Study Guide

Objective

Student
- understand the operating principles of X-ray tubes and generator, the origin of X-rays and have thorough insights into imaging techniques and the use of X-ray apparatus for conventional examinations
- has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
- conducts basic projection learning and can be the basic principles for planning, performing and evaluating nativity studies
- has basic knowledge of pathological findings.
- has basic knowledge of ultrasound technology and is familiar with various surveys; preparation, implementation and aftercare.
- has good insights into different types of X-ray equipment for examining the theet and jaws.
- can apply an aseptic way of working and have knowledge of infectious diseases and insulation principles
- understands the importance of good patient experience and safe patient care
- can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation

Content

-x-ray tubes and generators
-imaging techniques for conventinal examinations
-anatomy
-basics in projection learning and criteria for good x-ray examination
-Ultrasound
-x-rays of theeth
-Aseptic and infectious diseases
-Ethics

Location and time

During autumn 24 and spring 25

Materials

Companies, pp presentations, see Moodle
Radiology (2022) L. Blomqvist and S. Zackrisson.
Patient care in radiography: with an introduction to medical imaging. (2017) Ehrlich, Ruth Ann, author ; Coakes, Dawn M., author. Elsevier, Ninth edition
Radiography of children : a guide to good practice (2004) Hardwick, Judith ; Gold, Catherine. Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone
HUS-Hyvän kuvan kriteritit
Regulations
Recommendations
Current research
Websites

Teaching methods

Lectures, clinical exercises, discussion

Exam schedules

Examination - according to agreement
written submissions - according to agreement
exercise tasks - according to agreement

Student workload

27 h/c

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Passed the exam, passed mandatory assignments and exercises
Active participation can affect course grades. According to the supervisors, absences can be supplemented

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Failed the exam, unsubmitted mandatory tasks and assignments.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluating the exam
Students have superficial knowledge of the subject (reading by heart)

Assessment criteria for written work
Students have followed the instructions for the written work. Has deficient knowledge of the substance and is not familiar with it and has deficient knowledge of other people's written works.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluating the exam
Students can give an account of the literature, reflect and justify their opinions

Assessment criteria for written work
Students have followed the instructions for written work and master the substance of their work, but the application is limited. Has insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written works.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluating the exam
Students demonstrate in-depth knowledge and maturity within the subject

Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for written work and shows that she has mastered the material. Is well-read in the other participants' written works, can ask relevant questions and lead a seminar discussion. The written work and possible opposition demonstrate excellent knowledge. (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working method)

Qualifications

Introduction to clinical radiography

Objective

Student
-should show good knowledge in X-ray, the imaging technology and native projections.
-has basic knowledge of the flouroscopy technology and the most common screening studies
-has basic knowledge of mammography examinations and photography techniques.
-has basic knowledge of the computed tomography, the technology, examinations and work on computed tomography.
-has basic insights into using contrast agents and first aid related to them.
-has basic insights into the magnetic resonance imaging technology, in the use of MRI and deep-knowing in safety issues.
-has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
-understands the importance of good patient care,patient-centered and safe patientcare
-can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation
- radiation protection in relevant area
- measurements

Content

-conventional x-ray
-fluoroscopy
-mammography
-computed radiography
-magnetic tomography
-contrastmedia and first-aid
-anatomy
-patientcare
- measurements
- radiationprotection

Location and time

Spring 2025 and autumn 2025 according to lecture schedule

Materials

Study material on Moodle
Additional material according to the lecturer

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations and tasks.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination
Part 1
Part 2

International connections

13 cr corresponds to 351 hours of studies

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

13 cr corresponds to 351 hours of studies

Further information

Additional information on Moodle

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions.

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 1 and Clinical Radiography 1

Objective

The student:
- shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
- is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
- has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
- is aware of cultural differences in international context

Content

English (oral and written)

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

Teaching methods

Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

More information on Moodle.

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Performed presentation, written exam.

Student workload

3 x 27 h = 81 hours

Content scheduling

-

Further information

Active participation is required.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

Student
- can present their thesis and act as an opponent for another degree project
- can describe the most important results of the thesis in a maturity test, which also demonstrates the ability to express themselves in writing

Content

The research process
Presentation of thesis and acting as opponent
Maturity exam

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
Week 21 of Spring 2025 and week x of Fall 2025

Materials

Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Teaching methods

Written thesis
Seminar

Employer connections

Presentation of thesis in public

Exam schedules

Spring 2025 week 21 presentation of thesis and maturity exam
Fall 2025 week x

Completion alternatives

Thesis
Maturity test

Further information

More information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

Thesis is graded 0-5
Opposition of another student's work passed or failed
Maturity test is graded passed or failed

Qualifications

Study module Research process

Objective

Student
- has the ability to produce an idea for his thesis and can perform and argue for choices she/he have done

Content

Thesis idea
The research process including presentation of an idea

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

According to the topic of Thesis

Recommended literature: Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Teaching methods

Introduction lecture to the course, thesis work, followed by mainly self-directed studies with possibility to supervision. The student makes a plan for the thesis. The presentation of the plan for the thesis is the examination

Employer connections

The Thesis can be a work ordered, but is not necessary always so

Exam schedules

Presentation of work plan for thesis autumn 2024 and presentation of the thesis in May 2025

Completion alternatives

No optional examination form

Student workload

The course is 3 cr which is equivalent to 81 h work for the student

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

If the thesis plan is done according to instructions it is assessed as passed.

Further information

The content of the work plan for thesis:
Novia titlepage
Table of content
Introduction
Background (description of the topic, at least 5-6 scientific studies)
Aim and problem definition
Method (Data collection based on 2 references/discuss method of selection)
Ethical consideration (based on references)
Timetable
Reference list
Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excl. Title page and table of content)
Follow Novia’s instructions for writing Thesis)

1. You find Novia’s title page on Moodle (no key needed)
2. Table of content is done in Word, if you do not know how to do choose ? (help) in the upper right corner and write list of content in the search field
3. The introduction should be about 1 p, where the reader is introduced to the topic and also to your interest of studying it.
4. Background shall be 3 – 5 p and divided into chapters where description of concepts and the topic of the subject. In the background you also describe the previous research done
5. Aim and problem definition can be short about ½ p.
6. The method can be described on 2-3 p. The chapter includes a description of the approach (qualitative/quantitative design), motivation for the choice and data collection method. References need to be included.
7. Ethical considerations are described on about 1 p and with the help of references ethical principles followed are discussed. refer to relevant documents on Finnish National advicory board on Research Integrity TENK. (tenk.fi)
8. Time plan should estimate how Thesis proceeds. Please do a realistic plan writing something for each month and write it also in your calender.
9. Works cited

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

The work plan for the thesis is assessed as either failed or passed.

