Academic year 2021 - 2022

•   Antenatal care 1 BM14BM03-3004 04.04.2022-01.05.2022  3 credits  (UBM19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered the follow-up of the expectant mother and fetus during pregnancy
  - can identify risk factors in connection with pregnancy and has the ability to prevent and intervene early
  - can identify mothers and prospective parents in need of extra support and follow-up
  - has knowledge of models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - mastered follow-up, care referral, supervision and counseling of the woman and the family during pregnancy and childhood
  - mastered the care and follow-up of the new mother and the newborn child
  - has knowledge of couple relationships, parenting and early interaction

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
  Mental health and psychiatry

  Content of the study unit

  Antenatal care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.04.2022 - 01.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 03.04.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Antenatal care 2 BM14BM04-3003 30.08.2021-06.02.2022  3 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered the follow-up of the expectant mother and fetus during pregnancy
  - can identify risk factors in connection with pregnancy and has the ability to prevent and intervene early
  - can identify mothers and prospective parents in need of extra support and follow-up
  - has knowledge of models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - mastered follow-up, care referral, supervision and counseling of the woman and the family during pregnancy and childhood
  - mastered the care and follow-up of the new mother and the newborn child
  - can identify women with childbearing fears and have basic knowledge of the care of childbearing fears

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Antenatal care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1-2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paananen m.fl. (2015). Kätilötyö. Edita.
  Lindgren m.fl. (2016). Reproduktiv hälsa. Studentlitteratur.
  Nationella expertgruppen för mödravården (Förf.) (2015) Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T. (Red.)
  Handbok för mödrarådgivningen - Nationell rekommendation
  Tillgänglig från http://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/126655
  Naistentaudit ja synnykset. toim. Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O. & Mäkikallio, K. 2019, Duodecim
  Articles according to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures and discussions, group work, self-studies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For passing the course, an approved examination (at least 60% right) and approved assignments are required.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 06.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written examnination
  Individual assignment
  Group work
  Mandatory attendance at lectures in Postpatrum check-up.
  Mandatory attendance at conference about cultural sensitivity in October 2021.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam autumn 2021.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

•   Basic Nursing Skills VÅV21KV01-3005 10.01.2022-31.07.2022  7 credits  (ÖH21VÅETAPP-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs
  - have basic knowledge of nutrition
  - has knowledge of the care process based on evidence and can document it according to national systematic electronic
  care documentation system including ISBAR, FinCC
  - implements an aseptic approach in working
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination
  - has knowledge to implement basic wound care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing care process
  Human basic needs and basic care
  Basic Nutrition
  Service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  Hygiene
  Basic Nursing Skills
  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  58% Face-to-face, 42% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodleföreläsningar
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  e
  Lectures (online)
  Self-study
  Practical Exercises on Campus (Compulsory)
  Written exercises
  Tent

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 31.07.2022

  Enrollment date range

  11.12.2021 - 09.01.2022

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH21VÅETAPP-V

  Seats

  13 - 20

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

•   Basic Nursing Skills VÅV21KV01-3003 20.09.2021-14.11.2021  7 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs
  - have basic knowledge of nutrition
  - has knowledge of the care process based on evidence and can document it according to national systematic electronic
  care documentation system including ISBAR, FinCC
  - implements an aseptic approach in working
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination
  - has knowledge to implement basic wound care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing care process
  Human basic needs and basic care
  Basic Nutrition
  Service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  Hygiene
  Basic Nursing Skills
  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2021 - 14.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 19.09.2021

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic Nursing Skills VÅV21KV01-3001 06.09.2021-12.12.2021  7 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs
  - have basic knowledge of nutrition
  - has knowledge of the care process based on evidence and can document it according to national systematic electronic
  care documentation system including ISBAR, FinCC
  - implements an aseptic approach in working
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination
  - has knowledge to implement basic wound care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing care process
  Human basic needs and basic care
  Basic Nutrition
  Service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  Hygiene
  Basic Nursing Skills
  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  86% Face-to-face, 14% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012.
  Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodleföreläsningar
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, group-work, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2021 - 12.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination
  Approved exercise assignments.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Exam: 16.12.2021 (online)
  Re-take 1
  Re-take 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ic

•   Basic Nursing Skills VÅV21KV01-3002 23.09.2021-19.12.2021  7 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs
  - have basic knowledge of nutrition
  - has knowledge of the care process based on evidence and can document it according to national systematic electronic
  care documentation system including ISBAR, FinCC
  - implements an aseptic approach in working
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination
  - has knowledge to implement basic wound care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing care process
  Human basic needs and basic care
  Basic Nutrition
  Service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  Hygiene
  Basic Nursing Skills
  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  86% Face-to-face, 14% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodleföreläsningar
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, group-work, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.09.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 24.10.2021

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

•   Basic Nursing Skills VÅV21KV01-3004 10.01.2022-27.02.2022  7 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs
  - have basic knowledge of nutrition
  - has knowledge of the care process based on evidence and can document it according to national systematic electronic
  care documentation system including ISBAR, FinCC
  - implements an aseptic approach in working
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination
  - has knowledge to implement basic wound care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing care process
  Human basic needs and basic care
  Basic Nutrition
  Service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  Hygiene
  Basic Nursing Skills
  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  86% Face-to-face, 14% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodleföreläsningar
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, group-work, demonstration, practice
  Clinical, practical training as peer learning with students from VAMK

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 27.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3030 18.08.2021-18.12.2021  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.08.2021 - 18.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2020 - 05.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3022 11.10.2021-19.12.2021  2 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Enligt nationella kurskrav se moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning (obligatorisk)
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar på KTC (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Inlämnad och godkänd portfolio enligt nationell standard
  Godkänd virtuell tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.10.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 10.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen gäller endast examensstuderande
  
  Förkunskapskrav : Godkänd kurs där injektioner ingår ( läkemedelsbehandling 1) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för portfolioinlämning v 48 29.11 kl 08.00
  Virtuell tentamen öppen 49-50 7.12 kl 8.00-13.12 kl 23.00 (not translated)

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3023 27.09.2021-21.11.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Enligt nationella kurskrav se moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar på KTC (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Inlämnad och godkänd portfolio enligt nationell standard
  Godkänd virtuell tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.09.2021 - 21.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen gäller endast examensstuderande
  
  Förkunskapskrav : Godkänd kurs där injektioner ingår ( läkemedelsbehandling 1) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio 26.10 kl 23.00
  Virtuell tentamen öppen 4.11 kl 8.00 -11.11. kl 23.00 (not translated)

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3024 01.11.2021-19.12.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Enligt nationella kurskrav se moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar på KTC (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Inlämnad och godkänd portfolio enligt nationell standard
  Godkänd virtuell tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 11.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen gäller endast examensstuderande
  
