Study Guide

Objective

The Student:
- knows and can apply the Church's spiritual guidance tradition in a diverse way, considering the equal value of all people
- can support the spiritual development of individuals and groups in a safe and culturally sensitive way
- can plan, apply, and evaluate devotional life together with parishioners and employees in a way that supports participation and accessibility

Content

- the Christian foundation of spiritual work and calling
- spirituality and holiness
- spiritual development of the individual
- Interacting with people of diverse spiritual traditions
- special needs
- forms of spiritual work
- devotion, prayer
- the guiding conversation
- retreat and self-recovery
- The Bible, hymn book and Church manuals

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student possesses a basic competence in the subject / The student does not show sufficient competence in the subject

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student:
-has knowledge of the processes that an aging individual undergoes
- knows the factors that contribute to a good quality of life for the elderly
- knows the structure and content of the various forms of care for the elderly
- can take a stand on ethical dilemmas in working with older people
- can apply working methods that support functional capacity and promote self-determination, quality of life and participation

Content

- the basic theories of social gerontology
-self-determination, participation and empowerment
-resource-strengthening methods
- central legislation, forms of service and current developments
-service guidance for the elderly and their loved ones
- the memory of a lived life
-health and well-being
-loneliness
-ageism

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of the employee's rights and obligations within the work community.
- can follow and work for the organization's goals and strategies.
- has skills in professional interaction and can actively promote his/her own working health as well as the well-being of the work community.

Content

- employee rights and obligations
- work contracts
- occupational health
- working communities
- work supervision
- professional-related protection of interest
- teamwork
- methods that support collaboration

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

ava

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of the employee's rights and obligations within the work community.
- can follow and work for the organization's goals and strategies.
- has skills in professional interaction and can actively promote his/her own working health as well as the well-being of the work community.

Content

- employee rights and obligations
- work contracts
- occupational health
- working communities
- work supervision
- professional-related protection of interest
- teamwork
- methods that support collaboration

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge about the employment market and the social risks connected to unemployment and incapacity for work.
- can guide clients in employment promotion and rehabilitation activities as well as in working life-related economy matters.
- can relate critically and with a developmental approach to labour force related issues.

Content

- the view on work and unemployment
- labour market policy and statistics
- the social service system and legislation in relation to unemployment, incapacity for work, retirement
- social counselling in employment promotion and rehabilitation activities
- social counselling in matters related to economy, income security
- continuous learning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The Student:
- can identify risks and resources in the everyday lives of vulnerable children and families - has a good knowledge of the objectives and forms of service of child welfare
- know the central legislation of child welfare and the rights of the child
- is prepared to support children and families in demanding life situations through Resource-strengthening methods and to cooperate inter professionally with different actors and networks based on the best interests of the child
- can take a stand for the best interests of the child in ethical dilemmas

Content

- deficiencies in parenting, risk behaviour in the child and other risk factors
- the resource-strengthening perspective, protective factors of the child and its network
- the rights of the child and the child's perspective
-ethics and ethic dilemmas in child welfare
- the Child Welfare Act and the client process
- child welfare outpatient care and the methods of effective family work
- objectives, structure and methods of family care, institutional care and aftercare
- meeting children of different ages as a client, talking methods
- documentation

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student:
- can identify risks and resources in the everyday lives of vulnerable children and families - has a good knowledge of the objectives and forms of service of child welfare
- know the central legislation of child welfare and the rights of the child
- is prepared to support children and families in demanding life situations through Resource-strengthening methods and to cooperate inter professionally with different actors and networks based on the best interests of the child
- can take a stand for the best interests of the child in ethical dilemmas

Content

- deficiencies in parenting, risk behaviour in the child and other risk factors
- the resource-strengthening perspective, protective factors of the child and its network
- the rights of the child and the child's perspective
-ethics and ethic dilemmas in child welfare
- the Child Welfare Act and the client process
- child welfare outpatient care and the methods of effective family work
- objectives, structure and methods of family care, institutional care and aftercare
- meeting children of different ages as a client, talking methods
- documentation

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

For approved course:
Attendance or compensation information for all part-time study opportunities.
Approved examination assignments.

Examination assignments that are submitted after the agreed deadline are graded one mark lower.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student’s understanding is at a very general and superficial level. Failed assignments and examinations. Absence/no compensation at mandatory on-campus sessions. Does not follow Novia’s writing guidelines, which are required according to the examination task. The student uses unprocessed AI-generated text as their own text.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

In a fundamental way, students have been able to observe and analyze the knowledge and have been able to make their own applied reflections.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student has been able to observe and analyze the knowledge and, in addition, has demonstrated clarity regarding central concepts and definitions. The text shows logical structure, and the student can also make relevant, reflective parallels to the field of child protection.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates strong clarity and maturity in their understanding, beyond the ordinary. They are able to reflect on various phenomena in a profound way and connect their theoretical knowledge to working life and the field of child protection. The student shows commitment to their task.

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The student:
- is able to identify risks and resources in the lives of vulnerable children, young people and families.
- has knowledge about legislation and service within child protection.
- is able to apply resource promoting methods and embodies a child-centered working method.
- is able to work systemically and interprofessionally within various child protection service types.

Content

- the risk perspective, family violence, child abuse, neglect, parental deficiencies
- the resource-enhancing perspective, protective factors, resilience
- the Child Protection Act and the client process
- the child protection service system
- systemic working method
- open care and methods of child protection, family work
- family care and institutional care structure and methods
- after-care in child care
- to encounter the child as a client, child roles, conversation methodology
- parental support
- documentation

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- can identify risks and resources in relation to addictive disorder.
- has knowledge of the legislation in substance abuse care and can guide in the substance abuse care service system.
- can apply resource-enhancing methods to individuals, families and groups.
- is able to reflect critically on ethical aspects in relation to addictive disorder and substance abuse clients.

Content

- the physical, mental and social risks of addictive disorder
- turning points, motivation and social networks as a resource for change management
- national and global trends
- substance abuse care legislation and forms of service
- co-dependency
- treatment methods, self-help groups, digital forms of support and interprofessional work

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- can identify risks and resources in relation to addictive disorder.
- has knowledge of the legislation in substance abuse care and can guide in the substance abuse care service system.
- can apply resource-enhancing methods to individuals, families and groups.
- is able to reflect critically on ethical aspects in relation to addictive disorder and substance abuse clients.

Content

- the physical, mental and social risks of addictive disorder
- turning points, motivation and social networks as a resource for change management
- national and global trends
- substance abuse care legislation and forms of service
- co-dependency
- treatment methods, self-help groups, digital forms of support and interprofessional work

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of crime at the individual and community level.
- has knowledge of the rehabilitation activities within criminal justice and the third sector's activities.
- encompasses a conscious professional approach to clients and their relatives in crime prevention and criminal justice.