The plan must include the following parts (for passing):
• Novia cover page
• Table of contents
• Introduction (at least 1 page): must include at least 2 sources
• Purpose and research questions
• Background (at least 4 pages). Must include: for one student: at least 6 sources, of which at least 2 are scientific and for two students: at least 9 sources, of which at least 4 are scientific
• Method (at least 1 page): Selection; Data collection; Data analysis method; Ethical considerations and Timeline
• References (of the sources used in the plan)

Length: at least 6 pages and at most 9 pages (excluding cover page, table of contents, and references)

Must follow Novia's writing guidelines: https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/

Qualifications

Studymodule Researchprocess

Objective

The student
- has capacity to independently write a thesis according to college rules
- can work systematic and purposefully according to scientific and ethical rules

Content

Thesis plan
The research process including presentation of an plan

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Self-studies
Seminar

Employer connections

Topic for thesis.

Exam schedules

Mandatory presence at the Mid-seminar according to schedual

Student workload

27 h/cr corresponds to 162 h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Passed:
The structure of the thesis is according to instructions.
The background is relevant and informative, and motivates the choice of research topic
The aim and research questions have a clear delimitation
The collection of data material and the analysis of the data is ongoing
The references are relevant and relates to the aim and research questions
The list of references are done correctly according to instructions given for writing a thesis

Further information

Thesis plan should be accepted before the student take part of the Mid-seminar

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

Students follow the instructions for the mid-seminar.
The data collection must be completed and the data analysis started for passing.
Those who cannot participate (or have not progressed far enough in the EA process) will receive a passed grade when the completed thesis is presented.

Qualifications

Studymodule Researchprocess

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Content

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Nordeng och Spigset (2009) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
Lecture material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 28.5.2025
Re-examination x.x.2025 and x.x.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination x h, self studies and digital teaching methods

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
- demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

Content

Finnish (oral and written)

Location and time

Spring 2025.

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Objective

Students
- can specify and evaluate the most common qualitative and quantitative research methods
- can reproduce the research process and apply the different phases of the research process
- can use different methods for qualitative data collection and data analysis in care research
- can use the most common methods for quantitative data collection and analysis
- can make simple statistical calculations and tests
- has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work

Content

Qualitative and quantitative research methods

Location and time

Autumn 2024 according to the schedule

Materials

Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.
Qualitative methods:
Course literature :
Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
Qualitative methods: lectures and group discussion and assignment

Exam schedules

Quantitative method: the assignment has to be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course
Qualitative method: written assignment and presentation within a seminar

Completion alternatives

Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 0-5, 1-5 is a passed grade)
qualitative methods: written assignment and presentation (graded according to the scale 0-5., where 1-5 is a passed grade)

Student workload

Quantitative research methodology is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours work of which 12 are scheduled lectures and seminars and the rest is the students' own work. assignment is submitted on a agreed date after the lectures.
Qualitative methods is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

Qualitative method: based on a exam, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental concepts and understanding the research process and analysis approaches, is evaluated. Written assignments have to be done on time.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

Qualitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply the research process and analysis methods.
Written assignments missing or inadequate.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

Qualitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of analysis methods and is not adequately preform content analysis

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

Qualitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply concepts analysis , and only minor errors are found in the analysis process.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

Qualitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding and makes only insignificant errors when applying the methods.

Qualifications

Research methodology

Objective

The students
- have basic insights into knowledge theory and science theory
- can both manually and digitally search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
- can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the learning process and in projects
- understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
- has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

Content

Science theory and evidence-based knowledge
Research approaches
Research process

Location and time

Autumn 2024 according to the schedule

Materials

Course literature :
Henricson, M. (red.) (2023, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur

Teaching methods

Lectures, group discussion and assignments

Exam schedules

Course examination 01.10.2024
Re-examination 25.10 and 13.12
Written assignments according to schedule

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

The course is 3 cr which corresponds to 81 hours of work

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle platform

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam and the individual, written assignments.
In order to pass the course all parts (exam and assignments) have to be passed.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The students does not understand and can not apply the methods of qualitative research

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Notable weakness are found in students understanding and application on the research aims and questions or the data collection stage

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding and can apply qualitative concepts into the different research phases

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students demonstrates a complete understanding for qualitative concepts of research and make only insignificant errors when applying and planing research

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student
- have obtained knowledge that support them in their personal development and/or professionalism.
- have obtained specific qualifications according to chosen course

Content

Subjects that support professional development

Location and time

Nuttrition and health:

Can be done during the studies during selectable period

Teaching methods

Nutrion and health 2 etcs:
Lectures, individual assignments/tasks, written assignment, seminaries

Can be one or more of this alternatives:
Lecturers
Conferences
Studyvisits
Seminars
Individual written assignment
Written report, article

Student workload

1sp= 27h, 5x 27=135h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team

Further information

The course can look different for students, it can be built according to students needs and earlier experiences

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- are able to identify a person's need for first aid, and are able to provide first aid.
- are familiar with the procedures of emergency cases.

Content

First aid
Health care in case of emergency

Location and time

spring 2025

Materials

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Teaching methods

Lessons, demonstration, practice

Completion alternatives

Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

Further information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with their own university of applied sciences, its teaching methods, use of various platforms, and digital tools
- acquaints themselves with searching in various databases with basic literature searches in different databases
- reflects on higher education studies and are aware of the importance of the personal learning process in relation to continuous learning
- is familiar with their own education and have knowledge of their own professional field, as well as the competence requirements for their own profession

Content

Study information and information retrieval
Learning in a higher education context
Social media, data protection, and data security
Use of AI
The importance of the profession
The work areas of nurses, public health nurses, and midwives

Location and time

Introduction to academic studies:According to schedule

Teaching methods

Introduction to academic studies: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test ( library/ informationservice)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The stundent
-is familiar with the history of radiography and radiotherapy
-has a knowledge about different modalities in diagnostic and therapeutic radiography and about radioggrahers profession.
-has a knowledge about basic words and concepts
- is familiar with the research field in clinical radiography
- can describe the organization of social and health care in Finland and the legislation that governs the activities
- has knowledge of service systems and the patient's / client's social benefits
- has basic skills in interprofessional work
- understands and can reflect on ethical guidelines and profession-specific ethical codes and can in his future profession work on the basis of these
- understands the importance of culture in healthcare and can respond to clients / patients from different cultures
- is aware of the importance of internal sustainability based on the demands placed on the profession and can maintain good health

Content

Radiation
Modalities in radiography, radiotherapy, nuclearmedicin
Radiographer education
The radiographer profession and their workfield
Clinical radiography research
Health care in Finland
Management structures, different sustainable service environments and service systems
General laws in social and health care
Interprofessional work
The client's / patient's position and rights
Ethical guidelines and codes
Professional encounters Internal sustainability in the profession

Location and time

According to the schedule

Materials

Radiologi, Blomqvist, Lennart. Valda delar
radiography: webpages, current research
Sustainable development

Teaching methods

Lecturers, workshops, study visits

Completion alternatives

Exam
Individual written assignment

Student workload

27h x 6= 162h

Further information

Introductions, workshops and seminars have mandatory attendance.

