Academic year 2020 - 2021

•   Antenatal care 1 BM14BM03-3003 08.03.2021-18.04.2021  3 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered the follow-up of the expectant mother and fetus during pregnancy
  - can identify risk factors in connection with pregnancy and has the ability to prevent and intervene early
  - can identify mothers and prospective parents in need of extra support and follow-up
  - has knowledge of models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - mastered follow-up, care referral, supervision and counseling of the woman and the family during pregnancy and childhood
  - mastered the care and follow-up of the new mother and the newborn child
  - has knowledge of couple relationships, parenting and early interaction

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
  Mental health and psychiatry

  Content of the study unit

  Antenatal care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen m.fl. (2015). Kätilötyö. Edita. Kapitel 2, 4, 6, 7.2
  
  Berg, M. & Lundgren, I. (2010). Att stöda och stärka - vårdande vid barnafödande. Studentlitteratur, Lund. Kapitel 1-5 samt 12
  
  Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T.( red.) (2015). Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Institutet för hälsa och välfärd, Helsingfors.
  
  
  Naistentaudit ja synnykset. toim. Ylikorkala, O. & Tapanainen, J. 2011, Duodecim
  
  Fosterscreeningar
  http://www.thl.fi/sv_SE/web/sv/forskning/verktyg/fosteravvikelser/utbildningspaket
  
  Articles according to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures and discussions, group work, self-studies.
  Practical skills training + film.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved clinical training by filming
  Passed exam
  Individual assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.03.2021 - 18.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Additional information

  Course introduction and clinical training are compulsory

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Clinical training (through filming) and active participation in the course.
  Written exam.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

•   Antenatal care 2 BM14BM04-3002 31.08.2020-23.10.2020  3 credits  (UBM17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered the follow-up of the expectant mother and fetus during pregnancy
  - can identify risk factors in connection with pregnancy and has the ability to prevent and intervene early
  - can identify mothers and prospective parents in need of extra support and follow-up
  - has knowledge of models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - mastered follow-up, care referral, supervision and counseling of the woman and the family during pregnancy and childhood
  - mastered the care and follow-up of the new mother and the newborn child
  - can identify women with childbearing fears and have basic knowledge of the care of childbearing fears

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Antenatal care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1-2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen m.fl. (2015). Kätilötyö. Edita.
  Nationella expertgruppen för mödravården (Förf.) (2015) Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T. (Red.)
  Handbok för mödrarådgivningen - Nationell rekommendation
  Tillgänglig från http://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/126655
  Naistentaudit ja synnykset. toim. Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O. & Mäkikallio, K. 2019, Duodecim
  Articles according to the lecturer's instructions
  Lindgren m.fl. (2016). Reproduktiv hälsa. Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures and discussions, group work, self-studies.
  Practical skills training.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For passing the course, an approved examination (at least 60% right) and approved assignments are required.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 23.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examnination
  Individual assignment
  Group work
  Mandatory attendance at lectures in Postpatrum check-up in January 2021.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam autumn 2020.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

•   Basic clinical nursing skills VÅV19KVV06-3007 05.10.2020-08.11.2020  2 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Basic Nursing Skills

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, T., Kan, S., Puska, E-L.& Vihunen, R.2004. Vård och välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P.20012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki. SanomaPro
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  Evidence-based articles according to the lecturer's instructions
  Moodle lectures

  Learning methods

  Flipped learning, lectures, demonstrations, clinical skills training, films, discussions, self-studies with an assignment.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For passing the course, the student must have passed an approved individual assignment, active attendance at clinical skills training (100%), approved clinical examination (OSCE).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 08.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  The clinical skills training requires active attendanse (100%). "Nurse-dress" is used in clinical skills training.

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Clinical examination OSCE: pass/fail

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical examination OSCE

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours/cr

•   Basic clinical nursing skills VÅV19KVV06-3008 18.01.2021-28.02.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Basic Nursing Skills

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro
  Liljamo, Kinnunen& Ensio. 2012.FinCC luokituskokonaisuuden käyttöopas.
  https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/90804/URN_ISBN_978-952-245-675-5.pdf?sequence=1
  Current other literature or articles according to teachers instruction

  Learning methods

  Lectures, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Attendance
  Approved OSCE
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 17.01.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Uniform is used in practice

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  OSCE
  Attendance compulsary

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  OSCE:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr, attendance in practical classes

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles

•   Basic clinical nursing skills VÅV19KVV06-3006 21.09.2020-13.12.2020  2 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Basic Nursing Skills

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro
  Liljamo, Kinnunen& Ensio. 2012.FinCC luokituskokonaisuuden käyttöopas.
  https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/90804/URN_ISBN_978-952-245-675-5.pdf?sequence=1
  Current other literature or articles according to teachers instruction

  Learning methods

  Lectures, practice
  Part of the course is realized together with VAMK

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Attendance
  Approved OSCE
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.09.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Uniform is used in practice

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  OSCE
  Attendance compulsary

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  OSCE:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr, attendance in practical classes

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3020 18.08.2020-18.12.2020  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.08.2020 - 18.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2020 - 31.07.2020

  • 2 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3021 01.09.2020-31.01.2021  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.09.2020 - 31.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2020 - 31.07.2020

  • 2 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3017 01.08.2020-31.12.2020  2 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se nationella Moodlekursen i Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp , Novia , Vasa (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatory attendance at the course start and practical exercises
  Approved portfolio submitted within the deadline
  Approved virtual exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk introduktion till kursen 7.10 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio : 1.12. kl 23.00
  Deadline för virtuell tentamen: 15.12. kl 08.00
  
  Vecka 46 feedback+ praktiska övningar 15.12 10-11.45 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h /sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  According to national criterias
  Approved:
  Approved portfolio
  Passed virtual exam
  Not approved:
  Not approved portfolio
  Not passed virtual exam

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3015 21.09.2020-15.11.2020  2 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  se nationella kursen i Moodle ; Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp NOVIA VASA (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Virtual/On line studies
  Contact teaching ( introduction and feedback)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatory attendance at the course start and practical exercises
  Approved portfolio submitted within the deadline
  Approved virtual exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.09.2020 - 15.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 27.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid kursstart - introduktion vecka 39 23.9.20 kl
  samt avlutande praktiska övningar vecka 46 13.11 kl 10-11.45 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Publiceras i Moodlekursen
  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio : 23.10 kl 8.00
  Deadline för virtuell tentamen: 9.11 kl 23.00
  
  Vecka 46 feedback+ praktiska övningar 13,11 10-11.45 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  According to national criterias
  Approved:
  Approved portfolio
  Passed virtual exam
  Not approved:
  Not approved portfolio
  Not passed virtual exam

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3016 19.10.2020-13.12.2020  2 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  se nationella kursen i Moodle ; Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp NOVIA VASA (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Virtual/On line studies
  Contact teaching ( introduction and feedback)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatory attendance at the course start and practical exercises
  Approved portfolio submitted within the deadline
  Approved virtual exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.10.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 25.10.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid kursstart-introduktion vecka 43 : 19.10
  samt avslutande praktiska övningar vecka 51: 14.12: 10-11.45 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Publiceras i Moodlekursen
  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio : 23.11 8.00
  Deadline för virtuell tentamen: 14.12 kl 8.00 ( tenten öppen 7.12 kl 8.00-14.12 kl 8.00)
  
  14.12 Feedback+praktiska övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  According to national criterias
  Approved:
  Approved portfolio
  Passed virtual exam
  Not approved:
  Not approved portfolio
  Not passed virtual exam

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3007 19.04.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red). 2018. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Andersson, R. Jeppson, B., Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap. 8. Kärlkirurgi. s. 269 – 288.
  Ericson,T. Lind, M (red) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap 1. Vården vid ateroskleros, hyperlipidemi, fetma och hypertoni. Kap 2. Vård vid hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar. Kap 3. Vård vid tromboemboliska sjukdomar.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på Moodle
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises and physical assessment class

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.04.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 18.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class .
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test
  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 2h + 2h + 4h + 4h+4h+4h
  SimMan practice, group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3008 08.03.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red). 2018. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Andersson, R. Jeppson, B., Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap. 8. Kärlkirurgi. s. 269 – 288.
  Ericson,T. Lind, M (red) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap 1. Vården vid ateroskleros, hyperlipidemi, fetma och hypertoni. Kap 2. Vård vid hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar. Kap 3. Vård vid tromboemboliska sjukdomar.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på Moodle
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises and physical assessment class

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.03.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class .
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test
  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 2h + 2h + 4h + 4h+4h+4h
  SimMan practice, group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3009 15.03.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red). 2018. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Andersson, R. Jeppson, B., Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap. 8. Kärlkirurgi. s. 269 – 288.
  Ericson,T. Lind, M (red) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap 1. Vården vid ateroskleros, hyperlipidemi, fetma och hypertoni. Kap 2. Vård vid hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar. Kap 3. Vård vid tromboemboliska sjukdomar.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på Moodle
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises and physical assessment class

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.03.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 14.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class .
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test
  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 2h + 2h + 4h + 4h+4h+4h
  SimMan practice, group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3005 29.09.2020-20.12.2020  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 17 och 18. Liber.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 13 och 14. Studentlitteratur.
  Skhole-föreläsningar: Diabetes 1, 2 , 3, Hypotyreoidism och hypertyreoidism
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 14, 15. Liber.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om tarmtömning s 420 – 429, 436 – 439. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 10 och 12. Studentlitteratur.
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.09.2020 - 20.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information about the course!

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3006 08.03.2021-11.04.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 17 och 18. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 14, 15. Liber, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber, Stockholm.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om tarmtömning s 420 – 429, 436 – 439. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 9 och 10. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.03.2021 - 11.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3004 04.01.2021-07.02.2021  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. Chapter 1, 2, 9-19
  or
  Tapanainen et al. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Chapter: 1-17,19-31.
  Medibas?
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, skhole lectures, online work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 07.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Seats

  15 - 22

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The first exam is the last lecture of the course
  The retakes are on the following general exams 12th of February and 12th of March.

  Pedagogic approaches

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h.
  3 cr = 81 h.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3005 25.01.2021-28.02.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. Chapter 1, 2, 9-19
  or
  Tapanainen et al. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Chapter: 1-17,19-31.
  Medibas?
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, skhole lectures, online work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 24.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  20 - 32

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The first exam is the last lecture of the course
  The retakes are on the following general exams or according to the teachers instructions.

