Materials

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Teaching methods

Lessons, demonstration, practice

Completion alternatives

Practical tests and theoretic test

Further information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
- masters the basics of providing first aid
- can act in crisis and disaster situations

Content

First aid
Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Teaching methods

Lessons, demonstration, practice

Completion alternatives

Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

Further information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
- has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
-has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
- has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
- has knowledge of various memory disorders
- masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
- has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
- masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
- can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
- has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
- has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

Content

Gerontology
Geriatrics
Acute geriatrics
Gerotechnology
Drug treatment for elderly
Nutrition for elderly

Location and time

Autumn 2025
Campus

Materials

Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.

+ recommended articles and literature at Moodle

Student workload

1c =27h
4c=108h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
The methodological literature is not used.
Reflections are not performed.
The technical design is lacking.
Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
The literature is referenced
Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
The technical design is satisfactory.
Refers concepts and basic principle
Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The questions are answered.
The methodological literature is applied.
The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
The technical design is good
Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
The literature is analyzed and applied.
The reflection is scientifically analytical.
The technical design is commendable.
Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
Makes versatile use of literature
Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
- understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
- can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
- can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
- can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
- has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
- can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

Content

Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
Prevention levels
Epidemiology
Health determinants
Ethical issues in health education
Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
Health promotion in different service environments
Artificial Intelligence

Location and time

Vasa, Alere
Hösten 2025

Materials

Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
Valda artiklar.
Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

Teaching methods

Föreläsning, diskussion, självstudier, grupparbete.

Exam schedules

Godkända individuella -och grupparbete.

Student workload

3 sp
1sp=27 timmar

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
- understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
- can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
- can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
- can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
- has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
- can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

Content

Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
Prevention levels
Epidemiology
Health determinants
Ethical issues in health education
Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
Health promotion in different service environments
Artificial Intelligence

Location and time

Novia, Vasa
Hösten 2025

Materials

Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
Valda artiklar.
Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

Teaching methods

Föreläsning, självstudier, grupparbete.

Exam schedules

Godkända individuella -och grupparbete.

Student workload

3 sp
1 sp = 27 timmar

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
- understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
- can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
- can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
- can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
- has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
- can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

Content

Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
Prevention levels
Epidemiology
Health determinants
Ethical issues in health education
Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
Health promotion in different service environments
Artificial Intelligence

Location and time

Hösterminen 2025, Novia

Teaching methods

Introduktion till kursen är på plats vid Alere, för övrigt finns föreläsningsmaterialet på Moodle, dvs Power Point och hänvisning till aktuella websidor finns på Moodle sidan. Till kursen hör individuella uppgifter och ett grupparbete/rapport.

Further information

Kursen är online och studierna förverkligas sjävständigt och i grupp.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
- can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
- has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
- can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
- has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
- can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

Content

Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

Location and time

Hösten 2025
YH Novia, Alere, Vasa

Materials

ENDOCRINOLOGI
Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.

RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
(vård vid lungsjukdomar)
Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma

KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle
Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kapitel. 8.
Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.

Teaching methods

Lectures, tutorials, workshops
SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

Exam schedules

Common exam for all parts

Further information

Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
Written exam is graded 0-5

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the most common gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological, gynecological disorders and breast disease conditions and understand their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
-have knowledge of early pregnancy complications, their care and treatment
- has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders
- can describe the physiology and anatomy of the digestive system, urinary tract, kidneys, and reproductive organs
- can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
- has the ability to assess the need for nursing care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
- can integrate health-promoting care in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological diseases, as well as support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care
- understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders

Content

Care of the patient with gastrointestinal disorders
Care of the patient with urological and nephrological disorders
Care of the patient with gynecological disorders

Location and time

Novia, Vasa Alere.

Hösten 2025

Materials

GYNEKOLOGICAL NURSING CARE
Bäckström, T., Kjolhede,P., Landgren, B-M (red) (2022). Gynekologi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Chapters: 1, 2(p. 33-35,37), 4, 5(p.65-66), 6, 7(p.89-94), 8, 11-13, 16-18, 20-23, 25, 27-30, 32, 34-35, 37-39.

UROLOGICAL CARE
Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2021). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.

Föreläsningar på moodle

GASTROINTESTINAL CARE
Föreläsningsmaterial och instuderingsfrågor på moodle.
Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.

Teaching methods

Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, quizz
Workshops and SimMan exercises are mandatory attendance

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

Two retake exams on genral examdays
Deadline for sexuality assignment
See time table and Moodle course for dates.

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia instructions
Common exam for all parts

Student workload

The course has two parts: gynaecologic care (2 cr), urologic care (1 cr) and gastrointenstinal care (2 cr)
Individual online assignment on sexuality.
Group work on cancer nursing and family planning
1 cr = 27 h. 5 cr= 135 h.

Gynecologic care: 16 h lectures, 2 h exam, 4 h individual work on sexuality assignment, 32 h individual work = 54 h

Written exam for all parts 3

Content scheduling

-

Further information

Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
Mandatory attendance at workshops and the SimMan exercises.
Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

Written exam on Moodle with SEB in class, no paper exams.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, can reflect and motivate their positions

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Accepted written exam for both parts
Grade 0-5
Gynaecologic care 15 points
Gastrointestinal care 30 points
Urologic unhealth 15 points
= totalt 60 points

Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
- can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
- has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
- can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
- can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
- has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
- understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
- can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

Content

Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
Care of the patient with neurological disorders
Care of the patient with hematological disorders
Care of the patient with sensory disorders

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
Autumn 2025

Materials

MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
Andersson, R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red). (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap. 10. Allmän ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red). (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi. Kap. 28. Ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 21 och 22. Stockholm: Liber AB.
Föreläsningar på Moodle

NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
Andersson R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). (2020). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 23 och 24. Stockholm: Liber AB,
Föreläsningar på Moodle

HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
Stubberud, D-G, Almås H.& Gronseth, R.(red). 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 28 (delar). Stockholm: Liber AB.
Material på Moodle.

SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle.

Övrigt:
Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.

Referenslitteratur:
Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
Ekwall, A. & Jansson, M. (2022). Omvårdnad och medicin.
Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.

Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

Teaching methods

Lectures
Self-studies
Workshops (case & practice)

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Further information

Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
Mandatory attendance at workshops.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Written exam: points < 50%

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Written exam: points 70%-89%

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
- reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
- can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
- is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
- can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

Content

Study information and information retrieval
Learning in an academic context
Data protection and data security
Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
Reliable source material and source criticism
Oral and written presentation
Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

Location and time

Online / teams autumn 2025

Teaching methods

Introduction
Self Studies

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
- reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
- can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
- is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
- can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

Content

Study information and information retrieval
Learning in an academic context
Data protection and data security
Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
Reliable source material and source criticism
Oral and written presentation
Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

Location and time

Communication:
- Contact teaching in class
- Remote group work or in class
- Contact the teacher via Microsoft Teams according to given times

Introduction to academic studies:
- According to schedule. Compulsary attendance

Materials

Communication
Novia's instructions for degree projects.
Materials on Moodle

Teaching methods

Communication: Swedish 3 cr
- Lectures on scientific writing
- Lectures on oral presentation
- Group work in scientific writing
- Exercises in oral presentation
- Oral presentations that are analyzed

Introduction to academic studies 1 cr:
- Lecturers, presentations,
- Virtual on line test.
- Virtual test ( library )

More course information can be found on Moodle platform

Exam schedules

Communication: Assessed group work and assessed oral presentation at the end of the course.

Introduction to academic studies: virtual tests

Student workload

One (1) credit corresponds to 27 hours of work for the student.
This course is 4 credits which means 108 hours of work for this course.

The course is divided according to:
3 credits Communication/Swedish (Language teacher)
1 ECTS Introduction (Marie Hjortell and Terese Österberg)

Further information

Introduction to university studies 1 cr:
Study information and information search
Learning in a university context
Data protection and data security

Communication for midwives/public health nurses 3 credits:
Scientific writing in Swedish and literature searches manually and in databases
Reliable source material and source criticism
Oral and written presentation
E-mail handling and use of social media in care work

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Communication

Student
- can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way, in accordance with the requirements of working life and social life.
knows the work process of scientific writing and can use referencing systems.
- is aware of different ways to search for information and can report according to the rules for standard reporting.
Students with Finnish as the language of schooling must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required of public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should demonstrate satisfactory (grade 1-3) or good (grade 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written skills are assessed separately.
Prerequisites
No prior knowledge requirements

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Kommunikation:
Underkänd
Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Communication:
Assessment criteria - satisfactory-extremely satisfactory (1-2)
Students demonstrate a superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Communication:
Assessment criteria - good-extremely good (3-4)
• Students demonstrate a competence that is related and linked to the literature
• Students can reflect and justify their own points of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Communication:
Assessment criteria - excellent (5)
• Students have in-depth competence and show a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the future profession

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
- reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
- can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
- is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
- can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

Content

Study information and information retrieval
Learning in an academic context
Data protection and data security
Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
Reliable source material and source criticism
Oral and written presentation
Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

Location and time

Communication:
- Contact teaching in class
- Remote group work or in class
- Contact the teacher via Microsoft Teams according to given times

Introduction to academic studies: According to schedule

Materials

Communication:
Novia's instructions for degree projects.
Materials on Moodle

Introduction: Materials on Moodle

Teaching methods

Communication - Swedish 3 cr:
- Lectures on scientific writing
- Lectures on oral presentation
- Group work in scientific writing
- Exercises in oral presentation
- Oral presentations that are analyzed

Introduction to academic studies 1 cr: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test. More course information can be found in Moodle platform

Exam schedules

Communication: Assessed group work and assessed oral presentation at the end of the course.

Introduction to academic studies: virtual tests

Student workload

27 h/cr

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student do not have a sufficient knowledge and competence about the topic.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Communication:
Assessment criteria - satisfactory-extremely satisfactory (1-2)
Students demonstrate a superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Communication:
Assessment criteria - good-extremely good (3-4)
• Students demonstrate a competence that is related and linked to the literature
• Students can reflect and justify their own points of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Assessment criteria - excellent (5)
• Students have in-depth competence and show a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the future profession

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
- reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
- can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
- is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
- can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

Content

Study information and information retrieval
Learning in an academic context
Data protection and data security
Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
Reliable source material and source criticism
Oral and written presentation
Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

Location and time

Communication:
- Contact teaching in class
- Remote group work or in class
- Contact the teacher via Microsoft Teams according to given times

Introduction to academic studies: According to schedule

Materials

Communication:
Novia's instructions for degree projects.
Materials on Moodle

Introduction: Materials on Moodle

Teaching methods

Communication - Swedish 3 cr:
- Lectures on scientific writing
- Lectures on oral presentation
- Exercises on scientific writing
- Exercises on oral presentation
- Oral presentations that are analyzed

Introduction to academic studies 1 cr: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test. More course information can be found in Moodle platform

Exam schedules

Communication: Assessed essay and assessed oral presentation at the end of the course.

Introduction to academic studies: virtual tests

Student workload

27 h/cr

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student do not have a sufficient knowledge and competence about the topic.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Communication:
Assessment criteria - satisfactory-extremely satisfactory (1-2)
Students demonstrate a superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Communication:
Assessment criteria - good-extremely good (3-4)
• Students demonstrate a competence that is related and linked to the literature
• Students can reflect and justify their own points of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Assessment criteria - excellent (5)
• Students have in-depth competence and show a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the future profession

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
- has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
- has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
- understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

Content

Clinical pharmacology

Location and time

Fall semester 2025

Materials

Found in Moodle.

Teaching methods

Blended learning

Exam schedules

Assignments.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
- has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
- has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
- understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

Content

Clinical pharmacology

Location and time

100% online course

Materials

Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
Läkemedelsboken online 2025
Fimea,fi
https://laakeinfo.fi/
Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

Teaching methods

Online 100%
Groupdiscussions/workshops online
selfstudes with assignmetas and short tests
recorded lectures
forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
Final online test / multiple choice

Exam schedules

Short micro learning assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy
Reflection
Final test online
The test can be done first after all assignmenst are handed in

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr


Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

Qualifications

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
- has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
- has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
- understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

Content

Clinical pharmacology

Location and time

Fall semester 2025

Materials

Found at Moodle.