All assignments follow Instructions for writing in Novia and plagiation control through Ouriginal
Use of AI according to lecturer

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Clinical radiography: Tentamina will be graded between 0-5, The written assignments are approved/ not approved and can affect the final grade by raising.
Feedback on assignments is given in writing
Active participation in the course can affect the grade

Qualifications

None

Objective

The Student:
- has basic understanding in electricity and good insight into radiation in order to apply knowledge in future courses using different types of methods and thus different types of radiation
- understands the interaction of radiation with matter, has insight into the effects of radiation on humans and the radiation sensitivity of different organs and tissues

Content

Basic physics
Radiation biology

Location and time

According to the schedule.

Lecturer:
Radiationphysics: Anders Skjäl
Radiationbiology: Katarina Vironen

Materials

Medicinsk fysik, Eva Berglund&Bo-Anders Jönsson
Grundläggande strålningsfysik, Mats Isaksson, 2002 och nyare upplaga
Strålskydd, Karl-Johan Johansson
Radiologi, L. Blomqvist & S.Zackrisson, (red), 2022.
Andra aktuella forskningar och rapporter ( bl.a STUK)

Teaching methods

Lectures and workshops

Student workload

Radiation physics 27h x= 54h
Radiation biology 27h x= 54h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Objective

The students
- have fundamental skills in clinical nursing and its main methods.
- are familiar with good ergonomics and realize the importance of acting according to aseptic principles.
- are able to apply interactive skills, and embrace a comprehensive and process-oriented perspective in the caring profession.

Content

Clinical nursing methods
Ergonomics in the work
Aseptic manners
Nursing process

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Terveysportti
Vårdhandboken
Moodle material

Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

Teaching methods

Self-study
On-campus teaching
Individual works
practical exercises at KTC - Compulsory attendance

Exam schedules

Autumn 2024

Completion alternatives

Examination
Mandatory attendance 100% for practical exercises
Approved exercises in training classes
Approved submissions.

Student workload

27h/ECT

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The examination is graded 0-5
Written exercises are assessed UK/GK
Clinical exercises are assessed UK/GK

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
- knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
- can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
- can name the most common pathogenic microbes
- understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
- understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
- understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
- understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
- can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
- can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
- have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
- can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
- understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

Content

Clinical microbiology
Immunology
Pathology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
- are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
- have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
- know various types of pain medication
- know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

Content

Medication administration and different medication groups
Pharmacology

Location and time

spring 2025, Alere

Materials

Nordeng och Spigset (2018) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
SHM.2021. Handbok i säker läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848

Läkemedelsräkning och -behandling:
Envall, S., Pulli, A. & Salonen, A-M. 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Sarijärven Offset Oy, Saarijärvi.
Läkemedelsberäkningskommendium
Rekommenderad litteratur:
Björkman, E. & Hagberg, M. 2005. Läkemedelsberäkning för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Artlkar/material enl föreläsarens anvisningar
armacology distributed by the teacher

Teaching methods

workshops and seminars
tasks and tests

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Task passed not approved
The calculation exam have to be 100% correct for pass.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
- will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
- will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
- will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system

Content

Terminology
Cells, tissues, integumentary system
Nervous system, sense organs, reproductive system and endocrine system
Support- and movement organs

Location and time

Autumn 2024 according to the schedule

Materials

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended literature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 16th of December 2024
Re-examination 17th of January and 7th of March 2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 22 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 59 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle platform

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Qualifications

None

Objective

The students
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
- will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels

Content

The circulatory system
The lymphatic system
The respiratory system
The digestive and secretory organs
The kidneys and urinary tracts
Fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 10th of March 2025
Re-examination 04.04.2023 and 23.05.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

1 cr corresponds to 27 hours work for the student
Lectures and examination 23 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 58 h

Further information

More about the course on the Moodle page

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the on-line exam and virtual tests

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Qualifications

Human Physiology and Anatomy 1

Objective

Student:

- gain a basic insight into the importance of lifestyle habits for one's own health. - reflects on their own choices and lifestyle.
-students actively participate in the course content/exercises and tasks

Content

Basics in nutrition and health.
The importance of health in working life and in study life.

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

According to the lecturer

Teaching methods

Lecturers, Individual/ group assignment, individual exercises, group exercise. Own activity is a must in this course

Exam schedules

To pass, you must pass in the individual assignments/ group assignments and actively participate in the course.

Student workload

2 credits= 2 x 27h= 54h

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

Inga förkunskapskrav

Objective

Student
- has the ability to plan, perform and evaluate the most common conventional x-ray examinations under supervision
- has the ability to act as a caretaker in ultrasound and biopsies, punctures
- can plan, perform and evaluate dental examinations
- can apply an aseptic way of working
- has basic insights into the patient's overall care and can apply theoretical knowledge in diagnostic radiography
- understands and works in accordance with principles for safe and safe patient care

Content

Clinical training
Conventional examinations
US
Dental examinations

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 1

Objective

Student
- has the ability to plan, perform and evaluate the most common conventional x-ray examinations under supervision
- has the ability to act as a caretaker in ultrasound and biopsies, punctures
- can plan, perform and evaluate dental examinations
- can apply an aseptic way of working
- has basic insights into the patient's overall care and can apply theoretical knowledge in diagnostic radiography
- understands and works in accordance with principles for safe and safe patient care

Content

Clinical training
Conventional examinations
US
Dental examinations

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 1

Objective

Student:
- has the ability to apply theoretical knowledge in practice
- has the ability to independently, as a member of the work team, plan, perform and evaluate nativity studies and easier MRI and angiography examinations
- can handle, care and treat the patient overall in examinations and interventions and have good readiness to care for patients at different situations / different circumstances / with varying needs and problems.
- understands the meaning of patient-centered and safe patient care
- familiar with the care of other types of departments than their own
- can apply the principles of sustainable development in all dimensions and have developed the ability to collaborate and demonstrate responsibility in work with increased demands for independence and initiative
- has ability to independently acquire new knowledge in the diagnostic radiography's sub-areas.

