Academic year 2023 - 2024

•   Acute nursing care and best nursing practices VÅV14AK03-3006 24.08.2023-17.09.2023  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of emergency care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their loved ones
  - has readiness to care for patients of different ages in emergency care, in various traumas and disasters
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - can in a simulated situation be responsible for a safe drug treatment in emergency care

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Acute nursing care and best nursing practices

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional5
  
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Pediatrick care:
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Qvist, E. 2013. Lääkärinkäsikirja. Akuutisti sairas imeväinen.
  Qvist, E. & Korppi, M. 2009. Duodecim. Alle kolmen kuukauden ikäinen lapsi päivystysksessä.
  Rantala, H. & Eriksson, K. 2016 Kuoristava lapsi ja kuumekouristukset. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  
  Emergency care
  Wikström, J. 2018. Akutsjukvård. Omvårdnad och behandling vid akut sjukdom och skada. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. s. 13 – 306.
  Akuuttihoito-opas https://www.terveysportti.fi/dtk/aho/koti
  Lecture material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Gästföreläsningar - Obligatoriska
  Sammarbets projekt med VCS - Obligatoriskt
  Självstudier
  HLR projekt vecka 37 - obligatoriska
  
  Skriftlig tentamen i slutet av kursen (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Emergency care
  Mandatory attendance in the emergency care simulation project. Rating: GK / UK
  Mandatory attendance in the CPR project Certificate: GK / UK
  Emergency care exam: Grades: 5 - UK

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.08.2023 - 17.09.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Care suit and slippers are used in exercises

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Mandatory attendance at the lectures on pediatric emergency care
  Mandatory attendance in the emergency care simulation project
  Mandatory attendance in the CPR project
  Mandatory attendance in the lecture session in pediatric emergency care
  Approved clinical exercises

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Emergency care simulation in collaboration with VCS
  The CPR project in collaboration with VCS

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen: hösten 2023
  
  Omtentamen 1:
  
  Omtentamen 2: (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can work with others within the student group

•   Acute nursing care and best nursing practices VÅV14FK02-3005 24.08.2023-17.09.2023  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of emergency care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their loved ones
  - has readiness to care for patients of different ages in emergency care, in various traumas and disasters
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - can in a simulated situation be responsible for a safe drug treatment in emergency care

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Acute nursing care and best nursing practices

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ADULT EMERGENCY CARE
  Wikström, J. 2018. Akutsjukvård. Omvårdnad och behandling vid akut sjukdom och skada. Studentlitteratur, AB, Lund.
  Material on moodle
  
  Child emergency care
  Helminen, M. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti epiglottiitti. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Jartti, T., Mäkelä, M. & Remes, S. 2016. Akuutti astma ja uloshengitysvaikeus. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Rantala, H. & Eriksson, K. 2016. Kouristava lapsi ja kuumekouristukset. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Saxén, H. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti laryngiitti.Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Individual work
  Demonstrations
  Simulation exercises

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.08.2023 - 17.09.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Care suit and slippers are used in exercises

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Mandatory attendance at the lectures on pediatric emergency care
  Mandatory attendance in the emergency care simulation project
  Mandatory attendance in the CPR project
  Mandatory attendance in the lecture session in pediatric emergency care
  Approved clinical exercises

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Emergency care simulation in collaboration with VCS
  The CPR project in collaboration with VCS

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen: 2023
  
  Omtentamen 1:
  
  Omtentamen 2: (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can work with others within the student group

•   Advanced Nursing I USS20FV01-3001 24.08.2023-30.11.2023  5 credits  (USS20D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can apply, reflect and deepen his/her expertise in clinical care work
  
  Can argue for evidence based activity and care methods
  
  Can apply ethical decision making in a variety of service environments and care situations
  
  Masters person-centered/client-centered holistic care and medication management in different healthcare and service environments
  
  Students can use health technology and digital solutions in in-depth care work
  
  Can evaluate the guidance efficiency together with patient, close relatives and healthcare personnel
  
  Can promote patient and client safety

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  In-depth care methods in internal medicine
  
  In-depth care methods in surgical care
  
  Ethical decision-making in complicated situations and in different service system
  
  Advanced medication management
  
  Person-centered/client-centered holistic care
  
  Health technology and digital solutions
  
  Application of health science theories and research
  
  Welfare economy
  
  The effects of guidance and different gauges
  
  Patient and client safety

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Medibase
  Föreläsningsmaterial
  Internetmedicin.se https://www.internetmedicin.se/
  God medicinsk praxis https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/
  Terveysportti: Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja
  Terveysportti, Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat.
  Hotus -vårdrekommendationer
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  
  Övriga källor:
  Ahonen, O. et al 219. Kliininen hoitotyö.
  Alahuhta, S. et al. 2010. Nestehoito eller motsvarande inom vätsketerapi.
  Alanen, P. 2022. Tehohoitotyö ELLER Ritmala-Castren, M et al. 2017. Teho- ja valvontahoitotyön opas.
  Cox, C. 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor
  Ekvall, A. & Jansson, A. 2022 (eller 2016). Omvårdnad & Medicin. ELLER Ericson, T & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar
  Iivanainen, A. 2016. Hoida ja kirja. Sanoma Pro. eller THL:s publikationer om dokumentation
  Klang, B. 2017 (eller äldre upplaga) Patientundervisning
  Kinnunen, U-M. et al. 2021. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCC
  Kumlin, C. 2022 (eller äldre upplaga) Omvårdnad & kirurgi ELLER Ljungqvist, O. 2021. Kirurgi.
  Jevon, P. 2014. Att övervaka patienter med livshotande sjukdom
  Rubertsson, S. 2020. Intensivvård (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Smågruppsarbete
  Workshops (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Workshopsarbete bedöms GK-UK. Obligatorisk närvaro. För GK vitsord bör studerande aktivt deltagit i tillfället den 14.11 och gjord förhandsuppgiften "patiencase" (0.5 sp)
  2. Inlärningsdagbok bedöms i skalan 0-5 (2 sp)
  4. Individuell skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 (2.5 sp)
  
  Kursvitsord: För godkänt kursvitsord bör alla delar vara godkända. Kursvitsordet räknas: Inlärningsdagboken 50 % av helhetsvitsordet och skriftlig examination 50% av helhetsvitsordet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.08.2023 - 30.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  - (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Expertföreläsningar från arbetslivet (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Individuell examination 26.9. Omtentamen enligt överenskommelse med examinatorn.
  2) Inlärningsdagbok. Inlämning senast november 2023.. Datum:23.11?? (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 35 h
  Workshop (ink. förberedande arbete) 10h
  Tentamen 3h
  Distansuppgift 57 h
  Självstudier 30 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 60 % av maximalpoängen i examinationen
  __________________________________________________________________________
  
  Inlärningsdagboken är inte inlämnad inom utsatt tid eller innehåller inte alla krävda delar. Studerande använder sig inte av evidensbaserade källor i arbete. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 72 % av maximal poängen i examinationen
  
  ______________________________________________
  Inlärningsdagboken innehåller alla krävda delar. Studerande använder källor ytligt. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i inremedicinskt- och kirurgiskt-/perioperativt vårdarbete, vårdmetoder och/eller egna reflektioner är svaga eller saknas. Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande har delvis bedömt sitt kunnande i relation till alla delar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 90 % av maximal poängen i examinationen
  
  _________________________________________________
  
  Inlärningsdagboken innehåller alla delar och studerande använder vetenskapliga källor, men inte mångsidigt. Studerande kan beskriva och har goda kunskaper i inremedicinska- och kirurgiska/perioperativa patientens vårdarbete, vårdmetoder och egna reflektioner görs i alla delar. Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande har förmåga att bedöma sitt kunnande i relation till alla delar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med eller över 90 % av maximal poängen i examinationen.
  
  _________________________________________________________
  
  Inlärningsdagboken innehåller och behandlar på djupgående nivå alla delar. Studerande använder vetenskapliga källor mångsidigt, samt kan motivera sina tolkningar och kopplingar mellan källor. Studerande har djupa kunskaper och kan djupgående beskriva inremedicinska- och kirurgiska-/perioperativa patientens vårdarbete och vårdmetoder, samt relatera de olika delarna till varandra och till sjukskötarens arbetsuppgifter. Studerande kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner och kan djupgående analysera sitt kunnande. (not translated)

•   Advanced Nursing II USS20FV02-3001 28.08.2023-30.11.2023  5 credits  (USS20D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can apply, reflect and analyse his/her expertise in clinical care work
  
  Can argue for evidence based care activity and methods
  
  Is capable of ethical decisions making in varying service systems and care situations
  
  Masters person-centered/client-centrerad holistic care and medication management in various service systems
  
  Can use health technology and digital solutions in in-depth care work
  
  Can utilize health science and health economics knowledge in decision making
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate as well as motivate supervision and self-care from an educational and ethical perspective
  
  Can apply the theory of sustainable development

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Methods of in-depth mental health care and substance abuse treatment, including preventive care
  
  Methods of care in in-depth child care
  
  Methods of care within in-depth gerontological care work
  
  Ethical decision making
  
  Advanced medication management
  
  Person-centered/client centered holistic care
  
  Health technology and digital solutions
  
  Application of health science theories and research
  
  To motivate change and self-care
  
  Sustainable development in varying service environments

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alahuhta, S. et al. 2010. Nestehoito
  Andershed, B. et al. 2020. Palliativ vård: Begrepp och perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur
  Bengstsson, M.& Lundström, U. 2015. Palliativ vård. Gleerups
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. S 171-202.
  Guldbransen, T. 2009. Intensivvård: avancerad omvårdnad och behandling.
  Hjelmqvist, H. 2006. Vätsketerapi.
  Jevon, P. & Ewens, B. (ed.) 2014. Att övervaka patienter med livshotande sjukdom. Studentlitteratur.
  Lagercrantz, H. mfl. Neonatologi. 2015.Studentlitteratur.
  Leino-Kilpi, H. & Välimäki M. 2014. Etiikka hoitotyössä.
  Moell, C., Gustafsson, J. 2017. Pediatrik. Liber.
  Niemi-Murola L. 2014. Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet.
  Rubertsson et al. 2020. Intensivvård. Liber
  Saarto, T. et al. 2016 Palliatiivinen hoito. Duodecim
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  Suomen tehohoitoyhdistys. 1997. Suomen Tehohoitoyhdistyksen eettiset ohjeet.
  Takkunen et al. 2006. Tehohoito-opas.
  Terveysportti: Akuuttihoitotyön opas, Teho- ja valvontahoitotyön opas
  samt aktuella ämnespecifika artiklar som läggs upp på Moodle
  Wiklund Gustin,L. & Bergbom, I. 2017. Vårdvetenskapliga begrepp i teori och praktik (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Workshops
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur
  Inlämningsuppgift
  Seminarier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell inlämningsuppgift, bedöms med vitsord 0-5, feedback sker via Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 30.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Workshops, seminarier, obligatorisk närvaro
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individuell inlämningsuppgift inlämnas på Moodle studerande har två möjliga inlämningsdatum, 6.10 eller 13.11 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Workshops 11h
  Föreläsningar 16h
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift 30h
  Självstudier 72h
  Seminarier 6h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande svarar inte på uppgiftens alla delar och relaterar inte delarna till varandra. Studerande har mycket ytliga kunskaper i hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabilteringsmetoder, och studerande kan inte vårdplanering i relation till dessa. Studerande har inte kunskaper i patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och kan inte relatera det till sjukskötarens uppgifter eller i en vårdplan. Vårdplaneringen är mycket bristfällig. Studerande har mycket bristfälliga kunskaper i etik och patientsäkerhet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar men har inte förmågan att relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper om olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder, men tillämpningen i form av vårdplanering är svag. Studerande har svårigheter att gestalta patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och har svårt att relatera den till sjukskötarens uppgifter och i en vårdplan. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, men kan inte tillämpa dem, och egna reflektioner fattas (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar och kan relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har djupa kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter och beaktar ett mångprofessionellt arbetssätt och kan göra en helhetsmässig vårdplan. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna djupgående reflektioner (not translated)

•   Advanced clinical care USS20FV04-3001 04.09.2023-19.11.2023  3 credits  (USS20D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Is able to plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client-centered care in collaboration with the patient and close relatives and demonstrates a reflective and ethical approach
  
  Can apply theoretical knowledge and guidance methods in in-depth care work
  
  Masters the aseptic way of working
  
  Can use the central evidence based care methods and can perform clinical investigations, functional measurements and treatments
  
  Can carry out care and patient monitoring using health technology and apply various directives regarding patient and client safety and sustainable development
  
  Masters safe medication and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Reflection
  
  Ethics
  
  Clinical skills
  
  Supervision methods
  
  Asepsis
  
  Evidence based care methods
  
  Clinical examinations
  
  Functional measurements
  
  Patient monitoring
  
  Health technology
  
  Patient and client safety
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Medication management
  
  Fluid balance

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se kurslitteratur i förverkligande:
  Fördjupat vårdarbete I och II
  Litteratur i Moodle
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  
  Simulationer (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 19.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Obligatorisk kursintroduktion 7.9.2023
  Obligatoriska förhandsuppgifter inför simulationer
  Obligatoriska simulationer i fördjupat kliniskt vårdarbete (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatoriska simulationer och kliniska övningar samt tillhörande förhandsmaterial med inlämningsuppgifter. Mera information om förhandsmaterial och inlämningsuppgifter publiceras i Moodle. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81h
  Simulationer
  Självstudier inför simulationer och förhandsuppgifter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  GK = Studerande delatar aktivt alla simualtioner och har lämnat in förhandsuppgifter inom utsatta tid. Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i fördjupat kliniskt vårdarbete.
  
  
  UK = Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerande har inte lämnat införhandsuppgifter i tid. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i fördjupat kliniskt vårdarbete (not translated)

•   Anatomy and Physiology USS22IV06-3002 06.09.2023-15.12.2023  4 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can explain human anatomy and physiology
  - understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The cell and tissues
  
  Cardiovascular system
  
  The respiratory system
  
  The nervous system
  
  The digestive system
  
  The urinary system
  
  The endocrine system
  
  The musculoskeletal system

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course litterature:
  
  Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended litterature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  
  On moodle give litterature.
  
  Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.
  
  
  "To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

  Learning methods

  Lectures on campus and via teams.
  
  Interactive digital material.
  
  Independent studying and assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomy and physiology test.
  
  Assignments.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Anatomi och fysiologi tenter under hösten 2023:
  
  Datum:
  
  Deltentamen 1: Vecka 46
  Deltentamen 2: Vecka 49
  
  Två omtenter i varje del erbjuds.
  
  Omtentamen del 1: 24.11 och 8.12
  Omtentamen del 2: 19.1 och 9.2
  
  Oblikatoriska workshops och seminarier med tillhörande oblikatorisk uppgift. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningstillfällen 9 h
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter 40 h
  
  Självstudier 59 h
  
  Deltentamen 1 1.5 sp
  Deltentamen 2 1.5 sp
  Workshops och seminarier med tillhörande inlämningsuppgifter 1sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra. (not translated)

•   Anatomy and Physiology USS22IV06-3003 28.08.2023-08.12.2023  4 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can explain human anatomy and physiology
  - understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The cell and tissues
  
  Cardiovascular system
  
  The respiratory system
  
  The nervous system
  
  The digestive system
  
  The urinary system
  
  The endocrine system
  
  The musculoskeletal system

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course litterature:
  
  Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended litterature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  
  On moodle give litterature.
  
  Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.
  
  
  "To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

  Learning methods

  Lectures on campus and via teams.
  
  Interactive digital material.
  
  Independent studying and assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 08.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomy and physiology test.
  
  Assignments.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Anatomi och fysiologi tenter under hösten 2023:
  
  Datum:
  
  Deltentamen 1: Vecka 41
  Deltentamen 2: Vecka 48
  
  Två omtenter i varje del erbjuds.
  
  Deltentamen 1: 27.10 och 24.11.2023
  Deltentamen 2: 19.1 och 9.2.2024
  
  
  Oblikatoriska workshops och seminarier med tillhörande oblikatorisk uppgift. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningstillfällen 24 h
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter 40 h
  
  Självstudier 44 h
  
  Deltentamen 1 1.5 sp
  Deltentamen 2 1.5 sp
  Workshops och seminarier med tillhörande inlämningsuppgifter 1sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra. (not translated)

•   Bachelor's Thesis USS20UV03-3002 01.01.2024-16.06.2024  15 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under supervision and gradually independently, carry out a degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and/or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the degree project process and in projects
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can assess research ethics aspects in his/her degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  120 credits. Courses Introduction to Academic Studies and Research Methodology.

  Content of the study unit

  Bachelor's Thesis within inter-professional small-groups
  
  Oppose a Thesis
  
  Maturity test

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Liljeroth

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteratur i forskningsmetodik
  Litteratur och forskningsartiklar enligt ämne (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Studier i grupp
  Grupphandledning
  Seminarier
  Närmare instruktioner finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=9405 (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningskriterierna finns publicerade på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=6996 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 16.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 15 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg, Pia Liljeroth, Michaela Jalava, Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  RDI share

  15 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=9405 (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Arbetslivssamarbete enligt respektive examensarbetsprojekt (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatorisk närvaro på handledningstillfällen under processen enligt tidtabellen som finns publicerad på Moodle.
  Obligatorisk närvaro och presentation av det egna arbetet på mellanseminarium 20.3.2024:
  Obligatorisk närvaro och presentation av det egna arbetet på slutseminarium antingen 22 eller 23.5.2024.
  Mognadsprov 22, 23 eller 24.5.2024.
  
  Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=9405 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=9405 (not translated)

•   Bachelor's Thesis USS20UV03-3003 01.01.2024-16.06.2024  15 credits  (USS21D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under supervision and gradually independently, carry out a degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and/or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the degree project process and in projects
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can assess research ethics aspects in his/her degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  120 credits. Courses Introduction to Academic Studies and Research Methodology.

  Content of the study unit

  Bachelor's Thesis within inter-professional small-groups
  
  Oppose a Thesis
  
  Maturity test

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Liljeroth

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteratur i forskningsmetodik
  Litteratur och forskningsartiklar enligt ämne (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Studier i grupp
  Grupphandledning
  Seminarier
  Närmare instruktioner finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=9405 (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningskriterierna finns publicerade på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=6996 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 16.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 15 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-Å
  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg, Pia Liljeroth, Michaela Jalava, Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Åbo Vård 1, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Maria Engberg, Marika Rask

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  RDI share

  15 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=9405 (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Arbetslivssamarbete enligt respektive examensarbetsprojekt (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatorisk närvaro på handledningstillfällen under processen enligt tidtabellen som finns publicerad på Moodle.
  Obligatorisk närvaro och presentation av det egna arbetet på mellanseminarium 20.3.2024:
  Obligatorisk närvaro och presentation av det egna arbetet på slutseminarium antingen 22 eller 23.5.2024.
  Mognadsprov 22, 23 eller 24.5.2024.
  
  Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=9405 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=9405 (not translated)

•   Bacic in nursing care VAL22032-3002 01.04.2024-31.05.2024  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - knows some of the basics in nursing care
  - cab apply ethics in nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  .

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Valda delar ur:
  
  Elektroniskt given material.
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur tillgänglig elektroniskt (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Genomgång av teoretiskt material och praktiska övningar under handledning.
  
  Interaktivt material digitalt. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.04.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  09.12.2023 - 31.03.2024

  • 2 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Under kursen fungerar sjukskötarstuderanden vid Yrkeshögskolan Novia som tutorer. (not translated)

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande på Yrkeshögskolan Novia planerar simuleringstillfällena med förankring i arbetslivet och rådande evidens. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Oblikatoriskt aktivt deltagande under tillfällen. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Förhandsmaterial inför tillfällen.
  Deltagande under föreläsningstillfällen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Studerande deltar aktivt under föreläsningstillfällen samt tar del av förhandsmaterialet och lämnar in den tilldelade uppgiften. GK
  
  Studerande deltar inte i föreläsningstillfällen och tar inte del av förhandsmaterialet eller lämnar in uppgiften. UK (not translated)

•   Basic Vaccination Knowledge VÅV18BV09-3034 28.08.2023-31.12.2023  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Efter genomgången och godkänd kurs i den nationella utbildningshelheten Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap har deltagaren grundläggande kompetens och färdigheter gällande vaccinering och själva vaccinationsprocessen.
  
  Kursens innehåll:
  -Förebyggande av sjukdomar genom vaccination
  -Det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet
  -Fördelarna med vaccination
  - Information om potentiella biverkningar av vacciner
  - Vägledning och stöd till klienter baserat på forskningsbaserad kunskap
  - Grundläggande färdigheter för vaccination (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Enligt nationella kriterier (not translated)

  Learning methods

  VIrtuella studier i den nationella kursen : Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Seats

  10 - 110

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic Vaccination Knowledge VÅV18BV09-3037 11.09.2023-05.02.2024  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Efter genomgången och godkänd kurs i den nationella utbildningshelheten Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap har deltagaren grundläggande kompetens och färdigheter gällande vaccinering och själva vaccinationsprocessen.
  
  Kursens innehåll:
  -Förebyggande av sjukdomar genom vaccination
  -Det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet
  -Fördelarna med vaccination
  - Information om potentiella biverkningar av vacciner
  - Vägledning och stöd till klienter baserat på forskningsbaserad kunskap
  - Grundläggande färdigheter för vaccination (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Virtuell kurs i Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2023 - 05.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  12.08.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic Vaccination Knowledge VÅV18BV09-3036 05.10.2023-15.12.2023  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Efter genomgången och godkänd kurs i den nationella utbildningshelheten Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap har deltagaren grundläggande kompetens och färdigheter gällande vaccinering och själva vaccinationsprocessen.
  
  Kursens innehåll:
  -Förebyggande av sjukdomar genom vaccination
  -Det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet
  -Fördelarna med vaccination
  - Information om potentiella biverkningar av vacciner
  - Vägledning och stöd till klienter baserat på forskningsbaserad kunskap
  - Grundläggande färdigheter för vaccination (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning methods

  The national training programme in vaccination knowledge has been developed in cooperation with Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Diakonia University of Applied Sciences, Turku University of Applied Sciences and the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. The Swedish-language programme has been developed in cooperation with Novia University of Applied Sciences and Arcada University of Applied Sciences.
  
  
  The course is realised virtually as independent studies via the online platform Moodle during the time period 5.10-15.12 2023.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course has been designed to cover all the basic areas of vaccination that the vaccinator should know and master.
  
  According to THL, passing the study section is the main proof of the important theoretical vaccination knowledge required by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health's Vaccination Decree for nurses and midwives working as vaccinators.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  25.08.2023 - 05.10.2023

  • 2 credits

  Seats

  19 - 110

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen är en fortbildning som riktar sig till professionella i arbetslivet. (not translated)

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Student's schedule and workload

  Total working hours of the course: 54 hours = 2 ECTS

•   Basic Vaccination Knowledge VÅV18BV09-3038 11.04.2024-07.06.2024  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Efter genomgången och godkänd kurs i den nationella utbildningshelheten Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap har deltagaren grundläggande kompetens och färdigheter gällande vaccinering och själva vaccinationsprocessen.
  
  Kursens innehåll:
  -Förebyggande av sjukdomar genom vaccination
  -Det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet
  -Fördelarna med vaccination
  - Information om potentiella biverkningar av vacciner
  - Vägledning och stöd till klienter baserat på forskningsbaserad kunskap
  - Grundläggande färdigheter för vaccination (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  The national training programme in vaccination knowledge has been developed in cooperation with Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Diakonia University of Applied Sciences, Turku University of Applied Sciences and the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. The Swedish-language programme has been developed in cooperation with Novia University of Applied Sciences and Arcada University of Applied Sciences.
  
  The course is realised virtually as independent studies via the online platform Moodle during the time period 11.4-7.6 2024

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course has been designed to cover all the basic areas of vaccination that the vaccinator should know and master.
  
  According to THL, passing the study section is the main proof of the important theoretical vaccination knowledge required by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health's Vaccination Decree for nurses and midwives working as vaccinators.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.04.2024 - 07.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  09.02.2024 - 03.04.2024

  • 2 credits

  Seats

  5 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen är en fortbildning som riktar sig till professionella i arbetslivet. (not translated)

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för Portfolioinlämning 20.5 kl 8.00
  Virtuell tentamen öppen 23.5-6.6 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Total working hours of the course: 54 hours = 2 ECTS

•   Basic Vaccination Knowledge and Infectious Diseases VÅV22KV09-3003 27.11.2023-28.01.2024  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the diseases that are prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - has knowledge of the composition of the vaccines, benefits of vaccinations and vaccination side effects
  - has knowledge of the national vaccination program in Finland and its legislation
  - has knowledge of vaccination of different groups
  - has skills in counselling and preparation for vaccination, knowledge of vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment of the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV04 Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge of vaccinations
  Vaccination skills
  National and global infectious diseases
  Epidemiology
  Legislation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  National course in The Basics of Vaccination Knowledge 2 credits is included in the study unit.
  Examination via portfolio and virtual exam

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  According to national course requirements for basic vaccination knowledge (see moodle)
  Infectious diseases

  Learning methods

  Basic Vaccination Knowledge 2 credits (National Course):
  Introductory Lecture
  Individual Virtual Online Studies (Portfolio + Exam)
  Final Workshop
  
  Infectious Diseases 1 credit:
  Lectures
  Written Group Work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Submitted and approved portfolio according to national standard
  Passed virtual exam
  Approved written group work in infectious diseases

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.11.2023 - 28.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  21.10.2023 - 21.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen gäller endast examensstuderande
  
  Förkunskapskrav : Godkänd kurs där injektioner ingår (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline for submission of portfolio:8.1.2024
  Virtual exam open :15.1-25.1.24
  Deadline for submission of written group work in infectious disease:19.1.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3008 15.09.2023-15.12.2023  6 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.09.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 15.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen sker online, vänligen se schema för datum
  
  Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle se peppi. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp =27 h
  6sp=162 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3009 02.10.2023-17.12.2023  6 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar
  På engelska

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.10.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Practical exercises mandatory!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h

  Content scheduling

  Theory

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and his/her knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student demonstrates limited substantive knowledge, can the essentials.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge of the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance even concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and justify their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  In his answer, the student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3013 28.08.2023-27.10.2023  6 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 27.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen sker online, vänligen se schema för datum
  
  Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle se peppi. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp =27 h
  6sp=162 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3014 04.09.2023-30.11.2023  6 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar
  På engelska

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 30.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Maria Berg

  Additional information

  Practical exercises mandatory!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h

  Content scheduling

  Theory

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and his/her knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student demonstrates limited substantive knowledge, can the essentials.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge of the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance even concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and justify their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  In his answer, the student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3008 18.09.2023-29.10.2023  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi
  As well as recommended material in moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lecture, group work and presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grupparbete GK/UK
  Tentamen 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.09.2023 - 29.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3010 25.09.2023-10.11.2023  3 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Obligatorisk kurslitteratur:
  Beaglehole, R., Bonita & Kjällström T, 2010. Grundläggande epidemiologi sid 17 - 66 och 147 - 250. Studentlitteratur.
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 56 - 103 (finns som e-bok)
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro.
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Klang & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
  Kauhanen mfl. Kansanterveystiede. 2013. Sanoma Pro. Helsinki.
  Pellmer et.al. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Andersson, I., Eljertsson, G. 2013. Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Backman, G. ((ed) 2012. The right to health. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde, B. (red). 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund.
  Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E., Lyckhage, G., Tengelin, E. 2015. Jämlik vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson, M. (red) 2015. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Liber.
  Gaudeamus. 2022, Terveempi maailma.Gaudeamus ja Helsingin yliopisto.
  Nunes-Ferraz, J., Karlberg, I. 2012. Hälsoekonomi -begrepp och tillämpningar.
  Skolin 2018. Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Studentlitteratur.
  Schäfer Elinder, L., Kwak, L. (red) 2014. Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar både online och på Moodle
  Självstudier
  Gruppuppgift obligatorisk
  Uppgift i epidemiologi
  Grupphemtentamen obligatorisk deltagande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Gruppuppgift med seminarium GK/ UK
  Uppgift i epidemiologi GK/UK
  Grupp hemtentamen 1-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.09.2023 - 10.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 24.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 46

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Jaana-Sofia Tengström
  Lärare Pia Nygårdas (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Grupparbete (1,0 sp) inlämning vecka 42, 20.10 kl. 16.00 obligatorisk. Gemensam skrifltig respons på Moodle. GK/UK
  Uppgift i epidemiologi v. 41, inlämning enligt överneskommelse, obligatorisk GK/UK
  Grupphemtentamen (2 sp), inlämning vecka 45, 6.11 kl.16.00. Skriftlig respons på Moodle. 1-5. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
  Studerande använder Novias skrivansviningar i samtliga inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier 34 h
  Gruppuppgift samt uppgift i epidemiologi 20 h
  Hemtentamen 27 h (not translated)

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3012 20.11.2023-15.12.2023  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Obligatorisk kurslitteratur:
  Beaglehole, R., Bonita & Kjällström T, 2010. Grundläggande epidemiologi sid 17 - 66 och 147 - 250. Studentlitteratur.
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 56 - 103 (finns som e-bok)
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro.
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Klang & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
  Kauhanen mfl. Kansanterveystiede. 2013. Sanoma Pro. Helsinki.
  Pellmer et.al. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Andersson, I., Eljertsson, G. 2013. Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Backman, G. ((ed) 2012. The right to health. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde, B. (red). 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund.
  Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E., Lyckhage, G., Tengelin, E. 2015. Jämlik vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson, M. (red) 2015. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Liber.
  Nunes-Ferraz, J., Karlberg, I. 2012. Hälsoekonomi -begrepp och tillämpningar.
  Skolin 2018. Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Studentlitteratur.
  Schäfer Elinder, L., Kwak, L. (red) 2014. Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Självstudier
  Workshop/ Smågruppsarbete obligatorisk närvaro
  Gruppuppgift med seminarium obligatorisk närvaro
  Grupphemtentamen obligatorisk deltagande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Gruppuppgift med seminarium GK/ UK
  Grupp hemtentamen 1-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.11.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 19.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Jaana-Sofia Tengström
  Lärare Pia Nygårdas (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Workshops under lekitoner . Muntlig respons under workshoppen
  Uppgift i epidemiologi v. 49 GK/UK
  Grupparbete med seminarium (1,0 sp) vecka 50 obligatorisk närvaro. Muntlig respons vid seminariumtillfället vecka 50. GK/UK
  Grupphemtentamen (2 sp), inlämning vecka 50. Skriftlig respons på Moodle. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar. (1-5)
  Studerande använder Novias skrivansviningar i samtliga inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier 27 h
  Gruppuppgift samt seminarium 20 h
  Hemtentamen 34 h (not translated)

•   Care assessment and health technology VÅV22KV14-3002 15.04.2024-26.05.2024  3 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in different business environments within healthcare
  - can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
  - can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
  - can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
  - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Care assessment
  ABCDE evaluation
  Telephone counseling
  Digital consulting
  Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  Ethics
  Sustainable Development

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Care Assessment:
  Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432
  
  Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630
  
  Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974
  
  Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255
  
  Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3
  
  Health technology:
  
  Nordens välfärdscenter
  https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/
  
  Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
  https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/
  
  Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
  https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-
  
  Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
  https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324
  
  Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658
  
  A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z
  
  Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
  https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

  Learning methods

  lectures, group discussion and seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 14.04.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Seminar and assignment
  instruction will be given in Moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ECTS= 27 hours

  Content scheduling

  Care assessment 2 credits - grade from 0-5
  Health technology 1 credit - grade pass/fail

  Assessment criteria

  Did not achieve any of the criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.
  
  In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.
  
  To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

•   Care of the Patient with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beahvior VÅV21KV14-3002 28.08.2023-05.11.2023  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorder
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk
  - Can apply mentalfirst aid
  - Has sreadiness to provide mental first aid
  - can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
  - has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
  - can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
  - is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
  - is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
  - can meet people with special needs

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders
  Substance use disorders and addiction
  Special needs and disability

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit?
  Expert by experience

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 05.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda, Johanna Sigfrids

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visit?

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  On moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beaviour VÅV21KV14-3003 20.11.2023-25.02.2024  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorder
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk
  - Can apply mentalfirst aid
  - Has sreadiness to provide mental first aid
  - can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
  - has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
  - can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
  - is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
  - is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
  - can meet people with special needs

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders
  Substance use disorders and addiction
  Special needs and disability

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.11.2023 - 25.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 19.11.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Viktor Matintupa, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  6 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  On moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beaviour VÅV21KV14-3006 20.11.2023-04.02.2024  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorder
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk
  - Can apply mentalfirst aid
  - Has sreadiness to provide mental first aid
  - can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
  - has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
  - can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
  - is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
  - is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
  - can meet people with special needs

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders
  Substance use disorders and addiction
  Special needs and disability

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit?
  Expert by experience

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.11.2023 - 04.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 19.11.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Viktor Matintupa, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visit?

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  On moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Clinical Nursing USS22KV04-3001 28.08.2023-12.11.2023  5 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - can apply theoretical knowledge and guidance methods in different care contexts
  - can apply the aseptic method
  - can use the central evidence based care methods and perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
  - can carry out care and patient monitoring using health technology and apply various directives regarding patient- and client safety and sustainable development
  - can perform safe medication and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Resuscitation in hospital environment
  
  Central examination methods
  
  Central care methods
  
  Aseptics/aseptic way of working
  
  Teamwork
  
  Clinical assessments
  
  Patient monitoring
  
  Guidance
  
  Wound care
  
  Documentation and reporting
  
  Pre- and intra-operative preparations for surgery
  
  Patient monitoring during anesthesia
  
  Different roles in the operating theatre
  
  Application of sustainable methods (cost-effectiveness, aseptics, work ergonomics, waste sorting)
  
  Patient, client and occupational safety
  
  Safe blood transfusion
  
  Intravenous medication and fluid treatment

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se kurslitteratur i förverkliganden:
  
  Läkemedelsbehandling II
  
  Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
  
  Inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete
  
  
  Medibas
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  
  Simulationer
  
  Kliniska övningar och test (videofilmning) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande:
  
  Kan planera, utföra, utvärdera, dokumentera och rapportera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård i samarbete med patienten och närstående samt påvisar ett reflektivt och etiskt förhållningssätt i vården
  
  Kan tillämpa teoretiska kunskaper och handledningsmetoder i olika vårdkontexter
  
  Kan tillämpa aseptiskt arbetssätt
  
  Kan använda de centrala evidensbaserade vårdmetoderna och kan utföra kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och behandlingar
  
  Kan utföra vård och patientövervakning med hjälp av hälsoteknologi och tillämpa olika direktiv gällande patient- och klientsäkerhet och hållbar utveckling
  
  Kan utföra säker läkemedels- och vätskebehandling (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 12.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.09.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Kursen ska avläggas samtidigt med teorikurser Läkemedelsbehandling II, Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, Inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Obligatorisk kursintro 7.9. online
  
  Obligatoriska simulationer i läkemedelsbehandling, i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete och i inremedicinskt vårdarbete.
  
  Obligatoriska kliniska övningar
  
  Kliniskt test (Videofilmning) (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatoriska simulationer och kliniska övningar samt tillhörande Quiz i Moodle.
  
  Klinsikt test i form av videofilmning, paruppgift vecka 45. Mera information i Moodle. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp = 135h
  
  Simulationer och kliniska övningar: 35h
  
  Självstudier inför simulationer och inför kliniska övningar (Quiz): 50h
  
  Klinisk test med självstudier, övningar i kliniken samt filmning: 50h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  GK = Studerande delatar aktivt alla simualtioner och kliniska övningar och har svarat i Quiz inom utsatta tid före varje simulering. Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test (videofilmning).
  
  
  UK = Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller kliniksa övningar eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerandehar inte svarat i Quiz i tid före varje simulering. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test (videofilmning). (not translated)

•   Clinical Nursing USS22KV04-3004 25.03.2024-31.08.2024  5 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - can apply theoretical knowledge and guidance methods in different care contexts
  - can apply the aseptic method
  - can use the central evidence based care methods and perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
  - can carry out care and patient monitoring using health technology and apply various directives regarding patient- and client safety and sustainable development
  - can perform safe medication and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Resuscitation in hospital environment
  
  Central examination methods
  
  Central care methods
  
  Aseptics/aseptic way of working
  
  Teamwork
  
  Clinical assessments
  
  Patient monitoring
  
  Guidance
  
  Wound care
  
  Documentation and reporting
  
  Pre- and intra-operative preparations for surgery
  
  Patient monitoring during anesthesia
  
  Different roles in the operating theatre
  
  Application of sustainable methods (cost-effectiveness, aseptics, work ergonomics, waste sorting)
  
  Patient, client and occupational safety
  
  Safe blood transfusion
  
  Intravenous medication and fluid treatment

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se kurslitteratur i förverkliganden:
  
  Läkemedelsbehandling II
  
  Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
  
  Inremedicinskt vårdarbete
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  
  Simulationer
  
  Kliniska övningar med förhandsuppgifter (Quiz) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande:
  
  Kan planera, utföra, utvärdera, dokumentera och rapportera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård i samarbete med patienten och närstående samt påvisar ett reflektivt och etiskt förhållningssätt i vården
  
  Kan tillämpa teoretiska kunskaper och handledningsmetoder i olika vårdkontexter
  
  Kan tillämpa aseptiskt arbetssätt
  
  Kan använda de centrala evidensbaserade vårdmetoderna och kan utföra kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och behandlingar
  
  Kan utföra vård och patientövervakning med hjälp av hälsoteknologi och tillämpa olika direktiv gällande patient- och klientsäkerhet och hållbar utveckling
  
  Kan utföra säker läkemedels- och vätskebehandling (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.03.2024 - 31.08.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 24.03.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursintro 26.3.
  
  Simulationer i läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Simualtioner i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete samt i sårvård
  
  Simulationer i inremedicinskt vårdarbete
  
  Kliniska övningar
  
  Kliniskt test
  
  Öppenklinik (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatoriska simulationer och kliniska övningar samt tillhörande Quiz:
  Kliniska övningar 16.4. och 17.4. DL för Quiz 11.4.
  Kliniska övningar och simulationer 14.5. och 15.5. DL för Quiz 8.5.
  
  Kliniskt test i form av filmning 15.5. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp = 135h
  
  
  Kliniska övningar och simulationer i klass 32 h
  
  Självstudier inför simulationer och kliniska övningar 95 h
  
  Klinisk test i form av filmning 8 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  GK = Studerande deltar aktivt alla simulationer och kliniska övningar och har lämnat in inlämningsuppgifter inom utsatta tid. Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under klinisk test.
  
  
  
  UK = Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller kliniska övningar eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerande har inte lämnat in inlämningsuppgifter i tid. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under klinisk test. (not translated)

•   Clinical assessment VÅV21AK04-3001 25.03.2024-28.04.2024  3 credits  (USS21F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, carry out and evaluate the care of patients of different ages
  - can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages
  - can perform basic clinical assessment of vital functions for patients of different ages
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context

  Content of the study unit

  Physical assessment

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Cox C.L. (red.) (2015). Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  
  Hogan-Quigley, B., Palm, ML. & Bickley, LS. (2012 or 2017). Nursing Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. Philadelphia, Wolther Kluwer Health Lippincott.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial Moodle
  
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  lectures and practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.03.2024 - 28.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 24.03.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V
  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written assignment and seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  practical class are obligatory

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ESTS= 27 hours

  Assessment criteria

  The student did not achieve any of the criteria and participated in the practical lectures ,

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, , conduct frail case analysis, and weak analysis of the results

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has a good knowledge of the subject, conduct respectable and valuable case presentation, the analysis and the results gave good knowledge about the topic

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows an in-depth knowledge, the process of collecting the data and the results presentation enhance the knowledge and understanding

•   Clinical assessment VÅV21FK03-3001 26.03.2024-26.04.2024  3 credits  (USS21F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, carry out and evaluate the care of patients of different ages
  - can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages
  - can perform basic clinical assessment of vital functions for patients of different ages
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical assessment

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Cox C.L. (red.) (2015). Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  
  Hogan-Quigley, B., Palm, ML. & Bickley, LS. (2012 or 2017). Nursing Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. Philadelphia, Wolther Kluwer Health Lippincott.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  lectures and practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.03.2024 - 26.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 25.03.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V
  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written assignment and seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  practical class are obligatory

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ESTS= 27 hours

  Assessment criteria

  The student did not achieve any of the criteria and participated in the practical lectures ,

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, , conduct frail case analysis, and weak analysis of the results

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has a good knowledge of the subject, conduct respectable and valuable case presentation, the analysis and the results gave good knowledge about the topic

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows an in-depth knowledge, the process of collecting the data and the results presentation enhance the knowledge and understanding

•   Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3006 28.08.2023-13.10.2023  5 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
  - can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
  - has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
  Blood transfusions
  PICC and CVK
  Use of perfusor
  Inhalation drugs
  Fluid balance sheet
  CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
  Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
  Medical radiation and radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  RADIATION SAFETY: Strålsäkerhetslagen, Statsrådets förordning om joniserande strålning, Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets förordning om joniserande strålning, S-föreskrifterna, Radiologi (2022, Blomqvist, L. & Zackrisson, S.)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 13.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Katarina Vironen, Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 1 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 8 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgifter som finns på moodle gör på egen hand:
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 1, 8 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift, 1,½ - 2 h
  Deltagande i seniormässan4.10: 6 h, 3 h / studerande
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 1 h 15 min/studerande
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: ca 33 h
  Eget arbete: 7,5 h
  TOTALT: 40,5 h
  
  RESUSKITATION: 1 sp = 27 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  7h Förberädande för kunskaptest & genomförtande av kunskapstest.
  
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  On-line examination in radiation safety, Grade: Approved/Failed

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology VÅV22GV04-3005 08.01.2024-23.02.2024  4 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Maria Berg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material på moodle
  
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 23.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 04.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Berg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras med tent.
  
  Kurstentamen: 23.2.24
  
  Omtentamina: (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  På svenska
  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology VÅV22GV04-3006 11.03.2024-21.04.2024  4 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Maria Berg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material på moodle
  
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Vitsord enligt tentamen. Se bedömningskriterier nedan. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.03.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.03.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 43

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Berg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras med tent.
  
  Kurstentamina: 15.4.2024
  
  Omtentamina 2024: 24.5.24 (allmän omtentamen) samt 13.9.24 (allmän omtentamen) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology VÅV22GV04-3009 29.01.2024-17.03.2024  4 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Maria Berg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material på moodle
  
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Vitsord enligt tentamen, se kriterier nedan (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.01.2024 - 17.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 25.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Berg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras med tent.
  
  Kurstentamina: 20.3.24
  
  Omtentamina 2023: 3.5.24 (allmän omtentamen) samt 13.9.24 (allmän omtentamen) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3001 11.09.2023-29.10.2023  2 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2023 - 29.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3003 04.09.2023-01.10.2023  2 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 01.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3006 27.11.2023-17.12.2023  2 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.11.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 26.11.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h /sp for students
  total 54 h

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Degree Project 1 VÅV21EX01-3001 28.08.2023-31.12.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

  Prerequisites

  HVV21FU01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Work plan

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Individual assignment
  Presentation of research plan for thesis

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Research plan for thesis: fail-pass.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 60

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Planen skall innehålla följande delar (för gk):
  • Novia titelblad
  • Innehållsförteckning
  • Inledning (minst 1 sid): skall innehålla minst 2 källor
  • Syfte och frågeställningar
  • Bakgrund (minst 4 sidor). Skall innehålla: 1 stud. minst 6 källor, varav minst 2 vetenskapliga; 2 stud. minst 9 källor, varav minst 4 vetenskapliga; 3 stud. minst 12 källor, varav minst 6 vetenskapliga
  • Metod (minst 1 sida): Urval; Datainsamling; Dataanalysmetod; Etiska överväganden och Tidsplan
  • Källförteckning (över de källor som används i planen)
  Omfattning min 7 sidor och max 10 sidor (exkl. titelblad, innehållsförteckning och källförteckning)
  Skall följa Novias skrivanvisningar https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/ (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Presentation of approved research plan for thesis.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Underkänd:
  Struktur saknas, likaså vissa källor och källhänvisningarna.
  Hänvisningar och källförteckning följer inte de skriftliga anvisningar för examensarbete.
  Syfte och frågeställningarna är otydliga och saknar vårdperspektivet.
  Metoden för examensarbetet är oklar.
  
  Godkänd: Följer anvisningarna och alla delar finns med. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 1 VÅV21EX01-3004 29.08.2023-03.12.2023  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

  Prerequisites

  HVV21FU01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Work plan

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Individual assignment
  Presentation of research plan for thesis

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Research plan for thesis: fail-pass.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2023 - 03.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 28.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Planen skall innehålla följande delar (för gk):
  • Novia titelblad
  • Innehållsförteckning
  • Inledning (minst 1 sid): skall innehålla minst 2 källor
  • Syfte och frågeställningar
  • Bakgrund (minst 4 sidor). Skall innehålla: 1 stud. minst 6 källor, varav minst 2 vetenskapliga; 2 stud. minst 9 källor, varav minst 4 vetenskapliga; 3 stud. minst 12 källor, varav minst 6 vetenskapliga
  • Metod (minst 1 sida): Urval; Datainsamling; Dataanalysmetod; Etiska överväganden och Tidsplan
  • Källförteckning (över de källor som används i planen)
  Omfattning min 7 sidor och max 10 sidor (exkl. titelblad, innehållsförteckning och källförteckning)
  Skall följa Novias skrivanvisningar https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/ (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Presentation of approved research plan for thesis.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Underkänd:
  Struktur saknas, likaså vissa källor och källhänvisningarna.
  Hänvisningar och källförteckning följer inte de skriftliga anvisningar för examensarbete.
  Syfte och frågeställningarna är otydliga och saknar vårdperspektivet.
  Metoden för examensarbetet är oklar.
  
  Godkänd: Följer anvisningarna och alla delar finns med. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 2 VÅV21EX02-3001 06.11.2023-31.03.2024  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 31.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  07.10.2023 - 31.01.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 60

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Midseminar

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedual

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 H/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Strukturen följer anvisningarna
  Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete
  Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
  Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
  Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
  Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 2 VÅV21EX02-3004 01.01.2024-29.02.2024  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 29.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.01.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Midseminar

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedual

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 H/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Strukturen följer anvisningarna
  Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete
  Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
  Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
  Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
  Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 2 VÅV21EX02-3005 28.08.2023-30.01.2024  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the subject for thesis and literature for research method is free of choice

  Learning methods

  Individual supervision
  seminar for presentation of parts of thesis, discussion and supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The theoretical framework for thesis i suitable for the content and can be approved. The methodology is described and the data collection is almost done. the analysis of the data has begun. The thesis work is under construction.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 30.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  15 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  -
  See scedule and Moodle course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  See Novia instructions for validation

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar December to January

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The hours counted for the course is 162 (6 cu) and contains mainly independent work but individual supervision is available during the course

  Content scheduling

  Approved work, consisting of theoretical framework to thesis, description of methodology used, collected datamaterial and the analysis of data has begun

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  See practical guide and content above

•   Degree Project 3 VÅV21EX03-3002 01.01.2024-31.07.2024  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX02

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the topic of Thesis

  Learning methods

  Independent work with support from the supervisor.
  Seminar + maturity test.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis is assessed according to 5 criteria, scientific writing, theoretical framework, method, result and presentation. Each criteria ha a scale from 1 to 5. The assessment criteria is published on the Moodlepage linked to this implementation plan.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 31.07.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Terese Österberg, Anita Kvist, Marlene Gädda, Anita Wikberg, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  See practical guide and Moodle course.
  Follow Novia instuctions for thesis writing.
  AI=Artificial intelligence is not allowed in the thesis = RED according to Novias instuctions

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia general instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The thesis can be ordered, then an agreement is needed
  The data material can be collected from different helath care or other organisations if ethical permissions are approved.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation and maturity test in May or in week 47, see Moodle and time schedule.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  Students plan their time use themselves, see below

  Content scheduling

  154 hours mostly self-directed work, 6 hours seminar 2 hours maturity test.