  Pedagogic approaches

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h.
  3 cr = 81 h.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3006 08.03.2021-18.04.2021  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. Chapter 1, 2, 9-19
  or
  Tapanainen et al. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Chapter: 1-17,19-31.
  Medibas?
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, skhole lectures, online work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.03.2021 - 18.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Seats

  20 - 28

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The first exam is the last lecture of the course
  The retakes are on the following general exams or according to the teachers instructions.

  Pedagogic approaches

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h.
  3 cr = 81 h.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3008 01.08.2020-31.12.2020  2 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Truedesson, L. Klinisk immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2012.
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur 2015
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Sid 92-109. Studentlitteratur
  Hedman m.fl. Immunologia. III Immunologiset kudosvauriot, immuunisairaudet ja interventiot. Duodecim
  Material på moodle
  Rekommendationer, anvisningar och information på nätet
  Nätinformation:
  https://www.terveyskirjasto.fi/terveyskirjasto/tk.koti?p_artikkeli=dlk00010
  https://www.immuunipuutospotilaidenyhdistys.fi/tietoa/tietoa/immuunipuutokset-ja-hoito/vasta-ainepuutos/
  http://pio.nu/primar-immunbrist-pi/
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3245434/
  https://www.aaaai.org/conditions-and-treatments/primary-immunodeficiency-disease
  https://primaryimmune.org/about-primary-immunodeficiencies
  https://www.aarda.org/diseaselist/
  https://arthritis.org/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Blended learning:
  Lectures
  Self-studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid kursstart (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Immunologisk ohälsa : tent v
  Omtent
  Fredag kl. 12-16
  Fredag kl. 12-16
  
  Infektionssjukdomar: Tent v
  Omtent Fredag kl 12-16
  Omtent Fredag kl 12-16 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp
  Immunologisk ohälsa: 7,5 h schemalagd undervisning, 20 h litteraturstudier
  Infektionssjukdomar : 8 h schemalagd undervisning 19 h litteraturstudier (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3006 31.08.2020-31.12.2020  2 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Truedesson, L. Klinisk immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2012.
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur 2015
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Sid 92-109. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi.Liber 2018.
  Hedman m.fl. Immunologia. III Immunologiset kudosvauriot, immuunisairaudet ja interventiot. Duodecim
  Material på moodle
  Rekommendationer, anvisningar och information på nätet
  Nätinformation: THL, ECDC, CDC, WHO (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier och uppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd tentamen och godkänd uppgift (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminarium oktober 2020
  Tent v 43
  Omtenter: (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  54h / 2 sp
  Schemalagd undervisning 14h, Litteraturstudier och uppgift 40h (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3004 25.01.2021-28.02.2021  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kap.14 Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kap.15 Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson. R., Jeppsson. B. & Rydholm. A. (red.) (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (red.) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad. Del 2. Liber: Stockholm.
  Kapitel 23. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar I rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 24. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  Lonkkamurtuma
  Osteoporoosi
  Polvi- ja nivelrikko
  Selkäydinvamma
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, case studies, demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.
  Group discussion will affect the grade.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 24.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla tre case studies.
  Aktivt deltagande krävs. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examinationen i kursen är godkänt deltagande, både muntligen och skriftligen i samtliga case studies.
  
  Övningscase: case 1
  Examination: case 2 och case 3.
  
  Upplägg för casen:
  1. Individuell del (tentamen) ingen litteratur tillåts.
  2. Gruppdel av case (motivera svar) användning av litteratur tillåten.
  3. Genomgång av case.
  
  Vid underkänd prestation eller frånvaro under ett eller flera case studies - kan kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen, vid de två efterföljande datumen efter examinations case. Hela kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen. Datumen uppdateras i Moodle. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam/case: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam/case: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam/case: points < 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam/case: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3005 04.01.2021-24.01.2021  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kap.14 Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kap.15 Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson. R., Jeppsson. B. & Rydholm. A. (red.) (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (red.) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad. Del 2. Liber: Stockholm.
  Kapitel 23. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar I rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 24. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  Lonkkamurtuma
  Osteoporoosi
  Polvi- ja nivelrikko
  Selkäydinvamma
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, case studies, demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.
  Group discussion will affect the grade.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 24.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla tre case studies.
  Aktivt deltagande krävs. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examinationen i kursen är godkänt deltagande, både muntligen och skriftligen i samtliga case studies.
  
  Övningscase: case 1
  Examination: case 2 och case 3.
  
  Upplägg för casen:
  1. Individuell del (tentamen) ingen litteratur tillåts.
  2. Gruppdel av case (motivera svar) användning av litteratur tillåten.
  3. Genomgång av case.
  
  Vid underkänd prestation eller frånvaro under ett eller flera case studies - kan kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen, vid de två efterföljande datumen efter examinations case. Hela kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen. Datumen uppdateras i Moodle. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam/case: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam/case: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam/case: points < 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam/case: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3006 01.02.2021-21.03.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kap.14 Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kap.15 Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson. R., Jeppsson. B. & Rydholm. A. (red.) (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (red.) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad. Del 2. Liber: Stockholm.
  Kapitel 23. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar I rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 24. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  Lonkkamurtuma
  Osteoporoosi
  Polvi- ja nivelrikko
  Selkäydinvamma
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, case studies, demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.
  Group discussion will affect the grade.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.02.2021 - 21.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 31.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla tre case studies.
  Aktivt deltagande krävs. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examinationen i kursen är godkänt deltagande, både muntligen och skriftligen i samtliga case studies.
  
  Övningscase: case 1
  Examination: case 2 och case 3.
  
  Upplägg för casen:
  1. Individuell del (tentamen) ingen litteratur tillåts.
  2. Gruppdel av case (motivera svar) användning av litteratur tillåten.
  3. Genomgång av case.
  
  Vid underkänd prestation eller frånvaro under ett eller flera case studies - kan kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen, vid de två efterföljande datumen efter examinations case. Hela kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen. Datumen uppdateras i Moodle. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam/case: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam/case: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam/case: points < 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam/case: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3004 19.04.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 25, 26 & 27
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar. Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Reference literature:
  • Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  • Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Own studies
  Written assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.04.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 18.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points < 90%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3005 25.01.2021-14.03.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 25, 26 & 27
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar. Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Reference literature:
  • Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  • Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Own studies
  Written assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.01.2021 - 14.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 24.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points < 90%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3006 15.03.2021-25.04.2021  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 25, 26 & 27
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar. Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Reference literature:
  • Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  • Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Own studies
  Written assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.03.2021 - 25.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 14.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points < 90%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with psychiatric disorders VÅV18KV14-3003 23.11.2020-31.01.2021  3 credits  (UBM18D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.& Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  ...according to the teacher's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Exam: max 20p
  19-20 p=5
  17-18 p=4
  14-16 p=3
  12-13 p=2
  10-11 p=1
  Well-done self-study assignments (4-5) can increase the final grade by ½ points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.11.2020 - 31.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V
  • UHV18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visits to VCH; psychiatric unit and Gamla Vaasa hospital

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline 18.12.2020

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with psychiatric disorders VÅV18KV14-3004 15.02.2021-31.05.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Medibas handboken
  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  ...according to the teacher's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in pairs
  Study visits

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  criteria on moodle

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.02.2021 - 31.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 14.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Moodletest
  Assignments; selfstudy/in pairs

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visits to VCH; psychiatric unit and Gamla Vaasa hospital

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Moodletest
  Re exam on general re exam days spring 2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot the essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with psychiatric disorders VÅV18KV14-3005 26.04.2021-31.07.2021  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Medibas handboken
  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  ...according to the teacher's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in pairs
  Study visits

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  criteria on moodle

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.04.2021 - 31.07.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 25.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Moodletest
  Assignments; selfstudy/in pairs

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visits to VCH; psychiatric unit and Gamla Vaasa hospital

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Moodletest
  Re exam on general re exam days spring 2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot the essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3006 04.01.2021-31.01.2021  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red). (2014). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Liber. Stockholm.
  Anders, R., Jeppsson, B., & Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Cox, C. 8red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Lindgren,S.& Aspegren, K. 2004. Kliniska färdigheter. Informationsutbyte mellan patient och läkare
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin hoito. Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja.
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumatautia sairastavan ohjaus
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin pahenemisvaiheen hoito
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro
  Aktuella artiklar enligt föreläsares anvisningar
  Kitson, AL., Athlin, ÅM., Conroy, T Anything but Basic: Nursing’s Challenge in Meeting Patients’Fundamental Care Needs. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 46(5), 2012. Pp 331-339
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group discussion , self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 31.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Part of the lectures are in English
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3004 31.08.2020-27.09.2020  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red). (2014). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Liber. Stockholm.
  Anders, R., Jeppsson, B., & Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Cox, C. 8red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Lindgren,S.& Aspegren, K. 2004. Kliniska färdigheter. Informationsutbyte mellan patient och läkare
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin hoito. Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja.
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumatautia sairastavan ohjaus
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin pahenemisvaiheen hoito
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro
  Aktuella artiklar enligt föreläsares anvisningar
  Kitson, AL., Athlin, ÅM., Conroy, T Anything but Basic: Nursing’s Challenge in Meeting Patients’Fundamental Care Needs. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 46(5), 2012. Pp 331-339
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group discussion , self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 27.09.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Part of the lectures are in English
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3005 02.11.2020-06.12.2020  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red). (2014). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Liber. Stockholm.
  Anders, R., Jeppsson, B., & Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Cox, C. 8red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Lindgren,S.& Aspegren, K. 2004. Kliniska färdigheter. Informationsutbyte mellan patient och läkare
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin hoito. Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja.
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumatautia sairastavan ohjaus
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin pahenemisvaiheen hoito
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro
  Aktuella artiklar enligt föreläsares anvisningar
  Kitson, AL., Athlin, ÅM., Conroy, T Anything but Basic: Nursing’s Challenge in Meeting Patients’Fundamental Care Needs. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 46(5), 2012. Pp 331-339
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group discussion , self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.11.2020 - 06.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 08.11.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Part of the lectures are in English
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV18KV02-3008 21.09.2020-01.11.2020  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  NURSING SCIENCE
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  kapitel 1-5 (sid. 11-226) kapitel 4 gäller vårdetiken.
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  NURSING ETHICS
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  INTERCULTURAL CARE
  Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
  Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
  Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, interview, seminar, online course