Content

Conventional examinations
MRI
Angiography

Location and time

According to the schedule

Materials

See Moodle for more information:
About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
About assignments

Teaching methods

Practice and written assignements

Exam schedules

Internship info, Mandatory attendance
Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

International connections

Students can practice abroad

Completion alternatives

Approved internship
Approved assignments
Participation in internship seminar

Student workload

27 h/c, 17 x 27=459
27 h/c and during practice 28h/w
Information about practice, assignments and seminars is a part of the course

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Assessment methods and criteria

På engelska
Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 4, Clinical radiography 2 and 3/4 approved courses in study modules Patient Care in Clinical Radiography Context and in Biosciences

Objective

Student
- can apply theoretical knowledge in radiotherapy and have the ability to plan, implement and evaluate radiotherapy under supervision
- has the ability and ability to respond, care and support the cancer patient and his relatives
- has insight into the importance of the care chain for the overall care of the cancer patient and has developed the ability to cooperate and shows responsibility in his work
- has ability to independently acquire new knowledge in therapeutic radiography

Content

Radiotherapy

Location and time

According to the schedule

Materials

See Moodle for more information:
About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
About assignments

Teaching methods

Practice and written assignements

Exam schedules

Internship info, Mandatory attendance
Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

International connections

Students can practice abroad

Completion alternatives

Approved internship
Approved assignments
Participation in internship seminar

Student workload

27 h/c, 10 x 27 =270 h

In practice 38 h/w+ assignments
Infomation about practice, assignments and seminar is a part of the course

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Therapeutical Radiography, Clinical Radiography and 3/4 approved courses in study modules Patient in Clinical Radiography Context and in Biosciences

Objective

Student:
- can describe the radiographers profession
- has an understanding of which laws and regulations govern the operations of the various modalities
- understands the importance of a good radiation safety culture
- has insight into the patient's care chain within radiography and radiotherapy
- has knowledge of the multi-professional work within radiography and radiotherapy
- gain an understanding of the importance of knowledge in anatomy and physiology
- insight into the radiographers job

Content

Practice:
Conventional examination
MRI
CT
Radiotheraphy
Nuclearmedicin

Location and time

Acoording to timetable/ plan

Teaching methods

Clinical practice, introduction and seminarie ( compulsory)

Student workload

27hx 4cr= 108h

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Assessment methods and criteria

Clinical practice is evaluated Pass/ Fail

Qualifications

Introduction to clinical radiography

Objective

The student
- has knowledge of laws, regulations and directives regarding medical use of radiation and can apply them
- understands the radiological hygiene work that the medical use of radiation requires and can work according to approved principles in the field.

Content

Radiation Protection Authorities (international / national)
Radiation safety legislation, directive
International and national recommendations
Radiation safety
Radiation doses
Measurements

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

Introduction to clinical radiography

Objective

Students can
- define and apply the concepts and principles of radiation protection in native X-ray, dental care and animal imaging.
- identifying, evaluating and minimising the risks of using radiation and preparing and responsible for radiation safety incidents
- justify their decisions on the basis of existing laws and regulations in nativity, dental and animal x-ray operations, and implement and monitor radiation protection arrangements in their area of ​​expertise, including radiation protection for workers and the public,
- to guide the safe use of radiation, in the introduction of new methods and its optimisation, in quality assurance and to contribute to the development of a good safety culture regarding radiation in collaboration with the radiation safety expert

Content

1. Introduction to radiation physics for native, dental, and animal X-rays
2. Measurement techniques and calculation methods in native x-ray, dental and animal x-ray
- Methods for determining patient dose (ESAK, KAP, MGD, effective dose)
- Radiation scattering at native x-ray, dental and animal x-ray
- The role of delimitation and tube voltage for scattered radiation
- Radiation dosimeter
- Radiation protection design (HVL, material)
3. Radiation protection in native x-ray, dental and animal x-ray
- Radiation Biology
- Legislation and international recommendations
- Radiation safety in the workplace
- Radiation safety deviations
- Safety culture, radiation protection training and quality assurance
4. Requirements, purchases and maintenance of X-ray equipment for native, dental and animal X-rays

Location and time

Info via Zoom ti 1.4.2025 16-17
Seminar
28.4.25 16-17:30 Zoom
29.4.2025 16-17:30 Zoom
5.5.2025 16-17:30 Zoom

Materials

In Moodle

Teaching methods

Online
Seminars
Examniation

Student workload

5x27h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Authorization as a radiation safety officer (SSA) is added to the exam grade

Qualifications

The student has completed all diagnostic and therapeutic radiography courses with approved results

Further information

Collaboration with radiographer educations at OAMK, Metropolia, TAMK, Turku AMK and Savonia

Objective

Training for professionals involved in radiological practices

Content

Radiation protection in odontology
Law

Materials

According to the lecturer's recommendations

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Objective

Student
- has basic insights into cancer diseases, epidemiology and treatment methods
- recognizes the special features of the oncological care
- controls the basic principles for the use of radiotherapy equipment and has good knowledge of radiotherapy as a cancer treatment
- has good knowledge of the care of cancer patients and understands its special features
- is familiar with the importance of safe patient care
- knows about individual palliative care and care in the end-of-life care
- understands the importance of good care and guiding the patient and relatives

Content

Oncology
Radiotherapy
equipment
treatment
radiotherapyprocess
safe and good care for cancerpatients
palliative care

Location and time

According to schedule

Materials

All material and sources can be found at Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, individual assignment, workshops, study visit

Exam schedules

Kataina: 2 examinations (part 1 and 2), according to the plan/ schedule

Student workload

27h x8cr= 216h
Katarina: 27hx 4cr= 108h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

Clinical Radiography 2

Objective

Student
- has knowledge of different health sciences and occupational history and development
- has knowledge of and can apply the basic principles of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
- has the basic ability to work in accordance with ethical guidelines in their future profession and by respecting and respecting the values and life views of other people, without violating human rights

Content

Fundamental components of caring science

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student
- has the ability to plan, perform and evaluate the most common conventional x-ray examinations under supervision
- has the ability to act as a caretaker in ultrasound and biopsies, punctures
- can plan, perform and evaluate dental examinations
- can apply an aseptic way of working
- has basic insights into the patient's overall care and can apply theoretical knowledge in diagnostic radiography
- understands and works in accordance with principles for safe and safe patient care

Content

Clinical training
Conventional examinations
US
Dental examinations

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 1

Objective

The students
- are familiar with the ethical aspects and statutes of medication administration.
- are familiar with different forms of medication and administration.
- are familiar with different medication groups, indications, interactions and the most common side-effects. They are also able to observe and assess the effect of the medication.
- command the fundamental rules of arithmetic needed for medication dosage, and are able to administer medication flawlessly in exercises (pill dispensers/medicin tray, subcutant, intramuscular)
- are aware of their responsabilities when administering medication.
- are familiar with the concepts and terminology of pharmacology, and are knowledgeable of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
- have knowledge of drug therapy among the most common endemic diseases
- know various types of pain medication
- know medication used as anticoagulant therapy

Content

Medication administration and different medication groups
Pharmacology

Location and time

spring 2025, Alere

Materials

Nordeng och Spigset (2018) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
SHM.2021. Handbok i säker läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848

Läkemedelsräkning och -behandling:
Envall, S., Pulli, A. & Salonen, A-M. 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Sarijärven Offset Oy, Saarijärvi.
Läkemedelsberäkningskommendium
Rekommenderad litteratur:
Björkman, E. & Hagberg, M. 2005. Läkemedelsberäkning för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Artlkar/material enl föreläsarens anvisningar
armacology distributed by the teacher

Teaching methods

workshops and seminars
tasks and tests

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject


Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Task passed not approved
The calculation exam have to be 100% correct for pass.

