Academic year 2020 - 2021

•   Acute geriatric nursing care VÅV14KV06-3004 12.04.2021-30.05.2021  3 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of aging and its importance for acute conditions and can apply it in health care
  - has knowledge of health risks and common symptoms in the highest age groups
  - mastered the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and its importance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - mastered drug-related problems in the care of the elderly

  Prerequisites

  Geriatric and palliative nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1

  Content of the study unit

  Acute geriatric nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Terveysportti/Geriatria:
  Äkillinen sekavuustila. Vanhusiäninfektioongelmat. Iäkkäiden virtsatieinkontinessi. Iäkkäiden henkilöiden toimintakyvyn arvionti. Terveysportti
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2013. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Fimea. 2013. Sic temanummer: Ikäihmisten lääkehoito on taitolaji och
  Fimea: Iäkkäiden lääkityksen tietokanta
  Articles:
  Hedström et al. 2009.PHASE-20: ett nytt instrument för skattning av möjliga läkemedelsrelateradesymtom hos äldre personer i äldreboende
  Diabeteshandboken.se: Läkemedel som höjer blodsocker
  Socialstyrelsen.se : Läkemedel som ökar risk för fall samt mag och tarm-blödningar
  Zachary et al 2010. Recognizing the risk of chronic non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in older adults
  De Vries et al. 2018.Fall risk increasing drugs a systematic review man Meta Analysis I. Cardiovascular drugs
  Seppala et al 2018. Fall risk increasing drugs a systematic review and Meta Analysis II Psycotropics
  Seppala et al .2018. Fall risk increasing drugs a systematic review and Meta analysis III . Others
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Davi`s Nursing Drug guide. 2011 till 2017.FA Davis company eller Nursing DrugHandbook.Wolter Kluwer Flera årgångar går att använda. Finns även som e-bilaga
  Rekommenderade artiklar på Moodle
  Filmer och artiklar enligt föreläsarnas anvisningar

  Learning methods

  First class obligatory introduction
  Supervision online
  Self studies and virtual studies
  Online exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Forumreflection Pass/fail
  Written assignment for seminar and opponentship is graded 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.04.2021 - 30.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 11.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • AK (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Additional information

  The group is also divided into smaller groups in some parts of lectures
  Information at the start of the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam, groupwork,case

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar week 46
  Deadline individual reflection in forum week 46

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ credit

•   Acute geriatric nursing care VÅV14KV06-3005 12.04.2021-30.05.2021  3 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of aging and its importance for acute conditions and can apply it in health care
  - has knowledge of health risks and common symptoms in the highest age groups
  - mastered the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and its importance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - mastered drug-related problems in the care of the elderly

  Prerequisites

  Geriatric and palliative nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1

  Content of the study unit

  Acute geriatric nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Terveysportti/Geriatria:
  Äkillinen sekavuustila. Vanhusiäninfektioongelmat. Iäkkäiden virtsatieinkontinessi. Iäkkäiden henkilöiden toimintakyvyn arvionti. Terveysportti
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2013. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Fimea. 2013. Sic temanummer: Ikäihmisten lääkehoito on taitolaji och
  Fimea: Iäkkäiden lääkityksen tietokanta
  Articles:
  Hedström et al. 2009.PHASE-20: ett nytt instrument för skattning av möjliga läkemedelsrelateradesymtom hos äldre personer i äldreboende
  Diabeteshandboken.se: Läkemedel som höjer blodsocker
  Socialstyrelsen.se : Läkemedel som ökar risk för fall samt mag och tarm-blödningar
  Zachary et al 2010. Recognizing the risk of chronic non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in older adults
  De Vries et al. 2018.Fall risk increasing drugs a systematic review man Meta Analysis I. Cardiovascular drugs
  Seppala et al 2018. Fall risk increasing drugs a systematic review and Meta Analysis II Psycotropics
  Seppala et al .2018. Fall risk increasing drugs a systematic review and Meta analysis III . Others
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Davi`s Nursing Drug guide. 2011 till 2017.FA Davis company eller Nursing DrugHandbook.Wolter Kluwer Flera årgångar går att använda. Finns även som e-bilaga
  Rekommenderade artiklar på Moodle
  Filmer och artiklar enligt föreläsarnas anvisningar

  Learning methods

  First class obligatory introduction
  Supervision online
  Self studies and virtual studies
  Online exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Forumreflection Pass/fail
  Written assignment for seminar and opponentship ipass, not pass complement
  Onlinetest 0-5; 75% correct for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.04.2021 - 30.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 11.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • FK (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)
  • PV (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Additional information

  The group is also divided into smaller groups in some parts of lectures
  Information at the start of the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam, groupwork,case

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar week 13
  Deadline individual reflection in forum week

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ credit

•   Acute nursing care and best nursing practices VÅV14AK03-3004 08.02.2021-31.12.2021  3 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of emergency care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their loved ones
  - has readiness to care for patients of different ages in emergency care, in various traumas and disasters
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - can in a simulated situation be responsible for a safe drug treatment in emergency care

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Acute nursing care and best nursing practices

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional5
  
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Pediatrick care:
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Qvist, E. 2013. Lääkärinkäsikirja. Akuutisti sairas imeväinen.
  Qvist, E. & Korppi, M. 2009. Duodecim. Alle kolmen kuukauden ikäinen lapsi päivystysksessä.
  Rantala, H. & Eriksson, K. 2016 Kuoristava lapsi ja kuumekouristukset. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  
  Emergency care
  Wikström, J. 2018. Akutsjukvård. Omvårdnad och behandling vid akut sjukdom och skada. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. s. 13 – 306.
  Akuuttihoito-opas https://www.terveysportti.fi/dtk/aho/koti
  Lecture material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case demonstrations
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Individual work
  Videos
  Demonstrations
  Simulation exercises

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Children's section:
  Mandatory and active attendance at the lessons
  Testimonials GK / UK during clinical exercises / Compulsory attendance
  
  Emergency care
  Mandatory attendance in the emergency care simulation project. Rating: GK / UK
  Mandatory attendance in the CPR project Certificate: GK / UK
  Emergency care exam: Grades: 5 - UK

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • AK (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marice Nedergård, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Care suit and slippers are used in exercises

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Mandatory attendance at the lectures on pediatric emergency care
  Mandatory attendance in the emergency care simulation project
  Mandatory attendance in the CPR project
  Approved clinical exercises

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Emergency care simulation in collaboration with VCS
  The CPR project in collaboration with VCS

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen: 17.9.2021
  Omtentamen 1:
  Omtentamen 2: (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can work with others within the student group

•   Acute nursing care and best nursing practices VÅV14FK02-3003 08.02.2021-31.12.2021  3 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of emergency care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their loved ones
  - has readiness to care for patients of different ages in emergency care, in various traumas and disasters
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - can in a simulated situation be responsible for a safe drug treatment in emergency care

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Acute nursing care and best nursing practices

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Child emergency care
  Helminen, M. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti epiglottiitti. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Jartti, T., Mäkelä, M. & Remes, S. 2016. Akuutti astma ja uloshengitysvaikeus. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Rantala, H. & Eriksson, K. 2016. Kouristava lapsi ja kuumekouristukset. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Saxén, H. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti laryngiitti.Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  
  ADULT EMERGENCY CARE
  Wikström, J. 2018. Akutsjukvård. Omvårdnad och behandling vid akut sjukdom och skada. Studentlitteratur, AB, Lund.
  Material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case demonstrations
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Individual work
  Videos
  Demonstrations
  Simulation exercises

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Children's section:
  Mandatory and active attendance at the lessons
  Testimonials GK / UK during clinical exercises / Compulsory attendance

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • FK (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Care suit and slippers are used in exercises

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Mandatory attendance at the lectures on pediatric emergency care
  Mandatory attendance in the emergency care simulation project
  Mandatory attendance in the CPR project
  Approved clinical exercises

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Emergency care simulation in collaboration with VCS
  The CPR project in collaboration with VCS

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen: 17.9.2021 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can work with others within the student group

•   Acute paediatric care VAL20010-3002 01.08.2020-31.07.2021  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Have preparedness to care for pediatric patients in perioperative care
  Have preparedness to care for pediatric patients in intensive care
  Have preparedness to care for pediatric patients of different ages in emergency care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Perioperative care for pediatric patients: Post and preoperative preparation, care for the most common surgical measures for children, children and pain
  Intensive care for pediatric patients
  Emergency medical care for pediatric patients: Children who are ill, fever in children and care for fever cramps

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Akut pediatrics
  Helminen, M. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti epiglottiitti. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Jartti, T., Mäkelä, M. & Remes, S. 2016. Akuutti astma ja uloshengitysvaikeus. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Jääskeläinen, J., Miettinen, P., Niinikoski, H., Saha, M-T. & Veijola R. 2016. Diabeettisen ketoasidoosinhoito. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Mäkelä, M. & Dunder, T. 2016. Anafylaktinen reaktio. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. &Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Saxén, H. & Nokso-Koivisto, J. 2016. Akuutti laryngiitti. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Handouts
  
  Perioperative child care:
  Selected parts. R. Christofferson, G. Läckgren & A. (Eds.) Stenberg. 2015. Grotte's child surgery and pediatric urology.Student literature.
  Ljumsbråck children usual care recommendations from Internetmedicin.se
  Tuominen, M. Peacock surgeons potilaan hoito. 2014. Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Duodecim.
  Vaasa Central Hospital website

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case demonstrations
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Individual work
  Videos
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.07.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 2 credits

  Seats

  1 - 10

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Åsa Lågland, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Neonatal CPR theory test ((Child / Anesthesia SSK and transport)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2021
  Re exam 1 spring 2021,
  Re exam 2 spring 2021.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Anatomy and Physiology USS20IV06-3001 28.09.2020-10.11.2020  5 credits  (UHV20D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can explain human anatomy and physiology
  
  Understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The cell and tissues
  
  Cardiovascular system
  
  The respiratory system
  
  The nervous system
  
  The digestive system
  
  The urinary system
  
  The endocrine system
  
  The musculoskeletal system

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  40% Face-to-face, 60% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Haug E, Sand O.& Bjålie J. 1998. Människokroppen.
  Nienstedt W, Hänninen O. & Arstila A. 1998. Människans fysiologi och anatomi.
  Sand O. m.fl. 2007. Människokroppen - Fysiologi och anatomi.
  Sjastaad O. m.fl. 2003. Arbetsbok till människokroppen.
  Sonesson B. & Sonesson G.2006. Anatomi och fysiologi.
  Vigue J. & Martin Orte E. 2006. Atlas över människokroppen.
  Nicolaysen, G.m.fl. 2014. Anatomi och fysiologi.
  Höök, I-M.2015. Människans anatomi.
  Christensen, R. 2012. Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur
  Föreläsningar
  Workshops
  Seminarier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi
  Paruppgift i Workshops
  Deltagande i seminarier (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 10.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV20D-Å
  • USS20D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Workshops och seminarier, obligatorisk närvaro
  Anatomi och fysiologi tentamen, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Anatomi och fysiologi tent 10.11.2020
  Omtenter 27.11.2020 och 11.12.2020 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 18 h
  Workshops och seminarier 24 h
  Självstudier inför tentamen och seminarier 70 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner.
  På engelska (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människorkroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggand och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva männsikorkroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra. (not translated)

•   Basic clinical nursing skills VÅV19KVV06-3007 05.10.2020-08.11.2020  2 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Basic Nursing Skills

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, T., Kan, S., Puska, E-L.& Vihunen, R.2004. Vård och välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P.20012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki. SanomaPro
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  Evidence-based articles according to the lecturer's instructions
  Moodle lectures

  Learning methods

  Flipped learning, lectures, demonstrations, clinical skills training, films, discussions, self-studies with an assignment.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For passing the course, the student must have passed an approved individual assignment, active attendance at clinical skills training (100%), approved clinical examination (OSCE).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 08.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  The clinical skills training requires active attendanse (100%). "Nurse-dress" is used in clinical skills training.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Clinical examination OSCE: pass/fail

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical examination OSCE

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours/cr

•   Basic clinical nursing skills VÅV19KVV06-3008 18.01.2021-28.02.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Basic Nursing Skills