Content

- sociological and psychological explanatory models for crime
- criminal proceedings
- the organisation, forms of activity and rehabilitation of the The Criminal Sanctions Agency
- mediation in crime
- psychosocial forms of support through third sector organisations and associations
- victimology
- societal current trends and strategies

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The Student:
- knows the theoretical foundations of social work, its target groups, and forms of activity
- develops a professional and client-centered approach to vulnerable individuals and groups in society
- knows the ethical foundations of social work

Content

- Human Rights
-key definitions and concepts
- central theories and methods in social work
- the client's interest, the child's best interests
- social work at individual, family, group, and societal level
- the target groups and forms of activity of social work
- the client process
- participation, distribution of power, critical thinking, and professionalism in social work
- ethics and ethical dilemmas in social work

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Studerande har en fördjupad kompetens och visar en djupare förståelse för ämnet i relation till det kommande yrket

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student possesses a basic competence in the subject / The student does not show sufficient competence in the subject

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student:
- knows the history and mission of the diaconal work in today's church and society
- can plan, apply, document, evaluate and develop deaconal activities for individuals, families, and groups
- can apply humane, resource-strengthening, and participatory methods

Content

- the history, present and visions of the diaconal work
- target groups and forms of activity of the diaconal work
- methods of the diaconal work
- digital diaconal work
- political and prophetical diaconal work
- inclusive, community-promoting and empathetic approach

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student possesses a basic competence in the subject / The student does not show sufficient competence in the subject

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student:
- can respond to the elderly and people in marginalised groups and their relatives and guide them within the social services system
- can work in a resource-strengthening and participatory way both individually and group-related with people
in vulnerable situations
- can support, lead, and develop volunteering
- as an expert in diaconal work in interprofessional networks, can analyze and develop the role of the deacon in relation to society's service system

Content

- basic theories of social gerontology
- service and service guidance for the elderly and their relatives
- spiritual work among the elderly and their relatives
- diaconal work with socially and economically marginalized individuals and groups
- organization and supervision of volunteering
- inter-professional work
- promotion of participation, community and hope

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student possesses a basic competence in the subject / The student does not show sufficient competence in the subject

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

Students:
- have knowledge of policy, legislation and research on homelessness among young people in Europe
- can reflect on the concept of dignity and capability in relation to homelessness
- are familiar with social work practice, services and support of the young and homeless in Europe
- have a professional approach to young clients who are homeless
- have knowledge of homelessness among young people based on sustainable development goals

Content

- Central concepts: Homelessness, Human rights, Dignity and Capability, Inclusion & Participation, Youth development
- Homelessness among young people: Social work policy and legislation (macro level), Social work practice and the role of the social worker (meso level), Social work clients (micro level)

Location and time

The course includes preliminary assignments and two international online meetings from march 2026 and ends with an intensive the Haague, Nederlands 18-22.5.2026.

Materials

See course description in English on the course page in Microsoft Teams.

Teaching methods

See course description in English on the course page in Microsoft Teams.

International connections

The course is a collaboration with students and teachers from AP UAS, Belgium, The Hague UAS, Netherlands and Novia UAS, Finland

Student workload

Students are admitted to the course by justifying their participation. Course registration is made by e-mail to the course coordinator, daniela.sundell@novia.fi before 17.12.2025. In the request, you answer the question; "Why is it important that I get a place in the course?"

If you have been admitted and are prevented from participating, contact the course coordinator immediately by e-mail so that the place on the course can go to the following student on the registration list.

Students who have registered for the course will receive a notification if they have been admitted before 19.12.2025. Any reserve places will be distributed until the course begins.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

Group work, group presentation and individual reflections will be graded according to the scale
Pass/Fail:
- Preparation according to the instructions
- Active participation during the meetings
- Content of the presentation is relevant and based on reliable sources
- The presentation is given in a visual and understandable way
- Ability to reflect on ones own learning process

Objective

Student:
-can communicate in a professional way orally and in writing in the situations that arise in working life
-masters central terminology in their own field and can assimilate the main content of non-fiction in their field
-is positive about developing their receptive and productive language skills
-is aware of cultural differences in communication

Content

-working life related documents
-field-specific communication in working life

Location and time

Lessons on campus.

Materials

Material directed by the course coordinator

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises, discussions etc.

Student workload

81 h for 3 sp (27 h = 1 sp)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

Oral exam (0-5), written exam (0-5), and other assignments (pass).

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate competencies and uncompleted/failed assignments.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Superficial competencies and a basic understanding of the subject. The student has partly followed instructions.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Adequate competencies and the ability to make connections to the literature. The student is able to reflect on their views and explain their reasoning. The student has followed the instructions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates advanced competencies and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to their future profession. The student has followed the instructions and completed the assignments well.

Qualifications

Graduation from the second stage.

Objective

Student:
-can communicate in a professional way orally and in writing in the situations that arise in working life
-masters central terminology in their own field and can assimilate the main content of non-fiction in their field
-is positive about developing their receptive and productive language skills
-is aware of cultural differences in communication

Content

-working life related documents
-field-specific communication in working life

Location and time

Spring 2026

Materials

Material directed by the course coordinator

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises, discussions etc.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Qualifications

Graduation from the second stage.

Objective

The student:
- can work according to the principles of internal leadership in an interprofessional environment.
- knows the basics of entrepreneurship and can operate cost-effectively.
- has knowledge of entrepreneurship in social and health care.

Content

- entrepreneurship
- inner leadership
- entrepreneurship within social and health care enterprise
- budgeting and final accounts

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- can work according to the principles of internal leadership in an interprofessional environment.
- knows the basics of entrepreneurship and can operate cost-effectively.
- has knowledge of entrepreneurship in social and health care.

Content

- entrepreneurship
- inner leadership
- entrepreneurship within social and health care enterprise
- budgeting and final accounts

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The Student
- has insights into entrepreneurship within Social and Health Care
- knows what company establishment means
- develops skills for planning and implementing a business model
- develops an understanding for entrepreneurship and social innovations
- has the prerequisites to cooperate in inter professional activities

Content

Entrepreneurship within Social Welfare, Health Care and Beauty Care
Practical Entrepreneurship
The Procedure of Becoming an Approved Service Provider within Social Welfare and Health Care
Business Model
Social Innovations
Strategies to Strengthen Cooperation
Inter Professional Learning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No prior prerequisite

Further information

-

Objective

The Student:
- has insights into entrepreneurship in social and health care
- knows what company establishment means
- develops skills in planning and implementing business plans
- develops understanding of entrepreneurship and social innovations
- has the prerequisites to cooperate in inter professional activities

Content

- entrepreneurship in the social, health and beauty industries
- practical entrepreneurship
- the process of becoming an approved service provider in social and health care
- business plan
- social innovations
- strategies to strengthen collaboration
- inter professional learning

Location and time

The course is delivered via the Moodle platform.
An introductory session will be held live on Teams on 9 January from 9:00 to 10:00. The session will be recorded and made available for students unable to attend live.

The course commences on 9 January 2026 and runs until 31 March 2026.

Materials

Study materials and recommended reading are available on Moodle

Teaching methods

Web-based lectures including PowerPoint presentations, video materials, knowledge assessments, and reflective assignments.

Exam schedules

Examination is conducted in accordance with the instructions provided in Moodle. The assessment includes open-book tests and reflective assignments.