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student
- has knowledge of different health sciences and occupational history and development
- has knowledge of and can apply the basic principles of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
- has the basic ability to work in accordance with ethical guidelines in their future profession and by respecting and respecting the values and life views of other people, without violating human rights

Content

Fundamental components of caring science

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with concepts and terminology in pharmacology and has knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
- has insights about different groups of drugs; knows indications, interactions and the most common side effects and can observe and evaluate the effect of the drugs

Content

Basic pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with concepts.
Drug interactions, drug side effects and drug use in the elderly.
Common drug groups such as analgesics, antibiotics, drugs for cardiovascular disease, drugs for diabetes, drugs for gastrointestinal diseases and drugs for mental disorders.

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Nordeng och Spigset (2009) Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad
Lecture material on Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 28.5.2025
Re-examination x.x.2025 and x.x.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination x h, self studies and digital teaching methods

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student
-should show good knowledge in X-ray, the imaging technology and native projections.
-has basic knowledge of the flouroscopy technology and the most common screening studies
-has basic knowledge of mammography examinations and photography techniques.
-has basic knowledge of the computed tomography, the technology, examinations and work on computed tomography.
-has basic insights into using contrast agents and first aid related to them.
-has basic insights into the magnetic resonance imaging technology, in the use of MRI and deep-knowing in safety issues.
-has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
-understands the importance of good patient care,patient-centered and safe patientcare
-can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation
- radiation protection in relevant area
- measurements

Content

-conventional x-ray
-fluoroscopy
-mammography
-computed radiography
-magnetic tomography
-contrastmedia and first-aid
-anatomy
-patientcare
- measurements
- radiationprotection

Location and time

Spring 2025 and autumn 2025 according to lecture schedule

Materials

Study material on Moodle
Additional material according to the lecturer

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations and tasks.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination
Part 1
Part 2

International connections

13 cr corresponds to 351 hours of studies

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

13 cr corresponds to 351 hours of studies

Further information

Additional information on Moodle

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions.

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 1 and Clinical Radiography 1

Objective

The student
- have obtained knowledge that support them in their personal development and/or professionalism.
- have obtained specific qualifications according to chosen course

Content

Subjects that support professional development

Location and time

Nuttrition and health:

Can be done during the studies during selectable period

Teaching methods

Nutrion and health 2 etcs:
Lectures, individual assignments/tasks, written assignment, seminaries

Can be one or more of this alternatives:
Lecturers
Conferences
Studyvisits
Seminars
Individual written assignment
Written report, article

Student workload

1sp= 27h, 5x 27=135h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team

Further information

The course can look different for students, it can be built according to students needs and earlier experiences

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team

Qualifications

None

Objective

Students can
- define and apply the concepts and principles of radiation protection in native X-ray, dental care and animal imaging.
- identifying, evaluating and minimising the risks of using radiation and preparing and responsible for radiation safety incidents
- justify their decisions on the basis of existing laws and regulations in nativity, dental and animal x-ray operations, and implement and monitor radiation protection arrangements in their area of ​​expertise, including radiation protection for workers and the public,
- to guide the safe use of radiation, in the introduction of new methods and its optimisation, in quality assurance and to contribute to the development of a good safety culture regarding radiation in collaboration with the radiation safety expert

Content

1. Introduction to radiation physics for native, dental, and animal X-rays
2. Measurement techniques and calculation methods in native x-ray, dental and animal x-ray
- Methods for determining patient dose (ESAK, KAP, MGD, effective dose)
- Radiation scattering at native x-ray, dental and animal x-ray
- The role of delimitation and tube voltage for scattered radiation
- Radiation dosimeter
- Radiation protection design (HVL, material)
3. Radiation protection in native x-ray, dental and animal x-ray
- Radiation Biology
- Legislation and international recommendations
- Radiation safety in the workplace
- Radiation safety deviations
- Safety culture, radiation protection training and quality assurance
4. Requirements, purchases and maintenance of X-ray equipment for native, dental and animal X-rays

Location and time

Info via Zoom ti 1.4.2025 16-17
Seminar
28.4.25 16-17:30 Zoom
29.4.2025 16-17:30 Zoom
5.5.2025 16-17:30 Zoom

Materials

In Moodle

Teaching methods

Online
Seminars
Examniation

Student workload

5x27h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Authorization as a radiation safety officer (SSA) is added to the exam grade

Qualifications

The student has completed all diagnostic and therapeutic radiography courses with approved results

Further information

Collaboration with radiographer educations at OAMK, Metropolia, TAMK, Turku AMK and Savonia

Objective

Student
- can present their thesis and act as an opponent for another degree project
- can describe the most important results of the thesis in a maturity test, which also demonstrates the ability to express themselves in writing

Content

The research process
Presentation of thesis and acting as opponent
Maturity exam

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
Week 21 of Spring 2025 and week x of Fall 2025

Materials

Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Teaching methods

Written thesis
Seminar

Employer connections

Presentation of thesis in public

Exam schedules

Spring 2025 week 21 presentation of thesis and maturity exam
Fall 2025 week x

Completion alternatives

Thesis
Maturity test

Further information

More information on the Moodle page of the course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

Thesis is graded 0-5
Opposition of another student's work passed or failed
Maturity test is graded passed or failed

Qualifications

Study module Research process

Objective

Training for professionals involved in radiological practices

Content

Radiation protection in odontology
Law

Materials

According to the lecturer's recommendations

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Objective

Student
- has the ability to plan, perform and evaluate the most common conventional x-ray examinations under supervision
- has the ability to act as a caretaker in ultrasound and biopsies, punctures
- can plan, perform and evaluate dental examinations
- can apply an aseptic way of working
- has basic insights into the patient's overall care and can apply theoretical knowledge in diagnostic radiography
- understands and works in accordance with principles for safe and safe patient care

Content

Clinical training
Conventional examinations
US
Dental examinations

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 1

Objective

The students
- are able to identify a person's need for first aid, and are able to provide first aid.
- are familiar with the procedures of emergency cases.

Content

First aid
Health care in case of emergency

Location and time

spring 2025

Materials

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Teaching methods

Lessons, demonstration, practice

Completion alternatives

Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

Further information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
- demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

Content

Finnish (oral and written)

Location and time

Spring 2025.

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Objective

The student:
- shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
- is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
- has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
- is aware of cultural differences in international context

Content

English (oral and written)

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

-according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

Teaching methods

Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

More information on Moodle.

