Academic year 2023 - 2024

•   Acute nursing care and best nursing practices VÅV14AK03-3006 24.08.2023-17.09.2023  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of emergency care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their loved ones
  - has readiness to care for patients of different ages in emergency care, in various traumas and disasters
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - can in a simulated situation be responsible for a safe drug treatment in emergency care

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Acute nursing care and best nursing practices

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional5
  
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Pediatrick care:
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Qvist, E. 2013. Lääkärinkäsikirja. Akuutisti sairas imeväinen.
  Qvist, E. & Korppi, M. 2009. Duodecim. Alle kolmen kuukauden ikäinen lapsi päivystysksessä.
  Rantala, H. & Eriksson, K. 2016 Kuoristava lapsi ja kuumekouristukset. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  
  Emergency care
  Wikström, J. 2018. Akutsjukvård. Omvårdnad och behandling vid akut sjukdom och skada. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. s. 13 – 306.
  Akuuttihoito-opas https://www.terveysportti.fi/dtk/aho/koti
  Lecture material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Gästföreläsningar - Obligatoriska
  Sammarbets projekt med VCS - Obligatoriskt
  Självstudier
  HLR projekt vecka 37 - obligatoriska
  
  Skriftlig tentamen i slutet av kursen (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Emergency care
  Mandatory attendance in the emergency care simulation project. Rating: GK / UK
  Mandatory attendance in the CPR project Certificate: GK / UK
  Emergency care exam: Grades: 5 - UK

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.08.2023 - 17.09.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Care suit and slippers are used in exercises

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Mandatory attendance at the lectures on pediatric emergency care
  Mandatory attendance in the emergency care simulation project
  Mandatory attendance in the CPR project
  Mandatory attendance in the lecture session in pediatric emergency care
  Approved clinical exercises

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Emergency care simulation in collaboration with VCS
  The CPR project in collaboration with VCS

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen: hösten 2023
  
  Omtentamen 1:
  
  Omtentamen 2: (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can work with others within the student group

•   Acute nursing care and best nursing practices VÅV14FK02-3005 24.08.2023-17.09.2023  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of emergency care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their loved ones
  - has readiness to care for patients of different ages in emergency care, in various traumas and disasters
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - can in a simulated situation be responsible for a safe drug treatment in emergency care

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Acute nursing care and best nursing practices

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ADULT EMERGENCY CARE
  Wikström, J. 2018. Akutsjukvård. Omvårdnad och behandling vid akut sjukdom och skada. Studentlitteratur, AB, Lund.
  Material on moodle
  
  Child emergency care
  Helminen, M. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti epiglottiitti. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Jartti, T., Mäkelä, M. & Remes, S. 2016. Akuutti astma ja uloshengitysvaikeus. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Rantala, H. & Eriksson, K. 2016. Kouristava lapsi ja kuumekouristukset. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Saxén, H. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti laryngiitti.Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Individual work
  Demonstrations
  Simulation exercises

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.08.2023 - 17.09.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Care suit and slippers are used in exercises

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Mandatory attendance at the lectures on pediatric emergency care
  Mandatory attendance in the emergency care simulation project
  Mandatory attendance in the CPR project
  Mandatory attendance in the lecture session in pediatric emergency care
  Approved clinical exercises

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Emergency care simulation in collaboration with VCS
  The CPR project in collaboration with VCS

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen: 2023
  
  Omtentamen 1:
  
  Omtentamen 2: (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can work with others within the student group

•   Advanced Nursing I USS20FV01-3001 24.08.2023-30.11.2023  5 credits  (USS20D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can apply, reflect and deepen his/her expertise in clinical care work
  
  Can argue for evidence based activity and care methods
  
  Can apply ethical decision making in a variety of service environments and care situations
  
  Masters person-centered/client-centered holistic care and medication management in different healthcare and service environments
  
  Students can use health technology and digital solutions in in-depth care work
  
  Can evaluate the guidance efficiency together with patient, close relatives and healthcare personnel
  
  Can promote patient and client safety

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  In-depth care methods in internal medicine
  
  In-depth care methods in surgical care
  
  Ethical decision-making in complicated situations and in different service system
  
  Advanced medication management
  
  Person-centered/client-centered holistic care
  
  Health technology and digital solutions
  
  Application of health science theories and research
  
  Welfare economy
  
  The effects of guidance and different gauges
  
  Patient and client safety

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Medibase
  Föreläsningsmaterial
  Internetmedicin.se https://www.internetmedicin.se/
  God medicinsk praxis https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/
  Terveysportti: Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja
  Terveysportti, Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat.
  Hotus -vårdrekommendationer
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  
  Övriga källor:
  Ahonen, O. et al 219. Kliininen hoitotyö.
  Alahuhta, S. et al. 2010. Nestehoito eller motsvarande inom vätsketerapi.
  Alanen, P. 2022. Tehohoitotyö ELLER Ritmala-Castren, M et al. 2017. Teho- ja valvontahoitotyön opas.
  Cox, C. 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor
  Ekvall, A. & Jansson, A. 2022 (eller 2016). Omvårdnad & Medicin. ELLER Ericson, T & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar
  Iivanainen, A. 2016. Hoida ja kirja. Sanoma Pro. eller THL:s publikationer om dokumentation
  Klang, B. 2017 (eller äldre upplaga) Patientundervisning
  Kinnunen, U-M. et al. 2021. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCC
  Kumlin, C. 2022 (eller äldre upplaga) Omvårdnad & kirurgi ELLER Ljungqvist, O. 2021. Kirurgi.
  Jevon, P. 2014. Att övervaka patienter med livshotande sjukdom
  Rubertsson, S. 2020. Intensivvård (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Smågruppsarbete
  Workshops (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Workshopsarbete bedöms GK-UK. Obligatorisk närvaro. För GK vitsord bör studerande aktivt deltagit i tillfället den 14.11 och gjord förhandsuppgiften "patiencase" (0.5 sp)
  2. Inlärningsdagbok bedöms i skalan 0-5 (2 sp)
  4. Individuell skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 (2.5 sp)
  
  Kursvitsord: För godkänt kursvitsord bör alla delar vara godkända. Kursvitsordet räknas: Inlärningsdagboken 50 % av helhetsvitsordet och skriftlig examination 50% av helhetsvitsordet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.08.2023 - 30.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  - (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Expertföreläsningar från arbetslivet (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Individuell examination 26.9. Omtentamen enligt överenskommelse med examinatorn.
  2) Inlärningsdagbok. Inlämning senast november 2023.. Datum:23.11?? (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 35 h
  Workshop (ink. förberedande arbete) 10h
  Tentamen 3h
  Distansuppgift 57 h
  Självstudier 30 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 60 % av maximalpoängen i examinationen
  __________________________________________________________________________
  
  Inlärningsdagboken är inte inlämnad inom utsatt tid eller innehåller inte alla krävda delar. Studerande använder sig inte av evidensbaserade källor i arbete. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 72 % av maximal poängen i examinationen
  
  ______________________________________________
  Inlärningsdagboken innehåller alla krävda delar. Studerande använder källor ytligt. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i inremedicinskt- och kirurgiskt-/perioperativt vårdarbete, vårdmetoder och/eller egna reflektioner är svaga eller saknas. Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande har delvis bedömt sitt kunnande i relation till alla delar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 90 % av maximal poängen i examinationen
  
  _________________________________________________
  
  Inlärningsdagboken innehåller alla delar och studerande använder vetenskapliga källor, men inte mångsidigt. Studerande kan beskriva och har goda kunskaper i inremedicinska- och kirurgiska/perioperativa patientens vårdarbete, vårdmetoder och egna reflektioner görs i alla delar. Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande har förmåga att bedöma sitt kunnande i relation till alla delar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med eller över 90 % av maximal poängen i examinationen.
  
  _________________________________________________________
  
  Inlärningsdagboken innehåller och behandlar på djupgående nivå alla delar. Studerande använder vetenskapliga källor mångsidigt, samt kan motivera sina tolkningar och kopplingar mellan källor. Studerande har djupa kunskaper och kan djupgående beskriva inremedicinska- och kirurgiska-/perioperativa patientens vårdarbete och vårdmetoder, samt relatera de olika delarna till varandra och till sjukskötarens arbetsuppgifter. Studerande kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner och kan djupgående analysera sitt kunnande. (not translated)

•   Advanced Nursing II USS20FV02-3001 28.08.2023-30.11.2023  5 credits  (USS20D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can apply, reflect and analyse his/her expertise in clinical care work
  
  Can argue for evidence based care activity and methods
  
  Is capable of ethical decisions making in varying service systems and care situations
  
  Masters person-centered/client-centrerad holistic care and medication management in various service systems
  
  Can use health technology and digital solutions in in-depth care work
  
  Can utilize health science and health economics knowledge in decision making
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate as well as motivate supervision and self-care from an educational and ethical perspective
  
  Can apply the theory of sustainable development

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Methods of in-depth mental health care and substance abuse treatment, including preventive care
  
  Methods of care in in-depth child care
  
  Methods of care within in-depth gerontological care work
  
  Ethical decision making
  
  Advanced medication management
  
  Person-centered/client centered holistic care
  
  Health technology and digital solutions
  
  Application of health science theories and research
  
  To motivate change and self-care
  
  Sustainable development in varying service environments

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alahuhta, S. et al. 2010. Nestehoito
  Andershed, B. et al. 2020. Palliativ vård: Begrepp och perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur
  Bengstsson, M.& Lundström, U. 2015. Palliativ vård. Gleerups
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. S 171-202.
  Guldbransen, T. 2009. Intensivvård: avancerad omvårdnad och behandling.
  Hjelmqvist, H. 2006. Vätsketerapi.
  Jevon, P. & Ewens, B. (ed.) 2014. Att övervaka patienter med livshotande sjukdom. Studentlitteratur.
  Lagercrantz, H. mfl. Neonatologi. 2015.Studentlitteratur.
  Leino-Kilpi, H. & Välimäki M. 2014. Etiikka hoitotyössä.
  Moell, C., Gustafsson, J. 2017. Pediatrik. Liber.
  Niemi-Murola L. 2014. Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet.
  Rubertsson et al. 2020. Intensivvård. Liber
  Saarto, T. et al. 2016 Palliatiivinen hoito. Duodecim
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  Suomen tehohoitoyhdistys. 1997. Suomen Tehohoitoyhdistyksen eettiset ohjeet.
  Takkunen et al. 2006. Tehohoito-opas.
  Terveysportti: Akuuttihoitotyön opas, Teho- ja valvontahoitotyön opas
  samt aktuella ämnespecifika artiklar som läggs upp på Moodle
  Wiklund Gustin,L. & Bergbom, I. 2017. Vårdvetenskapliga begrepp i teori och praktik (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Workshops
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur
  Inlämningsuppgift
  Seminarier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell inlämningsuppgift, bedöms med vitsord 0-5, feedback sker via Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 30.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Workshops, seminarier, obligatorisk närvaro
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individuell inlämningsuppgift inlämnas på Moodle studerande har två möjliga inlämningsdatum, 6.10 eller 13.11 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Workshops 11h
  Föreläsningar 16h
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift 30h
  Självstudier 72h
  Seminarier 6h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande svarar inte på uppgiftens alla delar och relaterar inte delarna till varandra. Studerande har mycket ytliga kunskaper i hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabilteringsmetoder, och studerande kan inte vårdplanering i relation till dessa. Studerande har inte kunskaper i patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och kan inte relatera det till sjukskötarens uppgifter eller i en vårdplan. Vårdplaneringen är mycket bristfällig. Studerande har mycket bristfälliga kunskaper i etik och patientsäkerhet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar men har inte förmågan att relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper om olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder, men tillämpningen i form av vårdplanering är svag. Studerande har svårigheter att gestalta patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och har svårt att relatera den till sjukskötarens uppgifter och i en vårdplan. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, men kan inte tillämpa dem, och egna reflektioner fattas (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar och kan relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har djupa kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter och beaktar ett mångprofessionellt arbetssätt och kan göra en helhetsmässig vårdplan. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna djupgående reflektioner (not translated)