•   Degree Project 3 VÅV21EX03-3001 08.01.2024-12.05.2024  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX02

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis: 0-5
  Maturity test: uk-gk

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 12.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.03.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Sirkku Säätelä, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marica Hinders, Jannica Andtfolk, Anita Kvist, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Thesis
  Maturity test

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Presentation of thesis public.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring v.20
  Autumn v.47

  Assessment criteria

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.
  Metod:
  Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
  Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
  Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
  Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
  Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Resultat:
  Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
  Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
  Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
  Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
  En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
  Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
  Källkritiken är bristfällig.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
  Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
  Slutsatserna är triviala.
  Resultat:
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
  Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
  Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
  Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
  Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
  Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
  Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
  Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
  Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
  Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
  Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
  En god källkritik.
  Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
  Källkritiken är god.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
  Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
  Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
  Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
  Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
  Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.
  Presentation:
  Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
  Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
  Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
  Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
  Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
  Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
  Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.
  Presentation:
  Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
  Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
  Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
  Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 3 VÅV21EX03-3003 12.02.2024-26.05.2024  6 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX02

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis: 0-5
  Maturity test: uk-gk

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.02.2024 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.03.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Ann-Louise Glasberg, Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Jannica Andtfolk, Terese Österberg, Anita Kvist, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Anita Wikberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marica Hinders, Sanna Gunell, Nina Vestö, Maria Berg, Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Thesis
  Maturity test

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Presentation of thesis public.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring v.20
  Autumn v.47

  Assessment criteria

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.
  Metod:
  Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
  Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
  Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
  Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
  Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Resultat:
  Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
  Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
  Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
  Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
  En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
  Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
  Källkritiken är bristfällig.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
  Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
  Slutsatserna är triviala.
  Resultat:
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
  Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
  Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
  Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
  Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
  Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
  Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
  Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
  Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
  Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
  Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
  En god källkritik.
  Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
  Källkritiken är god.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
  Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
  Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
  Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
  Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
  Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.
  Presentation:
  Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
  Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
  Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
  Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
  Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
  Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
  Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.
  Presentation:
  Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
  Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
  Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
  Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3009 11.09.2023-17.11.2023  3 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Recommended litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according tol instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid implementation
  Contact studies in online , seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2023 - 17.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  
  Aktuell lagstiftning
  
  Etik vid läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Säker läkemedelsbehandling vid olika skeden av läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  
  Grundmatematik
  
  Enhetsomvandlingar
  
  Dosering av läkemedel i fast och flytande form
  
  Nomogram
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments and forum discussion online
  Test online and drug calculation test in class

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  kursens omfattning 3x27h= 81h
  
  föreläsningar + tenter 7h
  
  moodleuppgifter + självstudier 61h
  
  simuleringar 13h (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  27 h/credit

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  På svenska
  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God-synnerligen god nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3010 25.09.2023-26.11.2023  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Recommended litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according tol instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid implementation
  Contact studies in online , seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.09.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 15.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  
  Aktuell lagstiftning
  
  Etik vid läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Säker läkemedelsbehandling vid olika skeden av läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  
  Grundmatematik
  
  Enhetsomvandlingar
  
  Dosering av läkemedel i fast och flytande form
  
  Infusionshastighet
  
  Utspädningar
  
  Nomogram
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments and forum discussion online
  Test online and drug calculation test in class

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  kursens omfattning 3x27h= 81h
  
  föreläsningar + tenter 7h
  
  moodleuppgifter + självstudier 61h
  
  simuleringar 13h (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  27 h/credit

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  På svenska
  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God-synnerligen god nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3012 23.10.2023-15.12.2023  3 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Nygårdas

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual test 80 % correctly

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.10.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 22.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram, Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Virtual test
  Exam in drug calculation

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 20 hours + 4 hours for the exam
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Webbaserade uppgifter: UK
  Virtuellt test i teori 80 % inte korrekt, vitsord UK
  Tentamen i läkemedelsräkning inte godkänt om inte 100 % är korrekt (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 80 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3013 06.11.2023-15.12.2023  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Nygårdas

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Recommended litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according tol instructions

  Learning methods

  seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 05.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Läkemedlesräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/credit

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God-synnerligen god nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  På engelska (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3010 01.04.2024-12.05.2024  2 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  calculation test t 100% correct t national criteria
  Online test 1-5 according % scale
  assgnments pass/ comlpete

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.04.2024 - 12.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.03.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  Den pedagogisk refensramen är enligt inlärninsgpyramiden och Feynmans teknik
  Studerande jobbar i grupper under workshps och stöder även varnarda i inlärningen (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda
  re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27H /cr

  Content scheduling

  Teoridelen periodiserad enligt kronologisk ordning så föregående microdel gör före nästa
  Läkemedlesräkningen delad i tre oliks kategorier (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3001 28.08.2023-01.10.2023  2 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
  Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
  Assignmets pass/ rejected
  Undone task =0
  Active participation in workshops
  one part rejected = course 0

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 01.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
  Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
  Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
  task according to moodle in specific order
  tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr
  %4 h toal workload

  Content scheduling

  Task / week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
  Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
  Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
  Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3008 04.03.2024-21.04.2024  2 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
  Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
  Assignmets pass/ rejected
  Undone task =0
  Active participation in workshops
  one part rejected = course 0

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 05.03.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
  Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
  Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
  task according to moodle in specific order
  tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr
  %4 h toal workload

  Content scheduling

  Task / week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
  Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
  Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
  Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3009 19.02.2024-29.03.2024  2 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  calculation test t 100% correct t national criteria
  Online test 1-5 according % scale
  assgnments pass/ comlpete

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.02.2024 - 29.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 16.02.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  Den pedagogisk refensramen är enligt inlärninsgpyramiden och Feynmans teknik
  Studerande jobbar i grupper under workshps och stöder även varnarda i inlärningen (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda
  re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27H /cr

  Content scheduling

  Teoridelen periodiserad enligt kronologisk ordning så föregående microdel gör före nästa
  Läkemedlesräkningen delad i tre oliks kategorier (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3011 01.04.2024-12.05.2024  2 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
  Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
  Assignmets pass/ rejected
  Undone task =0
  Active participation in workshops
  one part rejected = course 0

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.04.2024 - 12.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 30.03.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
  Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
  Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
  task according to moodle in specific order
  tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr
  %4 h toal workload

  Content scheduling

  Task / week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
  Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
  Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
  Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

•   Emergency Care and Radiation Safety USS21UV01-3001 03.01.2024-09.06.2024  4 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Is familiar with the regional, national and international collaboration in crisis and disaster situations
  
  Is able to, as part of an interprofessional team, assess the need for care, plan, perform and document emergency care
  
  Has expertise in care in various service system
  
  Can meet, support and mentor the critically ill patient and relatives
  
  Masters medication management in emergency care
  
  Deepens his/her knowledge of psychosocial support in crisis situations
  
  Can start immediate rescue operations independently and act in emergency situations
  
  Masters the basics of radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Surgical and Perioperative Care, Nursing in Internal Medicine and Palliative care, Clinical Nursing

  Content of the study unit

  Patient care in emergency care situations in an interprofessional team and befitting medication management and medication calculation
  
  Psychosocial support in various crisis situations and application of evidence based working methods in emergency care and in different service environments
  
  Regional, national and international cooperation in crisis and disaster situations
  
  Assessment of the situation and rescue operations in crisis and disaster situations
  
  The basics of radiation physics, radiation biology, radiation protection legislation, radiation safety measures in the workplace and medical use of radiation

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Radiation safety: according to the teachers instructions, Moodle

  Learning methods

  Radiationsafety: first lesson on-line, schedule. The other lectures are recorded.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Radiationsafety: Approved written assignement/ written exaination A/F

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2024 - 09.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 02.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1. Obligastoriska simulationer med inlämningsuppgifter och Moodlediskussion
  
  2. Tent i läkemedelsräkning
  
  3. Hemtent i pre-hospital och akut vård
  
  4. Tent i strålsäkerhet (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Radiationsafety: examinationdates will be planned under the first lesson

  Student's schedule and workload

  Radiationsafety: 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Godkänd:
  Studerande lämnar in i tid instuderingsfrågor.
  Studerande deltar aktivt simuleringar och påvisar kunnandet i akut vård.
  Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: alla svar måste vara till 100% korrekt räknade för att studerande skall bli godkänd i examinationen.
  Tent i akutvård:
  Studerande känner till samarbete vid kris- och katastrofsituationer regionalt och nationellt.
  Studerande kan i ett mångprofessionellt team bedöma vårdbehovet, planera, utföra och dokumentera akutvård
  Studerande kan bemöta och handleda den kritiskt sjuka patienten och anhöriga
  Studerande behärskar läkemedelsbehandling inom prehospital- och akutvård
  
  Underkänd:
  Studerande har inte lämnat in instuderingsfrågor vid DL eller deltar inte aktivt simuleringar och påvisar inte kunnandet i akutvård.
  Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: resultat under 100% korrekt
  Tent i akutvård: Studerande påvisar inte kunskap i kursens olika kompetensområden och svarar till uppgifter på en allmän nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande känner till på en allmän nivå begrepp och grundläggande principer inom akutvård. Det finns ytlig samband mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande förstår och kan förklara begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Visar förmåga till att reflektera mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har förmåga att se samband och göra egna slutsatser mellan begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Kan reflektera mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

•   Emergency Care and Radiation Safety USS21UV01-3003 08.01.2024-07.04.2024  4 credits  (USS21D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Is familiar with the regional, national and international collaboration in crisis and disaster situations
  
  Is able to, as part of an interprofessional team, assess the need for care, plan, perform and document emergency care
  
  Has expertise in care in various service system
  
  Can meet, support and mentor the critically ill patient and relatives
  
  Masters medication management in emergency care
  
  Deepens his/her knowledge of psychosocial support in crisis situations
  
  Can start immediate rescue operations independently and act in emergency situations
  
  Masters the basics of radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Surgical and Perioperative Care, Nursing in Internal Medicine and Palliative care, Clinical Nursing

  Content of the study unit

  Patient care in emergency care situations in an interprofessional team and befitting medication management and medication calculation
  
  Psychosocial support in various crisis situations and application of evidence based working methods in emergency care and in different service environments
  
  Regional, national and international cooperation in crisis and disaster situations
  
  Assessment of the situation and rescue operations in crisis and disaster situations
  
  The basics of radiation physics, radiation biology, radiation protection legislation, radiation safety measures in the workplace and medical use of radiation

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Strålsäkerhet: enligt lärarens anvisning, Moodle
  Akutvård:
  God medicinsk praxis 2020. Posttraumatiska stressreaktioner och posttraumatiskt stressyndrom. https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/khr00125
  God medicinsk praxis 2021. Psykosocialt stöd och tjänster (bild). https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/imk01307
  God medicinsk praxis 2021. Återhämtning från posttraumatiskt stressyndrom och traumatyp hos vuxna (bild). https://www.kaypahoito.fi/imk01308
  Hälso- och sjukvårdslag §38-40
  https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/ajantasa/2010/20101326
  Lennquist, S. (red.) 2017. Traumatologi.
  Lennquist, S. (red.) 2009. Katastrofmedicin.
  Lundberg, Lars; Bäckström, Denise; Andersson Hagiwara, Magnus 2022. Prehospital akutsjukvård.
  Läkemedelsboken - Akutmedicin https://lakemedelsboken.se/
  Räddningsväsendet 2016. Räddningsverksamhet. http://www.pelastustoimi.fi/raddningsvasendet/raddningsverksamhet
  Saviluoto Anssi 2018. Luentosarja Ensihoidon lääkkeet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3UgziVBVHM
  Statsrådets förordning om räddningsväsendet
  https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/ajantasa/2011/20110407
  SHM 2023. Prehospital akutsjukvård.
  http://stm.fi/sv/prehospital-akutsjukvard
  
  TERVEYSPORTTI:
  Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat:
  -Traumapotilaan hoito; hoito onnettomuuspaikalla ja kuljetuksen aikana och Vaikeasti loukkaantuneen potilaan hoito päivystyspoliklinikalla.
  Akuuttihoidon tietokannat:
  -Akuuttihoito-opas; Hätätilapotilaan hoito, Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito, Akuuttihoidon laitteet (Sairaalan ulkopuolisessa hoidossa käytettävät laitteet), Kuvat (Sairaalan ulkopuolisessa hoidossa käytettävät laitteet)
  Akuuttihoidon lääkkeet
  -Ensihoito-opas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Radiation safety 1cr.:
  - Introduction lecture 2t, on-line
  - Material, tasks and lectures on Moodle
  - On-line examination

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  På svenska
  1. Obligatorisk föreläsning GK/UK
  
  2. Obligastoriska kliniska övningar, simulationer och inlämmningsuppgifter GK/UK.
  
  3. Tent i läkemedelsräkning. GK/UK. Kalkylator får användas (ej mobiltelefon). .
  
  4. Tent i akutvård (0-5)
  
  5. Strålsäkerhet : GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 07.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-Å
  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Studerande får muntlig feedback av instuderingsfrågor, kliniska övningar och simulationer under övningar.
  Studerande får skriftlig gruppfeedback efter hemtent. Individuell feedback vid behov (tiden bokas med lärare). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1.Obligatorisk introduktion och obliatoriska föreläsningar
  2.Obligastoriska kliniska övningar med inlämningsuppgifter och simulationer . Gjorda och i tid inlämnade uppgifter är förutsättning för att studerande kan delta kliniska övningar.
  3.Tent i läkemedelsräkning
  4. Hemtent i akutvård
  5. Strålsäkerhet: Uppgifter i Moodle (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatorisk introduktion 11.1.
  Obligatoriska föreläsningar 15.1., 23.1. 8.2. 19.3.
  Inlämningsuppgifter inför de obligatoriska kliniska övningar den 20.2. DL 15.2. kl 16
  Obligatoriska simulationer 8.3.
  Examination i läkemedelsräkning 22.03. (omtent 1 19.04., omtent 2 24.05.).
  Hemtent i akutvård 28.3.
  
  Strålsäkerhet: tentamensdatum planeras under första lektionen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  4sp = 108h
  Föreläsningar 12 h
  Instuderingsfrågor och simulationer 27 h
  Läkemedelsräkning 13 h
  Tent i akut vårdarbete 31 h (Självstudier inför tent + tent 4 timmar)
  Strålsäkerhet 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Godkänd:
  Studerande har deltagit de obligatoriska föreläsningar. Vid frånvaro kompletterat föreläsningar enligt examinators anvisningar.
  
  Studerande deltar aktivt kliniska övningar och simuleringar och påvisar kunnandet i akutvård.
  
  Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: alla svar måste vara till 100% korrekt räknade för att studerande skall bli godkänd i examinationen.
  
  Tent i akutvård:
  Studerande känner till samarbete vid kris- och katastrofsituationer regionalt och nationellt.
  Studerande kan i ett mångprofessionellt team bedöma vårdbehovet, planera, utföra och dokumentera akutvård
  Studerande kan bemöta och handleda den kritiskt sjuka patienten och anhöriga
  Studerande behärskar läkemedelsbehandling inom akutvård.
  
  Underkänd:
  Studerande deltar inte de obligatoriska föreläsningar och har inte kompletterat frånvaro enligt anvisningar.
  
  Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller deltar inte aktivt simuleringar och påvisar inte kunnandet i akutvård.
  
  Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: resultat under 100% korrekt
  
  Tent i akutvård: Studerande påvisar inte kunskap i kursens olika kompetensområden.
  
  Strålskydd: Har inte lämnat in uppgifter i strålsäkerhet/ UK i online-tent
  
  Studerande påvisar inte kunskap i kursens olika kompetensområden och svarar till uppgifter på en allmän nivå (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande känner till på en allmän nivå begrepp och grundläggande principer inom akutvård. Det finns ytlig samband mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande förstår och kan förklara begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Visar förmåga till att reflektera mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har förmåga att se samband och göra egna slutsatser mellan begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Kan reflektera mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

•   English VÅV22EN01-3006 15.04.2024-24.05.2024  3 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 24.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 12.04.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV22EN01-3007 04.03.2024-07.04.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 07.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.03.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 43

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English USS22GV06-3002 26.02.2024-21.04.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
  - can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
  - is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
  
  Oral and written communication
  
  Oral and written presentations
  
  Language correctness and language planning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Maria Engberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Text material and assignments are part of the course.

  Learning methods

  Contact lessons based on communication, adaption of text material, individual work, work in pairs/groups, essay writing, simulations of cases.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grading on a scale 1-5 or fail. An approved course requires approved oral presentations and approved written assignments.

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  26.02.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 14.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Cindy Forsblom

  Additional information

  Attendance is mandatory and any absences must be compensated.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  N/A

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  N/A

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spoken assignments:
  
  1) Reading Circle (APPROVED/FAIL)
  2) Simulations of Cases (GRADE), execution at different times,
  
  Written assignments:
  
  3) A Nursing Case Study Essay (GRADE)
  4) Written Examination on Vocabulary Knowledge (vocabulary lists provided) (GRADE)
  5) Summary of an Academic Article (APPROVED/FAIL)
  
  NB! Written assignment 5 can support the student in receiving a higher grade.

  Internationa connections

  N/A

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course comprises 3 credits and the students are expected to work approximately 81 hours.

  Assessment criteria

  The student fails to submit the assignments by the deadline provided and/or fails to take part in oral presentations/simulations.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student can express himself in a simple but coherent way and write reports in a simple but often unstructured way. There are spelling mistakes and weaknesses in basic structures of a written text. The student manages to present orally but the presentation may be difficult for foreigners to understand. Limited ability to express oneself fluently in speech, the student pauses to find suitable expressions or uses words in his native language. Have problems to find synonyms and a suitable style.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Grade 3
  The student can write coherent, analytical and structured texts including his own opinions and arguments and can draw conclusions of information from different sources. Breach of style, spelling mistakes and other small mistakes can be found but the student has a good command of the basic structures and can use difficult structures more correctly. Oral presentations are of a routine nature but structured.
  
  Grade 4
  The student writes almost flawless English and expresses himself fluently and professionally in speech and writing. The student writes well structured, analytical texts with well-grounded conclusions about more demanding topics and manages to pinpoint the most important in a text and provide examples. The student can express himself orally within a wide variety of topics spontaneously and rarely needs to look for the right expression. A versatile vocabulary.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Grade 5
  The language is idiomatic and flawless. The student can write scientific texts in a well-structured, interesting and correct way. Manages to vary the style and use of language depending on the target group. Can in speech use professional, balanced and idiomatic language, make corrections without the audience being disturbed by it and has a good command of insinuations and multi-faceted expressions. Oral speeches are interesting, creative and well structured.

•   English USS22GV06-3003 08.01.2024-14.04.2024  3 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
  - can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
  - is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
  
  Oral and written communication
  
  Oral and written presentations
  
  Language correctness and language planning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Maria Engberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Text material and assignments are part of the course.

  Learning methods

  Contact lessons based on communication, adaption of text material, individual work, work in pairs/groups, essay writing.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grading on a scale 1-5 or fail. An approved course requires approved oral presentations, approved written assignments, and approved compensation assignments.

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 14.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Cindy Forsblom

  Additional information

  Attendance is mandatory and any absences must be compensated.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  N/A

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  N/A

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments will be presented and deadlines will be agreed on at the introduction to the course.
  There will be a vocabulary exam for which you will need a laptop: date to be determined.

  Internationa connections

  N/A

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course comprises 3 credits and the students are expected to work approximately 81 hours.

  Assessment criteria

  The student fails to submit the assignments by the deadline provided and/or fails to take part in oral presentations/simulations.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student can express himself in a simple but coherent way and write reports in a simple but often unstructured way. There are spelling mistakes and weaknesses in basic structures of a written text. The student manages to present orally but the presentation may be difficult for foreigners to understand. Limited ability to express oneself fluently in speech, the student pauses to find suitable expressions or uses words in his native language. Have problems to find synonyms and a suitable style.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student can write coherent, analytical and structured texts including his own opinions and arguments and can draw conclusions of information from different sources. Breach of style, spelling mistakes and other small mistakes can be found but the student has a good command of the basic structures and can use difficult structures more correctly. Oral presentations are of a routine nature but structured.
  
  Grade 4
  The student writes almost flawless English and expresses himself fluently and professionally in speech and writing. The student writes well structured, analytical texts with well-grounded conclusions about more demanding topics and manages to pinpoint the most important in a text and provide examples. The student can express himself orally within a wide variety of topics spontaneously and rarely needs to look for the right expression. A versatile vocabulary.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Grade 5
  The language is idiomatic and flawless. The student can write scientific texts in a well-structured, interesting and correct way. Manages to vary the style and use of language depending on the target group. Can in speech use professional, balanced and idiomatic language, make corrections without the audience being disturbed by it and has a good command of insinuations and multi-faceted expressions. Oral speeches are interesting, creative and well structured.

•   English VÅV22EN01-3010 29.04.2024-26.05.2024  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.04.2024 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 28.04.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV22EN01-3002 02.01.2024-24.03.2024  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 24.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3005 14.08.2023-31.12.2023  7 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  - can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  - can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)
  
  Physical, social and symbolic environment
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  Wound-care, chronic wound
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
  Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)
  
  Övrig litteratur:
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.
  
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
  Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.
  
  Artiklar och databas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Simulationer obligatoriks närvaro
  Smågruppsarbete (distans)
  Reflektionsdagbok
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete (distans) och simulationer . Bedöms: GK/UK.
  
  2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK.
  
  3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker GK/UK Skriftlig respons på Moodle
  
  4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
  För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Muntlig respons efter examinationen.
  
  5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
  Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Skriftlig respons och utvärdering på Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 31.08.2023

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in till daniel.nenonen@novia.fi via e-ahot före den 31.8.2023 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Reflektionsdagbok
  Simulationer
  Praktisk examination
  Individuell skriftlig examination
  Förstahjälp (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Reflektionsdagbok lämnas in på Moodle inför varje simulation
  Simulation vecka 43 och 50, + öppen klinik vecka 50
  Första hjälp vecka 43.
  Praktisk examination. Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommelse med examinator
  Skriftlig individuell examination. Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommelse med examinator (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier inför examination 80h
  Självstudier, smågruppsarbete, reflektionsdagbok - inför varje simulation 70 h
  Föreläsningar på campus ca. 12 h
  Simulation: 16h
  Första hjälp övning: 4h
  Examination: 4h
  
  Livräddande första hjälpen 0,25 sp
  Skriftlig individuell tentamen 2.5 sp
  Simulering 1 sp
  Releksionsdagbok 1 sp
  Praktisk examination 1 sp
  Självstudier (moodle) och föreläsningar 1,25 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3003 04.10.2023-09.02.2024  7 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  - can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  - can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)
  
  Physical, social and symbolic environment
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  Wound-care, chronic wound
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
  Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)
  
  Övrig litteratur:
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.
  
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
  Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.
  
  Artiklar och databas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Simulationer obligatoriks närvaro
  Smågruppsarbete (distans)
  Reflektionsdagbok
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete (distans) och simulationer . Bedöms: GK/UK.
  
  2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK.
  
  3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker GK/UK Skriftlig respons på Moodle
  
  4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
  För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Muntlig respons efter examinationen.
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle
  
  5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
  Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Skriftlig respons och utvärdering på Moodle
  
  6. Tystnadsplikt - inlämning på Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.10.2023 - 09.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  29.07.2023 - 07.09.2023

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in till Josephine Åberg via e-ahot före den 9.10.2023 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Reflektionsdagbok
  Simulationer
  Praktisk examination
  Individuell skriftlig examination
  Förstahjälp (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Reflektionsdagbok lämnas in på Moodle inför varje simulation (dvs. v.46, 49 samt v. 1/2024)
  Simulation( vecka 46, 49 - 2023. Samt v. 2 2024)
  Första hjälp, v 2/2024
  Praktisk examination v. 7/2024 Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommlese med examinatorn
  Skriftlig individuell examination vecka 4/2024. Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommlese med examinatorn (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier inför examination 80h
  Självstudier, smågruppsarbete, reflektionsdagbok - inför varje simulation 70 h
  Föreläsningar på campus ca. 12 h
  Simulation: 16h
  Första hjälp övning: 4h
  Examination: 4h
  Tystandsplikt - inlämning
  
  Livräddande första hjälpen 0,25 sp
  Skriftlig individuell tentamen (hemtentamen) 2.5. sp
  Simulering 1 sp
  Refleksionsdagbok 2.25 sp
  Praktisk examination 1 sp
  Självstudier (moodle) och föreläsningar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3004 04.09.2023-31.01.2024  7 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  - can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  - can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)
  
  Physical, social and symbolic environment
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  Wound-care, chronic wound
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
  Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)
  
  Övrig litteratur:
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.
  
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
  Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.
  
  Artiklar och databas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Kliniska övningar
  Studiebesök (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Inlämningsuppgifter inför kliniska övningar GK/UK. Muntlig respons ges under övningar.
  
  2. Quiz i sårvård. Självrättande tent.
  
  3. Obligatorisk närvaro under kliniska övningar och studiebesök GK/UK. Muntlig respons ges under övningar,
  
  4. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK. Muntlig respons ges kontinuerligt.
  
  5. Praktisk examination i form av filmning GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
  För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Studerande får skriftlig respons parvis på Moodle.
  
  6. Skriftlig individuell examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
  Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Studerande får skriftlig individuell respons och utvärdering på Moodle. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 31.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.09.2023

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering av kurs eller kursdel lämnas in innan undervisningen börjar till Hanna Limnell via e-ahot före den 18.9.
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Ouriginal via Moodle
  
  Examensstadga §4 "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska." (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Obligatorisk introduktion 6.9.
  Inlämningsuppgifter inför kliniska övningar
  Obligatoriska kliniska övningar
  Praktisk examination i form av filmning
  Individuell skriftlig examination
  Nödförstahjälpen 4h (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studiebesök i smågrupper; Kunnonkoti Åbo YH (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Inlämningsuppgifter inför kliniska övningar lämnas in vecka 41 10.10. på Moodle
  Quiz i sårvård Vecka 44
  Obligatoriska kliniska övningar och studiebesök vecka 43-49
  Livräddande förstahjälpen 4h vecka 49 7-8.12.
  Praktisk examination i form av filmning vecka 48-50 Inlämning senast 15.12. på Moodle.
  Skriftlig individuell examination vecka 49 5.12.2023 Omtentamen 1 19.01. 2024 omtentamen 2 09.02.2024 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h 7 sp = 189h
  
  Föreläsningar 24 h 1sp
  Inlämningsuppgifter inför kliniska övningar och Quiz 54 h 2sp
  Kliniska övningar och studiebesök 27 h 1 sp
  Självstudier och skriftlig individuell examination 40 h 1,5 sp
  Självstudier och klinisk examination i form av filmning 44h 1,5 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Extended Nursing Care of the Patient with Substance Use Disorders VÅV16PV03-3009 28.08.2023-26.11.2023  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and societal governance in substance abuse care
  - can identify the consequences of abuse and dependence on the welfare society
  - can apply preventive care work and describe the care chain in the abusive care system
  - can describe specific features of different drug groups
  - can evaluate different care and treatment efforts in different contexts

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Nursing care of the patient with substance use disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2011. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Handouts
  According to the lecturer´s instruction

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case demonstrations
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Videos
  Study
  Experience Experts

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The following points are considered in the Group work:
  Theoretical basis and use of literature with scale 1 - 5
  Content and logical structure of work with scale 1 - 5
  Cooperation with scale 1-5
  Presentation with scale 1 - 5
  The following points are considered on the Project day:
  Preparation for the presentation with scale 1-5
  Get the students interested in the subject, get them to cooperate and discuss with scale 1-5
  Can summarize the discussion on the subject with scale 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 25.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Group work
  Indivudual assignment

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visit
  Experts by experience
  Participation in an external lecturers day and Hallå 2 project

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Group work:
  Seminar autumn 2022

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can do the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

•   Extended clinical nursing care in primary health care VÅV21FK01-3001 22.01.2024-31.05.2024  6 credits  (USS21F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of primary care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their relatives
  - mastered the care of patients in primary care
  - mastered the care of acutely ill children
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - can, in a simulated situation, be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can apply a rehabilitative and health-promoting approach
  - can apply patient guidance

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  PEDIATRIC CAR
  Jääskeläinen, J., Miettinen, P., Niinikoski, H., Saha, M-T. & Veijola R. 2016. Diabeettisen ketoasidoosinhoito. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Mäkelä, M. & Dunder, T. 2016. Anafylaktinen reaktio. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Qvist, E. 2013. Lääkärinkäsikirja. Akuutisti sairas imeväinen.
  Qvist, E. & Korppi, M. 2009. Duodecim. Alle kolmen kuukauden ikäinen lapsi päivystysksessä.
  
  https://www.terveyskyla.fi/kuntoutumistalo/sv
  
  https://www.vardhandboken.se/arbetssatt-och-ansvar/bemotande-i-vard-och-omsorg/telefonradgivning---ett-personcentrerat-vardmote/telefonradgivning-med-samtalsprocessen-som-metod/
  
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red) 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm
  
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Group work
  Individual work
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Active attendance at the lessons
  Approved practical exercises
  Written examination assignment. Grade: scale 1 - 5
  Mandatory attendance at Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  
  Surgical care, internal medical care, rehabilitation and pediatric care: exam grades 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.01.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 21.01.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V
  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa - timlärare Vård, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marica Hinders, Viktor Matintupa, Carita Blomström, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Active attendance
  Approved practical exercises
  Written examination in internal medicine care, surgical care and pediatric care

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditiona

•   Extended nursing care in an optional clinical context VÅV14KVV15-3009 11.09.2023-17.12.2023  12 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and related persons and take into account their cultural affiliation
  - can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
  - can handle complicated vocational tasks within the chosen health context
  - can independently make decisions regarding the patient's care process and be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can independently acquire and assess evidence-based knowledge
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - has the skills to supervise and teach patients
  - shows ability to meet people in crisis
  - has readiness to shop in different situations in the healthcare sector

  Prerequisites

  Core studies
  Professional studies
  Practice

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About internships

  Learning methods

  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context
  Written internships in different contexts

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved internship
  Approved written assignment
  Participation in seminar

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 12 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  1 - 60

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda

  Additional information

  Students have the opportunity to get some of the practice validated through summer jobs as nurses in the summer of 2022
  is the supervisor for those who do internships in paediatric care
  
  Supervisors for those who do internships in emergency care, intensive care, internal medicine and surgical health care are Marice Nedergård, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Jannica Andtfolk & Åsa Lågland.
  
  The supervisor for those who do their internship in psychiatry is Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Internationa connections

  Students can complete the internship abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h
  1 week = 40 h, of which 38 h per week mandatory attendance at the internship
  2 h / week for internships on your own.
  Mandatory attendance at the internship info before the internship and the internship seminar after the end of the internship

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  follows the work list and holds agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
  Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team

•   Extended nursing care in an optional clinical context VÅV21KVV15-3002 23.11.2023-15.12.2024  15 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and related persons and take into account their cultural affiliation
  - can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
  - can handle complicated vocational tasks within the chosen health context
  - can independently make decisions regarding the patient's care process and be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can independently acquire and assess evidence-based knowledge
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - has the skills to supervise and teach patients
  - shows ability to meet people in crisis
  - has readiness to shop in different situations in the healthcare sector

  Prerequisites

  Core studies
  Professional studies
  Practice

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About internships

  Learning methods

  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context
  Written internships in different contexts

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved internship
  Approved written assignment
  Participation in INFO and seminar

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.11.2023 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.09.2024

  • 15 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  1 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Students have the opportunity to get some of the practice validated through summer jobs as nurses in the summer of 2023/2024
  
  Supervisors for this course are Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Jannica Andtfolk & Åsa Lågland.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar (MANDATORY)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Internationa connections

  Students can complete the internship abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  15 cr=405h
  1 cr = 27 h
  
  1 week = 40 h, of which 38 h per week mandatory attendance at the internship (2 h / week for internships on your own)
  10 weeks practice =400h
  2h MANDATORY attendance at the internship info before
  3h Internship seminar after the end of the internship MANDATORY

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  follows the work list and holds agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
  Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team

•   Extended nursing care in an optional clinical context VÅV21KVV15-3003 26.01.2024-15.12.2024  15 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and related persons and take into account their cultural affiliation
  - can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
  - can handle complicated vocational tasks within the chosen health context
  - can independently make decisions regarding the patient's care process and be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can independently acquire and assess evidence-based knowledge
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - has the skills to supervise and teach patients
  - shows ability to meet people in crisis
  - has readiness to shop in different situations in the healthcare sector

  Prerequisites

  Core studies
  Professional studies
  Practice

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About internships

  Learning methods

  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context
  Written internships in different contexts

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved internship
  Approved written assignment
  Participation in INFO and seminar

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.01.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  17.08.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 15 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  1 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Students have the opportunity to get some of the practice validated through summer jobs as nurses in the summer of 2023/2024
  
  Supervisors for this course are Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Jannica Andtfolk & Marice Nedergård.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar (MANDATORY)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Internationa connections

  Students can complete the internship abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  15 cr=405h
  1 cr = 27 h
  
  1 week = 40 h, of which 38 h per week mandatory attendance at the internship (2 h / week for internships on your own)
  10 weeks practice =400h
  2h MANDATORY attendance at the internship info before
  3h Internship seminar after the end of the internship MANDATORY

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  follows the work list and holds agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
  Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team

•   Family Health Care VÅV21HV03-3001 16.10.2023-17.12.2023  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs of pediatric patients
  - have basic knowledge in different theories about human development from age 0 - 20 years and about the personal development of the adult and the elderly

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children
  Developmental psychologhy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020
  
  Utvecklingspsykologi
  Utvecklingspsykologi:
  Jerlang, E. 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier. Stockholm, Liber
  Hwang, P. & Nilsson, B. 2011. Utvecklingspsykologi. Stockholm, Natur och Kultur
  Tetzchner, S. 2016. Utvecklingspsykologi. Studentlitteratur, Lund

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.10.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 13.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 cr
  Children and young people's health 1.5 cr
  Developmental psychology 0.5 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's and young people's health and children's healthcare 3 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Developmental psychology 0.5 credits - written assignment
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination autumn 2023
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV21HV03-3006 28.08.2023-08.10.2023  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs of pediatric patients
  - have basic knowledge in different theories about human development from age 0 - 20 years and about the personal development of the adult and the elderly

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children
  Developmental psychologhy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020
  
  Utvecklingspsykologi
  Utvecklingspsykologi:
  Jerlang, E. 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier. Stockholm, Liber
  Hwang, P. & Nilsson, B. 2011. Utvecklingspsykologi. Stockholm, Natur och Kultur
  Tetzchner, S. 2016. Utvecklingspsykologi. Studentlitteratur, Lund

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 08.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 04.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 cr
  Children and young people's health 1.5 cr
  Developmental psychology 0.5 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's and young people's health and children's healthcare 3 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Developmental psychology 0.5 credits - written assignment
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2023
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3008 04.12.2023-10.05.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.12.2023 - 10.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2023 - 03.12.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Johanna Wide, Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3010 06.11.2023-10.12.2023  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 10.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 05.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   Finnish USS22GV05-3002 14.08.2023-31.12.2023  3 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
  - can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
  - is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
  
  Oral and written communication
  
  Oral and written presentations
  
  Language correctness and language planning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sanna Nygård

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ingår i kursen och finns i Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier, muntliga och skriftliga övningar och uppgifter. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper bedöms skilt. Bedömningen baserar sig på den gemensamma europeiska referensramen för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1 motsvarar nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1-3) och nivå B2 eller högre motsvarar goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4-5).
  Examinationer och timaktivitet påverkar bedömningen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 31.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sanna Nygård

  Additional information

  Noggrannare information om uppgifter, tentamen och datum publiceras i Moodle och gås igenom under första kurstillfället.
  Delprestationer är i kraft fram till 31.12.2023 eller enligt särskild överenskommelse.
  För uppgifter som lämnats in efter deadline ges ingen feedback.
  Sena inlämningar påverkar kursvitsordet. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  För godkänd kurs krävs:
  - närvaro på lektioner (enligt egen nivå)
  - godkända muntliga och skriftliga kursuppgifter
  - godkänd muntlig tentamen
  - godkänd skriftlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadlines för inlämningsuppgifter publiceras i Moodle och gås igenom under första kurstillfället.
  Muntlig tentamen i smågrupper i oktober.
  Skritflig tentamen i december. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h arbete (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  B1
  Vitsordet 1: Klarar sig nöjaktigt i förutsebara yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan skriva en enkel sammanhängande text. Budskapet förmedlas även om felen kan försvåra kommunikationen.
  Vitsordet 2: Klarar sig någorlunda i oförutsedda yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan skriva konsekventa texter som förmedlar ett budskap. Felen leder i allmänhet inte till missförstånd även om de kan störa läsrytmen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Vitsordet 3 (B1): Klarar sig allmänhet bra i yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan vanligen uttrycka sig enligt situationens krav.
  Vitsordet 4 (B2): Klarar sig bra i allmänna yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Använder språket mångsidigt.
  Uttrycker sig enligt situationens krav (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  B2 (eller högre):
  Klarar sig mycket bra i allmänna yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Använder språket smidigt och mångsidigt.
  Uttrycker sig tydligt enligt situationens krav. (not translated)

•   Finnish USS22GV05-3003 08.01.2024-03.03.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
  - can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
  - is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
  
  Oral and written communication
  
  Oral and written presentations
  
  Language correctness and language planning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sanna Nygård

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet är sammanställt av läraren och finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, par- och grupparbete, muntliga och skriftliga övningar och uppgifter, textbearbetning, självstudier. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper bedöms skilt. Bedömningen baserar sig på den gemensamma europeiska referensramen för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1 motsvarar nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1-3) och nivå B2 eller högre motsvarar goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4-5).
  Examinationer och timaktivitet påverkar bedömningen. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 03.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Johanna Wide, Sanna Nygård

  Additional information

  Noggrannare information om uppgifter, tentamen och datum finns i Moodle och gås igenom under första kurstillfället.
  Delprestationer är i kraft fram till 31.5 eller enligt särskild överenskommelse.
  För uppgifter som lämnats in efter deadline ges ingen feedback.
  Sena inlämningar påverkar kursvitsordet. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  För godkänd kurs krävs:
  - aktivt deltagande under lektioner (80 % närvarokrav för B- och C-nivå)
  - obligatoriska muntliga och skriftliga inlämningsuppgifter
  - godkänd muntlig och skriftlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig tentamen vecka 9.
  Skriftlig tentamen vecka 9.
  Skriftlig omtentamen under allmän omtentamen.
  Muntlig omtentamen enligt överenskommelse. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h arbete. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  En eller flera kursuppgifter är ogjorda eller underkända.
  Studerande har knappt deltagit i kursen eller har kunskaper under B1-nivå:
  Klarar varken alldaglig eller branschspecifik skriftlig eller muntlig kommunikation på ett vederbörligt sätt.
  Kommunikationen är så bristfällig och/eller innehåller så många fel att misstolkningar uppstår eller kommunikationen förhindras. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  CEFR B1 (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  CEFR B1-B2 (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  CEFR B2.2 eller högre (not translated)

•   Finnish USS22GV05-3004 08.01.2024-14.04.2024  3 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
  - can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
  - is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
  
  Oral and written communication
  
  Oral and written presentations
  
  Language correctness and language planning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sanna Nygård

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier, korta föreläsningar, par- och grupparbete, muntliga och skriftliga övningar och uppgifter, textbearbetning, självstudier. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper bedöms skilt. Bedömningen baserar sig på den gemensamma europeiska referensramen för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1 motsvarar nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1-3) och nivå B2 eller högre motsvarar goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4-5).
  Examinationer och timaktivitet påverkar bedömningen. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 14.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 09.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Johanna Wide, Sanna Nygård

  Additional information

  Noggrannare information om uppgifter, tentamen och datum publiceras i Moodle och gås igenom under första kurstillfället.
  Delprestationer är i kraft fram till 31.5.2024 eller enligt särskild överenskommelse.
  För uppgifter som lämnats in efter deadline ges ingen feedback.
  Sena inlämningar kan påverka kursvitsordet. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  För godkänd kurs krävs:
  - aktivt deltagande under lektioner (enligt egen nivå)
  - obligatoriska muntliga och skriftliga inlämningsuppgifter
  - godkänd muntlig och skriftlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadlines för inlämningsuppgifter publiceras i Moodle och gås igenom under första kurstillfället.
  Muntlig tentamen i smågrupper 2.4.
  Skritflig tentamen 4.4. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h arbete (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Under B1-nivå eller ogjorda kursuppgifter eller för många okompenserade frånvaron. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  B1
  Vitsordet 1: Klarar sig nöjaktigt i förutsebara yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan skriva en enkel sammanhängande text. Budskapet förmedlas även om felen kan försvåra kommunikationen.
  Vitsordet 2: Klarar sig någorlunda i oförutsedda yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan skriva konsekventa texter som förmedlar ett budskap. Felen leder i allmänhet inte till missförstånd även om de kan störa läsrytmen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Vitsordet 3 (B1): Klarar sig allmänhet bra i yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan vanligen uttrycka sig enligt situationens krav.
  Vitsordet 4 (B2): Klarar sig bra i allmänna yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Använder språket mångsidigt.
  Uttrycker sig enligt situationens krav (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  B2-C1
  Klarar sig mycket bra i allmänna yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Använder språket smidigt och mångsidigt.
  Uttrycker sig tydligt enligt situationens krav. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3011 12.02.2024-31.05.2024  3 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.02.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 17.03.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Johanna Wide, Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3007 02.01.2024-28.01.2024  2 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 28.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 30.12.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 43

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3008 14.09.2023-20.10.2023  2 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test: approved/failed
  Group assignment: approved/failed
  Individual written case studies: approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.09.2023 - 20.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests during lesson time, virtual test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 h = 54 h

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3011 06.11.2023-08.12.2023  2 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  essons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test: approved/failed
  Group assignment: approved/failed
  Individual written case studies: approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 08.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 05.11.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests during lesson time, virtual test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3013 15.04.2024-19.05.2024  2 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 19.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 14.04.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time
  Group assinment

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)

•   From Elderly to Geriatric Patient USS21KL02-3002 28.08.2023-08.10.2023  4 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Has an understanding of normal aging
  
  Can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
  
  Can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  
  Has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
  
  Master evidence-based care methods and appropriate medication management
  
  Can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient
  
  Chain of care and service system
  
  Coping/adaptation
  
  Partnership and counseling
  
  Caring for close relatives
  
  Ethical decision making
  
  The aged patient's health problems
  
  Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
  
  Adequate medication management
  
  Geriatric technology
  
  Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder
  
  Evidence-based care
  
  Care chains and service types, elderly care
  
  Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  - Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., Hylen Ranhoff, A., Bolinder-Palmér, I. & Olsson, K. (2018). Geriatrisk omvårdnad: God omsorg och vård till den äldre (Andra upplagan.). Liber AB.
  - Dehlin, O. & Rundgren, Å. (2018). Geriatrik (3:4 upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  eller Arkkila, P., Pitkälä, K., Strandberg, T., Sulkava, R., Tilvis, R. & Viitanen, M. (2016). Geriatria (3., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim.
  Gottlieb, L. N. 2012 Strengths-Based Nursing Care
  Litteratur:
  Drevenhorn, E. 2017. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekstedt, M. & Flink, M. 2019. Hemsjukvård-olika perspektiv på trygg och säker vård
  Ernsth Bravell, M. 2011. Äldre och åldrande.
  Etene. 2008. Vårdetik på ålderns höst
  Finlex 2012 Lag om stödjande av den äldre befolkningens funktionsförmåga och om social- och hälsovårdstjänster för äldre.
  Hellström, I. & Hydén, L-C. (red). 2016. Att leva med demens.
  Johansson, S: & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (red). 2016. Förändringsperspektiv på äldreomsorgen.
  Jönson, H., & Harnett, T. 2015. Socialt arbete med äldre.
  Kivelä, S-L. 2010. Vi äldre och våra mediciner.
  Larsson, Å. (red) 2015. Vardagsteknik för äldre.
  Lindqvist, E-L. 2016 Äldres hälsa och livskvalitet
  NMR. 2015. Kvalitet i äldreomsorgen. Äldreomsorg i Norden Sid 55-90. Nordiskt välfärdscentrum.
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  SHM 2020: Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen.
  THL. 2020. Livskraft på äldre dar - kostrekommendationer på äldre personer.
  Fimea. 2020. Medicin75+
  Medibas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Workshops
  Simuleringar
  Inlämningsuppgift
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examinationsuppgift bedömning 0-5
  Tent i Geriatrik GK/UK
  Deltagande i Workshops och simulering bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 08.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Workshops och simulationer obilgatorisk närvaro
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedömd med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tent i Geriatrik 3.10, Omtentamen 27.10 och 24,11
  Examinationsuppgift inlämning senast 29.9 och/eller 15.11 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 4h
  Workshops och simulationer 6h
  Självstudier i Geriatrik och tent i Geriatrik 28h
  Individuell skrifltig uppgift, (examinationsuppgif) 27h
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur 43h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte. Texten besvarar inte frågorna och är ofullständig, Litteratur och forskningar tillämpas inte och inga reflektioner görs, Brister finns i den tekniska utformningen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial men har inte förmåga att göra egna reflektioner. Studerande har svårigheter med att redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteorin och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial och förmår till en viss del göra reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och kan tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar. Studerande kan relatera de olika delarna av uppgiften till varandraoch använder kursmateriel, forskningar och föreläsningsmaterial som stöd för sina reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess och kan anlysera detta och göra egna reflektioner. (not translated)

•   From Elderly to Geriatric Patient USS22KL02-3001 12.02.2024-17.03.2024  4 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of normal aging
  - can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
  - can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
  - master evidence-based and sustainable care methods and appropriate medication management
  - can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient
  
  Chain of care and service system
  
  Coping/adaptation
  
  Partnership and counseling
  
  Caring for close relatives
  
  Ethical decision making
  
  The aged patient's health problems
  
  Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
  Care of chronic wound
  
  Adequate medication management
  
  Geriatric technology
  
  Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder
  
  Evidence-based care
  
  Care chains and service types, elderly care
  
  Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  - Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., Hylen Ranhoff, A., Bolinder-Palmér, I. & Olsson, K. (2018). Geriatrisk omvårdnad: God omsorg och vård till den äldre (Andra upplagan.). Liber AB.
  - Dehlin, O. & Rundgren, Å. (2018). Geriatrik (3:4 upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  eller Arkkila, P., Pitkälä, K., Strandberg, T., Sulkava, R., Tilvis, R. & Viitanen, M. (2016). Geriatria (3., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim.
  Gottlieb, L. N. 2012 Strengths-Based Nursing Care
  Litteratur:
  Drevenhorn, E. 2017. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekstedt, M. & Flink, M. 2019. Hemsjukvård-olika perspektiv på trygg och säker vård
  Ernsth Bravell, M. 2011. Äldre och åldrande.
  Etene. 2008. Vårdetik på ålderns höst
  Finlex 2012 Lag om stödjande av den äldre befolkningens funktionsförmåga och om social- och hälsovårdstjänster för äldre.
  Hellström, I. & Hydén, L-C. (red). 2016. Att leva med demens.
  Johansson, S: & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (red). 2016. Förändringsperspektiv på äldreomsorgen.
  Jönson, H., & Harnett, T. 2015. Socialt arbete med äldre.
  Kivelä, S-L. 2010. Vi äldre och våra mediciner.
  Larsson, Å. (red) 2015. Vardagsteknik för äldre.
  Lindqvist, E-L. 2016 Äldres hälsa och livskvalitet
  NMR. 2015. Kvalitet i äldreomsorgen. Äldreomsorg i Norden Sid 55-90. Nordiskt välfärdscentrum.
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  SHM 2020: Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen.
  THL. 2020. Livskraft på äldre dar - kostrekommendationer på äldre personer.
  Fimea. 2020. Medicin75+
  Medibas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Workshops
  Simuleringar
  Inlämningsuppgift
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examinationsuppgift bedömning 0-5
  Tent i Geriatrik GK/UK
  Deltagande i Föreläsningar, Workshops och Simulering bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.02.2024 - 17.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 11.02.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Föreläsningar, Workshops och simulationer obligatorisk närvaro till 80%. Kompensationsuppgifter vid frånvaro.
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedömd med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tent i Geriatrik 7.3, Omtentamen 19.4 och 3.5
  Examinationsuppgift inlämning senast 24.3 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 14 h
  Workshops och simulationer 6 h
  Självstudier i Geriatrik och tent i Geriatrik 28h
  Individuell skrifltig uppgift, (examinationsuppgif) 27h
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur 33h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte. Texten besvarar inte frågorna och är ofullständig, Litteratur och forskningar tillämpas inte och inga reflektioner görs, Brister finns i den tekniska utformningen (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial men har inte förmåga att göra egna reflektioner. Studerande har svårigheter med att redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial och förmår till en viss del göra reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och kan tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar. Studerande kan relatera de olika delarna av uppgiften till varandraoch använder kursmateriel, forskningar och föreläsningsmaterial som stöd för sina reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess och kan anlysera detta och göra egna reflektioner. (not translated)

•   Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3004 27.11.2023-14.01.2024  4 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.
  