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Performed presentation, written exam.

Student workload

3 x 27 h = 81 hours

Content scheduling

-

Further information

Active participation is required.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The students
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
- will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels

Content

The circulatory system
The lymphatic system
The respiratory system
The digestive and secretory organs
The kidneys and urinary tracts
Fluid, electrolyte and acid-base balance

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 10th of March 2025
Re-examination 04.04.2023 and 23.05.2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

1 cr corresponds to 27 hours work for the student
Lectures and examination 23 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 58 h

Further information

More about the course on the Moodle page

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the on-line exam and virtual tests

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Qualifications

Human Physiology and Anatomy 1

Objective

The student
- has knowledge of laws, regulations and directives regarding medical use of radiation and can apply them
- understands the radiological hygiene work that the medical use of radiation requires and can work according to approved principles in the field.

Content

Radiation Protection Authorities (international / national)
Radiation safety legislation, directive
International and national recommendations
Radiation safety
Radiation doses
Measurements

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

Introduction to clinical radiography

Objective

The student
- has capacity to independently write a thesis according to college rules
- can work systematic and purposefully according to scientific and ethical rules

Content

Thesis plan
The research process including presentation of an plan

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Course literature:
Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Self-studies
Seminar

Employer connections

Topic for thesis.

Exam schedules

Mandatory presence at the Mid-seminar according to schedual

Student workload

27 h/cr corresponds to 162 h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Passed:
The structure of the thesis is according to instructions.
The background is relevant and informative, and motivates the choice of research topic
The aim and research questions have a clear delimitation
The collection of data material and the analysis of the data is ongoing
The references are relevant and relates to the aim and research questions
The list of references are done correctly according to instructions given for writing a thesis

Further information

Thesis plan should be accepted before the student take part of the Mid-seminar

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

Students follow the instructions for the mid-seminar.
The data collection must be completed and the data analysis started for passing.
Those who cannot participate (or have not progressed far enough in the EA process) will receive a passed grade when the completed thesis is presented.

Qualifications

Studymodule Researchprocess

Objective

Student:
- can describe the radiographers profession
- has an understanding of which laws and regulations govern the operations of the various modalities
- understands the importance of a good radiation safety culture
- has insight into the patient's care chain within radiography and radiotherapy
- has knowledge of the multi-professional work within radiography and radiotherapy
- gain an understanding of the importance of knowledge in anatomy and physiology
- insight into the radiographers job

Content

Practice:
Conventional examination
MRI
CT
Radiotheraphy
Nuclearmedicin

Location and time

Acoording to timetable/ plan

Teaching methods

Clinical practice, introduction and seminarie ( compulsory)

Student workload

27hx 4cr= 108h

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Assessment methods and criteria

Clinical practice is evaluated Pass/ Fail

Qualifications

Introduction to clinical radiography

Objective

Student:
- has the ability to apply theoretical knowledge in practice
- has the ability to independently, as a member of the work team, plan, perform and evaluate nativity studies and easier MRI and angiography examinations
- can handle, care and treat the patient overall in examinations and interventions and have good readiness to care for patients at different situations / different circumstances / with varying needs and problems.
- understands the meaning of patient-centered and safe patient care
- familiar with the care of other types of departments than their own
- can apply the principles of sustainable development in all dimensions and have developed the ability to collaborate and demonstrate responsibility in work with increased demands for independence and initiative
- has ability to independently acquire new knowledge in the diagnostic radiography's sub-areas.

Content

Conventional examinations
MRI
Angiography

Location and time

According to the schedule

Materials

See Moodle for more information:
About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
About assignments

Teaching methods

Practice and written assignements

Exam schedules

Internship info, Mandatory attendance
Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

International connections

Students can practice abroad

Completion alternatives

Approved internship
Approved assignments
Participation in internship seminar

Student workload

27 h/c, 17 x 27=459
27 h/c and during practice 28h/w
Information about practice, assignments and seminars is a part of the course

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Assessment methods and criteria

På engelska
Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Diagnostic Radiography 4, Clinical radiography 2 and 3/4 approved courses in study modules Patient Care in Clinical Radiography Context and in Biosciences

Objective

Student
- can apply theoretical knowledge in radiotherapy and have the ability to plan, implement and evaluate radiotherapy under supervision
- has the ability and ability to respond, care and support the cancer patient and his relatives
- has insight into the importance of the care chain for the overall care of the cancer patient and has developed the ability to cooperate and shows responsibility in his work
- has ability to independently acquire new knowledge in therapeutic radiography

Content

Radiotherapy

Location and time

According to the schedule

Materials

See Moodle for more information:
About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
About assignments

Teaching methods

Practice and written assignements

Exam schedules

Internship info, Mandatory attendance
Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

International connections

Students can practice abroad

Completion alternatives

Approved internship
Approved assignments
Participation in internship seminar

Student workload

27 h/c, 10 x 27 =270 h

In practice 38 h/w+ assignments
Infomation about practice, assignments and seminar is a part of the course

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved performance

The student:
Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills 
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times 
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work 
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments 
Can perform tasks under supervision 
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work 
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks 
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level 
Know the values and consider the ethical principles 
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers 
Can work with others in the work team

Failure performance does not substantially meet the goals for approved performance.

Qualifications

Therapeutical Radiography, Clinical Radiography and 3/4 approved courses in study modules Patient in Clinical Radiography Context and in Biosciences

Objective

Student
- has the ability to produce an idea for his thesis and can perform and argue for choices she/he have done

Content

Thesis idea
The research process including presentation of an idea

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

According to the topic of Thesis

Recommended literature: Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Teaching methods

Introduction lecture to the course, thesis work, followed by mainly self-directed studies with possibility to supervision. The student makes a plan for the thesis. The presentation of the plan for the thesis is the examination

Employer connections

The Thesis can be a work ordered, but is not necessary always so

Exam schedules

Presentation of work plan for thesis autumn 2024 and presentation of the thesis in May 2025

Completion alternatives

No optional examination form

Student workload

The course is 3 cr which is equivalent to 81 h work for the student

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

If the thesis plan is done according to instructions it is assessed as passed.