•   Advanced clinical care USS20FV04-3001 04.09.2023-19.11.2023  3 credits  (USS20D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Is able to plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client-centered care in collaboration with the patient and close relatives and demonstrates a reflective and ethical approach
  
  Can apply theoretical knowledge and guidance methods in in-depth care work
  
  Masters the aseptic way of working
  
  Can use the central evidence based care methods and can perform clinical investigations, functional measurements and treatments
  
  Can carry out care and patient monitoring using health technology and apply various directives regarding patient and client safety and sustainable development
  
  Masters safe medication and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Reflection
  
  Ethics
  
  Clinical skills
  
  Supervision methods
  
  Asepsis
  
  Evidence based care methods
  
  Clinical examinations
  
  Functional measurements
  
  Patient monitoring
  
  Health technology
  
  Patient and client safety
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Medication management
  
  Fluid balance

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se kurslitteratur i förverkligande:
  Fördjupat vårdarbete I och II
  Litteratur i Moodle
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  
  Simulationer (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 19.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Obligatorisk kursintroduktion 7.9.2023
  Obligatoriska förhandsuppgifter inför simulationer
  Obligatoriska simulationer i fördjupat kliniskt vårdarbete (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatoriska simulationer och kliniska övningar samt tillhörande förhandsmaterial med inlämningsuppgifter. Mera information om förhandsmaterial och inlämningsuppgifter publiceras i Moodle. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81h
  Simulationer
  Självstudier inför simulationer och förhandsuppgifter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  GK = Studerande delatar aktivt alla simualtioner och har lämnat in förhandsuppgifter inom utsatta tid. Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i fördjupat kliniskt vårdarbete.
  
  
  UK = Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerande har inte lämnat införhandsuppgifter i tid. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i fördjupat kliniskt vårdarbete (not translated)

•   Anatomy and Physiology USS22IV06-3002 06.09.2023-15.12.2023  4 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can explain human anatomy and physiology
  - understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The cell and tissues
  
  Cardiovascular system
  
  The respiratory system
  
  The nervous system
  
  The digestive system
  
  The urinary system
  
  The endocrine system
  
  The musculoskeletal system

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course litterature:
  
  Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended litterature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  
  On moodle give litterature.
  
  Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.
  
  
  "To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

  Learning methods

  Lectures on campus and via teams.
  
  Interactive digital material.
  
  Independent studying and assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomy and physiology test.
  
  Assignments.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Anatomi och fysiologi tenter under hösten 2023:
  
  Datum:
  
  Deltentamen 1: Vecka 46
  Deltentamen 2: Vecka 49
  
  Två omtenter i varje del erbjuds.
  
  Omtentamen del 1: 24.11 och 8.12
  Omtentamen del 2: 19.1 och 9.2
  
  Oblikatoriska workshops och seminarier med tillhörande oblikatorisk uppgift. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningstillfällen 9 h
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter 40 h
  
  Självstudier 59 h
  
  Deltentamen 1 1.5 sp
  Deltentamen 2 1.5 sp
  Workshops och seminarier med tillhörande inlämningsuppgifter 1sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra. (not translated)

•   Anatomy and Physiology USS22IV06-3003 28.08.2023-08.12.2023  4 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can explain human anatomy and physiology
  - understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The cell and tissues
  
  Cardiovascular system
  
  The respiratory system
  
  The nervous system
  
  The digestive system
  
  The urinary system
  
  The endocrine system
  
  The musculoskeletal system

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course litterature:
  
  Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended litterature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  
  On moodle give litterature.
  
  Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.
  
  
  "To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

  Learning methods

  Lectures on campus and via teams.
  
  Interactive digital material.
  
  Independent studying and assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 08.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomy and physiology test.
  
  Assignments.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Anatomi och fysiologi tenter under hösten 2023:
  
  Datum:
  
  Deltentamen 1: Vecka 41
  Deltentamen 2: Vecka 48
  
  Två omtenter i varje del erbjuds.
  
  Deltentamen 1: 27.10 och 24.11.2023
  Deltentamen 2: 19.1 och 9.2.2024
  
  
  Oblikatoriska workshops och seminarier med tillhörande oblikatorisk uppgift. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningstillfällen 24 h
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter 40 h
  
  Självstudier 44 h
  
  Deltentamen 1 1.5 sp
  Deltentamen 2 1.5 sp
  Workshops och seminarier med tillhörande inlämningsuppgifter 1sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra. (not translated)

•   Basic Vaccination Knowledge VÅV18BV09-3036 05.10.2023-15.12.2023  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning methods

  The national training programme in vaccination knowledge has been developed in cooperation with Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Diakonia University of Applied Sciences, Turku University of Applied Sciences and the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. The Swedish-language programme has been developed in cooperation with Novia University of Applied Sciences and Arcada University of Applied Sciences.
  
  
  The course is realised virtually as independent studies via the online platform Moodle during the time period 5.10-15.12 2023.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course has been designed to cover all the basic areas of vaccination that the vaccinator should know and master.
  
  According to THL, passing the study section is the main proof of the important theoretical vaccination knowledge required by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health's Vaccination Decree for nurses and midwives working as vaccinators.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  25.08.2023 - 05.10.2023

  • 2 credits

  Seats

  19 - 110

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen är en fortbildning som riktar sig till professionella i arbetslivet. (not translated)

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Student's schedule and workload

  Total working hours of the course: 54 hours = 2 ECTS

•   Basic Vaccination Knowledge and Infectious Diseases VÅV22KV09-3003 27.11.2023-28.01.2024  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the diseases that are prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - has knowledge of the composition of the vaccines, benefits of vaccinations and vaccination side effects
  - has knowledge of the national vaccination program in Finland and its legislation
  - has knowledge of vaccination of different groups
  - has skills in counselling and preparation for vaccination, knowledge of vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment of the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV04
  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge of vaccinations
  Vaccination skills
  National and global infectious diseases
  Epidemiology
  Legislation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  National course in The Basics of Vaccination Knowledge 2 credits is included in the study unit.
  Examination via portfolio and virtual exam

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  According to national course requirements for basic vaccination knowledge (see moodle)
  Infectious diseases

  Learning methods

  Basic Vaccination Knowledge 2 credits (National Course):
  Introductory Lecture
  Individual Virtual Online Studies (Portfolio + Exam)
  Final Workshop
  
  Infectious Diseases 1 credit:
  Lectures
  Written Group Work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Submitted and approved portfolio according to national standard
  Passed virtual exam
  Approved written group work in infectious diseases

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.11.2023 - 28.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  21.10.2023 - 21.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen gäller endast examensstuderande
  
  Förkunskapskrav : Godkänd kurs där injektioner ingår (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline for submission of portfolio:8.1.2024
  Virtual exam open :15.1-25.1.24
  Deadline for submission of written group work in infectious disease:19.1.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3008 15.09.2023-15.12.2023  6 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.09.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 15.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen sker online, vänligen se schema för datum
  
  Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle se peppi. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp =27 h
  6sp=162 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3009 02.10.2023-17.12.2023  6 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar
  På engelska

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.10.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Practical exercises mandatory!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h

  Content scheduling

  Theory

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and his/her knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student demonstrates limited substantive knowledge, can the essentials.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge of the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance even concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and justify their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  In his answer, the student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3013 28.08.2023-27.10.2023  6 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 27.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen sker online, vänligen se schema för datum
  
  Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle se peppi. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp =27 h
  6sp=162 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Basics in nursing care VÅV22GV02-3014 04.09.2023-30.11.2023  6 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar
  På engelska

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 30.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Maria Berg

  Additional information

  Practical exercises mandatory!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h

  Content scheduling

  Theory

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and his/her knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student demonstrates limited substantive knowledge, can the essentials.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge of the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance even concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and justify their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluating the exam
  In his answer, the student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluating written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3008 18.09.2023-29.10.2023  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi
  As well as recommended material in moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lecture, group work and presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grupparbete GK/UK
  Tentamen 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.09.2023 - 29.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3010 25.09.2023-10.11.2023  3 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Obligatorisk kurslitteratur:
  Beaglehole, R., Bonita & Kjällström T, 2010. Grundläggande epidemiologi sid 17 - 66 och 147 - 250. Studentlitteratur.
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 56 - 103 (finns som e-bok)
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro.
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Klang & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
  Kauhanen mfl. Kansanterveystiede. 2013. Sanoma Pro. Helsinki.
  Pellmer et.al. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Andersson, I., Eljertsson, G. 2013. Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Backman, G. ((ed) 2012. The right to health. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde, B. (red). 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund.
  Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E., Lyckhage, G., Tengelin, E. 2015. Jämlik vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson, M. (red) 2015. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Liber.
  Gaudeamus. 2022, Terveempi maailma.Gaudeamus ja Helsingin yliopisto.
  Nunes-Ferraz, J., Karlberg, I. 2012. Hälsoekonomi -begrepp och tillämpningar.
  Skolin 2018. Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Studentlitteratur.
  Schäfer Elinder, L., Kwak, L. (red) 2014. Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar både online och på Moodle
  Självstudier
  Gruppuppgift obligatorisk
  Uppgift i epidemiologi
  Grupphemtentamen obligatorisk deltagande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Gruppuppgift med seminarium GK/ UK
  Uppgift i epidemiologi GK/UK
  Grupp hemtentamen 1-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.09.2023 - 10.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 24.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 46

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Jaana-Sofia Tengström
  Lärare Pia Nygårdas (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Grupparbete (1,0 sp) inlämning vecka 42, 20.10 kl. 16.00 obligatorisk. Gemensam skrifltig respons på Moodle. GK/UK
  Uppgift i epidemiologi v. 41, inlämning enligt överneskommelse, obligatorisk GK/UK
  Grupphemtentamen (2 sp), inlämning vecka 45, 6.11 kl.16.00. Skriftlig respons på Moodle. 1-5. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
  Studerande använder Novias skrivansviningar i samtliga inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier 34 h
  Gruppuppgift samt uppgift i epidemiologi 20 h
  Hemtentamen 27 h (not translated)

•   Basics of health-promoting care VÅV22HF01-3012 20.11.2023-15.12.2023  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Obligatorisk kurslitteratur:
  Beaglehole, R., Bonita & Kjällström T, 2010. Grundläggande epidemiologi sid 17 - 66 och 147 - 250. Studentlitteratur.
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 56 - 103 (finns som e-bok)
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro.
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Klang & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
  Kauhanen mfl. Kansanterveystiede. 2013. Sanoma Pro. Helsinki.
  Pellmer et.al. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Andersson, I., Eljertsson, G. 2013. Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Backman, G. ((ed) 2012. The right to health. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde, B. (red). 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund.
  Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E., Lyckhage, G., Tengelin, E. 2015. Jämlik vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson, M. (red) 2015. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Liber.
  Nunes-Ferraz, J., Karlberg, I. 2012. Hälsoekonomi -begrepp och tillämpningar.
  Skolin 2018. Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Studentlitteratur.
  Schäfer Elinder, L., Kwak, L. (red) 2014. Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Självstudier
  Workshop/ Smågruppsarbete obligatorisk närvaro
  Gruppuppgift med seminarium obligatorisk närvaro
  Grupphemtentamen obligatorisk deltagande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Gruppuppgift med seminarium GK/ UK
  Grupp hemtentamen 1-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.11.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 19.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Jaana-Sofia Tengström
  Lärare Pia Nygårdas (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Workshops under lekitoner . Muntlig respons under workshoppen
  Uppgift i epidemiologi v. 49 GK/UK
  Grupparbete med seminarium (1,0 sp) vecka 50 obligatorisk närvaro. Muntlig respons vid seminariumtillfället vecka 50. GK/UK
  Grupphemtentamen (2 sp), inlämning vecka 50. Skriftlig respons på Moodle. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar. (1-5)
  Studerande använder Novias skrivansviningar i samtliga inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier 27 h
  Gruppuppgift samt seminarium 20 h
  Hemtentamen 34 h (not translated)

•   Care of the Patient with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beahvior VÅV21KV14-3002 28.08.2023-05.11.2023  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorder
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk
  - Can apply mentalfirst aid
  - Has sreadiness to provide mental first aid
  - can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
  - has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
  - can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
  - is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
  - is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
  - can meet people with special needs

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders
  Substance use disorders and addiction
  Special needs and disability

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit?
  Expert by experience

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 05.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda, Johanna Sigfrids

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visit?

