Academic year 2020 - 2021

•   Basic clinical nursing care internship RA18KSG01-3002 07.12.2020-30.01.2021  3 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has basic insights into clinical care and clinical care methods
  - has the ability to identify and meet the needs of the patient for basic care
  - has the ability to create a good patient relationship, can function responsibly and engage in patient care as well as realize the importance of collaboration.

  Prerequisites

  Basic nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Basic clinical nursing care internship

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.12.2020 - 30.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic nursing care RB20VG03-3001 14.09.2020-13.12.2020  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have fundamental skills in clinical nursing and its main methods.
  - are familiar with good ergonomics and realize the importance of acting according to aseptic principles.
  - are able to apply interactive skills, and embrace a comprehensive and process-oriented perspective in the caring profession.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical nursing methods
  Ergonomics in the work
  Aseptic manners
  Nursing process

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Anttila K, Kaila-Mattila T, Kan S, Puska E-L & Vihunen R. 2004. Vård och välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen. Tammerfors
  
  Iivanainen A & Syväoja, P 2012. ,Hoida ja Kirjaa. SanomaPro (valda delar)
  
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  ww.vardhandboken.se (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.09.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene RB20BV03-3001 05.10.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  -master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  -master aseptic methods
  -understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  -become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  -understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  -have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  -be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Hygiene

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ulla Penttinen. Kurskompendium (tillgängligt på moodle)
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson, & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Upplaga 5. Liber 2018 NY!
  Jag och mina mikrober (Orginal: I contain multitudes). Yong, Ed. 2017
  Människans normalflora Adlerberth, Ingegerd, Wold, Agnes, 2017
  Hoitoon liittyvien infektioiden torjunta. Anttila, Kanerva, Kuronen, 2018
  
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Norstedts 2010. Gammal
  Danielsson. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Liber. Gammal
  Steen. Mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2011 Gammal (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Övningsuppgifter
  Studier på egen hand (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  50% av maximipoäng är godkänt (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen
  Övningsuppgift
  Omtentamina (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursen omfattar 3 sp vilket betyder ca 81 h arbete för studerande.
  Schemalagd undervisning är 20 h och egna studier (tentamensläsning och övningsuppgifter) 61 h. (not translated)

•   Clinical physics and radiation biology RA20ST02-3001 21.09.2020-31.01.2021  4 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has basic understanding in electricity and good insight into radiation in order to apply knowledge in future courses using different types of methods and thus different types of radiation
  - understands the interaction of radiation with matter, has insight into the effects of radiation on humans and the radiation sensitivity of different organs and tissues.

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to clinical radiography and radiotherapy

  Content of the study unit

  -basic physics
  -radiation biology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, virtuella studier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsupgifter och räkningar (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.09.2020 - 31.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Godkända övningar virtuellt + godkända räkningar under kursens gång (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  4sp= 27tx4=108t (not translated)

•   Clinical radiography 1 RA20KSR01-3001 15.02.2021-30.05.2021  13 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has the ability to plan, perform and evaluate the most common conventional x-ray examinations under supervision
  - has the ability to act as a caretaker in ultrasound and biopsies, punctures
  - can plan, perform and evaluate dental examinations
  - can apply an aseptic way of working
  - has basic insights into the patient's overall care and can apply theoretical knowledge in diagnostic radiography
  - understands and works in accordance with principles for safe and safe patient care

  Prerequisites

  Diagnostic radiography 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Conventional examinations
  US
  Dental examinations

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Clinicla practice at school
  Practice 40h/week
  Compulsory attendance 100 %
  Approved assignments and seminars

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.02.2021 - 30.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 14.02.2021

  • 13 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 13

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda, Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  According to teacher

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp

  Assessment criteria

  Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

  Approved / Failed

  The student:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
  Can perform tasks under supervision 
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
  Can work with others in the work team

•   Clinical radiography 4 RA18KSR04-3001 09.11.2020-18.04.2021  17 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has the ability to apply theoretical knowledge in practice
  - has the ability to independently, as a member of the work team, plan, perform and evaluate nativity studies and easier MRI and angiography examinations
  - can handle, care and treat the patient overall in studies and inventions and have good readiness to care for the patient at different situations / different circumstances / with varying needs and problems.
  - understands the meaning of safe patient care
  - familiar with the care of other types of departments than their own
  - can apply the principles of sustainable development in all
  dimensions and have developed the ability to collaborate and demonstrate responsibility in work with increased demands for independence and initiative
  - has ability to independently acquire new knowledge in the diagnostic radiography's sub-areas.