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro
  Liljamo, Kinnunen& Ensio. 2012.FinCC luokituskokonaisuuden käyttöopas.
  https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/90804/URN_ISBN_978-952-245-675-5.pdf?sequence=1
  Current other literature or articles according to teachers instruction

  Learning methods

  Lectures, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Attendance
  Approved OSCE
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 17.01.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Uniform is used in practice

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  OSCE
  Attendance compulsary

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  OSCE:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr, attendance in practical classes

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles

•   Basic clinical nursing skills VÅV19KVV06-3006 21.09.2020-13.12.2020  2 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Basic Nursing Skills

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro
  Liljamo, Kinnunen& Ensio. 2012.FinCC luokituskokonaisuuden käyttöopas.
  https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/90804/URN_ISBN_978-952-245-675-5.pdf?sequence=1
  Current other literature or articles according to teachers instruction

  Learning methods

  Lectures, practice
  Part of the course is realized together with VAMK

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Attendance
  Approved OSCE
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.09.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Uniform is used in practice

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  OSCE
  Attendance compulsary

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  OSCE:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr, attendance in practical classes

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3017 01.08.2020-31.12.2020  2 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se nationella Moodlekursen i Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp , Novia , Vasa (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatory attendance at the course start and practical exercises
  Approved portfolio submitted within the deadline
  Approved virtual exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk introduktion till kursen 7.10 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio : 1.12. kl 23.00
  Deadline för virtuell tentamen: 15.12. kl 08.00
  
  Vecka 46 feedback+ praktiska övningar 15.12 10-11.45 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h /sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  According to national criterias
  Approved:
  Approved portfolio
  Passed virtual exam
  Not approved:
  Not approved portfolio
  Not passed virtual exam

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3020 18.08.2020-18.12.2020  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.08.2020 - 18.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2020 - 31.07.2020

  • 2 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3021 01.09.2020-31.01.2021  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.09.2020 - 31.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2020 - 31.07.2020

  • 2 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3015 21.09.2020-15.11.2020  2 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  se nationella kursen i Moodle ; Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp NOVIA VASA (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Virtual/On line studies
  Contact teaching ( introduction and feedback)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatory attendance at the course start and practical exercises
  Approved portfolio submitted within the deadline
  Approved virtual exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.09.2020 - 15.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 27.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid kursstart - introduktion vecka 39 23.9.20 kl
  samt avlutande praktiska övningar vecka 46 13.11 kl 10-11.45 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Publiceras i Moodlekursen
  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio : 23.10 kl 8.00
  Deadline för virtuell tentamen: 9.11 kl 23.00
  
  Vecka 46 feedback+ praktiska övningar 13,11 10-11.45 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  According to national criterias
  Approved:
  Approved portfolio
  Passed virtual exam
  Not approved:
  Not approved portfolio
  Not passed virtual exam

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3016 19.10.2020-13.12.2020  2 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  se nationella kursen i Moodle ; Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp NOVIA VASA (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Virtual/On line studies
  Contact teaching ( introduction and feedback)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatory attendance at the course start and practical exercises
  Approved portfolio submitted within the deadline
  Approved virtual exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.10.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 25.10.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid kursstart-introduktion vecka 43 : 19.10
  samt avslutande praktiska övningar vecka 51: 14.12: 10-11.45 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Publiceras i Moodlekursen
  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio : 23.11 8.00
  Deadline för virtuell tentamen: 14.12 kl 8.00 ( tenten öppen 7.12 kl 8.00-14.12 kl 8.00)
  
  14.12 Feedback+praktiska övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  According to national criterias
  Approved:
  Approved portfolio
  Passed virtual exam
  Not approved:
  Not approved portfolio
  Not passed virtual exam

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3007 08.04.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson, R. Jeppson, B., Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap. 8. Kärlkirurgi. s. 269 – 288.
  Ericson,T. Lind, M (red) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap 1. Vården vid ateroskleros, hyperlipidemi, fetma och hypertoni. Kap 2. Vård vid hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar. Kap 3. Vård vid tromboemboliska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G., Grønseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2021.Upplaga 3. Klinisk omvårdnad 1. Kap. 7 och 8. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på Moodle
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, pair assignment, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved exercises performed during the course.
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.04.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 18.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the course's introductory occasion
  Mandatory attendance at introduction to SimMan and at the SimMan exercises.
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test
  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h+4h
  SimMan practice, group 1,2 and 2, 4 h x 3
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3008 08.03.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson, R. Jeppson, B., Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap. 8. Kärlkirurgi. s. 269 – 288.
  Ericson,T. Lind, M (red) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap 1. Vården vid ateroskleros, hyperlipidemi, fetma och hypertoni. Kap 2. Vård vid hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar. Kap 3. Vård vid tromboemboliska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G., Grønseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2021.Upplaga 3. Klinisk omvårdnad 1. Kap. 7 och 8. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på Moodle
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, exercises, pair assignments, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved exercises performed during the course.
  Mandatory attendance at introduction to SimMan and at the SimMan exercises.
  Written exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.03.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class .
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h+ 4h
  SimMan practice, group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3009 24.02.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson, R. Jeppson, B., Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap. 8. Kärlkirurgi. s. 269 – 288.
  Ericson,T. Lind, M (red) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund. Kap 1. Vården vid ateroskleros, hyperlipidemi, fetma och hypertoni. Kap 2. Vård vid hjärt- och kärlsjukdomar. Kap 3. Vård vid tromboemboliska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G., Grønseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2021.Upplaga 3. Klinisk omvårdnad 1. Kap. 7 och 8. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på Moodle
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, pair assignment, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved exercises performed during the course.
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.02.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 23.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the course's introductory occasion
  Mandatory attendance at introduction to SimMan and at the SimMan exercises.
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test
  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h+4h
  SimMan practice, group 1,2 and 2, 4 h x 3
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3005 29.09.2020-20.12.2020  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 17 och 18. Liber.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 13 och 14. Studentlitteratur.
  Skhole-föreläsningar: Diabetes 1, 2 , 3, Hypotyreoidism och hypertyreoidism
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 14, 15. Liber.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om tarmtömning s 420 – 429, 436 – 439. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 10 och 12. Studentlitteratur.
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.09.2020 - 20.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information about the course!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3006 08.03.2021-11.04.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 9 och 10. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G.,Grönseth, R. Almås, H. (red) (2020). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 13, 14, 15. Liber AB, Stockholm.Material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.03.2021 - 11.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3004 04.01.2021-07.02.2021  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. Chapter 1, 2, 9-19
  or
  Tapanainen et al. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Chapter: 1-17,19-31.
  Medibas?
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, skhole lectures, online work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 07.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Seats

  15 - 22

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The first exam is the last lecture of the course
  The retakes are on the following general exams 12th of February and 12th of March.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h.
  3 cr = 81 h.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3005 25.01.2021-28.02.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. Chapter 1, 2, 9-19
  or
  Tapanainen et al. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Chapter: 1-17,19-31.
  Medibas?
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, skhole lectures, online work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 24.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  20 - 32

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The first exam is the last lecture of the course
  The retakes are on 12th of March and 26th of March 2021 on general exams.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h.
  3 cr = 81 h.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3006 11.02.2021-31.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. Chapter 1, 2, 9-19
  or
  Tapanainen et al. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Chapter: 1-17,19-31.
  Medibas
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, skhole lectures, online work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.02.2021 - 31.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Seats

  20 - 28

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The first exam is the last lecture of the course
  The two retakes are on 7th and 28th of May 2021, registration in time is required.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h.
  3 cr = 81 h.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3008 01.08.2020-31.12.2020  2 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Truedesson, L. Klinisk immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2012.
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur 2015
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Sid 92-109. Studentlitteratur
  Hedman m.fl. Immunologia. III Immunologiset kudosvauriot, immuunisairaudet ja interventiot. Duodecim
  Material på moodle
  Rekommendationer, anvisningar och information på nätet
  Nätinformation:
  https://www.terveyskirjasto.fi/terveyskirjasto/tk.koti?p_artikkeli=dlk00010
  https://www.immuunipuutospotilaidenyhdistys.fi/tietoa/tietoa/immuunipuutokset-ja-hoito/vasta-ainepuutos/
  http://pio.nu/primar-immunbrist-pi/
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3245434/
  https://www.aaaai.org/conditions-and-treatments/primary-immunodeficiency-disease
  https://primaryimmune.org/about-primary-immunodeficiencies
  https://www.aarda.org/diseaselist/
  https://arthritis.org/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Blended learning:
  Lectures
  Self-studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid kursstart (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Immunologisk ohälsa : tent v
  Omtent
  Fredag kl. 12-16
  Fredag kl. 12-16
  
  Infektionssjukdomar: Tent v
  Omtent Fredag kl 12-16
  Omtent Fredag kl 12-16 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp
  Immunologisk ohälsa: 7,5 h schemalagd undervisning, 20 h litteraturstudier
  Infektionssjukdomar : 8 h schemalagd undervisning 19 h litteraturstudier (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3006 31.08.2020-31.12.2020  2 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Truedesson, L. Klinisk immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2012.
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur 2015
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Sid 92-109. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi.Liber 2018.
  Hedman m.fl. Immunologia. III Immunologiset kudosvauriot, immuunisairaudet ja interventiot. Duodecim
  Material på moodle
  Rekommendationer, anvisningar och information på nätet
  Nätinformation: THL, ECDC, CDC, WHO (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier och uppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd tentamen och godkänd uppgift (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminarium oktober 2020
  Tent v 43
  Omtenter: (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  54h / 2 sp
  Schemalagd undervisning 14h, Litteraturstudier och uppgift 40h (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3004 25.01.2021-28.02.2021  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kap.14 Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kap.15 Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson. R., Jeppsson. B. & Rydholm. A. (red.) (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (red.) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad. Del 2. Liber: Stockholm.
  Kapitel 23. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar I rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 24. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  Lonkkamurtuma
  Osteoporoosi
  Polvi- ja nivelrikko
  Selkäydinvamma
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, case studies, demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.
  Group discussion will affect the grade.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 24.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla tre case studies.
  Aktivt deltagande krävs. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examinationen i kursen är godkänt deltagande, både muntligen och skriftligen i samtliga case studies.
  
  Övningscase: case 1
  Examination: case 2 och case 3.
  
  Upplägg för casen:
  1. Individuell del (tentamen) ingen litteratur tillåts.
  2. Gruppdel av case (motivera svar) användning av litteratur tillåten.
  3. Genomgång av case.
  
  Vid underkänd prestation eller frånvaro under ett eller flera case studies - kan kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen, vid de två efterföljande datumen efter examinations case. Hela kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen. Datumen uppdateras i Moodle. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam/case: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam/case: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam/case: points < 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam/case: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3005 04.01.2021-24.01.2021  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kap.14 Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kap.15 Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson. R., Jeppsson. B. & Rydholm. A. (red.) (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (red.) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad. Del 2. Liber: Stockholm.
  Kapitel 23. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar I rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 24. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  Lonkkamurtuma
  Osteoporoosi
  Polvi- ja nivelrikko
  Selkäydinvamma
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, case studies, demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.
  Group discussion will affect the grade.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 24.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla tre case studies.
  Aktivt deltagande krävs. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examinationen i kursen är godkänt deltagande, både muntligen och skriftligen i samtliga case studies.
  
  Övningscase: case 1
  Examination: case 2 och case 3.
  
  Upplägg för casen:
  1. Individuell del (tentamen) ingen litteratur tillåts.
  2. Gruppdel av case (motivera svar) användning av litteratur tillåten.
  3. Genomgång av case.
  
  Vid underkänd prestation eller frånvaro under ett eller flera case studies - kan kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen, vid de två efterföljande datumen efter examinations case. Hela kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen. Datumen uppdateras i Moodle. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam/case: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam/case: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam/case: points < 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam/case: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3006 01.02.2021-21.03.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kap.14 Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kap.15 Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson. R., Jeppsson. B. & Rydholm. A. (red.) (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (red.) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad. Del 2. Liber: Stockholm.
  Kapitel 23. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar I rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 24. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  Lonkkamurtuma
  Osteoporoosi
  Polvi- ja nivelrikko
  Selkäydinvamma
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, case studies, demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.
  Group discussion will affect the grade.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.02.2021 - 21.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 31.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Irén Vikström

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla tre case studies.
  Aktivt deltagande krävs. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examinationen i kursen är godkänt deltagande, både muntligen och skriftligen i samtliga case studies.
  