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  On moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beaviour VÅV21KV14-3003 20.11.2023-25.02.2024  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorder
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk
  - Can apply mentalfirst aid
  - Has sreadiness to provide mental first aid
  - can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
  - has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
  - can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
  - is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
  - is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
  - can meet people with special needs

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders
  Substance use disorders and addiction
  Special needs and disability

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.11.2023 - 25.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 19.11.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Viktor Matintupa, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  6 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  On moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with with Special Needs, Psychiatric Disorders and Addictive Beaviour VÅV21KV14-3006 20.11.2023-04.02.2024  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorder
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk
  - Can apply mentalfirst aid
  - Has sreadiness to provide mental first aid
  - can identify addiction and have preparedness in the care of substance use disorders
  - has knowledge of various forms of substance use disorders, mainly abuse of alcohol, drugs and drugs
  - can inform, advise and supervise substance use disorders issues
  - is familiar with the area's central legislation and substance abuse strategies and can apply them in their profession
  - is familiar with various forms of treatment, therapy and care and can apply them with consideration of individual factors in the care of patient with substance abuse problems
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to substance use disorders
  - can meet people with special needs

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders
  Substance use disorders and addiction
  Special needs and disability

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit?
  Expert by experience

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.11.2023 - 04.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 19.11.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Viktor Matintupa, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visit?

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  On moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Clinical Nursing USS22KV04-3001 28.08.2023-12.11.2023  5 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - can apply theoretical knowledge and guidance methods in different care contexts
  - can apply the aseptic method
  - can use the central evidence based care methods and perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
  - can carry out care and patient monitoring using health technology and apply various directives regarding patient- and client safety and sustainable development
  - can perform safe medication and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Resuscitation in hospital environment
  
  Central examination methods
  
  Central care methods
  
  Aseptics/aseptic way of working
  
  Teamwork
  
  Clinical assessments
  
  Patient monitoring
  
  Guidance
  
  Wound care
  
  Documentation and reporting
  
  Pre- and intra-operative preparations for surgery
  
  Patient monitoring during anesthesia
  
  Different roles in the operating theatre
  
  Application of sustainable methods (cost-effectiveness, aseptics, work ergonomics, waste sorting)
  
  Patient, client and occupational safety
  
  Safe blood transfusion
  
  Intravenous medication and fluid treatment

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se kurslitteratur i förverkliganden:
  
  Läkemedelsbehandling II
  
  Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
  
  Inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete
  
  
  Medibas
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  
  Simulationer
  
  Kliniska övningar och test (videofilmning) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande:
  
  Kan planera, utföra, utvärdera, dokumentera och rapportera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård i samarbete med patienten och närstående samt påvisar ett reflektivt och etiskt förhållningssätt i vården
  
  Kan tillämpa teoretiska kunskaper och handledningsmetoder i olika vårdkontexter
  
  Kan tillämpa aseptiskt arbetssätt
  
  Kan använda de centrala evidensbaserade vårdmetoderna och kan utföra kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och behandlingar
  
  Kan utföra vård och patientövervakning med hjälp av hälsoteknologi och tillämpa olika direktiv gällande patient- och klientsäkerhet och hållbar utveckling
  
  Kan utföra säker läkemedels- och vätskebehandling (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 12.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.09.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Kursen ska avläggas samtidigt med teorikurser Läkemedelsbehandling II, Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, Inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Obligatorisk kursintro 7.9. online
  
  Obligatoriska simulationer i läkemedelsbehandling, i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete och i inremedicinskt vårdarbete.
  
  Obligatoriska kliniska övningar
  
  Kliniskt test (Videofilmning) (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatoriska simulationer och kliniska övningar samt tillhörande Quiz i Moodle.
  
  Klinsikt test i form av videofilmning, paruppgift vecka 45. Mera information i Moodle. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp = 135h
  
  Simulationer och kliniska övningar: 35h
  
  Självstudier inför simulationer och inför kliniska övningar (Quiz): 50h
  
  Klinisk test med självstudier, övningar i kliniken samt filmning: 50h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  GK = Studerande delatar aktivt alla simualtioner och kliniska övningar och har svarat i Quiz inom utsatta tid före varje simulering. Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test (videofilmning).
  
  
  UK = Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller kliniksa övningar eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerandehar inte svarat i Quiz i tid före varje simulering. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test (videofilmning). (not translated)

•   Clinical assessment VÅV21AK04-3001 25.03.2024-28.04.2024  3 credits  (USS21F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, carry out and evaluate the care of patients of different ages
  - can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages
  - can perform basic clinical assessment of vital functions for patients of different ages
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context

  Content of the study unit

  Physical assessment

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Cox C.L. (red.) (2015). Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  
  Hogan-Quigley, B., Palm, ML. & Bickley, LS. (2012 or 2017). Nursing Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. Philadelphia, Wolther Kluwer Health Lippincott.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial Moodle
  
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  lectures and practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.03.2024 - 28.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 24.03.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V
  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written assignment and seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  practical class are obligatory

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ESTS= 27 hours

  Assessment criteria

  The student did not achieve any of the criteria and participated in the practical lectures ,

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, , conduct frail case analysis, and weak analysis of the results

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has a good knowledge of the subject, conduct respectable and valuable case presentation, the analysis and the results gave good knowledge about the topic

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows an in-depth knowledge, the process of collecting the data and the results presentation enhance the knowledge and understanding

•   Clinical assessment VÅV21FK03-3001 26.03.2024-26.04.2024  3 credits  (USS21F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, carry out and evaluate the care of patients of different ages
  - can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages
  - can perform basic clinical assessment of vital functions for patients of different ages
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical assessment

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Cox C.L. (red.) (2015). Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  
  Hogan-Quigley, B., Palm, ML. & Bickley, LS. (2012 or 2017). Nursing Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. Philadelphia, Wolther Kluwer Health Lippincott.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  lectures and practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.03.2024 - 26.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 25.03.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V
  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written assignment and seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  practical class are obligatory

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ESTS= 27 hours

  Assessment criteria

  The student did not achieve any of the criteria and participated in the practical lectures ,

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, , conduct frail case analysis, and weak analysis of the results

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has a good knowledge of the subject, conduct respectable and valuable case presentation, the analysis and the results gave good knowledge about the topic

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows an in-depth knowledge, the process of collecting the data and the results presentation enhance the knowledge and understanding

•   Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3006 28.08.2023-13.10.2023  5 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
  - can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
  - has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV05
  VÅV22GV06
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
  Blood transfusions
  PICC and CVK
  Use of perfusor
  Inhalation drugs
  Fluid balance sheet
  CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
  Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
  Medical radiation and radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  RADIATION SAFETY: Strålsäkerhetslagen, Statsrådets förordning om joniserande strålning, Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets förordning om joniserande strålning, S-föreskrifterna, Radiologi (2022, Blomqvist, L. & Zackrisson, S.)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 13.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Katarina Vironen, Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 1 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 8 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgifter som finns på moodle gör på egen hand:
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 1, 8 h
  Övningsstationer dag 2 + Läkemedelsräkningstest Grupp 2, 8 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift, 1,½ - 2 h
  Deltagande i seniormässan4.10: 6 h, 3 h / studerande
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 1 h 15 min/studerande
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: ca 33 h
  Eget arbete: 7,5 h
  TOTALT: 40,5 h
  
  RESUSKITATION: 1 sp = 27 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  7h Förberädande för kunskaptest & genomförtande av kunskapstest.
  
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  On-line examination in radiation safety, Grade: Approved/Failed

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology VÅV22GV04-3005 08.01.2024-23.02.2024  4 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Petra Lithén

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material på moodle
  
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 23.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 04.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 2, Vasa Vård 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras med tent.
  
  Kurstentamen: 20.2.24
  
  Omtentamina: (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  På svenska
  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology, immunology and pathology VÅV22GV04-3006 11.03.2024-21.04.2024  4 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Petra Lithén

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material på moodle
  
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Ericson & Ericson. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Vitsord enligt tentamen. Se bedömningskriterier nedan. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.03.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 07.03.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 43

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Bioanalytik 2, Vasa Vård 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras med tent.
  
  Kurstentamina: 15.4.2024
  
  Omtentamina 2024: 24.5.24 (allmän omtentamen) samt 13.9.24 (allmän omtentamen) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3001 11.09.2023-29.10.2023  2 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2023 - 29.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3003 04.09.2023-01.10.2023  2 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 01.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3006 27.11.2023-17.12.2023  2 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.11.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 26.11.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h /sp for students
  total 54 h

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Degree Project 1 VÅV21EX01-3001 28.08.2023-31.12.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

  Prerequisites

  HVV21FU01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Work plan

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Individual assignment
  Presentation of research plan for thesis

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Research plan for thesis: fail-pass.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 60

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Planen skall innehålla följande delar (för gk):
  • Novia titelblad
  • Innehållsförteckning
  • Inledning (minst 1 sid): skall innehålla minst 2 källor
  • Syfte och frågeställningar
  • Bakgrund (minst 4 sidor). Skall innehålla: 1 stud. minst 6 källor, varav minst 2 vetenskapliga; 2 stud. minst 9 källor, varav minst 4 vetenskapliga; 3 stud. minst 12 källor, varav minst 6 vetenskapliga
  • Metod (minst 1 sida): Urval; Datainsamling; Dataanalysmetod; Etiska överväganden och Tidsplan
  • Källförteckning (över de källor som används i planen)
  Omfattning min 7 sidor och max 10 sidor (exkl. titelblad, innehållsförteckning och källförteckning)
  Skall följa Novias skrivanvisningar https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/ (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Presentation of approved research plan for thesis.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Underkänd:
  Struktur saknas, likaså vissa källor och källhänvisningarna.
  Hänvisningar och källförteckning följer inte de skriftliga anvisningar för examensarbete.
  Syfte och frågeställningarna är otydliga och saknar vårdperspektivet.
  Metoden för examensarbetet är oklar.
  