Student workload

3 cp = 81h

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass (Approved):
Assignments have been submitted in accordance with the provided instructions
Tests have been completed and results achieved according to the specified instructions and criteria
The student is able to reflect on and justify their own opinions

Fail (Not Approved):
Assignments not submitted or failed

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

Education for nurses: VÅV22U02 Leadership, entrepreneurship and innovation
Nursing: NU22NR04 Innovation, Leadership and Entrepreneurship in Nursing

Objective

The Student:
- has insights into entrepreneurship in social and health care
- knows what company establishment means
- develops skills in planning and implementing business plans
- develops understanding of entrepreneurship and social innovations
- has the prerequisites to cooperate in inter professional activities

Content

- entrepreneurship in the social, health and beauty industries
- practical entrepreneurship
- the process of becoming an approved service provider in social and health care
- business plan
- social innovations
- strategies to strengthen collaboration
- inter professional learning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

Education for nurses: VÅV22U02 Leadership, entrepreneurship and innovation
Nursing: NU22NR04 Innovation, Leadership and Entrepreneurship in Nursing

Objective

The Student:
- has insights into entrepreneurship in social and health care
- knows what company establishment means
- develops skills in planning and implementing business plans
- develops understanding of entrepreneurship and social innovations
- has the prerequisites to cooperate in inter professional activities

Content

- entrepreneurship in the social, health and beauty industries
- practical entrepreneurship
- the process of becoming an approved service provider in social and health care
- business plan
- social innovations
- strategies to strengthen collaboration
- inter professional learning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

Education for nurses: VÅV22U02 Leadership, entrepreneurship and innovation
Nursing: NU22NR04 Innovation, Leadership and Entrepreneurship in Nursing

Objective

The student
- is familiar with the conceptual and theoretical foundation of ethnocentrism, racism, discrimination, and related concepts (intersectionality, populism, and nativism, among others)
- is familiar with the historical legacies of migration, new and old minorities, racism, and discrimination in Europe, the Nordics and in Finland, in particular
- can analyse and critically discuss salient issues, institutions and practices in the Nordics in respect of the theme of the course

Content

- The conceptual and theoretical foundation of the themes of the course (ethnocentrism, racism and discrimination), as well as on related themes, such as intersectionality, nativism and populism
- Historical legacies of migration, racism and discrimination in Europe and the Nordics
- New and old (established) minorities in the Nordic countries
- Contemporary issues, among others, the rise and consolidation of populist parties, institutional racism and segregation in present-day society, legal frameworks, racist violence and crime in Finland

Location and time

Date, time and venue
11.03.2026 09.00 - 11.30 W31-C121
16.03.2026 09.00 - 11.30 W31-C121
25.03.2026 09.00 - 11.30 W31-E133
01.04.2026 12.30 - 15.00 W31-E133
22.04.2026 09.00 - 11.30 W31-C121
04.05.2026 09.00 - 11.30 W31-C117
07.05.2026 09.00 - 11.30 W31-C117
11.05.2026 09.00 - 11.30 will be published later

Materials

Recommended literature is presented during lectures and on the Moodle platform of the course.
Students will also need to include relevant literataure on their selected topics of presentation.

Teaching methods

The course is realised through lectures, including video materials; literature studies; workshops; and student's oral presentations.

Employer connections

---

Exam schedules

The examination of the course is based on active engagement during lectures and workshops, and on student-led presentations of given topics, including written contributions as a basis of the presentations.

International connections

The course is offered both to degree programme students and to exchange students from different countries.

Completion alternatives

---

Student workload

The course equals to 5 ECTS, approximately 135 h, of which 24 h are scheduled in class and approximately 100 h consist of independent studies.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature.
The student can reflect on and motivate his/her point of view.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession.

Assessment methods and criteria

Successful completion requires both oral and written contributions that demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the themes in focus.
The evaluation (grading) will be based on
1. participation
2. presentations of selected topics, including: content accuracy; relevance; presentation clarity and engagement
3. the written component.

See also "Uppgifter om studieperioden" in respect of grading.

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student:
-deepens knowledge and skills in a key area of competence in their own professional field
- can identify research and development needs and systematically develop their profession to promote welfare
- can carry out a study or development work in a structured and methodical manner
- can apply the ethical principles and recommendations for research and development activities

Content

Thesis

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

Completed studies at least 120 credits including the courses Research Methodology and Project Work and Research and Development Methodology

Objective

The Student:
-deepens knowledge and skills in a key area of competence in their own professional field
- can identify research and development needs and systematically develop their profession to promote welfare
- can carry out a study or development work in a structured and methodical manner
- can apply the ethical principles and recommendations for research and development activities

Content

Thesis

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

Completed studies at least 120 credits including the courses Research Methodology and Project Work and Research and Development Methodology

Objective

The Student:
-deepens knowledge and skills in a key area of competence in their own professional field
- can identify research and development needs and systematically develop their profession to promote welfare
- can carry out a study or development work in a structured and methodical manner
- can apply the ethical principles and recommendations for research and development activities

Content

Thesis

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

Completed studies at least 120 credits including the courses Research Methodology and Project Work and Research and Development Methodology

Objective

The student:
- deepens his/her level of knowledge and skills in a central area of competence within his/her professional field.
- can identify research and development needs and systematically develop his/her professional field.
- can conduct a research or development work in a structured and methodical manner.
- can carry out research and development activities in a group.
- can apply the research ethical principles to the thesis.
- has the ability to critically review research and development work and is able to argue in a professional manner.

Content

Final Thesis

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

120 cr including Introduction to Academic Studies 5 cr and Research and Development Methodology 5 cr

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of education and can adopt the main content of specialised literature.
- can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge.
- is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both orally and in writing.

Content

- terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
- oral and written communication
- oral and written presentations
- language correctness and language planning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of education and can adopt the main content of specialised literature.
- can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge.
- is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both orally and in writing.

Content

- terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
- oral and written communication
- oral and written presentations
- language correctness and language planning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

See syllabus

Content

See syllabus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

See syllabus

Objective

See syllabus

Content

See syllabus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

See syllabus

Objective

See syllabus

Content

See syllabus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

See syllabus

Objective

See syllabus

Content

See syllabus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

See syllabus

Objective

See syllabus

Content

See syllabus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

See syllabus

Objective

See syllabus

Content

See syllabus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

See syllabus

Objective

See syllabus

Content

See syllabus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

See syllabus

Objective

See syllabus

Content

See syllabus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

See syllabus

Objective

See syllabus

Content

See syllabus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

See syllabus

Objective

See syllabus

Content

See syllabus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

See syllabus

Objective

Student:
- has basic practical skills in speech and writing for the profession.
- is familiar with professional texts and terminology in his own field of work.

Content

- the terminology in the professional field
- oral presentation
- written petition
-language correctness

Location and time

Spring 2026

Materials

Matrial on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

Knowledege on the B1 level

Objective

The Student:
- can orally and in writing deal with topics relating to one's own industry
- masters the central vocabulary of one's own industry
- masters the industry-typical communication situations
- can write and present central documents in professional Finnish, is aware of style differences and can use different styles in communication
- can understand the essence of various articles, texts and news related to one's own profession
- demonstrates the knowledge of Finnish required by law (424/2003) by civil servants and should demonstrate satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) the ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.

Content

- the texts and terminology of their own area of work
- oral and written working life communication
- oral and written examination
- language correctness

Location and time

Autumn 2025.

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

Knowledge on the B1 level

Objective

The Student:
- can orally and in writing deal with topics relating to one's own industry
- masters the central vocabulary of one's own industry
- masters the industry-typical communication situations
- can write and present central documents in professional Finnish, is aware of style differences and can use different styles in communication
- can understand the essence of various articles, texts and news related to one's own profession
- demonstrates the knowledge of Finnish required by law (424/2003) by civil servants and should demonstrate satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) the ability to use Finnish in speech and writing.

Content

- the texts and terminology of their own area of work
- oral and written working life communication
- oral and written examination
- language correctness

Location and time

Spring 2026.

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

Knowledge on the B1 level

Objective

The Student:
- knows the basics of development work
- know and understand the basic concepts of research methodology and the research process
- know and understand key data collection, analysis and reporting methods and can apply them in their own field of science and profession
- can apply and evaluate research ethics in research and development activities
- can write and argue scientifically

Content

the parts and importance of development work and the research process for one's own profession
- basic concepts of research methodology
- qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods
- scientific reporting
- ethical principles of research
- scientific writing and reasoning

Location and time

See schedule

Materials

1. Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
2. Kvale, S. (1997) Kvalitativ forskningsintervju. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
3. Ejlertsson, Göran. 2019 eller tidigare. Statistik för hälsovetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Tredje upplagan eller tidigare.

Teaching methods

Lectures, exercises in computer class, literature, participation in seminars

Exam schedules

The examination or alternative method of evaluation takes place no later than at the end of the course, taking into consideration students' other courses.

Completion alternatives

Research methods (4 cr.)
This part of the course is graded according to the scale 1-5 based on examinations or written assignments or exercises.
Swedish (1 cr.):
This part of the course is graded pass/fail.

The evaluation is weighted according to the share of individual parts of the examination.

Student workload

27 h per credit, in total 135 h.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

Research methods (4 cr.)
- The student is expected to demonstrate knowledge of scientific methodology through an examination, including performing a basic statistical analysis.
Swedish (1 cr.):
-The student shall demonstrate knowledge of academic writing through examination. To pass, the rules of academic writing must be followed in a written assignment.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Research methods (4 cr.)
- The student has insufficient knowledge of scientific methods, and cannot perform a basic type of statistical analysis.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Research methods (4 cr.)
The student has in the examination demonstrated a basic but very weak knowledge of scientific methods. Notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Research methods (4 cr.)
The student has in the examination demonstrated a notable knowledge of scientific methods. The student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Research methods (4 cr.)
The student has in the examination demonstrated an excellent knowledge of scientific methods. The student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

Qualifications

Research Methodology and Project Work

Objective

The Student:
- has basic insights into knowledge theory, theory of science, research, and development methodology
- understands the research process and how the different parts interact with each other
-has basic skills in carrying out projects, research and development work
-understand and can describe in qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests

Content

-basic science theory and research and development methodology concepts
-general logical rules and methodological principles and methods for data collection and analysis
-the basics of project activities

Location and time

See schedule

Materials

Recommended literature:
Ahnlund, P. & Sauer, L. 2021. Att forska i socialt arbete. Utmaningar, förhållningssätt och metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. According to instructions.
Denscombe, M. 2016. Forskningshandboken - för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Eklund, S. 2010. Arbeta i projekt - individen, gruppen, ledaren. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Patel, R. & Davidson, R. (1994 eller senare upplaga). Forskningsmetodikens grunder. Att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur. 2. upplagan.
Rosing, H. (1984 eller tidigare upplaga) Vetenskapens logiska grunder. Hangö: Schildts.
Other literature suggested by the examiner.

Teaching methods

Lectures and small scale exercises

Exam schedules

The written assignments must be submitted before the end date of the course, alternatively the written test is held before the end date.

Completion alternatives

Written assignments, alternatively a written test.

Student workload

27 h per credit, 81 h in total.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student possesses a basic competence in the subject / The student does not show sufficient competence in the subject

Assessment methods and criteria

Through the assignment and/or the written test, the student is expected to demonstrate fundamental knowledge of epistemology, research methodology, as well as scientific critique and assessment of sources

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student lacks fundamental knowledge of epistemology, research methodology, project management, as well as scientific criticque and assessment of sources

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has limited knowledge of epistemology, research methodology and project management, as well as scientific criticque and assessment of sources

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates good knowledge of epistemology, research methodology and project management, as well as scientific criticque and assessment of sources

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates excellent knowledge of epistemology, research methodology, project management, as well as scientific criticque and assessment of sources

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The student:
- understands how functional methods can be applied in the interaction with different target groups.
- can promote participation, engagement and reflection among the target group by means of functional methods.

Content

- process guidance and group dynamics
- resource-enhancing perspective
- creative methods
- movement-based methods
- communication, participation and reflection
- guidance through functional methods

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- understands how functional methods can be applied in the interaction with different target groups.
- can promote participation, engagement and reflection among the target group by means of functional methods.

Content

- process guidance and group dynamics
- resource-enhancing perspective
- creative methods
- movement-based methods
- communication, participation and reflection
- guidance through functional methods

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of various disabilities as well as the impact of disabilities on an individual's living conditions.
- can guide people with disabilities in terms of rights and forms of service.
- can promote participation, self-determination and functional ability among people with disabilities.
- is able to consider accessibility aspects in client work and knows about alternatives and supplementary communication.

Content

- diagnoses and living conditions for people with disabilities in different life situations
- the service user perspective, the family- and kinship perspective, legal certainty and participation
- social counselling, service systems, forms of support and processes
- assistive tools and accessibility for people with disabilities
- alternative and supplementary communication

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The Student:
- can identify the resources and risks of pupils and students in everyday life and the school community
- has knowledge of the role and tasks of the school counselor and includes a pupil- and student-centered approach
- has knowledge of objectives, central legislation and current governance documents in student and student care work
- can plan, apply and evaluate common and individual working methods that promote, maintain and create conditions for well-being in the school community in inter-professional cooperation

Content

- the professional image of the school counselor from preschool to second stage
- risks and resources in the everyday lives of schoolchildren and teenagers
- prevention and intervention in bullying
- the structure of pupil and student care, governance documents and legislation
- school professionals, actors, and partners
- health promotion and prevention in schools
- cooperation with guardians and other related parties
- student-centered working methods

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student:
- can identify the resources and risks of pupils and students in everyday life and the school community
- has knowledge of the role and tasks of the school counselor and includes a pupil- and student-centered approach
- has knowledge of objectives, central legislation and current governance documents in student and student care work
- can plan, apply and evaluate common and individual working methods that promote, maintain and create conditions for well-being in the school community in inter-professional cooperation

Content

- the professional image of the school counselor from preschool to second stage
- risks and resources in the everyday lives of schoolchildren and teenagers
- prevention and intervention in bullying
- the structure of pupil and student care, governance documents and legislation
- school professionals, actors, and partners
- health promotion and prevention in schools
- cooperation with guardians and other related parties
- student-centered working methods

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student:
- is familiar with key methods used in social work
- are prepared to prevent individuals and groups from being marginalized in society
- can analyse factors that lead to vulnerability
- can critically reflect on various professional efforts in the social field and assess repercussions from both an individual and a larger societal and societal perspective
- have knowledge / understanding of the structure and structure of Finnish social protection
- can supervise clients on issues related to the central benefits of Finnish social security

Content

- services under the Social Welfare Act
- support in the child's home conditions and parenthood
-family center model
-methods to prevent and prevent marginalisation from a life cycle perspective
-factors leading to vulnerability
- use of preventive support measures
-social assistance

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student:
- is familiar with key methods used in social work
- are prepared to prevent individuals and groups from being marginalized in society
- can analyse factors that lead to vulnerability
- can critically reflect on various professional efforts in the social field and assess repercussions from both an individual and a larger societal and societal perspective
- have knowledge / understanding of the structure and structure of Finnish social protection
- can supervise clients on issues related to the central benefits of Finnish social security

Content

- services under the Social Welfare Act
- support in the child's home conditions and parenthood
-family center model
-methods to prevent and prevent marginalisation from a life cycle perspective
-factors leading to vulnerability
- use of preventive support measures
-social assistance

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student
- can work according to the Core Curriculum of Early Childhood Education and Care, values and recommendations
- can, in collaboration with other staff, plan, implement, document, evaluate and develop the activities and the learning environment
- can promote and support the child's and family's participation and opportunities for influence
- can promote equality and security for children and families and can work for an environment that respects diversity
- has a sensitive approach to the child and can support the guardians in the fostering work

Content

- legislation concerning early childhood education and care
- the Core Curriculum of Early Childhood Education and Care and recommendations within the field
- pedagogical documentation, child-centered evaluation and quality- and development work
- participation of children and families and opportunities for influence
- fostering cooperation
- cultural diversity as a resource
- the importance of the fostering and learning environment for the child's development, learning and well-being
- prevention of and intervention in bullying
- norm-critical pedagogy

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The Student
- can work according to the Core Curriculum of Early Childhood Education and Care, values and recommendations
- can, in collaboration with other staff, plan, implement, document, evaluate and develop the activities and the learning environment
- can promote and support the child's and family's participation and opportunities for influence
- can promote equality and security for children and families and can work for an environment that respects diversity
- has a sensitive approach to the child and can support the guardians in the fostering work

Content

- legislation concerning early childhood education and care
- the Core Curriculum of Early Childhood Education and Care and recommendations within the field
- pedagogical documentation, child-centered evaluation and quality- and development work
- participation of children and families and opportunities for influence
- fostering cooperation
- cultural diversity as a resource
- the importance of the fostering and learning environment for the child's development, learning and well-being
- prevention of and intervention in bullying
- norm-critical pedagogy

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- understands the most central theories and principles within social pedagogy.
- can reflect on how the core values, choice of goals and working methods affect the nature of the work and results.

Content

- development trends and tasks within social pedagogy
- the central concepts and operating principles of social pedagogy
- the three orientations of the social pedagogical activities
- the areas of activity in social pedagogy
- the core values of social pedagogy

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- understands the most central theories and principles within social pedagogy.
- can reflect on how the core values, choice of goals and working methods affect the nature of the work and results.

Content

- development trends and tasks within social pedagogy
- the central concepts and operating principles of social pedagogy
- the three orientations of the social pedagogical activities
- the areas of activity in social pedagogy
- the core values of social pedagogy

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- understands the most central theories and principles within social pedagogy.
- can reflect on how the core values, choice of goals and working methods affect the nature of the work and results.

Content

- development trends and tasks within social pedagogy
- the central concepts and operating principles of social pedagogy
- the three orientations of the social pedagogical activities
- the areas of activity in social pedagogy
- the core values of social pedagogy

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of the structure and development of the welfare system.
- has knowledge of how social policy is realised in various arenas in society.
- is familiar with national and global social policy concepts, trends and challenges.

Content

- the central concepts of social policy, welfare models and subfields
- the historical development of the welfare system
- the state, municipalities, the third and the private sectors as welfare actors
- strategies, trends and challenges in the welfare sector and the welfare economy
- opportunities to influence within issues related to social policy

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of the structure and development of the welfare system.
- has knowledge of how social policy is realised in various arenas in society.
- is familiar with national and global social policy concepts, trends and challenges.

Content

- the central concepts of social policy, welfare models and subfields
- the historical development of the welfare system
- the state, municipalities, the third and the private sectors as welfare actors
- strategies, trends and challenges in the welfare sector and the welfare economy
- opportunities to influence within issues related to social policy

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with the theoretical basics of social work, its target groups and forms of activity.
- develops a professional and client-centered approach to vulnerable individuals and groups in society.

Content

- human rights and equality
- central definitions and concepts
- social work at individual, family, group and community level
- the social work's target groups and forms of activity
- the client process
- participation, separation of powers and professionalism in social work

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with the theoretical basics of social work, its target groups and forms of activity.
- develops a professional and client-centered approach to vulnerable individuals and groups in society.

Content

- human rights and equality
- central definitions and concepts
- social work at individual, family, group and community level
- the social work's target groups and forms of activity
- the client process
- participation, separation of powers and professionalism in social work

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- knows the central theoretical and conceptual perspectives of sociology.
- can interpret and explain the relationship between the individual and society from a sociological perspective.
- is familiar with current sociological research.

Content

- central sociological concepts and theories
- classics in sociology
- the fields of research within sociology
- the relation between the individual and society
- contemporary central themes

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- knows the central theoretical and conceptual perspectives of sociology.
- can interpret and explain the relationship between the individual and society from a sociological perspective.
- is familiar with current sociological research.

Content

- central sociological concepts and theories
- classics in sociology
- the fields of research within sociology
- the relation between the individual and society
- contemporary central themes

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The Student:
- knows the basic concepts of sociology and current research areas of particular importance to social workers
- can identify the basic features and changes in Finnish society from a social science perspective
- understands the factors that affect human and group social behavior

Content

-everyday sociology
-social roles
-socialization and identity
-social stratification
-poverty and social exclusion
- close relationships and their importance
- disease and health from a sociological perspective
- gender, gender minorities, gender, and gender equality
-ethnicity, religion, and culture from a sociological perspective

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student possesses a basic competence in the subject / The student does not show sufficient competence in the subject

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student:
- knows the basic concepts of sociology and current research areas of particular importance to social workers
- can identify the basic features and changes in Finnish society from a social science perspective
- understands the factors that affect human and group social behavior

Content

-everyday sociology
-social roles
-socialization and identity
-social stratification
-poverty and social exclusion
- close relationships and their importance
- disease and health from a sociological perspective
- gender, gender minorities, gender, and gender equality
-ethnicity, religion, and culture from a sociological perspective

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student possesses a basic competence in the subject / The student does not show sufficient competence in the subject

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of service systems and legislation within the area of immigration and integration.
- can work with a culture-sensitive and integration promoting approach.
- can promote intercultural encounters and environments.

Content

- immigration, integration, refugee and asylum
- cultural sensitivity and cultural competence
- integration laws
- the integration process
- the service system for asylum seekers and quota refugees

Location and time

Scheduled lectures
15.9 8.15-16
16.9 8.15-16
30.9 12.15-16 ONLINE
6.10 8.15-16
7.10 8.15-16

Please inform teacher if you cannot attend first lecture.

All scheduled lectures are mandatory. In case of absence, a compensatory assignment must be completed. However, to complete the course students must attend at least two class sessions (2/4)

Materials

Refugee’s Journey to the Municipality training, IOM
Paloma training THL
My story, workbook Centre for Psychotraumatology
Act on the Promotion of Immigrant Integration
(1386/2010)
Aliens Act
(301/2004)
Act on the Integration of Immigrants and Reception of Asylum Seekers
https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990493.pdf

Teaching methods

The course is conducted through four in-person study days and one online session, consisting of lectures, workshops, study visits, and literature studies.

Employer connections

Study visit to local organizations that work with immigrant/integration.

Exam schedules

Deadlines
part I: deadline 26.9, Quota Refugee Assignment
part II: deadline 3.10, Integration Services Assignment
Part III: deadline 10.10, Assignment on Inclusion and Intercultural Competence

Student workload

3 credits consisting of

1 credit attendance in class (Approved/Not approved)
0,5 credit Quota refugee assignment (Approved/ Not approved)
0,5 credit Integration services assignment (1-5)
1 credit Assignment on Inclusion and Intercultural Competence (1-5)

Further information

The Course is conducted in English but Assignments can be written in Swedish.
Language skills are not assessed and do not affect the assessment.

Direct copy from AI such as chatgtp or copilot are prohibited when making essay or other text documents. Copy from AI is considered cheating. Use of AI is allowed when used correctly according to Novias rules, but must be clearly documented in submitted assignments.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment on a scale 1-5

Assessment criteria

Ability to apply Theoretical Framework on Multicultural Practice, comprehending the Level of Complexity in working with Immigrants and Good Ethical and Professional Approach and Attitude.

Feedback will be provided in Moodle within 3 weeks of all Assignments being handed in.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of service systems and legislation within the area of immigration and integration.
- can work with a culture-sensitive and integration promoting approach.
- can promote intercultural encounters and environments.

Content

- immigration, integration, refugee and asylum
- cultural sensitivity and cultural competence
- integration laws
- the integration process
- the service system for asylum seekers and quota refugees

Location and time

Scheduled teaching sessions:

Friday 24.10 8.15 - 16
Saturday 25.10 9 - 15

All scheduled Lectures are Mandatory. In case of Absence, a Compensatory Assignment must be completed.

Materials

Refugee’s Journey to the Municipality training, IOM
Paloma training THL
My story, workbook Centre for Psychotraumatology
Act on the Promotion of Immigrant Integration
(1386/2010)
Aliens Act
(301/2004)
Act on the Integration of Immigrants and Reception of Asylum Seekers
https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990493.pdf

Teaching methods

Course in conducted through Class Lectures and Individual Assignments in Moodle.

Exam schedules

Attendance in class 24-25.10
Assignments in Moodle can be handed in individually during 10.10-15.12
Part I: International Refugee Work
Part II: Quota Refugee Reception
Part III: Life in a Reception Center
Part IV: Culture Sensitive Approach

Student workload

3 credits consisting of

1 credit attendance in class (Approved/Not approved)
2 credits individual assignments in Moodle

Further information

Direct copy from AI such as chatgtp or copilot are prohibited when making essay or other text documents. Copy from AI is considered cheating. Use of AI is allowed when used correctly according to Novias rules, but must be clearly documented in submitted assignments.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

Assessment on a scale 1-5

Assessment criteria

Ability to apply Theoretical Framework on Multicultural Practice, comprehending the Level of Complexity in working with Immigrants and Good Ethical and Professional Approach and Attitude.

Feedback will be provided in Moodle within 3 weeks of all Assignments being handed in.

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of service systems and legislation within the area of immigration and integration.
- can work with a culture-sensitive and integration promoting approach.
- can promote intercultural encounters and environments.

Content

- immigration, integration, refugee and asylum
- cultural sensitivity and cultural competence
- integration laws
- the integration process
- the service system for asylum seekers and quota refugees

Location and time

Course Assignment, a portfolio, can be submitted in Moodle between 19.1.2026 - 7.12.2026.
This Course in open in Moodle between 1.1.2026 - 31.12.2026

Materials

Lag om främjande av integration 681/2023
https://www.finlex.fi/eli?uri=http://data.finlex.fi/eli/sd/2023/681/ajantasa/2025-06-27/swe

Lag om mottagande av personer som söker internationellt skydd och om identifiering av och hjälp till offer för människohandel 761/2011
https://www.finlex.fi/eli?uri=http://data.finlex.fi/eli/sd/2011/746/ajantasa/2024-07-05/swe

IOM - Flyktingens väg till kommunen - en handbok

integration.fi
migri.fi

Teaching methods

The Course is online and assignments and exercises are found in Moodle

Exam schedules

Portfolio Assignment, 3 ect

Portfolio consists of Six Parts;
Part 1: Migration and International Protection
Part 2: International Refugee Work
Part 3: Quota refugees
Part 3: Reception System in Finland
Part 4: Intercultural competence and -communication
Part 5: Integration services

Student workload

Portfolio can be handed in between 19.1.26- 7.12.26

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

Criteria of Assessment:
Ability to acquire up-to-date information on the subject from current official sources and governing documents. Knowledge of legal rights and obligations of the Immigrant connected to the integration process. Ability to reflect on the concept of cultural competence and ability to apply theoretical framework on multicultural practice. Good ethical and professional approach and attitude.

Individual feedback will be given in Moodle within 3 weeks after the student has handed in the Study Portfolio

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

H-5

For an approved performance, the scope, content and design of the portfolio meet the specified instructions and the student demonstrates values in accordance with social services ethical code.

portfolio will be assessed on the scale scale of
Superficial knowledge 1-2
Good knowledge and commitment 3-4
Advanced knowledge and commitment 5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The Student:
-can identify individual and societal processes regarding immigration and migration
- knows about central immigration policy and legislation in Finland
- can work to reduce and prevent racism and segregation
- knows the basics/starting points of international diaconal work, mission and the intercultural work of the Church and can apply them to work in the parish
- develops a professional and dialogueal approach that supports participation and human rights locally and globally

Content

- interculturality in society
- integration support service
- church as sanctuary
- missionary activities and organization of missionary activities
- missionary education
- engaging with people from diverse cultural and religious backgrounds
-integration and participatory activities
- respectful religious and ecumenical dialogue

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student possesses a basic competence in the subject / The student does not show sufficient competence in the subject

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of his/her professional field and its basic concept.
- has knowledge of the structure and organisation of social- and health care, its service systems, and future visions.
- has knowledge of legislation within social- and health care.
- has basic skills in interprofessional work.
- sees social and health care as a fundamental right to promote equal health and welfare.