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The nursing ethics is pass/fail
  The written assignment is evaluated with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  Criteria for evaluation of VÅV18KV02 Max points 40
  Has chosen a relevant concept and described it 10
  Referred to one of the recommended books on each topic nursing science and intercultural care 2
  Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  Referred to a scientific study/article (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and the chosen concept e.g. health among Vietnamese. Described the result 2
  Interview with a person from another culture than your own, descried the result, questions as an appendix. 2
  Reflection 3
  Followed Novia's instructions for writing thesis, especially references 2
  9 pages text if 3 stud., 5-6 if 2 stud. 1
  Extra literature 1
  Something extra except what was demanded, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  Presentation 2
  Comments on other students work in class or in Moodle 1
  Submitted on date agreed on 1
  Active participation in the class 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.09.2020 - 01.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Seats

  20 - 32

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be described in Moodle
  On the seminar on the last lecture of the course the group is divided into two 4h each.
  The introduction in nursing ethics is in a computer class room. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their workers. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.
  Introductions and seminars are compulsory!
  If the written assignment is not handed in, presented or is not accepted two retakes can be done.
  Literature for written exam (retake)
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group, if not accepted or not presented there is a possibility to do a written exam twice on two general exams days.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last time of the course, the class is divided in two groups.
  Retake exams 27.11 and 6.12.2020 on general exam days. Registration is necessary.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  3cr 3x27h=81h
  Nursing ethics: Introduction to nursing ethics is in a computer classroom 1h + 26h reading of material + doing tests on Moodle= 27h.
  Nusring science and intercultural care: 6x4h +2h= 26h lectures and group discussions in class +
  26h teamwork on written assignment + seminar 4h = 54h.

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV18KV02-3010 22.03.2021-25.04.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  NURSING SCIENCE
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  chapter 1-3, 5
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  
  NURSING ETHICS
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  chapter 4.
  
  INTERCULTURAL CARE
  Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
  Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
  Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, interview, seminar, online course

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The nursing ethics is pass/fail
  The written assignment is evaluated with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  Criteria for evaluation of VÅV18KV02 Max points 40
  Has chosen a relevant concept and described it 10
  Referred to one of the recommended books on each topic nursing science and intercultural care 2
  Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  Referred to a scientific study/article (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and the chosen concept e.g. health among Vietnamese. Described the result 2
  Interview with a person from another culture than your own, descried the result, questions as an appendix. 2
  Reflection 3
  Followed Novia's instructions for writing thesis, especially references 2
  9 pages text if 3 stud., 5-6 if 2 stud. 1
  Extra literature 1
  Something extra except what was demanded, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  Presentation 2
  Comments on other students work in class or in Moodle 1
  Submitted on date agreed on 1
  Active participation in the class 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.03.2021 - 25.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 21.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 41

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be in Moodle.
  On the seminar on the last lecture of the course the students divide themselves into two groups, which have 4h each.
  
  The introduction in nursing ethics is recommended. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new empoyees. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.
  
  Introductions and seminars are compulsory!
  
  If the written assignment is not handed in, presented or is not accepted two retakes can be done.
  Retake for nursing science + intercultural care is on general retake dates.
  Registration in time is demanded. Retakes are always 12.00-16.00
  During the corona- time there might be other arrangements.
  
  Literature for written exam (retake)
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  Talk to the teacher if you have part of the course accepted from before.

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times, 1cr.
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group, if not accepted or not presented there is a possibility to do a written exam twice on the two general exams following the seminar 2cr.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last time of the course, the class is divided in two groups.
  Retake exams 1 and 2 on two following general exam days. Registration is necessary.
  Retake dates:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  3cr 3x27h=81h
  Nursing ethics: Introduction to nursing ethics is in a computer classroom 1-2h + 25h reading of material + doing tests on Moodle= 27h.
  Nursing science and intercultural care: 6x4h +2h= 26h lectures and group discussions in class +
  26h teamwork on written assignment + seminar 4h = 54h.

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV18KV02-3007 19.10.2020-13.12.2020  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  NURSING SCIENCE
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  chapter 1-3, 5
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  
  NURSING ETHICS
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  chapter 4.
  
  INTERCULTURAL CARE
  Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
  Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
  Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, interview, seminar, online course

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The nursing ethics is pass/fail
  The written assignment is evaluated with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  Criteria for evaluation of VÅV18KV02 Max points 40
  Has chosen a relevant concept and described it 10
  Referred to one of the recommended books on each topic nursing science and intercultural care 2
  Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  Referred to a scientific study/article (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and the chosen concept e.g. health among Vietnamese. Described the result 2
  Interview with a person from another culture than your own, descried the result, questions as an appendix. 2
  Reflection 3
  Followed Novia's instructions for writing thesis, especially references 2
  9 pages text if 3 stud., 5-6 if 2 stud. 1
  Extra literature 1
  Something extra except what was demanded, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  Presentation 2
  Comments on other students work in class or in Moodle 1
  Submitted on date agreed on 1
  Active participation in the class 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.10.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 25.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  20 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be in Moodle.
  On the seminar on the last lecture of the course the students divide themselves into two groups, which have 4h each.
  
  The introduction in nursing ethics is recommended. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new empoyees. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.
  
  Introductions and seminars are compulsory!
  
  If the written assignment is not handed in, presented or is not accepted two retakes can be done.
  Retake for nursing science + intercultural care is on general retake dates.
  Registration in time is demanded. Retakes are always 12.00-16.00
  During the corona- time there might be other arrangements.
  
  Literature for written exam (retake)
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  Talk to the teacher if you have part of the course accepted from before.

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times, 1cr.
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group, if not accepted or not presented there is a possibility to do a written exam twice on the two general exams following the seminar 2cr.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last time of the course, the class is divided in two groups.
  Retake exams 1 and 2 on two following general exam days. Registration is necessary.
  Retake dates: 22nd of January 2020 and 12th of February 2020

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  3cr 3x27h=81h
  Nursing ethics: Introduction to nursing ethics is in a computer classroom 1-2h + 25h reading of material + doing tests on Moodle= 27h.
  Nursing science and intercultural care: 6x4h +2h= 26h lectures and group discussions in class +
  26h teamwork on written assignment + seminar 4h = 54h.

•   Clinical care during the postnatal period BM14KB02-3003 01.08.2020-31.12.2021  9 credits  (UBM17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered midwifery knowledge during the postnatal period
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate the mother's and the child's care during postnatal period and document it according to national documentation systems
  - can work family-centered in the support of the new family
  - can create a good care relationship with the woman and her family and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge within postnatal care
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical care during the postnatal period

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in postnatal care.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV18KVV03-3008 25.01.2021-05.09.2021  6 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team
  - can account for the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory tests

  Prerequisites

  The nurising process
  Ergonomy and Kinesthetics
  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Geriatrics and nursing care of the elderly

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Clinical practice 4.5 sp
  Laboratory exminations 1.5 sp

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurskompendium (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, demonstrationer, individuella uppgifter, kliniska övningar: 1.5 sp
  
  Praktik 4.5 sp
  Tre veckor valfripraktik inom vården under sommaren (sommarjobb): serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd individuell uppgift i lab-delen
  Utförda blodprovstagningar och EKG
  
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för BMHV20 gruppen 21.4 kl.9.00 - 9.45.
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36.
  Godkänd inlämnad arbetslista och praktikrapport. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.01.2021 - 05.09.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 24.01.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro under laborationsundervisningen
  Studerande söker själv sitt sommararbete. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  VÅV18KVV03, Klinisk vård inom valbar kontext, 6 sp varav 4,5 sp görs som sommarpraktik. (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Sommarpraktik på serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Vårterminen och sommaren 2021
  Inlämningsuppgift inom vt 2021 (not translated)

  Pedagogic approaches

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Praktik 3 veckor (4,5 sp) görs som sommarpraktik 2021 inom vård t.ex. hemservice, serviceboende, vårdavdelningar.
  Godkänd praktikrapport på ca 4 sidor om Dina upplevelser och erfarenheter av att göra sommarpraktik. Vad hade Du för målsättning för praktiken, vad har du lärt dig och nådde du Din målsättning. Undertecknad arbetslista inlämnas.
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för SSK20 grupperna 12.3 kl.9.00 - 9.45. Obligatorisk närvaro.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36. (not translated)

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV18KVV03-3009 19.04.2021-05.09.2021  6 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team
  - can account for the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory tests

  Prerequisites

  The nurising process
  Ergonomy and Kinesthetics
  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Geriatrics and nursing care of the elderly

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Clinical practice 4.5 sp
  Laboratory exminations 1.5 sp

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurskompendium (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, demonstrationer, individuella uppgifter, kliniska övningar: 1.5 sp
  
  Praktik 4.5 sp
  Tre veckor valfripraktik inom vården under sommaren (sommarjobb): serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd individuell uppgift i lab-delen
  Utförda blodprovstagningar och EKG
  
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för SSK20 grupperna 9.4 kl.12.30 - 13.15.
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36.
  Godkänd inlämnad arbetslista och praktikrapport. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.04.2021 - 05.09.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 18.04.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro under laborationsundervisningen
  Studerande söker själv sitt sommararbete. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  VÅV18KVV03, Klinisk vård inom valbar kontext, 6 sp varav 4,5 sp görs som sommarpraktik. (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Sommarpraktik på serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Vårterminen och sommaren 2021
  Inlämningsuppgift inom vt 2021 (not translated)

  Pedagogic approaches

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Praktik 3 veckor (4,5 sp) görs som sommarpraktik 2021 inom vård t.ex. hemservice, serviceboende, vårdavdelningar.
  Godkänd praktikrapport på ca 4 sidor om Dina upplevelser och erfarenheter av att göra sommarpraktik. Vad hade Du för målsättning för praktiken, vad har du lärt dig och nådde du Din målsättning. Undertecknad arbetslista inlämnas.
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för SSK20 grupperna 12.3 kl.9.00 - 9.45. Obligatorisk närvaro.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36. (not translated)

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV18KVV03-3010 08.03.2021-05.09.2021  6 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team
  - can account for the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory tests

  Prerequisites

  The nurising process
  Ergonomy and Kinesthetics
  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Geriatrics and nursing care of the elderly