  Godkänd: Följer anvisningarna och alla delar finns med. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 1 VÅV21EX01-3004 29.08.2023-03.12.2023  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

  Prerequisites

  HVV21FU01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Work plan

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Individual assignment
  Presentation of research plan for thesis

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Research plan for thesis: fail-pass.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.08.2023 - 03.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 28.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Planen skall innehålla följande delar (för gk):
  • Novia titelblad
  • Innehållsförteckning
  • Inledning (minst 1 sid): skall innehålla minst 2 källor
  • Syfte och frågeställningar
  • Bakgrund (minst 4 sidor). Skall innehålla: 1 stud. minst 6 källor, varav minst 2 vetenskapliga; 2 stud. minst 9 källor, varav minst 4 vetenskapliga; 3 stud. minst 12 källor, varav minst 6 vetenskapliga
  • Metod (minst 1 sida): Urval; Datainsamling; Dataanalysmetod; Etiska överväganden och Tidsplan
  • Källförteckning (över de källor som används i planen)
  Omfattning min 7 sidor och max 10 sidor (exkl. titelblad, innehållsförteckning och källförteckning)
  Skall följa Novias skrivanvisningar https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/ (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Presentation of approved research plan for thesis.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Underkänd:
  Struktur saknas, likaså vissa källor och källhänvisningarna.
  Hänvisningar och källförteckning följer inte de skriftliga anvisningar för examensarbete.
  Syfte och frågeställningarna är otydliga och saknar vårdperspektivet.
  Metoden för examensarbetet är oklar.
  
  Godkänd: Följer anvisningarna och alla delar finns med. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 2 VÅV21EX02-3001 06.11.2023-31.03.2024  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 31.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  07.10.2023 - 31.01.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 60

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Midseminar

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedual

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 H/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Strukturen följer anvisningarna
  Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete
  Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
  Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
  Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
  Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 2 VÅV21EX02-3004 01.01.2024-29.02.2024  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2012, 2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 29.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 31.01.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Midseminar

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedual

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 H/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Strukturen följer anvisningarna
  Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete
  Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
  Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
  Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
  Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 2 VÅV21EX02-3005 28.08.2023-30.01.2024  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the subject for thesis and literature for research method is free of choice

  Learning methods

  Individual supervision
  seminar for presentation of parts of thesis, discussion and supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The theoretical framework for thesis i suitable for the content and can be approved. The methodology is described and the data collection is almost done. the analysis of the data has begun. The thesis work is under construction.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 30.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  15 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  -
  See scedule and Moodle course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  See Novia instructions for validation

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar December to January

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The hours counted for the course is 162 (6 cu) and contains mainly independent work but individual supervision is available during the course

  Content scheduling

  Approved work, consisting of theoretical framework to thesis, description of methodology used, collected datamaterial and the analysis of data has begun

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  See practical guide and content above

•   Degree Project 3 VÅV21EX03-3001 08.01.2024-12.05.2024  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX02

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis: 0-5
  Maturity test: uk-gk

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 12.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.03.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Jannica Andtfolk, Anita Kvist, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Thesis
  Maturity test

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Presentation of thesis public.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring v.20
  Autumn v.47

  Assessment criteria

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.
  Metod:
  Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
  Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
  Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
  Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
  Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Resultat:
  Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
  Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
  Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
  Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
  En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
  Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
  Källkritiken är bristfällig.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
  Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
  Slutsatserna är triviala.
  Resultat:
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
  Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
  Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
  Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
  Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
  Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
  Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
  Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
  Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
  Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
  Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
  En god källkritik.
  Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
  Källkritiken är god.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
  Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
  Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
  Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
  Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
  Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.
  Presentation:
  Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
  Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
  Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
  Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
  Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
  Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
  Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.
  Presentation:
  Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
  Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
  Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
  Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)

•   Degree Project 3 VÅV21EX03-3002 01.01.2024-31.07.2024  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX02

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the topic of Thesis

  Learning methods

  Independent work with support from the supervisor.
  Seminar + maturity test.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis is assessed according to 5 criteria, scientific writing, theoretical framework, method, result and presentation. Each criteria ha a scale from 1 to 5. The assessment criteria is published on the Moodlepage linked to this implementation plan.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2024 - 31.07.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Terese Österberg, Anita Kvist, Marlene Gädda, Anita Wikberg, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  See practical guide and Moodle course.
  Follow Novia instuctions for thesis writing.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia general instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The thesis can be ordered, then an agreement is needed
  The data material can be collected from different helath care or other organisations if ethical permissions are approved.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation and maturity test in May or in week 47, see Moodle and time schedule.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  Students plan their time use themselves, see below

  Content scheduling

  154 hours mostly self-directed work, 6 hours seminar 2 hours maturity test.

•   Degree Project 3 VÅV21EX03-3003 25.03.2024-12.05.2024  6 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV21EX02

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis: 0-5
  Maturity test: uk-gk

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.03.2024 - 12.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 31.03.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Ann-Louise Glasberg, Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Jannica Andtfolk, Terese Österberg, Anita Kvist, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Anita Wikberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marica Hinders, Marice Nedergård, Nina Vestö, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Thesis
  Maturity test

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Presentation of thesis public.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring v.20
  Autumn v.47

  Assessment criteria

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.
  Metod:
  Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
  Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
  Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
  Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
  Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Resultat:
  Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
  Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
  Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
  Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
  En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
  Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
  Källkritiken är bristfällig.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
  Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
  Slutsatserna är triviala.
  Resultat:
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
  Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
  Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
  Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
  Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
  Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
  Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
  Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
  Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
  Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
  Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
  En god källkritik.
  Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
  Källkritiken är god.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
  Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
  Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
  Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
  Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
  Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.
  Presentation:
  Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
  Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
  Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
  Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
  Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
  Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
  Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.
  Presentation:
  Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
  Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
  Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
  Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)

•   Degree project 1 VÅV22EX01-3002 13.05.2024-06.10.2024  3 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Work plan

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the topic of Thesis.
  See also literature in method course.
  For inspiration to find a title:
  Lundgren, I., Blix, E., Gottfredsdóttir, H., Wikberg, A. & Aagaard Nohr, E. (Eds.) 2022. Theories and perspectives for midwifery - a Nordic view. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Oscarsson M. & Gerorgsson S. (red.). (2021). Etik för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  An introduction lecture to the course will be held. The course is mainly done as selfdirected studies with possibility to group supervision. submission of the plan for the thesis is the examination.
  
  The content of the work plan for thesis:
  Novia titlepage
  Table of content
  Introduction
  Background (description of the topic, at least 5-6 scientific studies)
  Aim and problem definition
  Method (Data collection based on 2 references/discuss method of selection)
  Ethical consideration (based on references)
  Timetable
  Reference list
  Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excl. Title page and table of content)
  Follow Novia’s instructions for writing Thesis.
  
  1. You find Novia’s title page on Moodle (no key needed)
  2. Table of content is done in Word, if you do not know how to do choose ? (help) in the upper right corner and write list of content in the search field
  3. The introduction should be about 1 p, where the reader is introduced to the topic and also to your interest and motivation of studying it.
  4. Background shall be 3 – 5 p and divided into chapters where description of concepts and the topic of the subject. In the background you also describe the previous research done
  5. Aim and problem definition can be short about ½ p.
  6. The method can be described on 1-3 p. The chapter includes a description of the approach (qualitative/quantitative design), motivation for the choice and data collection method. References need to be included.
  7. Ethical considerations are described on about 1 p and with the help of references ethical principles followed are discussed. refer to relevant documents on Finnish National advicory board on Research Integrity TENK. (tenk.fi)
  8. Time plan should estimate how Thesis proceeds. Please do a realistic plan writing something for each month and write it also in your calender.
  9. Works cited
  
  Submit manuscript on Moodle

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For an approved Thesis plan the requirements stipulated above should fulfilled.
  The plan fulfills the above stipulated requirements = GK, which mean PASS

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.05.2024 - 06.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Start well in advance!
  Individual feedback after submitting the plan.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia general instructions
  Evaluated as failed or pass

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The thesis can be ordered but this is not necessary.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  submission in the beginning of October 2024.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 3 credits which is equivalent to about 80 h work for the student out of which 10 are scheduled, the rest is individual work.No seminar. See time table.

  Content scheduling

  Individual planning is part of the process

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3009 11.09.2023-17.11.2023  3 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Recommended litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according tol instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid implementation
  Contact studies in online , seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2023 - 17.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  
  Aktuell lagstiftning
  
  Etik vid läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Säker läkemedelsbehandling vid olika skeden av läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  
  Grundmatematik
  
  Enhetsomvandlingar
  
  Dosering av läkemedel i fast och flytande form
  
  Nomogram
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments and forum discussion online
  Test online and drug calculation test in class

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  kursens omfattning 3x27h= 81h
  
  föreläsningar + tenter 7h
  
  moodleuppgifter + självstudier 61h
  
  simuleringar 13h (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  27 h/credit

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  På svenska
  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God-synnerligen god nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3010 25.09.2023-26.11.2023  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Recommended litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according tol instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid implementation
  Contact studies in online , seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.09.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 15.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  
  Aktuell lagstiftning
  
  Etik vid läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Säker läkemedelsbehandling vid olika skeden av läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  
  Grundmatematik
  
  Enhetsomvandlingar
  
  Dosering av läkemedel i fast och flytande form
  
  Infusionshastighet
  
  Utspädningar
  
  Nomogram
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments and forum discussion online
  Test online and drug calculation test in class

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  kursens omfattning 3x27h= 81h
  
  föreläsningar + tenter 7h
  
  moodleuppgifter + självstudier 61h
  
  simuleringar 13h (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  27 h/credit

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  På svenska
  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God-synnerligen god nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3012 23.10.2023-15.12.2023  3 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Nygårdas

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual test 80 % correctly

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.10.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 22.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram, Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Virtual test
  Exam in drug calculation

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 20 hours + 4 hours for the exam
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Webbaserade uppgifter: UK
  Virtuellt test i teori 80 % inte korrekt, vitsord UK
  Tentamen i läkemedelsräkning inte godkänt om inte 100 % är korrekt (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 80 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3013 06.11.2023-15.12.2023  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Nygårdas

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Recommended litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according tol instructions

  Learning methods

  seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 05.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Läkemedlesräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/credit

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God-synnerligen god nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  På engelska (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3008 18.03.2024-21.04.2024  2 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
  Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
  Assignmets pass/ rejected
  Undone task =0
  Active participation in workshops
  one part rejected = course 0

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.03.2024 - 21.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2023 - 31.07.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Vasa Vård 1

  Additional information

  The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
  Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
  Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
  task according to moodle in specific order
  tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr
  %4 h toal workload

  Content scheduling

  Task / week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
  Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
  Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
  Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3009 19.02.2024-29.03.2024  2 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  calculation test t 100% correct t national criteria
  Online test 1-5 according % scale
  assgnments pass/ comlpete

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.02.2024 - 29.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 16.02.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  Den pedagogisk refensramen är enligt inlärninsgpyramiden och Feynmans teknik
  Studerande jobbar i grupper under workshps och stöder även varnarda i inlärningen (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda
  re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27H /cr

  Content scheduling

  Teoridelen periodiserad enligt kronologisk ordning så föregående microdel gör före nästa
  Läkemedlesräkningen delad i tre oliks kategorier (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3010 01.04.2024-12.05.2024  2 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  calculation test t 100% correct t national criteria
  Online test 1-5 according % scale
  assgnments pass/ comlpete

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.04.2024 - 12.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.03.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  Den pedagogisk refensramen är enligt inlärninsgpyramiden och Feynmans teknik
  Studerande jobbar i grupper under workshps och stöder även varnarda i inlärningen (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda
  re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27H /cr

  Content scheduling

  Teoridelen periodiserad enligt kronologisk ordning så föregående microdel gör före nästa
  Läkemedlesräkningen delad i tre oliks kategorier (not translated)