  Övningscase: case 1
  Examination: case 2 och case 3.
  
  Upplägg för casen:
  1. Individuell del (tentamen) ingen litteratur tillåts.
  2. Gruppdel av case (motivera svar) användning av litteratur tillåten.
  3. Genomgång av case.
  
  Vid underkänd prestation eller frånvaro under ett eller flera case studies - kan kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen, vid de två efterföljande datumen efter examinations case. Hela kursen tenteras vid allmän omtentamen. Datumen uppdateras i Moodle. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam/case: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam/case: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam/case: points < 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam/case: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3004 19.04.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 25, 26 & 27
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar. Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Reference literature:
  • Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  • Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Own studies
  Written assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.04.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 18.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points < 90%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3005 25.01.2021-14.03.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 25, 26 & 27
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar. Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Reference literature:
  • Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  • Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Own studies
  Written assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.01.2021 - 14.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 24.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points < 90%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3006 11.02.2021-25.04.2021  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 25, 26 & 27
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar. Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Reference literature:
  • Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  • Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Own studies
  Written assignments

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.02.2021 - 25.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 14.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points < 90%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with psychiatric disorders VÅV18KV14-3003 23.11.2020-31.01.2021  3 credits  (UBM18D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.& Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  ...according to the teacher's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Exam: max 20p
  19-20 p=5
  17-18 p=4
  14-16 p=3
  12-13 p=2
  10-11 p=1
  Well-done self-study assignments (4-5) can increase the final grade by ½ points

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.11.2020 - 31.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V
  • UHV18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visits to VCH; psychiatric unit and Gamla Vaasa hospital

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline 18.12.2020

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with psychiatric disorders VÅV18KV14-3004 15.02.2021-31.05.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Medibas handboken
  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  ...according to the teacher's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in pairs
  Study visits

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  criteria on moodle

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.02.2021 - 31.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 14.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Moodletest
  Assignments; selfstudy/in pairs

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visits to VCH; psychiatric unit and Gamla Vaasa hospital

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Moodletest
  Re exam on general re exam days spring 2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot the essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with psychiatric disorders VÅV18KV14-3005 26.04.2021-31.07.2021  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Medibas handboken
  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  ...according to the teacher's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in pairs
  Study visits

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  criteria on moodle

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.04.2021 - 31.07.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 25.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Moodletest
  Assignments; selfstudy/in pairs

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visits to VCH; psychiatric unit and Gamla Vaasa hospital

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Moodletest
  Re exam on general re exam days spring 2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot the essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3006 04.01.2021-31.01.2021  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red). (2014). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Liber. Stockholm.
  Anders, R., Jeppsson, B., & Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Cox, C. 8red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Lindgren,S.& Aspegren, K. 2004. Kliniska färdigheter. Informationsutbyte mellan patient och läkare
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin hoito. Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja.
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumatautia sairastavan ohjaus
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin pahenemisvaiheen hoito
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro
  Aktuella artiklar enligt föreläsares anvisningar
  Kitson, AL., Athlin, ÅM., Conroy, T Anything but Basic: Nursing’s Challenge in Meeting Patients’Fundamental Care Needs. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 46(5), 2012. Pp 331-339
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group discussion , self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 31.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Part of the lectures are in English
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3004 31.08.2020-27.09.2020  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red). (2014). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Liber. Stockholm.
  Anders, R., Jeppsson, B., & Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Cox, C. 8red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Lindgren,S.& Aspegren, K. 2004. Kliniska färdigheter. Informationsutbyte mellan patient och läkare
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin hoito. Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja.
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumatautia sairastavan ohjaus
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin pahenemisvaiheen hoito
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro
  Aktuella artiklar enligt föreläsares anvisningar
  Kitson, AL., Athlin, ÅM., Conroy, T Anything but Basic: Nursing’s Challenge in Meeting Patients’Fundamental Care Needs. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 46(5), 2012. Pp 331-339
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group discussion , self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 27.09.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Part of the lectures are in English
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3005 02.11.2020-06.12.2020  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red). (2014). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. Liber. Stockholm.
  Anders, R., Jeppsson, B., & Rydholm, A. 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Cox, C. 8red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Lindgren,S.& Aspegren, K. 2004. Kliniska färdigheter. Informationsutbyte mellan patient och läkare
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin hoito. Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja.
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumatautia sairastavan ohjaus
  Matilainen, E. 2019. Keuhkoahtaumataudin pahenemisvaiheen hoito
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro
  Aktuella artiklar enligt föreläsares anvisningar
  Kitson, AL., Athlin, ÅM., Conroy, T Anything but Basic: Nursing’s Challenge in Meeting Patients’Fundamental Care Needs. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 46(5), 2012. Pp 331-339
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  Lectures, group discussion , self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.11.2020 - 06.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 08.11.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Part of the lectures are in English
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV18KV02-3009 04.09.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (ETAPP 20 SJUKSKÖTARE) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  NURSING SCIENCE
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  kapitel 1-5 (sid. 11-226) kapitel 4 gäller vårdetiken.
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  
  NURSING ETHICS
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  INTERCULTURAL CARE
  Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
  Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
  Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, interview, seminar, online course

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The nursing ethics is pass/fail
  
  The written assignment is evaluated with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  Criteria for evaluation of VÅV18KV02 Max points 40
  Has chosen a relevant concept and described it 10
  Referred to one of the recommended books on each topic nursing science and intercultural care 2
  Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  Referred to a scientific study/article (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and the chosen concept e.g. health among Vietnamese. Described the result 2
  Interview with a person from another culture than your own, descried the result, questions as an appendix. 2
  Reflection 3
  Followed Novia's instructions for writing thesis, especially references 2
  9 pages text if 3 stud., 5-6 if 2 stud. 1
  Extra literature 1
  Something extra except what was demanded, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  Presentation 2
  Comments on other students work in class or in Moodle 1
  Submitted on date agreed on 1
  Active participation in the class during seminars 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  05.08.2020 - 03.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ETAPP 20 SJUKSKÖTARE

  Seats

  13 - 26

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be described in Moodle.
  The introduction to nursing ethics is separate.
  The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new workers. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District.
  There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.
  
  Introductions and seminars are compulsory!
  If the written assignment is not handed in, presented or is not accepted two retakes can be done.
  See above for dates.
  Literature for written exam (retake)
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group, if not accepted or not presented there is a possibility to do a written exam twice on two general exams days.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last time of the course.
  Retake exams 22nd of January and 12th of February 2020 on general exam days. Registration is necessary.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  3cr 3x27h=81h
  Nursing ethics: Introduction to nursing ethics 2h + 25h reading of material + doing tests on Moodle= 27h.
  Nursing science and intercultural care: 2x8h= 16h lectures and group discussions in class +
  34h teamwork on written assignment + seminar 4h = 54h.

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV18KV02-3008 21.09.2020-01.11.2020  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  NURSING SCIENCE
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  kapitel 1-5 (sid. 11-226) kapitel 4 gäller vårdetiken.
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  NURSING ETHICS
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  INTERCULTURAL CARE
  Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
  Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
  Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, interview, seminar, online course

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The nursing ethics is pass/fail
  The written assignment is evaluated with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  Criteria for evaluation of VÅV18KV02 Max points 40
  Has chosen a relevant concept and described it 10
  Referred to one of the recommended books on each topic nursing science and intercultural care 2
  Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  Referred to a scientific study/article (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and the chosen concept e.g. health among Vietnamese. Described the result 2
  Interview with a person from another culture than your own, descried the result, questions as an appendix. 2
  Reflection 3
  Followed Novia's instructions for writing thesis, especially references 2
  9 pages text if 3 stud., 5-6 if 2 stud. 1
  Extra literature 1
  Something extra except what was demanded, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  Presentation 2
  Comments on other students work in class or in Moodle 1
  Submitted on date agreed on 1
  Active participation in the class 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.09.2020 - 01.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Seats

  20 - 32

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be described in Moodle
  On the seminar on the last lecture of the course the group is divided into two 4h each.
  The introduction in nursing ethics is in a computer class room. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their workers. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.
  Introductions and seminars are compulsory!
  If the written assignment is not handed in, presented or is not accepted two retakes can be done.
  Literature for written exam (retake)
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group, if not accepted or not presented there is a possibility to do a written exam twice on two general exams days.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last time of the course, the class is divided in two groups.
  Retake exams 27.11 and 6.12.2020 on general exam days. Registration is necessary.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  3cr 3x27h=81h
  Nursing ethics: Introduction to nursing ethics is in a computer classroom 1h + 26h reading of material + doing tests on Moodle= 27h.
  Nusring science and intercultural care: 6x4h +2h= 26h lectures and group discussions in class +
  26h teamwork on written assignment + seminar 4h = 54h.

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV18KV02-3010 22.03.2021-25.04.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  NURSING SCIENCE
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  chapter 1-3, 5
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Rehnsfeldt, A. & Arman, M. (red.). 2020. Klinisk vårdvetenskap. Vårdande på teoretisk grund. Stockholm: Liber Ab.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  
  
  NURSING ETHICS
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  chapter 4.
  
  INTERCULTURAL CARE
  Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
  Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
  Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, interview, seminar, online course

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The nursing ethics is pass/fail
  The written assignment is evaluated with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  Criteria for evaluation of VÅV18KV02 Max points 40
  Has chosen a relevant concept and described it 10
  Referred to one of the recommended books on each topic nursing science and intercultural care 2
  Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  Referred to a scientific study/article (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and the chosen concept e.g. health among Vietnamese. Described the result 2
  Interview with a person from another culture than your own, descried the result, questions as an appendix. 2
  Reflection 3
  Followed Novia's instructions for writing thesis, especially references 2
  9 pages text if 3 stud., 5-6 if 2 stud. 1
  Extra literature 1
  Something extra except what was demanded, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  Presentation 2
  Comments on other students work in class or in Moodle 1
  Submitted on date agreed on 1
  Active participation in the class 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.03.2021 - 25.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 21.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 41

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be in Moodle.
  On the seminar on the last lecture of the course the students divide themselves into two groups, which have 4h each.
  
  The introduction in nursing ethics is recommended. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new empoyees. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.
  
  Introductions and seminars are compulsory!
  
  If the written assignment is not handed in, presented or is not accepted two retakes can be done.
  Retake for nursing science + intercultural care is on general retake dates.
  Registration in time is demanded. Retakes are always 12.00-16.00
  During the corona- time there might be other arrangements.
  
  Literature for written exam (retake)
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  + Moodle material
  Talk to the teacher if you have part of the course accepted from before.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times, 1cr.
  The nursing ethics is on another Moodle course called Vårdetik online 2020
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group, if not accepted or not presented there is a possibility to do a written exam twice on the two general exams following the seminar 2cr.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last time of the course, the class is divided in two groups.
  Retake exams 1 and 2 on two following general exam days. Registration is necessary.
  Seminar 20.4.2021
  Deadline for nursing ethics 30.4.2021
  Retake dates: 7th and 28 of May 2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  3cr 3x27h=81h
  Nursing ethics: Introduction to nursing ethics is in a computer classroom 1-2h + 25h reading of material + doing tests on Moodle= 27h.
  Nursing science and intercultural care: 6x4h +2h= 26h lectures and group discussions in class +
  26h teamwork on written assignment + seminar 4h = 54h.

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV18KV02-3007 19.10.2020-13.12.2020  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  NURSING SCIENCE
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  chapter 1-3, 5
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  
  NURSING ETHICS
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  chapter 4.
  