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Clinical practice 4.5 sp
  Laboratory exminations 1.5 sp

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurskompendium (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, demonstrationer, individuella uppgifter, kliniska övningar: 1.5 sp
  
  Praktik 4.5 sp
  Tre veckor valfri praktik inom vården under sommaren (sommarjobb): serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd individuell uppgift i lab-delen
  Utförda blodprovstagningar och EKG
  
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för SSK20 grupperna.
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36.
  Godkänd inlämnad arbetslista och praktikrapport. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.03.2021 - 05.09.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.03.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro under laborationsundervisningen
  Studerande söker själv sitt sommararbete. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  VÅV18KVV03, Klinisk vård inom valbar kontext, 6 sp varav 4,5 sp görs som sommarpraktik. (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Sommarpraktik på serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Vårterminen och sommaren 2021
  Inlämningsuppgift inom vt 2021 (not translated)

  Pedagogic approaches

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Praktik 3 veckor (4,5 sp) görs som sommarpraktik 2021 inom vård t.ex. hemservice, serviceboende, vårdavdelningar.
  Godkänd praktikrapport på ca 4 sidor om Dina upplevelser och erfarenheter av att göra sommarpraktik. Vad hade Du för målsättning för praktiken, vad har du lärt dig och nådde du Din målsättning. Undertecknad arbetslista inlämnas.
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för SSK20 grupperna. Obligatorisk närvaro.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36. (not translated)

•   Clinical care of the pregnant women BM14KB03-3003 01.01.2021-31.12.2021  9 credits  (UBM17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered midwifery knowledge during pregnancy
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the patient's care in maternity care during pregnancy and the postnatal period
  - can identify the pregnant woman's resources and health problems and support both the health of the pregnant woman and the waiting family
  - has insights into models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - has insights into family planning
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical care of the pregnant women

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vardhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in antenatal clinic.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical intrapartum care 1 BM14KB06-3003 01.08.2020-28.02.2021  6 credits  (UBM17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - Understands the physiological course of birth
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - understands and can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the woman in labor, realize pain relief
  - has basic skills to identify abnormalities and deal with care in childbirth complications and deviant deliveries in collaboration with the care team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum care

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical intrapartum care 2 BM14KB07-3003 01.01.2021-31.12.2021  6 credits  (UBM17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - Understands the physiological course of birth
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - understands and can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the woman in labor, realize pain relief
  - has basic skills to identify abnormalities and deal with care in childbirth complications and deviant deliveries in collaboration with the care team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum care

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in delivery room.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical intrapartum care 3 BM14KB08-3003 01.01.2021-31.12.2021  6 credits  (UBM17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth and identify abnormalities in it
  - can, in cooperation with the woman in labor, realize pain relief
  - can predict and identify when normal delivery becomes abnormal
  - can care for abnormal delivery and risk delivery in a multi-professional work team
  - has cooperative ability and holistic thinking
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum care

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in delivery room.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical intrapartum care 4 BM14KB09-3004 01.01.2021-31.12.2021  6 credits  (UBM17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - can manage the normal delivery independently
  - mastered fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the woman in labor, realize pain relief
  - can predict and identify when normal delivery becomes abnormal
  - In case of deviant delivery and during risk delivery, can care for a multi-professional work team
  - has cooperative ability and holistic thinking
  - Master-safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 3

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum care

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in delivery room.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene VÅV18BV03-3006 28.09.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care
  - master aseptic methods

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Hygiene

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Hygien:
  Suojaeristyksen toteuttaminen, tartuntaeristyksen toteuttaminen, infektioiden ehkäisyt, och infektioon liittyvä ohjaus +sidorna 307-310 ( preparering för åtgärd) från boken Hoida ja kirjaa.2012 Iivanainen-Syväoja.
  WHO.2015. Guidelines for Hand Hygiene in Health care
  Vårdhandboken.http://www.vardhandboken.se/
  Aktuella filmer och artiklar enligt föreläsarens anvisningar
  
  Klinisk mikrobiologi:
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi &immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2015 eller nyare.
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi.Liber 2018.
  Aktuella artiklar enligt anvisning.
  Nätinformation: THL, ECDC, CDC, WHO (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hygiene:
  Lecturesand discussionss, demonstration, two group works, clinical skills training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Hygiene:
  For passing the course part in Hygiene, an approved group work, approved virtual test (min 70% right answers) and active participation in clinical skills training are required.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Hygien:
  Grupparbeten GK/kompletteras
  Virtuellt test 0-5
  Deltagande vid kliniska övningar
  
  Mikrobiologi: tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Hygiene:
  Group 1 A: Deadline for groupwork
  Virtual test open Re-take
  Group 1 B: Deadline for group work
  Virtual test open Re-take

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours/cr
  Clinical microbiology 54 h: Scheduled teaching 14 h, Literature studies 40 h

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene VÅV18BV03-3004 31.08.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care
  - master aseptic methods

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Hygiene

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Hygiene:
  Suojaeristyksen toteuttaminen, tartuntaeristyksen toteuttaminen, infektioiden ehkäisyt, och infektioon liittyvä ohjaus +sidorna 307-310 from the book Hoida ja kirjaa, 2012 Iivanainen-Syväoja.
  WHO.2015. Guidelines for Hand Hygiene in Health care
  http://www.vardhandboken.se/
  Films and articles according to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Hygiene:
  Lecturesand discussionss, demonstration, two group works, clinical skills training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Hygiene:
  For passing the course part in Hygiene, an approved group work, approved virtual test (min 70% right answers) and active participation in clinical skills training are required.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Hygiene:
  Group work pass/must be supplemented
  Virtual test 0-5
  Participation in clinical skills training

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Hygiene:
  Group 1 A: Deadline for groupwork
  Virtual test open Re-take
  Group 1 B: Deadline for group work
  Virtual test open Re-take

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene VÅV18BV03-3005 05.10.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care
  - master aseptic methods

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Hygiene

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Hygiene:
  Suojaeristyksen toteuttaminen, tartuntaeristyksen toteuttaminen, infektioiden ehkäisyt, och infektioon liittyvä ohjaus +sidorna 307-310 from the book Hoida ja kirjaa, 2012 Iivanainen-Syväoja.
  WHO.2015. Guidelines for Hand Hygiene in Health care
  http://www.vardhandboken.se/
  Films and articles according to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Hygiene:
  Lecturesand discussionss, demonstration, two group works, clinical skills training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Hygiene:
  For passing the course part in Hygiene, an approved group work, approved virtual test (min 70% right answers) and active participation in clinical skills training are required.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 11.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Hygiene:
  Group work pass/must be supplemented
  Virtual test 0-5
  Participation in clinical skills training

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Hygiene:
  Group 1 A: Deadline for groupwork
  Virtual test open Re-take
  Group 1 B: Deadline for group work
  Virtual test open Re-take

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours/cr
  Clinical microbiology 54 h: Scheduled teaching 14 h, Literature studies 40 h

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV20KVV05-3001 19.04.2021-30.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - has achieved competence in surgical and perioperative nursing care according to national standard

  Prerequisites

  Care of the old and geriatrics
  Surgical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  BEHANDLINGSÅTGÄRDER VID BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER;
  Patientinformation. 3.10.2018. K. Tarnanen., T. Tuomi., P Illanne-Parikka., A-K. Tuomaala., T. Meinander och finska läkaresällskapet. Insulinberoende diabetes.
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 28.6.2018. P Ilanne-Parikka. Tyypin 1 diabetes: hoito
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 25.10.2018. Insuliinihoidon periaatteet tyypin 1 diabeteksessa - pikatietoa
  Diabetes typ 1 hos barn, ungdomar och unga vuxna. 2018. Ragnar Hanås
  www.novonordisk.fi
  
  ARRHYTHMIAS
  Handbok i de vanligaste artymierna. Tolkning och behandling. Ambu.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito, rytmihäiriöt
  Moodleföreläsningar.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.04.2021 - 30.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 18.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  Look at moodle for more information

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual assignments and problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Aktiv närvaro i delen om blodsockeravvikelser

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical exam week
  Moodle arytmitest made last
  Red Cross blood web-course made last

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h sp. Totalt 81 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid övningar.
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 2 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Hemuppgift: Valbar antibiotika, 1 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 1, 6 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase, 2 h
  Vätskebalansövning, 10 min
  Övningsstationer 3. Blodtransfusionsuppgift genomgång, Grupp 1 och 2, 2 h
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 2 h
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: 29 h
  Eget arbete: 11 h
  TOTALT: 40 h
  HJÄRTRYTMER: 0,25 sp, 6,75 h
  Hjärtrytmer, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Självstudier + Moodletest: EKG rytmer ca 2,75 h
  RESUSKITATION:
  4h teori, 6 h övning och 6h examination (enligt gruppindelning).
  Alla tillfällen obligatorisk närvaro.
  BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER
  4 h obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV14KVV05-3007 01.08.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients

  Prerequisites

  Care of the old and geriatrics
  Surgical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth,R. 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad. Del 1 och 2, valda delar. Liber, Stockholm.
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  BEHANDLINGSÅTGÄRDER VID BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER;
  Patientinformation. 3.10.2018. K. Tarnanen., T. Tuomi., P Illanne-Parikka., A-K. Tuomaala., T. Meinander och finska läkaresällskapet. Insulinberoende diabetes.
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 28.6.2018. P Ilanne-Parikka. Tyypin 1 diabetes: hoito
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 25.10.2018. Insuliinihoidon periaatteet tyypin 1 diabeteksessa - pikatietoa
  Diabetes typ 1 hos barn, ungdomar och unga vuxna. 2018. Ragnar Hanås
  www.novonordisk.fi
  
  ARRHYTHMIAS
  Handbok i de vanligaste artymierna. Tolkning och behandling. Ambu.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito, rytmihäiriöt
  Moodleföreläsningar.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks.
  Approved clinical examination
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  Look at moodle for more information

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual assignments and problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Aktiv närvaro i delen om blodsockeravvikelser

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical exam week
  Moodle arytmitest made last
  Red Cross blood web-course made last