Further information

The content of the work plan for thesis:
Novia titlepage
Table of content
Introduction
Background (description of the topic, at least 5-6 scientific studies)
Aim and problem definition
Method (Data collection based on 2 references/discuss method of selection)
Ethical consideration (based on references)
Timetable
Reference list
Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excl. Title page and table of content)
Follow Novia’s instructions for writing Thesis)

1. You find Novia’s title page on Moodle (no key needed)
2. Table of content is done in Word, if you do not know how to do choose ? (help) in the upper right corner and write list of content in the search field
3. The introduction should be about 1 p, where the reader is introduced to the topic and also to your interest of studying it.
4. Background shall be 3 – 5 p and divided into chapters where description of concepts and the topic of the subject. In the background you also describe the previous research done
5. Aim and problem definition can be short about ½ p.
6. The method can be described on 2-3 p. The chapter includes a description of the approach (qualitative/quantitative design), motivation for the choice and data collection method. References need to be included.
7. Ethical considerations are described on about 1 p and with the help of references ethical principles followed are discussed. refer to relevant documents on Finnish National advicory board on Research Integrity TENK. (tenk.fi)
8. Time plan should estimate how Thesis proceeds. Please do a realistic plan writing something for each month and write it also in your calender.
9. Works cited

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
Can perform tasks under supervision
Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
Can work with others in the work team

Assessment methods and criteria

The work plan for the thesis is assessed as either failed or passed.

The plan must include the following parts (for passing):
• Novia cover page
• Table of contents
• Introduction (at least 1 page): must include at least 2 sources
• Purpose and research questions
• Background (at least 4 pages). Must include: for one student: at least 6 sources, of which at least 2 are scientific and for two students: at least 9 sources, of which at least 4 are scientific
• Method (at least 1 page): Selection; Data collection; Data analysis method; Ethical considerations and Timeline
• References (of the sources used in the plan)

Length: at least 6 pages and at most 9 pages (excluding cover page, table of contents, and references)

Must follow Novia's writing guidelines: https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/

Qualifications

Studymodule Researchprocess

Objective

The students
- have fundamental skills in clinical nursing and its main methods.
- are familiar with good ergonomics and realize the importance of acting according to aseptic principles.
- are able to apply interactive skills, and embrace a comprehensive and process-oriented perspective in the caring profession.

Content

Clinical nursing methods
Ergonomics in the work
Aseptic manners
Nursing process

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

Terveysportti
Vårdhandboken
Moodle material

Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

Teaching methods

Self-study
On-campus teaching
Individual works
practical exercises at KTC - Compulsory attendance

Exam schedules

Autumn 2024

Completion alternatives

Examination
Mandatory attendance 100% for practical exercises
Approved exercises in training classes
Approved submissions.

Student workload

27h/ECT

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The examination is graded 0-5
Written exercises are assessed UK/GK
Clinical exercises are assessed UK/GK

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student:

- gain a basic insight into the importance of lifestyle habits for one's own health. - reflects on their own choices and lifestyle.
-students actively participate in the course content/exercises and tasks

Content

Basics in nutrition and health.
The importance of health in working life and in study life.

Location and time

Autumn 2024

Materials

According to the lecturer

Teaching methods

Lecturers, Individual/ group assignment, individual exercises, group exercise. Own activity is a must in this course

Exam schedules

To pass, you must pass in the individual assignments/ group assignments and actively participate in the course.

Student workload

2 credits= 2 x 27h= 54h

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

Inga förkunskapskrav

Objective

The students
- will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
- will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
- will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
- will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system

Content

Terminology
Cells, tissues, integumentary system
Nervous system, sense organs, reproductive system and endocrine system
Support- and movement organs

Location and time

Autumn 2024 according to the schedule

Materials

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended literature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Teaching methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Exam schedules

Course examination 16th of December 2024
Re-examination 17th of January and 7th of March 2025

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

Lectures and examination 22 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 59 h

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle platform

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
- knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
- can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
- can name the most common pathogenic microbes
- understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
- understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
- understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
- understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
- can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
- can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
- have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
- can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
- understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

Content

Clinical microbiology
Immunology
Pathology

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The students
- have basic insights into knowledge theory and science theory
- can both manually and digitally search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
- can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the learning process and in projects
- understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
- has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

Content

Science theory and evidence-based knowledge
Research approaches
Research process

Location and time

Autumn 2024 according to the schedule

Materials

Course literature :
Henricson, M. (red.) (2023, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur

Teaching methods

Lectures, group discussion and assignments

Exam schedules

Course examination 01.10.2024
Re-examination 25.10 and 13.12
Written assignments according to schedule

Completion alternatives

Examination

Student workload

The course is 3 cr which corresponds to 81 hours of work

Further information

Additional information on the Moodle platform

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam and the individual, written assignments.
In order to pass the course all parts (exam and assignments) have to be passed.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The students does not understand and can not apply the methods of qualitative research

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Notable weakness are found in students understanding and application on the research aims and questions or the data collection stage

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding and can apply qualitative concepts into the different research phases

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The students demonstrates a complete understanding for qualitative concepts of research and make only insignificant errors when applying and planing research

Qualifications

None

Objective

Students
- can specify and evaluate the most common qualitative and quantitative research methods
- can reproduce the research process and apply the different phases of the research process
- can use different methods for qualitative data collection and data analysis in care research
- can use the most common methods for quantitative data collection and analysis
- can make simple statistical calculations and tests
- has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work

Content

Qualitative and quantitative research methods

Location and time

Autumn 2024 according to the schedule

Materials

Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.
Qualitative methods:
Course literature :
Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
Qualitative methods: lectures and group discussion and assignment

Exam schedules

Quantitative method: the assignment has to be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course
Qualitative method: written assignment and presentation within a seminar

Completion alternatives

Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 0-5, 1-5 is a passed grade)
qualitative methods: written assignment and presentation (graded according to the scale 0-5., where 1-5 is a passed grade)

Student workload

Quantitative research methodology is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours work of which 12 are scheduled lectures and seminars and the rest is the students' own work. assignment is submitted on a agreed date after the lectures.
Qualitative methods is 2 cr which is equivalent to 54 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam
answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature
has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject

Written assignment
The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam
can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
can give an independent account of the literature
understands most of the topic
presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations
can motivate some of their claims and positions
can give some own examples

Written assignment
The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam
has in-depth knowledge of the subject
can analyze and interpret subject facts
master the subject versatile
has a broad grasp of the subject
presents original and apposite examples

Written assignment
The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

Qualitative method: based on a exam, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental concepts and understanding the research process and analysis approaches, is evaluated. Written assignments have to be done on time.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

Qualitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply the research process and analysis methods.
Written assignments missing or inadequate.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

Qualitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of analysis methods and is not adequately preform content analysis

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

Qualitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply concepts analysis , and only minor errors are found in the analysis process.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

Qualitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding and makes only insignificant errors when applying the methods.