  Prerequisites

  Diagnostic radiography 4, Clinical radiography 2 and 3/4 approved courses in study modules Patient care in clinical radiography context and in Biosciences

  Content of the study unit

  Conventional examinations
  MRI
  Angiography

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nativundersökningar
  MRI
  Angiografi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Klinisk praktik och skriftliga övningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.11.2020 - 18.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 15.11.2020

  • 17 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  Praktik 40h/vecka
  Obligatorisk närvaro 100 %
  Godkända uppgifter och seminarie (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  The course is failed when the goals are not reached

•   Clinical radiotherapy RA18KSR05-3001 09.11.2020-18.04.2021  10 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply theoretical knowledge in radiotherapy and have the ability to plan, implement and evaluate radiotherapy under supervision
  - has the ability and ability to respond, care and support the cancer patient and his relatives
  - has insight into the importance of the care chain for the overall care of the cancer patient and has developed the ability to cooperate and shows responsibility in his work
  - has ability to independently acquire new knowledge in therapeutic radiography

  Prerequisites

  Therapeutical radiography, Clinical radiography and 3/4 approved courses in study modules Patient in clinical radiography context and in Biosciences

  Content of the study unit

  Radiotherapy

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.11.2020 - 18.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Diagnostic radiography 1 RA20ST03-3001 19.10.2020-04.04.2021  7 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - understand the operating principles of X-ray tubes and generator, the origin of X-rays and have thorough insights into imaging techniques and the use of X-ray apparatus for conventional examinations
  - has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
  - conducts basic projection learning and can be the basic principles for planning, performing and evaluating nativity studies
  - has basic knowledge of pathological findings.
  - has basic knowledge of ultrasound technology and is familiar with various surveys; preparation, implementation and aftercare.
  - has good insights into different types of X-ray equipment for examining the theet and jaws.
  - can apply an aseptic way of working and have knowledge of infectious diseases and insulation principles
  - understands the importance of good patient experience and safe patient care
  - can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to clinical radiography

  Content of the study unit

  -x-ray tubes and generators
  -imaging techniques for conventinal examinations
  -anatomy
  -basics in projection learning and criteria for good x-ray examination
  -Ultrasound
  -x-rays of theeth
  -Aseptic and infectious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.10.2020 - 04.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 25.10.2020

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Diagnostic radiography 4 RA18SA01-3001 31.08.2020-20.12.2020  6 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - master the basic principles in MRI
  - has insight into the methods of examination
  - has in-depth knowledge of anatomy and basic knowledge in the pathology at MRI
  - has the ability to care and supervise the patient as a whole at MRI

  Prerequisites

  Clinical radiography 2

  Content of the study unit

  MRI

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  17% Face-to-face, 83% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, förevisningar, övningar, skriftilgt övningsarbete, tent (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 20.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deltent/ skriftligt övningsarbete för de olika delområden (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  6sp= 27x6= 162t (not translated)

•   Finnish RB20FI01-3001 11.01.2021-28.02.2021  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing.
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Oral and written communication
  Fundamental terminology of the profession
  Scientific and professional formulation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Vi läser texter som berör vård, sjukdomar, röntgen- och laboratorieprov. Sedan samtalar vi om texterna och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna och ta till sig viktig information. De fyller i ordlistorna och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning 1-3 goda insikter, 4-5 goda insikter. Studerande får vitsord i såväl skriftlig som muntlig framställning. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar kursen i samband med kurstentamen. Tvåspråkiga läser materialet på egenhand. Mera info fås vid kursstarten. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen avslutas med en muntlig och en skriftlig tentamen. Omtentamen meddelas i samband med kursstarten, (not translated)