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h sp. Totalt 81 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid övningar.
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 2 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Hemuppgift: Valbar antibiotika, 1 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 1, 6 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase, 2 h
  Vätskebalansövning, 10 min
  Övningsstationer 3. Blodtransfusionsuppgift genomgång, Grupp 1 och 2, 2 h
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 2 h
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: 29 h
  Eget arbete: 11 h
  TOTALT: 40 h
  HJÄRTRYTMER: 0,25 sp, 6,75 h
  Hjärtrytmer, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Självstudier + Moodletest: EKG rytmer ca 2,75 h
  RESUSKITATION:
  4h teori, 6 h övning och 6h examination (enligt gruppindelning).
  Alla tillfällen obligatorisk närvaro.
  BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER
  4 h obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Moodletest Hjärtarytmier bör vara godkänd med 80% om inte underkänd.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs bör vara godkänd med 80 % om inte underkänd. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks.
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Approved clinical examination
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV14KVV05-3006 05.10.2020-29.11.2020  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients

  Prerequisites

  Care of the old and geriatrics
  Surgical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth,R. 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad. Del 1 och 2, valda delar. Liber AB Stockholm.
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  BEHANDLINGSÅTGÄRDER VID BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER;
  Patientinformation. 3.10.2018. K. Tarnanen., T. Tuomi., P Illanne-Parikka., A-K. Tuomaala., T. Meinander och finska läkaresällskapet. Insulinberoende diabetes.
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 28.6.2018. P Ilanne-Parikka. Tyypin 1 diabetes: hoito
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 25.10.2018. Insuliinihoidon periaatteet tyypin 1 diabeteksessa - pikatietoa
  Diabetes typ 1 hos barn, ungdomar och unga vuxna. 2018. Ragnar Hanås
  www.novonordisk.fi
  
  ARRHYTHMIAS
  Handbok i de vanligaste artymierna. Tolkning och behandling. Ambu.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito, rytmihäiriöt
  Moodleföreläsningar.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks.
  Approved clinical examination
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 29.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 11.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  Look at moodle for more information

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual assignments and problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Aktiv närvaro i delen om blodsockeravvikelser

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical exam week
  Moodle arytmitest made last
  Red Cross blood web-course made last

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h sp. Totalt 81 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid övningar.
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 2 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Hemuppgift: Valbar antibiotika, 1 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 1, 6 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase, 2 h
  Vätskebalansövning, 10 min
  Övningsstationer 3. Blodtransfusionsuppgift genomgång, Grupp 1 och 2, 2 h
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 2 h
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: 29 h
  Eget arbete: 11 h
  TOTALT: 40 h
  HJÄRTRYTMER: 0,25 sp, 6,75 h
  Hjärtrytmer, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Självstudier + Moodletest: EKG rytmer ca 2,75 h
  RESUSKITATION:
  4h teori, 6 h övning och 6h examination (enligt gruppindelning).
  Alla tillfällen obligatorisk närvaro.
  BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER
  4 h obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Moodletest Hjärtarytmier bör vara godkänd med 80% om inte underkänd.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs bör vara godkänd med 80 % om inte underkänd. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks.
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Approved clinical examination
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course

•   Developmental project in midwifery BM14FU04-3003 01.08.2020-19.05.2021  5 credits  (UBM17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  -shows the ability to deepen and develop their substance knowledge in midwifery

  Prerequisites

  Thesis 2

  Content of the study unit

  Developmental project in midwifery

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the chosen theme

  Learning methods

  Lectures, seminars and independent work with supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The development work is evaluated 1-5
  Criteria for evaluation
  Starting point for and goal of the development work
  The theoretical foundation of development work
  Area of ​​use for the development work
  Critical review of development work, process and product

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 19.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM17U-V

  Seats

  0 - 20

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maj-Helen Nyback

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  5 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  -

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  the own work may be ordered from Health Care Center, hospital or other care institution

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation of development work week 47 year 2020 or week 19, 22 year 2021

  Pedagogic approaches

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  4 h lecture
  4 h + 4 h seminars
  123 h individual work, with supervision

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  The development work does not fulfill the criterion for achieving 1

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The purpose of the development work is unclearly formulated and the objective is not relevant or unclearly explained. The work includes all relevant parts but they are inadequately described
  The purpose and objectives remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge in the thematic area. The relevance of the development work is described, albeit superficially, and the delimitation is deficient
  Justification for choosing background material / frame of reference is missing or is scarce / inconsistent. Ability to source criticism is lacking
  Students' choice of background material / frame of reference is partly relevant. The ability to critique sources is weak. The process description / method description is based on literature but it is not fully applied as described. The process / method is not well chosen considering the product
  The product / study is inadequately presented, has a greater anchoring in the respondents' own perception than in theory and expectations from working life. It requires extensive processing to be able to be used / published / distributed
  The product is well presented, but the anchoring in the needs of working life is weakly substantiated and the product / information can form the basis for further processing before a possible spread.The description and motivation for choosing a product / study is very deficient and not entirely appropriate in terms of purpose, issues and area of ​​use.
  The description of and motivation for choosing a product / study method is weak. There are some errors in the product / study and the discussion and reflection on the implementation of the study / product is deficient.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The motivation for choosing a theme area is universal and the goal is clear but could be more clearly justified. The development work is clearly delimited.
  The development work is clearly and logically structured and reflects purpose and objectives and a good ability to apply a scientific approach (with practical roots). The work includes all relevant parts and the parts are proportional in relation to each other
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and sufficient basic material (eg data material for analysis) has been used
  The process description / method description is based on literature and there is a clear approach to anchoring the product's development in the process description / method. The process / method is well chosen with the product in mind. The respondent / respondents can reflect on the choice of process / method and discuss this.
  Background / frame of reference well described, motivated, relevant and forms a good basis for the development work. The ability to critique sources is good. The process description / method description is well chosen with the product in mind, well described and is well rooted in literature. The process is carried out in accordance with the description and well described. The respondent / respondents are able to reflect and critically examine the choice and the discussion concerning the choice and the description of the process / method is well implemented.
  
  The product / study is carefully carried out but has little grounding in working life and requires processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life requires a certain amount of processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The choice and justification of the method for the product / study is appropriate. The use of traditional methods (for both product and study) is good. The critical review is weak.
  The description of method and approach is good and based on a good motivation. The respondent (s) master their methods well, and there is a clear connection to the purpose of the product / study. In the critical review of planning and implementation, the respondents show awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the product / study.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The development work is current and innovative and develops the student's professional knowledge. The purpose and objective are clear and well motivated. The development work has been carried out in such a way that the purpose and objective are fulfilled.
  The chosen subject area is discussed and the respondents / n / s are able to reflect on their subject area and add something new to the discussion.
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and is based on sufficient basic material. There is a pronounced / described anchoring in the degree project / in a need that is based on the care area. Background / frame of reference forms a clear and logical basis for the development work. The rationale for the choices made is clear, unambiguous and relevant. The student has made a meritorious synthesis. The ability to critique sources is commendable. The product is ready for distribution
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life and is well processed to be used in working life / published / disseminated
  The description and use of the method and approach are excellent and based on an excellent motivation. The report has a clear connection to the purpose of the survey. The discussion and the critical review show an excellent ability to account in theoretical reasoning for the product / study's advantages and disadvantages regarding choice of method / process and implementation

•   Developmental project in midwifery BM14FU04-3004 06.01.2021-31.12.2021  5 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  -shows the ability to deepen and develop their substance knowledge in midwifery

  Prerequisites

  Thesis 2

  Content of the study unit

  Developmental project in midwifery

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  40% Face-to-face, 60% Distance learning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.01.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  06.01.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Seats

  1 - 20

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maj-Helen Nyback

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  5 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3011 31.12.2020-31.07.2021  3 credits  (ETAPP 20 SJUKSKÖTARE) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Etappvis till sjukskötare, Öppna YH, våren 2021, kursen genomförs på distans på grund av COVID-19
  Deltagarna anmäls till förverkligandet av kurskoordinator Ann-Sofi Storbjörk
  Examinator Sirkku Säätelä (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.12.2020 - 31.07.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2020 - 30.12.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ETAPP 20 SJUKSKÖTARE

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3007 05.10.2020-13.12.2020  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Inkinen, R., Volmanen, P. & Hakoinen, S. (toim.) 2015. Turvallinen lääkehoito Opas lääkehoitosuunnitelman tekemiseen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Julkari. https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1 valda delar
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Aktuella artiklar och material enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närstudier i form av föreläsningar och workshops i läkemedelsräkning
  Seminarier
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops).
  Uppgifterna utförs virtuellt i moodle
  Kliniska övningar i injektionsgivning 2 x 3 h (obligatorisk närvaro) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifetr Gk/UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 75% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedlesräkning 100% rätt förGK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 11.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen
  Uppgifter (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt överenskommelse med gruppen vid kursstart
  Räknetent i klass
  Omtentamina på omtentsdagar under våren enligt meddelande efter kursstart 2020
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  arbetsbörda 27h arbete per studiepoäng (not translated)

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3008 16.11.2020-20.12.2020  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Inkinen, R., Volmanen, P. & Hakoinen, S. (toim.) 2015. Turvallinen lääkehoito Opas lääkehoitosuunnitelman tekemiseen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Julkari. https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1 valda delar
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Aktuella artiklar och material enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närstudier i form av föreläsningar och workshops i läkemedelsräkning
  Seminarier
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops).
  Uppgifterna utförs virtuellt i moodle
  Kliniska övningar i injektionsgivning 2 x 3 h (obligatorisk närvaro) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifetr Gk/UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 75% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedlesräkning 100% rätt förGK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.11.2020 - 20.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen
  Uppgifter (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt överenskommelse med gruppen vid kursstart
  Räknetent i klass
  Omtentamina på omtentsdagar under våren enligt meddelande efter kursstart 2020
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  arbetsbörda 27h arbete per studiepoäng (not translated)