  Förkunskapskrav : Godkänd kurs där injektioner ingår ( läkemedelsbehandling 1) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio vecka 47 22.11 kl 8
  Virtuell tentamen öppen 3.12.kl 08.00-13.12 kl 23.00 (not translated)

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3025 01.08.2021-18.12.2021  2 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 18.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 31.07.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3010 28.03.2022-08.05.2022  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson, R. Jeppson, B., Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap. 8. Kärlkirurgi. s. 269 – 288.
  Ericson,T. Lind, M (red) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap 1. Vården vid ateroskleros, hyperlipidemi, fetma och hypertoni. Kap 2. Vård vid hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar. Kap 3. Vård vid tromboemboliska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G., Grønseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2021.Upplaga 3. Klinisk omvårdnad 1. Kap. 7 och 8. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på Moodle
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, pair assignment, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved exercises performed during the course.
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.03.2022 - 08.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 27.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the course's introductory occasion
  Mandatory attendance at introduction to SimMan and at the SimMan exercises.
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test
  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h+4h
  SimMan practice, group 1 and 2, 4 h x 2
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3012 24.01.2022-22.05.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson, R. Jeppson, B., Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap. 8. Kärlkirurgi. s. 269 – 288.
  Ericson,T. Lind, M (red) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap 1. Vården vid ateroskleros, hyperlipidemi, fetma och hypertoni. Kap 2. Vård vid hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar. Kap 3. Vård vid tromboemboliska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G., Grønseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2021.Upplaga 3. Klinisk omvårdnad 1. Kap. 7 och 8. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på Moodle
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, pair assignment, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved exercises performed during the course.
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.01.2022 - 22.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 30.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK21 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the course's introductory occasion
  Mandatory attendance at introduction to SimMan and at the SimMan exercises.
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test
  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h+4h
  SimMan practice, group 1 and 2, 4 h x 2
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3013 21.02.2022-27.03.2022  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson, R. Jeppson, B., Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap. 8. Kärlkirurgi. s. 269 – 288.
  Ericson,T. Lind, M (red) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap 1. Vården vid ateroskleros, hyperlipidemi, fetma och hypertoni. Kap 2. Vård vid hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar. Kap 3. Vård vid tromboemboliska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G., Grønseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2021.Upplaga 3. Klinisk omvårdnad 1. Kap. 7 och 8. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på Moodle
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, pair assignment, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved exercises performed during the course.
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.02.2022 - 27.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 20.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the course's introductory occasion
  Mandatory attendance at introduction to SimMan and at the SimMan exercises.
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test
  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h+4h
  SimMan practice, group 1 and 2, 4 h x 2
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3007 29.11.2021-19.12.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 9 och 10. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G.,Grönseth, R. Almås, H. (red) (2020). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 13, 14, 15. Liber AB, Stockholm.Material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 28.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3008 18.10.2021-14.11.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 9 och 10. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G.,Grönseth, R. Almås, H. (red) (2020). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 13, 14, 15. Liber AB, Stockholm.Material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.10.2021 - 14.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 17.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3013 07.03.2022-17.04.2022  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 9 och 10. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G.,Grönseth, R. Almås, H. (red) (2020). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 13, 14, 15. Liber AB, Stockholm.Material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.03.2022 - 17.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 06.03.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3007 14.02.2022-15.05.2022  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. Chapter 1, 2, 9-19
  or
  Tapanainen et al. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Chapter: 1-17,19-31.
  
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, skhole lectures, online work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.02.2022 - 15.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 13.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Seats

  15 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The first exam is the last lecture of the course
  The retakes are on general exams.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h.
  3 cr = 81 h.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3009 07.02.2022-17.04.2022  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. Chapter 1, 2, 9-19
  or
  Tapanainen et al. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Chapter: 1-17,19-31.
  
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, skhole lectures, online work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.02.2022 - 17.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 06.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  20 - 75

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The first exam is the last lecture of the course
  The retakes are on general exams.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h.
  3 cr = 81 h.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3009 30.08.2021-15.11.2021  2 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Truedesson, L. Klinisk immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2012.
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur 2015
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Sid 92-109. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi.Liber 2018.
  Hedman m.fl. Immunologia. III Immunologiset kudosvauriot, immuunisairaudet ja interventiot. Duodecim
  Material på moodle
  Rekommendationer, anvisningar och information på nätet
  Nätinformation: THL, ECDC, CDC, WHO, IDF (Immune deficiency foundation), AARDA, Terveyskirjasto
  Övrigt enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier och uppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd uppgift (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 15.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen går veckorna 35-37
  Immunologisk ohälsa 1 sp ; Ulla Penttinen
  Infektionssjukdomar 1 sp ; Marie Hjortell (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Grupparbete i immunologisk ohälsa och infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  54h / 2 sp
  Schemalagd undervisning
  10 h Immunologisk ohälsa
  10 h Infektionssjukdomar
  
  Egna självständiga studier
  17 h Immunologisk ohälsa
  17 h Infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3010 25.10.2021-19.12.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Truedesson, L. Klinisk immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2012.
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur 2015
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021 (om sars-cov-2 och immunförsvaret)
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Sid 92-109. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi.Liber 2018.
  Hedman m.fl. Immunologia. III Immunologiset kudosvauriot, immuunisairaudet ja interventiot. Duodecim
  Material på moodle
  Rekommendationer, anvisningar och information på nätet
  Nätinformation: THL, ECDC, CDC, WHO, IDF, AARDA, Terveyskirjasto
  Övrigt enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier och uppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd uppgift (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.10.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 24.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen går veckorna 43-47 för SSK20 grupp 1
  Immunologisk ohälsa 1 sp ; Ulla Penttinen
  Infektionssjukdomar 1 sp ; Marie Hjortell (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Grupparbete i immunologisk ohälsa och infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  54h / 2 sp
  Schemalagd undervisning
  10 h Immunologisk ohälsa
  10 h infektionssjukdomar
  
  Egna självständiga studier
  17 h immunologisk ohälsa
  17 h infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3011 25.10.2021-19.12.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Truedesson, L. Klinisk immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2012.
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur 2015
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021 (om sars-cov-2 och immunförsvaret)
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Sid 92-109. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi.Liber 2018.
  Hedman m.fl. Immunologia. III Immunologiset kudosvauriot, immuunisairaudet ja interventiot. Duodecim
  Material på moodle
  Rekommendationer, anvisningar och information på nätet
  Nätinformation: THL, ECDC, CDC, WHO, IDF (Immune deficiency foundation), AARDA, Terveyskirjasto
  Övrigt enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier och uppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd uppgift (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.10.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen går veckorna 43-47 för SSK20 grupp 2
  Immunologisk ohälsa 1 sp ; Ulla Penttinen
  Infektionssjukdomar 1 sp ; Marie Hjortell (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Grupparbete i immunologisk ohälsa och infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  54h / 2 sp
  Schemalagd undervisning
  10 h immunologisk ohälsa
  10 h infektionssjukdomar
  Egna självständiga studier
  17 h immunologisk ohälsa
  17 h infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3015 28.02.2022-20.05.2022  2 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.02.2022 - 20.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 27.02.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3016 25.04.2022-29.05.2022  2 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.04.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 24.04.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3007 24.01.2022-27.02.2022  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kap.14 Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kap.15 Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson. R., Jeppsson. B. & Rydholm. A. (red.) (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm.
  Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 22. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  (alt. motsvarande delar i upplaga 2011)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  Lonkkamurtuma
  Osteoporoosi
  Polvi- ja nivelrikko
  Selkäydinvamma
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, case studies, discussions