•   First aid RB20VG01-3001 25.01.2021-28.02.2021  2 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are able to identify a person's need for first aid, and are able to provide first aid.
  - are familiar with the procedures of emergency cases.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Health care in case of emergency

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2017. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test; approved/failed
  Practical test; approved/faled
  Resuscitation. 90% correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 24.01.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • RS (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)
  • BA (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretical test during lessson

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cr = 54 hours

•   Human physiology and anatomy 1 RB20BV01-3001 28.09.2020-15.11.2020  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have knowledge of Latin and Greek anatomical terms
  - have knowledge about cells, tissues and the integumentary system
  - have knowledge about and understands how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in the body
  - understands the structure and function of the sense organs
  - understands how the endocrine system regulates body metabolism and organ functions
  - have knowledge about the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - have fundamental insights into the support- and movement organs

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology
  Cells, tissues, integumentary system
  Nervous system, sense organs, reproductive system and endocrine system
  Support- and movement organs

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  eller som alternativ: Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  Vigué-Martín (2006, 2012) Atlas over människokroppen. Liber. Budowick, Bjålie, Rolstad och Toverud (1993). Anatomisk atlas. Liber, Stockholm
  Dauber (2006). Anatomisk bildordbok. Liber.
  Tortora G. J. (2006 eller äldre upplaga) A brief atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy and selected medical images
  Lecture material and exercises on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 15.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  More information is found in Moodle

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination is 19.11.2020
  Re-examination 22.01.2020 and 26.03.2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human physiology and anatomy 2 RB20BV02-3001 18.01.2021-28.02.2021  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - have knowledge of the structure and function of the circulatory system
  - have knowledge of the structure and function of the lymphatic system
  - have knowledge of the structure and function of the respiratory system
  - have knowledge of the structure and function of the digestive and secretory organs
  - have knowledge of the structure and function of the kidneys and urinary tracts
  - have knowledge of the importance of the fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance

  Prerequisites

  Anatomy and physiology 1

  Content of the study unit

  The circulatory system
  The lymphatic system
  The respiratory system
  The digestive and secretory organs
  The kidneys and urinary tracts
  Fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursvitsord enligt skalan 0-5 baserat på resultat i tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 17.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursexamination fredagen den 26.02.2021
  Omtentamen 26.03.2021 och 07.05.2021 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar och examination 21 h, självstudier och digitala undervisningsformer 60 h. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärkta kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

•   Introduction to Academic Studies RB20IN01-3001 01.08.2020-29.11.2020  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - is familiar with his/her UAS and her/his study programme
  - is familiar with the functions and tools that support the individual learning process
  - reflects on his/her studies and future plans and is aware of the significance of personal development in relation to life-long learning and the profession
  - can generate new knowledge and create personal learning environments
  - is familiar with the core values of the profession
  - can retrieve and critically view information
  - can work in groups and teams with individuals
  - understand the importance of environmental responsibility and sustainable development within different fields, seen from a ecological, social and economical perspective.
  - are able to see their own responsibility as practitioners of a profession and implement this knowledge within their own field. However, they must also possess the tools to work for global and lasting social development

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Information about the studies at Novia and how to study
  Information retrieval
  Sustainable development
  Biomedical laboratory science as profession

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 29.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • BA20 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)
  • RS20 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Introduction to academic studies VÅV14IN01-3005 31.08.2020-13.12.2020  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - reflects on his/her studies and future plans and is aware of the significance of personal development in relation to life-long learning and the profession
  - is familiar with his/her UAS, professional field and individual learning style
  - can generate new knowledge and create personal learning environments
  - is familiar with the ethical values of the profession
  - can retrieve and critically view information
  - can work in groups and teams with individuals regardless of their background
  - understand the importance of environmental responsibility and sustainable development within different fields, seen from an ecological, technical and economical aspect with special attention to sustainable development from a health- and social welfare-perspective
  - are able to see his/her own responsibility as practitioners of a profession, and implement this knowledge within his/her own field but also posses the tools to work for global and lasting social development, as well as know the position outlined by the management of Novia, University of Applied Science
  - is knowledgeable on how the environment affects our health, and is able to work for sustainable development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Information about studying at Novia UAS
  Studytechnique
  Nursing as profession