  Forumreflection Pass/fail
  Written assignment for seminar according to Novias instruction for written assignments/ Thesis and opponentship pass, not pass complement
  Onlinetest 0-5; 75% correct for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.11.2023 - 14.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 26.11.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

  Assessment criteria

  The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
  The methodological literature is not used.
  Reflections are not performed.
  The technical design is lacking.
  Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
  The literature is referenced
  Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
  The technical design is satisfactory.
  Refers concepts and basic principle
  Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The questions are answered.
  The methodological literature is applied.
  The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
  The technical design is good
  Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
  The literature is analyzed and applied.
  The reflection is scientifically analytical.
  The technical design is commendable.
  Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
  Makes versatile use of literature
  Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically

•   Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3001 08.04.2024-19.05.2024  4 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.04.2024 - 19.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 04.04.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

•   Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3005 04.03.2024-07.04.2024  4 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 07.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.03.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

•   Health Promoting Care USS22GV01-3002 14.08.2023-31.12.2023  4 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with the theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and palliative care
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can, under guidance, along with individuals/groups in inter-professional teams plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional capacity
  - has expertise in care in various service environments within health promotion

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and illness, public health and endemic diseases
  
  Sustainable care at local and national level
  
  Health determinants
  
  Epidemiology
  
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention, methods, rehabilitation
  
  Empowerment
  
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and commitment
  
  Different service environments
  
  Ethical issues in health education
  
  Disabilities/impairments, functional ability, measurement methods
  
  Artificial intelligence

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Obligatorisk kurslitteratur:
  Beaglehole, R., Bonita & Kjällström T, 2010. Grundläggande epidemiologi sid 17 - 66 och 147 - 250. Studentlitteratur.
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 56 - 103 (finns som e-bok)
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro.
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Klang & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
  Kauhanen mfl. Kansanterveystiede. 2013. Sanoma Pro. Helsinki.
  Pellmer et.al. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Andersson, I., Eljertsson, G. 2013. Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Backman, G. ((ed) 2012. The right to health. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde, B. (red). 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund.
  Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E., Lyckhage, G., Tengelin, E. 2015. Jämlik vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson, M. (red) 2015. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Liber.
  Nunes-Ferraz, J., Karlberg, I. 2012. Hälsoekonomi -begrepp och tillämpningar.
  Skolin 2018. Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Studentlitteratur.
  Schäfer Elinder, L., Kwak, L. (red) 2014. Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar med uppgifter
  Självstudier
  Smågruppsarbeten obligatorisk deltagande
  Workshop obligatorisk närvaro
  Seminarieuppgift grupparbete
  Grupphemtentamen obligatorisk deltagande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Workshop GK/UK
  Underkänt
  Studerande deltar inte i workshop
  Studerande är inte en aktiv deltagare under simuleringar
  Godkänt
  Studernade deltar i simuleringar aktivt
  
  Epidemiologiuppgiften GK/UK
  GK
  Studernade gör uppgiften och lämnar in den i angiven tid samt läser andras uppgifter enligt anvisingar.
  Studerande kopletterar uppgiften vid behov enligt examinators anvisingar.
  UK
  Studernade lämnar inte in uppgiften eller läser inte andras uppgifter/ kommenterar eller gör inte kompletteringar enligt anvisingarna.
  
  Hemtentamen 1-5:
  Skriftlig hemtentamen i grupp bedöms i skalan 0-5. I hemtentamen ska studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter i resursförstärkande metoder i det hälsofrämjande och förebyggande arbetet. Studerande ska ta i beakatande hållbarheten i omgivningen. Studerande ska visa kunskaper i handledning av individer och grupper till ett hälsofrämjande levnadssätt. Studerande visar att hen förstår betydelsen av mångprofessionellt arbete inom folkhälsoarbete kontext.
  Komplettering enligt examinators skilda anvisingar. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Jaana-Sofia Tengström (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Workshops och smågruppsarbeten (0,5 sp) vecka 43 obligatorisk närvaro. Muntlig respons under workshoppen
  Seminarieuppgift, videofilmas och laddas på Moodle (1 sp) v.39, 29.9 kl.16.00
  Epidemiologi uppgift under närstudiedagen(0,5 sp). Uppgiften laddas på Moodle. Grupperna läser varandras uppgifter. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
  Grupphemtentamen (2 sp), inlämning vecka 47, 24.11 kl.16.00. Skriftlig respons på Moodle. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
  Studerande använder Novias skrivansviningar i samtliga inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier 35 h
  Föreläsningar samt workshop 30 h
  Hemtentamen samt seminarieuppgift 43 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Hemtentamen
  I examinationen besvaras alla examinationens delar utgående från få källor, men de olika delar kan inte relateras till varandra eller text är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande använder smalt kurslitteratur eller enbart egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Hemtentamen
  Studerande svarar på alla examinationens delar utgående från källor men de olika svaren kan inte helt relateras till varandra. Studerande använder både kurslitteratur och sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar, men inte systematiskt. Studernade använder sig inte av andra evidensbaserade källor. Examination är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Hemtentamen
  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå till alla examinationens delar utgående från olika evidensbaserade källor och kan relatera de olika delarna av examination till varandra. Studerande använder systematiskt kurslitteratur, andra evidensbaserade källor samt sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

•   Health Promoting Care USS22GV01-3003 08.01.2024-14.04.2024  4 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with the theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and palliative care
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can, under guidance, along with individuals/groups in inter-professional teams plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional capacity
  - has expertise in care in various service environments within health promotion

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and illness, public health and endemic diseases
  
  Sustainable care at local and national level
  
  Health determinants
  
  Epidemiology
  
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention, methods, rehabilitation
  
  Empowerment
  
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and commitment
  
  Different service environments
  
  Ethical issues in health education
  
  Disabilities/impairments, functional ability, measurement methods
  
  Artificial intelligence

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Liljeroth

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Obligatorisk kurslitteratur:
  Beaglehole, R., Bonita & Kjällström T, 2010. Grundläggande epidemiologi sid 17 - 66 och 147 - 250. Studentlitteratur.
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 56 - 103 (finns som e-bok)
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro.
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Klang & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
  Kauhanen mfl. Kansanterveystiede. 2013. Sanoma Pro. Helsinki.
  Pellmer et.al. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Andersson, I., Eljertsson, G. 2013. Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Backman, G. ((ed) 2012. The right to health. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde, B. (red). 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund.
  Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E., Lyckhage, G., Tengelin, E. 2015. Jämlik vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson, M. (red) 2015. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Liber.
  Nunes-Ferraz, J., Karlberg, I. 2012. Hälsoekonomi -begrepp och tillämpningar.
  Skolin 2018. Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Studentlitteratur.
  Schäfer Elinder, L., Kwak, L. (red) 2014. Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Självstudier
  Learning café, obligatorisk närvaro
  Seminarium, obligatorisk närvaro
  Simulering, obligatorisk närvaro
  Grupphemtentamen, obligatoriskt deltagande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Seminarium GK/UK
  Underkänt:
  Prestationen är underkänd om något av följande uppfylls:
  - Studerande identiefierar inte de grundläggande aspekterna i uppgiften
  - Studerande fungerar inte som en ansvarsfull (bär inte sitt ansvar som) gruppmedlem
  - Studerande deltar inte i seminariet
  
  Godkänt (alla kriterier uppfylls):
  - Studerande känner till de grundläggande aspekterna och principerna i uppgiftens syfte
  - Studerande bär sitt ansvar som gruppmedlem och kan bevisa deltagandet
  - Studerande arbetar ansvarsfullt och aktivt kring seminariearbetet och dess framförande
  - Studernade deltar aktivt på seminariet
  
  Simulering GK/UK
  Underkänt:
  Studerande deltar inte i simuleringen eller/ och
  Studerande är inte en aktiv deltagare under simuleringen
  
  Godkänt:
  Studernade både deltar i simuleringar samt deltar aktivt under simuleringstillfällen
  
  Hemtentamen 1-5:
  Skriftlig hemtentamen i par bedöms enligt skalan 0-5. I hemtentamen ska studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter i resursförstärkande metoder i det hälsofrämjande och förebyggande arbetet. Studerande ska ta i beakatande hållbarheten i omgivningen. Studerande ska visa kunskaper i handledning av individer och grupper till ett hälsofrämjande levnadssätt. Studerande visar att hen förstår betydelsen av mångprofessionellt arbete inom folkhälsoarbetets kontext.
  Komplettering enligt examinators skilda anvisingar.
  Försenad inlämning leder att vitsordet sänks med ett steg. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 14.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pia Liljeroth, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Det är inte tillåtet för studerande att använda artificiell intelligens för att skapa innehållet i examinationerna. Artificiell intelligens får dock användas för idéer, planering och granskning av språkdräkt. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminarium (1,0 sp) vecka 9, obligatorisk närvaro. Muntlig respons vid seminariumtillfället.
  Simulering (0,5 sp) vecka 13, obligatorisk närvaro.
  Grupphemtentamen (2,5 sp), inlämning vecka 14, 5.4.2024 kl.16.00. Skriftlig respons på Moodle. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
  Studerande använder Novias skrivansviningar i samtliga inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier 27 h
  Föreläsningar samt seminarium 31 h
  Simulation inkl förberedande arbete 23 h
  Hemtentamen 27 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Hemtentamen
  I examinationen besvaras alla examinationens delar utgående från få källor, men de olika delarna kan inte relateras till varandra eller texten är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande använder kurslitteratur smalt eller enbart egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Hemtentamen
  Studerande svarar på alla examinationens delar utgående från källor men de olika svaren kan inte helt relateras till varandra. Studerande använder både kurslitteratur och sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar, men inte systematiskt. Studernade använder sig inte av andra evidensbaserade källor. Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Hemtentamen
  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på alla examinationens delar utgående från olika evidensbaserade källor och kan relatera de olika delarna av examination till varandra. Studerande använder systematiskt kurslitteratur, andra evidensbaserade källor samt sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

•   Health Promoting Care USS22GV01-3004 12.02.2024-02.06.2024  4 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with the theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and palliative care
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can, under guidance, along with individuals/groups in inter-professional teams plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional capacity
  - has expertise in care in various service environments within health promotion

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and illness, public health and endemic diseases
  
  Sustainable care at local and national level
  
  Health determinants
  
  Epidemiology
  
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention, methods, rehabilitation
  
  Empowerment
  
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and commitment
  
  Different service environments
  
  Ethical issues in health education
  
  Disabilities/impairments, functional ability, measurement methods
  
  Artificial intelligence

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Beaglehole, R., Bonita & Kjällström T, 2010. Grundläggande epidemiologi sid 17 - 66 och 147 - 250. Studentlitteratur.
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 56 - 103 (finns som e-bok)
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro.
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Klang & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
  Kauhanen mfl. Kansanterveystiede. 2013. Sanoma Pro. Helsinki.
  Pellmer et.al. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Andersson, I., Eljertsson, G. 2013. Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Backman, G. ((ed) 2012. The right to health. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde, B. (red). 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund.
  Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E., Lyckhage, G., Tengelin, E. 2015. Jämlik vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson, M. (red) 2015. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Liber.
  Nunes-Ferraz, J., Karlberg, I. 2012. Hälsoekonomi -begrepp och tillämpningar.
  Skolin 2018. Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Studentlitteratur.
  Schäfer Elinder, L., Kwak, L. (red) 2014. Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar med uppgifter
  Självstudier
  Smågruppsarbeten obligatorisk deltagande
  Workshop obligatorisk närvaro
  Seminarieuppgift grupparbete
  Grupphemtentamen obligatorisk deltagande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Workshop och simulering GK/UK
  Underkänt
  Studerande deltar inte i workshop
  Studerande är inte en aktiv deltagare under simuleringar
  Godkänt
  Studernade deltar i simuleringar aktivt
  
  Epidemiologiuppgiften GK/UK
  GK
  Studernade gör uppgiften och lämnar in den i angiven tid samt läser andras uppgifter enligt anvisingar.
  Studerande kopletterar uppgiften vid behov enligt examinators anvisingar.
  UK
  Studernade lämnar inte in uppgiften eller läser inte andras uppgifter/ kommenterar eller gör inte kompletteringar enligt anvisingarna.
  
  Hemtentamen 1-5:
  Skriftlig hemtentamen i grupp bedöms i skalan 0-5. I hemtentamen ska studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter i resursförstärkande metoder i det hälsofrämjande och förebyggande arbetet. Studerande ska ta i beakatande hållbarheten i omgivningen. Studerande ska visa kunskaper i handledning av individer och grupper till ett hälsofrämjande levnadssätt. Studerande visar att hen förstår betydelsen av mångprofessionellt arbete inom folkhälsoarbete kontext.
  Komplettering enligt examinators skilda anvisingar. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.02.2024 - 02.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 11.02.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Workshops, smågruppsarbeten och simulering (1 sp) 3.4 och 27.5 obligatorisk närvaro. Muntlig respons under workshoppen. Epidemiologi uppgift under närstudiedagen 3.4. Uppgiften laddas på Moodle. Grupperna läser varandras uppgifter. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
  
  Seminarieuppgift, videofilmas och laddas på Moodle (1 sp) dl.15.3 kl.16.00
  
  Grupphemtentamen (2 sp), inlämning vecka 2.5 kl.16.00. Skriftlig respons på Moodle. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
  Studerande använder Novias skrivansviningar i samtliga inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier 35 h
  Föreläsningar samt workshop 30 h
  Hemtentamen samt seminarieuppgift 43 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Hemtentamen
  I examinationen besvaras alla examinationens delar utgående från få källor, men de olika delar kan inte relateras till varandra eller text är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande använder smalt kurslitteratur eller enbart egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Hemtentamen
  Studerande svarar på alla examinationens delar utgående från källor men de olika svaren kan inte helt relateras till varandra. Studerande använder både kurslitteratur och sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar, men inte systematiskt. Studernade använder sig inte av andra evidensbaserade källor. Examination är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Hemtentamen
  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå till alla examinationens delar utgående från olika evidensbaserade källor och kan relatera de olika delarna av examination till varandra. Studerande använder systematiskt kurslitteratur, andra evidensbaserade källor samt sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3013 09.10.2023-26.11.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Guidebook for expecting and looking after a baby. Helsinki: Institute for Health and Welfare (available online)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration,groupworks, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.10.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on Peppi. Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
  In the assignment Novia instruction for writing thesis must be used.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars on the last lecture of the course w. 41-46. See time table.
  Retake exams on the following general exams: 24th of November and 8th of December 2023.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3014 02.09.2023-15.10.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/146505 Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby THL. A guidebook for expecting and looking after a baby, Helsinki: THL ( available online)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period, including using THL guide for antenatal clinics: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2023 - 15.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on Peppi.
  Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
  In the assignment Novia instruction for writing thesis must be used.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written quiz on delivery on the last lecture with AW 13.9
  Seminars on the last lecture of the course w. 40
  Retake exams on the following general exams: 27th of October and 24th of November 2023.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Health-promoting care at different ages VÅV22HF02-3001 22.01.2024-25.02.2024  5 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
  - can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
  - can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
  - can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
  - knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
  - has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
  - knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
  - can collaborate in interprofessional teams

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

  Content of the study unit

  Human sexuality
  The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
  Development of children and young people
  Follow-up of children's and young people's health
  Adult health care and screenings
  Health technology
  Interprofessional collaboration

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Holmström, E. & Ohlsson, K. 2014. Människan i arbetslivet. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2017. Vi väntar barn. Information till nyblivna föräldrar. Helsingfors (tiillgänglig på nätet)
  THL. 2023. Dtabasen NEUKO , Terveysportti.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.01.2024 - 25.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 19.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 41

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination Moodle on the last lecture of the course w.
  Retake exams 1 and 2: on the following general exams x of January and of February 2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h /cr
  5 cr = 135 h

•   Health-promoting care at different ages VÅV22HF02-3002 04.03.2024-14.04.2024  5 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
  - can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
  - can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
  - can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
  - knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
  - has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
  - knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
  - can collaborate in interprofessional teams

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

  Content of the study unit

  Human sexuality
  The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
  Development of children and young people
  Follow-up of children's and young people's health
  Adult health care and screenings
  Health technology
  Interprofessional collaboration

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
  THL.2023. Databasen Neuko (ersätter Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Tillgänglig från: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  STM Arbetslivet 2023 (valda artiklar)
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex

  Learning methods

  Inbandade föreläsningar på Moodle, individuella uppgifter samt tentamen på moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 14.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.03.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

  Additional information

  Kursen är online och studierna förverkligas sjävständigt under tiden 4/3-12/4 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Moodle tentamen 12 /4 klockan 9-11.30 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 t
  5 sp = 135 timmar individuella studier (not translated)

•   Health-promoting care at different ages VÅV22HF02-3003 15.04.2024-31.05.2024  5 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
  - can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
  - can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
  - can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
  - knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
  - has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
  - knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
  - can collaborate in interprofessional teams

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

  Content of the study unit

  Human sexuality
  The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
  Development of children and young people
  Follow-up of children's and young people's health
  Adult health care and screenings
  Health technology
  Interprofessional collaboration

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Maternity care:
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
  
  STM Arbetslivet 2023 (valda artiklar)
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL.2023. Databasen Neuko (ersätter Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Tillgänglig från: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, group work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 14.04.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Exam
  Two retakes possible

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr, 5 cr= 135h

•   Human Development USS22GV03-3002 02.10.2023-15.02.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of health
  - understands the human physical, mental, cognitive and social development at different ages
  - have knowledge of human needs (spiritual, existential, sexual)
  - can offer support in developmental and traumatic crises

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The dimensions of health and sustainable development
  
  The human life cycle
  
  Human physical, mental, cognitive and social development
  
  Accessibility
  
  Spiritual needs
  
  Existential needs
  
  Sexual needs
  
  Gender diversity
  
  Attachment theory
  
  Developmental Psychological Theories
  
  Crises, traumatic crises and crisis relief
  
  Coping

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Angelöw B & Jonsson T. 2015. Introduktion till socialpsykologi.
  Bowlby J. 2010. En trygg bas.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytningsteori. Betydelsen av nära känslomässiga relationer.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytning i praktiken. Tillämpning av anknytningsteori.
  Grina, T. 2015. Den livsviktiga anknytningen: teori, utredning och behandling.
  Eysenck M. (red.) 2000. Psykologi. Ett integrerat perspektiv.
  Espen J (red.) 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier.
  Hwang, P & Nilsson B. 2019. Utvecklingspsykologi.
  Giddens A. 2014. Sociologi (kap. 2,4,5,9,11,17)
  Meeuwisse A. & Swärd H. (red). 2015. Prespektiv på sociala problem.
  Repstad P. 2016. Sociologiska perspektiv i vård, omsorg och socialt arbete.
  Sundbeck M. 2013. Sexuell hälsa i vården.
  Sivonen K. 2000. Vården och det andliga. En bestämning av begreppet andlig ur ett vårdvetenskapligt perspektiv.
  Geels A. & Wikström O. 2012. Den religiösa människan. En introduktion till religionpsykologin.
  Drakos G. & Hydén L. 2011. Diagnos & identitet.
  Övrig ändamålsenlig litteratur.
  På engelska (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Smågruppsarbete
  Seminarier
  Inlämningsuppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Smågruppsarbete och seminarium. Bedöms som GK/UK. Kriterierna för GK är deltagande i
  smågruppsarbete och seminarium. Professionellt förhållningssätt, obligatorisk närvaro.
  2. Individuell inlämningsuppgift, inlämning på Moodle 27.11.2023 Bedöms enligt vitsordsskala 0-5
  3. Familjecenterkörkort, avläggs på Moodle genom en separat länk, utförande 45 minuter, studerande erhåller ett intyg som visas för kursansvariga. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.10.2023 - 15.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Inlämningsuppgift på Moodle 18.12.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 10h
  Seminarier 4h
  Handlett grupparbetet 4h
  Självstudier grupparbete 8h
  Övriga självstudier 8h
  Individuell inlämningsuppgift 47h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar endast delvis eller ytligt på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övrig facklitteratur. Inlämningsuppgiften har delvis relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat beskrivs ytligt och ensidigt. Egna reflektoner förekommer inte eller beskrivs kort. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och en tillämpning av det egna temat syns. Egna reflektioner förekommer. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar månsidigt på frågeställningar och är skriven utgående från fakta, artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat syns tydligt. Egna reflektioner och analys beskrivs väl. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Human Development USS22GV03-3003 08.01.2024-21.04.2024  3 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of health
  - understands the human physical, mental, cognitive and social development at different ages
  - have knowledge of human needs (spiritual, existential, sexual)
  - can offer support in developmental and traumatic crises

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The dimensions of health and sustainable development
  
  The human life cycle
  
  Human physical, mental, cognitive and social development
  
  Accessibility
  
  Spiritual needs
  
  Existential needs
  
  Sexual needs
  
  Gender diversity
  
  Attachment theory
  
  Developmental Psychological Theories
  
  Crises, traumatic crises and crisis relief
  
  Coping

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Angelöw B & Jonsson T. 2015. Introduktion till socialpsykologi.
  Bowlby J. 2010. En trygg bas.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytningsteori. Betydelsen av nära känslomässiga relationer.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytning i praktiken. Tillämpning av anknytningsteori.
  Grina, T. 2015. Den livsviktiga anknytningen: teori, utredning och behandling.
  Eysenck M. (red.) 2000. Psykologi. Ett integrerat perspektiv.
  Espen J (red.) 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier.
  Hwang, P & Nilsson B. 2019. Utvecklingspsykologi.
  Giddens A. 2014. Sociologi (kap. 2,4,5,9,11,17)
  Meeuwisse A. & Swärd H. (red). 2015. Prespektiv på sociala problem.
  Repstad P. 2016. Sociologiska perspektiv i vård, omsorg och socialt arbete.
  Sundbeck M. 2013. Sexuell hälsa i vården.
  Sivonen K. 2000. Vården och det andliga. En bestämning av begreppet andlig ur ett vårdvetenskapligt perspektiv.
  Geels A. & Wikström O. 2012. Den religiösa människan. En introduktion till religionpsykologin.
  Drakos G. & Hydén L. 2011. Diagnos & identitet.
  Övrig ändamålsenlig litteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Workshops
  Seminarier
  Inlämningsuppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Workshops och seminarium. Bedöms som GK/UK. Kriterier för GK är deltagande i Workshop och seminarium
  2. Individuell inlämningsuppgift. Inlämning på Moodle Bedöms enligt vitsordsskala se nedan. Feedback på inlämningsuppgiften sker via Moodle plattformen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Workshops och seminarier enligt läsordning
  Individuell inlämningsuppgift, Inlämning på Moodle 28.3 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursintroduktion 2h
  Workshops 2h
  Seminarier 4h
  Workshops uppgift 10h
  Individuell inlämningsuppgift 63h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar endast delvis eller ytligt på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övrig facklitteratur. Inlämningsuppgiften har delvis relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat beskrivs ytligt och ensidigt. Egna reflektioner förekommer inte eller beskrivs kort. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och en tillämpning av det egna temat syns. Egna reflektioner förekommer. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar mångsidigt på frågeställningar och är skriven utgående från fakta, artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat syns tydligt. Egna reflektioner och analys beskrivs väl. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Human Development USS22GV03-3004 08.01.2024-09.06.2024  3 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of health
  - understands the human physical, mental, cognitive and social development at different ages
  - have knowledge of human needs (spiritual, existential, sexual)
  - can offer support in developmental and traumatic crises

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The dimensions of health and sustainable development
  
  The human life cycle
  
  Human physical, mental, cognitive and social development
  
  Accessibility
  
  Spiritual needs
  
  Existential needs
  
  Sexual needs
  
  Gender diversity
  
  Attachment theory
  
  Developmental Psychological Theories
  
  Crises, traumatic crises and crisis relief
  
  Coping

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Angelöw B & Jonsson T. 2015. Introduktion till socialpsykologi.
  Bowlby J. 2010. En trygg bas.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytningsteori. Betydelsen av nära känslomässiga relationer.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytning i praktiken. Tillämpning av anknytningsteori.
  Grina, T. 2015. Den livsviktiga anknytningen: teori, utredning och behandling.
  Eysenck M. (red.) 2000. Psykologi. Ett integrerat perspektiv.
  Espen J (red.) 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier.
  Hwang, P & Nilsson B. 2019. Utvecklingspsykologi.
  Giddens A. 2014. Sociologi (kap. 2,4,5,9,11,17)
  Meeuwisse A. & Swärd H. (red). 2015. Prespektiv på sociala problem.
  Repstad P. 2016. Sociologiska perspektiv i vård, omsorg och socialt arbete.
  Sundbeck M. 2013. Sexuell hälsa i vården.
  Sivonen K. 2000. Vården och det andliga. En bestämning av begreppet andlig ur ett vårdvetenskapligt perspektiv.
  Geels A. & Wikström O. 2012. Den religiösa människan. En introduktion till religionpsykologin.
  Drakos G. & Hydén L. 2011. Diagnos & identitet.
  Övrig ändamålsenlig litteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Workshops
  Seminarier
  Inlämningsuppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Workshops och seminarium. Bedöms som GK/UK. Kriterier för GK är deltagande i Workshop och seminarium
  2. Individuell inlämningsuppgift. Inlämning på Moodle Bedöms enligt vitsrodsskala se nedan. Feedback på inlämningsuppgiften sker via Moodle plattformen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 09.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Workshops och seminarier enligt läsordning
  Individuell inlämningsuppgift, Inlämning på Moodle 12.4 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursintroduktion 2h
  Workshops 2h
  Seminarier 4h
  Workshops uppgift 10h
  Individuell inlämningsuppgift 63h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar endast delvis eller ytligt på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övrig facklitteratur. Inlämningsuppgiften har delvis relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat beskrivs ytligt och ensidigt. Egna reflektioner förekommer inte eller beskrivs kort. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och en tillämpning av det egna temat syns. Egna reflektioner förekommer. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar mångsidigt på frågeställningar och är skriven utgående från fakta, artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat syns tydligt. Egna reflektioner och analys beskrivs väl. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3007 04.09.2023-10.11.2023  4 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Nygårdas

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur som t.ex. Medibas, Terveysportti. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, samt Moodle-baserad undervisning i form av föreläsningsvideon, övningsuppgifter och självständiga studier. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 10.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 46

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomi och fysiologi tenter.
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra (not translated)

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3008 04.09.2023-03.12.2023  4 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 03.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 4.12. 2023
  Re-examination 19.01.2024, 08.03.2024 and 03.05.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3010 18.09.2023-19.11.2023  4 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.09.2023 - 19.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 14.11.2023
  Re-examination 08.12.2023, 08.03.2024 and 03.05.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Intensive and critical nursing care VÅV21AK02-3001 23.01.2024-26.05.2024  3 credits  (USS21F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of intensive care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their loved ones
  - has readiness to care for patients in intensive care
  - has readiness to care for child patients in intensive care
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - in a simulated situation can be responsible for a safe drug treatment in intensive care

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context

  Content of the study unit

  Intensive and critical nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  PEDIATRICS
  Helminen, M. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti epiglottiitti. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Jartti, T., Mäkelä, M. & Remes, S. 2016. Akuutti astma ja uloshengitysvaikeus. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Jääskeläinen, J., Miettinen, P., Niinikoski, H., Saha, M-T. & Veijola R. 2016. Diabeettisen ketoasidoosinhoito. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Mäkelä, M. & Dunder, T. 2016. Anafylaktinen reaktio. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. &Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Saxén, H. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti laryngiitti. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Handouts
  
  INTENSIVE CARE ADULTS
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Andra upplagan. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Rubertsson, S., Larsson, A., Lipcsey, M., Smekal, D. 2022. Intensivvård. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kap. 42.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Lecture material on moodle
  
  Gulbrandsen, T. & Stubberud, D-G. 2009. Intensivvård. Avancerad omvårdnad och behandling. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, videos, cases, problem solving.
  Mandatory attendance at Clinical exercises.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.01.2024 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 22.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V
  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa - timlärare Vård, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Viktor Matintupa, Jannica Andtfolk, Carita Blomström, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination
  Re exam 1
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

•   Internal Medicine and Surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3010 02.01.2024-16.02.2024  4 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  - can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
  - has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
  Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
  Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGI
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  
  RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma
  
  KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
  Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
  Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 16.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.12.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Common exam for all parts

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/ 27h denna kurs är 4sp 108h
  
  18h Teori ONLINE
  
  Praktiska Övningar 12h/ grupp OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  Hjärtarytmitest 1 h
  
  Sammanlagt
  18h teori
  12h praktisk övning
  1h Hjärtarytmitest
  3h tent
  74 h studier på egenhand (för sammanställning av uppgifter och tent läsning). (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal medicine and surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3007 29.01.2024-10.03.2024  4 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  - can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
  - has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
  Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
  Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGI
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  
  RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma
  
  KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
  Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
  Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.01.2024 - 10.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 26.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Common exam for all parts

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/ 27h denna kurs är 4sp 108h
  
  Endokrinologi 3/4 sp = 6 h teori
  
  Respiratoriska Sjukdomstillstånd
  Teori 12h
  Praktiska 8 h x 2 gånger (indelade i två grupper, alltså 8 h per grupp)
  
  Kardiologiska sjukdomar och hjärtrytmer 1 sp
  12h teori
  2 x 4 h SimMan övningar
  Hjärtarytmitest 1 h
  
  Sammanlagt
  30h teori
  12h praktisk övning
  3h tent
  63 h för sammanställning av uppgifter och tent läsning. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal medicine and surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3008 19.02.2024-28.04.2024  4 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  - can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
  - has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
  Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
  Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGI
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  
  RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma
  
  KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
  Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
  Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.02.2024 - 28.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 03.03.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Common exam for all parts

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/ 27h denna kurs är 4sp 108h
  
  Endokrinologi 3/4 sp = 6 h teori
  
  Respiratoriska sjukdomstillstånd
  Teori 12h
  Praktiska 8 h x 2 gånger (indelade i två grupper, alltså 8 h per grupp ;))
  
  Kardiologiska sjukdomar och hjärtrytmer 1 sp
  12h teori
  2 x 4 h SimMan övningar
  Hjärtarytmitest 1 h
  
  Sammanlagt
  30h teori
  12h praktisk övning
  3h tent
  63 h för sammanställning av uppgifter och tent läsning. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 2 VÅV22KV02-3007 11.03.2024-28.04.2024  5 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the most common gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological, gynecological disorders and breast disease conditions and understand their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  -have knowledge of early pregnancy complications, their care and treatment
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the digestive system, urinary tract, kidneys, and reproductive organs
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for nursing care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can integrate health-promoting care in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological diseases, as well as support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with gastrointestinal disorders
  Care of the patient with urological and nephrological disorders
  Care of the patient with gynecological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and motivate their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGIC CARE
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. kapitel 1, 2, 9-19
  eller
  Tapanainen m.fl. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Kapitel: 1-17,19-31.
  
  UROLOGICAL CARE
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Stubberud, D., Grønseth, R., Almås, H., Ahlberg, K., Bolinder-Palmér, I., Olsson, K., & Toverud, K. C. (2021). Klinisk omvårdnad: 2 (Upplaga 3.). Kap 20 och 21. Liber AB.
  Ericson, T., Lind, M., & Abelsson, J. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB. Kapitel 13
  Föreläsningar och instuderingsfrågor på moodle
  
  GASTROINTESTINAL CARE
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
  o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
  o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.
  
  Simrén, M., Bergquist, A., Hultcrantz, R., Karling, P., Lindgren., Stål,. P. 2023. Gastroenterologi och hepatologi. Andra upplagan, Liber AB, Stockholm.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic care 30 points
  Gastrointestinal care 30 points
  Urologic unhealth 15 points
  = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.03.2024 - 28.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 10.03.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for all parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam on the last lecture
  Two retake exams on genral examdays
  Deadline for sexuality assignment

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic care (2 cr), urologic care (1 cr) and gastrointenstinal (2 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning
  1 cr = 27 h. 5 cr= 135 h.
  
  Gynecologic care: 16 h lectures, 2 h exam, 4 h individual work on sexuality assignment, 32 h individual work = 54 h

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 2 VÅV22KV02-3008 22.04.2024-31.05.2024  5 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the most common gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological, gynecological disorders and breast disease conditions and understand their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  -have knowledge of early pregnancy complications, their care and treatment
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the digestive system, urinary tract, kidneys, and reproductive organs
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for nursing care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can integrate health-promoting care in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological diseases, as well as support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with gastrointestinal disorders
  Care of the patient with urological and nephrological disorders
  Care of the patient with gynecological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and motivate their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGIC CARE
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. kapitel 1, 2, 9-19
  eller
  Tapanainen m.fl. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Kapitel: 1-17,19-31.
  
  UROLOGICAL CARE
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2021). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  GASTROINTESTINAL CARE
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
  o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
  o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.
  
  Simrén, M., Bergquist, A., Hultcrantz, R., Karling, P., Lindgren., Stål,. P. 2023. Gastroenterologi och hepatologi. Andra upplagan, Liber AB, Stockholm.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic care 30 points
  Gastrointestinal care 30 points
  Urologic unhealth 15 points
  = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.04.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 19.04.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for all parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam on the last lecture
  Two retake exams on genral examdays
  Deadline for sexuality assignment

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic care (2 cr), urologic care (1 cr) and gastrointenstinal (2 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning
  1 cr = 27 h. 5 cr= 135 h.
  
  Gynecologic care: 16 h lectures, 2 h exam, 4 h individual work on sexuality assignment, 32 h individual work = 54 h

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 2 VÅV22KV02-3010 20.03.2024-10.05.2024  5 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the most common gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological, gynecological disorders and breast disease conditions and understand their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  -have knowledge of early pregnancy complications, their care and treatment
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the digestive system, urinary tract, kidneys, and reproductive organs
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for nursing care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can integrate health-promoting care in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological diseases, as well as support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with gastrointestinal disorders
  Care of the patient with urological and nephrological disorders
  Care of the patient with gynecological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and motivate their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGIC CARE
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. kapitel 1, 2, 9-19
  eller
  Tapanainen m.fl. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Kapitel: 1-17,19-31.
  
  UROLOGICAL CARE
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Stubberud, D., Grønseth, R., Almås, H., Ahlberg, K., Bolinder-Palmér, I., Olsson, K., & Toverud, K. C. (2021). Klinisk omvårdnad: 2 (Upplaga 3.). Kap 20 och 21. Liber AB.
  Ericson, T., Lind, M., & Abelsson, J. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB. Kapitel 13
  Föreläsningar och instuderingsfrågor på moodle
  
  GASTROINTESTINAL CARE
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
  o Kap. 10. Vård vid leversjukdomar s. 473 – 520.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
  o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
  o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic care 30 points
  Gastrointestinal care 30 points
  Urologic unhealth 15 points
  = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.03.2024 - 10.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 22.03.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for all parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Första tenten på kursens sista lektion
  Två omtentamenstillfällen på allmänna examenstillfällen ( se moodle)
  Workshop övningar är obligatoriska
  Deadline för sexualitetsuppgift (not translated)

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic care (2 cr), urologic care (1 cr) and gastrointenstinal (2 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3001 25.09.2023-19.11.2023  5 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 10. Allmän ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red) 2022. Omvårdnad &kirurgi. Kap.28. Ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi - skallskada och ryggmärgsskada. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Kap 23 och 24. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R.(red). 2011.Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Andra upplagan. Kap. 34. Omvårdnad vid blodsjukdomar. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter som utförs under kursens gång.
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktisk övningar och SimMan övningar och bedöms GK/UK
  Godkänd test i hematologi
  Skriftlig tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.09.2023 - 19.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 29.10.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam during last lecture in the course
  Two retake exams on genral exam days

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h. 5 sp= 135 h.
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3003 28.08.2023-15.10.2023  5 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  På svenska
  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 10. Allmän ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red) 2022. Omvårdnad &kirurgi. Kap.28. Ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi - skallskada och ryggmärgsskada. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Kap 23 och 24. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R.(red). 2011.Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Andra upplagan. Kap. 34. Omvårdnad vid blodsjukdomar. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures online, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter som utförs under kursens gång.
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktisk övningar och SimMan övningar och bedöms GK/UK
  Godkänd test i hematologi
  Skriftlig tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 36

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård, Maria Berg, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture online
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam during last lecture in the course
  Two retake exams on genral exam days

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h. 5 sp= 135 h.
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3006 28.08.2023-15.10.2023  5 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 10. Allmän ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red) 2022. Omvårdnad &kirurgi. Kap.28. Ortopedi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Andersson R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. (red) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi - skallskada och ryggmärgsskada. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Kap 23 och 24. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R.(red). 2011.Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Andra upplagan. Kap. 34. Omvårdnad vid blodsjukdomar. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsningar på moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter som utförs under kursens gång.
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktisk övningar och SimMan övningar och bedöms GK/UK
  Godkänd test i hematologi
  Skriftlig tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 15.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård, Maria Berg, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam during last lecture in the course
  Two retake exams on genral exam days

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h. 5 sp= 135 h.
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   International Studies VAL230023-3002 01.08.2023-31.12.2024  3 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - studies in depth theory and/or internship that supports professional development

  Content of the study unit

  Accoring separate information for example within Nordplus or Erasmus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  01.08.2023 - 31.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2023 - 01.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Internship, Advanced Nursing Practice USS20FV05-3001 18.09.2023-30.11.2023  8 credits  (USS20D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can, in an interprofessional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report person-centered/client-centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate as well as motivate supervision and self-care from an educational and ethical perspective
  
  Can apply and argue for evidence based care methods
  
  Can apply ethical decision making in a variety of service systems
  
  Master safe medication management
  
  Reflects on his/her professional growth and professional identity and analyses opportunities for career development
  
  Identifies, analyses and argues for development needs in the healthcare and service chain

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 140 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen från tidigare utförda teoretiska kurser inom utbildningen samt material från praktikenheten. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktik information innan praktiken inleds. Första tillfället 10.3.2023.
  Praktik seminarium efter avslutad praktik. Tidpunkt: v. 46 eller v. 47
  Handledd klinisk praktik inom fördjupad vårdarbete under fem veckor (v. 41-45) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens mål och studerandes individuella mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. Samt deltagande i informationstillfällen innan praktiken och i praktikseminariet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.09.2023 - 30.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar på kursens moodle sida + Teams kanalen "Praktikbro"
  Eventuell frånvaro bör meddelas till handledande lärare och praktikavdelning.
  Informationstillfällen inför praktiken är obligatoriska samt praktik seminariet
  
  Validering: Anhållan via eAHOT senast 8.9.2023 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik enligt givna direktiv
  Bearbetning av egna praktikmål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellan utvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Avsnittet utförs som handledd praktik. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Praktikinformation 4h
  Självstudier / bekantning av material om reserverad praktikplats 7h
  Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för självstudier ( tex. fördjupning av kunskap inom området).
  Seminarium 3h (not translated)

•   Internship, Gerontological Care/Mental Health Care I USS20KL04-3004 12.09.2023-12.11.2023  8 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Gerontological care work:
  The student:
  
  Can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional cooperation, plan, execute and evaluate person-centered/client -centered care and take into account the cultural background of the patient and his/her relatives
  
  Can use various evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use sustainable and resource strengthening care methods
  
  Can document and report
  
  Demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives and can identify ethical problems
  
  Can assess and support the patient's/client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  
  Can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment
  
  Understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  
  Mental Care and Substance abuse treatment:
  The student:
  
  Can, under supervision in interprofessional cooperation, plan, implement and evaluate person-centered/client centered mental care and addiction treatment
  
  Can use different evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central care methods
  
  Can document and report
  
  Treats patients professionally within mental care and substance abuse treatment
  
  Can identify patient resources and collaborate with the patient and the interprofessional team
  
  Has a reflective and ethical approach and takes into consideration the patient's right to self-determination and patient and client safety
  
  Can guide the patient in mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  
  Students can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tidigare och pågende kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik i
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes indivduella kompetenser/mål.
  Sjukfrånvarodagar görs tillbaka i form av handledd praktik. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.09.2023 - 12.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.10.2023

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Michaela Jalava

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig och handledare inom mental- och missbrukarvården Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg och inom gerontologiska vårdarbetet Michaela Jalava (ev. anhållan om validering via eAhot i god tid före praktiken inleds)
  Mer information finns på gruppens Teams samt på moodle. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren borde vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Praktikinfo enligt schemat, obligatorisk deltahgande
  Praktik veckor 41-45 enligt gruppindelningen på gruppens Teams
  Praktikseminarium enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik (8 sp). Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. Praktiktimmar 190 h/5 veckor. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande uppnår inte ovanstående kompetenserna. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  För att bli godkänd studerande ska uppnå följande kompetenser:
  
  Kan under handledning i det interprofessionella samarbetet planera, utföra och utvärdera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård och beaktar patientens och närståendes kulturella bakgrund
  
  Kan använda olika evidensbaserade vårdrekommendationer i planering av vård och kan använda hållbara och resursförstärkande vårdmetoder
  
  Kan dokumentera och rapportera
  
  Påvisar respekt för patienten/klienten och närstående samt kan identifiera etiska problem
  
  Kan bedöma och stöda patientens/klientens funktionsförmåga samt patientens och närståendes delaktighet i vården
  
  Kan planera, utföra och utvärdera säker läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Förstår betydelsen av patient- och klientsäkerhet och tillämpar aseptiska principer i patientvården (not translated)

•   Internship, Gerontological Care/Mental Health Care II USS20KL05-3003 13.11.2023-10.12.2023  8 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Gerontological care work:
  The student:
  
  Can, under supervision in the context of interprofessional cooperation, plan, execute and evaluate person-centered/client-centered care and take into account the cultural background of the patient and his / her relatives
  
  Can use various evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central resource strengthening care methods
  
  Can document and report
  
  Demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives and can identify ethical problems
  
  Can assess and support the patient's / client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  
  Can plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management
  
  Understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  
  Mental Care and Substance abuse treatment:
  The student:
  
  Can, under supervision in interprofessional cooperation, plan, implement and evaluate person-centered/client-centered mental care and addiction treatment
  
  Can use different evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central care methods
  
  Can document and report
  
  Treats patients professionally within mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  
  Can identify patient resources and collaborate with the patient and the interprofessional team
  
  Has a reflective and ethical approach and takes into consideration the patient's right to self-determination and patient and client safety
  
  Can guide the patient in mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  
  Students can plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes indivduella kompetenser/mål.
  Sjukfrånvarodagar görs tillbaka i form av handledd praktik. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.11.2023 - 10.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 12.11.2023

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Michaela Jalava

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig och handledare inom mental- och missbrukarvården är Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg och inom det gerontologiska vårdarbetet Michaela Jalava (ev. anhållan om validering via eAhot i god tid före praktiken inleds)
  
  Mer information finns på gruppens Teams samt på moodle. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren borde vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Praktikinfo enligt schemat, obligatorisk deltahgande
  Praktik veckor 46-50 enligt gruppindelningen på gruppens Teams
  Praktikseminarium enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik (8 sp). Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. Praktiktimmar 190 h/5 veckor. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande uppnår inte ovanstående kompetenser. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  För att bli godkänd ska studerande uppnå följande kompetenser:
  
  Kan under handledning i det interprofessionella samarbetet planera, förverkliga och utvärdera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad mental- och missbrukarvård
  
  Kan använda olika evidensbaserade vårdrekommendationer i planering av vård och kan använda centrala vårdmetoder
  
  Kan dokumentera och rapportera
  
  Kan professionellt bemöta patienten inom mental- och missbrukarvården
  
  Kan identifiera patientens resurser och kan samarbeta med patienten och interprofessionella arbetsgrupper (not translated)

•   Internship, Pediatric Care/Health Care in the home or Primary Care I USS20KÅ04-3003 25.09.2023-11.11.2023  8 credits  (UHV21D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Pediatric Care:
  The student:
  
  Can, under supervision, plan, implement, evaluate and document comprehensive care for children and young people
  
  Performs under supervision central care methods, clinical examinations and functional measurements in pediatric health care
  
  Can, under supervision, plan, implement and evaluate safe medical management in the care of children and young people
  
  Takes into account patient and client safety in the care of children and young people
  
  Applies evidence-based methods in health promotion work with children, young people and families and gives guidance to a health-promoting way of life
  
  Primary care:
  The student:
  
  Is familiar with national and international action programs, strategies and resource-enhancing methods in health promotion work with different age groups
  
  Can, under supervision in interprofessional collaboration, plan, implement, evaluate and document resource enhancing work at individual, group and community level
  
  Guides individuals and groups to a health promoting way of life
  
  Can plan, execute and evaluate safe medical management
  
  Home Health Care:
  The student:
  
  Is able to, under supervision and in interprofessional collaboration, plan, execute and evaluate person-centered/client-centered care in a home setting taking into account the cultural background of the patient and his/her relatives.
  
  Can use different evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central resource enhancing care methods in home environment
  
  Can document and report
  
  Demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives in the home environment and can identify ethical problems
  
  Can assess and support the patient's/client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  
  Can plan, execute and evaluate safe medical management
  
  Understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Internship, Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing I and II

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bökberg, C. (2013). Omvårdnad i primärvården (1. uppl.). Studentlitteratur.
  
  Aaltonen, J., Heikkilä, T. I., Larivaara, P., Manninen, I., Lindroos, S. & Heikkilä, T. (2009). Potilas, perhe ja perusterveydenhuolto. Duodecim.
  