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3009 04.01.2021-07.02.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 07.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3006 31.08.2020-11.10.2020  4 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur
  På svenska
  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  FRK. Blodtranfusioner https://www.blodtjanst.fi/for-halsovardsexperter/blodtjanst-utbildar/blodtransfusionens-abo
  Filmer och virtuellt material på moodle
  Material och evidensbaserade nya vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner
  Caselösningar och genomgång av problemlösningar under workshops
  Virtuella uppgifter, forumdiskussion och virtuellt test i teori
  Läkemedelsräkning som flipped learning ( studerande läser teoretisk bakgrund till räkneproblem som praktiseras på workshops), deltenter i läkemedelsräkning efter utförd workshop (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 11.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3004 31.08.2020-11.10.2020  4 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner
  Caselösningar och genomgång av problemlösningar under workshops
  Virtuella uppgifter, forumdiskussion och virtuellt test i teori
  Läkemedelsräkning som flipped learning ( studerande läser teoretisk bakgrund till räkneproblem som praktiseras på workshops), deltenter i läkemedelsräkning efter utförd workshop (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 11.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3005 31.08.2020-15.11.2020  4 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  FRK. Blodtranfusioner https://www.blodtjanst.fi/for-halsovardsexperter/blodtjanst-utbildar/blodtransfusionens-abo
  Filmer och virtuellt material på moodle
  Material och evidensbaserade nya vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner
  Caselösningar och genomgång av problemlösningar under workshops
  Virtuella uppgifter, forumdiskussion och virtuellt test i teori
  Läkemedelsräkning som flipped learning ( studerande läser teoretisk bakgrund till räkneproblem som praktiseras på workshops), deltenter i läkemedelsräkning efter utförd workshop (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Läkemedelsräkning 100% rätt för GK
  Teoritest 65% rätt för godkänt. Godkänd prestation bedöms 1-5
  Uppgifter och forumdiskussion inlämnade inom deadline GK+, GK , kompletteras
  Försenade uppgifter drar ner slutvitsord (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 15.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  Blodtranfusioner tas upp i Kursen KVV05 kliniska vårdåtgärder så det faller bort ur dettaförverkligande (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Virtuellt test samt deadline för uppgifter enligt överenskommelse med gruppen
  Läkemedelsräkning deltenter efter utförda workshops. Kalkylator får användas
  Omtentamina i läkemedelsräkning ( alla delar tentas i omtent) november 2019 och december 2020 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h arbetsbörda per studiepoäng. Läkemedelsräkning kräver deltagande i workshops för de flesta (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   English VÅV14EN01-3008 11.01.2021-28.02.2021  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments, passed exam (oral and written).

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks, passed exam (oral and written)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Pedagogic approaches

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3009 15.03.2021-18.04.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments, passed exam (oral and written).

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.03.2021 - 18.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks, passed exam (oral and written)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Pedagogic approaches

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3007 19.10.2020-22.11.2020  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments, passed exam (oral and written).

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.10.2020 - 22.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 25.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks, passed exam (oral and written)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Pedagogic approaches

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Ergonomic and Kinesthetics VÅV19KVV02-3005 04.01.2021-17.01.2021  1 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Patientförflyttning. En skicklig vårdare aktiverar och hjälper. Helsingfors: Arbetshälsoinstitutet, 2014.
  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Potilassiirrot. Taitava avustaja aktivoi ja auttaa.Helsingfors: Työterveyslaitos, 2013.
  http://www.ttl.fi/fi/ergonomia/ergonomia_eri_aloille/terveydenhuolto/potilassiirrot/sivut/default.aspx

  Learning methods

  Lecture
  Demonstrations
  Vdeos
  Practical exercises

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 17.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 1 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  100% attendance, approved exercises and approved recorded film

•   Ergonomic and Kinesthetics VÅV19KVV02-3006 04.01.2021-31.01.2021  1 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Patientförflyttning. En skicklig vårdare aktiverar och hjälper. Helsingfors: Arbetshälsoinstitutet, 2014.
  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Potilassiirrot. Taitava avustaja aktivoi ja auttaa.Helsingfors: Työterveyslaitos, 2013.
  http://www.ttl.fi/fi/ergonomia/ergonomia_eri_aloille/terveydenhuolto/potilassiirrot/sivut/default.aspx

  Learning methods

  Lecture
  Demonstrations
  Videos
  Practical exercises

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 31.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 1 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  100% attendance, approved exercises and approved recorded film

•   Ergonomic and Kinesthetics VÅV19KVV02-3004 07.09.2020-25.10.2020  1 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Patientförflyttning. En skicklig vårdare aktiverar och hjälper. Helsingfors: Arbetshälsoinstitutet, 2014.
  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Potilassiirrot. Taitava avustaja aktivoi ja auttaa.Helsingfors: Työterveyslaitos, 2013.
  http://www.ttl.fi/fi/ergonomia/ergonomia_eri_aloille/terveydenhuolto/potilassiirrot/sivut/default.aspx

  Learning methods

  Lecture
  Demonstrations
  Vdeos
  Practical exercises

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.09.2020 - 25.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 1 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance
  Change to work clothes

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  100% attendance, approved exercises and approved recorded film

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring 2020, week 2 - 4

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3003 01.08.2020-31.12.2020  4 credits  (UBM18D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Health promotion among children and adolescents: Literature:
  Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen & inom skolhälsovård. Metodhandbok, THL.Tammerfors 2018
  Handbok för studerandehälsovården. STM, publikationer, Helsingfors 2007.
  Current legislation and scientific articles and research according to the lecturer´s directive

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  33 - 36 point = 5
  29 - 32 point = 4
  25 - 28 point = 3
  21 - 24 point = 2
  18 - 20 point = 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V
  • UHV18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Tree hours of external lecture with Susanna Back from the association Projekt liv
  Eight hours of external lecture with Siv Östman from the association Hörselförbundet r.f. Wednesday 9.9.2020 kl. 9 - 16.15.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination in Pediatric Care autumn 2020 week 47
  Reexamination 1: Friday 6.11.2020
  Reexamination 2: Friday 11.12.2020
  
  Health promotion among children and adolescents - seminar 8.10.2020

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3004 05.04.2021-09.05.2021  4 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen & inom skolhälsovård. Metodhandbok, THL.Tammerfors 2014 (finsk version från år 2016)
  Handbok för studerandehälsovården. STM, publikationer, Helsingfors 2007.
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL

  Learning methods

  Lecture remotely via Webex, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  33 - 36 point = 5
  29 - 32 point = 4
  25 - 28 point = 3
  21 - 24 point = 2
  18 - 20 point = 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.04.2021 - 09.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 04.04.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lisen Kullas-Nyman, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2021
  Reexamination 1:
  Reexamination 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3008 26.04.2021-30.05.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna och ta till sig viktig information, fyller i ordlistorna och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1-3 nöjaktiga insikter, 4-5 goda insikter. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.04.2021 - 30.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 25.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar muntligt och skriftligt samt gör ett arbete. De deltar inte i klassundervisningen. Mera information fås vid kursstarten. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen i slutet av kursen samt ett inlämningsarbete. Omtentamen meddelas vid kursstarten. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3009 15.02.2021-28.03.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna och ta till sig viktig information. De fyller i ordlistorna och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Vitsord 1-3 nöjaktiga insikter, 4-5 goda insikter, Vitsord ges i muntlig och skriftlig framställning
  samt ett kursvitsord. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.02.2021 - 28.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 14.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar muntlig och skriftlig samt gör ett arbete. De behöver inte delta i undervisningen. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen i slutet av kursen. Godkänt övningsarbete. Omtentamen meddelas vid kursstarten. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3010 12.04.2021-16.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna och ta till sig viktig information. De fyller i ordlistorna och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning 1-3 nöjaktiga insikter, 4-5 goda insikter. Studerande får ett vitsord i såväl munlig
  som skriftlig framställning samt ett kursvitsord. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.04.2021 - 16.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 11.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar kursen såväl muntligt som skriftligt. De lämnar in ett skriftligt arbete. Ingen närundervisning. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen tenteras såväl muntligt som skriftligt i samband med kursen. Ett skriftligt arbete inlämnas.
  Tidpunkten för omtentamen meddelas vid kursstarten. (not translated)

•   First Aid VÅV19KVV01-3005 01.02.2021-28.02.2021  2 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2017. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, Practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.02.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 31.01.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • BM (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • HV (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cr = 54 hours

•   First Aid VÅV19KVV01-3006 08.02.2021-14.03.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2017. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, Practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 14.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cr = 54 hours

•   First Aid VÅV19KVV01-3004 07.09.2020-31.12.2020  2 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2017. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, demonstrationer, praktiska övningar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical test: approved/failed
  Resuscitation 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.09.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance
  Cooperation with Vamk, language bath

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical and theoretical test during the lessons

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cp = 54 hours

•   Geriatric and palliative nursing care VÅV20KV05-3001 04.01.2021-07.02.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology and geriatrics and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and have a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - has knowledge of and can apply palliative care
  - has knowledge of care at the end of life and can apply it in the meeting with patients and next of kin
  - has acquired expertise in care of the elderly according to national standards

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology and geriatrics
  Care at the end of life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Läkemedelboken online / äldres läkemedelsbehandling ( processer kritiska punkter , ej preparat eller medicinering) Midlöf & Kragh kapitel Läkemedelsbehandling hos äldre https://lakemedelsboken.se/kapitel/lakemedelsanvandning/lakemedelsbehandling_hos_aldre.html
  Dehlin O. & Rundgren, Å. 2014. Geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekwall, A.2010. Äldres hälsa och ohälsa - en introduktion till geriatrisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur.
  Larsson, M. & Rundgren, Å.2010. Geriatriska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur.
  Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., & Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2014. Geriatrisk omvårdnad Liber
  Widell, M. 2016. Palliativ vård. Sanoma Utbildning ab.
  Andershed, B.,Ternestedt, B-M. & Håkansson, C. 2013. Palliativ vård. Begrepp & perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Kettunen, R., Kähäri-Wiik, K., Vuori-Kemilä, A. & Ihalainen, J. Modern rehabilitering - en resurs
  Artiklar och övrig litteratur enligt föreläsarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Groupwork
  Online examination
  Obligatory lectur: Filip koskinen and teologist
  If not present: task in moodle

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grade 1-5
  Exam and assignments approved

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 07.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Online tentamen bedöms 0-5 enligt schema
  Omtente enligt överenskommelse med läraren (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h = 1 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Geriatric and palliative nursing care VÅV20KV05-3002 04.01.2021-24.01.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology and geriatrics and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and have a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - has knowledge of and can apply palliative care
  - has knowledge of care at the end of life and can apply it in the meeting with patients and next of kin
  - has acquired expertise in care of the elderly according to national standards

