Academic year 2021 - 2022

•   Alternative enhanced studies RA18AL03-3001 30.08.2021-05.12.2021  3 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - deepend own knowledge in choosen alternative by analyzing the latest research and actualities as well as describing the quality aspects in the field.
  
  The course runs parallel to the clinical course so that the work can be anchored in practice.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical basic care, Clinical radiography 2, Clinical radiography 3- Nuclearmedicin, Clinical radiotherapy and Studiemodule Patient in clinical radiography

  Content of the study unit

  Selected area/ modality

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Newest scientific articles in your chosen field

  Learning methods

  Individual written exercise work, tutoring and seminars

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The course is linked to the chosen alternative internship

  Student's schedule and workload

  3sp= 3X27h

•   Clinical radiography 2 RA20KSR02-3001 22.11.2021-03.04.2022  16 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has the ability to apply theoretical knowledge in practice
  - has the ability to independently, as a member of the work team, plan, perform and evaluate nativity studies , flouroscopy examinations, mammography examinations, computed tomography and easier MRI examinations.
  - can handle, care and treat the patient overall in examinations and interventions and have good readiness to care for patients at different situations / different circumstances / with varying needs and problems.
  - understands the meaning of patient-centered and safe patient care
  - can apply the principles of sustainable development in all
  dimensions and have developed the ability to collaborate and demonstrate responsibility in work with increased demands for independence and initiative
  - has ability to independently acquire new knowledge in the diagnostic radiography's sub-areas.

  Prerequisites

  Diagnostic radiography 2, 2/4 approved courses in study modules Patient care in clinical radiography context and in Biosciences

  Content of the study unit

  -conventional x-ray
  -flouroscopy
  -mammography
  -computed tomography
  -MRI

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Carina Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.11.2021 - 03.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 16 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical radiography 3 - Nuclearmedicin RA18KSR03-3002 22.11.2021-03.04.2022  5 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has the ability to apply theoretical knowledge in nuclear medicine
  - has the ability to plan, perform and evaluate the most common surveys under supervision
  - can handle, care and treat the patient in general during the examination / treatment
  - has developed the ability to collaborate and shows responsibility in work
  - has the ability to independently acquire new knowledge in nuclear medicine radiography

  Prerequisites

  Diagnostik radiography 3- Nuclearmedicin, Clinical radiography 1and study module Radiation in medical use 1

  Content of the study unit

  Nuclearmedicin

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Carina Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Praktik (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  God praktik och praktikrapport (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.11.2021 - 03.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Diagnostic radiography 2 RA20SM01-3001 30.08.2021-07.11.2021  11 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  -should show good knowledge in X-ray, the imaging technology and native projections.
  -has basic knowledge of the flouroscopy technology and the most common screening studies
  -has basic knowledge of mammography examinations and photography techniques.
  -has basic knowledge of the computed tomography, the technology, examinations and work on computed tomography.
  -has basic insights into using contrast agents and first aid related to them.
  -has basic insights into the magnetic resonance imaging technology, in the use of MRI and deep-knowing in safety issues.
  -has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
  -understands the importance of good patient care,patient-centered and safe patientcare
  -can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation

  Prerequisites

  Diagnostic radiography 1 and Clinical radiography 1

  Content of the study unit

  -conventional x-ray
  -fluoroscopy
  -mammography
  -computed radiography
  -magnetic tomography
  -contrastmedia and first-aid
  -anatomy
  -patientcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 07.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 11 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda, Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Diagnostic radiography 3 - Nuclear medicine RA18SM02-3002 30.08.2021-12.10.2021  3 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has insight into the basic principles for the use of gamma camera and know all the imaging methods in nuclear medicine
  - has knowledge of radioactive substances and radiopharmaceuticals and basic skills for safe use of these
  - has knowledge of nuclear medicine pathology
  - has basic preparedness to plan, perform and evaluate the most common nuclear medicine studies under supervision.
  - are able to take care of the patient overall in examination/treatment
  - can work according to sustainable development principles in nuclear medicine.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical radiography 1

  Content of the study unit

  - the basic principles of nuclear medicine; radioactive isotopes, decay, gamma radiation, radio-pharmaceutics, half-life and activity
  - activity accounts
  - different methods
  - most common assessments
  - respond and inform the patient at skeletal scintigraphy and others methods
  - radiation protection in the isotope ward: patient and staff radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 12.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English RB20EN01-3004 19.04.2022-05.06.2022  3 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a work context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Oral and written communication
  Fundamental terminology of the profession
  Scientific and professional formulation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Carina Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  19.04.2022 - 05.06.2022

  Enrollment date range

  19.03.2022 - 18.04.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English RB20EN01-3001 10.01.2022-01.04.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a work context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Oral and written communication
  Fundamental terminology of the profession
  Scientific and professional formulation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 01.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

•   Enhanced clinical studies RA18KSR06-3001 06.09.2021-07.11.2021  13 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has in-depth theoretical knowledge in the chosen field of study and skills to utilize them in clinical work
  - demonstrate self-esteem planning, execution and evaluation of frequent investigations and treatments in the choosen area of encanced clinical field
  - controls the treatment, overall care and supervision of the patient.
  - has good ability to cooperate and shows responsibility in the work with increased demands for independence and initiative
  - has ability to independently acquire new knowledge and to also, in new situations, pay attention to, analyze, structure and solve problems related to the deepening option

  Prerequisites

  Basic nursing care, Clinical radiography 2, Clinical radiography 3- Nuclearmedicin, Clinical radiotherapy and Patientsafety in radiotherapy and intervetion radiology. Course Clinical radiography 4 minimum to 1/2 approved.

  Content of the study unit

  Selected area in clinical radiography

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2021 - 07.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 13 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Immunology and pathology RB20BV04-3001 30.08.2021-20.12.2021  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the function of lymphocytes in human immune defence
  - knows the process of immunisation
  - command immunological and pathological terminology.
  - are familiar with the acute inflammation, and changes in cells and tissues in disease
  - are familiar with the main sources of information within immunology and pathology
  - understand the importance of immunology within health care professions

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Immunology and pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Penttinen, Ulla. Immunologi och patologi. Kurskompendium på moodle
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur (Toppenbra bok!)
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021 (om sars-cov-2 och immunförsvaret)
  Truedsson. Klinisk immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur.
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Kapitel 2, sid 27-109 handlar om immunologi.
  Brehmer-Andersson. Allmän patologi. Studentlitteratur 2011
  Seidal. Klinisk patologi. Studentlitteratur 2006
  Mäkinen et al. Patologia. Duodecim 2012 finns på Terveysportti
  Karttunen, Soini, Vuopala. Tautioppi. Edita 2005.
  Agger, Andersen, Leslie, Aasted. Immunologi. Studentlitteratur.2007. ISBN: 9789144034355
  Erlanson-Albertsson. Cellbiologi. Studentlitteratur
  Immunologibok på internet http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK27123/
  
  Immune responses to viruses:
  https://www.immunology.org/public-information/bitesized-immunology/pathogens-and-disease/immune-responses-viruses
  
  The Immune System
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27784777 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Skriftligt arbete (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 20.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tentamen på Alere ca 1-2 veckor efter föreläsningarnas slut
  Omtentamen i december 2021 och januari 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp innebär 3 x 27 h arbete för studerande, 81 h arbete (not translated)

•   Medical Treatment RB20BV05-3001 13.09.2021-30.11.2021  5 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
  - are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
  - are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
  - command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
  - are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
  - are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Medication administration and different medication groups
  Pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Nordeng och Spigset (2018) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
  SHM.2021. Handbok i säker läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  
  Läkemedelsräkning och -behandling:
  Envall, S., Pulli, A. & Salonen, A-M. 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Sarijärven Offset Oy, Saarijärvi.
  Läkemedelsberäkningskommendium
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Björkman, E. & Hagberg, M. 2005. Läkemedelsberäkning för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Artlkar/material enl föreläsarens anvisningar
  armacology distributed by the teacher

  Learning methods

  Online lectures and seminars
  tasks and tests online

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Task passed not approved
  test 0-5 scale

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.09.2021 - 30.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  5 credits

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Patient safety in clinical radiography RA20SM03-3001 28.03.2022-08.05.2022  3 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  -has insight in patient safety in the own workfield

  Prerequisites

  Diagnsotic radiography 2

  Content of the study unit

  Patientsafety

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lecturers
  Discussions
  Individual work
  Patientsafety portal

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.03.2022 - 08.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 27.03.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 14

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The evaluation of the course through the individual werg/ patientsafety portal has to be approved

  Student's schedule and workload

  27hx3

•   Patient-centered care in clinical radiography RA20SM04-3002 22.11.2021-01.05.2022  6 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student has ability to meet and take care of patients in all ages, with any cultural background in her/his own context. Can handle different kind of patient situations and has the ability to guide the patient.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  - Geriatric
  - Pediatric
  - Social psychology
  - Cultural competence
  - Pedagogy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Carina Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Kursen går delvis virtuellt via Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.11.2021 - 01.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda, Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  6 sp x 27 h= 162 h (not translated)

•   Remedial teaching in immunology and pathology VÅV16BV11-3003 01.08.2021-31.07.2022  1 credits +-
  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  enligt kursen BV04 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Repetition av immunologi och patologi
  Föreläsning, diskussion och självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  GK/0 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 31.07.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 1 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Additional information

  Kursen kan med fördel användas för att repetera immunologi och patologi (not translated)

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery, Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Science

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppsats inlämnas hösten 2021
  Studerande kan få extra tenttillfälle i BV04 hösten 2021 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd uppsats (not translated)

•   Support subjects for radiographers RA20VAL01-3001 28.03.2022-29.05.2022  5 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students have obtained knowledge that support them in their personal development and/or professionalism.
  Specific qualifications according to chosen course.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Subjects that support professional development

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  20% Face-to-face, 80% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Lectures in subjects that support professional development
  Individual work/ teamwork
  Conferences
  Studyvisits
  Seminars

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.03.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 27.03.2022

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 14

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  4 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  There are possibilities to achive the coursegoals in alternative ways

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The examination is ongoing during the course, the assignements are scored

•   The theoretical and ethical basics in nursing care RB20VG05-3001 20.09.2021-30.11.2021  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health sciences and occupational history and development
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic principles of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the ethics of care and can apply them to healthcare
  - has the basic ability to work in accordance with ethical guidelines in their future profession and by respecting and respecting the values and life views of other people, without violating human rights

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Fundamental components of caring science
  Ethical aspects

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Margareta Antus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2021 - 30.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Thesis, presentation and maturity test RA16EX03-3002 30.08.2021-15.12.2021  3 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can present their thesis and act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can describe the most important results of the thesis in a maturity test, which also demonstrates the ability to express themselves in writing

  Prerequisites

  Study module Research process

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of thesis and acting as opponent
  Maturity exam

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Individual tutorial and group discussion

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 15.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Anita Kvist, Ulla Penttinen

  Additional information

  Individual tutoring is ongoing the whole semster and after clinical practice w 15 we also have group tutoring

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

Academic year 2022 - 2023

•   Basic nursing care RBA22VG02-3002 19.09.2022-04.12.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental skills in clinical nursing and its main methods.
  - are familiar with good ergonomics and realize the importance of acting according to aseptic principles.
  - are able to apply interactive skills, and embrace a comprehensive and process-oriented perspective in the caring profession.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical nursing methods
  Ergonomics in the work
  Aseptic manners
  Nursing process

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Anttila K, Kaila-Mattila T, Kan S, Puska E-L & Vihunen R. 2004. Vård och välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen. Tammerfors
  
  Iivanainen A & Syväoja, P 2012. ,Hoida ja Kirjaa. SanomaPro (valda delar)
  
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  ww.vardhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning
  Individuella arbeten
  Kliniska övningar på KTC ( obligatorisk närvaro)
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 04.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

•   Human physiology and anatomy 1 RBA22BV01-3003 26.09.2022-13.11.2022  3 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology
  Cells, tissues, integumentary system
  Nervous system, sense organs, reproductive system and endocrine system
  Support- and movement organs

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.09.2022 - 13.11.2022

  Enrollment date range

  27.08.2022 - 25.09.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination
  Re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 22 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 59 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Introduction to academic studies and communication RBA22IN01-3002 29.08.2022-30.10.2022  4 credits  (UBA22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Swedish 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kommunikation
  Novias anvisningar för examensarbeten.
  Material på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kommunikation:
  - Föreläsningar om vetenskapligt skrivande
  - Föreläsningar om muntlig framställning
  - Grupparbete i vetenskapligt skrivande
  - Övningar i muntlig presentation
  - Muntliga presentationer som videobandas och analyseras (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kommunikation
  
  Studerande
  - kan kommunicera både muntligt och skriftligt på ett strukturerat och språkligt välfungerande sätt, i enlighet med arbetslivets och samhällslivets krav.
  känner till arbetsprocessen för vetenskapligt skrivande och kan använda referenssystem.
  - är medveten om olika vägar att söka information och kan rapportera enligt reglerna för standarduppställning.
  Studeranden med finska som skolbildningsspråk ska uppvisa sådana kunskaper i svenska som enligt lagen (424/2003) krävs av offentligt anställda. Detta innebär att dessa studerande bör visa nöjaktig (vitsord 1-3) eller god (vitsord 4-5) förmåga att använda svenska i tal och skrift. Muntlig och skriftlig förmåga bedöms separat.
  Förkunskapskrav
  Inga förkunskapskrav (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2022 - 30.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA22D-V
  • URS22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 1, Katarina Vironen, Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kommunikation: Bedömt grupparbete och bedömd muntlig presentationen i slutet av kursen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kommunikation:Underkänd
  Studerande innehar en grundläggande kompetens i ämnet / Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)
  Studerande påvisar en ytlig kompetens och grundläggande förståelse för ämnet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kommunikation:
  Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)
  • Studerande påvisar en kompetens som relateras och kopplas till litteraturen
  • Studerande kan reflektera och motivera egna synpunkter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - berömliga (5)
  • Studerande har en fördjupad kompetens och visar en djupare förståelse för ämnet i relation till det kommande yrket (not translated)

•   Research Methodology RB20FU01-3001 19.09.2022-09.10.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have basic insights into knowledge theory and science theory
  - can both manually and digitally search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the learning process and in projects
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Science theory and evidence-based knowledge
  Research approaches
  Research process

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature :
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures group discussion and assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 09.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Group assignment and home test, the test on Moothe

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Based on the test on Moodle and group assignment graded as 0-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 3 cr. 1 cr=27 hours; 3 cr= 81 hours,

  Assessment criteria

  The students does not understand and can not apply the methods of qualitative research

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Notable weakness are found in students understanding and application on the research aims and questions or the data collection stage

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding and can apply qualitative concepts into the different research phases

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The students demonstrates a complete understanding for qualitative concepts of research and make only insignificant errors when applying and planing research

•   Research Methods RB20FU02-3001 19.09.2022-09.10.2022  4 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Students
  - can specify and evaluate the most common qualitative and quantitative research methods
  - can reproduce the research process and apply the different phases of the research process
  - can use different methods for qualitative data collection and data analysis in care research
  - can use the most common methods for quantitative data collection and analysis
  - can make simple statistical calculations and tests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work

  Prerequisites

  Research methodology

  Content of the study unit

  Qualitative and quantitative research methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.
  Qualitative methods:
  Course literature :
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
  qualitative methods: lectures and group discussion and assignment

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.
  
  qualitative method: based on a home exam, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental concepts and understanding the research process and analysis approaches, is evaluated

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.09.2022 - 09.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2022 - 31.07.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ralf Lillbacka, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)
  qualitative methods: written assignment and presentation (graded according to the scale 1-5)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Quantitative method: the assignment has to be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course
  
  qualitative method: group written assignment and presentation within a seminar

  Student's schedule and workload

  Quantitative research methodology is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours work of which 12 are scheduled lectures and seminars and the rest is the students' own work. assignment is submitted on a agreed date after the lectures.
  qualitative methods is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours

  Assessment criteria

  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply the research process and analysis methods.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.
  
  qualitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of analysis methods and is not adequately preform content analysis

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply concepts analysis , and only minor errors are found in the analysis process.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.
  
  Qualitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding and makes only insignificant errors when applying the methods.