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3011 01.04.2024-12.05.2024  2 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
  Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
  Assignmets pass/ rejected
  Undone task =0
  Active participation in workshops
  one part rejected = course 0

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.04.2024 - 12.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 30.03.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Vasa Vård 1

  Additional information

  The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
  Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
  Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
  task according to moodle in specific order
  tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr
  %4 h toal workload

  Content scheduling

  Task / week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
  Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
  Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
  Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

•   Drug treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3001 28.08.2023-01.10.2023  2 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
  Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
  Assignmets pass/ rejected
  Undone task =0
  Active participation in workshops
  one part rejected = course 0

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 01.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
  Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
  Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
  task according to moodle in specific order
  tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr
  %4 h toal workload

  Content scheduling

  Task / week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
  Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
  Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
  Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

•   Emergency Care and Radiation Safety USS21UV01-3001 03.01.2024-09.06.2024  4 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Is familiar with the regional, national and international collaboration in crisis and disaster situations
  
  Is able to, as part of an interprofessional team, assess the need for care, plan, perform and document emergency care
  
  Has expertise in care in various service system
  
  Can meet, support and mentor the critically ill patient and relatives
  
  Masters medication management in emergency care
  
  Deepens his/her knowledge of psychosocial support in crisis situations
  
  Can start immediate rescue operations independently and act in emergency situations
  
  Masters the basics of radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Surgical and Perioperative Care, Nursing in Internal Medicine and Palliative care, Clinical Nursing

  Content of the study unit

  Patient care in emergency care situations in an interprofessional team and befitting medication management and medication calculation
  
  Psychosocial support in various crisis situations and application of evidence based working methods in emergency care and in different service environments
  
  Regional, national and international cooperation in crisis and disaster situations
  
  Assessment of the situation and rescue operations in crisis and disaster situations
  
  The basics of radiation physics, radiation biology, radiation protection legislation, radiation safety measures in the workplace and medical use of radiation

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Radiation safety: according to the teachers instructions, Moodle

  Learning methods

  Radiationsafety: first lesson on-line, schedule. The other lectures are recorded.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Radiationsafety: Approved written assignement/ written exaination A/F

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2024 - 09.06.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 02.01.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1. Obligastoriska simulationer med inlämningsuppgifter
  
  2. Tent i läkemedelsräkning
  
  3. Hemtent i pre-hospital och akut vård
  
  4. Tent i strålsäkerhet (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Radiationsafety: examinationdates will be planned under the first lesson

  Student's schedule and workload

  Radiationsafety: 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Godkänd:
  Studerande lämnar in i tid instuderingsfrågor.
  Studerande deltar aktivt simuleringar och påvisar kunnandet i akut vård.
  Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: alla svar måste vara till 100% korrekt räknade för att studerande skall bli godkänd i examinationen.
  Tent i akutvård:
  Studerande känner till samarbete vid kris- och katastrofsituationer regionalt och nationellt.
  Studerande kan i ett mångprofessionellt team bedöma vårdbehovet, planera, utföra och dokumentera akutvård
  Studerande kan bemöta och handleda den kritiskt sjuka patienten och anhöriga
  Studerande behärskar läkemedelsbehandling inom prehospital- och akutvård
  
  Underkänd:
  Studerande har inte lämnat in instuderingsfrågor vid DL eller deltar inte aktivt simuleringar och påvisar inte kunnandet i akutvård.
  Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: resultat under 100% korrekt
  Tent i akutvård: Studerande påvisar inte kunskap i kursens olika kompetensområden och svarar till uppgifter på en allmän nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande känner till på en allmän nivå begrepp och grundläggande principer inom akutvård. Det finns ytlig samband mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande förstår och kan förklara begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Visar förmåga till att reflektera mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har förmåga att se samband och göra egna slutsatser mellan begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Kan reflektera mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

•   Emergency Care and Radiation Safety USS21UV01-3003 08.01.2024-07.04.2024  4 credits  (USS21D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Is familiar with the regional, national and international collaboration in crisis and disaster situations
  
  Is able to, as part of an interprofessional team, assess the need for care, plan, perform and document emergency care
  
  Has expertise in care in various service system
  
  Can meet, support and mentor the critically ill patient and relatives
  
  Masters medication management in emergency care
  
  Deepens his/her knowledge of psychosocial support in crisis situations
  
  Can start immediate rescue operations independently and act in emergency situations
  
  Masters the basics of radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Surgical and Perioperative Care, Nursing in Internal Medicine and Palliative care, Clinical Nursing

  Content of the study unit

  Patient care in emergency care situations in an interprofessional team and befitting medication management and medication calculation
  
  Psychosocial support in various crisis situations and application of evidence based working methods in emergency care and in different service environments
  
  Regional, national and international cooperation in crisis and disaster situations
  
  Assessment of the situation and rescue operations in crisis and disaster situations
  
  The basics of radiation physics, radiation biology, radiation protection legislation, radiation safety measures in the workplace and medical use of radiation

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Strålsäkerhet: enligt lärarens anvisning, Moodle
  Akutvård:
  God medicinsk praxis 2020. Posttraumatiska stressreaktioner och posttraumatiskt stressyndrom. https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/khr00125
  God medicinsk praxis 2021. Psykosocialt stöd och tjänster (bild). https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/imk01307
  God medicinsk praxis 2021. Återhämtning från posttraumatiskt stressyndrom och traumatyp hos vuxna (bild). https://www.kaypahoito.fi/imk01308
  Hälso- och sjukvårdslag §38-40
  https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/ajantasa/2010/20101326
  Lennquist, S. (red.) 2017. Traumatologi.
  Lennquist, S. (red.) 2009. Katastrofmedicin.
  Lundberg, Lars; Bäckström, Denise; Andersson Hagiwara, Magnus 2022. Prehospital akutsjukvård.
  Läkemedelsboken - Akutmedicin https://lakemedelsboken.se/
  Räddningsväsendet 2016. Räddningsverksamhet. http://www.pelastustoimi.fi/raddningsvasendet/raddningsverksamhet
  Saviluoto Anssi 2018. Luentosarja Ensihoidon lääkkeet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3UgziVBVHM
  Statsrådets förordning om räddningsväsendet
  https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/ajantasa/2011/20110407
  SHM 2023. Prehospital akutsjukvård.
  http://stm.fi/sv/prehospital-akutsjukvard
  
  TERVEYSPORTTI:
  Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat:
  -Traumapotilaan hoito; hoito onnettomuuspaikalla ja kuljetuksen aikana och Vaikeasti loukkaantuneen potilaan hoito päivystyspoliklinikalla.
  Akuuttihoidon tietokannat:
  -Akuuttihoito-opas; Hätätilapotilaan hoito, Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito, Akuuttihoidon laitteet (Sairaalan ulkopuolisessa hoidossa käytettävät laitteet), Kuvat (Sairaalan ulkopuolisessa hoidossa käytettävät laitteet)
  Akuuttihoidon lääkkeet
  -Ensihoito-opas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Radiation safety 1cr.:
  - Introduction lecture 2t, on-line
  - Material, tasks and lectures on Moodle
  - On-line examination

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  På svenska
  1. Obligatorisk föreläsning GK/UK
  
  2. Obligastoriska kliniska övningar, simulationer och inlämmningsuppgifter GK/UK.
  
  3. Tent i läkemedelsräkning. GK/UK. Kalkylator får användas (ej mobiltelefon). .
  
  4. Tent i akutvård (0-5)
  
  5. Strålsäkerhet : GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.01.2024 - 07.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-Å
  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Studerande får muntlig feedback av instuderingsfrågor, kliniska övningar och simulationer under övningar.
  Studerande får skriftlig gruppfeedback efter hemtent. Individuell feedback vid behov (tiden bokas med lärare). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1.Obligatorisk introduktion och obliatoriska föreläsningar
  2.Obligastoriska kliniska övningar med inlämningsuppgifter och simulationer . Gjorda och i tid inlämnade uppgifter är förutsättning för att studerande kan delta kliniska övningar.
  3.Tent i läkemedelsräkning
  4. Hemtent i akutvård
  5. Strålsäkerhet: Uppgifter i Moodle (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatorisk introduktion 11.1.
  Obligatoriska föreläsningar 15.1., 23.1. 8.2. 19.3.
  Inlämningsuppgifter inför kliniska övningar DL 15.2. kl 16 och 4.3. kl 16
  Examination i läkemedelsräkning 22.03. (omtent 1 19.04., omtent 2 24.05.).
  Hemtent i akutvård 28.3.
  
  Strålsäkerhet: tentamensdatum planeras under första lektionen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  4sp = 108h
  Föreläsningar 12 h
  Instuderingsfrågor och simulationer 27 h
  Läkemedelsräkning 13 h
  Tent i akut vårdarbete 31 h (Självstudier inför tent + tent 4 timmar)
  Strålsäkerhet 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Godkänd:
  Studerande har deltagit de obligatoriska föreläsningar.
  
  Studerande deltar aktivt kliniska övningar och simuleringar och påvisar kunnandet i akutvård.
  
  Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: alla svar måste vara till 100% korrekt räknade för att studerande skall bli godkänd i examinationen.
  
  Tent i akutvård:
  Studerande känner till samarbete vid kris- och katastrofsituationer regionalt och nationellt.
  Studerande kan i ett mångprofessionellt team bedöma vårdbehovet, planera, utföra och dokumentera akutvård
  Studerande kan bemöta och handleda den kritiskt sjuka patienten och anhöriga
  Studerande behärskar läkemedelsbehandling inom akutvård.
  
  Underkänd:
  Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller deltar inte aktivt simuleringar och påvisar inte kunnandet i akutvård.
  
  Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: resultat under 100% korrekt
  
  Tent i akutvård: Studerande påvisar inte kunskap i kursens olika kompetensområden.
  
  Strålskydd: Har inte lämnat in uppgifter i strålsäkerhet/ UK i online-tent
  
  Studerande påvisar inte kunskap i kursens olika kompetensområden och svarar till uppgifter på en allmän nivå (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande känner till på en allmän nivå begrepp och grundläggande principer inom akutvård. Det finns ytlig samband mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande förstår och kan förklara begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Visar förmåga till att reflektera mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har förmåga att se samband och göra egna slutsatser mellan begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Kan reflektera mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

•   English VÅV22EN01-3006 15.04.2024-24.05.2024  3 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 24.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 12.04.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV22EN01-3007 04.03.2024-07.04.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 07.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.03.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 43

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV22EN01-3002 02.01.2024-24.03.2024  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 24.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.12.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ellinor Granholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3005 14.08.2023-31.12.2023  7 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  - can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  - can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)
  
  Physical, social and symbolic environment
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  Wound-care, chronic wound
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
  Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)
  
  Övrig litteratur:
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.
  
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
  Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.
  
  Artiklar och databas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Simulationer obligatoriks närvaro
  Smågruppsarbete (distans)
  Reflektionsdagbok
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete (distans) och simulationer . Bedöms: GK/UK.
  
  2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK.
  
  3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker GK/UK Skriftlig respons på Moodle
  
  4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
  För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Muntlig respons efter examinationen.
  