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group exercises, tasks, presentations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Attendance during contact teaching
  Participation at seminar and approved assignment in the part assignment The own profession
  Approved virtual course in sustainable development

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Margareta Antus, Marlene Gädda, Marie Hjortell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery, Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Framförande av uppgift i det egna yrket vecka 45
  Inom terminen 2019 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp, 40 h närstudier, 41 eget arbete (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  The student has not participated in the contact studies and has not achieved, nor has he attempted to achieve the criterion level in the subject

  Approved / Failed

  Passed
  The student has actively participated in the contact studies and has achieved the criterion level in the subject

•   Introduction to academic studies VÅV14IN01-3003 31.08.2020-29.11.2020  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - reflects on his/her studies and future plans and is aware of the significance of personal development in relation to life-long learning and the profession
  - is familiar with his/her UAS, professional field and individual learning style
  - can generate new knowledge and create personal learning environments
  - is familiar with the ethical values of the profession
  - can retrieve and critically view information
  - can work in groups and teams with individuals regardless of their background
  - understand the importance of environmental responsibility and sustainable development within different fields, seen from an ecological, technical and economical aspect with special attention to sustainable development from a health- and social welfare-perspective
  - are able to see his/her own responsibility as practitioners of a profession, and implement this knowledge within his/her own field but also posses the tools to work for global and lasting social development, as well as know the position outlined by the management of Novia, University of Applied Science
  - is knowledgeable on how the environment affects our health, and is able to work for sustainable development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Information about studying at Novia UAS
  Studytechnique
  Nursing as profession

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group exercises, tasks, presentations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation at seminar and approved assignment in the part assignment "The own profession"

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 29.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20-1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20-2 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Katarina Vironen, Margareta Antus, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery, Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Mandatory attendance, participation in lectures and group processes, approved tasks.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Interviews with nurses in different contexts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar for the part assignment in The own profession week

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h, 40 h närstudier, 41 h eget arbete (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  The student has not participated in the contact studies and has not achieved, nor has he attempted to achieve the criterion level in the subject

  Approved / Failed

  Accepted
  The student has actively participated in the nearby studies and has achieved the criterion level in the subject

•   Introduction to clinical radiography RA20ST01-3001 31.08.2020-27.09.2020  4 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The stundent
  -is familiar with the history of radiography and radiotherapy
  -has a knowledge about different modalities in diagnostic and therapeutic radiography and about radioggrahers profession.
  -has a knowledge about basic words and concepts
  - is familiar with the research field in clinical radiography

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  - Radiation
  - Modalities in radiography, radiotherapy, nuclearmedicin
  - Radiographer education
  - The radiographer profession and their workfield
  - Clinical radiography research

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  - olika branschspecifika websidor
  - artiklar
  - aktuella avhandlingar
  - enl. föreläsare (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 27.09.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen U-5
  Skriftliga uppgifter U/Gk (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studiebesök (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  tentamen: (not translated)

•   Leadership end entrepreneurship RA16AL02-3001 01.09.2020-01.04.2021  4 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the main principles of organizational activity and leadership, and have a preparedness to lead the work.
  - have insights into the planning and organization of activities.
  - are familiar with the different forms of activities of working life and are able to participate in the professional community.
  - fundamental insights into entrepreneurship

  Content of the study unit

  Organizational activities and leadership
  Entrepreneurship

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.09.2020 - 01.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  29.09.2020 - 31.10.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Public health RB20VG02-3001 31.08.2020-20.09.2020  2 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - obtain basic knowledge of health care and social welfare structures
  - become familiar with health care and social welfare services organized by the public and private sector
  - become familiar with the treatment and service chains of social and health care
  - understand the basic principles of health legislation in Finland and will be able to apply laws and regulations to his/her health care practice
  - have basic knowledge in different theories about human development from age 0 - 20 years and about the personal development of the adult and the elderly