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology and geriatrics
  Care at the end of life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Läkemedelboken online / äldres läkemedelsbehandling ( processer kritiska punkter , ej preparat eller medicinering) Midlöf & Kragh kapitel Läkemedelsbehandling hos äldre https://lakemedelsboken.se/kapitel/lakemedelsanvandning/lakemedelsbehandling_hos_aldre.html
  Dehlin O. & Rundgren, Å. 2014. Geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekwall, A.2010. Äldres hälsa och ohälsa - en introduktion till geriatrisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur.
  Larsson, M. & Rundgren, Å.2010. Geriatriska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur.
  Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., & Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2014. Geriatrisk omvårdnad Liber
  Widell, M. 2016. Palliativ vård. Sanoma Utbildning ab.
  Andershed, B.,Ternestedt, B-M. & Håkansson, C. 2013. Palliativ vård. Begrepp & perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Kettunen, R., Kähäri-Wiik, K., Vuori-Kemilä, A. & Ihalainen, J. Modern rehabilitering - en resurs
  Artiklar och övrig litteratur enligt föreläsarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Groupwork
  Groupexamination
  Obligatory lectur: Filip koskinen and teologist
  If not present: task in moodle

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Tentamen vitsord 0-5
  Uppgifter Gk/kompletteras/Uk (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 24.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Online examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Geriatric and palliative nursing care VÅV20KV05-3003 11.01.2021-14.02.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology and geriatrics and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and have a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - has knowledge of and can apply palliative care
  - has knowledge of care at the end of life and can apply it in the meeting with patients and next of kin
  - has acquired expertise in care of the elderly according to national standards

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology and geriatrics
  Care at the end of life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Läkemedelboken online / äldres läkemedelsbehandling ( processer kritiska punkter , ej preparat eller medicinering) Midlöf & Kragh kapitel Läkemedelsbehandling hos äldre https://lakemedelsboken.se/kapitel/lakemedelsanvandning/lakemedelsbehandling_hos_aldre.html
  Dehlin O. & Rundgren, Å. 2014. Geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekwall, A.2010. Äldres hälsa och ohälsa - en introduktion till geriatrisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur.
  Larsson, M. & Rundgren, Å.2010. Geriatriska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur.
  Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., & Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2014. Geriatrisk omvårdnad Liber
  Widell, M. 2016. Palliativ vård. Sanoma Utbildning ab.
  Andershed, B.,Ternestedt, B-M. & Håkansson, C. 2013. Palliativ vård. Begrepp & perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Kettunen, R., Kähäri-Wiik, K., Vuori-Kemilä, A. & Ihalainen, J. Modern rehabilitering - en resurs
  Artiklar och övrig litteratur enligt föreläsarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Groupwork
  online examination
  Obligatory lectur: Filip Koskinen and teologist
  If not present: task in moodle

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  tentamen 0-5
  Uppgifter gk/kompletteras/uk (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 14.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Enligt schema (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/ 27 timmar arbete (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  or the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3006 01.08.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (UBM18D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2017. Vi väntar barn. Information till nyblivna föräldrar. Helsingfors (tiillgänglig på nätet)

  Learning methods

  lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V
  • UHV18D-V

  Seats

  20 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be published on Moodle
  Exam on delivery/birth with Anita Wikberg

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars on the last lecture of the course
  Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams 23rd of October and 6th of November

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in writtten assignment.

•   High-risk antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal clinical care BM14KB04-3003 01.01.2021-31.12.2021  6 credits  (UBM17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has insights on midwifery knowledge during risk pregnancy, risk delivery and deviant postnatal period
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the patient's care during risk pregnancy, risk delivery and deviant postnatal period

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  High-risk antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal clinical care

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice with women with highrisk pregnancy, -delivery or postnatal period.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people VÅV14KVV11-3007 01.08.2020-31.05.2021  9 credits  (UBM18D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care of child patients
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in home care, child care, maternity care, and in the care of the disabled
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics within home care, child care, maternity care, and in the care of the disabled
  - has knowledge and understanding of patient care in the home environment
  - understands the importance of the home and related parties to the patient
  - is familiar with the most common causes of physical and mental disabilities and is familiar with the principles of activity for the care of the disabled
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can safely carry out vaccinations for adults
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team

  Prerequisites

  Health promotion
  Care within internal medicine and surgical care context 1 and 3

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  89% Face-to-face, 11% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Barnsjukvårdsdelen:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2009. (red.) Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) 2016. Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research from Terveysportti according to the lecturer's directive
  Homecare:
  Pöyhilä, R, Guldogan, E & Vanhanen A. (red.)2018. Kotisairaala. Duodecim, Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Paediatrics: Clinical practice in class
  Practicum with simulation:Child care and Paediatrics 1,5 ects at Novia Clinical Training center, group work
  Lectures, discussions, teamwork
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Drug Calculations
  Current DVD movies
  demonstrations
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class
  Home Health Care:
  Supervised internship in home care
  Written assignment

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Practical paediatric:
  Presence 100%
  Active participation in practical exercises
  Approved practical exercises
  Home Health Care:
  Approved internship

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V
  • UHV18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Paediatrics practise:
  The teaching is carried out as contact studies in the polytechnic, class E205
  Compulsory attendance 100%
  Work clothes on

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Paediatrics: Clinical practice in class
  Approved drug calculations
  Approved clinical exercises, 100% attendance
  Home Health Care:
  Approved internship
  Approved internships
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in homecare

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Paediatrics: Clinical practice in class
  Autumn 2020
  Home Health Care:
  Spring 2020 week

  Pedagogic approaches

  Practice abroad is possible

  Student's schedule and workload

  Practice: 40 h/week
  Paediatrics practise: 27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Paediatrics practice:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Home health care:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people VÅV14KVV11-3005 28.09.2020-28.02.2021  9 credits  (SSK18A, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care of child patients
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in home care, child care, maternity care, and in the care of the disabled
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics within home care, child care, maternity care, and in the care of the disabled
  - has knowledge and understanding of patient care in the home environment
  - understands the importance of the home and related parties to the patient
  - is familiar with the most common causes of physical and mental disabilities and is familiar with the principles of activity for the care of the disabled
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can safely carry out vaccinations for adults
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team

  Prerequisites

  Health promotion
  Care within internal medicine and surgical care context 1 and 3

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Barnsjukvårdsdelen:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2009. (red.) Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) 2016. Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research from Terveysportti according to the lecturer's directive
  Homecare:
  Pöyhilä, R, Guldogan, E & Vanhanen A. (red.)2018. Kotisairaala. Duodecim, Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Paediatrics: Clinical practice in class
  Practicum with simulation:Child care and Paediatrics 1,5 ects at Novia Clinical Training center, group work
  Lectures, discussions, teamwork
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Drug Calculations
  Current DVD movies
  demonstrations
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class
  Home Health Care:
  Supervised internship in home care
  Written assignment

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Practical paediatric:
  Presence 100%
  Active participation in practical exercises
  Approved practical exercises
  Home and Community Nursing Care:
  Approved internship

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 01.11.2020

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK18A
  • USS18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK18A grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK18A grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  Paediatrics practise:
  The teaching is carried out as contact studies in the polytechnic, class E205
  Compulsory attendance 100%
  Work clothes on

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  9 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Paediatrics: Clinical practice in class
  Approved drug calculations
  Approved clinical exercises, 100% attendance
  Home Health Care:
  Approved internship
  Approved internships
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in homecare
  
  Tre hours of external lecture with Susanna Back from the association Projeckt liv
  Eight hours of external lecture with Siv Östman from the association Hörselförbundet r.f.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Paediatrics: Clinical practice in class
  Autumn 2020
  Home Health Care:
  Spring 2021 week

  Pedagogic approaches

  Practice abroad is possible

  Student's schedule and workload

  Practice: 40 h/week
  Paediatrics practise: 27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Paediatrics practice:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Home health care:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people VÅV14KVV11-3006 01.08.2020-30.04.2021  9 credits  (SSK18B, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care of child patients
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in home care, child care, maternity care, and in the care of the disabled
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics within home care, child care, maternity care, and in the care of the disabled
  - has knowledge and understanding of patient care in the home environment
  - understands the importance of the home and related parties to the patient
  - is familiar with the most common causes of physical and mental disabilities and is familiar with the principles of activity for the care of the disabled
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can safely carry out vaccinations for adults
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team

  Prerequisites

  Health promotion
  Care within internal medicine and surgical care context 1 and 3

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Barnsjukvårdsdelen:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2009. (red.) Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) 2016. Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research from Terveysportti according to the lecturer's directive
  Homecare:
  Pöyhilä, R, Guldogan, E & Vanhanen A. (red.)2018. Kotisairaala. Duodecim, Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Paediatrics: Clinical practice in class
  Practicum with simulation:Child care and Paediatrics 1,5 ects at Novia Clinical Training center, group work
  Lectures, discussions, teamwork
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Drug Calculations
  Current DVD movies
  demonstrations
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class
  Home Health Care:
  Supervised internship in home care
  Written assignment

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Practical paediatric:
  Presence 100%
  Active participation in practical exercises
  Approved practical exercises
  Home Health Care:
  Approved internship

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 30.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK18B
  • USS18D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK18B grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK18B grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  Paediatrics practise:
  The teaching is carried out as contact studies in the polytechnic, class E205
  Compulsory attendance 100%
  Work clothes on

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Paediatrics: Clinical practice in class
  Approved drug calculations
  Approved clinical exercises, 100% attendance
  Home Health Care:
  Approved internship
  Approved internships
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in homecare
  
  Tre hours of external lecture with Susanna Back from the association Projeckt liv
  Eight hours of external lecture with Siv Östman from the association Hörselförbundet r.f.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Paediatrics: Clinical practice in class
  Autumn 2020
  Home Health Care:
  Spring 2020 week

  Pedagogic approaches

  Practice abroad is possible

  Student's schedule and workload

  Practice: 40 h/week
  Paediatrics practise: 27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Paediatrics practice:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Home health care:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Human physiology and anatomy 1 VÅV14BV01-3008 31.08.2020-25.10.2020  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  -understand the structure and function of the locomotor system, as well as the anatomic position and the description of orientation
  -become familiar with cell biology, as well as different types of tissues, and understand their function
  -understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes
  -understand the structure and function of the sense organs
  -understand how the endocrine system regulates body metabolism and organ functions
  -understand the reproductive system
  -be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Human physiology and anatomy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  eller som alternativ: Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  Vigué-Martín (2006, 2012) Atlas over människokroppen. Liber. Budowick, Bjålie, Rolstad och Toverud (1993). Anatomisk atlas. Liber, Stockholm
  Dauber (2006). Anatomisk bildordbok. Liber.
  Tortora G. J. (2006 eller äldre upplaga) A brief atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy and selected medical images
  Lecture material and exercises on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on results in the exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 25.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  More information is found in Moodle