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.01.2022 - 27.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 23.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70% - 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3010 03.01.2022-03.04.2022  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kap.14 Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kap.15 Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson. R., Jeppsson. B. & Rydholm. A. (red.) (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm.
  Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 22. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  (alt. motsvarande delar i upplaga 2011)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  Lonkkamurtuma
  Osteoporoosi
  Polvi- ja nivelrikko
  Selkäydinvamma
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, case studies, discussions

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 03.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70% - 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3007 26.10.2021-12.12.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Stubberud D-G., Grønseth R. & Almås H. (2021 alt. 2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 23-25 (in 2011 version kap. 25-27)
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Lectures in Moodle.
  
  Reference literature:
  • Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  • Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  • Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.10.2021 - 12.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 07.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points < 89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3008 03.01.2022-13.02.2022  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Stubberud D-G., Grønseth R. & Almås H. (2021 alt. 2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 23-25 (in 2011 upplaga kap. 25-27)
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Lectures in Moodle.
  
  Reference literature:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013, 2016) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 13.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3012 24.01.2022-13.03.2022  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Stubberud D-G., Grønseth R. & Almås H. (2021 alt. 2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 23-25 (in 2011 upplaga kap. 25-27)
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Lectures in Moodle.
  
  Reference literature:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013, 2016) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.01.2022 - 13.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 23.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with psychiatric disorders VÅV18KV14-3006 29.11.2021-09.01.2022  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.& Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  ...according to the teacher's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.11.2021 - 09.01.2022

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 28.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visits to VCH; psychiatric unit and Gamla Vaasa hospital

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline 17.12.2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with psychiatric disorders VÅV18KV14-3009 21.02.2022-08.05.2022  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.& Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  ...according to the teacher's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.02.2022 - 08.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 20.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visits to VCH; psychiatric unit and Gamla Vaasa hospital

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3007 20.09.2021-17.10.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  TENTAMENSLITTERATUR
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid 105-161
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid. 283-303, 313-341
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid.319-367
  
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Sid 214-221
  
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2021 - 17.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1: 15.10.2021
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3008 30.08.2021-03.10.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  TENTAMENSLITTERATUR
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid 105-161
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid. 283-303, 313-341
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid.319-367
  
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Sid 214-221
  
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 03.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Test 1: 15.10.2021
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3009 25.04.2022-29.05.2022  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.04.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 24.04.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3011 04.04.2022-29.05.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.04.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 03.04.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3013 03.01.2022-20.02.2022  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  TENTAMENSLITTERATUR
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid 105-161
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid. 283-303, 313-341
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid.319-367
  
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Sid 214-221
  
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 20.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV21KV02-3003 20.09.2021-07.11.2021  2 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, online course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2021 - 07.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 29.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be in Moodle.
  
  
  The introduction in nursing ethics is recommended. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new empoyees. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times, 0,5cr.
  The nursing ethics is on another Moodle course called Vårdetik online 2020
  Nursing science and intercultural care: written assignment

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  2cr 2x27h=54h

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV21KV02-3004 01.08.2021-31.12.2021  2 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV21KV02-3001 12.11.2021-31.12.2021  2 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  According to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, seminar, online course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Pettersson

  Additional information

  The course is held by part-time teacher Maria Pettersson
  Information about the course as well as content, examination and assessment criteria can be found on moodle.
  Introductions and seminars are compulsory!
  The care ethics part is the same course that the Vaasa healthcare district requires of new employees. No special certificate is given for the course. Students with this course code have all done the spring ethics according to the requirements of the Vaasa healthcare district.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV21KV02-3002 21.09.2021-28.11.2021  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, seminar, online course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.09.2021 - 28.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 13.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be in Moodle.
  On the seminar on the last lecture of the course the students divide themselves into two groups, which have 4h each.
  
  The introduction in nursing ethics is recommended. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new empoyees. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times, 0,5cr.
  The nursing ethics is on another Moodle course called Vårdetik online 2020
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last time of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  2cr 2x27h=54h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV21KV02-3005 10.01.2022-13.03.2022  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, seminar, online course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 13.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be in Moodle.
  On the seminar on the last lecture of the course the students divide themselves into two groups, which have 4h each.
  
  The introduction in nursing ethics is recommended. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new empoyees. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times, 0,5cr.
  The nursing ethics is on another Moodle course called Vårdetik online 2020
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last time of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  2cr 2x27h=54h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Clinical antenatal midwifery BM18KB03-3001 01.01.2022-31.12.2022  9 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered midwifery knowledge during pregnancy
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the patient's care in maternity health care during pregnancy and childhood
  - can identify the pregnant woman's resources and health problems and support both the health of the pregnant woman and the waiting family
  - has insights into models and networks that support the woman and the family
  - has insights into family planning
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical antenatal midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV21KVV03-3001 01.06.2022-04.09.2022  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team

  Prerequisites

  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Elderly care and geriatric

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  Further information

  Clinical practice 9 sp

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Fyra veckor valfri praktik inom vården under sommaren (sommarjobb): serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.06.2022 - 04.09.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.05.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Students apply for their own summer job.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Summer internship at service housing, streamlined service housing, home service.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Summer 2022
  Participation in internship information in the spring of 2022. Mandatory attendance.
  Summer internship report submitted via moodle no later than week 35, 2022.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35, 2022.

  Student's schedule and workload

  Summer internship = 6 credits = 4 weeks. 38 h / week. Total: 152 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV21KVV03-3003 23.05.2022-18.09.2022  6 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team

  Prerequisites

  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Elderly care and geriatric

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  Further information

  Clinical practice 9 sp

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Four weeks of optional internship in health care during the summer (summer job): service housing, more efficient service housing, home service.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.05.2022 - 18.09.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 22.05.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Students apply for their own summer job.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Summer internship at service housing, streamlined service housing, home service.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Summer 2022
  Participation in internship information in the spring of 2022. Mandatory attendance.
  Summer internship report submitted via moodle no later than week 35, 2022.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35, 2022.