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of public health science
  The structure and organization of social and health care
  The central legislation of social and health care
  Multi-professional public health care and health promotion work at individual, group and community level

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kannas, L., Eskola K., Räsänen, P & Mustajoki P. 2009. Hälsokunskap för Gymnasiet 1-2.Keuru.
  Kannas, L., Eskola, K., Räsänen, P & Mustajoki P. Hälsokunskap för Gymnasiet 3.Keuru 2010.
  Fogelholm, M.,Norkko, C. & Könönen, P. 2014. Hälsokunskap för gymnasier 1. Helsingfors, Schildts & Söderströms.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2012. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Scriven, A. 2010. Ewles & Simnett hälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Winroth, J. & Rydqvist, L-G. 2008. Hälsa och hälsopromotion. med focus på individ-, grupp- och organisationsnivå. Sisu Idrottsböcker, Stockholm.
  Institutet för hälsa och välfärd (THL) www.thl.fi
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet (STM) www. stm.fi
  Justitsieministeriet. Lagar och författningar. www.finlex.fi
  Nationella program och strategier

  Learning methods

  Introduction, tutorials, group work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved selfstudies/tutorials in public health care.
  Group work in public health care , grades 0-5
  
  Partially virtual course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 20.09.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination in the end of the course

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr
  2 cr =54 h

•   Quality assurance and radiation safety RA18AL01-3001 19.04.2021-16.05.2021  5 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has in-depth knowledge of laws, regulations and directives regarding the medical use of radiation
  - controls the radiation hygiene work that the medical use of radiation requires
  - is familiar with development and quality work in radiography and radiotherapy and recognize their role in sustainable development
  - has skills to perform their own work / assignments in quality development.

  Prerequisites

  Study module Radiation in medical use 3

  Content of the study unit

  - Radiation safety
  - Quality development

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the teacher's instructions
  Quality assurance EBP:
  Berman, A., Snyder, S. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Person, New-Jersy. 2012, pp. 161-335.
  Chen, S., Chang, H., & Pai, H. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203
  Hinno, S., Partanen, P., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. The professional nursing practice environment and nurse-reported job outcomes in two European countries: a survey of nurses in Finland and the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. Mar2012, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p133-143.
  Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2004). Evidence-based practice – an incomplete model of the relationship between theory and professional work. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 187–196.
  Miller, L. L., Ward, D., & Young, H. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Nursing. Generations, 34(1), 72–77. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=53063435&site=ehost-live

  Learning methods

  Blended learning
  Lectures
  Clinical exercises

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.04.2021 - 16.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 18.04.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  Radiation safety 3sp
  Quality assurance 2sp

•   Radiation safety RA20ST04-3001 25.01.2021-21.03.2021  5 credits  (URS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - has knowledge of laws, regulations and directives regarding medical use of radiation and can apply them
  - understands the radiological hygiene work that the medical use of radiation requires and can work according to approved principles in the field.

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to clinical radiography

  Content of the study unit

  Radiation Protection Authorities (international / national)
  Radiation safety legislation, directive
  International and national recommendations
  Radiation safety
  Radiation doses

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.01.2021 - 21.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 24.01.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Responsible for radiation safety RA20SA04-3001 12.01.2021-30.03.2021  5 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Students can
  - define and apply the concepts and principles of radiation protection in native X-ray, dental care and animal imaging.
  - identifying, evaluating and minimising the risks of using radiation and preparing and responsible for radiation safety incidents
  - justify their decisions on the basis of existing laws and regulations in nativity, dental and animal x-ray operations, and implement and monitor radiation protection arrangements in their area of ​​expertise, including radiation protection for workers and the public,
  - to guide the safe use of radiation, in the introduction of new methods and its optimisation, in quality assurance and to contribute to the development of a good safety culture regarding radiation in collaboration with the radiation safety expert

  Prerequisites

  The student has completed all diagnostic and therapeutic radiography courses with approved results

  Content of the study unit

  1. Introduction to radiation physics for native, dental, and animal X-rays
  2. Measurement techniques and calculation methods in native x-ray, dental and animal x-ray
  - Methods for determining patient dose (ESAK, KAP, MGD, effective dose)
  - Radiation scattering at native x-ray, dental and animal x-ray
  - The role of delimitation and tube voltage for scattered radiation
  - Radiation dosimeter
  - Radiation protection design (HVL, material)
  3. Radiation protection in native x-ray, dental and animal x-ray
  - Radiation Biology
  - Legislation and international recommendations
  - Radiation safety in the workplace
  - Radiation safety deviations
  - Safety culture, radiation protection training and quality assurance
  4. Requirements, purchases and maintenance of X-ray equipment for native, dental and animal X-rays

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  Further information

  Collaboration with radiographer educations at OAMK, Metropolia, TAMK, TuAMK and savonia

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Everything can be found at the Moodle platform

  Learning methods

  Virtual course with two on-line meetings

  Teaching language

  Timing

  12.01.2021 - 30.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2020 - 11.01.2021

  • 5 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Anita Kronqvist

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  16.3, 23.3, 30.3.2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  5sp= 5x27h= 135h

•   Swedish RB20SV01-3001 31.08.2020-27.09.2020  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - can communicate coherently and in a professional manner both orally and in writing, in a work context
  - demonstrates appropriate knowledge of the process of academic writing and a correct use of references
  - can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout
  
  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Oral and written communication
  Fundamental terminology of the profession
  Scientific and professional formulation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  - Kursmaterialet finns på Moodle och Intranät (not translated)

  Learning methods

  - Föreläsningar om vetenskapligt skrivande
  - Föreläsningar om muntlig framställning
  - Grupparbete i vetenskapligt skrivande
  - Övningar i muntlig presentation
  - Muntliga presentationer som videobandas och analyseras (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningskriterier

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 27.09.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Bedömt grupparbete och bedömd muntlig presentationen i slutet av kursen. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp varav en del sker i klass. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Bedömningskriterier - tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)
  Studerande påvisar en ytlig kompetens och grundläggande förståelse för ämnet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)
  • Studerande påvisar en kompetens som relateras och kopplas till litteraturen
  • Studerande kan reflektera och motivera egna synpunkter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Bedömningskriterier - berömliga (5)
  • Studerande har en fördjupad kompetens och visar en djupare förståelse för ämnet i relation till det kommande yrket (not translated)

•   Therapeutic radiography RA18SA02-3001 31.08.2020-01.11.2020  7 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has basic insights into cancer diseases, epidemiology and treatment methods
  - recognizes the special features of the oncological care
  - controls the basic principles for the use of radiotherapy equipment and has good knowledge of radiotherapy as a cancer treatment
  - has good knowledge of the care of cancer patients and understands its special features
  - is familiar with the importance of safe patient care.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical radiography 2

  Content of the study unit

  Radiotherapy, equipment, treatment, workprocess, safe and good care for cancerpatients

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  58% Face-to-face, 42% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Föreläsningar
  Tidigare kursmaterial från bla. Klinisk fysik och strålbiologi
  Av föreläsaren rekommenderad litteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, studiebesök, förevisningar, övningar, egna övningsarbeten (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 01.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Additional information

  Alla specialistföreläsningar är obligatoriska (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Övningsarbeten
  Delförhör x3 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  7sp= 27tx7= 189t (not translated)

•   Thesis, plan and execution RA16EX02-3002 11.01.2021-23.05.2021  10 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student has capacity to independently write a thesis according to coellege rules. Can work systematic and purposefully according to scientific and ethical rules

  Prerequisites

  Studymodule Researchprocess

  Content of the study unit

  Thesis plan
  The research process including presentation of an plan

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

Academic year 2021 - 2022

•   Alternative enhanced studies RA18AL03-3001 30.08.2021-05.12.2021  3 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - deepend own knowledge in choosen alternative by analyzing the latest research and actualities as well as describing the quality aspects in the field.
  
  The course runs parallel to the clinical course so that the work can be anchored in practice.

  Prerequisites

  Clinical basic care, Clinical radiography 2, Clinical radiography 3- Nuclearmedicin, Clinical radiotherapy and Studiemodule Patient in clinical radiography

  Content of the study unit

  Selected area/ modality

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Newest scientific articles in your chosen field

  Learning methods

  Individual written exercise work, tutoring and seminars

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The course is linked to the chosen alternative internship

  Student's schedule and workload

  3sp= 3X27h

•   English RB20EN01-3001 01.01.2022-30.06.2022  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a work context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Oral and written communication
  Fundamental terminology of the profession
  Scientific and professional formulation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written assignments. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.01.2022 - 30.06.2022

  Enrollment date range

  01.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

•   Immunology and pathology RB20BV04-3001 30.08.2021-20.12.2021  3 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the function of lymphocytes in human immune defence
  - knows the process of immunisation
  - command immunological and pathological terminology.
  - are familiar with the acute inflammation, and changes in cells and tissues in disease
  - are familiar with the main sources of information within immunology and pathology
  - understand the importance of immunology within health care professions

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Immunology and pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Penttinen, Ulla. Immunologi och patologi. Kurskompendium på moodle
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur (Toppenbra bok!)
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021 (om sars-cov-2 och immunförsvaret)
  Truedsson. Klinisk immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur.
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Kapitel 2, sid 27-109 handlar om immunologi.
  Brehmer-Andersson. Allmän patologi. Studentlitteratur 2011
  Seidal. Klinisk patologi. Studentlitteratur 2006
  Mäkinen et al. Patologia. Duodecim 2012 finns på Terveysportti
  Karttunen, Soini, Vuopala. Tautioppi. Edita 2005.
  Agger, Andersen, Leslie, Aasted. Immunologi. Studentlitteratur.2007. ISBN: 9789144034355
  Erlanson-Albertsson. Cellbiologi. Studentlitteratur
  Immunologibok på internet http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK27123/
  
  Immune responses to viruses:
  https://www.immunology.org/public-information/bitesized-immunology/pathogens-and-disease/immune-responses-viruses
  
  The Immune System
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27784777 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Skriftligt arbete (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 20.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tentamen på Alere ca 1-2 veckor efter föreläsningarnas slut
  Omtentamen i december 2021 och januari 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp innebär 3 x 27 h arbete för studerande, 81 h arbete (not translated)

•   Medical Treatment RB20BV05-3001 13.09.2021-31.10.2021  5 credits  (UBA20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The students
  - are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
  - are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
  - are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
  - command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
  - are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
  - are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

  Prerequisites

  None

  Content of the study unit

  Medication administration and different medication groups
  Pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Exam
  answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
  has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject
  
  
  Written assignment
  The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Exam
  can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  can give an independent account of the literature
  understands most of the topic
  presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
  can motivate some of their claims and positions
  can give some own examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Exam
  has in-depth knowledge of the subject
  can analyze and interpret subject facts
  master the subject versatile
  has a broad grasp of the subject
  presents original and apposite examples
  
  Written assignment
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Farmakolgi:
  Föreläsningskompendium.
  Nordeng och Spigset (2018) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
  SHM.2021. Handbok i säker läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  
  Läkemedelsräkning och -behandling:
  Envall, S., Pulli, A. & Salonen, A-M. 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Sarijärven Offset Oy, Saarijärvi.
  Läkemedelsberäkningskommendium
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Björkman, E. & Hagberg, M. 2005. Läkemedelsberäkning för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Artlkar/material enl föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Online föreläsningar och seminarier
  Uppgifter test och räknetent online (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.09.2021 - 31.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBA20D-V
  • URS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Thesis, presentation and maturity test RA16EX03-3002 30.08.2021-28.11.2021  3 credits  (URS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can present their thesis and act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can describe the most important results of the thesis in a maturity test, which also demonstrates the ability to express themselves in writing

  Prerequisites

  Study module Research process

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of thesis and acting as opponent
  Maturity exam

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 
  
  Assessment criteria for written work 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
  Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
  Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Individual tutorial and group discussion

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 28.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • URS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen

  Additional information

  Individual tutoring is ongoing the whole semster and after clinical practice w 15 we also have group tutoring

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5