Teaching methods

Blended learning. Online course.

Exam schedules

Assignments.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
- knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
- can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
- can name the most common pathogenic microbes
- understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
- understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
- understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
- understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
- can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
- can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
- have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
- can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
- understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

Content

Clinical microbiology
Immunology
Pathology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

Student:
- can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
- can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
- can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
- can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
- has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

Content

Simulation exercises based on case
IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
Blood transfusions
PICC and CVK
Use of perfusor
Inhalation drugs
Fluid balance sheet
CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
Medical radiation and radiation protection

Location and time

2025
University of Applied Science, Alere, Vasa

Materials

KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
Moodleföreläsningar.

RESUSCITATION;
Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
Moodleföreläsningar.

LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

RADIATION SAFETY: Strålsäkerhetslagen, Statsrådets förordning om joniserande strålning, Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets förordning om joniserande strålning, S-föreskrifterna, Radiologi (2022, Blomqvist, L. & Zackrisson, S.)

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

Exam schedules

Red Cross blood web-course made last
Clinical exam week
Resuscitation test according to schedule
Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved individual tasks and exercises.
Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
On-line examination in radiation safety, Grade: Approved/Failed

Further information

Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
See Moodle for more information.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

Student:
- can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
- can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
- can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
- can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
- has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

Content

Simulation exercises based on case
IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
Blood transfusions
PICC and CVK
Use of perfusor
Inhalation drugs
Fluid balance sheet
CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
Medical radiation and radiation protection

Location and time

Autumn 2025
University of Applied Science, Alere, Vasa

Materials

KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
Moodleföreläsningar.

RESUSCITATION;
Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
Moodleföreläsningar.

LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

Exam schedules

Red Cross blood web-course made last
Clinical exam week
Resuscitation test according to schedule
Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved individual tasks and exercises.
Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
Radiation safety: Grade Approved/ Failed

Further information

Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
See Moodle for more information!

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
- has basic knowledge of pharmacology
- masters the aseptics of drug treatment
- masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
- has skills in administration of injections
- can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
- has insight into theory for prescriptions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
- masters drug calculation at a basic level

Content

Legislation
Pharmacology
Aseptics and route of administration
Theory for prescriptions
Patient guidance and documentation
Drug calculation
Administration of injections

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848

Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14)
eller
Nordeng, H, och Spigset, O. 2020. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)

WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar

Lääketietokanta, Lääkkeet ja hinnat och lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti
eller
FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0

Molin et al 2016. Träna Läkemedelsberäkning Liber, Stockholm
eller
Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor. eller
Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.

Rekommenderad litteratur:
Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Aktuella artiklar och material enligt föreläsarens anvisningar på finska /engelska

Teaching methods

seminars , lectures, groupwork
Selfstuides in moodle
Clinical exercises and examination on campus

Exam schedules

Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
Calcularion test in class after workshops
Re test on days for re test on campus
clinical examination in injections according to schedule

Student workload

27 h/credit

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
- has basic knowledge of pharmacology
- masters the aseptics of drug treatment
- masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
- has skills in administration of injections
- can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
- has insight into theory for prescriptions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
- masters drug calculation at a basic level

Content

Legislation
Pharmacology
Aseptics and route of administration
Theory for prescriptions
Patient guidance and documentation
Drug calculation
Administration of injections

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
- has basic knowledge of pharmacology
- masters the aseptics of drug treatment
- masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
- has skills in administration of injections
- can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
- has insight into theory for prescriptions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
- masters drug calculation at a basic level

Content

Legislation
Pharmacology
Aseptics and route of administration
Theory for prescriptions
Patient guidance and documentation
Drug calculation
Administration of injections

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
- will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
- will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
- will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
- will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
- will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

Content

Physiology of the human body
The anatomy of the human body

Location and time

Autumn 2025 according to the schedule

Materials

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended literature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Teaching methods

Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
Självständiga studier.

Exam schedules

Course examination: to be announce
Re-examination

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle platform

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
- will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
- will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
- will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
- will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
- will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

Content

Physiology of the human body
The anatomy of the human body

Location and time

Campus Alere, Vaasa: Introduction to the course and course examination held at campus during autumn 2025
Tutoring online

Materials

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended literature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2021, 2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Teaching methods

Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
Självständiga studier.

Exam schedules

Course examination 05.11.2025
Re-examination 12.12.2025, 06.02.2026 and 08.05.2026

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle platform

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

Student:
- can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
- knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
- can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
- can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
- can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
- understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
- understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

Content

The basics of palliative care
Pain and symptom treatment
Holistic support for patients and relatives
Interaction and encounters
Care in the final stages of life
Care of the deceased
Ethics and law
Interprofessional teamwork

Location and time

Hösten 2025

Materials

Recommended literature in Moodle

Teaching methods

Introduction lecture - compulsory
Work shop -Escape Game- Compulsory

Completion alternatives

Individual case study
Online Exam

Student workload

1 c =27h
2 c =54

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Case study is graded 0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Qualifications

VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

Student:
- can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
- knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
- can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
- can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
- can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
- understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
- understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

Content

The basics of palliative care
Pain and symptom treatment
Holistic support for patients and relatives
Interaction and encounters
Care in the final stages of life
Care of the deceased
Ethics and law
Interprofessional teamwork

Location and time

Fall 2025 15.9-19.10

Materials

Recommended literature in Moodle

Teaching methods

Case
THL palliativa kompetenspass
Escape Game

Completion alternatives

Online
Escape Game på Campus

Student workload

2cr = 54 h

Further information

Escape Game compulsory

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Case exam grade 0-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Qualifications

VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

Student:
-can describe conditions for and challenges with the work regarding patient and client safety within the social and health care areas of activity
- knows the laws and recommendations regarding and the supervision of patient and client safety in Finland
- knows how digital systems ensure patient safety by predicting risks, risk management, reporting and follow-up
- can describe opportunities and challenges in ensuring client and patient safety when using digital e-Health services
- can describe what a safety culture entails when healthcare is digitized
- reflects on ethical positions for the patient / client in the digital world

Content

Patient safety today and tomorrow
Welfare technology as a tool that supports patient and client safety
Security for the patient and the client in the digital world

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

Vasa: VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care, VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basics Care
Åbo: Radiation Safety within course USS22UV01 Care and Radiation Safety

Objective

Student:
-can describe conditions for and challenges with the work regarding patient and client safety within the social and health care areas of activity
- knows the laws and recommendations regarding and the supervision of patient and client safety in Finland
- knows how digital systems ensure patient safety by predicting risks, risk management, reporting and follow-up
- can describe opportunities and challenges in ensuring client and patient safety when using digital e-Health services
- can describe what a safety culture entails when healthcare is digitized
- reflects on ethical positions for the patient / client in the digital world

Content

Patient safety today and tomorrow
Welfare technology as a tool that supports patient and client safety
Security for the patient and the client in the digital world

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

All study material is available in the moodle course.

Teaching methods

Virtual course with recorded lectures on Moodle, discussions on the Moodle platform, written exercises.

Exam schedules

The course is examined through two smaller written assignments and a self-correcting test. All information is submitted no later than the end of the course.

Student workload

1 cr = 27 hours

Further information

Prerequisites before the course: THL's webcourse Patient safety through knowledge and skills.

In this course, Moodle acts as a platform where all the material is available: instructional videos, lecture materials, a list of the course objectives and content, course literature, instructions for assignments and so on.

The course lasts for six weeks, and consists of three parts (each part lasts for two weeks). It is therefore important to keep up and be active during the course.

The course material is partly in Swedish and partly in Finnish.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is assessed according to the scale 1-5. It is the assignments that are assessed, but e.g. a lively and reflective participation in the discussions can raise the grade.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.

In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.

To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

Qualifications

Vasa: VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care, VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basics Care
Åbo: Radiation Safety within course USS22UV01 Care and Radiation Safety

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
- can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
- have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
- has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
- has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
- can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

Content

Preoperative and postoperative care
Anesthesiological care
Intraoperative care

Location and time

Autumn 2025
YH Novia, Vasa, Alere

Materials

PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
Terveysportti

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, films, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

Exam schedules

Individual tasks and exercises.
Clinical examination
Moodle online tent.

Completion alternatives

Individual tasks and exercises.
Clinical examination
Moodle online tent.

Student workload

3 cr = 81 h
Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
Theory 4 h + 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 3
Study on your own
ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
8+8 h practical in operation room
Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

Further information

Mandatory attendance at exercises
Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
See Moodle for more detailed information!

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved individual tasks and exercises.
Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

Student:
- can plan, implement and evaluate basic care under supervision
- can apply evidence-based methods in basic care
- can show collegiality and demonstrate employee competence
- can work in interprofessional teams
- can professionally treat patients and relatives
- can supervise patients in basic care
- can perform safe drug treatment under supervision
- understand the importance of patient and client safety
- masters the central knowledge base for patient and client safety
- can promote patient safety and prevent risk situations

Content

Clinical practice under supervision
Patient safety

Teaching methods

Clinical practice 6 ects
Patient Safety 1 ects

Further information

Mandatory attendance during practice.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
- has achieved satisfactory goals for the internship section
- can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
- follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- knows the values ​​and consider the ethical principlesStudent:
- has achieved satisfactory goals for the internship section
- can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
- follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- knows the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team/student group

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

Further information

The course includes: Patient safety through knowledge and skills - web training from THL / Institute for Health and Welfare

Objective

Student:
- can plan, implement and evaluate basic care under supervision
- can apply evidence-based methods in basic care
- can show collegiality and demonstrate employee competence
- can work in interprofessional teams
- can professionally treat patients and relatives
- can supervise patients in basic care
- can perform safe drug treatment under supervision
- understand the importance of patient and client safety
- masters the central knowledge base for patient and client safety
- can promote patient safety and prevent risk situations

Content

Clinical practice under supervision
Patient safety

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
- has achieved satisfactory goals for the internship section
- can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
- follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- knows the values ​​and consider the ethical principlesStudent:
- has achieved satisfactory goals for the internship section
- can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
- follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- knows the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

Further information

The course includes: Patient safety through knowledge and skills - web training from THL / Institute for Health and Welfare

Objective

Student:
- can plan, implement and evaluate basic care under supervision
- can apply evidence-based methods in basic care
- can show collegiality and demonstrate employee competence
- can work in interprofessional teams
- can professionally treat patients and relatives
- can supervise patients in basic care
- can perform safe drug treatment under supervision
- understand the importance of patient and client safety
- masters the central knowledge base for patient and client safety
- can promote patient safety and prevent risk situations

Content

Clinical practice under supervision
Patient safety

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
- has achieved satisfactory goals for the internship section
- can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
- follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- knows the values ​​and consider the ethical principlesStudent:
- has achieved satisfactory goals for the internship section
- can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
- follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- knows the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

Further information

The course includes: Patient safety through knowledge and skills - web training from THL / Institute for Health and Welfare

Objective

Student:
- can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
- can apply evidence-based methods within gynaecology
- can document and report
- can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
- can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
- can professionally treat patients and relatives
- respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
- can supervise patient

Content

Clinical practice under supervision

Location and time

The course is conducted during 2025-2026.
Information and seminar are held at Alere.
Supervised clinical practice in gynaecological context according to individual internship plan.

Materials

Scientific articles
www.kaypahoito.fi
www.vårdhandboken.se

Teaching methods

Supervised clinical practice in gynaecological context.
Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
Individual reflections and case.
Information and seminar.

Exam schedules

All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

Completion alternatives

Performed and approved clinical practice.
Reflection diary.
Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
Participation in internship seminar.