  Student's schedule and workload

  Summer internship = 6 credits = 4 weeks. 38 h / week. Total: 152 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV21KVV03-3004 02.05.2022-11.09.2022  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team

  Prerequisites

  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Elderly care and geriatric

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  Further information

  Clinical practice 9 sp

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Four weeks of optional internship in health care during the summer (summer job): service housing, more efficient service housing, home service.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.05.2022 - 11.09.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 01.05.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Students apply for their own summer job.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Summer internship at service housing, streamlined service housing, home service.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Summer 2022
  Participation in internship information in the spring of 2022. Mandatory attendance.
  Summer internship report submitted via moodle no later than week 35, 2022.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35, 2022.

  Student's schedule and workload

  Summer internship = 6 credits = 4 weeks. 38 h / week. Total: 152 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 1 BM18KB06-3001 22.11.2021-19.12.2021  6 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - Understands the physiological course of birth
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - understands and can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the nursing woman, realize pain relief
  - has basic skills in identifying deviations and dealing with care in childbirth complications and deviant deliveries in cooperation with the care team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum care

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice at delivery ward.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 2 BM18KB07-3001 01.01.2022-31.12.2022  6 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - Understands the physiological course of birth
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - understands and can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the nursing woman, realize pain relief
  - has basic skills in identifying deviations and dealing with care in childbirth complications and deviant deliveries in cooperation with the care team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 3 BM18KB08-3001 01.01.2022-31.12.2022  6 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - can perform fetal monitoring during childbirth and identify abnormalities in it
  - can, in cooperation with the woman in labor, realize pain relief
  - can predict and identify when normal delivery becomes abnormal
  - can care for abnormal delivery and risk delivery in a multi-professional work team
  - has cooperative ability and holistic thinking
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Intrapartum care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical intrapartum midwifery 4 BM18KB09-3001 01.01.2022-31.12.2022  6 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the care during normal delivery
  - can manage the normal delivery independently
  - mastered fetal monitoring during childbirth
  - can, in cooperation with the woman in labor, realize pain relief
  - can predict and identify when normal delivery becomes abnormal
  - In case of deviant delivery and during risk delivery, can care for a multi-professional work team
  - has cooperative ability and holistic thinking
  - Master-safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Clinical intrapartum care 3

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical intrapartum midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical microbiology VÅV21BV03-3001 25.10.2021-31.12.2021  2 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ulla Penttinen. Kurskompendium (tillgängligt på moodle), Faktablad m.m. på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson, & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Upplaga 5. Liber 2018
  Heikkinen et al. Mikrobiologia. Duodecim 2020
  Aktuella artiklar enligt anvisning
  WEBSIDOR:
  THL (Finland) https://www.thl.fi/sv/web/infektionssjukdomar
  Folkhälsomyndigheten (Sverige)
  https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/mikrobiologi-laboratorieanalyser/
  ECDC (Europa) https://ecdc.europa.eu/en
  CDC (USA) https://www.cdc.gov/
  WHO
  http://www.who.int/topics/infectious_diseases/en/
  http://www.who.int/topics/infection_control/en/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Övningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.10.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 24.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Skriftlig eller eventuellt muntlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tent 1-2 veckor efter föreläsningarna
  Omtentamen januari och februari 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursens omfattning är 2 sp vilket innebär 54 h arbete för studerande.
  Schemalagd undervisning16 h
  Litteraturstudier och annat 38 h (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology VÅV21BV03-3002 13.09.2021-05.12.2021  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ulla Penttinen. Kurskompendium (tillgängligt på moodle), Faktablad m.m. på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson, & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Upplaga 5. Liber 2018
  Heikkinen et al. Mikrobiologia. Duodecim 2020
  Aktuella artiklar enligt anvisning
  WEBSIDOR:
  THL (Finland) https://www.thl.fi/sv/web/infektionssjukdomar
  Folkhälsomyndigheten (Sverige)
  https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/mikrobiologi-laboratorieanalyser/
  ECDC (Europa) https://ecdc.europa.eu/en
  CDC (USA) https://www.cdc.gov/
  WHO
  http://www.who.int/topics/infectious_diseases/en/
  http://www.who.int/topics/infection_control/en/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Övningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.09.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 12.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Skriftlig eller eventuellt muntlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tent 1-2 veckor efter föreläsningarna
  Omtentamen januari och februari 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursens omfattning är 2 sp vilket innebär 54 h arbete för studerande.
  Schemalagd undervisning16 h
  Litteraturstudier och annat 38 h (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene VÅV21BV03-3003 11.10.2021-28.11.2021  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ulla Penttinen. Kurskompendium (tillgängligt på moodle), Faktablad m.m. på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson, & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Upplaga 5. Liber 2018
  Heikkinen et al. Mikrobiologia. Duodecim 2020
  Aktuella artiklar enligt anvisning
  WEBSIDOR:
  THL (Finland) https://www.thl.fi/sv/web/infektionssjukdomar
  Folkhälsomyndigheten (Sverige)
  https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/mikrobiologi-laboratorieanalyser/
  ECDC (Europa) https://ecdc.europa.eu/en
  CDC (USA) https://www.cdc.gov/
  WHO
  http://www.who.int/topics/infectious_diseases/en/
  http://www.who.int/topics/infection_control/en/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Övningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.10.2021 - 28.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 10.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Skriftlig eller eventuellt muntlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tent 1-2 veckor efter föreläsningarna
  Omtentamen januari och februari 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursens omfattning är 2 sp vilket innebär 54 h arbete för studerande.
  Schemalagd undervisning16 h
  Litteraturstudier och annat 38 h (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene VÅV21BV03-3004 01.09.2021-31.12.2021  2 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ulla Penttinen. Kurskompendium (tillgängligt på moodle), Faktablad m.m. på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson, & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Upplaga 5. Liber 2018
  Heikkinen et al. Mikrobiologia. Duodecim 2020
  Aktuella artiklar enligt anvisning
  WEBSIDOR:
  THL (Finland) https://www.thl.fi/sv/web/infektionssjukdomar
  Folkhälsomyndigheten (Sverige)
  https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/mikrobiologi-laboratorieanalyser/
  ECDC (Europa) https://ecdc.europa.eu/en
  CDC (USA) https://www.cdc.gov/
  WHO
  http://www.who.int/topics/infectious_diseases/en/
  http://www.who.int/topics/infection_control/en/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Övningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkända uppgifter och tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.09.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 10.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Skriftlig eller eventuellt muntlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tent 1-2 veckor efter föreläsningarna
  Omtentamen januari och februari 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursens omfattning är 2 sp vilket innebär 54 h arbete för studerande.
  Schemalagd undervisning16 h
  Litteraturstudier och annat 38 h (not translated)