Qualifications

Research methodology

Objective

Student
- has basic insights into cancer diseases, epidemiology and treatment methods
- recognizes the special features of the oncological care
- controls the basic principles for the use of radiotherapy equipment and has good knowledge of radiotherapy as a cancer treatment
- has good knowledge of the care of cancer patients and understands its special features
- is familiar with the importance of safe patient care
- knows about individual palliative care and care in the end-of-life care
- understands the importance of good care and guiding the patient and relatives

Content

Oncology
Radiotherapy
equipment
treatment
radiotherapyprocess
safe and good care for cancerpatients
palliative care

Location and time

According to schedule

Materials

All material and sources can be found at Moodle

Teaching methods

Lectures, individual assignment, workshops, study visit

Exam schedules

Kataina: 2 examinations (part 1 and 2), according to the plan/ schedule

Student workload

27h x8cr= 216h
Katarina: 27hx 4cr= 108h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Qualifications

Clinical Radiography 2

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with their own university of applied sciences, its teaching methods, use of various platforms, and digital tools
- acquaints themselves with searching in various databases with basic literature searches in different databases
- reflects on higher education studies and are aware of the importance of the personal learning process in relation to continuous learning
- is familiar with their own education and have knowledge of their own professional field, as well as the competence requirements for their own profession

Content

Study information and information retrieval
Learning in a higher education context
Social media, data protection, and data security
Use of AI
The importance of the profession
The work areas of nurses, public health nurses, and midwives

Location and time

Introduction to academic studies:According to schedule

Teaching methods

Introduction to academic studies: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test ( library/ informationservice)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The stundent
-is familiar with the history of radiography and radiotherapy
-has a knowledge about different modalities in diagnostic and therapeutic radiography and about radioggrahers profession.
-has a knowledge about basic words and concepts
- is familiar with the research field in clinical radiography
- can describe the organization of social and health care in Finland and the legislation that governs the activities
- has knowledge of service systems and the patient's / client's social benefits
- has basic skills in interprofessional work
- understands and can reflect on ethical guidelines and profession-specific ethical codes and can in his future profession work on the basis of these
- understands the importance of culture in healthcare and can respond to clients / patients from different cultures
- is aware of the importance of internal sustainability based on the demands placed on the profession and can maintain good health

Content

Radiation
Modalities in radiography, radiotherapy, nuclearmedicin
Radiographer education
The radiographer profession and their workfield
Clinical radiography research
Health care in Finland
Management structures, different sustainable service environments and service systems
General laws in social and health care
Interprofessional work
The client's / patient's position and rights
Ethical guidelines and codes
Professional encounters Internal sustainability in the profession

Location and time

According to the schedule

Materials

Radiologi, Blomqvist, Lennart. Valda delar
radiography: webpages, current research
Sustainable development

Teaching methods

Lecturers, workshops, study visits

Completion alternatives

Exam
Individual written assignment

Student workload

27h x 6= 162h

Further information

Introductions, workshops and seminars have mandatory attendance.

All assignments follow Instructions for writing in Novia and plagiation control through Ouriginal
Use of AI according to lecturer

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) 

Assessment criteria for written work 
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views 

Assessment criteria for written work 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam 
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject 

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups 
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Clinical radiography: Tentamina will be graded between 0-5, The written assignments are approved/ not approved and can affect the final grade by raising.
Feedback on assignments is given in writing
Active participation in the course can affect the grade

Qualifications

None

Objective

The Student:
- has basic understanding in electricity and good insight into radiation in order to apply knowledge in future courses using different types of methods and thus different types of radiation
- understands the interaction of radiation with matter, has insight into the effects of radiation on humans and the radiation sensitivity of different organs and tissues

Content

Basic physics
Radiation biology

Location and time

According to the schedule.

Lecturer:
Radiationphysics: Anders Skjäl
Radiationbiology: Katarina Vironen

Materials

Medicinsk fysik, Eva Berglund&Bo-Anders Jönsson
Grundläggande strålningsfysik, Mats Isaksson, 2002 och nyare upplaga
Strålskydd, Karl-Johan Johansson
Radiologi, L. Blomqvist & S.Zackrisson, (red), 2022.
Andra aktuella forskningar och rapporter ( bl.a STUK)

Teaching methods

Lectures and workshops

Student workload

Radiation physics 27h x= 54h
Radiation biology 27h x= 54h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Objective

Student
- understand the operating principles of X-ray tubes and generator, the origin of X-rays and have thorough insights into imaging techniques and the use of X-ray apparatus for conventional examinations
- has in-depth knowledge of human anatomy
- conducts basic projection learning and can be the basic principles for planning, performing and evaluating nativity studies
- has basic knowledge of pathological findings.
- has basic knowledge of ultrasound technology and is familiar with various surveys; preparation, implementation and aftercare.
- has good insights into different types of X-ray equipment for examining the theet and jaws.
- can apply an aseptic way of working and have knowledge of infectious diseases and insulation principles
- understands the importance of good patient experience and safe patient care
- can take into account the principles of sustainable development regarding radiation

Content

-x-ray tubes and generators
-imaging techniques for conventinal examinations
-anatomy
-basics in projection learning and criteria for good x-ray examination
-Ultrasound
-x-rays of theeth
-Aseptic and infectious diseases
-Ethics

Location and time

During autumn 24 and spring 25

Materials

Companies, pp presentations, see Moodle
Radiology (2022) L. Blomqvist and S. Zackrisson.
Patient care in radiography: with an introduction to medical imaging. (2017) Ehrlich, Ruth Ann, author ; Coakes, Dawn M., author. Elsevier, Ninth edition
Radiography of children : a guide to good practice (2004) Hardwick, Judith ; Gold, Catherine. Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone
HUS-Hyvän kuvan kriteritit
Regulations
Recommendations
Current research
Websites

Teaching methods

Lectures, clinical exercises, discussion

Exam schedules

Examination - according to agreement
written submissions - according to agreement
exercise tasks - according to agreement

Student workload

27 h/c

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed instructions for the written task. The student shows limited substance knowledge and are not familiar nor knowledge about other students' written work.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate views

Assessment criteria for written work
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited. Shows insufficient knowledge about other students' written work

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
Student shows in-depth knowledge and maturity in the subject

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
Student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance. Shows good knowledge in the other participants' written work, ask relevant questions and have capacity to lead a seminar discussion. The written work and the possible opponentship shows excellent knowledge (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Passed the exam, passed mandatory assignments and exercises
Active participation can affect course grades. According to the supervisors, absences can be supplemented

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Failed the exam, unsubmitted mandatory tasks and assignments.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluating the exam
Students have superficial knowledge of the subject (reading by heart)

Assessment criteria for written work
Students have followed the instructions for the written work. Has deficient knowledge of the substance and is not familiar with it and has deficient knowledge of other people's written works.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluating the exam
Students can give an account of the literature, reflect and justify their opinions

Assessment criteria for written work
Students have followed the instructions for written work and master the substance of their work, but the application is limited. Has insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written works.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluating the exam
Students demonstrate in-depth knowledge and maturity within the subject

Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for written work and shows that she has mastered the material. Is well-read in the other participants' written works, can ask relevant questions and lead a seminar discussion. The written work and possible opposition demonstrate excellent knowledge. (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working method)

Qualifications

Introduction to clinical radiography