  5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
  Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Skriftlig respons och utvärdering på Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 31.08.2023

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in till daniel.nenonen@novia.fi via e-ahot före den 31.8.2023 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Reflektionsdagbok
  Simulationer
  Praktisk examination
  Individuell skriftlig examination
  Förstahjälp (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Reflektionsdagbok lämnas in på Moodle inför varje simulation
  Simulation vecka 43 och 50, + öppen klinik vecka 50
  Första hjälp vecka 43.
  Praktisk examination. Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommelse med examinator
  Skriftlig individuell examination. Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommelse med examinator (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier inför examination 80h
  Självstudier, smågruppsarbete, reflektionsdagbok - inför varje simulation 70 h
  Föreläsningar på campus ca. 12 h
  Simulation: 16h
  Första hjälp övning: 4h
  Examination: 4h
  
  Livräddande första hjälpen 0,25 sp
  Skriftlig individuell tentamen 2.5 sp
  Simulering 1 sp
  Releksionsdagbok 1 sp
  Praktisk examination 1 sp
  Självstudier (moodle) och föreläsningar 1,25 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3003 04.10.2023-09.02.2024  7 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  - can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  - can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)
  
  Physical, social and symbolic environment
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  Wound-care, chronic wound
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
  Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)
  
  Övrig litteratur:
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.
  
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
  Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.
  
  Artiklar och databas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Simulationer obligatoriks närvaro
  Smågruppsarbete (distans)
  Reflektionsdagbok
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete (distans) och simulationer . Bedöms: GK/UK.
  
  2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK.
  
  3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker GK/UK Skriftlig respons på Moodle
  
  4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
  För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Muntlig respons efter examinationen.
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle
  
  5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
  Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Skriftlig respons och utvärdering på Moodle
  
  6. Tystnadsplikt - inlämning på Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.10.2023 - 09.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  29.07.2023 - 07.09.2023

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in till Josephine Åberg via e-ahot före den 9.10.2023 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Reflektionsdagbok
  Simulationer
  Praktisk examination
  Individuell skriftlig examination
  Förstahjälp (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Reflektionsdagbok lämnas in på Moodle inför varje simulation (dvs. v.46, 49 samt v. 1/2024)
  Simulation( vecka 46, 49 - 2023. Samt v. 2 2024)
  Första hjälp, v 2/2024
  Praktisk examination v. 7/2024 Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommlese med examinatorn
  Skriftlig individuell examination vecka 4/2024. Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommlese med examinatorn (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier inför examination 80h
  Självstudier, smågruppsarbete, reflektionsdagbok - inför varje simulation 70 h
  Föreläsningar på campus ca. 12 h
  Simulation: 16h
  Första hjälp övning: 4h
  Examination: 4h
  Tystandsplikt - inlämning
  
  Livräddande första hjälpen 0,25 sp
  Skriftlig individuell tentamen (hemtentamen) 2.5. sp
  Simulering 1 sp
  Refleksionsdagbok 2.25 sp
  Praktisk examination 1 sp
  Självstudier (moodle) och föreläsningar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3004 04.09.2023-31.01.2024  7 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  - can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  - can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)
  
  Physical, social and symbolic environment
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  Wound-care, chronic wound
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
  Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)
  
  Övrig litteratur:
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.
  
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
  Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.
  
  Artiklar och databas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Kliniska övningar
  Studiebesök (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Inlämningsuppgifter inför kliniska övningar GK/UK. Muntlig respons ges under övningar.
  
  2. Quiz i sårvård. Självrättande tent.
  
  3. Obligatorisk närvaro under kliniska övningar och studiebesök GK/UK. Muntlig respons ges under övningar,
  
  4. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK. Muntlig respons ges kontinuerligt.
  
  5. Praktisk examination i form av filmning GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
  För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Studerande får skriftlig respons parvis på Moodle.
  
  6. Skriftlig individuell examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
  Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Studerande får skriftlig individuell respons och utvärdering på Moodle. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 31.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.09.2023

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering av kurs eller kursdel lämnas in innan undervisningen börjar till Hanna Limnell via e-ahot före den 18.9.
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Ouriginal via Moodle
  
  Examensstadga §4 "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska." (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Obligatorisk introduktion 6.9.
  Inlämningsuppgifter inför kliniska övningar
  Obligatoriska kliniska övningar
  Praktisk examination i form av filmning
  Individuell skriftlig examination
  Nödförstahjälpen 4h (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studiebesök i smågrupper; Kunnonkoti Åbo YH (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Inlämningsuppgifter inför kliniska övningar lämnas in vecka 41 10.10. på Moodle
  Quiz i sårvård Vecka 44
  Obligatoriska kliniska övningar och studiebesök vecka 43-49
  Livräddande förstahjälpen 4h vecka 49 7-8.12.
  Praktisk examination i form av filmning vecka 48-50 Inlämning senast 15.12. på Moodle.
  Skriftlig individuell examination vecka 49 5.12.2023 Omtentamen 1 19.01. 2024 omtentamen 2 09.02.2024 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h 7 sp = 189h
  
  Föreläsningar 24 h 1sp
  Inlämningsuppgifter inför kliniska övningar och Quiz 54 h 2sp
  Kliniska övningar och studiebesök 27 h 1 sp
  Självstudier och skriftlig individuell examination 40 h 1,5 sp
  Självstudier och klinisk examination i form av filmning 44h 1,5 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Extended Nursing Care of the Patient with Substance Use Disorders VÅV16PV03-3009 28.08.2023-26.11.2023  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and societal governance in substance abuse care
  - can identify the consequences of abuse and dependence on the welfare society
  - can apply preventive care work and describe the care chain in the abusive care system
  - can describe specific features of different drug groups
  - can evaluate different care and treatment efforts in different contexts

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Nursing care of the patient with substance use disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2011. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Handouts
  According to the lecturer´s instruction

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case demonstrations
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Videos
  Study
  Experience Experts

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The following points are considered in the Group work:
  Theoretical basis and use of literature with scale 1 - 5
  Content and logical structure of work with scale 1 - 5
  Cooperation with scale 1-5
  Presentation with scale 1 - 5
  The following points are considered on the Project day:
  Preparation for the presentation with scale 1-5
  Get the students interested in the subject, get them to cooperate and discuss with scale 1-5
  Can summarize the discussion on the subject with scale 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 25.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Group work
  Indivudual assignment

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visit
  Experts by experience
  Participation in an external lecturers day and Hallå 2 project

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Group work:
  Seminar autumn 2022

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can do the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

•   Extended clinical nursing care in primary health care VÅV21FK01-3001 22.01.2024-31.05.2024  6 credits  (USS21F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of primary care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their relatives
  - mastered the care of patients in primary care
  - mastered the care of acutely ill children
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - can, in a simulated situation, be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can apply a rehabilitative and health-promoting approach
  - can apply patient guidance

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  PEDIATRIC CAR
  Jääskeläinen, J., Miettinen, P., Niinikoski, H., Saha, M-T. & Veijola R. 2016. Diabeettisen ketoasidoosinhoito. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Mäkelä, M. & Dunder, T. 2016. Anafylaktinen reaktio. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Qvist, E. 2013. Lääkärinkäsikirja. Akuutisti sairas imeväinen.
  Qvist, E. & Korppi, M. 2009. Duodecim. Alle kolmen kuukauden ikäinen lapsi päivystysksessä.
  
  https://www.terveyskyla.fi/kuntoutumistalo/sv
  
  https://www.vardhandboken.se/arbetssatt-och-ansvar/bemotande-i-vard-och-omsorg/telefonradgivning---ett-personcentrerat-vardmote/telefonradgivning-med-samtalsprocessen-som-metod/
  
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red) 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm
  
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Group work
  Individual work
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Active attendance at the lessons
  Approved practical exercises
  Written examination assignment. Grade: scale 1 - 5
  Mandatory attendance at Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  
  Surgical care, internal medical care, rehabilitation and pediatric care: exam grades 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.01.2024 - 31.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 21.01.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V
  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Vasa - timlärare Vård, Marica Hinders, Viktor Matintupa, Carita Blomström, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Active attendance
  Approved practical exercises
  Written examination in internal medicine care, surgical care and pediatric care

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditiona

•   Extended nursing care in an optional clinical context VÅV14KVV15-3009 11.09.2023-17.12.2023  12 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and related persons and take into account their cultural affiliation
  - can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
  - can handle complicated vocational tasks within the chosen health context
  - can independently make decisions regarding the patient's care process and be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can independently acquire and assess evidence-based knowledge
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - has the skills to supervise and teach patients
  - shows ability to meet people in crisis
  - has readiness to shop in different situations in the healthcare sector

  Prerequisites

  Core studies
  Professional studies
  Practice

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About internships

  Learning methods

  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context
  Written internships in different contexts

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved internship
  Approved written assignment
  Participation in seminar

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 12 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  1 - 60

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda

  Additional information

  Students have the opportunity to get some of the practice validated through summer jobs as nurses in the summer of 2022
  is the supervisor for those who do internships in paediatric care
  
  Supervisors for those who do internships in emergency care, intensive care, internal medicine and surgical health care are Marice Nedergård, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Jannica Andtfolk & Åsa Lågland.
  
  The supervisor for those who do their internship in psychiatry is Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Internationa connections

  Students can complete the internship abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h
  1 week = 40 h, of which 38 h per week mandatory attendance at the internship
  2 h / week for internships on your own.
  Mandatory attendance at the internship info before the internship and the internship seminar after the end of the internship

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  follows the work list and holds agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
  Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team

•   Extended nursing care in an optional clinical context VÅV21KVV15-3002 23.11.2023-15.12.2024  15 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and related persons and take into account their cultural affiliation
  - can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
  - can handle complicated vocational tasks within the chosen health context
  - can independently make decisions regarding the patient's care process and be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can independently acquire and assess evidence-based knowledge
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - has the skills to supervise and teach patients
  - shows ability to meet people in crisis
  - has readiness to shop in different situations in the healthcare sector

  Prerequisites

  Core studies
  Professional studies
  Practice

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About internships

  Learning methods

  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context
  Written internships in different contexts

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved internship
  Approved written assignment
  Participation in INFO and seminar

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.11.2023 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.09.2024

  • 15 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Seats

  1 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Students have the opportunity to get some of the practice validated through summer jobs as nurses in the summer of 2023/2024
  
  Supervisors for this course are Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Jannica Andtfolk & Åsa Lågland.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar (MANDATORY)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Internationa connections

  Students can complete the internship abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  15 cr=405h
  1 cr = 27 h
  
  1 week = 40 h, of which 38 h per week mandatory attendance at the internship (2 h / week for internships on your own)
  10 weeks practice =400h
  2h MANDATORY attendance at the internship info before
  3h Internship seminar after the end of the internship MANDATORY

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  follows the work list and holds agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
  Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team

•   Family Health Care VÅV21HV03-3001 16.10.2023-17.12.2023  6 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs of pediatric patients
  - have basic knowledge in different theories about human development from age 0 - 20 years and about the personal development of the adult and the elderly

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children
  Developmental psychologhy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020
  
  Utvecklingspsykologi
  Utvecklingspsykologi:
  Jerlang, E. 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier. Stockholm, Liber
  Hwang, P. & Nilsson, B. 2011. Utvecklingspsykologi. Stockholm, Natur och Kultur
  Tetzchner, S. 2016. Utvecklingspsykologi. Studentlitteratur, Lund

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.10.2023 - 17.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 13.10.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 cr
  Children and young people's health 1.5 cr
  Developmental psychology 0.5 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's and young people's health and children's healthcare 3 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Developmental psychology 0.5 credits - written assignment
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination autumn 2023
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV21HV03-3006 28.08.2023-08.10.2023  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs of pediatric patients
  - have basic knowledge in different theories about human development from age 0 - 20 years and about the personal development of the adult and the elderly

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children
  Developmental psychologhy

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020
  
  Utvecklingspsykologi
  Utvecklingspsykologi:
  Jerlang, E. 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier. Stockholm, Liber
  Hwang, P. & Nilsson, B. 2011. Utvecklingspsykologi. Stockholm, Natur och Kultur
  Tetzchner, S. 2016. Utvecklingspsykologi. Studentlitteratur, Lund

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 08.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 04.09.2023

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  0 - 32

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 cr
  Children and young people's health 1.5 cr
  Developmental psychology 0.5 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's and young people's health and children's healthcare 3 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Developmental psychology 0.5 credits - written assignment
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 1.5 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2023
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3008 04.12.2023-02.02.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.12.2023 - 02.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2023 - 03.12.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3010 06.11.2023-10.12.2023  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 10.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 05.11.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   Finnish USS22GV05-3002 14.08.2023-31.12.2023  3 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
  - can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
  - is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
  
  Oral and written communication
  
  Oral and written presentations
  
  Language correctness and language planning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sanna Nygård

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ingår i kursen och finns i Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier, muntliga och skriftliga övningar och uppgifter. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper bedöms skilt. Bedömningen baserar sig på den gemensamma europeiska referensramen för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1 motsvarar nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1-3) och nivå B2 eller högre motsvarar goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4-5).
  Examinationer och timaktivitet påverkar bedömningen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 31.08.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sanna Nygård

  Additional information

  Noggrannare information om uppgifter, tentamen och datum publiceras i Moodle och gås igenom under första kurstillfället.
  Delprestationer är i kraft fram till 31.12.2023 eller enligt särskild överenskommelse.
  För uppgifter som lämnats in efter deadline ges ingen feedback.
  Sena inlämningar påverkar kursvitsordet. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  För godkänd kurs krävs:
  - närvaro på lektioner (enligt egen nivå)
  - godkända muntliga och skriftliga kursuppgifter
  - godkänd muntlig tentamen
  - godkänd skriftlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadlines för inlämningsuppgifter publiceras i Moodle och gås igenom under första kurstillfället.
  Muntlig tentamen i smågrupper i oktober.
  Skritflig tentamen i december. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h arbete (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  B1
  Vitsordet 1: Klarar sig nöjaktigt i förutsebara yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan skriva en enkel sammanhängande text. Budskapet förmedlas även om felen kan försvåra kommunikationen.
  Vitsordet 2: Klarar sig någorlunda i oförutsedda yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan skriva konsekventa texter som förmedlar ett budskap. Felen leder i allmänhet inte till missförstånd även om de kan störa läsrytmen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Vitsordet 3 (B1): Klarar sig allmänhet bra i yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan vanligen uttrycka sig enligt situationens krav.
  Vitsordet 4 (B2): Klarar sig bra i allmänna yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Använder språket mångsidigt.
  Uttrycker sig enligt situationens krav (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  B2 (eller högre):
  Klarar sig mycket bra i allmänna yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Använder språket smidigt och mångsidigt.
  Uttrycker sig tydligt enligt situationens krav. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3011 12.02.2024-22.03.2024  3 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.02.2024 - 22.03.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 09.02.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3012 02.01.2024-16.02.2024  3 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  Översättningsövningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 16.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.12.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga kursen såväl muntligt som skriftligt men behöver inte närvara under lektionerna. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen. 2 omtentamenstillfällen. Höjning av vitsord möjligt inom ett år efter godkänt vitsord. (not translated)

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3007 02.01.2024-28.01.2024  2 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 28.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 30.12.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 43

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3008 14.09.2023-20.10.2023  2 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test: approved/failed
  Group assignment: approved/failed
  Individual written case studies: approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.09.2023 - 20.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests during lesson time, virtual test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 h = 54 h

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3011 06.11.2023-08.12.2023  2 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  essons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test: approved/failed
  Group assignment: approved/failed
  Individual written case studies: approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.11.2023 - 08.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 05.11.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests during lesson time, virtual test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   First aid and emergency preparedness VÅV22GV06-3013 15.04.2024-19.05.2024  2 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.04.2024 - 19.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2023 - 31.12.2023

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time
  Group assinment

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)

•   From Elderly to Geriatric Patient USS21KL02-3002 28.08.2023-08.10.2023  4 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Has an understanding of normal aging
  
  Can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
  
  Can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  
  Has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
  
  Master evidence-based care methods and appropriate medication management
  
  Can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient
  
  Chain of care and service system
  
  Coping/adaptation
  
  Partnership and counseling
  
  Caring for close relatives
  
  Ethical decision making
  
  The aged patient's health problems
  
  Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
  
  Adequate medication management
  
  Geriatric technology
  
  Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder
  
  Evidence-based care
  
  Care chains and service types, elderly care
  
  Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  - Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., Hylen Ranhoff, A., Bolinder-Palmér, I. & Olsson, K. (2018). Geriatrisk omvårdnad: God omsorg och vård till den äldre (Andra upplagan.). Liber AB.
  - Dehlin, O. & Rundgren, Å. (2018). Geriatrik (3:4 upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  eller Arkkila, P., Pitkälä, K., Strandberg, T., Sulkava, R., Tilvis, R. & Viitanen, M. (2016). Geriatria (3., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim.
  Gottlieb, L. N. 2012 Strengths-Based Nursing Care
  Litteratur:
  Drevenhorn, E. 2017. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekstedt, M. & Flink, M. 2019. Hemsjukvård-olika perspektiv på trygg och säker vård
  Ernsth Bravell, M. 2011. Äldre och åldrande.
  Etene. 2008. Vårdetik på ålderns höst
  Finlex 2012 Lag om stödjande av den äldre befolkningens funktionsförmåga och om social- och hälsovårdstjänster för äldre.
  Hellström, I. & Hydén, L-C. (red). 2016. Att leva med demens.
  Johansson, S: & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (red). 2016. Förändringsperspektiv på äldreomsorgen.
  Jönson, H., & Harnett, T. 2015. Socialt arbete med äldre.
  Kivelä, S-L. 2010. Vi äldre och våra mediciner.
  Larsson, Å. (red) 2015. Vardagsteknik för äldre.
  Lindqvist, E-L. 2016 Äldres hälsa och livskvalitet
  NMR. 2015. Kvalitet i äldreomsorgen. Äldreomsorg i Norden Sid 55-90. Nordiskt välfärdscentrum.
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  SHM 2020: Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen.
  THL. 2020. Livskraft på äldre dar - kostrekommendationer på äldre personer.
  Fimea. 2020. Medicin75+
  Medibas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Workshops
  Simuleringar
  Inlämningsuppgift
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examinationsuppgift bedömning 0-5
  Tent i Geriatrik GK/UK
  Deltagande i Workshops och simulering bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2023 - 08.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 27.08.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Workshops och simulationer obilgatorisk närvaro
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedömd med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tent i Geriatrik 3.10, Omtentamen 27.10 och 24,11
  Examinationsuppgift inlämning senast 29.9 och/eller 15.11 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 4h
  Workshops och simulationer 6h
  Självstudier i Geriatrik och tent i Geriatrik 28h
  Individuell skrifltig uppgift, (examinationsuppgif) 27h
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur 43h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte. Texten besvarar inte frågorna och är ofullständig, Litteratur och forskningar tillämpas inte och inga reflektioner görs, Brister finns i den tekniska utformningen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial men har inte förmåga att göra egna reflektioner. Studerande har svårigheter med att redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteorin och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial och förmår till en viss del göra reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och kan tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar. Studerande kan relatera de olika delarna av uppgiften till varandraoch använder kursmateriel, forskningar och föreläsningsmaterial som stöd för sina reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess och kan anlysera detta och göra egna reflektioner. (not translated)

•   Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3001 08.04.2024-19.05.2024  4 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV05
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.04.2024 - 19.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 04.04.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

•   Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3004 27.11.2023-14.01.2024  4 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV05
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.
  
  Forumreflection Pass/fail
  Written assignment for seminar according to Novias instruction for written assignments/ Thesis and opponentship pass, not pass complement
  Onlinetest 0-5; 75% correct for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.11.2023 - 14.01.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 26.11.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

  Assessment criteria

  The text is fragmentary and it does not answer the questions.
  The methodological literature is not used.
  Reflections are not performed.
  The technical design is lacking.
  Does not explain the central concepts and basic principles.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The questions are answered vaguely and narrowly.
  The literature is referenced
  Reflections are performed only to a limited extent.
  The technical design is satisfactory.
  Refers concepts and basic principle
  Students have justifiable knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a deficient understanding of basic relevant concepts

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The questions are answered.
  The methodological literature is applied.
  The text is reflective and there are critical points of view.
  The technical design is good
  Understands and can explain concepts and the basic principles are based on literature. Students have good knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied,

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The questions are answered exhaustively and in many ways.
  The literature is analyzed and applied.
  The reflection is scientifically analytical.
  The technical design is commendable.
  Has the ability to see connections and draw own conclusions
  Makes versatile use of literature
  Students have excellent knowledge of quality management and improvement work and how these should be applied, as well as a good understanding of basic relevant concepts and can use these independently and critically

•   Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3005 04.03.2024-07.04.2024  4 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV05
  VÅV22PR01

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 07.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.03.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

•   Health Promoting Care USS22GV01-3002 14.08.2023-31.12.2023  4 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with the theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and palliative care
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can, under guidance, along with individuals/groups in inter-professional teams plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional capacity
  - has expertise in care in various service environments within health promotion

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and illness, public health and endemic diseases
  
  Sustainable care at local and national level
  
  Health determinants
  
  Epidemiology
  
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention, methods, rehabilitation
  
  Empowerment
  
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and commitment
  
  Different service environments
  
  Ethical issues in health education
  
  Disabilities/impairments, functional ability, measurement methods
  
  Artificial intelligence

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Obligatorisk kurslitteratur:
  Beaglehole, R., Bonita & Kjällström T, 2010. Grundläggande epidemiologi sid 17 - 66 och 147 - 250. Studentlitteratur.
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 56 - 103 (finns som e-bok)
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro.
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Klang & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
  Kauhanen mfl. Kansanterveystiede. 2013. Sanoma Pro. Helsinki.
  Pellmer et.al. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Andersson, I., Eljertsson, G. 2013. Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Backman, G. ((ed) 2012. The right to health. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde, B. (red). 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund.
  Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E., Lyckhage, G., Tengelin, E. 2015. Jämlik vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson, M. (red) 2015. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Liber.
  Nunes-Ferraz, J., Karlberg, I. 2012. Hälsoekonomi -begrepp och tillämpningar.
  Skolin 2018. Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Studentlitteratur.
  Schäfer Elinder, L., Kwak, L. (red) 2014. Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar med uppgifter
  Självstudier
  Smågruppsarbeten obligatorisk deltagande
  Workshop obligatorisk närvaro
  Seminarieuppgift grupparbete
  Grupphemtentamen obligatorisk deltagande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Workshop GK/UK
  Underkänt
  Studerande deltar inte i workshop
  Studerande är inte en aktiv deltagare under simuleringar
  Godkänt
  Studernade deltar i simuleringar aktivt
  
  Epidemiologiuppgiften GK/UK
  GK
  Studernade gör uppgiften och lämnar in den i angiven tid samt läser andras uppgifter enligt anvisingar.
  Studerande kopletterar uppgiften vid behov enligt examinators anvisingar.
  UK
  Studernade lämnar inte in uppgiften eller läser inte andras uppgifter/ kommenterar eller gör inte kompletteringar enligt anvisingarna.
  