  Hälsovårdscentaler: https://stm.fi/sv/halsovardscentraler
  
  Edwinson Månsson, M. & Enskär, K. (2008). Pediatrisk vård och specifik omvårdnad (Andra upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
  
  Hallström, I. & Lindberg, T. (2009). Pediatrisk omvårdnad (1. uppl.). Liber.
  
  Hanséus, K., Jägervall, M., Norman, M. & Alfvén, G. (2020). Barnmedicin (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  
  Rajantie, J., Heikinheimo, M., Renko, M. & Alapulli, H. (2016). Lastentaudit (6., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion till kursen (obligatorisk).
  
  Studerande söker själv praktikplats, fördelning enligt lista på Teams och Jaana-Sofia Tengström eller Michaela Jalava godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet beroende på vilken praktik det är frågan om.
  
  Praktikhandledaren bör vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare.
  
  Praktikanvisningar på Teams, Praktikbro
  
  Studerande kan delta i konferensen med tema: Välfärdsområden 4.10.2022
  
  Praktikseminarium i december 2023, 12.12 kl: 13-16.00 (obligatoriskt).
  
  1) Studerande formulerar sina individuella kompetenser/mål.
  En måldiskussion sker tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande. Studerande laddar upp på kursens Moodle-sida sina individuella skriftliga kompetenser/mål till kursansvarig lärare för godkännande i slutet av den första praktikveckan.
  
  2) Mellanutvärdering hålls i mitten av praktikperioden. Studerande och praktikhandledaren deltar. Läraren deltar vid behov.
  
  3) Studerande skriver under den sista praktikveckan en självutvärdering i relation till kursens kompetenser/mål och de individuella målen.
  
  4) Det ifyllda arbetstidsschemat med praktikhandledarens underskrift och den ifyllda utvärderingsblanketten laddas upp på moodle före praktikseminariet. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatorisk närvaro under praktiken (38 h /vecka)
  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.09.2023 - 11.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 24.09.2023

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å
  • USS21D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar finns i Praktikanvisningarna på Teams i Praktikbron.
  
  Studerande introducerar och handleder praktikhandledaren i användning av Praktikbron
  
  Tystnadsplikt
  
  Vaccineringar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Hösten 2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik inom primärhälsovården eller hemsjukvård(8 sp) eller praktik inom barnsjukvård eller motsvarande (8sp)
  
  Totala arbetstiden är 38 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. En söckenhelg (röd dag i kalendern) är praktik. (not translated)

•   Internship, Pediatric Care/Health Care in the home or Primary Care II USS20KÅ05-3003 13.11.2023-16.12.2023  8 credits  (UHV21D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Pediatric Care:
  The student:
  
  Can, under supervision, plan, implement, evaluate and document comprehensive care for children and young people
  
  Performs, under supervision, central care methods, clinical examinations and functional measurements in pediatric health care
  
  Can, under supervision, plan, implement and evaluate safe medication management in the care of children and young people
  
  Takes into account patient and client safety in the care of children and young people
  
  Applies evidence-based methods in health promotion work with children, young people and families and gives guidance to a health-promoting way of life
  
  Primary care:
  The student:
  
  Is familiar with national and international action programs, strategies and resource enhancing methods in health promotion work with different age groups
  
  Can, under supervision in interprofessional collaboration, plan, implement, evaluate and document resource enhancing work at individual, group and community level
  
  Guides individuals and groups to a health promoting way of life
  
  Can plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management
  
  Home Health Care:
  The student:
  
  Is able to, under supervision and in interprofessional collaboration, plan, execute and evaluate person-centered/client-centered care in a home setting taking into account the cultural background of the patient and his / her relatives.
  
  Can use different evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central resource enhancing care methods in the home environment
  
  Can document and report
  
  Demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives in the home environment and can identify ethical problems
  
  Can assess and support the patient's / client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  
  Can plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management
  
  Understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Internship, Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing I and II

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Coaching
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bökberg, C. (2013). Omvårdnad i primärvården (1. uppl.). Studentlitteratur.
  
  Aaltonen, J., Heikkilä, T. I., Larivaara, P., Manninen, I., Lindroos, S. & Heikkilä, T. (2009). Potilas, perhe ja perusterveydenhuolto. Duodecim.
  
  Hälsovårdscentaler: https://stm.fi/sv/halsovardscentraler
  Edwinson Månsson, M. & Enskär, K. (2008). Pediatrisk vård och specifik omvårdnad (Andra upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
  
  Hallström, I. & Lindberg, T. (2009). Pediatrisk omvårdnad (1. uppl.). Liber.
  
  Hanséus, K., Jägervall, M., Norman, M. & Alfvén, G. (2020). Barnmedicin (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  
  Rajantie, J., Heikinheimo, M., Renko, M. & Alapulli, H. (2016). Lastentaudit (6., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion till kursen (obligatorisk).
  
  Studerande söker själv praktikplats, fördelning enligt lista på Teams och Jaana-Sofia Tengström eller Michaela Jalava godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet beroende på vilken praktik det är frågan om.
  
  Praktikhandledaren bör vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare.
  
  Praktikanvisningar på Teams, Praktikbro
  
  Praktikseminarium i december 2023 (obligatoriskt).
  
  1) Studerande formulerar sina individuella kompetenser/mål.
  En måldiskussion sker tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande. Studerande laddar upp på kursens Moodle-sida sina individuella skriftliga kompetenser/mål till kursansvarig lärare för godkännande i slutet av den första praktikveckan.
  
  2) Mellanutvärdering hålls i mitten av praktikperioden. Studerande och praktikhandledaren deltar. Läraren deltar vid behov.
  
  3) Studerande skriver under den sista praktikveckan en självutvärdering i relation till kursens kompetenser/mål och de individuella målen.
  
  4) Det ifyllda arbetstidsschemat med praktikhandledarens underskrift och den ifyllda utvärderingsblanketten laddas upp på moodle före praktikseminariet. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatorisk närvaro under praktiken (38 h /vecka)
  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.11.2023 - 16.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 12.11.2023

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å
  • USS21D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar finns i Praktikanvisningarna på Teams i Praktikbron.
  
  Studerande introducerar och handleder praktikhandledaren i användning av Praktikbron
  
  Tystnadsplikt
  
  Vaccineringar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik inom primärhälsovården eller hemsjukvård(8 sp) eller praktik inom barnsjukvård eller motsvarande (8sp)
  
  Totala arbetstiden är 38 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. En söckenhelg (röd dag i kalendern) är praktik. (not translated)

•   Internship: Basic Care USS22GV07-3002 02.10.2023-31.12.2023  8 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, under supervision plan, implement and assess basic care and end-of-life care
  - shows collegiality and demonstrate readiness for working life
  - can work in inter-professional teams
  - can apply evidence based and sustainable methods in primary care
  - treats patients and relatives professionally
  - can guide patients within primary care

  Prerequisites

  Medication calculation in the Course Medication Management I

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Coaching
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteratur i kursen under läsåret 1
  Teams praktikbro (praktikanvisningar mm.) (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktikinfo under närstudiedagar i september
  Handledd praktik
  Praktikseminarium i december (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningskriterierna finns i praktikutvärderingsblanketterna på Moodle
  Underkänd praktik kompletteras enligt handledarens bedömning (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.10.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig och praktikhandledare Michaela Jalava (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validering inlämnas i Peppi, eAHOT (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Olika praktikplatser (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Praktikinfo 1 gång före praktiken inleds
  Praktik 38 h per vecka, obligatoriskt
  Praktikseminarium, obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

•   Internship: Basic Care USS22GV07-3003 18.03.2024-19.05.2024  8 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, under supervision plan, implement and assess basic care and end-of-life care
  - shows collegiality and demonstrate readiness for working life
  - can work in inter-professional teams
  - can apply evidence based and sustainable methods in primary care
  - treats patients and relatives professionally
  - can guide patients within primary care

  Prerequisites

  Medication calculation in the Course Medication Management I

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Coaching
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen i kurserna under läsåret 1
  Teams: praktikbro (praktikanvisningar mm.) (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktikinfotillfällen, obligatorisk närvaro
  Handledd praktik, 38 timmar per vecka.
  Praktikseminarium efter praktiken obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningskriterierna finns i praktikutvärderingsblanketten på Moodle
  Underkänd praktik kompletteras enligt handledarens bedömning (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.03.2024 - 19.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 14.04.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validering inlämnas i Peppi, eAhot till Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Olika praktikplatser (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tidtabell för inlämning av mål, mellanutvärdering samt slututvärdering finns på kursens moodle.
  Mellanutvärdering hålls via Teams mellan handledande lärare, studerande och handledare från fältet. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Praktikinfo, obligatorisk närvaro
  Praktik 38 h per vecka, obligatoriskt
  Praktikseminarium, obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  För att bli godkänns skall följande kompteser uppnås:
  - kan under handledning planera, förverkliga och utvärdera grundvård och vård i livets slutskede
  - kan visa kollegialitet och påvisa medarbetarkompetens
  - kan arbeta i interprofessionella team
  - kan tillämpa evidensbaserade och hållbara metoder inom grundvården
  - kan bemöta patienter och närstående professionellt
  - kan handleda patienter inom grundvården (not translated)

•   Internship: Basic Care USS22GV07-3004 18.03.2024-26.05.2024  8 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, under supervision plan, implement and assess basic care and end-of-life care
  - shows collegiality and demonstrate readiness for working life
  - can work in inter-professional teams
  - can apply evidence based and sustainable methods in primary care
  - treats patients and relatives professionally
  - can guide patients within primary care

  Prerequisites

  Medication calculation in the Course Medication Management I

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Coaching
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen i kurserna under läsåret 1
  Teams: praktikbro (praktikanvisningar mm.) (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktikinfotillfällen, obligatorisk närvaro
  Handledd praktik 38 t per vecka.
  Praktikseminarium efter praktiken obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningskriterierna finns i praktikutvärderingsblanketten på Moodle
  Underkänd praktik kompletteras enligt handledarens bedömning (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.03.2024 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 14.04.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg och praktikhandledare Josephine Åberg. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validering inlämnas i Peppi, eAhot till Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Olika praktikplatser (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tidtabell för inlämning av mål, mellanutvärdering samt slututvärdering finns på kursens moodle.
  Mellanutvärdering hålls via Teams mellan handledande lärare, studerande och handledare från fältet. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Praktikinfo (två gånger) 4 h, obligatorisk närvaro
  Praktik 38 h per vecka, obligatoriskt
  Praktikseminarium, obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  För att bli godkänns skall följande kompteser uppnås:
  - kan under handledning planera, förverkliga och utvärdera grundvård och vård i livets slutskede
  - kan visa kollegialitet och påvisa medarbetarkompetens
  - kan arbeta i interprofessionella team
  - kan tillämpa evidensbaserade och hållbara metoder inom grundvården
  - kan bemöta patienter och närstående professionellt
  - kan handleda patienter inom grundvården (not translated)

•   Internship: Gerontological Care/Mental Health Care I USS22KL04-3001 18.03.2024-21.04.2024  8 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Gerontological care work:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional cooperation, plan, execute and evaluate person-centered/client -centered care and take into account the cultural background of the patient and his/her relatives
  - can use various evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central resource strengthening care methods
  - can document and report
  - demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives and can identify ethical problems
  - can assess and support the patient's/client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment
  - understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  
  Mental Care and Substance abuse treatment:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in inter-professional cooperation, plan, implement and evaluate person-centered/client centered mental care and addiction treatment
  - can use different evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central care methods
  - can document and report
  - treats patients professionally within mental care and substance abuse treatment
  - can identify patient resources and collaborate with the patient and the inter-professional team
  - has a reflective and ethical approach and takes into consideration the patient's right to self-determination and patient and client safety
  - can guide the patient in mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tidigare och pågende kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik i
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För att bli godkänd studerande ska uppnå följande kompetenser:
  
  Kan under handledning i det interprofessionella samarbetet planera, utföra och utvärdera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård och beaktar patientens och närståendes kulturella bakgrund
  
  Kan använda olika evidensbaserade vårdrekommendationer i planering av vård och kan använda hållbara och resursförstärkande vårdmetoder
  
  Kan dokumentera och rapportera
  
  Påvisar respekt för patienten/klienten och närstående samt kan identifiera etiska problem
  
  Kan bedöma och stöda patientens/klientens funktionsförmåga samt patientens och närståendes delaktighet i vården
  
  Kan planera, utföra och utvärdera säker läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Förstår betydelsen av patient- och klientsäkerhet och tillämpar aseptiska principer i patientvården (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.03.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 17.03.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren borde vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare.
  Utvärderingsdiskussion hålls via Teams mellan handledande lärare, studerande och handledare från fältet. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Våren 2024
  Praktikinfo enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande
  Praktik veckor v 12- 16 eller 17 - 21, 38 timmar per vecka.
  Praktikseminarium - enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande (not translated)

  Internationa connections

  De studerande som deltar i Nordplus intenskivveckan i Umeå vecka 15 är borta från praktiken vecka 15. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik (8 sp). Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. Praktiktimmar 190 h/5 veckor. (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursansvarig och handledare inom mental- och missbrukarvården Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg och inom gerontologiska vårdarbetet Michaela Jalava (ev. anhållan om validering via eAhot i god tid före praktiken inleds)
  Mer information finns på gruppens Teams samt på moodle. (not translated)

•   Internship: Gerontological Care/Mental Health Care I USS22KL05-3001 22.04.2024-26.05.2024  8 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Gerontological care work:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional cooperation, plan, execute and evaluate person-centered/client -centered care and take into account the cultural background of the patient and his/her relatives
  - can use various evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use sustainable and resource strengthening care methods
  - can document and report
  - demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives and can identify ethical problems
  - can assess and support the patient's/client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment
  - understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  
  Mental Care and Substance abuse treatment:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in inter-professional cooperation, plan, implement and evaluate person-centered/client centered mental care and addiction treatment
  - can use different evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central care methods
  - can document and report
  - treats patients professionally within mental care and substance abuse treatment
  - can identify patient resources and collaborate with the patient and the inter-professional team
  - has a reflective and ethical approach and takes into consideration the patient's right to self-determination and patient and client safety
  - can guide the patient in mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tidigare och pågående kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För att bli godkänd studerande ska uppnå följande kompetenser:
  
  Kan under handledning i det interprofessionella samarbetet planera, utföra och utvärdera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård och beaktar patientens och närståendes kulturella bakgrund
  
  Kan använda olika evidensbaserade vårdrekommendationer i planering av vård och kan använda hållbara och resursförstärkande vårdmetoder
  
  Kan dokumentera och rapportera
  
  Påvisar respekt för patienten/klienten och närstående samt kan identifiera etiska problem
  
  Kan bedöma och stöda patientens/klientens funktionsförmåga samt patientens och närståendes delaktighet i vården
  
  Kan planera, utföra och utvärdera säker läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Förstår betydelsen av patient- och klientsäkerhet och tillämpar aseptiska principer i patientvården (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.04.2024 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 21.04.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren borde vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Våren 2024
  Praktikinfo enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande
  Praktik veckor v 12- 16 eller 17 - 21
  Praktikseminarium - enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik (8 sp). Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. Praktiktimmar 190 h/5 veckor (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursansvarig och handledare inom gerontologiskt vårdarbete Michaela Jalava och inom mental- och missbrukarvården Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (ev. anhållan om validering via eAhot i god tid före praktiken inleds)
  Mer information finns på gruppens Teams samt på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Internship: Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing I USS22KV05-3001 31.10.2023-17.12.2023  8 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Medical Nursing Care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional collaboration, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client centered medical nursing care with the patient
  - is able to follow different evidence-based care recommendations when planning care and implement sustainable treatment methods within internal medicine
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe pharmaceutical treatment
  - can identify ethical issues and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes into account patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutritional and fluid treatment
  
  Surgical Nursing care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional collaboration, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client centered surgical care for the patient
  - is able to follow different evidence-based care recommendations when planning care and implement the most common treatment methods within surgical care
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe pharmaceutical treatment
  - can identify ethical issues and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes into account patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutritional and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and medical calculation in the Course Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutorial
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen från tidigare utförda teoretiska kurser inom utbildningen samt material från praktikenheten (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktik information innan praktiken inleds. Första tillfället 8.3.2023.
  Praktik seminarium efter avslutad praktik. Tidpunkt: 15.12.2023
  Handledd klinisk praktik inom kirurgisk eller inre medicinsk avdelning / poliklinik under fem veckor (13.11-17.12)
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens kompetenser/mål och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.10.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 12.11.2023

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar på kursens moodle sida + Teams kanalen "Praktikbro"
  Eventuell frånvaro bör meddelas till handledande lärare och praktikavdelning.
  Informationstillfällen inför praktiken är obligatoriska samt praktik seminariet den 15.12. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik enligt givna direktiv
  Bearbetning av egna praktikmål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellan utvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Avsnittet utförs som handledd praktik (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Praktikinformation 6h
  Självstudier / bekantning av material om reserverad praktikplats 7h
  Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för självstudier ( tex. fördjupning av kunskap inom området).
  Seminarium 3h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens mål och studerandes individuella mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. Samt deltagande i informationstillfällen innan praktiken och i praktikseminariet. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens mål och studerandes individuella mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. Samt deltagande i informationstillfällen innan praktiken och i praktikseminariet. (not translated)

•   Internship: Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing II USS22KL03-3002 08.01.2024-11.02.2024  8 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Medical Nursing Care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the inter-professional collaborative, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client-centered ans sustainable medical nursing care
  - is able to follow various evidence-based care guidelines in care planing and implement the most common methods of treatment within internal medicine
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe medication management
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes patient and client safety into consideration and applies aseptic principles to patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutrition and fluid treatment
  
  Surgical care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the inter-professional collaborative, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client-centered surgical care
  - is able to follow various evidence-based care guidelines in care planning and implement the most common methods of treatment within surgical nursing
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe medication management
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - understands the significance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles to patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutrition and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen från tidigare utförda teoretiska kurser inom utbildningen. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Handledd klinisk praktik inom kirurgisk eller inre medicinsk avdelning / poliklinik under sex veckor.
  Självstudier
  Praktik seminarium 9.2. 2024 kl 13-16. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK enligt kurskompetenser i relation till studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 11.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar finns på Moodle och i Praktikbron (Teams), (kursnyckeln är praktikbro). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik enligt givna direktiv 38h/vecka
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellan utvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Läkemedelsbehandlingspass.
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Kurs utförs som handledd praktik i arbetslivet. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt kurskompetenser i relation till studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. (not translated)

•   Introduction to Academic Studies USS22IV01-3002 06.09.2023-15.12.2023  5 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his/her UAS and field of education
  - can use common digital programs to communicate through text, film and sound files
  - has knowledge of the central national and international databases in his/her field of study
  - is familiar with the fundamentals of a scholarly approach, information management and can research and examine scientific information
  - can realize small-scale projects
  - has knowledge of basic mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The central documents and virtual platforms of the university and degree programme
  
  Learning styles, reading and note-taking techniques
  
  Time and stress management
  
  Text processing and implementation of Novia UAS's writing instructions
  
  Audio and video recording and editing
  
  Different types of communication utalising digital programs
  
  Project methodology
  
  Searching for scientific information in various databases
  
  Perspectives of knowledge in different fields of science
  
  Evaluating the reliability and scientific credibility of information

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  20% Face-to-face, 80% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Delen yrkeshögskolestudier:
  Angelöw, B. (2011). Konsten att lyckas med studierna. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur
  Blomström, V. & Wennerberg, J. 2018. Akademiskt läsande och skrivande. Studentlitteratur
  Cowen, M., Maier, P. & Price, G. 2012. Studera smart när du läser till sjuksköterska. Pearson.
  Drew, S. & Bingham, R. (2010). The guide to learning and study skills for higher education and work, Farnham: Gower
  Kellquist, M. & Eneroth, M. (2010). Studieteknik för universitet/högskola. Stockholm: Svenska studieteknikförlaget
  Liljeqvist, B. (2015). Plugga smart och lär dig mer! Lund: Studentlitteratur
  Läroplan 2021, Åbo
  Yrkeshögskolan Novias skrivanvisningar
  Yrkeshögskolan Novias Examensstadga
  
  Delen projektmetodik:
  Andersen, E. & Schwenke, E. 2013. Projektarbete - en vägledning för studenter.
  Skyttemoen, T., Vaagaasar, A.L. & Torhell S-E. 2017. Värdeskapande projektledning. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Delen evidensbaserat arbetssätt:
  Backman, J. 2016. Rapporter och uppsatser. Lund: studentlitteratur.
  Elomaa, L. & Mikkola, H. 2010. Näytön jäljillä. Turun Amk. http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522161611.pdf
  Kristensson, J. 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivandet och forskningsmetodik för studerande inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Valda delar. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  Larsen, A. K. & Dalén, H. ö. 2018. Metod helt enkelt: En introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod. Andra upplagan. Malmö: Gleerups.
  Willman, A., Bahtsevani, C., Nilsson, R. & Sandström, B. 2016. Evidensbaserad omvårdnad: En bro mellan forskning och klinisk praktik. Upplaga 4:1. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Delen IT: av föreläsaren given litteratur och nätsidor (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar, information
  Workshops, obligatorisk närvaro
  It-övningar, obligatorisk närvaro
  Test i matematik
  Artikelsökning
  Konferens (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Inlämning av grupprapporten i evidensbaserat arbetssätt (uk-gk)
  2) quiz (gk/Uk)
  3) Deltagande i test i grundmatematik
  4) Deltagande i konferensen 4.10.2024
  
  Studerande har rätt att komplettera delarna 3 gånger enligt överenskommen tidtabell.
  Vitsordet i kursen ges då alla delar är gjorda och blivit godkända (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 06.09.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Ludvig Kihlman, Daniel Nenonen, Sebastian Lindgren

  Additional information

  kursansvarig Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  4 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar, information
  Workshops, obligatorisk närvaro
  It-övningar, obligatorisk närvaro
  Test i matematik
  Artikelsökning
  Konferens (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Konferens 4.10.2023 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Inlämning av grupprapport i evidensbaserat arbetssätt (Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa) dl 3.12.2023
  2) Guiz i evidensbaserat arbetssätt (Emilia Kieli-Viljamaa) dl 3.12.2023
  3) Test i grundmatematik finns i schema (Daniel Nenonen)
  4) Deltagande i konferensen 4.10.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier ink. examinationer 78 h
  Föreläsningar, information, konferens och handledning 43 h
  Test i matematik 2h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  För godkänt arbete krävs:
  1) Skriftlig grupprapport:
  - förmåga att kunna sammanfatta relevant data och svara på frågeställningar
  - kritisk reflektion
  - användning av metodlitteratur
  - tydlig redogörelse för sökprocessen
  - att Novias skrivanvisningar används
  
  2) Quiz:
  - För godkänt krävs 60 % av totalpoäng
  
  3) Deltagande i matematiktest (not translated)

•   Introduction to Academic Studies USS22IV01-3003 28.08.2023-03.11.2023  5 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his/her UAS and field of education
  - can use common digital programs to communicate through text, film and sound files
  - has knowledge of the central national and international databases in his/her field of study
  - is familiar with the fundamentals of a scholarly approach, information management and can research and examine scientific information
  - can realize small-scale projects
  - has knowledge of basic mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The central documents and virtual platforms of the university and degree programme
  
  Learning styles, reading and note-taking techniques
  
  Time and stress management
  
  Text processing and implementation of Novia UAS's writing instructions
  
  Audio and video recording and editing
  
  Different types of communication utalising digital programs
  
  Project methodology
  
  Searching for scientific information in various databases
  
  Perspectives of knowledge in different fields of science
  
  Evaluating the reliability and scientific credibility of information

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Delen yrkeshögskolestudier:
  Angelöw, B. (2011). Konsten att lyckas med studierna. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur
  Blomström, V. & Wennerberg, J. 2018. Akademiskt läsande och skrivande. Studentlitteratur
  Cowen, M., Maier, P. & Price, G. 2012. Studera smart när du läser till sjuksköterska. Pearson.
  Drew, S. & Bingham, R. (2010). The guide to learning and study skills for higher education and work, Farnham: Gower
  Kellquist, M. & Eneroth, M. (2010). Studieteknik för universitet/högskola. Stockholm: Svenska studieteknikförlaget
  Liljeqvist, B. (2015). Plugga smart och lär dig mer! Lund: Studentlitteratur
  Läroplan 2023, Åbo
  Yrkeshögskolan Novias skrivanvisningar
  Yrkeshögskolan Novias Examensstadga
  
  Delen projektmetodik:
  Andersen, E. & Schwenke, E. 2013. Projektarbete - en vägledning för studenter.
  Skyttemoen, T., Vaagaasar, A.L. & Torhell S-E. 2017. Värdeskapande projektledning. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Delen evidensbaserat arbetssätt:
  Backman, J. 2016. Rapporter och uppsatser. Lund: studentlitteratur.
  Elomaa, L. & Mikkola, H. 2010. Näytön jäljillä. Turun Amk. http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522161611.pdf
  Kristensson, J. 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivandet och forskningsmetodik för studerande inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Valda delar. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  Larsen, A. K. & Dalén, H. ö. 2018. Metod helt enkelt: En introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod. Andra upplagan. Malmö: Gleerups.
  Willman, A., Bahtsevani, C., Nilsson, R. & Sandström, B. 2016. Evidensbaserad omvårdnad: En bro mellan forskning och klinisk praktik. Upplaga 4:1. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Delen IT: av föreläsaren given litteratur och nätsidor (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar och information, obligatorisk närvaro
  Workshops, obligatorisk närvaro
  It-övningar, obligatorisk närvaro
  Test i matematik (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Inlämning av grupparbete i projektmetodik (GK/UK)
  2) Inlämning av grupprapporten i evidensbaserat arbetssätt och quiz (GK/UK)
  3) Test i grundmatematik (GK/UK)
  
  Studerande har rätt att komplettera delarna 3 gånger enligt överenskommen tidtabell.
  Vitsordet i kursen ges då alla delar är gjorda och blivit godkända (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 03.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Ludvig Kihlman, Daniel Nenonen, Sebastian Lindgren

  Additional information

  Alla skriftliga inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras (Ouriginal) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Inlämning av grupparbete i projektmetodik 29.10.2023
  2) Inlämning av en quiz 1.10.2023 samt en grupprapport i evidensbaserat arbetssätt -delen 15.10.2023
  3) Test i grundmatematik v.37 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier ink. examinationer 78 h
  Föreläsningar, information och handledning 43 h
  Test i matematik 2h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  1) För godkänt arbete krävs:
  - förmåga att kunna sammanfatta relevant data
  - kritisk reflektion
  - användning av metodlitteratur
  - tydlig redogörelse för sökprocessen
  - att Novias skrivanvisningar följs
  
  2) För godkänt arbete krävs:
  Skriftlig grupprapport:
  - förmåga att kunna sammanfatta relevant data och svara på frågeställningar
  - kritisk reflektion
  - användning av metodlitteratur
  - tydlig redogörelse för sökprocessen
  - att Novias skrivanvisningar används
  Quiz:
  - För godkänt krävs 60 % av totalpoäng
  
  3) Deltagande i test (not translated)

•   Introduction to academic studies and communication VÅV22IN01-3009 28.08.2023-22.10.2023  4 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
  - can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kommunikation
  Novias anvisningar för examensarbete
  Material påmoodle
  
  Introduktion
  Allt material finns på moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kommunikation: Svenska 3sp
  -Föreläsningar om vetenskapligt skrivande
  -Förelsäsningar om muntlig framställning
  -Grupparbete i Vetenskpligt skrivande
  -Övningar i muntlig presentation
  -Muntlig presentation som videobandas och analyseras
  
  Introduktion till högskolestudier 1 sp
  Föreläsningar
  Presentation
  Online test (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 22.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm, Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kommunikation
  Bedömt grupparbete
  Bedömt muntlig prestation
  
  Introduktion till högskolestudier
  Närvaro den 29.8
  Online test bör vara godkänt (3 försök) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 studiepoäng motsvarar 27h arbete för studeranden.
  Denna kurs är 4 studiepoäng vilket betyder 108 h arbete för denna kurs.
  
  Kursen är uppdelad såhär:
  
  1 sp introduktion (Jannica Andtfolk)
  3 sp Kommunikation (Språklärare) (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Introduktion till högskolestudier 1sp:
  Studieinformation och informationssökning
  Lärande i ett högskolesammanhang
  Dataskydd och datasäkerhet
  
  Kommunikation för sjukskötare 3 sp:
  Vetenskapligt skrivande på svenska samt litteratursökning manuellt och i databaser
  Tillförlitligt källmaterial och källkritik
  Muntlig och skriftlig framställning
  Epost-hantering och användning av sociala medier i vårdarbetet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Introduction to academic studies and communication VÅV22IN01-3011 28.08.2023-08.10.2023  4 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
  - can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Communication
  Novia's instructions for degree projects.
  Materials on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Communication: Swedish 3 cr
  - Lectures on scientific writing
  - Lectures on oral presentation
  - Group work in scientific writing
  - Exercises in oral presentation
  - Oral presentations that are analyzed
  
  Introduction to academic studies 1 cr: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test. More course information can be found in Moodle platform

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Communication
  
  Student
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way, in accordance with the requirements of working life and social life.
  knows the work process of scientific writing and can use referencing systems.
  - is aware of different ways to search for information and can report according to the rules for standard reporting.
  Students with Finnish as the language of schooling must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required of public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should demonstrate satisfactory (grade 1-3) or good (grade 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written skills are assessed separately.
  Prerequisites
  No prior knowledge requirements

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 08.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm, Terese Österberg, Marie Hjortell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Communication: Assessed group work and assessed oral presentation at the end of the course.
  
  Introduction to academic studies: virtual tests

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Kommunikation:
  Underkänd
  Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - satisfactory-extremely satisfactory (1-2)
  Students demonstrate a superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - good-extremely good (3-4)
  • Students demonstrate a competence that is related and linked to the literature
  • Students can reflect and justify their own points of view

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - excellent (5)
  • Students have in-depth competence and show a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the future profession

•   Introduction to academic studies and communication VÅV22IN01-3008 28.08.2023-15.12.2023  4 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
  - can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kommunikation
  Novias anvisningar för examensarbeten.
  Material på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduction to academic studies: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test (library/ informationservice). More course information can be found at Moodle.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kommunikation
  
  Studerande
  - kan kommunicera både muntligt och skriftligt på ett strukturerat och språkligt välfungerande sätt, i enlighet med arbetslivets och samhällslivets krav.
  känner till arbetsprocessen för vetenskapligt skrivande och kan använda referenssystem.
  - är medveten om olika vägar att söka information och kan rapportera enligt reglerna för standarduppställning.
  Studeranden med finska som skolbildningsspråk ska uppvisa sådana kunskaper i svenska som enligt lagen (424/2003) krävs av offentligt anställda. Detta innebär att dessa studerande bör visa nöjaktig (vitsord 1-3) eller god (vitsord 4-5) förmåga att använda svenska i tal och skrift. Muntlig och skriftlig förmåga bedöms separat.
  Förkunskapskrav
  Inga förkunskapskrav (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kommunikation: Bedömt grupparbete och bedömd muntlig presentationen i slutet av kursen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kommunikation:Underkänd
  Studerande innehar en grundläggande kompetens i ämnet / Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - tillfredsställande-synnerligen tillfredsställande (1-2)
  Studerande påvisar en ytlig kompetens och grundläggande förståelse för ämnet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kommunikation:
  Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)
  • Studerande påvisar en kompetens som relateras och kopplas till litteraturen
  • Studerande kan reflektera och motivera egna synpunkter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kommunikation: Bedömningskriterier - berömliga (5)
  • Studerande har en fördjupad kompetens och visar en djupare förståelse för ämnet i relation till det kommande yrket (not translated)

•   Leadership and Entrepreneurship USS21UV02-3001 03.01.2024-09.06.2024  4 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Knows the basics of leadership and methods for development in health care
  
  Understands the importance of co-operation and the workplace community
  
  Demonstrates knowledge of quality assurance in care work
  
  Can prioritise work tasks
  
  Is familiar with the possibilities of health technology in social and health care
  
  Can use health care science and interdisciplinary knowledge in decision making as team leader
  
  Can promote patient- and client safety
  
  Understands the importance of the welfare economy, cost-effectiveness and sustainable development
  
  Can supervise work colleagues and students
  
  Has knowledge about career opportunities for nurses
  
  Realises the importance of continuous learning
  
  Can work according to the principles of internal leadership in an interprofessional business environment
  
  Knows the basics of entrepreneurship and can operate cost-effectively
  
  Has knowledge of entrepreneurship and business in social and health care

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Person-centering/client-centered as a basis for leadership and organizational development
  
  Service guidance in different service system
  
  Manager responsibilities
  
  Leadership theories
  
  Organisational models
  
  Internal and external entrepreneurship
  
  Employee Skills
  
  Team building and collegiality
  
  Handling conflict
  
  Quality assurance
  
  Welfare economy
  
  Promoting quality in care from different perspectives
  
  Development of patient and client safety
  
  Career opportunities
  
  Allowance forms within organisations that support professional development
  
  Guidance of staff and students
  
  Entrepreneurship
  
  Privatisation

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Arbetarskydd:
  https://www.tyosuojelu.fi/web/sv
  http://www.avi.fi/sv/web/avi/tyosuojelu#.VI63uyuUdaA
  http://www.stm.fi/sv/arbetslivet
  
  Boström, A-M, Nordström, G & Wilde-Larsson, B. 2018. Kvalitetsarbete för bättre och säkrare vård. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Dellve, L. & Eriksson, A: 2016. Hållbart ledarskap: i vardag och förändring. Finns som e-bok http://hb.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:953495/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  Ehrenberg, A. & Wallin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnadens grunder. Ansvar och utveckling.Kap. 8-11.
  Ekman, I. (red.) 2014. Personcentrering inom hälso- och sjukvård. Kap. 5
  Fagerström. (red.) 2011. Avancerad klinisk sjuksköterska. Avancerad klinisk omvårdnad i teori och praxis. Kap.19.
  Hamrefors. 2009/2014. Kommunikativ ledarskap.
  Henrekson Magnus, Stenkula Mikael. 2015 Entreprenörskap - Vad, hur och varför
  Hewitt-Taylor, J. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.2018. Kap. 7-11.
  Jacobsen, D.I. 2019. Organisationsförändringar och förändringsledarskap.
  Jordan, T. 2015. Konflikthantering i arbetslivet. Gleerups, Malmö.
  Jackson et al. 2009. Patterns of knowing – theory for nursing leadership. Nursing Economics 27(3), 149-159.
  Kallankari, S. 2019. Muutoksen johtaminen arjessa. Opas sosiaali- ja terveydenhuoltoon.
  Kelly, Vottero & Christie-McAuliffe. 2014. Introduction to quality and safety education for nurses.(google scholar)
  Khilgren, Engström & Johansson. 2009. Sjuksköterska med uppdrag att leda.
  Klinga, C. & Söderhjelm T. 2022. Ledarskap i vård och omsorg-att leda med mod och tillit
  Laaksonen, H. & Ollila, S. 2017. Lähijohtamisen perusteet terveydenhuollossa.
  Larsson. 2008. Mellanchef i vård och omsorg.
  Lundin, K. &Sandström, B. 2016. Ledarskap inom vård och omsorg.
  Marshall. 2011. Transformational leadership in nursing. From expert clinician to influential leader.(google Scholar)
  Norbäck & Targama. 2009. Det komplexa sjukhuset: att leda djupgående förändringar i en multiprofessionell verksamhet.
  Nyberg, J. 2010A Caring Approach in Nursing Administration https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/novia-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3039736&query=caring
  Rissanen, S. & Lammintakanen, J. (toim.) 2018. Sosiaali- ja terveysjohtaminen.
  Rosengren. 2014. Vårdledarskap - att utveckla och förbättra framtidens vård och omsorg.
  Sandberg. 2006. Det goda teamet: om teamarbete, arbetsklimat och samarbetshälsa.
  Sveningsson. 2010. Ledarskap.
  Stanley, D.2016. Clinical Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare : Values into Action. (google Scholar)
  Svedberg. 2012. Gruppsykologi. Om grupper, organisationer och ledarskap. Kap. 22.
  Suomen Sairaanhoitajat. 2016. Teknologia sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Fioca, Helsinki. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning
  Självstudier
  Simulering
  Skriftlig uppgift
  Seminarier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Skriftlig inlämning, bedöms med vitsord 0-5
  2. Deltagande i seminarie, bedöms GK/UK
  3. Intervju i kursdelen Entreprenörskap, bedöms GK/UK
  4. Simulering bedöms enligt GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2024 - 09.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 02.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Ledarskap 3 sp:
  Simulering 22.3, obligatorisk närvaro.
  Inlämningsuppgift 21.5, feedback på kursens Moodle sida
  Seminarier kring ledarskap enligt inlämningsuppgiften.
  
  Entreprenörskap 1 sp:
  Intervju, inlämning. 26.2, feedback på kursens Moodle sida (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier inklusive intervju 88h
  Föreläsningar, Seminarium, simulering, 20h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte
  Texten svarar inte på frågorna i uppgifter
  Kurslitteratur används inte
  Reflektioner framförs inte
  Den tekniska utformningen brister
  Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Frågorna besvaras vagt och smalt
  Kurslitteratur refereras
  Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning
  Den teoretiska utformningen är nöjaktig (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Frågorna besvaras
  Kurslitteraturen används tillämpande
  Texten är reflekterande och det finns en analys
  Den tekniska utformningen är god (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Frågorna besvaras uttömmande och mångsidigt
  Kurslitteraturen analyseras och tillämpas
  Reflektionen är analytisk och vetenskaplig
  Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig (not translated)

•   Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing VÅV21KVV14-3001 27.11.2023-21.01.2024  9 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - follow the general rules and routines in a working environment
  - demonstrate an understanding of health promotion working methods and implement these in his/her own practice
  - become familiar with the health centre organization, as well as the working methods at different wards and receptions
  - implement the nursing process into the care for an ill child or a pregnant woman, in both simulated and real situations, under supervision
  - apply evidence-based nursing, as well as identify and analyze the specific needs of the child, the pregnant woman and the family
  - employ safe working methods
  - has achieved competence in various service environments (open and home health care) according to national standard
  - perform safe drug administration for children and pregnant women
  - guide the family in health promotion and illness prevention
  - employ health promotion working methods

  Prerequisites

  Health promotion in nursing care
  Medical and Surgical 1
  Medical and Surgical 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.11.2023 - 21.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  29.07.2023 - 24.11.2023

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  1 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing VÅV21KVV14-3002 12.02.2024-24.03.2024  9 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - follow the general rules and routines in a working environment
  - demonstrate an understanding of health promotion working methods and implement these in his/her own practice
  - become familiar with the health centre organization, as well as the working methods at different wards and receptions
  - implement the nursing process into the care for an ill child or a pregnant woman, in both simulated and real situations, under supervision
  - apply evidence-based nursing, as well as identify and analyze the specific needs of the child, the pregnant woman and the family
  - employ safe working methods
  - has achieved competence in various service environments (open and home health care) according to national standard
  - perform safe drug administration for children and pregnant women
  - guide the family in health promotion and illness prevention
  - employ health promotion working methods

  Prerequisites

  Health promotion in nursing care
  Medical and Surgical 1
  Medical and Surgical 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Drevenhorn, E. 2010. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Pöyhilä, R, Guldogan, E & Vanhanen A. (red.)2018. Kotisairaala. Duodecim, Helsinki.Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Supervised internship in home care
  Written assignment

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.02.2024 - 24.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 09.02.2024

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Maria Berg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved internships
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in homecare

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring 2024

  Internationa connections

  Internship abroad is possible

  Student's schedule and workload

  Practice: 40 h/week

•   Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing VÅV21KVV14-3003 04.09.2023-08.10.2023  9 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - follow the general rules and routines in a working environment
  - demonstrate an understanding of health promotion working methods and implement these in his/her own practice
  - become familiar with the health centre organization, as well as the working methods at different wards and receptions
  - implement the nursing process into the care for an ill child or a pregnant woman, in both simulated and real situations, under supervision
  - apply evidence-based nursing, as well as identify and analyze the specific needs of the child, the pregnant woman and the family
  - employ safe working methods
  - has achieved competence in various service environments (open and home health care) according to national standard
  - perform safe drug administration for children and pregnant women
  - guide the family in health promotion and illness prevention
  - employ health promotion working methods

  Prerequisites

  Health promotion in nursing care
  Medical and Surgical 1
  Medical and Surgical 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Home care:
  Drevenhorn, E. 2010. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Pöyhilä, R, Guldogan, E & Vanhanen A. (red.)2018. Kotisairaala. Duodecim, Helsinki.Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Nursing Home Care:
  Supervised internship in nursing home care
  Written assignment

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing home Care:
  Approved internship

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 08.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  1 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Maria Berg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Nursing Home Care:
  Approved internship
  Approved internships
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in nursing home care

•   Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing VÅV21KVV14-3006 25.09.2023-26.11.2023  9 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will be able to:
  - take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - follow the general rules and routines in a working environment
  - demonstrate an understanding of health promotion working methods and implement these in his/her own practice
  - become familiar with the health centre organization, as well as the working methods at different wards and receptions
  - implement the nursing process into the care for an ill child or a pregnant woman, in both simulated and real situations, under supervision
  - apply evidence-based nursing, as well as identify and analyze the specific needs of the child, the pregnant woman and the family
  - employ safe working methods
  - has achieved competence in various service environments (open and home health care) according to national standard
  - perform safe drug administration for children and pregnant women
  - guide the family in health promotion and illness prevention
  - employ health promotion working methods

  Prerequisites

  Health promotion in nursing care
  Medical and Surgical 1
  Medical and Surgical 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Maternity care, Paediatrics and Home nursing

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se Moodle för närmare information:
  Om eventuella hälsogranskningar, prov och vaccinationer
  Om praktikuppgifter (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Clinical practice

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.09.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 24.09.2023

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Berg

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro under praktiken. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Godkänd praktik
  Godkända praktikuppgifter
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27h (not translated)

•   Medical and surgical 5 VÅV21KVV13-3001 08.01.2024-25.08.2024  12 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - understand the importance of aseptic working methods
  - employ safe working methods
  - be able to assess the patient’s caring needs, plan for interventions, implement nursing activities and demonstrate clinical nursing skills related to medical and surgical nursing, under supervision and with increasing independence
  -implement the underlying principles of medical and surgical nursing care at different wards
  - be able to perform safe drug administration under supervision

  Prerequisites

  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Medical and surgical practice

  Further information

  Summerpractice

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Made as paid summer work without supervision from the school.
  It is desirable that students can work as a nurse substitute.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 25.08.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 05.01.2024

  • 12 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1
  • SSK21-2

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Students apply for their summer work themselves
  It is desirable that students can work as a nurse substitute.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Course responsible teachers approve the internship and validate after the summer.
  The practice is 8 weeks and the students do an average of 38 h / week.
  A signed work list must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  Internship report / Learning diary written and submitted on moodle no later than week 35.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  38 h/week. 8 week.
  Total: 304 h
  The summer internship documents were submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

  Student's schedule and workload

  38 h/week. 8 week. Total 304 h

•   Medical and surgical 5 VÅV21KVV13-3003 27.11.2023-01.09.2024  12 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to take part in a multiprofessional team and create a natural caring relationship with the patient
  - understand the importance of aseptic working methods
  - employ safe working methods
  - be able to assess the patient’s caring needs, plan for interventions, implement nursing activities and demonstrate clinical nursing skills related to medical and surgical nursing, under supervision and with increasing independence
  -implement the underlying principles of medical and surgical nursing care at different wards
  - be able to perform safe drug administration under supervision

  Prerequisites

  Medical and surgical 1
  Medical and surgical 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Medical and surgical practice

  Further information

  Summerpractice

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Made as paid summer work without supervision from the school.
  It is desirable that students can work as a nurse substitute.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.11.2023 - 01.09.2024

  Enrollment date range

  27.11.2023 - 05.05.2024

  • 12 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  1 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Students apply for their summer work themselves
  It is desirable that students can work as a nurse substitute.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Course responsible teachers approve the internship and validate after the summer.
  The practice is 8 weeks and the students do an average of 38 h / week.
  A signed work list must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  Internship report / Learning diary written and submitted on moodle no later than week 35.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  38 h/week. 8 week.
  Total: 304 h
  The summer internship documents were submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

  Student's schedule and workload

  38 h/week. 8 week. Total 304 h

•   Medication Management I USS22GV02-3002 04.10.2023-29.03.2024  5 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of how human anatomy, physiology, and pathology affect the administration of medication, taking into account the phases of medication and the effects on the organism when planning, implementing and evaluating a safe medication management for different patient groups
  - can explain the legal grounds of medication management and can provide mentoring
  - can work cost-effectively taking into consideration the environment and sustainable development

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The most common types of medication and their uses, effect mechanisms and administration
  
  The 5 right of medication
  
  The implementation of medication management through various modes of administration
  
  Self medication
  
  Medication calculation
  
  Basic mathematics
  
  Rounding
  
  Roman numerals
  
  Equation solving
  
  Conversions
  
  Dosage
  
  Calculation of active substances (tablets, solutions)
  
  Dosage taking into account the patient's body weight, skin area
  
  Dosage tables
  
  Nomogram
  
  Laws and governing documents in the implementation of medicinal treatment
  
  The nurse's role, duties and responsibilities in the process of medication management
  
  Plan for medication management
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Material use, reuse and disposal of medication in social and health care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling
  
  http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-00-8686-2
  
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  
  https://medibas-se.ezproxy.novia.fi/
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  
  Koskinen, T., Puirava, A. et.al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammattilaisille.
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2009. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2008. Lääkehoito eller nyare (2011) upplagan
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2003. Lääkehoidon ABC
  
  Persson P. (red.) 2001. Läkemedel och läkemedelshantering för sjuksköterskor
  
  Veräjänkorva O. mfl. 2006. Lääkehoito hoitotyössä.
  
  Lääkeinfo.fi
  
  Medicin 75+
  https://www.fimea.fi/web/sv/soktjanster_och_forteckningar/lakemedelsinformation/en_databas_for_medicineringen_av_aldre
  
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  
  Ernvall S. m.fl. 2009. Lääkelaskenta.
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska." (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hybridutförande
  Uppgifterna utförs online i moodle
  Kontaktstudier i form av föreläsningar och i läkemedelsräkning i klass, som komplement till detta finns inbandade föreläsningar inom respektive ämne till förfogande.
  
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och/eller gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops).
  
  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  Självstudier
  Närstudier
  Smågruppsarbeten samt inlämningar inför simulation på Moodle
  Kliniska oblikatoriska simuleringsövningar med tillhörande förhandsuppgifter.
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  Självstudier
  Närstudier
  Räkneövningar på moodle (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Individuell tent i Läkemedelsmatematik I (gk/uk) kräver 100% rätt
  
  2. Individuell tent i Lkm behandling I (5/uk)
  
  3. Simulering (gk/uk)
  
  4. Moodleuppgifter (gk/uk)
  
  Kursvitsordet är en helhet av de 4 ovannämda delarna. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.10.2023 - 29.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  08.09.2023 - 15.10.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  
  Aktuell lagstiftning
  
  Etik vid läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Säker läkemedelsbehandling vid olika skeden av läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  
  Grundmatematik
  
  Enhetsomvandlingar
  
  Dosering av läkemedel i fast och flytande form
  
  Nomogram
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt instruktioner vid kursstart.
  Räknetent efter utförda räkneworkshops och test.
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar enligt schema
  
  Individuell tentamen och omtentamen i läkemedelshantering enligt schema inom ramen för kursen.
  
  Tentamenstillfälle 1:
  
  På moodle
  
  Andra omtentamenstillfället på allmänt omtentamensdatum:
  
  8.12
  
  Tredje omtentamenstillfället på allmänt omtentamensdatum:
  
  19.1
  
  Individuell tentamen och omtentamen i läkemedelsräkning enligt schema inom ramen för kusen.
  
  Läkemedelsräkningstent 1:
  
  På Moodle
  
  Läkemedelsräkning omtentament 1:
  
  19.1
  
  Omtentamen 2:
  
  9.2
  
  Obligatorisk simulering i smågrupper enligt schema
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  kursens omfattning 5x27h= 135h
  
  föreläsningar + tenter 10h
  
  moodleuppgifter + självstudier 112h
  
  simuleringar 13h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God nivå:
  
  Studerande svarar på alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och kan reletera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner i viss mån.
  
  Studerande känner till läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

•   Medication Management I USS22GV02-3003 14.08.2023-31.12.2023  5 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of how human anatomy, physiology, and pathology affect the administration of medication, taking into account the phases of medication and the effects on the organism when planning, implementing and evaluating a safe medication management for different patient groups
  - can explain the legal grounds of medication management and can provide mentoring
  - can work cost-effectively taking into consideration the environment and sustainable development

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The most common types of medication and their uses, effect mechanisms and administration
  
  The 5 right of medication
  
  The implementation of medication management through various modes of administration
  
  Self medication
  
  Medication calculation
  
  Basic mathematics
  
  Rounding
  
  Roman numerals
  
  Equation solving
  
  Conversions
  
  Dosage
  
  Calculation of active substances (tablets, solutions)
  
  Dosage taking into account the patient's body weight, skin area
  
  Dosage tables
  
  Nomogram
  
  Laws and governing documents in the implementation of medicinal treatment
  
  The nurse's role, duties and responsibilities in the process of medication management
  
  Plan for medication management
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Material use, reuse and disposal of medication in social and health care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling
  
  http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-00-8686-2
  
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  
  https://medibas-se.ezproxy.novia.fi/
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  
  Koskinen, T., Puirava, A. et.al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammattilaisille.
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2009. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2008. Lääkehoito eller nyare (2011) upplagan
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2003. Lääkehoidon ABC
  
  Persson P. (red.) 2001. Läkemedel och läkemedelshantering för sjuksköterskor
  
  Veräjänkorva O. mfl. 2006. Lääkehoito hoitotyössä.
  
  Lääkeinfo.fi
  
  Medicin 75+
  https://www.fimea.fi/web/sv/soktjanster_och_forteckningar/lakemedelsinformation/en_databas_for_medicineringen_av_aldre
  
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  
  Ernvall S. m.fl. 2009. Lääkelaskenta.
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska." (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hybridutförande
  Uppgifterna utförs online i moodle
  Kontaktstudier i form av föreläsningar och i läkemedelsräkning i klass, som komplement till detta finns inbandade föreläsningar inom respektive ämne till förfogande.
  
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och/eller gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops).
  
  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  Självstudier
  Närstudier
  Smågruppsarbeten samt inlämningar inför simulation på Moodle
  Kliniska oblikatoriska simuleringsövningar med tillhörande förhandsuppgifter.
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  Självstudier
  Närstudier
  Räkneövningar på moodle (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Individuell tent i Läkemedelsmatematik I (gk/uk) kräver 100% rätt
  
  2. Individuell tent i Lkm behandling I (5/uk)
  
  3. Simulering (gk/uk)
  
  4. Moodleuppgifter (gk/uk)
  
  Kursvitsordet är en helhet av de 4 ovannämda delarna. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 31.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  
  Aktuell lagstiftning
  
  Etik vid läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Säker läkemedelsbehandling vid olika skeden av läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  
  Grundmatematik
  
  Enhetsomvandlingar
  
  Dosering av läkemedel i fast och flytande form
  
  Nomogram
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. "
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt instruktioner vid kursstart.
  Räknetent efter utförda räkneworkshops och test.
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar enligt schema
  
  Individuell tentamen och omtentamen i läkemedelshantering enligt schema inom ramen för kursen.
  
  Tentamenstillfälle 1:
  
  11.12
  
  Andra omtentamenstillfället på allmänt omtentamensdatum:
  
  19.1
  
  Tredje omtentamenstillfället på allmänt omtentamensdatum:
  
  9.2
  
  Individuell tentamen och omtentamen i läkemedelsräkning enligt schema inom ramen för kusen.
  
  Läkemedelsräkningstent 1:
  
  13.12
  
  Läkemedelsräkning omtentament 1:
  
  19.1
  
  Omtentamen 2:
  
  9.2
  
  Obligatorisk simulering i smågrupper enligt schema
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  kursens omfattning 5x27h= 135h
  
  föreläsningar + tenter 10h
  
  moodleuppgifter + självstudier 112h
  
  simuleringar 13h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God nivå:
  
  Studerande svarar på alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och kan reletera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner i viss mån.
  
  Studerande känner till läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

•   Medication Management I USS22GV02-3004 08.01.2024-02.06.2024  5 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of how human anatomy, physiology, and pathology affect the administration of medication, taking into account the phases of medication and the effects on the organism when planning, implementing and evaluating a safe medication management for different patient groups
  - can explain the legal grounds of medication management and can provide mentoring
  - can work cost-effectively taking into consideration the environment and sustainable development

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The most common types of medication and their uses, effect mechanisms and administration
  
  The 5 right of medication
  
  The implementation of medication management through various modes of administration
  
  Self medication
  
  Medication calculation
  
  Basic mathematics
  
  Rounding
  
  Roman numerals
  
  Equation solving
  
  Conversions
  
  Dosage
  
  Calculation of active substances (tablets, solutions)
  
  Dosage taking into account the patient's body weight, skin area
  
  Dosage tables
  
  Nomogram
  
  Laws and governing documents in the implementation of medicinal treatment
  
  The nurse's role, duties and responsibilities in the process of medication management
  
  Plan for medication management
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Material use, reuse and disposal of medication in social and health care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling
  
  http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-00-8686-2
  
  FIMEA, Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2020 (äldre upplaga från 2013 kan också användas). Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2020 (äldre upplaga från 2014 kan också användas). Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  
  https://medibas-se.ezproxy.novia.fi/
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  
  Koskinen, T., Puirava, A. et.al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammattilaisille.
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2009. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2008. Lääkehoito eller nyare (2011) upplagan
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2003. Lääkehoidon ABC
  
  Persson P. (red.) 2001. Läkemedel och läkemedelshantering för sjuksköterskor
  
  Veräjänkorva O. mfl. 2006. Lääkehoito hoitotyössä.
  
  Lääkeinfo.fi
  
  Medicin 75+
  https://www.fimea.fi/web/sv/soktjanster_och_forteckningar/lakemedelsinformation/en_databas_for_medicineringen_av_aldre
  
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  
  Ernvall S. m.fl. 2009. Lääkelaskenta.
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Läkemedelslära 4 sp
  Självstudier
  Närstudier
  Smågruppsarbeten samt inlämningar inför simulation på Moodle
  Simuleringsövningar med praktisk examination
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  Självstudier
  Närstudier
  Räkneövningar på moodle (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Individuell tent i Läkemedelsmatematik I (gk/uk) kräver 100% rätt Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg
  
  2. Individuell tent i Lkm behandling I (5/uk) Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg
  
  3. Simulering (gk/uk)
  
  4. Moodleuppgifter (gk/uk) Plagiatkontrolleras
  
  Kursvitsordet är en helhet av de 4 ovannämda delarna. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 02.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Läkemedelslära 4 sp
  
  Aktuell lagstiftning
  
  Etik vid läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Säker läkemedelsbehandling vid olika skeden av läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  
  Grundmatematik
  
  Enhetsomvandlingar
  
  Dosering av läkemedel i fast och flytande form
  
  Nomogram
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individuell tentamen och omtentamen i läkemedelshantering och läkemedelsräkning enligt schema inom ramen för kursen.
  
  Obligatorisk simulering i smågrupper enligt schema samt praktisk examination
  
  Alla inlämningar på Moodle plagiatkontrolleras med Ouriginal (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  kursens omfattning 5x 27h= 135h
  
  föreläsningar + tenter
  
  moodleuppgifter + självstudier
  
  simuleringar och praktisk examination (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God nivå:
  
  Studerande svarar på alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och kan reletera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner i viss mån.
  
  Studerande känner till läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

•   Medication Management II and Pharmacology USS22KV03-3001 21.08.2023-29.10.2023  4 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of how human anatomy and physiology, pathology and applied pharmacology affect the administration of medication, taking into account the phases of the medication and the effect of the organism when planning, implementation and evaluation of safe medication management of various illnesses
  - can explain the legal grounds of medication management and can provide mentoring
  - can work cost-effectively taking into consideration the environment and sustainable development
  - understands the importance of commitment of the patient
  - can guide the patient in medication management

  Prerequisites

  Course Medication Management I

  Content of the study unit

  Fundamentals of Pharmacology: Pharmaconetics, Pharmacodynamics and Toxicology
  
  The most common types of medication and their uses, effect mechanisms and administration
  
  The therapeutic mechanisms of medication, side effect, interactions as well as mechanisms of interaction
  
  Follow-up of effects during medication
  
  Documentation
  
  Evaluation and review of medication
  
  The 5-9 right of medication
  
  Implementation of medication management through various modes of administration
  
  Applied pharmacology
  
  Performing blood transfusions
  
  Medical Technology
  
  Medication calculation: basic calculation, rounding, percentage, Roman numeral systems, equations, conversions, dosages, calculation of active substances (tablets, injection solutions, medicinal solutions), dosage taking into account the patient's body weight, skin area, dose tables, nomogram, calculating drip speed, drip time, infusion concentrate, oxygen, electrolytes, preparation of solutions, mixtures and dilutions, energy and liquid needs, nutritional solutions
  
  Laws and governing documents in the implementation of medication management
  
  The nurse's role, duties and responsibilities in the medication management process
  
  Commitment to medicinal treatment
  
  Plan for medicinal treatment
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Material use, reuse and disposal of medication in social and health care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Donnerdal L. (2014). Vätskebalans genom omvårdnadsplan. Studentlitteratur.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Ernvall S. m.fl. 2009. Lääkelaskenta
  Henriksson O. & Lennermark I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt och syra-basbalans. (Studentlitteratur).
  Lukkanen, E. & Ruokoniemi, P. 2021. Säker läkemedelsbehandling. Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling. Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2021:7
  Simonsen, T. et. al. 2020. Illustrerad farmakologi 1. Principer och tillämpningar. Natur och kultur.
  Simonsen, T. & Hasselström, J. 2020. Illustrerad farmakologi 2. Sjukdomar och behandling. Natur och kultur
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2020. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-12, Del II, ej kpt 9) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska." (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hybridutförande
  Uppgifterna utförs online i moodle
  Kontaktstudier i form av föreläsningar och i läkemedelsräkning i klass, som komplement till detta finns inbandade föreläsningar inom respektive ämne till förfogande.
  
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och/eller gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops). (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Den skriftliga individuella tentamen i läkemedelsräkning bedöms gk/uk. Krävs 100 % rätt
  2. Individuell tentamen (5-1/uk)
  3. Obligatorisk medverkande närvaro vid simuleringstillfällen (gk/uk)
  4. ABO test (gk/uk)
  Kursvitsordet är en helhet av de 4 ovannämda delarna. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.08.2023 - 29.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelsräkning
  2. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi
  3. Simulering och arbete i smågrupper
  4. ABO test (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt instruktioner vid kursstart.
  Räknetent efter utförda räkneworkshops och test.
  Klinisk examination i samband med övningar inom Kliniskt vårdarbete enligt schema
  
  1. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelsräkning 29.9. Omtentamen I 5.10, omtentamen II 9.10, omtentamen III 25.10
  2. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi 3.10. Omtentamen I 27.10 omtentamen II 24.11
  3. Simulering inom kliniskt vårdarbete och arbete i smågrupper
  
  4. ABO test
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier: räkning, ABO test, instuderingsfrågor mm. 90 h
  föreläsningar: matematik 10 h, behandling 12 h, farmakologi 8h
  handledd gruppsimulering 6h
  smågruppsarbete 12h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Känner ej till begrepp eller grundläggande principer. Förstår ej samband mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  N1 känner till begrepp och grundläggande principer inom läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Ser samband mellan teori och praktik men kan ej reflektera (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  G3 förstår och kan förklara begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Visar förmåga till att reflektera mellan teori och praktik (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  B5 har förmåga att se samband och göra egna slutsatser mellan begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Kan reflektera mellan teori och praktik (not translated)

•   Medication Management II and Pharmacology USS22KV03-3004 08.01.2024-09.06.2024  4 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of how human anatomy and physiology, pathology and applied pharmacology affect the administration of medication, taking into account the phases of the medication and the effect of the organism when planning, implementation and evaluation of safe medication management of various illnesses
  - can explain the legal grounds of medication management and can provide mentoring
  - can work cost-effectively taking into consideration the environment and sustainable development
  - understands the importance of commitment of the patient
  - can guide the patient in medication management

  Prerequisites

  Course Medication Management I

  Content of the study unit

  Fundamentals of Pharmacology: Pharmaconetics, Pharmacodynamics and Toxicology
  
  The most common types of medication and their uses, effect mechanisms and administration
  
  The therapeutic mechanisms of medication, side effect, interactions as well as mechanisms of interaction
  
  Follow-up of effects during medication
  
  Documentation
  
  Evaluation and review of medication
  
  The 5-9 right of medication
  
  Implementation of medication management through various modes of administration
  
  Applied pharmacology
  
  Performing blood transfusions
  
  Medical Technology
  
  Medication calculation: basic calculation, rounding, percentage, Roman numeral systems, equations, conversions, dosages, calculation of active substances (tablets, injection solutions, medicinal solutions), dosage taking into account the patient's body weight, skin area, dose tables, nomogram, calculating drip speed, drip time, infusion concentrate, oxygen, electrolytes, preparation of solutions, mixtures and dilutions, energy and liquid needs, nutritional solutions
  
  Laws and governing documents in the implementation of medication management
  
  The nurse's role, duties and responsibilities in the medication management process
  
  Commitment to medicinal treatment
  
  Plan for medicinal treatment
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Material use, reuse and disposal of medication in social and health care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Donnerdal L. (2014). Vätskebalans genom omvårdnadsplan. Studentlitteratur.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Ernvall S. m.fl. 2009. Lääkelaskenta
  Henriksson O. & Lennermark I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt och syra-basbalans. (Studentlitteratur).
  Lukkanen, E. & Ruokoniemi, P. 2021. Säker läkemedelsbehandling. Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling. Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2021:7
  Simonsen, T. et. al. 2020. Illustrerad farmakologi 1. Principer och tillämpningar. Natur och kultur.
  Simonsen, T. & Hasselström, J. 2020. Illustrerad farmakologi 2. Sjukdomar och behandling. Natur och kultur
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2020. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-12, Del II, ej kpt 9) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska." (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hybridutförande
  Uppgifterna utförs online i moodle
  Kontaktstudier i form av föreläsningar och i läkemedelsräkning i klass, som komplement till detta finns inbandade föreläsningar inom respektive ämne till förfogande.
  
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och/eller gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops). (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Den skriftliga individuella tentamen i läkemedelsräkning bedöms gk/uk. Krävs 100 % rätt. Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg.
  2. Individuell tentamen (5-1/uk) Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg.
  3. Obligatorisk medverkande närvaro vid simuleringstillfällen (gk/uk)
  4. ABO test (gk/uk)
  5. Inlämningsuppgifter (gk/uk)
  
  Kursvitsordet är en helhet av de 5 ovannämda delarna. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 09.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelsräkning
  2. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi
  3. Simulering och arbete i smågrupper
  4. ABO test
  5. Inlämningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Virtuellt teoritest enligt instruktioner vid kursstart. Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg
  
  Räknetent efter utförda räkneworkshops och test. Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg
  
  Klinisk examination i samband med övningar inom Kliniskt vårdarbete enligt schema
  
  ABO test
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier: räkning, ABO test.
  
  Föreläsningar: läkemedeslräkning, läkemedelsbehandlingbehandling och farmakologi.
  
  Handledd gruppsimulering.
  
  smågruppsarbete med instuderingsfrågor och inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Känner ej till begrepp eller grundläggande principer. Förstår ej samband mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  N1 känner till begrepp och grundläggande principer inom läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Ser samband mellan teori och praktik men kan ej reflektera (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  G3 förstår och kan förklara begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Visar förmåga till att reflektera mellan teori och praktik (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  B5 har förmåga att se samband och göra egna slutsatser mellan begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Kan reflektera mellan teori och praktik (not translated)

•   Mental Health Care and Substance Abuse Treatment USS22KL01-3002 12.02.2024-17.03.2024  5 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can as part of an inter-professional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client-centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has expertise in mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  - has expertise in care in various service environments
  - can evaluate the patient's counseling needs and resources, and plan counseling and patient self-care
  - knows the patient's care chain and servicesystem
  - can apply knowledge about mental health and central psychiatric disorders and illnesses
  - can consider how climate-related events affect mental health
  - can the central evidence-based care methods used in substance abuse treatment and mental health care for patients, families and relatives
  - master methods for early intervention and preventive work

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The central psychiatric disorders
  
  Professional treatment of the person suffering from psychiatric illness or addiction
  
  Patient care chain, service environments and legislation concerning mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  
  Commitment to care
  
  Person-centered/client-centered and family-centered guidance methods
  
  Motivate the patient to self-care
  
  Advocasy and person-centered care
  
  Care relationship
  
  Family work
  
  Network
  
  Rehabilitation
  Climate-related stress and anxiety
  
  Evaluation of suicide risk
  
  Preventative mental health care work
  
  Mini-intervention
  
  Ethics och autonomy
  
  Alcohol and substance abuse culture and politics in Finland

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Skärsäter I. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå.
  Kuhanen, C. m.fl. 2017. Mielenterveystyö.
  Pederson R. & Nortvedt (red.). 2021. Etik i psykiatrisk vård.
  Gabrielsson S, m.fl. 2023. Sjuksköterska i psykiatrisk heldygnsvård.
  Eklund M. m.fl. 2020. Aktivitet och relation : mål och medel inom psykosocial rehabilitering.
  Cullberg J., Skott M. & Strålin P. 2020. Att insjukna i psykos- Förlopp, behandling, återhämtning
  Andersson G, Bulow P, Denhov A. & Topor A. 2016. Från patient till person. Om allvarliga psykiska problem - vardag, vård och stöd.
  www.psykporten.fi
  Sandberg, H. 2014. Sjuksköterskans samtal - Professionalitet och medmänsklighet.
  Friberg F. & Öhlén J. 2013. Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Sidor 220 - 231, 377 - 405.
  Lehti J. 2017. Masennus mahdollisuutena. matkaopas muutokseen.
  Eide, H. 2009. Omvårdnadsorienterad kommunikation: relationsetik, samarbete och konfliktlösning.
  Gottlieb, B 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care, 56-103,146, 170-171, 203-251.
  Jahren Kristofferssen, N. m.fl, 2006. Grundläggande omvårdnad 4, s. 18 - 101.
  Nordmann M. & Vuohelainen E. (red.) 2014. Synvinklar på det rusmedelsförebyggande arbetet med unga i Finland.
  Herlofson J. m.fl. 2016. Psykiatri.
  Sögaard Nielsen, A. 2009. Behandling av alkoholproblem.
  Havio M, Inkinen M. & Partanen A. (red.). 2014. Päihde-hoitotyö.
  Tammi T. & Raento P. (red.) 2013. Addiktioyhteiskunta. Riippuvuus aikamme ilmiönä.
  Pehkonen A, m.fl. 2019. Oikeus päihdehuoltoon.
  Leith, W. 2008. De hungriga åren: en matmissbrukarens bekännelser.
  Trulsson, K. 2006. Dans på lina: Om kvinnors missbruk, familjeliv och behandling.
  Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende SOU 2100:35.
  Suomen sairaanhoitajaliitto ry. 2008. Tämä potilas kuuluu meille: sairaanhoitaja tekee mielenterveys- ja päihdehoitotyötä.
  Holmberg, J. 2010. Päihderiippuvuudesta elämänhallintaan.
  Saarelainen, Stengård & Vuori-Kemilä. 2007. Mielenterveys- ja päihdetyötä: yhteistyötä ja kumppanuutta.
  Koski-Jännes A., Riittinen L. & Saarnio P. 2008. Kohti muutosta.
  Huttunen M. & Lumikukka S. 2017. Psyykenlääkkeet ja niiden käyttö.
  www.droglanken.fi
  SOU 2011:35. Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende. Volym 1 och 2.
  Andersson Höglund I. & Hedman Ahlström B. 2013. Psykiatri 2.
  Andersson Höglund I. & Hedman Ahlström B. 2012. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri.
  Ahola T. & Ahola M. 2016. Väkivallasta turvallisuuteen.
  Etelä-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri. Toimintaohje perhe-ja lähisuhdeväkivaltaa kohdanneiden ja väkivaltaa tehneiden hoitotilanteissa. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kursinformation, obligatoriskt deltagande
  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar, obligatoriskt deltagande
  Simulering, obligariskt deltagande
  Temavecka (vecka 10) med socionomstuderande, obligatoriskt deltagande. Arbetsformen under temaveckan är interprofessionellt workshopsarbete där socionom- och sjukskötarstuderande blandas i mindre grupper. Workshopsarbetet fokuserar på vissa aktuella aktuella teman och resulterar i ett slutseminarium med gruppvisa presentationer. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Temaveckan: Smågruppsarbetet och seminariet kräver obligatorisk närvaro och utvärderas enligt skalan gk/uk med följande bedömningskriterier: studerandes aktivitet under smågrupper, inhämtning och bearbetning av källmaterial och aktivit deltagande i seminariet.
  
  2) Den skriftliga rapporten bedöms i skalan gk/uk (1-5) och väger 50 % av kursvitsordet.
  
  3) Tent i psykiatri utvärderas enligt skalan gk/uk (1-5) och väger 50 % av kursvitsordet. . (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.02.2024 - 17.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 11.02.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Pia Liljeroth, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig lärare Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg ansvarar för tillgodoräkningen via validering (eAhot).
  Deltagande i kursstart, simulationen, föreläsningar, ev.expertföreläsningar och temaveckan är obligatoriskt. Frånvaro kompenseras.
  
  Feedback på temaveckan ges gemensamt till gruppen och feedback på rapporten ges individuellt på moodle. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursinformation
  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Simulering
  Temavecka (vecka 10) med socionomstuderande, obligatoriskt deltagande. Arbetsformen under temaveckan är interprofessionellt workshopsarbete där socionom- och sjukskötarstuderande blandas i mindre grupper. Workshopsarbetet fokuserar på vissa aktuella aktuella teman och resulterar i ett slutseminarium med gruppvisa presentationer. (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Erfarenhetstalare (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Interprofessionellt arbete (smågruppsarbete, grupprapport och seminariet) under temavecka 10. Inlämning av grupprapporter 4.3 och 5.3.2024.
  2) Inlämning av individuell rapport på Moodle 17.3 2024.
  3) Tent i psykiatri 26.2. 2024. Omtenter: Fre 5.4.2024 kl. 12-16 och Fre 3.5.2024 kl. 12-16. Anmälning via Ukot i Peppi. Görs på moodle med Safe Browsner. (not translated)

  Internationa connections

  4 studerande kan anhålla om att delta i Nordplus intensivveckan i Umeå 3 sp vecka 15. 1,5 sp tas från denna kurs och 1,5 sp tas från praktiken alt. Valfria studier. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursinformation 2 h
  Självstudier 23 h
  Tent 1 h ink. läsning 19 h
  Interaktiva föreläsningar, experter 20 h
  Simulering 4 h
  Temavecka 24 h
  Individivuell rapport 40 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kriterier för vitsordet 1. Underkänd rapport kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Rapporten svarar endast delvis eller ytligt de ställda frågorna med stöd av vetenskapliga artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Rapporten har delvis relevant innehåll och tillämpningen beskrivs ytligt och ensidigt. Rapporten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid och den följer delvis Novias skrivanvisningar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Rapporten svarar på de ställda frågorna med stöd av minst 3 vetenskapliga relevanta artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Rapporten har kompetent innehåll och case -tillämpningen är beskriven. Rapporrten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle och den följer i stort sett Novias skrivanvisningar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Rapporten svarar mångsidigt på frågeställningar med stöd av minst 3 vetenskapliga relevanta artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Rapporten har kompetent och aktuellt innehåll och case -tillämpningen är tydligt och logiskt beskriven. Rapporten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle och den följer Novias skrivanvisningar (not translated)

•   Mental and substance abuse care VÅV22KV12-3001 22.04.2024-02.06.2024  6 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - has knowledge of and an understanding of the most common forms of mental illness
  - has knowledge of and masters the various treatment and care methods of mental health care
  - can assess the need for care in people in need of emergency psychiatric care
  - can define risk use, harmful use / abuse, addiction and co-dependence
  - has knowledge of various forms of abuse; mainly alcohol, drugs and medicines
  - has knowledge of various forms of treatment and psycho social care
  - has the skills to intervene in time, inform, give advice and guide the client and relatives in substance abuse issues
  - understands the importance of health promotion and prevention interventions and care as well as rehabilitation in mental illness and in addiction and dependence
  - can interpret the central legislation and the national planning for the area and can apply the knowledge in professional practice
  - masters the medical terminology and drug treatment in the field
  - can interact professionally and caringly with clients / patients of different ages and with varying backgrounds and with their relatives
  - respects the patient / client and treats them as an expert on their own life
  - can support and guide the client / patient and relatives to get involved in care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Mental illness
  Addiction and addiction

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Allgulander, C. 2019. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Lindqvist B. & Hildebrand Karlén. 2023. Handbok i missbruks- och beroendepsykologi, Liber, Stockholm
  Lagstiftning
  Medibas
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.04.2024 - 02.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 19.04.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  6 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  on moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Mental and substance abuse care VÅV22KV12-3003 04.03.2024-14.04.2024  6 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - has knowledge of and an understanding of the most common forms of mental illness
  - has knowledge of and masters the various treatment and care methods of mental health care
  - can assess the need for care in people in need of emergency psychiatric care
  - can define risk use, harmful use / abuse, addiction and co-dependence
  - has knowledge of various forms of abuse; mainly alcohol, drugs and medicines
  - has knowledge of various forms of treatment and psycho social care
  - has the skills to intervene in time, inform, give advice and guide the client and relatives in substance abuse issues
  - understands the importance of health promotion and prevention interventions and care as well as rehabilitation in mental illness and in addiction and dependence
  - can interpret the central legislation and the national planning for the area and can apply the knowledge in professional practice
  - masters the medical terminology and drug treatment in the field
  - can interact professionally and caringly with clients / patients of different ages and with varying backgrounds and with their relatives
  - respects the patient / client and treats them as an expert on their own life
  - can support and guide the client / patient and relatives to get involved in care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Mental illness
  Addiction and addiction

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Allgulander, C. 2019. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Lindqvist B. & Hildebrand Karlén. 2023. Handbok i missbruks- och beroendepsykologi, Liber, Stockholm
  Lagstiftning
  Medibas
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit?
  Expert by experience

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 14.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.03.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid Introduktion, Workshop, Seminarie (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  on moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Mental health and psychiatry VÅV21KVV16-3001 28.08.2023-08.10.2023  9 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in psychiatric and addictive context
  - within the context of psychiatric and addictive context can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can identify and interpret the patient's / client's basic needs regarding mental illness and abuse
  - has readiness to provide mental first aid
  - can respond to the patient / client and relatives in their immediate environment
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team

  Prerequisites

  Care of the patient with with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beaviour
  Elderly care and geriatric

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Part 1: Mental Health First Aid
  Workshop
  Part 2: Clinical practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Part 1: Mental Health First Aid
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Del 2: Clinical practice
  Approved practice
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 08.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 25.08.2023

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  1 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp A (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp B (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Part 1: Mental Health First Aid
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Part 2: Clinical practice
  Approved clinical practice
  Written assignments
  Participation i seminars

  Student's schedule and workload

  38h/week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  • follows the work list and respects agreed times
  • can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  C Knowledge and skills
  • mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
  • can perform tasks under supervision
  • has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  • can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  • makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
  • is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
  D Collaboration and response
  • can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  • can work with others within the work team
  Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
  • does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
  C Knowledge and skills
  • does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
  • has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
  • lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
  • has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
  D Collaboration and response
  • possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
  • shows an unprofessional attitude

•   Mental health and psychiatry VÅV21KVV16-3002 30.10.2023-17.12.2023  9 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in psychiatric and addictive context
  - within the context of psychiatric and addictive context can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can identify and interpret the patient's / client's basic needs regarding mental illness and abuse
  - has readiness to provide mental first aid
  - can respond to the patient / client and relatives in their immediate environment
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team

  Prerequisites

  Care of the patient with with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beaviour
  Elderly care and geriatric

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Part 1: Mental Health First Aid
  Workshop
  Part 2: Clinical practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Part 1: Mental Health First Aid
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Del 2: Clinical practice
  Approved practice
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.10.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.10.2023

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Seats

  1 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp A (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp B (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Part 1: Mental Health First Aid
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Part 2: Clinical practice
  Approved clinical practice
  Written assignments
  Participation i seminars

  Student's schedule and workload

  38h/week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  • follows the work list and respects agreed times
  • can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  C Knowledge and skills
  • mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
  • can perform tasks under supervision
  • has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  • can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  • makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
  • is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
  D Collaboration and response
  • can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  • can work with others within the work team
  Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
  • does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
  C Knowledge and skills
  • does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
  • has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
  • lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
  • has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
  D Collaboration and response
  • possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
  • shows an unprofessional attitude

•   Mental health and psychiatry VÅV21KVV16-3003 02.01.2024-24.03.2024  9 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in psychiatric and addictive context
  - within the context of psychiatric and addictive context can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can identify and interpret the patient's / client's basic needs regarding mental illness and abuse
  - has readiness to provide mental first aid
  - can respond to the patient / client and relatives in their immediate environment
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team

  Prerequisites

  Care of the patient with with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beaviour
  Elderly care and geriatric

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Part 1: Workshop
  Part 2: Clinical practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Part 1: Workshop
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Del 2: Clinical practice
  Approved practice
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 24.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 18.02.2024

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  1 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp A (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp B (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Part 1: Workshop
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Part 2: Clinical practice
  Approved clinical practice
  Written assignments
  Participation i seminars

  Student's schedule and workload

  38h/week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  • follows the work list and respects agreed times
  • can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  C Knowledge and skills
  • mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
  • can perform tasks under supervision
  • has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  • can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  • makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
  • is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
  D Collaboration and response
  • can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  • can work with others within the work team
  Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
  • does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
  C Knowledge and skills
  • does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
  • has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
  • lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
  • has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
  D Collaboration and response
  • possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
  • shows an unprofessional attitude

•   Mental health and psychiatry VÅV21KVV16-3004 05.01.2024-18.02.2024  9 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in psychiatric and addictive context
  - within the context of psychiatric and addictive context can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can identify and interpret the patient's / client's basic needs regarding mental illness and abuse
  - has readiness to provide mental first aid
  - can respond to the patient / client and relatives in their immediate environment
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and document this
  - can create a good healthcare relationship with the patient and related parties and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can perform safe drug treatment
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team

  Prerequisites

  Care of the patient with with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beaviour
  Elderly care and geriatric

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Part 1: Workshop
  Part 2: Clinical practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Part 1: Workshop
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Del 2: Clinical practice
  Approved practice
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.01.2024 - 18.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 04.01.2024

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp A (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp B (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Berg, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Part 1: Workshop
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Part 2: Clinical practice
  Approved clinical practice
  Written assignments
  Participation i seminars

  Student's schedule and workload

  38h/week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  • follows the work list and respects agreed times
  • can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  C Knowledge and skills
  • mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
  • can perform tasks under supervision
  • has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  • can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  • makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
  • is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
  D Collaboration and response
  • can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  • can work with others within the work team
  Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
  • does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
  C Knowledge and skills
  • does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
  • has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
  • lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
  • has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
  D Collaboration and response
  • possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
  • shows an unprofessional attitude

•   Mental health promotion VÅV14PV01-3006 22.01.2024-28.05.2024  3 credits  (USS21F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has the ability to compare mental health and ill-health from an interdisciplinary perspective
  - can identify different perspectives on mental health and ill-health from a national and regional perspective
  - can distinguish mental health services taking into account the special needs of man of different ages

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Mental health promotion

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Alfvén, G. 2017. Barn och psykosomatik i teori och klinik. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  Levander, S.,Adler, H.,Gefvert, O. & Tuninger, E. 2017. Psykiatri - en orienterande översikt. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
  Brenner, E.,Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
  Glant, H. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin, Gothia Förlag, Stockholm
  Johansson, R&S & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Stockholm
  Nyberg, U. 2018. Suicidprevention i praktiken. Natur och kultur, Stockholm
  Hallberg, U. 2018. Unga med psykisk ohälsa, självskadebeteende och självmordstankar - en kunskapsöversikt. Liber AB, Stockholm
  Ringskog Vagnhammar S & Wasserman, D. 2017. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
  Handout

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case demonstrations
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Individual work
  Videos
  Demonstrations
  Study visits
  Experience expert

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grade scale
  92 - 100 % = 5
  84 - 91 % = 4
  76 - 83 % = 3
  68 - 75 % = 2
  60 - 67 % = 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.01.2024 - 28.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 21.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V
  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  4 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Virtual test at Moodle
  Self-study tasks

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Experience expert from various areas of psychiatry and care for drug abuse

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Virtual examination deadline

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Methods for mental health promotion VÅV21PV02-3001 22.01.2024-30.05.2024  5 credits  (USS21F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can identify methods for early intervention and need for emergency assistance
  - master family-centered working methods and operating models
  - has an insight into early interaction between parents and children
  - can assess the need for support and guidance for the family
  - can evaluate various therapeutic methods
  - can develop their own professional skills

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for mental health promotion

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Gillberg, C. 2016. Neurpsykiatriska funktionshinder hos barn och ungdomar. Internetmedicin.se
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om Barn- och ungdomspsykiatri av Engström, I.. Liber, Stockholm.
  Utvalda delar ur Skhole
  Levander, S.,Adler, H.,Gefvert, O. & Tuninger, E. 2017. Psykiatri - en orienterande översikt. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
  Brenner, E.,Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm
  Glant, H. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin, Gothia Förlag, Stockholm
  Johansson, R&S & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Stockholm
  Nyberg, U. 2018. Suicidprevention i praktiken. Natur och kultur, Stockholm
  Hallberg, U. 2018. Unga med psykisk ohälsa, självskadebeteende och självmordstankar - en kunskapsöversikt. Liber AB, Stockholm
  Ringskog Vagnhammar S & Wasserman, D. 2017. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case demonstrations
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Individual work
  Videos
  Study
  Experience Experts

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The following points are considered:
  Starting points and goal with scale 1 - 5
  Theoretical basis and use of literature with the scale 1 - 5
  Process control with scale 1 - 5
  Content and logical structure of work with scale 1 - 5
  Analysis and results report with scale 1 - 5
  Presentation with scale 1 - 5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.01.2024 - 30.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 21.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V
  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  4 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Viktor Matintupa, Carita Blomström, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tutorial task
  The project: The family

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  In connection with the project, students can have contact with various care institutions, organizations and private persons with experience of the problems in the Project family

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Intermediate seminar week
  Intermediate seminar week
  Final seminar Intermediate seminar week
  Deadline for tutorials

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can do the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

•   Microbiology, Pathology and Basics in Vaccination USS22GV04-3002 05.02.2024-21.04.2024  5 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can the basics of microbiology
  - can the basics of pathology
  - has knowledge of and can prevent current global infections
  - can guide and support individuals and groups at risk and proceed in suspicion of global epidemics and pandemics
  - can the national vaccination program and know how the legislation regulates vaccinations
  - can the principles of vaccination of adults
  - can guide clients on vaccinations using the latest evidence-based knowledge

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of microbiology
  
  Pathology and pathophysiology
  
  Global infectious diseases
  
  Laws and regulation on contagious illnesses
  
  Current global infections
  
  Basic vaccination knowledge
  
  Guidance of the patient

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Mikrobiologi och patologi Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Material som erbjuds på Moodle
  
  Medical Microbiology 8:de eller 9:de versionen av Murray, Rosenthal, Pfaller
  
  Anttila, V-J et al. (red.) 2019. Hoitoon liittyvien infektioiden torjunta. Del V Ongelmamikrobien aiheuttamat infektiot.
  Brauner, Castor, Falk, m.fl. 2021. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Melhus 2019. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan 2018. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros 2021. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita
  Brändén 2021. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag
  Brehmer-Andersson, E. 2011. Allmän patologi - en introduktion.
  
  Grunder i vaccinationskunskap
  Lag om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2016/20161227,
  Statsrådets förordning om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2017/20170146
  Folkhälsomyndigheten, smittskydd och beredskap, https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/smittskydd-beredskap/,
  Thl.fi (rokottajan käsikirja)
  THL.fi (matkailijan terveysopas)
  World Health Organization (WHO)
  Europan Centre for Disease Prevention and Controll (ECDE)
  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.
  https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/surveillance-and-disease-data
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
  Kunnat.net
  Filha.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Självstudier och föreläsningar i mikrobiologi och patologi
  Eventuella uppgifter delas ut under lektionerna.
  
  Simulationer i aseptik/hygien och vaccinationskunskap i grupper; obligatorisk närvaro
  Virtuell kurs, grunder i vaccinationskunskap , egen Moodle plattform (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination i mikrobiologi, bedömning GK/UK: Studerande kan grunderna i mikrobiologi.
  
  Examination i patologi och mikrobiologi, bedömning GK/UK.: Studerande kan grunderna i patologi
  
  
  Examination i grundläggande vaccinationskunskap
  1. Skriftlig portfolio, bedömning gk/uk.
  Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kompetenser och innehåll för den angivna kursen), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap.
  2. Skriftlig tentamen.
  Bedömning GK/ UK. För att kunna göra den avslutande tentamen som ingår i grunderna i vaccinationskunskap bör din portfolio vara inlämnad och godkänd. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.02.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Maria Berg, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination i mikrobiologi och patologi : 10.4.2024, omtentamenstillfällen hösten 2024, meddelas senare.
  
  Obligatoriska simulationer
  OBS! För att kunna delta ska studerande fylla i blanketten invasiva ingrepp på Moodle
  
  Den grundläggande kursen i vaccinationskunskap på Moodle består av två deltester
  1. Individuell portfolio med inlämning på Moodle
  2. Skriftlig tent på Moodle (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination i mikrobiologi och patologi : 10.4.2024, omtentamenstillfällen hösten 2024, meddelas senare.
  
  Grundkurs i vaccinationskunskap:
  1. Skriftlig portfolio är tillgänglig under tiden 22.1–17.3.2024. Portfolion ämnas in på Moodle plattformen senast 17.3.2024
  2. Skriftlig tent som är öppen på Moodle enligt information 2.4–14.4.2024 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Mikrobiologi 1sp sp = 27 h, varav föreläsningar och tentamen ca 6 h, och självstudier 21 h
  Patologi 1 sp = 27, varav föreläsningar och tentemen ca 6 h, Självstudier 21 h
  Vaccinationskunskap 2 sp = 54 h
  Simulationer 1 sp =27 h med flapplearning (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  För GK krävs att studerande:
  Kan grunderna i mikrobiologi
  Kan grunderna i patologi
  Har kunskap om och kan förebygga aktuella globala infektioner
  Kan handleda och stöda individer och grupper i risker och tillvägagångssätt vid misstanke om globala epidemier och pandemier
  Kan det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet och känner till hur lagstiftningen reglerar vaccinationerna
  Kan principerna för vaccinationsverksamheten för vuxna
  Kan handleda klienter om vaccinationer med stöd av den nyaste evidensbaserade kunskapen (not translated)

•   Microbiology, Pathology and Basics in Vaccination USS22GV04-3003 08.01.2024-01.06.2024  5 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can the basics of microbiology
  - can the basics of pathology
  - has knowledge of and can prevent current global infections
  - can guide and support individuals and groups at risk and proceed in suspicion of global epidemics and pandemics
  - can the national vaccination program and know how the legislation regulates vaccinations
  - can the principles of vaccination of adults
  - can guide clients on vaccinations using the latest evidence-based knowledge

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of microbiology
  
  Pathology and pathophysiology
  
  Global infectious diseases
  
  Laws and regulation on contagious illnesses
  
  Current global infections
  
  Basic vaccination knowledge
  
  Guidance of the patient

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Mikrobiologi och patologi Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Material som erbjuds på Moodle
  
  Medical Microbiology 8:de eller 9:de versionen av Murray, Rosenthal, Pfaller
  
  Anttila, V-J et al. (red.) 2019. Hoitoon liittyvien infektioiden torjunta. Del V Ongelmamikrobien aiheuttamat infektiot.
  Brauner, Castor, Falk, m.fl. 2021. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Melhus 2019. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan 2018. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros 2021. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita
  Brändén 2021. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag
  Brehmer-Andersson, E. 2011. Allmän patologi - en introduktion.
  
  
  Grunder i vaccinationskunskap
  Lag om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2016/20161227,
  Statsrådets förordning om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2017/20170146
  Folkhälsomyndigheten.se
  Thl.fi (rokottajan käsikirja)
  THL.fi (matkailijan terveysopas)
  World Health Organization (WHO)
  Europan Centre for Disease Prevention and Controll (ECDE)
  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.
  https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/surveillance-and-disease-data
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
  Kunnat.net
  Filha.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Obligatoriska föreläsningar i mikrobiologi och patologi online
  Eventuella uppgifter delas ut under föreläsningarna
  
  Simulationer obligatorisl närvaro, campus Åbo
  Workshop obligatorisk närvaro, campus Åbo
  Virtuell kurs, grunder i vaccinationskunskap , egen Moodle plattform (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination i mikrobiologi, bedömning GK/UK: Studerande kan grunderna i mikrobiologi.
  Examination i patologi, bedömning GK/UK.: Studerande kan grunderna i patologi
  
  
  Examination i grundläggande vaccinationskunskap
  1. Skriftlig portfolio, bedömning GK/UK.
  Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kompetenser och innehåll för den angivna kursen), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap.
  2. Skriftlig tentamen.
  Bedömning GK/UK; För att kunna göra den avslutande tentamen som ingår i grunderna i vaccinationskunskap bör din portfolio vara inlämnad och godkänd. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 01.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Maria Berg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination i mikrobiologi och patologi
  
  Obligatoriska simulationer
  OBS! För att kunna delta ska studerande fylla i blanketten invasiva ingrepp på Moodle
  
  Den grundläggande kursen i vaccinationskunskap på Moodle består av två deltester
  1. Individuell portfolio med inlämning på Moodle.Vecka 3–18= 15.1–23.2
  2.Skriftlig tent på Moodle efter godkänd portfolio 11.3–24.3 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination i mikrobiologi och patologi 28.5.24 (omtent: hösten 24, datum meddelas senare)
  
  Obligatorisk simulering och workshop enligt schema
  Grundkurs i vaccinationskunskap:
  1. Skriftlig portfolio som lämnas in på Moodle plattformen
  2. Skriftlig tent som är öppen på Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Mikrobiologi 1 sp = 27 h varav föreläsningar Online 6 h, instuderingsfrågor och självstudier 21 h
  Patologi 1 sp = 27 h varav föreläsning Online 6 h, instuderingsfrågor och självstudier 21 h
  
  Vaccinationskunskap 2,5 sp = varav 54 h Moodlekurs och 2 timmar föreläsning på campus + självstudier
  Simuleringar och workshop 0,5 sp varava simulering 8 h och workshop 2 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  För GK krävs att studerande:
  Kan grunderna i mikrobiologi
  Kan grunderna i patologi
  Har kunskap om och kan förebygga aktuella globala infektioner
  Kan handleda och stöda individer och grupper i risker och tillvägagångssätt vid misstanke om globala epidemier och pandemier
  Kan det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet och känner till hur lagstiftningen reglerar vaccinationerna
  Kan principerna för vaccinationsverksamheten för vuxna
  Kan handleda klienter om vaccinationer med stöd av den nyaste evidensbaserade kunskapen (not translated)

•   Microbiology, Pathology and Basics in Vaccination USS22GV04-3004 15.01.2024-09.06.2024  5 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can the basics of microbiology
  - can the basics of pathology
  - has knowledge of and can prevent current global infections
  - can guide and support individuals and groups at risk and proceed in suspicion of global epidemics and pandemics
  - can the national vaccination program and know how the legislation regulates vaccinations
  - can the principles of vaccination of adults
  - can guide clients on vaccinations using the latest evidence-based knowledge

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of microbiology
  
  Pathology and pathophysiology
  
  Global infectious diseases
  
  Laws and regulation on contagious illnesses
  
  Current global infections
  
  Basic vaccination knowledge
  
  Guidance of the patient

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Mikrobiologi och patologi Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Material som erbjuds på Moodle
  
  Medical Microbiology 8:de eller 9:de versionen av Murray, Rosenthal, Pfaller
  
  Anttila, V-J et al. (red.) 2019. Hoitoon liittyvien infektioiden torjunta. Del V Ongelmamikrobien aiheuttamat infektiot.
  Brauner, Castor, Falk, m.fl. 2021. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Melhus 2019. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan 2018. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros 2021. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita
  Brändén 2021. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag
  Brehmer-Andersson, E. 2011. Allmän patologi - en introduktion.
  
  Grunder i vaccinationskunskap
  Lag om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2016/20161227,
  Statsrådets förordning om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2017/20170146
  Folkhälsomyndigheten.se
  Thl.fi (rokottajan käsikirja)
  THL.fi (matkailijan terveysopas)
  World Health Organization (WHO)
  Europan Centre for Disease Prevention and Controll (ECDE)
  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.
  https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/surveillance-and-disease-data
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
  Kunnat.net
  Filha.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Självstudier och obligatoriska online föreläsningar i mikrobiologi och patologi
  Eventuella uppgifter delas ut under lektionerna.
  
  Simulationer obligatorisl närvaro, campus Raseborg
  Workshop obligatorisk närvaro, campus Raseborg
  Virtuell kurs, grunder i vaccinationskunskap , egen Moodle plattform (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination i mikrobiologi, bedömning GK/UK: Studerande kan grunderna i mikrobiologi.
  Examination i patologi, bedömning GK/UK.: Studerande kan grunderna i patologi
  
  
  Examination i grundläggande vaccinationskunskap
  1. Skriftlig portfolio, bedömning GK/UK.
  Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kompetenser och innehåll för den angivna kursen), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap.
  2. Skriftlig tentamen.
  Bedömning GK/UK; För att kunna göra den avslutande tentamen som ingår i grunderna i vaccinationskunskap bör din portfolio vara inlämnad och godkänd. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.01.2024 - 09.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Maria Berg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination i mikrobiologi och patologi 14.5.23
  Omtenter: hösten 2024- datum meddelas senare
  
  
  Obligatorisk simulering och workshop enligt schema
  OBS! För att kunna delta ska studerande fylla i blanketten invasiva ingrepp på Moodle
  
  Den grundläggande kursen i vaccinationskunskap på Moodle består av två deltester
  1. Individuell portfolio med inlämning på Moodle.Vecka 3; 15.1- v. 9; 3.3.
  2.Skriftlig tent på Moodle efter godkänd portfolio öppen under tiden: 18.3-31.3 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Mikrobiologi 1 sp = 27 h varav föreläsningar Online 6 h, instuderingsfrågor och självstudier 21 h
  Patologi 1 sp = 27 h varav föreläsning Online 6 h, instuderingsfrågor och självstudier 21 h
  Vaccinationskunskap 2,5 sp = varav 54 h Moodlekurs och 2 timmar föreläsning på campus + självstudier
  Simuleringar och workshop 0,5 sp sp varava simulering 8 h och workshop 4 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  För GK krävs att studerande:
  Kan grunderna i mikrobiologi
  Kan grunderna i patologi
  Har kunskap om och kan förebygga aktuella globala infektioner
  Kan handleda och stöda individer och grupper i risker och tillvägagångssätt vid misstanke om globala epidemier och pandemier
  Kan det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet och känner till hur lagstiftningen reglerar vaccinationerna
  Kan principerna för vaccinationsverksamheten för vuxna
  Kan handleda klienter om vaccinationer med stöd av den nyaste evidensbaserade kunskapen (not translated)

•   Nursing Care of Children, Adolescents and Families USS21KÅ01-3002 28.08.2023-06.10.2023  5 credits  (UHV21D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can, in an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  
  Has expertise in the care of children, young people and families and deepens his/her knowledge of the growth, development and characteristics of children and young people
  
  Can use resource enhancing methods to support the well-being, resources and participation of children, adolescents and the family
  
  Knows about the chain of care
  
  Can apply his/her knowledge in the treatment of the most common illnesses and disabilities in children and adolescents
  
  Can, in an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate and document a comprehensive and person-centered/client centered care for children, young people and families
  
  Has expertise in care in various service system
  
  Has expertise in the care of people with special needs
  
  Can plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management
  
  Has a reflective and ethical approach in the care of children, young people and families

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Surgical and Perioperative Care, Nursing in Internal Medicine and Palliative care, Clinical Nursing

  Content of the study unit

  Chain of care, different service system
  
  The development of pediatric care and its unique features
  
  The development of children and young people
  
  Working with and care of children and young people
  
  Nutritional issues in the care of children and young people
  
  Methods for work with families
  
  Anatomy and physiology of children and adolescents
  
  The most common childhood illnesses, theory and treatment, and taking them into account in a comprehensive care plan with anchoring in the care process of children and young people
  
  Safe medication management for children and young people
  
  Guidance of children, young people and families in the child health care context
  
  Children and young people with disabilities and special needs
  
  Mental illness in children and young people
  
  Vulnerable children and young people
  
  People with disabilities

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Litteratur/studiematerial:
  Välj 1–2 av följande böcker:
  Hanséus, K mfl. Barnmedicin. 2020
  Lundqvist,P. 2013. Omvårdnad av det nyfödda barnet.
  Rajantie,J, Heikinheimo, M, Renko,M. 2016 Lastentaudit. Duodecim.
  Storvik- Sydänmaa mfl. 2019. Lapsen ja perheen hoitotyö.
  Hallström, J & Lindborg, T. 2023. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  Korppi;M. mfl. 2016. Lastentautien päivystyskirja.
  Lundqvist,P. 2013. Omvårdnad av det nyfödda barnet.
  Pihko,H,Haataja,L, Rantala,H. (toim.) 2015. Duodecim. Lastenneurologia.
  Rindstedt,C. 2013. Barnet möter vården.
  Söderback mfl. 2014. Kommunikation med barn och unga I vården
  Tillsammans kring matbordet- kostrekommendationer till barnfamiljer
  Lastensuojelun käsikirja. http://www.sosiaaliportti.fi/fi-FI/lastensuojelunkasikirja
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet. Slå inte barnet! Nationella handlingsprogrammet för att minska kroppslig aga mot barn 2010–2015
  Medibase
  THL.fi
  MLL.fi
  Terveysportti
  Hälsobyn.fi
  Terveyskylä.fi
  Varsinaissuomen hoitoreitit
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Askland;L.mfl. 2014. Utvecklingspsykologiska perspektiv på barns uppväxt.
  Bischofberger m.fl 2004. Barnet i vården. Liber.
  Broberg, A. mfl. 2008. Anknytning i praktiken: tillämpning av anknytningsteorin.
  Hertz, S. (2011) Barn- och ungdomspsykiatri, nya perspektiv och oanade möjligheter
  https://thl.fi/fi/web/olycksfall/olyckor-bland-barn-och-unga,
  Lagerqvist,B. 2015. Barn med funktionsnedsättning.
  Mothander Risholm; P. 2018. Att möta små barn och deras föräldrar i vården: om anknytning, utveckling och samspel.
  Rijt, H & Plooi, F. Växa och upptäcka världen: sju utvecklingssprång under barnets första levnadsår.2009.
  Vygotskij L. Daidalos 1995 Fantasi och kreativitet i barndomen.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar, forskningar och annan litteratur. (Hoitotiede, Tutkiva hoitotyö, Sairaanhoitaja, Vård i focus)
  Diabetesförbundet.fi
  Diabetesfonden (not translated)

  Learning methods

  1. Föreläsning
  2. Workshops
  3. Självstudier
  4. Simulering (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Simuleringen bedöms enligt skalan gk/uk.
  I simuleringen bedöms
  - handledning
  - bemötandet av barnet, den unga och familjen
  - beaktande av trygghet och säkerhet i vårdarbetet
  - planering av vårdåtgärder med beaktande av barnets och den ungas utvecklingsstadium och situation
  - utförande av vårdåtgärder
  - beaktande av aseptiskt arbetssätt
  - dokumentation
  - tillämpning av ett resursförstärkande och hälsofrämjande arbetssätt.
  - korrekt utförd läkemedelsbehandling
  Prestationen är underkänd om studerande inte har genomfört simuleringen och har svårigheter med stora delar av ovanstående ämnen.
  
  
  2.Läkemedelsräkningen bedöms enligt skalan gk/uk.
  - läkemedelsräkningen skall vara 100% korrekt
  
  3. Workshops uppgift, bedöms GK/UK
  - Användning av kurslitterartur, terveysportti mm.
  - Användning av relevant data och förmåga att se helhetssituation
  
  4.. Den skriftliga inlämningsuppgiften bedöms enligt skalan 0-5
  Bedömningen baseras på
  - Förmåga att kunna sammanfatta relevant data
  - Kritiska reflektion
  - Användning av kurslitteratur
  - Användning av Novias skrivansvisningar
  Feedback på inlämningsuppgiften ges via Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 06.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 22.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å
  • USS21D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Lilian Nordell, Michaela Jalava, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1.Simuleringar, obligatorisk närvaro, uppgifter om gruppindelning och exakt tidtabell för simulering publiceras på Moodle
  
  2.Läkemedelräkning tent (omtent enligt överenskommelse med examinator)
  
  3.Skriftlig individuell inlämningsuppgift, inlämnas senast den 16.10 gemensam uppgift tillsammans med kursen Reproduktiv hälsa (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Inlämningsuppgift på Moodle tillsammans med kursen i Reproduktiv hälsa inlämning den 16.10 på Moodle.
  Tent i läkemedelsräkning. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 25h
  Workshops 2 h
  Simulering 6h
  Inlämningsuppgift 27 h
  Självstudier 75 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte
  Texten är fragmentarisk och den besvarar inte frågorna
  Kurslitteraturen används inte
  Reflektionerna framförs inte
  Den tekniska utformningen brister
  Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Frågorna besvaras vagt och smalt
  Kurslitteraturen refereras
  Reflektionerna framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning
  Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Frågorna besvaras
  Metodlitteraturen tillämpas
  Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns
  Den tekniska utformningen är god (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Frågorna besvaras uttömmande och mångsidigt
  Kurslitteraturen analyseras och tillämpas
  Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk
  Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig (not translated)

•   Nursing in Internal Medicine and Oncology USS22KV02-3002 27.05.2024-10.11.2024  7 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, as part of an inter-professional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client-centered sustainable care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - has expertise in care work within internal medicine and can account for various health hindrances, health resources, illnesses, examinations and treatments and how different illnesses and complications can be prevented
  - masters central evidence-based care methods within internal medicine and palliative care and can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
  - can in an inter-professional team respond to, support and supervise patients and relatives in palliative care and death, as well as account for and apply central laws and governing documents
  - can meet different needs and provide support in spiritual, existential and cultural needs at the end of life
  - can guide the patient
  - is familiar with the chain of care
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Care of patients with different internal health issues/diseases
  
  End-of-life care and identification of changes and symptoms of imminent death
  
  The central illnesses and hindrances to health in internal medicine, clinical examinations, functional measurements, evidence-based patient-centered sustainable care and rehabilitation methods
  
  Person-centered/client-centered care plan and summary within internal medicine and palliative care
  
  Prevention of complications and illnesses
  
  Counselling/education methods
  
  Personal treatment and cultural diversity
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Nutrition
  
  Resuscitation in a hospital environment
  
  Chain of care and servicesystem
  
  Medication management
  
  Person-centered / client-centered care planning for palliative care
  
  Documentation
  
  Laws and guidelines for palliative care
  
  Central evidence-based care methods in palliative care
  
  Ethical, spiritual and existential issues at the end of life
  
  Supporting and supervising relatives and their participation in care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ekvall, A. & Jansson, A. 2022 (eller 2016). Omvårdnad & Medicin.
  Almås H. 2021. Klinisk omvårdnad I och II
  Ericson, T & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar
  Ahonen O. 2023. Kliininen hoitotyö - sisätaudit, kirurgia ja syöpätaudit (eller en motsvarande bok, max 5 år gammal)
  _______________________________________
  
  Övriga källor / Material:
  
  Medibase
  Föreläsningsmaterial
  Internetmedicin.se https://www.internetmedicin.se/
  God medicinsk praxis https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/
  Terveysportti: Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja - valda delar
  Terveysportti, Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat.- valda delar
  Hotus -vårdrekommendationer (inom inremedicin)
  Vårdhandboken (de nationella metoderna och riktlinjerna i Sverige).
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  
  Iivanainen, A. 2016. Hoida ja kirja. Sanoma Pro. eller THL:s publikationer om dokumentation
  
  Ala-Kokko,T. 2022. Peruselintoimintoijen häiriöt ja niiden hoito. ELLER Svensén, C. & Hjelmqvist, H. 2014. Vätsketerapi eller Donnerdal, L. 2014. Vätskebalans genom omvårdnadsplan. - valde delar
  
  Mutanen, M. & Uusitupa, M. 2012. Ravitsemushoito: suositus sairaaloille, terveyskeskuksille, palvelu- ja hoitokoteihin ja kuntoutuskeskuksiin.
  Skolin, I. 2018, Näringslära för sjuksköterskor.
  
  McCormack, B.(red) 2021. Personcentrerade arbetsätt inom vård: teori och praktik.
  
  Andershed, B. et al. 2020. Palliativ vård: Begrepp och perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur
  
  Bengtsson, M.& Lundström, U. Palliativ vård. 2015, Gleerups. Malmö
  
  Palliativisen hoidon asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti, 2019, Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
  
  Saarto. T. et al. 2016. Palliativinen hoito. Duodecim
  
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  
  STM. Asiakas- ja potilasturvallisuusstrategia ja toimeenpanosuunnitelma 2022-2026. (Julkaisu 2022:2) eller Institut för hälsa och välfärd. 2012. Handbook om patiensäkerhet; eller Lindh M.& Sahlqvist L. 2012. Säker vård. Att förbygga skador och felbehandlingar inom vård och omsorg;
  
  Sundelöf, J.,Tegman, P. 2019 Palliativ vård vid demens. Gothia Fortbildning (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Seminarie
  Smågruppsarbete
  Workshops
  Övningar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Deltagande i workshops och simulationer inom inremedicinskt vårdarbete och smågruppsarbete bedöms GK-UK. Obligatorisk närvaro. För GK vitsord bör studerande aktivt deltagit i alla delar.
  2. Workshop och seminarie inom palliativt vårdarbete bedöms GK-UK. För GK vitsord bör studerande därtill aktivt delta i workshopen och gjort förhandsarbete i anslutning till workshop samt deltagit i seminarie
  3. Distansuppgiften bedöms i skalan 0-5. Två del inlämningarna (GK/UK)
  4. Individuell skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5
  
  Kursvitsord: För godkänt kursvitsord bör alla delar vara godkända. Kursvitsordet räknas: Distansuppgiften är 40 % av helhetsvitsordet och skriftlig examination 60% av helhetsvitsordet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.05.2024 - 10.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  13.04.2024 - 12.05.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Utförligare information om kursen publiceras på kursens Moodle-sida. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar och smågruppsarbete
  Seminarie
  Workshopsarbete och övningar (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Samarbete med Neurocentrum, ÅUCS - projekt Fadderskola. Samt expertföreläsningar från arbetslivet. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1. Deltagande i Workshop inom onkologi, kardiologi och gastroenterologi samt expertföreläsning neurologi (1 sp)
  2. Workshop och seminarie inom palliativt vårdarbete (1 sp)
  3. Distansuppgift ( 2 sp) - Uppgiften består av 2 delar: Del 1 inlämning augusti DEL 2 Inlämning ?.
  4. Individuell skriftlig examination oktober 2024. Den skriftliga examinationen (3 sp) baseras på självstudier, workshops, smågruppsarbete, och föreläsningar.
  Omtentamen I är X och omtentamen II är X.
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle
  
  Eventuella kompletteringar av examinationer bör vara gjorda innan 20.12.2024. Ifall någon del är UK e bör kursen i sin helhet gås om (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h / 1 sp
  
  Uppskattade tidsanvändning:
  Självstudier inom inremedicinskt vårdarbete 50 h
  Workshop inremedicinskt vårdarbete (campus)11h
  Simulation 10 h
  Interaktiva föreläsningar på campus 33 h
  Föreläsningar vid ÅUCS 5 h
  Självstudier och förberedande arbete inom palliativ vårdarbete 13 h
  Workshop och seminarie inom palliativt vårdarbete 8 h
  Distansuppgift (2 delar) 54 h
  Tentamen 3 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 50 % av maximalpoängen i examinationen
  __________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften är inte inlämnad inom utsatt tid eller innehåller inte alla krävda delar. Studerande använder sig inte av evidensbaserade källor i arbete.
  
  ______________________________________________________________
  Studerande har inte deltagit inte aktivt deltagit i workshops-arbeten eller grupparbeten (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 70 % av maximal poängen i examinationen
  
  Essäfrågorna i skriftlig examinationen
  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar, men delarna relateras inte till varande. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan ytligt tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner
  
  _______________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar. Studerande använder kurslitteratur och andra källor ytligt. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete, vårdmetoder och/eller egna reflektioner är svaga eller saknas. Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Essäfrågorna i skriftliga examinationen:
  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande beskriver den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller alla delar och studerande använder kurslitteratur och källor, men inte mångsidigt. Studerande kan beskriva och har goda kunskaper i inremedicinskt- och palliativt vårdarbete, vårdmetoder och egna reflektioner görs i alla delar. Studerande kan beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med eller över 90 % av maximal poängen i examinationen.
  
  
  Essäfrågorna i skriftliga examinationen:
  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på alla uppgiftens delar och kan relaterad dem till varandra. Studerande har djupa kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande kan beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter och beakta mångprofessionella arbetssättet. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna djupgående reflektioner.
  ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller och behandlar på djupgående nivå alla delar. Studerande använder kurslitteratur och källor mångsidigt, samt kan motivera sina tolkningar och kopplingar mellan källor. Studerande har djupa kunskaper och kan djupgående beskriva inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete och vårdmetoder, samt relatera de olika delarna till varandra och till sjukskötarens arbetsuppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner. (not translated)

•   Nursing in Internal Medicine and Oncology USS22KV02-3003 20.05.2024-15.12.2024  7 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, as part of an inter-professional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client-centered sustainable care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - has expertise in care work within internal medicine and can account for various health hindrances, health resources, illnesses, examinations and treatments and how different illnesses and complications can be prevented
  - masters central evidence-based care methods within internal medicine and palliative care and can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
  - can in an inter-professional team respond to, support and supervise patients and relatives in palliative care and death, as well as account for and apply central laws and governing documents
  - can meet different needs and provide support in spiritual, existential and cultural needs at the end of life
  - can guide the patient
  - is familiar with the chain of care
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Care of patients with different internal health issues/diseases
  
  End-of-life care and identification of changes and symptoms of imminent death
  
  The central illnesses and hindrances to health in internal medicine, clinical examinations, functional measurements, evidence-based patient-centered sustainable care and rehabilitation methods
  
  Person-centered/client-centered care plan and summary within internal medicine and palliative care
  
  Prevention of complications and illnesses
  
  Counselling/education methods
  
  Personal treatment and cultural diversity
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Nutrition
  
  Resuscitation in a hospital environment
  
  Chain of care and servicesystem
  
  Medication management
  
  Person-centered / client-centered care planning for palliative care
  
  Documentation
  
  Laws and guidelines for palliative care
  
  Central evidence-based care methods in palliative care
  
  Ethical, spiritual and existential issues at the end of life
  
  Supporting and supervising relatives and their participation in care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ekvall, A. & Jansson, A. 2022 (eller 2016). Omvårdnad & Medicin.
  Almås H. 2021. Klinisk omvårdnad I och II
  Ericson, T & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar
  Ahonen O. 2023. Kliininen hoitotyö - sisätaudit, kirurgia ja syöpätaudit (eller en motsvarande bok, max 5 år gammal)
  _______________________________________
  
  Övriga källor / Material:
  
  Medibase
  Föreläsningsmaterial
  Internetmedicin.se https://www.internetmedicin.se/
  God medicinsk praxis https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/
  Terveysportti: Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja - valda delar
  Terveysportti, Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat.- valda delar
  Hotus -vårdrekommendationer (inom inremedicin)
  Vårdhandboken (de nationella metoderna och riktlinjerna i Sverige).
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  
  Iivanainen, A. 2016. Hoida ja kirja. Sanoma Pro. eller THL:s publikationer om dokumentation
  
  Ala-Kokko,T. 2022. Peruselintoimintoijen häiriöt ja niiden hoito. ELLER Svensén, C. & Hjelmqvist, H. 2014. Vätsketerapi eller Donnerdal, L. 2014. Vätskebalans genom omvårdnadsplan. - valde delar
  
  Mutanen, M. & Uusitupa, M. 2012. Ravitsemushoito: suositus sairaaloille, terveyskeskuksille, palvelu- ja hoitokoteihin ja kuntoutuskeskuksiin.
  Skolin, I. 2018, Näringslära för sjuksköterskor.
  
  McCormack, B.(red) 2021. Personcentrerade arbetsätt inom vård: teori och praktik.
  
  Andershed, B. et al. 2020. Palliativ vård: Begrepp och perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur
  
  Bengtsson, M.& Lundström, U. Palliativ vård. 2015, Gleerups. Malmö
  
  Palliativisen hoidon asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti, 2019, Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
  
  Saarto. T. et al. 2016. Palliativinen hoito. Duodecim
  
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  
  STM. Asiakas- ja potilasturvallisuusstrategia ja toimeenpanosuunnitelma 2022-2026. (Julkaisu 2022:2) eller Institut för hälsa och välfärd. 2012. Handbook om patiensäkerhet; eller Lindh M.& Sahlqvist L. 2012. Säker vård. Att förbygga skador och felbehandlingar inom vård och omsorg;
  
  Sundelöf, J.,Tegman, P. 2019 Palliativ vård vid demens. Gothia Fortbildning (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Seminarie
  Smågruppsarbete
  Workshops
  Övningar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Deltagande i workshops inom inremedicinskt vårdarbete och smågruppsarbete bedöms GK-UK. Obligatorisk närvaro. För GK vitsord bör studerande aktivt deltagit i alla delar.
  2. Workshop och seminarie inom palliativt vårdarbete bedöms GK-UK. För GK vitsord bör studerande därtill aktivt delta i workshopen och gjort förhandsarbete i anslutning till workshop samt deltagit i seminarie
  3. Distansuppgiften bedöms i skalan 0-5. Del inlämningarna (GK/UK)
  4. Individuell skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5
  
  Kursvitsord: För godkänt kursvitsord bör alla delar vara godkända. Kursvitsordet räknas: Distansuppgiften är 40 % av helhetsvitsordet och skriftlig examination 60% av helhetsvitsordet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.05.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 19.05.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Utförligare information om kursen publiceras på kursens Moodle-sida. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar och smågruppsarbete
  Seminarie
  Workshopsarbete och övningar (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Samarbete med Neurocentrum, ÅUCS samt expertföreläsningar från arbetslivet. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1. Deltagande i Workshop inom inremedicinska temaområden samt expertföreläsning (1 sp)
  2. Workshop och seminarie inom palliativt vårdarbete (1 sp)
  3. Distansuppgift ( 2,5 sp) - Uppgiften består av 2 delar: Del 1 inlämning september 2024, Del 2 inlämning november 2024 ?
  4. Individuell skriftlig examination oktober 2024. Den skriftliga examinationen (2,5 sp) baseras på självstudier, workshops, smågruppsarbete, och föreläsningar.
  Omtentamen I är 13,12 .2024 och omtentamen II är 7.2.2025
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle
  
  Eventuella kompletteringar av examinationer bör vara gjorda innan 20.12.2024. Ifall någon del är UK e bör kursen i sin helhet gås om (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h / 1 sp
  
  Uppskattade tidsanvändning:
  Självstudier och smågruppsarbete inom inremedicinskt vårdarbete 70 h
  Workshop / interaktiv föreläsningar inremedicinskt vårdarbete 16h
  Självstudier och förberedande arbete inom palliativ vårdarbete 25 h
  Workshop och seminarie inom palliativt vårdarbete 4 h
  Distansuppgift (3 delar) 73 h
  Tentamen 3 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 50 % av maximalpoängen i examinationen
  __________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften är inte inlämnad inom utsatt tid eller innehåller inte alla krävda delar. Studerande använder sig inte av evidensbaserade källor i arbete.
  
  ______________________________________________________________
  Studerande har inte deltagit inte aktivt deltagit i workshops-arbeten eller grupparbeten (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 70 % av maximal poängen i examinationen
  
  Essäfrågorna i skriftlig examinationen
  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar, men delarna relateras inte till varande. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan ytligt tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner
  
  _______________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar. Studerande använder kurslitteratur och andra källor ytligt. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete, vårdmetoder och/eller egna reflektioner är svaga eller saknas. Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Essäfrågorna i skriftliga examinationen:
  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande beskriver den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller alla delar och studerande använder kurslitteratur och källor, men inte mångsidigt. Studerande kan beskriva och har goda kunskaper i inremedicinskt- och palliativt vårdarbete, vårdmetoder och egna reflektioner görs i alla delar. Studerande kan beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med eller över 90 % av maximal poängen i examinationen.
  
  
  Essäfrågorna i skriftliga examinationen:
  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på alla uppgiftens delar och kan relaterad dem till varandra. Studerande har djupa kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande kan beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter och beakta mångprofessionella arbetssättet. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna djupgående reflektioner.
  ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller och behandlar på djupgående nivå alla delar. Studerande använder kurslitteratur och källor mångsidigt, samt kan motivera sina tolkningar och kopplingar mellan källor. Studerande har djupa kunskaper och kan djupgående beskriva inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete och vårdmetoder, samt relatera de olika delarna till varandra och till sjukskötarens arbetsuppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner. (not translated)

•   Nursing in Internal Medicine and Oncology USS22KV02-3004 08.01.2024-09.06.2024  7 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, as part of an inter-professional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client-centered sustainable care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - has expertise in care work within internal medicine and can account for various health hindrances, health resources, illnesses, examinations and treatments and how different illnesses and complications can be prevented
  - masters central evidence-based care methods within internal medicine and palliative care and can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
  - can in an inter-professional team respond to, support and supervise patients and relatives in palliative care and death, as well as account for and apply central laws and governing documents
  - can meet different needs and provide support in spiritual, existential and cultural needs at the end of life
  - can guide the patient
  - is familiar with the chain of care
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Care of patients with different internal health issues/diseases
  
  End-of-life care and identification of changes and symptoms of imminent death
  
  The central illnesses and hindrances to health in internal medicine, clinical examinations, functional measurements, evidence-based patient-centered sustainable care and rehabilitation methods
  
  Person-centered/client-centered care plan and summary within internal medicine and palliative care
  
  Prevention of complications and illnesses
  
  Counselling/education methods
  
  Personal treatment and cultural diversity
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Nutrition
  
  Resuscitation in a hospital environment
  
  Chain of care and servicesystem
  
  Medication management
  
  Person-centered / client-centered care planning for palliative care
  
  Documentation
  
  Laws and guidelines for palliative care
  
  Central evidence-based care methods in palliative care
  
  Ethical, spiritual and existential issues at the end of life
  
  Supporting and supervising relatives and their participation in care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ekvall, A. & Jansson, A. 2022 (eller 2016). Omvårdnad & Medicin.
  Almås H. 2021. Klinisk omvårdnad I och II
  Ericson, T & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar
  Ahonen O. 2023. Kliininen hoitotyö - sisätaudit, kirurgia ja syöpätaudit (eller en motsvarande bok, max 5 år gammal)
  _______________________________________
  
  Övriga källor / Material:
  
  Medibase
  Föreläsningsmaterial
  Internetmedicin.se https://www.internetmedicin.se/
  God medicinsk praxis https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/
  Terveysportti: Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja - valda delar
  Terveysportti, Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat.- valda delar
  Hotus -vårdrekommendationer (inom inremedicin)
  Vårdhandboken (de nationella metoderna och riktlinjerna i Sverige).
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  
  Iivanainen, A. 2016. Hoida ja kirja. Sanoma Pro. eller THL:s publikationer om dokumentation
  
  Ala-Kokko,T. 2022. Peruselintoimintoijen häiriöt ja niiden hoito. ELLER Svensén, C. & Hjelmqvist, H. 2014. Vätsketerapi eller Donnerdal, L. 2014. Vätskebalans genom omvårdnadsplan. - valde delar
  
  Mutanen, M. & Uusitupa, M. 2012. Ravitsemushoito: suositus sairaaloille, terveyskeskuksille, palvelu- ja hoitokoteihin ja kuntoutuskeskuksiin.
  Skolin, I. 2018, Näringslära för sjuksköterskor.
  
  McCormack, B.(red) 2021. Personcentrerade arbetsätt inom vård: teori och praktik.
  
  Andershed, B. et al. 2020. Palliativ vård: Begrepp och perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur
  
  Bengtsson, M.& Lundström, U. Palliativ vård. 2015, Gleerups. Malmö
  
  Palliativisen hoidon asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti, 2019, Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
  
  Saarto. T. et al. 2016. Palliativinen hoito. Duodecim
  
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  
  STM. Asiakas- ja potilasturvallisuusstrategia ja toimeenpanosuunnitelma 2022-2026. (Julkaisu 2022:2) eller Institut för hälsa och välfärd. 2012. Handbook om patiensäkerhet; eller Lindh M.& Sahlqvist L. 2012. Säker vård. Att förbygga skador och felbehandlingar inom vård och omsorg;
  
  Sundelöf, J.,Tegman, P. 2019 Palliativ vård vid demens. Gothia Fortbildning (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Seminarie
  Smågruppsarbete
  Workshops
  Övningar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Deltagande i workshops inom inremedicinskt vårdarbete och smågruppsarbete bedöms GK-UK. Obligatorisk närvaro. För GK vitsord bör studerande aktivt deltagit i alla delar.
  2. Workshop och seminarie inom palliativt vårdarbete bedöms GK-UK. För GK vitsord bör studerande därtill aktivt delta i workshopen och gjort förhandsarbete i anslutning till workshop samt deltagit i seminarie
  3. Distansuppgiften bedöms i skalan 0-5. Del inlämningarna (GK/UK)
  4. Individuell skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5
  
  Kursvitsord: För godkänt kursvitsord bör alla delar vara godkända. Kursvitsordet räknas: Distansuppgiften är 50 % av helhetsvitsordet och skriftlig examination 50% av helhetsvitsordet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 09.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Utförligare information om kursen publiceras på kursens Moodle-sida. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar och smågruppsarbete
  Seminarie
  Workshopsarbete och övningar (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Expertföreläsningar från arbetslivet, under hösten 2024. Distans (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1. Deltagande i Workshop, 3 st, inom inremedicinska temaområden. Notera självstudier inför varje tillfälle (1 sp)
  2. Workshop och seminarie inom palliativt vårdarbete (1 sp)
  3. Distansuppgift ( 2,5 sp) - Uppgiften består av 2 delar: Del 1 24.3.2024, Del 2 inlämning 31.5 2024,
  4. Individuell skriftlig examination 15.4 2024. Den skriftliga examinationen (2,5 sp) baseras på självstudier, workshops, smågruppsarbete, och föreläsningar.
  Omtentamen I är 24.5 och omtentamen II är 13.9
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle
  
  Eventuella kompletteringar av examinationer bör vara gjorda innan 15.6.2024. Ifall någon del är UK e bör kursen i sin helhet gås om (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h / 1 sp
  
  Uppskattade tidsanvändning:
  Självstudier och smågruppsarbete inom inremedicinskt vårdarbete 70 h
  Workshop / interaktiv föreläsningar inremedicinskt vårdarbete 12h
  Självstudier och förberedande arbete inom palliativ vårdarbete 25 h
  Workshop och seminarie inom palliativt vårdarbete 8 h
  Distansuppgift (3 delar) 73 h
  Tentamen 2 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 50 % av maximalpoängen i examinationen
  __________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften är inte inlämnad inom utsatt tid eller innehåller inte alla krävda delar. Studerande använder sig inte av evidensbaserade källor i arbete.
  
  ______________________________________________________________
  Studerande har inte deltagit inte aktivt deltagit i workshops-arbeten eller grupparbeten (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 70 % av maximal poängen i examinationen
  
  Essäfrågorna i skriftlig examinationen
  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar, men delarna relateras inte till varande. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan ytligt tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner
  
  _______________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar. Studerande använder kurslitteratur och andra källor ytligt. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete, vårdmetoder och/eller egna reflektioner är svaga eller saknas. Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Essäfrågorna i skriftliga examinationen:
  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande beskriver den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller alla delar och studerande använder kurslitteratur och källor, men inte mångsidigt. Studerande kan beskriva och har goda kunskaper i inremedicinskt- och palliativt vårdarbete, vårdmetoder och egna reflektioner görs i alla delar. Studerande kan beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med eller över 90 % av maximal poängen i examinationen.
  
  
  Essäfrågorna i skriftliga examinationen:
  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på alla uppgiftens delar och kan relaterad dem till varandra. Studerande har djupa kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande kan beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter och beakta mångprofessionella arbetssättet. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna djupgående reflektioner.
  ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller och behandlar på djupgående nivå alla delar. Studerande använder kurslitteratur och källor mångsidigt, samt kan motivera sina tolkningar och kopplingar mellan källor. Studerande har djupa kunskaper och kan djupgående beskriva inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete och vårdmetoder, samt relatera de olika delarna till varandra och till sjukskötarens arbetsuppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner. (not translated)

•   Nursing leadership VÅV21FU03-3001 12.02.2024-10.03.2024  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - understands the importance of leadership in patient care
  - can appreciate the work group's resources, prioritize the tasks and the responsibility they bring
  - can identify the main principles for planning, organizing and managing operations, and have readiness to lead the work
  - can coordinate and be responsible for a continuous care of the patient as a whole
  - can account for management principles, the working methods of working life and can work in the work community
  - can describe work collective agreements and occupational safety
  - can develop and understand the importance of internal and external entrepreneurship
  - Understands the importance of change in healthcare and can function responsibly in the event of changes

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Nursing leadership

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Arbetskollektivavtal och arbetarskydd:
  - Allmänt kommunalt tjänste- och arbetskollektivavtal AKTA
  - Työsuojelu - Arbetarskyddsförvaltningsens webbtjänst
  - Finlex.fi
  
  + Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Problem solving
  Self studies
  Individual work
  Groupwork

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Working collective agreements and labor protection - participation 100 %
  0-5 for administration and leadership

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  12.02.2024 - 10.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 09.02.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual exam

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr - 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student can describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working metho

•   Nursing leadership VÅV21FU03-3002 08.01.2024-18.02.2024  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - understands the importance of leadership in patient care
  - can appreciate the work group's resources, prioritize the tasks and the responsibility they bring
  - can identify the main principles for planning, organizing and managing operations, and have readiness to lead the work
  - can coordinate and be responsible for a continuous care of the patient as a whole
  - can account for management principles, the working methods of working life and can work in the work community
  - can describe work collective agreements and occupational safety
  - can develop and understand the importance of internal and external entrepreneurship
  - Understands the importance of change in healthcare and can function responsibly in the event of changes

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Nursing leadership

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Arbetskollektivavtal och arbetarskydd:
  - Allmänt kommunalt tjänste- och arbetskollektivavtal AKTA
  - Työsuojelu - Arbetarskyddsförvaltningsens webbtjänst
  - Finlex.fi
  
  + Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Problem solving
  Self studies
  Individual work
  Groupwork

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Working collective agreements and labor protection - participation 100 %
  0-5 for administration and leadership

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 18.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual exam

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr - 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student can describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working metho

•   Nursing leadership VÅV21FU03-3003 02.01.2024-03.03.2024  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - understands the importance of leadership in patient care
  - can appreciate the work group's resources, prioritize the tasks and the responsibility they bring
  - can identify the main principles for planning, organizing and managing operations, and have readiness to lead the work
  - can coordinate and be responsible for a continuous care of the patient as a whole
  - can account for management principles, the working methods of working life and can work in the work community
  - can describe work collective agreements and occupational safety
  - can develop and understand the importance of internal and external entrepreneurship
  - Understands the importance of change in healthcare and can function responsibly in the event of changes

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Nursing leadership

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Carina Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Arbetskollektivavtal och arbetarskydd:
  - Allmänt kommunalt tjänste- och arbetskollektivavtal AKTA
  - Työsuojelu - Arbetarskyddsförvaltningsens webbtjänst
  - Finlex.fi
  
  + Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Problem solving
  Self studies
  Individual work
  Groupwork

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Working collective agreements and labor protection - participation 100 %
  0-5 for administration and leadership

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 03.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Carina Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual exam

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr - 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student can describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working metho

•   Palliative care and care in the final stages of life VÅV22KV05-3001 27.11.2023-21.01.2024  2 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
  - knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
  - can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
  - can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
  - can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
  - understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
  - understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of palliative care
  Pain and symptom treatment
  Holistic support for patients and relatives
  Interaction and encounters
  Care in the final stages of life
  Care of the deceased
  Ethics and law
  Interprofessional teamwork

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Online recorded lectures/info

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individual cas study graded 0-5
  Reflection Pass/Fail
  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.11.2023 - 21.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  04.10.2023 - 26.11.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Moodle opens 27.11

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual case study
  Reflection assignment

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr= 27h
  2 cr= 54h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Palliative care and care in the final stages of life VÅV22KV05-3002 09.10.2023-24.11.2023  2 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
  - knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
  - can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
  - can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
  - can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
  - understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
  - understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of palliative care
  Pain and symptom treatment
  Holistic support for patients and relatives
  Interaction and encounters
  Care in the final stages of life
  Care of the deceased
  Ethics and law
  Interprofessional teamwork

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Introduction lecture - compulsory
  Work shop -Escape Game- Compulsory

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individual cas study graded 0-5
  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.10.2023 - 24.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.10.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Lectures are Compulsory

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual case study

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr= 27h
  2 cr= 54h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Palliative care and care in the final stages of life VÅV22KV05-3003 02.01.2024-11.02.2024  2 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
  - knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
  - can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
  - can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
  - can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
  - understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
  - understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of palliative care
  Pain and symptom treatment
  Holistic support for patients and relatives
  Interaction and encounters
  Care in the final stages of life
  Care of the deceased
  Ethics and law
  Interprofessional teamwork

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Introduction lecture - compulsory
  Work shop -Escape Game- Compulsory

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 11.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 08.01.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual case study
  Online Exam

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 c =27h
  2 c =54

•   Patient and client safety when social and health care is digitized VÅV22KV13-3008 15.04.2024-31.05.2024  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  -can describe conditions for and challenges with the work regarding patient and client safety within the social and health care areas of activity
  - knows the laws and recommendations regarding and the supervision of patient and client safety in Finland
  - knows how digital systems ensure patient safety by predicting risks, risk management, reporting and follow-up
  - can describe opportunities and challenges in ensuring client and patient safety when using digital e-Health services
  - can describe what a safety culture entails when healthcare is digitized
  - reflects on ethical positions for the patient / client in the digital world

  Prerequisites

  Vasa: VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care, VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basics Care
  Åbo: Radiation Safety within course USS22UV01 Care and Radiation Safety

  Content of the study unit

  Patient safety today and tomorrow
  Welfare technology as a tool that supports patient and client safety
  Security for the patient and the client in the digital world

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Österberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  All study material is available in the moodle course.

  Learning methods

  Virtual course with recorded lectures on Moodle, discussions on the Moodle platform, written exercises.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is assessed according to the scale 1-5. It is the assignments that are assessed, but e.g. a lively and reflective participation in the discussions can raise the grade.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 14.04.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg

  Additional information

  Prerequisites before the course: THL's webcourse Patient safety through knowledge and skills.
  
  In this course, Moodle acts as a platform where all the material is available: instructional videos, lecture materials, a list of the course objectives and content, course literature, instructions for assignments and so on.
  
  The course lasts for six weeks, and consists of three parts (each part lasts for two weeks). It is therefore important to keep up and be active during the course.
  
  The course material is partly in Swedish and partly in Finnish.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery, Degree Programme in Health Care

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Moodle -kurs (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The course is examined through two smaller written assignments and a self-correcting test. All information is submitted no later than the end of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 hours

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.
  
  In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.
  
  To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

•   Patient and client safety when social and health care is digitized VÅV22KV13-3011 29.04.2024-31.05.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  -can describe conditions for and challenges with the work regarding patient and client safety within the social and health care areas of activity
  - knows the laws and recommendations regarding and the supervision of patient and client safety in Finland
  - knows how digital systems ensure patient safety by predicting risks, risk management, reporting and follow-up
  - can describe opportunities and challenges in ensuring client and patient safety when using digital e-Health services
  - can describe what a safety culture entails when healthcare is digitized
  - reflects on ethical positions for the patient / client in the digital world

  Prerequisites

  Vasa: VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care, VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basics Care
  Åbo: Radiation Safety within course USS22UV01 Care and Radiation Safety

  Content of the study unit

  Patient safety today and tomorrow
  Welfare technology as a tool that supports patient and client safety
  Security for the patient and the client in the digital world

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Carina Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  All study material is available in the moodle course.

  Learning methods

  Virtual course with recorded lectures on Moodle, discussions on the Moodle platform, written exercises.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.04.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 26.04.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda

  Additional information

  In this course, Moodle acts as a platform where all the material is available: instructional videos, lecture materials, a list of the course objectives and content, course literature, instructions for assignments and so on.
  
  The course lasts for six weeks, and consists of three parts (each part lasts for two weeks). It is therefore important to keep up and be active during the course.
  
  The course material is partly in Swedish and partly in Finnish.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery, Degree Programme in Health Care

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The course is examined through two smaller written assignments and a self-correcting test. All information is submitted no later than the end of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h
  Total 3 cr = 81 h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.
  
  In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.
  
  To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

•   Patient and client safety when social and health care is digitized VÅV22KV13-3012 15.04.2024-31.05.2024  3 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  -can describe conditions for and challenges with the work regarding patient and client safety within the social and health care areas of activity
  - knows the laws and recommendations regarding and the supervision of patient and client safety in Finland
  - knows how digital systems ensure patient safety by predicting risks, risk management, reporting and follow-up
  - can describe opportunities and challenges in ensuring client and patient safety when using digital e-Health services
  - can describe what a safety culture entails when healthcare is digitized
  - reflects on ethical positions for the patient / client in the digital world

  Prerequisites

  Vasa: VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care, VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basics Care
  Åbo: Radiation Safety within course USS22UV01 Care and Radiation Safety

  Content of the study unit

  Patient safety today and tomorrow
  Welfare technology as a tool that supports patient and client safety
  Security for the patient and the client in the digital world

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  All study material is available in the moodle course.

  Learning methods

  Virtual course with recorded lectures on Moodle, discussions on the Moodle platform, written exercises.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is assessed according to the scale 1-5. It is the assignments that are assessed, but e.g. a lively and reflective participation in the discussions can raise the grade.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 05.04.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Prerequisites before the course: THL's webcourse Patient safety through knowledge and skills.
  
  In this course, Moodle acts as a platform where all the material is available: instructional videos, lecture materials, a list of the course objectives and content, course literature, instructions for assignments and so on.
  
  The course lasts for six weeks, and consists of three parts (each part lasts for two weeks). It is therefore important to keep up and be active during the course.
  
  The course material is partly in Swedish and partly in Finnish.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery, Degree Programme in Health Care

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Moodle -kurs (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The course is examined through two smaller written assignments and a self-correcting test. All information is submitted no later than the end of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 hours

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.
  
  In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.
  
  To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

•   Pediatric care VÅV22KV11-3001 11.03.2024-21.04.2024  5 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can in their care work apply their knowledge of the most central diseases in children and young people
  - has knowledge of and understands the importance of child and family-centered care
  - can apply knowledge in pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  - can identify, evaluate and care for children and young people's pain
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs in children and young people
  - can in the care of people with disabilities or handicaps apply their knowledge of the most central disabilities or handicaps

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection

  Content of the study unit

  Central diseases in children and adolescents
  Central disabilities and handicaps
  Child and family-centered care
  Pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  Pain
  Simulation exercises

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.03.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 08.03.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 cr
  Functional variations in children 1 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's healthcare 1,5 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Functional variations in children 1 cr
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2024
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions, and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student can describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working metho

•   Pediatric care VÅV22KV11-3002 02.01.2024-18.02.2024  5 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can in their care work apply their knowledge of the most central diseases in children and young people
  - has knowledge of and understands the importance of child and family-centered care
  - can apply knowledge in pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  - can identify, evaluate and care for children and young people's pain
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs in children and young people
  - can in the care of people with disabilities or handicaps apply their knowledge of the most central disabilities or handicaps

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection

  Content of the study unit

  Central diseases in children and adolescents
  Central disabilities and handicaps
  Child and family-centered care
  Pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  Pain
  Simulation exercises

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 18.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 08.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 cr
  Functional variations in children 1 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's healthcare 1,5 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Functional variations in children 1 cr
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2024
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions, and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student can describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working metho

•   Pediatric care VÅV22KV11-3003 22.01.2024-07.04.2024  5 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can in their care work apply their knowledge of the most central diseases in children and young people
  - has knowledge of and understands the importance of child and family-centered care
  - can apply knowledge in pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  - can identify, evaluate and care for children and young people's pain
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs in children and young people
  - can in the care of people with disabilities or handicaps apply their knowledge of the most central disabilities or handicaps

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection

  Content of the study unit

  Central diseases in children and adolescents
  Central disabilities and handicaps
  Child and family-centered care
  Pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  Pain
  Simulation exercises

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.01.2024 - 07.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 23.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 cr
  Functional variations in children 1 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's healthcare 1,5 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Functional variations in children 1 cr
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2024
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions, and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student can describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working metho

•   Perioperative Nursing Care VÅV18AK01-3004 22.01.2024-21.04.2024  3 credits  (USS21F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of perioperative care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their loved ones
  - has readiness to care for patients in perioperative care
  - has readiness to care for child patients in perioperative care
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning, documentation and reporting according to national directives
  - in a simulated situation can be responsible for a safe drug treatment within perioperative care
  - can apply patient guidance

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Perioperative nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tentlitteratur för Perioperativ vuxna
  Dåvoy Myklestul. G, Eide, P.H & Hansen, I. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård - Operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  
  Kapitel 8: Positionering av patienten på operationsbädden
  
  Kapitel 9: Preventiva omvårdnadsåtgärder mot hypotermi
  
  
  Hovind, Inger Liv (red.) (2013). Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Kapitel 16: Uppläggning av operationspatienten
  Kapitel 18: Förebygga och behandla anestesirelaterade komplikationer
  Kapitel 26-29: Äldre patienter, hjärtsjuka patienter, lungsjuka patienter, överviktiga patienter
  Del 5 Kapitel 34-43: obstetrisk, gynekologisk, urologisk, gastro-, ortopedisk, öron-näsa-hals-, ögon-, kärl-, torax-, neurokirurgi
  
  Terveysportti: Sairaainhoitajan tietokannat
  
  Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja: Leikkausasennot, Vanhuspotilas, Sairauksiin liittyvät erityspiirteet, Anestesiologiset eritystilanteet, Silmän toimenpiteet, Korvan, nenän ja kurkun toimenpiteet, neurogirurgiset toimenpiteet, sydän, verisuoni, ja keuhkokirurgia, Maha-suolikanavan toimenpiteet, virtsaelinkirurgia, raskaus,synnytys ja naistentautien toimenpiteet, tuki-ja liikuntaelinten kirurgia, monivammapotilaan hoiti, plastiikk- ja palovammakirurgia
  + material på moodle
  
  Perioperativ vård barn:
  Valda delar. R. Christofferson, G. Läckgren & A. (red.) Stenberg. 2015. Grottes barnkirurgi och barnurologi.Studentlitteratur.
  Ljumsbråck barn gängse vårdrekommendationer från Internetmedicin.se
  Tuominen, M. Päiväkirurgisen potilaan hoito. 2014. Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Duodecim.
  Vasa centralsjukhus hemsida
  
  EBP Berman, A., Snyder, S. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Person, New-Jersy. 2012, pp. 161-335.
  Chen, S., Chang, H., & Pai, H. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203
  Hinno, S., Partanen, P., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. The professional nursing practice environment and nurse-reported job outcomes in two European countries: a survey of nurses in Finland and the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. Mar2012, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p133-143.
  Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2004). Evidence-based practice – an incomplete model of the relationship between theory and professional work. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 187–196.
  Miller, L. L., Ward, D., & Young, H. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Nursing. Generations, 34(1), 72–77. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=53063435&site=ehost-live

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case demonstrations
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Individual work
  Videos
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.01.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 21.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V
  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Eamination

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Perioperative care VÅV22KV04-3001 12.10.2023-26.11.2023  3 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
  - can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
  - have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
  - has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
  - can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Preoperative and postoperative care
  Anesthesiological care
  Intraoperative care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
  ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
  Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
  Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
  Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Terveysportti

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, films, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
  Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.10.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 15.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at exercises
  Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cr = 81 h
  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
  Theory 4 h + 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 3
  Study on your own
  ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
  INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
  8+8 h practical in operation room
  Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
  Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

•   Perioperative care VÅV22KV04-3002 28.08.2023-29.09.2023  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
  - can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
  - have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
  - has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
  - can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Preoperative and postoperative care
  Anesthesiological care
  Intraoperative care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
  ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
  Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Terveysportti
  
  OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
  Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
  Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar

  Learning methods

  Introduction online and other theorylessons recorded, demonstrationfilms, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
  Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 29.09.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 36

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at exercises
  Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cr= 81 h
  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
  Theory 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 2
  Study on your own
  ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
  INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
  Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
  Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

•   Perioperative care VÅV22KV04-3005 28.08.2023-08.10.2023  3 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
  - can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
  - have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
  - has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
  - can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Preoperative and postoperative care
  Anesthesiological care
  Intraoperative care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
  ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
  Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Terveysportti
  
  OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
  Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
  Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, films, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
  Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 08.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at exercises
  Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Student's schedule and workload

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises. 3 cr = 81 h
  PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
  Theory 4 h + 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 2
  Study on your own
  ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
  INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
  Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
  Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

•   Practice: Basic care VÅV22PR01-3008 13.09.2023-17.12.2023  7 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can plan, implement and evaluate basic care under supervision
  - can apply evidence-based methods in basic care
  - can show collegiality and demonstrate employee competence
  - can work in interprofessional teams
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - can supervise patients in basic care
  - can perform safe drug treatment under supervision
  - understand the importance of patient and client safety
  - masters the central knowledge base for patient and client safety
  - can promote patient safety and prevent risk situations

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Patient safety

  Further information

  The course includes: Patient safety through knowledge and skills - web training from THL / Institute for Health and Welfare

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Clinical practice in patient-centered nursing care under the supervision
  Patient safety/THL 1 cu

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved/Rejected

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.09.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 12.11.2023

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Clinical practice in patient-centered nursing care under the supervision
  This coure can be validated if you are a practical nurs and have been working at least 3 months in elderycare after you have graduated.
  
  Everybodey needs to do the patient safety test/THL 1 cu

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical practice 40 h/week for 5 weeks. (38h/ week at the practice place and 2 h/ week for assignments)
  Approved assignments and seminars
  
  THL-online course for 1 credit (27h) Read by your own and make a test, you need to pass it.

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 credit 27h total 9 credits 243h
  
  Practice 40h x 5 weeks = 200h
  Thl test 1 27h
  Information (MANDATORY) 3 h
  Seminarday (MANDATORY) 5 h
  Handing in your assignments 8 h

  Content scheduling

  PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
  1 of these 3
  VÅV22GV01 (Sjukskötarens profession)
  BM22GV01 (Sjukskötarens och barnmoskansprofession)
  HVV22GV01 (Sjukskötarens och hälsovårdarens profession)
  
  and
  
  VÅV22GV02

•   Practice: Basic care VÅV22PR01-3010 04.01.2024-29.03.2024  7 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can plan, implement and evaluate basic care under supervision
  - can apply evidence-based methods in basic care
  - can show collegiality and demonstrate employee competence
  - can work in interprofessional teams
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - can supervise patients in basic care
  - can perform safe drug treatment under supervision
  - understand the importance of patient and client safety
  - masters the central knowledge base for patient and client safety
  - can promote patient safety and prevent risk situations

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Patient safety

  Further information

  The course includes: Patient safety through knowledge and skills - web training from THL / Institute for Health and Welfare

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Clinical practice in patient-centered nursing care under the supervision
  Patient safety/THL 1 cu

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved/Rejected
  
  You need to pass the practice and also the patientsafety test to be approved in this course.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2024 - 29.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.12.2023

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  1 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Clinical practice in patient-centered nursing care under the supervision
  This coure can be validated if you are a practical nurs and have been working at least 3 months in elderycare after you have graduated.
  
  Everybodey needs to do the patient safety test/THL 1 cu

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical practice 40 h/week for 4 weeks. (38h/ week at the practice place and 2 h/ week for assignments)
  Approved assignments and seminars
  
  THL-online course for 1 credit (27h) Read by your own and make a test, you need to pass it.

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 credit 27h total 7 credits 189h
  
  Practice 40h x 4 weeks = 160h
  Thl test 1 27h
  Information (MANDATORY)
  Seminarday (MANDATORY)

  Content scheduling

  PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
  1 of these 3
  VÅV22GV01 (Sjukskötarens profession)
  BM22GV01 (Sjukskötarens och barnmoskansprofession)
  HVV22GV01 (Sjukskötarens och hälsovårdarens profession)
  
  and
  
  VÅV22GV02 (Vårdens grunder)

•   Practice: Basic care VÅV22PR01-3011 03.11.2023-10.03.2024  7 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can plan, implement and evaluate basic care under supervision
  - can apply evidence-based methods in basic care
  - can show collegiality and demonstrate employee competence
  - can work in interprofessional teams
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - can supervise patients in basic care
  - can perform safe drug treatment under supervision
  - understand the importance of patient and client safety
  - masters the central knowledge base for patient and client safety
  - can promote patient safety and prevent risk situations

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Patient safety

  Further information

  The course includes: Patient safety through knowledge and skills - web training from THL / Institute for Health and Welfare

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Supervised Clinical Practice
  Online Training in Patient Safety (THL)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Pass/Fail
  
  All assignments must be submitted in order to pass the course.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.11.2023 - 10.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  24.10.2023 - 28.01.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  1 - 44

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Clinical practice under tradesman
  The course can be validated if you are a previous caregiver and have worked at least 3 months in elderly care.
  
  However, everyone should take the THL patient safety test

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  To pass the course, you must be on an internship for 4 weeks
  or present a certificate stating that you have worked as a caregiver for at least 3 months in the care of the elderly.
  
  Present an approved course from THL Patient Safety.

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr 27h total 7 sp 189h
  
  4 weeks 40h/week 160h
  or present a certificate stating that you have worked as a caregiver for at least 3 months in the elderly care system.
  
  Course from THL Patient Safety. 27h
  
  Information opportunity 2 h

  Content scheduling

  INITIAL KNOWLEDGE REQUIREMENTS
  
  1 of these 3
  VÅV22GV01 (Nursing profession)
  BM22GV01 (Profession of Nurse and Child Nurse)
  HVV22GV01 (Profession of nurse and health care provider)
  
  AND
  
  VÅV22GV02 (Basics of Health Care)

•   Practice: Basic care VÅV22PR01-3012 04.12.2023-04.02.2024  7 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can plan, implement and evaluate basic care under supervision
  - can apply evidence-based methods in basic care
  - can show collegiality and demonstrate employee competence
  - can work in interprofessional teams
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - can supervise patients in basic care
  - can perform safe drug treatment under supervision
  - understand the importance of patient and client safety
  - masters the central knowledge base for patient and client safety
  - can promote patient safety and prevent risk situations

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Patient safety

  Further information

  The course includes: Patient safety through knowledge and skills - web training from THL / Institute for Health and Welfare

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se Moodle för närmare information:
  - eventuella hälsogranskningar, prov och vaccinationer
  - praktikuppgifter (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Clinical practice 6 ects
  Patient Safety 1 ects

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.12.2023 - 04.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  04.12.2023 - 02.01.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance during practice.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Godkänd praktik
  Godkända praktikuppgifter
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium
  Godkänd webbutbildning kring patientsäkerhet
  Deltagande vid föreläsning och framförande om patientsäkerhet
  
  
  1 sp = 27 h (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande:
  - kan under handledning planera, förverkliga och utvärdera grundvård
  - kan tillämpa evidensbaserade metoder inom grundvården
  - kan visa kollegialitet och påvisa medarbetarkompetens
  - an arbeta i interprofessionella team
  - kan professionellt bemöta patienter och närstående
  - kan handleda patienter inom grundvården
  - kan under handledning utföra en säker läkemedelsbehandling
  - förstår vikten av patient- och klientsäkerhet
  - behärskar den centrala kunskapsbasen för patient- och klientsäkerhet
  - kan främja patientsäkerheten och förebygga risksituationer (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h (not translated)

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 1 VÅV22PR02-3001 23.10.2023-21.01.2024  10 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  90% Face-to-face, 10% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
  Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
  Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In order to pass the course, students must
  - participated in the simulation exercises.
  - participated in practice information
  - have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
  - all practical assignments must be approved.
  - participated in practical seminar
  - practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.10.2023 - 21.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  05.10.2023 - 26.11.2023

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  1 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård, Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Simulation exercises
  Clinical practice in different contexts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
  Internship info, Mandatory attendance
  Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
  The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.
  
  Internship info 3h/student
  Simulations 6 h/student
  Internship seminar 3 h
  Independent reading 15 h Total 27 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 1 VÅV22PR02-3003 27.09.2023-26.11.2023  10 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Klinisk praktik 6 veckor under handledning
  Simuleringsövningar x 2 (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För att få kursen godkänd skall man ha utfört praktiken och uppnått målen som anges i läroplanen. Alla uppgifter som blivit givna skall lämnas in och godkännas av läraren. Ytterligare skall studeranden närvara på alla obligatoriska övningar. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.09.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 15.10.2023

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  1 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Förkunskapskrav
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 sjukskötarens profession
  VÅV22GV02 Vårdens grunder
  VÅV22GV03 Människans fysiologi och anatomi
  VÅV22GV04 Klinisk mikrobiologi, immunologi och patologi
  VÅV22GV05 Läkemedelsbehandling 1
  VÅV22GV06 Första hjälp och katastrofberedskap
  VÅV22PR01 grundvårdspraktik
  VÅV22KV01 Inre medicin och kirurgiska sjukdomar 1 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Klinisk praktik under handledning
  Simuleringsövningar (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Simuleringsövningar/Workshop 8 h/grupp före praktiken börjar. OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  PraktikINFO, OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  Simuleringsövningar/Workshop 4h/grupp efter praktiken (denna dag innehåller också seminarie) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  10 studiepoäng (1sp 27h, 10 sp 270h)
  
  Studaranden skall vara på praktikplatsen 38/h vecka. Och ytterligare 2h/ vecka används till de uppgifter som blir givna. Så sammanlagt 40h/vecka skall praktiken vara, varav 38h på fältet. (6 veckor x 40h = 240h)
  
  Simuleringar 12h/ studeranden
  Praktikinfo 3h/studernande
  Läsning på egenhand 15h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Studerande:
  - kan ta emot feedback och visar vilja att utveckla yrkesskickligheten
  - följer arbetslistan och håller överenskomna tider
  - kan ställa frågor som är relevanta för att lära sig ett arbetsmoment
  - arbetar för det mesta planmässigt och har en grundläggande noggrannhet i viktiga arbetsmoment
  - kan utföra arbetsuppgifter under handledning
  - har grundläggande kunskaper och kan ställa frågor som är relevanta för att lära sig ett arbetsmoment
  - kan följa direktiv och anvisningar och tar ansvar för uppgifter
  - kan fatta beslut som rör arbetsuppgifter på grundläggande nivå
  - känner till värdegrunden och beaktar de yrkesetiska principerna
  - kan kommunicera och bemöta patienter/klienter/kunder
  - kan samarbeta med andra inom arbetsteamet (not translated)

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 1 VÅV22PR02-3006 02.10.2023-03.12.2023  10 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
  Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
  Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In order to pass the course, students must
  - participated in the simulation exercises.
  - participated in practice information
  - have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
  - all practical assignments must be approved.
  - participated in practical seminar
  - practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.10.2023 - 03.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Simulation exercises
  Clinical practice in different contexts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
  Internship info, Mandatory attendance
  Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
  The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.
  
  Internship info 3h/student
  Simulations 6 h/student
  Internship seminar 3 h
  Independent reading 15 h Total 27 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 2 VÅV22PR03-3001 21.03.2024-26.05.2024  10 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  6 weeks at Internal Medicine and Surgery Care a
  Written assignments and seminars
  WORSHOP 1 cr MANDATORY
  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participated in internship information
  Participated in the internship seminar
  Participateing in worshop
  Approved internships submitted and submitted in connection with the internship seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.03.2024 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.03.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Maria Berg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar and Workshop

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar
  Participation in WORKSHOP

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Compulsory attendance / 38 hours per week and 2 hours/week for practical tasks
  38 h / week. 6 weeks internship = Total 240 h.

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  1cr =27h
  10cr=270h
  
  40 h / week. 6 weeks internship (and 2 h/week for internship tasks) = Total 240 h.
  1cr=27h for workshop (8 hours in school + 3h seminar)
  
  3h INFO

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 2 VÅV22PR03-3002 13.12.2023-10.03.2024  10 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  6 weeks at Internal Medicine and Surgery Care a
  Written assignments and seminars
  WORSHOP 1 cr MANDATORY
  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participated in internship information
  Participated in the internship seminar
  Participateing in worshop
  Approved internships submitted and submitted in connection with the internship seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.12.2023 - 10.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar and Workshop

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar
  Participation in WORKSHOP

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Compulsory attendance / 38 hours per week and 2 hours/week for practical tasks
  38 h / week. 6 weeks internship = Total 240 h.

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  1cr =27h
  10cr=270h
  
  40 h / week. 6 weeks internship (and 2 h/week for internship tasks) = Total 240 h.
  1cr=27h for workshop (8 hours in school + 3h seminar)
  
  3h INFO

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 2 VÅV22PR03-3003 07.02.2024-21.04.2024  10 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  6 weeks at Internal Medicine and Surgery Care a
  Written assignments and seminars
  WORSHOP 1 cr MANDATORY
  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participated in internship information
  Participated in the internship seminar
  Participateing in worshop
  Approved internships submitted and submitted in connection with the internship seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.02.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 16.02.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar and Workshop
  
  PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
  
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04
  VÅV22GV05
  VÅV22GV06
  
  VÅV22KV01
  VÅV22KV04
  VÅV22KV06
  VÅV22KV08
  VÅV22PR01
  VÅV22PR02

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar
  Participation in WORKSHOP

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Compulsory attendance / 38 hours per week and 2 hours/week for practical tasks
  38 h / week. 6 weeks internship = Total 240 h.

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  1cr =27h
  10cr=270h
  
  40 h / week. 6 weeks internship (and 2 h/week for internship tasks) = Total 240 h.
  1cr=27h for workshop (8 hours in school + 3h seminar)
  
  3h INFO

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Optional context 1 VÅV22PR06-3005 02.01.2024-15.09.2024  6 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods within an optional care context
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patient

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care :
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical work during the summer, recommended after the second academic year, that the student arranges himself and which can later be validated

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Four weeks optional internship in healthcare during the summer (summer job): serviced accommodation, enhanced serviced accommodation, home service

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2024 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 15.09.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 30.04.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  Students look for their summer job themselves

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Summer internship at serviced accommodation, enhanced serviced accommodation, home service

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Summer 2024
  Participation in internship information in 2024. Mandatory attendance.
  Summer internship report submitted via Moodle no later than week 35, 2024
  The signed work list is submitted on Moodle no later than week 35, 2024

  Internationa connections

  Can be done abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The summer internship = 6 ECTS = 4 weeks. 38 h/week. A total of 152 hours.

•   Practice: Optional context 1 VÅV22PR06-3006 02.01.2024-15.09.2024  6 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods within an optional care context
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patient

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care :
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical work during the summer, recommended after the second academic year, that the student arranges himself and which can later be validated

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Four weeks optional internship in healthcare during the summer (summer job): serviced accommodation, enhanced serviced accommodation, home service

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2024 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 15.09.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.05.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  0 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  Students look for their summer job themselves

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Summer internship at serviced accommodation, enhanced serviced accommodation, home service

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Summer 2023
  Participation in internship information in 2024. Mandatory attendance.
  Summer internship report submitted via Moodle no later than week 35, 2024
  The signed work list is submitted on Moodle no later than week 35, 2024

  Internationa connections

  Can be done abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The summer internship = 6 ECTS = 4 weeks. 38 h/week. A total of 152 hours.

•   Practice: Optional context 2 VÅV22PR07-3001 08.01.2024-31.12.2025  9 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods within an elective care context
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR03 Practice: Medicaland Surgicla Nursing Care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical work during the summer, recommended after the third academic year, that the student arranges himself and which can later be validated

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 31.12.2025

  Enrollment date range

  04.12.2023 - 31.05.2024

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Professional Ethics and Professional Interaction in Social and Health Care USS22IV04-3002 04.10.2023-15.12.2023  4 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - knows the legal and ethical principles of patient and client work
  - is capable of professional interaction in inter-professional teams
  - can meet clients/patients and close relatives as experts in their own lives
  - understands the cultural significance in care and can respond to clients / patients individually depending on cultural background
  - understands the importance of the ethical values within health care
  - understands sustainability as an ethical principle

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The position and rights of the client/patient
  
  Professional interaction and communication, dialogue
  
  Ethical recommendations and principles
  
  Client/patient participation, self-determination and autonomy
  
  Professional encounters
  
  Person-centred care as basis for healthcare science
  
  Different cultures and subcultures
  
  Different religions

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Holm, U. 2009. Det räcker inte att vara snäll. Om empati och professionellt bemötande i människovårdande yrke.
  Fossum, B (red). 2010. Kommunikation samtal och bemötande i vården.
  Magnusson, A-S. 2014. Om kommunikation - för personal i vårdande yrke.
  Sandberg, H. 2014. Sjuksköterskans samtal. Professionalitet och medmänsklighet.
  Scherman, M.H, Runesson, U. (red) 2009. Den lärande patienten.
  SHM https://stm.fi/sv/social-och-halsotjanster/lagstiftning.
  Sandman L. & Kjellström S. 2018. Etik för vårdande yrken.
  Wellman E. 2017. Eri kultturien tuntemus hoitotyössä.
  Lorentz H. & Bergstedt B. 2017. Interkulturella perspektiv. Pedagogik i mångkulturella lärandemiljöer. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Inspelade föreläsningar och PP utan ljud
  Workshop/övning
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.10.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.10.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig lärare Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Inspelade föreläsningar, PP
  Workshop/övning
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individuell rapport, inlämning 25.11.2023
  Seminarium 7.12.2023
  Quiz 7.12.2023 kl 18 - 20 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursstart 2 h
  Självstudier ink. Quiz 70 h
  Föreläsningar och workshops 4 h
  Individuell rapport 32 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Rapporten fyller inte kriterier för vitsordet 1. Underkänd rapport kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell.
  
  Quiz bedöms i skalan uk - gk (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Rapporten svarar endast delvis eller ytligt på de ställda frågorna. Källorna har använts knappt. Rapporten har delvis relevant innehåll. Rapporten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Rapporten svarar på de ställda frågorna med stöd av relevanta källor. Rapporten har relevant innehåll. Egna reflektioner beskrivs. Rapporten är är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Rapporten svarar mångsidigt och brett på frågeställningarna och baserar på relevanta källor. Egna reflektioner beskrivs väl. Rapporten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Professional Ethics and Professional Interaction in Social and Health Care USS22IV04-3003 04.09.2023-27.11.2023  4 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - knows the legal and ethical principles of patient and client work
  - is capable of professional interaction in inter-professional teams
  - can meet clients/patients and close relatives as experts in their own lives
  - understands the cultural significance in care and can respond to clients / patients individually depending on cultural background
  - understands the importance of the ethical values within health care
  - understands sustainability as an ethical principle

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The position and rights of the client/patient
  
  Professional interaction and communication, dialogue
  
  Ethical recommendations and principles
  
  Client/patient participation, self-determination and autonomy
  
  Professional encounters
  
  Person-centred care as basis for healthcare science
  
  Different cultures and subcultures
  
  Different religions

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Lämplig material för kursen/ Sovelutuva kurssimateriaali:
  Holm, U. 2009. Det räcker inte att vara snäll. Om empati och professionellt bemötande i människovårdande yrke.
  Fossum, B (red). 2010. Kommunikation samtal och bemötande i vården.
  Magnusson, A-S. 2014. Om kommunikation - för personal i vårdande yrke.
  Sandberg, H. 2014. Sjuksköterskans samtal. Professionalitet och medmänsklighet.
  Scherman, M.H, Runesson, U. (red) 2009. Den lärande patienten.
  SHM https://stm.fi/sv/social-och-halsotjanster/lagstiftning
  Sandman L. & Kjellström S. 2018. Etik för vårdande yrken
  Wellman E. 2017. Eri kultturien tuntemus hoitotyössä.
  Artiklar och databaser/ Artikkelit ja internetsivut
  Kursmaterial och litteratur ges på kursen (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Korsstudier med Turun amk/ Ristiinopiskelu Turun amk
  Självstudier/ Itsenäistä opiskelua
  Föreläsningar/ Luentoja
  Övningar, grupparbeten, seminarium Obligatorisk närvaro/ harjoituksa, ryhmätöitä, seminaari - pakollinen läsnäolo
  Interprofessionellt språkbadsamarbete sk. SotePlask (2 sp) mellan Åbo Yrkeshögskola (Turun ammattikorkeakoulu) och Yh Novia/ smågruppsarbeten. Skriftlig uppgift med seminarium. Obligatorisk närvaro./ SoTePlaskTurun amk ja Novia sairaanhoitajat, terveydenhoitajat, sosionomiopiskelijat. Kirjallinen työ ja seminaari. Pakollinen läsnäolo (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Yrkesetik, korsstudier med Turku amk 2 sp. Osio ammattietiikka 2 op. Arviointi: Hyväksytty/ hylätty. Bedömningskala GK/UK.
  Bedömningskriterier/ Arviointikiriteerit:
  Hylätty/ Underkänt:
  Prestationen är underkänd om något av följande uppfylls:
  - Studerande (känner till grundvärderingar) identiefierar inte de grundläggande värderingarna inom social- och hälsovård, yrkesetiska principer eller lagstiftning
  - Studerande fungerar inte som en ansvarsfull (bär inte sitt ansvar som) gruppmedlem
  - Studerande deltar inte aktivt i uppgifter. Semianrium och introduktion oblaigatorisk närvaro, kompensationsuppgift ifall man är frånvarande.
  
  Interprofessionellt samarbete SotePlask 2 sp. Bedömningskala GK/UK. Osio SoTePlask arviointi: Hyväksytty/ hylätty
  Bedömningskriterier/ Arviointikriteerit::
  Underkänt/ Hylätty:
  Prestationen är underkänd om något av följande uppfylls:
  - Studerande (känner till grundvärderingar) identiefierar inte de grundläggande värderingarna inom social- och hälsovård, yrkesetiska principer eller lagstiftning
  - Studerande fungerar inte som en ansvarsfull gruppmedlem
  - Studerande deltar inte aktivt i den interprofessionella kommunikationen under studieperioden
  - Obligatorisk närvaro på introduktion och seminarium, kompensationsuppgift ifall frånvaro.
  
  Godkänt (alla 3 kriterier uppfylls)/ HYväksytty (kaikki kriteerit täyttyvät):
  - Studerande känner till de grundläggande värderingarna (grundvärderingar) inom social- och hälsovård och yrkesetiska principer (eller lagstiftning)
  - Studerande bär sitt ansvar som gruppmedlem. Studerande kan ange branschens centrala lagstiftning
  - Studerande arbetar ansvarsfullt och aktivt i den interprofessionell kommunikationen under studieperioden
  - Studerande deltar i samarbete med Turun amk studerande
  - Studerande deltar i grupparbete med rapport.
  - Studerande bär sitt ansvar som gruppmedlem och gör sin del av uppgifterna.
  - Studerande deltar i obligatoriska delar av kursen
  - Studerande arbetar ansvarsfullt och aktivt i den interprofessionell kommunikationen under studieperioden (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 27.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Kursen administreras från YH Novia, Moodle som arbetsbord.
  Kurssin hallinointi Yh Novialla, Moodle oppismisalustana. Turun amk opiskelijat ilmoittautuvat Noviaan erillisen ohjeen mukaan. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminarium del I/ Seminaari osa I: Yrkesetik- Ammattietiikka (2sp/ op) 25.9.2023
  Seminarium SoTePlask (2 sp/ op) 9.11.2023
  SoTePlask individuell refleksionsdokument inlämning senast 16.11 Moodle/ SoTePlask yksilötehtävä kirjallinen itsereflektio viimeistään 16.11 Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  SoTePlask/ Interprofessionellt samarbete med Turun ammattikorkeakoulu och socionomstuderande från Novia, SoTePlask 54 h. Ajankäyttö 54 h
  Ammattietiikka/ Samarbete med Turun amk, korsstudier 54 h; Föreläsningar, övningar, grupparbeten och självstudier. Ajankäyttö 54 h luentoja, harjoituksia, ryhmätöitä ja istenäistä opiskelua (not translated)

•   Reproductive Health USS21KÅ02-3002 23.08.2023-06.10.2023  4 credits  (UHV21D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can, in an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report person-centered/client-centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  
  Has expertise in care in various service system
  
  Can describe what sexual and reproductive health means in promoting individual and family health
  
  Can describe the most common sexually transmitted diseases and their treatment
  
  Can describe the course of normal pregnancy, the central follow-up methods and the content of health care guidance
  
  Can describe the course of a normal delivery and care methods
  
  Knows the basics of following up and caring for the newly-delivered woman and the newborn during normal puerperium
  
  Has knowledge of the breastfeeding recommendations and can act as support during breastfeeding

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Surgical and Perioperative Care, Nursing in Internal Medicine and Palliative Care, Clinical Nursing

  Content of the study unit

  The service system and various service environments
  
  The care process, decision making, ethics
  
  Aseptics, sustainable development
  
  Participation of patients and relatives in care
  
  Sexual and reproductive health and its promotion (central gynecological and andrological problems in relation to reproduction, prevention, infertility)
  
  The most common sexually transmitted diseases
  
  Follow-up, health care guidance and care during normal pregnancy
  
  Follow-up and care during normal childbirth
  
  Emergency delivery
  
  Follow-up and care of the woman and the healthy newborn baby in the maternity ward
  
  National breastfeeding recommendations and common breastfeeding problems

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Liljeroth

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Botha, E. & Ryttyläinen-Korhonen, K., 2016. Naisen hoitotyö. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  Kapitlen 1-2 och 5.
  ELLER
  Eskola, K. & Hytönen, K., 2002. Nainen hoitotyön asiakkaana. Helsinki: WSOY.
  Kapitlen 4-9.
  
  OCH
  Lindgren, H., Christensson, K. & Dykes, A-K. 2016. Reproduktiv hälsa - barnmorskans kompetensområde. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Kapitel 14 (den normala graviditeten).
  ELLER
  Kaplan, A., Hogg, B., Hildingsson, I. & Lundgren, I. 2009. Lärobok för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  (Eller annan motsvarande i annan bok i obstetrik eller lärobok för barnmorskor).
  
  OCH
  Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. 2015. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-490-8
  OCH
  Klemetti, R. & Raussi-Lehto, E. 2016. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta — seksuaali- ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-174-7
  
  Webbsidor:
  https://www.rfsu.se/
  https://www.folkhalsan.fi/kunskap/kunskapsomraden/kropp-halsa/
  https://www.vaestoliitto.fi/sv/sexualitet/
  
  Övrig litteratur som finns i Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  1. Självstudier
  2. Föreläsningar, obligatorisk närvaro på 80 % av föreläsningarna.
  3. Handlett smågruppsarbete. Gruppindelning görs då kursen startar. Mera information på Moodle.
  4. Kliniska övningar i grupper. Obligatorisk närvaro, gruppindelning görs då kursen startar.
  5. Simulering
  Simuleringen görs i samarbete med kursen USS20KÅ01 Vård av barn, unga och familj. Instruktioner, gruppindelning och uppgifter för simuleringen publiceras på Moodle under kursen Reproduktiv hälsa (instruktionerna publiceras också under kursen Vård av barn, unga och familj).
  Simuleringen är obligatorisk. Om förhandsuppgifterna inte är inlämnade vid ovannämnda datum kan studerande inte delta simuleringen. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  På svenska
  Föreläsningar, kliniska övningar och simulering 1 sp
  Bedöms enligt skalan gk/uk.
  Obligatoriskt deltgande, förhandsuppgifter inlämnade i tid.
  
  Smågruppsarbete 1 sp och skriftlig inämningsuppgift 2 sp
  Bedöms enligt skalan 1-5/uk.
  Bedömning baseras på:
  - Förmåga att kunna sammanfatta relevant data
  - Kritisk reflektion
  - Användning av kurslitteratur
  - Användning av Novias skrivanvisningar (skriftlig inlämningsuppgift)
  - Kreativitet (smågruppsarbete) (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.08.2023 - 06.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 22.08.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å
  • USS21D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pia Liljeroth

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1. Smågruppsarbete
  Tema för smågruppsarbete presenteras då kursen startar. Närmare instruktioner och gruppindelning finns på Moodle.
  
  2. Simulering
  Förhandsuppgift inlämnad inom utsatt tid och obligatorisk närvaro på plats på Henriksgatan vid simulering.
  Uppgifter om gruppindelning och exakt tidtabell publiceras i Moodle.
  
  3. Individuell skriftlig inlämningsuppgift
  Kurserna USS20KÅ02 Reproduktiv hälsa och USS20KÅ01 Vård av barn, unga och familj examineras med en gemensam uppgift. Närmare information om examinationen publiceras i Moodle. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1. Smågruppsarbete lämnas in på Moodle senast 2.10.2023. Studerande ger feedback åt varandra på Moodle senast 16.10.2023. Kursansvarig ger gruppvis feedback på Moodle efter att alla studerande kommenterat allaa inlägg.
  
  2. Uppgifter om gruppindelning och exakt tidtabell för simulering publiceras på Moodle.
  
  3. Skriftlig individuell inlämningsuppgift, gemensam uppgift tillsammans med kursen Vård av barn, unga och familj.
  Deadline: 16.10.2023.
  Studerande får individuell feedback på Moodle. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Smågruppsarbete 27 t
  Simulering och kliniska övningar 7 t
  föreläsningar 20 t
  Självstudier 54 t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Skriftlig inämningsuppgift:
  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte
  Texten är fragmentarisk och den besvarar inte frågorna
  Kurslitteraturen används inte
  Reflektioner framförs inte
  Den tekniska utformningen brister
  Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Skriftlig inämningsuppgift:
  Frågorna besvaras vagt och smalt
  Kurslitteraturen refereras
  Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning
  Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  På svenska
  Skriftlig inämningsuppgift:
  Frågorna besvaras
  Kurslitteraturen tillämpas
  Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns
  Den tekniska utformningen är god (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Skriftlig inämningsuppgift:
  Frågorna besvaras uttömmande och mångsidigt
  Kurslitteraturen analyseras och tillämpas
  Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk
  Den tekniska utformningen är utmärkt (not translated)

•   Research Methodology USS20KÅ03-3002 28.08.2023-08.10.2023  5 credits  (UHV21D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Knows the basics of research and development
  
  Knows and understands basic research methodological concepts and the research process
  
  Knows and understands central data collection, analysis and reporting methods and is able to apply them in his/her own field of science and profession
  
  Can apply and evaluate research ethics in research and development activities
  
  Can write and debate scientifically

  Prerequisites

  Course Introduction to Academic Studies

  Content of the study unit

  The significance of the development and research work and the research process for one's own professional field
  
  Basic concepts of research methodology
  
  Qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods
  
  Scientific reporting
  
  Research ethical principles
  
  Scientific writing and reasoning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bell, J., Waters, S. & Nilsson, B. S. (2016). Introduktion till forskningsmetodik (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
  
  Henricson, M. (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod: Från idé till examination inom omvårdnad (Upplaga 2:1.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  
  Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S. (2021). Forskningsprocessen: Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv (Upplaga 4.). Liber AB.
  
  Höglund-Nielsen, B. & Granskär, M. (2017). Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård (Upplaga 3:1.). Studentlitteratur.
  
  Nyquist, H. & Bränberg, K. (2021). Statistikens grunder: Vetenskap, empiriska undersökningar och statistisk analys (Andra upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  
  Kristensson, J. (2014). Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur & Kultur.
  
  Kostamo, P., Airaksinen T. & Vilkka H. (2022). Kirjoita itsesi asiantuntijaksi - Opas toiminnalliseen opinnäytetyöhön. Art House.
  
  TENK: https://www.tenk.fi/sv (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Workshopar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Quizarna (4st.) bedöms enligt skalan 0-5, ger 20 % (5 % per quiz) av vitsordet
  Individuell uppgift (artikelanalys) bedöms enligt skalan 0-5, ger 30 % av vitsordet
  Grupprapport bedöms enligt skalan 0-5, ger 50 % av vitsordet
  
  Bedömning av quizarna: 6p=1, 7p=2, 8p=3, 9p=4, 10p=5
  
  Bedömning av gruppuppgiften och individuell uppgiften baseras på:
  - Självstyrdhet, förmåga att samarbeta och ta ansvar
  - Förmåga att kunna analysera och sammanfatta relevant data
  - Förmåga att besvara alla delar i uppgiften
  - Användning av vetenskapliga källor
  - Användning av Novias skrivanvisningar
  
  Bedömningen av examinationsuppgift i kvantitativ metod (modul 4) kommer att finnas på Moodle
  
  För godkänt kursvitsord bör alla deluppgifter vara godkända. Uppgifter ska lämnas in/göras inom utsatt tid. Försenade inlämningar kan sänka vitsordet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 08.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å
  • USS21D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pia Liljeroth, Ralf Lillbacka, Ludvig Kihlman, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Carolina Silin

  Additional information

  Workshopar: obligatorisk närvaro
  Alla skriftliga inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras (Ouriginal) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Quiz 1: Forsknings- och utvecklingsprocessen och -design, deadline 10.09.2023
  Quiz 2: Etik och dataskydd, deadline 10.09.2023
  Quiz 3a & 3b: Tillförlitlighet (granskning av artiklar), deadline 24.09.2023
  
  Individuell uppgift (artikelanalys), deadline 01.10.2023
  Grupprapport, deadline 08.10.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  5sp=135h
  
  Föreläsningar: 7h
  Workshopar: 12h
  Självstudier: 70h
  Grupparbete: 46h (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Modul 1: Forsknings- och utvecklingsprocessen och -design
  Modul 2: Etik och dataskydd
  Modul 3: Datainsamlingsmetoder
  Modul 4: Dataanalys
  Modul 5: Tillförlitlighet
  Modul 6: Funktionellt arbete (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Skriftliga uppgifter (grupp- och individuelluppgift):
  - Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte
  - Texten är fragmentarisk
  - Vetenskapliga källor används inte eller i lite grad
  - Reflektioner framförs inte
  - Den tekniska utformningen brister
  - Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar
  - Studerande har inte tagit ansvar och enbart i liten grad deltagit i grupparbete
  
  Quizar: <6p
  
  Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators anvisningar och lämnas in enligt överenskommelse (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Skriftliga uppgifter (grupp- och individuella uppgifter):
  - Frågorna besvaras vagt och smalt
  - Källor refereras men kopplas inte
  - Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning
  - Kopplingen mellan uppgiftens olika delar är bristfällig
  - Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig
  - Studerande har tagit lite ansvar för grupparbete (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Skriftliga uppgifter (grupp- och individuella uppgifter):
  - Frågorna besvaras
  - Källor tillämpas
  - Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns
  - Goda kopplingar och motiveringar mellan uppgiftens olika delar
  - Den tekniska utformningen är god
  - Studerande har varit ansvarstagande och bidragit till grupparbete framskridit enligt instruktioner
  - Uppgiften lämnas in i rätt form inom utsatt tid (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Skriftliga uppgifter (grupp- och individuella uppgifter):
  - Frågorna besvaras uttömmande och mångsidigt
  - Källor analyseras och tillämpas
  - Motiveringar till olika val i processen är uttömmande och arbetets alla delar är kongruenta
  - Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk
  - Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig
  - Uppgiften lämnas in i rätt form inom utsatt tid (not translated)

•   Research methodology VÅV21FU01-3001 28.08.2023-19.11.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have basic insights into knowledge theory and science theory
  - can both manually and digitally search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the learning process and in projects
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Research methodology
  The research process
  Qualitative research methods
  Quantitative research methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1 – 2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
  5

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  5
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Information search
  Reflection report: fail-pass
  Scientific articles: fail-pass
  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 19.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 29.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 60

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Kursen är kopplad till skrivande av examensarbete, samt förutsätter att man har en idé/plan för sitt examensarbete och inleder skrivandet av examensarbetet.
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid introduktion av kursen, seminarier och presentationer av uppgifter. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Moodle-test in information search
  Reflection report and scientific articles assignment
  Written exam
  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%
  Written assignment: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject.
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  Written assignment:The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance.

•   Research methods and nursing theory VÅV21FU02-3001 09.10.2023-10.12.2023  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can specify and evaluate the most common qualitative and quantitative research methods
  - can reproduce the research process and apply the different phases of the research process
  - can use different methods for qualitative data collection and data analysis in care research
  - can use the most common methods for quantitative data collection and analysis
  - can make simple statistical calculations and tests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
  - has knowledge of different care theories and care models and their areas of application
  - can apply health theories and care models in different care settings
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Research methods and nursing theory
  The research process
  Qualitative research methods
  Quantitative research methods
  Nursing theory

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1 – 2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  3 – 4
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Alligood M.R. (2017). Nursing theorists and their work (9th ed.) Missouri: Elsevier/Mosby.
  
  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

  Learning methods

  Qualitative methods and nursing theories: lectures, self-studies, individual interview, group assignments and seminar
  
  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: based on the written assignments, the student's ability to understand and apply a theoretical approach in health care and selected qualitative research methods.
  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.10.2023 - 10.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Ralf Lillbacka

  Additional information

  Kursen är delvis kopplad till skrivande av examensarbete.
  En fördel om man påbörjat eller genomfört VÅV14FU01-Forskningsmetodik.
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid introduktion och seminarium/presentation av examinationsuppgift. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Qualitative methods and nursing theories: interview and analysis (graded according to the scale 0-5)
  
  Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 0-5)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Qualitative methods and nursing theories: according to schedule.
  Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h per credit: 108 h for Qualitative methods and nursing theories and 54 h for Quantitative methods

  Assessment criteria

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

•   Research methods and nursing theory VÅV21FU02-3002 18.09.2023-12.11.2023  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can specify and evaluate the most common qualitative and quantitative research methods
  - can reproduce the research process and apply the different phases of the research process
  - can use different methods for qualitative data collection and data analysis in care research
  - can use the most common methods for quantitative data collection and analysis
  - can make simple statistical calculations and tests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
  - has knowledge of different care theories and care models and their areas of application
  - can apply health theories and care models in different care settings
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Research methods and nursing theory
  The research process
  Qualitative research methods
  Quantitative research methods
  Nursing theory

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1 – 2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  3 – 4
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Alligood M.R. (2017). Nursing theorists and their work (9th ed.) Missouri: Elsevier/Mosby.
  
  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

  Learning methods

  Qualitative methods and nursing theories: lectures, self-studies, individual interview, group assignments and seminar
  
  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: based on the written assignments, the student's ability to understand and apply a theoretical approach in health care and selected qualitative research methods.
  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.09.2023 - 12.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Ralf Lillbacka

  Additional information

  Kursen är delvis kopplad till skrivande av examensarbete.
  En fördel om man påbörjat eller genomfört VÅV14FU01-Forskningsmetodik.
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid introduktion och seminarium/presentation av examinationsuppgift. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Qualitative methods and nursing theories: interview and analysis (graded according to the scale 0-5)
  
  Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 0-5)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Qualitative methods and nursing theories: according to schedule.
  Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h per credit: 108 h for Qualitative methods and nursing theories and 54 h for Quantitative methods

  Assessment criteria

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

•   Research methods and nursing theory VÅV21FU02-3003 28.08.2023-03.12.2023  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can specify and evaluate the most common qualitative and quantitative research methods
  - can reproduce the research process and apply the different phases of the research process
  - can use different methods for qualitative data collection and data analysis in care research
  - can use the most common methods for quantitative data collection and analysis
  - can make simple statistical calculations and tests
  - has preparedness to independently and under supervision carry out thesis work
  - has knowledge of different care theories and care models and their areas of application
  - can apply health theories and care models in different care settings
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in the care work

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Research methods and nursing theory
  The research process
  Qualitative research methods
  Quantitative research methods
  Nursing theory

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1 – 2
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  3 – 4
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Alligood M.R. (2017). Nursing theorists and their work (9th ed.) Missouri: Elsevier/Mosby.
  
  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

  Learning methods

  Qualitative methods and nursing theories: lectures, self-studies, individual interview, group assignments and seminar
  
  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: based on the written assignments, the student's ability to understand and apply a theoretical approach in health care and selected qualitative research methods.
  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 03.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 02.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Ralf Lillbacka

  Additional information

  Kursen är delvis kopplad till skrivande av examensarbete.
  En fördel om man påbörjat eller genomfört VÅV14FU01-Forskningsmetodik.
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid introduktion och seminarium/presentation av examinationsuppgift. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Qualitative methods and nursing theories: interview and analysis (graded according to the scale 0-5)
  
  Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 0-5)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Qualitative methods and nursing theories: according to schedule.
  Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h per credit: 108 h for Qualitative methods and nursing theories and 54 h for Quantitative methods

  Assessment criteria

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

•   Surgical and Perioperative Care USS22KV01-3001 21.08.2023-05.11.2023  6 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report person-centered/client centrerad care in pre-, peri- and post-operative care and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - is competent in surgical and perioperative care and has mastered central evidence based and sustainable care methods and can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments and knows how to prevent complications
  - can guide the patient pre- and postoperatively and understands the chain of care
  - masters aseptics in pre-, peri- and post-operative care and understand the nurse's responsibility in preventing the spread of infection
  - is able to plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management in surgical and perioperative care
  - can account for various surgical health hindrance, health resources, illness, examinations and treatments
  - can account for various types of anesthesia and analgesia and explains how they affect the patient's vital functions

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Care of patients with central surgical health hindrance/illnesses pre-, intra- and post-operatively
  
  The central clinical examinations and functional measurements, evidence-based sustainable patient-centered care and rehabilitation methods
  
  Person-centered care process
  
  Patient safety and aseptics in pre-, peri-, and post-operative care
  Care of acute wounds
  
  Medication management in pre-operative and post-operative care
  
  The central surgical diseases (gastro-surgery, orthopedics, urology, gynecology, thoracic and vascular surgery)
  
  The central anesthetic and analgesic types

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kirurgiskt vårdarbete:
  Ahonen, Blek-Vehkaluoto, Buure, Ekola, Partamies, Sulosaari, 2019. Kliininen hoitotyö. (Tillämpliga delar)
  Almås, H. et al (red.) 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 1 & 2. (Tillämpliga delar)
  Andersson, R. et al. (red.) 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar.
  Anttila, V-J. et al (red.) 2019. Hoitoon liittyvien infektioiden torjunta. Del III, kap. 14-19.
  Boman, L. &Wikström, C. 2020. Medicinsk teknik.
  Cox, C.L. (red.). 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor.
  Ellergård, L. 2019. Klinisk nutrition. Kap. 4 Bedömning av nutritionsstatus och Kap. 6 Kirurgi
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund U. (red.) 2017. Kirurgi. (Eller motsvarande bok i kirurgi(svenska/finska/engelska))
  Hotus-hoitosuositus 2013: Aikuispotilaan kirurgisen toimenpiteen jälkeisen lyhytkestoisen kivun hoitotyö.
  Järhult, J., Offenbartl, K. & Andersson, M. 2019. Kirurgiboken : vård av patienter med kirurgiska, urologiska och ortopediska sjukdomar.
  Klang, B. et al. 2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnande. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Kap. 20. Pre- och postoperativ omvårdnad.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red.) 2022 (eller äldre). Omvårdnad & kirurgi.
  Lindwall L. (red.) 2012. Omvårdnad vid kirurgiska sjukdomar.
  Saano & Taam-Ukkonen, 2020. Lääkehoidon käsikirja, Sanoma Pro. Kivun lääkehoito Kap 5 s. 477-493
  Svensen, C. &Hjelmqvist, H. 2014. Vätsketerapi. Kap. 5
  
  Läkemedelsboken https://lakemedelsboken.se/
  Medibas (Databas) --> Kirurgi, Gynekologi
  Terveysportti: Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja och Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja
  Material i Moodle samt aktuella evidensbaserade artiklar.
  
  Perioperativt vårdarbete:
  Alahuhta, S. et.al (red.) 2016. Peruselintoimintojen häiriöt ja niiden hoito. Kap. 11.05-11.15 Perioperatiivinen nestehoito.
  Anttila, V-J. et. al. (red.)2019. Kap III Leikkaustoimintaan liittyvien infektioiden torjunta och kap. IV/28 Anestesiaan ja puudutuksiin liittyvät infektiot.
  Hotus-hoitosuositus 2022: Aikuispotilaan normotermian ylläpito perioperatiivisen hoitoprosessin aikana
  Hovind, I. (red.) 2013 . Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. DEL II-III.
  Ilola, T. et.al (red.) 2013. Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja. (Terveysportti/Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat.)
  Karma, A., Kinnunen, T., Palovaara, M. 2016. Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö.
  Lindahl, S. (red.) 2016 Anestesi eller motsvarande bok i anestesiologi på svenska finska eller engelska.
  Lindwall, L.,Prost, I. 2008. Perioperativ vård : att förena teori och praxis.
  Myklestul Dåvoy G., Hege Eide, P. & Hansen, I. (red.) 2013. Operationssjukvård. Operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad.
  Svensén, C. & Hjelmqvist, H. 2014. Vätsketerapi. Kap. 5 Perioperativ vätskebehandling.
  Terveysportti, Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja, 2013.
  - Happeutuminen ja ventilaatio
  - Sydämen toiminta ja verenkierto
  - Luvun Kanyloinnit ja invasiivinen monitorointi osat Kanyloinnin perusteet ja ääreislaskimon kanylointi
  - Luvun Kivun hoito osat Leikkauspotilaan kivunhoidon periaatteet, Kivun arviointi, Kivun
  lääkehoito
  Medibas (Databas), Kirurgi --> Anestesi
  Material i Moodle.
  Aktuella artiklar.
  
  Sårvård:
  Lindholm, C. (2018). Sår (Fjärde upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  Juutilainen, V., & Hietanen, H.(2018). Haavanhoidon periaatteet (4., uudistettu painos.). Sanoma Pro Oy. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Instuderingsfrågor
  Föreläsningar
  Work Shop (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Sårvård GK/UK Självrättande tent.
  Work shop GK/UK Muntlig feedback ges under tillfället.
  Inlärningsdagbok 0-5 Studerande får bedömning och skriftlig feedback om alla inlämnade delar i Moodle. Helhetsvitsord blir medeltal av de tre inlämnade delar. Alla delar ska vara godkända för att studerande är GK. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.08.2023 - 05.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 31.08.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Hanna Limnell, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Kursstruktur för inlärningsdagbok finns i Moodle.
  Alla skriftliga inlämningar i Moodle plagiatkontrolleras (Ouriginal). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Inlärningsdagbok
  Obligatorisk work shop
  Test i sårvård (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatorisk work shop 7.12.
  Kunskapstest i sårvård, 5.11 (GK/UK, minst 60 % måste vara rätt)
  Inlämning av inlärningsdagbok del 1 17.9., del 2 15.10. och del 3 12.11. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27h 6 sp = 162h
  Föreläsningar i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete samt work shop: 28 h
  Föreläsningar och självstudier i sårvård + kunskapstest 27 h
  Självstudier med instuderingsfrågor 40 h
  Självstudier med inlärningsdagbok 67 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå och Inlärningsdagbokens delar är inte inlämnade i utsatta tider eller delarna innehåller plagiat. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar, men delarna relateras inte till varandra.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidesbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan ytligt tillämpa dem i examinaton.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan ytligt beakta dem i examinaton.
  Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och men egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande använder litteratur men har inte förmåga att använda evidensbaserade källor. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidesbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i examinaton.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan beakta dem i examinaton.
  Studerande kan beskriva den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerande påvisar kunnandet i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner.
  Studerande använder kurslitteratur och har förmåga att använda andra evidensbaserade källor. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå alla uppgiftens delar och kan relatera dem till varandra.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidesbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan tillämpa dem i examinaton.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan tillämpa dem i examinaton.
  Studerande kan beskriva utförligt den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och gör mångsidiga egna reflektioner.
  Studerande använder mångsidigt litteratur och evidensbaserade vårdvetenskapliga artiklar som diskuterar med varandra. (not translated)

•   Surgical and Perioperative Care USS22KV01-3003 20.05.2024-15.12.2024  6 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report person-centered/client centrerad care in pre-, peri- and post-operative care and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - is competent in surgical and perioperative care and has mastered central evidence based and sustainable care methods and can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments and knows how to prevent complications
  - can guide the patient pre- and postoperatively and understands the chain of care
  - masters aseptics in pre-, peri- and post-operative care and understand the nurse's responsibility in preventing the spread of infection
  - is able to plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management in surgical and perioperative care
  - can account for various surgical health hindrance, health resources, illness, examinations and treatments
  - can account for various types of anesthesia and analgesia and explains how they affect the patient's vital functions

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Care of patients with central surgical health hindrance/illnesses pre-, intra- and post-operatively
  
  The central clinical examinations and functional measurements, evidence-based sustainable patient-centered care and rehabilitation methods
  
  Person-centered care process
  
  Patient safety and aseptics in pre-, peri-, and post-operative care
  Care of acute wounds
  
  Medication management in pre-operative and post-operative care
  
  The central surgical diseases (gastro-surgery, orthopedics, urology, gynecology, thoracic and vascular surgery)
  
  The central anesthetic and analgesic types

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ahonen, Blek-Vehkaluoto, Buure, Ekola, Partamies, Sulosaari, 2019. Kliininen hoitotyö. (Tillämpliga delar)
  Almås, H. et al (red.) 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 1 & 2. (Tillämpliga delar)
  Andersson, R. et al. (red.) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar.
  Anttila, V-J. et al (red.) 2019. Hoitoon liittyvien infektioiden torjunta. Del III, kap. 14-19.
  Boman, L. &Wikström, C. 2020. Medicinsk teknik.
  Cox, C.L. (red.). 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor.
  Ellergård, L. 2019. Klinisk nutrition. Kap. 4 Bedömning av nutritionsstatus och Kap. 6 Kirurgi
  Järhult, J., Offenbartl, K. & Andersson, M. 2019. Kirurgiboken : vård av patienter med kirurgiska, urologiska och ortopediska sjukdomar.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red.) 2022. Omvårdnad & kirurgi.
  Lindwall L. (red.) 2012. Omvårdnad vid kirurgiska sjukdomar.
  Ljungqvist, Olle (red.). Kirurgi. 2021 (Eller motsvarande bok i kirurgi(svenska/finska/engelska)
  Saano & Taam-Ukkonen, 2020. Lääkehoidon käsikirja, Sanoma Pro. Kivun lääkehoito Kap 5 s. 477-493
  Svensen, C. &Hjelmqvist, H. 2014. Vätsketerapi. Kap. 5
  
  Läkemedelsboken https://lakemedelsboken.se/
  Medibas (Databas) --> Kirurgi, Gynekologi
  Terveysportti: Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja och Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja
  Material i Moodle samt aktuella evidensbaserade artiklar.
  
  Perioperativt vårdarbete:
  Alahuhta, S. et.al (red.) 2016. Peruselintoimintojen häiriöt ja niiden hoito. Kap. 11.05-11.15 Perioperatiivinen nestehoito.
  Anttila, V-J. et. al. (red.)2019. Kap III Leikkaustoimintaan liittyvien infektioiden torjunta och kap. IV/28 Anestesiaan ja puudutuksiin liittyvät infektiot.
  Aura, S., Kinnunen, T. 2022. Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö.
  Hotus-hoitosuositus, 2022. Aikuispotilaan normotermian ylläpito perioperatiivisen hoitoprosessin aikana https://www.hotus.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/normotermia-hoitosuositus.pdf
  Hovind, I. (red.) 2013. Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. DEL II-III.
  Ilola, T. et.al (red.) 2013. Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja. (Terveysportti/Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat.)
  Lindahl, S. (red.) 2016 Anestesi eller motsvarande bok i anestesiologi på svenska finska eller engelska.
  Myklestul Dåvoy G., Hege Eide, P. & Hansen, I. (red.) 2013. Operationssjukvård. Operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad.
  Svensén, C. & Hjelmqvist, H. 2014. Vätsketerapi. Kap. 5 Perioperativ vätskebehandling.
  Terveysportti, Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja, 2013.
  - Happeutuminen ja ventilaatio
  - Sydämen toiminta ja verenkierto
  - Luvun Kanyloinnit ja invasiivinen monitorointi osat Kanyloinnin perusteet ja ääreislaskimon kanylointi
  - Luvun Kivun hoito osat Leikkauspotilaan kivunhoidon periaatteet, Kivun arviointi, Kivun
  lääkehoito
  Medibas (Databas), Kirurgi --> Anestesi
  Material i Moodle.
  Aktuella artiklar.
  
  Sårvård:
  Lindholm, C. (2018). Sår (Fjärde upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  Juutilainen, V., & Hietanen, H.(2018). Haavanhoidon periaatteet (4., uudistettu painos.). Sanoma Pro Oy. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
  Introduktion i sårvård
  WS i kirurgiskt vårdarbete
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Instuderingsfrågor GK/UK
  WS GK/UK
  Sårvård GK/UK
  Inlärningsdagbok 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.05.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.05.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Hanna Limnell, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Instuderingsfrågor i kirurgi och anestesiologi
  WS
  Inlärningsdagbok (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Inlämning av instuderingsfrågor (kirurgi och anestesiologi)
  Sårvård: kunskapstest (GK/UK, minst 60 % måste vara rätt), datum bestäms vid första närstudiedagar.
  Inlämning av inlärningsdagbok del 1, del 2 och del 3. Datum för inlämningar se Moodle/kursstruktur. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Sårvård: 1sp = 27h
  - WS: 3h
  - Självstudier: 24h
  
  Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete 5sp = 135h
  Instuderingsfrågor i kirurgi och anestesiologi 60 h
  WS 9 h
  Inlärningsdagbok 66 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har inte deltagit work shoppar.
  Studerande har inte lämnat in instuderingsfrågor i kirurgi och anestesiologi.
  Kunskapstest i sårvård är UK.
  
  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå och inlärningsdagbokens delar är inte inlämnade i utsatta tider eller delarna innehåller plagiat. Underkända delar kompletteras inte efter examinatorns respons. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar, men delarna relateras inte till varande.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidesbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan ytligt tillämpa dem i viss mån i examinaton.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan ytligt beakta dem i viss mån i examinaton.
  Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner.
  Studerande använder litteratur men har inte förmåga att använda evidensbaserat och mångsidigt material. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidesbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i examinaton.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan beakta dem i examinaton.
  Studerande kan beskriva den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerande påvisar kunnandet i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner.
  Studerande använder kurslitteratur och har förmåga att använda andra evidensbaserade källor. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå alla uppgiftens delar och kan relatera dem till varandra.
  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå alla uppgiftens delar och kan relatera dem till varandra.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidesbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan tillämpa dem i examinaton.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan tillämpa dem i examinaton.
  Studerande kan beskriva utförligt den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerandehar djupa kunskaper i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och gör mångsidiga egna reflektioner.
  Studerande använder mångsidigt litteratur och andra evidensbaserade källor. (not translated)

•   Surgical and Perioperative Care USS22KV01-3004 08.01.2024-09.06.2024  6 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report person-centered/client centrerad care in pre-, peri- and post-operative care and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - is competent in surgical and perioperative care and has mastered central evidence based and sustainable care methods and can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments and knows how to prevent complications
  - can guide the patient pre- and postoperatively and understands the chain of care
  - masters aseptics in pre-, peri- and post-operative care and understand the nurse's responsibility in preventing the spread of infection
  - is able to plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management in surgical and perioperative care
  - can account for various surgical health hindrance, health resources, illness, examinations and treatments
  - can account for various types of anesthesia and analgesia and explains how they affect the patient's vital functions

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Care of patients with central surgical health hindrance/illnesses pre-, intra- and post-operatively
  
  The central clinical examinations and functional measurements, evidence-based sustainable patient-centered care and rehabilitation methods
  
  Person-centered care process
  
  Patient safety and aseptics in pre-, peri-, and post-operative care
  Care of acute wounds
  
  Medication management in pre-operative and post-operative care
  
  The central surgical diseases (gastro-surgery, orthopedics, urology, gynecology, thoracic and vascular surgery)
  
  The central anesthetic and analgesic types

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ahonen, Blek-Vehkaluoto, Buure, Ekola, Partamies, Sulosaari, 2019. Kliininen hoitotyö. (Tillämpliga delar)
  Almås, H. et al (red.) 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 1 & 2. (Tillämpliga delar)
  Andersson, R. et al. (red.) 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar.
  Anttila, V-J. et al (red.) 2019. Hoitoon liittyvien infektioiden torjunta. Del III, kap. 14-19.
  Boman, L. &Wikström, C. 2020. Medicinsk teknik.
  Cox, C.L. (red.). 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor.
  Ellergård, L. 2019. Klinisk nutrition. Kap. 4 Bedömning av nutritionsstatus och Kap. 6 Kirurgi
  Järhult, J., Offenbartl, K. & Andersson, M. 2019. Kirurgiboken : vård av patienter med kirurgiska, urologiska och ortopediska sjukdomar.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red.) 2022. Omvårdnad & kirurgi.
  Lindwall L. (red.) 2012. Omvårdnad vid kirurgiska sjukdomar.
  Ljungqvist, Olle (red.). Kirurgi. 2021 (Eller motsvarande bok i kirurgi(svenska/finska/engelska)
  Saano & Taam-Ukkonen, 2020. Lääkehoidon käsikirja, Sanoma Pro. Kivun lääkehoito Kap 5 s. 477-493
  Svensen, C. &Hjelmqvist, H. 2014. Vätsketerapi. Kap. 5
  
  Läkemedelsboken https://lakemedelsboken.se/
  Medibas (Databas) --> Kirurgi, Gynekologi
  Terveysportti: Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja och Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja
  Material i Moodle samt aktuella evidensbaserade artiklar.
  
  Perioperativt vårdarbete:
  Alahuhta, S. et.al (red.) 2016. Peruselintoimintojen häiriöt ja niiden hoito. Kap. 11.05-11.15 Perioperatiivinen nestehoito.
  Anttila, V-J. et. al. (red.)2019. Kap III Leikkaustoimintaan liittyvien infektioiden torjunta och kap. IV/28 Anestesiaan ja puudutuksiin liittyvät infektiot.
  Aura, S., Kinnunen, T. 2022. Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö.
  Hotus-hoitosuositus, 2022. Aikuispotilaan normotermian ylläpito perioperatiivisen hoitoprosessin aikana https://www.hotus.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/normotermia-hoitosuositus.pdf
  Hovind, I. (red.) 2013. Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. DEL II-III.
  Ilola, T. et.al (red.) 2013. Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja. (Terveysportti/Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat.)
  Lindahl, S. (red.) 2016 Anestesi eller motsvarande bok i anestesiologi på svenska finska eller engelska.
  Myklestul Dåvoy G., Hege Eide, P. & Hansen, I. (red.) 2013. Operationssjukvård. Operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad.
  Svensén, C. & Hjelmqvist, H. 2014. Vätsketerapi. Kap. 5 Perioperativ vätskebehandling.
  Terveysportti, Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja, 2013.
  - Happeutuminen ja ventilaatio
  - Sydämen toiminta ja verenkierto
  - Luvun Kanyloinnit ja invasiivinen monitorointi osat Kanyloinnin perusteet ja ääreislaskimon kanylointi
  - Luvun Kivun hoito osat Leikkauspotilaan kivunhoidon periaatteet, Kivun arviointi, Kivun
  lääkehoito
  Medibas (Databas), Kirurgi --> Anestesi
  Material i Moodle.
  Aktuella artiklar.
  
  Sårvård:
  Lindholm, C. (2018). Sår (Fjärde upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  Juutilainen, V., & Hietanen, H.(2018). Haavanhoidon periaatteet (4., uudistettu painos.). Sanoma Pro Oy. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
  WS i kirurgiskt vårdarbete, i perioperativt vårdarbete och i sårvård
  Handledning i inlärningsdagbok
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Instuderingsfrågor GK/UK
  Work shop GK/UK
  Sårvård GK/UK
  Inlärningsdagbok 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 09.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.01.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Instuderingsfrågor i kirurgi och anestesiologi
  Work shoppar
  Inlärningsdagbok (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Sårvård: kunskapstest (GK/UK, minst 60 % måste vara rätt), datum bestäms vid första närstudiedagar.
  Inlämning av inlärningsdagbok del 1, del 2 och del 3. Datum för inlämningar se Moodle/kursstruktur. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Sårvård: 1sp = 27h
  - WS: 3h
  - Självstudier: 24h
  
  Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete 5sp = 135h
  Instuderingsfrågor i kirurgi och anestesiologi 60 h
  WS 9 h
  Inlärningsdagbok 66 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har inte deltagit work shoppar.
  Studerande har inte lämnat in instuderingsfrågor i kirurgi och anestesiologi.
  Kunskapstest i sårvård är UK.
  
  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå och inlärningsdagbokens delar är inte inlämnade i utsatta tider eller delarna innehåller plagiat. Underkända delar kompletteras inte efter examinatorns respons. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar, men delarna relateras inte till varande.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidesbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan ytligt tillämpa dem i viss mån i examinaton.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan ytligt beakta dem i viss mån i examinaton.
  Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner.
  Studerande använder litteratur men har inte förmåga att använda evidensbaserat och mångsidigt material. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra.
  Studerande har goda kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidensbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i examination.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan beakta dem i examination.
  Studerande kan beskriva den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerande påvisar kunnandet i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande använder kurslitteratur och har förmåga att använda andra evidensbaserade källor.
  På engelska (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå alla uppgiftens delar och kan relatera dem till varandra.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidesbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan tillämpa dem i examinaton.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan tillämpa dem i examinaton.
  Studerande kan beskriva utförligt den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerandehar djupa kunskaper i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och gör mångsidiga egna reflektioner.
  Studerande använder mångsidigt litteratur och andra evidensbaserade källor. (not translated)

•   Swedish USS22IV03-3002 06.09.2023-01.12.2023  3 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to communicate coherently and in a professional manner both orally and in writing
  - demonstrates appropriate knowledge of the process of academic writing and a proper use of references
  - can search for information and report in accordance with the rules for Novia's writing instructions

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Producing recipient-friendly writing by considering linguistic advice and linguistic correctness
  
  Different language styles and recognizing the difference between refined and unrefined use of Swedish
  
  Oral communication and oral presentations
  
  Novia's requirements for academic writing
  
  Novia's writing instructions

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marika Rask

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Svenska skrivregler 2017 Svenska språknämnden. Fjärde upplagan. Stockholm: Liber
  Sommardahl, Eivor (2012): Klarspråk i kommunen. Kommunförbundet
  Största delen av det studiematerial som behövs för kursen hittas i Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kursmaterial i Moodle och på nätet
  Individuella övningsuppgifter
  Muntlig presentation
  Kurstent (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursen bedöms med vitsordet 0-5.
  Kurstenten (del 1 och 2) utgör 80 % av kursvitsordet och bedöms med vitsordet 0-5. Kursvitsordet påverkas även av kursaktivitet och gjorda kursuppgifter samt av den muntliga presentationen.
  Studerande som fått sin skolbildning (Grundskola åk 1-9 och/ eller gymnasium) på annat språk än svenska behöver (utöver kursvitsord i svenska) också få separata vitsord i både muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper i svenska. Kontakta kursansvarig ifråga om dessa. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2023 - 01.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 06.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marika Rask

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Inlämningsuppgifter, muntligt anförande samt kurstent. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen ska avläggas med godkänt vitsord senast 15.5.2024 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Närstudier 12 h
  Muntlig presentation 10 h
  Självstudier 48 h
  Kurstent 10 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Den studerande är underkänd i kursen om:
  - kurstenten är underkänd
  - den studerande inte hållit den muntliga presentationen som hör till kursen
  - språket i den studerandes inlämningsuppgifter är mycket svagt och språk- och skrivfel gör innehållet svårbegripligt.
  - den studerande inte kan använda och hänvisa till källor enligt givna anvisningar
  - den studerande enbart läser innantill vid muntlig presentation
  - den studerandes arbetsinsats är obetydlig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  För vitsordet 1-2 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd med vitsordet 1 eller 2.
  - språket i den studerandes inlämningsuppgifter är begripligt, även om språk- och skrivfel förekommer
  - den studerande har använt källmaterial och kan hänvisa till detta enligt anvisningar
  - den studerande inte läser innantill vid muntlig presentation och framförandet är nöjaktigt
  - den studerandes egna arbetsinsats är liten. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  För vitsordet 3-4 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd med vitsordet 3 eller 4
  - kursuppgifter har lämnats in senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i inlämningsuppgifter är smidigt och gott, även om enstaka språkfel förekommer
  - den studerande kan hänvisa till källor mångsidigt och väl
  - den studerande har förberett den muntliga presentationen väl och framförandet är mycket gott
  - den studerande är aktiv och kan fungera självständigt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  För vitsordet 5 krävs att:
  - vitsordet i kurstenten är minst 4,5.
  - kursuppgifter har lämnats in senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i inlämningsuppgifter är nyanserat, smidigt och så gott som felfritt
  - den studerande kan använda sig av olika källor på ett mångsidigt och korrekt sätt
  - den studerande har förberett den muntliga presentationen väl och framförandet är mycket gott
  - den studerande fungerar självständigt
  - den studerande är aktiv, innovativ och samarbetar i god anda. (not translated)

•   Swedish USS22IV03-3003 05.09.2023-11.12.2023  3 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to communicate coherently and in a professional manner both orally and in writing
  - demonstrates appropriate knowledge of the process of academic writing and a proper use of references
  - can search for information and report in accordance with the rules for Novia's writing instructions

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Producing recipient-friendly writing by considering linguistic advice and linguistic correctness
  
  Different language styles and recognizing the difference between refined and unrefined use of Swedish
  
  Oral communication and oral presentations
  
  Novia's requirements for academic writing
  
  Novia's writing instructions

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marika Rask

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Svenska skrivregler 2017 Svenska språknämnden. Fjärde upplagan. Stockholm: Liber
  Största delen av det studiematerial som behövs för kursen hittas i Moodle.
  En del av materialet för de olika temaområdena öppnas vartefter kursen framskrider.
  Tidtabell och kursprogram presenteras vid det första närundervisningstillfället. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier och lärarledd handledning
  Individuella, par- och gruppvisa arbeten
  Muntliga presentationer
  Kurstent (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursen bedöms med vitsordet 0-5.
  Kursvitsordet baserar sig på den studerandes aktivitet, inlämningsuppgifter, muntlig presentation och kurstent.
  Försenad inlämning av uppgifter sänker kursvitsordet.
  Studerande som fått sin skolbildning (grundskola åk 1-9 och/ eller gymnasium) på annat språk än svenska behöver (utöver kursvitsord i svenska) också få separata vitsord i både muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper i svenska. Kontakta kursansvarig ifråga om dessa. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.09.2023 - 11.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 07.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marika Rask

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Utvärdering av kurstent samt kursaktivitet, kursuppgifter och muntliga anföranden. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  17.10.2023 Kurstentamen
  Allmänt omtentamenstillfälle 24.11.2023 fre kl 12-16
  Allmänt omtentamenstillfälle 8.12.2023 fre kl 12-16
  
  
  Information på Intranätet om hur du anmäler dig till allmänt omtentamenstillfälle:
  https://intra.novia.fi/studier/oppen-yh-studerande/omtentamen/
  
  Kursen ska avläggas med godkänt vitsord senast 15.5.2024.
  Vid behov går den studerande om kursen vid ett senare tillfälle om inte annat överenskommits med kursansvarig. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Närstudier 20 h
  Skriftliga uppgifter 18 h
  Muntliga presentationer 8 h
  Självstudier 30 h
  Kurstent 10 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Den studerande är underkänd i kursen om:
  - kurstenten är underkänd
  - kursuppgifter är ogjorda eller underkända senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - den studerande inte har hållit den muntliga presentationen som ingår i kursen
  - - den studerande enbart läser innantill vid muntliga presentationer
  - den studerandes språk är mycket svagt och innehåller mycket grava språk- och skrivfel
  - den studerande inte använder sig av och inte kan hänvisa till källmaterial
  - den studerande har knappt deltagit i kursen
  - den studerandes kursinsats är obetydlig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  För vitsordet 1-2 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd
  - alla kursuppgifter är gjorda och inlämnade senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i den studerandes arbeten är begripligt men många språk- och skrivfel förekommer
  - att den studerande använder sig av och hänvisar till källor enligt givna anvisningar
  - den studerande inte läser innantill vid muntliga presentationen
  - den studerande deltar i liten omfattning i kursen
  - den studerandes självständiga kursinsats är liten. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  För vitsordet 3-4 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd och motsvarar vitsordet goda kunskaper
  - alla kursuppgifter är gjorda och inlämnade senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i både tal och skrift är smidigt och gott, även om språkfel förekommer
  - layouten i den studerandes arbeten följer givna anvisningar
  - den studerande använder sig av relevanta källor mångsidigt och väl,
  - den muntliga presentationen är väl förberedd och framförandet ledigt och gott
  - den studerande deltar aktivt i kursen
  - den studerande arbetar rätt självständigt men kan samarbeta, tar hänsyn till sina kurskamrater och utför sin del av arbetet också i grupp. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  För vitsordet 5 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd med ett mycket gott eller berömligt vitsord.
  - alla kursuppgifter är gjorda och inlämnade senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i både tal och skrift är nyanserat, smidigt och så gott som felfritt
  - layouten i den studerandes arbeten följer givna anvisningar
  - källmaterialet för uppgifterna är relevant och välvalt och används på ett mångsidigt och korrekt sätt
  - presentationen är väl förberedd och framförandet mycket gott
  - den studerande deltar aktivt i kursen
  - den studerande arbetar självständigt men kan samarbeta, tar hänsyn till, stödjer vid behov sina kurskamrater och utför sin del av arbetet också i grupp.
  - den studerande är innovativ och positiv. (not translated)

•   Swedish - Oral Skills YH10SV01-M-3061 06.09.2023-01.12.2023  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marika Rask

  Mode of delivery

  100% Face-to-face, 0% Distance learning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2023 - 01.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 06.09.2023

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marika Rask

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Swedish - Oral Skills YH10SV01-M-3074 05.09.2023-11.12.2023  (USS23D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marika Rask

  Mode of delivery

  100% Face-to-face, 0% Distance learning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.09.2023 - 11.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  06.08.2023 - 04.09.2023

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Swedish - Writing Skills YH10SV01-S-3060 06.09.2023-01.12.2023  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marika Rask

  Mode of delivery

  100% Face-to-face, 0% Distance learning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2023 - 01.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 06.09.2023

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marika Rask

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Swedish - Writing Skills YH10SV01-S-3073 05.09.2023-11.12.2023  (USS23D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marika Rask

  Mode of delivery

  100% Face-to-face, 0% Distance learning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.09.2023 - 11.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  06.08.2023 - 04.09.2023

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   The Interprofessional Social- and Health Care USS22IV02-3003 06.09.2023-15.12.2023  4 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of his/her own professional field and its basic concepts
  - has an understanding of the structure, services, organisation and future vision of the social- and health care system
  - has competencies in care in various
  sustainable service environments
  - has an understanding of the social and health care legislation
  - has fundamental skills in inter-professional work

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Healthcare in Finland
  
  The importance of nursing and health care profession
  
  Management structures, different service environments and systems
  
  Future visions
  
  General legislation within social and health care, principles of patient and client safety
  
  Interprofessional work

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Willman A. & Andersson Å. 2021. Sjuksköteska. Ett jobb för livet.
  Dahlborg-Lyckehage (red). 2018. Att bli sjuksköterska - en introduktion till yrke och ämne
  Klang et al. 2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnande. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Personcentering ...
  Crawford, K. 2012. Interprofessional Collaboration in Social Work Practice.
  Kline, R. & Preston-Shot, M. 2012. Professional Accountability in social Care and Health.
  Quinney, A. & Hafford-Letchfield, T. 2012. Interprofessional Social Work: Effective Collaborative Approaches
  Reeves, S., Lewin, S., Espin, S. & Zwarenstein, M. 2010. Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social
  Care.
  Thylefors, I. 2013. Babels torn - Om tvärprofessionellt teamsamarbete.
  Juslin E., Liljeroth P. & Vaartio-Rajalin H. 2013. Resursförstärkande mångprofessionell yrkespraxis; social- och hälsovårdsutbildning i utveckling
  Tuomela, K. 2017 Moniammatillinen oppiminen yhteistyöosaamisen edistäjänä terveydenhuollossa
  Källa: Hoitotiede. 29/4.
  Pohjola A. m.fl. 2017. Asiakkaasta kehittäjäksi ja vaikuttajaksi. Asiakkaiden osallisuuden muutos sosiaali- ja terveyspalveluissa.
  https://stm.fi/sv/social-och-halsotjanster
  övrig material som ges under kursen
  Artiklar och databaser
  Litteratur och material angående moodlekursen i lagstiftning anges skilt (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Lagstiftningsdelen, huvudsakligen som Moodlekurs, men även handledningstillfällen med framföranden obligatorisk närvaro 2,5 sp
  Konferens den 4.10.2023 (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Moodlekurs i lagstiftning. Bedömningsskala: 0-5. Skilda anvisingar vid kursstart och på Moodle.
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - Inlämning av uppgifterna i den angivna tiden.
  - Mångsidig kunskap i lagstiftning och servicesystem inom social- och hälsovården i
  förhållande till givna uppgifter och case
  - Tillämpning av lagar till praktiken
  - Studerandes förmåga att lösa uppgifter och case ur ett helhetsperspektiv.
  - Ett gott etiskt förhållningssätt i relation till uppgifter och case skall tydligt framgå i den
  skriftliga delen
  - Studerandes förmåga till reflektivt tänkande
  - Arbetet skrivet enligt YH Novias skrivanvisningar
  
  
  2) Paruppgift. Bedömningsskala GK/UK.
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - gjorda intervjufrågor och intervjuer
  - sammanställning av en presentation och framförande
  - inlämning till Moodle i angivna tiden. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 07.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Konferens 4.10.2023 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Moodlekurs i lagsftning är öppen under veckorna 36-48, skrifltig respons på Moodle inlämningslåda, för uppgifter som framförs respons under tillfället. Inlämningstider framkommer på introduktion och på Moodle. 2 del inlämningar.
  2) Presentation - par uppgift. Interprofessionellt vårdarbete
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar, konferens 0,5 sp
  Lagstiftningsdelen med handledningar 2,5 sp
  Paruppgift 1 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Arbetet är inte inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande har inte följt anvisningarna för uppgiften eller för det skriftliga arbetet. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Arbetet är inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Studernade har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Arbetet är inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen och lagstiftningen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet . Studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Det skriftliga arbetet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt, tillämpning) (not translated)

•   The Interprofessional Social- and Health Care USS22IV02-3004 11.09.2023-01.12.2023  4 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of his/her own professional field and its basic concepts
  - has an understanding of the structure, services, organisation and future vision of the social- and health care system
  - has competencies in care in various
  sustainable service environments
  - has an understanding of the social and health care legislation
  - has fundamental skills in inter-professional work

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Healthcare in Finland
  
  The importance of nursing and health care profession
  
  Management structures, different service environments and systems
  
  Future visions
  
  General legislation within social and health care, principles of patient and client safety
  
  Interprofessional work

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Willman A. & Andersson Å. 2021. Sjuksköteska. Ett jobb för livet.
  Dahlborg-Lyckehage (red). 2018. Att bli sjuksköterska - en introduktion till yrke och ämne
  Klang et al. 2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnande. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Personcentering ...
  Crawford, K. 2012. Interprofessional Collaboration in Social Work Practice.
  Kline, R. & Preston-Shot, M. 2012. Professional Accountability in social Care and Health.
  Quinney, A. & Hafford-Letchfield, T. 2012. Interprofessional Social Work: Effective Collaborative Approaches
  Reeves, S., Lewin, S., Espin, S. & Zwarenstein, M. 2010. Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social
  Care.
  Thylefors, I. 2013. Babels torn - Om tvärprofessionellt teamsamarbete.
  Juslin E., Liljeroth P. & Vaartio-Rajalin H. 2013. Resursförstärkande mångprofessionell yrkespraxis; social- och hälsovårdsutbildning i utveckling
  Tuomela, K. 2017 Moniammatillinen oppiminen yhteistyöosaamisen edistäjänä terveydenhuollossa
  Källa: Hoitotiede. 29/4.
  Pohjola A. m.fl. 2017. Asiakkaasta kehittäjäksi ja vaikuttajaksi. Asiakkaiden osallisuuden muutos sosiaali- ja terveyspalveluissa.
  https://stm.fi/sv/social-och-halsotjanster
  övrig material som ges under kursen
  Artiklar och databaser
  Litteratur och material angående moodlekursen i lagstiftning anges skilt (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Intervju och seminarium obligatorisk närvaro 0,5. Seminarium tillsammans med kursen i svenska (Marika Rask).
  Föreläsningar
  Lagstiftningsdelen, huvudsakligen som Moodlekurs, men även handledningstillfällen med framföranden obligatorisk närvaro 2,5 sp
  Interprofessionellt samarbete och verkstäder med socionomstuderande från Yh Novia med seminarium 1 sp; 13.11.23 + 27.11.23 Obligatorisk närvaro
  Konferens den 4.10.2023 (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Moodlekurs i lagstiftning. Bedömningsskala: 2+4 uppgifter GK/UK och två uppgifter (1+3) 1-5. Skilda anvisingar vid kursstart och på Moodle.
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - Inlämning av uppgifterna i den angivna tiden.
  - Mångsidig kunskap i lagstiftning och servicesystem inom social- och hälsovården i
  förhållande till givna uppgifter och case
  - Tillämpning av lagar till praktiken
  - Studerandes förmåga att lösa uppgifter och case ur ett helhetsperspektiv.
  - Ett gott etiskt förhållningssätt i relation till uppgifter och case skall tydligt framgå i den
  skriftliga delen
  - Studerandes förmåga till reflektivt tänkande
  - Arbetet skrivet enligt YH Novias skrivanvisningar
  
  2) Interprofessionellt samarbete (med socionomstudernade). Bedömningsskala GK/UK.
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - studerande har deltagit i utformandet av gruppens examination och deltagit på båda tillfällen
  - förmåga att sammanfatta och reflektera
  - professionellt och etiskt förhållningsätt
  
  
  3) Intervju och seminariet. Bedömningsskala GK/UK.
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - gjorda intervjufrågor och intervjuer
  - sammanställning av en presentation
  - presentation och deltagande i seminariet
  - inlämning till Moodle i angivna tiden. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2023 - 01.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Konferens 4.10.2023 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Moodlekurs i lagsftning är öppen under veckorna 41-47, skrifltig respons på Moodle inlämningslåda, för uppgifter som framförs respons under tillfället. Inlämningstider framkommer på introduktion och på Moodle.
  2) Interprofessionellt samarbete och verkstäder under veckorna 46-48; muntlig respons under seminarium
  3) Intervju av en sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare; muntlig respons under seminarium (5.10 eller 6.10.23, två grupper). Seminarium görs i samarbete med språkundervisingen, kursen i svenska. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar, konferens och seminarium 0,5 sp
  Lagstiftningsdelen med handledningar och framföranden Moodlekurs 2,5 sp
  Interprofessionellt samarbete och verkstäder med socionomstuderande från Yh Novia 1 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Arbetet är inte inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande har inte följt anvisningarna för uppgiften eller för det skriftliga arbetet. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Arbetet är inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Studernade har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Arbetet är inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen och lagstiftningen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet . Studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Det skriftliga arbetet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt, tillämpning) (not translated)

•   The Interprofessional Social- and Health Care USS22IV02-3005 30.08.2023-31.01.2024  4 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of his/her own professional field and its basic concepts
  - has an understanding of the structure, services, organisation and future vision of the social- and health care system
  - has competencies in care in various
  sustainable service environments
  - has an understanding of the social and health care legislation
  - has fundamental skills in inter-professional work

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Healthcare in Finland
  
  The importance of nursing and health care profession
  
  Management structures, different service environments and systems
  
  Future visions
  
  General legislation within social and health care, principles of patient and client safety
  
  Interprofessional work

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Willman A. & Andersson Å. 2021. Sjuksköteska. Ett jobb för livet.
  Dahlborg-Lyckehage (red). 2018. Att bli sjuksköterska - en introduktion till yrke och ämne
  Klang et al. 2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnande. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Personcentering ...
  Crawford, K. 2012. Interprofessional Collaboration in Social Work Practice.
  Kline, R. & Preston-Shot, M. 2012. Professional Accountability in social Care and Health.
  Quinney, A. & Hafford-Letchfield, T. 2012. Interprofessional Social Work: Effective Collaborative Approaches
  Reeves, S., Lewin, S., Espin, S. & Zwarenstein, M. 2010. Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social
  Care.
  Thylefors, I. 2013. Babels torn - Om tvärprofessionellt teamsamarbete.
  Juslin E., Liljeroth P. & Vaartio-Rajalin H. 2013. Resursförstärkande mångprofessionell yrkespraxis; social- och hälsovårdsutbildning i utveckling
  Tuomela, K. 2017 Moniammatillinen oppiminen yhteistyöosaamisen edistäjänä terveydenhuollossa
  Källa: Hoitotiede. 29/4.
  Pohjola A. m.fl. 2017. Asiakkaasta kehittäjäksi ja vaikuttajaksi. Asiakkaiden osallisuuden muutos sosiaali- ja terveyspalveluissa.
  https://stm.fi/sv/social-och-halsotjanster
  övrig material som ges under kursen
  Artiklar och databaser
  Litteratur och material angående moodlekursen i lagstiftning anges skilt (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Lagstiftnings- och servicesystemsdelen, som Moodlekurs, men även handledningstillfällen i form av workshops, Görs parvis (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Moodlekurs i lagstiftning. Bedömningsskala: 0-5. Skilda anvisingar vid kursstart och på Moodle.
  Examinator: Michaela Jalava
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - Inlämning av uppgifterna i den angivna tiden.
  - Mångsidig kunskap i lagstiftning och servicesystem inom social- och hälsovården i
  förhållande till givna uppgifter och case
  - Tillämpning av lagar och servicesystem till praktiken
  - Studerandes förmåga att lösa uppgifter och case ur ett helhetsperspektiv.
  - Ett gott etiskt förhållningssätt i relation till uppgifter och case skall tydligt framgå i den
  skriftliga delen
  - Studerandes förmåga till reflektivt tänkande
  - Arbetet skrivet enligt YH Novias skrivanvisningar
  
  Uppgift im servicesystem bedöms som Uk-Gk.
  Examinator: Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2023 - 31.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 29.08.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Michaela Jalava

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig lärare Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, examinator även Michaela Jalava (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Moodlekurs i lagsftning och servicesystem:
  1) Inlämning av del 1 1 är 5.10.2023
  Inlämning av del 2 är 15.12.2023
  Uppgifterna görs parvis. Skrifltig respons på Moodle inlämningslåda
  
  2) Uppgift om social- och hälsovårdens uppbyggnad görs parvis och lämnas in på moodle senast 7.12.2023. Uppgifterna presenteras/diksuteras på seminarium 13.12.2023
  
  3) Uppvisning av straffregister till Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar, workshops och seminarium 10 h
  Lagstiftnings- och servicesystemsdelen och servicesystem 94 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Arbetet är inte inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande har inte följt anvisningarna för uppgiften eller för det skriftliga arbetet. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Uppgifterna är inlämnade i tid.
  Studerande har delvis följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet.
  Studernade har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga och tillämpningen är delvis korrekt.. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Uppgifterna är inlämnade i tid.
  Studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen och lagstiftningen samt servicesystemet, kan reflektera och motivera sina svar. Studerande har nästan korrekt följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet . Studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Uppgifterna är inlämnade i tid.
  Studerande visar i sina svar korrekt kunskap och kan reflektera och motivera sina svar väl. Tillämpningen är väl gjort.
  Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. (not translated)

•   The basics of vaccination knowledge and infectious diseases VÅV22KV09-3002 28.08.2023-26.11.2023  3 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the diseases that are prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - has knowledge of the composition of the vaccines, benefits of vaccinations and vaccination side effects
  - has knowledge of the national vaccination program in Finland and its legislation
  - has knowledge of vaccination of different groups
  - has skills in counselling and preparation for vaccination, knowledge of vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment of the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV04 Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge of vaccinations
  Vaccination skills
  National and global infectious diseases
  Epidemiology
  Legislation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  National course in The Basics of Vaccination Knowledge 2 credits is included in the study unit.
  Examination via portfolio and virtual exam

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  According to national course requirements for basic vaccination knowledge (see moodle)
  Infectious diseases

  Learning methods

  Basic Vaccination Knowledge 2 credits (National Course):
  Introductory Lecture
  Individual Virtual Online Studies (Portfolio + Exam)
  Final Workshop
  
  Infectious Diseases 1 credit:
  Lectures
  Written Group Work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Submitted and approved portfolio according to national standard
  Passed virtual exam
  Approved written group work in infectious diseases

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 28.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 48

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 3 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  The course only applies to degree students
  
  Prerequisites: Approved course that includes injections

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline for submission of portfolio : 23.10.23
  Virtual exam open: 6.11-20.11
  Deadline for submission of written group work in infectious diseases: 17.11.23

•   The profession of nurse VÅV22GV01-3004 28.08.2023-26.11.2023  6 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of their own professional field, the history and development of caring science
  - has knowledge of and can reflect on basic concepts in caring science
  - knows the basic competence requirements for their own profession
  - understand the importance of evidence-based care
  - can describe the organization of social and health care in Finland and the legislation that governs the activities
  - has knowledge of service systems and the patient's / client's social benefits
  - has basic skills in interprofessional work
  - understands and can reflect on ethical guidelines and profession-specific ethical codes and can in his future profession work on the basis of these
  - understands the importance of culture in healthcare and can respond to clients / patients from different cultures
  - has knowledge about The Agenda for Sustainable Development 2030 and its implementation at Novia
  - is aware of the importance of internal sustainability based on the demands placed on the profession and can maintain good health

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Caring science knowledge and evidence as a basis for care
  The importance of the nursing profession
  Work areas of a nurse
  Health care in Finland
  Management structures, different sustainable service environments and service systems
  General laws in social and health care
  Interprofessional work
  The client's / patient's position and rights
  Ethical guidelines and codes
  Professional encounters
  Person centered care
  Intercultural care
  Internal sustainability in the profession

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  CARING SCIENCE
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  chapter 1-3, 5
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Rehnsfeldt, A. & Arman, M. (red.). 2020. Klinisk vårdvetenskap. Vårdande på teoretisk grund. Stockholm: Liber Ab.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  Willman, A., Bahtsevani, C., Nilsson, R. & Sandström, B. 2016. Evidensbaserad omvårdnad en bro mellan forskning och klinisk verksamhet.
  
  VÅRDETIK
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber. chapter 4.
  
  INTERCULTURAL CARING
  Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
  Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
  Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.
  
  + links on Moodle
  
  Social and health care organisation, Social and health care reform and acts and decrees www.finlex.fi
  länkar på Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, excercises, tutorials, interviews, seminars, online work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing ethics PASS/FAIL
  
  Assignment 1 is evaluated with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  Kriteria for evaluation Max points 40
  Has chosen a relevant concept and described it 10
  Refered to one of the recommended books in both topics caring science and intercultural care 2
  Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  Refered to at least one scientific study/article (peer reviewed) about the chosen culture and trhe chosen concept for example health among Vietnamese. Discribed the results 2
  Interviewed a person from a different culture than their own. Described the result. Questions in attachment. 2
  Reflection, including evidence based nursing 3
  Used Novia instruction for thesis, especially for references 2
  9 pages text if 3 stud., 5-6 if 2 stud. 1
  Extra literature 1
  Something extra that was not required, for example, PP, film, theory 2
  Presentation 2
  Comments on other students work in class or on Moodle 1
  Submitted before deadline 1
  Active participation during seminar 1
  
  Health care organisation evaluated 0-5
  
  Own work about profession is evaluated PASS/FAIL

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  The content is found in Moodle.
  Introductions and seminars are compulsory, during all other lectures presence is highly recommended.
  Use Novia instructions for writing in all assignments.
  
  General feedback on assignments will be given in class or through moodle to the whole class.
  Individual feedback can be received on request from the teacher.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  interviews

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Nursing ethics: online tests deadline XXX
  
  Caring science + interculturell are seminar 1
  
  Health care organisation, Sote, different forms of care + acts and degree seminar 2,
  
  Dedline for Nursing ethics 1
  
  Own profession, assignment deadline XXX

  Student's schedule and workload

  Nursing ethics 2h introdukction, 25h tutorials and tests=27h
  
  Caring science, intercultural caring and evidence based nursing: 16h lectures, group work and discussions + 30h tutorials and teamwork with assignment + 8h seminar = 54h.
  
  Health care organisation, sote, forms of care, acts 9h lectures and group work, tutorials and group assignment 41h + seminar 4h= 54h
  
  Own profession, sustainable deelopment, interprofessional work lectures, groupdiscussions 4h, tutorials 23h = 27h

  Content scheduling

  --

•   The profession of nurse VÅV22GV01-3006 04.09.2023-30.11.2023  6 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of their own professional field, the history and development of caring science
  - has knowledge of and can reflect on basic concepts in caring science
  - knows the basic competence requirements for their own profession
  - understand the importance of evidence-based care
  - can describe the organization of social and health care in Finland and the legislation that governs the activities
  - has knowledge of service systems and the patient's / client's social benefits
  - has basic skills in interprofessional work
  - understands and can reflect on ethical guidelines and profession-specific ethical codes and can in his future profession work on the basis of these
  - understands the importance of culture in healthcare and can respond to clients / patients from different cultures
  - has knowledge about The Agenda for Sustainable Development 2030 and its implementation at Novia
  - is aware of the importance of internal sustainability based on the demands placed on the profession and can maintain good health

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Caring science knowledge and evidence as a basis for care
  The importance of the nursing profession
  Work areas of a nurse
  Health care in Finland
  Management structures, different sustainable service environments and service systems
  General laws in social and health care
  Interprofessional work
  The client's / patient's position and rights
  Ethical guidelines and codes
  Professional encounters
  Person centered care
  Intercultural care
  Internal sustainability in the profession

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  17% Face-to-face, 83% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ÅRDVETENSKAP
  Alligood, M. R. (2014). Nursing theorists and their work (Eighth edition.). Elsevier.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  kapitel 1-3, 5
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Rehnsfeldt, A. & Arman, M. (red.). 2020. Klinisk vårdvetenskap. Vårdande på teoretisk grund. Stockholm: Liber Ab.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  
  VÅRDETIK
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  kapitel 4.
  
  INTERKULTURELL VÅRD
  Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
  Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
  Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.
  Wellman
  + länkar på Moodle
  
  Social och hälsovårdsorganisation och Social och hälsovårdsreformen, lagar www.finlex.fi
  länkar på Moodle

  Learning methods

  Please note that all assignments here can be updated and changed before the course begins
  
  The course starts as online
  The studies take place on your own online
  Online supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Care ethics assessed GK /UK
  
  The exercise work (caring science + inter-cultural nursing) is assessed with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  
  Criteria for evaluation Max score 40
  Criteria for evaluation Max score 40:
  - Have chosen a relevant term and described it 10
  - Referenced to one of the recommended books on each subject of health sciences and
  intercultural care 2
  - Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  - Referenced a scientific article/study (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and concept e.g. health of Vietnamese. Told about the result 3
  - Interviewed a person from a culture other than their own. Told about the result. The questions in Annex. 2
  - Reflection 3
  - Followed Novia's instructions before degree project especially references 2
  - 9 pages of text on 3 stud., 5-6 on 2 stud. 1
  - Extra Literature 1
  - Something else extra in addition to what was required, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  - Comments on other people's work on Moodle 3
  - Submitted on agreed date 1
  
  The health care organization is assessed 0-5
  
  Own work if the profession is assessed gk/uk

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 30.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 07.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 46

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Carina Gädda, Marica Hinders, Maria Berg

  Additional information

  Introductions, workshops and seminar are mandatory and mandatory attendance.
  Otherwise, you study on your own and submit various assignments according to the given deadline,
  Content and materials can be found in Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's instructions

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Interviews

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Care Ethics: Online Tests + Tasks Deadline XXX
  Care Sciences + Inter-cultural Care: deadline:
  Sote, legistlation: deadline XXX
  Own profession and sustainable development , own work deadline XXX
  
  Own works in: ?

  Student's schedule and workload

  Caring science and inter-cultural care: lectures and group exercises and discussions + team work with the exercise work = 54h.
  Nursing ethics 2h introduction, 25h own reading and implementation of tests and tasks
  Sote and legislation: lectures + group work and discussions = 54h
  Own profession and sustainable development: lectures and material other own reading and implementation + individual task = 27h

  Content scheduling

  -- (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Uppnår inte kriterier för 1. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Se ovan (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Se ovan (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Se ovan (not translated)

•   Trends and health technology in health care USS20FV03-3001 24.08.2023-30.11.2023  3 credits  (USS20D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can the importance of continuously and digital learning and show social commitment
  
  Recognises and can analyze the health care industry's trends and future challenges
  
  Actively follows innovations and health technology in the healthcare industry

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Continues learning
  
  Digital learning and digital patient guidance
  
  Social impact and debate
  
  Health technology innovations (eg AI, robotisation)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet. Information som stöd för välfärden och de reformerade tjänsterna. Utnyttja social- och hälsovårdsinformation-strategi fram till 2020.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet. Ett socialt hållbart Finland 2020. Stragei för social- och hälsovårdspolitiken.
  Terveys 2050. Neljä skenaariota ihmislähtöisestä terveydestä ja valinnanvapaudesta. DEMOS. Helsinki.
  Sairaanhoitajaliitto: Sairaanhoitajien uudet työnkuvat - laatua tulevaisuuteen ja sotepalveluihin.
  Kangasniemi, M. m.fl. 2018. Optimoitu sote-ammattilaisten koulutus- ja
  osaamisuudistus.
  Hoitotyön vuosikirja 2016. Teknologia soisaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Sairaanhoitajat
  Vehko, T. et al, 2019. E-health and e-welfare if Finland. THL Report 7/2019
  Vehko, T. et al. 2019 Miten tietojärjestelmät palvelevat terveydenhuollon ammattilaisten työtä? Vaikutukset työhön ja hyvinvointiin.
  http/innokylä.fi
  https://soteuudistus.fi/sv/vad-ar-ett-valfardsomrade
  Övriga aktuella artiklar och publikationer (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Tehys nätkurs https://www.soteosaajaksi.fi/sv/hemsida/
  Planering, förverkligande och utvärdering av konferens (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Konferensplanering väger 50 % av kursvitsord (med siffra)
  Deltagande i konferensen väger 30 % av kursvitsord (siffta)
  Tehys test uk - gk (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.08.2023 - 30.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 23.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Michaela Jalava, Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig lärare Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Tehys nätkurs https://www.soteosaajaksi.fi/sv/hemsida/
  Planering, förverkligande och utvärdering av konferens (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Fackföreningar och olika regionala samarbetspartner (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Förberedelsena inför konferensen 24.8 - 3.10.2023
  Konferens 4.10.2023
  Tehys kurs dl 15.10.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 18 h
  Konferens 59 h
  Tehy 4 t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Uppnår inte kriterier för 1 (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Deltagande i konferensplanering
  Studerande har tagit lite ansvar av konferensplaneringen
  Studerande gör sina uppgifter
  Deltagande under konferensdagen (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Aktivt deltagande i konferensplanering
  Studerande har tagit ansvar av konferensplaneringen
  Studerande visar intresse
  Aktivt medverkande under konferensdagen (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Aktivt deltagande i konferensplanering
  Studerande har tagit ansvar av konferensplaneringen enligt överenskommelsen
  Studerande är engagerad
  Aktivt medverkande under konferensdagen (not translated)