•   Clinical midwifery during the postnatal period BM18KB02-3001 25.10.2021-21.11.2021  9 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - mastered midwifery knowledge during puerperium
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate the mother's and the child's care during puerperium and document it according to national documentation systems
  - can work family-centered in the support of the new family
  - can create a good care relationship with the woman and her family and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge within postnatal care
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - mastered safe drug treatment

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical midwifery during the postnatal period

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in postnatal care.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.10.2021 - 21.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Clinical midwifery in an optional context 2 BM18KB11-3001 01.01.2022-31.12.2022  3 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge within selected midwife context
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team

  Prerequisites

  Clinical care during the postnatal period
  Clinical care of the pregnant women
  Clinical intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical midwifery in an optional context

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV20KVV05-3003 11.10.2021-05.12.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - has achieved competence in surgical and perioperative nursing care according to national standard

  Prerequisites

  Care of the old and geriatrics
  Surgical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  BEHANDLINGSÅTGÄRDER VID BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER;
  Material and links in Moodle.
  Hanås R. (2018). Typ 1 diabetes hos barn, ungdomar och unga vuxna - Hur du blir expert på din egen diabetes. Betamed.
  
  ARRHYTHMIAS
  Handbok i de vanligaste artymierna. Tolkning och behandling. Ambu.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.10.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 07.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual assignments and problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course
  Resuscitation test.
  Arrhythmia: passed Moodle test
  Carbohydrates calculation and insulinneed: Test

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical exam week
  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Moodle arrhythmia test according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp Totalt 80 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid övningar.
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 2 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Hemuppgift: Valbar antibiotika, 1 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 1, 6 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase, 2 h
  Vätskebalansövning, 10 min
  Övningsstationer 3. Blodtransfusionsuppgift genomgång, Grupp 1 och 2, 2 h
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 2 h
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: 29 h
  Eget arbete: 11 h
  TOTALT: 40 h
  HJÄRTRYTMER: 0,25 sp (6,75 h)
  Självstudier + Moodletest: EKG rytmer
  RESUSKITATION:
  4h teori (alla)
  4 h övning och 4 h examination (enligt gruppindelning).
  Alla tillfällen obligatorisk närvaro.
  Övriga timmar till nationella test.
  BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER:
  4 h obligatorisk närvaro
  NATIONELLA TEST:
  Kompetenser i kirurgisk- och perioperativ vård: Följande test testas:
  Test 4: Inledande av intravenös infusionsbehandling och iv-kanylering
  Test 7: Förbandsbyte av rent kirurgiskt sår/ bedömning av omläggningsbehov
  Test 9: Blodtransfusion
  Test 10: Spädning av antibiotika
  Test 11: Läkemedelsbehandling vid smärta och illamående (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Pass: approved in all tests.

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV20KVV05-3002 01.09.2021-10.10.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - has achieved competence in surgical and perioperative nursing care according to national standard

  Prerequisites

  Care of the old and geriatrics
  Surgical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  BEHANDLINGSÅTGÄRDER VID BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER;
  Material and links in Moodle.
  Hanås R. (2018). Typ 1 diabetes hos barn, ungdomar och unga vuxna - Hur du blir expert på din egen diabetes. Betamed.
  
  ARRHYTHMIAS
  Handbok i de vanligaste artymierna. Tolkning och behandling. Ambu.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.09.2021 - 10.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual assignments and problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course
  Resuscitation test.
  Arrhythmia: passed Moodle test
  Carbohydrates calculation and insulinneed: Test

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical exam week
  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Moodle arrhythmia test according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp Totalt 80 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid övningar.
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 2 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Hemuppgift: Valbar antibiotika, 1 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 1, 6 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase, 2 h
  Vätskebalansövning, 10 min
  Övningsstationer 3. Blodtransfusionsuppgift genomgång, Grupp 1 och 2, 2 h
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 2 h
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: 29 h
  Eget arbete: 11 h
  TOTALT: 40 h
  HJÄRTRYTMER: 0,25 sp (6,75 h)
  Självstudier + Moodletest: EKG rytmer
  RESUSKITATION:
  4h teori (alla)
  4 h övning och 4 h examination (enligt gruppindelning).
  Alla tillfällen obligatorisk närvaro.
  Övriga timmar till nationella test.
  BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER:
  4 h obligatorisk närvaro
  NATIONELLA TEST:
  Kompetenser i kirurgisk- och perioperativ vård: Följande test testas:
  Test 4: Inledande av intravenös infusionsbehandling och iv-kanylering
  Test 7: Förbandsbyte av rent kirurgiskt sår/ bedömning av omläggningsbehov
  Test 9: Blodtransfusion
  Test 10: Spädning av antibiotika
  Test 11: Läkemedelsbehandling vid smärta och illamående (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Pass: approved in all tests.

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV21KVV05-3001 14.03.2022-09.10.2022  4 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - can explain the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory examinations

  Prerequisites

  Drug treatment 1
  Care of the old and geriatrics

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.03.2022 - 09.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.07.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk, Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV21KVV05-3003 18.04.2022-29.05.2022  4 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - can explain the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory examinations

  Prerequisites

  Drug treatment 1
  Care of the old and geriatrics

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.04.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 17.04.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV21KVV05-3004 25.04.2022-12.06.2022  4 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - can explain the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory examinations

  Prerequisites

  Drug treatment 1
  Care of the old and geriatrics

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.04.2022 - 12.06.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 24.04.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Developmental project in midwifery BM14FU04-3006 01.01.2022-31.07.2022  5 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  -shows the ability to deepen and develop their substance knowledge in midwifery

  Prerequisites

  Thesis 2

  Content of the study unit

  Developmental project in midwifery

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Maj-Helen Nyback

  Mode of delivery

  40% Face-to-face, 60% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the chosen theme

  Learning methods

  Lectures, seminars and independent work with supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The development work is evaluated 1-5
  Criteria for evaluation
  Starting point for and goal of the development work
  The theoretical foundation of development work
  Area of ​​use for the development work
  Critical review of development work, process and product

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2022 - 31.07.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Seats

  1 - 20

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Maj-Helen Nyback, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  5 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  -

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  the own work may be ordered from Health Care Center, hospital or other care institution

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation of development work week 47 year 2021 or in may 2022

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  4 h lecture
  4 h + 4 h seminars
  123 h individual work, with supervision