Content

- the social field
- the social work profession
- management structures and service systems
- the basics of social legislation
- general legislation in social- and health care
- interprofessional work
- link between social and health care and sustainable development and responsibility

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of his/her professional field and its basic concept.
- has knowledge of the structure and organisation of social- and health care, its service systems, and future visions.
- has knowledge of legislation within social- and health care.
- has basic skills in interprofessional work.
- sees social and health care as a fundamental right to promote equal health and welfare.

Content

- the social field
- the social work profession
- management structures and service systems
- the basics of social legislation
- general legislation in social- and health care
- interprofessional work
- link between social and health care and sustainable development and responsibility

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student
- knows his own college and his education
- is familiar with the functions and tools that support the study process
- reflects on studies, future plans and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning and profession
- can create his/her own knowledge and create his/her own personal learning environments
- can search and critically evaluate information
- can work with others in groups and teams

Content

- Study information and learning in a higher education context
- Group processes
- Information search
- Introduction to your own profession

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

The student possesses a basic competence in the subject / The student does not show sufficient competence in the subject

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with his/her UAS and field of education.
- understands the link between the education and the agenda for sustainable development, responsibility and carbon neutrality.
- knows what is expected of a UAS student.
- is able to use general digital programmes to produce text, film and audio files as well as to communicate.
- can realise small-scale projects.
- has knowledge of the central national and international databases within his/her own field of science.
- knows the basics of a scientific approach and is able to search and review scientific information.

Content

- the central documents and virtual platforms of the university and education
- sustainability, responsibility and carbon neutrality in the social field
- study style, reading and note-taking technique
- time planning and stress management
- text processing and implementation of Novia UAS's writing instructions
- audio and video recording and editing
- different forms of communication by using digital programmes
- project methodology
- searching for scientific information in various databases
- Perspective of knowledge in different fields of science
- Evaluating the reliability and scientific credibility of the information

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with his/her UAS and field of education.
- understands the link between the education and the agenda for sustainable development, responsibility and carbon neutrality.
- knows what is expected of a UAS student.
- is able to use general digital programmes to produce text, film and audio files as well as to communicate.
- can realise small-scale projects.
- has knowledge of the central national and international databases within his/her own field of science.
- knows the basics of a scientific approach and is able to search and review scientific information.

Content

- the central documents and virtual platforms of the university and education
- sustainability, responsibility and carbon neutrality in the social field
- study style, reading and note-taking technique
- time planning and stress management
- text processing and implementation of Novia UAS's writing instructions
- audio and video recording and editing
- different forms of communication by using digital programmes
- project methodology
- searching for scientific information in various databases
- Perspective of knowledge in different fields of science
- Evaluating the reliability and scientific credibility of the information

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of client groups in need of social service guidance and social rehabilitation.
- can work with client processes, mapping support measures and service planning.
- has knowledge of structured documentation within social care.
- can participate and mentor individuals and groups in need of social service guidance and social rehabilitation in a participatory manner.

Content

- concepts and theoretical frame of reference
- central legislation, service systems and social benefits
- service and client plans
- the client process
- mapping of service needs (ICF)
- principles for structured documentation
- client-related interest surveillance and guardianship
- professional role and personal professionalism
- communication and conversation technique
- client-centered, resource-enhancing and participation-promoting ways of working
- relationship and supervision skills

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of client groups in need of social service guidance and social rehabilitation.
- can work with client processes, mapping support measures and service planning.
- has knowledge of structured documentation within social care.
- can participate and mentor individuals and groups in need of social service guidance and social rehabilitation in a participatory manner.

Content

- concepts and theoretical frame of reference
- central legislation, service systems and social benefits
- service and client plans
- the client process
- mapping of service needs (ICF)
- principles for structured documentation
- client-related interest surveillance and guardianship
- professional role and personal professionalism
- communication and conversation technique
- client-centered, resource-enhancing and participation-promoting ways of working
- relationship and supervision skills

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

None

Objective

Student:
- can communicate orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
- knows the process of scientific writing and can use reference systems
- can use different ways to search for information and report according to the rules for standard layout

Students with Finnish as their schooling language must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required by public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should show satisfactory (grades 1-3) or good (grades 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written ability are assessed separately

Content

Plain language and scientific writing
Oral presentation

Location and time

Lectures on campus

Materials

Material directed by the lecturer

Teaching methods

Lectures on communication, searching for information, source criticism, academic writing and techniques for presenting.

Discussions, exercises and assignments.

Exam schedules

Presentation (0-5), essay (0-5) and other assignments (pass/fail).

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Inadequate competencies and uncompleted/failed assignments.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Superficial competencies and a basic understanding of the subject. The student has partly followed instructions.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Adequate competencies and the ability to make connections to the literature. The student is able to reflect on their views and explain their reasoning. The student has followed the instructions.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates advanced competencies and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to their future profession. The student has followed the instructions and completed the assignments well.

Qualifications

Graduation from the second stage

Objective

The Student:
- has knowledge of the principles and application of confirmation pedagogy
- can plan, apply, document, evaluate and develop confirmation work, relief management activities and camp activities within the church
- can situationally respond to and support young people individually and in groups

Content

- the theological basis of confirmation and the confirmation plan
- confirmation pedagogy
- various forms of writing school - digital confirmation work
- auxiliary leadership activities
- the materials and methods of confirmation work
- cultural sensitive and inclusive approach

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

Demonstrates Knowledge Of A Selection Of Current Methods Within The Social Field
Is Able To Apply Selected Methods In Accordance With Theory And Procedures
Can Identify When Selected Methods Are Appropriate And Effective
Can Use Creative Approaches To Promote Well-Being And Counteract Social Risk Factors

Content

Selected Current Methods in the Social Field
Adapted Teaching Designs in Accordance With Current Partners and Organizations
Theoretical Background
Evaluation Tools
Working Methods and Tools

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Approved performance: Sufficient Knowledge of Creative Methods and the ability to apply them appropriately with a Client Group.
Unapproved performance: Displays Insufficient knowledge of Creative Methods and lacks the Ability to apply them appropriately with a Client Group.

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of trauma-conscious care
- have an understanding of the significance of the treatment in the work with people who have experienced a crisis or trauma
- can identify risks and consequences of perceived crisis and / or trauma
- can apply different methods in crisis and trauma work
- support and understand children and young people who have experienced trauma and / or crisis

Content

- Trauma-conscious care (TMO)
- The grieving process
- Children and trauma
- Treatment in crisis and trauma
- Respect for children's comprehension
- Mental first aid
- Crisis theory
- Consequences of trauma
- Debriefing
- Secondary trauma / Empathy fatigue
- Resilience

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The course competences are partly met

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The course competences are met

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The course competences are met with honors

Qualifications

No prerequisites

Objective

The student
- is familiar with the concept of gender awareness
- develops an understanding of gender diversity
- is able to use gender sensitive methods and material in client contacts
- has the prerequisites to supervise in matters concerning gender diversity

Content

- School information training
- Gender diversity and treatment
- Gender awareness in client work

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Passed
The student has followed examination task instructions and can reflect and motivate arguments and opinions. Examination tasks are submitted within dead-lines.

