Academic year 2021 - 2022

•   Acute geriatric nursing care VÅV14KV06-3006 10.01.2022-15.05.2022  3 credits  (USS19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of aging and its importance for acute conditions and can apply it in health care
  - has knowledge of health risks and common symptoms in the highest age groups
  - mastered the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and its importance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of and can apply the characteristics of elderly drug treatment
  - mastered drug-related problems in the care of the elderly

  Prerequisites

  Geriatric and palliative nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1

  Content of the study unit

  Acute geriatric nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Terveysportti/Geriatria:
  Äkillinen sekavuustila. Vanhusiäninfektioongelmat. Iäkkäiden virtsatieinkontinessi. Iäkkäiden henkilöiden toimintakyvyn arvionti. Terveysportti
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2013. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Fimea. 2013. Sic temanummer: Ikäihmisten lääkehoito on taitolaji och
  Fimea: Iäkkäiden lääkityksen tietokanta
  Articles:
  Hedström et al. 2009.PHASE-20: ett nytt instrument för skattning av möjliga läkemedelsrelateradesymtom hos äldre personer i äldreboende
  Diabeteshandboken.se: Läkemedel som höjer blodsocker
  Socialstyrelsen.se : Läkemedel som ökar risk för fall samt mag och tarm-blödningar
  Zachary et al 2010. Recognizing the risk of chronic non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in older adults
  De Vries et al. 2018.Fall risk increasing drugs a systematic review man Meta Analysis I. Cardiovascular drugs
  Seppala et al 2018. Fall risk increasing drugs a systematic review and Meta Analysis II Psycotropics
  Seppala et al .2018. Fall risk increasing drugs a systematic review and Meta analysis III . Others
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Davi`s Nursing Drug guide. 2011 till 2017.FA Davis company eller Nursing DrugHandbook.Wolter Kluwer Flera årgångar går att använda. Finns även som e-bilaga
  Rekommenderade artiklar på Moodle
  Filmer och artiklar enligt föreläsarnas anvisningar

  Learning methods

  First class obligatory introduction
  Supervision online
  Self studies and virtual studies
  Online exam

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Forumreflection Pass/fail
  Written assignment for seminar according to Novias instruction for written assignments/ Thesis and opponentship pass, not pass complement
  Onlinetest 0-5; 75% correct for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 15.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Additional information

  The group is also divided into smaller groups in some parts of lectures
  Information at the start of the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar week
  Deadline individual reflection in forum week

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ credit

•   Anatomy and Physiology USS21IV06-3001 01.08.2021-30.11.2021  4 credits  (UHV21D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can explain human anatomy and physiology
  
  Understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The cell and tissues
  
  Cardiovascular system
  
  The respiratory system
  
  The nervous system
  
  The digestive system
  
  The urinary system
  
  The endocrine system
  
  The musculoskeletal system

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Haug E, Sand O.& Bjålie J. 1998. Människokroppen.
  Nienstedt W, Hänninen O. & Arstila A. 1998. Människans fysiologi och anatomi.
  Sand O. m.fl. 2007. Människokroppen - Fysiologi och anatomi.
  Sjastaad O. m.fl. 2003. Arbetsbok till människokroppen.
  Sonesson B. & Sonesson G.2006. Anatomi och fysiologi.
  Vigue J. & Martin Orte E. 2006. Atlas över människokroppen.
  Skhole
  Brehmer-Andersson, E. 2011. Allmän patologi - en introduktion.
  Laitio, M. & Vaajalahti, P. 1993. Sjukdomslärans grunder.
  Myhre, E. 1992. Patologi: funktionella förändringar vid sjukdomar
  eller en motsvarande bok i patologi.
  Nicolaysen, G.m.fl. 2014. Anatomi och fysiologi.
  Höök, I-M.2015. Människans anatomi.
  Christensen, R. 2012. Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning
  Workshops
  Seminarier
  Sjävstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5
  Deltagande i workshops och seminarier bedöms med GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 30.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 05.09.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å
  • USS21D-Å
  • ÖH21USSLED-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Ritva Lindell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomi och fysiologi tent
  Workshops och seminarier (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Anatomi och fysiologi tent vecka 46, omtenter 10.12.2021 och 21.1.2022
  Workshops och seminarier, obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 34 h
  Workshops och seminarier 16 h
  Självstudier 58 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra (not translated)

•   Anatomy and Physiology USS21IV06-3002 01.08.2021-05.12.2021  4 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can explain human anatomy and physiology
  
  Understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The cell and tissues
  
  Cardiovascular system
  
  The respiratory system
  
  The nervous system
  
  The digestive system
  
  The urinary system
  
  The endocrine system
  
  The musculoskeletal system

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Haug E, Sand O.& Bjålie J. 1998. Människokroppen.
  Nienstedt W, Hänninen O. & Arstila A. 1998. Människans fysiologi och anatomi.
  Sand O. m.fl. 2007. Människokroppen - Fysiologi och anatomi.
  Sjastaad O. m.fl. 2003. Arbetsbok till människokroppen.
  Sonesson B. & Sonesson G.2006. Anatomi och fysiologi.
  Vigue J. & Martin Orte E. 2006. Atlas över människokroppen.
  Skhole
  Brehmer-Andersson, E. 2011. Allmän patologi - en introduktion.
  Laitio, M. & Vaajalahti, P. 1993. Sjukdomslärans grunder.
  Myhre, E. 1992. Patologi: funktionella förändringar vid sjukdomar
  eller en motsvarande bok i patologi.
  Nicolaysen, G.m.fl. 2014. Anatomi och fysiologi.
  Höök, I-M.2015. Människans anatomi.
  Christensen, R. 2012. Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur enligt teman
  Föreläsning
  Workshops
  Seminarier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5
  Deltagande i workshops och seminarier bedöms med GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 12.09.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomi och fysiologi tent
  Workshops och seminarier (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Anatomi och fysiologi tent vecka 47, omtenter 21.1.2022 och 11.2.2022
  Workshops och seminarier på närvarodagar vecka 39,vecka 43 och vecka 47 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 12 h
  Workshops och seminarier 8 h
  Sjävstudier 88 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra (not translated)

•   Bachelor's Thesis USS16UV01-3005 10.01.2022-08.05.2022  15 credits  (UHV19D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student shows knowledge of systematic development in the professional field. He/she has science-based
  skills (with focus on research within nursing science) to implement, present, discuss and evaluate
  development projects within multi-professional teams

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have participated in courses during semesters 1, 2, 3 and 4, especially courses USS15GV03 and USS17PK06.

  Content of the study unit

  Master thesis
  Opponentship
  Maturity test

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Liljeroth

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteratur enligt examensarbetsprojektets tema samt litteratur i forskningsmetodik. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självständigt arbete
  Handledning i grupp
  Seminarier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningskriterierna för examensarbetet finns under rubriken "Blanketter" på Moodle. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 08.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  01.09.2021 - 21.12.2021

  • 15 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV19D-Å
  • USS19D-Å
  • USS19F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Peter Edelsköld, Daniela Sundell, Janina Dahla, Michaela Jalava, Pia Liljeroth, Christine Alm, Susanne Davidsson, Lena Storbacka-Järvinen, Marika Rask, Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Lilian Nordell, Josephine Åberg, Iris Nurmi, Daniel Nenonen, Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Katarina Sandström, Hanna Limnell, Eva Juslin, Johanna Wikgren-Roelofs

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  RDI share

  15 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examensarbetet skrivs vid institutionen för hälsa och välfärd i Åbo inom ramen för avdelningens interprofessionella examensarbetsprojekt.
  
  Examensarbetet skrivs i grupper på 3-4 studerande.
  
  Examensarbetsprojekten presenteras fredagen den 10 december 2021 kl. 8.15-10. Studerande kan delta i projektpresentationen på plats i Åbo, eller på distans. Cirka en vecka innan projektpresentationen publiceras en kort beskrivning av examensarbetsprojektet på Moodle.
  
  Information om examensarbetet ges via Moodlesidan: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=4675 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Se examensarbetstidtabellen på Moodle. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  15 sp = 405 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Se bedömningskriterierna för examensarbete på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Se bedömningskriterierna för examensarbete på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Se bedömningskriterierna för examensarbete på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Basic Nursing Skills VÅV21KV01-3005 10.01.2022-31.07.2022  7 credits  (ÖH21VÅETAPP-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs
  - have basic knowledge of nutrition
  - has knowledge of the care process based on evidence and can document it according to national systematic electronic
  care documentation system including ISBAR, FinCC
  - implements an aseptic approach in working
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination
  - has knowledge to implement basic wound care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing care process
  Human basic needs and basic care
  Basic Nutrition
  Service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  Hygiene
  Basic Nursing Skills
  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  58% Face-to-face, 42% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodleföreläsningar
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  e
  Lectures (online)
  Self-study
  Practical Exercises on Campus (Compulsory)
  Written exercises
  Tent

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 31.07.2022

  Enrollment date range

  11.12.2021 - 09.01.2022

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH21VÅETAPP-V

  Seats

  13 - 20

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

•   Basic Nursing Skills VÅV21KV01-3003 20.09.2021-21.02.2022  7 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs
  - have basic knowledge of nutrition
  - has knowledge of the care process based on evidence and can document it according to national systematic electronic
  care documentation system including ISBAR, FinCC
  - implements an aseptic approach in working
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination
  - has knowledge to implement basic wound care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing care process
  Human basic needs and basic care
  Basic Nutrition
  Service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  Hygiene
  Basic Nursing Skills
  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2021 - 21.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 19.09.2021

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic Nursing Skills VÅV21KV01-3001 06.09.2021-12.12.2021  7 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs
  - have basic knowledge of nutrition
  - has knowledge of the care process based on evidence and can document it according to national systematic electronic
  care documentation system including ISBAR, FinCC
  - implements an aseptic approach in working
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination
  - has knowledge to implement basic wound care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing care process
  Human basic needs and basic care
  Basic Nutrition
  Service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  Hygiene
  Basic Nursing Skills
  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  86% Face-to-face, 14% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012.
  Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodleföreläsningar
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, group-work, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2021 - 12.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination
  Approved exercise assignments.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Exam: 16.12.2021 (online)
  Re-take 1
  Re-take 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ic

•   Basic Nursing Skills VÅV21KV01-3002 23.09.2021-19.12.2021  7 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs
  - have basic knowledge of nutrition
  - has knowledge of the care process based on evidence and can document it according to national systematic electronic
  care documentation system including ISBAR, FinCC
  - implements an aseptic approach in working
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination
  - has knowledge to implement basic wound care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing care process
  Human basic needs and basic care
  Basic Nutrition
  Service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  Hygiene
  Basic Nursing Skills
  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  86% Face-to-face, 14% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodleföreläsningar
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, group-work, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.09.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 24.10.2021

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

•   Basic Nursing Skills VÅV21KV01-3004 10.01.2022-27.02.2022  7 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - have knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs
  - have basic knowledge of nutrition
  - has knowledge of the care process based on evidence and can document it according to national systematic electronic
  care documentation system including ISBAR, FinCC
  - implements an aseptic approach in working
  - understands the origin and idea of clinical caring science and has basic knowledge in creating a good caring relationship
  - Know the importance of ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving and handling patients
  - can apply and value the caring process
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care
  - can perform basic care measures
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation and demonstrate their knowledge in a clinical examination
  - has knowledge to implement basic wound care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing care process
  Human basic needs and basic care
  Basic Nutrition
  Service design in social and health care in relation to patient information and supervision
  Hygiene
  Basic Nursing Skills
  Ergonomic working methods, kinesthetics and show skills in moving
  Wound care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  86% Face-to-face, 14% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdens grunder: Iivanainen A & Syväoja P. 2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. sanoma Pro Oy, Helsinki och aktuella artiklar.
  Antila, k., Kaila-Mattila., Kan, s., Puska, EL., Vihunen, R. (1996). Vård och Välbefinnande. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
  
  http://vardhandboken.se
  http://www.terveysportti.fi
  
  Moodleföreläsningar
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, group-work, demonstration, practice
  Clinical, practical training as peer learning with students from VAMK

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 27.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3030 18.08.2021-18.12.2021  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.08.2021 - 18.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2020 - 05.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3022 11.10.2021-19.12.2021  2 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Enligt nationella kurskrav se moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning (obligatorisk)
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar på KTC (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Inlämnad och godkänd portfolio enligt nationell standard
  Godkänd virtuell tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.10.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 10.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen gäller endast examensstuderande
  
  Förkunskapskrav : Godkänd kurs där injektioner ingår ( läkemedelsbehandling 1) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för portfolioinlämning v 48 29.11 kl 08.00
  Virtuell tentamen öppen 49-50 7.12 kl 8.00-13.12 kl 23.00 (not translated)

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3023 27.09.2021-21.11.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Enligt nationella kurskrav se moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar på KTC (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Inlämnad och godkänd portfolio enligt nationell standard
  Godkänd virtuell tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.09.2021 - 21.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen gäller endast examensstuderande
  
  Förkunskapskrav : Godkänd kurs där injektioner ingår ( läkemedelsbehandling 1) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio 26.10 kl 23.00
  Virtuell tentamen öppen 4.11 kl 8.00 -11.11. kl 23.00 (not translated)

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3024 01.11.2021-19.12.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Enligt nationella kurskrav se moodle (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktionsföreläsning
  Virtuella studier
  Feedbacktillfälle med praktiska övningar på KTC (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Inlämnad och godkänd portfolio enligt nationell standard
  Godkänd virtuell tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 11.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen gäller endast examensstuderande
  
  Förkunskapskrav : Godkänd kurs där injektioner ingår ( läkemedelsbehandling 1) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline för inlämning av portfolio vecka 47 22.11 kl 8
  Virtuell tentamen öppen 3.12.kl 08.00-13.12 kl 23.00 (not translated)

•   Basic vaccination skills VÅV18BV09-3025 01.08.2021-18.12.2021  2 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap 2 sp är en nationellt erkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 18.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 31.07.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3010 28.03.2022-08.05.2022  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, pair assignment, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved exercises performed during the course.
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.03.2022 - 08.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 27.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the course's introductory occasion
  Mandatory attendance at introduction to SimMan and at the SimMan exercises.
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test
  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h+4h
  SimMan practice, group 1 and 2, 4 h x 2
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3012 24.01.2022-22.05.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, pair assignment, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved exercises performed during the course.
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.01.2022 - 22.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 30.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK21 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the course's introductory occasion
  Mandatory attendance at introduction to SimMan and at the SimMan exercises.
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test
  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h+4h
  SimMan practice, group 1 and 2, 4 h x 2
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders VÅV18KV07-3013 21.02.2022-27.03.2022  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking to the patient's cardiovascular disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of cardiovascular disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can, by adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, assess the patient's care needs, and can prioritize and document according to national classification systems
  - can account for cardiovascular physiology and anatomy
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common cardiovascular disease conditions and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular disease conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to cardiovascular disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Cardiovascular disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self study, pair assignment, study questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved exercises performed during the course.
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.02.2022 - 27.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 20.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the course's introductory occasion
  Mandatory attendance at introduction to SimMan and at the SimMan exercises.
  Care clothing and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  written test
  Exam 1:
  Re-exam 1:
  Re-exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Theory, 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h + 4h+4h
  SimMan practice, group 1 and 2, 4 h x 2
  Exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3007 29.11.2021-19.12.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 9 och 10. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G.,Grönseth, R. Almås, H. (red) (2020). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 13, 14, 15. Liber AB, Stockholm.Material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 28.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3008 18.10.2021-14.11.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 22. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 9 och 10. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund, U. (red) 2017. Kir9. = Kirurgi:Nionde upplagan. Liber, Stockholm. Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Jeppsson, B. & Ljungqvist, O., Naredi, P., Sund, M. 2016. Kirurgi. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.Valda delar som berör gastroenterologiska sjukdomar.
  Stubberud, D-G.,Grönseth, R. Almås, H. (red) (2020). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 1. Kap 9, 13, 14, 15. Liber AB, Stockholm.Material on moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.10.2021 - 14.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 17.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 2c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders VÅV18KV09-3013 07.03.2022-17.04.2022  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the food digestive system and endocrine system
  - has knowledge of man's most common gastrointestinal and endocrinological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal and endocrinological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - Understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal and endocrinological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Gastrointestinal and endocrine disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGIST
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  GASTROINTESTINAL
  Andersson, R., Regnér, S., Rogmark, C., (red.) 2021. Tredje upplagan. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 5. Bukorganens sjukdomar och kirurgi. s. 113 – 185.
  o Kap. 17. Komplikationer vid trauma, kirurgi och kirurgiska sjukdomar. s. 395 – 402.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
  o Kap. 10. Vård vid leversjukdomar s. 473 – 520.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
  o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
  o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self-study, guided questions
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Write test
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and physical assessment class
  Marice part 70% och Rika part 30%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.03.2022 - 17.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 06.03.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Write test
  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Teory, 4 h + 4 h, (Marice)
  SimMan , Group 1 och 2, 4 h x 2 (Marice)
  Test reading:
  Theory part 4 h + 4 h (Rika)
  Physical assessment 4 h (Rika)
  exam 2 h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3007 14.02.2022-15.05.2022  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. Chapter 1, 2, 9-19
  or
  Tapanainen et al. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Chapter: 1-17,19-31.
  
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, skhole lectures, online work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.02.2022 - 15.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 13.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Seats

  15 - 25

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The first exam is the last lecture of the course
  The retakes are on general exams 11th of March and 25th of March 2022

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h.
  3 cr = 81 h.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Care of the patient with genitourinary disorders VÅV18KV12-3009 07.02.2022-17.04.2022  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of urogenital disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the treatment of urogenital disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the kidney, urinary tract and reproductive system
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common urogenital disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of disease states in breast muscle and glands and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in urogenital conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to urogenital disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in urogenital disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - Understands the importance of considering human sexuality and promoting it as an integral part of care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Urogenital disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Borgfeldt, C mfl. 2019 Obstetrik och gynekologi för sjuksköterskor. lund: Studentlitteratur. Chapter 1, 2, 9-19
  or
  Tapanainen et al. (toim.) 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Chapter: 1-17,19-31.
  
  
  UROLOGISK OHÄLSA
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2011). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  Braun, C. A. & Anderson. C.M. (2012) Patofysiologi. Om hur förändringar i kroppens funktioner påverkar vår hälsa. Kap 15, det som handlar om njurfunktionen s 416 – 420, 423 – 426, 429 - 435. Studentlitteratur.
  Ericson, E. & Ericson, T. 2012. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Studentlitteratur.
  Föreläsningar på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, skhole lectures, online work

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic unhealth 50 points
  Urologic unhealth 25 points = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.02.2022 - 17.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 06.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  20 - 75

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic unhealth (2 cr) and urologic unhealth (1 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for both parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The first exam is the last lecture of the course
  The retakes are on general exams.
  SSK-20-1 have retakes 25th of March and 22nd of April 2022
  SSk 20-2 have retakes 22nd of April and 6rh of May 2022

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 h.
  3 cr = 81 h.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  -

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  -

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  -

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  -

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3009 30.08.2021-15.11.2021  2 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Truedesson, L. Klinisk immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2012.
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur 2015
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Sid 92-109. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi.Liber 2018.
  Hedman m.fl. Immunologia. III Immunologiset kudosvauriot, immuunisairaudet ja interventiot. Duodecim
  Material på moodle
  Rekommendationer, anvisningar och information på nätet
  Nätinformation: THL, ECDC, CDC, WHO, IDF (Immune deficiency foundation), AARDA, Terveyskirjasto
  Övrigt enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier och uppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd uppgift (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 15.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen går veckorna 35-37
  Immunologisk ohälsa 1 sp ; Ulla Penttinen
  Infektionssjukdomar 1 sp ; Marie Hjortell (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Grupparbete i immunologisk ohälsa och infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  54h / 2 sp
  Schemalagd undervisning
  10 h Immunologisk ohälsa
  10 h Infektionssjukdomar
  
  Egna självständiga studier
  17 h Immunologisk ohälsa
  17 h Infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3010 25.10.2021-19.12.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Truedesson, L. Klinisk immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2012.
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur 2015
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021 (om sars-cov-2 och immunförsvaret)
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Sid 92-109. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi.Liber 2018.
  Hedman m.fl. Immunologia. III Immunologiset kudosvauriot, immuunisairaudet ja interventiot. Duodecim
  Material på moodle
  Rekommendationer, anvisningar och information på nätet
  Nätinformation: THL, ECDC, CDC, WHO, IDF, AARDA, Terveyskirjasto
  Övrigt enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier och uppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd uppgift (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.10.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 24.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen går veckorna 43-47 för SSK20 grupp 1
  Immunologisk ohälsa 1 sp ; Ulla Penttinen
  Infektionssjukdomar 1 sp ; Marie Hjortell (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Grupparbete i immunologisk ohälsa och infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  54h / 2 sp
  Schemalagd undervisning
  10 h Immunologisk ohälsa
  10 h infektionssjukdomar
  
  Egna självständiga studier
  17 h immunologisk ohälsa
  17 h infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3011 25.10.2021-19.12.2021  2 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Truedesson, L. Klinisk immunologi. Studentlitteratur 2012.
  Brauner. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Kapitel 2. Studentlitteratur 2015
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021 (om sars-cov-2 och immunförsvaret)
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Sid 92-109. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi.Liber 2018.
  Hedman m.fl. Immunologia. III Immunologiset kudosvauriot, immuunisairaudet ja interventiot. Duodecim
  Material på moodle
  Rekommendationer, anvisningar och information på nätet
  Nätinformation: THL, ECDC, CDC, WHO, IDF (Immune deficiency foundation), AARDA, Terveyskirjasto
  Övrigt enligt föreläsarens anvisningar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier och uppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd uppgift (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.10.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen går veckorna 43-47 för SSK20 grupp 2
  Immunologisk ohälsa 1 sp ; Ulla Penttinen
  Infektionssjukdomar 1 sp ; Marie Hjortell (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Grupparbete i immunologisk ohälsa och infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  54h / 2 sp
  Schemalagd undervisning
  10 h immunologisk ohälsa
  10 h infektionssjukdomar
  Egna självständiga studier
  17 h immunologisk ohälsa
  17 h infektionssjukdomar (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3015 28.02.2022-20.05.2022  2 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Aktuella nätsidor enligt anvisning (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner och eget arbete (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Immunologisk ohälsa 0-5
  Infektionssjukdomar grupparbete GK/underkänt (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.02.2022 - 20.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 27.02.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Immunologisk ohälsa 21.4 onlinetent
  Infektionssjukdomar: grupparbete inom maj (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with immune disorders and infectious diseases VÅV18KV10-3016 25.04.2022-29.05.2022  2 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in immunological diseases
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the immune system's physiology
  - has knowledge of preventive care and treatment at the most common national and global infectious diseases
  - is aware of the epidemiology of infectious diseases
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in immunological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to immunological diseases