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The purpose of the development work is unclearly formulated and the objective is not relevant or unclearly explained. The work includes all relevant parts but they are inadequately described
  The purpose and objectives remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge in the thematic area. The relevance of the development work is described, albeit superficially, and the delimitation is deficient
  Justification for choosing background material / frame of reference is missing or is scarce / inconsistent. Ability to source criticism is lacking
  Students' choice of background material / frame of reference is partly relevant. The ability to critique sources is weak. The process description / method description is based on literature but it is not fully applied as described. The process / method is not well chosen considering the product
  The product / study is inadequately presented, has a greater anchoring in the respondents' own perception than in theory and expectations from working life. It requires extensive processing to be able to be used / published / distributed
  The product is well presented, but the anchoring in the needs of working life is weakly substantiated and the product / information can form the basis for further processing before a possible spread.The description and motivation for choosing a product / study is very deficient and not entirely appropriate in terms of purpose, issues and area of ​​use.
  The description of and motivation for choosing a product / study method is weak. There are some errors in the product / study and the discussion and reflection on the implementation of the study / product is deficient.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The motivation for choosing a theme area is universal and the goal is clear but could be more clearly justified. The development work is clearly delimited.
  The development work is clearly and logically structured and reflects purpose and objectives and a good ability to apply a scientific approach (with practical roots). The work includes all relevant parts and the parts are proportional in relation to each other
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and sufficient basic material (eg data material for analysis) has been used
  The process description / method description is based on literature and there is a clear approach to anchoring the product's development in the process description / method. The process / method is well chosen with the product in mind. The respondent / respondents can reflect on the choice of process / method and discuss this.
  Background / frame of reference well described, motivated, relevant and forms a good basis for the development work. The ability to critique sources is good. The process description / method description is well chosen with the product in mind, well described and is well rooted in literature. The process is carried out in accordance with the description and well described. The respondent / respondents are able to reflect and critically examine the choice and the discussion concerning the choice and the description of the process / method is well implemented.
  
  The product / study is carefully carried out but has little grounding in working life and requires processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life requires a certain amount of processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The choice and justification of the method for the product / study is appropriate. The use of traditional methods (for both product and study) is good. The critical review is weak.
  The description of method and approach is good and based on a good motivation. The respondent (s) master their methods well, and there is a clear connection to the purpose of the product / study. In the critical review of planning and implementation, the respondents show awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the product / study.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The development work is current and innovative and develops the student's professional knowledge. The purpose and objective are clear and well motivated. The development work has been carried out in such a way that the purpose and objective are fulfilled.
  The chosen subject area is discussed and the respondents / n / s are able to reflect on their subject area and add something new to the discussion.
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and is based on sufficient basic material. There is a pronounced / described anchoring in the degree project / in a need that is based on the care area. Background / frame of reference forms a clear and logical basis for the development work. The rationale for the choices made is clear, unambiguous and relevant. The student has made a meritorious synthesis. The ability to critique sources is commendable. The product is ready for distribution
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life and is well processed to be used in working life / published / disseminated
  The description and use of the method and approach are excellent and based on an excellent motivation. The report has a clear connection to the purpose of the survey. The discussion and the critical review show an excellent ability to account in theoretical reasoning for the product / study's advantages and disadvantages regarding choice of method / process and implementation

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3013 03.01.2022-13.02.2022  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual test 80 % correctly

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 13.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Virtual test
  Exam in drug calculation

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 20 hours + 4 hours for the exam
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 80 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3014 03.01.2022-06.02.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Contact studoes in webex , seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifter Gk+/Gk /UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 70% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedelsräkning 100% rätt för GK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 06.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Small group(s)

  • SSK21 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Camilla Mattjus

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Online tasks and examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt överenskommelse med gruppen vid kursstart
  Räknetent efetr utförda räkneworkshops
  Omtentamina på omtentsdagar under våren enligt meddelande efter kursstart
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  arbetsbörda 27h arbete per studiepoäng (not translated)

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3010 22.11.2021-19.12.2021  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen, R., Volmanen, P. & Hakoinen, S. (toim.) 2015. Turvallinen lääkehoito Opas lääkehoitosuunnitelman tekemiseen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Julkari. https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1 valda delar
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according to teachers advice

  Learning methods

  Contact studies in webex online. Lectures and workshops
  Seminars, groupwork
  Selfstudies with individual tasks online i moodle
  Clinical lectures in class in injections

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifetr Gk/UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 75% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedlesräkning 100% rätt förGK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 21.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Pia Nygårdas

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  exam online
  tasks online

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt överenskommelse med gruppen vid kursstart
  Räknetent i klass
  Omtentamina på omtentsdagar under våren enligt meddelande efter kursstart 2020
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h per credit for students

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3012 25.10.2021-19.12.2021  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  STM: 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling. Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Contact studies in webex, workshops, seminars
  selfstudies, individual tasks and assigments
  Online test
  Exercises in injection in clinical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifter Gk+/Gk /UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 70% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedelsräkning 100% rätt för GK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.10.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 24.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK21 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 2c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Camilla Mattjus

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Uppgifter och foruminlägg online
  Tentamen online i teori och läkemedelsräkning via webex (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt överenskommelse med gruppen vid kursstart
  Räknetent efetr utförda räkneworkshops
  Omtentamina på omtentsdagar under våren enligt meddelande efter kursstart
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  arbetsbörda 27h arbete per studiepoäng (not translated)

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3007 30.08.2021-14.11.2021  4 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur
  På svenska
  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  FRK. Blodtranfusioner https://www.blodtjanst.fi/for-halsovardsexperter/blodtjanst-utbildar/blodtransfusionens-abo
  Filmer och virtuellt material på moodle
  Material och evidensbaserade nya vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner
  Caselösningar och genomgång av problemlösningar under workshops
  Virtuella uppgifter, forumdiskussion och virtuellt test i teori
  Läkemedelsräkning som flipped learning ( studerande läser teoretisk bakgrund till räkneproblem som praktiseras på workshops), deltenter i läkemedelsräkning efter utförd workshop (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 14.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3008 30.08.2021-14.11.2021  4 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur
  På svenska
  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  FRK. Blodtranfusioner https://www.blodtjanst.fi/for-halsovardsexperter/blodtjanst-utbildar/blodtransfusionens-abo
  Filmer och virtuellt material på moodle
  Material och evidensbaserade nya vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner
  Caselösningar och genomgång av problemlösningar under workshops
  Virtuella uppgifter, forumdiskussion och virtuellt test i teori
  Läkemedelsräkning som flipped learning ( studerande läser teoretisk bakgrund till räkneproblem som praktiseras på workshops), deltenter i läkemedelsräkning efter utförd workshop (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 14.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3009 30.08.2021-19.12.2021  4 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after differenst sections

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV14EN01-3020 15.10.2021-28.02.2022  3 credits  (ÖH21VÅETAPP-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Ingår som en kurs i Etappvis till sjukskötare/Öppna YH och förverkligas genom Öppna YH hösten 2021.
  Detta förverkligande är enbart skapat för Etappvis till sjukskötare hösten 2021. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.10.2021 - 28.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.09.2021 - 14.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH21VÅETAPP-V

  Seats

  19 - 19

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Hanna Kuusisto, Ann-Sofi Storbjörk

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV14EN01-3016 01.08.2021-31.12.2021  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 31.07.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV14EN01-3010 01.11.2021-05.12.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.11.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 31.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Anne Cleary-Hautaniemi