Student workload

27h / cr
1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
-can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
-follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team
Can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
Seminar mandatory.
Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

Qualifications

BM22BK08 Gynaecological Midwifery

Objective

The student:
- can, under supervision in multiprofessional collaboration, plan, perform, and evaluate person-centered - care in gynecological midwifery and promotion of sexual and reproductive health
- can apply evidence-based methods in women's health
- can document and report
- can plan, perform, and evaluate safe medication administration
- can identify ethical issues and demonstrate an ethical approach
- can professionally interact with patients/clients and relatives
- considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
- can guide patients and clients

Content

Clinical practice under supervision and evaluation

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student:
- has achieved satisfactory goals for the internship section
- can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
- follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team

Qualifications

BM22BK08 Gynaecological Midwifery
BM22BK09 Sexual Health

Objective

Student:
- can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
- can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
- can document and report
- can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
- can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
- can professionally treat patients and relatives
- considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
- can supervise patients
- can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

Content

Clinical practice under supervision
Simulation exercises

Location and time

Autumn 2025
Internal medicine, surgery and community hospital departments within the Ostrobothnian welfare area

Materials

See Moodle for more information:
About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
About assignments

Teaching methods

Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

Employer connections

Simulation exercises
Clinical practice in different contexts

Exam schedules

Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
Internship info, Mandatory attendance
Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

International connections

Students can practice abroad

Completion alternatives

Approved internship
Approved assignments
Participation in internship seminar

Student workload

The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.

Internship info 3h/student
Simulations 6 h/student
Internship seminar 3 h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Students:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team/student group

Further information

Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
-can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
-follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

In order to pass the course, students must
- participated in the simulation exercises.
- participated in practice information
- have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
- all practical assignments must be approved.
- participated in practical seminar
- practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

Student:
- can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
- can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
- can document and report
- can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
- can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
- can professionally treat patients and relatives
- considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
- can supervise patients
- can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

Content

Clinical practice under supervision
Simulation exercises

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
-can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
-follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team

Qualifications

VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

Student:
- can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
- can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
- can document and report
- can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
- can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
- can professionally treat patients and relatives
- considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
- can supervise patients
- can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

Content

Clinical practice under supervision
Simulation exercises

Location and time

Autumn 2025
Internal medicine, surgery and community hospital departments within the Ostrobothnian welfare area

Materials

See Moodle for more information:
About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
About assignments

Teaching methods

Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

Employer connections

Simulation exercises
Clinical practice in different contexts

Exam schedules

Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
Internship info, Mandatory attendance
Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

International connections

Students can practice abroad

Completion alternatives

Approved internship
Approved assignments
Participation in internship seminar

Student workload

The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.

Internship info 3h/student
Simulations 6 h/student
Internship seminar 3 h
Independent reading 15 h Total 27 h.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Students:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team/student group

Further information

Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
-can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
-follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

In order to pass the course, students must
- participated in the simulation exercises.
- participated in practice information
- have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
- all practical assignments must be approved.
- participated in practical seminar
- practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

Student
- applies evidence-based knowledge in the psychiatric and substance abuse care context
- identifies and interprets the patient's / client's problems regarding mental illness and substance abuse / addiction
- creates an understanding for the client / patient, shows respect and treats him as an expert on his own life
- assesses, plans, implements, evaluates and documents the patient's / client's care under supervision
- creates a good care relationship with the client / patient and relatives and demonstrates a professional approach
- can perform a safe drug treatment
- understands the importance of and has the ability to collaborate with different professional groups within the care team
- has the skills and ability to provide first aid for mental illness

Content

Clinical practice under supervision
Acute crisis, crisis management, treatment of victims of violence
First aid for mental illness

Location and time

Autumn 2025

Teaching methods

Part 1: Workshop på KTC
Part 2: Clinical practice

Completion alternatives

Part 1: Workshop 2 days at CTC
Compulsory attendance

Part 2: Clinical practice
Approved clinical practice
Written assignments
Participation i seminars

Student workload

38h/week

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
B Interest and motivation
• is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
• follows the work list and respects agreed times
• can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
C Knowledge and skills
• mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
• can perform tasks under supervision
• has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
• can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
• makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
• is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
D Collaboration and response
• can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
• can work with others within the work team
Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
B Interest and motivation
• has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
• does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
C Knowledge and skills
• does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
• has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
• lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
• has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
D Collaboration and response
• possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
• shows an unprofessional attitude

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
-can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
-follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team
Can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

Part 1: Workshop
Compulsory attendance

Del 2: Clinical practice
Approved practice
Approved written assignments

Qualifications

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22KV12 Mental and Substance Abuse Care

Objective

Student
- applies evidence-based knowledge in the psychiatric and substance abuse care context
- identifies and interprets the patient's / client's problems regarding mental illness and substance abuse / addiction
- creates an understanding for the client / patient, shows respect and treats him as an expert on his own life
- assesses, plans, implements, evaluates and documents the patient's / client's care under supervision
- creates a good care relationship with the client / patient and relatives and demonstrates a professional approach
- can perform a safe drug treatment
- understands the importance of and has the ability to collaborate with different professional groups within the care team
- has the skills and ability to provide first aid for mental illness

Content

Clinical practice under supervision
Acute crisis, crisis management, treatment of victims of violence
First aid for mental illness

Location and time

Autumn 2025

Teaching methods

Part 1: Workshop på KTC
Part 2: Clinical practice

Completion alternatives

Part 1: Workshop 2 days at CTC
Compulsory attendance

Part 2: Clinical practice
Approved clinical practice
Written assignments
Participation i seminars

Student workload

38h/week

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
B Interest and motivation
• is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
• follows the work list and respects agreed times
• can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
C Knowledge and skills
• mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
• can perform tasks under supervision
• has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
• can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
• makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
• is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
D Collaboration and response
• can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
• can work with others within the work team
Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
B Interest and motivation
• has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
• does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
C Knowledge and skills
• does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
• has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
• lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
• has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
D Collaboration and response
• possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
• shows an unprofessional attitude

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
-can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
-follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team
Can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

Part 1: Workshop
Compulsory attendance

Del 2: Clinical practice
Approved practice
Approved written assignments

Qualifications

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
VÅV22KV12 Mental and Substance Abuse Care

Objective

Student:
- can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
- can apply evidence-based methods in primary care
- has knowledge of and understanding of patient care in the home environment
- understands the importance of the home and relatives for the patient
- can document and report
- can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
- can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
- can in a professional manner treat patients and relatives
- respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
- can supervise patients

Content

Clinical practice under supervision in different primary care contexts

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student:
- can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
- follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning
- for the most part, works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work step
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate with and respond to patients / clients
- can work with others in the work team

Qualifications

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

Objective

Student:
- can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
- can apply evidence-based methods in primary care
- has knowledge of and understanding of patient care in the home environment
- understands the importance of the home and relatives for the patient
- can document and report
- can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
- can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
- can in a professional manner treat patients and relatives
- respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
- can supervise patients

Content

Clinical practice under supervision in different primary care contexts

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student:
- can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
- follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning
- for the most part, works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work step
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate with and respond to patients / clients
- can work with others in the work team

Qualifications

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

Objective

Student:
- can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
- can apply evidence-based methods in primary care
- has knowledge of and understanding of patient care in the home environment
- understands the importance of the home and relatives for the patient
- can document and report
- can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
- can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
- can in a professional manner treat patients and relatives
- respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
- can supervise patients

Content

Clinical practice under supervision in different primary care contexts

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student:
- can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
- follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning
- for the most part, works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work step
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate with and respond to patients / clients
- can work with others in the work team

Qualifications

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

Objective

Student
- mastered midwifery knowledge during puerperium
- can assess, plan, implement and evaluate the mother's and the child's care during puerperium and document it according to national documentation systems
- can work family-centered in the support of the new family
- can create a good care relationship with the woman and her family and demonstrate a professional approach
- can apply evidence-based knowledge within postnatal care
- can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
- masters safe drug treatment
- considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care

Content

Clinical midwifery during the postnatal period

Location and time

The course is conducted during the autumn term 2025 (part 1) and 2026 (part 2).
Information and seminar are held at Alere.
Supervised clinical practice at maternity ward (postnatal care) according to individual internship plan.

Materials

Scientific articles
www.kaypahoito.fi
www.vårdhandboken.se

Teaching methods

Supervised clinical practice in postnatal care.
Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
Individual reflections and case.
Information and seminar.

Exam schedules

All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

Completion alternatives

Performed and approved clinical practice.
Reflection diary.
Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
Participation in internship seminar.

Student workload

27h / cr
1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
-can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
-follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
Seminar mandatory.
Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

Qualifications

BM22BK03 Antenatal Midwifery
BM22BK04 Intrapartum Care 1
BM22BK06 Postpartum Care and Breastfeeding Counselling

Objective

Student:
- understands the physiological course of childbirth
- can plan, implement, evaluate and document care during normal childbirth
- understands and can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth
can, in collaboration with the woman giving birth, realize pain relief
- has basic skills in handling care in case of delivery complications and abnormal births in collaboration with the care team
- masters safe drug treatment
- can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
- can professionally treat patients and relatives
- consider patient safety and apply aseptic principles in patient care

Content

Clinical intrapartum care

Location and time

The course is conducted during the autumn term 2025.
Information and seminar are held at Alere.
Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward according to individual internship plan.

Materials

Scientific articles
www.kaypahoito.fi
www.vårdhandboken.se

Teaching methods

Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
Individual reflections and case.
Information and seminar.

Exam schedules

All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

Completion alternatives

Performed and approved clinical practice.
Reflection diary.
Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
Participation in internship seminar.

Student workload

27h / cr
1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
-can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
-follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
Seminar mandatory
Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

Qualifications

BM22BK03 Antenatal Midwifery
BM22BK04 Intrapartum Care 1
BM22BK06 Postpartum Care and Breastfeeding Counselling

Objective

Student:
- has in-depth knowledge of sexual health and sexology
- can guide and support clients in issues related to sexual health and family planning
- has learning and guidance skills
- can work to ensure that all people can maintain their sexual health in dignity and equality

Content

Sexual and reproductive health
The midwife as a promoter of sexual health
The different dimensions of sexuality
Sexual rights
Family planning

Location and time

September 2025

Materials

Paananen m.fl., 2021, Edita, Helsingfors.

Ryttyläinen K. & Valkama S., 2010, Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä, Edita, Helsingfors

Reija Klemetti & Eija Raussi-Lehto (red.), Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta – Seksuaali- ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014–2020, Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. Opas 33/2014.

According to the lecturer's instructions

Teaching methods

Lectures
Discussions
Self studies

Student workload

27 h/cr

Further information

Course introduction is compulsory

Feedback on the lesson in sexual health is given in writing to each group individually

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Plan and conduct a lesson in sexual health
Active participation in discussions
Approved individual assignment

Qualifications

Study units:
VÅV22GV
VÅV22HF
VÅV22KV
VÅV22PR

and the course BM22BK01

Objective

- has knowledge of their own professional field, the history and development of care science
- has knowledge of and can reflect on basic concepts in care science
- knows the basic competence requirements for their own profession
- understand the importance of evidence-based care
- can describe the organization of social and health care in Finland and the legislation that governs the activities
- has knowledge of service systems and the patient's / client's social benefits
- have basic skills in interprofessional work
- understands and can reflect on ethical guidelines and profession-specific ethical codes and can in his future profession work on the basis of these
- understands the importance of culture in healthcare and can respond to clients / patients from different cultures
- has knowledge about The Agenda for Sustainable Development 2030 and its implementation at Novia
- is aware of the importance of internal sustainability based on the demands placed on the profession and can maintain good health

Content

Caring science knowledge and evidence as a basis for care
The importance of the nursing and public health nursing profession
Work areas of nurse and midwife
Health care in Finland
Management structures, different sustainable service environments and service systems
General laws in social and health care
Interprofessional work
The client's / patient's position and rights
Ethical guidelines and codes
Professional encounters
Person centered care
Intercultural care
Internal sustainability in the profession

Location and time

On campus Alere
Autumn 2025

Materials

NURSING SCIENCE (Choose at least one book)
Alligood, M. R. (2014). Nursing theorists and their work (Eighth edition.). Elsevier.
Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2022. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
kapitel 1-3, 5
Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
Learner, H. 2025. Att defininiera hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Rehnsfeldt, A. & Arman, M. (red.). 2020. Klinisk vårdvetenskap. Vårdande på teoretisk grund. Stockholm: Liber Ab.
Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.

NURSING ETHICS
Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
kapitel 4.

INTERKULTURELL VÅRD (Choose at least one book)
Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Ekblad, S, (red.).Hälsa och mångfald: ett kliniskt perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.
Wellman
+ links on Moodle

Social and Health care organization and the Sote reform
acts on www.finlex.fi
links on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, group work, individual work, optional study visit at Vaasa Central Hospital
Workshop/seminars (compulsory attendance)

Employer connections

Nurses association, midwifery association
Wefare county, Tehy

Exam schedules

Nursing Ethics: 7 Online Tests. Examiner: Anita Wikberg
Nursing Sciences + Intercultural Care. Interview and group work. Examiner: Anita Wikberg
Social and health care organisation, Sote, legistlation: assignments and group work. Examiner Anita Wikberg
Sustainable development, assignments Examiner: Anita Wikberg
Compulsory attendance during Hub 11th of September
Own profession individual work. Examiner Terese Österberg/ Frida Gädda

International connections

Interview with someone with a different cultural background
Hub with Swedish universities

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia's instructions

Student workload

Nursing science and intercultural care: lectures, discussions, interview, group work, assignment, seminars = 48h.
Nursing ethics 1h introduction, 21h own reading and implementation of tests
Sote and legislation: lectures + group work, discussions and seminars = 54h
Own profession and sustainable development: lectures and material other own reading and implementation + individual task = 27h
Participation in Hub and sustainable development 11h

Content scheduling

-

Further information

Introductions, some lectures (see Moodle), seminar are mandatory and mandatory attendance.
Other lectures are recommended, submission of assignments before deadlines.
Content and materials can be found in Moodle.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Nursing ethics assessed Pass/ Fail 4/5 = 80% pass.

The assignment (caring science + intercultural care) is assessed with grades 0-5
21-24pints = grade 1
25-28=2
29-32=3
33-36=4
37-40=5

Criteria for evaluation Max score 40
Criteria for evaluation Max score 40:
- Have chosen a relevant term and described it 10
- Referenced to one of the recommended books on each subject of health sciences and
intercultural care 2
- Described the culture, ethnic group 10
- Referenced a scientific article/study (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and concept e.g. health of Vietnamese. Told about the result 3
- Interviewed a person from a culture other than their own. Told about the result. The questions in Annex. 2
- Reflection 3
- Followed Novia's instructions before degree project especially references 2
- 9 pages of text on 3 stud., 5-6 on 2 stud. 1
- Extra Literature 1
- Something else extra in addition to what was required, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
- Comments on other people's work on Moodle 3
- Submitted on agreed date 1

The health care organization is assessed 0-5

Own work on the profession and sustainable development is assessed pass/fail

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Criterias for grade 1 is not reached

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

See above

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

See above

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

See above

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

Student:
- can produce a developmental project in midwifery that is to be based on individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in sexual and reproductive health for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- shows the ability to deepen and develop the substance knowledge in midwifery
- develops innovatively midwifery from a societal or working life perspective (eg within projects)
- can reflect on, maintain and apply evidence-based knowledge

Content

Developmental project in midwifery

Location and time

Alere
Autumn 2025, spring 2026

Materials

According to the chosen theme
Documents from Finnish National Board on Research ethics (www.tenk.fi)

Teaching methods

Introduction, independent work with supervision, seminar

Employer connections

The work may be ordered from Health Care Center, hospital or other care institution

Exam schedules

Presentation of development work in November 2025 or in May 2026

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

A finished product and presentation of development project

Student workload

3 h introduction
4 h seminars
128 h individual work, with supervision

Content scheduling

-

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

See separate document for assessment criteria (available in Moodle)

Assessment criteria, good (3)

See separate document for assessment criteria (available in Moodle)

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

See separate document for assessment criteria (available in Moodle)

Assessment methods and criteria

The development work is evaluated 1-5
Criteria for evaluation:
Starting point for and goal of the development work
The theoretical foundation of development work
Area of ​​use for the development work
Critical review of development work, process and product

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The development work does not fulfill the criterion for achieving 1

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The purpose of the development work is unclearly formulated and the objective is not relevant or unclearly explained. The work includes all relevant parts but they are inadequately described
The purpose and objectives remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge in the thematic area. The relevance of the development work is described, albeit superficially, and the delimitation is deficient
Justification for choosing background material / frame of reference is missing or is scarce / inconsistent. Ability to source criticism is lacking
Students' choice of background material / frame of reference is partly relevant. The ability to critique sources is weak. The process description / method description is based on literature but it is not fully applied as described. The process / method is not well chosen considering the product
The product / study is inadequately presented, has a greater anchoring in the respondents' own perception than in theory and expectations from working life. It requires extensive processing to be able to be used / published / distributed
The product is well presented, but the anchoring in the needs of working life is weakly substantiated and the product / information can form the basis for further processing before a possible spread. The description and motivation for choosing a product / study is very deficient and not entirely appropriate in terms of purpose, issues and area of ​​use.
The description of and motivation for choosing a product / study method is weak. There are some errors in the product / study and the discussion and reflection on the implementation of the study / product is deficient.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The motivation for choosing a theme area is universal and the goal is clear but could be more clearly justified. The development work is clearly delimited.
The development work is clearly and logically structured and reflects purpose and objectives and a good ability to apply a scientific approach (with practical roots). The work includes all relevant parts and the parts are proportional in relation to each other
The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and sufficient basic material (eg data material for analysis) has been used
The process description / method description is based on literature and there is a clear approach to anchoring the product's development in the process description / method. The process / method is well chosen with the product in mind. The respondent / respondents can reflect on the choice of process / method and discuss this.
Background / frame of reference well described, motivated, relevant and forms a good basis for the development work. The ability to critique sources is good. The process description / method description is well chosen with the product in mind, well described and is well rooted in literature. The process is carried out in accordance with the description and well described. The respondent / respondents are able to reflect and critically examine the choice and the discussion concerning the choice and the description of the process / method is well implemented.

The product / study is carefully carried out but has little grounding in working life and requires processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life requires a certain amount of processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
The choice and justification of the method for the product / study is appropriate. The use of traditional methods (for both product and study) is good. The critical review is weak.
The description of method and approach is good and based on a good motivation. The respondent (s) master their methods well, and there is a clear connection to the purpose of the product / study. In the critical review of planning and implementation, the respondents show awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the product / study.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The development work is current and innovative and develops the student's professional knowledge. The purpose and objective are clear and well motivated. The development work has been carried out in such a way that the purpose and objective are fulfilled.
The chosen subject area is discussed and the respondents / n / s are able to reflect on their subject area and add something new to the discussion.
The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and is based on sufficient basic material. There is a pronounced / described anchoring in the degree project / in a need that is based on the care area. Background / frame of reference forms a clear and logical basis for the development work. The rationale for the choices made is clear, unambiguous and relevant. The student has made a meritorious synthesis. The ability to critique sources is commendable. The product is ready for distribution
The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life and is well processed to be used in working life / published / disseminated
The description and use of the method and approach are excellent and based on an excellent motivation. The report has a clear connection to the purpose of the survey. The discussion and the critical review show an excellent ability to account in theoretical reasoning for the product / study's advantages and disadvantages regarding choice of method / process and implementation

Qualifications

VÅV22EX03

Objective

Student
- can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
- can manage the normal delivery independently
- mastered fetal monitoring during childbirth
- can, in cooperation with the woman in labor, realize pain relief
- can predict and identify when normal delivery becomes abnormal
- In case of deviant delivery and during risk delivery, can care for a multi-professional work team
- has cooperative ability and holistic thinking
- Master-safe drug treatment

Content

Clinical intrapartum midwifery

Location and time

The course is conducted during 2025.
Information and seminar are held at Alere.
Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward according to individual internship plan.

Materials

Scientific articles
www.kaypahoito.fi
www.vårdhandboken.se

Teaching methods

Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
Individual reflections and case.
Information and seminar.

Exam schedules

All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

Completion alternatives

Performed and approved clinical practice.
Reflection diary.
Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
Participation in internship seminar.

Student workload

27h / cr
1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student:
- has achieved satisfactory goals for the internship section
-can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
-follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
- can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
- for the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
- can perform tasks under supervision
- has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
- can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
- can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
- know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
- can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
- can work with others in the work team

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
Seminar mandatory
Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

Qualifications

Clinical intrapartum care 3

Objective

Student:
- has evidence based in-depth knowledge of gynecological care and gynecological special issues in midwifery
- has clinical skills in gynecological care
- has the knowledge to care for patients in gynecological care with an ethical and professional approach
- can apply patient guidance as well as a rehabilitative and health-promoting approach
- has a professional mindset to pay attention in gynecological care to all forms and dimensions of poverty and inequality
- have insights into the importance of cultural sensitivity in midwifery

Content

Acute gynecology and bleeding disorders
Abortion
Early pregnancy complications
Gynecological infections
Gynecological cancer
Prolapse and incontinence
Menopause
Infertility

Location and time

Autumn 2025
Novia, Alere + online

Materials

Botha, E. & Ryttyläinen-Korhonen, K. (2016). Naisen hoitotyö. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.

Bäckström, T., Kjølhede, P. & Landgren, B-M. (red.). (2022). Gynekologi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Lindgren et al. 2022. Reproduktiv hälsa. Barnmorksans kompetensområde. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Lundgren, I, Blix, E, Gottfredsdottir, H., Wikberg, A. & Aagard Nohr, E. 2022. Theories and perspectives for midwifery a Nordic view. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Oscarsson M. & Georgsson S. (red.). (2021). Etik för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Harvala m.fl., 2021, Kätilötyö. Edita, Helsingfors.

Tapanainen,J., Heikinheimo, O.& Kaarin Mäkikallio, K. (toim.) 2019 (eller 2011). Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Duodecim. (kap. 1-17, 20-31)(kap. 2-12, 14-28 i 2011)

www.terveysportti.fi

According to lecturers instructions

Teaching methods

Lectures, group works, discussion, video, demonstration, practical exercises, individual work

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

Validation according to general directives in Novia.
Written exam deadline see Moodle
Retake exams on two general exam days, see Moodle or Peppi

Registration on Peppi is compulsory for re take exams no later than the Monday before the exam.
In the retake Bäckström et al. above or equivalent literature in English + Moodle material both lectures and groups works are included.

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Lectures
Compulsory attendance at practical exercises and group work
Moodle exam in class
Active participation in discussions

Student workload

3sp = 3x27h= 81h
Gynecological nursing (3 sp):
Lectures 12 h
Practical exercises 4 h
Presentation of group work 12 h
Individual studies 51 h
Written exam 2 h

Content scheduling

-

Further information

Topics for 3 group works are available on Moodle
Clinical training is mandatory

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work:
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups:
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Written exam 40p
21-24points = grade 1
25-28=2
29-32=3
33-36=4
37-40=5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Does not reach 21 points
Does not participate in or present assignment

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

See above

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

See above

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

See above

Qualifications

Study units:
VÅV22GV
VÅV22HF
VÅV22KV
VÅV22PR

Objective

Student:
- can work in different business environments within healthcare
- can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
- can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
- can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
- can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
- can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

Content

Care assessment
ABCDE evaluation
Telephone counseling
Digital consulting
Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
Ethics
Sustainable Development

Location and time

Autumn 2025 , Vaasa

Materials

Care Assessment:
Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432

Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630

Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974

Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255

Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3

Health technology:

Nordens välfärdscenter
https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/

Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/

Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-

Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324

Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658

A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z

Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121