  Prerequisites

  Clinical microbiology and hygiene

  Content of the study unit

  Immune disorders
  National and global infecious diseases

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ulla Penttinen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.04.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 24.04.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3007 24.01.2022-27.02.2022  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kap.14 Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kap.15 Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson. R., Jeppsson. B. & Rydholm. A. (red.) (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm.
  Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 22. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  (alt. motsvarande delar i upplaga 2011)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  Lonkkamurtuma
  Osteoporoosi
  Polvi- ja nivelrikko
  Selkäydinvamma
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, case studies, discussions

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.01.2022 - 27.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 23.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70% - 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders VÅV18KV11-3010 03.01.2022-03.04.2022  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in the case of musculoskeletal disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of musculoskeletal disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the skeleton and muscles
  - has knowledge of man's most common musculoskeletal disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in musculoskeletal disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal disorders
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal disorders, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - can demonstrate the importance of rehabilitation as part of the patient's overall care and explain the rehabilitation process

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Musculoskeletal disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (red.) (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kap.14 Vård vid paratyreoideasjukdomar och osteoporos (valda delar).
  Kap.15 Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  
  Andersson. R., Jeppsson. B. & Rydholm. A. (red.) (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
  Kapitel 10. Ortopedi
  
  Almås H., Stubberud D-G & Grønseth R. (2021) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm.
  Kapitel 21. Omvårdnad vid skador och sjukdomar i rörelseapparaten.
  Kapitel 22. Omvårdnad vid reumatiska sjukdomar.
  (alt. motsvarande delar i upplaga 2011)
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial. Se Moodle!
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  
  Terveysportti - Käypähoito - Suositukset:
  Lonkkamurtuma
  Osteoporoosi
  Polvi- ja nivelrikko
  Selkäydinvamma
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  I Medibas: Välj ”Kliniska kapitel” → ”Ortopedi” Under Ortopedi läs/se igenom materialet under följande ”flikar” 1) Tillstånd och sjukdomar, 2) Symtom och tecken, samt 3) Illustrationer.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, case studies, discussions

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 03.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr.

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70% - 90%.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%.

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3007 26.10.2021-12.12.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Stubberud D-G., Grønseth R. & Almås H. (2021 alt. 2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 23-25 (in 2011 version kap. 25-27)
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Lectures in Moodle.
  
  Reference literature:
  • Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  • Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  • Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.10.2021 - 12.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 07.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points < 89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3008 03.01.2022-13.02.2022  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Stubberud D-G., Grønseth R. & Almås H. (2021 alt. 2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 23-25 (in 2011 upplaga kap. 25-27)
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Lectures in Moodle.
  
  Reference literature:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013, 2016) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 13.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with neurological and haematological disorders VÅV18KV13-3012 24.01.2022-13.03.2022  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in neurological and hematological disorders
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of neurological and hematological disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can account for the physiology and anatomy of the nervous system, as well as the composition and properties of the blood
  - can account for and calculate the fluid and electrolyte balance
  - has knowledge of man's most common neurological and hematological disease states and their underlying pathophysiology
  - have knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in neurological and hematological conditions
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to neurological and hematological disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Neurology
  Hematology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ericson T. & Lind M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 5 & 6 alt. Ericson E. & Ericson T. (2012). Medicinska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 6 & 7
  
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2012). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund. kap. 12
  
  Stubberud D-G., Grønseth R. & Almås H. (2021 alt. 2011) Klinisk omvårdnad (red.). Del 2. Liber, Stockholm. kap. 23-25 (in 2011 upplaga kap. 25-27)
  
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. 2012. Blodets sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Lectures in Moodle.
  
  Reference literature:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Gottberg, K. (2015) Omvårdnad vid neurologiska sjukdomar (red.). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013, 2016) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Written exam: 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.01.2022 - 13.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 23.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Margareta Antus

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Written exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Care of the patient with psychiatric disorders VÅV18KV14-3006 29.11.2021-09.01.2022  3 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.& Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  ...according to the teacher's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  29.11.2021 - 09.01.2022

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 28.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visits to VCH; psychiatric unit and Gamla Vaasa hospital

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadline 17.12.2021

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with psychiatric disorders VÅV18KV14-3009 21.02.2022-08.05.2022  3 credits  (USS20D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in case of psychiatric disorders
  - has knowledge of mental health and various forms of psychiatric disorders, eg. depression, anxiety disorder, psychoses, personality disorders
  - is familiar with the central legislation and mental health strategies of the area and can apply them in practice
  - knows the different forms of service and care of mental health care
  - has knowledge of the medical terminology and drug treatment in psychiatric disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of acute psychiatric care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care, mental hygiene and rehabilitation in relation to mental illness
  - can integrate health-promoting care in mental illness, and support and supervise the patient in self-care
  - is familiar with the legislation and has a basic readiness to act in situations where children are at risk

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Psychiatric disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Skärsäter, I.& Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Brenner, E., Rydell, P. & Skoog, I. 2016. Akut psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Glant Helene. 2010. Ny i psykiatrin. Gothia förlag, Stockholm
  Herlofson, J., Ekselius, L., Lundin, A., Mårtensson, B. & Åsberg, M. 2016. Psykiatri. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Allgulander, C. 2014. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Johansson, R., Johansson, S. & Skärgren, L. 2016. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri. Liber, Malmö.
  Hietaharju, P. & Nuuttila, M. 2016. Käytännön mielenterveystyö, Tammi, Helsinki
  Lagstiftning
  Aktuell forskning
  ...according to the teacher's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.02.2022 - 08.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 20.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Study visits to VCH; psychiatric unit and Gamla Vaasa hospital

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3007 20.09.2021-17.10.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  TENTAMENSLITTERATUR
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid 105-161
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid. 283-303, 313-341
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid.319-367
  
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Sid 214-221
  
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2021 - 17.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1: 15.10.2021
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3008 30.08.2021-03.10.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  TENTAMENSLITTERATUR
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid 105-161
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid. 283-303, 313-341
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid.319-367
  
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Sid 214-221
  
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 03.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Test 1: 15.10.2021
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3009 25.04.2022-29.05.2022  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 26 omvårdnad vid sjukdomar och skador i ögat.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Sid 214-221
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Simulationer
  Case
  Individuella/grupparbete
  Diskussioner (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedöms med vitsord 0-5. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.04.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 24.04.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktiska övningar och tentamen. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tentamen 19.05.2022
  
  Omtentamen på allmäna omtentamenstillfälle (anmälning via peppi) 25.5 & 26.8. 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp Denna kurs 3sp, vilket utgör 81h. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  60% av tenten bör vara godkänd för att klara kursen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen:
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen:
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3011 04.04.2022-29.05.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Lena Sandén-Eriksson

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 26 omvårdnad vid sjukdomar och skador i ögat.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Sid 214-221
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Simulationer
  Case
  Indviduella/grupparbete
  Diskussioner (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av kursen sker via en tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.04.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 03.04.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lena Sandén-Eriksson, Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  Praktiska övningar är obligatoriska. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Se moodle för tentamensdatum
  Se peppi för omtentamens datum (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp denna kurs omfattar 3 sp vilket utgör 81h timmar arbete. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  60% rätt i tenten behövs för att bli godkänd. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen:
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen:
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella (not translated)

•   Care of the patient with respiratory and sensory disorders VÅV18KV08-3013 03.01.2022-20.02.2022  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can in case of respiratory and sensory disorders, apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the medical and surgical patient's characteristics and about the care of respiratory and sensory disorders
  - can use caring science as a basis for caring
  - According to national directives, can carry out structured care planning and documentation
  - can assess the patient's care needs through adequate clinical and physiological assessments and measurement methods, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the respiratory system and sensory organs
  - has knowledge of man's most common respiratory and sensory disorders and their underlying pathophysiology
  - has knowledge of medical terminology and drug treatment in respiratory and sensory disorders
  - has the ability to assess the need for care of patients in need of emergency care, and to support them and their relatives
  - understands the importance of health promotion, preventive care and rehabilitation in relation to respiratory and sensory disorders

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Respiratory and sensory disorders,

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  TENTAMENSLITTERATUR
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid 105-161
  
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2014).Klinisk Omvårdnad 2. 2ed Liber Stockholm. Sid. 283-303, 313-341
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid.319-367
  
  Syväoja & Iivanainen.2013. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Sid 214-221
  
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, self studies
  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The exam is assessed 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 20.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Exam

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Test 1:
  Re exam 1:
  Re exam 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 hours per 1 SP

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Practical class is mandatory ( physical assessment)

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV21KV02-3003 20.09.2021-07.11.2021  2 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, online course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2021 - 07.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 29.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be in Moodle.
  
  
  The introduction in nursing ethics is recommended. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new empoyees. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times, 0,5cr.
  The nursing ethics is on another Moodle course called Vårdetik online 2020
  Nursing science and intercultural care: written assignment

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  2cr 2x27h=54h

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV21KV02-3004 01.08.2021-31.12.2021  2 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV21KV02-3001 12.11.2021-31.12.2021  2 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  According to the lecturer's instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, seminar, online course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Pettersson

  Additional information

  The course is held by part-time teacher Maria Pettersson
  Information about the course as well as content, examination and assessment criteria can be found on moodle.
  Introductions and seminars are compulsory!
  The care ethics part is the same course that the Vaasa healthcare district requires of new employees. No special certificate is given for the course. Students with this course code have all done the spring ethics according to the requirements of the Vaasa healthcare district.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV21KV02-3002 21.09.2021-28.11.2021  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, seminar, online course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.09.2021 - 28.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 13.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be in Moodle.
  On the seminar on the last lecture of the course the students divide themselves into two groups, which have 4h each.
  
  The introduction in nursing ethics is recommended. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new empoyees. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times, 0,5cr.
  The nursing ethics is on another Moodle course called Vårdetik online 2020
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last time of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  2cr 2x27h=54h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Caring theory and ethics VÅV21KV02-3005 10.01.2022-13.03.2022  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has knowledge of different health science traditions and the history and development of the professional field
  - has knowledge of and can apply the basic concepts of health and well-being, human, patient, life-world, suffering and caring
  - has knowledge of the healthcare legislation and ethical grounds and can apply them in health care
  - can, in its upcoming profession, work on the basis of ethical guidelines and professional-specific ethical codes and can, by respecting and accentuating other people's values and views of life, work without violating human rights
  - can respond to the individual as an expert on their own life and in the care of the patient take advantage of the patient's own experience
  - can respond to people with different cultural backgrounds and understand the importance of culture in health care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Caring Sciences
  Legislation
  Ethics
  Intercultural communication

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, exercises, tutorials, seminar, online course

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 13.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  The content of the course will be in Moodle.
  On the seminar on the last lecture of the course the students divide themselves into two groups, which have 4h each.
  
