Study Guide

Objective

Student
-should show good knowledge in X-ray, the imaging technology and native projections.
-has basic knowledge of the flouroscopy technology and the most common screening studies
-has basic knowledge of mammography examinations and photography techniques.
-has basic knowledge of the computed tomography, the technology, examinations and work on computed tomography.
-has basic insights into using contrast agents and first aid related to them.
-has basic insights into the magnetic resonance imaging technology, in the use of MRI and deep-knowing in safety issues.
-has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
-understands the importance of good patient care,patient-centered and safe patientcare
-can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation
- radiation protection in relevant area
- measurements

Content

-conventional x-ray
-fluoroscopy
-mammography
-computed radiography
-magnetic tomography
-contrastmedia and first-aid
-anatomy
-patientcare
- measurements
- radiationprotection

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 1 and Clinical Radiography 1

Objective

Student
- has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know all the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
- has knowledge of radioactive substances and radiopharmaceuticals and basic skills for safe use of these
- has knowledge of nuclear medicine pathology
- has basic preparedness to plan, perform and evaluate the most common nuclear medicine studies under supervision.
- are able to take care of the patient overall in examination/treatment
- can work according to sustainable development principles in nuclear medicine.

Content

- the basic principles of nuclear medicine; radioactive isotopes, decay, gamma radiation, radio-pharmaceutics, half-life and activity
- activity accounts
- different methods
- most common assessments
- respond and inform the patient at skeletal scintigraphy and others methods
- radiation protection in the isotope ward: patient and staff radiation protection

Location and time

w. 40-47

Materials

According to the teachers/ lecturers

Teaching methods

Lectures, study visits, workshops, written assignment

Exam schedules

Exam: 20.11.2025
Retake 1: 12.12.2025
Retake 2: 16.1.2026

Student workload

3 sp X 27h= 81h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam: 0-5
Written assignment: GK/UK

Qualifications

Clinical radiography 1

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Content

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Nordeng och Spigset (2009) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
Lecture material on Moodle

Exam schedules

Course examination 16.9.2025
Re-examination x.x.2025 and x.x.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

2 cp =54 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student
- immerses own knowledge in selected alternative by analyzing the latest research and actualities as well as describing the quality aspects in the field.
- can evaluate their own skills and development needs in a radiographers work
- have a good insight in worklife competences

The course runs parallel with the clinical course so the work can be anchored in practice.

Content

Selected area/ modality
Tool for working life

Location and time

Autumn 2025

Teaching methods

Lectures
Invidual examination
Seminar
Workshop

Exam schedules

Seminar 13.11
Workshop 20.11

Student workload

5 cp x 27 h = 135 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

Clinical Radiography 4

Objective

The student
-have a insight in the common internal medicin and surgical diseases and the care and treatment of these.
-have basic knowledge about pre- and postoperative care, emergency care and intensive care and understand the special needs for the patients at this units.

Content

Internal medical illnesses
Surgical obstacles and illnesses,
Emergency care and intensive care

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Basic nursing care
Clinical basic nursing care internship

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the main principles of organizational activity and leadership, and have a preparedness to lead the work.
- have insights into the planning and organization of activities.
- understand the importance of employee competence and the work community
- are familiar with the different forms of activities of working life and are able to participate in the professional community.
- can function according to the principles of internal leadership in an interprofessional business environment
- have basic insights into inner entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship in social and health care
- have insight into developing services that better meet the needs of users.

Content

Organizational activities and leadership
Entrepreneurship
Service design

Location and time

Alere Autumn 2025

Teaching methods

Lectures
Written assignment

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
- are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
- have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
- know various types of pain medication
- know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

Content

Medication administration and different medication groups
Pharmacology

Location and time

According to schedule

Materials

According to teacher

Teaching methods

Lectures, workshops, blended learning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The calculation exam must be 100% correct for pass.

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student
- has in-depth theoretical knowledge in the chosen field of study and skills to utilize them in clinical work
- demonstrate self-esteem planning, execution and evaluation of frequent investigations and treatments in the choosen area of encanced clinical field
- controls the treatment, overall care and supervision of the patient.
- has good ability to cooperate and shows responsibility in the work with increased demands for independence and initiative
- has ability to independently acquire new knowledge and to also, in new situations, pay attention to, analyze, structure and solve problems related to the deepening option

Content

Selected area in clinical radiography

Teaching methods

Clinical practice

Further information

You can use all the weeks of the traineeship for one modality but you can also divide it so that the immersion option is a minimum of 4 weeks of the training period and the other weeks any other modality of interest. It may be possible to get credit for some of the other weeks if you work as a radiograher with for example conventional radiography.
The traineeship also includes assignments.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Basic Nursing Care, Clinical radiography 2, Clinical Radiography 3- Nuclearmedicin, Clinical Radiotherapy and Patient Safety in Radiotherapy and Intervetion Radiology. Course Clinical radiography 4 minimum to 1/2 approved.

Objective

Student:
- has the ability to apply theoretical knowledge in practice
- has the ability to independently, as a member of the work team, plan, perform and evaluate nativity studies , flouroscopy examinations, mammography examinations, computed tomography and easier MRI examinations.
- can handle, care and treat the patient overall in examinations and interventions and have good readiness to care for patients at different situations / different circumstances / with varying needs and problems.
- understands the meaning of patient-centered and safe patient care
- can apply the principles of sustainable development in all
dimensions and have developed the ability to collaborate and demonstrate responsibility in work with increased demands for independence and initiative
- has ability to independently acquire new knowledge in the diagnostic radiography's sub-areas.

Content

-conventional x-ray
-flouroscopy
-mammography
-computed tomography
-MRI

Location and time

According to the plan

Teaching methods

Clinical practice, written assignment, seminar

Employer connections

Clinical practice at conventional radiography, flouroscopy, mammography,CT or MRI

Student workload

27h/ ETCS

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 2, 2/4 approved courses in study modules Patient Care in Clinical Radiography Context and in Biosciences

Objective

Student
- has the ability to apply theoretical knowledge in nuclear medicine
- has the ability to plan, perform and evaluate the most common surveys under supervision
- can handle, care and treat the patient in general during the examination / treatment
- has developed the ability to collaborate and shows responsibility in work
- has the ability to independently acquire new knowledge in nuclear medicine radiography

Content

Nuclearmedicin

Location and time

According to the plan

Teaching methods

Clinical practice, written assignment, seminar

Employer connections

Nuclearmedicin department

Student workload

27h/ETCS

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Diagnostik Radiography 3- Nuclearmedicin, Clinical Radiography 1 and study module Radiation in Medical Use 1

Objective

Student
- has knowledge of different health sciences and occupational history and development
- has knowledge of and can apply the basic principles of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
- has the basic ability to work in accordance with ethical guidelines in their future profession and by respecting and respecting the values and life views of other people, without violating human rights

Content

Fundamental components of caring science

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student:
- has the ability to apply theoretical knowledge in practice
- has the ability to independently, as a member of the work team, plan, perform and evaluate nativity studies , flouroscopy examinations, mammography examinations, computed tomography and easier MRI examinations.
- can handle, care and treat the patient overall in examinations and interventions and have good readiness to care for patients at different situations / different circumstances / with varying needs and problems.
- understands the meaning of patient-centered and safe patient care
- can apply the principles of sustainable development in all
dimensions and have developed the ability to collaborate and demonstrate responsibility in work with increased demands for independence and initiative
- has ability to independently acquire new knowledge in the diagnostic radiography's sub-areas.

Content

-conventional x-ray
-flouroscopy
-mammography
-computed tomography
-MRI

Location and time

According to the plan

Teaching methods

Clinical practice, written assignment, seminar

Employer connections

Clinical practice at conventional radiography, flouroscopy, mammography,CT or MRI

Student workload

27h/ ETCS

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 2, 2/4 approved courses in study modules Patient Care in Clinical Radiography Context and in Biosciences

Objective

Student
- has the ability to apply theoretical knowledge in nuclear medicine
- has the ability to plan, perform and evaluate the most common surveys under supervision
- can handle, care and treat the patient in general during the examination / treatment
- has developed the ability to collaborate and shows responsibility in work
- has the ability to independently acquire new knowledge in nuclear medicine radiography

Content

Nuclearmedicin

Location and time

According to the plan

Teaching methods

Clinical practice, written assignment, seminar

Employer connections

Nuclearmedicin department

Student workload

27h/ETCS

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Diagnostik Radiography 3- Nuclearmedicin, Clinical Radiography 1 and study module Radiation in Medical Use 1

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the main principles of organizational activity and leadership, and have a preparedness to lead the work.
- have insights into the planning and organization of activities.
- understand the importance of employee competence and the work community
- are familiar with the different forms of activities of working life and are able to participate in the professional community.
- can function according to the principles of internal leadership in an interprofessional business environment
- have basic insights into inner entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship in social and health care
- have insight into developing services that better meet the needs of users.

Content

Organizational activities and leadership
Entrepreneurship
Service design

Location and time

Alere Autumn 2025

Teaching methods

Lectures
Written assignment

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student
-have a insight in the common internal medicin and surgical diseases and the care and treatment of these.
-have basic knowledge about pre- and postoperative care, emergency care and intensive care and understand the special needs for the patients at this units.

Content

Internal medical illnesses
Surgical obstacles and illnesses,
Emergency care and intensive care

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Basic nursing care
Clinical basic nursing care internship

Objective

Student
- has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know all the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
- has knowledge of radioactive substances and radiopharmaceuticals and basic skills for safe use of these
- has knowledge of nuclear medicine pathology
- has basic preparedness to plan, perform and evaluate the most common nuclear medicine studies under supervision.
- are able to take care of the patient overall in examination/treatment
- can work according to sustainable development principles in nuclear medicine.

Content

- the basic principles of nuclear medicine; radioactive isotopes, decay, gamma radiation, radio-pharmaceutics, half-life and activity
- activity accounts
- different methods
- most common assessments
- respond and inform the patient at skeletal scintigraphy and others methods
- radiation protection in the isotope ward: patient and staff radiation protection

Location and time

w. 40-47

Materials

According to the teachers/ lecturers

Teaching methods

Lectures, study visits, workshops, written assignment

Exam schedules

Exam: 20.11.2025
Retake 1: 12.12.2025
Retake 2: 16.1.2026

Student workload

3 sp X 27h= 81h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Exam: 0-5
Written assignment: GK/UK

Qualifications

Clinical radiography 1

Objective

Student
- immerses own knowledge in selected alternative by analyzing the latest research and actualities as well as describing the quality aspects in the field.
- can evaluate their own skills and development needs in a radiographers work
- have a good insight in worklife competences

The course runs parallel with the clinical course so the work can be anchored in practice.

Content

Selected area/ modality
Tool for working life

Location and time

Autumn 2025

Teaching methods

Lectures
Invidual examination
Seminar
Workshop

Exam schedules

Seminar 13.11
Workshop 20.11

Student workload

5 cp x 27 h = 135 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

Clinical Radiography 4

Objective

Student
- has in-depth theoretical knowledge in the chosen field of study and skills to utilize them in clinical work
- demonstrate self-esteem planning, execution and evaluation of frequent investigations and treatments in the choosen area of encanced clinical field
- controls the treatment, overall care and supervision of the patient.
- has good ability to cooperate and shows responsibility in the work with increased demands for independence and initiative
- has ability to independently acquire new knowledge and to also, in new situations, pay attention to, analyze, structure and solve problems related to the deepening option

Content

Selected area in clinical radiography

Teaching methods

Clinical practice

Further information

You can use all the weeks of the traineeship for one modality but you can also divide it so that the immersion option is a minimum of 4 weeks of the training period and the other weeks any other modality of interest. It may be possible to get credit for some of the other weeks if you work as a radiograher with for example conventional radiography.
The traineeship also includes assignments.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Basic Nursing Care, Clinical radiography 2, Clinical Radiography 3- Nuclearmedicin, Clinical Radiotherapy and Patient Safety in Radiotherapy and Intervetion Radiology. Course Clinical radiography 4 minimum to 1/2 approved.

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
- are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
- have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
- know various types of pain medication
- know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

Content

Medication administration and different medication groups
Pharmacology

Location and time

According to schedule

Materials

According to teacher

Teaching methods

Lectures, workshops, blended learning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The calculation exam must be 100% correct for pass.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Content

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Nordeng och Spigset (2009) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
Lecture material on Moodle

Exam schedules

Course examination 16.9.2025
Re-examination x.x.2025 and x.x.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

2 cp =54 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student
- has knowledge of different health sciences and occupational history and development
- has knowledge of and can apply the basic principles of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
- has the basic ability to work in accordance with ethical guidelines in their future profession and by respecting and respecting the values and life views of other people, without violating human rights

Content

Fundamental components of caring science

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student
-should show good knowledge in X-ray, the imaging technology and native projections.
-has basic knowledge of the flouroscopy technology and the most common screening studies
-has basic knowledge of mammography examinations and photography techniques.
-has basic knowledge of the computed tomography, the technology, examinations and work on computed tomography.
-has basic insights into using contrast agents and first aid related to them.
-has basic insights into the magnetic resonance imaging technology, in the use of MRI and deep-knowing in safety issues.
-has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
-understands the importance of good patient care,patient-centered and safe patientcare
-can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation
- radiation protection in relevant area
- measurements

Content

-conventional x-ray
-fluoroscopy
-mammography
-computed radiography
-magnetic tomography
-contrastmedia and first-aid
-anatomy
-patientcare
- measurements
- radiationprotection

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 1 and Clinical Radiography 1