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 20.10.2020
  Re-examination 27.11.2020 and 22.01.2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human physiology and anatomy 1 VÅV14BV01-3006 31.08.2020-15.11.2020  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  -understand the structure and function of the locomotor system, as well as the anatomic position and the description of orientation
  -become familiar with cell biology, as well as different types of tissues, and understand their function
  -understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes
  -understand the structure and function of the sense organs
  -understand how the endocrine system regulates body metabolism and organ functions
  -understand the reproductive system
  -be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Human physiology and anatomy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  eller som alternativ: Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  Vigué-Martín (2006, 2012) Atlas over människokroppen. Liber. Budowick, Bjålie, Rolstad och Toverud (1993). Anatomisk atlas. Liber, Stockholm
  Dauber (2006). Anatomisk bildordbok. Liber.
  Tortora G. J. (2006 eller äldre upplaga) A brief atlas of the skeleton, surface anatomy and selected medical images
  Lecture material and exercises on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 15.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  24.07.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  More information is found in Moodle

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination group 1 12.11.2020 and group 2 04.11.2020
  Re-examination 11.12.2020 and 22.01.2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures and examination 21 h, self studies and digital teaching methods 60 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human physiology and anatomy 2 VÅV14BV02-3011 18.01.2021-28.02.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  -understand the function of different organ systems, such as blood circulation, respiration, digestion and the urinary system
  -understand how the lymphatic system works
  -understand the body's fluid- and acid-base balance
  -be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Human physiology and anatomy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursvitsord enligt skalan 0-5 baserat på resultat i tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 17.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursexamination fredagen den 26.02.2021
  Omtentamen 26.03.2021 och 07.05.2021 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar och examination 21 h, självstudier och digitala undervisningsformer 60 h. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärkta kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

•   Human physiology and anatomy 2 VÅV14BV02-3012 08.03.2021-09.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  -understand the function of different organ systems, such as blood circulation, respiration, digestion and the urinary system
  -understand how the lymphatic system works
  -understand the body's fluid- and acid-base balance
  -be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Human physiology and anatomy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursvitsord enligt skalan 0-5 baserat på resultat i tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.03.2021 - 09.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursexamination den 04.05.2021
  Omtentamen 28.05.2021 och 27.08.2021 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar och examination 21 h, självstudier och digitala undervisningsformer 60 h. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärkta kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

•   Human physiology and anatomy 2 VÅV14BV02-3013 23.02.2021-31.07.2021  3 credits  (ETAPP 20 SJUKSKÖTARE) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  -understand the function of different organ systems, such as blood circulation, respiration, digestion and the urinary system
  -understand how the lymphatic system works
  -understand the body's fluid- and acid-base balance
  -be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Human physiology and anatomy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  23.2-31.7.21
  Etappvis till sjukskötare, Öppna YH
  Lektor Camilla Ribacka, kursen utanför arbetstidsplanen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.02.2021 - 31.07.2021

  Enrollment date range

  24.01.2021 - 22.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ETAPP 20 SJUKSKÖTARE

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Human physiology and anatomy 2 VÅV14BV02-3010 26.10.2020-20.12.2020  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  -understand the function of different organ systems, such as blood circulation, respiration, digestion and the urinary system
  -understand how the lymphatic system works
  -understand the body's fluid- and acid-base balance
  -be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Human physiology and anatomy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursvitsord enligt skalan 0-5 baserat på resultat i tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.10.2020 - 20.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 01.11.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursexamination fredagen den 18.12.2020
  Omtentamen 12.02.2021 och 26.03.2021 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar och examination 21 h, självstudier och digitala undervisningsformer 60 h. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har mycket svaga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har nöjaktiga kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har goda kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har utmärkta kunskaper i grundläggande fysiologi och anatomi (not translated)

•   Immunology and pathology VÅV14BV04-3009 05.04.2021-16.05.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of human cell biology, biochemistry, metabolism and metabolic disorders
  - can describe how the lymphocytes work in the immune system
  - knows what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - master immunological and pathological terminology
  - knows about various causes of disease (etiology)
  - can describe the acute inflammatory reaction as well as cell and tissue changes in disease
  - is familiar with key sources of information in immunology and pathology
  - understands the importance of immunology and pathology in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Immunology and pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.04.2021 - 16.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 04.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Immunology and pathology VÅV14BV04-3010 04.01.2021-21.02.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of human cell biology, biochemistry, metabolism and metabolic disorders
  - can describe how the lymphocytes work in the immune system
  - knows what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - master immunological and pathological terminology
  - knows about various causes of disease (etiology)
  - can describe the acute inflammatory reaction as well as cell and tissue changes in disease
  - is familiar with key sources of information in immunology and pathology
  - understands the importance of immunology and pathology in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Immunology and pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012 eller nyare.
  Material på moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Litteraturstudier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 21.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tent 1 16.2.2021
  Omtent mars, april (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  22 h lektionstid
  59 h självstudier (not translated)

•   Immunology and pathology VÅV14BV04-3011 05.04.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of human cell biology, biochemistry, metabolism and metabolic disorders
  - can describe how the lymphocytes work in the immune system
  - knows what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - master immunological and pathological terminology
  - knows about various causes of disease (etiology)
  - can describe the acute inflammatory reaction as well as cell and tissue changes in disease
  - is familiar with key sources of information in immunology and pathology
  - understands the importance of immunology and pathology in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Immunology and pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012 eller nyare.
  Material på moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Litteraturstudier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.04.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 31.12.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tent 1 21.5.2021
  Omtent augusti, september (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  22 h lektionstid
  59 h självstudier (not translated)

•   Intrapartum care 1 BM14BM05-3003 05.04.2021-02.05.2021  3 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have the skills to be able to support the parents during labor
  - understands the delivery process
  - mastered the care during normal delivery
  - has knowledge of fetal monitoring
  - in collaboration with the giving woman can realize pain relief during childbirth
  - has basic knowledge of complications during childbirth
  - can and understand the importance of documentation during childbirth
  - can and understand the importance of safe working methods in childcare

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
  Mental health and psychiatry

  Content of the study unit

  Intrapartum care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1-2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen m.fl. Kätilötyö (2015)
  
  Suomen kätilöliitto, Synnyttäjän hoito ponnistusvaihessa
  
  Lindgren m.fl. Barnmorskans handläggning vid normal förlossning: forskning och erfarenhet, Studentlitteratur, Lund (2019)
  
  http://ctgutbildning.se/
  
  http://backenbottenutbildning.se/

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, clinical skills training, study visit to VCS/delivery room

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed exam
  Active participation in clinical skills training
  Approved films and other individual assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.04.2021 - 02.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 04.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Additional information

  Course introduction and clinical skills training are compulsory

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examination
  Filming of two sequences: delivery and suturing

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

•   Intrapartum care 2 BM14KB05-3003 01.01.2021-30.05.2021  3 credits  (UBM17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has the skills to support the prospective parents during childbirth
  - mastered the care during normal delivery
  - has knowledge of fetal monitoring
  - has knowledge of pain and pain relief during childbirth
  - has knowledge and ability to deal with care during childbirth complications individually and together with other professional groups
  - can demonstrate obstetric knowledge and knowledge in anesthesiology in relation to childbirth
  - can and understand the importance of documentation during childbirth
  - can and understand the importance of safe working methods in childbirth care

  Prerequisites

  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Intrapartum care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen et al, Kätilötyö
  Backenbottenutbildning.se
  ctg-utbildning.se
  Käypähoito
  Vårdhandboken
  Moodle course Änglatröst
  Articles according to the lecturers' instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures and discussions
  Moodle course Änglatröst
  Bäckenbottenutbildning.se
  Practical skills training, simulations
  Individual assignments
  Clinical Examination (OSCE)
  Written exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For passing the course, the following are required:
  Certificate of completed course "Bäckenbottenutbildning"
  Approved written exam
  Approved OSCE
  Presence at clinical exercises

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 30.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Additional information

  External lecturers:
  Midwife Maria Kronkvist - prophylaxis
  Gynecologist Päivi Kivelä - ctg
  
  Mandatory attendance at course introduction and clinical exercises

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam
  Clinical examination (OSCE)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  week 21 in spring 2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

•   Introduction to academic studies VÅV14IN01-3005 31.08.2020-13.12.2020  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - reflects on his/her studies and future plans and is aware of the significance of personal development in relation to life-long learning and the profession
  - is familiar with his/her UAS, professional field and individual learning style
  - can generate new knowledge and create personal learning environments
  - is familiar with the ethical values of the profession
  - can retrieve and critically view information
  - can work in groups and teams with individuals regardless of their background
  - understand the importance of environmental responsibility and sustainable development within different fields, seen from an ecological, technical and economical aspect with special attention to sustainable development from a health- and social welfare-perspective
  - are able to see his/her own responsibility as practitioners of a profession, and implement this knowledge within his/her own field but also posses the tools to work for global and lasting social development, as well as know the position outlined by the management of Novia, University of Applied Science
  - is knowledgeable on how the environment affects our health, and is able to work for sustainable development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Information about studying at Novia UAS
  Studytechnique
  Nursing as profession

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group exercises, tasks, presentations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Attendance during contact teaching
  Participation at seminar and approved assignment in the part assignment The own profession
  Approved virtual course in sustainable development

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Margareta Antus, Marlene Gädda, Marie Hjortell

  Responsible unit

  Vaasa

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery, Degree Programme in Radiography and Radiotherapy, Degree Programme in Biomedical Laboratory Scientist

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Framförande av uppgift i det egna yrket vecka 45
  Inom terminen 2019 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp, 40 h närstudier, 41 eget arbete (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  The student has not participated in the contact studies and has not achieved, nor has he attempted to achieve the criterion level in the subject

  Approved / Failed

  Passed
  The student has actively participated in the contact studies and has achieved the criterion level in the subject

•   Introduction to academic studies VÅV14IN01-3003 31.08.2020-29.11.2020  3 credits  (USS20D-V)