Failed
Examination tasks are not sufficiently comprehensive, are not completed or not submitted within dead-lines.

Qualifications

No requirements

Objective

The Student:
- can identify goals, strategies, visions, and development needs in the social field of activity
- has knowledge of practical leadership functions, human resources and financial management, administrative procedures, and management principles in the social field
- is prepared to act as a team leader for a working community in the social field, considering ethical principles and sustainable development
- is prepared to review, reflect on and define development needs in his own leadership
-knows about current changes in social and health care

Content

-leadership theories
-strategic leadership in social and health care: vision, mission, strategy, and business planning
-human resources management and administration in the public sector
conflict management
-leader's control documents, national development programs and trends in social and health care
-quality management
-leadership – to find your own values and personal leadership
- current changes

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student:
- can identify goals, strategies, visions, and development needs in the social field of activity
- has knowledge of practical leadership functions, human resources and financial management, administrative procedures, and management principles in the social field
- is prepared to act as a team leader for a working community in the social field, considering ethical principles and sustainable development
- is prepared to review, reflect on and define development needs in his own leadership
-knows about current changes in social and health care

Content

-leadership theories
-strategic leadership in social and health care: vision, mission, strategy, and business planning
-human resources management and administration in the public sector
conflict management
-leader's control documents, national development programs and trends in social and health care
-quality management
-leadership – to find your own values and personal leadership
- current changes

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The student:
- can serve as facilitator for civic orientation courses aimed at newcomers in Finland
- is familiar with the national material for civic orientation and can use it appropriately
- develops competencies in leading group activities

Content

- The 10 themes of civic orientation (Integration, Finnish Culture, Everyday Life and Working Life, Education, Family Life, Health and Wellbeing, Society and Civic Engagement, The Legal System and History of Finland)
- Planning the implementation of civic orientation for immigrants
- Introduction to leading group activities
- Practical session with own language group (ev. with interpreter)

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Presentation of a civic orientation theme
Submission of the written assignment
Planning and implementation of a practical session in a group
Minimum 50% attendance at lectures

Qualifications

Swedish B-level

Objective

The Student:
- can follow and promote the organization's goals and strategies - have knowledge of the employee's rights and obligations
-has the ability and tools to take care of one's own well-being at work and actively promote the working health of the working community - has a general readiness to interpret and apply the laws, regulations, collective agreements and other norms that regulate labour market conditions with particular emphasis on the social field

Content

- workers' and employer's rights and obligations
- employment agreements, collective agreements, and interest monitoring
- occupational health and guidance
- work security
- law on professionals in social care, identification, security, and reporting obligations
-central features of Finnish labour legislation
- privacy and data protection under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Location and time

Autumn 2025

Materials

Niklas Bruun. 2022. Den finska arbetsrättens grunder. Helsingfors: Alma Talent.
Eller
Niklas Bruun & Anders von Koskull. Allmän arbetsrätt. 2006 eller 2003. Helsingfors: Schildts Förlag,
or other literature designated by the examiner.

Teaching methods

Individual assignments, alternatively test.

Exam schedules

The assignment must be submitted no later than the last day of the implementation.

Completion alternatives

Lectures, written assignments, alternatively test.

Student workload

27 h per credit, in total 54 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

A written assignment through which the student's knowledge of Finnish labor legislation is assessed, alternatively through a test.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student demonstrates poor knowledge of Finnish labor legislation

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student demonstrates a very basic but weak knowledge of Finnish labor legislation

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates notable knowledge of Finnish labor legislation

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates excellent knowledge of Finnish labor legislation

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

The Student:
- can follow and promote the organization's goals and strategies - have knowledge of the employee's rights and obligations
-has the ability and tools to take care of one's own well-being at work and actively promote the working health of the working community - has a general readiness to interpret and apply the laws, regulations, collective agreements and other norms that regulate labour market conditions with particular emphasis on the social field

Content

- workers' and employer's rights and obligations
- employment agreements, collective agreements, and interest monitoring
- occupational health and guidance
- work security
- law on professionals in social care, identification, security, and reporting obligations
-central features of Finnish labour legislation
- privacy and data protection under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Location and time

Autumn 2025

Materials

Niklas Bruun. 2022. Den finska arbetsrättens grunder. Helsingfors: Alma Talent.
Eller
Niklas Bruun & Anders von Koskull. Allmän arbetsrätt. 2006 eller 2003. Helsingfors: Schildts Förlag,
or other literature designated by the examiner.

Teaching methods

Individual assignments, alternatively test.

Exam schedules

The assignment must be submitted no later than the last day of the implementation.

Completion alternatives

Lectures, written assignments, alternatively test.

Student workload

27 h per credit, in total 54 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

The student demonstrates superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

Assessment criteria, good (3)

The student demonstrates a competence that is related and linked to the literature
The student can reflect and motivate from his/her point of view

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has an immerse competence and shows a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the upcoming profession

Assessment methods and criteria

A written assignment through which the student's knowledge of Finnish labor legislation is assessed, alternatively through a test.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student demonstrates poor knowledge of Finnish labor legislation

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student demonstrates a very basic but weak knowledge of Finnish labor legislation

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates notable knowledge of Finnish labor legislation

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates excellent knowledge of Finnish labor legislation

Qualifications

No previous knowledge

Objective

- Knowledge of Psychological Support and Risk Factors related to Flight and Migration
- Understanding of culturally bound Factors that may influence the Integration Process
- Knowledge of the Theoretical Foundation of MindSpring
- Tools to apply MindSpring in accordance with the Manuals in a group of either Children, Youth, or Adults
- Tools to manage Emotions, Opinions, and Conflicts within a Support Group

Content

- Introduction to MindSpring as a Method and Practice
- Psychosocial Support and Psychoeducation among Refugees and Immigrants (First, Second, and Third Generation)
- Group dynamics in a Support Group
- Introduction to the MindSpring Manuals for Children, Youth, and Adults
- Selected themes and exercises from the Manuals
- Planning group implementation according to the MindSpring Method
- Trauma-informed approach

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved:
The student demonstrates solid knowledge of the subject.
The student is able to reason and reflect on key concepts based on evidence-based knowledge.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

After completing the course:
- Students master the basic tools in motivational conversation and can conduct a coherent dialogue.
- Are students prepared to hold conversations with people who have low, medium and high readiness for change
- Students understand the basic principles for using motivational interviewing with groups
- Students understand the basic principles for using motivational interviewing with clients with intellectual disabilities

Content

- Rehearsal of the basic tools within Motivational Interviewing
- Support self-confidence and autonomy
- Methods of resistance
- M I in case of cognitive and language difficulties
-Leading motivational conversations in groups

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Students have carried out an observation, interpreted and analyzed conversations and been able to use relevant tools. With the help of literature studies, the picture has been deepened by motivational conversations as a method.

Qualifications

Basic studies (1,5-2 sp) ) in Motivational Interviewing
This course is primarily for USO21D-V and USO22F-V