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3011 01.11.2021-05.12.2021  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.11.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 31.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Anne Cleary-Hautaniemi

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3012 11.04.2022-15.05.2022  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.04.2022 - 15.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 10.04.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3014 03.01.2022-30.01.2022  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 30.01.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3017 07.03.2022-17.04.2022  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.03.2022 - 17.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 06.03.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3005 27.09.2021-30.12.2021  4 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen & inom skolhälsovård. Metodhandbok, THL.Tammerfors 2014 (finsk version från år 2016)
  Handbok för studerandehälsovården. STM, publikationer, Helsingfors 2007.
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL

  Learning methods

  Lectures as close studies
  Lecture remotely via Webex, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  33 - 36 point = 5
  29 - 32 point = 4
  25 - 28 point = 3
  21 - 24 point = 2
  18 - 20 point = 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.09.2021 - 30.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination autumn 2021
  Reexamination 1:
  Reexamination 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3006 01.11.2021-12.12.2021  4 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen & inom skolhälsovård. Metodhandbok, THL.Tammerfors 2014 (finsk version från år 2016)
  Handbok för studerandehälsovården. STM, publikationer, Helsingfors 2007.
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL

  Learning methods

  Lectures as close studies
  Lecture remotely via Webex, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  33 - 36 point = 5
  29 - 32 point = 4
  25 - 28 point = 3
  21 - 24 point = 2
  18 - 20 point = 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.11.2021 - 12.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 31.10.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination autumn 2021
  Reexamination 1:
  Reexamination 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3009 04.04.2022-08.05.2022  4 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020

  Learning methods

  Lectures as close studies
  Lecture remotely via Webex, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  33 - 36 point = 5
  29 - 32 point = 4
  25 - 28 point = 3
  21 - 24 point = 2
  18 - 20 point = 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.04.2022 - 08.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 03.04.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2022
  Reexamination 1:
  Reexamination 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3011 07.09.2021-12.12.2021  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning)
  Översättningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.09.2021 - 12.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 14.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3012 01.11.2021-19.12.2021  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning)
  Översättningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 31.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3013 31.01.2022-13.03.2022  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning)
  Översättningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.01.2022 - 13.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 30.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3014 14.02.2022-10.04.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  
  Översättningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.02.2022 - 10.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 13.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

•   First Aid VÅV21KVV01-3001 13.09.2021-17.10.2021  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.09.2021 - 17.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 05.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK21 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cp = 54 h

•   First Aid VÅV21KVV01-3002 15.11.2021-19.12.2021  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 05.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK21 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cp = 54 h

•   First Aid VÅV21KVV01-3003 31.01.2022-27.02.2022  2 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.01.2022 - 27.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 30.01.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cp = 54 h

•   First Aid VÅV21KVV01-3005 07.02.2022-06.03.2022  2 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.02.2022 - 06.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 06.02.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and virtual test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cp = 54 h

•   Geriatric and palliative nursing care VÅV20KV05-3008 01.08.2021-31.12.2021  3 credits  (ÖH21VÅETAPP-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology and geriatrics and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and have a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - has knowledge of and can apply palliative care
  - has knowledge of care at the end of life and can apply it in the meeting with patients and next of kin

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology and geriatrics
  Care at the end of life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 31.08.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH21VÅETAPP-V

  Seats

  19 - 19

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Detta är ett förverkligande för Etappvis till sjukskötare hösten 2021. Inga andra anmälda tas emot. Anmälningen till förverkligandet sker via kurskoordinator Ann-Sofi Storbjörk (not translated)

•   Geriatric and palliative nursing care VÅV20KV05-3004 31.01.2022-13.03.2022  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology and geriatrics and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and have a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - has knowledge of and can apply palliative care
  - has knowledge of care at the end of life and can apply it in the meeting with patients and next of kin

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology and geriatrics
  Care at the end of life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Läkemedelboken online / äldres läkemedelsbehandling ( processer kritiska punkter , ej preparat eller medicinering) Midlöf & Kragh kapitel Läkemedelsbehandling hos äldre https://lakemedelsboken.se/kapitel/lakemedelsanvandning/lakemedelsbehandling_hos_aldre.html
  Dehlin O. & Rundgren, Å. 2014. Geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekwall, A.2010. Äldres hälsa och ohälsa - en introduktion till geriatrisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur.
  Larsson, M. & Rundgren, Å.2010. Geriatriska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur.
  Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., & Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2014. Geriatrisk omvårdnad Liber
  Widell, M. 2016. Palliativ vård. Sanoma Utbildning ab.
  Andershed, B.,Ternestedt, B-M. & Håkansson, C. 2013. Palliativ vård. Begrepp & perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Kettunen, R., Kähäri-Wiik, K., Vuori-Kemilä, A. & Ihalainen, J. Modern rehabilitering - en resurs
  Artiklar och övrig litteratur enligt föreläsarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Groupwork
  Online exam. Information about retake on Moodle
  Obligatory lecture: Filip Koskinen
  If not present: task in Moodle

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Geriatrics: Online exam grade 1-5
  Groupwork pass/fail/to complete
  Palliative care: THL webbcourse - pass/fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.01.2022 - 13.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 30.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Enligt schema (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/27 hours workload

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  or the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Geriatric and palliative nursing care VÅV20KV05-3006 03.01.2022-13.02.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology and geriatrics and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and have a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - has knowledge of and can apply palliative care
  - has knowledge of care at the end of life and can apply it in the meeting with patients and next of kin

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology and geriatrics
  Care at the end of life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Läkemedelboken online / äldres läkemedelsbehandling ( processer kritiska punkter , ej preparat eller medicinering) Midlöf & Kragh kapitel Läkemedelsbehandling hos äldre https://lakemedelsboken.se/kapitel/lakemedelsanvandning/lakemedelsbehandling_hos_aldre.html
  Dehlin O. & Rundgren, Å. 2014. Geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekwall, A.2010. Äldres hälsa och ohälsa - en introduktion till geriatrisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur.
  Larsson, M. & Rundgren, Å.2010. Geriatriska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur.
  Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., & Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2014. Geriatrisk omvårdnad Liber
  Widell, M. 2016. Palliativ vård. Sanoma Utbildning ab.
  Andershed, B.,Ternestedt, B-M. & Håkansson, C. 2013. Palliativ vård. Begrepp & perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Kettunen, R., Kähäri-Wiik, K., Vuori-Kemilä, A. & Ihalainen, J. Modern rehabilitering - en resurs
  Artiklar och övrig litteratur enligt föreläsarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Groupwork
  Online exam. Information about retake on Moodle
  Obligatory lecture: Filip Koskinen
  If not present: task in Moodle