  The introduction in nursing ethics is recommended. The nursing ethics part is the same as Vaasa Hospital District demand of their new empoyees. Students who have passed the course with this course code have done the nursing ethics according to Vaasa Hospital District. There is a separate Moodle course for the Nursing ethics part.

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validetion according to Novia general directives
  Nursing ethics includes 7 online tests, each can be taken three times, 0,5cr.
  The nursing ethics is on another Moodle course called Vårdetik online 2020
  Nursing science and intercultural care: one written assignment in a group.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and presentation the last time of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr
  2cr 2x27h=54h

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Clinical Nursing USS21KV04-3002 07.03.2022-24.05.2022  5 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can, as part of an interprofessional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  
  Can apply theoretical knowledge and guidance methods in different care contexts
  
  Can apply the aseptic method
  
  Can use the central evidence based care methods and perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
  
  Can carry out care and patient monitoring using health technology and apply various directives regarding patient- and client safety and sustainable development
  
  Can perform safe medication and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Resuscitation in hospital environment
  
  Central examination methods
  
  Central care methods
  
  Aseptics/aseptic way of working
  
  Teamwork
  
  Clinical assessments
  
  Patient monitoring
  
  Guidance
  
  Wound care
  
  Documentation and reporting
  
  Pre- and intra-operative preparations for surgery
  
  Patient monitoring during anesthesia
  
  Different roles in the operating theatre
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Patient, client and occupational safety
  
  Safe blood transfusion
  
  Intravenous medication and fluid treatment

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se kurslitteratur i förverkliganden:
  
  Läkemedelsbehandling II
  
  Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
  
  Inremedicinskt vårdarbete
  
  Litteratur i Digicampus för kliniska test (kompetens i kirurgisk och perioperativ vård)
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  
  Simulationer
  
  Kliniska övningar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande:
  
  Kan planera, utföra, utvärdera, dokumentera och rapportera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård i samarbete med patienten och närstående samt påvisar ett reflektivt och etiskt förhållningssätt i vården
  
  Kan tillämpa teoretiska kunskaper och handledningsmetoder i olika vårdkontexter
  
  Kan tillämpa aseptiskt arbetssätt
  
  Kan använda de centrala evidensbaserade vårdmetoderna och kan utföra kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och behandlingar
  
  Kan utföra vård och patientövervakning med hjälp av hälsoteknologi och tillämpa olika direktiv gällande patient- och klientsäkerhet och hållbar utveckling
  
  Kan utföra säker läkemedels- och vätskebehandling (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.03.2022 - 24.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 06.03.2022

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Kursen ska avläggas samtidigt med teorikurser Läkemedelsbehandling II, Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, Inremedicinskt vårdarbete
  
  
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursintro vecka 10
  
  Simulationer i läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Simualtioner i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
  
  Simulationer i inremedicinskt vårdarbete
  
  Kliniska övningar
  
  Kliniskt test, kompetens i kirurgisk och perioperativ vård (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatoriska simualtioner och kliniska övningar samt tillhörande inlämningsuppgifter. Mera information om inlämningsuppgifter finns i Moodle.
  
  
  
  Kliniskt test, kompetens i kirurgiskt och perioperativ vård förverkligas inom ramen för kursen Läkemedelsbehandling II och farmakologi på hösten 2022.
  
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp = 135h
  
  Föreläsningar: 6h
  
  Simulationer: 18h
  
  Självstudier inför simulationer och kliniska övningar (inlämningsuppgifter): 56h
  
  Klinisk test , kompetens i kirurgiskt och perioperativ vård med självstudier och övningar i kliniken: 55h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  GK = Studerande delatar aktivt alla simualtioner och kliniska övningar och har lämnat in inlämningsuppgifter inom utsatta tid. Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test kompetens i kirurgiskt och perioperativ vård.
  
  
  
  UK = Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller kliniksa övningar eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerandehar inte lämnat in inlämningsuppgifter i tid. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test , kompetens i kirurgiskt och perioperativ vård. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  GK = Studerande delatar aktivt alla simualtioner och kliniska övningar och har lämnat in inlämningsuppgifter inom utsatta tid. Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test kompetens i kirurgiskt och perioperativ vård.
  
  
  
  UK = Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller kliniksa övningar eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerandehar inte lämnat in inlämningsuppgifter i tid. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test , kompetens i kirurgiskt och perioperativ vård. (not translated)

•   Clinical Nursing USS20KV04-3001 01.08.2021-30.11.2021  5 credits  (UHV20D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can, as part of an interprofessional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  
  Can apply theoretical knowledge and guidance methods in different care contexts
  
  Can apply the aseptic method
  
  Can use the central evidence based care methods and perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
  
  Can carry out care and patient monitoring using health technology and apply various directives regarding patient- and client safety and sustainable development
  
  Can perform safe medication and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Resuscitation in hospital environment
  
  Central examination methods
  
  Central care methods
  
  Aseptics/aseptic way of working
  
  Teamwork
  
  Clinical assessments
  
  Patient monitoring
  
  Guidance
  
  Wound care
  
  Documentation and reporting
  
  Pre- and intra-operative preparations for surgery
  
  Patient monitoring during anesthesia
  
  Different roles in the operating theatre
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Patient, client and occupational safety
  
  Safe blood transfusion
  
  Intravenous medication and fluid treatment

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se kurslitteratur i förverkliganden:
  Läkemedelsbehandling II
  Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
  Inremedicinskt vårdarbete
  Material i Moodle
  
  Litteratur i Digicampus för klinist test (kompetens i kirurgisk och perioperativ vård) (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Simulationer
  Kliniska övningar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande:
  Kan planera, utföra, utvärdera, dokumentera och rapportera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård i samarbete med patienten och närstående samt påvisar ett reflektivt och etiskt förhållningssätt i vården
  Kan tillämpa teoretiska kunskaper och handledningsmetoder i olika vårdkontexter
  Kan tillämpa aseptiskt arbetssätt
  Kan använda de centrala evidensbaserade vårdmetoderna och kan utföra kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och behandlingar
  Kan utföra vård och patientövervakning med hjälp av hälsoteknologi och tillämpa olika direktiv gällande patient- och klientsäkerhet och hållbar utveckling
  Kan utföra säker läkemedels- och vätskebehandling (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 30.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 15.09.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV20D-Å
  • USS20D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Kursen ska avläggas samtidigt med teorikurser Läkemedelsbehandling II, Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, Inremedicinskt vårdarbete
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursintro vecka 35
  Simulationer i läkemedelsbehandling
  Simualtioner i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
  Simulationer i inremedicinskt vårdarbete
  Kliniska övningar
  Kliniskt test, kompetens i kirurgisk och perioperativ vård (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatoriska simualtioner och kliniska övningar samt tillhörande inlämningsuppgifter. Mera information om inlämningsuppgifter finns i Moodle.
  
  Kliniskt test, kompetens i kirurgiskt och perioperativ vård 2.-3.11. (omtgning I 8.11., omtagning II 11.11.) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier inför simulationer och kliniska övningar (inlämningsuppgifter) 2 sp (52h)
  Handledda simulationer och kliniska övningar 1 sp (28h)
  Klinisk test , kompetens i kirurgiskt och perioperativ vård med självstudier och övningar i kliniken 2 sp (55h) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  GK = Studerande delatar aktivt alla simualtioner och kliniska övningar och har lämnat in inlämningsuppgifter inom utsatta tid. Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test kompetens i kirurgiskt och perioperativ vård.
  
  UK = Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller kliniksa övningar eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerandehar inte lämnat in inlämningsuppgifter i tid. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test , kompetens i kirurgiskt och perioperativ vård. (not translated)

•   Clinical assessment VÅV14AK04-3004 18.04.2022-29.05.2022  3 credits  (USS19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, carry out and evaluate the care of patients of different ages
  - can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages
  - can perform basic clinical assessment of vital functions for patients of different ages
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Physical assessment

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Cox C.L. (red.) (2015). Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013) Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  
  Hogan-Quigley, B., Palm, ML. & Bickley, LS. (2012 or 2017). Nursing Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. Philadelphia, Wolther Kluwer Health Lippincott.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial Moodle
  
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case
  Physical assessment theory and practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Case

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.04.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.03.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has a god knowledge of the subject, points 71-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Clinical assessment VÅV14FK03-3004 17.02.2022-08.05.2022  3 credits  (USS19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can account for and understand human physiology and pathophysiology
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, carry out and evaluate the care of patients of different ages
  - can use central examination and diagnostic methods for patients of different ages
  - can perform basic clinical assessment of vital functions for patients of different ages
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical assessment

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Cox C.L. (red.) (2015). Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  alternativt
  
  Hogan-Quigley, B., Palm, ML. & Bickley, LS. (2012 alt. 2017). Nursing Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. . Philadelphia, Wolther Kluwer Health Lippincott.
  
  Föreläsningsmaterial Moodle
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2013). Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro, Helsinki.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi
  
  Timby, B. K. (2013). Fundamental Nursing Skills and Concept. 10th ed. Wolter Kluwer Health. Lippincott

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Case
  Physical assessment theory and practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Case

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  17.02.2022 - 08.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 23.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  According to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27h

  Assessment criteria

  Points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points < 70%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has a god knowledge of the subject, points 71-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV21KVV03-3001 08.03.2022-04.09.2022  6 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team

  Prerequisites

  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Elderly care and geriatric

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  Further information

  Clinical practice 6 sp

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Fyra veckor valfri praktik inom vården under sommaren (sommarjobb): serviceboende, effektiverat serviceboende, hemservice. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  08.03.2022 - 04.09.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.05.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Students apply for their own summer job.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Summer internship at service housing, streamlined service housing, home service.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Summer 2022
  Participation in internship information in the spring of 2022. Mandatory attendance.
  Summer internship report submitted via moodle no later than week 35, 2022.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35, 2022.

  Student's schedule and workload

  Summer internship = 6 credits = 4 weeks. 38 h / week. Total: 152 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV21KVV03-3003 28.03.2022-18.09.2022  6 credits  (USS21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team

  Prerequisites

  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Elderly care and geriatric

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  Further information

  Clinical practice 6 sp

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Four weeks of optional internship in health care during the summer (summer job): service housing, more efficient service housing, home service.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.03.2022 - 18.09.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 22.05.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Students apply for their own summer job.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Summer internship at service housing, streamlined service housing, home service.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Summer 2022
  Participation in internship information in the spring of 2022. Mandatory attendance.
  Summer internship report submitted via moodle no later than week 35, 2022.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35, 2022.

  Student's schedule and workload

  Summer internship = 6 credits = 4 weeks. 38 h / week. Total: 152 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

•   Clinical care in an optional context VÅV21KVV03-3004 02.05.2022-11.09.2022  6 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply evidence-based knowledge in the care context
  - within the care context, can distinguish the individual patient's characteristics
  - can, under supervision, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and document it
  - can create a good caring relationship with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a professional approach
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the care team

  Prerequisites

  Basic clinical nursing skills
  Elderly care and geriatric

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  Further information

  Clinical practice 6 sp

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Four weeks of optional internship in health care during the summer (summer job): service housing, more efficient service housing, home service.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.05.2022 - 11.09.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 01.05.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Students apply for their own summer job.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Summer internship at service housing, streamlined service housing, home service.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Summer 2022
  Participation in internship information in the spring of 2022. Mandatory attendance.
  Summer internship report submitted via moodle no later than week 35, 2022.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35, 2022.

  Student's schedule and workload

  Summer internship = 6 credits = 4 weeks. 38 h / week. Total: 152 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2022 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

•   Clinical microbiology VÅV21BV03-3001 25.10.2021-31.12.2021  2 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Ulla Penttinen. Kurskompendium (tillgängligt på moodle), Faktablad m.m. på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson, & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Upplaga 5. Liber 2018
  Heikkinen et al. Mikrobiologia. Duodecim 2020
  Aktuella artiklar enligt anvisning
  WEBSIDOR:
  THL (Finland) https://www.thl.fi/sv/web/infektionssjukdomar
  Folkhälsomyndigheten (Sverige)
  https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/mikrobiologi-laboratorieanalyser/
  ECDC (Europa) https://ecdc.europa.eu/en
  CDC (USA) https://www.cdc.gov/
  WHO
  http://www.who.int/topics/infectious_diseases/en/
  http://www.who.int/topics/infection_control/en/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Övningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.10.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 24.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Skriftlig eller eventuellt muntlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tent 1-2 veckor efter föreläsningarna
  Omtentamen januari och februari 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursens omfattning är 2 sp vilket innebär 54 h arbete för studerande.
  Schemalagd undervisning16 h
  Litteraturstudier och annat 38 h (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology VÅV21BV03-3002 13.09.2021-05.12.2021  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ulla Penttinen. Kurskompendium (tillgängligt på moodle), Faktablad m.m. på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson, & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Upplaga 5. Liber 2018
  Heikkinen et al. Mikrobiologia. Duodecim 2020
  Aktuella artiklar enligt anvisning
  WEBSIDOR:
  THL (Finland) https://www.thl.fi/sv/web/infektionssjukdomar
  Folkhälsomyndigheten (Sverige)
  https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/mikrobiologi-laboratorieanalyser/
  ECDC (Europa) https://ecdc.europa.eu/en
  CDC (USA) https://www.cdc.gov/
  WHO
  http://www.who.int/topics/infectious_diseases/en/
  http://www.who.int/topics/infection_control/en/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Övningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.09.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 12.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Skriftlig eller eventuellt muntlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tent 1-2 veckor efter föreläsningarna
  Omtentamen januari och februari 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursens omfattning är 2 sp vilket innebär 54 h arbete för studerande.
  Schemalagd undervisning16 h
  Litteraturstudier och annat 38 h (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene VÅV21BV03-3003 11.10.2021-28.11.2021  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ulla Penttinen. Kurskompendium (tillgängligt på moodle), Faktablad m.m. på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson, & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Upplaga 5. Liber 2018
  Heikkinen et al. Mikrobiologia. Duodecim 2020
  Aktuella artiklar enligt anvisning
  WEBSIDOR:
  THL (Finland) https://www.thl.fi/sv/web/infektionssjukdomar
  Folkhälsomyndigheten (Sverige)
  https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/mikrobiologi-laboratorieanalyser/
  ECDC (Europa) https://ecdc.europa.eu/en
  CDC (USA) https://www.cdc.gov/
  WHO
  http://www.who.int/topics/infectious_diseases/en/
  http://www.who.int/topics/infection_control/en/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Övningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkänd tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.10.2021 - 28.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 10.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Skriftlig eller eventuellt muntlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tent 1-2 veckor efter föreläsningarna
  Omtentamen januari och februari 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursens omfattning är 2 sp vilket innebär 54 h arbete för studerande.
  Schemalagd undervisning16 h
  Litteraturstudier och annat 38 h (not translated)

•   Clinical microbiology and hygiene VÅV21BV03-3004 01.09.2021-31.12.2021  2 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - master the terminology of clinical microbiology to the extent needed in nursing care
  - understand the concept of microbe and become familiar with the biology of different microbe groups, bacteria, virus, protozoa, and fungi
  - become familiar with the most common pathogenes
  - understand the human microbiota (normal flora) and how microbes spread
  - have fundamental insights into the resistance development of bacteria, and understand the biology behind the resistance of bacteria
  - be able to apply course competences to the above mentioned fields of nursing care

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ulla Penttinen. Kurskompendium (tillgängligt på moodle), Faktablad m.m. på moodle
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi och immunologi. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson, & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Upplaga 5. Liber 2018
  Heikkinen et al. Mikrobiologia. Duodecim 2020
  Aktuella artiklar enligt anvisning
  WEBSIDOR:
  THL (Finland) https://www.thl.fi/sv/web/infektionssjukdomar
  Folkhälsomyndigheten (Sverige)
  https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/mikrobiologi-laboratorieanalyser/
  ECDC (Europa) https://ecdc.europa.eu/en
  CDC (USA) https://www.cdc.gov/
  WHO
  http://www.who.int/topics/infectious_diseases/en/
  http://www.who.int/topics/infection_control/en/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussioner
  Litteraturstudier
  Övningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För godkänd kurs krävs godkända uppgifter och tentamen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.09.2021 - 31.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 10.10.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ulla Penttinen

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Skriftlig eller eventuellt muntlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Skriftlig tent 1-2 veckor efter föreläsningarna
  Omtentamen januari och februari 2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursens omfattning är 2 sp vilket innebär 54 h arbete för studerande.
  Schemalagd undervisning16 h
  Litteraturstudier och annat 38 h (not translated)

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV20KVV05-3003 11.10.2021-05.12.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - has achieved competence in surgical and perioperative nursing care according to national standard

  Prerequisites

  Care of the old and geriatrics
  Surgical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  BEHANDLINGSÅTGÄRDER VID BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER;
  Material and links in Moodle.
  Hanås R. (2018). Typ 1 diabetes hos barn, ungdomar och unga vuxna - Hur du blir expert på din egen diabetes. Betamed.
  
  ARRHYTHMIAS
  Handbok i de vanligaste artymierna. Tolkning och behandling. Ambu.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.10.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 07.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK20 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK20 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual assignments and problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course
  Resuscitation test.
  Arrhythmia: passed Moodle test
  Carbohydrates calculation and insulinneed: Test

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical exam week
  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Moodle arrhythmia test according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp Totalt 80 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid övningar.
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 2 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Hemuppgift: Valbar antibiotika, 1 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 1, 6 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase, 2 h
  Vätskebalansövning, 10 min
  Övningsstationer 3. Blodtransfusionsuppgift genomgång, Grupp 1 och 2, 2 h
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 2 h
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: 29 h
  Eget arbete: 11 h
  TOTALT: 40 h
  HJÄRTRYTMER: 0,25 sp (6,75 h)
  Självstudier + Moodletest: EKG rytmer
  RESUSKITATION:
  4h teori (alla)
  4 h övning och 4 h examination (enligt gruppindelning).
  Alla tillfällen obligatorisk närvaro.
  Övriga timmar till nationella test.
  BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER:
  4 h obligatorisk närvaro
  NATIONELLA TEST:
  Kompetenser i kirurgisk- och perioperativ vård: Följande test testas:
  Test 4: Inledande av intravenös infusionsbehandling och iv-kanylering
  Test 7: Förbandsbyte av rent kirurgiskt sår/ bedömning av omläggningsbehov
  Test 9: Blodtransfusion
  Test 10: Spädning av antibiotika
  Test 11: Läkemedelsbehandling vid smärta och illamående (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Pass: approved in all tests.

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV20KVV05-3002 01.09.2021-10.10.2021  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - has achieved competence in surgical and perioperative nursing care according to national standard

  Prerequisites

  Care of the old and geriatrics
  Surgical nursing care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Björkman, E. & Karlsson, K. 2008 eller 2014. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor. Material. Metod. Ansvar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  BEHANDLINGSÅTGÄRDER VID BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER;
  Material and links in Moodle.
  Hanås R. (2018). Typ 1 diabetes hos barn, ungdomar och unga vuxna - Hur du blir expert på din egen diabetes. Betamed.
  
  ARRHYTHMIAS
  Handbok i de vanligaste artymierna. Tolkning och behandling. Ambu.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.09.2021 - 10.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual assignments and problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  Approved Red Cross blood web-course
  Resuscitation test.
  Arrhythmia: passed Moodle test
  Carbohydrates calculation and insulinneed: Test

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical exam week
  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Moodle arrhythmia test according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp Totalt 80 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid övningar.
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 1,5 sp = 40,5 h
  Iv-kanylering och övriga katetrar, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 4 h
  Hemuppgift: Se iv-kanyleringsfilm + läs materialet på moodle 2 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 1, 4 h
  Iv-kanylering övning, Grupp 2, 4 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Gemensamma kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 7 h
  Hemuppgift: Valbar antibiotika, 1 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 1, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 1. Grupp 2, 4 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 1, 6 h
  Övningsstationer 2. Grupp 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)
  Blodtransfusionscase, 2 h
  Vätskebalansövning, 10 min
  Övningsstationer 3. Blodtransfusionsuppgift genomgång, Grupp 1 och 2, 2 h
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination 3 h
  Filmning av examination, mm 2 h
  Filminlämning mm 1 h
  Varje studerande närundervisning: 29 h
  Eget arbete: 11 h
  TOTALT: 40 h
  HJÄRTRYTMER: 0,25 sp (6,75 h)
  Självstudier + Moodletest: EKG rytmer
  RESUSKITATION:
  4h teori (alla)
  4 h övning och 4 h examination (enligt gruppindelning).
  Alla tillfällen obligatorisk närvaro.
  Övriga timmar till nationella test.
  BLODSOCKERAVVIKELSER:
  4 h obligatorisk närvaro
  NATIONELLA TEST:
  Kompetenser i kirurgisk- och perioperativ vård: Följande test testas:
  Test 4: Inledande av intravenös infusionsbehandling och iv-kanylering
  Test 7: Förbandsbyte av rent kirurgiskt sår/ bedömning av omläggningsbehov
  Test 9: Blodtransfusion
  Test 10: Spädning av antibiotika
  Test 11: Läkemedelsbehandling vid smärta och illamående (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Pass: approved in all tests.

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV21KVV05-3001 14.03.2022-09.10.2022  4 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - can explain the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory examinations

  Prerequisites

  Drug treatment 1
  Care of the old and geriatrics

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Margareta Antus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.03.2022 - 09.10.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.07.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk, Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV21KVV05-3003 18.04.2022-29.05.2022  4 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - can explain the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory examinations

  Prerequisites

  Drug treatment 1
  Care of the old and geriatrics

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.04.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 17.04.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Clinical nursing skills VÅV21KVV05-3004 25.04.2022-12.06.2022  4 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - in simulated situations can identify and analyze the need for care in patients with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds and, as part of a team, carry out the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment in healthcare
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess, plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care and use electronic health documentation programs
  - can perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - in a simulated situation can revive patients
  - can explain the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care and perform basic laboratory examinations

  Prerequisites

  Drug treatment 1
  Care of the old and geriatrics

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  Laboratory examinations

  Further information

  Examination according to national standard for the upcoming national test after 180 credits

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.04.2022 - 12.06.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 24.04.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Margareta Antus, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3013 03.01.2022-13.02.2022  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual test 80 % correctly

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 13.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Virtual test
  Exam in drug calculation

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 20 hours + 4 hours for the exam
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 80 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3010 22.11.2021-19.12.2021  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen, R., Volmanen, P. & Hakoinen, S. (toim.) 2015. Turvallinen lääkehoito Opas lääkehoitosuunnitelman tekemiseen sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Julkari. https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1 valda delar
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Articles according to teachers advice

  Learning methods

  Contact studies in webex online. Lectures and workshops
  Seminars, groupwork
  Selfstudies with individual tasks online i moodle
  Clinical lectures in class in injections

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifetr Gk/UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 75% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedlesräkning 100% rätt förGK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 21.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Pia Nygårdas

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  exam online
  tasks online

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt överenskommelse med gruppen vid kursstart
  Räknetent i klass
  Omtentamina på omtentsdagar under våren enligt meddelande efter kursstart 2020
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h per credit for students

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3012 25.10.2021-23.01.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  STM: 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling. Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Contact studies in webex, workshops, seminars
  selfstudies, individual tasks and assigments
  Online test
  Exercises in injection in clinical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifter Gk+/Gk /UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 70% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedelsräkning 100% rätt för GK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.10.2021 - 23.01.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 24.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • SSK21 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 2c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Camilla Mattjus

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Uppgifter och foruminlägg online
  Tentamen online i teori och läkemedelsräkning via webex (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt överenskommelse med gruppen vid kursstart
  Räknetent efetr utförda räkneworkshops
  Omtentamina på omtentsdagar under våren enligt meddelande efter kursstart
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  arbetsbörda 27h arbete per studiepoäng (not translated)

•   Drug therapy 1 VÅV18BV05-3014 03.01.2022-13.03.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - be able to apply laws and directives to drug therapy in nursing care
  - be able to implement asepsis in drug therapy
  - knows about different types of medication and methods of administration
  - be able to define selected terms related to the administration of medications, and describe astions of drugs on the body
  - has skills about prescription
  - knows the preparative procedures for introvenous and blood transfusion
  - be able to give injections
  - be able to supervise the patient and to documentate according to medication
  - demonstrates skills in nursing mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation - nursing mathematics
  Administation of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

  Learning methods

  Contact studoes in webex , seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgifter Gk+/Gk /UK Virtuell tentamen skala -0-5 ( 70% rätt för godkänt)
  Läkemedelsräkning 100% rätt för GK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 13.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 02.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Small group(s)

  • SSK21 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 1c (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Camilla Mattjus

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Online tasks and examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt överenskommelse med gruppen vid kursstart
  Räknetent efetr utförda räkneworkshops
  Omtentamina på omtentsdagar under våren enligt meddelande efter kursstart
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  arbetsbörda 27h arbete per studiepoäng (not translated)

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3007 30.08.2021-14.11.2021  4 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur
  På svenska
  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  FRK. Blodtranfusioner https://www.blodtjanst.fi/for-halsovardsexperter/blodtjanst-utbildar/blodtransfusionens-abo
  Filmer och virtuellt material på moodle
  Material och evidensbaserade nya vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner
  Caselösningar och genomgång av problemlösningar under workshops
  Virtuella uppgifter, forumdiskussion och virtuellt test i teori
  Läkemedelsräkning som flipped learning ( studerande läser teoretisk bakgrund till räkneproblem som praktiseras på workshops), deltenter i läkemedelsräkning efter utförd workshop (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 14.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3008 30.08.2021-14.11.2021  4 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Studiematerial och rekommenderad litteratur
  På svenska
  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  FRK. Blodtranfusioner https://www.blodtjanst.fi/for-halsovardsexperter/blodtjanst-utbildar/blodtransfusionens-abo
  Filmer och virtuellt material på moodle
  Material och evidensbaserade nya vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, grupparbeten och diskussioner
  Caselösningar och genomgång av problemlösningar under workshops
  Virtuella uppgifter, forumdiskussion och virtuellt test i teori
  Läkemedelsräkning som flipped learning ( studerande läser teoretisk bakgrund till räkneproblem som praktiseras på workshops), deltenter i läkemedelsräkning efter utförd workshop (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 14.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Drug therapy 2 VÅV18BV06-3009 30.08.2021-19.12.2021  4 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the most common indications and contraindications for the use of medication and is able to identify interactions between different drugs
  - know clinical pharmacology in a biomedical context
  - know drug therapy related to de most common diseases in Finland
  - know various types of pain medication
  - know medication used as anticoagulant therapy
  - know the generic name for drugs used when treating the most common diseases
  - master advanced drug therapy in nursing care of adultsand recognize personal responsibility in drug handling, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
  - be able to manage the preparative procedures for intravenous (IV) therapy, endovascular treatment and blood transfusions, prepare for these procedures and treatments, and monitor the patient during and after IV-therapy and blood transfusion
  - master patient guidance and documentation related to drug therapy
  - understand the importance of safe drug therapy in relation to patient safety
  - master calculations needed in medical and infusion treatment, and be able to dose and administer medication without error

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology
  Drug therapy
  Drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after differenst sections

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.08.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  0 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Elective Studies USS15UV05-3002 01.01.2022-05.06.2022  5 credits  (USS19D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student gains a deeper understanding of theory and/or nursing practice which supports the professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Elective studies

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2022 - 05.06.2022

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-Å
  • UHV19D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Elective Studies USS15UV05-3003 01.01.2022-18.12.2022  5 credits  (USS19F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student gains a deeper understanding of theory and/or nursing practice which supports the professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Elective studies

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2022 - 18.12.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Christine Alm, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV14EN01-3020 15.10.2021-28.02.2022  3 credits  (ÖH21VÅETAPP-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Ingår som en kurs i Etappvis till sjukskötare/Öppna YH och förverkligas genom Öppna YH hösten 2021.
  Detta förverkligande är enbart skapat för Etappvis till sjukskötare hösten 2021. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.10.2021 - 28.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.09.2021 - 14.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH21VÅETAPP-V

  Seats

  19 - 19

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Hanna Kuusisto, Ann-Sofi Storbjörk

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV14EN01-3010 01.11.2021-05.12.2021  3 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.11.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 31.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Anne Cleary-Hautaniemi

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3011 01.11.2021-05.12.2021  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.11.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 31.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Anne Cleary-Hautaniemi

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3012 11.04.2022-15.05.2022  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.04.2022 - 15.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 10.04.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa Engelska 1

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English VÅV14EN01-3014 03.01.2022-30.01.2022  3 credits  (UBM20D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.01.2022 - 30.01.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 31.12.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM20D-V
  • UHV20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa Engelska 1

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   English USS20GV06-3002 10.01.2022-17.04.2022  3 credits  (ÖH21USSLED-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
  
  Can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
  
  Is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
  
  Oral and written communication
  
  Oral and written presentations
  
  Language correctness and language planning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Cindy Forsblom

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Text material and assignments are part of the course.

  Learning methods

  Contact lessons based on communication, adaption of text material, individual work, work in pairs/groups, essay writing.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grading on a scale 1-5 or fail. An approved course requires approved oral presentations, approved written assignments, and approved compensation assignments.

  Teaching language

  English

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 17.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH21USSLED-Å
  • UHV21D-Å
  • USS21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Cindy Forsblom

  Additional information

  Attendance is mandatory and any absences must be compensated.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  N/A

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  N/A

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments will be presented and deadlines will be agreed on at the introduction to the course.
  There will be a vocabulary exam on February 28th.

  Internationa connections

  N/A

  Student's schedule and workload

  The courses comprises 3 credits and the the students are expected to work approximately 81 hours.

  Content scheduling

  N/A

  Assessment criteria

  Grade 0
  The student fails to submit the assignments by the deadline provided and/or fails to take part in oral presentations/simulations.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Grade 1-2
  The student can express himself in a simple but coherent way and write reports in a simple but often unstructured way. There are spelling mistakes and weaknesses in basic structures of a written text. The student manages to present orally but the presentation may be difficult for foreigners to understand. Limited ability express oneself fluently in speech, the student pauses to find suitable expressions or uses words in his native language. Have problems to find synonyms and a suitable style.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Grade 3
  The student can write coherent, analytical and structured texts including his own opinions and arguments and can draw conclusions of information from different sources. Breach of style, spelling mistakes and other small mistakes can be found but the student has a good command of the basic structures and can use difficult structures more correctly. Oral presentations are of a routine nature but structured.
  Grade 4
  The student writes almost flawless English and expresses himself fluently and professionally in speech and writing. The student writes well structured, analytical texts with well-grounded conclusions about more demanding topics and manages to pinpoint the most important in a text and provide examples. The student can express himself orally within a wide variety of topics spontaneously and rarely needs to look for the right expression. A versatile vocabulary.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Grade 5
  The language is idiomatic and flawless. The student can write scientific texts in a well-structured, interesting and correct way. Manages to vary the style and use of language depending on the target group. Can in speech use professional, balanced and idiomatic language, make corrections without the audience being disturbed by it and has a good command of insinuations and multi-faceted expressions. Oral speeches are interesting, creative and well structured.

•   English VÅV14EN01-3017 07.03.2022-17.04.2022  3 credits  (SSK20-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  - is familiar with essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature
  - has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills and is familiar with the relevant tools
  - is aware of cultural differences in international contexts

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  English (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  -according to the lecturer (information on Moodle)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, oral exercises, team work, work in pairs, presentations, individual tasks and written assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Grades 0-5 and in some exercises pass/fail.
  According to the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.03.2022 - 17.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 06.03.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-1
  • USS20D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa Engelska 1

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Performed presentation, approved tasks (portfolio)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  More information on Moodle.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27 h = 81 hours

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS20IV05-3002 01.08.2021-30.11.2021  5 credits  (UHV21D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Is able to, as part of an interprofessional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  
  Has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based central care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  
  Can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  
  Can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable development
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar eller
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar eller
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. Valda delar.
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  Övrig litteratur:
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Ekman I (red). 2015. Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Klang Söderkvist & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti
  Saranto K. m.fl. 2008. Hoitotyön systemaattinen kirjaaminen.
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012
  FinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0
  FinCC Funktioner inom vårdarbete 3.0 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Smågruppsarbete
  Reflektionsdagbok
  Lektioner
  Simulationer
  Examinationer
  Studiebesök (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete, simulationer och studiebesök GK/UK.
  
  2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK
  
  3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker GK/UK
  
  4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
  För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten.
  
  5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
  Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 30.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 05.09.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å
  • USS21D-Å
  • ÖH21USSLED-Å

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp A (Size: 25. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp B (Size: 25. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp C (Size: 25. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in innan kursen börjar till Daniel Nenonen via e-ahot före den 2.9 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Reflektionsdagbok
  Simulationer
  Praktisk examination.
  Individuell skriftlig examination
  1:a hjälp (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studiebesök (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Reflektionsdagbok v 39, 41 och 45 lämnas in på Moodle under smågruppsarbetet .
  Simulation v 40, 42 och 46.
  1:a hjälp v 46
  Praktisk examination v.46 / 47. Omtagningstillfälle 1: 23.11. Omtagningstillfälle 2: enligt överenskommelse med examinatorna
  Skriftlig individuell examination 26.11.2021 , omtent den 21.1.2022 och den 11.3.2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier, reflektionsdagbok, smågrupp, flipped och sim 54h
  Självstudier och examinationer 54 h
  Självstudier och föreläsningar 27 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS20IV05-3003 01.08.2021-05.12.2021  5 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Is able to, as part of an interprofessional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  
  Has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based central care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  
  Can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  
  Can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable development
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar eller
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar eller
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. Valda delar.
  Artiklar och databaser
  
  Övrig litteratur:
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Ekman I (red). 2015. Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Klang Söderkvist & Kneck (red). 2018. Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Studentlitteratur.
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti
  Saranto K. m.fl. 2008. Hoitotyön systemaattinen kirjaaminen.
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012
  FinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0
  FinCC Funktioner inom vårdarbete 3.0 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Smågruppsarbete
  Reflektionsdagbok
  Lektioner
  Simulationer
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Smågruppsarbete och simulationer GK/UK.
  
  2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro (4 timmar) GK/UK
  
  3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker GK/UK
  
  4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
  För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten.
  
  5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt bedömningskriterierna nedan. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2021 - 05.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 12.09.2021

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in innan kursen börjar till Daniel Nenonen via e-ahot före den 2.9 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Reflektions-/inlärningsdagbok
  Simulationer
  Praktisk examination
  Individuell skriftlig hemtentamen
  1:a hjälp (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Smågruppsarbete v 37, 38, 40, 41 och 42
  Reflektionsdagbok v 38 och 42 lämnas in på Moodle
  Simulation v 39 och 43.
  1:a hjälp v 43
  Praktisk examination v 47
  Skriftlig individuell hemtentamen inlämning v 46 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier, reflektionsdagbok, smågrupp, flipped och sim 54h
  Självstudier och examinationer 54 h
  Självstudier och föreläsningar 27 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Extended clinical nursing care in primary health care VÅV18FK01-3002 07.02.2022-29.05.2022  6 credits  (USS19D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - has evidence-based knowledge of primary care and understands the importance of creating a good care relationship both to the patient and their relatives
  - mastered the care of patients in primary care
  - mastered the care of acutely ill children
  - shows the ability to assess, plan, implement and evaluate the care
  - can perform structured care planning and documentation according to national directives
  - can, in a simulated situation, be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can apply a rehabilitative and health-promoting approach
  - can apply patient guidance

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Nursing care in general internal medicine 1
  Nursing care in general surgery 1
  Home nursing, child care and paediatrics, maternity care and care of disabled people
  Psychiatric nursing and substance abuse care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  PEDIATRIC CARE
  Jääskeläinen, J., Miettinen, P., Niinikoski, H., Saha, M-T. & Veijola R. 2016. Diabeettisen ketoasidoosinhoito. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Moell, C & Gustafsson, J. (Red.) 2017. Ped. Kapitel 35 om misshandel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Mäkelä, M. & Dunder, T. 2016. Anafylaktinen reaktio. Kirjassa: Korppi, M., Kröger, L., Rantala, H. & Niinikoski, H. (toim.) Lastentautien päivystyskirja 3.
  Qvist, E. 2013. Lääkärinkäsikirja. Akuutisti sairas imeväinen.
  Qvist, E. & Korppi, M. 2009. Duodecim. Alle kolmen kuukauden ikäinen lapsi päivystysksessä.
  
  INREMEDICINSK VÅRD OCH REHABILITERING
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Sid 17-32
  Mikaelsson M & Lindberg, T. 2020. District nurses’ experiences of providing palliative care in the home. Nordic Journal of Nursing research. https://journals-sagepub-com.ezproxy.novia.fi/doi/pdf/10.1177/2057158519857002
  
  Janhunen, E. & Pikkarinen, A. 2017. Ikääntyneen potilaan kuntoutus vuodeosastolla ja kotihoidossa Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja. Terveysportti.
  Den här länken går direkt till Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat, https://ezproxy.novia.fi/login?url=https://www.terveysportti.fi/dtk/shk/koti. Sök artikel.
  
  Vasa sjukvårdsdistrikt. Patientsäkerhetsmeddelande 1/2018. En lyckad utskrivning fulländar god vård.
  https://issuu.com/vaasacentralhospital/docs/ptt_1-2018_sve_nettiversio
  
  Vasa sjukvårdsdistrikt. Checklistor för hemförlovning
  https://www.vaasankeskussairaala.fi/sv/for-vardgivare/for-vardgivare/sammandrag-av-vard--och-servicekedjor/vard--och-servicekedjor/den-geriatriska-patientens-servicekedja/checklistorna-for-hemforlovning-pa-olika-servicenivaer/
  
  https://www.terveyskyla.fi/kuntoutumistalo/sv
  
  https://www.terveysportti.fi/dtk/shk/koti?p_artikkeli=shk04420&p_haku=puhelinneuvonta
  
  https://www.vardhandboken.se/arbetssatt-och-ansvar/bemotande-i-vard-och-omsorg/telefonradgivning---ett-personcentrerat-vardmote/telefonradgivning-med-samtalsprocessen-som-metod/
  
  Samt föreläsningsmaterial på moodle
  
  
  SURGICAL CARE
  Almås, H. Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red) 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 1. Liber. Stockholm.
  Almås, H. Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (red) 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber. Stockholm.
  Björkman, E & Karlsson, K. 2008. Medicinsk teknik för sjuksköterskor: material, metod, ansvar. Studentlitteratur. AB, Lund.
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Studentlitteratur. AB, Lund.
  Käypä hoito-suositus:
  Sepsis www.terveysportti.fi
  Svenska infektionsläkarföreningen. Uppdaterat 2018. Vårdprogram Svår sepsis och septisk chock – tidig identifiering och initial handläggning.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.
  Aktuella vårdvetenskapliga artiklar samt aktuella artiklar från Duodecim: Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat och Lääkärin tietokannat.

  Learning methods

  På engelska
  Lectures
  Group work
  Individual work
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Active attendance at the lessons
  Approved practical exercises
  Written examination assignment. Grade: scale 1 - 5
  
  
  Mandatory attendance at Clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  
  Surgical care, internal medical care, rehabilitation and pediatric care: exam grades 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.02.2022 - 29.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 23.01.2022

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Active attendance
  Approved practical exercises
  Written examination in internal medicine care, surgical care and pediatric care

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student is able to describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views

•   Extended nursing care in an optional clinical context VÅV14KVV15-3004 20.09.2021-28.11.2021  12 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and related persons and take into account their cultural affiliation
  - can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
  - can handle complicated vocational tasks within the chosen health context
  - can independently make decisions regarding the patient's care process and be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can independently acquire and assess evidence-based knowledge
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - has the skills to supervise and teach patients
  - shows ability to meet people in crisis
  - has readiness to shop in different situations in the healthcare sector

  Prerequisites

  Core studies
  Professional studies
  Practice

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About internships

  Learning methods

  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context
  Written internships in different contexts

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved internship
  Approved written assignment
  Participation in seminar

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2021 - 28.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 12 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Students have the opportunity to get some of the practice validated through summer jobs as nurses in the summer of 2021
  is the supervisor for those who do internships in paediatric care
  Supervisors for those who do internships in emergency care, intensive care, internal medicine and surgical health care are Marice Nedergård and Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn.
  The supervisor for those who do their internship in psychiatry is

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Week 39 - 46 autumn 2021

  Internationa connections

  Students can complete the internship abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  40 h/week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  follows the work list and holds agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level
  Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team

•   Extended nursing care in an optional clinical context VÅV14KVV15-3005 20.09.2021-28.11.2021  12 credits  (USS18D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can apply an ethical approach to the treatment of patients and related persons and take into account their cultural affiliation
  - can apply theoretical knowledge in health care
  - can handle complicated vocational tasks within the chosen health context
  - can independently make decisions regarding the patient's care process and be responsible for safe drug treatment
  - can independently acquire and assess evidence-based knowledge
  - can cooperate with various professional groups within the healthcare team
  - has the skills to supervise and teach patients
  - shows ability to meet people in crisis
  - has readiness to shop in different situations in the healthcare sector

  Prerequisites

  Core studies
  Professional studies
  Practice

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.09.2021 - 28.11.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 12 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS18D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3005 27.09.2021-30.12.2021  4 credits  (UBM19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen & inom skolhälsovård. Metodhandbok, THL.Tammerfors 2014 (finsk version från år 2016)
  Handbok för studerandehälsovården. STM, publikationer, Helsingfors 2007.
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL

  Learning methods

  Lectures as close studies
  Lecture remotely via Webex, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  33 - 36 point = 5
  29 - 32 point = 4
  25 - 28 point = 3
  21 - 24 point = 2
  18 - 20 point = 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.09.2021 - 30.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 30.09.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM19D-V
  • UHV19D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination autumn 2021
  Reexamination 1:
  Reexamination 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3006 01.11.2021-12.12.2021  4 credits  (USS19D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen & inom skolhälsovård. Metodhandbok, THL.Tammerfors 2014 (finsk version från år 2016)
  Handbok för studerandehälsovården. STM, publikationer, Helsingfors 2007.
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL

  Learning methods

  Lectures as close studies
  Lecture remotely via Webex, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  33 - 36 point = 5
  29 - 32 point = 4
  25 - 28 point = 3
  21 - 24 point = 2
  18 - 20 point = 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.11.2021 - 12.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  11.06.2021 - 31.10.2021

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS19D-V
  • SSK19-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination autumn 2021
  Reexamination 1:
  Reexamination 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Family health care VÅV18HV03-3009 04.04.2022-08.05.2022  4 credits  (SSK20-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will
  - obtain knowledge of the specific prerequisites related to caring for family-centrerad care
  - obtain knowledge of specific health risks related to children and adolescents and prepare to guide the child, adolescent and family in their decisions regarding health-promotion
  - master advanced drug therapy for children

  Prerequisites

  Public health care

  Content of the study unit

  Health care of children and adolescents
  Pediatrics
  Drug therapy for children

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Paediatric Care
  Selected parts from:
  Hallström, I & Lindberg, T. 2015. (red.)Andra upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2012. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Rajantie, J., Mertsola, J. & Heidkinheimo, M. (toim.) 2010. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Skhole: Neurologi hos barn och ungdomar
  Evidence-based scientific articles and research according to the lecturer's directive
  Handout
  
  Healthpromotion among children and adolescents:
  Literature:
  Aktuell lagstiftning och valda artiklar samt valda delar från THL
  Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivningen och skolhälsovården. Metodhandbok. Handbok 31/2018.
  
  Guiden till studerande hälsovården 2020.Social-och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2020:17. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2020

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual work, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problemsolutions
  Current DVD movies
  Demonstrations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination
  Grade scale 0 - 5
  33 - 36 point = 5
  29 - 32 point = 4
  25 - 28 point = 3
  21 - 24 point = 2
  18 - 20 point = 1

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.04.2022 - 08.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 03.04.2022

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK20-2
  • USS20D-V

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  The attendance days will be exposed in addition to the schedule also on the platform Moodle.
  The contents of the section of the attendance days will be published on the platform Moodle.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2022
  Reexamination 1:
  Reexamination 2:

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam and for written work
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows
  limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3011 07.09.2021-12.12.2021  3 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning)
  Översättningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.09.2021 - 12.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  01.08.2021 - 14.11.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V
  • ÖH21UHVLED-V
  • ÖH21UBMLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3012 01.11.2021-19.12.2021  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner och presentation i en större grupp
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning)
  Översättningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 31.10.2021

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3013 14.03.2022-22.05.2022  3 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner
  Skriftliga arbeten (sammanfattning)
  Översättningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.03.2022 - 22.05.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 30.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

•   Finnish USS20GV05-3002 10.01.2022-01.04.2022  3 credits  (UHV21D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
  
  Can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
  
  Is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
  
  Oral and written communication
  
  Oral and written presentations
  
  Language correctness and language planning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Iris Nurmi

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet är sammanställt av läraren och finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, par- och grupparbete, muntliga och skriftliga övningar och uppgifter, textbearbetning, självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper bedöms skilt. Bedömningen baserar sig på den gemensamma europeiska referensramen för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1 motsvarar nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1-3) och nivå B2 eller högre motsvarar goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4-5).
  Examinationer och timaktivitet påverkar bedömningen. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 01.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 09.01.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å
  • USS21D-Å
  • ÖH21USSLED-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Iris Nurmi

  Additional information

  Noggrannare information om uppgifter, tentamen och datum finns i Moodle och gås igenom under första kurstillfället.
  Delprestationer är i kraft fram till 31.5 eller enligt särskild överenskommelse.
  För uppgifter som lämnats in efter deadline ges ingen feedback.
  Sena inlämningar påverkar kursvitsordet. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  För godkänd kurs krävs:
  - aktivt deltagande under lektioner (80 % närvarokrav för B- och C-nivå)
  - obligatoriska muntliga och skriftliga inlämningsuppgifter
  - godkänd muntlig och skriftlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig och skriftlig tentamen vecka 10.
  Skriftlig omtentamen under allmän omtentamen.
  Muntlig omtentamen enligt överenskommelse. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h arbete. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  En eller flera kursuppgifter är ogjorda eller underkända.
  Studerande har knappt deltagit i kursen eller har kunskaper under A2-nivå:
  Klarar varken alldaglig eller branschspecifik skriftlig eller muntlig kommunikation på ett vederbörligt sätt.
  Kommunikationen är så bristfällig och/eller innehåller så många fel att misstolkningar uppstår eller kommunikationen
  förhindras. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  B1
  Vitsordet 1: Klarar sig nöjaktigt i förutsebara yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan skriva en enkel sammanhängande text. Budskapet förmedlas även om felen kan försvåra kommunikationen.
  Vitsordet 2: Klarar sig någorlunda i oförutsedda yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan skriva konsekventa texter som förmedlar ett budskap. Felen leder i allmänhet inte till missförstånd även om de kan störa läsrytmen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Vitsordet 3 (B1): Klarar sig i allmänhet bra i yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Kan vanligen uttrycka sig enligt situationens krav.
  
  Vitsordet 4 (B2): Klarar sig bra i allmänna yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Använder språket mångsidigt.
  Uttrycker sig enligt situationens krav. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  B2 (eller högre):
  Klarar sig mycket bra i allmänna yrkesmässiga och branschspecifika språksituationer. Använder språket smidigt och mångsidigt.
  Uttrycker sig tydligt enligt situationens krav. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV14FI01-3014 07.03.2022-10.04.2022  3 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development
  - shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Närundervisning.
  Vi läser texter som berör vård och sjukdomar, samtalar om texterna
  och lär oss att använda fackterminologin i tal och skrift.
  Textläsning: Studerande förbereder sig hemma genom att läsa texterna, ta till sig viktig information och besvarar frågorna på svenska.
  Pardiskussioner.
  
  Översättningar. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För bedömningen av kunskaper i finska som andra inhemska används Gemensam europeisk referensram för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1.1 och B1.2 anger
  nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1–3) och nivå B2 eller högre anger goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4–5). För att utföra kursen med godkänt vitsord (vitsordet
  1) bör den studerande uppvisa sådana kunskaper som krävs för nivå B1.1.
  https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/nivaskala-for-sprakkunskaper-och-sprakutveckling_2003.pdf (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.03.2022 - 10.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 13.02.2022

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Tvåspråkiga tenterar i samband med kursen. Ingen närundervisning för dem. (not translated)

•   Finnish - Oral Skills YH10FI01-M-3091 10.01.2022-01.04.2022  (USS21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Iris Nurmi

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 01.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  11.12.2021 - 09.01.2022

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Iris Nurmi

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Finnish - Writing Skills YH10FI01-S-3086 10.01.2022-01.04.2022  (USS21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Iris Nurmi

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Timing

  10.01.2022 - 01.04.2022

  Enrollment date range

  11.12.2021 - 09.01.2022

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Iris Nurmi

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   First Aid VÅV21KVV01-3001 13.09.2021-17.10.2021  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.09.2021 - 17.10.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 05.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-1
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK21 grupp 1a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 1b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cp = 54 h

•   First Aid VÅV21KVV01-3002 15.11.2021-19.12.2021  2 credits  (USS21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Irén Vikström-Dahl

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.11.2021 - 19.12.2021

  Enrollment date range

  02.07.2021 - 05.09.2021

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-V
  • SSK21-2
  • ÖH21USSLED-V

  Small group(s)

  • SSK21 grupp 2a (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • SSK21 grupp 2b (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Administration

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cp = 54 h

•   First Aid VÅV21KVV01-3003 31.01.2022-27.02.2022  2 credits  (UBM21D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.01.2022 - 27.02.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 30.01.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM21D-V
  • UHV21D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cp = 54 h

•   First Aid VÅV21KVV01-3005 07.02.2022-06.03.2022  2 credits  (USS21F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Upon completion of the course, the participant masters the basics of giving first aid in the topics included in the course contents EA 1 and EA 2.

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical training in first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.02.2022 - 06.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 06.02.2022

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Campus

  Vasa, Wolffskavägen 31

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and virtual test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 cp = 54 h

•   From Elderly to Geriatric Patient USS20KL02-3001 14.02.2022-20.03.2022  5 credits  (UHV20D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Has an understanding of normal aging
  
  Can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
  
  Can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  
  Has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
  
  Master evidence-based care methods and appropriate medication management
  
  Can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient
  
  Chain of care and service system
  
  Coping/adaptation
  
  Partnership and counseling
  
  Caring for close relatives
  
  Ethical decision making
  
  The aged patient's health problems
  
  Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
  
  Adequate medication management
  
  Geriatric technology
  
  Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder
  
  Evidence-based care
  
  Care chains and service types, elderly care
  
  Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  - Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., Hylen Ranhoff, A., Bolinder-Palmér, I. & Olsson, K. (2018). Geriatrisk omvårdnad: God omsorg och vård till den äldre (Andra upplagan.). Liber AB.
  - Dehlin, O. & Rundgren, Å. (2018). Geriatrik (3:4 upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  eller Arkkila, P., Pitkälä, K., Strandberg, T., Sulkava, R., Tilvis, R. & Viitanen, M. (2016). Geriatria (3., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim.
  
  Litteratur:
  Drevenhorn, E. 2017. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur.
  Ernsth Bravell, M. 2011. Äldre och åldrande.
  Etene. 2008. Vårdetik på ålderns höst
  Finlex 2012 Lag om stödjande av den äldre befolkningens funktionsförmåga och om social- och hälsovårdstjänster för äldre.
  Hellström, I. & Hydén, L-C. (red). 2016. Att leva med demens.
  Johansson, S: & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (red). 2016. Förändringsperspektiv på äldreomsorgen.
  Jönson, H., & Harnett, T. 2015. Socialt arbete med äldre.
  Kivelä, S-L. 2010. Vi äldre och våra mediciner.
  Larsson, Å. (red) 2015. Vardagsteknik för äldre.
  NMR. 2015. Kvalitet i äldreomsorgen. Äldreomsorg i Norden Sid 55-90. Nordiskt välfärdscentrum.
  SHM 2020: Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen.
  THL. 2020. Livskraft på äldre dar - kostrekommendationer på äldre personer.
  Fimea. 2020. Medicin75+ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Gästföreläsningar (obligatorisk närvaro)
  Learning cafe (obligatorisk närvaro)
  Seminarie (obligatorisk närvaro)
  Simulation (obligatorisk närvaro) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter i den gerontologiska patientens vårdkedja, vårdprocess, vårdplanering, i de centrala geriatriska hälsohindren/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder. Studerande förstår betydelsen av mångprofessionellt arbete inom gerontologiskt kontext. Uppgifter lämnas inom utsatt tid.
  
  - Substanskunskap
  - Integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap
  - Anvädning av litteratur
  - Deltagande i närundervisningen
  
  Del 1 (50 % av kursvitsordet)
  - Hemtentamen: GK/UK
  - Individuell uppgift: 1-5 (50 %)
  
  Del 2 (50 % av kursvitsordet)
  - Gruppuppgift (learning cafe): GK/UK
  - Gruppuppgift: 1-5 (50 %) (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.02.2022 - 20.03.2022

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2021 - 13.02.2022

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV20D-Å
  • USS20D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Del 1:
  - Hemtentamen, 28.2-4.3.2022
  - Individuell uppgift, 28.2.2022
  
  Del 2:
  - Gruppuppgift (learning cafe), 9.3.2022
  - Gruppuppgift, 18.3.2022 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  5sp = 135h
  
  Del1: (67,5h)
  - Föreläsningar: 6h
  - Simuleringar: 4h
  - Självstudier: 57,5h
  
  Del 2 (67,5h)
  - Föreläsningar: 4h
  - Learning cafe 2h
  - Seminarie: 3h
  - Självstudier: 58,5h (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Del 1: Geriatriska sjukdomar/hälsohindren
  Del 2: Personcentrerad vård (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp tillbedömningskriterier för tillfredsställande. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på uppgifter på basen av kurslitteratur men har inte förmåga att använda annat material eller göra egna reflektioner. Studerande kan beskriva den gerontologiska patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i geriatriska sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på uppgifter på basen av kurslitteratur samt andra källor men användning av materialet är inte mångsidigt. Studerande kan beskriva gerontologiska patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i geriatriska sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgifter och använder mångsidigt kurslitteratur samt andra evidensbaserade källor. Studerande kan beskriva den gerontologiska patient