  INTERCULTURAL CARE
  Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
  Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
  Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, interview, seminar, online course

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The nursing ethics is pass/fail
  The written assignment is evaluated with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  Criteria for evaluation of VÅV18KV02 Max points 40
  Has chosen a relevant concept and described it 10
  Referred to one of the recommended books on each topic nursing science and intercultural care 2
  Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  Referred to a scientific study/article (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and the chosen concept e.g. health among Vietnamese. Described the result 2
  Interview with a person from another culture than your own, descried the result, questions as an appendix. 2
  Reflection 3
  Followed Novia's instructions for writing thesis, especially references 2
  9 pages text if 3 stud., 5-6 if 2 stud. 1
  Extra literature 1
  Something extra except what was demanded, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  Presentation 2
  Comments on other students work in class or in Moodle 1
  Submitted on date agreed on 1
  Active participation in the class 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.10.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 25.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  20 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be in Moodle.
  On the seminar on the last lecture of the course the students divide themselves into two groups, which have 4h each.
  
  The introduction in nursing ethics is recommended. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new empoyees. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.
  
  Introductions and seminars are compulsory!
  
  If the written assignment is not handed in, presented or is not accepted two retakes can be done.
  Retake for nursing science + intercultural care is on general retake dates.
  Registration in time is demanded. Retakes are always 12.00-16.00
  During the corona- time there might be other arrangements.
  
  Literature for written exam (retake)
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  Talk to the teacher if you have part of the course accepted from before.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times, 1cr.
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group, if not accepted or not presented there is a possibility to do a written exam twice on the two general exams following the seminar 2cr.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last time of the course, the class is divided in two groups.
  Retake exams 1 and 2 on two following general exam days. Registration is necessary.
  Retake dates: 22nd of January 2020 and 12th of February 2020

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  3cr 3x27h=81h
  Nursing ethics: Introduction to nursing ethics is in a computer classroom 1-2h + 25h reading of material + doing tests on Moodle= 27h.
  Nursing science and intercultural care: 6x4h +2h= 26h lectures and group discussions in class +
  26h teamwork on written assignment + seminar 4h = 54h.

•   Clinical assessment VÅV14AK04-3003 08.02.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, carry out and evaluate the care of patients of different ages
  - can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages
  - can perform basic clinical assessment of vital functions for patients of different ages
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Physical assessment

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Cox C.L. (red.) (2015). Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  
  Hogan-Quigley, B., Palm, ML. & Bickley, LS. (2012 or 2017). Nursing Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. Philadelphia, Wolther Kluwer Health Lippincott.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial Moodle
  
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case
  Physical assessment theory and practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Case

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • AK (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has a god knowledge of the subject, points 71-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Clinical assessment VÅV14FK03-3003 08.02.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, carry out and evaluate the care of patients of different ages
  - can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages
  - can perform basic clinical assessment of vital functions for patients of different ages
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical assessment

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Cox C.L. (red.) (2015). Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013). Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  
  Hogan-Quigley, B., Palm, ML. & Bickley, LS. (2012 alt. 2017). Nursing Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. . Philadelphia, Wolther Kluwer Health Lippincott.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial Moodle
  
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case
  Physical assessment theory and practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Case

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • FK (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has a god knowledge of the subject, points 71-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV18KVV03-3008 25.01.2021-05.09.2021  6 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team
  - can account for the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory tests

  Prerequisites

  The nurising process
  Ergonomy and Kinesthetics
  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Geriatrics and nursing care of the elderly

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Clinical practice 4.5 sp
  Laboratory exminations 1.5 sp

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurskompendium (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, demonstrationer, individuella uppgifter, kliniska övningar: 1.5 sp
  
  Praktik 4.5 sp
  Tre veckor valfripraktik inom vården under sommaren (sommarjobb): serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd individuell uppgift i lab-delen
  Utförda blodprovstagningar och EKG
  
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för BMHV20 gruppen 21.4 kl.9.00 - 9.45.
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36.
  Godkänd inlämnad arbetslista och praktikrapport. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.01.2021 - 05.09.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 24.01.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro under laborationsundervisningen
  Studerande söker själv sitt sommararbete. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  VÅV18KVV03, Klinisk vård inom valbar kontext, 6 sp varav 4,5 sp görs som sommarpraktik. (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Sommarpraktik på serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Vårterminen och sommaren 2021
  Inlämningsuppgift inom vt 2021 (not translated)

  Internationa connections

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Praktik 3 veckor (4,5 sp) görs som sommarpraktik 2021 inom vård t.ex. hemservice, serviceboende, vårdavdelningar.
  Godkänd praktikrapport på ca 4 sidor om Dina upplevelser och erfarenheter av att göra sommarpraktik. Vad hade Du för målsättning för praktiken, vad har du lärt dig och nådde du Din målsättning. Undertecknad arbetslista inlämnas.
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för SSK20 grupperna 12.3 kl.9.00 - 9.45. Obligatorisk närvaro.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36. (not translated)

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV18KVV03-3009 09.04.2021-05.09.2021  6 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team
  - can account for the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory tests

  Prerequisites

  The nurising process
  Ergonomy and Kinesthetics
  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Geriatrics and nursing care of the elderly

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Clinical practice 4.5 sp
  Laboratory exminations 1.5 sp

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurskompendium (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, demonstrationer, individuella uppgifter, kliniska övningar: 1.5 sp
  
  Praktik 4.5 sp
  Tre veckor valfripraktik inom vården under sommaren (sommarjobb): serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd individuell uppgift i lab-delen
  Utförda blodprovstagningar och EKG
  
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för SSK20 grupperna 9.4 kl.12.30 - 13.15.
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36.
  Godkänd inlämnad arbetslista och praktikrapport. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.04.2021 - 05.09.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 18.04.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro under laborationsundervisningen
  Studerande söker själv sitt sommararbete. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  VÅV18KVV03, Klinisk vård inom valbar kontext, 6 sp varav 4,5 sp görs som sommarpraktik. (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Sommarpraktik på serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Vårterminen och sommaren 2021
  Inlämningsuppgift inom vt 2021 (not translated)

  Internationa connections

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Praktik 3 veckor (4,5 sp) görs som sommarpraktik 2021 inom vård t.ex. hemservice, serviceboende, vårdavdelningar.
  Godkänd praktikrapport på ca 4 sidor om Dina upplevelser och erfarenheter av att göra sommarpraktik. Vad hade Du för målsättning för praktiken, vad har du lärt dig och nådde du Din målsättning. Undertecknad arbetslista inlämnas.
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för SSK20 grupperna 12.3 kl.9.00 - 9.45. Obligatorisk närvaro.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36. (not translated)

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV18KVV03-3010 08.03.2021-05.09.2021  6 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team
  - can account for the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory tests

  Prerequisites

  The nurising process
  Ergonomy and Kinesthetics
  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Geriatrics and nursing care of the elderly

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Clinical practice 4.5 sp
  Laboratory exminations 1.5 sp

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurskompendium (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, demonstrationer, individuella uppgifter, kliniska övningar: 1.5 sp
  
  Praktik 4.5 sp
  Tre veckor valfri praktik inom vården under sommaren (sommarjobb): serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd individuell uppgift i lab-delen
  Utförda blodprovstagningar och EKG
  
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för SSK20 grupperna.
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36.
  Godkänd inlämnad arbetslista och praktikrapport. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.03.2021 - 05.09.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.03.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro under laborationsundervisningen
  Studerande söker själv sitt sommararbete. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  VÅV18KVV03, Klinisk vård inom valbar kontext, 6 sp varav 4,5 sp görs som sommarpraktik. (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Sommarpraktik på serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Vårterminen och sommaren 2021
  Inlämningsuppgift inom vt 2021 (not translated)

  Internationa connections

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1.5 x 27 = 40.5 h = 1.5 sp
  Sommarpraktiken = 4,5 sp = 3 veckor. 38 h /veckan. Totalt: 114 h. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Praktik 3 veckor (4,5 sp) görs som sommarpraktik 2021 inom vård t.ex. hemservice, serviceboende, vårdavdelningar.
  Godkänd praktikrapport på ca 4 sidor om Dina upplevelser och erfarenheter av att göra sommarpraktik. Vad hade Du för målsättning för praktiken, vad har du lärt dig och nådde du Din målsättning. Undertecknad arbetslista inlämnas.
  Deltagande i praktikinfo för SSK20 grupperna. Obligatorisk närvaro.
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium vecka 36. (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene VÅV18BV03-3007 04.09.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (ETAPP 20 SJUKSKÖTARE) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care
  - master aseptic methods

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Hygiene

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.09.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  05.08.2020 - 03.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ETAPP 20 SJUKSKÖTARE

  Seats

  13 - 26

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene VÅV18BV03-3006 28.09.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care
  - master aseptic methods

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Hygiene

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Hygien:
  Suojaeristyksen toteuttaminen, tartuntaeristyksen toteuttaminen, infektioiden ehkäisyt, och infektioon liittyvä ohjaus +sidorna 307-310 ( preparering för åtgärd) från boken Hoida ja kirjaa.2012 Iivanainen-Syväoja.
  WHO.2015. Guidelines for Hand Hygiene in Health care
  Vårdhandboken.http://www.vardhandboken.se/
  Aktuella filmer och artiklar enligt föreläsarens anvisningar
  
  Klinisk mikrobiologi:
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi &immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2015 eller nyare.
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi.Liber 2018.
  Aktuella artiklar enligt anvisning.
  Nätinformation: THL, ECDC, CDC, WHO (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hygiene:
  Lecturesand discussionss, demonstration, two group works, clinical skills training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Hygiene:
  For passing the course part in Hygiene, an approved group work, approved virtual test (min 70% right answers) and active participation in clinical skills training are required.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.09.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Hygien:
  Grupparbeten GK/kompletteras
  Virtuellt test 0-5
  Deltagande vid kliniska övningar
  
  Mikrobiologi: tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Hygiene:
  Group 1 A: Deadline for groupwork
  Virtual test open Re-take
  Group 1 B: Deadline for group work
  Virtual test open Re-take

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours/cr
  Clinical microbiology 54 h: Scheduled teaching 14 h, Literature studies 40 h

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene VÅV18BV03-3004 31.08.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care
  - master aseptic methods

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Hygiene

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Hygiene:
  Suojaeristyksen toteuttaminen, tartuntaeristyksen toteuttaminen, infektioiden ehkäisyt, och infektioon liittyvä ohjaus +sidorna 307-310 from the book Hoida ja kirjaa, 2012 Iivanainen-Syväoja.
  WHO.2015. Guidelines for Hand Hygiene in Health care
  http://www.vardhandboken.se/
  Films and articles according to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Hygiene:
  Lecturesand discussionss, demonstration, two group works, clinical skills training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Hygiene:
  For passing the course part in Hygiene, an approved group work, approved virtual test (min 70% right answers) and active participation in clinical skills training are required.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Hygiene:
  Group work pass/must be supplemented
  Virtual test 0-5
  Participation in clinical skills training

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Hygiene:
  Group 1 A: Deadline for groupwork
  Virtual test open Re-take
  Group 1 B: Deadline for group work
  Virtual test open Re-take

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene VÅV18BV03-3005 05.10.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care
  - master aseptic methods

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Hygiene

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Hygiene:
  Suojaeristyksen toteuttaminen, tartuntaeristyksen toteuttaminen, infektioiden ehkäisyt, och infektioon liittyvä ohjaus +sidorna 307-310 from the book Hoida ja kirjaa, 2012 Iivanainen-Syväoja.
  WHO.2015. Guidelines for Hand Hygiene in Health care
  http://www.vardhandboken.se/
  Films and articles according to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Hygiene:
  Lecturesand discussionss, demonstration, two group works, clinical skills training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Hygiene:
  For passing the course part in Hygiene, an approved group work, approved virtual test (min 70% right answers) and active participation in clinical skills training are required.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 11.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Hygiene:
  Group work pass/must be supplemented
  Virtual test 0-5
  Participation in clinical skills training

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Hygiene:
  Group 1 A: Deadline for groupwork
  Virtual test open Re-take
  Group 1 B: Deadline for group work
  Virtual test open Re-take

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours/cr
  Clinical microbiology 54 h: Scheduled teaching 14 h, Literature studies 40 h

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV14KVV05-3007 01.08.2020-31.12.2020  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients

  Prerequisites

  Care of the old and geriatrics
  Surgical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth,R. 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad. Del 1 och 2, valda delar. Liber, Stockholm.
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  BEHANDLINGSÅTGÄRDER VID BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER;
  Patientinformation. 3.10.2018. K. Tarnanen., T. Tuomi., P Illanne-Parikka., A-K. Tuomaala., T. Meinander och finska läkaresällskapet. Insulinberoende diabetes.
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 28.6.2018. P Ilanne-Parikka. Tyypin 1 diabetes: hoito
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 25.10.2018. Insuliinihoidon periaatteet tyypin 1 diabeteksessa - pikatietoa
  Diabetes typ 1 hos barn, ungdomar och unga vuxna. 2018. Ragnar Hanås
  www.novonordisk.fi
  
  ARRHYTHMIAS
  Handbok i de vanligaste artymierna. Tolkning och behandling. Ambu.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito, rytmihäiriöt
  Moodleföreläsningar.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks.
  Approved clinical examination
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  Look at moodle for more information

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual assignments and problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Aktiv närvaro i delen om blodsockeravvikelser

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical exam week
  Moodle arytmitest made last
  Red Cross blood web-course made last

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h sp. Totalt 81 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid övningar.
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 2 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Hemuppgift: Valbar antibiotika, 1 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 1, 6 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase, 2 h
  Vätskebalansövning, 10 min
  Övningsstationer 3. Blodtransfusionsuppgift genomgång, Grupp 1 och 2, 2 h
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 2 h
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: 29 h
  Eget arbete: 11 h
  TOTALT: 40 h
  HJÄRTRYTMER: 0,25 sp, 6,75 h
  Hjärtrytmer, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Självstudier + Moodletest: EKG rytmer ca 2,75 h
  RESUSKITATION:
  4h teori, 6 h övning och 6h examination (enligt gruppindelning).
  Alla tillfällen obligatorisk närvaro.
  BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER
  4 h obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Moodletest Hjärtarytmier bör vara godkänd med 80% om inte underkänd.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs bör vara godkänd med 80 % om inte underkänd. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks.
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Approved clinical examination
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV20KVV05-3001 27.01.2021-31.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - has achieved competence in surgical and perioperative nursing care according to national standard

  Prerequisites

  Care of the old and geriatrics
  Surgical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  BEHANDLINGSÅTGÄRDER VID BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER;
  Patientinformation. 3.10.2018. K. Tarnanen., T. Tuomi., P Illanne-Parikka., A-K. Tuomaala., T. Meinander och finska läkaresällskapet. Insulinberoende diabetes.
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 28.6.2018. P Ilanne-Parikka. Tyypin 1 diabetes: hoito
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 25.10.2018. Insuliinihoidon periaatteet tyypin 1 diabeteksessa - pikatietoa
  Diabetes typ 1 hos barn, ungdomar och unga vuxna. 2018. Ragnar Hanås
  www.novonordisk.fi
  
  ARRHYTHMIAS
  Handbok i de vanligaste artymierna. Tolkning och behandling. Ambu.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito, rytmihäiriöt
  Moodleföreläsningar.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.01.2021 - 31.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 18.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Ann-Louise Glasberg, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  Look at moodle for more information

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual assignments and problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Aktiv närvaro i delen om blodsockeravvikelser

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical exam week
  Moodle arytmitest made last
  Red Cross blood web-course made last

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h sp. Totalt 81 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid övningar.
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 2 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Hemuppgift: Valbar antibiotika, 1 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 1, 6 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase, 2 h
  Vätskebalansövning, 10 min
  Övningsstationer 3. Blodtransfusionsuppgift genomgång, Grupp 1 och 2, 2 h
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 2 h
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: 29 h
  Eget arbete: 11 h
  TOTALT: 40 h
  HJÄRTRYTMER: 0,25 sp, 6,75 h
  Hjärtrytmer, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Självstudier + Moodletest: EKG rytmer ca 2,75 h
  RESUSKITATION:
  4h teori, 6 h övning och 6h examination (enligt gruppindelning).
  Alla tillfällen obligatorisk närvaro.
  BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER
  4 h obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV14KVV05-3006 05.10.2020-29.11.2020  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients

  Prerequisites

  Care of the old and geriatrics
  Surgical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth,R. 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad. Del 1 och 2, valda delar. Liber AB Stockholm.
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  BEHANDLINGSÅTGÄRDER VID BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER;
  Patientinformation. 3.10.2018. K. Tarnanen., T. Tuomi., P Illanne-Parikka., A-K. Tuomaala., T. Meinander och finska läkaresällskapet. Insulinberoende diabetes.
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 28.6.2018. P Ilanne-Parikka. Tyypin 1 diabetes: hoito
  Lääkärin käsikirja. 25.10.2018. Insuliinihoidon periaatteet tyypin 1 diabeteksessa - pikatietoa
  Diabetes typ 1 hos barn, ungdomar och unga vuxna. 2018. Ragnar Hanås
  www.novonordisk.fi
  
  ARRHYTHMIAS
  Handbok i de vanligaste artymierna. Tolkning och behandling. Ambu.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito, rytmihäiriöt
  Moodleföreläsningar.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks.
  Approved clinical examination
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 29.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 11.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK19 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  Look at moodle for more information

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual assignments and problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Aktiv närvaro i delen om blodsockeravvikelser

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical exam week
  Moodle arytmitest made last
  Red Cross blood web-course made last

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h sp. Totalt 81 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid övningar.
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 2 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Hemuppgift: Valbar antibiotika, 1 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 1, 6 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase, 2 h
  Vätskebalansövning, 10 min
  Övningsstationer 3. Blodtransfusionsuppgift genomgång, Grupp 1 och 2, 2 h
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 2 h
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: 29 h
  Eget arbete: 11 h
  TOTALT: 40 h
  HJÄRTRYTMER: 0,25 sp, 6,75 h
  Hjärtrytmer, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Självstudier + Moodletest: EKG rytmer ca 2,75 h
  RESUSKITATION:
  4h teori, 6 h övning och 6h examination (enligt gruppindelning).
  Alla tillfällen obligatorisk närvaro.
  BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER
  4 h obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Moodletest Hjärtarytmier bör vara godkänd med 80% om inte underkänd.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs bör vara godkänd med 80 % om inte underkänd. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks.
  Arrhythmias, passed moodle test
  Approved clinical examination
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3011 31.12.2020-31.07.2021  3 credits  (ETAPP 20 SJUKSKÖTARE) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Etappvis till sjukskötare, Öppna YH, våren 2021, kursen genomförs på distans på grund av COVID-19
  Deltagarna anmäls till förverkligandet av kurskoordinator Ann-Sofi Storbjörk
  Examinator Sirkku Säätelä (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.12.2020 - 31.07.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2020 - 30.12.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ETAPP 20 SJUKSKÖTARE

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3007 05.10.2020-13.12.2020  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Inkinen, R., Volmanen, P. & Hakoinen, S. (toim.) 2015. Turvallinen lääkehoito Opas lääkehoitosuunnitelman tekemiseen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Julkari. https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1 valda delar
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Aktuella artiklar och material enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närstudier i form av föreläsningar och workshops i läkemedelsräkning
  Seminarier
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops).
  Uppgifterna utförs virtuellt i moodle
  Kliniska övningar i injektionsgivning 2 x 3 h (obligatorisk närvaro) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifetr Gk/UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 75% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedlesräkning 100% rätt förGK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.10.2020 - 13.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 11.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen
  Uppgifter (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt överenskommelse med gruppen vid kursstart
  Räknetent i klass
  Omtentamina på omtentsdagar under våren enligt meddelande efter kursstart 2020
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  arbetsbörda 27h arbete per studiepoäng (not translated)

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3008 16.11.2020-20.12.2020  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Inkinen, R., Volmanen, P. & Hakoinen, S. (toim.) 2015. Turvallinen lääkehoito Opas lääkehoitosuunnitelman tekemiseen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Julkari. https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1 valda delar
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Aktuella artiklar och material enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närstudier i form av föreläsningar och workshops i läkemedelsräkning
  Seminarier
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops).
  Uppgifterna utförs virtuellt i moodle
  Kliniska övningar i injektionsgivning 2 x 3 h (obligatorisk närvaro) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifetr Gk/UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 75% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedlesräkning 100% rätt förGK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.11.2020 - 20.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen
  Uppgifter (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt överenskommelse med gruppen vid kursstart
  Räknetent i klass
  Omtentamina på omtentsdagar under våren enligt meddelande efter kursstart 2020
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  arbetsbörda 27h arbete per studiepoäng (not translated)

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3009 04.01.2021-30.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Inkinen, R., Volmanen, P. & Hakoinen, S. (toim.) 2015. Turvallinen lääkehoito Opas lääkehoitosuunnitelman tekemiseen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Julkari. https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1 valda delar
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Aktuella artiklar och material enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närstudier i form av föreläsningar och workshops i läkemedelsräkning
  Seminarier
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops).
  Uppgifterna utförs virtuellt i moodle
  Kliniska övningar i injektionsgivning 2 x 3 h (obligatorisk närvaro) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifetr Gk/UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 75% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedlesräkning 100% rätt förGK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 30.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tentamen
  Uppgifter (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt överenskommelse med gruppen vid kursstart
  Räknetent i klass
  Omtentamina på omtentsdagar under våren enligt meddelande efter kursstart 2020
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  arbetsbörda 27h arbete per studiepoäng (not translated)

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3006 31.08.2020-11.10.2020  4 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur
  På svenska
  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  FRK. Blodtranfusioner https://www.blodtjanst.fi/for-halsovardsexperter/blodtjanst-utbildar/blodtransfusionens-abo
  Filmer och virtuellt material på moodle
  Material och evidensbaserade nya vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner
  Caselösningar och genomgång av problemlösningar under workshops
  Virtuella uppgifter, forumdiskussion och virtuellt test i teori
  Läkemedelsräkning som flipped learning ( studerande läser teoretisk bakgrund till räkneproblem som praktiseras på workshops), deltenter i läkemedelsräkning efter utförd workshop (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 11.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3004 31.08.2020-11.10.2020  4 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner
  Caselösningar och genomgång av problemlösningar under workshops
  Virtuella uppgifter, forumdiskussion och virtuellt test i teori
  Läkemedelsräkning som flipped learning ( studerande läser teoretisk bakgrund till räkneproblem som praktiseras på workshops), deltenter i läkemedelsräkning efter utförd workshop (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 11.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3005 31.08.2020-15.11.2020  4 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  FRK. Blodtranfusioner https://www.blodtjanst.fi/for-halsovardsexperter/blodtjanst-utbildar/blodtransfusionens-abo
  Filmer och virtuellt material på moodle
  Material och evidensbaserade nya vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner
  Caselösningar och genomgång av problemlösningar under workshops
  Virtuella uppgifter, forumdiskussion och virtuellt test i teori
  Läkemedelsräkning som flipped learning ( studerande läser teoretisk bakgrund till räkneproblem som praktiseras på workshops), deltenter i läkemedelsräkning efter utförd workshop (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Läkemedelsräkning 100% rätt för GK
  Teoritest 65% rätt för godkänt. Godkänd prestation bedöms 1-5
  Uppgifter och forumdiskussion inlämnade inom deadline GK+, GK , kompletteras
  Försenade uppgifter drar ner slutvitsord (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 15.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  Blodtranfusioner tas upp i Kursen KVV05 kliniska vårdåtgärder så det faller bort ur dettaförverkligande (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Virtuellt test samt deadline för uppgifter enligt överenskommelse med gruppen
  Läkemedelsräkning deltenter efter utförda workshops. Kalkylator får användas
  Omtentamina i läkemedelsräkning ( alla delar tentas i omtent) november 2019 och december 2020 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h arbetsbörda per studiepoäng. Läkemedelsräkning kräver deltagande i workshops för de flesta (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

•   English VÅV14EN01-3008 11.01.2021-28.02.2021  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments, passed exam (oral and written).

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks, passed exam (oral and written)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3009 15.03.2021-18.04.2021  3 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments, passed exam (oral and written).

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.03.2021 - 18.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.03.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 1 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks, passed exam (oral and written)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3007 19.10.2020-22.11.2020  3 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments, passed exam (oral and written).

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.10.2020 - 22.11.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 25.10.2020

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks, passed exam (oral and written)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English USS20GV06-3001 22.02.2021-30.05.2021  3 credits  (UHV20D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
  
  Can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
  
  Is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
  
  Oral and written communication
  
  Oral and written presentations
  
  Language correctness and language planning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Text material and assignments are part of the course.

  Learning methods

  Contact lessons based on communication, adaption of text material, individual work, work in pairs/groups, essay writing, simulations of cases.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grading on a scale 1-5 or fail. An approved course requires approved oral presentations and approved written assignments.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.02.2021 - 30.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 21.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV20D-Å
  • USS20D-Å

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp A (Size: 30. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp B (Size: 30. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Cindy Forsblom, Maria Engberg

  Additional information

  N/A

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  N/A

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  N/A

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spoken assignments:
  
  1) Reading Circle (APPROVED/FAIL),
  2) Simulations of Cases (GRADE), execution at different times,
  
  Written assignments:
  
  3) A Nursing Case Study Essay (GRADE)
  4) Written Examination on Vocabulary Knowledge (vocabulary lists provided) (GRADE)
  5) Poster Creation and a Discussion (APPROVED/FAIL)
  
  NB! Written assignment 5 can support the student in receiving a higher grade.

  Internationa connections

  N/A

  Student's schedule and workload

  The courses comprises 3 credits and the the students are expected to work approximately 81 hours.

  Content scheduling

  N/A

  Assessment criteria

  Grade 0
  The student fails to submit the assignments by the deadline provided and/or fails to take part in oral presentations/simulations.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Grade 1-2
  The student can express himself in a simple but coherent way and write reports in a simple but often unstructured way. There are spelling mistakes and weaknesses in basic structures of a written text. The student manages to present orally but the presentation may be difficult for foreigners to understand. Limited ability express oneself fluently in speech, the student pauses to find suitable expressions or uses words in his native language. Have problems to find synonyms and a suitable style.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Grade 3
  The student can write coherent, analytical and structured texts including his own opinions and arguments and can draw conclusions of information from different sources. Breach of style, spelling mistakes and other small mistakes can be found but the student has a good command of the basic structures and can use difficult structures more correctly. Oral presentations are of a routine nature but structured.
  Grade 4
  The student writes almost flawless English and expresses himself fluently and professionally in speech and writing. The student writes well structured, analytical texts with well-grounded conclusions about more demanding topics and manages to pinpoint the most important in a text and provide examples. The student can express himself orally within a wide variety of topics spontaneously and rarely needs to look for the right expression. A versatile vocabulary.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Grade 5
  The language is idiomatic and flawless. The student can write scientific texts in a well-structured, interesting and correct way. Manages to vary the style and use of language depending on the target group. Can in speech use professional, balanced and idiomatic language, make corrections without the audience being disturbed by it and has a good command of insinuations and multi-faceted expressions. Oral speeches are interesting, creative and well structured.

•   English YH10EN01-3025 08.02.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (UHV19D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  By the end of the course, the student is expected to
  • be able to communicate in a professional way, both in speech and in writing, in stituations that are relevant for their professional life
  • have knowledge about the central terminology in their own field, along with the ability to understand and make use of the main content of texts in the field

  Prerequisites

  No

  Content of the study unit

  Oral and written communication. Central terminology in the respective professional fields.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Text material and assignments are part of the course.

  Learning methods

  Contact lessons based on communication, adaption of text material, individual work, work in pairs/groups, essay writing, simulations of cases.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grading on a scale 1-5 or fail. An approved course requires approved oral presentations and approved written assignments.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV19D-Å
  • USS19D-Å

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Cindy Forsblom, Maria Engberg

  Additional information

  N/A

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  N/A

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  N/A

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spoken assignments:
  
  1) Reading Circle (APPROVED/FAIL)
  2) Simulations of Cases (GRADE), execution at different times,
  
  Written assignments:
  
  3) A Nursing Case Study Essay (GRADE)
  4) Written Examination on Vocabulary Knowledge (vocabulary lists provided) (GRADE)
  5) Poster Creation and a Discussion (APPROVED/FAIL)
  
  NB! Written assignment 5 can support the student in receiving a higher grade.

  Internationa connections

  N/A

  Student's schedule and workload

  The courses comprises 3 credits and the the students are expected to work approximately 81 hours.

  Content scheduling

  N/A

  Assessment criteria

  Grade 0
  The student fails to submit the assignments by the deadline provided and/or fails to take part in oral presentations/simulations.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Grade 1-2
  The student can express himself in a simple but coherent way and write reports in a simple but often unstructured way. There are spelling mistakes and weaknesses in basic structures of a written text. The student manages to present orally but the presentation may be difficult for foreigners to understand. Limited ability express oneself fluently in speech, the student pauses to find suitable expressions or uses words in his native language. Have problems to find synonyms and a suitable style.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Grade 3
  The student can write coherent, analytical and structured texts including his own opinions and arguments and can draw conclusions of information from different sources. Breach of style, spelling mistakes and other small mistakes can be found but the student has a good command of the basic structures and can use difficult structures more correctly. Oral presentations are of a routine nature but structured.
  Grade 4
  The student writes almost flawless English and expresses himself fluently and professionally in speech and writing. The student writes well structured, analytical texts with well-grounded conclusions about more demanding topics and manages to pinpoint the most important in a text and provide examples. The student can express himself orally within a wide variety of topics spontaneously and rarely needs to look for the right expression. A versatile vocabulary.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Grade 5
  The language is idiomatic and flawless. The student can write scientific texts in a well-structured, interesting and correct way. Manages to vary the style and use of language depending on the target group. Can in speech use professional, balanced and idiomatic language, make corrections without the audience being disturbed by it and has a good command of insinuations and multi-faceted expressions. Oral speeches are interesting, creative and well structured.

•   English YH10EN01-3026 08.02.2021-23.05.2021  3 credits  (USS19F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  By the end of the course, the student is expected to
  • be able to communicate in a professional way, both in speech and in writing, in stituations that are relevant for their professional life
  • have knowledge about the central terminology in their own field, along with the ability to understand and make use of the main content of texts in the field

  Prerequisites

  No

  Content of the study unit

  Oral and written communication. Central terminology in the respective professional fields.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Text material and assignments are part of the course.

  Learning methods

  Contact lessons based on communication, adaption of text material, individual work, work in pairs/groups, essay writing, simulations of cases.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grading on a scale 1-5 or fail. An approved course requires approved oral presentations and approved written assignments.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 23.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19F-Å

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Engberg

  Additional information

  N/A

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  N/A

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  N/A

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spoken assignments:
  
  1) Reading Circle (APPROVED/FAIL)
  2) Simulations of Cases (GRADE), execution at different times,
  
  Written assignments:
  
  3) A Nursing Case Study Essay (GRADE)
  4) Written Examination on Vocabulary Knowledge (vocabulary lists provided) (GRADE)
  5) Poster Creation and a Discussion (APPROVED/FAIL)
  
  NB! Written assignment 5 can support the student in receiving a higher grade.

  Internationa connections

  N/A

  Student's schedule and workload

  The courses comprises 3 credits and the the students are expected to work approximately 81 hours.

  Content scheduling

  N/A

  Assessment criteria

  Grade 0
  The student fails to submit the assignments by the deadline provided and/or fails to take part in oral presentations/simulations.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Grade 1-2
  The student can express himself in a simple but coherent way and write reports in a simple but often unstructured way. There are spelling mistakes and weaknesses in basic structures of a written text. The student manages to present orally but the presentation may be difficult for foreigners to understand. Limited ability express oneself fluently in speech, the student pauses to find suitable expressions or uses words in his native language. Have problems to find synonyms and a suitable style.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Grade 3
  The student can write coherent, analytical and structured texts including his own opinions and arguments and can draw conclusions of information from different sources. Breach of style, spelling mistakes and other small mistakes can be found but the student has a good command of the basic structures and can use difficult structures more correctly. Oral presentations are of a routine nature but structured.
  Grade 4
  The student writes almost flawless English and expresses himself fluently and professionally in speech and writing. The student writes well structured, analytical texts with well-grounded conclusions about more demanding topics and manages to pinpoint the most important in a text and provide examples. The student can express himself orally within a wide variety of topics spontaneously and rarely needs to look for the right expression. A versatile vocabulary.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Grade 5
  The language is idiomatic and flawless. The student can write scientific texts in a well-structured, interesting and correct way. Manages to vary the style and use of language depending on the target group. Can in speech use professional, balanced and idiomatic language, make corrections without the audience being disturbed by it and has a good command of insinuations and multi-faceted expressions. Oral speeches are interesting, creative and well structured.

•   Ergonomic and Kinesthetics VÅV19KVV02-3005 04.01.2021-17.01.2021  1 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Patientförflyttning. En skicklig vårdare aktiverar och hjälper. Helsingfors: Arbetshälsoinstitutet, 2014.
  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Potilassiirrot. Taitava avustaja aktivoi ja auttaa.Helsingfors: Työterveyslaitos, 2013.
  http://www.ttl.fi/fi/ergonomia/ergonomia_eri_aloille/terveydenhuolto/potilassiirrot/sivut/default.aspx

  Learning methods

  Lecture
  Demonstrations
  Vdeos
  Practical exercises

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 17.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 1 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  100% attendance, approved exercises and approved recorded film

•   Ergonomic and Kinesthetics VÅV19KVV02-3006 04.01.2021-31.01.2021  1 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Patientförflyttning. En skicklig vårdare aktiverar och hjälper. Helsingfors: Arbetshälsoinstitutet, 2014.
  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Potilassiirrot. Taitava avustaja aktivoi ja auttaa.Helsingfors: Työterveyslaitos, 2013.
  http://www.ttl.fi/fi/ergonomia/ergonomia_eri_aloille/terveydenhuolto/potilassiirrot/sivut/default.aspx

  Learning methods

  Lecture
  Demonstrations
  Videos
  Practical exercises

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 31.01.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 1 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  100% attendance, approved exercises and approved recorded film

•   Ergonomic and Kinesthetics VÅV19KVV02-3004 07.09.2020-25.10.2020  1 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Patientförflyttning. En skicklig vårdare aktiverar och hjälper. Helsingfors: Arbetshälsoinstitutet, 2014.
  Tamminen-Peter, L. & Wikström, G. Potilassiirrot. Taitava avustaja aktivoi ja auttaa.Helsingfors: Työterveyslaitos, 2013.
  http://www.ttl.fi/fi/ergonomia/ergonomia_eri_aloille/terveydenhuolto/potilassiirrot/sivut/default.aspx

  Learning methods

  Lecture
  Demonstrations
  Vdeos
  Practical exercises

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.09.2020 - 25.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 1 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance
  Change to work clothes

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  100% attendance, approved exercises and approved recorded film

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring 2020, week 2 - 4

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to your own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Know the values and consider the ethical principles

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS20IV05-3001 21.09.2020-14.12.2020  5 credits  (UHV20D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Is able to, as part of an interprofessional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  
  Has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based central care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  
  Can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  
  Can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable development
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Bodil Julin

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar eller
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar eller
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa.Valda delar.
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  Övrig litteratur: (kommer att uppdateras)
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Ekman I (red). 2015. Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Klang Söderkvist & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti
  Saranto K. m.fl. 2008. Hoitotyön systemaattinen kirjaaminen.
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012
  FinnCC Vårdbehov 3.0
  FinCC Funktioner inom vårdarbete 3.0 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Smågruppsarbete
  Reflektionsdagbok
  Lektioner
  Simulationer
  Examinationer
  Studiebesök (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete, simulationer och studiebesök.
  1:a hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK
  Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker GK/UK
  
  Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier: Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården.
  
  Aktivtivitet under föreläsningar, smågrupper och simulation kan höja eller sänka vitsordet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.09.2020 - 14.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV20D-Å
  • USS20D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anne Nummela, Bodil Julin, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in via e-ahot före den 11.9 till Bodil Julin. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Reflektionsdagbok
  Simulationer
  Praktisk examination
  Individuell skriftlig examination
  1:a hjälp (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studiebesök
  Externa föreläsare (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Reflektionsdagbok v 40, 41,42, 44, 46, 47 och 49 lämnas in på Moodle under smågruppsarbetet .
  Simulation v 40, 41,42,44, 46, 47 och 49
  1:a hjälp v 47,48,49
  Praktisk examination v 50
  Skriftlig individuell examination v 50, omtent den 22.1.21 och den 12.2.21 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier och reflektionsdagbok 135 h (c 12h/vecka)
  Smågrupp och lektioner 21 h
  Simulation: 23 h
  1:a hjälp 4 h
  Studiebesök 3 h
  Examinationer: 5 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Extended clinical nursing care in primary health care VÅV18FK01-3001 08.02.2021-25.04.2021  6 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of primary care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their relatives
  - mastered the care of patients in primary care
  - mastered the care of acutely ill children
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - can, in a simulated situation, be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can apply a rehabilitative and health-promoting approach
  - can apply patient guidance

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  PEDIATRIC CARE
  Jääskeläinen, J., Miettinen, P., Niinikoski, H., Saha, M-T. & Veijola R. 2016. Diabeettisen ketoasidoosinhoito. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Mäkelä, M. & Dunder, T. 2016. Anafylaktinen reaktio. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Qvist, E. 2013. Lääkärinkäsikirja. Akuutisti sairas imeväinen.
  Qvist, E. & Korppi, M. 2009. Duodecim. Alle kolmen kuukauden ikäinen lapsi päivystysksessä.
  
  INREMEDICINSK VÅRD OCH REHABILITERING
  Aktuella vårdvetenskapliga artiklar samt aktuella artiklar från Duodecim: Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat och Lääkärin tietokannat.
  Sundelöf Andersson, S. 2012. Rehabilitering i vårdarbetet. Studentlitteratur
  Terveysportti: kuntoutus
  Vasa centralsjukhus: kontrollistor för utskrivning av patient
  
  SURGICAL CARE
  Almås, H. Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red) 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 1. Liber. Stockholm.
  Almås, H. Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red) 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber. Stockholm.
  Björkman, E & Karlsson, K. 2008. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor: material, metod, ansvar. Studentlitteratur. AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur. AB, Lund.
  Käypä hoito-suositus:
  Sepsis www.terveysportti.fi
  Svenska infektionsläkarföreningen. Uppdaterat 2018. Vårdprogram Svår sepsis och septisk chock – tidig identifiering och initial handläggning.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.
  Aktuella vårdvetenskapliga artiklar samt aktuella artiklar från Duodecim: Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat och Lääkärin tietokannat.
  
  EBP:
  Berman, A., Snyder, S. Fundamentals of Nursing. Concepts, Process and Practice. 9th ed. Person, New-Jersy. 2012, pp. 161-335.
  Chen, S., Chang, H., & Pai, H. (2018). Caring behaviours directly and indirectly affect nursing students’ critical thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32(1), 197–203
  Hinno, S., Partanen, P., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. The professional nursing practice environment and nurse-reported job outcomes in two European countries: a survey of nurses in Finland and the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. Mar2012, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p133-143.
  Hancock, H. C., & Easen, P. R. (2004). Evidence-based practice – an incomplete model of the relationship between theory and professional work. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 187–196.
  Miller, L. L., Ward, D., & Young, H. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practices in Nursing. Generations, 34(1), 72–77. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=53063435&site=ehost-live

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case demonstrations
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Individual work
  Videos
  Demonstrations
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Active attendance at the lessons
  Approved practical exercises
  Written examination assignment. Grade: scale 1 - 5
  Participation in seminar
  
  Mandatory attendance at Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  
  Surgical care, internal medical care, rehabilitation and pediatric care: exam grades 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 25.04.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • FK (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marice Nedergård, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Susanne Svahn, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Mandatory and active attendance
  Approved practical exercises
  Written examination in internal medicine care, surgical care and pediatric care

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written examen

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Extended nursing care in an optional clinical context VÅV14KVV15-3003 15.02.2021-05.12.2021  12 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and related persons and take into account their cultural affiliation
  - can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
  - can handle complicated vocational tasks within the chosen health context
  - can independently make decisions regarding the patient's care process and be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can independently acquire and assess evidence-based knowledge
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - has the skills to supervise and teach patients
  - shows ability to meet people in crisis
  - has readiness to shop in different situations in the healthcare sector

  Prerequisites

  Core studies
  Professional studies
  Practice

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  92% Face-to-face, 8% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About internships

  Learning methods

  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context
  Written assignment

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved internship
  Approved written assignment
  Participation in seminar

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.02.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  12.02.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 12 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Seats

  1 - 60

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Students have the opportunity to get some of the practice validated through summer jobs as nurses in the summer of 2021

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual weeks in the spring of 2021
  Week 38 - 47 autumn 2021

  Internationa connections

  Students can complete the internship abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  38 h/week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  follows the work list and holds agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
  Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team

•   Extended nursing care in an optional clinical context VÅV14KVV15-3002 24.08.2020-31.12.2020  12 credits  (USS17U-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and related persons and take into account their cultural affiliation
  - can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
  - can handle complicated vocational tasks within the chosen health context
  - can independently make decisions regarding the patient's care process and be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can independently acquire and assess evidence-based knowledge
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - has the skills to supervise and teach patients
  - shows ability to meet people in crisis
  - has readiness to shop in different situations in the healthcare sector

  Prerequisites

  Core studies
  Professional studies
  Practice

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  92% Face-to-face, 8% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About internships

  Learning methods

  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context
  Written assignment

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved internship
  Approved written assignment
  Participation in seminar

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.08.2020

  • 12 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS17U-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lisen Kullas-Nyman, Åsa Lågland, Marice Nedergård, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Students have the opportunity to get some of the practice validated through summer jobs as nurses in the summer of 2020
  Anita Ståhl-Levón is the supervisor for those who do internships in paediatric care
  The supervisor for those who do their internship in psychiatry is Marlene Gädda
  Supervisor for those doing internship in internal medical and surgical healthcare is Marice Nedergård
  Supervisor for those who do practice in emergency and intensive care is Marice Nedergård.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Week 38 - 46 autumn 2020

  Internationa connections

  Students can complete the internship abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  38 h/week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  follows the work list and holds agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
  Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team

•   Extended nursing care of the patient with substance use disorders VÅV16PV03-3005 08.02.2021-31.12.2021  3 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and societal governance in substance abuse care
  - can identify the consequences of abuse and dependence on the welfare society
  - can apply preventive care work and describe the care chain in the abusive care system
  - can describe specific features of different drug groups
  - can evaluate different care and treatment efforts in different contexts

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Nursing care of the patient with substance use disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2011. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Handouts
  According to the lecturer´s instruction

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case demonstrations
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Videos
  Study
  Experience Experts

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The following points are considered in the Group work:
  Theoretical basis and use of literature with scale 1 - 5
  Content and logical structure of work with scale 1 - 5
  Cooperation with scale 1-5
  Presentation with scale 1 - 5
  The following points are considered on the Project day:
  Preparation for the presentation with scale 1-5
  Get the students interested in the subject, get them to cooperate and discuss with scale 1-5
  Can summarize the discussion on the subject with scale 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • PV (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Group work
  Project together with UsÖ

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Lecturers spring 2021:
  
  
  Lectures and study autumn 2021
  In connection with the project the students have a drug prevention day for secondary school students

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Group work:
  Seminar autumn 2021
  Project day:
  Hösten 2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can do the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

•   Extended nursing care of the patient with substance use disorders VÅV16PV03-3006 01.01.2021-31.12.2021  3 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and societal governance in substance abuse care
  - can identify the consequences of abuse and dependence on the welfare society
  - can apply preventive care work and describe the care chain in the abusive care system
  - can describe specific features of different drug groups
  - can evaluate different care and treatment efforts in different contexts

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Nursing care of the patient with substance use disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2011. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Handouts
  According to the lecturer´s instruction

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case demonstrations
  Troubleshooting
  Group work
  Videos
  Study
  Experience Experts

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The following points are considered in the Group work:
  Theoretical basis and use of literature with scale 1 - 5
  Content and logical structure of work with scale 1 - 5
  Cooperation with scale 1-5
  Presentation with scale 1 - 5
  The following points are considered on the Project day:
  Preparation for the presentation with scale 1-5
  Get the students interested in the subject, get them to cooperate and discuss with scale 1-5
  Can summarize the discussion on the subject with scale 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • PV (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Group work
  Project together with UsÖ

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Lecturers spring 2021:
  
  
  Lectures and study autumn 2021
  In connection with the project the students have a drug prevention day for secondary school students

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Group work:
  Seminar autumn 2021
  Project day:
  Hösten 2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can do the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3003 01.08.2020-31.12.2020  4 credits  (UBM18D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Health promotion among children and adolescents: Literature:
  Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen & inom skolhälsovård. Metodhandbok, THL.Tammerfors 2018
  Handbok för studerandehälsovården. STM, publikationer, Helsingfors 2007.
  Current legislation and scientific articles and research according to the lecturer´s directive

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  33 - 36 point = 5
  29 - 32 point = 4
  25 - 28 point = 3
  21 - 24 point = 2
  18 - 20 point = 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM18D-V
  • UHV18D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Tree hours of external lecture with Susanna Back from the association Projekt liv
  Eight hours of external lecture with Siv Östman from the association Hörselförbundet r.f. Wednesday 9.9.2020 kl. 9 - 16.15.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination in Pediatric Care autumn 2020 week 47
  Reexamination 1: Friday 6.11.2020
  Reexamination 2: Friday 11.12.2020
  
  Health promotion among children and adolescents - seminar 8.10.2020

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3004 05.04.2021-09.05.2021  4 credits  (SSK19-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen & inom skolhälsovård. Metodhandbok, THL.Tammerfors 2014 (finsk version från år 2016)
  Handbok för studerandehälsovården. STM, publikationer, Helsingfors 2007.
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL

  Learning methods

  Lecture remotely via Webex, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  33 - 36 point = 5
  29 - 32 point = 4
  25 - 28 point = 3
  21 - 24 point = 2
  18 - 20 point = 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.04.2021 - 09.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 04.04.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK19-2
  • USS19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK19 grupp 2 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lisen Kullas-Nyman, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2021
  Reexamination 1:
  Reexamination 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3008 26.04.2021-30.05.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna och ta till sig viktig information, fyller i ordlistorna och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1-3 nöjaktiga insikter, 4-5 goda insikter. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.04.2021 - 30.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 25.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar muntligt och skriftligt samt gör ett arbete. De deltar inte i klassundervisningen. Mera information fås vid kursstarten. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen i slutet av kursen samt ett inlämningsarbete. Omtentamen meddelas vid kursstarten. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3009 15.02.2021-28.03.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna och ta till sig viktig information. De fyller i ordlistorna och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Vitsord 1-3 nöjaktiga insikter, 4-5 goda insikter, Vitsord ges i muntlig och skriftlig framställning
  samt ett kursvitsord. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.02.2021 - 28.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 14.02.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar muntlig och skriftlig samt gör ett arbete. De behöver inte delta i undervisningen. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen i slutet av kursen. Godkänt övningsarbete. Omtentamen meddelas vid kursstarten. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3010 12.04.2021-16.05.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna och ta till sig viktig information. De fyller i ordlistorna och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning 1-3 nöjaktiga insikter, 4-5 goda insikter. Studerande får ett vitsord i såväl munlig
  som skriftlig framställning samt ett kursvitsord. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.04.2021 - 16.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 11.04.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar kursen såväl muntligt som skriftligt. De lämnar in ett skriftligt arbete. Ingen närundervisning. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen tenteras såväl muntligt som skriftligt i samband med kursen. Ett skriftligt arbete inlämnas.
  Tidpunkten för omtentamen meddelas vid kursstarten. (not translated)

•   Finnish USS20GV05-3001 11.01.2021-14.03.2021  3 credits  (UHV20D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
  
  Can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
  
  Is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
  
  Oral and written communication
  
  Oral and written presentations
  
  Language correctness and language planning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Materialet är sammanställt av läraren och finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, par- och grupparbete, muntliga och skriftliga övningar och uppgifter, textbearbetning, självstudier. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper bedöms skilt. Bedömningen baserar sig på den gemensamma europeiska referensramen för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1 motsvarar nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1-3) och nivå B2 eller högre motsvarar goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4-5).
  Examinationer och timaktivitet påverkar bedömningen. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 14.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV20D-Å
  • USS20D-Å

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp A (Size: 35. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp B (Size: 35. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sanna Nygård

  Additional information

  Noggrannare information om uppgifter, tentamen och datum finns i Moodle och gås igenom under första kurstillfället.
  Delprestationer är i kraft fram till 31.5 eller enligt särskild överenskommelse.
  För uppgifter som lämnats in efter deadline ges ingen feedback.
  Sena inlämningar påverkar kursvitsordet. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  För godkänd kurs krävs:
  - aktivt deltagande under lektioner (80 % närvarokrav för B- och C-nivå)
  - obligatoriska muntliga och skriftliga inlämningsuppgifter
  - godkänd muntlig och skriftlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen vecka 10.
  Skriftlig omtentamen under allmän omtentamen (två tillfällen).
  Muntlig omtentamen enligt överenskommelse. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h arbete. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  En eller flera kursuppgifter är ogjorda eller underkända.
  Studerande har knappt deltagit i kursen eller har kunskaper under A2-nivå:
  Klarar varken alldaglig eller branschspecifik skriftlig eller muntlig kommunikation på ett vederbörligt sätt.
  Kommunikationen är så bristfällig och/eller innehåller så många fel att misstolkningar uppstår eller kommunikationen
  förhindras. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  B1
  Vitsordet 1: Klarar sig nöjaktigt i förutsebara yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan skriva en enkel sammanhängande text. Budskapet förmedlas även om felen kan försvåra kommunikationen.
  Vitsordet 2: Klarar sig någorlunda i oförutsedda yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan skriva konsekventa texter som förmedlar ett budskap. Felen leder i allmänhet inte till missförstånd även om de kan störa läsrytmen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Vitsordet 3 (B1): Klarar sig i allmänhet bra i yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan vanligen uttrycka sig enligt situationens krav.
  
  Vitsordet 4 (B2): Klarar sig bra i allmänna yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Använder språket mångsidigt.
  Uttrycker sig enligt situationens krav. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  B2 (eller högre):
  Klarar sig mycket bra i allmänna yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Använder språket smidigt och mångsidigt.
  Uttrycker sig tydligt enligt situationens krav. (not translated)

•   Finnish - Oral Skills YH10FI01-M-3061 01.01.2021-31.07.2021  (UHV20D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.07.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 28.02.2021

  Group(s)

  • UHV20D-Å
  • USS20D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sanna Nygård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Finnish - Writing Skills YH10FI01-S-3065 12.04.2021-16.05.2021  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Timing

  12.04.2021 - 16.05.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Finnish - Writing Skills YH10FI01-S-3058 01.01.2021-31.07.2021  (UHV20D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Timing

  01.01.2021 - 31.07.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 28.02.2021

  Group(s)

  • UHV20D-Å
  • USS20D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sanna Nygård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   First Aid VÅV19KVV01-3005 01.02.2021-28.02.2021  2 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2017. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, Practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.02.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 31.01.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • BM (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • HV (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cr = 54 hours

•   First Aid VÅV19KVV01-3006 08.02.2021-14.03.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2017. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, Practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.02.2021 - 14.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 07.02.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cr = 54 hours

•   First Aid VÅV19KVV01-3004 07.09.2020-31.12.2020  2 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2017. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, demonstrationer, praktiska övningar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical test: approved/failed
  Resuscitation 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.09.2020 - 31.12.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.09.2020

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance
  Cooperation with Vamk, language bath

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical and theoretical test during the lessons

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cp = 54 hours

•   Future Visions of the Health Care Field USS15RF03-3004 31.08.2020-04.10.2020  4 credits  (USS17U-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student becomes aware of the importance of life-long learning and shows social engagement
  The student observes the future challenges of the field and shows interest in innovation within the area

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students participate in courses during semesters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 and have completed 180 credits.

  Content of the study unit

  The lifelong learning and own professional development
  Nurses' social commitment and global responsibility
  The future challenges and innovations of the healthcare
  Social media as a resource in healthcare work
  National and international research findings in healthcare work

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet. Information som stöd för välfärden och de reformerade tjänsterna. Utnyttja social- och hälsovårdsinformation-strategi fram till 2020.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet. Ett socialt hållbart Finland 2020. Stragei för social- och hälsovårdspolitiken.
  Terveys 2050. Neljä skenaariota ihmislähtöisestä terveydestä ja valinnanvapaudesta. DEMOS. Helsinki.
  Sairaanhoitajaliitto: Sairaanhoitajien uudet työnkuvat - laatua tulevaisuuteen ja sotepalveluihin.
  Kangasniemi, M. m.fl. 2018. Optimoitu sote-ammattilaisten koulutus- ja
  osaamisuudistus.
  Hoitotyön vuosikirja 2016. Teknologia soisaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Sairaanhoitajat
  Vehko, T. et al, 2019. E-health and e-welfare if Finland. THL Report 7/2019
  Vehko, T. et al. 2019 Miten tietojärjestelmät palvelevat terveydenhuollon ammattilaisten työtä? Vaikutukset työhön ja hyvinvointiin.
  http/innokylä.fi
  Övriga aktuella artiklar och publikationer (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Tehys nätkurs https://www.soteosaajaksi.fi/sv/hemsida/
  Individuell rapport.
  Seminarium. Obligatoriskt deltagande. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Tehy nätkurs. Bedömning enligt skalan uk - gk. GK: När kursen är gjord och bevis på en godkänd prestation har skickats per mejl till kursansvarig lärare
  2) Individuell rapport, vitsordsskala 0 - 5, se nedan (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.08.2020 - 04.10.2020

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2020 - 30.08.2020

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS17U-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1) Tehy nätkurs
  2) Individuell rapport (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Tehys nätkurs gjorg före praktiken vecka 41
  2) Individuell rapport. Inlämning av rapporten är 27.9.2020 på moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier 11 h
  Föreläsningar 16 h
  Tehy 20 h
  Individuell rapport 37 h. Inlämning på moodle 27.9.2020.
  Seminarium 4 h (gruppen delad till två mindre grupper) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 inte uppfylls. Underkänd rapport kompletteras enligt examinators anvisningar och lämnas in enligt överenskommelse. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande besvarar frågeställningen kortfattat och vagt, med mindre förmåga till analys och reflektion. Sambandet mellan individcentrerad och samhällsrelaterad vård blir otydlig. Mindre del av källorna är vetenskapligt förankrade, relevanta och nya.Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande besvarar frågeställningen på en god nivå, utnyttjar teoretisk och praktisk kunskap i frågor som rör vårdbranschens framtid nationellt och internationellt.Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns. Stora delar av källorna är vetenskapligt förankrade, relevanta och nya. Den tekniska utformningen är god. Uppgiften lämnas in i rätt form inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan på en djupgående nivå och mångsidigt besvara frågeställningen, har förmåga att relatera svaret till en samhällelig och global nivå. Studerande kan på ett berömligt sätt föra en diskussion mellan teoretisk och praktisk kunskap. Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk. Källorna är vetenskapligt förankrade, relevanta och nya. Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig. Uppgiften lämnas in i rätt form inom utsatt tid (not translated)

•   Geriatric and palliative nursing care VÅV20KV05-3001 04.01.2021-28.02.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology and geriatrics and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and have a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - has knowledge of and can apply palliative care
  - has knowledge of care at the end of life and can apply it in the meeting with patients and next of kin

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology and geriatrics
  Care at the end of life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Läkemedelboken online / äldres läkemedelsbehandling ( processer kritiska punkter , ej preparat eller medicinering) Midlöf & Kragh kapitel Läkemedelsbehandling hos äldre https://lakemedelsboken.se/kapitel/lakemedelsanvandning/lakemedelsbehandling_hos_aldre.html
  Dehlin O. & Rundgren, Å. 2014. Geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekwall, A.2010. Äldres hälsa och ohälsa - en introduktion till geriatrisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur.
  Larsson, M. & Rundgren, Å.2010. Geriatriska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur.
  Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., & Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2014. Geriatrisk omvårdnad Liber
  Widell, M. 2016. Palliativ vård. Sanoma Utbildning ab.
  Andershed, B.,Ternestedt, B-M. & Håkansson, C. 2013. Palliativ vård. Begrepp & perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Kettunen, R., Kähäri-Wiik, K., Vuori-Kemilä, A. & Ihalainen, J. Modern rehabilitering - en resurs
  Artiklar och övrig litteratur enligt föreläsarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Groupwork
  Online examination
  Obligatory lectur: Filip koskinen and teologist
  If not present: task in moodle

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grade 1-5
  Exam and assignments approved

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 28.02.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Online tentamen bedöms 0-5 enligt schema
  Omtente enligt överenskommelse med läraren (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h = 1 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Geriatric and palliative nursing care VÅV20KV05-3002 04.01.2021-31.03.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology and geriatrics and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and have a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - has knowledge of and can apply palliative care
  - has knowledge of care at the end of life and can apply it in the meeting with patients and next of kin

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology and geriatrics
  Care at the end of life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Läkemedelboken online / äldres läkemedelsbehandling ( processer kritiska punkter , ej preparat eller medicinering) Midlöf & Kragh kapitel Läkemedelsbehandling hos äldre https://lakemedelsboken.se/kapitel/lakemedelsanvandning/lakemedelsbehandling_hos_aldre.html
  Dehlin O. & Rundgren, Å. 2014. Geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekwall, A.2010. Äldres hälsa och ohälsa - en introduktion till geriatrisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur.
  Larsson, M. & Rundgren, Å.2010. Geriatriska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur.
  Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., & Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2014. Geriatrisk omvårdnad Liber
  Widell, M. 2016. Palliativ vård. Sanoma Utbildning ab.
  Andershed, B.,Ternestedt, B-M. & Håkansson, C. 2013. Palliativ vård. Begrepp & perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Kettunen, R., Kähäri-Wiik, K., Vuori-Kemilä, A. & Ihalainen, J. Modern rehabilitering - en resurs
  Artiklar och övrig litteratur enligt föreläsarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Groupwork
  Groupexamination
  Obligatory lectur: Filip koskinen and teologist
  If not present: task in moodle

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Tentamen vitsord 0-5
  Uppgifter Gk/kompletteras/Uk (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.01.2021 - 31.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1 (Size: 40. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Online examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Geriatric and palliative nursing care VÅV20KV05-3003 11.01.2021-31.03.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology and geriatrics and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and have a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - has knowledge of and can apply palliative care
  - has knowledge of care at the end of life and can apply it in the meeting with patients and next of kin

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology and geriatrics
  Care at the end of life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Läkemedelboken online / äldres läkemedelsbehandling ( processer kritiska punkter , ej preparat eller medicinering) Midlöf & Kragh kapitel Läkemedelsbehandling hos äldre https://lakemedelsboken.se/kapitel/lakemedelsanvandning/lakemedelsbehandling_hos_aldre.html
  Dehlin O. & Rundgren, Å. 2014. Geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekwall, A.2010. Äldres hälsa och ohälsa - en introduktion till geriatrisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur.
  Larsson, M. & Rundgren, Å.2010. Geriatriska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur.
  Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., & Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2014. Geriatrisk omvårdnad Liber
  Widell, M. 2016. Palliativ vård. Sanoma Utbildning ab.
  Andershed, B.,Ternestedt, B-M. & Håkansson, C. 2013. Palliativ vård. Begrepp & perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  Kettunen, R., Kähäri-Wiik, K., Vuori-Kemilä, A. & Ihalainen, J. Modern rehabilitering - en resurs
  Artiklar och övrig litteratur enligt föreläsarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Groupwork
  online examination
  Obligatory lectur: Filip Koskinen and teologist
  If not present: task in moodle

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  tentamen 0-5
  Uppgifter gk/kompletteras/uk (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.01.2021 - 31.03.2021

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2020 - 10.01.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2 (Size: 50. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31