  Hemtentamen 1-5:
  Skriftlig hemtentamen i grupp bedöms i skalan 0-5. I hemtentamen ska studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter i resursförstärkande metoder i det hälsofrämjande och förebyggande arbetet. Studerande ska ta i beakatande hållbarheten i omgivningen. Studerande ska visa kunskaper i handledning av individer och grupper till ett hälsofrämjande levnadssätt. Studerande visar att hen förstår betydelsen av mångprofessionellt arbete inom folkhälsoarbete kontext.
  Komplettering enligt examinators skilda anvisingar. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.08.2023 - 31.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 03.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Jaana-Sofia Tengström (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Workshops och smågruppsarbeten (0,5 sp) vecka 43 obligatorisk närvaro. Muntlig respons under workshoppen
  Seminarieuppgift, videofilmas och laddas på Moodle (1 sp) v.39, 29.9 kl.16.00
  Epidemiologi uppgift under närstudiedagen(0,5 sp). Uppgiften laddas på Moodle. Grupperna läser varandras uppgifter. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
  Grupphemtentamen (2 sp), inlämning vecka 47, 24.11 kl.16.00. Skriftlig respons på Moodle. Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
  Studerande använder Novias skrivansviningar i samtliga inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier 35 h
  Föreläsningar samt workshop 30 h
  Hemtentamen samt seminarieuppgift 43 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Hemtentamen
  I examinationen besvaras alla examinationens delar utgående från få källor, men de olika delar kan inte relateras till varandra eller text är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande använder smalt kurslitteratur eller enbart egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Hemtentamen
  Studerande svarar på alla examinationens delar utgående från källor men de olika svaren kan inte helt relateras till varandra. Studerande använder både kurslitteratur och sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar, men inte systematiskt. Studernade använder sig inte av andra evidensbaserade källor. Examination är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Hemtentamen
  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå till alla examinationens delar utgående från olika evidensbaserade källor och kan relatera de olika delarna av examination till varandra. Studerande använder systematiskt kurslitteratur, andra evidensbaserade källor samt sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3013 09.10.2023-26.11.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Guidebook for expecting and looking after a baby. Helsinki: Institute for Health and Welfare (available online)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration,groupworks, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.10.2023 - 26.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 08.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on Peppi. Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
  In the assignment Novia instruction for writing thesis must be used.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminars on the last lecture of the course w. 41-46. See time table.
  Retake exams on the following general exams: 24th of November and 8th of December 2023.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Health promotion VÅV14HV02-3014 02.09.2023-15.10.2023  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - become familiar with health promotion
  - be able to support health promotion and illness prevention for specific patient groups at risk
  - become familiar with screenings, and be able to apply this knowledge to nursing care
  - has basic knowledge concerning pregnancy, child birth and post partum period and knowledge of health promotion in relation to these.

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Methods for health promotion
  Health promoting work among adults
  Maternity care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/146505 Nationell rekommendation. Handbok 40 (valda delar)
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby THL. A guidebook for expecting and looking after a baby, Helsinki: THL ( available online)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  46 - 50 points = 5
  41 - 45 points = 4
  36 - 40 points= 3
  31 - 35 points = 2
  26 - 30 points = 1
  Criterias for evaluation of the written assignment:
  Methods for health promotion:
  - description of the case:5 points
  - literature: 2½ points
  - creativity:2½ points
  - application of Mi method: 10 points
  - something extra + layout: 5 points
  Maternity care:
  - exam about the birth/delivery: 5 points
  - describing the topic e.g. dental health, smoking prevention, weight :10 points
  - applying the topic to pregnancy and the post natal period, including using THL guide for antenatal clinics: 10 points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2023 - 15.10.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Feedback on the assignment is given generally during the seminar and through grade on Peppi.
  Individual feedback is given if asked for from the teachers.
  In the assignment Novia instruction for writing thesis must be used.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written assignments (max 45p) + exam on delivery/birth (max 5p)
  The written assignment need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written quiz on delivery on the last lecture with AW 13.9
  Seminars on the last lecture of the course w. 40
  Retake exams on the following general exams: 27th of October and 24th of November 2023.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr 3 cr= 81 h
  5 x 4 h + seminar (6h) = 26 h
  55 h = individual work to read relevant and new literature, read Moodle material and cooperate with other students in written assignment.

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Health-promoting care at different ages VÅV22HF02-3001 22.01.2024-25.02.2024  5 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
  - can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
  - can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
  - can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
  - knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
  - has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
  - knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
  - can collaborate in interprofessional teams

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22HF01

  Content of the study unit

  Human sexuality
  The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
  Development of children and young people
  Follow-up of children's and young people's health
  Adult health care and screenings
  Health technology
  Interprofessional collaboration

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.01.2024 - 25.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 19.01.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 41

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Health-promoting care at different ages VÅV22HF02-3002 04.03.2024-14.04.2024  5 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
  - can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
  - can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
  - can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
  - knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
  - has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
  - knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
  - can collaborate in interprofessional teams

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22HF01

  Content of the study unit

  Human sexuality
  The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
  Development of children and young people
  Follow-up of children's and young people's health
  Adult health care and screenings
  Health technology
  Interprofessional collaboration

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.03.2024 - 14.04.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 01.03.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Human Development USS22GV03-3002 02.10.2023-15.12.2023  3 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of health
  - understands the human physical, mental, cognitive and social development at different ages
  - have knowledge of human needs (spiritual, existential, sexual)
  - can offer support in developmental and traumatic crises

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The dimensions of health and sustainable development
  
  The human life cycle
  
  Human physical, mental, cognitive and social development
  
  Accessibility
  
  Spiritual needs
  
  Existential needs
  
  Sexual needs
  
  Gender diversity
  
  Attachment theory
  
  Developmental Psychological Theories
  
  Crises, traumatic crises and crisis relief
  
  Coping

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Angelöw B & Jonsson T. 2015. Introduktion till socialpsykologi.
  Bowlby J. 2010. En trygg bas.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytningsteori. Betydelsen av nära känslomässiga relationer.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytning i praktiken. Tillämpning av anknytningsteori.
  Grina, T. 2015. Den livsviktiga anknytningen: teori, utredning och behandling.
  Eysenck M. (red.) 2000. Psykologi. Ett integrerat perspektiv.
  Espen J (red.) 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier.
  Hwang, P & Nilsson B. 2019. Utvecklingspsykologi.
  Giddens A. 2014. Sociologi (kap. 2,4,5,9,11,17)
  Meeuwisse A. & Swärd H. (red). 2015. Prespektiv på sociala problem.
  Repstad P. 2016. Sociologiska perspektiv i vård, omsorg och socialt arbete.
  Sundbeck M. 2013. Sexuell hälsa i vården.
  Sivonen K. 2000. Vården och det andliga. En bestämning av begreppet andlig ur ett vårdvetenskapligt perspektiv.
  Geels A. & Wikström O. 2012. Den religiösa människan. En introduktion till religionpsykologin.
  Drakos G. & Hydén L. 2011. Diagnos & identitet.
  Övrig ändamålsenlig litteratur.
  På engelska (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Smågruppsarbete
  Seminarier
  Inlämningsuppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Smågruppsarbete och seminarium. Bedöms som GK/UK. Kriterierna för GK är deltagande i
  smågruppsarbete och seminarium. Professionellt förhållningssätt, obligatorisk närvaro.
  2. Individuell inlämningsuppgift, inlämning på Moodle 27.11.2023 Bedöms enligt vitsordsskala 0-5
  3. Familjecenterkörkort, avläggs på Moodle genom en separat länk, utförande 45 minuter, studerande erhåller ett intyg som visas för kursansvariga. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.10.2023 - 15.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 01.10.2023

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Inlämningsuppgift på Moodle 18.12.2023 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 10h
  Seminarier 4h
  Handlett grupparbetet 4h
  Självstudier grupparbete 8h
  Övriga självstudier 8h
  Individuell inlämningsuppgift 47h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar endast delvis eller ytligt på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övrig facklitteratur. Inlämningsuppgiften har delvis relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat beskrivs ytligt och ensidigt. Egna reflektoner förekommer inte eller beskrivs kort. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och en tillämpning av det egna temat syns. Egna reflektioner förekommer. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar månsidigt på frågeställningar och är skriven utgående från fakta, artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat syns tydligt. Egna reflektioner och analys beskrivs väl. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3007 04.09.2023-10.11.2023  4 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Nygårdas

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Annan rekommenderad litteratur:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur som t.ex. Medibas, Terveysportti. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, samt Moodle-baserad undervisning i form av föreläsningsvideon, övningsuppgifter och självständiga studier. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 10.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 10.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 46

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pia Nygårdas

  Additional information

  Mera information på kursens Moodle (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomi och fysiologi tenter.
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra (not translated)

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3008 04.09.2023-03.12.2023  4 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2023 - 03.12.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 4.12. 2023
  Re-examination 19.01.2024, 08.03.2024 and 03.05.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human physiology and anatomy VÅV22GV03-3010 18.09.2023-19.11.2023  4 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.09.2023 - 19.11.2023

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2023 - 17.09.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 14.11.2023
  Re-examination 08.12.2023, 08.03.2024 and 03.05.2024

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Intensive and critical nursing care VÅV21AK02-3001 23.01.2024-26.05.2024  3 credits  (USS21F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of intensive care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their loved ones
  - has readiness to care for patients in intensive care
  - has readiness to care for child patients in intensive care
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - in a simulated situation can be responsible for a safe drug treatment in intensive care

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Clinical care science in different contexts in addition to Internal Medicine and Surgery 5 and Advanced care in clinical context

  Content of the study unit

  Intensive and critical nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited
  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  PEDIATRICS
  Helminen, M. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti epiglottiitti. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Jartti, T., Mäkelä, M. & Remes, S. 2016. Akuutti astma ja uloshengitysvaikeus. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Jääskeläinen, J., Miettinen, P., Niinikoski, H., Saha, M-T. & Veijola R. 2016. Diabeettisen ketoasidoosinhoito. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Mäkelä, M. & Dunder, T. 2016. Anafylaktinen reaktio. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. &Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Saxén, H. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti laryngiitti. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Handouts
  
  INTENSIVE CARE ADULTS
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Andra upplagan. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Rubertsson, S., Larsson, A., Lipcsey, M., Smekal, D. 2022. Intensivvård. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kap. 42.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Lecture material on moodle
  
  Gulbrandsen, T. & Stubberud, D-G. 2009. Intensivvård. Avancerad omvårdnad och behandling. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, videos, cases, problem solving.
  Mandatory attendance at Clinical exercises.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.01.2024 - 26.05.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 22.01.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V
  • USS21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Vasa - timlärare Vård, Viktor Matintupa, Jannica Andtfolk, Carita Blomström, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination
  Re exam 1
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

•   Internal Medicine and Surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3010 02.01.2024-16.02.2024  4 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  - can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
  - has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
  Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
  Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGI
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  
  RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma
  
  KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
  Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
  Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.01.2024 - 16.02.2024

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2023 - 29.12.2023

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Common exam for all parts

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/ 27h denna kurs är 4sp 108h
  
  18h Teori ONLINE
  
  Praktiska Övningar 12h/ grupp OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  Hjärtarytmitest 1 h
  
  Sammanlagt
  18h teori
  12h praktisk övning
  1h Hjärtarytmitest
  3h tent
  74 h studier på egenhand (för sammanställning av uppgifter och tent läsning). (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal medicine and surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3007 29.01.2024-10.03.2024  4 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  - can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
  - has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HV22GV01
  VÅV22GV02
  VÅV22GV03
  VÅV22GV04

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
  Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
  Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGI
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  
  RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma
  
  KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance