Study Guide

Objective

The student:​
- is familiar with internal and external beauty and body positivity​
- understands how beauty affects the individual's wellbeing and self-image​
- can achieve and maintain work-life balance through personal strategies​
- understands the significance of mental wellness, attained through mindfulness and stress management​
- understands the significance of health, attained through nutrition and exercise​
- can apply strategies for personal health, wellness, and sustainable living​

Content

Internal Beauty​
External Beauty​
Body Positivity​
Wellness and Mindfulness​
Health​
Nutrition and Exercise

Location and time

15.8-5.12.2025 online

Materials

Study material on Moodle
According to lecturers instructions

Teaching methods

Online Studies

Exam schedules

Examination consists of submitted module assignments, graded (Pass/Fail). Examination in December 2025.

Instructions for the examination are given on Moodle.

Completion alternatives

Examination consists of submitted module assignments, grade (Pass/Fail). All assignments in selected modules needs to be completed and approved to achieve the final course grade (Pass/Fail).

Instructions for the examination are given on Moodle.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours / ECTS
Self study online: 135 hrs
Total: 135 hrs

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Assessment Criterias (Pass / Fail)​

Criteria 1. Knowledge & Understanding ​
- The student know and understand the theory and discourse within the context of individual modules.​

Criteria 2. Critical Thinking​
- The student has the ability to identify patterns and relationships between self-image and wellness in addition to selected references.​

Criteria 3. Application ​
- The student can make practical use of techniques and / or strategies in everyday life.​    ​

Further information

More information on Moodle

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Assessment Criterias (Pass / Fail)​

Criteria 1. Knowledge & Understanding ​
- The student know and understand the theory and discourse within the context of individual modules.​

Criteria 2. Critical Thinking​
- The student has the ability to identify patterns and relationships between self-image and wellness in addition to selected references.​

Criteria 3. Application ​
- The student can make practical use of techniques and / or strategies in everyday life.​

Assessment methods and criteria

​Approved module assignments and the course is evaluated as Pass or Fail.

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Objective

• The students are familiar with the structure and attributes of tissues to comprehend their importance for well-being
• The students have knowledge about microbes and understands the importance of microbiology within beauty and cosmetics
• The students are familiar with the immune system and function of the lymphocyte
• The students have knowledge about changes in cell and tissue for skin diseases
• The students have knowledge about the basics of cosmetic chemistry
• The students are able to manufacture simple beauty products
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promotes economical and ecological sustainability within product manufacturing

Content

Cell, Molecule and Tissue
Microbiology
Immune System
Lymphocyte
Skin Diseases
Cosmetic Chemistry
Beauty Products

Location and time

The course comprises two parts:
Part 1 (2 cr) is held fall 2025 and comprises skin histology, clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology
Part 2 (2 cr) is held spring 2026 and comprises basic chemistry, biochemistry and cosmetic chemistry

Materials

Part 1: Material on the Moodle page of the course and additional recommended litterature mentioned on the Moodle page.
Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur
Relevant articles
Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.


Part 2:
Marie Lodén: Ren, mjuk och vacker Kemi och funktion hos kosmetika, chapters 3 and 4
General chemistry books for upper secondary school (gymnasiet)

Teaching methods

Lectures, assignments and self studies
Cosmetic products

Exam schedules

Exam dates for spring 2026 will be given at a later date

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

1 cr corresponds to 27 h of studies. The course is a total of 4 cr corresponding to 108 h of studies.

Further information

Mandatory presence at product manufacturing
More information on the Moodle page for the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded based on the results in part 1 and part 2 of the course.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has very poor knowledge of the subject
The student has not participated in the mandatory product manufacturing

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Further information

-

Objective

• The students have knowledge of style history before the 21st century
• The students have in-depth knowledge of selected key clothing and accessories from style eras
• The students have knowledge of key figures in the history of style
•The students understand the meaning of vintage fashion and second hand
• The students can create and work with different techniques, tools and products in styling
• The students have the ability to recreate and renew looks from selected style eras
• The students follow good industrial hygiene
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promote economic, ecological and social sustainability and consumption of looks and product use

Content

Style History before the 21st Century
Key Clothing, Accessories and Looks
Key Figures in Style History
Vintage Fashion and Second Hand
Styling Techniques, Tools and Products

Location and time

Autumn 2025 Campus Alere

Jaana's part 26.8-3.10.2025
Lotta's part 6.10-7.11.2025

Seminars 3.12.2025 & 28.1.2026

Materials

Study material on Moodle and according to the teacher's instructions.

Literature:
Hay, B. Style me vintage.(2010)
Young, L.Timeless a Century of Iconic Looks(2017)

Hennessy, K. & DK Publishing, I. (2019). Fashion: The definitive visual guide (New edition. Second edition.). DK Publishing.
McDowell, C. (2013). The Anatomy of fashion: Why we dress the way we do. Phaidon Press Ltd.
Mulvey, K., & Richards, M. (2007). A century of fashion. Bounty Books.
Peacock, J. Länsimainen puku antiikista nykyaikaan. (2004). Otava kustannusosakeyhtiö.

Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS

Teaching methods

Lectures, narrative method, demonstrations, practical exercises, workshops, research, self studies, mood boards, portfolio and team work.

Employer connections

For course assignment the aim is to cooperate with working life.

Exam schedules

Examination consists of submitted assignments:

Joint Examination Assignment for Lotta and Jaana: Style Rebirth: Elements Reimagined, 3 cr
Part 1, theoretical research, deadline and presentation: 3.12.2025
Part 2, practical part, deadline and presentation: 28.1.2026

assignment in Lotta's part (0,5/2cr): Restyle, 0,5 cr, deadline autumn 2025

Jaana's part: examination consists of assignments, grades (0-5) and activity/attendance, grades (0-5).
1. Visual Identity: Crafting Personal Portraits, course assignment individually or in pairs, 1 ECTS. Deadline: 17.10.2025 via Moodle. Feedback is given via Moodle. Grades (0-5).
2. Activity and Attendance, 0,5 ECTS. grade (0-5).

All course assignments needs to be completed and approved to get the course graded.

Instructions for the examination are given at each course part introduction.

Completion alternatives

Approved practical assignments and course assignments.
Pair / group feedback is given during seminar and after finished course.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: 40hrs
Self study: 95 hrs
Total: 135 hrs

Further information

More information is given at each course part introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual, pair and / or team). The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.

The following criteria are assessed in the course's examination assignment:
Research Quality: Depth and accuracy in historical research
Creativity: Originality and innovation in the reinterpretation of style
Presentation Skills: Clarity, engagement, and use of visual aids

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignment and shows especially vague competences within the theme.
The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature.
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view.
The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.
The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates excellent competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.

Qualifications

SKV24GE03

Objective

• The students can define and identify with the professional role in the industry
• The students develop knowledge for business and internal and external entrepreneurship
• The students structure a creative business idea and a business model within industry
• The students are able as an entrepreneur to plan and carry out a customer event within a chosen field in the industry in association with others
• The students develop an understanding for building networks
• The students create a personal brand and are able to do marketing for the business
• The students have knowledge about the significance of economy for the business
• The students have fundamental insights into bookkeeping
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promotes economic, ecological and social sustainability for internal and external entrepreneurship and services

Content

Enterprise
Entrepreneurship
Business Model
Personal Branding and Marketing
Treatments and Services
Customer Event
Networking
Economy and Bookkeeping

Location and time

28th October to 15th December Online via Teams

Materials

Kursbok + tentbok:

Skärvad, P., & Olsson, J. (2008). Företagsekonomi 100: Faktabok (14. uppl.). Liber ekonom

Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley.

Com. B. (2020) Foundamentals of Entrepreneurship. National Education policy. Kap. 1-4. Litteraturen finns som länk i Moodle.

Tent bok:
Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D., & Regnér, P. (2018). Fundamentals of strategy. Pearson. Chapter 4 and 6

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, test, practical assignments, assignments and open books exams.

Employer connections

For course assignment is the aim to cooperate with working life
The student´s are encouraged to collaborate and network with working life.

Exam schedules

More information in Moddle

Student workload

The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 50 hrs
Self study: 85 hrs
Total: 135 hrs

Content scheduling

This Course focus on the sustainable goal 4 Quality Education. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.

4:4 INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITH RELEVANT SKILLS FOR FINANCIAL SUCCESS
By 2030, substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship.

Further information

More information is given at introduction of each course part.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5).Total points are calculated, and a grade is given based on an assessment total points.

Qualifications

SKV24EE01

Objective

The Student
- has insights into entrepreneurship within Social and Health Care
- knows what company establishment means
- develops skills for planning and implementing a business model
- develops an understanding for entrepreneurship and social innovations
- has the prerequisites to cooperate in inter professional activities

Content

Entrepreneurship within Social Welfare, Health Care and Beauty Care
Practical Entrepreneurship
The Procedure of Becoming an Approved Service Provider within Social Welfare and Health Care
Business Model
Social Innovations
Strategies to Strengthen Cooperation
Inter Professional Learning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No prior prerequisite

Further information

-

Objective

• The students have the ability to present the result systematically and do relevant interpretations
• The students have the ability to critically view the own thesis
• The students are able to present the most central aspects of the thesis when presented
• The students are able to function as opponents and carry out the maturity test

Content

Scientific Work Methods
Scientific Report - Result, Interpretations, Critical View and Discussion
Deepened Knowledge - Result and Interpretation, Critical View and Discussion
Scientific Writing
Presentation of Thesis
Opponent and Maturity Test

Location and time

25.8-25.11.2025, Campus Alere

Mandatory sessions:
25 August Introduction
24 November Thesis Presentation and Opposition
25 November Maturity Test

Materials

Literature about thesis topic and data, resources within the own research area.
Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.
According to the supervisor´s instructions.

Teaching methods

Self studies with Thesis.
Booked individual guidance meeting with supervisors (Jaana and Johanna).
Guidance in group sessions with Jaana.

Employer connections

Possible commissioned work and / or collaboration partners, sponsors.

Exam schedules

Students work individually with their Thesis according to own scheduled plan. Students are expected to participate in group sessions and book individual guidance sessions for thesis process advancement.

1. Finished and presented Thesis. Students present thesis at the mandatory presentation seminar 24th November 2025. Deadline for submission for thesis final review is 7th November 2025. Individual feedback is given by supervisors at final thesis review.
2. Opposition and Opponent Story. Students have read and critically reviewed appointed thesis and oppose it at the mandatory presentation seminar. Students write an opponent story as essay for the appointed thesis, deadline: 24th November 2025. Feedback for opposition and opponent story is given in thesis assessment document.
3. Maturity Test. Students write the mandatory maturity test 25th November 2025 on own laptop.

Completion alternatives

Finished and presented thesis. The mandatory parts are conducted at campus Alere.
Feedback is given individually during the individual guidance sessions.

Finished and approved course part statement and presentation, grade (Pass / Fail).

1. Finished and presented Thesis. Students present thesis at the mandatory presentation seminar 24th November 2025. Deadline for submission for thesis final review is 7th November 2025. Individual feedback is given by supervisors at final thesis review.
2. Opposition and Opponent Story. Students have read and critically reviewed appointed thesis and oppose it at the mandatory presentation seminar. Students write an opponent story as essay for the appointed thesis, deadline: 24th November 2025. Feedback for opposition and opponent story is given in thesis assessment document.
3. Maturity Test. Students write the mandatory maturity test 25th November 2025 on own laptop.

Student workload

The students work for 5 ECTS, 135 hours.

Group guidance in class: 6 hours.
Presentation seminar: 7 hours.
Maturity test: 2 hours.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass:
The student has followed instructions and shows sufficient knowledge about the topic.
The student has shown interest.

Fail:
The student has not followed instructions and shows especially insufficient knowledge about the topic.
The student has not shown much interest.

Further information

More information is given at group and individual guidance sessions.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student possesses a basic competence in the subject / The student does not show sufficient competence in the subject

Assessment methods and criteria

The part is approved with Pass / Fail and is included in Thesis 15 ECTS. The Thesis has a specific assessment document.

Qualifications

Research Methodology

Further information

-

Objective

The Student
- has basic practical skills in speech and writing for the profession
- becomes familiar with professional texts and terminology in own field of work

Content

- the terminology in the professional field
- oral presentation
- written presentation
- language correctness

Location and time

Autumn 2025

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students show such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish.
Written and oral skills are assessed separately

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students show such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish.
Written and oral skills are assessed separately

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students show such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish.
Written and oral skills are assessed separately

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

Knowledge on level B1

Further information

-

Objective

• The students understand the research process and the different parts of the thesis
• The students can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the thesis
• The students understand and can use selected qualitative and quantitative methods
• The students can apply appropriate data collection and data analysis methods in the thesis
• The students have the ability to write and argue scientifically in the thesis
• The students can apply, analyze and develop approach that promote economic, ecological and social sustainability in the research process

Content

The Research Process and the Different Parts
Qualitative and Quantitative Data Collection and Data Analysis Methods
Thesis
Scientific Writing

Location and time

5.11.2025-10.12.2025 Campus Alere.

Quantitative methods, 2 ECTS with Ralf Lillbacka: Autumn 2025.
Qualitative methods, 3 ECTS with Jaana: Autumn 2025 / Spring 2026.

Materials

Quantitative methods: the following literature is recommended: Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, or other literature suggested by the examiner.

Jaana´s part: Study material and course literature on Moodle.
Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (4th ed.). 1 ex.
Holme, I. M. & Solvang, B. K. (1997). 2 (uppl.). Forskningsmetodik. Om kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder.
Jakobsson, U. (2011). Forskningens termer och begrepp- en ordbok.
Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S. (2007). 2 (uppl.). Forskningsprocessen- kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv.
Patel, R. & Davidson, B. (2011). 4 (uppl.). Forskningsmetodikens grunder. Att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning.

In addition:
Databases through Finna.
Written instructions and previous thesis.
Current research within the industry.
According to the lecturer.

Teaching methods

Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written assignment.

Jaana´s part: Lectures, workshops, research, guidance, narrative method, discussions and teamwork.

Employer connections

The students are encouraged to write thesis (idea plan) as commissioned work for working life.

Exam schedules

Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month of the date of the end of the course.

Jaana´s part, 3 ECTS: Examination consists of submitted assignments, grade (0-5). Deadline in January 2026 and idea seminar 28 January 2026.
1. Idea Plan, 1 ECTS. Students present their own plan at idea seminar 28 January, deadline for submission of work plan: the week before, 21 January 2026. Individual feedback is given after the seminar. Note! This plan can be required to be compensated after idea seminar, before given a grade.
2. Opposition and Opponent Story, 1 ECTS. Students have read the appointed student's work plan, have written the opponent story and oppose the plan at the idea seminar, deadline: 28 January 2026. Grade and feedback are included in the opponent story's grade and feedback. Feedback and grade are given via Moodle.
3. Active participation in classes, 1 ECTS.

Instructions for the examinations are given by each teacher at the beginning of course part.

Completion alternatives

Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)

Jaana´s part: Approved assignments (grade 0-5): own thesis plan, opposition and opposed written essay of thesis plan. Own thesis plan is presented and opposed at idea seminar 28 January 2026. Individual feedback is given on the thesis plan after the seminar.

Student workload

Quantitative methods:
The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: 12h
Self study: 42h
Total: 54h

Jaana´s part:
The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: 25 hrs
Self study: 56 hrs
Total: 81 hrs

Further information

More information is given at each course part introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

Jaana´s part: The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual). The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

Jaana´s part: The student has not followed the instructions of the assignment and shows especially vague competences and understanding within the theme.
The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

Jaana´s part: The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

Jaana´s part: The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence and good understanding within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

Jaana´s part: The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates excellent competence and a complete understanding within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.

Qualifications

SKV24FL01

Objective

The students have knowledge of facial musculature.
The students have knowledge of the historical background of Gua Sha.
The students have knowledge of the fundamentals of Gua Sha treatments.
The students are familiar with and can perform Gua Sha treatments.
The students apply aseptic methods in skincare and follow good industrial hygiene.
The students are familiar with the professional role of the cosmetologist and the practical work in the industry.
The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promotes sustainable development.
The students can analyze and assess their own work.

Content

Historical background and technical foundations of Gua Sha
Benefits of Gua Sha treatments
Blood circulation, stagnation, and massage techniques
Facial sculpting and lifting
Selection and care of Gua Sha tools, along with product selection

Location and time

01.12.2025 - 19.12.2025 Campus Alere.
Course introduction MANDATORY ATTENDANCE

Materials

Study material on Moodle.
Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, practical exercises, narrative teaching, information retrieval, presentations, teamwork.

Exam schedules

Examination consists of practical exercises in class, a course assignment and practical exam.
Deadline in Autumn 2025.
1. Participation and activity during practical exercises in class, 1cr.
2. Course assignment - presentation 1cr.
3. Practical exam 1cr.

Completion alternatives

Approved practical assignments in class, course assignments and practical exam.
Feedback is given after finished course.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: 21 hrs
Self study: 60 hrs
Total: 81 hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates excellent competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments. The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.
The grades are given for the following parts:
1. Participation and activity during practical exercises in class, 1cr.
2. Course assignment - presentation 1cr.
3. Practical exam 1cr.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the task's instructions and demonstrate particularly weak knowledge of the subject.
The submitted assignment is incomplete or missing.
The student has not participated and has not contributed to the process of the project work. The student's share in the project cannot be demonstrated or is brief.
The student has not shown greater commitment and has not been active during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partially followed the task's instructions and demonstrate satisfactory knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is satisfactory.
The student has partly participated and have partly contributed in the process of the project work. The student´s share in the project is satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but engagement and activity has been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has almost or has completed the task's instructions and demonstrate good or extremely good knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is good or extremely good.
The student has participated, taken partial responsibility and contributed to the process of the project work. The student´s share in the project is good or extremely good. The student has participated or actively participated in the course and demonstrate commitment to course content and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has completed the task's instructions and demonstrate excellent knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is excellent and exceptionally well done.
The student has taken responsibility and has contributed to the progress of the project work process. The student's share in the project is clear and excellent. The student has been active throughout the course and demonstrate extra commitment and interest in course content and course assignments.

Qualifications

The anatomy and function of the skin

Objective

• The students have in-depth knowledge of selected classic clothing styles and looks
• The students have further developed the ability to analyze the client´s anatomical conditions, life stage, needs and wishes in order to carry out style consultation
• The students have the ability to create customized looks for the client within classic style and for various occasions through style consultation
• The students have knowledge of dress codes
• The students can create suitable makeups for clients, looks and occasions with different techniques, tools, products and accessories
• The students can style suitable hairstyles for clients, looks and occasions with different techniques, tools, products and accessories
• The students can analyze, plan, execute and evaluate looks for clients and occasions
• The students follow good industrial hygiene
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promote economic, ecological and social sustainability and consumption of looks, services and product use

Content

Classic Clothing Styles and Looks
Style Consultation
Clothes and Accessories
Dress Codes
Styling with Makeup and Hair
Techniques, Tools and Products

Location and time

Autumn 2025 Campus Alere

Materials

Study material on Moodle and according to the teacher's instructions. Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS, if stated in assignment descriptions.

Additional literature:
Rees, A. (2016). The curated closet. (First edition.).

Coggins, D., & O'Brien, G. (2016). Men and style. E-book.​

Freer, A., & Kuo, J. (2015). How to get dressed.

Brown, B. (2011). Bobbi Brown makeup manual. (1st trade ed.)

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, practical exercises, workshops, research, self studies, mood boards, portfolio, salon work and team work.

Employer connections

For course assignment is the aim to cooperate with working life

Exam schedules

Examination consists of submitted assignments and presentations, deadline autumn 2025

Completion alternatives

Approved practical assignments and course assignments.
Group feedback is given after finished course.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: 40hrs
Self study: 95 hrs
Total: 135 hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual and / or team). The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignment and shows especially vague competences within the theme.
The assignment is inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates excellent competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Qualifications

SKV24GE03

Objective

• The students understand the importance of esthetics in the field of Beauty and Cosmetics
• The students are familiar with the history of fashion and with important people that had influence on fashion
• The students are familiar with different beauty ideals and style icons through ages
• The students are familiar with the basics of fashion studies and understand its role in society
• The students have knowledge about the social and cultural significance in fashion and clothing
• The students can apply picture analysis on fashion pictures and photographs
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promotes social, economical and ecological sustainability through ideals, fashion and clothing

Content

Esthetics in Beauty and Cosmetics
History of Fashion and Fashion Profiles
Beauty Ideals and Style Icons Through Ages
Fashion Studies
Social and Cultural Context of Fashion and Clothing
Picture Analysis

Location and time

25.8-31.10.2025 Campus Alere, mandatory module meetings.

Materials

Study material on Moodle and according to the lecturer.

Adz, K. & Stone, W. (2018). This is not Fashion: Streetwear Past, Present and Future. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
Ander, G. (2016). Den lilla svarta. Modeindustrins mörka baksida. Stockholm: Ordfront.
Bale, K. (2009). Estetik. En introduktion. Göteborg: Daidalos AB.
Barnard, M. (2014). Fashion Theory: an introduction. London: Routledge.
DK Publishing, Inc., publisher, & Hennessy, K. (2019). Fashion: The definitive visual guide (New edition. Second edition.). 1 ex.
Edwards, L. (2017). How to Read a Dress. London: Bloomsbury.
Ehrman, E. (Ed.). (2018). Fashioned from Nature. London: V&A Publishing.
Eldvik, B. (2010). Modemakt – 300 år av kläder. Stockholm: Nordiska Museets Förlag.
Fashionary. (2017). Fashionpedia. The visual dictionary of fashion design. Hong Kong: Fashionary International Ltd.
Fashionary. (2018). The Fashion Business Manual. Hong Kong: Fashionary International Ltd.
Fredriksson, C. (2012). Mode. Malmö: Liber AB.
Kaiser, B. S. (2012). Fashion and Cultural Studies. London: Berg.
Kawamura, Y. (2007, 2017). Fashion-ology. A introduction to Fashion Studies. New York: Berg Publishers.
M. Granger, M. & A. Farnan, S. (2020). (4. uppl.). The Fashion Industry and Its Careers. 1 ex. ​
Muoti – tyylit ja vaatteet kautta aikojen. (2013). Kustannusosakeyhtiö TAMMI.
Severinsson, E., Warkander, P., & Andersson, P. K. (2021). Modevetenskap. (Första upplagan.). 1 ex.​
Stevenson, NJ. (2011). Muodin vuosikymmenet. Kustannusosakeyhtiö TAMMI.
Thomas, S. (2018). Fashion Ethics. London: Routledge.
Welters, L. & Lillethun, A. (Ed). (2011). The Fashion Reader. London: Berg.
Welters, L. & Lillethun, A. (Ed). (2018). Fashion History. London: Bloomsbury.

Magazines, online platforms within the industry, mobile applications and social media.
Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.

Teaching methods

Module meetings / seminars, pair and team work as module workshops, research, mood boards, presentations, narrative method, discussions and guidance.

Employer connections

For module assignments, if suitable, the aim is to collaborate with working life.

Exam schedules

Examination consists of module assignments that are submitted for the mandatory module seminar. The last deadline is at the last module seminar. The timetable for modules is presented in Moodle.

1. Module 1 & 2. Aesthetics, Standards and Icons, 0,5sp, deadline: 29.8 via Moodle.
2. Module 3. Fashion Stories and Influencers, 1sp, deadline: 11.9 via Moodle.
3. Module 4. Fashion Studies, 1sp, deadline: 23.9 via Moodle.
4. Module 5. Social and Cultural Context in Fashion, 0,5sp, deadline: 7.10 via Moodle.
5. Participation, activity and commitment affects the final course grade.

Completion alternatives

Approved module assignments for the modules, participation, activity and commitment on Moodle and during mandatory module seminars at campus Alere.
Students commitment and activity during the course are crucial for a successful outcome.
Feedback is given for pairs or for the team at module meetings in class.

Student workload

The student work 27 hours / ECTS.
In class / module meetings: 15 hrs
Self study: 66 hrs
Total: 81 hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for module assignments (pair and team). The average of the grades for module assignments form the final grade in the course. The student´s activity during the course and during the pair / team work is important for a successful outcome.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the module assignment and shows especially vague competences within the theme.
The module assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the module assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted module assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the module assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted module assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and module assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the module assignments and demonstrates excellent competence within the subject.
The content of submitted module assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and module assignments.
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Qualifications

SKV22SK01

Further information

-

Objective

• The students are familiar with how a fashion show is executed and how the process is carried through
• The students have the ability to create suitable looks for the concept of the fashion show
• The students have knowledge about styling to create visual looks for the models
• The students can produce a visually integrated fashion show in collaboration with each other and partners
• The students understand the significance of important factors for the project´s success
• The students are able to plan, carry out and evaluate a fashion show as a project
• The students can compile a project report
• The students follow good industrial hygiene
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promotes social, economic and ecological sustainability and consumption through content in project and in collaboration with partners

Content

Visually Integrated Fashion Show, Concept and Process
Clothing and Accessories
Visual Looks for Models
Styling with Makeup and Hair
Techniques, Tools and Products
Project Report

Location and time

8.9-31.10 Campus Alere. The fashion show is planned to take place in week 44, but could take place in November.

Materials

Study material on Moodle.

Literature:
Everett, J. C., Swanson, K. K. & Blanco, J. F. (2019). Guide to producing a Fashion Show (4th edition).
Holmberg, P. (2022). A glimpse behind the scenes: en handbok om hur en modevisning skapas.
Eklund, S. (2011, 2009). Arbeta i projekt.
Dowson, R. & Bassett, D. (2015). Event Planning and Management.
Shone, A. & Parry, B. (2013). Successful Event Management.

According to the lecturers instructions.
Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.

Teaching methods

Teamwork, meetings, workshops, research, mood boards, discussions, narrative method and lectures.

Employer connections

The students and their teams collaborate with working life. For the project to succeed, the sponsors are an inevitable asset. Student search for sponsors.

Exam schedules

Executed project- fashion show and submitted project report. Deadline Autumn 2025 and seminar November-December 2025.

Grade (0-5) is given for the following parts:
1. Mood board! Teams presents for the group a mood board in specific theme at occasion, 1cr, deadline: week 39. Team feedback is given directly during the occasion.
2. Individual project report about the fashion show (planning, realization and assessment), 2cr, deadline and seminar: Autumn 2025
3. Active participation in the project during in class teaching, through teamwork, own role and individual contribution, 2cr.
4. Mandatory seminar: Autumn 2025. Group feedback is given at the seminar.

Instructions for the examinations are given by teacher at the beginning of the course.

Completion alternatives

Approved project work, approved project report and activity. The student´s activity is in a central role to carry out the project.
Feedback is given for the team or for the whole group

Student workload

The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 40hrs
Self- studies: 95hrs
Total: 135hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual and team) and for activity. The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the task's instructions and demonstrate particularly weak knowledge of the subject.
The submitted assignment is incomplete or missing.
The student has not participated and has not contributed to the process of the project work. The student's share in the project cannot be demonstrated or is brief.
The student has not shown greater commitment and has not been active during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partially followed the task's instructions and demonstrate satisfactory knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is satisfactory.
The student has partly participated and have partly contributed in the process of the project work. The student´s share in the project is satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but engagement and activity has been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has almost or has completed the task's instructions and demonstrate good or extremely good knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is good or extremely good.
The student has participated, taken partial responsibility and contributed to the process of the project work. The student´s share in the project is good or extremely good. The student has participated or actively participated in the course and demonstrate commitment to course content and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has completed the task's instructions and demonstrate excellent knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is excellent and exceptionally well done.
The student has taken responsibility and has contributed to the progress of the project work process. The student's share in the project is clear and excellent. The student has been active throughout the course and demonstrate extra commitment and interest in course content and course assignments.

Qualifications

SKV24GE01, SKV24GE02, SKV24GE03, SKV24GE04

Objective

• The students are ready to create for all stages in life the ultimate service module that suits the client
• The students have the ability and preparedness to meet and cooperate with different kind of client personalities and are able to respond to the client’s needs and wishes through style consulting
• The students function as style consultants and can apply their knowledge about different products when giving the client advice
• The students have the preparedness to plan makeup and hair to create suitable looks with clothing and accessories
• The students have knowledge about fashion, trends and colors for the season and can adapt it to creating the client’s style and looks
• The students can create a complete and sustainable wardrobe for the client
• The students are familiar with the work as a personal shopper and comply it during style consultation
• The students can apply, analyze and develop looks and an approach that promotes economical, ecological and social sustainability for clothing and accessories, body image, consumtion, fashion and trends for the season and wardrobe

Content

Stages in Life and Personal Style
Ultimate Service Module
Client Personalities
Style Consulting
Products
Suitable Looks with Clothing and Accessories
Fashion, Trends and Colors for the Season
Complete and Sustainable Wardrobe
Personal Shopper

Location and time

25th August to 1 October 2025 at Campus Alere Vasa (Some part will be arranged as study visits)

Materials

Jonsson, A., Egels-Zandén, N., Hagberg, J., Lammgård, C., & Sundström, M. (2017). Handelns digitalisering och förändrade affärer.

Virtanen, H., Ravald, A., Björk, P., & Lundström, J. (2022-01-01). Marknadsföringen har en avgörande roll i förändringsarbetet. Ekonomiska samfundets tidskrift, 3, 24-29.

Rislund, C., & Jonasson, G. (2022). Handbok i tjänstedesign: Kund- och användarcentrerat utvecklingsarbete steg för steg (Tredje upplagan.). [Rislund, Carina].

Gustavsson, J. (2022). Influencer marketing i praktiken: Strategi, ekonomi & juridik (Första upplagan.). Sanoma utbildning.

Moxnes, P., Lindelöf, I., & Lindelöf, I. (2008). Fasettmänniskan: Teori och forskning om personlighet och roller. Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

The course will be based on a study visit to Helsinki on either September 15 or 16. Participation in the visit is, of course, voluntary, but if you choose not to attend, you will be given compensatory assignments. Students are responsible for the cost of their own train ticket.

- The assessment for the course is based on:
- Planning
- An image portfolio from the study visits.
– Those who do not participate in the visits must create an image portfolio using borrowed images, as well as write an essay for each visit min 5000 word. It’s much more fun and easier to take part in the day in Helsinki.

Employer connections

Study visit to different companys

Exam schedules

Information in Moodle

Student workload

The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 20 hrs
Study visit: 20-40 hrs
Self study: 88-68 hrs
Total: 108 hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction an based of discussion.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual or in pairs).Total points are calculated, and a grade is given based on an assessment total points.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Studerande påvisar en ytlig kompetens och grundläggande förståelse för ämnet

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Studerande påvisar en kompetens som relateras och kopplas till litteraturen
Studerande kan reflektera och motivera egna synpunkter

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Studerande har en fördjupad kompetens och visar en djupare förståelse för ämnet i relation till det kommande yrket

Qualifications

SKV22SK01, SKV22SK02, SKV22SK03

Further information

-

Objective

• The students can apply their own knowledge, analyze the skin, plan and perform treatments for the client
• The students can apply their own knowledge, analyze anatomical conditions, plan and create makeups for the client
• The students can apply different techniques with instruments, tools and products in beauty care and makeup
• The students can recommend care treatments and make-up for the client as well as give advice on self-care
• The students know nail technology and different ways to create nails
• The students follow good industrial hygiene
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promote economic, ecological and social sustainability and consumption of treatments, services and product use

Content

Skincare Analyze, Skincare Problems, Problem Solving and Treatments
Nail Technology
Instruments, Tools and Products in Beauty Care and Makeup
Anatomical Conditions, Makeup Styles and Occasions
Diversity

Location and time

25.08.2025 - 19.12.2025 Campus Alere.

Materials

Study material on Moodle or according to the lecturer.

Teaching methods

Lectures, narrative teaching, information retrieval, demonstrations, practical exercises, workshops, salon work, study visits, and teamwork.

Employer connections

Salon work

Exam schedules

The examination consists of submitted assignments, practical and theoretical exams, as well as participation in practical exercises during lessons. Examination in autumn 2025. Instructions for the examination are given by each teacher at the beginning of course part.

Valeria's part, 5cr: The examination consists of a submitted assignment, a practical exam, and participation during practical exercises in class, grade: 0–5.
1.Course assignment: The Power of Makeup (makeup on mature skin), 1,5cr.
2. Practical makeup exam in class, 1,5cr.
3. Participation and activity during practical exercises in class, 2cr.

Johanna's part, 3cr:
1. Group essay
2. Individual work
3. Theoretical test
4. Practical test

Completion alternatives

Approved practical assignments, practical and theoretical exams, course assignments and activity. Feedback is given individually or as group feedback after finished course.

Valeria's part, 5cr: one approved course assignment, a practical makeup exam, and active participation in practical exercises in class (activity), grade 0–5.

Johanna's part, 3cr: Approved tasks, theoretical and practical test, grade 0-5.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 80hrs
Self study: 136hrs
Total: 216hrs

Valeria's part, 5cr:
The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 50hrs
Self study: 85hrs
Total: 135hrs

Johanna's part, 3cr:
The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 30hrs
Self study: 51hrs
Total: 81hrs

Further information

More information is given at introduction of each course part.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual, pair and/or team). The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignment and shows especially vague competences within the theme.
The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has almost or has fullfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fullfilled the instructions of the assignments.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Qualifications

SKV24GE01, SKV24GE02

Objective

• The students know about selected special care and beauty treatments and equipment for the client
• The students have knowledge of current trends in beauty and cosmetics
• The students have in-depth knowledge of research in beauty and cosmetics
• The students master sales of care treatments, services and products
• The students follow good industrial hygiene
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promote economic, ecological and social sustainability and consumption of treatments, services and product use

Content

Special Care and Beauty Treatments and Equipments
Trends and Research within Beauty and Cosmetics
Sales of Care Treatments, Services and Products

Location and time

25.8-3.10.2025 Campus Alere.

Materials

Study material on Moodle and according to the teacher's instructions.

Additional literature:
Fagerberg, E., Wahlberg, A., & Garpenschöld, A. (2022). Hudnära: Hudterapeuternas hemligheter. Bazar förlag.
Gillbro, J. (2019). Hudbibeln: Förstå din hud - myter, vetenskap och goda råd. Bookmark.

Databases, social media, industry literature

Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.

Teaching methods

Lectures, workshops, self studies, research, guidance, discussions and work individually/pairs/team

Employer connections

cooperation with the working life is encouraged

Exam schedules

Examination consists of submitted assignments, presentation and a forum diskussion.
Deadline autumn 2025

Completion alternatives

Approved practical assignments and course assignments.
Group or individual feedback is given after finished course.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: about 24hrs
Self study: about 57hrs
Total: 81hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual and / or team). The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course. Forum discussion is evaluated as Pass/Fail

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignment and shows especially vague competences within the theme.
The assignment is inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates excellent competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Qualifications

SKV24KB01

Objective

• The students are familiar with the structure and attributes of tissues to comprehend their importance for well-being
• The students have knowledge about microbes and understands the importance of microbiology within beauty and cosmetics
• The students are familiar with the immune system and function of the lymphocyte
• The students have knowledge about changes in cell and tissue for skin diseases
• The students have knowledge about the basics of cosmetic chemistry
• The students are able to manufacture simple beauty products
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promotes economical and ecological sustainability within product manufacturing

Content

Cell, Molecule and Tissue
Microbiology
Immune System
Lymphocyte
Skin Diseases
Cosmetic Chemistry
Beauty Products

Location and time

The course comprises two parts:
Part 1 (2 cr) is held fall 2025 and comprises skin histology, clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology
Part 2 (2 cr) is held spring 2026 and comprises basic chemistry, biochemistry and cosmetic chemistry

Materials

Part 1: Material on the Moodle page of the course and additional recommended litterature mentioned on the Moodle page.
Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur
Relevant articles
Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.


Part 2:
Marie Lodén: Ren, mjuk och vacker Kemi och funktion hos kosmetika, chapters 3 and 4
General chemistry books for upper secondary school (gymnasiet)

Teaching methods

Lectures, assignments and self studies
Cosmetic products

Exam schedules

Exam dates for spring 2026 will be given at a later date

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

1 cr corresponds to 27 h of studies. The course is a total of 4 cr corresponding to 108 h of studies.

Further information

Mandatory presence at product manufacturing
More information on the Moodle page for the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded based on the results in part 1 and part 2 of the course.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has very poor knowledge of the subject
The student has not participated in the mandatory product manufacturing

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of the subject

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has excellent knowledge of the subject

Qualifications

No prior prerequisites

Further information

-

Objective

The students have knowledge of facial musculature.
The students have knowledge of the historical background of Gua Sha.
The students have knowledge of the fundamentals of Gua Sha treatments.
The students are familiar with and can perform Gua Sha treatments.
The students apply aseptic methods in skincare and follow good industrial hygiene.
The students are familiar with the professional role of the cosmetologist and the practical work in the industry.
The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promotes sustainable development.
The students can analyze and assess their own work.

Content

Historical background and technical foundations of Gua Sha
Benefits of Gua Sha treatments
Blood circulation, stagnation, and massage techniques
Facial sculpting and lifting
Selection and care of Gua Sha tools, along with product selection

Location and time

01.12.2025 - 19.12.2025 Campus Alere.
Course introduction MANDATORY ATTENDANCE

Materials

Study material on Moodle.
Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, practical exercises, narrative teaching, information retrieval, presentations, teamwork.

Exam schedules

Examination consists of practical exercises in class, a course assignment and practical exam.
Deadline in Autumn 2025.
1. Participation and activity during practical exercises in class, 1cr.
2. Course assignment - presentation 1cr.
3. Practical exam 1cr.

Completion alternatives

Approved practical assignments in class, course assignments and practical exam.
Feedback is given after finished course.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: 21 hrs
Self study: 60 hrs
Total: 81 hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates excellent competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments. The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.
The grades are given for the following parts:
1. Participation and activity during practical exercises in class, 1cr.
2. Course assignment - presentation 1cr.
3. Practical exam 1cr.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the task's instructions and demonstrate particularly weak knowledge of the subject.
The submitted assignment is incomplete or missing.
The student has not participated and has not contributed to the process of the project work. The student's share in the project cannot be demonstrated or is brief.
The student has not shown greater commitment and has not been active during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partially followed the task's instructions and demonstrate satisfactory knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is satisfactory.
The student has partly participated and have partly contributed in the process of the project work. The student´s share in the project is satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but engagement and activity has been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has almost or has completed the task's instructions and demonstrate good or extremely good knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is good or extremely good.
The student has participated, taken partial responsibility and contributed to the process of the project work. The student´s share in the project is good or extremely good. The student has participated or actively participated in the course and demonstrate commitment to course content and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has completed the task's instructions and demonstrate excellent knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is excellent and exceptionally well done.
The student has taken responsibility and has contributed to the progress of the project work process. The student's share in the project is clear and excellent. The student has been active throughout the course and demonstrate extra commitment and interest in course content and course assignments.

Qualifications

The anatomy and function of the skin

Objective

• The students understand the research process and the different parts of the thesis
• The students can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the thesis
• The students understand and can use selected qualitative and quantitative methods
• The students can apply appropriate data collection and data analysis methods in the thesis
• The students have the ability to write and argue scientifically in the thesis
• The students can apply, analyze and develop approach that promote economic, ecological and social sustainability in the research process

Content

The Research Process and the Different Parts
Qualitative and Quantitative Data Collection and Data Analysis Methods
Thesis
Scientific Writing

Location and time

5.11.2025-10.12.2025 Campus Alere.

Quantitative methods, 2 ECTS with Ralf Lillbacka: Autumn 2025.
Qualitative methods, 3 ECTS with Jaana: Autumn 2025 / Spring 2026.

Materials

Quantitative methods: the following literature is recommended: Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, or other literature suggested by the examiner.

Jaana´s part: Study material and course literature on Moodle.
Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (4th ed.). 1 ex.
Holme, I. M. & Solvang, B. K. (1997). 2 (uppl.). Forskningsmetodik. Om kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder.
Jakobsson, U. (2011). Forskningens termer och begrepp- en ordbok.
Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S. (2007). 2 (uppl.). Forskningsprocessen- kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv.
Patel, R. & Davidson, B. (2011). 4 (uppl.). Forskningsmetodikens grunder. Att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning.

In addition:
Databases through Finna.
Written instructions and previous thesis.
Current research within the industry.
According to the lecturer.

Teaching methods

Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written assignment.

Jaana´s part: Lectures, workshops, research, guidance, narrative method, discussions and teamwork.

Employer connections

The students are encouraged to write thesis (idea plan) as commissioned work for working life.

Exam schedules

Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month of the date of the end of the course.

Jaana´s part, 3 ECTS: Examination consists of submitted assignments, grade (0-5). Deadline in January 2026 and idea seminar 28 January 2026.
1. Idea Plan, 1 ECTS. Students present their own plan at idea seminar 28 January, deadline for submission of work plan: the week before, 21 January 2026. Individual feedback is given after the seminar. Note! This plan can be required to be compensated after idea seminar, before given a grade.
2. Opposition and Opponent Story, 1 ECTS. Students have read the appointed student's work plan, have written the opponent story and oppose the plan at the idea seminar, deadline: 28 January 2026. Grade and feedback are included in the opponent story's grade and feedback. Feedback and grade are given via Moodle.
3. Active participation in classes, 1 ECTS.

Instructions for the examinations are given by each teacher at the beginning of course part.

Completion alternatives

Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)

Jaana´s part: Approved assignments (grade 0-5): own thesis plan, opposition and opposed written essay of thesis plan. Own thesis plan is presented and opposed at idea seminar 28 January 2026. Individual feedback is given on the thesis plan after the seminar.

Student workload

Quantitative methods:
The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: 12h
Self study: 42h
Total: 54h

Jaana´s part:
The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: 25 hrs
Self study: 56 hrs
Total: 81 hrs

Further information

More information is given at each course part introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

Jaana´s part: The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual). The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

Jaana´s part: The student has not followed the instructions of the assignment and shows especially vague competences and understanding within the theme.
The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

Jaana´s part: The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

Jaana´s part: The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence and good understanding within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

Jaana´s part: The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates excellent competence and a complete understanding within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.

Qualifications

SKV24FL01

Objective

• The students can define and identify with the professional role in the industry
• The students develop knowledge for business and internal and external entrepreneurship
• The students structure a creative business idea and a business model within industry
• The students are able as an entrepreneur to plan and carry out a customer event within a chosen field in the industry in association with others
• The students develop an understanding for building networks
• The students create a personal brand and are able to do marketing for the business
• The students have knowledge about the significance of economy for the business
• The students have fundamental insights into bookkeeping
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promotes economic, ecological and social sustainability for internal and external entrepreneurship and services

Content

Enterprise
Entrepreneurship
Business Model
Personal Branding and Marketing
Treatments and Services
Customer Event
Networking
Economy and Bookkeeping

Location and time

28th October to 15th December Online via Teams

Materials

Kursbok + tentbok:

Skärvad, P., & Olsson, J. (2008). Företagsekonomi 100: Faktabok (14. uppl.). Liber ekonom

Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley.

Com. B. (2020) Foundamentals of Entrepreneurship. National Education policy. Kap. 1-4. Litteraturen finns som länk i Moodle.

Tent bok:
Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D., & Regnér, P. (2018). Fundamentals of strategy. Pearson. Chapter 4 and 6

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, test, practical assignments, assignments and open books exams.

Employer connections

For course assignment is the aim to cooperate with working life
The student´s are encouraged to collaborate and network with working life.

Exam schedules

More information in Moddle

Student workload

The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 50 hrs
Self study: 85 hrs
Total: 135 hrs

Content scheduling

This Course focus on the sustainable goal 4 Quality Education. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.

4:4 INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITH RELEVANT SKILLS FOR FINANCIAL SUCCESS
By 2030, substantially increase the number of youth and adults who have relevant skills, including technical and vocational skills, for employment, decent jobs and entrepreneurship.

Further information

More information is given at introduction of each course part.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5).Total points are calculated, and a grade is given based on an assessment total points.

Qualifications

SKV24EE01

Objective

• The students have in-depth knowledge of selected classic clothing styles and looks
• The students have further developed the ability to analyze the client´s anatomical conditions, life stage, needs and wishes in order to carry out style consultation
• The students have the ability to create customized looks for the client within classic style and for various occasions through style consultation
• The students have knowledge of dress codes
• The students can create suitable makeups for clients, looks and occasions with different techniques, tools, products and accessories
• The students can style suitable hairstyles for clients, looks and occasions with different techniques, tools, products and accessories
• The students can analyze, plan, execute and evaluate looks for clients and occasions
• The students follow good industrial hygiene
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promote economic, ecological and social sustainability and consumption of looks, services and product use

Content

Classic Clothing Styles and Looks
Style Consultation
Clothes and Accessories
Dress Codes
Styling with Makeup and Hair
Techniques, Tools and Products

Location and time

Autumn 2025 Campus Alere

Materials

Study material on Moodle and according to the teacher's instructions. Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS, if stated in assignment descriptions.

Additional literature:
Rees, A. (2016). The curated closet. (First edition.).

Coggins, D., & O'Brien, G. (2016). Men and style. E-book.​

Freer, A., & Kuo, J. (2015). How to get dressed.

Brown, B. (2011). Bobbi Brown makeup manual. (1st trade ed.)

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, practical exercises, workshops, research, self studies, mood boards, portfolio, salon work and team work.

Employer connections

For course assignment is the aim to cooperate with working life

Exam schedules

Examination consists of submitted assignments and presentations, deadline autumn 2025

Completion alternatives

Approved practical assignments and course assignments.
Group feedback is given after finished course.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: 40hrs
Self study: 95 hrs
Total: 135 hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual and / or team). The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignment and shows especially vague competences within the theme.
The assignment is inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates excellent competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Qualifications

SKV24GE03

Objective

• The students are familiar with how a fashion show is executed and how the process is carried through
• The students have the ability to create suitable looks for the concept of the fashion show
• The students have knowledge about styling to create visual looks for the models
• The students can produce a visually integrated fashion show in collaboration with each other and partners
• The students understand the significance of important factors for the project´s success
• The students are able to plan, carry out and evaluate a fashion show as a project
• The students can compile a project report
• The students follow good industrial hygiene
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promotes social, economic and ecological sustainability and consumption through content in project and in collaboration with partners

Content

Visually Integrated Fashion Show, Concept and Process
Clothing and Accessories
Visual Looks for Models
Styling with Makeup and Hair
Techniques, Tools and Products
Project Report

Location and time

8.9-31.10 Campus Alere. The fashion show is planned to take place in week 44, but could take place in November.

Materials

Study material on Moodle.

Literature:
Everett, J. C., Swanson, K. K. & Blanco, J. F. (2019). Guide to producing a Fashion Show (4th edition).
Holmberg, P. (2022). A glimpse behind the scenes: en handbok om hur en modevisning skapas.
Eklund, S. (2011, 2009). Arbeta i projekt.
Dowson, R. & Bassett, D. (2015). Event Planning and Management.
Shone, A. & Parry, B. (2013). Successful Event Management.

According to the lecturers instructions.
Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.

Teaching methods

Teamwork, meetings, workshops, research, mood boards, discussions, narrative method and lectures.

Employer connections

The students and their teams collaborate with working life. For the project to succeed, the sponsors are an inevitable asset. Student search for sponsors.

Exam schedules

Executed project- fashion show and submitted project report. Deadline Autumn 2025 and seminar November-December 2025.

Grade (0-5) is given for the following parts:
1. Mood board! Teams presents for the group a mood board in specific theme at occasion, 1cr, deadline: week 39. Team feedback is given directly during the occasion.
2. Individual project report about the fashion show (planning, realization and assessment), 2cr, deadline and seminar: Autumn 2025
3. Active participation in the project during in class teaching, through teamwork, own role and individual contribution, 2cr.
4. Mandatory seminar: Autumn 2025. Group feedback is given at the seminar.

Instructions for the examinations are given by teacher at the beginning of the course.

Completion alternatives

Approved project work, approved project report and activity. The student´s activity is in a central role to carry out the project.
Feedback is given for the team or for the whole group

Student workload

The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 40hrs
Self- studies: 95hrs
Total: 135hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual and team) and for activity. The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the task's instructions and demonstrate particularly weak knowledge of the subject.
The submitted assignment is incomplete or missing.
The student has not participated and has not contributed to the process of the project work. The student's share in the project cannot be demonstrated or is brief.
The student has not shown greater commitment and has not been active during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partially followed the task's instructions and demonstrate satisfactory knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is satisfactory.
The student has partly participated and have partly contributed in the process of the project work. The student´s share in the project is satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but engagement and activity has been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has almost or has completed the task's instructions and demonstrate good or extremely good knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is good or extremely good.
The student has participated, taken partial responsibility and contributed to the process of the project work. The student´s share in the project is good or extremely good. The student has participated or actively participated in the course and demonstrate commitment to course content and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has completed the task's instructions and demonstrate excellent knowledge of the subject.
The content of the submitted assignment is excellent and exceptionally well done.
The student has taken responsibility and has contributed to the progress of the project work process. The student's share in the project is clear and excellent. The student has been active throughout the course and demonstrate extra commitment and interest in course content and course assignments.

Qualifications

SKV24GE01, SKV24GE02, SKV24GE03, SKV24GE04

Objective

The Student
- has insights into entrepreneurship within Social and Health Care
- knows what company establishment means
- develops skills for planning and implementing a business model
- develops an understanding for entrepreneurship and social innovations
- has the prerequisites to cooperate in inter professional activities

Content

Entrepreneurship within Social Welfare, Health Care and Beauty Care
Practical Entrepreneurship
The Procedure of Becoming an Approved Service Provider within Social Welfare and Health Care
Business Model
Social Innovations
Strategies to Strengthen Cooperation
Inter Professional Learning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No prior prerequisite

Further information

-

Objective

• The students are ready to create for all stages in life the ultimate service module that suits the client
• The students have the ability and preparedness to meet and cooperate with different kind of client personalities and are able to respond to the client’s needs and wishes through style consulting
• The students function as style consultants and can apply their knowledge about different products when giving the client advice
• The students have the preparedness to plan makeup and hair to create suitable looks with clothing and accessories
• The students have knowledge about fashion, trends and colors for the season and can adapt it to creating the client’s style and looks
• The students can create a complete and sustainable wardrobe for the client
• The students are familiar with the work as a personal shopper and comply it during style consultation
• The students can apply, analyze and develop looks and an approach that promotes economical, ecological and social sustainability for clothing and accessories, body image, consumtion, fashion and trends for the season and wardrobe

Content

Stages in Life and Personal Style
Ultimate Service Module
Client Personalities
Style Consulting
Products
Suitable Looks with Clothing and Accessories
Fashion, Trends and Colors for the Season
Complete and Sustainable Wardrobe
Personal Shopper

Location and time

25th August to 1 October 2025 at Campus Alere Vasa (Some part will be arranged as study visits)

Materials

Jonsson, A., Egels-Zandén, N., Hagberg, J., Lammgård, C., & Sundström, M. (2017). Handelns digitalisering och förändrade affärer.

Virtanen, H., Ravald, A., Björk, P., & Lundström, J. (2022-01-01). Marknadsföringen har en avgörande roll i förändringsarbetet. Ekonomiska samfundets tidskrift, 3, 24-29.

Rislund, C., & Jonasson, G. (2022). Handbok i tjänstedesign: Kund- och användarcentrerat utvecklingsarbete steg för steg (Tredje upplagan.). [Rislund, Carina].

Gustavsson, J. (2022). Influencer marketing i praktiken: Strategi, ekonomi & juridik (Första upplagan.). Sanoma utbildning.

Moxnes, P., Lindelöf, I., & Lindelöf, I. (2008). Fasettmänniskan: Teori och forskning om personlighet och roller. Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

The course will be based on a study visit to Helsinki on either September 15 or 16. Participation in the visit is, of course, voluntary, but if you choose not to attend, you will be given compensatory assignments. Students are responsible for the cost of their own train ticket.

- The assessment for the course is based on:
- Planning
- An image portfolio from the study visits.
– Those who do not participate in the visits must create an image portfolio using borrowed images, as well as write an essay for each visit min 5000 word. It’s much more fun and easier to take part in the day in Helsinki.

Employer connections

Study visit to different companys

Exam schedules

Information in Moodle

Student workload

The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 20 hrs
Study visit: 20-40 hrs
Self study: 88-68 hrs
Total: 108 hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction an based of discussion.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual or in pairs).Total points are calculated, and a grade is given based on an assessment total points.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Studerande påvisar en ytlig kompetens och grundläggande förståelse för ämnet

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Studerande påvisar en kompetens som relateras och kopplas till litteraturen
Studerande kan reflektera och motivera egna synpunkter

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Studerande har en fördjupad kompetens och visar en djupare förståelse för ämnet i relation till det kommande yrket

Qualifications

SKV22SK01, SKV22SK02, SKV22SK03

Further information

-

Objective

• The students understand the importance of esthetics in the field of Beauty and Cosmetics
• The students are familiar with the history of fashion and with important people that had influence on fashion
• The students are familiar with different beauty ideals and style icons through ages
• The students are familiar with the basics of fashion studies and understand its role in society
• The students have knowledge about the social and cultural significance in fashion and clothing
• The students can apply picture analysis on fashion pictures and photographs
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promotes social, economical and ecological sustainability through ideals, fashion and clothing

Content

Esthetics in Beauty and Cosmetics
History of Fashion and Fashion Profiles
Beauty Ideals and Style Icons Through Ages
Fashion Studies
Social and Cultural Context of Fashion and Clothing
Picture Analysis

Location and time

25.8-31.10.2025 Campus Alere, mandatory module meetings.

Materials

Study material on Moodle and according to the lecturer.

Adz, K. & Stone, W. (2018). This is not Fashion: Streetwear Past, Present and Future. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
Ander, G. (2016). Den lilla svarta. Modeindustrins mörka baksida. Stockholm: Ordfront.
Bale, K. (2009). Estetik. En introduktion. Göteborg: Daidalos AB.
Barnard, M. (2014). Fashion Theory: an introduction. London: Routledge.
DK Publishing, Inc., publisher, & Hennessy, K. (2019). Fashion: The definitive visual guide (New edition. Second edition.). 1 ex.
Edwards, L. (2017). How to Read a Dress. London: Bloomsbury.
Ehrman, E. (Ed.). (2018). Fashioned from Nature. London: V&A Publishing.
Eldvik, B. (2010). Modemakt – 300 år av kläder. Stockholm: Nordiska Museets Förlag.
Fashionary. (2017). Fashionpedia. The visual dictionary of fashion design. Hong Kong: Fashionary International Ltd.
Fashionary. (2018). The Fashion Business Manual. Hong Kong: Fashionary International Ltd.
Fredriksson, C. (2012). Mode. Malmö: Liber AB.
Kaiser, B. S. (2012). Fashion and Cultural Studies. London: Berg.
Kawamura, Y. (2007, 2017). Fashion-ology. A introduction to Fashion Studies. New York: Berg Publishers.
M. Granger, M. & A. Farnan, S. (2020). (4. uppl.). The Fashion Industry and Its Careers. 1 ex. ​
Muoti – tyylit ja vaatteet kautta aikojen. (2013). Kustannusosakeyhtiö TAMMI.
Severinsson, E., Warkander, P., & Andersson, P. K. (2021). Modevetenskap. (Första upplagan.). 1 ex.​
Stevenson, NJ. (2011). Muodin vuosikymmenet. Kustannusosakeyhtiö TAMMI.
Thomas, S. (2018). Fashion Ethics. London: Routledge.
Welters, L. & Lillethun, A. (Ed). (2011). The Fashion Reader. London: Berg.
Welters, L. & Lillethun, A. (Ed). (2018). Fashion History. London: Bloomsbury.

Magazines, online platforms within the industry, mobile applications and social media.
Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.

Teaching methods

Module meetings / seminars, pair and team work as module workshops, research, mood boards, presentations, narrative method, discussions and guidance.

Employer connections

For module assignments, if suitable, the aim is to collaborate with working life.

Exam schedules

Examination consists of module assignments that are submitted for the mandatory module seminar. The last deadline is at the last module seminar. The timetable for modules is presented in Moodle.

1. Module 1 & 2. Aesthetics, Standards and Icons, 0,5sp, deadline: 29.8 via Moodle.
2. Module 3. Fashion Stories and Influencers, 1sp, deadline: 11.9 via Moodle.
3. Module 4. Fashion Studies, 1sp, deadline: 23.9 via Moodle.
4. Module 5. Social and Cultural Context in Fashion, 0,5sp, deadline: 7.10 via Moodle.
5. Participation, activity and commitment affects the final course grade.

Completion alternatives

Approved module assignments for the modules, participation, activity and commitment on Moodle and during mandatory module seminars at campus Alere.
Students commitment and activity during the course are crucial for a successful outcome.
Feedback is given for pairs or for the team at module meetings in class.

Student workload

The student work 27 hours / ECTS.
In class / module meetings: 15 hrs
Self study: 66 hrs
Total: 81 hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for module assignments (pair and team). The average of the grades for module assignments form the final grade in the course. The student´s activity during the course and during the pair / team work is important for a successful outcome.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the module assignment and shows especially vague competences within the theme.
The module assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the module assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted module assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the module assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted module assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and module assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the module assignments and demonstrates excellent competence within the subject.
The content of submitted module assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and module assignments.
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Qualifications

SKV22SK01

Further information

-

Objective

• The students have the ability to present the result systematically and do relevant interpretations
• The students have the ability to critically view the own thesis
• The students are able to present the most central aspects of the thesis when presented
• The students are able to function as opponents and carry out the maturity test

Content

Scientific Work Methods
Scientific Report - Result, Interpretations, Critical View and Discussion
Deepened Knowledge - Result and Interpretation, Critical View and Discussion
Scientific Writing
Presentation of Thesis
Opponent and Maturity Test

Location and time

25.8-25.11.2025, Campus Alere

Mandatory sessions:
25 August Introduction
24 November Thesis Presentation and Opposition
25 November Maturity Test

Materials

Literature about thesis topic and data, resources within the own research area.
Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.
According to the supervisor´s instructions.

Teaching methods

Self studies with Thesis.
Booked individual guidance meeting with supervisors (Jaana and Johanna).
Guidance in group sessions with Jaana.

Employer connections

Possible commissioned work and / or collaboration partners, sponsors.

Exam schedules

Students work individually with their Thesis according to own scheduled plan. Students are expected to participate in group sessions and book individual guidance sessions for thesis process advancement.

1. Finished and presented Thesis. Students present thesis at the mandatory presentation seminar 24th November 2025. Deadline for submission for thesis final review is 7th November 2025. Individual feedback is given by supervisors at final thesis review.
2. Opposition and Opponent Story. Students have read and critically reviewed appointed thesis and oppose it at the mandatory presentation seminar. Students write an opponent story as essay for the appointed thesis, deadline: 24th November 2025. Feedback for opposition and opponent story is given in thesis assessment document.
3. Maturity Test. Students write the mandatory maturity test 25th November 2025 on own laptop.

Completion alternatives

Finished and presented thesis. The mandatory parts are conducted at campus Alere.
Feedback is given individually during the individual guidance sessions.

Finished and approved course part statement and presentation, grade (Pass / Fail).

1. Finished and presented Thesis. Students present thesis at the mandatory presentation seminar 24th November 2025. Deadline for submission for thesis final review is 7th November 2025. Individual feedback is given by supervisors at final thesis review.
2. Opposition and Opponent Story. Students have read and critically reviewed appointed thesis and oppose it at the mandatory presentation seminar. Students write an opponent story as essay for the appointed thesis, deadline: 24th November 2025. Feedback for opposition and opponent story is given in thesis assessment document.
3. Maturity Test. Students write the mandatory maturity test 25th November 2025 on own laptop.

Student workload

The students work for 5 ECTS, 135 hours.

Group guidance in class: 6 hours.
Presentation seminar: 7 hours.
Maturity test: 2 hours.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass:
The student has followed instructions and shows sufficient knowledge about the topic.
The student has shown interest.

Fail:
The student has not followed instructions and shows especially insufficient knowledge about the topic.
The student has not shown much interest.

Further information

More information is given at group and individual guidance sessions.

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student possesses a basic competence in the subject / The student does not show sufficient competence in the subject

Assessment methods and criteria

The part is approved with Pass / Fail and is included in Thesis 15 ECTS. The Thesis has a specific assessment document.

Qualifications

Research Methodology

Further information

-

Objective

The Student
- has basic practical skills in speech and writing for the profession
- becomes familiar with professional texts and terminology in own field of work

Content

- the terminology in the professional field
- oral presentation
- written presentation
- language correctness

Location and time

Autumn 2025

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The students show such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish.
Written and oral skills are assessed separately

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The students show such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish.
Written and oral skills are assessed separately

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students show such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish.
Written and oral skills are assessed separately

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

Knowledge on level B1

Further information

-

Objective

• The students can apply their own knowledge, analyze the skin, plan and perform treatments for the client
• The students can apply their own knowledge, analyze anatomical conditions, plan and create makeups for the client
• The students can apply different techniques with instruments, tools and products in beauty care and makeup
• The students can recommend care treatments and make-up for the client as well as give advice on self-care
• The students know nail technology and different ways to create nails
• The students follow good industrial hygiene
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promote economic, ecological and social sustainability and consumption of treatments, services and product use

Content

Skincare Analyze, Skincare Problems, Problem Solving and Treatments
Nail Technology
Instruments, Tools and Products in Beauty Care and Makeup
Anatomical Conditions, Makeup Styles and Occasions
Diversity

Location and time

25.08.2025 - 19.12.2025 Campus Alere.

Materials

Study material on Moodle or according to the lecturer.

Teaching methods

Lectures, narrative teaching, information retrieval, demonstrations, practical exercises, workshops, salon work, study visits, and teamwork.

Employer connections

Salon work

Exam schedules

The examination consists of submitted assignments, practical and theoretical exams, as well as participation in practical exercises during lessons. Examination in autumn 2025. Instructions for the examination are given by each teacher at the beginning of course part.

Valeria's part, 5cr: The examination consists of a submitted assignment, a practical exam, and participation during practical exercises in class, grade: 0–5.
1.Course assignment: The Power of Makeup (makeup on mature skin), 1,5cr.
2. Practical makeup exam in class, 1,5cr.
3. Participation and activity during practical exercises in class, 2cr.

Johanna's part, 3cr:
1. Group essay
2. Individual work
3. Theoretical test
4. Practical test

Completion alternatives

Approved practical assignments, practical and theoretical exams, course assignments and activity. Feedback is given individually or as group feedback after finished course.

Valeria's part, 5cr: one approved course assignment, a practical makeup exam, and active participation in practical exercises in class (activity), grade 0–5.

Johanna's part, 3cr: Approved tasks, theoretical and practical test, grade 0-5.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 80hrs
Self study: 136hrs
Total: 216hrs

Valeria's part, 5cr:
The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 50hrs
Self study: 85hrs
Total: 135hrs

Johanna's part, 3cr:
The students work 27 hours/cr.
In class: 30hrs
Self study: 51hrs
Total: 81hrs

Further information

More information is given at introduction of each course part.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual, pair and/or team). The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignment and shows especially vague competences within the theme.
The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has almost or has fullfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fullfilled the instructions of the assignments.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Qualifications

SKV24GE01, SKV24GE02

Objective

• The students know about selected special care and beauty treatments and equipment for the client
• The students have knowledge of current trends in beauty and cosmetics
• The students have in-depth knowledge of research in beauty and cosmetics
• The students master sales of care treatments, services and products
• The students follow good industrial hygiene
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promote economic, ecological and social sustainability and consumption of treatments, services and product use

Content

Special Care and Beauty Treatments and Equipments
Trends and Research within Beauty and Cosmetics
Sales of Care Treatments, Services and Products

Location and time

25.8-3.10.2025 Campus Alere.

Materials

Study material on Moodle and according to the teacher's instructions.

Additional literature:
Fagerberg, E., Wahlberg, A., & Garpenschöld, A. (2022). Hudnära: Hudterapeuternas hemligheter. Bazar förlag.
Gillbro, J. (2019). Hudbibeln: Förstå din hud - myter, vetenskap och goda råd. Bookmark.

Databases, social media, industry literature

Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS.

Teaching methods

Lectures, workshops, self studies, research, guidance, discussions and work individually/pairs/team

Employer connections

cooperation with the working life is encouraged

Exam schedules

Examination consists of submitted assignments, presentation and a forum diskussion.
Deadline autumn 2025

Completion alternatives

Approved practical assignments and course assignments.
Group or individual feedback is given after finished course.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: about 24hrs
Self study: about 57hrs
Total: 81hrs

Further information

More information is given at course introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual and / or team). The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course. Forum discussion is evaluated as Pass/Fail

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignment and shows especially vague competences within the theme.
The assignment is inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view
The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates excellent competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.
The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Qualifications

SKV24KB01

Objective

• The students have knowledge of style history before the 21st century
• The students have in-depth knowledge of selected key clothing and accessories from style eras
• The students have knowledge of key figures in the history of style
•The students understand the meaning of vintage fashion and second hand
• The students can create and work with different techniques, tools and products in styling
• The students have the ability to recreate and renew looks from selected style eras
• The students follow good industrial hygiene
• The students can apply, analyze and develop an approach that promote economic, ecological and social sustainability and consumption of looks and product use

Content

Style History before the 21st Century
Key Clothing, Accessories and Looks
Key Figures in Style History
Vintage Fashion and Second Hand
Styling Techniques, Tools and Products

Location and time

Autumn 2025 Campus Alere

Jaana's part 26.8-3.10.2025
Lotta's part 6.10-7.11.2025

Seminars 3.12.2025 & 28.1.2026

Materials

Study material on Moodle and according to the teacher's instructions.

Literature:
Hay, B. Style me vintage.(2010)
Young, L.Timeless a Century of Iconic Looks(2017)

Hennessy, K. & DK Publishing, I. (2019). Fashion: The definitive visual guide (New edition. Second edition.). DK Publishing.
McDowell, C. (2013). The Anatomy of fashion: Why we dress the way we do. Phaidon Press Ltd.
Mulvey, K., & Richards, M. (2007). A century of fashion. Bounty Books.
Peacock, J. Länsimainen puku antiikista nykyaikaan. (2004). Otava kustannusosakeyhtiö.

Students follow the thesis writing instructions for Novia UAS

Teaching methods

Lectures, narrative method, demonstrations, practical exercises, workshops, research, self studies, mood boards, portfolio and team work.

Employer connections

For course assignment the aim is to cooperate with working life.

Exam schedules

Examination consists of submitted assignments:

Joint Examination Assignment for Lotta and Jaana: Style Rebirth: Elements Reimagined, 3 cr
Part 1, theoretical research, deadline and presentation: 3.12.2025
Part 2, practical part, deadline and presentation: 28.1.2026

assignment in Lotta's part (0,5/2cr): Restyle, 0,5 cr, deadline autumn 2025

Jaana's part: examination consists of assignments, grades (0-5) and activity/attendance, grades (0-5).
1. Visual Identity: Crafting Personal Portraits, course assignment individually or in pairs, 1 ECTS. Deadline: 17.10.2025 via Moodle. Feedback is given via Moodle. Grades (0-5).
2. Activity and Attendance, 0,5 ECTS. grade (0-5).

All course assignments needs to be completed and approved to get the course graded.

Instructions for the examination are given at each course part introduction.

Completion alternatives

Approved practical assignments and course assignments.
Pair / group feedback is given during seminar and after finished course.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours / cr.
In class: 40hrs
Self study: 95 hrs
Total: 135 hrs

Further information

More information is given at each course part introduction.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is evaluated based on grades (0-5) for assignments (individual, pair and / or team). The average of the grades for assignments form the final grade in the course.

The following criteria are assessed in the course's examination assignment:
Research Quality: Depth and accuracy in historical research
Creativity: Originality and innovation in the reinterpretation of style
Presentation Skills: Clarity, engagement, and use of visual aids

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignment and shows especially vague competences within the theme.
The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated or contributed anything during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature.
The student can reflect and motivate from own point of view.
The student has almost or has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates good or eminently good competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are good or eminently good.
The student has participated or participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment for content of the course and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.
The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates excellent competence within the subject.
The content of submitted assignments are excellent and exceptionally executed.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment and interest for content of the course and course assignments.

Qualifications

SKV24GE03

Objective

The student:​
- is familiar with internal and external beauty and body positivity​
- understands how beauty affects the individual's wellbeing and self-image​
- can achieve and maintain work-life balance through personal strategies​
- understands the significance of mental wellness, attained through mindfulness and stress management​
- understands the significance of health, attained through nutrition and exercise​
- can apply strategies for personal health, wellness, and sustainable living​

Content

Internal Beauty​
External Beauty​
Body Positivity​
Wellness and Mindfulness​
Health​
Nutrition and Exercise

Location and time

15.8-5.12.2025 online

Materials

Study material on Moodle
According to lecturers instructions

Teaching methods

Online Studies

Exam schedules

Examination consists of submitted module assignments, graded (Pass/Fail). Examination in December 2025.

Instructions for the examination are given on Moodle.

Completion alternatives

Examination consists of submitted module assignments, grade (Pass/Fail). All assignments in selected modules needs to be completed and approved to achieve the final course grade (Pass/Fail).

Instructions for the examination are given on Moodle.

Student workload

The students work 27 hours / ECTS
Self study online: 135 hrs
Total: 135 hrs

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Assessment Criterias (Pass / Fail)​

Criteria 1. Knowledge & Understanding ​
- The student know and understand the theory and discourse within the context of individual modules.​

Criteria 2. Critical Thinking​
- The student has the ability to identify patterns and relationships between self-image and wellness in addition to selected references.​

Criteria 3. Application ​
- The student can make practical use of techniques and / or strategies in everyday life.​    ​

Further information

More information on Moodle

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Assessment Criterias (Pass / Fail)​

Criteria 1. Knowledge & Understanding ​
- The student know and understand the theory and discourse within the context of individual modules.​

Criteria 2. Critical Thinking​
- The student has the ability to identify patterns and relationships between self-image and wellness in addition to selected references.​

Criteria 3. Application ​
- The student can make practical use of techniques and / or strategies in everyday life.​

Assessment methods and criteria

​Approved module assignments and the course is evaluated as Pass or Fail.

Qualifications

No prerequisites