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Geriatrics: Online exam grade 1-5
  Groupwork pass/fail/to complete
  Palliative care: THL webbcourse pass/fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 13.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Enligt schema (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/27 hours workload

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  or the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Geriatric and palliative nursing care VÅV20KV05-3007 03.01.2022-20.02.2022  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology and geriatrics and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and have a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - has knowledge of and can apply palliative care
  - has knowledge of care at the end of life and can apply it in the meeting with patients and next of kin

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology and geriatrics
  Care at the end of life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Läkemedelboken online / äldres läkemedelsbehandling ( processer kritiska punkter , ej preparat eller medicinering) Midlöf & Kragh kapitel Läkemedelsbehandling hos äldre https://lakemedelsboken.se/kapitel/lakemedelsanvandning/lakemedelsbehandling_hos_aldre.html
  Dehlin O. & Rundgren, Å. 2014. Geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekwall, A.2010. Äldres hälsa och ohälsa - en introduktion till geriatrisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur.
  Larsson, M. & Rundgren, Å.2010. Geriatriska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur.
  Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., & Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2014. Geriatrisk omvårdnad Liber
  Widell, M. 2016. Palliativ vård. Sanoma Utbildning ab.
  Andershed, B.,Ternestedt, B-M. & Håkansson, C. 2013. Palliativ vård. Begrepp & perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Kettunen, R., Kähäri-Wiik, K., Vuori-Kemilä, A. & Ihalainen, J. Modern rehabilitering - en resurs
  Artiklar och övrig litteratur enligt föreläsarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Groupwork
  Online exam. Information about retake on Moodle
  Obligatory lecture: Filip Koskinen

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Geriatrics:Online exam grade 1-5
  Groupwork pass/fail/to complete
  palliatice care: THL Webbcourse: pass/fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 20.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Enligt schema (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/27 hours workload

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  or the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Gynaecological midwifery care VÅV18KVV18-3001 27.09.2021-24.10.2021  6 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the gynecological patient's care, and document this
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in gynecological care context
  - can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing
  Mental health and psychiatry

  Content of the study unit

  Gynaecological midwifery care

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Scientific articles
  www.kaypahoito.fi
  www.vårdhandboken.se

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in gynaecological context.
  Supervision and assessment discussion with the teacher.
  Individual reflections and case.
  Information and seminar.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to Plan for Clinical Studies.
  Seminar mandatory.
  Approved individual assignments (reflection diary and case).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.09.2021 - 24.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed and approved clinical practice.
  Reflection diary.
  Case with current theme from clinical practice, with references to at least two scientific sources.
  Participation in internship seminar.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  All documents must be submitted to the teacher no later than one week after completing the internship.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h / cr
  1.5 cr / working week = 40 hours. Of these, 38 hours are performed at the internship and 2 hours are considered for individual assignments. The seminar comprising 3 hours is included in the total working hours.

•   Health Technology and service design VÅV21KV03-3003 15.02.2022-30.06.2022  2 credits  (ÖH21VÅETAPP-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has insights into the various uses of health and welfare technology in healthcare
  - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective
  - has basic knowledge of service design in social and health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Health technology as a resource in healthcare
  Service design

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Studymaterial and recommended literature on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, assignments and selfstudy modules

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graded from 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.02.2022 - 30.06.2022

  Enrollment date range

  16.01.2022 - 14.02.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH21VÅETAPP-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cr = 54h
  Lectures in class 10h + 2h for examination
  Time for assignments and selfstudies 42h

•   Health Technology and service design VÅV21KV03-3001 24.01.2022-03.04.2022  2 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has insights into the various uses of health and welfare technology in healthcare
  - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective
  - has basic knowledge of service design in social and health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Health technology as a resource in healthcare
  Service design

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Studymaterial and recommended literature on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, assignments and selfstudy modules

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graded from 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.01.2022 - 03.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 23.01.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cr = 54h
  Lectures in class 10h + 2h for examination
  Time for assignments and selfstudies 42h

•   Health Technology and service design VÅV21KV03-3002 31.01.2022-27.03.2022  2 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has insights into the various uses of health and welfare technology in healthcare
  - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective
  - has basic knowledge of service design in social and health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Health technology as a resource in healthcare
  Service design

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Studymaterial and recommended literature on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, assignments and selfstudy modules

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graded from 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.01.2022 - 27.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 30.01.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cr = 54h
  Lectures in class 10h + 2h for examination
  Time for assignments and selfstudies 42h

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3007 30.08.2021-30.11.2021  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (kap. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården.Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Holmström, E. & Ohlsson, K. 2014. Människan i arbetslivet. Teori och praktik, Denmark, Studentlitteratur.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2017. Vi väntar barn. Information till nyblivna föräldrar. Helsingfors (tiillgänglig på nätet)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 30.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Seats

  20 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  På engelska w39
  Seminars on the last lecture of the course
  Exam on the birth/delivery
  Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams (29th of October) and 26th of November and 10th of Decmber 2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3008 30.08.2021-10.10.2021  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex+
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.(repeat chapter 1,2, read 32,33,53,57 och 58)
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2020. Vi väntar barn. Information till nyblivna föräldrar. Helsingfors (tiillgänglig på nätet)

  Learning methods

  På engelska
  lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 10.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Seats

  20 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Students are devided into groups during the seminar and need to be prepared to present the whole work.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars on the last lecture of the course w 40
  Short examination about the birth/delivery
  Retake exams 1 and 2: on general examdays (29th of October) and 26th of November and 10th of December 2021

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3009 15.11.2021-19.12.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2017. Vi väntar barn. Information till nyblivna föräldrar. Helsingfors (tiillgänglig på nätet)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 14.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  20 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars on the last lecture of the course v 49
  Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams 21st of January and 11th of February 2022

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

•   High-risk antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal clinical midwifery BM18KB04-3001 01.01.2022-31.12.2022  6 credits  (UBM18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has insights on midwifery knowledge during risk pregnancy, risk delivery and deviant puerperium
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the patient's care during risk pregnancy, risk delivery and deviant puerperium

  Prerequisites

  Antenatal care 1
  Intrapartum care 1

  Content of the study unit

  High-risk antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal clinical midwifery

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2022 - 31.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV21BV01-3004 25.11.2021-31.07.2022  4 credits  (ÖH21VÅETAPP-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  -understand the structure and function of the locomotor system, as well as the anatomic position and the description of orientation
  -become familiar with cell biology, as well as different types of tissues, and understand their function
  -understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes
  -understand the structure and function of the sense organs
  -understand how the endocrine system regulates body metabolism and organ functions
  -understand the reproductive system
  -be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care
  understand the function of different organ systems, such as blood circulation, respiration, digestion and the urinary system
  -understand how the lymphatic system works
  -understand the body's fluid- and acid-base balance
  -be able to apply the above mentioned knowledge to nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Human physiology and anatomy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre u