Academic year 2024 - 2025

•   Advanced Nursing I USS21FV01-3001 26.08.2024-09.11.2024  8 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can apply, reflect and deepen his/her expertise in clinical care work
  
  Can argue for evidence based activity and care methods
  
  Can apply ethical decision making in a variety of service environments and care situations
  
  Masters person-centered/client-centered holistic care and medication management in different healthcare and service environments
  
  Students can use health technology and digital solutions in in-depth care work
  
  Can evaluate the guidance efficiency together with patient, close relatives and healthcare personnel
  
  Can promote patient and client safety

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  In-depth care methods in internal medicine
  
  In-depth care methods in surgical care
  
  Ethical decision-making in complicated situations and in different service system
  
  Advanced medication management
  
  Person-centered/client-centered holistic care
  
  Health technology and digital solutions
  
  Application of health science theories and research
  
  Welfare economy
  
  The effects of guidance and different gauges
  
  Patient and client safety

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alahuhta, S. et al. 2010. Nestehoito
  Andershed, B. et al. 2020. Palliativ vård: Begrepp och perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur
  Bengstsson, M.& Lundström, U. 2015. Palliativ vård. Gleerups
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. S 171-202.
  Guldbransen, T. 2009. Intensivvård: avancerad omvårdnad och behandling.
  Hjelmqvist, H. 2006. Vätsketerapi.
  Jevon, P. & Ewens, B. (ed.) 2014. Att övervaka patienter med livshotande sjukdom. Studentlitteratur.
  Lagercrantz, H. mfl. Neonatologi. 2015.Studentlitteratur.
  Leino-Kilpi, H. & Välimäki M. 2014. Etiikka hoitotyössä.
  Moell, C., Gustafsson, J. 2017. Pediatrik. Liber.
  Niemi-Murola L. 2014. Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet.
  Rubertsson et al. 2020. Intensivvård. Liber
  Saarto, T. et al. 2016 Palliatiivinen hoito. Duodecim
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  Suomen tehohoitoyhdistys. 1997. Suomen Tehohoitoyhdistyksen eettiset ohjeet.
  Takkunen et al. 2006. Tehohoito-opas.
  Terveysportti: Akuuttihoitotyön opas, Teho- ja valvontahoitotyön opas
  samt aktuella ämnespecifika artiklar som läggs upp på Moodle
  Wiklund Gustin,L. & Bergbom, I. 2017. Vårdvetenskapliga begrepp i teori och praktik (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Workshops
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur
  Inlämningsuppgift
  Simulering
  Seminarier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell inlämningsuppgift, bedöms med vitsord 0-5, feedback sker via Moodle
  Etikuppgift, bedöms med GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.08.2024 - 09.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg, Michaela Jalava, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Workshops, seminarier, obligatorisk närvaro
  Simuleringar, obligatorisk närvaro
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedöms med vitsord 0-5
  Etikuppgift, bedöms med vitsord GK/UK (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individuell inlämningsuppgift inlämnas på Moodle 6.11
  Etikuppgift inlämning på Moodle 20.9 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Workshops 4h
  Föreläsningar 14h
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift 30h
  Etikuppgift 30h
  Självstudier 126h
  Seminarier 8h
  Simulering 4h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande svarar inte på uppgiftens alla delar och relaterar inte delarna till varandra. Studerande har mycket ytliga kunskaper i hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder, och studerande kan inte vårdplanering i relation till dessa. Studerande har inte kunskaper i patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och kan inte relatera det till sjukskötarens uppgifter eller i en vårdplan. Vårdplaneringen är mycket bristfällig. Studerande har mycket bristfälliga kunskaper i etik och patientsäkerhet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar men har inte förmågan att relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper om olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder, men tillämpningen i form av vårdplanering är svag. Studerande har svårigheter att gestalta patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och har svårt att relatera den till sjukskötarens uppgifter och i en vårdplan. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, men kan inte tillämpa dem, och egna reflektioner fattas (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar och kan relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har djupa kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter och beaktar ett interprofessionellt arbetssätt och kan göra en helhetsmässig vårdplan. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna djupgående reflektioner (not translated)

•   Advanced Nursing I USS21FV01-3002 19.08.2024-30.11.2024  8 credits  (USS21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can apply, reflect and deepen his/her expertise in clinical care work
  
  Can argue for evidence based activity and care methods
  
  Can apply ethical decision making in a variety of service environments and care situations
  
  Masters person-centered/client-centered holistic care and medication management in different healthcare and service environments
  
  Students can use health technology and digital solutions in in-depth care work
  
  Can evaluate the guidance efficiency together with patient, close relatives and healthcare personnel
  
  Can promote patient and client safety

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  In-depth care methods in internal medicine
  
  In-depth care methods in surgical care
  
  Ethical decision-making in complicated situations and in different service system
  
  Advanced medication management
  
  Person-centered/client-centered holistic care
  
  Health technology and digital solutions
  
  Application of health science theories and research
  
  Welfare economy
  
  The effects of guidance and different gauges
  
  Patient and client safety

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  88% Face-to-face, 12% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Alahuhta, S. et al. 2010. Nestehoito
  Andershed, B. et al. 2020. Palliativ vård: Begrepp och perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur
  Bengstsson, M.& Lundström, U. 2015. Palliativ vård. Gleerups
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. S 171-202.
  Guldbransen, T. 2009. Intensivvård: avancerad omvårdnad och behandling.
  Hjelmqvist, H. 2006. Vätsketerapi.
  Jevon, P. & Ewens, B. (ed.) 2014. Att övervaka patienter med livshotande sjukdom. Studentlitteratur.
  Lagercrantz, H. mfl. Neonatologi. 2015.Studentlitteratur.
  Leino-Kilpi, H. & Välimäki M. 2014. Etiikka hoitotyössä.
  Moell, C., Gustafsson, J. 2017. Pediatrik. Liber.
  Niemi-Murola L. 2014. Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet.
  Rubertsson et al. 2020. Intensivvård. Liber
  Saarto, T. et al. 2016 Palliatiivinen hoito. Duodecim
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  Suomen tehohoitoyhdistys. 1997. Suomen Tehohoitoyhdistyksen eettiset ohjeet.
  Takkunen et al. 2006. Tehohoito-opas.
  Terveysportti: Akuuttihoitotyön opas, Teho- ja valvontahoitotyön opas
  samt aktuella ämnespecifika artiklar som läggs upp på Moodle
  Wiklund Gustin,L. & Bergbom, I. 2017. Vårdvetenskapliga begrepp i teori och praktik (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Workshops
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur
  Inlämningsuppgift
  Simulering
  Seminarier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell inlämningsuppgift, bedöms med vitsord 0-5, feedback sker via Moodle
  Etikuppgift, bedöms med GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.08.2024 - 30.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 18.08.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg, Michaela Jalava, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Workshops, seminarier, obligatorisk närvaro
  Simuleringar, obligatorisk närvaro
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedöms med vitsord 0-5
  Etikuppgift, bedöms med vitsord GK/UK (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individuell inlämningsuppgift inlämnas på Moodle 4.11.2024 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Workshops 6h
  Föreläsningar 32h
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift 30h
  Etikuppgift 30h
  Självstudier 95h
  Seminarier 8h
  Simulering 4h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande svarar inte på uppgiftens alla delar och relaterar inte delarna till varandra. Studerande har mycket ytliga kunskaper i hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder, och studerande kan inte vårdplanering i relation till dessa. Studerande har inte kunskaper i patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och kan inte relatera det till sjukskötarens uppgifter eller i en vårdplan. Vårdplaneringen är mycket bristfällig. Studerande har mycket bristfälliga kunskaper i etik och patientsäkerhet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar men har inte förmågan att relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper om olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder, men tillämpningen i form av vårdplanering är svag. Studerande har svårigheter att gestalta patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och har svårt att relatera den till sjukskötarens uppgifter och i en vårdplan. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, men kan inte tillämpa dem, och egna reflektioner fattas (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar och kan relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har djupa kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter och beaktar ett interprofessionellt arbetssätt och kan göra en helhetsmässig vårdplan. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna djupgående reflektioner (not translated)

•   Anatomy and Physiology USS22IV06-3005 05.09.2024-13.12.2024  4 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can explain human anatomy and physiology
  - understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The cell and tissues
  
  Cardiovascular system
  
  The respiratory system
  
  The nervous system
  
  The digestive system
  
  The urinary system
  
  The endocrine system
  
  The musculoskeletal system

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course litterature:
  
  Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended litterature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  
  On moodle give litterature.
  
  Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.
  
  
  "To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

  Learning methods

  Lectures on campus and via teams.
  
  Interactive digital material.
  
  Independent studying and assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.09.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 09.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomy and physiology tests.
  
  Assignments.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Anatomi och fysiologi tenter under hösten 2024:
  
  Datum:
  
  Deltentamen 1: Vecka 41
  Deltentamen 2: Vecka 48
  
  Två omtenter i varje del erbjuds.
  
  Deltentamen 1: 25.10 och 22.11.2023
  Deltentamen 2: 17.1 och 7.2.2024
  
  
  Oblikatoriska workshops och seminarier med tillhörande oblikatorisk uppgift. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningstillfällen 32 h
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter 40 h
  
  Självstudier 38 h
  
  Deltentamen 1 1.5 sp
  Deltentamen 2 1.5 sp
  Workshops och seminarier med tillhörande inlämningsuppgifter 1sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra. (not translated)

•   Anatomy and Physiology USS22IV06-3006 11.09.2024-13.12.2024  4 credits  (USS24F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can explain human anatomy and physiology
  - understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The cell and tissues
  
  Cardiovascular system
  
  The respiratory system
  
  The nervous system
  
  The digestive system
  
  The urinary system
  
  The endocrine system
  
  The musculoskeletal system

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course litterature:
  
  Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended litterature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  
  On moodle give litterature.
  
  Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.
  
  
  "To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

  Learning methods

  Lectures on campus and via teams.
  
  Interactive digital material.
  
  Independent studying and assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 10.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomy and physiology test.
  
  Assignments.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Anatomi och fysiologi tenter under hösten 2024:
  
  Datum:
  
  Deltentamen 1: Vecka 46
  Deltentamen 2: Vecka 49
  
  Två omtenter i varje del erbjuds.
  
  Omtentamen del 1: 13.12 och 17.1
  Omtentamen del 2: 17.1 och 7.2
  
  Oblikatoriska workshops och seminarier med tillhörande oblikatorisk uppgift. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningstillfällen 9 h
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter 40 h
  
  Självstudier 59 h
  
  Deltentamen 1 1.5 sp
  Deltentamen 2 1.5 sp
  Workshops och seminarier med tillhörande inlämningsuppgifter 1sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra. (not translated)

•   Anatomy and Physiology USS22IV06-3009 19.05.2025-30.09.2025  4 credits  (USS242D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can explain human anatomy and physiology
  - understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The cell and tissues
  
  Cardiovascular system
  
  The respiratory system
  
  The nervous system
  
  The digestive system
  
  The urinary system
  
  The endocrine system
  
  The musculoskeletal system

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course litterature:
  
  Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended litterature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm
  
  On moodle give litterature.
  
  Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.
  
  
  "To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

  Learning methods

  Lectures on campus and via teams.
  
  Interactive digital material.
  
  Independent studying and assignments.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.05.2025 - 30.09.2025

  Enrollment date range

  05.12.2024 - 18.05.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS242D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Anatomy and physiology tests.
  
  Assignments.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Anatomi och fysiologi tenter under 2025:
  
  Datum:
  
  Deltentamen 1: Vecka X
  Deltentamen 2: Vecka X
  
  Två omtenter i varje del erbjuds.
  
  Deltentamen 1: X och X
  Deltentamen 2: X och X
  
  
  Oblikatoriska workshops och seminarier med tillhörande oblikatorisk uppgift. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningstillfällen 10 h
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter 40 h
  
  Självstudier 60 h
  
  Deltentamen 1 1.5 sp
  Deltentamen 2 1.5 sp
  Workshops och seminarier med tillhörande inlämningsuppgifter 1sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra. (not translated)

•   Bachelor's Thesis USS22UV03-3001 01.01.2025-15.06.2025  15 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, under supervision and gradually independently, carry out a degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the degree project process and in projects
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can assess research ethics aspects in his / her degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing.

  Prerequisites

  120 credits. Courses Introduction to Academic Studies and Research Methodology.

  Content of the study unit

  Bachelor's Thesis within inter-professional groups
  
  Oppose a Thesis
  
  Maturity test

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Liljeroth

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteratur i forskningsmetodik
  Litteratur och forskningsartiklar enligt ämne (not translated)

  Learning methods

  På svenska
  Självstudier
  Studier i grupp
  Grupphandledning
  Seminarier
  Närmare instruktioner finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=11771 (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningskriterierna finns publicerade på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=11771 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2025 - 15.06.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024

  • 15 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg, Pia Liljeroth, Johanna Wide, Michaela Jalava, Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Marika Rask

  Additional information

  Det är inte tillåtet för studerande att använda artificiell intelligens för att skapa innehållet i examinationerna. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=11771 (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Arbetslivssamarbete enligt respektive examensarbetsuppdrag. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatorisk närvaro på handledningstillfällen under processen enligt tidtabellen som finns publicerad på Moodle.
  
  Obligatorisk närvaro och presentation av det egna arbetet på mellanseminarium 19.3.2025:
  
  Obligatorisk närvaro och presentation av det egna arbetet på slutseminarium antingen 26 eller 27.5.2025.
  
  Mognadsprov 26, 27 eller 28.5.2025.
  
  Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=11771 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=11771 (not translated)

•   Basic Vaccination Knowledge VÅV18BV09-3039 26.08.2024-31.12.2024  2 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student will:
  - know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
  - know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
  - know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
  - know about vaccination in different groups
  - have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

  Prerequisites

  Drug therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Knowledge about vaccinations
  Vaccination skills

  Further information

  Efter genomgången och godkänd kurs i den nationella utbildningshelheten Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap har deltagaren grundläggande kompetens och färdigheter gällande vaccinering och själva vaccinationsprocessen.
  
  Kursens innehåll:
  -Förebyggande av sjukdomar genom vaccination
  -Det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet
  -Fördelarna med vaccination
  - Information om potentiella biverkningar av vacciner
  - Vägledning och stöd till klienter baserat på forskningsbaserad kunskap
  - Grundläggande färdigheter för vaccination (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  National course in Moodle platform

  Learning methods

  Endast för Arcadas Studerande :Nationell kurs i vaccinationskunskap helt virtuellt via Novias Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 2 credits

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Portfolio + virtuell tent enligt inlämningsdeadline på Arcada (not translated)

•   Basics in Nursing Care VÅV22GV02-3015 09.09.2024-08.11.2024  6 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.09.2024 - 08.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 08.09.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Maria Berg, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h

•   Basics in Nursing Care VÅV22GV02-3016 07.10.2024-31.01.2025  6 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 31.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Carina Gädda, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes
  Approved objective structured clinical examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen sker online, vänligen se schema för datum
  
  Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle se peppi.

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp =27 h
  6sp=162 h

•   Basics in Nursing Care VÅV22GV02-3018 09.09.2024-08.11.2024  6 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
  - has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
  - can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
  - can perform basic wound care
  - can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
  - can act aseptically and motivate the actions
  - understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
  - can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
  - can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
  - understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  The nursing process
  Human basic needs and basic nursing care
  Nutrition
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  Care hygiene
  Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
  Wound care and bandaging
  ISBAR, FinCC
  Ethics
  Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
  Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
  Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
  Kap 5 Sond
  Kap 15 Katetrisering
  Kap 16 Puls
  Kap 17 Blodtryck
  
  Vårdhandboken.se
  Terveysportti
  
  Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.
  
  FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE
  
  
  Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  discussions,
  group-work,
  demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The examination is assessed 0-5
  Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK
  
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
  Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
  Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
  Knows the values ​​and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
  Can collaborate with others in the student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.09.2024 - 08.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  15 - 32

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Maria Berg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination
  Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
  Approved exercises in training classes

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Please see schedule
  See peppi for re-examination

  Student's schedule and workload

  1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h

•   Basics of Health Promoting Care VÅV22HF01-3014 28.10.2024-13.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning, självstudier, grupparbete.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.10.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 27.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Godkända individuella -och grupparbete.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp
  1 sp = 27 timmar

•   Basics of Health Promoting Care VÅV22HF01-3015 02.09.2024-18.10.2024  3 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Inbandad introduktion till kursen på Moodle, Power Point och hänvisning till aktuella websidor på Moodle, portfolio, individuella uppgifter samt rapport på moodle.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 18.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 14.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

  Additional information

  Kursen är online och studierna förverkligas sjävständigt under tiden 2/9-18/10.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Moodle tentamen 17 /10 klockan 09.00-11.00

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp
  1 sp = 27 timmar (not translated)

•   Basics of Health Promoting Care VÅV22HF01-3016 18.11.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
  - understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
  - can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
  - has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
  - can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
  Prevention levels
  Epidemiology
  Health determinants
  Ethical issues in health education
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
  Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
  Health promotion in different service environments
  Artificial Intelligence

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
  Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
  Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
  Valda artiklar.
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning, självstudier, grupparbete och workshops.
  Några lektioner är online, se moodle

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  0 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Godkända individuella -och grupparbete samt tentamen (då kursen avslutas)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp
  1 sp = 27 timmar

•   Care Assessment and Health Technology VÅV22KV14-3004 21.04.2025-23.05.2025  3 credits  (UBM23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in different business environments within healthcare
  - can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
  - can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
  - can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
  - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Care assessment
  ABCDE evaluation
  Telephone counseling
  Digital consulting
  Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  Ethics
  Sustainable Development

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Care Assessment:
  Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432
  
  Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630
  
  Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974
  
  Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255
  
  Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3
  
  Health technology:
  
  Nordens välfärdscenter
  https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/
  
  Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
  https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/
  
  Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
  https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-
  
  Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
  https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324
  
  Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658
  
  A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z
  
  Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
  https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

  Learning methods

  lectures, group discussion and seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.04.2025 - 23.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 20.04.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM23D-V
  • UHV23D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Seminar and assignment
  instruction will be given in Moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ECTS= 27 hours

  Content scheduling

  Care assessment 2 credits - grade from 0-5
  Health technology 1 credit - grade pass/fail

  Assessment criteria

  Did not achieve any of the criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.
  
  In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.
  
  To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

•   Care assessment and health technology VÅV22KV14-3001 07.10.2024-17.11.2024  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in different business environments within healthcare
  - can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
  - can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
  - can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
  - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Care assessment
  ABCDE evaluation
  Telephone counseling
  Digital consulting
  Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  Ethics
  Sustainable Development

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Care Assessment:
  Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432
  
  Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630
  
  Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974
  
  Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255
  
  Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3
  
  Health technology:
  
  Nordens välfärdscenter
  https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/
  
  Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
  https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/
  
  Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
  https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-
  
  Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
  https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324
  
  Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658
  
  A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z
  
  Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
  https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

  Learning methods

  lectures, group discussion and seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 17.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 04.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Frida Gädda, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Seminar and assignment
  instruction will be given in Moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ECTS= 27 hours

  Content scheduling

  Care assessment 2 credits - grade from 0-5
  Health technology 1 credit - grade pass/fail

  Assessment criteria

  Did not achieve any of the criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.
  
  In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.
  
  To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

•   Care assessment and health technology VÅV22KV14-3003 09.09.2024-13.10.2024  3 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can work in different business environments within healthcare
  - can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
  - can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
  - can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
  - can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  - can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Care assessment
  ABCDE evaluation
  Telephone counseling
  Digital consulting
  Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
  Ethics
  Sustainable Development

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Care Assessment:
  Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432
  
  Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630
  
  Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974
  
  Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255
  
  Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3
  
  Health technology:
  
  Nordens välfärdscenter
  https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/
  
  Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
  https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/
  
  Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
  https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-
  
  Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
  https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324
  
  Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658
  
  A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z
  
  Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
  https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

  Learning methods

  lectures, group discussion and seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 08.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Seminar and assignment
  instruction will be given in Moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 ECTS= 27 hours

  Content scheduling

  Care assessment 2 credits - grade from 0-5
  Health technology 1 credit - grade pass/fail

  Assessment criteria

  Did not achieve any of the criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.
  
  In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.
  
  To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

•   Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology VÅV22GV04-3010 03.02.2025-21.03.2025  4 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material på moodle
  
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus, Å. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Vitsord enligt tentamen, se kriterier nedan (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.02.2025 - 21.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 02.02.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  0 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa Vård 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras med tentamen i Moodle
  
  Kurstentamen: 18.3
  
  Omtentamina 4.4 (allmän omtentamen) samt 9.5 (allmän omtentamen) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology VÅV22GV04-3011 31.03.2025-11.05.2025  4 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Maria Berg

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Material på moodle
  
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus, Å. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Vitsord enligt tentamen, se kriterier nedan (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.03.2025 - 11.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 30.03.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa Vård 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras med tentamen i Moodle
  
  Kurstentamen: 5.5
  
  Omtentamina: 23.5 (allmän omtentamen) samt 12.9 (allmän omtentamen) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology VÅV22GV04-3012 14.04.2025-25.05.2025  4 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
  - knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
  - can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
  - can name the most common pathogenic microbes
  - understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
  - understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
  - understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
  - understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
  - can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
  - can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
  - have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
  - can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
  - understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical microbiology
  Immunology
  Pathology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Maria Berg

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Material på moodle
  
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
  Melhus, Å. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur 2019
  Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
  Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
  Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
  Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
  Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
  Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar: Novia Campus vid närstudiedagar, online (online föreläsningar bandas in) eller förinspelade föreläsningar samt diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Vitsord enligt tentamen, se kriterier nedan (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.04.2025 - 25.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 13.04.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa Vård 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen examineras med tentamen i Moodle
  
  Kurs tentamen, on-line: 21.5
  
  Omtentamen, på det Novias campus man väljer göra omtentamen;
  Omtentamen 1: 12.9 (Novias allmänna omtentamens-tillfälle)
  Omtentamen 2: datum kommer senare (Novias allmänna omtentamen-tillfälle) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
  2 sp är 54 h
  3 sp är 81 h
  4 sp är 108 h
  
  Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Clinical Nursing USS22KV04-3002 12.08.2024-10.11.2024  5 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - can apply theoretical knowledge and guidance methods in different care contexts
  - can apply the aseptic method
  - can use the central evidence based care methods and perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
  - can carry out care and patient monitoring using health technology and apply various directives regarding patient- and client safety and sustainable development
  - can perform safe medication and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Resuscitation in hospital environment
  
  Central examination methods
  
  Central care methods
  
  Aseptics/aseptic way of working
  
  Teamwork
  
  Clinical assessments
  
  Patient monitoring
  
  Guidance
  
  Wound care
  
  Documentation and reporting
  
  Pre- and intra-operative preparations for surgery
  
  Patient monitoring during anesthesia
  
  Different roles in the operating theatre
  
  Application of sustainable methods (cost-effectiveness, aseptics, work ergonomics, waste sorting)
  
  Patient, client and occupational safety
  
  Safe blood transfusion
  
  Intravenous medication and fluid treatment

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se kurslitteratur i förverkliganden:
  
  Läkemedelsbehandling II
  Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
  Inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete
  
  Medibas
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Simulationer
  Kliniska övningar och test (videofilmning) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande:
  
  Kan planera, utföra, utvärdera, dokumentera och rapportera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård i samarbete med patienten och närstående samt påvisar ett reflektivt och etiskt förhållningssätt i vården
  
  Kan tillämpa teoretiska kunskaper och handledningsmetoder i olika vårdkontexter
  
  Kan tillämpa aseptiskt arbetssätt
  
  Kan använda de centrala evidensbaserade vårdmetoderna och kan utföra kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och behandlingar
  
  Kan utföra vård och patientövervakning med hjälp av hälsoteknologi och tillämpa olika direktiv gällande patient- och klientsäkerhet och hållbar utveckling
  
  Kan utföra säker läkemedels- och vätskebehandling (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.08.2024 - 10.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Kursen ska avläggas samtidigt med teorikurser Läkemedelsbehandling II, Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, Inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Obligatorisk kursintro 29.8. online
  Obligatoriska simulationer i läkemedelsbehandling, i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete och i inremedicinskt vårdarbete.
  Obligatoriska kliniska övningar
  Obligatorisk öppenklinik
  Kliniskt test (Videofilmning) (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatoriska simulationer och kliniska övningar samt tillhörande Quiz i Moodle.
  Quiz 1 DL 1.9.
  Quiz 2 DL 8.9.
  Quiz 3 DL 22.9.
  Quiz 4 DL 29.9.
  Quiz 5 Dl 6.10.
  Quiz 6 DL 20.10.
  
  Obligatorisk öppenklinik v 44
  
  Klinsikt test i form av videofilmning, paruppgift vecka 45 . DL 10.11. Mera information i Moodle. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp = 135h
  
  Simulationer och kliniska övningar: 35h
  
  Självstudier inför simulationer och inför kliniska övningar (Quiz): 50h
  
  Klinisk test med självstudier, övningar i kliniken samt filmning: 50h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  GK = Studerande delatar aktivt alla simualtioner och kliniska övningar och har svarat i Quiz inom utsatta tid före varje simulering. Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test (videofilmning).
  
  
  UK = Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller kliniksa övningar eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerandehar inte svarat i Quiz i tid före varje simulering. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test (videofilmning). (not translated)

•   Clinical Nursing USS22KV04-3003 12.08.2024-15.12.2024  5 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - can apply theoretical knowledge and guidance methods in different care contexts
  - can apply the aseptic method
  - can use the central evidence based care methods and perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
  - can carry out care and patient monitoring using health technology and apply various directives regarding patient- and client safety and sustainable development
  - can perform safe medication and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Resuscitation in hospital environment
  
  Central examination methods
  
  Central care methods
  
  Aseptics/aseptic way of working
  
  Teamwork
  
  Clinical assessments
  
  Patient monitoring
  
  Guidance
  
  Wound care
  
  Documentation and reporting
  
  Pre- and intra-operative preparations for surgery
  
  Patient monitoring during anesthesia
  
  Different roles in the operating theatre
  
  Application of sustainable methods (cost-effectiveness, aseptics, work ergonomics, waste sorting)
  
  Patient, client and occupational safety
  
  Safe blood transfusion
  
  Intravenous medication and fluid treatment

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se kurslitteratur i förverkliganden:
  
  Läkemedelsbehandling II
  Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
  Inremedicinskt vårdarbete
  På Moodle given litteratur
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Simulationer och kliniska övningar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande:
  
  Kan planera, utföra, utvärdera, dokumentera och rapportera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård i samarbete med patienten och närstående samt påvisar ett reflektivt och etiskt förhållningssätt i vården
  
  Kan tillämpa teoretiska kunskaper och handledningsmetoder i olika vårdkontexter
  
  Kan tillämpa aseptiskt arbetssätt
  
  Kan använda de centrala evidensbaserade vårdmetoderna och kan utföra kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och behandlingar
  
  Kan utföra vård och patientövervakning med hjälp av hälsoteknologi och tillämpa olika direktiv gällande patient- och klientsäkerhet och hållbar utveckling
  
  Kan utföra säker läkemedels- och vätskebehandling (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.08.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 18.08.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursintroduktion online 12.8.
  Obligatoriska:
  - Kliniska övningar i läkemedelsbehandling
  - Kliniska övningar i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete samt i sårvård
  - Kliniska övningar i inremedicinskt vårdarbete
  - Öppenklinik
  - Klinisk examination (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatoriska simulationer och kliniska övningar samt tillhörande Quiz:
  Kliniska övningar 27.8. DL för Quiz 22.8.
  Kliniska övningar 16.9. DL för Quiz 12.9.
  Kliniska övningar 3.-4.10. DL för Quiz 27.9.
  Kliniska övningar 30.10. DL för Quiz 25.10.
  Öppen klinik samt klinisk test i form av filmning DL 10.11. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  sp = 135h
  
  Kliniska övningar i klass 18 h
  
  Självstudier inför kliniska övningar samt Quiz 109 h
  
  Klinisk test i form av filmning 8 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  GK = Studerande deltar aktivt alla kliniska övningar och har lämnat in kunskapstest inom utsatta tid. Kunskapstest skall vara GK för att studerande kan delta kliniska övningar. . Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under klinisk test.
  
  
  
  UK = Studerande är frånvarande från kliniska övningar eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerande har inte lämnat in kunskapstest i tid eller är UK i test. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under klinisk test. (not translated)

•   Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3007 02.09.2024-13.10.2024  5 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
  - can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
  - has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
  Blood transfusions
  PICC and CVK
  Use of perfusor
  Inhalation drugs
  Fluid balance sheet
  CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
  Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
  Medical radiation and radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Katarina Vironen, Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
  Teori: 4 h
  Övningsstationer; ca 20 h/grupp
  Hemuppgift: Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift och Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)/stud
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination och filmning av examination, ca 3 h /studerande
  
  RESUSKITATION: 1 sp =27 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  7h Förberedande för examination.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1 sp = 40,5 h
  Inblick i klinisk laboratorieverksamhet, grunder för venös provtagning och EKG, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Preanalytiska faktorer, kunskapstest, förberedelser inför kliniska övningar
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Radiation safety: Grade Approved/ Failed

•   Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3008 14.10.2024-01.12.2024  5 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
  - can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
  - has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
  Blood transfusions
  PICC and CVK
  Use of perfusor
  Inhalation drugs
  Fluid balance sheet
  CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
  Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
  Medical radiation and radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.10.2024 - 01.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 20.10.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Katarina Vironen, Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
  Teori: 4 h
  Övningsstationer; ca 20 h/grupp
  Hemuppgift: Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift och Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)/stud
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination och filmning av examination, ca 3 h /studerande
  
  RESUSKITATION: 1 sp =27 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  7h Förberedande för examination.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1 sp = 40,5 h
  Inblick i klinisk laboratorieverksamhet, grunder för venös provtagning och EKG, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Preanalytiska faktorer, kunskapstest, förberedelser inför kliniska övningar
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Radiation safety: Grade Approved/ Failed

•   Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3009 28.08.2024-11.10.2024  5 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
  - can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
  - can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
  - can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
  - has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Simulation exercises based on case
  IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
  Blood transfusions
  PICC and CVK
  Use of perfusor
  Inhalation drugs
  Fluid balance sheet
  CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
  Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
  Medical radiation and radiation protection

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
  Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  RESUSCITATION;
  Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
  www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
  Moodleföreläsningar.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
  Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
  Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
  Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
  Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
  Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.
  
  RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
  Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.08.2024 - 11.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 01.09.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 48

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Mikaela Engvall, Jannica Andtfolk, Carina Gädda, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
  In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
  See Moodle for more information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Red Cross blood web-course made last
  Clinical exam week
  Resuscitation test according to schedule
  Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 sp Totalt 135 h
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla övningar.
  
  KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
  Teori: 4 h
  Övningsstationer; ca 20 h/grupp
  Hemuppgift: Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift och Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)/stud
  Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination och filmning av examination, ca 3 h /studerande
  
  RESUSKITATION: 1 sp =27 h
  4 h teori (alla)
  4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  7h Förberedande för examination.
  
  LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1 sp = 40,5 h
  Inblick i klinisk laboratorieverksamhet, grunder för venös provtagning och EKG, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 6 h
  Hemuppgift: Preanalytiska faktorer, kunskapstest, förberedelser inför kliniska övningar
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
  
  STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t
  Förverkligas digitalt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Radiation safety: Grade Approved/ Failed

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3007 15.10.2024-20.12.2024  2 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3008 02.09.2024-13.10.2024  2 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 01.09.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3009 15.10.2024-20.12.2024  2 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  15.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.10.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3010 02.09.2024-13.10.2024  2 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
  - has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
  - has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
  - understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical pharmacology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Läkemedelsboken online
  
  Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online 100%
  Groupdiscussions/workshops online
  selfstudes
  recorded lectures
  forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
  Final online test / multiple choice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
  Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
  Final test online l

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h arbete /sp för studerande
  totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
  Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
  Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
  Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
  Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
  Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr
  
  
  Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade

•   Degree Project 3 VÅV22EX03-3005 07.01.2025-08.06.2025  6 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22EX02 Thesis 2
  Ragarding student midwives: BM22PR06 Practice: Intrapartum Midwifery 4

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the topic of thesis

  Learning methods

  Independent work with support from the supervisor.
  Seminar + maturity test.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis is assessed according to 5 criteria, scientific writing, theoretical framework, method, result and presentation. Each criteria ha a scale from 1 to 5. The assessment criteria is published on the Moodle page linked to this implementation plan.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2025 - 08.06.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 07.01.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders, Terese Österberg, Marlene Gädda, Anita Wikberg, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  See practical guide and Moodle course.
  Follow Novia instructions for thesis writing.
  AI=Artificial intelligence is not allowed in the thesis = RED according to Novias instructions

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia general instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The thesis can be ordered, then an agreement is needed
  The data material can be collected from different health care or other organisations if ethical permissions are approved.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation and maturity test in May or in week 47, see Moodle and time schedule.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  Students plan their time use themselves, see below

  Content scheduling

  154 hours mostly self-directed work, 6 hours seminar 2 hours maturity test.

•   Degree Project 3 VÅV22EX03-3006 20.01.2025-31.12.2025  6 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22EX02 Thesis 2
  Ragarding student midwives: BM22PR06 Practice: Intrapartum Midwifery 4

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - Från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis: 0-5
  Maturity test: uk-gk

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.01.2025 - 31.12.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 31.03.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Sirkku Säätelä, Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marica Hinders, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Presentation of thesis public.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring v.20
  Autumn v.47

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 162 h

  Assessment criteria

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.
  
  Metod:
  Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
  Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
  Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
  Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
  Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  
  Resultat:
  Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
  Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
  Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
  Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
  En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
  Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
  Källkritiken är bristfällig.
  
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
  Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
  Slutsatserna är triviala.
  
  Resultat:
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
  Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
  Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
  Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.
  
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
  Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
  Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
  Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
  Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
  Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
  Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
  Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
  En god källkritik.
  Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
  Källkritiken är god.
  
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
  Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
  Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
  Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
  Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.
  
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
  Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.
  
  Presentation:
  Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
  Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
  Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
  Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
  Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
  Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.
  
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
  Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.
  
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.
  
  Presentation:
  Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
  Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
  Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
  Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)

•   Degree project 1 VÅV22EX01-3001 07.10.2024-22.12.2024  3 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  
  The course VÅV22UV01 Research Methodology and Care Theory must be completed in parallel with VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1.

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Work plan

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Novia har licens att använda MOT Kielipalvelu:
  • MOT Ordböcker: 29 ordböcker; allmänna och specialordböcker
  • MOT Översättare: automatisk översättning, till 26 språk
  • MOT Språkgranskare
  • MOT Ordlistor: exempelvis ”Terveydenhuoltosanastoa”
  Mera om innehållet: https://www.sanakirja.fi/legal/our-content.
  Adressen fungerar när du är på campus, i Novias nät, medan följande adress fungerar på distans: https://www-sanakirja-fi.ezproxy.novia.fi/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Individual assignment
  Research plan for thesis

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Arbetsplan för examensarbete: uk-gk.
  
  Planen skall innehålla följande delar (för gk):
  • Novia titelblad
  • Innehållsförteckning
  • Inledning (minst 1 sid): skall innehålla minst 2 källor
  • Syfte och frågeställningar
  • Bakgrund (minst 4 sidor). Skall innehålla: 1 stud. minst 6 källor, varav minst 2 vetenskapliga; 2 stud. minst 9 källor, varav minst 4 vetenskapliga; 3 stud. minst 12 källor, varav minst 6 vetenskapliga
  • Metod (minst 1 sida): Urval; Datainsamling; Dataanalysmetod; Etiska överväganden och Tidsplan
  • Källförteckning (över de källor som används i planen)
  Omfattning min 6 sidor och max 9 sidor (exkl. titelblad, innehållsförteckning och källförteckning)
  Skall följa Novias skrivanvisningar https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/ (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 22.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 21.08.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Enligt Novias processbeskrivning:
  "Till studier som leder till yrkeshögskoleexamen ingår ett lärdomsprov som vid Novia kallas examensarbete. Examensarbetet är en analys av ett problem från verkligheten där du kan använda de kunskaper du fått under dina studier och specialisera dig inom ett ämnesområde. Det är viktigt att slutföra en kurs i forskningsmetodik före du börjar med examensarbetet."
  
  Innebär att kurs i forskningsmetodik skall vara slutförd eller påbörjad och slutförs under processen med skrivandet av planen för examensarbetet. Motsvarande kurs i forskningsmetodik vid annan yrkeshögskola eller universitet kan beaktas.
  
  Kursen är en av tre kursdelar för examensarbetet.
  Den innebär självständigt arbete, skrivande av och feed-back av plan för examensarbete (EA). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved research plan for thesis.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 81 h

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Underkänd:
  Struktur saknas, likaså vissa källor och källhänvisningarna.
  Hänvisningar och källförteckning följer inte de skriftliga anvisningar för examensarbete.
  Syfte och frågeställningarna är otydliga och saknar vårdperspektivet.
  Metoden för examensarbetet är oklar.
  
  Godkänd: Följer anvisningarna och alla delar finns med. (not translated)

•   Degree project 1 VÅV22EX01-3003 02.09.2024-22.12.2024  3 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  
  The course VÅV22UV01 Research Methodology and Care Theory must be completed in parallel with VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1.

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Work plan

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Novia har licens att använda MOT Kielipalvelu:
  • MOT Ordböcker: 29 ordböcker; allmänna och specialordböcker
  • MOT Översättare: automatisk översättning, till 26 språk
  • MOT Språkgranskare
  • MOT Ordlistor: exempelvis ”Terveydenhuoltosanastoa”
  Mera om innehållet: https://www.sanakirja.fi/legal/our-content.
  Adressen fungerar när du är på campus, i Novias nät, medan följande adress fungerar på distans: https://www-sanakirja-fi.ezproxy.novia.fi/ (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Individual assignment
  Research plan for thesis

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Arbetsplan för examensarbete: uk-gk.
  
  Planen skall innehålla följande delar (för gk):
  • Novia titelblad
  • Innehållsförteckning
  • Inledning (minst 1 sid): skall innehålla minst 2 källor
  • Syfte och frågeställningar
  • Bakgrund (minst 4 sidor). Skall innehålla: 1 stud. minst 6 källor, varav minst 2 vetenskapliga; 2 stud. minst 9 källor, varav minst 4 vetenskapliga; 3 stud. minst 12 källor, varav minst 6 vetenskapliga
  • Metod (minst 1 sida): Urval; Datainsamling; Dataanalysmetod; Etiska överväganden och Tidsplan
  • Källförteckning (över de källor som används i planen)
  Omfattning min 6 sidor och max 9 sidor (exkl. titelblad, innehållsförteckning och källförteckning)
  Skall följa Novias skrivanvisningar https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/ (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 22.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 02.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Enligt Novias processbeskrivning:
  "Till studier som leder till yrkeshögskoleexamen ingår ett lärdomsprov som vid Novia kallas examensarbete. Examensarbetet är en analys av ett problem från verkligheten där du kan använda de kunskaper du fått under dina studier och specialisera dig inom ett ämnesområde. Det är viktigt att slutföra en kurs i forskningsmetodik före du börjar med examensarbetet."
  
  Innebär att kurs i forskningsmetodik skall vara slutförd eller påbörjad och slutförs under processen med skrivandet av planen för examensarbetet. Motsvarande kurs i forskningsmetodik vid annan yrkeshögskola eller universitet kan beaktas.
  
  Kursen är en av tre kursdelar för examensarbetet.
  Den innebär självständigt arbete, skrivande av och feed-back av plan för examensarbete (EA). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  3 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved research plan for thesis.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Moodle.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 81 h

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Underkänd:
  Struktur saknas, likaså vissa källor och källhänvisningarna.
  Hänvisningar och källförteckning följer inte de skriftliga anvisningar för examensarbete.
  Syfte och frågeställningarna är otydliga och saknar vårdperspektivet.
  Metoden för examensarbetet är oklar.
  
  Godkänd: Följer anvisningarna och alla delar finns med. (not translated)

•   Degree project 2 VÅV22EX02-3001 25.11.2024-31.05.2025  6 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  17% Face-to-face, 83% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Self-studies
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium.
  Datainsamlingen skall vara gjord och dataanalysen påbörjad för gk.
  De som inte kan delta (eller kommit så långt i EA-processen) får gk i samband med att de presenterar det färdiga examensarbetet (EX03). (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.11.2024 - 31.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 16.03.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Planen för examensarbetet (EX01) skall var godkänd innan man deltar i mellansemi. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topic for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mid-seminar ccording to schedual.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 162 h

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Strukturen följer anvisningarna
  Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
  Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
  Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad.
  Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
  Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete (not translated)

•   Degree project 2 VÅV22EX02-3002 07.10.2024-31.01.2025  6 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the subject for thesis and literature for research method is free of choice
  See VÅV22UV01-3002

  Learning methods

  Individual work under supervision
  Seminar for presentation of parts of thesis, discussion and supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The theoretical framework for thesis i suitable for the content and can be approved. The methodology is described and the data collection is almost done. the analysis of the data has begun. The thesis work is under construction.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 31.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 02.01.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Approved work, consisting of theoretical framework to thesis, description of methodology used, collected datamaterial and the analysis of data has begun.
  Use Instructions for writing a thesis and word template available on Novia homepage

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  See Novia instructions for validation

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The thesis can be ordered from a health organization

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See time schedule, seminar i January 2025

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The hours counted for the course is 162 (6 cu) and contains mainly independent work but individual supervision is available during the course

  Content scheduling

  October to January

•   Degree project 2 VÅV22EX02-3003 25.11.2024-31.05.2025  6 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
  - can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
  - has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
  - can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Intermediate seminar

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  17% Face-to-face, 83% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  • Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
  • Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
  • Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  • Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
  • Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  • Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  • Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
  • Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Self-studies
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium.
  Datainsamlingen skall vara gjord och dataanalysen påbörjad för gk.
  De som inte kan delta (eller kommit så långt i EA-processen) får gk i samband med att de presenterar det färdiga examensarbetet (EX03). (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.11.2024 - 31.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 09.03.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Additional information

  Planen för examensarbetet (EX01) skall var godkänd innan man deltar i mellansemi. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  6 credits

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topic for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mid-seminar according to schedual.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 162 h

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Strukturen följer anvisningarna
  Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
  Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
  Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad.
  Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
  Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete (not translated)

•   Degree project 3 VÅV22EX03-3001 20.01.2025-01.06.2025  6 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
  - can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
  - can act as an opponent for another degree project
  - can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22EX02 Thesis 2
  Ragarding student midwives: BM22PR06 Practice: Intrapartum Midwifery 4

  Content of the study unit

  The research process
  Presentation of degree project and opposition
  Maturity test

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - Från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Learning methods

  Written assignments
  Seminar

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Thesis: 0-5
  Maturity test: uk-gk

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.01.2025 - 01.06.2025

  Enrollment date range

  07.12.2024 - 31.03.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  1 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Sirkku Säätelä, Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marica Hinders, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda, Anita Wikberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  1 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Presentation of thesis public.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Spring v.20
  Autumn v.47

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 162 h

  Assessment criteria

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.
  
  Metod:
  Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
  Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
  Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
  Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
  Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  
  Resultat:
  Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
  Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
  Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
  Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
  Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
  Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
  En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
  Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
  Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
  Källkritiken är bristfällig.
  
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
  Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
  Slutsatserna är triviala.
  
  Resultat:
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
  Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
  Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
  Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
  Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.
  
  Presentation:
  Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
  Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
  Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
  Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
  Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
  Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
  Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
  Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
  Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
  Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
  Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
  En god källkritik.
  Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
  Källkritiken är god.
  
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
  Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
  Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
  Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
  Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.
  
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
  Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.
  
  Presentation:
  Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
  Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
  Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
  Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
  Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Teoretisk grund:
  Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
  Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.
  
  Metod:
  Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
  Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
  Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.
  
  Resultat:
  Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
  Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.
  
  Presentation:
  Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
  Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
  Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
  Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
  Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)

•   Development of Health Care Practice UHV20HV12-3002 01.01.2025-30.06.2025  5 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Develops innovative healthcare work from a social and working life perspective (eg within projects)
  
  Maintains and applies evidence based knowledge
  
  Identifies his/her development needs and enhances their skills in their work as an expert in healthcare

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Development of health care work
  
  Future oriented healthcare work
  
  Application of research and project results
  
  Project expertise

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Rekommendation:
  - litteratur i vetenskapligt skrivande
  - litteratur i projektarbete
  - facktidskrifter, forskning inom det valda området, aktuella händelser i samhället via media
  - litteratur från tidigare kurser och kommande kurser inom hälsovårdarutbildningen, se utförandeplaner/förverkliganden från tidigare kursser (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion av utvecklingsarbete 10.12.2024 obligatorisk närvaro
  Studerande skriver utvecklingsarbete individuellt eller i par
  Studerande lämnar in plan för utvecklingsarbete vecka 3, dl.17.1.25 kl:12.00
  Grupphandledning x 1, 6.5.25 obligatorisk närvaro
  Handledning två gånger per arbete (varav den ena grupphandledning)
  Ev, praktiskt förverkligande av utvecklingsarbetet (förverkligandet kan variera beroende på projektets art).
  Skriftlig produkt
  Inlämning av arbetet 15.5.2025 kl.12.00
  Seminarium 22.5.2025 där utvecklingsarbetet presenteras och diskuteras i samarbete med samarbetspartners, handledare och hälsovårdarstuderande. Obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Praktiskt förverkligande (om möjligt)
  Skriftlig produkt bedöms med vitsordet 1-5
  Studerande har förmåga att utnyttja tidigare kunskap från utbildning till sjukskötare som forskningsmetodik, vetenskapligt skrivande, argumentation, presentation och yrkesmässig hållning på ett berömligt, gott eller nöjaktig sätt.
  Studerande har på ett berömligt, gott eller nöjaktigt sätt utvecklat sin utvecklingsidé och presenterar den muntligt och skriftligt.
  Studerande kan utveckla det hälsofrämjande arbetet på ett berömligt, gott eller nöjaktigt sätt med stöd av utvecklingsarbetet för en vald målgrupp i hälsovårdskontextet.
  Studerande har förmåga till kreativitet och innovation och grundar sin idé på evidens inom området.
  Rapporten är inlämnad i tid, följer Novias skrivanvisningar, motsvarar minst 8 sidor skriven text ( vid individuellt arbete) exkluderat pärmblad, innehållsförteckning och innehållsförteckning + eventuella bilagor.
  Obligatoriskt aktivt deltagande vid seminariet
  Vitsordet är en sammanställning av presentation+ praktiskt förverkligande+seminarierapport (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2025 - 30.06.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pia Liljeroth, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Arbetet ska gärna göras i samarbete med arbestlivet/ svara till arbetslivets behov (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Inlämning av det skriftliga arbetet 15.5.2025
  Seminarium 22.52025 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier + handledning 135 h
  Föreläsning och seminarium 10 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har inte förmågan att utnyttjasin tidigare kunskap från utbildning till sjukskötare som forskningsmetodik, vetenskapligt skrivande, argumentation, presentation och yrkesmässig hållning.
  Studerande kan inte utveckla sin idé och presentera den muntligt och skriftligt.
  Studerande har svårigheter att utveckla det hälsofrömjande arbetet med stöd av utvecklingsarbetet för en vald målgrupp i hälsovårdskontextet.
  Studerande visar ej kreativitet och innovation och grundar inte sin idé på evidens inom området.
  Rapporten är inte inlämnad i tid, Rapporten följer inte Novias skrivanvisningar, motsvarar minst 8 sidor skriven text exkluderat pärmblad, innehållsförteckning och innehållsförteckning + eventuella bilagor. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande har en svag förmåga att utnyttja tidigare kunskap från utbildning till sjukskötare som forskningsmetodik, vetenskapligt skrivande, argumentation, presentation och yrkesmässig hållning.
  Studerande kan svagt utveckla sin projektidé och presentera den muntligt och skriftligt.
  Studerande kan på ett nöjaktigt sätt utveckla det hälsofrämjande arbetet med stöd av utvecklingsarbetet för en vald målgrupp i hälsovårdskontextet.
  Studerande har en svag förmåga till kreativitet och innovation och grundar sin idé på evidens inom området.
  Rapporten är inlämnad i tid, följer Novias skrivanvisningar, motsvarar minst 8 sidor skriven text exkluderat pärmblad, innehållsförteckning och innehållsförteckning + eventuella bilagor. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande har förmåga till att utnyttja tidigare kunskap från utbildning till sjukskötare som forskningsmetodik, vetenskapligt skrivande, argumentation, presentation och yrkesmässig hållning på en god nivå.
  Studerande kan väl utveckla sin projektidé och presentera den muntligt och skriftligt.
  Studerande kan med stöd av utveckla det hälsofrämjande arbetet för en vald målgrupp i hälsovårdskontextet.
  Studerande har förmåga till kreativitet och innovation och grundar sin idé på evidens inom området.
  Rapporten är inlämnad i tid, Rapporten följer Novias skrivanvisningar, motsvarar minst 8 sidor skriven text exkluderat pärmblad, innehållsförteckning och innehållsförteckning + eventuella bilagor (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har en god förmåga att utnyttja tidigare kunskap från utbildning till sjukskötare som forskningsmetodik, vetenskapligt skrivande, argumentation, presentation och yrkesmässig hållning på ett berömligt, sätt.
  Studerande kan på ett berömligtt sätt utveckla sin projektidé och presentera den muntligt och skriftligt.
  Studerande kanpå ett berömligt, utveckla med stöd av utvecklingsarbetet det hälsofrämjande arbetet för en vald målgrupp i hälsovårdsarbetet.
  Studerande har förmåga till kreativitet och innovation och grundar sin idé på evidens inom området.
  Rapporten är inlämnad i tid. Rapporten följer Novias skrivanvisningar, motsvarar minst 8 sidor skriven text exkluderat pärmblad, innehållsförteckning och innehållsförteckning + eventuella bilagor. (not translated)

•   Developmental Project in Public Health Nursing HVV14FU04-3008 02.09.2024-31.07.2025  5 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  -shows the ability to deepen and develop their substance knowledge in public health care work

  Prerequisites

  Research methodology
  Research methods and nursing theory
  Degree thesis

  Content of the study unit

  Developmental project

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  According to the chosen theme

  Learning methods

  Lectures, seminars and independent work with supervision

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The development work is evaluated 1-5
  Criteria for evaluation
  Starting point for and goal of the development work
  The theoretical foundation of development work
  Area of ​​use for the development work
  Critical review of development work, process and product

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 31.07.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 20

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Terese Österberg, Marlene Gädda, Anita Wikberg, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  The lectures and seminars are compulsory
  Novia instructions for writing thesis has to be used
  AI is not allowed to use

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  RDI share

  5 credits

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  -

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The work may be ordered from Health Care Center, hospital or other care institution

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Presentation of development work week 47 year 2024 or in May 2025

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 h lecture
  6 h seminars
  126 h individual work, with supervision

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  The development work does not fulfill the criterion for achieving 1

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The purpose of the development work is unclearly formulated and the objective is not relevant or unclearly explained. The work includes all relevant parts but they are inadequately described
  The purpose and objectives remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge in the thematic area. The relevance of the development work is described, albeit superficially, and the delimitation is deficient
  Justification for choosing background material / frame of reference is missing or is scarce / inconsistent. Ability to source criticism is lacking
  Students' choice of background material / frame of reference is partly relevant. The ability to critique sources is weak. The process description / method description is based on literature but it is not fully applied as described. The process / method is not well chosen considering the product
  The product / study is inadequately presented, has a greater anchoring in the respondents' own perception than in theory and expectations from working life. It requires extensive processing to be able to be used / published / distributed
  The product is well presented, but the anchoring in the needs of working life is weakly substantiated and the product / information can form the basis for further processing before a possible spread.The description and motivation for choosing a product / study is very deficient and not entirely appropriate in terms of purpose, issues and area of ​​use.
  The description of and motivation for choosing a product / study method is weak. There are some errors in the product / study and the discussion and reflection on the implementation of the study / product is deficient.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  he motivation for choosing a theme area is universal and the goal is clear but could be more clearly justified. The development work is clearly delimited.
  The development work is clearly and logically structured and reflects purpose and objectives and a good ability to apply a scientific approach (with practical roots). The work includes all relevant parts and the parts are proportional in relation to each other
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and sufficient basic material (eg data material for analysis) has been used
  The process description / method description is based on literature and there is a clear approach to anchoring the product's development in the process description / method. The process / method is well chosen with the product in mind. The respondent / respondents can reflect on the choice of process / method and discuss this.
  Background / frame of reference well described, motivated, relevant and forms a good basis for the development work. The ability to critique sources is good. The process description / method description is well chosen with the product in mind, well described and is well rooted in literature. The process is carried out in accordance with the description and well described. The respondent / respondents are able to reflect and critically examine the choice and the discussion concerning the choice and the description of the process / method is well implemented.
  
  The product / study is carefully carried out but has little grounding in working life and requires processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life requires a certain amount of processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
  The choice and justification of the method for the product / study is appropriate. The use of traditional methods (for both product and study) is good. The critical review is weak.
  The description of method and approach is good and based on a good motivation. The respondent (s) master their methods well, and there is a clear connection to the purpose of the product / study. In the critical review of planning and implementation, the respondents show awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the product / study.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The development work is current and innovative and develops the student's professional knowledge. The purpose and objective are clear and well motivated. The development work has been carried out in such a way that the purpose and objective are fulfilled.
  The chosen subject area is discussed and the respondents / n / s are able to reflect on their subject area and add something new to the discussion.
  The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and is based on sufficient basic material. There is a pronounced / described anchoring in the degree project / in a need that is based on the care area. Background / frame of reference forms a clear and logical basis for the development work. The rationale for the choices made is clear, unambiguous and relevant. The student has made a meritorious synthesis. The ability to critique sources is commendable. The product is ready for distribution
  The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life and is well processed to be used in working life / published / disseminated
  The description and use of the method and approach are excellent and based on an excellent motivation. The report has a clear connection to the purpose of the survey. The discussion and the critical review show an excellent ability to account in theoretical reasoning for the product / study's advantages and disadvantages regarding choice of method / process and implementation

•   Drug Treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3014 07.10.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual test 80 % correctly
  Exam in drug calculation, 100% correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Group 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Group 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Group 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram, Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments
  Virtual test
  Exam in drug calculation

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 20 hours + 4 hours for the exam
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Webbaserade uppgifter: UK
  Virtuellt test i teori 80 % inte korrekt, vitsord UK
  Tentamen i läkemedelsräkning inte godkänt om inte 100 % är korrekt (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 80 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug Treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3015 21.10.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Mattjus

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
  Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
  Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
  Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  + material on moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures,
  Group work, individual work
  Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
  Drug calculation exercises with case problems

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Web-based tasks approved
  Virtual test 80 % correctly
  Exam in drug calculation, 100% correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 20.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Katarina Vironen

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram, Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments
  Virtual test
  Exam in drug calculation

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h
  Class teaching 20 hours + 4 hours for the exam
  Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Webbaserade uppgifter: UK
  Virtuellt test i teori 80 % inte korrekt, vitsord UK
  Tentamen i läkemedelsräkning inte godkänt om inte 100 % är korrekt (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Web-based tasks not approved
  Virtual test not 80 % correctly
  Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly

•   Drug Treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3016 11.11.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
  - has basic knowledge of pharmacology
  - masters the aseptics of drug treatment
  - masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
  - has skills in administration of injections
  - can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
  - has insight into theory for prescriptions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
  - masters drug calculation at a basic level

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation
  Pharmacology
  Aseptics and route of administration
  Theory for prescriptions
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Drug calculation
  Administration of injections

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848
  
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14)
  eller
  Nordeng, H, och Spigset, O. 2020. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  
  WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar
  
  Lääketietokanta, Lääkkeet ja hinnat och lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti
  eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  
  Molin et al 2016. Träna Läkemedelsberäkning Liber, Stockholm
  eller
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor. eller
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
  Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Aktuella artiklar och material enligt föreläsarens anvisningar på finska /engelska

  Learning methods

  seminars , lectures, groupwork
  Selfstuides in moodle
  Clinical exercises and examination on campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
  Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  0 - 36

  Small group(s)

  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Läkemedlesräkning innehåll:
  Grundmatematik
  Enhetsomvandlingar ( mikrogram, milligram, gram Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
  Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
  Infusionshastighet
  Utspädningar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
  Calcularion test in class after workshops
  Re test on days for re test on campus
  clinical examination in injections according to schedule

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/credit

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God-synnerligen god nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  På engelska (not translated)

•   Drug Treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3013 31.03.2025-02.05.2025  2 credits  (UBM24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Katarina Vironen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
  Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
  Assignmets pass/ rejected
  Undone task =0
  Active participation in workshops
  one part rejected = course 0

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.03.2025 - 02.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 30.03.2025

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM24D-V
  • UHV24D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Katarina Vironen

  Additional information

  The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
  Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
  Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
  task according to moodle in specific order
  tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr
  %4 h toal workload

  Content scheduling

  Task / week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
  Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
  Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
  Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

•   Drug Treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3014 17.03.2025-20.04.2025  2 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Online course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
  Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
  Assignmets pass/ rejected
  Undone task =0
  Active participation in workshops
  one part rejected = course 0

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  17.03.2025 - 20.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 16.03.2025

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
  Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
  Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  0.5 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
  task according to moodle in specific order
  tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/ cr
  %4 h toal workload

  Content scheduling

  Task / week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
  Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
  Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
  Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade

•   Drug Treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3015 27.01.2025-02.03.2025  2 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
  - masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
  - has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
  - masters advanced drug calculation

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

  Content of the study unit

  Advanced drug treatment
  Cytotestatic treatment
  Epidural pain relief
  Fluid treatment
  Blood transfusion
  Patient guidance and documentation
  Advanced drug calculation

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
  Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
  Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
  Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
  Films and online material in moodle
  Articles and research according to instructions

  Learning methods

  Hybrid course
  Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
  Case and problem solving in workshops
  Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
  Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  calculation test t 100% correct t national criteria
  Online test 1-5 according % scale
  assgnments pass/ comlpete

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.01.2025 - 02.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 26.01.2025

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Additional information

  Den pedagogisk refensramen är enligt inlärninsgpyramiden och Feynmans teknik
  Studerande jobbar i grupper under workshps och stöder även varnarda i inlärningen (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Calculationstest schedulded in agenda
  re take after course ended according to peppi

  Student's schedule and workload

  27H /cr

  Content scheduling

  Teoridelen periodiserad enligt kronologisk ordning så föregående microdel gör före nästa
  Läkemedlesräkningen delad i tre oliks kategorier (not translated)

•   Emergency Care and Radiation Safety USS22UV01-3002 06.01.2025-20.04.2025  4 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with the regional, national and international collaboration in crisis and disaster situations
  - is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, assess the need for care, plan, perform and document sustainable emergency care
  - has expertise in care in various service system
  - can meet, support and mentor the critically ill patient and relatives
  - masters sustainable medication management in emergency care
  - deepens his/her knowledge of psychosocial support in crisis situations
  - can start immediate rescue operations independently and act in emergency situations
  - masters the basics of radiation protection

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Surgical and Perioperative Care, Nursing in Internal Medicine and Palliative care, Clinical Nursing

  Content of the study unit

  Patient care in emergency care situations in an interprofessional team and befitting medication management and medication calculation
  
  Psychosocial support in various crisis situations and application of evidence based sustainable working methods in emergency care and in different service environments
  
  Regional, national and international cooperation in crisis and disaster situations
  
  Assessment of the situation and rescue operations in crisis and disaster situations
  
  The basics of radiation physics, radiation biology, radiation protection legislation, radiation safety measures in the workplace and medical use of radiation

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Strålsäkerhet: enligt lärarens anvisning, Moodle
  Akutvård:
  God medicinsk praxis 2020. Posttraumatiska stressreaktioner och posttraumatiskt stressyndrom. https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/khr00125
  God medicinsk praxis 2021. Psykosocialt stöd och tjänster (bild). https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/imk01307
  God medicinsk praxis 2021. Återhämtning från posttraumatiskt stressyndrom och traumatyp hos vuxna (bild). https://www.kaypahoito.fi/imk01308
  Hälso- och sjukvårdslag §38-40
  https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/ajantasa/2010/20101326
  Lennquist, S. (red.) 2017. Traumatologi.
  Lennquist, S. (red.) 2009. Katastrofmedicin.
  Lundberg, Lars; Bäckström, Denise; Andersson Hagiwara, Magnus 2022. Prehospital akutsjukvård.
  Läkemedelsboken - Akutmedicin https://lakemedelsboken.se/
  Räddningsväsendet 2016. Räddningsverksamhet. http://www.pelastustoimi.fi/raddningsvasendet/raddningsverksamhet
  Saviluoto Anssi 2018. Luentosarja Ensihoidon lääkkeet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3UgziVBVHM
  Statsrådets förordning om räddningsväsendet
  https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/ajantasa/2011/20110407
  SHM 2023. Prehospital akutsjukvård.
  http://stm.fi/sv/prehospital-akutsjukvard
  
  TERVEYSPORTTI:
  Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat:
  -Traumapotilaan hoito; hoito onnettomuuspaikalla ja kuljetuksen aikana och Vaikeasti loukkaantuneen potilaan hoito päivystyspoliklinikalla.
  Akuuttihoidon tietokannat:
  -Akuuttihoito-opas; Hätätilapotilaan hoito, Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito, Akuuttihoidon laitteet (Sairaalan ulkopuolisessa hoidossa käytettävät laitteet), Kuvat (Sairaalan ulkopuolisessa hoidossa käytettävät laitteet)
  Akuuttihoidon lääkkeet
  -Ensihoito-opas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier 1,5 sp
  Föreläsningar i pre-hospital och akutvård 0,5 sp
  Simulationer med inlärningsuppgifter 1 sp
  Strålsäkerhet 1 sp:
  - Introduktionsföreläsning 2t, on-line
  - Material, uppgifter och föreläsningar på Moodle
  - On-line tent (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  På svenska
  1. Obligatorisk föreläsning GK/UK
  
  2. Obligastoriska kliniska övningar, simulationer och inlämmningsuppgifter GK/UK.
  
  3. Tent i akutvård (0-5)
  
  4. Strålsäkerhet : GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.01.2025 - 20.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2024 - 06.01.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Katarina Vironen, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Studerande får muntlig feedback av instuderingsfrågor, kliniska övningar och simulationer under övningar.
  Studerande får skriftlig gruppfeedback efter hemtent. Individuell feedback vid behov (tiden bokas med lärare). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1.Obligatorisk introduktion och obliatoriska föreläsningar
  2.Obligastoriska kliniska övningar med inlämningsuppgifter och simulationer . Gjorda och i tid inlämnade uppgifter är förutsättning för att studerande kan delta kliniska övningar.
  3.Tent i akutvård
  4. Strålsäkerhet: Uppgifter i Moodle (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Obligatorisk introduktion i akutvård 13.1. och i strålsäkerhet (online) 14.1.
  Obligatoriska föreläsningar 14h Se schema
  Inlämningsuppgifter inför de obligatoriska kliniska övningar enligt tidtabell i Moodle
  Obligatoriska simulationer i två grupper. Se schema
  Tent i akutvård (SEB) 17.4.. (omtent I 9.5. och omtent II 23.5. )
  
  
  Strålsäkerhet: tentamensdatum planeras under första lektionen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  4sp = 108h
  Föreläsningar i akutvård 12 h
  Instuderingsfrågor och simulationer 40 h
  Tent i akut vårdarbete 31 h (Självstudier inför tent + tent 2 timmar)
  Strålsäkerhet 1sp= 27t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Godkänd:
  Studerande har deltagit de obligatoriska föreläsningar. Vid frånvaro kompletterat föreläsningar enligt examinators anvisningar.
  
  Studerande deltar aktivt kliniska övningar och simuleringar och påvisar kunnandet i akutvård.
  
  Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: alla svar måste vara till 100% korrekt räknade för att studerande skall bli godkänd i examinationen.
  
  Tent i akutvård:
  Studerande känner till samarbete vid kris- och katastrofsituationer regionalt och nationellt.
  Studerande kan i ett mångprofessionellt team bedöma vårdbehovet, planera, utföra och dokumentera akutvård
  Studerande kan bemöta och handleda den kritiskt sjuka patienten och anhöriga
  Studerande behärskar läkemedelsbehandling inom akutvård.
  
  Underkänd:
  Studerande deltar inte de obligatoriska föreläsningar och har inte kompletterat frånvaro enligt anvisningar.
  
  Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller deltar inte aktivt simuleringar och påvisar inte kunnandet i akutvård.
  
  Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: resultat under 100% korrekt
  
  Tent i akutvård: Studerande påvisar inte kunskap i kursens olika kompetensområden.
  
  Strålskydd: Har inte lämnat in uppgifter i strålsäkerhet/ UK i online-tent
  
  Studerande påvisar inte kunskap i kursens olika kompetensområden och svarar till uppgifter på en allmän nivå (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande känner till på en allmän nivå begrepp och grundläggande principer inom akutvård. Det finns ytlig samband mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande förstår och kan förklara begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Visar förmåga till att reflektera mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande har förmåga att se samband och göra egna slutsatser mellan begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Kan reflektera bra mellan teori och praktik (not translated)

•   English VÅV22EN01-3011 11.11.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 10.11.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Miranda Ekholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   English VÅV22EN01-3012 28.04.2025-30.05.2025  3 credits  (UBM24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Fagerudd

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  The teacher's material

  Learning methods

  On campus

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed exam, approved assignments and oral presentation, participation in class

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.04.2025 - 30.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 27.04.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM24D-V
  • UHV24D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Miranda Ekholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Final exam

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp = 81 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student has not followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the course material.
  The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
  The student has not participated during the course.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a basic understanding of the course material.
  The contents of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
  The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student demonstrates a good understanding of the course material and is able to draw on the literature.
  The student can reflect on and motivate their point of view.
  The student has almost or completely fulfilled the instructions of the assignments.
  The contents of submitted assignments are good.
  The student has participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment towards the course contents and course assignments.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates an excellent understanding of the course material.
  The contents of submitted assignments are excellent and the assignments have been executed exceptionally well.
  The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment towards and interest in the course contents and course assignments.
  The student has a deep understanding of the course contents and is able to use that knowledge in their future profession.

•   English VÅV22EN01-3013 20.01.2025-23.02.2025  3 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
  -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
  literature
  -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
  -is aware of cultural differences in communication

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Working life related documents
  Professional communication in working life

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  The teacher's material

  Learning methods

  Self-study

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved assignments and oral presentation

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 19.01.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Miranda Ekholm

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Portfolio

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp = 81 h

  Assessment criteria

  The student has not followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the course material.
  The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
  The student has not participated during the course.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a basic understanding of the course material.
  The contents of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
  The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student demonstrates a good understanding of the course material and is able to draw on the literature.
  The student can reflect on and motivate their point of view.
  The student has almost or completely fulfilled the instructions of the assignments.
  The contents of submitted assignments are good.
  The student has participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment towards the course contents and course assignments.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates an excellent understanding of the course material.
  The contents of submitted assignments are excellent and the assignments have been executed exceptionally well.
  The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment towards and interest in the course contents and course assignments.
  The student has a deep understanding of the course contents and is able to use that knowledge in their future profession.

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3010 21.04.2025-20.06.2025  7 credits  (USS242D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  - can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  - can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)
  
  Physical, social and symbolic environment
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  Wound-care, chronic wound
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
  Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)
  
  Övrig litteratur:
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.
  
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
  Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.
  
  Artiklar och databas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Simulationer obligatoriks närvaro
  Smågruppsarbete (distans)
  Reflektionsdagbok
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete (distans), flippedlektion och simulationer . Bedöms: GK/UK.
  
  2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK.
  
  3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker GK/UK Skriftlig respons på Moodle
  
  4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
  För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Muntlig respons efter examinationen.
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle
  
  5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
  Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Skriftlig respons och utvärdering på Moodle
  
  6. Tystnadsplikt - inlämning på Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.04.2025 - 20.06.2025

  Enrollment date range

  05.12.2024 - 20.04.2025

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS242D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in till Josephine Åberg via e-ahot före den 30.4.2025 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Diskussionsanteckningar
  Smågruppsarbete
  Simulationer
  Praktisk examination
  Individuell skriftlig examination
  Förstahjälp (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Reflektionsdagbok lämnas in på Moodle inför varje flipped lektion / simulation
  Simulation
  Första hjälp,
  Praktisk examination juni /2025 i form av filmning
  Skriftlig individuell examination juni. Omtagningstillfälle: augusti och september 2025
  Närmare information på kursens Moodle sida (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier inför examination 60 h
  Självstudier, smågruppsarbete, reflektionsdagbok - inför varje simulation 70 h
  Interaktiva föreläsningar och flipped lektion på campus 20 h
  Simulation: 25 h
  Första hjälp övning: 3 h
  Studiebesök: 2 h
  Praktisk examination: 2h - filmning av case
  
  Examination: 4h
  Tystandsplikt - inlämning
  
  Livräddande första hjälpen 0,25 sp
  Skriftlig individuell tentamen 2.5. sp
  Simulering 1 sp
  Refleksionsdagbok 2.25 sp
  Praktisk examination 1 sp
  Självstudier (moodle) och föreläsningar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3006 05.09.2024-13.12.2024  7 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  - can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  - can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)
  
  Physical, social and symbolic environment
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  Wound-care, chronic wound
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
  Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)
  
  Övrig litteratur:
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.
  
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
  Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.
  
  Artiklar och databas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Simulationer obligatoriks närvaro
  Smågruppsarbete (distans)
  Reflektionsdagbok
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete (distans), flippedlektion och simulationer . Bedöms: GK/UK.
  
  2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK.
  
  3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker GK/UK Skriftlig respons på Moodle
  
  4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
  För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Muntlig respons efter examinationen.
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle
  
  5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
  Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Skriftlig respons och utvärdering på Moodle
  
  6. Tystnadsplikt - inlämning på Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.09.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 04.09.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in till Josephine Åberg via e-ahot före den 15.9.2024 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Diskussionsanteckningar
  Smågruppsarbete
  Simulationer
  Praktisk examination
  Individuell skriftlig examination
  Förstahjälp (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Reflektionsdagbok lämnas in på Moodle inför varje flipped lektion / simulation
  Simulation
  Första hjälp,
  Praktisk examination december /2024 Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommlese med examinatorn
  Skriftlig individuell examination 4.12. Omtagningstillfälle: Fre 17.1.2025 kl. 12-16; Fre 7.2.2025 kl. 12-16. Närmare information på kursens Moodle sida (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier inför examination 60 h
  Självstudier, smågruppsarbete, reflektionsdagbok - inför varje simulation 70 h
  Interaktiva föreläsningar och flipped lektion på campus 20 h
  Simulation: 20 h
  Första hjälp övning: 3 h
  Studiebesök: 2 h
  Praktisk examination: 2h - filmning av case
  
  Examination: 4h
  Tystandsplikt - inlämning
  
  Livräddande första hjälpen 0,25 sp
  Skriftlig individuell tentamen 2.5. sp
  Simulering 1 sp
  Refleksionsdagbok 2.25 sp
  Praktisk examination 1 sp
  Självstudier (moodle) och föreläsningar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3007 10.09.2024-31.01.2025  7 credits  (USS24F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
  - can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
  - can life-saving first aid

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)
  
  Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession
  
  Ethics
  
  Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)
  
  Physical, social and symbolic environment
  
  The patients' and relatives' participation in care
  
  The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
  Wound-care, chronic wound
  
  Aid resource
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Vital functions, measurements and examinations
  
  Life-saving first aid

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
  Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
  Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
  Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
  Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)
  
  Övrig litteratur:
  Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
  Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
  Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
  Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.
  
  Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
  Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
  Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
  Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.
  
  Artiklar och databas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar/Workshopar (obligatorisk närvaro)
  Simulationer (obligatorisk närvaro)
  Smågruppsarbete (distans)
  Reflektionsdagbok
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete (distans) och simulationer. Bedöms: GK/UK.
  
  2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro. Bedöms: GK/UK.
  
  3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker. Bedöms: GK/UK Skriftlig respons på Moodle
  
  4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
  För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Muntlig respons efter examinationen.
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Ouriginal via Moodle
  
  5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
  Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Skriftlig respons och utvärdering på Moodle
  
  6. Tystnadsplikt - inlämning på Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.09.2024 - 31.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 09.09.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in till Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa via e-ahot före den 23.9.2024 (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Reflektionsdagbok
  Simulationer
  Praktisk examination
  Individuell skriftlig examination
  Förstahjälp (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Reflektionsdagbok lämnas in på Moodle inför varje simulation (dvs. v.40, 45 & 48)
  Simulation (vecka 40, 46 & 49)
  Första hjälp (januari 2025)
  Praktisk examination (filmning) (januari 2025) Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommelse med examinatorn
  Skriftlig individuell examination (hemtentamen) (januari 2025). Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommelse med examinatorn (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier inför examination 80h
  Självstudier, smågruppsarbete, reflektionsdagbok - inför varje simulation 70 h
  Föreläsningar på campus ca. 12 h
  Simulation: 16h
  Första hjälp övning: 4h
  Examination: 4h
  Tystandsplikt - inlämning
  
  Livräddande förstahjälpen 0,25 sp
  Skriftlig individuell tentamen (hemtentamen) 2,5 sp
  Simulering 1 sp
  Refleksionsdagbok 2,25 sp
  Praktisk examination 1 sp
  Självstudier (moodle) och föreläsningar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredsställande nivå. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3014 03.02.2025-14.03.2025  3 credits  (UBM24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Material on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.
  
  Interactive lessons
  Lectures
  Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
  Assignments
  Own work
  Vocabulary tests
  Oral and written examination

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).
  
  Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.
  
  The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.02.2025 - 14.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 02.02.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM24D-V
  • UHV24D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna Korhonen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27h = 81 hours

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3013 04.11.2024-20.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 03.11.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna Korhonen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Finnish USS22GV05-3006 06.01.2025-09.03.2025  3 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
  - can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
  - is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field
  
  Oral and written communication
  
  Oral and written presentations
  
  Language correctness and language planning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sanna Nygård

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Materialet är sammanställt av läraren och finns på Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, par- och grupparbete, muntliga och skriftliga övningar och uppgifter, textbearbetning, självstudier. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper bedöms skilt. Bedömningen baserar sig på den gemensamma europeiska referensramen för språk (CEFR). Nivå B1 motsvarar nöjaktiga kunskaper (vitsorden 1-3) och nivå B2 eller högre motsvarar goda kunskaper (vitsorden 4-5).
  Examinationer och timaktivitet påverkar bedömningen. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.01.2025 - 09.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  07.12.2024 - 05.01.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Johanna Wide

  Additional information

  Noggrannare information om uppgifter, tentamen och datum finns i Moodle och gås igenom under första kurstillfället.
  Delprestationer är i kraft fram till 31.5.2025 eller enligt särskild överenskommelse.
  För uppgifter som lämnats in efter deadline ges ingen feedback.
  Sena inlämningar påverkar kursvitsordet. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  För godkänd kurs krävs:
  - aktivt deltagande under lektioner (80 % närvarokrav för B- och C-nivå)
  - obligatoriska muntliga och skriftliga inlämningsuppgifter
  - godkänd muntlig och skriftlig tentamen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Muntlig tentamen vecka 10.
  Skriftlig tentamen vecka 10.
  Skriftlig omtentamen under allmän omtentamen.
  Muntlig omtentamen enligt överenskommelse. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81 h arbete. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  En eller flera kursuppgifter är ogjorda eller underkända.
  Studerande har knappt deltagit i kursen eller har kunskaper under B1-nivå:
  Klarar varken alldaglig eller branschspecifik skriftlig eller muntlig kommunikation på ett vederbörligt sätt.
  Kommunikationen är så bristfällig och/eller innehåller så många fel att misstolkningar uppstår eller kommunikationen förhindras. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  CEFR B1 (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  CEFR B1-B2 (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  CEFR B2.2 eller högre (not translated)

•   Finnish VÅV22FI01-3015 07.01.2025-02.02.2025  3 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
  - demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Finnish (oral and written)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
  The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ellinor Granholm

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Material on Moodle.

  Learning methods

  We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.
  
  Interactive lessons
  Lectures
  Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
  Assignments
  Own work
  Vocabulary tests
  Oral and written examination

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).
  
  Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.
  
  The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2025 - 02.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 06.01.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna Korhonen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  0.5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 x 27h = 81 hours.

•   Finnish - Oral Skills YH10FI01-M-3121 06.01.2025-07.03.2025  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  See syllabus

  Prerequisites

  See syllabus

  Content of the study unit

  See syllabus

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sanna Nygård

  Mode of delivery

  100% Face-to-face, 0% Distance learning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.01.2025 - 07.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 05.01.2025

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Johanna Wide, Sanna Nygård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   First Aid and Emergency Preparedness VÅV22GV06-3014 18.11.2024-13.12.2024  2 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  18.11.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 11.11.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  0 - 37

  Small group(s)

  • Practise 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Practise 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)

•   First Aid and Emergency Preparedness VÅV22GV06-3015 07.01.2025-02.02.2025  2 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Theoretical test: approved/failed
  Practical tests : approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2025 - 02.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 07.01.2025

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons
  
  You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  0.5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)

•   First Aid and Emergency Preparedness VÅV22GV06-3016 07.01.2025-19.01.2025  2 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the basics of providing first aid
  - can act in crisis and disaster situations

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  First aid
  Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
  Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
  Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

  Learning methods

  Lessons, demonstration, practical training

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Virtual test: approved/failed
  Group assignment: approved/failed
  Individual written case studies: approved/failed
  Resuscitation: 90 % correct

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2025 - 19.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 07.01.2025

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Compulsory attendance at all lessons

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Practical tests during lesson time, virtual test

  Student's schedule and workload

  2 x 27 h = 54 h

•   From Elderly to Geriatric Patient USS22KL02-3002 10.02.2025-16.03.2025  4 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of normal aging
  - can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
  - can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
  - master evidence-based and sustainable care methods and appropriate medication management
  - can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient
  
  Chain of care and service system
  
  Coping/adaptation
  
  Partnership and counseling
  
  Caring for close relatives
  
  Ethical decision making
  
  The aged patient's health problems
  
  Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
  Care of chronic wound
  
  Adequate medication management
  
  Geriatric technology
  
  Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder
  
  Evidence-based care
  
  Care chains and service types, elderly care
  
  Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  - Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., Hylen Ranhoff, A., Bolinder-Palmér, I. & Olsson, K. (2018). Geriatrisk omvårdnad: God omsorg och vård till den äldre (Andra upplagan.). Liber AB.
  - Dehlin, O. & Rundgren, Å. (2018). Geriatrik (3:4 upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  eller Arkkila, P., Pitkälä, K., Strandberg, T., Sulkava, R., Tilvis, R. & Viitanen, M. (2016). Geriatria (3., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim.
  Gottlieb, L. N. 2012 Strengths-Based Nursing Care
  Litteratur:
  Drevenhorn, E. 2017. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekstedt, M. & Flink, M. 2019. Hemsjukvård-olika perspektiv på trygg och säker vård
  Ernsth Bravell, M. 2011. Äldre och åldrande.
  Etene. 2008. Vårdetik på ålderns höst
  Finlex 2012 Lag om stödjande av den äldre befolkningens funktionsförmåga och om social- och hälsovårdstjänster för äldre.
  Hellström, I. & Hydén, L-C. (red). 2016. Att leva med demens.
  Johansson, S: & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (red). 2016. Förändringsperspektiv på äldreomsorgen.
  Jönson, H., & Harnett, T. 2015. Socialt arbete med äldre.
  Kivelä, S-L. 2010. Vi äldre och våra mediciner.
  Larsson, Å. (red) 2015. Vardagsteknik för äldre.
  Lindqvist, E-L. 2016 Äldres hälsa och livskvalitet
  NMR. 2015. Kvalitet i äldreomsorgen. Äldreomsorg i Norden Sid 55-90. Nordiskt välfärdscentrum.
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  SHM 2020: Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen.
  THL. 2020. Livskraft på äldre dar - kostrekommendationer på äldre personer.
  Fimea. 2020. Medicin75+
  Medibas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Workshops
  Simuleringar
  Inlämningsuppgift
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examinationsuppgift bedömning 0-5
  Tent i Geriatrik GK/UK
  Deltagande i Föreläsningar, Workshops och Simulering bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.02.2025 - 16.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  05.12.2024 - 09.02.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Föreläsningar, Workshops och simulationer obligatorisk närvaro till 80%. Kompensationsuppgifter vid frånvaro.
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedömd med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tent i Geriatrik v. 10 Omtentamen 4.4 och 25.4. 2025
  Examinationsuppgift inlämning senast 10.3 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 4h
  Workshops och simulationer 6h
  Självstudier i Geriatrik och tent i Geriatrik 28h
  Individuell skrifltig uppgift, (examinationsuppgif) 27h
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur 43h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte. Texten besvarar inte frågorna och är ofullständig, Litteratur och forskningar tillämpas inte och inga reflektioner görs, Brister finns i den tekniska utformningen (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial men har inte förmåga att göra egna reflektioner. Studerande har svårigheter med att redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial och förmår till en viss del göra reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och kan tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar. Studerande kan relatera de olika delarna av uppgiften till varandraoch använder kursmateriel, forskningar och föreläsningsmaterial som stöd för sina reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess och kan anlysera detta och göra egna reflektioner. (not translated)

•   From Elderly to Geriatric Patient USS22KL02-3004 10.02.2025-16.03.2025  4 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of normal aging
  - can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
  - can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
  - master evidence-based and sustainable care methods and appropriate medication management
  - can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient
  
  Chain of care and service system
  
  Coping/adaptation
  
  Partnership and counseling
  
  Caring for close relatives
  
  Ethical decision making
  
  The aged patient's health problems
  
  Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
  Care of chronic wound
  
  Adequate medication management
  
  Geriatric technology
  
  Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder
  
  Evidence-based care
  
  Care chains and service types, elderly care
  
  Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  - Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., Hylen Ranhoff, A., Bolinder-Palmér, I. & Olsson, K. (2018). Geriatrisk omvårdnad: God omsorg och vård till den äldre (Andra upplagan.). Liber AB.
  - Dehlin, O. & Rundgren, Å. (2018). Geriatrik (3:4 upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  eller Arkkila, P., Pitkälä, K., Strandberg, T., Sulkava, R., Tilvis, R. & Viitanen, M. (2016). Geriatria (3., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim.
  Gottlieb, L. N. 2012 Strengths-Based Nursing Care
  Litteratur:
  Drevenhorn, E. 2017. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekstedt, M. & Flink, M. 2019. Hemsjukvård-olika perspektiv på trygg och säker vård
  Ernsth Bravell, M. 2011. Äldre och åldrande.
  Etene. 2008. Vårdetik på ålderns höst
  Finlex 2012 Lag om stödjande av den äldre befolkningens funktionsförmåga och om social- och hälsovårdstjänster för äldre.
  Hellström, I. & Hydén, L-C. (red). 2016. Att leva med demens.
  Johansson, S: & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (red). 2016. Förändringsperspektiv på äldreomsorgen.
  Jönson, H., & Harnett, T. 2015. Socialt arbete med äldre.
  Kivelä, S-L. 2010. Vi äldre och våra mediciner.
  Larsson, Å. (red) 2015. Vardagsteknik för äldre.
  Lindqvist, E-L. 2016 Äldres hälsa och livskvalitet
  NMR. 2015. Kvalitet i äldreomsorgen. Äldreomsorg i Norden Sid 55-90. Nordiskt välfärdscentrum.
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  SHM 2020: Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen.
  THL. 2020. Livskraft på äldre dar - kostrekommendationer på äldre personer.
  Fimea. 2020. Medicin75+
  Medibas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Workshops
  Simuleringar
  Inlämningsuppgift
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examinationsuppgift bedömning 0-5
  Tent i Geriatrik GK/UK
  Deltagande i Föreläsningar, Workshops och Simulering bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.02.2025 - 16.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  05.12.2024 - 09.02.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Föreläsningar, Workshops och simulationer obligatorisk närvaro till 80%. Kompensationsuppgifter vid frånvaro.
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedömd med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tent i Geriatrik v.9, Omtentamen 4.4 och 25.4.2025
  Examinationsuppgift inlämning senast 11.3 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 14 h
  Workshops och simulationer 6 h
  Självstudier i Geriatrik och tent i Geriatrik 28h
  Individuell skrifltig uppgift, (examinationsuppgif) 27h
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur 33h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte. Texten besvarar inte frågorna och är ofullständig, Litteratur och forskningar tillämpas inte och inga reflektioner görs, Brister finns i den tekniska utformningen (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial men har inte förmåga att göra egna reflektioner. Studerande har svårigheter med att redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial och förmår till en viss del göra reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och kan tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar. Studerande kan relatera de olika delarna av uppgiften till varandraoch använder kursmateriel, forskningar och föreläsningsmaterial som stöd för sina reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess och kan anlysera detta och göra egna reflektioner. (not translated)

•   From Elderly to Geriatric Patient USS22KL02-3005 01.12.2024-14.03.2025  4 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of normal aging
  - can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
  - can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
  - master evidence-based and sustainable care methods and appropriate medication management
  - can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient
  
  Chain of care and service system
  
  Coping/adaptation
  
  Partnership and counseling
  
  Caring for close relatives
  
  Ethical decision making
  
  The aged patient's health problems
  
  Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
  Care of chronic wound
  
  Adequate medication management
  
  Geriatric technology
  
  Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder
  
  Evidence-based care
  
  Care chains and service types, elderly care
  
  Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kursböcker:
  - Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., Hylen Ranhoff, A., Bolinder-Palmér, I. & Olsson, K. (2018). Geriatrisk omvårdnad: God omsorg och vård till den äldre (Andra upplagan.). Liber AB.
  - Dehlin, O. & Rundgren, Å. (2018). Geriatrik (3:4 upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  eller Arkkila, P., Pitkälä, K., Strandberg, T., Sulkava, R., Tilvis, R. & Viitanen, M. (2016). Geriatria (3., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim.
  Gottlieb, L. N. 2012 Strengths-Based Nursing Care
  Litteratur:
  Drevenhorn, E. 2017. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur.
  Ekstedt, M. & Flink, M. 2019. Hemsjukvård-olika perspektiv på trygg och säker vård
  Ernsth Bravell, M. 2011. Äldre och åldrande.
  Etene. 2008. Vårdetik på ålderns höst
  Finlex 2012 Lag om stödjande av den äldre befolkningens funktionsförmåga och om social- och hälsovårdstjänster för äldre.
  Hellström, I. & Hydén, L-C. (red). 2016. Att leva med demens.
  Johansson, S: & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (red). 2016. Förändringsperspektiv på äldreomsorgen.
  Jönson, H., & Harnett, T. 2015. Socialt arbete med äldre.
  Kivelä, S-L. 2010. Vi äldre och våra mediciner.
  Larsson, Å. (red) 2015. Vardagsteknik för äldre.
  Lindqvist, E-L. 2016 Äldres hälsa och livskvalitet
  NMR. 2015. Kvalitet i äldreomsorgen. Äldreomsorg i Norden Sid 55-90. Nordiskt välfärdscentrum.
  Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
  SHM 2020: Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen.
  THL. 2020. Livskraft på äldre dar - kostrekommendationer på äldre personer.
  Fimea. 2020. Medicin75+
  Medibas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Workshops
  Simuleringar
  Inlämningsuppgift
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examinationsuppgift bedömning 0-5
  Tent i Geriatrik GK/UK
  Deltagande i Föreläsningar, Workshops och Simulering bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.12.2024 - 14.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  01.11.2024 - 30.11.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Föreläsningar, Workshops och simulationer obligatorisk närvaro till 80%. Kompensationsuppgifter vid frånvaro.
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedömd med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tent i Geriatrik 13.1 Omtentamen 7.2.2025 och 7.3.2025
  Examinationsuppgift inlämning senast 16.3 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 4h
  Workshops och simulationer 6h
  Självstudier i Geriatrik och tent i Geriatrik 28h
  Individuell skrifltig uppgift, (examinationsuppgif) 27h
  Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur 43h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte. Texten besvarar inte frågorna och är ofullständig, Litteratur och forskningar tillämpas inte och inga reflektioner görs, Brister finns i den tekniska utformningen (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial men har inte förmåga att göra egna reflektioner. Studerande har svårigheter med att redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial och förmår till en viss del göra reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och kan tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar. Studerande kan relatera de olika delarna av uppgiften till varandraoch använder kursmateriel, forskningar och föreläsningsmaterial som stöd för sina reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess och kan anlysera detta och göra egna reflektioner. (not translated)

•   Gerontology and Emergency Geriatric Care VÅV22KV10-3008 03.03.2025-06.04.2025  4 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.03.2025 - 06.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 09.03.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

•   Gerontology and Emergency Geriatric Care VÅV22KV10-3009 27.01.2025-07.03.2025  4 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.01.2025 - 07.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 26.01.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

•   Gerontology and Emergency Geriatric Care VÅV22KV10-3012 14.04.2025-30.05.2025  4 credits  (SSK23F-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
  Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
  Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  
  + recommended articles at Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies
  Group work
  Online exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.04.2025 - 30.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 13.04.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-1
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  1c =27h
  4c=108h

•   Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3006 14.10.2024-10.01.2025  4 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
  - has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
  -has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
  - has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
  - has knowledge of various memory disorders
  - masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
  - has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
  - masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
  - can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
  - has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
  - has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Gerontology
  Geriatrics
  Acute geriatrics
  Gerotechnology
  Drug treatment for elderly
  Nutrition for elderly

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.10.2024 - 10.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sirkku Säätelä, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Health Care Practice Among Families with Children UHV20HV04-3002 01.08.2024-31.12.2024  5 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of a child’s growth and development liaising with the family
  
  Can support the parents in their parenthood and can guide, with resource promoting methods, the parents and their child towards a healthy lifestyle
  
  Can assess the child’s and family’s need of additional support and further treatment

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  The service system and service environments for families with children
  
  The child's growth and development
  
  Health examinations, screenings, supervision
  
  Guidance and resource enhancing methods
  
  Group activities
  
  Client / patient involvement
  
  Multicultural work
  
  Children in need of extra support and further investigations
  
  Child protection

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/stodmaterial/lagar-och-handbocker/arbetet-vid-modra-och-barnradgivningen/lagstiftning.
  SHM 2005:12. Rådgivningsbyråerna för barnavård som stöd för barnfamiljerna. Handbok för personalen.
  https://thl.fi/sv/web/handbok-for-barnradgivningar,
  https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/stodmaterial/blanketter/blanketter-for-arbetet-vid-radgivningar,
  Mäki, Wikström, Hakulinen m.fl. Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivning och inom skolhälsovård. Handbok 31/2018 (elektronisk),
  http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-066-2,
  https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/80049,
  https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/80056,
  Blair, M m.fl. 2013. Barnhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Haarala, P et al. Terveydenhoitajan osaaminen. 2015.
  Magnusson,M.mfl. 2016. Barnhälsovård -att främja barns hälsa.
  Arfman, S & Hujala, N. 2010. Ravitsemus neuvolatyössä. Edita.
  https://www.livsmedelsverket.se/matvanor-halsa--miljo/kostrad-och-matvanor/barn-och-ungdomar
  https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/116079,
  Tillsammans kring matbordet, kostrekommendationer till barnfamiljer,
  http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/130021/KIDE27_RUOTSI_WEB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y,
  https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90855,
  https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/73899/Es200810swe.pdf?sequence=1,
  Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta. Seksuaali- ja lisääntymisterveyden edistäminen. Toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Helsingfors.
  Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön selvityksiä 2008:24. Isien ja isyyden tukeminen äitiys- ja lastenneuvoloissa.
  Ensi- ja turvakotien liitto. Tunnista vauvan hätä! Vauvan kaltoinkohtelun tunnistaminen ja siihen puuttuminen
  Folkhälsoinstitutet. Vaccinatörens handbok. (www.thl.fi)
  Korteniemi-Poikela, E & Cacciatore, R. 2010. Opas vanhemmille. Portaita pitkin. Lapsen ja nuoren seksuaalisuuden kehittyminen. WSOY.
  Ryttyläinen, K. & Valkama, S. 2010. Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä. Edita.
  SHM Publikation 2010:7. Slå inte barnet! Nationella handlingsprogrammet för att minska kroppslig aga 2010-2015.http://lapsiasia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/sla_inte_barnet.pdf
  https://www.mll.fi/,
  THL; Neuko tietokanta, https://www.terveysportti.fi/apps/dtk/nko
  
  https://www.folkhalsan.fi/barn/,
  
  Litteraturtips till de virtuella smågruppsarbeten:
  Fossum 2019. Samtal och bemötande i vården. (eller tidigare upplaga).
  
  Forsberg & Wallmark 2021. Nätverksboken - om mötets möjligheter (eller tidigare upplaga)
  
  Hedström 2014. Barn som oroar - bemötande och metoder i förskolan och förskoleklass
  
  Herz & Johansson 2019 Det professionella mötet (boken beställd till biblioteket)
  
  Lundström 2019 Att förstå föräldrar - till barn med funktionsnedsättning (boken beställd till biblioteket)
  
  Nilsson Tapper 2021 Professionella samtal med barn (boken beställd till biblioteket)
  
  Ringborg 2020 Förändrade familjesamtal (boken beställd till biblioteket)
  
  THL 2017 . Skapa förtroende . Skydda barnet.
  https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/136182/Skapa%20f%c3%b6rtroende%20-%20Skydda%20barnet_2019_10_09.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
  
  + Annat material som laddas upp på kursens Moodlesida
  
  Rikssvenskt material
  https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/contentassets/3addb7a81de44a8b8a8f4bfa29b8306c/forskolans-paverkan-barns-halsa-01086.pdf,
  
  http://www.vardgivarguiden.se/globalassets/behandlingsstod/barnhalsovard/bhv-rapporter/barns-ojamlika-forutsattningar.pdf?IsPdf=true,
  
  https://www.livsmedelsverket.se/matvanor-halsa--miljo/kostrad-och-matvanor/barn-och-ungdomar.
  
  Referenslitteratur :
  Ahonen, L. 2017. Haastavat kasvatustilanteet. Lämpimän vuorovaikutuksen käsikirja. Juva: PS-Kustannus. Ur verket läses: Osa I Lapsen sosiaalisemotionaaliset taidot ja niiden tukeminen. Sidorna 16–5.
  
  Mothander-Risholm P; Broberg;A. 2018. Att möta små barn och deras föräldrar I vården: om anknytning, utveckling och samspel.
  
  MLL. Hur växer och utvecklas barn.
  
  Hundeide, K. Vägledande samtal. 2008. WS Bokwell.
  
  Aktuella facktidskrifter, forkningar och artiklar
  
  Olsson,B.& Olsson, K. 2013. Att se möjligheter i svårigheter. Barn och ungdomar med koncentrationssvårigheter.
  
  Observera att litteraturen kan uppdateras under kursens gång (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, självstudier, smågruppsarbeten, pararbete, case-arbete
  Gästföreläsningar, obligatorisk närvaro (se schema på Peppi).
  Virtuellt interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete med socionomstuderande enligt instruktioner som finns på Moodle.
  Simulering (obligatorisk närvaro)
  Hälsovårdarutbildning fyller 100 år; festtillfälle 18.9.24 kl. 12-16.00 Obligatorisk närvaro
  Möjlighet att delta på Hälsovårdardagar 15.11.2024 (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Samarbete med socionomstuderande:
  1. Förhandsuppgift i grupp & smågruppsarbete med hälsovårdarstuderande samt deltagande i onlinetillfällen 1 sp
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk sakkunskap i relation till det givna caset
  - förmåga att arbeta utvecklingsinriktat i ett interprofessionellt team samt att kunna se nya utvecklingsmöjligheter i det gemensamma arbetet för barnets och familjens bästa
  - förmåga till professionellt och etiskt förhållningssätt
  
  Bedömning enligt skala 0-5. Vid validering bedömning enligt skala godkänd/underkänd.
  Examinatorer: Susanne Davidsson och Jaana-Sofia Tengström
  Studerande får muntlig feedback i samband med seminarierna. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lilian Nordell, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen består av fyra delexaminationer
  1. Skriftlig parrapport och seminarium 1sp
  Kurserna Resursförstärkande hälsovårdararbete, Hälsovårdarabete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdarabete med barnfamiljen examineras tillsammans i form av en parrapport. Studerande väljer (parvis) ett tema (t.ex. sömn, missbruk) och en metod (t.ex. motiverande samtal, resursförstärkande handledning) inom kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete. Temat och metoden ska synliggöras och tillämpas på den gravida familjen och i barnfamiljen (inom kurserna Hälsovårdarabete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdarabete med barnfamiljen). I rapporten ska fokus ligga på förebyggande och hälsofrämjande arbete, Tema- och parindelning görs på Moodle i kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete.
  Rapporten ska basera sig på kurslitteraturen, relevanta webbsidor samt minst 3 vetenskapliga artiklar (en per kurs).
  Paren ska boka in en handledningsgång med ansvariga lärare.
  Bedöms enligt skala 1-5.
  
  2. Muntlig examination 2sp
  Kurserna Hälsovårdararbete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdararbete med barnfamiljen examineras gemensamt med en muntlig parexamination.
  Gruppindelning, exakt tidpunkt och upplägg för examinationen meddelas senare (via Moodle under kursen Hälsovårdararbete med den väntande familjen).
  Bedöms enligt skala 1-5
  
  3.Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete 1 sp
  Kursen är digital och inleds med en obligatorisk online kursintro, inspirationsföreläsning & studerandes presentationer av förhandsuppgift den 4.9 kl 8.15-12 och avslutas med obligatoriskt online seminarium och diskussion den 24.9 kl 14.30-16.
  Interprofessionellt samarbete: Studerande jobbar online tillsammans med socionomstuderande i smågrupper och gör ett smågruppsarbete.
  Självstudier:
  Två schemalagda tidpunkter för smågruppsarbete online tillsammans med socionomstuderande finns insatta i gruppernas tidtabeller enligt följande: 13.9 14-16.00 pch 19.9 kl.14-16.00
  Handledning fås digitalt i kursens handledningsforum.
  Bedömning enligt skala 1-5
  
  4. Simulering 0,5 sp GK/UK
  5. Föreläsningar och uppgifter med seminarium + organisationsuppgift 0,5 sp vecka 45 GK/UK (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Online föreläsning med Annette Karlsson, Egentliga Finlands välfärdsområde, Chef för familjecenter (Kimitoön, Pargas, Åbo) och Hannele Nikander-Tuominen, Egentliga Finlands välfärdsområde, Chef för familjecenter (Reso, Rusko och Nådendal). (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1. Skriftliga parrapporten laddas upp på Moodle (under kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete) Rapporten presenteras på seminarium. Seminariets upplägg laddas upp på Moodle efter deadline.
  
  2. Muntlig examination i par v. 50.
  Vid underkänd muntlig examination tenteras kursen individuellt skriftligt. Omtentamensdatum kommer man överen med examinatorn.
  
  3. Interprofessionellt samarbete med socionomer online; smågruppsarbeten görs under vk. 36-40. Föruppgift 26.8-4.9.2024, Inledning 4.9.24 obligatorisk närvaro, handledning 16.9, inlämning och seminarium vecka 39/ 24.9 obligatorisk närvaro
  Grupperna arbetar enligt de instruktioner som finns på Moodle och laddar upp examinationerna på Moodle.
  
  5. Simulering, obligatoriskt deltagande, bedömning GK/UK enligt kursens kompetenser (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  1. Skriftlig parrapport
  Temaområdena behandlas fragmentariskt.
  Litteraturen används inte.
  Reflektioner framförs inte.
  Brister i den tekniska utformningen.
  
  2. Muntlig gruppexamination
  Studerande deltar inte på eget initiativ i gruppens diskussion. Studerande kan inte besvara frågor som ställs till hen.
  
  3. Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete
  Smågruppsarbete 1:
  Studerande har inte förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntligt format
  Studerande har inte förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
  Studerande har inte förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har brister i det professionella och etiska förhållningssättet
  
  Smågruppsarbete 2:
  Studerande har inte förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig format
  Studerande har inte förmåga att kunna samarbete med olika professionella
  Studerande har inte förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har inte förmåga att tillämpa givna metoder för att stöda barnet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  1. Skriftlig parrapport
  Temaområdena behandlas kort.
  Litteraturen refereras
  Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning.
  Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig.
  
  2. Muntlig gruppexamination
  Studerande deltar sporadiskt i gruppens diskussion. Studerande använder enbart kurslitteratur eller enbart egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar.
  
  3. Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete
  Smågruppsarbete 1:
  Vitsord 1
  Studerande har en svag förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntlig form
  Studerande har en svag förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
  Studerande har svag förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har brister i det professionella och etiska förhållningssättet
  
  Smågruppsarbete 2:
  Vitsord 1
  Studerande har en svag förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig form
  Studerande har en svag förmåga att kunna samarbete med olika professionella
  Studerande har svag förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har en svag förmåga att tillämpa givna metoder för att stöda barnet
  
  Smågruppsarbete 1:
  Vitsord 2
  Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntlig form
  Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
  Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga i det professionella och etiska förhållningssättet
  
  Smågruppsarbet 2:
  Vitsord 2
  Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig form
  Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att kunna samarbete med olika professionella
  Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att tillämpa givna metoder för att stöda barnet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  1.Skriftlig parrapport
  Temaområdena behandlas mångsidigt.
  Litteraturen tillämpas.
  Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns.
  Den tekniska utformningen är god.
  
  2.Muntlig gruppexamination
  Studerande deltar i gruppens diskussion och bidrar med relevant kunskap. Studerande använder både kurslitteratur och sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar, men inte systematiskt.
  
  3. Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete
  Smågruppsarbete 1:
  Vitsord 3
  Studerande har god förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntlig form
  Studerande har god förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
  Studerande har god förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har ett gott professionellt och etiskt förhållningssätt.
  
  Smågruppsarbete 2:
  Vitsord 3
  Studerande har en god förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig form
  Studerande har en god förmåga att kunna samarbete med olika professionella
  Studerande har god förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har en god förmåga att tillämpa givna metoder för att stöda barnet
  
  Smågruppsarbete 1:
  Vitsord 4
  Studerande har en mycket god förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntlig form
  Studerande har en mycket god förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
  Studerande har en mycket god förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har ett mycket gott professionellt och etiskt förhållningssätt.
  
  Smågruppsarbete 2
  Vitsord 4
  Studerande har en mycket förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig form
  Studerande har en mycket förmåga att kunna samarbete med olika professionella
  Studerande har en mycket god förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har en mycket förmåga att tillämpa givna metoder för att stöda barnet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  1.Skriftlig parrapport
  Temaområdena behandlas uttömmande och mångsidigt.
  Litteraturen analyseras och tillämpas.
  Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk.
  Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig.
  
  2. Muntlig gruppexamination
  Studerande deltar aktivt i gruppens diskussion under examinationen och bidrar med relevant och korrekt kunskap. Studerande använder systematiskt både kurslitteratur samt sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar.
  
  3. Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete
  Smågruppsarbete 1:
  Vitsord 5
  Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntlig form
  Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
  Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har ett utmärkt professionellt och etiskt förhållningssätt.
  
  Smågruppsarbet 2:
  Vitsord 5
  Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig form
  Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
  Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
  Studerande har ett utmärkt professionellt och etiskt förhållningssätt. (not translated)

•   Health Care Practice Among School Children, Adolescents and their Families UHV20HV06-3002 01.01.2025-09.03.2025  4 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the growth and development of school children and adolescents in consultation with the family
  
  Can, with resource promoting methods, support school children, adolescents and the family in health-promoting choices
  
  Can evaluate the need for extra support and continued care for the school child, adolescents and the family
  
  Can maintain and promote a safe growing, school and learning environment

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  The service system and service environments
  
  Health examinations, screenings
  
  Resource enhancement and health promotion guidance
  
  Support for family resources
  
  The participation of school children and adolescents in health-related issues
  
  Early intervention, guidance, to address dozens of difficult things
  
  Schoolchildren and adolescents in need of extra support and further investigations
  
  Schoolchildren and adolescents in need of extra support and further investigations
  
  Child protection services
  
  Safe school and student environment

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bramhagen, A-K,Carlsson,A. 2014. Hälsofrämjande arbete för barn och ungdomar. Studenthälsan.
  Clausson, Eva mfl. 2019. Skolsköterskans hälsofrämjande arbete. Studentlitteratur.
  Guide för studerandehälsovården 2021, https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/163320/STM_2021_15_J.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  Hakulinen- Viitanen, T mfl. Opas 22. THL. Laaja terveystarkastus. Ohjeistus äitiys- ja lastenneuvolatoimintaan sekä kouluterveydenhuoltoon, https://thl.fi/fi/web/lapset-nuoret-ja-perheet/peruspalvelut/opiskeluhuolto/kouluterveydenhuolto/terveystarkastukset/laajat-terveystarkastukset,
  Kumpulainen,K.ym. (toim.) Lastenpsykiatria ja nuorisopsykiatria. Duodecim 2016.
  Korteniemi-Poikela, E & Cacciatore, R. 2019. Rakkaus, ilo ja rohkeus. Seksuaalisuuden portaat.
  (Korteniemi-Poikela, E & Cacciatore, R. 2010. Opas vanhemmille. Portaita pitkin. Lapsen ja nuoren seksuaalisuuden kehittyminen. WSOY.)
  Leissner,M; Lundevall - Överby,H; 2020. Praktisk handbok för skolläkare och skolsköterskor. Studentlitteratur.
  Larsson, B.2010. Konstruktiva samtal i svåra möten; mellan skola och hemmet.
  Mäki, P., Wikström, K., Hakulinen-Viitanen, T. & Laatikainen, T. 2018. Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen & inom skolhälsovården Metodhandbok. THL. (delvis föråldrad)
  Opiskeluterveydenhuollon opas 2021
  https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/162957/STM_2021_14_J.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y,
  Storvik-Sydänmaa,S; Talvensaari,H; Kaisvuo,T.&Uotila, N. (toim.). 2015. Lapsen ja nuoren hoitotyö. SanomaPro
  SHM 2010:11. Rådgivningsverksamhet, skol- och studerandehälsovård samt förebyggande mun- och tandvård.
  Vaccinatörens handbok. (www.thl.fi)
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet, Finlands Kommunförbund. 2004. Kvalitetsrekommendation för skolhälsovården. Handböcker 2004:9.H:fors.
  Aktuella lagar, direktiv och program och verksamhetsmodeller.
  
  Referenslitteratur
  Börjesson,M. 2019. Hälsofrämjande samtal med tonåringar och unga vuxna
  Olsson,B-I & Olsson, K. 2015. Att se möjligheter i svårigheter. Barn och ungdomar med koncentrationssvårigheter.
  Ryttyläinen, K. & Valkama, S. 2010. Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä. Edita.
  Aktuella artiklar och facktidskrifter (Terveydenhoitaja tidskriften 2018-2023)
  Neuko
  www.folkhalsan.fi
  www.mll.fi
  www.thl.fi
  www.thl.fi/kasvunkumppanit
  www.stm.fi
  www.ukm-instituutti.fi
  www.vaestoliitto.fi
  www.rfsu.se
  http://tyttojenjuttu.fi/tjejernas-grej/
  www.oph.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  1. Obligatorisk kursintroduktion 3.1
  2. Självstudier
  3. Föreläsningar, seminarium, simulering och Workshops obligatorisk närvaro
  4. Gästföreläsningar
  5. Interprofessionellt grupparbete och seminarium med socionomstuderande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1.Skriftlig examination, bedömning 1-5/UK
  Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kursens kompetenserna och innehåll ), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap.
  
  2. Workshops, simuleringar med intervju GK/UK
  
  2.Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete med rapport och produkt.
  Rapporten bedöms med GK/UK med följande kriterier:
  - tydlighet
  - att instruktionerna och skrivanvisningarna har följts
  - källorna är relevanta och tydlig utskrivna
  - att innehållet är täckande i relation till uppgiften
  Produkten bedöms med GK/UK med följande kriterier:
  - Tydlig beskrivning av produkten
  - Användbarhet
  - Tydlig beskrivning av hur teorin har tillämpats vid utformningen av produkten (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2025 - 09.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 01.01.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Åbo - timlärare Vård, Carolina Silin

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Föreläsare och alumn från arbetslivet (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen består av 2 delexaminationer
  
  1. Skriftlig examination (2 sp), omtentamen/ komplettering enligt överenskommelse med examinator
  
  2. Workshops, simuleringar och intervju uppgift med seminarium (1 sp)
  
  2. Interprofessionellt grupparbete, skriftlig rapport och seminarium med socionomer (1sp) v.3. Närmare information på Moodle plattformen. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Undervisning 27h
  Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete 27h
  Självstudier med uppgifter 54h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Skriftlig examination
  Studerande svarar delvis på examinationens frågeställningar och använder sporadiskt kurslitteratur och andra källor och tillämpning av materialet är på en ytlig nivå.
  Studerande kan beskriva men kan inte reflektera kring skolelevens och studerandes hälsa i relation till det förebyggande arbetet som sker inom skolhälsovården.
  Studerande beaktar inte etiken.
  Studerande har mycket ytliga kunskaper inom skol- och studerandehälsovården och tillämpar sin kunskap på en mycket ytlig nivå (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Skriftlig examination
  Studerande svarar på examinationens frågeställningar och använder delvis kurslitteratur samt andra källor men användning av materialet är på en ytlig nivå.
  Studerande kan beskriva och delvis reflektera kring skolelevens och studerandes hälsa i relation till det förebyggande arbetet som sker inom skolhälsovården.
  Studerande beaktar delvis etiken.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper inom skol- och studerandehälsovården och tillämpar sin kunskap på en ytlig nivå (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Skriftlig examination
  Studerande svarar på examinationens alla frågeställningar och använder kurslitteratur samt andra källor men användning av materialet är inte mångsidigt.
  Studerande kan beskriva och reflektera kring skolelevens och studerandes hälsa i relation till det förebyggande arbetet som sker inom skolhälsovården.
  Studerande beaktar etiken.
  Studerande har kunskaper inom skol- och studerandehälsovården och tillämpar delvis din kunskap. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Skriftlig examination
  Studerande svarar på en djupgående nivå på examinationens alla frågeställningar och använder mångsidigt kurslitteratur samt andra evidensbaserade källor.
  Studerande kan på en fördjupad nivå beskriva och relatera till skolelevens och studerandes hälsa i relation till det förebyggande arbetet som sker inom skolhälsovården.
  Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etiken.
  Studerande har fördjupade kunskaper inom skol- och studerandehälsovården och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)

•   Health Care Practice Among the Working Population and the Elderly UHV20HV08-3002 10.02.2025-30.04.2025  4 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the health of the employee and the work community and support the maintenance of work capacity and use a resource enhancing way of working
  
  Can explain the principles of good interprofessional occupational health care
  
  Can evaluate the effect of work, work society and the environment on health
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the elderly's health and functional ability with resource enhancing methods at the individual and community level
  
  Can work in interprofessional working groups and networks as well as realise health care in a home environment

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  The service system and service environments within occupational health care
  
  Legislation in occupational health and occupational health and safety
  
  Principles for good corporate health practice
  
  Business plans, workplace mapping and follow-up of the work community
  
  Work health surveys
  
  Resources, supporting and burdensome factors in the work community and work environment
  
  Work-related illnesses and occupational illnesses
  
  Worker protection and ergonomics
  
  Resource enhancing methods in working life
  
  Occupational health-related health care
  
  Health care for the unemployed
  
  Health care in home environment
  
  The service system
  
  Health surveys for the elderly, health care and service plans
  
  Resource enhancing working methods
  
  Health advice
  
  The elderly's own resources and functional ability, early support for participation and opportunities for influence
  
  The use of new technology in health care in the home environment
  
  Family support and challenging clients, violence prevention and recognition

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Arbetsföras hälsovård:
  Edling, C. Mfl. (red.) 2019. Arbets- och miljömedicin. Studentlitteratur
  Haarala et al. 2015. Terveydenhoitajan osaaminen.
  Hakanen, J. et al. Upptäck dina kraftkällor: ABC i arbetshälsa.
  Hakanen, J. 2011. Työn imu. TTL
  Helldán, Helaskorpi. 2014. Suomalaisen aikuisväestön terveyskäyttäytyminen ja terveys.
  Härmä,M.mfl. 2020. Må bra i skiftarbete. TTL
  Karvala,K; Leino,T mfl. Arbetshälsoinstitutet. 2019 Exponeringsbaserad uppföljning av hälsa i arbetet.
  Martimo, K-P, Uitti, P, Antti-Poika M. 2018. Työstä terveyttä. Duodecim
  Michelsson, T, Rejula, K, Ala-Mursula L, Räsänen, K, Uitti J. 2018. Työelämän perustietoa. Duodecim
  Manka M-L mfl. Työn iloa ja imua työhyvinvoinnin ratkaisuja pientyöpaikalla.
  Rautio,M & Michelsen,T. 2013. AFM: så här använder du arbetsförmågeindex och enkäten. Arbetshälsoinstitutet.
  Taskinen mfl. 2011. Terveystarkastukset työterveyshuollossa. TTL
  Uitti, J.(red.) 2016. God företagshälsovårdspraxis. Arbetshälsoinstitutet
  Jouttimäki, L. & Leino, T. 2008. Kvalitetsnyckel för företagshälsovården, Arbetshälsoinstitutet
  Juutilainen 2004. Työterveyshoitajan käsikirja.
  Pietiläinen,R. 2003 Työturvallisuuslaki:soveltamisopas TTL
  SHM. 2013:14. Osaajia työterveyshuoltoon! Työterveyshuollon koulutuksen turvaaminen ja osaamisen vahvistaminen.
  Lagen om företagshälsovård 1383/2001
  Lagen om företagshälsovårdhandbok för tillämpning SHM.
  Arbetarskyddslagen 738/2002
  Arbetarskyddet i Finland SHM 2010
  www.tyosuojelu.fi
  www.aluehallintovirasto.fi
  Sinervo,L.& Hietapakka, L. 2013 Työttömien terveyspalvelut. Valtakunnallisen terveyskeskuskyselyn 2013 tulokset.
  Työttömän terveystarkastus; https://thl.fi/fi/web/sote-uudistus/tulevaisuuden-sosiaali-ja-terveyskeskus/toimivia-toimintamalleja-hankkeiden-tueksi/tyottoman-terveystarkastus,
  https://stm.fi/sv/halsotjanster-for-arbetslosa
  Artiklar och nätbaserad material
  
  Vuxenhälsovård :
  Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen 2020-2023: Målet är ett åldersvänligt Finland , https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162456
  Cancerföreningen,
  https://www.cancerforeningen.fi/organisationen/cancerforeningen-i-finland
  Nationellt åldersprogram fram till år 2030: För ett ålderskunnigt Finland
  https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162464
  Plan för att stödja den äldre befolkningen 2015–2030 (Korsholm, pdf 2,4 Mt)
  Vasa stads plan för att stöda seniorbefolkningen – Åldersvänligt åtgärdsprogram för åren 2020-2025 (pdf 3,4 Mt)
  Työttömien terveystarkastukset,
  https://thl.fi/fi/web/sote-uudistus/tulevaisuuden-sosiaali-ja-terveyskeskus/toimintamalleja-ja-menetelmia-tyon-tueksi/osallisuus/tyottoman-terveystarkastus,
  Työttömien terveyspalvelut
  https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/110751/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-049-8.pdf?sequence=1,
  Hälsovårdstjänster för arbetslösa
  https://stm.fi/sv/halsotjanster-for-arbetslosa,
  Vuxenbefolkningens hälsa,
  https://thl.fi/sv/web/thlfi-sv/forskning-och-utveckling/undersokningar-och-projekt/nationella-undersokningen-finsote/tidigare-undersokningar#EVTK,
  Eide, H. 2009. Omvårdnadsorienterad kommunikation: relationsetik, samarbete och konfliktlösning.
  Miehen terveys: https://www.miesklinikka.com/miesklinikka
  Mannens hälsa: https://www.manshalsafordig.se/
  Artiklar och övrig material (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Verkstad (obligatorisk närvaro)
  Smågruppsarbeten
  Seminarium
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Hälsovårdararbete med arbetsföra:
  Verkstäder och grupparbeten GK/UK
  Examination/ hemtentamen vitsord 1-5
  Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
  Vuxenhälsovård:
  Semiariearbete med seminarium vitsord 1-5
  Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.02.2025 - 30.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Daniel Nenonen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Arbetsföras hälsovård:
  Verkstad, grupparbete och föreläsningar (1 sp) enligt schema
  Hemtentamen (2 sp) inlämning den 13.4.25 kl.20.00
  
  Vuxen
  Seminariearbete samt seminarium 1 sp; Seminarium 6.3.2025 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursen 4 sp= 108 h
  Föreläsningar, seminarium, workshops 45 h
  Självstudier med uppgifter 68 (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande har inte lämnat in uppgiften och/ eller deltagit i seminarium
  Studernade har inte deltogit i verkstaden
  Examination: Studerande har inte lämnat in hemtentamen (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och
  
  Kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Health Care Practices Among Expecting Families UHV20HV02-3002 01.08.2024-31.12.2024  5 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can plan, implement and assess the follow-up of health, well-being and resources of expecting families as well as of families with infants
  
  Recognises risks and complications related to pregnancy and childbirth and can, if necessary, consult other experts in the field of maternal health care
  
  Is familiar with the course of childbirth and can manage an emergency childbirth
  
  Can, by use of resource promoting methods, advise clients in aspects related to pregnancy, childbirth, puerperium, couple relations and family planning

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  The service system
  
  Health examinations, screenings
  
  Normal pregnancy and puerperium
  
  Health risks and complications during pregnancy
  
  Social awareness (current challenges)
  
  The normal and complicated delivery process, pain relief and examination
  
  Resource enhancing methods in working with the family who have had a children
  
  Guidance and support for the pregnant and the family
  
  Family planning
  
  Family planning, sexual and reproductive health, couple relationship
  
  Socio-economic security when the family has children
  
  Early interaction
  
  Families from different cultures at child health clinics

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Liljeroth

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  OBLIGATORISK LITTERATUR:
  Paananen, U., Pietiläinen, S., Raussi-Lehto, E. & Äimälä, A-M. 2015. Kätilötyö. Edita. Kapitlen 3-11.
  ELLER
  Kaplan, A., Hogg, B., Hildingsson, I. & Lundgren, I. 2009. Lärobok för barnmorskor. Studentlitteratur. Kapitlen 3-8.
  ELLER
  Lindgren, H., Christensson, K. & Dykes, A-K. Reproduktiv hälsa - barnmorskans kompetensområde. Studentlitteratur. Kapitlen 15-29.
  
  OCH
  Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T. (red.). 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation.
  https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/126655/2015_THL_OPA040_web.pdf?sequence=3
  OCH
  THL: Mödra- och barnrådgivning. OBS! På finska finns mera omfattande information!
  https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning
  https://thl.fi/fi/web/lapset-nuoret-ja-perheet/sote-palvelut/aitiys-ja-lastenneuvola
  OCH
  Fosterscreening. SHM. https://stm.fi/sv/screeningar/fosterscreening
  OCH
  NEUKO-tietokanta: https://www.terveysportti.fi/apps/dtk/nko
  OCH
  Blodtjänst, Undersökningar som görs under graviditeten. https://www.veripalvelu.fi/sv/for-proffs/undersokningar-som-gors-under-graviditeten/
  
  REFERENSLITTERATUR:
  Deufel, M. & Montonen, E. 2016. Lapsivuodeaika. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  
  Ensitieto vastasyntyneen vanhemmille. Vammaispalvelujen käsikirja. THL.
  https://thl.fi/julkaisut/kasikirjat/vammaispalvelujen-kasikirja/asiakasprosessi/neuvonta-ja-ohjaus/ensitieto/ensitieto-vastasyntyneen-vanhemmille
  
  Eviras näringsrekommendationer. https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/sv/
  
  Främjande av sexuell hälsa. SHM. https://stm.fi/sv/halsoframjande/sexuell-halsa
  
  Gravida - råd om bra mat. Livsmedelsverket. https://www.livsmedelsverket.se/matvanor-halsa--miljo/kostrad/gravida
  
  Hakulinen, T., Laajasalo, T. & Mäkelä, J. 2019. Vanhemmuuden ja parisuhteen tuen vahvistaminen: Teoriasta käytäntöön Ohjaus: 2019: 9. THL.
  
  Lähisuhdeväkivalta. THL. https://thl.fi/fi/web/vakivalta/vakivallan-muodot/lahisuhdevakivalta
  
  Ryttyläinen, K. & Valkama, S. 2010 (eller 2020). Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä. Helsinki: Edita.
  
  Sekusaalisuus puheeksi. THL. https://thl.fi/fi/web/lapset-nuoret-ja-perheet/kehittyvat-kaytannot/seksuaalisuus-puheeksi
  
  Stenman, M. 2016. Liikkuvan äidin hyvinvointi. Raskausaika ja äitiys. Fitra Oy.
  
  Täckman, A. & Tiiri, J. Sivuvaunu – Opas vammaisille äideille ja äitiydestä haaveileville sekä ammattilaisille. https://www.rusettiry.fi/sivuvaunu/
  
  Våld i nära relationer och inom familjen. Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet. http://stm.fi/sv/forebyggande-av-vald-i-nara-relationer
  
  Material som ges under föreläsningarna och laddas upp på Moodle.
  Aktuella artiklar i Terveydenhoitajalehti & Kätilölehti
  Övriga aktuella nätsidor
  
  Observera att litteraturen kan uppdateras under kursens gång! (not translated)

  Learning methods

  1. Föreläsningar
  Inför vissa föreläsningar får studerande material att läsa in sig på, alternativt delas materialet ut under föreläsningen. Under föreläsningarna behandlas case utgående från förhandsmaterialet och/eller material som delas ut på föreläsningen.
  
  2. Gästföreläsningar (obligatorisk närvaro) i samarbete med kursen Hälsovårdarabete med barnfamiljen (se schema)
  
  3. Simuleringar (obligatorisk närvaro)
  
  4. Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Diagnostiskt test
  Bedömning gk/uk.
  Testet består av flervalsfrågor och ja-nej-frågor. För godkänt vitsord ska testet vara gjort.
  
  2. Skriftlig parrapport, bedömning 1-5/uk
  Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kompetenserna och innehåll i de angivna kurserna), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap.
  
  3. Muntlig gruppexamination, bedömning 1-5/uk.
  Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kompetenserna och innehåll i de angivna kurserna), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap, reflektionsförmåga. Studerande bedöms individuellt enligt substanskunskap (se kompetenser och innehåll) och förmåga till reflektion.
  
  4. Simuleringar gk/uk
  Obligatotiskt deltagande. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pia Liljeroth

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursen består av fyra delexaminationer.
  
  1. Diagnostiskt test (0,25 sp)
  Diagnostiskt test om normal graviditet och förlossning på Moodle. Bedöms gk/uk.
  
  2. Skriftlig parrapport och seminarium (2 sp)
  Kurserna Resursförstärkande hälsovårdararbete, Hälsovårdarabete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdarabete med barnfamiljen examineras tillsammans i form av en parrapport.
  
  Studerande väljer (parvis) ett tema (t.ex. sömn, missbruk) och en metod (t.ex. motiverande samtal, resursförstärkande handledning) inom kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete. Temat och metoden ska synliggöras och tillämpas på den gravida familjen och i barnfamiljen (inom kurserna Hälsovårdarabete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdarabete med barnfamiljen).
  
  I rapporten ska fokus ligga på förebyggande och hälsofrämjande arbete, Tema- och parindelning görs på Moodle i kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete.
  
  Rapporten ska basera sig på kurslitteraturen, relevanta webbsidor samt minst 3 vetenskapliga artiklar (en per kurs).
  Paren ska boka in en handledningsgång med ansvariga lärare.
  
  Arbetet bedöms enligt skalan 1-5.
  Studerande får skriftlig feedback efter seminariet.
  
  3. Muntlig examination (2 sp)
  Kurserna Hälsovårdararbete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdararbete med barnfamiljen examineras gemensamt med en muntlig examination i grupp.
  
  Gruppindelning, exakt tidpunkt och upplägg för examinationen meddelas senare (via Moodle under kursen Hälsovårdararbete med den väntande familjen).
  Bedöms enligt skala 1-5.
  Studerande får skriftlig feedback efter examinationen.
  
  4. Simuleringar (0,75 sp)
  Obligatoriskt deltagande och förhandsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1. Diagnostiskt test om normal graviditet och förlossning på Moodle. Görs efter kursintroduktionen och före första föreläsningen.
  
  2. Skriftliga parrapporten laddas upp på Moodle (under kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete) och presenteras på seminarium 5.11.2024. (seminariets upplägg laddas upp på Moodle efter deadline), se Moodle för närmare uppgifter.
  
  3. Muntlig examination i grupp v. 50.
  Vid underkänd muntlig gruppexamination tenteras kursen individuellt skriftligt. Omtentamensdatum 17.1.2025, 7.2.2025.
  .
  4. Simuleringar (se schema) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Diagnostiskt test 1 h
  Undervisning 20 h
  Simulering 10 h
  Examination (parrapport/seminarium och muntlig examination) 10 h
  Självstudier 94 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Skriftlig parrapport:
  Temaområdena behandlas fragmentariskt.
  Litteraturen används inte.
  Reflektioner framförs inte.
  Brister i den tekniska utformningen.
  
  Muntlig gruppexamination:
  Studerande deltar inte på eget initiativ i gruppens diskussion. Studerande kan inte besvara frågor som ställs till hen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Skriftlig parrapport:
  Temaområdena behandlas kort.
  Litteraturen refereras
  Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning.
  Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig.
  
  Muntlig gruppexamination:
  Studerande deltar sporadiskt i gruppens diskussion. Studerande använder enbart kurslitteratur eller enbart egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Skriftlig parrapport:
  Temaområdena behandlas mångsidigt.
  Litteraturen tillämpas.
  Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns.
  Den tekniska utformningen är god.
  
  Muntlig gruppexamination:
  Studerande deltar i gruppens diskussion och bidrar med relevant kunskap. Studerande använder både kurslitteratur och sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar, men inte systematiskt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Skriftlig parrapport:
  Temaområdena behandlas uttömmande och mångsidigt.
  Litteraturen analyseras och tillämpas.
  Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk.
  Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig.
  
  Muntlig gruppexamination:
  Studerande deltar aktivt i gruppens diskussion under examinationen och bidrar med relevant och korrekt kunskap. Studerande använder systematiskt både kurslitteratur samt sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. (not translated)

•   Health Promoting Care at Different Ages VÅV22HF02-3005 21.04.2025-30.05.2025  5 credits  (UBM23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
  - can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
  - can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
  - can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
  - knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
  - has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
  - knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
  - can collaborate in interprofessional teams

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

  Content of the study unit

  Human sexuality
  The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
  Development of children and young people
  Follow-up of children's and young people's health
  Adult health care and screenings
  Health technology
  Interprofessional collaboration

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maternity care:
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
  THL.2023. Data base Neuko (replace Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Tillgänglig från: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko
  
  STM Arbetslivet 2023 (valda artiklar)
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, group work,video

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  50% för godkänt, jämt fördelat mellan vitsord 1-5
  50-60%=1 60-70%= 2 etc. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.04.2025 - 30.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 20.04.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM23D-V
  • UHV23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Exam
  Two retakes possible

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Written exam last lecture

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr, 5 cr= 135h

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Health Promoting Care at Different Ages VÅV22HF02-3006 27.01.2025-09.03.2025  5 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
  - can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
  - can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
  - can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
  - knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
  - has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
  - knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
  - can collaborate in interprofessional teams

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

  Content of the study unit

  Human sexuality
  The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
  Development of children and young people
  Follow-up of children's and young people's health
  Adult health care and screenings
  Health technology
  Interprofessional collaboration

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
  Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
  Holmström, E. & Ohlsson, K. 2014. Människan i arbetslivet. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
  THL.2023. Data base Neuko (replace Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Available in Finnish and Swedish from: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.01.2025 - 09.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 26.01.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  -

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  
  Written assignments need to follow Novia instructions for writing

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  På engelska
  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Exam
  Two retakes possible

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h /cr
  5 cr = 135 h

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Health Promoting Care at Different Ages VÅV22HF02-3007 10.03.2025-13.04.2025  5 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
  - can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
  - can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
  - can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
  - knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
  - has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
  - knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
  - can collaborate in interprofessional teams

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

  Content of the study unit

  Human sexuality
  The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
  Development of children and young people
  Follow-up of children's and young people's health
  Adult health care and screenings
  Health technology
  Interprofessional collaboration

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
  Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
  Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
  THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
  THL.2023. Databasen Neuko (ersätter Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Tillgänglig från: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko
  THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
  STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
  STM Arbetslivet 2023 (valda artiklar)
  Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
  Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
  Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

  Learning methods

  Inbandade föreläsningar på Moodle, individuella uppgifter samt tentamen på moodle vid Alere. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.03.2025 - 13.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 09.02.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course is online

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's general instructions
  Written exam
  Two retakes possible

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Tentamen sista tillfället, klockan 9-11.30 (not translated)

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  1cr = 27h
  5 cr= 135h individual studies

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Health Promoting Care in Sustainable Environment USS22GV01-3007 07.01.2025-30.03.2025  4 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with the theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and palliative care
  - can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
  - can, under guidance, along with individuals/groups in inter-professional teams plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional capacity
  - has expertise in care in various service environments within health promotion

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Principles of health and illness, public health and endemic diseases
  
  Sustainable care at local and national level
  
  Health determinants
  
  Epidemiology
  
  Evidence-based health promotion and prevention, methods, rehabilitation
  
  Empowerment
  
  Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and commitment
  
  Different service environments
  
  Ethical issues in health education
  
  Disabilities/impairments, functional ability, measurement methods
  
  Artificial intelligence

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Liljeroth

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kurslitteratur:
  
  Bonita, R., Beaglehole, R. & Kjällström T, (2010). Grundläggande epidemiologi. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Sid. 17 - 66 och 147 - 250.
  
  Bringsén, Å. & Nilsson Lindström, P. (red.). (2019). Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Stockholm: Liber.
  
  Brulde, B. (red). (2011). Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Edberg, A-K. &Wijk, H. (red.) (2019). Omvårdnadens grunder: Hälsa och ohälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Gottlieb, L.N. (2013). Strengths-Based Nursing Care. New York: Springer. Sid. 56 - 103 (finns också som e-bok).
  
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  
  Klang Söderqvist, B. & Kneck, Å. (red). (2018). Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi
  
  Artiklar
  
  Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
  
  Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi
  
  En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
  Kauhanen, J. mfl. (2013). Kansanterveystiede. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  
  Pellmer, K. et.al. (2017). Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Stockholm: Liber.
  
  Svanström, L. (2012). En introduktion till folkhälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Ejlertsson, G. & Andersson, I. (2013). Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Eriksson, M. (red). (2015). Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Stockholm: Liber.
  
  Skolin, I. (2018). Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Schäfer Elinder, L. & Kwak, L. (red) (2014). Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsning
  Litteraturstudier
  Flipped learning med verkstäder
  Simulering (obligatorisk närvaro)
  Schemalagt grupparbete (obligatorisk närvaro)
  Seminarium (obligatorisk närvaro) (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individuell skriftlig inlämningsuppgift 0-5:
  Skriftlig inlämningsuppgift bedöms enligt skalan 0-5. I uppgiften ska studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter i resursförstärkande metoder i det hälsofrämjande och förebyggande arbetet. Studerande ska ta i beakatande hållbarheten i omgivningen. Studerande ska visa kunskaper i handledning av individer och grupper till ett hälsofrämjande levnadssätt. Studerande visar att hen förstår betydelsen av mångprofessionellt arbete inom folkhälsoarbetets kontext. Den skriftliga uppgiften ska göras enligt Novias skrivanvisningar (layout och källhantering).
  Komplettering enligt examinators anvisingar.
  Försenad inlämning leder att studerande inte kan delta i grupparbetet och seminariet.
  
  Seminarium GK/UK
  Underkänt:
  Prestationen är underkänd om något av följande uppfylls:
  - Studerande har inte lämnat in sin individuella inlämningsuppgift innan grupparbetet ska göras
  - Studerande identiefierar inte de grundläggande aspekterna i uppgiften
  - Studerande fungerar inte som en ansvarsfull (bär inte sitt ansvar som) gruppmedlem
  - Studerande deltar inte i seminariet
  
  Godkänt (alla kriterier uppfylls):
  - Studerande känner till de grundläggande aspekterna och principerna i uppgiftens syfte
  - Studerande bär sitt ansvar som gruppmedlem och kan bevisa deltagandet
  - Studerande arbetar ansvarsfullt och aktivt kring seminariearbetet och dess framförande
  - Studernade deltar aktivt på seminariet
  
  Simulering GK/UK
  Underkänt:
  Studerande har inte förberett sig inför simuleringen
  Studerande deltar inte i simuleringen eller/och
  Studerande är inte en aktiv deltagare under simuleringen
  
  Godkänt:
  Studerande har förberett sig inför simuleringen
  Studernade både deltar i simuleringar samt deltar aktivt under simuleringstillfället (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2025 - 30.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  07.12.2024 - 06.01.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pia Liljeroth

  Additional information

  Det är inte tillåtet för studerande att använda artificiell intelligens för att skapa innehållet i examinationerna. Artificiell intelligens får dock användas för idéer, planering och granskning av språkdräkt. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1. Flipped learning med verkstäder 1,5 sp
  Aktivt deltagande i verkstäder kring kursens teman (epidemiologi, etik, AI, funktionsförmåga, aktörer inom folkhälsoarbete). Studerande läser in sig på de olika temana enligt anvisningar och kommer förberedda till verkstäderna.
  Frånvaro från verkstäderna kompenseras med kompensationsuppgifter.
  
  2. Simulering (obligatorisk närvaro) 0,5 sp
  Förhandsuppgift inlämnad inom utsatt tid och obligatorisk närvaro på plats på Henriksgatan vid simulering. Uppgifter om gruppindelning och exakt tidtabell publiceras i Moodle.
  
  3. Individuell skriftlig inlämningsuppgift 1,5 sp
  Uppgiften utgör material för grupparbete och -presentation.
  
  4.Schemalagt grupparbete och presentation på seminarium 0,5 sp
  Obligatorisk närvaro på grupparbete och seminarium. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Simulering vecka 10
  Obligatorisk närvaro.
  
  Skriftlig inlämningsuppgift, inlämning vecka 12
  Inlämning på Moodle innan grupparbetet. Studerande får individuell skriftlig respons på sitt arbete på Moodle.
  
  Grupparbete (schemalagt) vecka 12
  Obligatorisk närvaro. För att kunna delta i grupparbetet och seminariet ska studerande ha lämnat in sin individuella inlämningsuppgift innan grupparbetet. Utgående från de skriftliga inlämningsuppgifterna sammanställer studerande i grupper presentationer inför seminarium.
  
  Seminarium vecka 13
  Obligatorisk närvaro. Muntlig respons ges vid seminariet. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 2 h
  Litteraturstudier 75 h
  Verkstäder 15 h
  Simulering 4 h
  Schemalagt grupparbete 6 h
  Seminarium 6 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kriterier för vitsordet 1. Underkänd skriftlig inlämningsuppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  I examinationen besvaras alla examinationens delar utgående från få källor, men de olika delarna kan inte relateras till varandra eller innehållet är på en ytlig nivå.
  Studerande använder kurslitteratur smalt eller enbart egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar.
  Layouten och källhanteringen följer huvudsakligen YH Novias skrivanvisningar.
  Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på alla examinationens delar utgående från källor men de olika svaren kan inte helt relateras till varandra.
  Studerande använder både kurslitteratur och sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar, men inte systematiskt.
  Studerande använder sig inte av andra evidensbaserade källor.
  Layouten följer YH Novias skrivanvisningar och det finns enstaka fel i källhanteringen.
  Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på alla examinationens delar utgående från olika evidensbaserade källor och kan relatera de olika delarna av examination till varandra. Studerande använder systematiskt kurslitteratur, andra evidensbaserade källor samt sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar.
  Källhanteringen och layouten följer givna anvisningar.
  Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

•   Health Promotion Methods in Public Health Nurse´s Workfield HVV22HA02-3002 10.03.2025-12.10.2025  4 credits  (UHV22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of different health-promoting working methods and has the skills to use these in the meeting with the family, the individual, the group and the society in change
  -has knowledge of working with outreach activities and a resource-strengthening approach as well as identifying and supporting clients/patients in need of special/intensive support
  - can make use of key research and screening methods in health care work
  - develops his/her abilities to teach and counsel
  - has theoretical knowledge to be able to perform postpartum examination after normal delivery
  - has readiness to carry out a safe vaccination for children and adults
  - knows about environmental health and can work to prevent accidents
  - master safe drug management

  Prerequisites

  Study unit VÅV22IN : all courses approved
  Study unit VÅV22GV : all courses approved
  Study unit VÅV22HF : all courses approved
  Study unit VÅV22KV : courses VÅV22KV01-KV14 approved
  Study unit VÅV22PR: courses VÅV22PR01-PR05 approved

  Content of the study unit

  Health and motivational intervju , lifestyle councelling
  Supervision and teaching
  Group supervision and group activities
  Laborations in central examination and screening methods
  Postpartum examination after normal birth
  Environmental health
  Digital solutions and welfare technology

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
  
  Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Magnusson, A-S. 2014. Om kommunikation - för personal i vårdande yrke. Liber
  Sandberg, H. 2014. Sjuksköterskans samtal. Professionalitet och medmänsklighet. Studentlitteratur.
  Berglund,M. &Ekebergh, M. (red.).2015. Reflektion i lärande och vård, en utmaning för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur.
  Barth, T; & Näsholm, C. 2006. Motiverande samtal. MI att hjälpa en människa till förändring på hennes egna villkor. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson,E & Arnkil, T.2006 Ta upp oron. En handbok i tidiga dialoger. Stakes, handböcker 64
  Killén, K. 2011. Professionell utveckling och handledning, ett yrkesövergripande perspektiv. Studentlitteratur.
  Kostenius,C & Lindqvist, A-K. 2009. Hälsovägledning. Från ord till handling. Studentlitteratur.
  Kyngäs, Kääriäinen, Poskiparta, Johansson, Hirvonen & Renfors. 2007. Ohjaaminen hoitotyössä. WSOY.
  Patja Kristiina (toim) mfl. 2022 Terveyden edistäminen .
  
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter 2018-2024
  
  Se även Moodle angående litteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  - Lectures våren 2025
  - Practical exercises/simulations in the clinical training center autumn 2025
  - Workshops
  - Recording and analysis of health conversations

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Compulsory attendance at workshops, contact study days and practical exercises/simulation Pass/Fail
  Recording and analysis of health conversations Pass/Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.03.2025 - 12.10.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 09.03.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Frida Gädda, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Post-partum examination - lectures and practical exercises will be carried out in the spring of 2025 together with group UBM22

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

•   Health Promotion Skills and Expert Knowledge HVV14HA07-3008 07.01.2025-09.02.2025  3 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - masters the prevention of infectious diseases can provide expertise regarding vaccination programmes for children and adults
  - knows about environmental health and can work to prevent accidents
  - develops his/her abilities to teach and counsel
  - develops his/her professional skills from a multidisciplinary perspective

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to public health nursing
  Health promotion skills in family health

  Content of the study unit

  In-depth vaccination knowledge - national virtual course
  
  Other expert knowledge

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
  
  Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  Further information

  I kurshelheten avlägger studeranden den nationella kursen i Fördjupad Vaccinationskunskap 1 sp (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  se moodlekurser:
  - Hälsofrämjande färdigheter och expertkunskap
  - Fördjupad vaccinationskunskap 1 sp (övriga kurser : gemensam Novia Vasa, Åbo, Arcada) (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Expertföreläsningar
  Kliniska övningar på KTC ( postpartum, första hjälp)
  Workshop ( fördjupad vaccinationskunskap)
  Eget arbete (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Fördjupad vaccinationskunskap portfolio GK/UK virtuell tentamen : GK/UK
  Deltagande i föreläsningar gällande efterundersökning Post Partum: GK/UK
  Metodhandbok : vitsord 1-5 ( kursens helhetsvitsord utgörs av vitsordet för metodhandboken) (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2025 - 09.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 07.01.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Nina Vestö, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  I kurshelheten ingår den virtuella kursen :
  Fördjupad vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Portfolio+ virtuell tentamen enligt tidtabell i moodlekursen fördjupad vaccinationskunskap:
  Portfolio deadline : 20.1.25 Virtuell tentamen deadline 14.2.25
  
  Inlämning av metodhandbok:3.3.2025 (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Fördjupad vaccinationskunskap portfolio GK/UK virtuell tentamen : GK
  Deltagande i föreläsningar gällande efterundersökning Post Partum: GK
  Metodhandbok : vitsord 1-5 (not translated)

•   Health promotion skills in family health HVV21HA08-3001 02.09.2024-02.02.2025  3 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - can make use of key research and screening methods in health care work
  - guides and supports clients on issues related to sexual health and family planning
  - possesses the skills to realize family and parents preparation
  - has readiness to carry out a safe vaccination for children
  - has knowledge of different health-promoting working methods and has the skills to use these in the meeting with the family, the individual, the group and the society in change
  - has knowledge of working with outreach activities and a resource-strengthening approach as well as identifying and supporting clients/patients in need of special/intensive support
  - master safe drug management

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to public health nursing
  Public health nursing with the expectant family

  Content of the study unit

  Examination and screening methods in health care work simulation exercises
  Reproductive health and family planning
  Family and parent preparation
  Vaccination of children - simulation exercises
  Different health promotion methods
  Child protection
  Educational sequences for children and adults
  Tutorial

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och
  kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  according to the lecturers instruction
  see moodle platform

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Simulations/practical exercises in the clinical training center
  Recording and analysis of health talks
  Virtual studies
  Preparation of methodological manual in child health care

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved participation in practical exercises in clinical training center
  Approved participation in recording and analysis of health talks
  Preparation of methodology manual in child counseling work, grades 1-5
  Participation in expert lectures in child protection and execution of task Passed/Failed

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 02.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 01.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 18

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa - timlärare Vård, Carita Blomström, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at simulations/practical exercises, recording and analysis of health talks and expert lectures in child protection and sexual health

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Simulations/practical exercises in autumn 2024
  Recording and analysis of health talks in autumn 2024
  Deadline for submission of method manual in february 2025

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

•   Human Development USS22GV03-3005 10.01.2025-06.04.2025  3 credits  (USS24F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of health
  - understands the human physical, mental, cognitive and social development at different ages
  - have knowledge of human needs (spiritual, existential, sexual)
  - can offer support in developmental and traumatic crises

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The dimensions of health and sustainable development
  
  The human life cycle
  
  Human physical, mental, cognitive and social development
  
  Accessibility
  
  Spiritual needs
  
  Existential needs
  
  Sexual needs
  
  Gender diversity
  
  Attachment theory
  
  Developmental Psychological Theories
  
  Crises, traumatic crises and crisis relief
  
  Coping

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Angelöw B & Jonsson T. 2015. Introduktion till socialpsykologi.
  Bowlby J. 2010. En trygg bas.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytningsteori. Betydelsen av nära känslomässiga relationer.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytning i praktiken. Tillämpning av anknytningsteori.
  Grina, T. 2015. Den livsviktiga anknytningen: teori, utredning och behandling.
  Eysenck M. (red.) 2000. Psykologi. Ett integrerat perspektiv.
  Espen J (red.) 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier.
  Hwang, P & Nilsson B. 2019. Utvecklingspsykologi.
  Giddens A. 2014. Sociologi (kap. 2,4,5,9,11,17)
  Meeuwisse A. & Swärd H. (red). 2015. Prespektiv på sociala problem.
  Repstad P. 2016. Sociologiska perspektiv i vård, omsorg och socialt arbete.
  Sundbeck M. 2013. Sexuell hälsa i vården.
  Sivonen K. 2000. Vården och det andliga. En bestämning av begreppet andlig ur ett vårdvetenskapligt perspektiv.
  Geels A. & Wikström O. 2012. Den religiösa människan. En introduktion till religionpsykologin.
  Drakos G. & Hydén L. 2011. Diagnos & identitet.
  Övrig ändamålsenlig litteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Workshops
  Seminarier
  Inlämningsuppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Workshops och seminarium. Bedöms som GK/UK. Kriterier för GK är deltagande i Workshop och seminarium
  2. Individuell inlämningsuppgift. Inlämning på Moodle Bedöms enligt vitsordsskala se nedan. Feedback på inlämningsuppgiften sker via Moodle plattformen (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.01.2025 - 06.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  07.12.2024 - 09.01.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Workshops och seminarier enligt läsordning
  Individuell inlämningsuppgift, Inlämning på Moodle 11.4 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursintroduktion 2h
  Workshops 2h
  Seminarier 4h
  Workshops uppgift 10h
  Individuell inlämningsuppgift 63h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar endast delvis eller ytligt på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övrig facklitteratur. Inlämningsuppgiften har delvis relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat beskrivs ytligt och ensidigt. Egna reflektioner förekommer inte eller beskrivs kort. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och en tillämpning av det egna temat syns. Egna reflektioner förekommer. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar mångsidigt på frågeställningar och är skriven utgående från fakta, artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat syns tydligt. Egna reflektioner och analys beskrivs väl. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Human Development USS22GV03-3006 27.01.2025-13.04.2025  3 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - understands the importance of health
  - understands the human physical, mental, cognitive and social development at different ages
  - have knowledge of human needs (spiritual, existential, sexual)
  - can offer support in developmental and traumatic crises

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The dimensions of health and sustainable development
  
  The human life cycle
  
  Human physical, mental, cognitive and social development
  
  Accessibility
  
  Spiritual needs
  
  Existential needs
  
  Sexual needs
  
  Gender diversity
  
  Attachment theory
  
  Developmental Psychological Theories
  
  Crises, traumatic crises and crisis relief
  
  Coping

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Angelöw B & Jonsson T. 2015. Introduktion till socialpsykologi.
  Bowlby J. 2010. En trygg bas.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytningsteori. Betydelsen av nära känslomässiga relationer.
  Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytning i praktiken. Tillämpning av anknytningsteori.
  Grina, T. 2015. Den livsviktiga anknytningen: teori, utredning och behandling.
  Eysenck M. (red.) 2000. Psykologi. Ett integrerat perspektiv.
  Espen J (red.) 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier.
  Hwang, P & Nilsson B. 2019. Utvecklingspsykologi.
  Giddens A. 2014. Sociologi (kap. 2,4,5,9,11,17)
  Meeuwisse A. & Swärd H. (red). 2015. Prespektiv på sociala problem.
  Repstad P. 2016. Sociologiska perspektiv i vård, omsorg och socialt arbete.
  Sundbeck M. 2013. Sexuell hälsa i vården.
  Sivonen K. 2000. Vården och det andliga. En bestämning av begreppet andlig ur ett vårdvetenskapligt perspektiv.
  Geels A. & Wikström O. 2012. Den religiösa människan. En introduktion till religionpsykologin.
  Drakos G. & Hydén L. 2011. Diagnos & identitet.
  Övrig ändamålsenlig litteratur.
  På engelska (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Smågruppsarbete
  Seminarier
  Inlämningsuppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Smågruppsarbete och seminarium. Bedöms som GK/UK. Kriterierna för GK är deltagande i
  smågruppsarbete och seminarium. Professionellt förhållningssätt, obligatorisk närvaro.
  2. Individuell inlämningsuppgift, inlämning på Moodle 13.4.2025 Bedöms enligt vitsordsskala 0-5
  3. Familjecenterkörkort, avläggs på Moodle genom en separat länk, utförande 45 minuter, studerande erhåller ett intyg som visas för kursansvariga. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.01.2025 - 13.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  10.12.2024 - 26.01.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Inlämningsuppgift på Moodle 13.4.2025 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 8h
  Seminarier 4h
  Handlett grupparbetet 4h
  Självstudier grupparbete 8h
  Övriga självstudier 10h
  Individuell inlämningsuppgift 47h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar endast delvis eller ytligt på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övrig facklitteratur. Inlämningsuppgiften har delvis relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat beskrivs ytligt och ensidigt. Egna reflektoner förekommer inte eller beskrivs kort. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och en tillämpning av det egna temat syns. Egna reflektioner förekommer. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Inlämningsuppgiften svarar månsidigt på frågeställningar och är skriven utgående från fakta, artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat syns tydligt. Egna reflektioner och analys beskrivs väl. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Human Physiology and Anatomy VÅV22GV03-3011 09.09.2024-08.11.2024  4 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
  Självständiga studier.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.09.2024 - 08.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 08.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 11.11.2024
  Re-examination 13.12.2024, 07.02.2025 and 09.05.2025

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human Physiology and Anatomy VÅV22GV03-3012 06.09.2024-15.11.2024  4 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Camilla Ribacka

  Mode of delivery

  25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2021, 2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
  Självständiga studier.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2024 - 15.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 07.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Ribacka

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination 13.11.2024
  Re-examination 13.12.2024, 07.02.2025 and 09.05.2025

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Human Physiology and Anatomy VÅV22GV03-3013 23.09.2024-22.11.2024  4 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
  - will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
  - will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
  - will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
  - will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
  - will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
  - will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Physiology of the human body
  The anatomy of the human body

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Sanna Gunell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Course literature:
  Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.
  
  Other recommended literature:
  Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
  Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
  Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tasks and discussions.
  Selfstudies.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
  In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.09.2024 - 22.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 24.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Seats

  0 - 40

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Sanna Gunell, Terese Österberg

  Additional information

  Additional information on the Moodle platform

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Course examination tba
  Re-examination tba

  Student's schedule and workload

  Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

  Assessment criteria

  Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

•   Internal Medicine and Surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3011 03.02.2025-28.03.2025  4 credits  (UBM24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  - can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
  - has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
  Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
  Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGI
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  
  RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma
  
  KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
  Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
  Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.02.2025 - 28.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 02.02.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM24D-V
  • UHV24D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Common exam for all parts

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/ 27h denna kurs är 4sp 108h
  
  Endokrinologi 3/4 sp = 6 h teori
  
  Respiratoriska Sjukdomstillstånd
  Teori 12h
  Praktiska 8 h x 2 gånger (indelade i två grupper, alltså 8 h per grupp)
  
  Kardiologiska sjukdomar och hjärtrytmer 1 sp
  12h teori
  2 x 4 h SimMan övningar
  Hjärtarytmitest 1 h
  
  Sammanlagt
  30h teori
  12h praktisk övning
  2 + 2 h tent
  62 h för sammanställning av uppgifter och tent läsning. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal Medicine and Surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3012 14.04.2025-25.05.2025  4 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  - can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
  - has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
  Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
  Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  ENDOCRINOLOGI
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  
  RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
  Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.
  
  Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4
  
  Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
  (vård vid lungsjukdomar)
  
  
  Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle
  
  Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
  Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma
  
  KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
  Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel. 8.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
  Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
  Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
  Referenslitteratur:
  www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

  Learning methods

  Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
  Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
  Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
  Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
  Written exam is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.04.2025 - 25.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 13.04.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Common exam for all parts

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp/ 27h denna kurs är 4sp 108h
  
  Endokrinologi 3/4 sp = 6 h teori
  
  Respiratoriska Sjukdomstillstånd
  Teori 12h
  Praktiska 8 h x 2 gånger (indelade i två grupper, alltså 8 h per grupp)
  
  Kardiologiska sjukdomar och hjärtrytmer 1 sp
  12h teori
  2 x 4 h SimMan övningar
  Hjärtarytmitest 1 h
  
  Sammanlagt
  30h teori
  12h praktisk övning
  2 + 2 h tent
  62 h för sammanställning av uppgifter och tent läsning. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Internal Medicine and Surgical Care 2 VÅV22KV02-3012 03.03.2025-06.04.2025  5 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the most common gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological, gynecological disorders and breast disease conditions and understand their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  -have knowledge of early pregnancy complications, their care and treatment
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the digestive system, urinary tract, kidneys, and reproductive organs
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for nursing care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can integrate health-promoting care in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological diseases, as well as support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with gastrointestinal disorders
  Care of the patient with urological and nephrological disorders
  Care of the patient with gynecological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and motivate their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGICAL NURSING CARE
  Bäckström, T., Kjolhede,P., Landgren, B-M (red) (2022). Gynekologi. Lund: Studentlitteratur. chosen parts
  
  UROLOGICAL CARE
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2021). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 20 och 21. Liber.
  
  Föreläsningar på moodle
  
  GASTROINTESTINAL CARE
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
  o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
  o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.
  
  Simrén, M., Bergquist, A., Hultcrantz, R., Karling, P., Lindgren., Stål,. P. 2023. Gastroenterologi och hepatologi. Andra upplagan, Liber AB, Stockholm.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic care 30 points
  Gastrointestinal care 30 points
  Urologic unhealth 15 points
  = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.03.2025 - 06.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 02.03.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for all parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First exam on the last lecture
  Two retake exams on genral examdays
  Deadline for sexuality assignment
  See time table and Moodle course for dates.

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic care (2 cr), urologic care (1 cr) and gastrointenstinal care (2 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning
  1 cr = 27 h. 5 cr= 135 h.
  
  Gynecologic care: 16 h lectures, 2 h exam, 4 h individual work on sexuality assignment, 32 h individual work = 54 h
  
  Written exam for all parts 3h

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Internal Medicine and Surgical Care 2 VÅV22KV02-3013 06.01.2025-09.02.2025  5 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the most common gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological, gynecological disorders and breast disease conditions and understand their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
  -have knowledge of early pregnancy complications, their care and treatment
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders
  - can describe the physiology and anatomy of the digestive system, urinary tract, kidneys, and reproductive organs
  - can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
  - has the ability to assess the need for nursing care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - can integrate health-promoting care in gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological diseases, as well as support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to gastrointestinal, urological, nephrological and gynecological disorders

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with gastrointestinal disorders
  Care of the patient with urological and nephrological disorders
  Care of the patient with gynecological disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, can reflect and motivate their positions
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student masters the substance of his work but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  20% Face-to-face, 80% Distance learning

  Learning material

  GYNEKOLOGIC CARE
  Bäckström, T., Kjolhede,P., Landgren, B-M (red) (2022). Gynekologi.Lund: Studentlitteratur. parts
  
  UROLOGICAL CARE
  Andersson R., Jeppsson B. & Rydholm A. (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar (red.). Kap 9 Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Stubberud, D., Grønseth, R., Almås, H., Ahlberg, K., Bolinder-Palmér, I., Olsson, K., & Toverud, K. C. (2021). Klinisk omvårdnad: 2 (Upplaga 3.). Kap 20 och 21. Liber AB.
  Ericson, T., Lind, M., & Abelsson, J. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB. Kapitel 13
  Föreläsningar och instuderingsfrågor på moodle
  
  GASTROINTESTINAL CARE
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M (red) 2020. Femte upplagan. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
  o Kap. 9. Vård vid mag-tarmsjukdomar s. 399 – 470.
  o Kap. 10. Vård vid leversjukdomar s. 473 – 520.
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  o Kap. 13. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i mag-tarmkanalen s. 453 – 475.
  o Kap. 14. Omvårdnad vid sjukdomar i gallvägar, bukspottskörtel och lever s. 479 – 502.
  o Kap. 15. Omvårdnad vid stomi s 505 – 531.
  Föreläsningsmaterial på moodle.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, groups work, tutorials, study questions, workshops
  SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Accepted written exam for both parts
  Grade 0-5
  Gynaecologic care 30 points
  Gastrointestinal care 30 points
  Urologic unhealth 15 points
  = totalt 75 ponts
  
  38-44 p. = 1
  45-52 p. = 2
  53-60 p. = 3
  61-68 p. = 4
  69-75 p. = 5
  
  Assignemnt on sexuality Pass/ Fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.01.2025 - 09.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 07.01.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises and gunaecological workshop
  Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises and gynaecological workshop.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  4 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions
  Common exam for all parts

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  -

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  First Written exam on the last lecture of the course
  two retakes on general exam days (see Moodle), registration in Peppi
  Workshops are compulsory
  Deadline for sexuality assignment (see Moodle)

  Internationa connections

  -

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course has two parts: gynaecologic care (2 cr), urologic care (1 cr) and gastrointenstinal (2 cr)
  Individual online assignment on sexuality.
  Group work on cancer nursing and family planning
  
  1 cr = 27 h. 5 cr= 135 h.
  
  Gynaecological care: 16 h lectures, 3 h exam, 4 h individual work with sexuality assignment, 32 h individual work = 54 h
  
  Urologisk care = 27 h
  
  Gastroenterologic conditions: 54 h
  
  Common Moodle exam 3 h

  Content scheduling

  -

•   Internal Medicine and Surgical Care 3 VÅV22KV03-3012 31.03.2025-30.05.2025  5 credits  (UBM24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson, R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red). (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap. 10. Allmän ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red). (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi. Kap. 28. Ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 21 och 22. Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). (2020). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 23 och 24. Stockholm: Liber AB,
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G, Almås H.& Gronseth, R.(red). 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 28 (delar). Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Material på Moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle.
  
  Övrigt:
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Ekwall, A. & Jansson, M. (2022). Omvårdnad och medicin.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Workshops (case & practice)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter / inlämningsuppgifter & tester som utförs under kursens gång (bedöms GK/UK)
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid workshops / praktiska övningar (bedöms GK/UK)
  MSK: tentamen bedöms 0-5
  Neuro: Tent & Quiz bedöms 0-5
  Sinnesorganen: Quiz bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.03.2025 - 30.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 30.03.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM24D-V
  • UHV24D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at workshops.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  För godkänd kurs behöver följande uppgifter och tentamen vara godkända:
  
  Quiz i sinnesorganens ohälsa (0-5)
  Anlays av berättelse/film Amputation (GK/UK)
  Korsord (reuma och atros) (GK/UK)
  Muskuloskeletal ohälsa/Ortopedi (vissa delar): tentamen i klass vid Alere (0-5)
  Stroke (kort tent före med workshop) (0-5)
  Quiz-online i Neurologi & Neurokirurgi (0-5)
  Hematologi: uppgift i Moodle (GK/UK) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp = 135 h
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  
  2 h Intro + MSK
  MSK:
  4 h Reuma + Artros föreläsning
  4 h Workshop, MSK-bedömning & case
  2 h Tent
  Självstudier (35 h): tent, korsord och uppgift om amputationer
  
  Neuro:
  3 h Strokeföreläsning
  2 h Neurologiska sjukdomar
  2 h Neurokirurgi och Neurobedömning
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro.
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro.
  Självstudier & Quiz/tent läsning (30 h)
  
  Sinnesorganen:
  4 h Workshop Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro.
  4 h Workshop Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro.
  Självstudier & Quiz (14 h)
  
  Hema:
  Självstudier (20 h) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Internal Medicine and Surgical Care 3 VÅV22KV03-3014 31.03.2025-04.05.2025  5 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  40% Face-to-face, 60% Distance learning

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson, R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red). (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap. 10. Allmän ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red). (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi. Kap. 28. Ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 21 och 22. Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). (2020). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 23 och 24. Stockholm: Liber AB,
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G, Almås H.& Gronseth, R.(red). 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 28 (delar). Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Material på Moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle.
  
  Övrigt:
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Ekwall, A. & Jansson, M. (2022). Omvårdnad och medicin.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Workshops (case & practice)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter / inlämningsuppgifter & tester som utförs under kursens gång (bedöms GK/UK)
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid workshops / praktiska övningar (bedöms GK/UK)
  MSK: Tent bedöms 0-5
  Neuro: Quiz x 2 bedöms 0-5
  Sinnesorganen: Quiz bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.03.2025 - 04.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 24.03.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at workshops.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  För godkänd kurs behöver följande uppgifter och tentamen vara godkända:
  
  Quiz i sinnesorganens ohälsa (0-5)
  Anlays av berättelse/film Amputation (GK/UK)
  Korsord (reuma och atros) (0-5)
  Stroke (kort tent före med workshop) (0-5)
  Quiz-online i Neurologi & Neurokirurgi (0-5)
  Hematologi: uppgift i Moodle (GK/UK)
  Muskuloskeletal ohälsa/Ortopedi (vissa delar): tent i klass vid Alere (0-5) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp = 135 h
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  
  4+2+2 h online
  
  Neuro:
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro.
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro.
  
  MSK:
  4 h Workshop, MSK-bedömning & case
  
  Sinnesorganen:
  4 h Workshop. Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro.
  4 h Workshop. Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro.
  
  Hematologi:
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3007 02.09.2024-20.10.2024  5 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson, R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red). (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap. 10. Allmän ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red). (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi. Kap. 28. Ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 21 och 22. Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). (2020). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 23 och 24. Stockholm: Liber AB,
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G, Almås H.& Gronseth, R.(red). 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 28 (delar). Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Material på Moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle.
  
  Övrigt:
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Ekwall, A. & Jansson, M. (2022). Omvårdnad och medicin.
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. (2012). Blodets sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Workshops (case & practice)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter / inlämningsuppgifter & tester som utförs under kursens gång (bedöms GK/UK)
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid workshops / praktiska övningar (bedöms GK/UK)
  MSK: Online deltenter bedöms 0-5
  Neuro: Tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 20.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 30.08.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at workshops.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  För godkänd kurs behöver följande uppgifter och tentamen vara godkända:
  
  Quiz i sinnesorganens ohälsa (GK/UK)
  Anlays av berättelse/film Amputation (GK/UK)
  Korsord (reuma och atros) (GK/UK)
  Stroke (kort tent i samband med workshop) (0-5)
  Quiz-online i Neurologi & Neurokirurgi (0-5)
  Hematologi: uppgift i Moodle (GK/UK)
  Muskuloskeletal ohälsa/Ortopedi (vissa delar): tent i klass vid Alere (0-5) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp = 135 h
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  
  2 h Intro (obligatorisk närvaro)
  
  Neuro:
  3 h Strokeföreläsning
  3 h EP, MS, Parkinson & hjärntumörer
  4 h Neurokirurgi och Neurobedömning workshop i A265
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro
  Självstudier & Quiz/tent läsning (26 h)
  
  MSK:
  2 h Teori
  4 h Reuma + Artros föreläsning
  6 h Workshop, Obligatorisk närvaro
  2 h Tent
  Självstudier (33 h): tent, korsord och uppgift om amputationer
  
  Sinnesorganen:
  4 h Workshop Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro
  4 h Workshop Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro
  Självstudier & Quiz (14 h)
  
  Hema:
  Självstudier (se Moodle = 20 h) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3008 30.09.2024-17.11.2024  5 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson, R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red). (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap. 10. Allmän ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red). (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi. Kap. 28. Ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 21 och 22. Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). (2020). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 23 och 24. Stockholm: Liber AB,
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G, Almås H.& Gronseth, R.(red). 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 28 (delar). Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Material på Moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle.
  
  Övrigt:
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Ekwall, A. & Jansson, M. (2022). Omvårdnad och medicin.
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. (2012). Blodets sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Workshops (case & practice)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter / inlämningsuppgifter & tester som utförs under kursens gång (bedöms GK/UK)
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid workshops / praktiska övningar (bedöms GK/UK)
  MSK: Online deltenter bedöms 0-5
  Neuro: Tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.09.2024 - 17.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 22.09.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at workshops.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  För godkänd kurs behöver följande uppgifter och tentamen vara godkända:
  
  Quiz i sinnesorganens ohälsa (GK/UK)
  Anlays av berättelse/film Amputation (GK/UK)
  Korsord (reuma och atros) (GK/UK)
  Stroke (kort tent i samband med workshop) (0-5)
  Quiz-online i Neurologi & Neurokirurgi (0-5)
  Hematologi: uppgift i Moodle (GK/UK)
  Muskuloskeletal ohälsa/Ortopedi (vissa delar): tent i klass vid Alere (0-5) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp = 135 h
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  
  2 h Intro (obligatorisk närvaro)
  
  Neuro:
  3 h Strokeföreläsning
  3 h EP, MS, Parkinson & hjärntumörer
  4 h Neurokirurgi och Neurobedömning workshop i A265
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro
  5 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro
  Självstudier & Quiz/tent läsning (26 h)
  
  MSK:
  2 h Teori
  4 h Reuma + Artros föreläsning
  6 h Workshop, Obligatorisk närvaro
  2 h Tent
  Självstudier (33 h): tent, korsord och uppgift om amputationer
  
  Sinnesorganen:
  4 h Workshop Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro
  4 h Workshop Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro
  Självstudier & Quiz (14 h)
  
  Hema:
  Självstudier (se Moodle = 20 h) (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Internal medicine and surgical care 3 VÅV22KV03-3009 02.09.2024-06.10.2024  5 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - has knowledge of the most common musculoskeletal-, neurological-, hematological-, and sensory disorders as well as their underlying pathophysiology and treatment
  - can describe the anatomy and physiology of the musculoskeletal system, nervous system and sensory organs
  - has evidence-based knowledge of the characteristics of the medical and surgical patient
  - can apply evidence-based clinical practice and critical thinking in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological, and sensory disorders
  - can carry out structured care planning and documentation in accordance with national directives
  - has the ability to assess the need for care in patients through adequate clinical and physiological assessments, and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
  - understands the importance of health promotion and preventive care, as well as rehabilitation in relation to musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders , and the disorders of the sensory organs
  - can integrate health-promoting care in musculoskeletal, neurological, hematological disorders and disorders of the sensory organs, and further more support and guide the patient and relatives in self-care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Care of the patient with musculoskeletal disorders
  Care of the patient with neurological disorders
  Care of the patient with hematological disorders
  Care of the patient with sensory disorders

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

  Learning material

  MUSKELOSKELETALA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson, R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red). (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap. 10. Allmän ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 15. Vård vid reumatiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red). (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi. Kap. 28. Ortopedi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 21 och 22. Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  NEUROLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Andersson R., Regnér, S. & Rogmark, C. (red) (2021). Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Kap 12. Neurokirurgi. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 5. Vård vid cerebrovaskulära sjukdomar. Kap. 6. Vård vid neurologiska sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G., Almås, H. & Gronseth, R, (red). (2020). Klinisk Omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 23 och 24. Stockholm: Liber AB,
  Föreläsningar på Moodle
  
  HEMATOLOGISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (2020). Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 4. Vård vid blodsjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
  Stubberud, D-G, Almås H.& Gronseth, R.(red). 2020. Klinisk omvårdnad 2 (3:e uppl.). Kap. 28 (delar). Stockholm: Liber AB.
  Material på Moodle.
  
  SINNESORGANENS SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND:
  Föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle.
  
  Övrigt:
  Föreläsningsmaterial i Moodle och enligt kursansvarigas anvisningar.
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Burman J., Nyholm D. & Amandusson Å. (2020). Neurologi (6:e upplagan). Liber.
  Ekwall, A. & Jansson, M. (2022). Omvårdnad och medicin.
  Gahrton, G & Juliusson, G. (2012). Blodets sjukdomar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  
  Medibas via www.ezproxy.novia.fi

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Workshops (case & practice)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkända övningsuppgifter / inlämningsuppgifter & tester som utförs under kursens gång (bedöms GK/UK)
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid workshops / praktiska övningar (bedöms GK/UK)
  MSK: Online deltenter bedöms 0-5
  Neuro: Tentamen bedöms 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 06.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 30.08.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Jannica Andtfolk

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
  Mandatory attendance at workshops.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  För godkänd kurs behöver följande uppgifter och tentamen vara godkända:
  
  Quiz i sinnesorganens ohälsa (0-5)
  Anlays av berättelse/film Amputation (GK/UK)
  Korsord (reuma och atros) (0-5)
  Stroke (kort tent i samband med workshop) (0-5)
  Quiz-online i Neurologi & Neurokirurgi (0-5)
  Hematologi: uppgift i Moodle (GK/UK)
  Muskuloskeletal ohälsa/Ortopedi (vissa delar): tent i klass vid Alere (0-5) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/sp = 135 h
  Kursen innehåller fyra delar:
  - Neurologiska sjukdomstillsstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Muskeloskeletala sjukdomstillstånd, 1,75 sp
  - Sinnesorganens sjukdomstillstånd, 0,75 sp
  - Hematologiska sjukdomstillstånd 0,75 sp
  
  2 h Intro-online (obligatorisk närvaro)
  
  Neuro:
  4 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 1, Obligatorisk närvaro
  4 h Workshop (stroke & neuro) Grupp 2, Obligatorisk närvaro
  2 h Workshop (Neurobedömning och -övervakning), Obligatorisk närvaro
  
  MSK:
  2 h Workshop, Obligatorisk närvaro (samma dag som Neurobedömning och -övervakning, samt sinnesorganen)
  
  Sinnesorganen:
  4 h Workshop, Obligatorisk närvaro
  
  Hema:
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: points 70%-89%

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%

•   Internship, Advanced Nursing Practice USS21FV05-3001 06.09.2024-15.12.2024  12 credits  (USS21F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can, in an interprofessional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report person-centered/client-centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate as well as motivate supervision and self-care from an educational and ethical perspective
  
  Can apply and argue for evidence based care methods
  
  Can apply ethical decision making in a variety of service systems
  
  Master safe medication management
  
  Reflects on his/her professional growth and professional identity and analyses opportunities for career development
  
  Identifies, analyses and argues for development needs in the healthcare and service chain

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 140 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Kurslitteratur som nämns i kursen Fördjupat vårdarbete används som grund i denna kurs. Därtill skall studerande gärna ta del av den litteratur som hänförs till det ämne inom vilket studerande gör sin fördjupade praktik (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Handledd praktik 12 sp (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningen av praktiken sker enligt skala GK/UK i relation till kursens kompetenser och hur kursens samt de individuella målen uppnåtts. Eventuell frånvaro från praktiken diskuteras individuellt för varje studerande i relation till huruvida kursens samt de individuella målen/ kompetenserna uppnåtts. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.09.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 12 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Michaela Jalava

  Additional information

  Tilläggsmaterial för praktiken finns på kursens Moodle sida.
  Studerande kan anhålla om validering men minst 4 veckor bör utföras som handledd praktik
  Anhållan om validering skall lämnas in i Pepi, e-Ahot (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Obligatorisk praktikhandledning
  Praktik enligt givna direktiv
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanvärdering med självreflektion
  Slutvärdering med självreflektion
  Ifyllnad av läkemedelsbehandlingspass
  Arbetstidsschema
  Obligatoriskt deltagande i praktikseminarium
  Studiebesök
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Avsnittet utförs som handledd praktik. Handledande lärare tar del av måldiskussionen och värderingarna. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Totala arbetstiden är 38h per vecka (40-2h som används för reflektion, läsning av material mm.) (not translated)

•   Internship, Advanced Nursing Practice USS21FV05-3002 03.10.2024-08.12.2024  12 credits  (USS21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can, in an interprofessional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report person-centered/client-centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate as well as motivate supervision and self-care from an educational and ethical perspective
  
  Can apply and argue for evidence based care methods
  
  Can apply ethical decision making in a variety of service systems
  
  Master safe medication management
  
  Reflects on his/her professional growth and professional identity and analyses opportunities for career development
  
  Identifies, analyses and argues for development needs in the healthcare and service chain

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 140 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Kurslitteratur som nämns i kursen Fördjupat vårdarbete används som grund i denna kurs. Därtill skall studerande gärna ta del av den litteratur som hänförs till det ämne inom vilket studerande gör sin fördjupade praktik (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Handledd praktik 12 sp (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömningen av praktiken sker enligt skala GK/UK i relation till kursens kompetenser och hur kursens samt de individuella målen uppnåtts. Eventuell frånvaro från praktiken diskuteras individuellt för varje studerande i relation till huruvida kursens samt de individuella målen/ kompetenserna uppnåtts. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.10.2024 - 08.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 13.10.2024

  • 12 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava

  Additional information

  Tilläggsmaterial för praktiken finns på kursens Moodle sida.
  Studerande kan anhålla om validering men minst 4 veckor bör utföras som handledd praktik
  Anhållan om validering skall lämnas in i Pepi, e-Ahot (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Obligatorisk praktikhandledning
  Praktik enligt givna direktiv
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanvärdering med självreflektion
  Slutvärdering med självreflektion
  Ifyllnad av läkemedelsbehandlingspass
  Arbetstidsschema
  Obligatoriskt deltagande i praktikseminarium
  Studiebesök
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Avsnittet utförs som handledd praktik. Handledande lärare tar del av måldiskussionen och värderingarna. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Totala arbetstiden är 38h per vecka (40-2h som används för reflektion, läsning av material mm.) (not translated)

•   Internship, Elective/Advanced UHV20HV10-3002 14.04.2025-11.05.2025  3 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can independently be responsible for the health care work in an elective context on the basis of previous practice
  
  Identifies their developmental needs and strengthens their skills in their work as an expert in health care work

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Elective Internship within health care work

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteratur utgående från det valfria hälsovårdskontextet (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktikinformation gemensam med arbetshälsa
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser /mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktiken (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.04.2025 - 11.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 16.03.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Information och anvisningar finns i Praktikanvisningarna på teams (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktikinformation
  Handledd praktik inom valfri hälsovårdskontext
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Läkemedelsbehandlingspass
  Arbetstidsschema (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren bör vara hälsovårdare.
  
  Utdrag om brottslig bakgrund dvs. straffregisterutdrag ska vara i kaft. Utdraget är i kraft sex månader. Om studeranden under den ovan avsedda giltighetstiden av sex månader måste förete sina registeruppgifter även för någon annan arbetsgivare än som utdraget beställts för kan han/hon använda det tidigare beställda utdraget. Utdraget ska visas till kursansvarig före praktiken börjar. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Praktikinfo enligt schema
  Praktiken utförs v: 17-18
  Praktikseminarium enligt schema (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik på (3sp=27x3)
  Den totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar /vecka kan användas för läsning av aktuell litteratur
  Praktiken planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK/UK i relation till kursens och studerandes individuella kompetenser/ mål
  Eventuell frånvaro kompenseras enligt överenskommelse (not translated)

•   Internship, Health Care Practice Among Adults UHV20HV09-3002 10.03.2025-13.04.2025  6 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Knows the service system and interprofessional cooperation in occupational health care / adult health care and can use various resource enhancing models and methods in health care work
  
  Is able to plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the employee and the health of the work community and support the maintenance of work ability
  
  Can assess the effect of work, work society and the environment on health
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the health and functional capacity of the unemployed and the elderly
  
  Can identify and meet service needs of the elderly and unemployed in interprofessional working groups and networks

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instruction
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tillämpning av litteratur från kursen Hälsovårdararbete med arbetsföra och äldre
  samt annan aktuell litteratur och aktuellt material. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktikinformation
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser /mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktiken
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.03.2025 - 13.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 31.01.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Information och anvisningar finns i Praktikanvisningarna på Teams (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktikinformation
  Praktik enligt givna direktiv.
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål.
  Måldiskussion.
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion Läkemedelsbehandlingspass
  Arbetstidsschema
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren bör vara hälsovårdare.
  
  Utdrag om brottslig bakgrund dvs. straffregisterutdrag ska vara i kaft. Utdraget är i kraft sex månader. Om studeranden under den ovan avsedda giltighetstiden av sex månader måste förete sina registeruppgifter även för någon annan arbetsgivare än som utdraget beställts för kan han/hon använda det tidigare beställda utdraget. Utdraget ska visas till kursansvarig före praktiken börjar. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Praktikinfo
  Praktiken utförs v. 11–14
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik på (6sp=27x6)
  Den totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar /vecka kan användas för läsning av aktuell litteratur
  Praktiken planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål
  
  Eventuell frånvaro från praktiken måste jobbas in.
  
  Obligatoriskt deltagande i praktikseminarium eller inlämning av kompletteringsuppgift (not translated)

•   Internship, Health Care Practice in Schools and Among Students UHV20HV07-3002 20.01.2025-28.02.2025  6 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Knows about the service system and the interprofessional cooperation in school and student health care and can use various resource enhancing business models and methods in health care work.
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the growth and development of school children and adolescents and support the family's well-being
  
  Can supervise school children, adolescents and their families in a diverse way
  
  Can maintain and promote collaboration with school children, adolescents and the family as well as various support groups with view to a safe school and learning environment and a resource enhancing learning climate

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tillämpning av litteratur från kursen Hälsovårdsarbete med elever och studerande samt annan aktuell litteratur och aktuellt material.
  Neuko databas (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktikinformation
  Handledd praktik
  Handledningstillfälle
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser /mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktiken
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  20.01.2025 - 28.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Information och anvisningar finns i Praktikanvisningarna på Teams (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik enligt givna direktiv
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Handledningstillfälle för en grupp elever/studerande under praktikperioden
  Läkemedelsbehandlingspass
  Arbetstidsschema
  Praktikseminarium 18.2.2025 (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren bör vara hälsovårdare.
  
  Utdrag om brottslig bakgrund dvs. straffregisterutdrag ska vara i kaft. Utdraget är i kraft sex månader. Om studeranden under den ovan avsedda giltighetstiden av sex månader måste förete sina registeruppgifter även för någon annan arbetsgivare än som utdraget beställts för kan han/hon använda det tidigare beställda utdraget. Utdraget ska visas till kursansvarig före praktiken börjar. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Praktikinfo 11.12.2024
  Praktiken utförs v. 4–7
  Handledd praktik
  Handledningstillfälle under praktiken
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser /mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik på skol-eller studerandehälsovård (6sp=27x6)
  Den totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar /vecka kan reserveras för planering av handledningstillfället
  Praktiken planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål
  Eventuell frånvaro från praktiken kompenseras enligt överenskommelse
  Handledningsplanen skall vara godkänd och handledningstillfället skall vara förverkligat.
  Obligatoriskt deltagande i praktikseminarium eller inlämning av kompletteringsuppgift (not translated)

•   Internship, Health Care Practice within Child Health Care UHV20HV05-3002 01.08.2024-31.12.2024  6 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Is familiar with the service system and the interprofessional collaboration within child health care and is able to use different resource promoting models and methods both individually and as part of a group
  
  Can plan, implement and assess the follow-up of a child’s growth and development as well as support the family’s well-being
  
  Can identify families with special needs and knows the process of referring a patient to further examinations and treatment
  
  Can maintain and promote collaboration with the family and various stakeholders with a view to a safe growing environment
  
  Can implement the vaccination program

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tillämpning av litteratur från kursen Hälsovårdsarbete med barnfamiljen samt annan aktuell litteratur och aktuellt material. Material som finns på praktiken. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktikhandledning
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser /mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktik och praktikseminarium
  Godkänd praktikperiod (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Information, anvisningar och dokument som behövs på praktiken finns på Teams på Praktikbron
  
  Rekommenderas att studerande har deltagit i kurser under termin 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 och 7 och har avlagt minst 180 sp. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik enligt givna direktiv
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Läkemedelsbehandlingspass
  Arbetstidsschema (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren bör vara hälsovårdare. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Praktiken utförs v 41–44 och 46–49.
  Praktikseminarium I vecka 45
  Praktikseminarium II vecka 50 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik på barnrådgivning eller kombinerad mödra- och barnrådgivning (6sp=27x6)
  Den totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete.
  Praktiken planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium är obligatoriskt. Ifall studerande inte kan delta på seminarium lämnar studerande in en kompletteringsuppgift. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium är obligatoriskt. Ifall studerande inte kan delta på seminarium lämnar studerande in en kompletteringsuppgift. (not translated)

•   Internship, Health Care Practices within Maternity Care UHV20HV03-3002 01.08.2024-31.12.2024  6 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Has an understanding of the service system and the interprofessional cooperation in maternal health care and can use various resource enhancing models and methods in health care work.
  
  Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up and care of the woman, the fetus and the family, both during pregnancy and puerperium
  
  Recognizes risk pregnancies, complications during pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium and can refer the client for further care
  
  Can guide both individually and in groups on issues related to pregnancy, childbirth, puerperium, couple relationship and family planning

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship information
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tillämpning av litteratur från kursen Hälsovårdararbete med familjen som väntar barn samt annan aktuell litteratur och aktuellt material. Material från praktiken. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktikhandledning
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktik, goskänd praktikperiod.
  Deltagande till praktikseminarium. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Information, anvisningar och dokument finns på Praktikbron på Teams (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Läkemedelsbehandlingspass
  Arbetstidsschema (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren bör vara hälsovårdare/ barnmorska. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Praktiken utförs v 41–44 och 46–49.
  Praktikseminarium vecka 45 och 50 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik på mödrarådgivning eller kombinerad mödra- och barnrådgivning (6sp=27x6)
  Den totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete.
  Praktiken planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium, obligatorisk närvaro. Ifall studerande har förhinder, inlämning av kompletteringsuppgift (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium, obligatorisk närvaro. Ifall studerande har förhinder, inlämning av kompletteringsuppgift (not translated)

•   Internship: Basic Care USS24GV07-3002 21.04.2025-25.05.2025  8 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, under supervision plan, implement and assess basic care and end-of-life care
  - shows collegiality and demonstrate readiness for working life
  - can work in inter-professional teams
  - can apply evidence based and sustainable methods in primary care
  - can apply aseptic principles to primary care
  - treats patients and relatives professionally
  - can guide patients within primary care
  - is familiar with the unit's medication management and can under supervision perform medical management

  Prerequisites

  Medication calculation in the Course Medication Management I

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Coaching
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursmaterial från tidigare genomförda kurser
  Teams: Praktikbron
  Praktikenhetens webbsidor och material (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktik vid olika vårdkontext inom grundvård. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens kompetenser/mål och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.04.2025 - 25.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  10.12.2024 - 20.04.2025

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar på kursens moodle sida + Teams kanalen "Praktikbro"
  Eventuell frånvaro bör meddelas till handledande lärare och praktikavdelning.
  Informationstillfällen inför praktiken är obligatoriska samt praktik seminariet efter avklard praktik (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Godkänd praktik
  Aktivt deltagande i praktikinformaitonstillfällen och -seminariet (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Avsnittet utförs som handledd praktik (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27h
  Praktikinformation 4h
  Självstudier / bekantning av material om reserverad praktikplats 5h
  Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för självstudier ( tex. fördjupning av kunskap inom området).
  Seminarium 2h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens mål och studerandes individuella mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. Samt deltagande i informationstillfällen innan praktiken och i praktikseminariet. (not translated)

•   Internship: Basic Care USS24GV07-3001 21.04.2025-25.05.2025  8 credits  (USS24F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, under supervision plan, implement and assess basic care and end-of-life care
  - shows collegiality and demonstrate readiness for working life
  - can work in inter-professional teams
  - can apply evidence based and sustainable methods in primary care
  - can apply aseptic principles to primary care
  - treats patients and relatives professionally
  - can guide patients within primary care
  - is familiar with the unit's medication management and can under supervision perform medical management

  Prerequisites

  Medication calculation in the Course Medication Management I

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Coaching
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Kursmaterial från tidigare genomförda kurser
  Teams: Praktikbron
  Praktikenhetens webbsidor och material (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktik vid olika vårdkontext inom grundvård. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens kompetenser/mål och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.04.2025 - 25.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  09.12.2024 - 20.04.2025

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar på kursens moodle sida + Teams kanalen "Praktikbro"
  Eventuell frånvaro bör meddelas till handledande lärare och praktikavdelning.
  Informationstillfällen inför praktiken är obligatoriska samt praktik seminariet efter avklard praktik
  
  Valideringen bör vara gjord senast sista januari 2025. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Godkänd praktik
  Aktivt deltagande i praktikinformaitonstillfällen och -seminariet
  
  Valideringen bör vara gjord senast sista januari 2025. (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Avsnittet utförs som handledd praktik (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27h
  Praktikinformation 4h
  Självstudier / bekantning av material om reserverad praktikplats 5h
  Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för självstudier ( tex. fördjupning av kunskap inom området).
  Seminarium 2h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens mål och studerandes individuella mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. Samt deltagande i informationstillfällen innan praktiken och i praktikseminariet. (not translated)

•   Internship: Gerontological Care/Mental Health Care I USS22KL05-3002 28.04.2025-01.06.2025  8 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Gerontological care work:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional cooperation, plan, execute and evaluate person-centered/client -centered care and take into account the cultural background of the patient and his/her relatives
  - can use various evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use sustainable and resource strengthening care methods
  - can document and report
  - demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives and can identify ethical problems
  - can assess and support the patient's/client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment
  - understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  
  Mental Care and Substance abuse treatment:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in inter-professional cooperation, plan, implement and evaluate person-centered/client centered mental care and addiction treatment
  - can use different evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central care methods
  - can document and report
  - treats patients professionally within mental care and substance abuse treatment
  - can identify patient resources and collaborate with the patient and the inter-professional team
  - has a reflective and ethical approach and takes into consideration the patient's right to self-determination and patient and client safety
  - can guide the patient in mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tidigare och pågående kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För att bli godkänd studerande ska uppnå följande kompetenser:
  
  Kan under handledning i det interprofessionella samarbetet planera, utföra och utvärdera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård och beaktar patientens och närståendes kulturella bakgrund
  
  Kan använda olika evidensbaserade vårdrekommendationer i planering av vård och kan använda hållbara och resursförstärkande vårdmetoder
  
  Kan dokumentera och rapportera
  
  Påvisar respekt för patienten/klienten och närstående samt kan identifiera etiska problem
  
  Kan bedöma och stöda patientens/klientens funktionsförmåga samt patientens och närståendes delaktighet i vården
  
  Kan planera, utföra och utvärdera säker läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Förstår betydelsen av patient- och klientsäkerhet och tillämpar aseptiska principer i patientvården (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.04.2025 - 01.06.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.12.2024 - 27.04.2025

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Daniel Nenonen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren borde vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Våren 2025
  Praktikinfo enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande
  Praktik veckor v 12- 16 eller 17 - 21
  Praktikseminarium - enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik (8 sp). Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. Praktiktimmar 190 h/5 veckor (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursansvarig och handledare inom gerontologiskt vårdarbete Michaela Jalava och inom mental- och missbrukarvården Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (ev. anhållan om validering via eAhot i god tid före praktiken inleds)
  Mer information finns på gruppens Teams samt på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Internship: Gerontological Care/Mental Health Care I USS22KL05-3003 21.04.2025-25.05.2025  8 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Gerontological care work:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional cooperation, plan, execute and evaluate person-centered/client -centered care and take into account the cultural background of the patient and his/her relatives
  - can use various evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use sustainable and resource strengthening care methods
  - can document and report
  - demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives and can identify ethical problems
  - can assess and support the patient's/client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment
  - understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  
  Mental Care and Substance abuse treatment:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in inter-professional cooperation, plan, implement and evaluate person-centered/client centered mental care and addiction treatment
  - can use different evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central care methods
  - can document and report
  - treats patients professionally within mental care and substance abuse treatment
  - can identify patient resources and collaborate with the patient and the inter-professional team
  - has a reflective and ethical approach and takes into consideration the patient's right to self-determination and patient and client safety
  - can guide the patient in mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tidigare och pågående kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För att bli godkänd studerande ska uppnå följande kompetenser:
  
  Kan under handledning i det interprofessionella samarbetet planera, utföra och utvärdera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård och beaktar patientens och närståendes kulturella bakgrund
  
  Kan använda olika evidensbaserade vårdrekommendationer i planering av vård och kan använda hållbara och resursförstärkande vårdmetoder
  
  Kan dokumentera och rapportera
  
  Påvisar respekt för patienten/klienten och närstående samt kan identifiera etiska problem
  
  Kan bedöma och stöda patientens/klientens funktionsförmåga samt patientens och närståendes delaktighet i vården
  
  Kan planera, utföra och utvärdera säker läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Förstår betydelsen av patient- och klientsäkerhet och tillämpar aseptiska principer i patientvården (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  21.04.2025 - 25.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2024 - 20.04.2025

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Daniel Nenonen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren borde vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Våren 2025
  Praktikinfo enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande
  Praktik veckor v 12- 16 eller 17 - 21
  Praktikseminarium - enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik (8 sp). Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. Praktiktimmar 190 h/5 veckor (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursansvarig och handledare inom gerontologiskt vårdarbete Michaela Jalava och inom mental- och missbrukarvården Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (ev. anhållan om validering via eAhot i god tid före praktiken inleds)
  Mer information finns på gruppens Teams samt på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Internship: Gerontological Care/Mental Health Care I USS22KL04-3003 10.02.2025-20.04.2025  8 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Gerontological care work:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional cooperation, plan, execute and evaluate person-centered/client -centered care and take into account the cultural background of the patient and his/her relatives
  - can use various evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central resource strengthening care methods
  - can document and report
  - demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives and can identify ethical problems
  - can assess and support the patient's/client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment
  - understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  
  Mental Care and Substance abuse treatment:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in inter-professional cooperation, plan, implement and evaluate person-centered/client centered mental care and addiction treatment
  - can use different evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central care methods
  - can document and report
  - treats patients professionally within mental care and substance abuse treatment
  - can identify patient resources and collaborate with the patient and the inter-professional team
  - has a reflective and ethical approach and takes into consideration the patient's right to self-determination and patient and client safety
  - can guide the patient in mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tidigare och pågende kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik i
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För att bli godkänd studerande ska uppnå följande kompetenser:
  
  Kan under handledning i det interprofessionella samarbetet planera, utföra och utvärdera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård och beaktar patientens och närståendes kulturella bakgrund
  
  Kan använda olika evidensbaserade vårdrekommendationer i planering av vård och kan använda hållbara och resursförstärkande vårdmetoder
  
  Kan dokumentera och rapportera
  
  Påvisar respekt för patienten/klienten och närstående samt kan identifiera etiska problem
  
  Kan bedöma och stöda patientens/klientens funktionsförmåga samt patientens och närståendes delaktighet i vården
  
  Kan planera, utföra och utvärdera säker läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Förstår betydelsen av patient- och klientsäkerhet och tillämpar aseptiska principer i patientvården (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.02.2025 - 20.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 09.02.2025

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Daniel Nenonen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren borde vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare.
  Utvärderingsdiskussion hålls via Teams mellan handledande lärare, studerande och handledare från fältet. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Våren 2025
  Praktikinfo enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande
  Praktik veckor v 12- 16 eller 17 - 21, 38 timmar per vecka.
  Praktikseminarium - enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande (not translated)

  Internationa connections

  De studerande som deltar i Nordplus intenskivveckan i Umeå vecka 15 är borta från praktiken vecka 15. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik (8 sp). Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursansvarig och handledare inom mental- och missbrukarvården Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg och inom gerontologiska vårdarbetet Daniel Nenonen (ev. anhållan om validering via eAhot i god tid före praktiken inleds)
  Mer information finns på gruppens Teams samt på moodle. (not translated)

•   Internship: Gerontological Care/Mental Health Care I USS22KL04-3005 01.09.2024-20.04.2025  8 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Gerontological care work:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional cooperation, plan, execute and evaluate person-centered/client -centered care and take into account the cultural background of the patient and his/her relatives
  - can use various evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central resource strengthening care methods
  - can document and report
  - demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives and can identify ethical problems
  - can assess and support the patient's/client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment
  - understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  
  Mental Care and Substance abuse treatment:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in inter-professional cooperation, plan, implement and evaluate person-centered/client centered mental care and addiction treatment
  - can use different evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central care methods
  - can document and report
  - treats patients professionally within mental care and substance abuse treatment
  - can identify patient resources and collaborate with the patient and the inter-professional team
  - has a reflective and ethical approach and takes into consideration the patient's right to self-determination and patient and client safety
  - can guide the patient in mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medicinal treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Tidigare och pågende kurslitteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik i
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  För att bli godkänd studerande ska uppnå följande kompetenser:
  
  Kan under handledning i det interprofessionella samarbetet planera, utföra och utvärdera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård och beaktar patientens och närståendes kulturella bakgrund
  
  Kan använda olika evidensbaserade vårdrekommendationer i planering av vård och kan använda hållbara och resursförstärkande vårdmetoder
  
  Kan dokumentera och rapportera
  
  Påvisar respekt för patienten/klienten och närstående samt kan identifiera etiska problem
  
  Kan bedöma och stöda patientens/klientens funktionsförmåga samt patientens och närståendes delaktighet i vården
  
  Kan planera, utföra och utvärdera säker läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Förstår betydelsen av patient- och klientsäkerhet och tillämpar aseptiska principer i patientvården (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.09.2024 - 20.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.08.2024 - 30.03.2025

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Michaela Jalava

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Introduktion
  Handledd praktik
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellanutvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande söker själv praktikplats och kursansvarig lärare godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet. Praktikhandledaren borde vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare.
  Utvärderingsdiskussion hålls via Teams mellan handledande lärare, studerande och handledare från fältet. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Hösten 2024 - våren 2025
  Praktik enl. ind. tidtabeller eller veckorna 7 - 11, eventuellt v. 17 - 21.
  Praktikseminarium - enligt schemat, obligatoriskt deltagande (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik (8 sp). Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. Praktiktimmar 190 h/5 veckor (röda helgdagar räknas bort). (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Kursansvarig och handledare inom mental- och missbrukarvården Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg. (ev. anhållan om validering via eAhot i god tid före praktiken inleds)
  Mer information på moodle. (not translated)

•   Internship: Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing I USS22KV05-3002 24.09.2024-15.12.2024  8 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Medical Nursing Care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional collaboration, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client centered medical nursing care with the patient
  - is able to follow different evidence-based care recommendations when planning care and implement sustainable treatment methods within internal medicine
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe pharmaceutical treatment
  - can identify ethical issues and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes into account patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutritional and fluid treatment
  
  Surgical Nursing care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional collaboration, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client centered surgical care for the patient
  - is able to follow different evidence-based care recommendations when planning care and implement the most common treatment methods within surgical care
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe pharmaceutical treatment
  - can identify ethical issues and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes into account patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutritional and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and medical calculation in the Course Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutorial
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen från tidigare utförda teoretiska kurser inom utbildningen samt material från praktikenheten (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktik information innan praktiken inleds. Första tillfället 13.2.2024.
  Praktik seminarium efter avslutad praktik. Tidpunkt: 13.12. klockan 14-16 TEAMS
  Handledd klinisk praktik inom kirurgisk eller inre medicinsk avdelning / poliklinik under fem veckor (11.11-15.12)
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens kompetenser/mål och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.09.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 13.10.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar på kursens moodle sida + Teams kanalen "Praktikbro"
  Eventuell frånvaro bör meddelas till handledande lärare och praktikenheten.
  Informationstillfällen inför praktiken är obligatoriska samt praktik seminariet.
  
  Studerande ansvarar för att följa de hälsotillståndsrelaterade anvisningar som praktikorganisationen kräver (kontaktar v.b SHVS), uppdaterar sin CV och förmedlar den till praktikorganisationen, skickar handledande lärarens kontaktuppgifter till praktikorganisationen samt meddelar att handledande lärare deltar gärna i mellanutvärderings diskussionen via Teams /på plats till handledaren på praktikenheten. Studerande bokar tid till trepartssamtalet (dvs utvärderingsdiskussionen). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik enligt givna direktiv
  Bearbetning av egna praktikmål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellan utvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Avsnittet utförs som handledd praktik
  
  Handledande lärare strävar till att delta i mellanutvärderingsdiskussionen via Teams/ på plats. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Praktikinformation 4 h
  Självstudier / bekantning av material om reserverad praktikplats 7h
  Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för självstudier ( tex. fördjupning av kunskap inom området).
  Seminarium 3h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens mål och studerandes individuella mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. Samt deltagande i informationstillfällen innan praktiken och i praktikseminariet. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens mål och studerandes individuella mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. Samt deltagande i informationstillfällen innan praktiken och i praktikseminariet. (not translated)

•   Internship: Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing I USS22KV05-3003 12.08.2024-15.12.2024  8 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Medical Nursing Care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional collaboration, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client centered medical nursing care with the patient
  - is able to follow different evidence-based care recommendations when planning care and implement sustainable treatment methods within internal medicine
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe pharmaceutical treatment
  - can identify ethical issues and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes into account patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutritional and fluid treatment
  
  Surgical Nursing care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional collaboration, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client centered surgical care for the patient
  - is able to follow different evidence-based care recommendations when planning care and implement the most common treatment methods within surgical care
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe pharmaceutical treatment
  - can identify ethical issues and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes into account patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutritional and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and medical calculation in the Course Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutorial
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen från tidigare utförda teoretiska kurser inom utbildningen (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Handledd klinisk praktik inom kirurgisk eller inre medicinsk avdelning / poliklinik under sex veckor.
  Självstudier
  Praktikinfo 27.8.2024
  Praktikseminarium 12.12.2024 (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK/UK enligt kurskompetenser i relation till studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.08.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 11.08.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Michaela Jalava, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar finns på Moodle och i Praktikbron (Teams), (kursnyckeln är praktikbro) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik enligt givna direktiv 38h/vecka
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellan utvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Läkemedelsbehandlingspass
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Kursen utförs som handledd praktik i arbetslivet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK/UK enligt kurskompetenser i relation till studerandes individuella kompetenser/målBedömning av praktiken sker enligt kurskompetenser i relation till studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. (not translated)

•   Internship: Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing I USS22KV05-3004 24.09.2024-22.12.2024  8 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Medical Nursing Care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional collaboration, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client centered medical nursing care with the patient
  - is able to follow different evidence-based care recommendations when planning care and implement sustainable treatment methods within internal medicine
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe pharmaceutical treatment
  - can identify ethical issues and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes into account patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutritional and fluid treatment
  
  Surgical Nursing care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the context of inter-professional collaboration, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client centered surgical care for the patient
  - is able to follow different evidence-based care recommendations when planning care and implement the most common treatment methods within surgical care
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe pharmaceutical treatment
  - can identify ethical issues and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes into account patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutritional and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and medical calculation in the Course Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutorial
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen från tidigare utförda teoretiska kurser inom utbildningen samt material från praktikenheten (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Praktik information innan praktiken inleds. Första tillfället 4.3.2024.
  Praktik seminarium efter avslutad praktik. Tidpunkt: 12.12.2024
  Handledd klinisk praktik inom kirurgisk eller inre medicinsk avdelning / poliklinik under fem veckor (11.11-15.12)
  Självstudier (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens kompetenser/mål och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.09.2024 - 22.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 10.11.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar på kursens moodle sida + Teams kanalen "Praktikbro"
  Eventuell frånvaro bör meddelas till handledande lärare och praktikenheten.
  Informationstillfällen inför praktiken är obligatoriska samt praktik seminariet.
  
  Studerande ansvarar för att följa de hälsotillståndsrelaterade anvisningar som praktikorganisationen kräver (kontaktar v.b SHVS), uppdaterar sin CV och förmedlar den till praktikorganisationen, skickar handledande lärarens kontaktuppgifter till praktikorganisationen samt meddelar att handledande lärare deltar gärna i mellanutvärderings diskussionen via Teams /på plats till handledaren på praktikenheten. Studerande bokar tid till trepartssamtalet (dvs utvärderingsdiskussionen). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik enligt givna direktiv
  Bearbetning av egna praktikmål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellan utvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Avsnittet utförs som handledd praktik
  
  Handledande lärare strävar till att delta i mellanutvärderingsdiskussionen via Teams/ på plats. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Praktikinformation 4 h
  Självstudier / bekantning av material om reserverad praktikplats 7h
  Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för självstudier ( tex. fördjupning av kunskap inom området).
  Seminarium 3h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens mål och studerandes individuella mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. Samt deltagande i informationstillfällen innan praktiken och i praktikseminariet. (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt utvärderingskriterierna för praktiska studier i relation till kursens mål och studerandes individuella mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. Samt deltagande i informationstillfällen innan praktiken och i praktikseminariet. (not translated)

•   Internship: Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing II USS22KL03-3001 12.08.2024-15.12.2024  8 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Medical Nursing Care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the inter-professional collaborative, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client-centered ans sustainable medical nursing care
  - is able to follow various evidence-based care guidelines in care planing and implement the most common methods of treatment within internal medicine
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe medication management
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes patient and client safety into consideration and applies aseptic principles to patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutrition and fluid treatment
  
  Surgical care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the inter-professional collaborative, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client-centered surgical care
  - is able to follow various evidence-based care guidelines in care planning and implement the most common methods of treatment within surgical nursing
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe medication management
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - understands the significance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles to patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutrition and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen från tidigare utförda teoretiska kurser inom utbildningen (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Handledd klinisk praktik inom kirurgisk eller inre medicinsk avdelning / poliklinik under sex veckor.
  Självstudier
  Praktikinfo 27.8.2024
  Praktikseminarium 12.12.2024 (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK/UK enligt kurskompetenser i relation till studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.08.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 11.08.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar finns på Moodle och i Praktikbron (Teams), (kursnyckeln är praktikbro) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik enligt givna direktiv 38h/vecka
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellan utvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Läkemedelsbehandlingspass
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Kurs utförs som handledd praktik i arbetslivet (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt kurskompetenser i relation till studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. (not translated)

•   Internship: Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing II USS22KL03-3003 06.01.2025-09.02.2025  8 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Medical Nursing Care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the inter-professional collaborative, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client-centered ans sustainable medical nursing care
  - is able to follow various evidence-based care guidelines in care planing and implement the most common methods of treatment within internal medicine
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe medication management
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes patient and client safety into consideration and applies aseptic principles to patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutrition and fluid treatment
  
  Surgical care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the inter-professional collaborative, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client-centered surgical care
  - is able to follow various evidence-based care guidelines in care planning and implement the most common methods of treatment within surgical nursing
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe medication management
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - understands the significance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles to patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutrition and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen från tidigare utförda teoretiska kurser inom utbildningen. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Handledd klinisk praktik inom kirurgisk eller inre medicinsk avdelning / poliklinik under sex veckor.
  Självstudier
  Praktik seminarium: (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK enligt kurskompetenser i relation till studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.01.2025 - 09.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  07.12.2024 - 05.01.2025

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar finns på Moodle och i Praktikbron (Teams), (kursnyckeln är praktikbro). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik enligt givna direktiv 38h/vecka
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellan utvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Läkemedelsbehandlingspass.
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Kurs utförs som handledd praktik i arbetslivet. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt kurskompetenser i relation till studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. (not translated)

•   Internship: Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing II USS22KL03-3004 06.01.2025-09.02.2025  8 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Medical Nursing Care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the inter-professional collaborative, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client-centered ans sustainable medical nursing care
  - is able to follow various evidence-based care guidelines in care planing and implement the most common methods of treatment within internal medicine
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe medication management
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - takes patient and client safety into consideration and applies aseptic principles to patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutrition and fluid treatment
  
  Surgical care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision in the inter-professional collaborative, plan, implement and assess patient-centered/client-centered surgical care
  - is able to follow various evidence-based care guidelines in care planning and implement the most common methods of treatment within surgical nursing
  - is able to document and report
  - can plan, implement and assess safe medication management
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrates an ethical approach
  - understands the significance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles to patient care
  - can care for patients with enteral and parenteral nutrition and fluid treatment

  Prerequisites

  Course Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Litteraturen från tidigare utförda teoretiska kurser inom utbildningen. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Handledd klinisk praktik inom kirurgisk eller inre medicinsk avdelning / poliklinik under sex veckor.
  Självstudier
  Praktik seminarium: (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK enligt kurskompetenser i relation till studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.01.2025 - 09.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  07.12.2024 - 05.01.2025

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar finns på Moodle och i Praktikbron (Teams), (kursnyckeln är praktikbro). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Praktik enligt givna direktiv 38h/vecka
  Bearbetning av egna kompetenser/mål
  Måldiskussion
  Mellan utvärdering med självreflektion
  Slututvärdering med självreflektion
  Läkemedelsbehandlingspass.
  Praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Kurs utförs som handledd praktik i arbetslivet. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Totala arbetstiden är 40 h/vecka. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Bedömning av praktiken sker enligt kurskompetenser i relation till studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. För godkänd praktik krävs därtill att måldiskussion, mellanutvärdering, slututvärdering och arbetstidsschema är inlämnade och godkända av ansvarig lärare. (not translated)

•   Internship: Pediatric Care/Health Care in the home or Primary Care I USS22KÅ04-3002 01.08.2024-31.12.2024  8 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Pediatric Care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision, plan, implement, evaluate and document sustainable and comprehensive care for children and young people
  - performs under supervision central, sustainable care methods, clinical examinations and functional measurements in pediatric health care
  - can, under supervision, plan, implement and evaluate safe, sustainable medical management in the care of children and young people
  - takes into account patient and client safety in the care of children and young people
  - applies evidence-based methods in health promotion work with children, young people and families and gives guidance to a health-promoting way of life
  
  Primary care:
  The student:
  - is familiar with national and international action programs, strategies and resource-enhancing methods in health promotion work with different age groups
  - can, under supervision in inter-professional collaboration, plan, implement, evaluate and document sustainable, resource enhancing work at individual, group and community level
  - guides individuals and groups to a health promoting way of life
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe and sustainable medical management
  
  Home Health Care:
  The student:
  - is able to, under supervision and in inter-professional collaboration, plan, execute and evaluate sustainable person-centered/client-centered care in a home setting taking into account the cultural background of the patient and his/her relatives.
  - can use different sustainable, evidence based care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central resource enhancing care methods in home environment
  - can document and report
  - demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives in the home environment and can identify ethical problems
  - can assess and support the patient's/client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe medical management
  - understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Internship, Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing I and II

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bökberg, C. (2013). Omvårdnad i primärvården (1. uppl.). Studentlitteratur.
  Aaltonen, J., Heikkilä, T. I., Larivaara, P., Manninen, I., Lindroos, S. & Heikkilä, T. (2009). Potilas, perhe ja perusterveydenhuolto. Duodecim.
  Hälsovårdscentaler: https://stm.fi/sv/halsovardscentraler
  Edwinson Månsson, M. & Enskär, K. (2008). Pediatrisk vård och specifik omvårdnad (Andra upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
  Hallström, I. & Lindberg, T. (2009). Pediatrisk omvårdnad (1. uppl.). Liber.
  Hanséus, K., Jägervall, M., Norman, M. & Alfvén, G. (2020). Barnmedicin (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  Rajantie, J., Heikinheimo, M., Renko, M. & Alapulli, H. (2016). Lastentaudit (6. uudistettu painos.). Duodecim. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion till kursen (obligatorisk).
  
  Studerande söker själv praktikplats, fördelning enligt lista på Teams och Hanna Limnell eller Michaela Jalava godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet beroende på vilken praktik det är frågan om.
  
  Praktikhandledaren bör vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare.
  
  Praktikanvisningar på Teams, Praktikbro
  
  Praktikseminarium i december 2024
  
  1) Studerande formulerar sina individuella kompetenser/mål.
  En måldiskussion sker tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande. Studerande laddar upp på kursens Moodle-sida sina individuella skriftliga kompetenser/mål till kursansvarig lärare för godkännande i slutet av den första praktikveckan.
  
  2) Mellanutvärdering hålls i mitten av praktikperioden. Studerande, praktikhandledare och lärare deltar
  
  3) Studerande skriver under den sista praktikveckan en självutvärdering i relation till kursens kompetenser/mål och de individuella målen.
  
  4) Det ifyllda arbetstidsschemat med praktikhandledarens underskrift och den ifyllda utvärderingsblanketten laddas upp på moodle före praktikseminariet. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatorisk närvaro under praktiken (38 h /vecka)
  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.09.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar finns i Praktikanvisningarna på Teams i Praktikbron.
  Studerande introducerar och handleder praktikhandledaren i användning av Praktikbron
  Tystnadsplikt
  Vaccineringar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik inom primärhälsovården eller hemsjukvård(8 sp) eller praktik inom barnsjukvård eller motsvarande (8sp)
  
  Totala arbetstiden är 38 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. (not translated)

•   Internship: Pediatric Care/Health Care in the home or Primary Care I USS22KÅ05-3002 01.08.2024-31.12.2024  8 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Pediatric Care:
  The student:
  - can, under supervision, plan, implement, evaluate and document sustainable comprehensive care for children and young people
  - performs under supervision central, sustainable care methods, clinical examinations and functional measurements in pediatric health care
  - can, under supervision, plan, implement and evaluate safe, sustainable medical management in the care of children and young people
  - takes into account patient and client safety in the care of children and young people
  - applies evidence-based methods in health promotion work with children, young people and families and gives guidance to a health-promoting way of life
  
  Primary care:
  The student:
  - is familiar with national and international action programs, strategies and resource-enhancing, sustainable methods in health promotion work with different age groups
  - can, under supervision in inter-professional collaboration, plan, implement, evaluate and document resource enhancing, sustainable work at individual, group and community level
  - guides individuals and groups to a health promoting way of life
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe and sustainable medical management
  
  Home Health Care:
  The student:
  - is able to, under supervision and in inter-professional collaboration, plan, execute and evaluate person-centered/client-centered, sustainable care in a home setting taking into account the cultural background of the patient and his/her relatives.
  - can use different evidence based, sustainable care recommendations in the planning of care and can use central resource enhancing care methods in home environment
  - can document and report
  - demonstrates respect for the patient/client and close relatives in the home environment and can identify ethical problems
  - can assess and support the patient's/client's functional ability as well as the patient's and relatives' involvement in care
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe and sustainable medical management
  - understands the importance of patient and client safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Internship, Medical Nursing Care/Surgical Nursing I and II

  Content of the study unit

  Internship information
  
  Internship instructions
  
  Confidentiality
  
  Tutoring
  
  Evaluation
  
  Internship seminar

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bökberg, C. (2013). Omvårdnad i primärvården (1. uppl.). Studentlitteratur.
  Aaltonen, J., Heikkilä, T. I., Larivaara, P., Manninen, I., Lindroos, S. & Heikkilä, T. (2009). Potilas, perhe ja perusterveydenhuolto. Duodecim.
  Hälsovårdscentaler: https://stm.fi/sv/halsovardscentraler
  Edwinson Månsson, M. & Enskär, K. (2008). Pediatrisk vård och specifik omvårdnad (Andra upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
  Hallström, I. & Lindberg, T. (2009). Pediatrisk omvårdnad (1. uppl.). Liber.
  Hanséus, K., Jägervall, M., Norman, M. & Alfvén, G. (2020). Barnmedicin (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  Rajantie, J., Heikinheimo, M., Renko, M. & Alapulli, H. (2016). Lastentaudit (6. uudistettu painos.). Duodecim. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Introduktion till kursen (obligatorisk).
  
  Studerande söker själv praktikplats, fördelning enligt lista på Teams och Hanna Limnell eller Michaela Jalava godkänner och bekräftar praktikplatsen till fältet beroende på vilken praktik det är frågan om.
  
  Praktikhandledaren bör vara sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare.
  
  Praktikanvisningar på Teams, Praktikbro
  
  Praktikseminarium i december 2024
  
  1) Studerande formulerar sina individuella kompetenser/mål.
  En måldiskussion sker tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande. Studerande laddar upp på kursens Moodle-sida sina individuella skriftliga kompetenser/mål till kursansvarig lärare för godkännande i slutet av den första praktikveckan.
  
  2) Mellanutvärdering hålls i mitten av praktikperioden. Studerande, praktikhandledare och lärare deltar
  
  3) Studerande skriver under den sista praktikveckan en självutvärdering i relation till kursens kompetenser/mål och de individuella målen.
  
  4) Det ifyllda arbetstidsschemat med praktikhandledarens underskrift och den ifyllda utvärderingsblanketten laddas upp på Moodle före praktikseminariet. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Obligatorisk närvaro under praktiken (38 h /vecka)
  Bedömning av praktiken sker i skalan GK-UK i relation till kursens och studerandes individuella kompetenser/mål. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.09.2024

  • 8 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Michaela Jalava, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Mer information och anvisningar finns i Praktikanvisningarna på Teams i Praktikbron.
  Studerande introducerar och handleder praktikhandledaren i användning av Praktikbron
  Tystnadsplikt
  Vaccineringar (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Student's schedule and workload

  Handledd praktik inom primärhälsovården eller hemsjukvård(8 sp) eller praktik inom barnsjukvård eller motsvarande (8sp)
  
  Totala arbetstiden är 38 h/vecka varav 2 timmar reserveras för individuellt arbete. Arbetsturerna planeras tillsammans med praktikhandledaren och studerande gör i mån av möjlighet samma turer som praktikhandledaren. (not translated)

•   Introduction to Academic Studies USS22IV01-3005 02.09.2024-15.12.2024  5 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his/her UAS and field of education
  - can use common digital programs to communicate through text, film and sound files
  - has knowledge of the central national and international databases in his/her field of study
  - is familiar with the fundamentals of a scholarly approach, information management and can research and examine scientific information
  - can realize small-scale projects
  - has knowledge of basic mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The central documents and virtual platforms of the university and degree programme
  
  Learning styles, reading and note-taking techniques
  
  Time and stress management
  
  Text processing and implementation of Novia UAS's writing instructions
  
  Audio and video recording and editing
  
  Different types of communication utalising digital programs
  
  Project methodology
  
  Searching for scientific information in various databases
  
  Perspectives of knowledge in different fields of science
  
  Evaluating the reliability and scientific credibility of information

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Delen yrkeshögskolestudier:
  Angelöw, B. (2011). Konsten att lyckas med studierna. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur
  Blomström, V. & Wennerberg, J. 2018. Akademiskt läsande och skrivande. Studentlitteratur
  Cowen, M., Maier, P. & Price, G. 2012. Studera smart när du läser till sjuksköterska. Pearson.
  Drew, S. & Bingham, R. (2010). The guide to learning and study skills for higher education and work, Farnham: Gower
  Kellquist, M. & Eneroth, M. (2010). Studieteknik för universitet/högskola. Stockholm: Svenska studieteknikförlaget
  Liljeqvist, B. (2015). Plugga smart och lär dig mer! Lund: Studentlitteratur
  Livshantering; avslappning och stresshantering - online guide: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=5977
  Läroplan 2023, Åbo
  Yrkeshögskolan Novias skrivanvisningar
  Yrkeshögskolan Novias Examensstadga
  
  Delen projektmetodik:
  Andersen, E. & Schwenke, E. 2013. Projektarbete - en vägledning för studenter.
  Skyttemoen, T., Vaagaasar, A.L. & Torhell S-E. 2017. Värdeskapande projektledning. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Delen evidensbaserat arbetssätt:
  Backman, J. 2016. Rapporter och uppsatser. Lund: studentlitteratur.
  Elomaa, L. & Mikkola, H. 2010. Näytön jäljillä. Turun Amk. http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522161611.pdf
  Kristensson, J. 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivandet och forskningsmetodik för studerande inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Valda delar. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  Larsen, A. K. & Dalén, H. ö. 2018. Metod helt enkelt: En introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod. Andra upplagan. Malmö: Gleerups.
  Willman, A., Bahtsevani, C., Nilsson, R. & Sandström, B. 2016. Evidensbaserad omvårdnad: En bro mellan forskning och klinisk praktik. Upplaga 4:1. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar och information, obligatorisk närvaro
  Workshops, obligatorisk närvaro
  Konferens, obligatorisk närvaro
  Test i matematik (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Inlämning av gruppuppgift i projektmetodik (GK/UK)
  2) Inlämning av grupprapporten i evidensbaserat arbetssätt och quiz (GK/UK)
  3) Test i grundmatematik (GK/UK)
  4) Konferens (inlämning) (GK/UK)
  
  Studerande har rätt att komplettera delarna 3 gånger enligt överenskommen tidtabell.
  Vitsordet i kursen ges då alla delar är gjorda och blivit godkända (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.09.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Additional information

  Alla skriftliga inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras (Ouriginal) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Inlämning av gruppuppgift i projektmetodik 9.10.2024
  2) Inlämning av en quiz 4.10.2024 samt en grupprapport i evidensbaserat arbetssätt -delen
  3) Test i grundmatematik 20.9.
  4) Konferens 2.10. Inlämningsuppgift DL 4.10. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier ink. examinationer 78 h
  Föreläsningar, information och handledning 43 h
  Test i matematik 2h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  1) För godkänt arbete krävs:
  - förmåga att kunna sammanfatta relevant data
  - kritisk reflektion
  - användning av metodlitteratur
  - tydlig redogörelse för sökprocessen
  - att Novias skrivanvisningar följs
  
  2) För godkänt arbete krävs:
  Skriftlig grupprapport:
  - förmåga att kunna sammanfatta relevant data och svara på frågeställningar
  - kritisk reflektion
  - användning av metodlitteratur
  - tydlig redogörelse för sökprocessen
  - att Novias skrivanvisningar används
  Quiz:
  - För godkänt krävs 60 % av totalpoäng
  
  3) Deltagande i test i matematik
  
  4) Deltagande i konferens, inlämningsuppgift
  
  UK: Studerande har iinte nått bedömningskriterier, (not translated)

•   Introduction to Academic Studies USS22IV01-3009 02.12.2024-28.02.2025  5 credits  (USS242D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his/her UAS and field of education
  - can use common digital programs to communicate through text, film and sound files
  - has knowledge of the central national and international databases in his/her field of study
  - is familiar with the fundamentals of a scholarly approach, information management and can research and examine scientific information
  - can realize small-scale projects
  - has knowledge of basic mathematics

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The central documents and virtual platforms of the university and degree programme
  
  Learning styles, reading and note-taking techniques
  
  Time and stress management
  
  Text processing and implementation of Novia UAS's writing instructions
  
  Audio and video recording and editing
  
  Different types of communication utalising digital programs
  
  Project methodology
  
  Searching for scientific information in various databases
  
  Perspectives of knowledge in different fields of science
  
  Evaluating the reliability and scientific credibility of information

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  40% Face-to-face, 60% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Delen yrkeshögskolestudier:
  Angelöw, B. (2011). Konsten att lyckas med studierna. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur
  Blomström, V. & Wennerberg, J. 2018. Akademiskt läsande och skrivande. Studentlitteratur
  Cowen, M., Maier, P. & Price, G. 2012. Studera smart när du läser till sjuksköterska. Pearson.
  Drew, S. & Bingham, R. (2010). The guide to learning and study skills for higher education and work, Farnham: Gower
  Kellquist, M. & Eneroth, M. (2010). Studieteknik för universitet/högskola. Stockholm: Svenska studieteknikförlaget
  Liljeqvist, B. (2015). Plugga smart och lär dig mer! Lund: Studentlitteratur
  Läroplan 2021, Åbo
  Yrkeshögskolan Novias skrivanvisningar
  Yrkeshögskolan Novias Examensstadga
  
  Delen projektmetodik:
  Andersen, E. & Schwenke, E. 2013. Projektarbete - en vägledning för studenter.
  Skyttemoen, T., Vaagaasar, A.L. & Torhell S-E. 2017. Värdeskapande projektledning. Studentlitteratur.
  
  Delen evidensbaserat arbetssätt:
  Backman, J. 2016. Rapporter och uppsatser. Lund: studentlitteratur.
  Elomaa, L. & Mikkola, H. 2010. Näytön jäljillä. Turun Amk. http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522161611.pdf
  Kristensson, J. 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivandet och forskningsmetodik för studerande inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Valda delar. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
  Larsen, A. K. & Dalén, H. ö. 2018. Metod helt enkelt: En introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod. Andra upplagan. Malmö: Gleerups.
  Willman, A., Bahtsevani, C., Nilsson, R. & Sandström, B. 2016. Evidensbaserad omvårdnad: En bro mellan forskning och klinisk praktik. Upplaga 4:1. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar, information
  Workshops, obligatorisk närvaro
  Test i matematik
  Artikelsökning (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) quiz (gk/uk)
  2) Inlämning av grupprapporten i evidensbaserat arbetssätt (uk-gk)
  3) Deltagande i test i grundmatematik
  
  
  Studerande har rätt att komplettera delarna 3 gånger enligt överenskommen tidtabell.
  Vitsordet i kursen ges då alla delar är gjorda och blivit godkända (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.12.2024 - 28.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2024 - 02.12.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS242D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Pia Liljeroth, Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Campus

  Åbo, Henriksgatan 7

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar, information
  Workshops, obligatorisk närvaro
  Test i matematik
  Artikelsökning (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Quiz i evidensbaserat arbetssätt, PIa Liljeroth, deadline 31.12.2024.
  2) Inlämning av parrapport i evidensbaserat arbetssätt, Pia Liljeroth, deadline 19.1.2025.
  3) Test i grundmatematik i januari 2025, Daniel Nenonen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier ink. examinationer 78 h
  Föreläsningar, information, konferens och handledning 43 h
  Test i matematik 2h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  För godkänt arbete krävs:
  
  1) Quiz:
  - För godkänt krävs 60 % av totalpoäng
  
  2) Skriftlig grupprapport:
  - förmåga att kunna sammanfatta relevant data och svara på frågeställningar
  - kritisk reflektion
  - användning av metodlitteratur
  - tydlig redogörelse för sökprocessen
  - användning av Novias skrivanvisningar
  
  3) Deltagande i matematiktest (not translated)

•   Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication VÅV22IN01-3015 02.09.2024-20.12.2024  4 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
  - can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Communication:
  Novia's instructions for degree projects.
  Materials on Moodle
  
  Introduction: Materials on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Communication - Swedish 3 cr:
  - Lectures on scientific writing
  - Lectures on oral presentation
  - Group work in scientific writing
  - Exercises in oral presentation
  - Oral presentations that are analyzed
  
  Introduction to academic studies 1 cr: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test. More course information can be found in Moodle platform

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande
  - kan kommunicera både muntligt och skriftligt på ett strukturerat och språkligt välfungerande sätt, i enlighet med arbetslivets och samhällslivets krav.
  känner till arbetsprocessen för vetenskapligt skrivande och kan använda referenssystem.
  - är medveten om olika vägar att söka information och kan rapportera enligt reglerna för standarduppställning.
  
  Studeranden med finska som skolbildningsspråk ska uppvisa sådana kunskaper i svenska som enligt lagen (424/2003) krävs av offentligt anställda. Detta innebär att dessa studerande bör visa nöjaktig (vitsord 1-3) eller god (vitsord 4-5) förmåga att använda svenska i tal och skrift. Muntlig och skriftlig förmåga bedöms separat. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Kvist, Anna Korhonen, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Communication: Assessed group work and assessed oral presentation at the end of the course.
  
  Introduction to academic studies: virtual tests

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Content scheduling

  Kommunikation för sjukskötare 3 sp:
  - Vetenskapligt skrivande på svenska samt litteratursökning manuellt och i databaser
  - Tillförlitligt källmaterial och källkritik
  - Muntlig och skriftlig framställning
  - E-post hantering och användning av sociala medier i vårdarbetet
  
  Introduktion till högskolestudier 1sp:
  - Studieinformation och informationssökning
  - Lärande i ett högskolesammanhang
  - Dataskydd och datasäkerhet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  The student do not have a sufficient knowledge and competence about the topic.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - satisfactory-extremely satisfactory (1-2)
  Students demonstrate a superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - good-extremely good (3-4)
  • Students demonstrate a competence that is related and linked to the literature
  • Students can reflect and justify their own points of view

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Assessment criteria - excellent (5)
  • Students have in-depth competence and show a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the future profession

•   Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication VÅV22IN01-3017 02.09.2024-11.10.2024  4 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
  - can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Communication
  Novia's instructions for degree projects.
  Materials on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Communication: Swedish 3 cr
  - Lectures on scientific writing
  - Lectures on oral presentation
  - Group work in scientific writing
  - Exercises in oral presentation
  - Oral presentations that are analyzed
  
  Introduction to academic studies 1 cr:
  - Lecturers, presentations,
  - Virtual on line test.
  - Virtual test ( library )
  
  More course information can be found on Moodle platform

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Communication
  
  Student
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way, in accordance with the requirements of working life and social life.
  knows the work process of scientific writing and can use referencing systems.
  - is aware of different ways to search for information and can report according to the rules for standard reporting.
  Students with Finnish as the language of schooling must demonstrate such knowledge of Swedish as is required of public employees according to the law (424/2003). This means that these students should demonstrate satisfactory (grade 1-3) or good (grade 4-5) ability to use Swedish in speech and writing. Oral and written skills are assessed separately.
  Prerequisites
  No prior knowledge requirements

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 11.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Anita Kvist, Anna Korhonen, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Introduction to university studies 1 cr:
  Study information and information search
  Learning in a university context
  Data protection and data security
  
  Communication for midwives/public health nurses 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature searches manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  E-mail handling and use of social media in care work

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Communication: Assessed group work and assessed oral presentation at the end of the course.
  
  Introduction to academic studies: virtual tests

  Student's schedule and workload

  One (1) credit corresponds to 27 hours of work for the student.
  This course is 4 credits which means 108 hours of work for this course.
  
  The course is divided according to:
  3 credits Communication/Swedish (Language teacher)
  1 ECTS Introduction (Marie Hjortell and Terese Österberg)

  Assessment criteria

  Kommunikation:
  Underkänd
  Studerande visar inte tillräcklig kompetens i ämnet.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - satisfactory-extremely satisfactory (1-2)
  Students demonstrate a superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - good-extremely good (3-4)
  • Students demonstrate a competence that is related and linked to the literature
  • Students can reflect and justify their own points of view

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - excellent (5)
  • Students have in-depth competence and show a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the future profession

•   Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication VÅV22IN01-3016 02.09.2024-20.12.2024  4 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is familiar with his own university, its teaching methods and the use of different platforms
  - reflects on the studies and is aware of the importance of personal development in relation to lifelong learning
  - can communicate both orally and in writing in a structured and linguistically well-functioning way
  - knows the work process for scientific writing and can use reference systems
  - is familiar with literature search and has a critical thinking
  - can use different channels to retrieve information and compile reports according to the standard form and layout

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Study information and information retrieval
  Learning in an academic context
  Data protection and data security
  Communication for nurse/midwife/public health nurse 3 credits:
  Scientific writing in Swedish and literature search both manually and in databases
  Reliable source material and source criticism
  Oral and written presentation
  Email management and the use of social media in nursing care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  Further information

  Students with Finnish as prior educational language have to show such skills in the Swedish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that these students must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Swedish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Kvist

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Communication:
  Novia's instructions for degree projects.
  Materials on Moodle
  
  Introduction: Materials on Moodle

  Learning methods

  Communication - Swedish 3 cr:
  - Lectures on scientific writing
  - Lectures on oral presentation
  - Group work in scientific writing
  - Exercises in oral presentation
  - Oral presentations that are analyzed
  
  Introduction to academic studies 1 cr: Lecturers, presentations, virtual test. More course information can be found in Moodle platform

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Studerande
  - kan kommunicera både muntligt och skriftligt på ett strukturerat och språkligt välfungerande sätt, i enlighet med arbetslivets och samhällslivets krav.
  känner till arbetsprocessen för vetenskapligt skrivande och kan använda referenssystem.
  - är medveten om olika vägar att söka information och kan rapportera enligt reglerna för standarduppställning.
  
  Studeranden med finska som skolbildningsspråk ska uppvisa sådana kunskaper i svenska som enligt lagen (424/2003) krävs av offentligt anställda. Detta innebär att dessa studerande bör visa nöjaktig (vitsord 1-3) eller god (vitsord 4-5) förmåga att använda svenska i tal och skrift. Muntlig och skriftlig förmåga bedöms separat. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 20.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 13.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Herrgård-Backlund, Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Communication: Assessed group work and assessed oral presentation at the end of the course.
  
  Introduction to academic studies: virtual tests

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Content scheduling

  Kommunikation för sjukskötare 3 sp:
  - Vetenskapligt skrivande på svenska samt litteratursökning manuellt och i databaser
  - Tillförlitligt källmaterial och källkritik
  - Muntlig och skriftlig framställning
  - E-post hantering och användning av sociala medier i vårdarbetet
  
  Introduktion till högskolestudier 1sp:
  - Studieinformation och informationssökning
  - Lärande i ett högskolesammanhang
  - Dataskydd och datasäkerhet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  The student do not have a sufficient knowledge and competence about the topic.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - satisfactory-extremely satisfactory (1-2)
  Students demonstrate a superficial competence and basic understanding of the subject.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Communication:
  Assessment criteria - good-extremely good (3-4)
  • Students demonstrate a competence that is related and linked to the literature
  • Students can reflect and justify their own points of view

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Assessment criteria - excellent (5)
  • Students have in-depth competence and show a deeper understanding of the subject in relation to the future profession

•   Leadership and Development in Public Health Nursing HVV21FU03-3001 07.01.2025-02.02.2025  3 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - Understands the importance of leadership in nursing care and public healthcare work
  - can identify the main principles for planning, organizing and managing operations, and have readiness to lead work and to act as leader in the work group
  - can account for management principles, working life forms of work and can function in multi-professional working groups, networks and projects
  - is responsible for own professional development and maintenance of quality within its work area
  - can develop and understand the importance of internal and external entrepreneurship in public health care work
  - is aware of current societal challenges and can participate in the development of the quality and efficiency of health services
  - has insights into the role of the health care professional as a professional decision maker and understands the significance of social awareness and commitment

  Prerequisites

  Biomedical sciences
  Health promotion in nursing care
  Clinical nursing care
  Introduction to public health nursing

  Content of the study unit

  Leadership and development in public health nursing

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och
  
  Kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Recommended literature can be found in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Lectures week 2-5
  Self-studies

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Leadership 2 cr Grades :1-5
  Context-Specific Leadership 1 cr P/F
  (Students who have participated in the Public Health Nurse Day on 15 November do not need to complete a written assignment with reflections on interviews, but participate in the interviews)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2025 - 02.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 07.01.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  The course consists of the following parts:
  Leadership 2 cr is held by Carina Gädda ( studied together with BM21)
  Context-specific leadership 1 cr is held by Marie Hjortell (read only by HV21)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual examination assignment in the part on Leadership ( Carina Gädda 2 cr)
  Task in context-specific leadership + presence at interviews ( Marie Hjortell 1 cr )

•   Leadership and Professional Development of the Public Health Nurse UHV20HV11-3002 19.08.2024-31.07.2025  3 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Applies in the evaluation of health care work quality recommendations and current strategies and can collaborate both as employees and leaders in interprofessional working groups
  
  Identifies and considers societal challenges and can provide appropriate services and ensure continuity of care chain
  
  May participate in national and international discussions on population health and well-being
  
  Can act as expert in various media
  
  Develops their professional knowledge and follows ethical principles in health care work

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Leadership in health care work, welfare strategies, business programs
  
  Various service producers in social and health care
  
  Health care professional's ethical activities, professional identity
  
  The health care professional as a social influencer
  
  The development of the quality and efficiency of health care services
  
  Collaboration with various media: radio, TV, internet, press, social media

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ledarskap
  Laaksonen, H; Laitinen. H; Hiilamo Heikki. 2020. Sosiaala- ja terveydenhuollon järjestelmä.
  Russberg, A. & Angelis, J. 2018. Piska eller morot? Change management för hållbara beteendeförändringar. Studentlitteratur
  Rosengren, K. 2014. Vårdledarskap. Att utveckla och förbättra framtidens vård och ledarskap. Studentlitteratur.
  Nordström, G (red). 2014. Kvalitetsarbete för bättre och säkrare vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Lueddeke, G.R. 2016. Global population health and well-being in the 21st century. Springer.
  Lundqvist Coey, Å. 2018. Samspel och rävspel - ideal och verkligenhet på jobbet. Vulkan.se. Riga.
  Tuominen, C. 2018. Johda tunteita. Menesty työelämässä. Tammi. Helsinki.
  Puro, L. Painonne arvosta kultaa. Terveydenhoitajaliitto terveydenhoitajatyön puolustajana.
  Karlsson, S., Sandelin, E. 2018. Sjuksköterskans ledarskap i kommunens hemsjukvård -
  En litteraturstudie. Examensarbete - magisternivå. Vårdvetenskap vid akademin för vård, arbetsliv och välfärd 2018:40
  Hommel, A., Andersson, Å. 2018. Kvalitetsutveckling inom omvårdnad. Sjukskötarens professionella ansvar. Studentlitteratur
  Peng, L. 2018. Transformational Leadership Research in China (2005-2015). Chinese Education & Society. Sep/Oct2018, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p372-409. 38p.
  Jambawo, Sharon. 2018. Transformational leadership and ethical leadership: their significance in the mental healthcare system. British Journal of Nursing. 9/20/2018, Vol. 27 Issue 17, p998-1001. 4p.
  Artiklar
  
  Etik
  Arlebrink, J. 2013. Grundläggande vårdetik- teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur
  Christoffersen, S-A. (red) 2017. Professionsetik. Gleerups.
  Henriksen, J-O & Vetlesen, A. 2013. Etik i arbete med människor. Studentlitteratur
  Olivestam, C E& Thorsen Håkan. 2012. Etik och människans livsvillkor. Liber.
  Ryynänen, O-P& Myllykangas, M. 2000. Terveydenhuollon etiikka:arvot monimutkaisuuden maailmassa. WSOY:
  Sandman,L&Kjellström,S. 2018. Etikboken:etik för vårdande yrken. Studentlitteratur
  Stryhn, H. 2007. Etik och omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur.
  Verksamhetschefens etiska kompetens
  Falkenström, E. 2012. Om identifiering och hantering av intressekonflikter i hälso- och sjukvården
  http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:545082/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  Artiklar (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kursintroduktion
  Föreläsningar
  Självstudier
  Gruppuppgift, skriftlig rapport och seminarium
  Planering och förverkligande av konferensen 2.10.2024
  Simulering (obligatrisk närvaro)
  Individuell skriftlig uppgift (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  På svenska
  1. Individuell uppgift 1-5
  2. Projektet konferens 1-5
  3. Workshop GK/UK
  Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.08.2024 - 31.07.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.12.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Utomstående föreläsning; kvalitetsledning, ledarskap, hälsovårdararbete, välfärdsområden ur hälsovårdarens perspektiv; karriärmöjligheter våren 2025
  Planering och förverkligande av konferensen tilsammans med arbetslivsaktörer hösten 2024 (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individuell skriftlig uppgift (1 sp) inl. 6.5.2025, skriftlig respons på Moodle 1-5
  Etik workshop 0,5 sp GK/UK
  Konferens-projektet hösten 2024; 1,5 sp 1-5 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar, workshop, projektarbete (konferens) 54 h
  Individuella arbeten och grupparbete 27 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  På svenska
  1 och 2. Studerande fyller inte krav för vitsord 1 eller gör inte arbeten, deltar inte i seminarium 3
  3. Studerande deltar inte i workshop (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av uppgifterna:
  Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Kriterier för utvärdering :
  Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter
  
  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering:
  Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och
  
  Kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
  
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

•   Maternity and child health care HVV14KH02-3008 30.09.2024-22.12.2024  15 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  -can plan, implement, evaluate and document the client’s/patient’s care in maternal health care during pregnancy and puerperium
  -can plan, implement, evaluate and document the client’s/patient’s care in child health care
  -can identify the client’s resources and health barriers and support the health of the pregnant woman, the expectant family and the family with children
  -can provide family-centered care in the support of the family
  -respects the cultural affiliation of the client/patient and the family
  -has insight into multiprofessional work and can form networks to promote health and wellbeing in the pregnant, the expectant family and the family with children
  -acquires insights into family planning
  -masters safe drug therapy management and vaccination programmes within the field of child health care

  Prerequisites

  Public health nursing with the expectant family
  Public health nursing with children and their families
  Neonatal care and breastfeeding counseling
  Health promotion skills in family health

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice at mother- and childhealth care units

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Handledd klinisk praktik inom mödra- och barnrådgivning
  Reflektioner och praktikseminarie (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Godkänd praktik
  Godkända praktikuppgifter (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.09.2024 - 22.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 29.09.2024

  • 15 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 18

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Frida Gädda, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktikinfotillfälle samt praktikseminarium (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Student's schedule and workload

  Praktik 40h/vecka på 10 veckor ( 2 h /vecka kan räknas till egna praktikuppgifter)
  Obligatorisk närvaro 100 % (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Kan ta emot feedback och visar vilja att utveckla yrkesskickligheten
  Följer arbetslistan och håller överenskomna tider
  Kan ställa frågor som är relevanta för att lära sig ett arbetsmoment
  Arbetar planmässigt och har en grundläggande noggrannhet i viktiga arbetsmoment
  Kan utföra arbetsuppgifter inledningsvis under handledning i riktning mot utökad självständighetsgrad
  Har kunskaper och kan ställa frågor som är relevanta för att lära sig ett arbetsmoment
  Kan följa direktiv och anvisningar och tar ansvar för uppgifter
  Kan fatta beslut som rör arbetsuppgifter på grundläggande och fördjupad nivå
  Känner till värdegrunden och beaktar de yrkesetiska principerna
  Kan kommunicera och bemöta patienter/klienter/kunder
  Kan samarbeta med andra inom arbetsteamet (not translated)

•   Medication Management I USS22GV02-3005 10.01.2025-06.04.2025  5 credits  (USS24F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of how human anatomy, physiology, and pathology affect the administration of medication, taking into account the phases of medication and the effects on the organism when planning, implementing and evaluating a safe medication management for different patient groups
  - can explain the legal grounds of medication management and can provide mentoring
  - can work cost-effectively taking into consideration the environment and sustainable development

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The most common types of medication and their uses, effect mechanisms and administration
  
  The 5 right of medication
  
  The implementation of medication management through various modes of administration
  
  Self medication
  
  Medication calculation
  
  Basic mathematics
  
  Rounding
  
  Roman numerals
  
  Equation solving
  
  Conversions
  
  Dosage
  
  Calculation of active substances (tablets, solutions)
  
  Dosage taking into account the patient's body weight, skin area
  
  Dosage tables
  
  Nomogram
  
  Laws and governing documents in the implementation of medicinal treatment
  
  The nurse's role, duties and responsibilities in the process of medication management
  
  Plan for medication management
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Material use, reuse and disposal of medication in social and health care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling
  
  http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-00-8686-2
  
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  
  https://medibas-se.ezproxy.novia.fi/
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  
  Koskinen, T., Puirava, A. et.al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammattilaisille.
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2009. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2008. Lääkehoito eller nyare (2011) upplagan
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2003. Lääkehoidon ABC
  
  Persson P. (red.) 2001. Läkemedel och läkemedelshantering för sjuksköterskor
  
  Veräjänkorva O. mfl. 2006. Lääkehoito hoitotyössä.
  
  Lääkeinfo.fi
  
  Medicin 75+
  https://www.fimea.fi/web/sv/soktjanster_och_forteckningar/lakemedelsinformation/en_databas_for_medicineringen_av_aldre
  
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  
  Ernvall S. m.fl. 2009. Lääkelaskenta.
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska." (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hybridutförande
  Uppgifterna utförs online i moodle
  Kontaktstudier i form av föreläsningar och i läkemedelsräkning i klass, som komplement till detta finns inbandade föreläsningar inom respektive ämne till förfogande.
  
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och/eller gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops).
  
  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  Självstudier
  Närstudier
  Smågruppsarbeten samt inlämningar inför simulation på Moodle
  Kliniska oblikatoriska simuleringsövningar med tillhörande förhandsuppgifter.
  Praktisk examination genom filmning.
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  Självstudier
  Närstudier
  Räkneövningar på moodle (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Individuell tent i Läkemedelsmatematik I (gk/uk) kräver 100% rätt
  
  2. Individuell tent i Lkm behandling I (5/uk)
  
  3. Simulering (gk/uk)
  
  4. Moodleuppgifter (gk/uk)
  
  Kursvitsordet är en helhet av de 4 ovannämda delarna. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.01.2025 - 06.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 09.01.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  
  Aktuell lagstiftning
  
  Etik vid läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Säker läkemedelsbehandling vid olika skeden av läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  
  Grundmatematik
  
  Enhetsomvandlingar
  
  Dosering av läkemedel i fast och flytande form
  
  Nomogram
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt instruktioner vid kursstart.
  Räknetent efter utförda räkneworkshops och test.
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar enligt schema
  
  Individuell tentamen och omtentamen i läkemedelshantering enligt schema inom ramen för kursen.
  
  Tentamenstillfälle 1: 14.3 Läkemedelsbehandling samt läkemedelsräkning
  
  På moodle
  
  Andra omtentamenstillfället på allmänt omtentamensdatum: Fre 4.4.2025 kl. 12-16
  
  
  
  Tredje omtentamenstillfället på allmänt omtentamensdatum: Fre 25.4.2025 kl. 12-16
  
  
  
  Individuell tentamen och omtentamen i läkemedelsräkning enligt schema inom ramen för kusen.
  
  Läkemedelsräkningstent 1: 14.3 Läkemedelsbehandling samt läkemedelsräkning
  
  På Moodle extra omtentamenstillfällen:
  
  21.3 klockan 12:00-13:30 (länk på moodlesidan)
  26.3 klockan 08:15-10:00 (länk på moodlesidan)
  1.4 klockan 10:00-11:30 (länk på moodlesidan)
  
  Läkemedelsräkning omtentament 1: Fre 4.4.2025 kl. 12-16
  
  
  
  Omtentamen 2: Fre 25.4.2025 kl. 12-16
  
  
  
  Obligatorisk simulering i smågrupper enligt schema
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  kursens omfattning 5x27h= 135h
  
  föreläsningar + tenter 10h
  
  moodleuppgifter + självstudier 112h
  
  simuleringar 13h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God nivå:
  
  Studerande svarar på alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och kan reletera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner i viss mån.
  
  Studerande känner till läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

•   Medication Management I USS22GV02-3006 07.01.2025-20.04.2025  5 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of how human anatomy, physiology, and pathology affect the administration of medication, taking into account the phases of medication and the effects on the organism when planning, implementing and evaluating a safe medication management for different patient groups
  - can explain the legal grounds of medication management and can provide mentoring
  - can work cost-effectively taking into consideration the environment and sustainable development

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The most common types of medication and their uses, effect mechanisms and administration
  
  The 5 right of medication
  
  The implementation of medication management through various modes of administration
  
  Self medication
  
  Medication calculation
  
  Basic mathematics
  
  Rounding
  
  Roman numerals
  
  Equation solving
  
  Conversions
  
  Dosage
  
  Calculation of active substances (tablets, solutions)
  
  Dosage taking into account the patient's body weight, skin area
  
  Dosage tables
  
  Nomogram
  
  Laws and governing documents in the implementation of medicinal treatment
  
  The nurse's role, duties and responsibilities in the process of medication management
  
  Plan for medication management
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Material use, reuse and disposal of medication in social and health care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling
  
  http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-00-8686-2
  
  FIMEA, Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2020 (äldre upplaga från 2013 kan också användas). Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14) eller
  
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2020 (äldre upplaga från 2014 kan också användas). Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)
  
  https://medibas-se.ezproxy.novia.fi/
  
  Rekommenderad litteratur:
  
  Koskinen, T., Puirava, A. et.al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammattilaisille.
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2009. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2008. Lääkehoito eller nyare (2011) upplagan
  
  Nurminen M-L. 2003. Lääkehoidon ABC
  
  Persson P. (red.) 2001. Läkemedel och läkemedelshantering för sjuksköterskor
  
  Veräjänkorva O. mfl. 2006. Lääkehoito hoitotyössä.
  
  Lääkeinfo.fi
  
  Medicin 75+
  https://www.fimea.fi/web/sv/soktjanster_och_forteckningar/lakemedelsinformation/en_databas_for_medicineringen_av_aldre
  
  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  
  Ernvall S. m.fl. 2009. Lääkelaskenta.
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Läkemedelsbehandling 4 sp
  Självstudier
  Närstudier
  Kliniska oblikatoriska simuleringsövningar med tillhörande förhandsuppgifter.
  Praktisk examination genom filmning.
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  Självstudier
  Närstudier
  Räkneövningar på moodle (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Individuell tent i Läkemedelsmatematik I (gk/uk) kräver 100% rätt Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg
  
  2. Individuell tent i Lkm behandling I (5/uk) Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg
  
  3. Simulering (gk/uk)
  
  4. Moodleuppgifter (gk/uk) Plagiatkontrolleras
  
  Kursvitsordet är en helhet av de 4 ovannämda delarna. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2025 - 20.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  07.12.2024 - 06.01.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Läkemedelslära 4 sp
  
  Aktuell lagstiftning
  
  Etik vid läkemedelsbehandling
  
  Läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Säker läkemedelsbehandling vid olika skeden av läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen
  
  Läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
  
  Läkemedelsräkning 1 sp
  
  Grundmatematik
  
  Enhetsomvandlingar
  
  Dosering av läkemedel i fast och flytande form
  
  Nomogram
  
  Examensstadga 4 §
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt instruktioner vid kursstart.
  
  Räknetent efter utförda räkneworkshops och test.
  
  Klinisk examination i injektioner i samband med övningar enligt schema
  
  Individuell tentamen och omtentamen i läkemedelshantering enligt schema inom ramen för kursen.
  
  Tentamenstillfälle 1: 26.2 10:15-11:30
  
  Andra omtentamenstillfället på allmänt omtentamensdatum: 7.3.2025 kl. 12-16
  
  
  
  Tredje omtentamenstillfället på allmänt omtentamensdatum: Fre 4.4.2025 kl. 12-16
  
  
  
  Individuell tentamen och omtentamen i läkemedelsräkning enligt schema inom ramen för kusen.
  
  Läkemedelsräkningstent 1: 24.1
  
  På Moodle extra omtentamenstillfällen:
  
  10.2
  26.2
  13.3
  26.3
  
  Läkemedelsräkning omtentament 1: Fre 4.4.2025 kl. 12-16
  
  
  
  Omtentamen 2: Fre 25.4.2025 kl. 12-16
  
  
  
  Obligatorisk simulering i smågrupper enligt schema
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  kursens omfattning 5x 27h= 135h
  
  föreläsningar + tenter
  
  moodleuppgifter + självstudier
  
  simuleringar och praktisk examination (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Nöjaktig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.
  
  Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  God nivå:
  
  Studerande svarar på alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och kan reletera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner i viss mån.
  
  Studerande känner till läkemedlets skeden i organismen
  
  Studerande känner till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Berömlig nivå:
  
  Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
  
  Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.
  
  Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

•   Medication Management II and Pharmacology USS22KV03-3002 19.08.2024-10.11.2024  4 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of how human anatomy and physiology, pathology and applied pharmacology affect the administration of medication, taking into account the phases of the medication and the effect of the organism when planning, implementation and evaluation of safe medication management of various illnesses
  - can explain the legal grounds of medication management and can provide mentoring
  - can work cost-effectively taking into consideration the environment and sustainable development
  - understands the importance of commitment of the patient
  - can guide the patient in medication management

  Prerequisites

  Course Medication Management I

  Content of the study unit

  Fundamentals of Pharmacology: Pharmaconetics, Pharmacodynamics and Toxicology
  
  The most common types of medication and their uses, effect mechanisms and administration
  
  The therapeutic mechanisms of medication, side effect, interactions as well as mechanisms of interaction
  
  Follow-up of effects during medication
  
  Documentation
  
  Evaluation and review of medication
  
  The 5-9 right of medication
  
  Implementation of medication management through various modes of administration
  
  Applied pharmacology
  
  Performing blood transfusions
  
  Medical Technology
  
  Medication calculation: basic calculation, rounding, percentage, Roman numeral systems, equations, conversions, dosages, calculation of active substances (tablets, injection solutions, medicinal solutions), dosage taking into account the patient's body weight, skin area, dose tables, nomogram, calculating drip speed, drip time, infusion concentrate, oxygen, electrolytes, preparation of solutions, mixtures and dilutions, energy and liquid needs, nutritional solutions
  
  Laws and governing documents in the implementation of medication management
  
  The nurse's role, duties and responsibilities in the medication management process
  
  Commitment to medicinal treatment
  
  Plan for medicinal treatment
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Material use, reuse and disposal of medication in social and health care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Donnerdal L. (2014). Vätskebalans genom omvårdnadsplan. Studentlitteratur.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Ernvall S. m.fl. 2009. Lääkelaskenta
  Henriksson O. & Lennermark I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt och syra-basbalans. (Studentlitteratur).
  Lukkanen, E. & Ruokoniemi, P. 2021. Säker läkemedelsbehandling. Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling. Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2021:7
  Simonsen, T. et. al. 2020. Illustrerad farmakologi 1. Principer och tillämpningar. Natur och kultur.
  Simonsen, T. & Hasselström, J. 2020. Illustrerad farmakologi 2. Sjukdomar och behandling. Natur och kultur
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2020. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-12, Del II, ej kpt 9) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska." (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hybridutförande
  Uppgifterna utförs online i moodle
  Kontaktstudier i form av föreläsningar och i läkemedelsräkning i klass, som komplement till detta finns inbandade föreläsningar inom respektive ämne till förfogande.
  
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och/eller gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops). (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Den skriftliga individuella tentamen i läkemedelsräkning bedöms gk/uk. Krävs 100 % rätt
  2. Individuell tentamen (5-1/uk)
  3. Obligatorisk medverkande närvaro vid simuleringstillfällen (gk/uk)
  4. ABO test (gk/uk)
  Kursvitsordet är en helhet av de 4 ovannämda delarna. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.08.2024 - 10.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 18.08.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelsräkning
  2. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi
  3. Simulering och arbete i smågrupper
  4. ABO test (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Uppgifter och virtuellt teoritest enligt instruktioner vid kursstart.
  Räknetent efter utförda räkneworkshops och test.
  Klinisk examination i samband med övningar inom Kliniskt vårdarbete enligt schema
  
  1. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelsräkning X. Omtentamen I X, omtentamen II X, omtentamen III X
  2. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi X. Omtentamen I X omtentamen II X
  3. Simulering inom kliniskt vårdarbete och arbete i smågrupper
  
  4. ABO test
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier: räkning, ABO test, instuderingsfrågor mm. 90 h
  föreläsningar: matematik 10 h, behandling 12 h, farmakologi 8h
  handledd gruppsimulering 6h
  smågruppsarbete 12h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Känner ej till begrepp eller grundläggande principer. Förstår ej samband mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  N1 känner till begrepp och grundläggande principer inom läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Ser samband mellan teori och praktik men kan ej reflektera (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  G3 förstår och kan förklara begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Visar förmåga till att reflektera mellan teori och praktik (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  B5 har förmåga att se samband och göra egna slutsatser mellan begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Kan reflektera mellan teori och praktik (not translated)

•   Medication Management II and Pharmacology USS22KV03-3003 26.08.2024-15.12.2024  4 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has an understanding of how human anatomy and physiology, pathology and applied pharmacology affect the administration of medication, taking into account the phases of the medication and the effect of the organism when planning, implementation and evaluation of safe medication management of various illnesses
  - can explain the legal grounds of medication management and can provide mentoring
  - can work cost-effectively taking into consideration the environment and sustainable development
  - understands the importance of commitment of the patient
  - can guide the patient in medication management

  Prerequisites

  Course Medication Management I

  Content of the study unit

  Fundamentals of Pharmacology: Pharmaconetics, Pharmacodynamics and Toxicology
  
  The most common types of medication and their uses, effect mechanisms and administration
  
  The therapeutic mechanisms of medication, side effect, interactions as well as mechanisms of interaction
  
  Follow-up of effects during medication
  
  Documentation
  
  Evaluation and review of medication
  
  The 5-9 right of medication
  
  Implementation of medication management through various modes of administration
  
  Applied pharmacology
  
  Performing blood transfusions
  
  Medical Technology
  
  Medication calculation: basic calculation, rounding, percentage, Roman numeral systems, equations, conversions, dosages, calculation of active substances (tablets, injection solutions, medicinal solutions), dosage taking into account the patient's body weight, skin area, dose tables, nomogram, calculating drip speed, drip time, infusion concentrate, oxygen, electrolytes, preparation of solutions, mixtures and dilutions, energy and liquid needs, nutritional solutions
  
  Laws and governing documents in the implementation of medication management
  
  The nurse's role, duties and responsibilities in the medication management process
  
  Commitment to medicinal treatment
  
  Plan for medicinal treatment
  
  Sustainable development
  
  Material use, reuse and disposal of medication in social and health care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor.
  Donnerdal L. (2014). Vätskebalans genom omvårdnadsplan. Studentlitteratur.
  Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.
  Ernvall S. m.fl. 2009. Lääkelaskenta
  Henriksson O. & Lennermark I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt och syra-basbalans. (Studentlitteratur).
  Lukkanen, E. & Ruokoniemi, P. 2021. Säker läkemedelsbehandling. Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling. Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2021:7
  Simonsen, T. et. al. 2020. Illustrerad farmakologi 1. Principer och tillämpningar. Natur och kultur.
  Simonsen, T. & Hasselström, J. 2020. Illustrerad farmakologi 2. Sjukdomar och behandling. Natur och kultur
  Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2020. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-12, Del II, ej kpt 9) eller
  Nordeng, H, et.al. 2014. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning
  Lääketietokanta, Pharmaca Fennica och SFINX lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti eller
  FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0
  
  På Moodle given litteratur
  
  Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur
  
  "För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska." (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Hybridutförande
  Uppgifterna utförs online i moodle
  Kontaktstudier i form av föreläsningar och i läkemedelsräkning i klass, som komplement till detta finns inbandade föreläsningar inom respektive ämne till förfogande.
  
  Självstudier i form av individuella uppgifter och/eller gruppuppgifter, flipped learning (studerande läser in material innan räkneworkshops). (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Den skriftliga individuella tentamen i läkemedelsräkning bedöms gk/uk. Krävs 100 % rätt. Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg.
  2. Individuell tentamen (5-1/uk) Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg.
  3. Obligatorisk medverkande närvaro vid simuleringstillfällen (gk/uk)
  4. ABO test (gk/uk)
  5. Inlämningsuppgifter (gk/uk)
  
  Kursvitsordet är en helhet av de 5 ovannämda delarna. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.08.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  20.04.2024 - 31.08.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.
  
  Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelsräkning
  2. Individuell tentamen i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi
  3. Simulering och arbete i smågrupper
  4. ABO test
  5. Inlämningsuppgifter (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Virtuellt teoritest enligt instruktioner vid kursstart. Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg
  
  Räknetent efter utförda räkneworkshops och test. Görs med egen dator och Safe Exam browser tillägg
  
  Klinisk examination i samband med övningar inom Kliniskt vårdarbete enligt schema
  
  ABO test
  
  Inlämningsuppgifter
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Självstudier: räkning, ABO test.
  
  Föreläsningar: läkemedeslräkning, läkemedelsbehandlingbehandling och farmakologi.
  
  Handledd gruppsimulering.
  
  smågruppsarbete med instuderingsfrågor och inlämningsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Känner ej till begrepp eller grundläggande principer. Förstår ej samband mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  N1 känner till begrepp och grundläggande principer inom läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Ser samband mellan teori och praktik men kan ej reflektera (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  G3 förstår och kan förklara begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Visar förmåga till att reflektera mellan teori och praktik (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  B5 har förmåga att se samband och göra egna slutsatser mellan begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i läkemedelshantering och farmakologi. Kan reflektera mellan teori och praktik (not translated)

•   Mental Health Care and Substance Abuse Treatment USS22KL01-3003 13.01.2025-16.03.2025  5 credits  (USS23F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can as part of an inter-professional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client-centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has expertise in mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  - has expertise in care in various service environments
  - can evaluate the patient's counseling needs and resources, and plan counseling and patient self-care
  - knows the patient's care chain and servicesystem
  - can apply knowledge about mental health and central psychiatric disorders and illnesses
  - can consider how climate-related events affect mental health
  - can the central evidence-based care methods used in substance abuse treatment and mental health care for patients, families and relatives
  - master methods for early intervention and preventive work

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The central psychiatric disorders
  
  Professional treatment of the person suffering from psychiatric illness or addiction
  
  Patient care chain, service environments and legislation concerning mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  
  Commitment to care
  
  Person-centered/client-centered and family-centered guidance methods
  
  Motivate the patient to self-care
  
  Advocasy and person-centered care
  
  Care relationship
  
  Family work
  
  Network
  
  Rehabilitation
  Climate-related stress and anxiety
  
  Evaluation of suicide risk
  
  Preventative mental health care work
  
  Mini-intervention
  
  Ethics och autonomy
  
  Alcohol and substance abuse culture and politics in Finland

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  30% Face-to-face, 70% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Skärsäter I. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå.
  Kuhanen, C. m.fl. 2017. Mielenterveystyö.
  Pederson R. & Nortvedt (red.). 2021. Etik i psykiatrisk vård.
  Gabrielsson S, m.fl. 2023. Sjuksköterska i psykiatrisk heldygnsvård.
  Eklund M. m.fl. 2020. Aktivitet och relation : mål och medel inom psykosocial rehabilitering.
  Cullberg J., Skott M. & Strålin P. 2020. Att insjukna i psykos- Förlopp, behandling, återhämtning
  Andersson G, Bulow P, Denhov A. & Topor A. 2016. Från patient till person. Om allvarliga psykiska problem - vardag, vård och stöd.
  www.psykporten.fi
  Sandberg, H. 2014. Sjuksköterskans samtal - Professionalitet och medmänsklighet.
  Friberg F. & Öhlén J. 2013. Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Sidor 220 - 231, 377 - 405.
  Lehti J. 2017. Masennus mahdollisuutena. matkaopas muutokseen.
  Eide, H. 2009. Omvårdnadsorienterad kommunikation: relationsetik, samarbete och konfliktlösning.
  Gottlieb, B 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care, 56-103,146, 170-171, 203-251.
  Jahren Kristofferssen, N. m.fl, 2006. Grundläggande omvårdnad 4, s. 18 - 101.
  Nordmann M. & Vuohelainen E. (red.) 2014. Synvinklar på det rusmedelsförebyggande arbetet med unga i Finland.
  Herlofson J. m.fl. 2016. Psykiatri.
  Sögaard Nielsen, A. 2009. Behandling av alkoholproblem.
  Havio M, Inkinen M. & Partanen A. (red.). 2014. Päihde-hoitotyö.
  Tammi T. & Raento P. (red.) 2013. Addiktioyhteiskunta. Riippuvuus aikamme ilmiönä.
  Pehkonen A, m.fl. 2019. Oikeus päihdehuoltoon.
  Leith, W. 2008. De hungriga åren: en matmissbrukarens bekännelser.
  Trulsson, K. 2006. Dans på lina: Om kvinnors missbruk, familjeliv och behandling.
  Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende SOU 2100:35.
  Suomen sairaanhoitajaliitto ry. 2008. Tämä potilas kuuluu meille: sairaanhoitaja tekee mielenterveys- ja päihdehoitotyötä.
  Holmberg, J. 2010. Päihderiippuvuudesta elämänhallintaan.
  Saarelainen, Stengård & Vuori-Kemilä. 2007. Mielenterveys- ja päihdetyötä: yhteistyötä ja kumppanuutta.
  Koski-Jännes A., Riittinen L. & Saarnio P. 2008. Kohti muutosta.
  Huttunen M. & Lumikukka S. 2017. Psyykenlääkkeet ja niiden käyttö.
  www.droglanken.fi
  SOU 2011:35. Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende. Volym 1 och 2.
  Andersson Höglund I. & Hedman Ahlström B. 2013. Psykiatri 2.
  Andersson Höglund I. & Hedman Ahlström B. 2012. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri.
  Ahola T. & Ahola M. 2016. Väkivallasta turvallisuuteen.
  Etelä-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri. Toimintaohje perhe-ja lähisuhdeväkivaltaa kohdanneiden ja väkivaltaa tehneiden hoitotilanteissa. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kursinformation
  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Workshop, obligatorisk deltagande
  Simulering, obligariskt deltagande (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Tent i psykiatri utvärderas enligt skalan gk/uk (1-5) och väger 50 % av kursvitsordet. .
  
  2) Den skriftliga rapporten bedöms i skalan gk/uk (1-5) och väger 50 % av kursvitsordet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.01.2025 - 16.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2024 - 09.02.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Daniel Nenonen, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig lärare Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg ansvarar för tillgodoräkningen via validering (eAhot).
  Deltagande i kursstart, simulationen, föreläsningar, ev.expertföreläsningar och temaveckan är obligatoriskt. Frånvaro kompenseras.
  
  Feedback på rapporten ges individuellt på moodle. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  3.5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursinformation
  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Workshop, obligatorisk deltagande
  Simulering, obligariskt deltagande (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Tent i psykiatri vecka 7. Omtenter: Fre 4.4.2025 kl. 12-16 och fre 9.5.2025 kl. 12-16. Anmälning via Ukot i Peppi. Görs på moodle med Safe Browsner.
  
  2) Inlämning av individuell rapport på Moodle 16.3 2025. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursinformation 2 h
  Självstudier 23 h
  Tent 1 h ink. läsning 29 h
  Interaktiva föreläsningar, experter 20 h
  Simulering 4 h
  Workshop 4 h
  Individivuell rapport 50 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kriterier för vitsordet 1. Underkänd rapport kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Rapporten svarar endast delvis eller ytligt de ställda frågorna med stöd av vetenskapliga artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Rapporten har delvis relevant innehåll och tillämpningen beskrivs ytligt och ensidigt. Rapporten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid och den följer delvis Novias skrivanvisningar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Rapporten svarar på de ställda frågorna med stöd av minst 3 vetenskapliga relevanta artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Rapporten har kompetent innehåll och case -tillämpningen är beskriven. Rapporrten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle och den följer i stort sett Novias skrivanvisningar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Rapporten svarar mångsidigt på frågeställningar med stöd av minst 3 vetenskapliga relevanta artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Rapporten har kompetent och aktuellt innehåll och case -tillämpningen är tydligt och logiskt beskriven. Rapporten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle och den följer Novias skrivanvisningar (not translated)

•   Mental Health Care and Substance Abuse Treatment USS22KL01-3004 10.02.2025-16.03.2025  5 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can as part of an inter-professional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client-centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has expertise in mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  - has expertise in care in various service environments
  - can evaluate the patient's counseling needs and resources, and plan counseling and patient self-care
  - knows the patient's care chain and servicesystem
  - can apply knowledge about mental health and central psychiatric disorders and illnesses
  - can consider how climate-related events affect mental health
  - can the central evidence-based care methods used in substance abuse treatment and mental health care for patients, families and relatives
  - master methods for early intervention and preventive work

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The central psychiatric disorders
  
  Professional treatment of the person suffering from psychiatric illness or addiction
  
  Patient care chain, service environments and legislation concerning mental health care and substance abuse treatment
  
  Commitment to care
  
  Person-centered/client-centered and family-centered guidance methods
  
  Motivate the patient to self-care
  
  Advocasy and person-centered care
  
  Care relationship
  
  Family work
  
  Network
  
  Rehabilitation
  Climate-related stress and anxiety
  
  Evaluation of suicide risk
  
  Preventative mental health care work
  
  Mini-intervention
  
  Ethics och autonomy
  
  Alcohol and substance abuse culture and politics in Finland

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Skärsäter I. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå.
  Kuhanen, C. m.fl. 2017. Mielenterveystyö.
  Pederson R. & Nortvedt (red.). 2021. Etik i psykiatrisk vård.
  Gabrielsson S, m.fl. 2023. Sjuksköterska i psykiatrisk heldygnsvård.
  Eklund M. m.fl. 2020. Aktivitet och relation : mål och medel inom psykosocial rehabilitering.
  Cullberg J., Skott M. & Strålin P. 2020. Att insjukna i psykos- Förlopp, behandling, återhämtning
  Andersson G, Bulow P, Denhov A. & Topor A. 2016. Från patient till person. Om allvarliga psykiska problem - vardag, vård och stöd.
  www.psykporten.fi
  Sandberg, H. 2014. Sjuksköterskans samtal - Professionalitet och medmänsklighet.
  Friberg F. & Öhlén J. 2013. Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Sidor 220 - 231, 377 - 405.
  Lehti J. 2017. Masennus mahdollisuutena. matkaopas muutokseen.
  Eide, H. 2009. Omvårdnadsorienterad kommunikation: relationsetik, samarbete och konfliktlösning.
  Gottlieb, B 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care, 56-103,146, 170-171, 203-251.
  Jahren Kristofferssen, N. m.fl, 2006. Grundläggande omvårdnad 4, s. 18 - 101.
  Nordmann M. & Vuohelainen E. (red.) 2014. Synvinklar på det rusmedelsförebyggande arbetet med unga i Finland.
  Herlofson J. m.fl. 2016. Psykiatri.
  Sögaard Nielsen, A. 2009. Behandling av alkoholproblem.
  Havio M, Inkinen M. & Partanen A. (red.). 2014. Päihde-hoitotyö.
  Tammi T. & Raento P. (red.) 2013. Addiktioyhteiskunta. Riippuvuus aikamme ilmiönä.
  Pehkonen A, m.fl. 2019. Oikeus päihdehuoltoon.
  Leith, W. 2008. De hungriga åren: en matmissbrukarens bekännelser.
  Trulsson, K. 2006. Dans på lina: Om kvinnors missbruk, familjeliv och behandling.
  Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende SOU 2100:35.
  Suomen sairaanhoitajaliitto ry. 2008. Tämä potilas kuuluu meille: sairaanhoitaja tekee mielenterveys- ja päihdehoitotyötä.
  Holmberg, J. 2010. Päihderiippuvuudesta elämänhallintaan.
  Saarelainen, Stengård & Vuori-Kemilä. 2007. Mielenterveys- ja päihdetyötä: yhteistyötä ja kumppanuutta.
  Koski-Jännes A., Riittinen L. & Saarnio P. 2008. Kohti muutosta.
  Huttunen M. & Lumikukka S. 2017. Psyykenlääkkeet ja niiden käyttö.
  www.droglanken.fi
  SOU 2011:35. Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende. Volym 1 och 2.
  Andersson Höglund I. & Hedman Ahlström B. 2013. Psykiatri 2.
  Andersson Höglund I. & Hedman Ahlström B. 2012. Samhällsbaserad psykiatri.
  Ahola T. & Ahola M. 2016. Väkivallasta turvallisuuteen.
  Etelä-Pohjanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri. Toimintaohje perhe-ja lähisuhdeväkivaltaa kohdanneiden ja väkivaltaa tehneiden hoitotilanteissa. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kursinformation, obligatoriskt deltagande
  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar, obligatoriskt deltagande
  Simulering, obligariskt deltagande
  Temadagar (vecka 10, tisdag och onsdag) med socionomstuderande, obligatoriskt deltagande. Arbetsformen under temaveckan är interprofessionellt workshopsarbete där socionom- och sjukskötarstuderande blandas i mindre grupper. Workshopsarbetet fokuserar på vissa aktuella aktuella teman och resulterar i ett slutseminarium med gruppvisa presentationer. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Temaveckan: Smågruppsarbetet och seminariet kräver obligatorisk närvaro och utvärderas enligt skalan gk/uk med följande bedömningskriterier: studerandes aktivitet under smågrupper, inhämtning och bearbetning av källmaterial och aktivit deltagande i seminariet.
  
  2) Den skriftliga rapporten bedöms i skalan gk/uk (1-5) och väger 50 % av kursvitsordet.
  
  3) Tent i psykiatri utvärderas enligt skalan gk/uk (1-5) och väger 50 % av kursvitsordet. . (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.02.2025 - 16.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  12.12.2024 - 09.02.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Daniel Nenonen, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig lärare Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg ansvarar för tillgodoräkningen via validering (eAhot).
  Deltagande i kursstart, simulationen, föreläsningar, ev.expertföreläsningar och temaveckan är obligatoriskt. Frånvaro kompenseras.
  
  Feedback på temaveckan ges gemensamt till gruppen och feedback på rapporten ges individuellt på moodle. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursinformation
  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Simulering
  Temadagar (vecka 10, tisdag och onsdag) med socionomstuderande, obligatoriskt deltagande. Arbetsformen under temaveckan är interprofessionellt workshopsarbete där socionom- och sjukskötarstuderande blandas i mindre grupper. Workshopsarbetet fokuserar på vissa aktuella aktuella teman och resulterar i ett slutseminarium med gruppvisa presentationer. (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Erfarenhetstalare (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Interprofessionellt arbete (smågruppsarbete, grupprapport och seminariet) under temadagar 10. Inlämning av grupprapporter 4.3 och 5.3.2024.
  2) Inlämning av individuell rapport på Moodle 16.3 2025.
  3) Tent i psykiatri vecka 8. Omtenter: Fre 4.4.2025 kl. 12-16 och fre 9.5.2025 kl. 12-16. Anmälning via Ukot i Peppi. Görs på moodle med Safe Browsner. (not translated)

  Internationa connections

  5 studerande kan anhålla om att delta i Nordplus intensivveckan 3 sp vecka 15. 1,5 sp tas från denna kurs och 1,5 sp tas från praktiken alt. Valfria studier. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursinformation 2 h
  Självstudier 23 h
  Tent 1 h ink. läsning 19 h
  Interaktiva föreläsningar, experter 20 h
  Simulering 4 h
  Temavecka 24 h
  Individivuell rapport 40 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Fyller inte kriterier för vitsordet 1. Underkänd rapport kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Rapporten svarar endast delvis eller ytligt de ställda frågorna med stöd av vetenskapliga artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Rapporten har delvis relevant innehåll och tillämpningen beskrivs ytligt och ensidigt. Rapporten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid och den följer delvis Novias skrivanvisningar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Rapporten svarar på de ställda frågorna med stöd av minst 3 vetenskapliga relevanta artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Rapporten har kompetent innehåll och case -tillämpningen är beskriven. Rapporrten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle och den följer i stort sett Novias skrivanvisningar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Rapporten svarar mångsidigt på frågeställningar med stöd av minst 3 vetenskapliga relevanta artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Rapporten har kompetent och aktuellt innehåll och case -tillämpningen är tydligt och logiskt beskriven. Rapporten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle och den följer Novias skrivanvisningar (not translated)

•   Mental and Substance Abuse Care VÅV22KV12-3004 10.03.2025-20.04.2025  6 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - has knowledge of and an understanding of the most common forms of mental illness
  - has knowledge of and masters the various treatment and care methods of mental health care
  - can assess the need for care in people in need of emergency psychiatric care
  - can define risk use, harmful use / abuse, addiction and co-dependence
  - has knowledge of various forms of abuse; mainly alcohol, drugs and medicines
  - has knowledge of various forms of treatment and psycho social care
  - has the skills to intervene in time, inform, give advice and guide the client and relatives in substance abuse issues
  - understands the importance of health promotion and prevention interventions and care as well as rehabilitation in mental illness and in addiction and dependence
  - can interpret the central legislation and the national planning for the area and can apply the knowledge in professional practice
  - masters the medical terminology and drug treatment in the field
  - can interact professionally and caringly with clients / patients of different ages and with varying backgrounds and with their relatives
  - respects the patient / client and treats them as an expert on their own life
  - can support and guide the client / patient and relatives to get involved in care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Mental illness
  Addiction and addiction

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Skärsäter, I.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2019. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Allgulander, C. 2019. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Lindqvist B. & Hildebrand Karlén. 2023. Handbok i missbruks- och beroendepsykologi, Liber, Stockholm
  Lagstiftning
  Medibas
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit?
  Expert by experience

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.03.2025 - 20.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 09.03.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda, Johanna Sigfrids

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid Introduktion del 1 och del 2, Workshop, Seminarie (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  on moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Mental and Substance Abuse Care VÅV22KV12-3005 27.01.2025-01.06.2025  6 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - has knowledge of and an understanding of the most common forms of mental illness
  - has knowledge of and masters the various treatment and care methods of mental health care
  - can assess the need for care in people in need of emergency psychiatric care
  - can define risk use, harmful use / abuse, addiction and co-dependence
  - has knowledge of various forms of abuse; mainly alcohol, drugs and medicines
  - has knowledge of various forms of treatment and psycho social care
  - has the skills to intervene in time, inform, give advice and guide the client and relatives in substance abuse issues
  - understands the importance of health promotion and prevention interventions and care as well as rehabilitation in mental illness and in addiction and dependence
  - can interpret the central legislation and the national planning for the area and can apply the knowledge in professional practice
  - masters the medical terminology and drug treatment in the field
  - can interact professionally and caringly with clients / patients of different ages and with varying backgrounds and with their relatives
  - respects the patient / client and treats them as an expert on their own life
  - can support and guide the client / patient and relatives to get involved in care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Mental illness
  Addiction and addiction

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Distance learning

  Learning material

  Molin, J.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2024. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Allgulander, C. 2019. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Lindqvist B. & Hildebrand Karlén. 2023. Handbok i missbruks- och beroendepsykologi, Liber, Stockholm
  Lagstiftning
  Medibas
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.01.2025 - 01.06.2025

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2024 - 26.01.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Viktor Matintupa, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  6 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Portfolio
  Test on moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  on moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Mental and Substance Abuse Care VÅV22KV12-3006 28.04.2025-12.09.2025  6 credits  (UBM23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - has knowledge of and an understanding of the most common forms of mental illness
  - has knowledge of and masters the various treatment and care methods of mental health care
  - can assess the need for care in people in need of emergency psychiatric care
  - can define risk use, harmful use / abuse, addiction and co-dependence
  - has knowledge of various forms of abuse; mainly alcohol, drugs and medicines
  - has knowledge of various forms of treatment and psycho social care
  - has the skills to intervene in time, inform, give advice and guide the client and relatives in substance abuse issues
  - understands the importance of health promotion and prevention interventions and care as well as rehabilitation in mental illness and in addiction and dependence
  - can interpret the central legislation and the national planning for the area and can apply the knowledge in professional practice
  - masters the medical terminology and drug treatment in the field
  - can interact professionally and caringly with clients / patients of different ages and with varying backgrounds and with their relatives
  - respects the patient / client and treats them as an expert on their own life
  - can support and guide the client / patient and relatives to get involved in care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Mental illness
  Addiction and addiction

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Molin, J.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2024. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Allgulander, C. 2019. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Lindqvist B. & Hildebrand Karlén. 2023. Handbok i missbruks- och beroendepsykologi, Liber, Stockholm
  Lagstiftning
  Medibas
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit?
  Expert by experience

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.04.2025 - 12.09.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 27.04.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM23D-V
  • UHV23D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Viktor Matintupa, Marlene Gädda

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid Introduktion del 1 och del 2, Workshop, Seminarie (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  on moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Mental and substance abuse care VÅV22KV12-3002 25.11.2024-12.01.2025  6 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - has knowledge of and an understanding of the most common forms of mental illness
  - has knowledge of and masters the various treatment and care methods of mental health care
  - can assess the need for care in people in need of emergency psychiatric care
  - can define risk use, harmful use / abuse, addiction and co-dependence
  - has knowledge of various forms of abuse; mainly alcohol, drugs and medicines
  - has knowledge of various forms of treatment and psycho social care
  - has the skills to intervene in time, inform, give advice and guide the client and relatives in substance abuse issues
  - understands the importance of health promotion and prevention interventions and care as well as rehabilitation in mental illness and in addiction and dependence
  - can interpret the central legislation and the national planning for the area and can apply the knowledge in professional practice
  - masters the medical terminology and drug treatment in the field
  - can interact professionally and caringly with clients / patients of different ages and with varying backgrounds and with their relatives
  - respects the patient / client and treats them as an expert on their own life
  - can support and guide the client / patient and relatives to get involved in care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Mental illness
  Addiction and addiction

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  42% Face-to-face, 58% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Molin, J.&Wiklund Gustin, L. (red.) 2024. Omvårdnad vid psykisk ohälsa - på grundläggande nivå, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund
  Andersson Höglund. I. & Hedman Ahlström. B. 2014. Psykiatri 2, Sanoma Utbildning AB, Stockholm
  Allgulander, C. 2019. Klinisk Psykiatri, Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Lindqvist B. & Hildebrand Karlén. 2023. Handbok i missbruks- och beroendepsykologi, Liber, Stockholm
  Lagstiftning
  Medibas
  Aktuell forskning
  M.m. enl lärarens anvisningar

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies, individually and in group
  Workshop
  Study visit?
  Expert by experience

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.11.2024 - 12.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 24.11.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marlene Gädda

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid Introduktion, Workshop, Seminarie (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  3.5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Assignments; selfstudy
  Groupwork
  Test on moodle

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  on moodle

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential
  For written work:
  The student has not followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is missing. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential
  
  For the exam:
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  For the exam:
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  For written work:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)
  
  For the exam:
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  For written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Microbiology, Pathology and Basic Vaccination Knowledge USS24GV04-3001 03.02.2025-06.04.2025  5 credits  (USS24F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can the basics of microbiology
  - can the basics of pathology
  - has knowledge of and can prevent current global infections
  - can guide and support individuals and groups at risk and proceed in suspicion of global epidemics and pandemics
  - can the national vaccination program and know how the legislation regulates vaccinations
  - can the principles of vaccination of adults
  - can guide clients on vaccinations using the latest evidence-based knowledge

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of microbiology
  
  Pathology and pathophysiology
  
  Global infectious diseases
  
  Laws and regulation on contagious illnesses
  
  Current global infections
  
  Basic vaccination knowledge
  
  Guidance of the patient

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Mikrobiologi och patologi, rekommenderad litteratur:
  Material som erbjuds på Moodle
  Melhus 2019. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan 2018. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros 2021. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita
  Anttila, V-J et al. (red.) 2019. Hoitoon liittyvien infektioiden torjunta. Del V Ongelmamikrobien aiheuttamat infektiot.
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros 2021. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita
  Brändén 2021. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag
  Brehmer-Andersson, E. 2011. Allmän patologi - en introduktion.
  
  
  Grunder i vaccinationskunskap
  Lag om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2016/20161227,
  Statsrådets förordning om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2017/20170146
  Folkhälsomyndigheten.se
  Thl.fi (rokottajan käsikirja)
  THL.fi (matkailijan terveysopas)
  World Health Organization (WHO)
  Europan Centre for Disease Prevention and Controll (ECDE)
  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.
  https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/surveillance-and-disease-data
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
  Kunnat.net
  Filha.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar i mikrobiologi och patologi
  Eventuella uppgifter delas ut under föreläsningarna
  
  Simulationer obligatorisl närvaro, campus Åbo
  Workshop obligatorisk närvaro, campus Åbo
  Virtuell kurs, grunder i vaccinationskunskap , egen Moodle plattform (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  På svenska
  Examination i mikrobiologi, bedömning GK/UK: Studerande kan grunderna i mikrobiologi.
  Examination i patologi, bedömning GK/UK.: Studerande kan grunderna i patologi
  
  
  Examination i grundläggande vaccinationskunskap
  1. Skriftlig portfolio, bedömning GK/UK.
  Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kompetenser och innehåll för den angivna kursen), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap.
  2. Skriftlig tentamen.
  Bedömning GK/UK; För att kunna göra den avslutande tentamen som ingår i grunderna i vaccinationskunskap bör din portfolio vara inlämnad och godkänd. Skriftlig tentemen ska vara godkänd.
  3. Simulering; vaccinering, kan grunderna i vaccineringstekniken; obligatorisk deltagande. Förutsättningen till deltagandet är godkänd portfolio och tentamen i vaccinationskunskapen.
  Efter en godkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskapen och deltagandet i simuleringen kan studerande delta i vaccinering på praktiken under handledning. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.02.2025 - 06.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  07.12.2024 - 02.02.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Vasa Vård 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination i mikrobiologi (tentamen) 4.4.2025 och patologi (inlämningsuppgift, deadline 9.3 och quiz i Moodle, deadline 12.3)
  
  Obligatoriska simulationer
  OBS! För att kunna delta ska studerande fylla i blanketten invasiva ingrepp på Moodle
  Obligatorisk deltagande till simulering i vaccinationskunskapen den 14.4.2025.
  
  Den grundläggande kursen i vaccinationskunskap på Moodle består av två deltester
  1. Individuell portfolio med inlämning på Moodle.Vecka 6–11= 3.2–16.3.2025
  2.Skriftlig tent på Moodle efter godkänd portfolio vecka 14-15: 31.3-13.4.2025
  Efter en godkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskapen och deltagandet i simuleringen kan studerande delta i vaccinering på praktiken under handledning. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  På svenska
  Mikrobiologi 1 sp = 27 h (föreläsningar, självstudier, godkänd tentamen)
  Patologi 1 sp = 27 h (föreläsning, självstudier, godkänd inlämningsuppgift samt quiz i Moodle)
  
  Vaccinationskunskap 2,5 sp = varav 54 h Moodlekurs och 2 timmar föreläsning på campus + självstudier
  Simuleringar och workshop 0,5 sp. Förutsättningen till deltagandet till simulering är godkänd portfolio och tentamen i vaccinationskunskapen. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  För GK krävs att studerande:
  Kan grunderna i mikrobiologi
  Kan grunderna i patologi
  Har kunskap om och kan förebygga aktuella globala infektioner
  Kan handleda och stöda individer och grupper i risker och tillvägagångssätt vid misstanke om globala epidemier och pandemier
  Kan det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet och känner till hur lagstiftningen reglerar vaccinationerna
  Kan principerna för vaccinationsverksamheten för vuxna
  Kan handleda klienter om vaccinationer med stöd av den nyaste evidensbaserade kunskapen
  Deltar i simuleringen/ vaccinering och kan grunderna i vaccineringstekniken (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  För GK krävs att studerande:
  Kan grunderna i mikrobiologi
  Kan grunderna i patologi
  Har kunskap om och kan förebygga aktuella globala infektioner
  Kan handleda och stöda individer och grupper i risker och tillvägagångssätt vid misstanke om globala epidemier och pandemier
  Kan det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet och känner till hur lagstiftningen reglerar vaccinationerna
  Kan principerna för vaccinationsverksamheten för vuxna
  Kan handleda klienter om vaccinationer med stöd av den nyaste evidensbaserade kunskapen
  Deltar i simuleringen/ vaccinering och kan grunderna i vaccineringstekniken (not translated)

•   Microbiology, Pathology and Basic Vaccination Knowledge USS24GV04-3002 13.01.2025-27.04.2025  5 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can the basics of microbiology
  - can the basics of pathology
  - has knowledge of and can prevent current global infections
  - can guide and support individuals and groups at risk and proceed in suspicion of global epidemics and pandemics
  - can the national vaccination program and know how the legislation regulates vaccinations
  - can the principles of vaccination of adults
  - can guide clients on vaccinations using the latest evidence-based knowledge

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of microbiology
  
  Pathology and pathophysiology
  
  Global infectious diseases
  
  Laws and regulation on contagious illnesses
  
  Current global infections
  
  Basic vaccination knowledge
  
  Guidance of the patient

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Mikrobiologi och patologi, rekommenderad litteratur:
  Material som erbjuds på Moodle
  Melhus 2019. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur
  Ericson, Ericson & Kan 2018. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros 2021. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita
  Anttila, V-J et al. (red.) 2019. Hoitoon liittyvien infektioiden torjunta. Del V Ongelmamikrobien aiheuttamat infektiot.
  Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros 2021. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita
  Brändén 2021. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag
  Brehmer-Andersson, E. 2011. Allmän patologi - en introduktion.
  
  
  Grunder i vaccinationskunskap
  Lag om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2016/20161227,
  Statsrådets förordning om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2017/20170146
  Folkhälsomyndigheten, smittskydd och beredskap, https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/smittskydd-beredskap/,
  Thl.fi (rokottajan käsikirja)
  THL.fi (matkailijan terveysopas)
  World Health Organization (WHO)
  Europan Centre for Disease Prevention and Controll (ECDE)
  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.
  https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/surveillance-and-disease-data
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
  Kunnat.net
  Filha.fi (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Självstudier och föreläsningar i mikrobiologi och patologi
  Eventuella uppgifter delas ut under lektionerna.
  
  Simulationer i aseptik/hygien och vaccinationskunskap i grupper; obligatorisk närvaro
  Virtuell kurs, grunder i vaccinationskunskap , egen Moodle plattform (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Examination i mikrobiologi, bedömning GK/UK: Studerande kan grunderna i mikrobiologi.
  
  Examination i patologi och mikrobiologi, bedömning GK/UK.: Studerande kan grunderna i patologi
  
  
  Examination i grundläggande vaccinationskunskap
  1. Skriftlig portfolio, bedömning GK/UK.
  Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kompetenser och innehåll för den angivna kursen), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap.
  2. Skriftlig tentamen.
  Bedömning GK/ UK. För att kunna göra den avslutande tentamen som ingår i grunderna i vaccinationskunskap bör din portfolio vara inlämnad och godkänd.
  För att kunna vaccinera under handledning på praktiken ska man ha en godkänd kurs i vaccinationskunskapen samt simuleringen avlagd. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.01.2025 - 27.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  16.12.2024 - 12.01.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Vasa Vård 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Examination i mikrobiologi och patologi anges senare, omtentamenstillfällen anges senare
  
  Obligatoriska simulationer
  OBS! För att kunna delta ska studerande fylla i blanketten invasiva ingrepp på Moodle.
  Obligatorisk deltagande till simulering i vaccinationskunskapen.
  
  Den grundläggande kursen i vaccinationskunskap på Moodle består av två deltester
  1. Individuell portfolio med inlämning på Moodle
  2. Skriftlig tent på Moodle (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination i mikrobiologi 9.4 (tentamen) Examination i patologi (inlämningsuppgift, deadline 9.3 och quiz i Moodle, deadline 12.3)
  
  Grundkurs i vaccinationskunskap:
  1. Skriftlig portfolio är tillgänglig under tiden 27.1–16.3.2025. Portfolion lämnas in på Moodle plattformen senast 16.3.2025. För att kunna delta i tentamen ska man ha en godkänd portfolio.
  2. Skriftlig tent som är öppen på Moodle enligt information 31.3–11.4.2025
  3. Simulering i vaccination 14-15.4.25 obligatorisk deltagande. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Mikrobiologi 1 sp = 27 h (föreläsningar, självstudier, godkänd tentamen)
  Patologi 1 sp = 27 h (föreläsning, självstudier, godkänd inlämningsuppgift samt quiz i Moodle)
  
  Vaccinationskunskap 2 sp = 54 h
  Simulationer 1 sp =27 h med flapplearning (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  För GK krävs att studerande:
  Kan grunderna i mikrobiologi
  Kan grunderna i patologi
  Har kunskap om och kan förebygga aktuella globala infektioner
  Kan handleda och stöda individer och grupper i risker och tillvägagångssätt vid misstanke om globala epidemier och pandemier
  Kan det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet och känner till hur lagstiftningen reglerar vaccinationerna
  Kan principerna för vaccinationsverksamheten för vuxna
  Kan handleda klienter om vaccinationer med stöd av den nyaste evidensbaserade kunskapen (not translated)

  Approved / Failed

  För GK krävs att studerande:
  Kan grunderna i mikrobiologi
  Kan grunderna i patologi
  Har kunskap om och kan förebygga aktuella globala infektioner
  Kan handleda och stöda individer och grupper i risker och tillvägagångssätt vid misstanke om globala epidemier och pandemier
  Kan det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet och känner till hur lagstiftningen reglerar vaccinationerna
  Kan principerna för vaccinationsverksamheten för vuxna
  Kan handleda klienter om vaccinationer med stöd av den nyaste evidensbaserade kunskapen (not translated)

•   Nursing Care of Children, Adolescents and Families USS22KÅ01-3001 19.08.2024-15.11.2024  5 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, in an inter-professional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a sustainable, reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has expertise in the care of children, young people and families and deepens his/her knowledge of the growth, development and characteristics of children and young people
  - can use resource enhancing, sustainable methods to support the well-being, resources and participation of children, adolescents and the family
  - knows about the chain of care
  - can apply his/her knowledge in the treatment of the most common illnesses and disabilities in children and adolescents
  - can, in an inter-professional team plan, execute, evaluate and document a comprehensive,sustainable and person-centered/client centered care for children, young people and families
  - has expertise in care in various service system
  - has expertise in the care of people with special needs
  - can plan, execute and evaluate safe and sustainable medication management
  - has a reflective and ethical approach in the care of children, young people and families

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Surgical and Perioperative Care, Nursing in Internal Medicine and Oncology, Clinical Nursing

  Content of the study unit

  Chain of care, different service system
  
  The development of pediatric care and its unique features
  
  The development of children and young people
  
  Working with and care of children and young people
  
  Nutritional issues in the care of children and young people
  
  Methods for work with families
  
  Anatomy and physiology of children and adolescents
  
  The most common childhood illnesses, theory and treatment, and taking them into account in a comprehensive care plan with anchoring in the care process of children and young people
  
  Safe medication management for children and young people
  
  Guidance of children, young people and families in the child health care context
  
  Children and young people with disabilities and special needs
  
  Mental illness in children and young people
  
  Vulnerable children and young people
  
  People with disabilities

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Michaela Jalava

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  å svenska
  Litteratur/studiematerial:
  Välj 1–2 av följande böcker:
  Hanséus, K mfl. Barnmedicin. 2020
  Lundqvist,P. 2013. Omvårdnad av det nyfödda barnet.
  Rajantie,J, Heikinheimo, M, Renko,M. 2016 Lastentaudit. Duodecim.
  Storvik- Sydänmaa mfl. 2019. Lapsen ja perheen hoitotyö.
  Hallström, J & Lindborg, T. 2023. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.
  Korppi;M. mfl. 2016. Lastentautien päivystyskirja.
  Lundqvist,P. 2013. Omvårdnad av det nyfödda barnet.
  Pihko,H,Haataja,L, Rantala,H. (toim.) 2015. Duodecim. Lastenneurologia.
  Rindstedt,C. 2013. Barnet möter vården.
  Söderback mfl. 2014. Kommunikation med barn och unga I vården
  Tillsammans kring matbordet- kostrekommendationer till barnfamiljer
  Lastensuojelun käsikirja. http://www.sosiaaliportti.fi/fi-FI/lastensuojelunkasikirja
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet. Slå inte barnet! Nationella handlingsprogrammet för att minska kroppslig aga mot barn 2010–2015
  Medibase
  THL.fi
  MLL.fi
  Terveysportti
  Hälsobyn.fi
  Terveyskylä.fi
  Varsinaissuomen hoitoreitit
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  Askland;L.mfl. 2014. Utvecklingspsykologiska perspektiv på barns uppväxt.
  Bischofberger m.fl 2004. Barnet i vården. Liber.
  Broberg, A. mfl. 2008. Anknytning i praktiken: tillämpning av anknytningsteorin.
  Hertz, S. (2011) Barn- och ungdomspsykiatri, nya perspektiv och oanade möjligheter
  https://thl.fi/fi/web/olycksfall/olyckor-bland-barn-och-unga,
  Lagerqvist,B. 2015. Barn med funktionsnedsättning.
  Mothander Risholm; P. 2018. Att möta små barn och deras föräldrar i vården: om anknytning, utveckling och samspel.
  Rijt, H & Plooi, F. Växa och upptäcka världen: sju utvecklingssprång under barnets första levnadsår.2009.
  Vygotskij L. Daidalos 1995 Fantasi och kreativitet i barndomen.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar, forskningar och annan litteratur. (Hoitotiede, Tutkiva hoitotyö, Sairaanhoitaja, Vård i focus)
  Diabetesförbundet.fi
  Diabetesfonden (not translated)

  Learning methods

  1. Föreläsning
  2.Workshops
  3.Självstudier
  4.Simulering (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  . Simuleringen bedöms enligt skalan gk/uk.
  I simuleringen bedöms
  - handledning
  - bemötandet av barnet, den unga och familjen
  - beaktande av trygghet och säkerhet i vårdarbetet
  - planering av vårdåtgärder med beaktande av barnets och den ungas utvecklingsstadium och situation
  - utförande av vårdåtgärder
  - beaktande av aseptiskt arbetssätt
  - dokumentation
  - tillämpning av ett resursförstärkande och hälsofrämjande arbetssätt.
  - korrekt utförd läkemedelsbehandling
  Prestationen är underkänd om studerande inte har genomfört simuleringen och har svårigheter med stora delar av ovanstående ämnen.
  
  
  2.Läkemedelsräkningen bedöms enligt skalan gk/uk.
  - läkemedelsräkningen skall vara 100% korrekt
  
  3. Tenten i pediatirik bedöms enligt skalan gk/uk
  
  4. Workshops uppgift, bedöms GK/UK
  - Användning av kurslitteratur, terveysportti mm.
  - Användning av relevant data och förmåga att se helhetssituation
  
  5. Den skriftliga inlämningsuppgiften bedöms enligt skalan 0-5
  Bedömningen baseras på
  - Förmåga att kunna sammanfatta relevant data
  - Kritiska reflektion
  - Användning av kurslitteratur
  - Användning av Novias skrivanvisningar
  Feedback på inlämningsuppgiften ges via Moodle (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.08.2024 - 15.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Lilian Nordell, Michaela Jalava, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  På svenska
  1.Simuleringar, obligatorisk närvaro, uppgifter om gruppindelning och exakt tidtabell för simulering publiceras på Moodle
  
  2.Läkemedelräkning tent, datum enligt läsordning (omtent enligt överenskommelse med examinator)
  
  3. Tent i Pediatrik på Moodle, datum enligt läsordning 23.9, omtentamen 25.10 och 22.11
  
  4.Skriftlig individuell inlämningsuppgift, gemensam uppgift tillsammans med kursen Reproduktiv hälsa. Två möjliga inlämningsdatum: Första inlämningsdatum 4.10 eller andra inlämningsdatum 15.11. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Inlämningsuppgift på Moodle tillsammans med kursen i Reproduktiv hälsa inlämning den på Moodle.
  Tent i pediatrik.
  Tent i läkemedelsräkning. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 25h
  Workshops 2 h
  Simulering 6h
  Inlämningsuppgift 27 h
  Självstudier 75 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte
  Texten är fragmentarisk och den besvarar inte frågorna
  Kurslitteraturen används inte
  Reflektionerna framförs inte
  Den tekniska utformningen brister
  Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Frågorna besvaras vagt och smalt
  Kurslitteraturen refereras
  Reflektionerna framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning
  Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Frågorna besvaras
  Metodlitteraturen tillämpas
  Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns
  Den tekniska utformningen är god (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Frågorna besvaras uttömmande och mångsidigt
  Kurslitteraturen analyseras och tillämpas
  Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk
  Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig (not translated)

•   Nursing in Internal Medicine USS24KV02-3001 26.05.2025-31.12.2025  5 credits  (USS24F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can, as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client-centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  
  Has expertise in care work within internal medicine and can account for various health hindrances, health resources, illnesses, examinations and treatments and how different illnesses and complications can be prevented
  
  Masters central evidence-based care methods and can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
  
  Can guide the patient
  
  Is familiar with the chain of care
  
  Can plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Care of patients with different internal and oncological health issues/diseases
  
  The central illnesses and hindrances to health in oncology and internal medicine, clinical examinations, functional measurements, evidence-based patient-centered care and rehabilitation methods
  
  Person-centered/client-centered care plan and summary
  
  Prevention of complications and illnesses
  
  Counselling/education methods
  
  Personal treatment and cultural diversity
  
  Patient- and client safety
  
  Aseptics
  
  Nutrition
  
  Resuscitation in a hospital environment
  
  Chain of care and servicesystem
  
  Medication management

  ---

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Ekvall, A. & Jansson, A. 2022 (eller 2016). Omvårdnad & Medicin.
  Almås H. 2021. Klinisk omvårdnad I och II
  Ericson, T & Lind, M. 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar
  Ahonen O. 2023. Kliininen hoitotyö - sisätaudit, kirurgia ja syöpätaudit (eller en motsvarande bok, max 5 år gammal)
  
  _________________________
  
  
  Medibase
  Föreläsningsmaterial
  Internetmedicin.se https://www.internetmedicin.se/
  God medicinsk praxis https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/
  Terveysportti: Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja - valda delar
  Terveysportti, Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat.- valda delar
  Hotus -vårdrekommendationer (inom inremedicin)
  Vårdhandboken (de nationella metoderna och riktlinjerna i Sverige).
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Seminarie
  Smågruppsarbete
  Workshops
  Övningar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1. Deltagande i workshops inom inremedicinskt vårdarbete och smågruppsarbete bedöms GK-UK. Obligatorisk närvaro. För GK vitsord bör studerande aktivt deltagit i alla delar.
  2. Distansuppgiften bedöms i skalan 0-5. Del inlämningarna (GK/UK)
  3. Individuell skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5
  
  Kursvitsord: För godkänt kursvitsord bör alla delar vara godkända. Kursvitsordet räknas: Distansuppgiften är 40 % av helhetsvitsordet och skriftlig examination 60 % av helhetsvitsordet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  26.05.2025 - 31.12.2025

  Enrollment date range

  10.12.2024 - 25.05.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar och smågruppsarbete
  Seminarie
  Workshopsarbete och övningar (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Samarbete med Neurocentrum, ÅUCS samt expertföreläsningar från arbetslivet (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1. Deltagande i Workshop inom inremedicinska temaområden samt expertföreläsning (1 sp)
  2. Distansuppgift ( 1,5 sp) -
  3. Individuell skriftlig examination oktober 2025. Den skriftliga examinationen (2,5 sp) baseras på självstudier, workshops, smågruppsarbete, och föreläsningar.
  Omtentamen I är XXX och omtentamen II är XX
  
  Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle
  
  Eventuella kompletteringar av examinationer bör vara gjorda innan 20.12.2024. Ifall någon del är UK e bör kursen i sin helhet gås om (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  På svenska
  27 h / 1 sp
  
  Uppskattade tidsanvändning:
  Självstudier och smågruppsarbete inom inremedicinskt vårdarbete 70 h
  Workshop / interaktiv föreläsningar inremedicinskt vårdarbete 16h
  Distansuppgift 50 h
  Tentamen 3 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 50 % av maximalpoängen i examinationen
  __________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften är inte inlämnad inom utsatt tid eller innehåller inte alla krävda delar. Studerande använder sig inte av evidensbaserade källor i arbete. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med under 70 % av maximal poängen i examinationen
  
  Essäfrågorna i skriftlig examinationen
  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar, men delarna relateras inte till varande. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan ytligt tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner
  
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller alla krävda delar. Studerande använder kurslitteratur och andra källor ytligt. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete, vårdmetoder och/eller egna reflektioner är svaga eller saknas. Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Essäfrågorna i skriftliga examinationen:
  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande beskriver den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna reflektioner.
  
  _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller alla delar och studerande använder kurslitteratur och källor, men inte mångsidigt. Studerande kan beskriva och har goda kunskaper i inremedicinsktvårdarbete, vårdmetoder och egna reflektioner görs i alla delar. Studerande kan beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Den skriftliga examinationen bedöms med eller över 90 % av maximal poängen i examinationen.
  
  
  Essäfrågorna i skriftliga examinationen:
  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på alla uppgiftens delar och kan relaterad dem till varandra. Studerande har djupa kunskaper i inremedicinskt vårdarbete och inremedicinska hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, och patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i en vårdplan/patientcase. Studerande kan beskriva den inremedicinska patientens vårdprocess i relation med sjukskötarens uppgifter och beakta mångprofessionella arbetssättet. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna djupgående reflektioner.
  ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  
  Distansuppgiften innehåller och behandlar på djupgående nivå alla delar. Studerande använder kurslitteratur och källor mångsidigt, samt kan motivera sina tolkningar och kopplingar mellan källor. Studerande har djupa kunskaper och kan djupgående beskriva inremedicinskt vårdarbete och vårdmetoder, samt relatera de olika delarna till varandra och till sjukskötarens arbetsuppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner. (not translated)

•   Occupational Health Care HVV14KH04-3006 03.02.2025-18.05.2025  6 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the client’s/patient’s care in occupational health care
  - can identify resources and health barriers and support the health among people of working age
  - has basic knowledge of how to investigate health hazards at the workplace through a workplace survey and how to conduct risk assessment at the workplace.
  - respects the cultural affiliation of the client/patient
  - masters safe drug therapy management and vaccination programmes within the field of occupational health care
  - has insight into multiprofessional work and can form networks to promote health and wellbeing among people of working age and their families

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to public health nursing
  Health promotion skills and family health
  Public health nursing with working age population and elderly

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice in occupational health care

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  see Moodle platform

  Learning methods

  Supervised clinical practice in occupational health care
  Practice seminar

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.02.2025 - 18.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 31.01.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Student's schedule and workload

  Practical training 40 h/week of which 2 h/week can be used for written assignments related to the course.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  Works according to plan and has a basic accuracy in important work steps
  Can perform tasks initially under supervision in the direction of increased independence
  Has knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at a basic and in-depth level
  Know the values ​​and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team

•   Palliative Care and Care in the Final Stages of Life VÅV22KV05-3007 07.01.2025-07.02.2025  2 credits  (UBM23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
  - knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
  - can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
  - can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
  - can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
  - understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
  - understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of palliative care
  Pain and symptom treatment
  Holistic support for patients and relatives
  Interaction and encounters
  Care in the final stages of life
  Care of the deceased
  Ethics and law
  Interprofessional teamwork

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Introduction lecture - compulsory
  Work shop -Escape Game- Compulsory

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Återkoppling på uppgifterna erhålls genom bedömningskriterier, mer detaljerad motivering erhålls vid kontakt med kursens lärare.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2025 - 07.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 07.01.2025

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM23D-V
  • UHV23D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual case study
  Online Exam

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 c =27h
  2 c =54

  Assessment criteria

  The student does not achieve criteria for grade 1

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject
  Assessment criteria for assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions and her/his knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written assignment:
  The student has followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student shows in her/his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of assignment individually or in groups:
  The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.

•   Palliative care and care in the final stages of life VÅV22KV05-3004 02.09.2024-13.10.2024  2 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
  - knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
  - can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
  - can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
  - can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
  - understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
  - understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of palliative care
  Pain and symptom treatment
  Holistic support for patients and relatives
  Interaction and encounters
  Care in the final stages of life
  Care of the deceased
  Ethics and law
  Interprofessional teamwork

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Introduction lecture - compulsory
  Work shop -Escape Game- Compulsory

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Case study is graded 0-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual case study
  Online Exam

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 c =27h
  2 c =54

•   Palliative care and care in the final stages of life VÅV22KV05-3005 25.11.2024-02.02.2025  2 credits  (SSK23F-1, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
  - knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
  - can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
  - can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
  - can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
  - understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
  - understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of palliative care
  Pain and symptom treatment
  Holistic support for patients and relatives
  Interaction and encounters
  Care in the final stages of life
  Care of the deceased
  Ethics and law
  Interprofessional teamwork

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Online recorded lectures

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individual cas study graded 0-5
  Reflection Pass/Fail
  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.11.2024 - 02.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-1
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Moodle opens 25.11
  The course closes 20.12

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual case study

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr= 27h
  2 cr= 54h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Palliative care and care in the final stages of life VÅV22KV05-3006 14.10.2024-15.11.2024  2 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can define as concepts care lines, care limitations and anticipatory care plan for the final stages of life and understand their significance in the implementation of palliative care.
  - knows the organization levels of palliative care and the service system as well as consultation channels
  - can draw up a plan for palliative care and care in the final stages of life together with the patient and her relatives, the doctor in charge and the other interprofessional team
  - can identifiy ethical and legal aspects associated with the final stages in life
  - can identify care needs and provide symptom-controlled and individual palliative care and end-of-life care
  - understand the importance of relatives and active role in treatment in palliative care work.
  - understand the importance of treating, supporting and guiding the patient and relatives with feeling and empathy.

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02: Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  The basics of palliative care
  Pain and symptom treatment
  Holistic support for patients and relatives
  Interaction and encounters
  Care in the final stages of life
  Care of the deceased
  Ethics and law
  Interprofessional teamwork

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marica Hinders

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Recommended literature in Moodle

  Learning methods

  Online recorded lectures

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Individual cas study graded 0-5
  Reflection Pass/Fail
  Feedback on the tasks is obtained through assessment criteria, more detailed justification is obtained when contacting the course's teacher.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  14.10.2024 - 15.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Marica Hinders

  Additional information

  Moodle opens 14.10
  The course closes 15.11

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual case study

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr= 27h
  2 cr= 54h

  Assessment criteria

  The student shows limited substantive knowledge, cannot be essential

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections and independent working methods)

•   Patient and client safety when social and health care is digitized VÅV22KV13-3009 10.03.2025-01.06.2025  3 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  -can describe conditions for and challenges with the work regarding patient and client safety within the social and health care areas of activity
  - knows the laws and recommendations regarding and the supervision of patient and client safety in Finland
  - knows how digital systems ensure patient safety by predicting risks, risk management, reporting and follow-up
  - can describe opportunities and challenges in ensuring client and patient safety when using digital e-Health services
  - can describe what a safety culture entails when healthcare is digitized
  - reflects on ethical positions for the patient / client in the digital world

  Prerequisites

  Vasa: VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care, VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basics Care
  Åbo: Radiation Safety within course USS22UV01 Care and Radiation Safety

  Content of the study unit

  Patient safety today and tomorrow
  Welfare technology as a tool that supports patient and client safety
  Security for the patient and the client in the digital world

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Daniel Nenonen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  All study material is available in the moodle course.

  Learning methods

  Virtual course with recorded lectures on Moodle, discussions on the Moodle platform, written exercises.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  The course is assessed according to the scale 1-5. It is the assignments that are assessed, but e.g. a lively and reflective participation in the discussions can raise the grade.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.03.2025 - 01.06.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Prerequisites before the course: THL's webcourse Patient safety through knowledge and skills.
  
  In this course, Moodle acts as a platform where all the material is available: instructional videos, lecture materials, a list of the course objectives and content, course literature, instructions for assignments and so on.
  
  The course lasts for six weeks, and consists of three parts (each part lasts for two weeks). It is therefore important to keep up and be active during the course.
  
  The course material is partly in Swedish and partly in Finnish.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Moodle -kurs (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  The course is examined through two smaller written assignments and a self-correcting test. All information is submitted no later than the end of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr = 27 hours

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.
  
  In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.
  
  To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.

•   Pediatric Care VÅV22KV11-3004 27.01.2025-07.03.2025  5 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can in their care work apply their knowledge of the most central diseases in children and young people
  - has knowledge of and understands the importance of child and family-centered care
  - can apply knowledge in pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  - can identify, evaluate and care for children and young people's pain
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs in children and young people
  - can in the care of people with disabilities or handicaps apply their knowledge of the most central disabilities or handicaps

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection

  Content of the study unit

  Central diseases in children and adolescents
  Central disabilities and handicaps
  Child and family-centered care
  Pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  Pain
  Simulation exercises

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Selected parts from:
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Kristensson Hallström, I & Derwig, M. 2023. (red.)Tredje upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Patriksson, K. & Wigert, H. (red.) 2024. Omvårdnad för barn och unga - på avancerad nivå. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Renko, M., Niinikoski, S., & Palmu, S. (toim.) 2023.7., 7 uudistettu painos. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidensbaserade vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv
  Åhörarkopior

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.01.2025 - 07.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 24.01.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 40

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 2 cr
  Functional variations in children 0,5 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's healthcare 1,5 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Functional variations in children 0,5 cr
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 2 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2025
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions, and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student can describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working metho

•   Pediatric Care VÅV22KV11-3005 27.01.2025-16.03.2025  5 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can in their care work apply their knowledge of the most central diseases in children and young people
  - has knowledge of and understands the importance of child and family-centered care
  - can apply knowledge in pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  - can identify, evaluate and care for children and young people's pain
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs in children and young people
  - can in the care of people with disabilities or handicaps apply their knowledge of the most central disabilities or handicaps

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection

  Content of the study unit

  Central diseases in children and adolescents
  Central disabilities and handicaps
  Child and family-centered care
  Pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  Pain
  Simulation exercises

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Selected parts from:
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Kristensson Hallström, I & Derwig, M. 2023. (red.)Tredje upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Patriksson, K. & Wigert, H. (red.) 2024. Omvårdnad för barn och unga - på avancerad nivå. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Renko, M., Niinikoski, S., & Palmu, S. (toim.) 2023.7., 7 uudistettu painos. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidensbaserade vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv
  Åhörarkopior

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.01.2025 - 16.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 26.01.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 2 cr
  Functional variations in children 0,5 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's healthcare 1,5 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Functional variations in children 0,5 cr
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 2 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2025
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions, and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student can describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working metho

•   Pediatric Care VÅV22KV11-3006 10.03.2025-20.04.2025  5 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can in their care work apply their knowledge of the most central diseases in children and young people
  - has knowledge of and understands the importance of child and family-centered care
  - can apply knowledge in pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  - can identify, evaluate and care for children and young people's pain
  - can in simulated situations identify and analyze care needs in children and young people
  - can in the care of people with disabilities or handicaps apply their knowledge of the most central disabilities or handicaps

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection

  Content of the study unit

  Central diseases in children and adolescents
  Central disabilities and handicaps
  Child and family-centered care
  Pharmacology and drug calculation in children and adolescents
  Pain
  Simulation exercises

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Selected parts from:
  Hanséus, K, Lagercrantz, H. & Lindberg, T. (red.) 2020. Barnmedicin. Författarna och Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Kristensson Hallström, I & Derwig, M. 2023. (red.)Tredje upplagan. Pediatrisk omvårdnad. Författarna och Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Patriksson, K. & Wigert, H. (red.) 2024. Omvårdnad för barn och unga - på avancerad nivå. Studentlitteratur, Lund
  Renko, M., Niinikoski, S., & Palmu, S. (toim.) 2023.7., 7 uudistettu painos. Lastentaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim, Helsinki.
  Evidensbaserade vetenskapliga artiklar och forskningar enligt föreläsarens direktiv
  Åhörarkopior

  Learning methods

  Lectures, individual assignments, group work
  Care planning
  Case demonstrations and review of problem solutions
  Current DVD movies
  DemonstratioPractical: Children's healthcarens - takes place at Novia's Clinical Training Center (KTC)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Graduscale 0 - 5
  Approved practical exercises in pediatric healthcare. Attendance 100%

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.03.2025 - 20.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 09.03.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  In addition to the schedule, the lectures will also be scheduled on the Moodle platform
  The content of the lectures will be published on the Moodle platform
  
  Children's health care 1.5 cr
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 cr
  Children's medicine account 0.5 credits
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 2 cr
  Functional variations in children 0,5 cr

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Children's healthcare 1,5 credits - exam
  Pediatric medicine 0.5 credits - online exam
  Children's drug calculation 0.5 credits - exam, 100% correct for GK
  Functional variations in children 0,5 cr
  Practical exercises in child healthcare 2 credits - compulsory attendance and active participation

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination spring 2025
  Reexamination 1
  Reexamination 2

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr

  Assessment criteria

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows limited knowledge of the substance, cannot do the essentials

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions, and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (excl. Reading)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student can describe the literature, can reflect and motivate their views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the examination
  The student shows in his answer a deeper knowledge and maturity in addition to the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working metho

•   Perioperative Care VÅV22KV04-3010 28.04.2025-30.05.2025  3 credits  (UBM24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
  - can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
  - have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
  - has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
  - can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Preoperative and postoperative care
  Anesthesiological care
  Intraoperative care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
  ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
  Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
  Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
  Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Terveysportti
  Kumlien, C., Rystedt, J., & Almquist, M. (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi (Andra upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, films, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
  Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.04.2025 - 30.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 27.04.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM24D-V
  • UHV24D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at exercises
  Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cr = 81 h
  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
  Theory 4 h + 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 3
  Study on your own
  ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
  INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
  8+8 h practical in operation room
  Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
  Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

•   Perioperative Care VÅV22KV04-3012 28.04.2025-01.06.2025  3 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
  - can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
  - have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
  - has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
  - can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Preoperative and postoperative care
  Anesthesiological care
  Intraoperative care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning material

  PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
  ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
  Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Terveysportti
  
  OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
  Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
  Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Kumlien, C., Rystedt, J., & Almquist, M. (2022). Omvårdnad & kirurgi (Andra upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.

  Learning methods

  Introduction online and other theorylessons recorded, demonstrationfilms, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
  Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.04.2025 - 01.06.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 27.04.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at exercises
  Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  0.5 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cr= 81 h
  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
  Theory 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 2
  Study on your own
  ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
  INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
  Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
  Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

•   Perioperative care VÅV22KV04-3006 02.09.2024-06.10.2024  3 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
  - can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
  - have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
  - has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
  - can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Preoperative and postoperative care
  Anesthesiological care
  Intraoperative care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
  ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
  Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
  Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
  Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Terveysportti

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, films, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
  Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 06.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at exercises
  Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cr = 81 h
  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
  Theory 4 h + 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 3
  Study on your own
  ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
  INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
  8+8 h practical in operation room
  Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
  Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

•   Perioperative care VÅV22KV04-3007 07.10.2024-17.11.2024  3 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
  - can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
  - have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
  - has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
  - can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Preoperative and postoperative care
  Anesthesiological care
  Intraoperative care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
  ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
  Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
  Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
  Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Terveysportti

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, films, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
  Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 17.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  10 - 44

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at exercises
  Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cr = 81 h
  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
  Theory 4 h + 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 3
  Study on your own
  ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
  INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
  8+8 h practical in operation room
  Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
  Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

•   Perioperative care VÅV22KV04-3008 02.09.2024-04.10.2024  3 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of, is able to account for and assess the different stages of the care process for a perioperative patient, as well as apply evidence-based knowledge of the most common diseases that require surgical care.
  - can understand the meaning and integrate a systematic and aseptic way of working
  - have knowledge of technical equipment and apparatus used in perioperative care
  - has knowledge of the importance of care documentation in perioperative care.
  - has knowledge and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in perioperative care
  - can in simulated situations identify, plan, implement and evaluate care needs in patients with surgical conditions and master the most central measures and methods of care in perioperative care

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Preoperative and postoperative care
  Anesthesiological care
  Intraoperative care

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  PRE- OCH POSTOPERATIV VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2018. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Föreläsarens moodleföreläsningar.
  ANESTESIOLOGISK VÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Bodelsson, M., (red.), Lundberg, D., Roth, B. & Werner, M. (2011). Anestesiologi. Studentlitteratur. Poland.
  Hovind, I. L. (red.) (2013) Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Niemi-Murola, L., Jalonen, J., Junttila, E., Metsävainio, K & Pöyhiä. R. (red.) (2012). Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar
  Terveysportti
  
  OPERATIONSSJUKVÅRD:
  Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H., (red). 2020. Tredje upplagan. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Liber AB, Stockholm.
  Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G,. Gronseth, Randi (red). 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 2. Liber AB. Stockholm.
  Lukkari, L., Kinnunen, T. & Korte, R. (2013). Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö. SanomaPro Oy. Helsinki.
  Myklestul Dåvöy, G., Hansen, I. & Hege Eide, P. (red.) (2012). Operationssjukvård – operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
  Aktuella vetenskapliga artiklar

  Learning methods

  Introduction online and other theorylessons recorded, demonstrationfilms, individual assignments, clinical exercises and independent exercises.
  Simulation exercises in pre- and postoperative care.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved individual tasks and exercises.
  Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
  Passed online examination: 80% correct answer for passed.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 04.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 03.10.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at exercises
  Uniform clothing and slippers at exercises.
  See Moodle for more detailed information!

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individual tasks and exercises.
  Clinical examination
  Moodle online tent.

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 cr= 81 h
  Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises.
  PRE- AND POSTOPERATIV VÅRD 1 sp
  Theory 4 h, SimMan exercises 4 h x 2
  Study on your own
  ANESTHESIOLOGY 1 sp
  INTRAOPERATIVE CARE 1 cr
  Common Moodletent for all parts of the course, 40 min.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students have not participated in all the exercises and are not approved in the clinical examination.
  Online examination: if students did not pass 80%, then students faild

•   Practice in Maternity Care VÅV22PR09-3001 28.04.2025-31.08.2025  3 credits  (UHV22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of work at maternity clinics and can provide care during childbirth
  - has knowledge of and is involved in the care of mother and child during puerperium at the maternity ward
  - is prepared to guide and assist the mother in breastfeeding
  - respects the cultural affiliation of the mother and her family
  - has knowledge of safe drug therapy management

  Prerequisites

  HVV22HA01 Starting Points for The Public Health Nurse´s Work at Individual, Group and Community Level
  HVV22HA03 Public Health Nursing with The Expectant Family

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice in maternity care unit

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  see Moodle platform

  Learning methods

  Internship info
  Supervised internship in maternity care 2 weeks

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved:
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the work list and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work step
  Mostly works according to plan and has basic accuracy in important work steps
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work step
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions related to work tasks at a basic level
  Knows the value base and considers the professional ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients/clients
  Able to collaborate with others within the work team

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  28.04.2025 - 31.08.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 27.04.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Student's schedule and workload

  40h/week, of which 2h/week can be used for written tasks related to the course

•   Practice: Basic Care VÅV22PR01-3015 13.01.2025-09.03.2025  7 credits  (USS24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can plan, implement and evaluate basic care under supervision
  - can apply evidence-based methods in basic care
  - can show collegiality and demonstrate employee competence
  - can work in interprofessional teams
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - can supervise patients in basic care
  - can perform safe drug treatment under supervision
  - understand the importance of patient and client safety
  - masters the central knowledge base for patient and client safety
  - can promote patient safety and prevent risk situations

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Patient safety

  Further information

  The course includes: Patient safety through knowledge and skills - web training from THL / Institute for Health and Welfare

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  86% Face-to-face, 14% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Supervised Clinical Practice
  Online Training in Patient Safety (THL)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Pass/Fail
  
  All assignments must be submitted in order to pass the course.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.01.2025 - 09.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 19.01.2025

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-V

  Seats

  1 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Clinical practice under tradesman
  The course can be validated if you are a previous caregiver and have worked at least 3 months in elderly care.
  
  However, everyone should take the THL patient safety test

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  To pass the course, you must be on an internship for 4 weeks
  or present a certificate stating that you have worked as a caregiver for at least 3 months in the care of the elderly.
  
  Present an approved course from THL Patient Safety.

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 cr 27h total 7 sp 189h
  
  4 weeks 40h/week 160h
  or present a certificate stating that you have worked as a caregiver for at least 3 months in the elderly care system.
  
  Workshop 1sp 27h

  Content scheduling

  INITIAL KNOWLEDGE REQUIREMENTS
  
  VÅV22GV02 (Basics of Health Care)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Studerande:
  - har tillfredställande nått målen för praktikavsnittet
  - kan ta emot feedback och visar vilja att utveckla yrkesskickligheten
  - följer arbetslistan och håller överenskomna tider
  - kan ställa frågor som är relevanta för att lära sig ett arbetsmoment
  - arbetar för det mesta planmässigt och har en grundläggande noggrannhet i viktiga arbetsmoment
  - kan utföra arbetsuppgifter under handledning
  - ar grundläggande kunskaper och kan ställa frågor som är relevanta för att lära sig ett arbetsmoment
  - an följa direktiv och anvisningar och tar ansvar för uppgifter
  - kan fatta beslut som rör arbetsuppgifter på grundläggande nivå
  - känner till värdegrunden och beaktar de yrkesetiska principerna
  - kan kommunicera och bemöta patienter/klienter/kunder
  - an samarbeta med andra inom arbetsteamet (not translated)

•   Practice: Basic Care VÅV22PR01-3016 27.09.2024-06.04.2025  7 credits  (USS24F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can plan, implement and evaluate basic care under supervision
  - can apply evidence-based methods in basic care
  - can show collegiality and demonstrate employee competence
  - can work in interprofessional teams
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - can supervise patients in basic care
  - can perform safe drug treatment under supervision
  - understand the importance of patient and client safety
  - masters the central knowledge base for patient and client safety
  - can promote patient safety and prevent risk situations

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Patient safety

  Further information

  The course includes: Patient safety through knowledge and skills - web training from THL / Institute for Health and Welfare

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  86% Face-to-face, 14% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Clinical practice in patient-centered nursing care under the supervision
  Patient safety/THL 0,5 ISP
  Simulations 0,5 ISP

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved/Rejected
  
  You need to pass the practice and also the patientsafety test to be approved in this course.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.09.2024 - 06.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  27.09.2024 - 09.02.2025

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-V

  Seats

  1 - 50

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Camilla Mattjus, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Clinical practice in patient-centered nursing care under the supervision
  This coure can be validated if you are a practical nurs and have been working at least 3 months in elderycare after you have graduated.
  
  Everybodey needs to do the patient safety test/THL 0,5 ISP
  
  Simulation 0,5 ISP

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Clinical practice 40 h/week for 4 weeks. (38h/ week at the practice place and 2 h/ week for assignments)
  Approved assignments and seminars
  
  THL-online course for 0,5 credit Read by your own and make a test, you need to pass it.
  
  Simulations

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 credit 27h total 7 credits 189h
  
  Practice 40h x 4 weeks = 160h
  Thl test 1 27h
  Information (MANDATORY)
  Seminarday (MANDATORY)

  Content scheduling

  PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
  
  VÅV22GV02 (Vårdens grunder)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Studerande:
  - har tillfredställande nått målen för praktikavsnittet
  - kan ta emot feedback och visar vilja att utveckla yrkesskickligheten
  - följer arbetslistan och håller överenskomna tider
  - kan ställa frågor som är relevanta för att lära sig ett arbetsmoment
  - arbetar för det mesta planmässigt och har en grundläggande noggrannhet i viktiga arbetsmoment
  - kan utföra arbetsuppgifter under handledning
  - ar grundläggande kunskaper och kan ställa frågor som är relevanta för att lära sig ett arbetsmoment
  - an följa direktiv och anvisningar och tar ansvar för uppgifter
  - kan fatta beslut som rör arbetsuppgifter på grundläggande nivå
  - känner till värdegrunden och beaktar de yrkesetiska principerna
  - kan kommunicera och bemöta patienter/klienter/kunder
  - an samarbeta med andra inom arbetsteamet (not translated)

•   Practice: Basic Care VÅV22PR01-3014 01.11.2024-07.02.2025  7 credits  (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can plan, implement and evaluate basic care under supervision
  - can apply evidence-based methods in basic care
  - can show collegiality and demonstrate employee competence
  - can work in interprofessional teams
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - can supervise patients in basic care
  - can perform safe drug treatment under supervision
  - understand the importance of patient and client safety
  - masters the central knowledge base for patient and client safety
  - can promote patient safety and prevent risk situations

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Patient safety

  Further information

  The course includes: Patient safety through knowledge and skills - web training from THL / Institute for Health and Welfare

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se Moodle för närmare information:
  - eventuella hälsogranskningar, prov och vaccinationer
  - praktikuppgifter (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Clinical practice 6 ects
  Patient Safety 1 ects

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.11.2024 - 07.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V
  • UBM24D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Terese Österberg, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance during practice.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Godkänd praktik
  Godkända praktikuppgifter
  Deltagande i praktikseminarium
  Godkänd webbutbildning kring patientsäkerhet
  Deltagande vid föreläsning och framförande om patientsäkerhet
  
  
  1 sp = 27 h (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Studerande:
  - kan under handledning planera, förverkliga och utvärdera grundvård
  - kan tillämpa evidensbaserade metoder inom grundvården
  - kan visa kollegialitet och påvisa medarbetarkompetens
  - an arbeta i interprofessionella team
  - kan professionellt bemöta patienter och närstående
  - kan handleda patienter inom grundvården
  - kan under handledning utföra en säker läkemedelsbehandling
  - förstår vikten av patient- och klientsäkerhet
  - behärskar den centrala kunskapsbasen för patient- och klientsäkerhet
  - kan främja patientsäkerheten och förebygga risksituationer (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27 h (not translated)

•   Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2 VÅV22PR03-3005 31.03.2025-01.06.2025  10 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  6 weeks at Internal Medicine and Surgery Care a
  Written assignments and seminars
  WORSHOP 1 cr MANDATORY
  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participated in internship information
  Participated in the internship seminar
  Participateing in worshop
  Approved internships submitted and submitted in connection with the internship seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.03.2025 - 01.06.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 30.03.2025

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  1 - 45

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar and Workshop

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar
  Participation in WORKSHOP

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Compulsory attendance / 38 hours per week and 2 hours/week for practical tasks
  38 h / week. 6 weeks internship = Total 240 h.

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  10cr=270h
  40 h / week. 6 weeks internship (and 2 h/week for internship tasks) = Total 240 h.
  1cr=27h for workshop (8 hours in school + 3h seminar)
  
  3h INFO

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2 VÅV22PR03-3006 24.02.2025-27.04.2025  10 credits  (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jannica Andtfolk

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  24.02.2025 - 27.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 23.02.2025

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV23D-V
  • UBM23D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Vasa Vård 1

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2 VÅV22PR03-3007 07.01.2025-16.03.2025  10 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  6 weeks at Internal Medicine and Surgery Care a
  Written assignments and seminars
  WORSHOP 1 cr MANDATORY
  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participated in internship information
  Participated in the internship seminar
  Participateing in worshop
  Approved internships submitted and submitted in connection with the internship seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2025 - 16.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 05.01.2025

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  1 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar and Workshop

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar
  Participation in WORKSHOP

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Compulsory attendance / 38 hours per week and 2 hours/week for practical tasks
  38 h / week. 6 weeks internship = Total 240 h.

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  10cr=270h
  40 h / week. 6 weeks internship (and 2 h/week for internship tasks) = Total 240 h.
  1cr=27h for workshop (8 hours in school + 3h seminar)
  
  3h INFO

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 2 VÅV22PR03-3008 31.03.2025-01.06.2025  10 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Åsa Lågland

  Mode of delivery

  80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health checks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  6 weeks at Internal Medicine and Surgery Care a
  Written assignments and seminars
  WORSHOP 1 cr MANDATORY
  Supervised internship in an optional clinical context

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participated in internship information
  Participated in the internship seminar
  Participateing in worshop
  Approved internships submitted and submitted in connection with the internship seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  31.03.2025 - 01.06.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 30.03.2025

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  1 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar and Workshop

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar
  Participation in WORKSHOP

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Clinical work in an optional clinical context

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Compulsory attendance / 38 hours per week and 2 hours/week for practical tasks
  38 h / week. 6 weeks internship = Total 240 h.

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  10cr=270h
  40 h / week. 6 weeks internship (and 2 h/week for internship tasks) = Total 240 h.
  1cr=27h for workshop (8 hours in school + 3h seminar)
  
  3h INFO

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 1 VÅV22PR02-3007 07.10.2024-08.12.2024  10 credits  (UBM23D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  90% Face-to-face, 10% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
  Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
  Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In order to pass the course, students must
  - participated in the simulation exercises.
  - participated in practice information
  - have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
  - all practical assignments must be approved.
  - participated in practical seminar
  - practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 08.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • UBM23D-V
  • UHV23D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Frida Gädda

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Simulation exercises
  Clinical practice in different contexts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
  Internship info, Mandatory attendance
  Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
  The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.
  
  Internship info 3h/student
  Simulations 6 h/student
  Internship seminar 3 h
  Independent reading 15 h Total 27 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 1 VÅV22PR02-3008 04.11.2024-02.02.2025  10 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  90% Face-to-face, 10% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
  Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
  Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In order to pass the course, students must
  - participated in the simulation exercises.
  - participated in practice information
  - have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
  - all practical assignments must be approved.
  - participated in practical seminar
  - practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.11.2024 - 02.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 10.11.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  1 - 44

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Frida Gädda

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Simulation exercises
  Clinical practice in different contexts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
  Internship info, Mandatory attendance
  Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
  The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.
  
  Internship info 3h/student
  Simulations 6 h/student
  Internship seminar 3 h
  Independent reading 15 h Total 27 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 1 VÅV22PR02-3009 23.09.2024-08.12.2024  10 credits  (USS23F-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  90% Face-to-face, 10% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
  Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
  Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In order to pass the course, students must
  - participated in the simulation exercises.
  - participated in practice information
  - have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
  - all practical assignments must be approved.
  - participated in practical seminar
  - practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  23.09.2024 - 08.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 22.09.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V
  • SSK23F-1

  Seats

  1 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård, Frida Gädda

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Simulation exercises
  Clinical practice in different contexts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
  Internship info, Mandatory attendance
  Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
  The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.
  
  Internship info 3h/student
  Simulations 6 h/student
  Internship seminar 3 h
  Independent reading 15 h Total 27 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Medical and surgical nursing care 1 VÅV22PR02-3010 04.11.2024-26.01.2025  10 credits  (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in internal medical and surgical care
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients
  - can as a student function as an independent member of the care team in a clinical teaching department

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
  VÅV22GV01 Basics in Nursing Care
  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Simulation exercises

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marice Nedergård

  Mode of delivery

  90% Face-to-face, 10% Distance learning

  Learning material

  See Moodle for more information:
  About any health ccks, tests and vaccinations
  About assignments

  Learning methods

  Simulation exercises at the school before the internship
  Supervised internship 6 weeks in Internal Medicine and Surgery
  Written assignments and seminar after completion of internship.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  In order to pass the course, students must
  - participated in the simulation exercises.
  - participated in practice information
  - have completed the internship and achieved the goals specified in the curriculum.
  - all practical assignments must be approved.
  - participated in practical seminar
  - practical tasks presented and submitted in connection with the practical seminar.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  04.11.2024 - 26.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 03.11.2024

  • 10 credits

  Group(s)

  • SSK23F-2
  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 50

  Small group(s)

  • Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marice Nedergård

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the simulation exercises, internship information, during the internship and at the internship seminar

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Approved internship
  Approved assignments
  Participation in internship seminar

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Simulation exercises
  Clinical practice in different contexts

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Mandatory Simulation Exercises/Workshop 6 h/group before the internship begins.
  Internship info, Mandatory attendance
  Internship seminar, Compulsory attendance

  Internationa connections

  Students can practice abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The course is 10 credits, of which simulation exercises, internship information and internship seminar = 1 credit 27 hours and 9 credit internship = 6 weeks of supervised internship.
  The student must be at the internship site 38/h per week = Total 228 h. and an additional 2 h/week that can be used for the internship tasks. A total of 40h/week, of which 38h in the field.
  
  Internship info 3h/student
  Simulations 6 h/student
  Internship seminar 3 h
  Independent reading 15 h Total 27 h.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Students:
  Can receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the worklist and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant for learning a work
  For the most part, it works in a planned manner and has a basic accuracy at important work moments
  Can perform tasks under supervision
  Has basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work
  Can follow directives and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions concerning tasks at the basic level Know the values and consider the ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  Can work with others in the work team/student group

•   Practice: Mental and substance abuse care VÅV22PR05-3001 03.02.2025-30.03.2025  9 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - applies evidence-based knowledge in the psychiatric and substance abuse care context
  - identifies and interprets the patient's / client's problems regarding mental illness and substance abuse / addiction
  - creates an understanding for the client / patient, shows respect and treats him as an expert on his own life
  - assesses, plans, implements, evaluates and documents the patient's / client's care under supervision
  - creates a good care relationship with the client / patient and relatives and demonstrates a professional approach
  - can perform a safe drug treatment
  - understands the importance of and has the ability to collaborate with different professional groups within the care team
  - has the skills and ability to provide first aid for mental illness

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
  VÅV22KV12 Mental and Substance Abuse Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Acute crisis, crisis management, treatment of victims of violence
  First aid for mental illness

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Part 1: Workshop
  Part 2: Clinical practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Part 1: Workshop
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Del 2: Clinical practice
  Approved practice
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.02.2025 - 30.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 02.02.2025

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Small group(s)

  • Group A (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Group B (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa Vård 1, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Part 1: Workshop 2 days at CTC
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Part 2: Clinical practice
  Approved clinical practice
  Written assignments
  Participation i seminars

  Student's schedule and workload

  38h/week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  • follows the work list and respects agreed times
  • can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  C Knowledge and skills
  • mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
  • can perform tasks under supervision
  • has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  • can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  • makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
  • is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
  D Collaboration and response
  • can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  • can work with others within the work team
  Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
  • does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
  C Knowledge and skills
  • does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
  • has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
  • lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
  • has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
  D Collaboration and response
  • possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
  • shows an unprofessional attitude

•   Practice: Mental and substance abuse care VÅV22PR05-3002 16.12.2024-21.02.2025  9 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - applies evidence-based knowledge in the psychiatric and substance abuse care context
  - identifies and interprets the patient's / client's problems regarding mental illness and substance abuse / addiction
  - creates an understanding for the client / patient, shows respect and treats him as an expert on his own life
  - assesses, plans, implements, evaluates and documents the patient's / client's care under supervision
  - creates a good care relationship with the client / patient and relatives and demonstrates a professional approach
  - can perform a safe drug treatment
  - understands the importance of and has the ability to collaborate with different professional groups within the care team
  - has the skills and ability to provide first aid for mental illness

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
  VÅV22KV12 Mental and Substance Abuse Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Acute crisis, crisis management, treatment of victims of violence
  First aid for mental illness

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Part 1: Workshop
  Part 2: Clinical practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Part 1: Workshop
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Del 2: Clinical practice
  Approved practice
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  16.12.2024 - 21.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Small group(s)

  • Group A (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
  • Group B (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa Vård 1, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Part 1: Workshop 2 days at CTC
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Part 2: Clinical practice
  Approved clinical practice
  Written assignments
  Participation i seminars

  Student's schedule and workload

  38h/week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  • follows the work list and respects agreed times
  • can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  C Knowledge and skills
  • mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
  • can perform tasks under supervision
  • has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  • can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  • makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
  • is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
  D Collaboration and response
  • can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  • can work with others within the work team
  Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
  • does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
  C Knowledge and skills
  • does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
  • has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
  • lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
  • has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
  D Collaboration and response
  • possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
  • shows an unprofessional attitude

•   Practice: Mental and substance abuse care VÅV22PR05-3003 07.10.2024-08.12.2024  9 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student
  - applies evidence-based knowledge in the psychiatric and substance abuse care context
  - identifies and interprets the patient's / client's problems regarding mental illness and substance abuse / addiction
  - creates an understanding for the client / patient, shows respect and treats him as an expert on his own life
  - assesses, plans, implements, evaluates and documents the patient's / client's care under supervision
  - creates a good care relationship with the client / patient and relatives and demonstrates a professional approach
  - can perform a safe drug treatment
  - understands the importance of and has the ability to collaborate with different professional groups within the care team
  - has the skills and ability to provide first aid for mental illness

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1
  VÅV22KV12 Mental and Substance Abuse Care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision
  Acute crisis, crisis management, treatment of victims of violence
  First aid for mental illness

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marlene Gädda

  Mode of delivery

  95% Face-to-face, 5% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Part 1: Workshop
  Part 2: Clinical practice

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Part 1: Workshop
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Del 2: Clinical practice
  Approved practice
  Approved written assignments

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 08.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Maria Berg, Marlene Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  0.5 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Part 1: Workshop 2 days at CTC
  Compulsory attendance
  
  Part 2: Clinical practice
  Approved clinical practice
  Written assignments
  Participation i seminars

  Student's schedule and workload

  38h/week

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Satisfactorily achieved the targets for work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • is able to receive feedback and show willingness to develop professional skills
  • follows the work list and respects agreed times
  • can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  C Knowledge and skills
  • mostly works according to a plan and has a basic accuracy of the important parts of the work
  • can perform tasks under supervision
  • has a basic knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learn one operation
  • can follow directions and instructions and take responsibility for tasks
  • makes decisions concerning work on a basic level
  • is familiar with values and considers the ethical vocational principles
  D Collaboration and response
  • can communicate and respond to patients / clients / customers
  • can work with others within the work team
  Failed achievement in clinical studies on a basic level:
  A Did not reach the objectives of work practice section.
  B Interest and motivation
  • has shown little or no interest and did not take enough responsibility for the tasks given
  • does not follow work list and is not able to respect agreed times
  C Knowledge and skills
  • does not work according to plan, and with an unsystematic approach
  • has demonstrated an unreliable approach to work with clear mistakes
  • lack of understanding where knowledge is fragmentary and sometimes only ostensibly apparent
  • has demonstrated professional immaturity and can compromise patient safety
  D Collaboration and response
  • possesses poor communication and interpersonal skills
  • shows an unprofessional attitude

•   Practice: Optional Context VÅV23PR06-3001 05.05.2025-31.08.2025  6 credits  (UHV22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  -can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  -can apply evidence-based methods within an optional care context
  -can document and report
  -can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  -can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  -can professionally treat patients and relatives
  -considers patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  -can supervise patients

  Prerequisites

  Practice: Medical- and Surgical Nursing Care 2

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice

  Further information

  Clinical work during the summer, recommended after the third academic year , that the student arranges himself and which can later be validated

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning methods

  Internship info
  4 weeks summer internship during summer 2024

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.05.2025 - 31.08.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 04.05.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  The practice can be realized within an elective context. Hospital internship in medical-surgery-pediatric or internship at a health center clinic or in home nursing

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Student's schedule and workload

  4 veckors sommararbete som kan räknas som praktik , 38 h x4 = 152 timmar

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Godkänd:
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid praktikinfo
  I Moodle fullföjt följande uppgifter:
  Undertecknad timlista över 4 veckors praktik/arbete = 154 timmar Deadline 29.8.2024
  Praktikrapport - 2 sidor Deadline 29.8.2024
  
  Underkänd:
  Ej fullföljt ovanstående kriterier

•   Practice: Optional Context 1 VÅV22PR06-3007 27.01.2025-07.09.2025  6 credits  (USS23D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods within an optional care context
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patient

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care :
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical work during the summer, recommended after the second academic year, that the student arranges himself and which can later be validated

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Nina Vestö

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Four weeks optional internship in healthcare during the summer (summer job): serviced accommodation, enhanced serviced accommodation, home service

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2025 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 35.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 35.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  27.01.2025 - 07.09.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 26.01.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-V

  Seats

  1 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Nina Vestö

  Additional information

  Students look for their summer job themselves

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Summer internship at serviced accommodation, enhanced serviced accommodation, home service

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Summer 2025
  Participation in internship information in 2025. Mandatory attendance.
  Summer internship report submitted via Moodle no later than week 35, 2025
  The signed work list is submitted on Moodle no later than week 35, 2025

  Internationa connections

  Can be done abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The summer internship = 6 ECTS = 4 weeks. 38 h/week. A total of 152 hours.

•   Practice: Optional Context 1 VÅV22PR06-3008 25.11.2024-07.09.2025  6 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods within an optional care context
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can professionally treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patient

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care :
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical work during the summer, recommended after the second academic year, that the student arranges himself and which can later be validated

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Mode of delivery

  84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

  Learning methods

  Four weeks elective internship in healthcare during the academic year (the work as a practical nurse is validated is usually carried out in the summer months): service accommodation, streamlined service accommodation, home service
  The course is validated after completed work as a practical nurse

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2025 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 36.
  The signed work list is submitted to moodle no later than week 36.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  25.11.2024 - 07.09.2025

  Enrollment date range

  28.10.2024 - 06.01.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  1 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anita Ståhl-Levón

  Additional information

  Students are looking for their own work (usually done during the summer months)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Internship at serviced accommodation, enhanced serviced accommodation, home service

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Summer 2025
  Participation in internship information in 2025. Mandatory attendance.
  Summer internship report submitted via Moodle no later than week 36, 2025
  The signed work list is submitted on Moodle no later than week 36, 2025

  Internationa connections

  Can be done abroad

  Student's schedule and workload

  The summer internship = 6 ECTS = 4 weeks. 38 h/week. A total of 152 hours.

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Participation in internship info. Compulsory attendance.
  Internship 4 weeks (6 credits) is done as a summer internship 2025 in care e.g. home care, service housing, wards.
  
  Approved internship report of about 4 pages must be submitted to moodle no later than week 36.
  The signed work list is submitted to Moodle no later than week 36.

•   Practice: Primary care VÅV22PR04-3002 30.09.2024-01.12.2024  9 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in primary care
  - has knowledge of and understanding of patient care in the home environment
  - understands the importance of the home and relatives for the patient
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can in a professional manner treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision in different primary care contexts

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anna-Lena Nieminen

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se Jobiili för att kontrollera praktikplatsens krav gällande vaccinationer, intyg
  Se Moodle gällande praktikuppgifter (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Klinisk praktik inom primärvården (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  30.09.2024 - 01.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Anna-Lena Nieminen, Nina Vestö

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Practice: Primary care VÅV22PR04-3003 13.01.2025-23.03.2025  9 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - can, under the guidance of the interprofessional collaboration, plan, perform and evaluate person-centered care
  - can apply evidence-based methods in primary care
  - has knowledge of and understanding of patient care in the home environment
  - understands the importance of the home and relatives for the patient
  - can document and report
  - can plan, perform and evaluate safe drug treatment
  - can identify ethical problems and demonstrate an ethical approach
  - can in a professional manner treat patients and relatives
  - respects patient safety and applies aseptic principles in patient care
  - can supervise patients

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
  VÅV22KV04 Perioperative Care
  VÅV22KV08 Clinical Care Measures, Clinical Diagnostics and Radiation Protection
  VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice under supervision in different primary care contexts

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Mode of delivery

  89% Face-to-face, 11% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Se Jobiili för att kontrollera praktikplatsens krav gällande vaccinationer, intyg
  Se Moodle gällande praktikuppgifter (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Klinisk praktik inom primärvården (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  13.01.2025 - 23.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 24.01.2025

  • 9 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  1 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  Share of online studies

  1 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Professional Ethics and Professional Interaction in Social and Health Care USS22IV04-3005 12.09.2024-15.12.2024  4 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - knows the legal and ethical principles of patient and client work
  - is capable of professional interaction in inter-professional teams
  - can meet clients/patients and close relatives as experts in their own lives
  - understands the cultural significance in care and can respond to clients / patients individually depending on cultural background
  - understands the importance of the ethical values within health care
  - understands sustainability as an ethical principle

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The position and rights of the client/patient
  
  Professional interaction and communication, dialogue
  
  Ethical recommendations and principles
  
  Client/patient participation, self-determination and autonomy
  
  Professional encounters
  
  Person-centred care as basis for healthcare science
  
  Different cultures and subcultures
  
  Different religions

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Lämplig material för kursen/ Sovelutuva kurssimateriaali:
  Holm, U. 2009. Det räcker inte att vara snäll. Om empati och professionellt bemötande i människovårdande yrke.
  Fossum, B (red). 2010. Kommunikation samtal och bemötande i vården.
  Magnusson, A-S. 2014. Om kommunikation - för personal i vårdande yrke.
  Sandberg, H. 2014. Sjuksköterskans samtal. Professionalitet och medmänsklighet.
  Scherman, M.H, Runesson, U. (red) 2009. Den lärande patienten.
  SHM https://stm.fi/sv/social-och-halsotjanster/lagstiftning
  Sandman L. & Kjellström S. 2018. Etik för vårdande yrken
  Wellman E. 2017. Eri kultturien tuntemus hoitotyössä.
  Artiklar och databaser/ Artikkelit ja internetsivut
  Kursmaterial och litteratur ges på kursen (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Korsstudier med Turun amk/ Ristiinopiskelu Turun amk
  Självstudier/ Itsenäistä opiskelua
  Föreläsningar/ Luentoja
  Övningar, grupparbeten, seminarium Obligatorisk närvaro/ harjoituksa, ryhmätöitä, seminaari - pakollinen läsnäolo
  Interprofessionellt språkbadsamarbete sk. SotePlask (2 sp) mellan Åbo Yrkeshögskola (Turun ammattikorkeakoulu) och Yh Novia/ smågruppsarbeten. Skriftlig uppgift med seminarium. Obligatorisk närvaro./ SoTePlaskTurun amk ja Novia sairaanhoitajat, terveydenhoitajat, sosionomiopiskelijat. Kirjallinen työ ja seminaari. Pakollinen läsnäolo (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Yrkesetik, korsstudier med Turku amk 2 sp. Osio ammattietiikka 2 op. Arviointi: Hyväksytty/ hylätty. Bedömningskala GK/UK.
  Bedömningskriterier/ Arviointikiriteerit:
  Hylätty/ Underkänt:
  Prestationen är underkänd om något av följande uppfylls:
  - Studerande (känner till grundvärderingar) identiefierar inte de grundläggande värderingarna inom social- och hälsovård, yrkesetiska principer eller lagstiftning
  - Studerande fungerar inte som en ansvarsfull (bär inte sitt ansvar som) gruppmedlem
  - Studerande deltar inte aktivt i uppgifter. Semianrium och introduktion oblaigatorisk närvaro, kompensationsuppgift ifall man är frånvarande.
  
  Interprofessionellt samarbete SotePlask 2 sp. Bedömningskala GK/UK. Osio SoTePlask arviointi: Hyväksytty/ hylätty
  Bedömningskriterier/ Arviointikriteerit::
  Underkänt/ Hylätty:
  Prestationen är underkänd om något av följande uppfylls:
  - Studerande (känner till grundvärderingar) identiefierar inte de grundläggande värderingarna inom social- och hälsovård, yrkesetiska principer eller lagstiftning
  - Studerande fungerar inte som en ansvarsfull gruppmedlem
  - Studerande deltar inte aktivt i den interprofessionella kommunikationen under studieperioden
  - Obligatorisk närvaro på introduktion och seminarium, kompensationsuppgift ifall frånvaro.
  
  Godkänt (alla 3 kriterier uppfylls)/ HYväksytty (kaikki kriteerit täyttyvät):
  - Studerande känner till de grundläggande värderingarna (grundvärderingar) inom social- och hälsovård och yrkesetiska principer (eller lagstiftning)
  - Studerande bär sitt ansvar som gruppmedlem. Studerande kan ange branschens centrala lagstiftning
  - Studerande arbetar ansvarsfullt och aktivt i den interprofessionell kommunikationen under studieperioden
  - Studerande deltar i samarbete med Turun amk studerande
  - Studerande deltar i grupparbete med rapport.
  - Studerande bär sitt ansvar som gruppmedlem och gör sin del av uppgifterna.
  - Studerande deltar i obligatoriska delar av kursen
  - Studerande arbetar ansvarsfullt och aktivt i den interprofessionell kommunikationen under studieperioden (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.09.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 13.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Kursen administreras från YH Novia, Moodle som arbetsbord.
  Kurssin hallinointi Yh Novialla, Moodle oppismisalustana. Turun amk opiskelijat ilmoittautuvat Noviaan erillisen ohjeen mukaan. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Seminarium del I/ Seminaari osa I: Yrkesetik- Ammattietiikka (2sp/ op) 30.9.2024. Inlämning 26.9.2024 kl. 12
  Seminarium SoTePlask (2 sp/ op) 7.11.2024
  SoTePlask individuell refleksionsdokument inlämning senast 10.11.2024 Moodle/ SoTePlask yksilötehtävä kirjallinen itsereflektio viimeistään 10.11.2024 Moodle (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  SoTePlask/ Interprofessionellt samarbete med Turun ammattikorkeakoulu och socionomstuderande från Novia, SoTePlask 54 h. Ajankäyttö 54 h
  Ammattietiikka/ Samarbete med Turun amk, korsstudier 54 h; Föreläsningar, övningar, grupparbeten och självstudier. Ajankäyttö 54 h luentoja, harjoituksia, ryhmätöitä ja istenäistä opiskelua (not translated)

•   Professional Ethics and Professional Interaction in Social and Health Care USS22IV04-3006 11.09.2024-13.12.2024  4 credits  (USS24F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - knows the legal and ethical principles of patient and client work
  - is capable of professional interaction in inter-professional teams
  - can meet clients/patients and close relatives as experts in their own lives
  - understands the cultural significance in care and can respond to clients / patients individually depending on cultural background
  - understands the importance of the ethical values within health care
  - understands sustainability as an ethical principle

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The position and rights of the client/patient
  
  Professional interaction and communication, dialogue
  
  Ethical recommendations and principles
  
  Client/patient participation, self-determination and autonomy
  
  Professional encounters
  
  Person-centred care as basis for healthcare science
  
  Different cultures and subcultures
  
  Different religions

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Martin L (red). 2021. Kommunikation i vården.
  Arman M. 2022. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande.
  Holm, U. 2009. Det räcker inte att vara snäll. Om empati och professionellt bemötande i människovårdande yrke.
  Fossum, B (red). 2010. Kommunikation samtal och bemötande i vården.
  Magnusson, A-S. 2014. Om kommunikation - för personal i vårdande yrke.
  Sandberg, H. 2014. Sjuksköterskans samtal. Professionalitet och medmänsklighet.
  Scherman, M.H, Runesson, U. (red) 2009. Den lärande patienten.
  SHM https://stm.fi/sv/social-och-halsotjanster/lagstiftning.
  Sandman L. & Kjellström S. 2018. Etik för vårdande yrken.
  Wellman E. 2017. Eri kultturien tuntemus hoitotyössä.
  Lorentz H. & Bergstedt B. 2017. Interkulturella perspektiv. Pedagogik i mångkulturella lärandemiljöer.
  Larsson, I. m.fl. 2016. Patient kommunikation i praktiken - information, dialog, delaktighet. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Inspelade föreläsningar och PP utan ljud
  Workshop/övning
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  11.09.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 11.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig lärare Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Inspelade föreläsningar, PP
  Workshop/övning
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individuell rapport, inlämning 28.11. 2024
  Seminarium 3.12. 2024
  Quiz 9.12.2024 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Kursstart 2 h
  Självstudier ink. Quiz 70 h
  Föreläsningar och workshops 4 h
  Individuell rapport 32 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Rapporten fyller inte kriterier för vitsordet 1. Underkänd rapport kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell.
  
  Quiz bedöms i skalan uk - gk (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Rapporten svarar endast delvis eller ytligt på de ställda frågorna. Källorna har använts knappt. Rapporten har delvis relevant innehåll. Rapporten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Rapporten svarar på de ställda frågorna med stöd av relevanta källor. Rapporten har relevant innehåll. Egna reflektioner beskrivs. Rapporten är är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Rapporten svarar mångsidigt och brett på frågeställningarna och baserar på relevanta källor. Egna reflektioner beskrivs väl. Rapporten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Professional Ethics and Professional Interaction in Social and Health Care USS22IV04-3009 19.05.2025-24.08.2025  4 credits  (USS242D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - knows the legal and ethical principles of patient and client work
  - is capable of professional interaction in inter-professional teams
  - can meet clients/patients and close relatives as experts in their own lives
  - understands the cultural significance in care and can respond to clients / patients individually depending on cultural background
  - understands the importance of the ethical values within health care
  - understands sustainability as an ethical principle

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  The position and rights of the client/patient
  
  Professional interaction and communication, dialogue
  
  Ethical recommendations and principles
  
  Client/patient participation, self-determination and autonomy
  
  Professional encounters
  
  Person-centred care as basis for healthcare science
  
  Different cultures and subcultures
  
  Different religions

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Martin L (red). 2021. Kommunikation i vården.
  Arman M. 2022. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande.
  Holm, U. 2009. Det räcker inte att vara snäll. Om empati och professionellt bemötande i människovårdande yrke.
  Fossum, B (red). 2010. Kommunikation samtal och bemötande i vården.
  Magnusson, A-S. 2014. Om kommunikation - för personal i vårdande yrke.
  Sandberg, H. 2014. Sjuksköterskans samtal. Professionalitet och medmänsklighet.
  Scherman, M.H, Runesson, U. (red) 2009. Den lärande patienten.
  SHM https://stm.fi/sv/social-och-halsotjanster/lagstiftning.
  Sandman L. & Kjellström S. 2018. Etik för vårdande yrken.
  Wellman E. 2017. Eri kultturien tuntemus hoitotyössä.
  Lorentz H. & Bergstedt B. 2017. Interkulturella perspektiv. Pedagogik i mångkulturella lärandemiljöer.
  Larsson, I. m.fl. 2016. Patient kommunikation i praktiken - information, dialog, delaktighet.
  Artiklar och databaser
  Övrig material som ges under kursen (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Kursstart 4.8.2025 Obligatorisk närvaro
  Övningar/ workshop/ gruppuppgift Obligatorisk närvaro
  Skriftlig uppgift med seminarium. Obligatorisk närvaro
  Möjlighet att kontakta läraren via Teams den 9.7 kl. 10-14.00 gällande uppgifterna. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.05.2025 - 24.08.2025

  Enrollment date range

  05.12.2024 - 18.05.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS242D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Jaana-Sofia Tengström (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar PowerPoint på Moodle
  Workshop
  Examinationer (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individuell bokuppgift, inlämning 17.8.2025
  Seminarium och rapport 13.8.2025
  Kursstart och workshop/ gruppuppgift under lektionen 4.6.2025 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar, workshops och självstudier 54 h
  Individuell uppgift 27 h
  Seminarie med rapport 27 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Rapporten/ uppgiften fyller inte kriterier för vitsordet 1. Underkänd rapport kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell.
  
  Workshop/ gruppuppgift GK/ UK (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Rapporten/ uppgiften svarar endast delvis eller ytligt på de ställda frågorna. Källorna har använts knappt. Rapporten/ uppgiften har delvis relevant innehåll. Rapporten är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Rapporten/ uppgiftne svarar på de ställda frågorna med stöd av relevanta källor. Rapporten/ uppgiften har relevant innehåll. Egna reflektioner beskrivs. Rapporten/ uppgiften är är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Rapporten/ uppgiften svarar mångsidigt och brett på frågeställningarna och baserar på relevanta källor. Egna reflektioner beskrivs väl. Rapporten/ uppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

•   Public Health Nursing in Optional Context VÅV14KVV17-3006 03.02.2025-18.05.2025  6 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the client’s/patient’s care in optional care context
  - deepens his/her skills in public health nursing
  - can demonstrate his/her skills in safe drug therapy management and that he/she masters vaccination programmes

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to public health nursing
  Maternity and child health care

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice - Public health nursing in optional context

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  see Modle platform

  Learning methods

  Practice info
  Clinical practice in optional context
  Praktikseminarium

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.02.2025 - 18.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 31.01.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marie Hjortell

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Student's schedule and workload

  40 credits/week of which 2 credits/week can be used for written assignments related to the course

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  Approved:
  Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop professional skills
  Follows the work list and keeps agreed times
  Can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work step
  Works according to plan and has basic accuracy in important work steps
  Can perform tasks initially under supervision in the direction of increased degree of independence
  Has knowledge and can ask questions that are relevant to learning a work step
  Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
  Can make decisions related to work tasks at a basic and advanced level
  Knows the value base and considers the professional ethical principles
  Can communicate and respond to patients/clients
  Able to collaborate with others within the work team

•   Public Health Nursing with The Expectant Family HVV22HA03-3002 10.03.2025-02.05.2025  5 credits  (UHV22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - masters the process of monitoring the expectant mother and foetus during pregnancy
  - knows about risk factors associated with pregnancy and childbirth and is capable to prevent and intervene at an early stage
  - can identify mothers and future parents in need of extra support and monitoring
  - knows how to monitor, handle referrals, guide and counsel the woman and family during pregnancy and puerperium
  - has basic knowledge of normal childbirth and can manage emergency childbirth
  - masters the care and monitoring of the new mother and the new-born child
  - has knowledge of relationships, parenting and early interaction
  - has skills to perform breastfeeding councelling
  - has the competence to respect the cultural affiliation of the woman and her family and different types of families
  - can work within various networks and teams to support the woman and her family
  - guides and supports clients on issues related to sexual health and family planning
  - possesses the skills to realize family and parents preparation
  - can use digital solutions in encounters with the family to be and in family planning

  Prerequisites

  Study unit VÅV22IN : all courses approved
  Study unit VÅV22GV : all courses approved
  Study unit VÅV22HF : all courses approved
  Study unit VÅV22KV : courses VÅV22KV01-KV14 approved
  Study unit VÅV22PR: courses VÅV22PR01-PR05 approved

  Content of the study unit

  Tutoring, counseling and support for the family who are expecting children and for the new family
  Follow-up of the expectant mother and fetus during pregnancy
  Recurrent and comprehensive health examinations, screenings
  Normal and complicated pregnancy and puerperium
  Early identification of risk factors and early intervention in complications during pregnancy and infancy
  The course of the normal and abnormal birth, treatment in acute delivery
  Follow-up and care of the new mother and the newborn baby
  Relationships, parenting and early interaction
  Breastfeeding councelling
  Interprofessional and intercultural health care work
  Family planning and sexual health
  Family- and parents preparation
  Digital solutions

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
  
  Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  Further information

  Breast feeding councelling 1,5 sp is included in the course. The breastfeeding training course corresponds to WHO's / Unicef's 20 hour breastfeeding tutor training.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  LITTERATUR:
  
  Berg M, Lundgren I (red). 2004. Att stärka och stödja. Vårdande vid barnafödande. ( valda delar)
  
  Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta - sexuaali ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020, Opas 33 , THL, 2013 ( valda delar)
  
  Hakulinen-Viitanen mfl. 2012. Laaja terveystarkastus- Ohjeistus äitiys- ja lastenneuvolatoimintaan sekä kouluterveydenhuoltoon. Opas 22. THL
  
  Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T. (red.). 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation.Handbok 40/215. ( elektronisk)
  https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/126655/2015_THL_OPA040_web.pdf?sequence=3
  NEUKO - neuvola- äitiysneuvola - elektronisk databas via THL/terveysportti , 2022
  NEUKO 2021 via duodecim - Äitiysneuvola
  
  Reproduktiv hälsa – barnmorskans kompetensområde. Red. H Lindgren, K Christensson, A-K Dykes. Studentlitteratur. 2016 eller nyare upplaga ( valda delar)
  eller alternativt
  Lärobok för barnmorskor. A., Hogg, B., Hildingsson, I. & Lundgren, I. . Studentlitteratur 2010 (valda delar)
  
  Tillsammans kring matbordet - Kostrekommendationer till barnfamiljer.
  http://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/130021 (elektronisk)
  
  Kansallinen imetyksen edistämisen toimintaohjelma vuosille 2018–2022 toim.
  Hakulinen mfl.
  
  Amning i dag. E. Kylberg, M.Westlund, S Swedberg. 2021( 4e uppl.) Gothia
  Imetysohjaus : K. Koskinen. 2008. Edita
  
  
  Referenslitteratur:
  se också Moodlekursen: Hälsovårdararbete med familjen som väntar barn, litteraturen kan uppdateras under kursens gång (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self studies
  Demonstrations
  Practical training at CTC , Campus Alere, Novia Vasa

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Tentamen; vitsord 1-5 ( utgör 70 % av hehetskursvitsordet)
  Skriftligt arbete och presentation i amningshandledning ; vitsord 1-5 ( utgör 30 % av helhetskursvitsordet)
  
  Bedömningskriterier: se uppgifter om studieperioden (kursen) (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  10.03.2025 - 02.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 09.03.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa - timlärare Vård, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Obligatorisk närvaro vid kursintroduktion samt praktiska övningar.
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid samtliga lektioner i amningshandledning för att kunna erhålla intyg över amningshandledningskompetens. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Eget arbete i kursdelen amningshandledning som presenteras
  Tentamen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  27h/sp vilket innebär 135 h innehållande både föreläsningar och egna studier (not translated)

•   Public Health Nursing with Working Age Population and Elderly HVV14HA06-3009 07.01.2025-09.02.2025  4 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - has knowledge of health care provided for people of working age and can apply current legislation and national policy documents
  - has knowledge and readiness to provide good occupational health care
  - can carry out health surveys and promote health and wellbeing among people of working age
  - has basic knowledge of how to investigate health hazards at the workplace through a workplace survey and how to conduct risk assessment at the workplace. The student also ha insights into occupational medicine
  - recognises the characteristics of health promotion among the elderly and can support the promotion of health and wellbeing of the elderly and their families
  - respects the cultural affiliation of the clients/patients
  - can work within various networks and teams to support people of working age, the elderly and their families

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to public health nursing

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation and governance documents in occupational health and safety at work
  Principles for good occupational health care practice
  Health screening for working age population, maintenance of work- and functional capacity, follow-up of the working person during the various stages of working life, assessment of work capacity
  Business plans, workplace surveys and follow-up of the work community
  Medical issues
  Health survey and health advice for older, resource-enhancing working methods
  Multi-professional and multicultural health care work

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
  
  Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Arbetsföras hälsovård:
  Edling, C. Mfl. (red.) 2019. Arbets- och miljömedicin. Studentlitteratur
  Haarala et al. 2015. Terveydenhoitajan osaaminen.
  Hakanen, J. et al. Upptäck dina kraftkällor: ABC i arbetshälsa.
  Hakanen, J. 2011. Työn imu. TTL
  Helldán, Helaskorpi. 2014. Suomalaisen aikuisväestön terveyskäyttäytyminen ja terveys.
  Härmä,M.mfl. 2020. Må bra i skiftarbete. TTL
  Karvala,K; Leino,T mfl. Arbetshälsoinstitutet. 2019 Exponeringsbaserad uppföljning av hälsa i arbetet.
  Martimo, K-P, Uitti, P, Antti-Poika M. 2018. Työstä terveyttä. Duodecim
  Michelsson, T, Rejula, K, Ala-Mursula L, Räsänen, K, Uitti J. 2018. Työelämän perustietoa. Duodecim
  Manka M-L mfl. Työn iloa ja imua työhyvinvoinnin ratkaisuja pientyöpaikalla.
  Rautio,M & Michelsen,T. 2013. AFM: så här använder du arbetsförmågeindex och enkäten. Arbetshälsoinstitutet.
  Taskinen mfl. 2011. Terveystarkastukset työterveyshuollossa. TTL
  Uitti, J.(red.) 2016. God företagshälsovårdspraxis. Arbetshälsoinstitutet
  Jouttimäki, L. & Leino, T. 2008. Kvalitetsnyckel för företagshälsovården, Arbetshälsoinstitutet
  Juutilainen 2004. Työterveyshoitajan käsikirja.
  Pietiläinen,R. 2003 Työturvallisuuslaki:soveltamisopas TTL
  SHM. 2013:14. Osaajia työterveyshuoltoon! Työterveyshuollon koulutuksen turvaaminen ja osaamisen vahvistaminen.
  Lagen om företagshälsovård 1383/2001
  Lagen om företagshälsovårdhandbok för tillämpning SHM.
  Arbetarskyddslagen 738/2002
  Arbetarskyddet i Finland SHM 2010
  www.tyosuojelu.fi
  www.aluehallintovirasto.fi
  Sinervo,L.& Hietapakka, L. 2013 Työttömien terveyspalvelut. Valtakunnallisen terveyskeskuskyselyn 2013 tulokset.
  Työttömän terveystarkastus; https://thl.fi/fi/web/sote-uudistus/tulevaisuuden-sosiaali-ja-terveyskeskus/toimivia-toimintamalleja-hankkeiden-tueksi/tyottoman-terveystarkastus,
  https://stm.fi/sv/halsotjanster-for-arbetslosa
  Artiklar och nätbaserad material (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Arbetshälsa:
  Föreläsningar
  Intervju
  Seminarium (obligatorisk närvaro)
  Verkstad (obligatorisk närvaro)
  Smågruppsarbeten
  Självstudier
  
  Äldres hälsa:
  Expertföreläsning
  Projekt på NoVakliniken - seniorrådgivning/temadag (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Hälsovårdararbete med arbetsföra:
  Verkstäder och grupparbeten GK/UK
  Examination/ hemtentamen vitsord 1-5
  Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisningar.
  
  Hälsovårdararbete med äldre : GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.01.2025 - 09.02.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 07.01.2025

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Kursen består av kursdelarna :
  Hälsovårdararbete med arbetsföra 3 sp kursansvarig : Jaana-Sofia Tengström
  Hälsovårdararbete med äldre 1 sp kursansvarig : Marie Hjortell (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Arbetsföras hälsovård:
  Gruppuppgift (0,5 sp)
  Verkstad (0,5 sp)
  Examensarbete/ hemtentamen (2 sp)
  
  Äldres hälsa:
  Genomförande av temamottagning/temadag på NoVakliniken (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Hälsovårdararbete med arbetsföra:
  Undervisining med workshop och grupparbeten 37 h, muntlig respons vid workshoppen
  Självstudier med skriftlig hemexamination 37 h, skriftlig respons i Moodle.
  
  Hälsovårdararbete med äldre:
  Föreläsningar 3 h
  Eget arbete med planering och genomförande av temadag på NoVakliniken 24 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Hälsovårdararbete med arbetsföra:
  Studernade har inte deltogit i verkstaden
  Examination: Studerande har inte lämnat in hemtentamen
  
  Hälsovårdararbete med äldre:
  Studerande har inte deltagit i planering och genomförande av temadag för äldre på NoVa kliniken (not translated)

•   Public Health Science and Resource Promoting Public Health Nursing UHV20HV01-3002 01.08.2024-31.05.2025  7 credits  (UHV21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Bases the health care work on legislation, national and international governance documents
  
  Can apply knowledge of public health, community analyses and municipal welfare reports in promoting the health of the population to reduce health disparities between different population groups
  
  Can take into account various health promoting and hindering environmental factors in the health care work and deepen their knowledge in the promotional and preventive health care work in different business environments
  
  Can cooperate in special and exceptional situations with other experts in environmental health care
  
  Can use evidence based knowledge when planning, implementing and evaluating client-centered health promotion work
  
  Can use resource enhancing business models and methods
  
  Can through outreach healthcare work support clients, families and communities who are in need of special support
  
  Can consider cultural factors to support the health and functional capacity of clients from different cultures
  
  Can prevent accidents and master first aid
  
  Master medication management
  
  Can apply national and international guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases in health care work
  
  Can implement the vaccination program and guide travelers
  
  Can promote breastfeeding and create breastfeeding friendly cultures

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation and health policies within the EU and WHO
  
  Epidemiology
  
  Prevention of common illnesses and identification of health risks
  
  Promotional and preventive health care work
  
  Resource enhancing work methods, client participation, client centering
  
  Business models and working methods in health care work
  
  Interprofessional healthcare work
  
  Multicultural healthcare work
  
  Networking
  
  Environmental health care, legislation and service structure, global, national and regional environmental factors, sustainable development and environmental awareness
  
  Breastfeeding Guide 1 sp
  
  Pharmaceutical bill 0.5sp
  
  First Aid 0.75 cr
  
  Advanced vaccination course 1sp

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Jaana-Sofia Tengström

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  AMNINGSHANDLEDNING, obligatorisk litteratur:
  Hakulinen, T. M.fl. 2017. Kansallinen imetyksen edistämisen toimintaohjelma vuosille 2018-2022. THL. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-949-1
  Hannula, L m.fl. 2020. Amningsrådgivning för gravida, mammor till spädbarn samt familjen. Hotus-vårdrekommendation.
  Kylberg, E., Westlund, M. & Zwedberg, S. 2014. Amning i dag. Gothia.
  THL. 2022. NEUKO-tietokanta. https://www.terveysportti.fi/apps/dtk/nko
  THL. 2019. Tillsammans kring matbordet - kostrekommendationer till barnfamiljer. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-263-5
  
  AMNINGSHANDLEDNING, referenslitteratur:
  Deufel, M. & Montonen, E. 2010. Onnistunut imetys. Duodecim.
  Ikonen, R. 202. Imeväisikäisten ruokinta Suomessa vuonna 2019. Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos (THL). Raportti 11/2020.
  Koskinen, K. 2008. Imetysohjaus. Edita.
  Pullonpyörittäjän opas. Väestöliitto. https://www.hyvakysymys.fi/artikkeli/pullonpyorittajien-opas/
  Aktuella artiklar
  Webbsidor som t.ex. Hälsobyn (https://www.terveyskyla.fi/naistalo/sv/graviditet-och-f%C3%B6rlossning/amning), Amningshjälpen (https://www.amningshjalpen.se/), Imetyksen tuki (https://imetys.fi/).
  
  FOLKHÄLSOVETENSKAP OCH RESURSFÖRSTÄRKANDE HÄLSOVÅRDARARBETE litteratur:
  
  Andersson,I; & Ejlertsson.2013. Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap, möten mellan ämnen. Studentlitteratur.
  Backman, G. ((ed) 2012. The right to health. Studentlitteratur.
  Beaglehole, R., Bonita & Kjällström T, 2010. Grundläggande epidemiologi
  Berglund,M. &Ekebergh, M. (red.).2015. Reflektion i lärande och vård, en utmaning för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur.
  Brulde B & Tengland P-A. 2003. Hälsa och sjukdom - en begreppslig utredning. Studentlitteratur.
  Dahlborg-Lyckhage, E., Lyckhage, G., Tengelin, E. 2015. Jämlik vård. Studentlitteratur.
  Edling, C., Nordberg G., Albin, M., Nordberg, M. 2019. Arbets- och miljömedicin - en lärobok om hälsa och miljö. Studentlitteratur.
  Eriksson, M. (red) 2015. Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Liber.
  Kauhanen, J. mfl. 2018. Kansanterveystiede.
  Leino-Kilpi H & Välimäki M. 2010. Etiikka hoitotyössä.
  Magnusson, A-S. 2014. Om kommunikation - för personal i vårdande yrke. Liber
  Mussalo-Rauhamaa, H., Pekkanen, J. & Tuomisto, J. 2020. Ympäristöterveys.
  Pellmer, K., Wramner, B., Wramner, K. 2017 Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber.
  Sandberg, H. 2014. Sjuksköterskans samtal. Professionalitet och medmänsklighet. Studentlitteratur.
  Schäfer Elinder, L., Kwak, L. (red) 2014. Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur.
  Svanström, L. 2012. En introduktion till Folkhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur
  https://stm.fi/sv/social-och-halsotjanster/lagstiftning
  https://thl.fi/fi/web/sote-uudistus
  http://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/79924
  www.thl.fi
  www.stm.fi
  https://ec.europa.eu/health
  www.who.int
  Artiklar
  
  
  REFERENSLITTERATUR: metodböcker:
  Barth, T; & Näsholm, C. 2006. Motiverande samtal. MI att hjälpa en människa till förändring på hennes egna villkor. Studentlitteratur.
  Dolfe, A. 2007. Konsten att få människor att vilja anstränga sig. Om salutogent motivationsarbete.
  Eriksson,E & Arnkil, T.2006 Ta upp oron. En handbok i tidiga dialoger. Stakes, handböcker 64
  Killén, K. 2011. Professionell utveckling och handledning, ett yrkesövergripande perspektiv. Studentlitteratur.
  Kostenius,C & Lindqvist, A-K. 2009. Hälsovägledning. Från ord till handling. Studentlitteratur.
  Kyngäs, Kääriäinen, Poskiparta, Johansson, Hirvonen & Renfors. 2007. Ohjaaminen hoitotyössä. WSOY.
  Pietilä, A-M (toim).2004. Terveyden edistäminen. Uudistuvat työmenetelmät.
  Patja Kristiina (toim) mfl. 2022 Terveyden edistäminen .
  
  Lagar, förordningar och strategier
  Förordning 2011/338 om rådgivningsverksamhet, skol- och studerandehälsovård samt förebyggande mun- och tandvård för barn och unga. Finlex.
  http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/71958
  SHM. 2006:19 Terveyden edistämisen laatusuositus.
  SHM. 2014:18. Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården framtidsutsikter
  https://thl.fi/sv/web/invandrare-och-kulturell-mangfald
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  
  Förebyggande och vård av infektionssjukdomar/ vaccinaering:
  Information om litteratur och annat material finns på kursens Moodle sida.
  Referenslitteratur :
  Lag om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2016/20161227,
  Statsrådets förordning om smittsamma sjukdomar, https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/alkup/2017/20170146,
  Folkhälsomyndigheten, smittskydd och beredskap, https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/smittskydd-beredskap/
  Hedman, K mfl. Infektiosairaudet. Mikrobiologia, immunologia ja infektiosairaudet.
  Keeling, A, W mfl. (Red.) 2015. Nurses and Disasters. Global, historical case studies. Springer publishing company.
  Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter
  Thl.fi (rokottajan käsikirja)
  THL.fi (matkailijan terveysopas)
  Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
  Kunnat.net
  Filha.fi
  Smittskyddsinstitutet.se
  World Health Organization (WHO)
  Europan Centre for Disease Prevention and Controll (ECDE)
  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.
  https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/surveillance-and-disease-data
  https://svenska.yle.fi/artikel/2018/01/23/klamydian-och-gonorren-okar-lakare-ocksa-en-trevlig-och-bekant-person-kan-smitta (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Amningshandledning: Föreläsningar, case, demonstrationer, praktiska övningar, simulering, självstudier.
  
  Självstudier,grupparbeten, workshop, föreläsningar
  Inför vissa föreläsningar kan studerande få material att läsa in sig på, alternativt delas materialet ut under föreläsningen. Studerande deltar i planering och förverkligande av den traditionella konferensen inom hälsa -och välfärd med tema interkulturell social- och hälsovård 2.10.24
  
  Infektionssjukdomar/ vaccineringskunskap:
  Obligatorisk kursintroduktion i infektsionssjukdomar/ vaccinering
  Självstudier
  Workshops och simulering i infektionssjukdomar
  Virtuell kurs på Moodle plattformen
  Muntlig feedback i december 2024
  
  Läkemedelsräkning: Självstudier, övning och examination hösten 2024.
  
  Första hjälpen: Föreläsningar, övningar. Kursen förverkligas våren 2025 (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Amningshandledning:
  - Närvaro vid föreläsningarna och simulering 100 %: gk/uk.
  - Amningshandledning i praktiken: GK/UK
  
  Insändare/ skriftlig individuell uppgift; Bedömning 1–5.
  
  Skriftlig parrapport, bedömning 1-5/UK
  Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kompetenserna och innehåll i de angivna kurserna), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap
  
  Läkemedelsräkning:
  Den skriftliga individuella tenten i läkemedelsräkning bedöms GK/UK. Svaren måste vara korrekt räknade till 100 % för att bli godkänd. Studerande övar på egen hand.
  
  Portfolio i vaccinationskunskap:
  Portfolio i elektronisk form lämnas in på Moodle inom utsatt tid. Portfolion bedöms på skalan godkänd/underkänd. Bedömningen sker utgående från nationella kriterier. I portfolion ingår tre uppgifter som bygger på egna reflektioner där studerande kan bearbeta egna tankar och bredda
  och fördjpa sin kunskap Portfolion ska dessutom innehålla en självbedömning av de egna vaccinationskunskaperna.
  Individuell skriftlig tent:
  När portfolion är GK kan studerande göra den individuella skriftliga tenten som finns på Moodle. För att få godkänt i tentamen måste studenten svara rätt på minst 85 procent av frågorna (34/40 poäng). GK/UK
  
  Första hjälpen:
  Närvaro vid föreläsning och övningar 100% GK/UK
  Konferensen, aktiv deltagande i palnering och förverkligande GK/UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.08.2024 - 31.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Janina Dahla, Pia Liljeroth, Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Daniel Nenonen

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Konferens 2.10.24, samarbete med arbetslivet (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Amningshandledning: Obligatorisk närvaro på föreläsningar och simulering, se schema.
  
  Skriftlig rapport och seminarium/ paruppgift:
  Gemensam examination på kurserna Folkhälsoarbete och resursförstärkande hälsovårdararbete, Hälsovårdarabete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdarabete med barnfamiljen görs i form av en parrapport.
  Studerande väljer (parvis) ett tema (t.ex. sömn, missbruk) och en metod (t.ex. motiverande samtal, resursförstärkande handledning) inom kursen Folkhälsoarbete och resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete. Temat och metoden ska synliggöras och tillämpas på den gravida familjen och i barnfamiljen (inom kurserna Hälsovårdarabete med den väntande familjen och med barnfamiljen). I rapporten ska fokus ligga på förebyggande och hälsofrämjande arbete. Tema- och parindelning görs på Moodle i kursen Folkhälsoarbete och resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete. Rapporten ska basera sig på kurslitteraturen, relevanta nätsidor samt minst 3 vetenskapliga artiklar (en per kurs). Studerande får skriftlig feedback, vitsord 1-5
  
  Insändare/ skriftlig uppgift; Hälsovårdaren i folkhälsoarbetet; välj ett tema ur folkhälsans syn (miljöhälsa, epidemiologi, folksjukdomar, smittsammasjukdomar, hälsostrtegier osv.). Sök vetenskap bakom substansen, skriv i tanke på hälsovårdarens yrkeskunskap och påverkningsmöjligheter/ ansvar 1–5. Hösten 2024
  
  Läkemedelsräkning skriftlig examination samt portfolio. Test hösten 2024.
  
  Första hjälpen, kursen förverkligas våren 2025 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Amningshandledning 1sp:
  - närstudier 16 h
  - amningshandledning i praktiken 2 h
  - sjävstudier 9
  - Närvaro vid föreläsningarna och simulering 100 %: GK/UK
  - Amningshandledningen i praktiken GK/UK.
  
  
  Skriftliga parrapporten 1 sp
  Rapporten laddas upp på Moodle (under kursen Folkhälsoarbete och resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete)
  Rapporten presenteras på seminarium 5.11.2024
  Seminariets upplägg laddas upp på Moodle efter deadline.
  
  Infektionssjukdomar/ vaccineringskunskap 1 sp:
  Portfolio 10h
  Skriftlig tent 1h
  Självstudier 16h
  
  Folkhälsoarbete insändare/ skriftlig rapport 1 sp. Seminarium 8.11.2024
  
  Läkemedelsräkning test hösten 2024, 0,5sp
  
  Första hjälpen 16 h, obligatorisk närvaro 100%. Examination i form av slutövning våren 2025. 0,75 sp
  
  Föreläsningar och smågruppsarbeten/ workshops, självstudier 0,25 sp
  
  Konferensen 1,5 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Skriftlig parrapport:
  Temaområdena behandlas fragmentariskt.
  Litteraturen används inte.
  Reflektioner framförs inte.
  Brister i den tekniska utformningen
  
  Individuell uppgift:
  Studerande lämnar inte in den skriftliga uppgiften eller följer inte de angivna anvisingar med litteratur, refeksion och/ eller tekniska utformningen (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Skriftlig parrapport :
  Temaområdena behandlas kort.
  Litteraturen refereras
  Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning.
  Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig.
  
  Individuell uppgift:
  Uppgiften besvaras utgående från få källor, men de olika delar kan inte relateras till varandra eller text är på en ytlig nivå. Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig. Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  På svenska
  Skriftlig parrapport:
  Temaområdena behandlas mångsidigt.
  Litteraturen tillämpas.
  Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns.
  Den tekniska utformningen är god.
  
  Individuell uppgift:
  Alla examinationens delar besvaras utgående från källor men de olika svaren kan inte helt relateras till varandra. Gruppen använder både kurslitteratur och sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar, men inte systematiskt. Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns. Den tekniska utformningen är god. Uppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Skriftlig parrapport:
  Temaområdena behandlas uttömmande och mångsidigt.
  Litteraturen analyseras och tillämpas.
  Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk.
  Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig.
  
  Individuell uppgift:
  Temaområden behandlas på djupgående nivå till alla examinationens delar utgående från olika evidensbaserade källor och kan relatera de olika delarna av examination till varandra. Man använder systematiskt kurslitteratur, andra evidensbaserade källor samt sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. Refleksionen är mångsidigt och analytisk. Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig. Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

•   Public health nursing among school children and youth HVV21HA05-3001 02.09.2024-06.10.2024  4 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - has knowledge of school and student health care and knows and understands the importance of national policy documents for the individual’s health care at school and in student health care
  - has acquired an in-depth knowledge of health promotion and wellbeing in both school and student environment
  - can support, monitor and assess the health and wellbeing of pupils and students in different life situations as well as support their families
  - has the skills to observe and intervene at an early stage in problematic situations and refer to continued care elsewhere
  - has skills to address difficult questions, prevent mental illness and support the pupil/student with mental illness
  - respects the cultural affiliation of the pupil or student
  - can work within various networks and teams to support school children, youths and their families

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to public health nursing

  Content of the study unit

  Legislation and governing documents within the school and student health care, student health
  Follow-up and support of the well-being and health of students and students
  Recurrent and comprehensive health examinations, screenings
  Support for family resources, parenting, parents / schoolchildren's and youth's health and well-being
  Early identification and early intervention
  Mental health in the school environment and supportive councelling
  Multi-professional and multicultural health care work

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
  
  Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Lag om elev- och studerandevård 30.12.2013/1287
  Hälso- och sjukvårdslagen 30.12.2010/1326
  NEUKO databas för skol-och studerandehälsovården, THL.
  Guide för studerandehälsovården 2021. Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2021:15. Social-och Hälsovårdsminsteriet, Helsingfors 2021
  Mäki P., Wikström K, Hakulinen T & Laatikainen T. Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd. Laaja terveystarkastus (2012 THL)
  Rådgivningsverksamhet, skol- och studerandehälsovård samt förebyggande mun- och tandvård (Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer 2010:11)
  Kvalitetsrekommendationer för skolhälsovården (Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets handböcker 2004:9)
  Opiskeluterveys. 2011. Kunttu K., Komulainen A., Makkonen K. & Pynnönen P. Duodecim. Helsinki.
  
  Milerad, J., Lindgren, C., & Forslund, L. (2024). Evidensbaserad elevhälsa (Tredje upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
  
  Institutet för hälsa och välfärd.www.thl.fi
  Social-och hälsovårdsminsteriet.www.stm.fi
  Valda artiklar mm. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Lectures, discussions, written assignments during the course and final exam

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 06.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 01.09.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 18

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa - timlärare Vård, Frida Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Exam 3.10

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/vecka (not translated)

•   Public health nursing with children and their families VÅV21HA04-3001 02.09.2024-11.10.2024  4 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - masters methods to support and monitor the child’s growth and development
  - recognizes and can intervene at an early stage in situations that may pose a risk to the child’s health and development
  - has knowledge of relationships, parenting and early interaction
  - is prepared to provide guidance and counselling to the family on issues regarding upbringing and health habits
  - can respect the cultural affiliation of the child and its family
  - can work within various networks and teams to support the child and its family
  - masters the vaccination program offered at the child welfare clinic

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to public health nursing

  Content of the study unit

  Couple relationship, parenting, early interaction
  Methods to support and monitor the child's growth and development
  Recurrent and comprehensive health examinations, screenings
  Early intervention and recognition of situations that may pose a risk to the child's health and development including child protection
  Supervision and counseling for the family in education issues and issues related to health habits
  Multi-professional and multicultural health care work
  Vaccination activities in child health clinics

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
  Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  För study material : see also Moodle
  Kurslitteratur:
  NEUKO databas - lastenneuvola via THL/terveysportti, 2022
  Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen och inom skolhälsovården - Metodhandbok 31/2018. THL ( elektronisk) Mäki P.Wikström K., Hakulinen-Viitanen T., Laatikainen T
  Institutet för hälsa och välfärd. www.thl.fi Webbsidan : Infektionssjukdomar och Vaccinationer
  Tillsammans kring matbordet-kostrekommendationer för barnfamiljer. THL. förnyad upplaga 2019
  
  Referenslitteratur ( barnhälsovård ) :
  Barnhälsovård-att främja barns hälsa . 2016. red. Magnusson, Blennow, Hagelin, Sundelin. Liber:Stockholm
  Barnrådgivningen som stöd för barnfamiljer. Handbok för personalen.
  Handböcker 2005:12. Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
  Bramhagen, A-C. och Carlsson, A. (red.) Hälsofrämjande arbete för barn och ungdomar. 2013. Studentlitteratur
  Ensi- ja turvakotien liitto. Tunnista vauvan hätä! Vauvan kaltoinkohtelun tunnistaminen ja siihen puuttuminen
  Hakulinen-Viitanen, Hietanen-Peltola, Hastrup, Wallin ja Pelkonen
  Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön selvityksiä 2008:24. Isien ja isyyden tukeminen äitiys- ja lastenneuvoloissa.
  Halme, N. 2009. Isän ja leikki-ikäisen lapsen yhdessäolo. THL.
  Kirjaamisopas: Lastenneuvola ja kouluterveydenhuolto. THL.2022
  Korteniemi-Poikela, E & Cacciatore, R. 2010. Opas vanhemmille. Portaita pitkin. Lapsen ja nuoren seksuaalisuuden kehittyminen. WSOY
  Laaja terveystarkastus. Ohjeistus äitiys- ja lastenneuvolatoimintaan sekä kouluterveydenhuoltoon. Opas 22/2012. THL
  Mothander-Risholm P; Broberg;A. 2018. Att möta små barn och deras föräldrar I vården: om anknytning, utveckling och samspel.
  MLL. Hur växer och utvecklas barn.
  Ryttyläinen, K. & Valkama, S. 2010. Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä. Edita.
  Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja 2010:7. Älä lyö lasta! Kansallinen lapsiin kohdistuvan kuritusväkivallan vähentämisen toimintaohjelma 2010-2015
  Salpa, P. 2007. Lapsen liikkumisen kehitys, ensimmäinen ikävuosi. Tammi.
  Silven, M. (toim.Ahonen, L. 2017. Haastavat kasvatustilanteet. Lämpimän vuorovaikutuksen käsikirja. Juva: PS-Kustannus.

  Learning methods

  Lectures, demonstrations, simulations,
  Own work in base groups

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Approved exam, grade 1-5
  Approved participation in simulations
  Deltagit i expertföreläsning

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 11.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-V

  Seats

  10 - 18

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Vasa - timlärare Vård, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Mandatory attendance at the start of the course, demonstrations, simulations and expert lectures

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Exam 11.10
  Reexam 1 22.11.2024
  Reexam 2 17.1.2025

  Student's schedule and workload

  Students' work effort is expected to correspond to 27 hours per credit

  Assessment criteria

  Failed exam
  Not participated in simulations
  Not participated in expert lecture

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
  Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
  Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

•   Reproductive Health USS22KÅ02-3002 19.08.2024-15.11.2024  4 credits  (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - can, in an inter-professional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report person-centered/client-centered, sustainable care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
  - has expertise in care in various service system
  - can describe what sustainable sexual and reproductive health means in promoting individual and family health
  - can describe the most common sexually transmitted diseases and their treatment
  - can describe the course of normal pregnancy, the central and sustainable follow-up methods and the content of health care guidance
  - can describe the course of a normal delivery and care methods
  - knows the basics of following up and caring for the newly-delivered woman and the newborn during normal puerperium
  - has knowledge of the breastfeeding recommendations and can act as support during breastfeeding

  Prerequisites

  Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Surgical and Perioperative Care, Nursing in Internal Medicine and Palliative Care, Clinical Nursing

  Content of the study unit

  The service system and various service environments
  
  The care process, decision making, ethics
  
  Aseptics, sustainable development
  
  Participation of patients and relatives in care
  
  Sexual and reproductive health and its promotion (central gynecological and andrological problems in relation to reproduction, prevention, infertility)
  
  The most common sexually transmitted diseases
  
  Follow-up, health care guidance and care during normal pregnancy
  
  Follow-up and care during normal childbirth
  
  Emergency delivery
  
  Follow-up and care of the woman and the healthy newborn baby in the maternity ward
  
  National breastfeeding recommendations and common breastfeeding problems

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Pia Liljeroth

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Botha, E. & Ryttyläinen-Korhonen, K., 2016. Naisen hoitotyö. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.
  Kapitlen 1-2 och 5.
  ELLER
  Eskola, K. & Hytönen, K., 2002. Nainen hoitotyön asiakkaana. Helsinki: WSOY.
  Kapitlen 4-9.
  
  OCH
  Lindgren, H., Christensson, K. & Dykes, A-K. 2016. Reproduktiv hälsa - barnmorskans kompetensområde. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Kapitel 14 (den normala graviditeten).
  ELLER
  Kaplan, A., Hogg, B., Hildingsson, I. & Lundgren, I. 2009. Lärobok för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  (Eller annan motsvarande i annan bok i obstetrik eller lärobok för barnmorskor).
  
  OCH
  Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. 2015. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-490-8
  OCH
  Klemetti, R. & Raussi-Lehto, E. 2016. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta — seksuaali- ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-174-7
  
  Webbsidor:
  https://www.rfsu.se/
  https://www.folkhalsan.fi/kunskap/kunskapsomraden/kropp-halsa/
  https://www.vaestoliitto.fi/sv/sexualitet/
  
  Övrig litteratur som finns i Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  1. Självstudier
  2. Föreläsningar, obligatorisk närvaro på 75 % av föreläsningarna.
  3. Handlett smågruppsarbete. Gruppindelning görs då kursen startar. Mera information på Moodle.
  4. Kliniska övningar i grupper. Obligatorisk närvaro, gruppindelning görs då kursen startar.
  5. Simulering
  Simuleringen görs i samarbete med kursen USS22KÅ01 Vård av barn, unga och familj. Instruktioner, gruppindelning och uppgifter för simuleringen publiceras på Moodle under kursen Reproduktiv hälsa (instruktionerna publiceras också under kursen Vård av barn, unga och familj).
  Simuleringen är obligatorisk. Om förhandsuppgifterna inte är inlämnade vid ovannämnda datum kan studerande inte delta simuleringen. (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Föreläsningar, kliniska övningar och simulering 1 sp
  Bedöms enligt skalan gk/uk.
  Obligatoriskt deltgande, förhandsuppgifter inlämnade i tid.
  
  Smågruppsarbete 1 sp och skriftlig inämningsuppgift 2 sp
  Bedöms enligt skalan 1-5/uk.
  Bedömning baseras på:
  - Förmåga att kunna sammanfatta relevant data
  - Kritisk reflektion
  - Användning av kurslitteratur
  - Användning av Novias skrivanvisningar (skriftlig inlämningsuppgift)
  - Kreativitet (smågruppsarbete) (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.08.2024 - 15.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-Å
  • USS22D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Pia Liljeroth

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  1. Smågruppsarbete
  Tema för smågruppsarbete presenteras då kursen startar. Närmare instruktioner och gruppindelning finns på Moodle.
  
  2. Simulering
  Förhandsuppgift inlämnad inom utsatt tid och obligatorisk närvaro på plats på Henriksgatan vid simulering.
  Uppgifter om gruppindelning och exakt tidtabell publiceras i Moodle.
  
  3. Kliniska övningar
  Obligatorisk närvaro på plats på Henriksgatan. Material finns på Moodle för förberedelse inför övningarna.
  Uppgifter om gruppindelning och exakt tidtabell publiceras i Moodle.
  
  4. Individuell skriftlig inlämningsuppgift
  Kurserna USS20KÅ02 Reproduktiv hälsa och USS20KÅ01 Vård av barn, unga och familj examineras med en gemensam uppgift. Närmare information om examinationen publiceras i Moodle. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1. Smågruppsarbete lämnas in på Moodle senast 20.9.2024. Studerande ger feedback åt varandra på Moodle senast 6.10.2024. Kursansvarig ger gruppvis feedback på Moodle efter att alla studerande kommenterat alla inlägg.
  
  2. Uppgifter om gruppindelning och exakt tidtabell för simulering publiceras på Moodle.
  
  3. Skriftlig individuell inlämningsuppgift, gemensam uppgift tillsammans med kursen Vård av barn, unga och familj.
  Deadline
  Inlämning 1: 4.10.2024
  Inlämning 2: 15.11.2024
  Studerande får individuell feedback på Moodle. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Smågruppsarbete 27 t
  Simulering och kliniska övningar 7 t
  Föreläsningar 16 t
  Självstudier 58 t (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Skriftlig inämningsuppgift:
  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte
  Texten är fragmentarisk och den besvarar inte frågorna
  Kurslitteraturen används inte
  Reflektioner framförs inte
  Den tekniska utformningen brister
  Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Skriftlig inämningsuppgift:
  Frågorna besvaras vagt och smalt
  Kurslitteraturen refereras
  Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning
  Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Skriftlig inämningsuppgift:
  Frågorna besvaras
  Kurslitteraturen tillämpas
  Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns
  Den tekniska utformningen är god (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Skriftlig inämningsuppgift:
  Frågorna besvaras uttömmande och mångsidigt
  Kurslitteraturen analyseras och tillämpas
  Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk
  Den tekniska utformningen är utmärkt (not translated)

•   Research Methodology USS22KÅ03-3004 01.01.2025-14.03.2025  5 credits  (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - knows the basics of research and development
  - knows and understands basic research methodological concepts and the research process
  - knows and understands central data collection, analysis and reporting methods and is able to apply them in his/her own field of science and profession
  - can apply and evaluate research ethics in research and development activities
  - can write and debate scientifically

  Prerequisites

  Course Introduction to Academic Studies

  Content of the study unit

  The significance of the development and research work and the research process for one's own professional field
  
  Basic concepts of research methodology
  
  Qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods
  
  Scientific reporting
  
  Research ethical principles
  
  Scientific writing and reasoning

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Bell, J., Waters, S. & Nilsson, B. S. (2016). Introduktion till forskningsmetodik (Femte upplagan.). Studentlitteratur.
  
  Henricson, M. (2017). Vetenskaplig teori och metod: Från idé till examination inom omvårdnad (Upplaga 2:1.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  
  Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S. (2021). Forskningsprocessen: Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv (Upplaga 4.). Liber AB.
  
  Höglund-Nielsen, B. & Granskär, M. (2017). Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård (Upplaga 3:1.). Studentlitteratur.
  
  Nyquist, H. & Bränberg, K. (2021). Statistikens grunder: Vetenskap, empiriska undersökningar och statistisk analys (Andra upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  
  Kristensson, J. (2014). Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur & Kultur.
  
  Kostamo, P., Airaksinen T. & Vilkka H. (2022). Kirjoita itsesi asiantuntijaksi - Opas toiminnalliseen opinnäytetyöhön. Art House.
  
  TENK: https://www.tenk.fi/sv (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Föreläsningar
  Workshopar (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Quizarna (3st.) bedöms enligt skalan 0-5, ger 20 % av vitsordet. Poängen på quizarna räknas ihop (0-30 poäng) och ger ett vitsord.
  Individuell uppgift (artikelanalys) bedöms enligt skalan 0-5, ger 30 % av vitsordet.
  Grupprapport bedöms enligt skalan 0-5, ger 50 % av vitsordet.
  
  Bedömning av quizarna:
  <16 poäng = 0
  16-18 poäng = 1
  19-21 poäng = 2
  22-24 poäng = 3
  25-27 poäng = 4
  28-30 poäng = 5
  
  
  Bedömning av gruppuppgiften och individuell uppgiften baseras på:
  - Självstyrdhet, förmåga att samarbeta och ta ansvar
  - Förmåga att kunna analysera och sammanfatta relevant data
  - Förmåga att besvara alla delar i uppgiften
  - Användning av vetenskapliga källor
  - Användning av Novias skrivanvisningar
  
  Bedömningen av examinationsuppgift i kvantitativ metod (modul 5) kommer att finnas på Moodle
  
  För godkänt kursvitsord bör alla deluppgifter vara godkända. Uppgifter ska lämnas in/göras inom utsatt tid. Försenade inlämningar kan sänka vitsordet. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  01.01.2025 - 14.03.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 13.01.2025

  • 5 credits

  Group(s)

  • ÖH23REGUSS-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Additional information

  Workshopar: obligatorisk närvaro
  Alla skriftliga inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras (Ouriginal) (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Quiz 1: Forsknings- och utvecklingsprocessen och -design, deadline 31.1.2025
  Quiz 2: Etik och dataskydd, deadline 31.1.2025
  Quiz 3: Tillförlitlighet, deadline 31.1.2025
  
  Individuell uppgift (artikelanalys), deadline 31.3.2025
  Grupprapport, deadline 31.3.2025 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  5sp=135h
  
  Föreläsningar: 7h
  Workshopar: 12h
  Självstudier: 70h
  Grupparbete: 46h (not translated)

  Content scheduling

  Modul 1: Forsknings- och utvecklingsprocessen och -design
  Modul 2: Etik och dataskydd
  Modul 3: Tillförlitlighet
  Modul 4: Datainsamlingsmetoder
  Modul 5: Dataanalys
  Modul 6: Utvecklingsarbete (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Skriftliga uppgifter (grupp- och individuella uppgifter):
  - Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte
  - Texten är fragmentarisk
  - Vetenskapliga källor används inte eller i lite grad
  - Reflektioner framförs inte
  - Den tekniska utformningen brister
  - Uppgiften innehåller inte alla krävda delar
  - Studerande har inte tagit ansvar och enbart i liten grad deltagit i grupparbete
  
  Quizar: <16p
  
  Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators anvisningar och lämnas in enligt överenskommelse (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Skriftliga uppgifter (grupp- och individuella uppgifter):
  - Frågorna besvaras vagt och smalt
  - Källor refereras men kopplas inte
  - Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning
  - Kopplingen mellan uppgiftens olika delar är bristfällig
  - Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig
  - Studerande har tagit lite ansvar för grupparbete
  
  Quizar:
  16-18p=1
  19-21=2 (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Skriftliga uppgifter (grupp- och individuella uppgifter):
  - Frågorna besvaras
  - Källor tillämpas
  - Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns
  - Goda kopplingar och motiveringar mellan uppgiftens olika delar
  - Den tekniska utformningen är god
  - Studerande har varit ansvarstagande och bidragit till grupparbete framskridit enligt instruktioner
  - Uppgiften lämnas in i rätt form inom utsatt tid
  
  Quizar:
  22-24p=3
  25-27p=4 (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Skriftliga uppgifter (grupp- och individuella uppgifter):
  - Frågorna besvaras uttömmande och mångsidigt
  - Källor analyseras och tillämpas
  - Motiveringar till olika val i processen är uttömmande och arbetets alla delar är kongruenta
  - Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk
  - Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig
  - Uppgiften lämnas in i rätt form inom utsatt tid
  
  Quizar:
  28-30p=5 (not translated)

•   Research Methodology and Care Theory VÅV22UV01-3005 19.05.2025-21.12.2025  7 credits  (USS23F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - knows basic knowledge and science theory
  - can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - know different research methods and how they are used
  - has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
  - can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
  - can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
  - is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Research methodology, research process and care theory
  Qualitative methods
  Quantitative methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  43% Face-to-face, 57% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Other literature see Moodle.
  
  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Assignments
  Qualitative methods: lectures, self-studies, individual interview, and group assignments
  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: based on the written assignments, the student's ability to understand and apply a theoretical approach in health care and selected qualitative research methods.
  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.05.2025 - 21.12.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 18.05.2025

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23F-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Ralf Lillbacka

  Additional information

  Kursen är kopplad till skrivande av examensarbete, samt förutsätter att man har en idé/plan för sitt examensarbete och inleder skrivandet av examensarbetet.
  
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid introduktion av kursen, seminarier och presentationer av examinationsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  4 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.
  
  Reflection report thesis
  Scientific articles assignment
  Moodle-test in information search
  Written exam
  Assignment in qualitative methods
  Assignment in quantitative methods
  Assignment in nursing theories
  
  Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 189 h

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%
  Written assignment: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views, points 70%-89%.
  Written assignment:The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

•   Research methodology and care theory VÅV22UV01-3002 02.09.2024-13.12.2024  7 credits  (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - knows basic knowledge and science theory
  - can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - know different research methods and how they are used
  - has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
  - can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
  - can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
  - is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Research methodology, research process and care theory
  Qualitative methods
  Quantitative methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  43% Face-to-face, 57% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Qualitative methodology:
  Alligood, M. (2022). Nursing Theorists and their work. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. (eller tidigare upplagor)
  
  Birkler, J. (2022). Vetenskapsteori en grundbok. Stockholm: Liber.
  
  Carlsson, T. & Georgsson, S. (2021). Forsknignsetik. Ingår i Oscarsson M & Gerorgsson S. (red.). Etik för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur, s 293- 308.
  
  Forsknignsetiska delegationens dokument tenk.fi
  
  Henricson, M. red. (2023). Vetenskapliglig teori och metod. Från idé till examination inom vård och hälsovetenskaper. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (eller tidigare upplagor)
  
  Lundgren I, et al. (Eds.). (2022). Theories and perspectives for midwifery a Nordic view. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  
  Wiklund Gustin, L. (2012). Omvårdnadsteorier i klinisk praxis. Natur och kultur.
  
  + annan valfri relevant litteratur.
  
  
  Quantitative methodology:
  som bredvidläsning rekommenderas Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, samt av examinator anvisad litteratur

  Learning methods

  Qualitative methods: lectures, written assignments, individual work and group work, tutorials home exam.
  
  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation
  
  Compulsory presence

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  For written assignment 1-4 the grading is Pass/Fail
  See details in Moodle
  For home exam grades 0-5
  
  Quantiative assignment is graded 1-5

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V
  • UBM22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ralf Lillbacka, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  The course is arranged with midwifery students and the public health nurse students together.
  More information about content in Moodle course
  Compulsory presence on some parts mentioned in Moodle.
  
  General feedback to the whole group, individual feedback on request.
  Use Novia instructions for thesis in the assignments.
  AI is not allowed to use unless it is explicitly encouraged.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  4 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Qualitative methods:
  4 assignments pass/ fail, see more details in Moodle
  + home exam 0-5
  Validation according to Novia's general instructions.
  
  Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)
  
  See Novia's instructions for validation

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  The students make an interview on a common topic that is agree on in class.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Deadlines for assignments and home exam in Moodle

  Internationa connections

  Visit from a professor in midwifery from South Africa w 39.
  Then the lectures will be in English

  Student's schedule and workload

  7 credits correspond to 189 hours of work for students.
  
  Qualitative methodology 5cr:
  Introduction 2h, lecture on interview including exercises 4h, research process 4h, qualitative content analysis including exercises 8h, midwifery, nursing or public health theory theory 2h. other: recorded lectures in Moodle, tutorials and individual and group work to be submitted in Moodle.
  
  Quantitative research methodology is 1.5 cr which is equivalent to 40.5 hours work of which 8 are scheduled lectures and seminars and the rest is the students' own work. assignment is submitted on a agreed date after the lectures.

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  A written assignment is failed when it doesn't fulfill the requirements for a passed grade. The requirements for passed grade are available at the Moodlepage designed for the course
  The examination is evaluated based on the answers given and if not the points all together reaches 50% of maximum the examination is failed.
  The quantitative assignment is evaluated similarly, according to the relative proportion of correct answers.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  50-69% correct answers

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  70-89% correct answers

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  90-100% correct answers

•   Research methodology and care theory VÅV22UV01-3001 22.08.2024-22.12.2024  7 credits  (USS22F-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - knows basic knowledge and science theory
  - can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - know different research methods and how they are used
  - has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
  - can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
  - can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
  - is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Research methodology, research process and care theory
  Qualitative methods
  Quantitative methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  43% Face-to-face, 57% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Other literature see Moodle.
  
  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Assignments
  Qualitative methods: lectures, self-studies, individual interview, group assignments and seminar
  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: based on the written assignments, the student's ability to understand and apply a theoretical approach in health care and selected qualitative research methods.
  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  22.08.2024 - 22.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 21.08.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22F-V

  Seats

  10 - 35

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Ralf Lillbacka, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Kursen är kopplad till skrivande av examensarbete, samt förutsätter att man har en idé/plan för sitt examensarbete och inleder skrivandet av examensarbetet.
  
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid introduktion av kursen, seminarier och presentationer av examinationsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  4 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.
  
  Moodle-test in information search
  Reflection report thesis
  Scientific articles assignment
  Written exam
  Assignment in qualitative methods
  Assignment in quantitative methods
  Assignment in nursing theories
  
  Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 189 h

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%
  Written assignment: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views, points 70%-89%.
  Written assignment:The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

•   Research methodology and care theory VÅV22UV01-3003 02.09.2024-22.12.2024  7 credits  (USS22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Student:
  - knows basic knowledge and science theory
  - can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
  - can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
  - understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
  - know different research methods and how they are used
  - has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
  - can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
  - can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
  - is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

  Prerequisites

  VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
  VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

  Content of the study unit

  Research methodology, research process and care theory
  Qualitative methods
  Quantitative methods

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Ann-Louise Glasberg

  Mode of delivery

  72% Face-to-face, 28% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
  Other literature see Moodle.
  
  Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

  Learning methods

  Lectures
  Self-studies
  Assignments
  Qualitative methods: lectures, self-studies, individual interview, group assignments and seminar
  Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: based on the written assignments, the student's ability to understand and apply a theoretical approach in health care and selected qualitative research methods.
  Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 22.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 02.09.2024

  • 7 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS22D-V

  Seats

  10 - 45

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Ann-Louise Glasberg, Ralf Lillbacka

  Additional information

  Kursen är kopplad till skrivande av examensarbete, samt förutsätter att man har en idé/plan för sitt examensarbete och inleder skrivandet av examensarbetet.
  
  Obligatorisk närvaro vid introduktion av kursen, seminarier och presentationer av examinationsuppgifter. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia instructions.

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Topics for thesis.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  See Peppi and Moodle.
  
  Moodle-test in information search
  Reflection report thesis
  Scientific articles assignment
  Written exam
  Assignment in qualitative methods
  Assignment in quantitative methods
  Assignment in nursing theories
  
  Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course.

  Student's schedule and workload

  27 h/cr = 189 h

  Assessment criteria

  Written exam: points < 50%
  Written assignment: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
  Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Written exam: The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views, points 70%-89%.
  Written assignment:The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
  Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%
  Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance.
  
  Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
  Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

•   School- and Student Health Care HVV14KH03-3007 03.02.2025-16.05.2025  6 credits  (UHV21D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student
  - can plan, implement, evaluate and document the client’s/patient’s care in school and student health care
  - can identify pupils’ and students’ resources and health barriers and support their health
  - respects the cultural affiliation of the pupils, students and their families
  - masters safe drug therapy management and vaccination programmes within the field of school and student health care
  - has insight into multiprofessional work and can form networks to promote health and wellbeing among pupils, students and their families

  Prerequisites

  Introduction to public health nursing
  Health promotion skills in family health
  Public health nursing with school children and youth

  Content of the study unit

  Clinical practice in school health care and student health care context

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.02.2025 - 16.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  02.12.2024 - 02.02.2025

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV21D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Frida Gädda

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

•   Starting Points for The Public Health Nurse´s Work at Individual, Group and Community Level HVV22HA01-3002 03.03.2025-04.04.2025  2 credits  (UHV22D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of the legislation, the strategies and the health policy programmes that form the basic principles for public health nurses
  - is well acquainted with the core values and ethical principles in public health nursing
  - knows about the developmental stages of public health nursing
  - understands the significance of social analysis as a main principle in health promotion work
  - has the skills to support health promotion in a multicultural and changing society based on the needs of various population groups
  - can work for sustainable development in public health care work

  Prerequisites

  Study unit VÅV22IN : all courses approved
  Study unit VÅV22GV : all courses approved
  Study unit VÅV22HF : all courses approved
  Study unit VÅV22KV : courses VÅV22KV01-KV14 approved
  Study unit VÅV22PR: courses VÅV22PR01-PR05 approved

  Content of the study unit

  Starting points for the public health nurse´s work at individual, group and community level

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
  
  Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marie Hjortell

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Se närmare Moodle och kursansvarigs anvisningar.
  Artiklar, databaser och aktuella styrdokument. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar
  Diskussion
  Självstudier och basgruppsarbete
  Examination (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Uppgift : styrdokument GK/UK
  Examination bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.03.2025 - 04.04.2025

  Enrollment date range

  03.12.2024 - 28.02.2025

  • 2 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV22D-V

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Frida Gädda, Marie Hjortell

  Additional information

  Obligatoriskt deltagande vid kursintroduktion och examinationstillfälle. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Examination i form av basgruppsarbete vars utformning planeras i samråd med studerandegruppen (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Studerandes arbetsinsats förväntas motvara 27h/sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Ej slutfört examinationsuppgifter och inte deltagit i seminariet (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
  
  Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
  Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och
  
  Kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)

•   Surgical and Perioperative Care USS22KV01-3002 19.08.2024-10.11.2024  6 credits  (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report person-centered/client centrerad care in pre-, peri- and post-operative care and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
  - is competent in surgical and perioperative care and has mastered central evidence based and sustainable care methods and can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments and knows how to prevent complications
  - can guide the patient pre- and postoperatively and understands the chain of care
  - masters aseptics in pre-, peri- and post-operative care and understand the nurse's responsibility in preventing the spread of infection
  - is able to plan, execute and evaluate safe medication management in surgical and perioperative care
  - can account for various surgical health hindrance, health resources, illness, examinations and treatments
  - can account for various types of anesthesia and analgesia and explains how they affect the patient's vital functions

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Care of patients with central surgical health hindrance/illnesses pre-, intra- and post-operatively
  
  The central clinical examinations and functional measurements, evidence-based sustainable patient-centered care and rehabilitation methods
  
  Person-centered care process
  
  Patient safety and aseptics in pre-, peri-, and post-operative care
  Care of acute wounds
  
  Medication management in pre-operative and post-operative care
  
  The central surgical diseases (gastro-surgery, orthopedics, urology, gynecology, thoracic and vascular surgery)
  
  The central anesthetic and analgesic types

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Hanna Limnell

  Mode of delivery

  17% Face-to-face, 83% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Kirurgiskt vårdarbete:
  Ahonen, Blek-Vehkaluoto, Buure, Ekola, Partamies, Sulosaari, 2019. Kliininen hoitotyö. (Tillämpliga delar)
  Almås, H. et al (red.) 2011. Klinisk omvårdnad 1 & 2. (Tillämpliga delar)
  Andersson, R. et al. (red.) 2012. Kirurgiska sjukdomar.
  Anttila, V-J. et al (red.) 2019. Hoitoon liittyvien infektioiden torjunta. Del III, kap. 14-19.
  Boman, L. &Wikström, C. 2020. Medicinsk teknik.
  Cox, C.L. (red.). 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor.
  Ellergård, L. 2019. Klinisk nutrition. Kap. 4 Bedömning av nutritionsstatus och Kap. 6 Kirurgi
  Hamberger, B. & Haglund U. (red.) 2017. Kirurgi. (Eller motsvarande bok i kirurgi(svenska/finska/engelska))
  Hotus-hoitosuositus 2013: Aikuispotilaan kirurgisen toimenpiteen jälkeisen lyhytkestoisen kivun hoitotyö.
  Järhult, J., Offenbartl, K. & Andersson, M. 2019. Kirurgiboken : vård av patienter med kirurgiska, urologiska och ortopediska sjukdomar.
  Klang, B. et al. 2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnande. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Kap. 20. Pre- och postoperativ omvårdnad.
  Kumlien, C. & Rystedt, J. (red.) 2022 (eller äldre). Omvårdnad & kirurgi.
  Lindwall L. (red.) 2012. Omvårdnad vid kirurgiska sjukdomar.
  Saano & Taam-Ukkonen, 2020. Lääkehoidon käsikirja, Sanoma Pro. Kivun lääkehoito Kap 5 s. 477-493
  Svensen, C. &Hjelmqvist, H. 2014. Vätsketerapi. Kap. 5
  
  Läkemedelsboken https://lakemedelsboken.se/
  Medibas (Databas) --> Kirurgi, Gynekologi
  Terveysportti: Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja och Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja
  Material i Moodle samt aktuella evidensbaserade artiklar.
  
  Perioperativt vårdarbete:
  Alahuhta, S. et.al (red.) 2016. Peruselintoimintojen häiriöt ja niiden hoito. Kap. 11.05-11.15 Perioperatiivinen nestehoito.
  Anttila, V-J. et. al. (red.)2019. Kap III Leikkaustoimintaan liittyvien infektioiden torjunta och kap. IV/28 Anestesiaan ja puudutuksiin liittyvät infektiot.
  Hotus-hoitosuositus 2022: Aikuispotilaan normotermian ylläpito perioperatiivisen hoitoprosessin aikana
  Hovind, I. (red.) 2013 . Anestesiologisk omvårdnad. DEL II-III.
  Ilola, T. et.al (red.) 2013. Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja. (Terveysportti/Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat.)
  Karma, A., Kinnunen, T., Palovaara, M. 2016. Perioperatiivinen hoitotyö.
  Lindahl, S. (red.) 2016 Anestesi eller motsvarande bok i anestesiologi på svenska finska eller engelska.
  Lindwall, L.,Prost, I. 2008. Perioperativ vård : att förena teori och praxis.
  Myklestul Dåvoy G., Hege Eide, P. & Hansen, I. (red.) 2013. Operationssjukvård. Operationssjuksköterskans perioperativa omvårdnad.
  Svensén, C. & Hjelmqvist, H. 2014. Vätsketerapi. Kap. 5 Perioperativ vätskebehandling.
  Terveysportti, Anestesiahoitotyön käsikirja, 2013.
  - Happeutuminen ja ventilaatio
  - Sydämen toiminta ja verenkierto
  - Luvun Kanyloinnit ja invasiivinen monitorointi osat Kanyloinnin perusteet ja ääreislaskimon kanylointi
  - Luvun Kivun hoito osat Leikkauspotilaan kivunhoidon periaatteet, Kivun arviointi, Kivun
  lääkehoito
  Medibas (Databas), Kirurgi --> Anestesi
  Material i Moodle.
  Aktuella artiklar.
  
  Sårvård:
  Lindholm, C. (2018). Sår (Fjärde upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  Juutilainen, V., & Hietanen, H.(2018). Haavanhoidon periaatteet (4., uudistettu painos.). Sanoma Pro Oy. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Instuderingsfrågor
  Föreläsningar
  Work Shop
  Case simulering (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Sårvård kunskapstest GK/UK. Självrättande tent.
  Work shop i kirurgiskt vårdarbete GK/UK Muntlig feedback ges under tillfället.
  Simulation i kirurgiskt vårdarbete GK/UK Muntlig feedback ges under tillfället.
  Inlärningsdagbok del 1-3 0-5 Studerande får bedömning och skriftlig feedback om alla inlämnade delar i Moodle. Helhetsvitsord blir medeltal av de tre inlämnade delar. Alla delar ska vara godkända för att studerande är GK. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  19.08.2024 - 10.11.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 18.08.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS23D-Å
  • UHV23D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Åbo - timlärare Vård

  Additional information

  Veckovis kursstruktur för kurs och inlärningsdagbok publiceras i Moodle i augusti.
  Alla skriftliga inlämningar i Moodle plagiatkontrolleras (Ouriginal). (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Kursintroduktion 22.8. 2024
  Instuderingsfrågor i kirurgi och anestesiologi
  Inlärningsdagbok
  Obligatorisk work shop i kirurgiskt vårdarbete
  Obligatorisk case simulering
  Obligatorisk work shop i sårvård
  Kunskapstest i sårvård (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Inlämning av instuderingsfrågor 1.9.2024
  Inlämning av inlärningsdagbok del 1 22.9., del 2 13.10, del 3 10.11.
  Obligatorisk WS 1 i preoperativt vårdarbete 5.9.
  Obligatorisk WS 2 i postoperativt vårdarbete och sårvård 9.9.
  Obligatorisk WS 3 i kirurgiskt vårdarbete (case) 21.10.
  Obligatorisk case simulering 23.10.
  Kunskapstest i sårvård vecka 38 (GK/UK, minst 60 % måste vara rätt) (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  1 sp = 27h 6 sp = 162h
  Work shop x 3 + Simulation x1: 12 h
  Självstudier i sårvård + kunskapstest 27 h
  Självstudier med instuderingsfrågor 40 h
  Självstudier med inlärningsdagbok 83 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredsställande nivå och inlärningsdagbokens delar är inte inlämnade i utsatta tider eller delarna innehåller plagiat. Inlärningsdagboken följer inte Novias skrivanvisningar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar, men delarna relateras inte till varandra.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidesbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan ytligt tillämpa dem i examination.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan ytligt beakta dem i examination.
  Studerande kan bristfälligt beskriva den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och men egna reflektioner fattas.
  Studerande använder litteratur men har inte förmåga att använda evidensbaserade källor.
  Inlärningsdagboken följer Novias skrivanvisningar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande svarar på alla uppgiftens delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidesbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i examination.
  Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan beakta dem i examination.
  Studerande kan beskriva den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerande påvisar kunnandet i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och kan göra i viss mån egna reflektioner.
  Studerande använder kurslitteratur och har förmåga att använda andra evidensbaserade källor.
  Inlärningsdagboken följer Novias skrivanvisningar. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå alla uppgiftens delar och kan relatera dem till varandra.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i person/klientcentrerad kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, centrala evidesbaserade vårdmetoder, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, behandlingar och i förebyggande av komplikationer samt kan tillämpa dem i examination.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i kirurgiska sjukdomar/hälsohinder, hälsoresurser, sjukdomar, undersökningar och behandlingar samt i anestesi- och analgesiformer och kan tillämpa dem i examination.
  Studerande kan beskriva utförligt den kirurgiska patientens vårdprocess under pre- peri och postoperativa vården i relation med patient handledning och sjukskötarens andra uppgifter.
  Studerande har djupa kunskaper i säker läkemedelsbehandling i det kirurgiska och perioperativa vårdarbetet.
  Studerande beaktar etik och aseptik och gör mångsidiga egna reflektioner.
  Studerande använder mångsidigt litteratur och evidensbaserade vårdvetenskapliga artiklar som diskuterar med varandra.
  Inlärningsdagboken följer Novias skrivanvisningar. (not translated)

•   Swedish USS22IV03-3005 09.09.2024-15.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to communicate coherently and in a professional manner both orally and in writing
  - demonstrates appropriate knowledge of the process of academic writing and a proper use of references
  - can search for information and report in accordance with the rules for Novia's writing instructions

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Producing recipient-friendly writing by considering linguistic advice and linguistic correctness
  
  Different language styles and recognizing the difference between refined and unrefined use of Swedish
  
  Oral communication and oral presentations
  
  Novia's requirements for academic writing
  
  Novia's writing instructions

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marika Rask

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Svenska skrivregler 2017 Svenska språknämnden. Fjärde upplagan. Stockholm: Liber
  Största delen av det studiematerial som behövs för kursen hittas i Moodle.
  En del av materialet för de olika temaområdena öppnas vartefter kursen framskrider.
  Tidtabell och kursprogram presenteras vid det första närundervisningstillfället. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier och lärarledd handledning
  Individuella, par- och gruppvisa arbeten
  Muntliga presentationer
  Kurstent (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursen bedöms med vitsordet 0-5.
  Kursvitsordet baserar sig på den studerandes aktivitet, inlämningsuppgifter, muntlig presentation och kurstent.
  Försenad inlämning av uppgifter sänker kursvitsordet.
  Studerande som fått sin skolbildning (grundskola åk 1-9 och/ eller gymnasium) på annat språk än svenska behöver (utöver kursvitsord i svenska) också få separata vitsord i både muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper i svenska. Kontakta kursansvarig ifråga om dessa. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  09.09.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 04.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marika Rask

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Utvärdering av kurstent samt kursaktivitet, kursuppgifter och muntliga anföranden. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1. Onsdag 16.10.2024 Kurstentamen
  2. Allmänt omtentamenstillfälle 25.10.2024 fre kl 12-16 (Kräver förhandsanmälan)
  3. Allmänt omtentamenstillfälle 22.11.2024 fre kl 12-16 (Kräver förhandsanmälan)
  
  Information på Intranätet om hur du anmäler dig till allmänt omtentamenstillfälle:
  https://intra.novia.fi/studier/oppen-yh-studerande/omtentamen/
  
  Ogjorda kursuppgifter tas emot fram till 1.5.2025.
  Kursen ska avläggas med godkänt vitsord senast 15.5.2025.
  Vid behov går den studerande om kursen vid ett senare tillfälle om inte annat överenskommits med kursansvarig. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Närstudier 20 h
  Skriftliga uppgifter 18 h
  Muntlig framställning 8 h
  Självstudier 30 h
  Kurstent 10 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Den studerande är underkänd i kursen om:
  - kurstenten är underkänd
  - kursuppgifter är ogjorda eller underkända senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - den studerandes språk är mycket svagt och innehåller mycket grava språk- och skrivfel
  - den studerande inte använder sig av och inte kan hänvisa till källmaterial
  - den studerande har knappt deltagit i kursen
  - den studerandes arbetsinsats är obetydlig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  För vitsordet 1-2 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd
  - alla kursuppgifter är gjorda och inlämnade senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i den studerandes arbeten är begripligt men många språk- och skrivfel förekommer
  - att den studerande använder sig av och hänvisar till källor enligt givna anvisningar
  - den studerande deltar i liten omfattning i kursen
  - den studerandes självständiga arbetsinsats är liten. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  För vitsordet 3-4 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd och motsvarar vitsordet goda kunskaper
  - alla kursuppgifter är gjorda och inlämnade senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i både tal och skrift är smidigt och gott, även om språkfel förekommer
  - layouten i den studerandes arbeten följer givna anvisningar
  - den studerande använder sig av relevanta källor mångsidigt och väl,
  - - den studerande deltar aktivt i kursen
  - den studerande arbetar rätt självständigt men kan samarbeta, tar hänsyn till sina kurskamrater och utför sin del av arbetet också i grupp. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  För vitsordet 5 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd med ett mycket gott eller berömligt vitsord.
  - alla kursuppgifter är gjorda och inlämnade senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i både tal och skrift är nyanserat, smidigt och så gott som felfritt
  - layouten i den studerandes arbeten följer givna anvisningar
  - källmaterialet för uppgifterna är relevant och välvalt och används på ett mångsidigt och korrekt sätt
  - den studerande deltar aktivt i kursen
  - den studerande arbetar självständigt men kan samarbeta, tar hänsyn till, stödjer vid behov sina kurskamrater och utför sin del av arbetet också i grupp.
  - den studerande är innovativ och positiv. (not translated)

•   Swedish USS22IV03-3006 02.09.2024-13.12.2024  3 credits  (USS24F-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to communicate coherently and in a professional manner both orally and in writing
  - demonstrates appropriate knowledge of the process of academic writing and a proper use of references
  - can search for information and report in accordance with the rules for Novia's writing instructions

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Producing recipient-friendly writing by considering linguistic advice and linguistic correctness
  
  Different language styles and recognizing the difference between refined and unrefined use of Swedish
  
  Oral communication and oral presentations
  
  Novia's requirements for academic writing
  
  Novia's writing instructions

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marika Rask

  Mode of delivery

  34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

  Learning material

  Svenska skrivregler 2017 Svenska språknämnden. Fjärde upplagan. Stockholm: Liber
  Sommardahl, Eivor (2012): Klarspråk i kommunen. Kommunförbundet
  Största delen av det studiematerial som behövs för kursen hittas i Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kursmaterialet finns på Moodle och på nätet
  Individuella övningsuppgifter
  Muntlig presentation
  Kurstent (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursen bedöms med vitsordet 0-5.
  Kurstenten (del 1 och 2) utgör 80 % av kursvitsordet och bedöms med vitsordet 0-5. Kursvitsordet påverkas även av kursaktivitet och gjorda kursuppgifter samt av den muntliga presentationen.
  Studerande som fått sin skolbildning (Grundskola åk 1-9 och/ eller gymnasium) på annat språk än svenska behöver (utöver kursvitsord i svenska) också få separata vitsord i både muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper i svenska. Kontakta kursansvarig ifråga om dessa. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 13.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 10.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24F-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marika Rask

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Inlämningsuppgifter, muntligt anförande samt kurstent. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen ska avläggas med godkänt vitsord senast 15.5.2025.
  Den studerande har rätt att skriva kurstentamen vid följande tre tillfällen:
  - Kurstentamen onsdag 13.11.2024
  
  Allmänt omtentamenstillfälle för alla studerande vid Novia:
  - Fredag 22.11.2024 kl 12-16 (kräver förhandsanmälan i Peppi)
  - Fredag 13.12.2024 kl 12-16 (kräver förhandsanmälan i Peppi)
  
  Läs här hur du anmäler dig till ett allmänt omtentamenstillfälle:
  https://intra.novia.fi/studier/oppen-yh-studerande/omtentamen/ (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Närstudier 12 h
  Muntlig presentation 10 h
  Självstudier 48 h
  Kurstentamen 10 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Den studerande är underkänd i kursen om:
  - kurstenten är underkänd
  - den studerande inte hållit den muntliga presentationen som hör till kursen
  - språket i den studerandes inlämningsuppgifter är mycket svagt och språk- och skrivfel gör innehållet svårbegripligt.
  - den studerande inte kan använda och hänvisa till källor enligt givna anvisningar
  - den studerande enbart läser innantill vid muntlig presentation
  - den studerandes arbetsinsats är obetydlig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  För vitsordet 1-2 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd med vitsordet 1 eller 2.
  - språket i den studerandes inlämningsuppgifter är begripligt, även om språk- och skrivfel förekommer
  - den studerande har använt källmaterial och kan hänvisa till detta enligt anvisningar
  - den studerande inte läser innantill vid muntlig presentation och framförandet är nöjaktigt
  - den studerandes egna arbetsinsats är liten. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  För vitsordet 3-4 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd med vitsordet 3 eller 4
  - kursuppgifter har lämnats in senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i inlämningsuppgifter är smidigt och gott, även om enstaka språkfel förekommer
  - den studerande kan hänvisa till källor mångsidigt och väl
  - den studerande har förberett den muntliga presentationen väl och framförandet är mycket gott
  - den studerande är aktiv och kan fungera självständigt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  För vitsordet 5 krävs att:
  - vitsordet i kurstenten är minst 4,5.
  - kursuppgifter har lämnats in senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i inlämningsuppgifter är nyanserat, smidigt och så gott som felfritt
  - den studerande kan använda sig av olika källor på ett mångsidigt och korrekt sätt
  - den studerande har förberett den muntliga presentationen väl och framförandet är mycket gott
  - den studerande fungerar självständigt
  - den studerande är aktiv, innovativ och samarbetar i god anda. (not translated)

•   Swedish USS22IV03-3009 12.03.2025-31.05.2025  3 credits  (USS242D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - is able to communicate coherently and in a professional manner both orally and in writing
  - demonstrates appropriate knowledge of the process of academic writing and a proper use of references
  - can search for information and report in accordance with the rules for Novia's writing instructions

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Producing recipient-friendly writing by considering linguistic advice and linguistic correctness
  
  Different language styles and recognizing the difference between refined and unrefined use of Swedish
  
  Oral communication and oral presentations
  
  Novia's requirements for academic writing
  
  Novia's writing instructions

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Marika Rask

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Svenska skrivregler 2017 Svenska språknämnden. Fjärde upplagan. Stockholm: Liber
  Sommardahl, Eivor (2012): Klarspråk i kommunen. Kommunförbundet
  Största delen av det studiematerial som behövs för kursen hittas i Moodle. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Kursmaterialet finns på Moodle och på nätet
  Individuella övningsuppgifter
  Muntlig presentation
  Kurstent (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Kursen bedöms med vitsordet 0-5.
  Kurstenten (del 1 och 2) utgör 80 % av kursvitsordet och bedöms med vitsordet 0-5. Kursvitsordet påverkas även av kursaktivitet och gjorda kursuppgifter samt av den muntliga presentationen.
  Studerande som fått sin skolbildning (Grundskola åk 1-9 och/ eller gymnasium) på annat språk än svenska behöver (utöver kursvitsord i svenska) också få separata vitsord i både muntliga och skriftliga kunskaper i svenska. Kontakta kursansvarig ifråga om dessa. (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  12.03.2025 - 31.05.2025

  Enrollment date range

  05.12.2024 - 11.03.2025

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS242D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Marika Rask

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Inlämningsuppgifter, muntligt anförande samt kurstent. (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kursen ska avläggas med godkänt vitsord senast 15.5.2025.
  Den studerande har rätt att skriva kurstentamen vid följande tre tillfällen:
  - Kurstentamen tisdag 29.4.2025
  
  Allmänt omtentamenstillfälle för alla studerande vid Novia:
  - Fredag 9.5.2025 kl 12-16 (kräver förhandsanmälan i Peppi)
  - Fredag 23.5.2025 kl 12-16 (kräver förhandsanmälan i Peppi)
  
  Läs här hur du anmäler dig till ett allmänt omtentamenstillfälle:
  https://intra.novia.fi/studier/oppen-yh-studerande/omtentamen/ (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Närstudier 12 h
  Muntlig presentation 10 h
  Självstudier 48 h
  Kurstentamen 10 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Den studerande är underkänd i kursen om:
  - kurstenten är underkänd
  - den studerande inte hållit den muntliga presentationen som hör till kursen
  - språket i den studerandes inlämningsuppgifter är mycket svagt och språk- och skrivfel gör innehållet svårbegripligt.
  - den studerande inte kan använda och hänvisa till källor enligt givna anvisningar
  - den studerande enbart läser innantill vid muntlig presentation
  - den studerandes arbetsinsats är obetydlig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  För vitsordet 1-2 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd med vitsordet 1 eller 2.
  - språket i den studerandes inlämningsuppgifter är begripligt, även om språk- och skrivfel förekommer
  - den studerande har använt källmaterial och kan hänvisa till detta enligt anvisningar
  - den studerande inte läser innantill vid muntlig presentation och framförandet är nöjaktigt
  - den studerandes egna arbetsinsats är liten. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  För vitsordet 3-4 krävs att:
  - kurstenten är godkänd med vitsordet 3 eller 4
  - kursuppgifter har lämnats in senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i inlämningsuppgifter är smidigt och gott, även om enstaka språkfel förekommer
  - den studerande kan hänvisa till källor mångsidigt och väl
  - den studerande har förberett den muntliga presentationen väl och framförandet är mycket gott
  - den studerande är aktiv och kan fungera självständigt. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  För vitsordet 5 krävs att:
  - vitsordet i kurstenten är minst 4,5.
  - kursuppgifter har lämnats in senast vid sista inlämningsdatum
  - språket i inlämningsuppgifter är nyanserat, smidigt och så gott som felfritt
  - den studerande kan använda sig av olika källor på ett mångsidigt och korrekt sätt
  - den studerande har förberett den muntliga presentationen väl och framförandet är mycket gott
  - den studerande fungerar självständigt
  - den studerande är aktiv, innovativ och samarbetar i god anda. (not translated)

•   The Interprofessional Social- and Health Care USS22IV02-3006 07.10.2024-15.12.2024  4 credits  (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of his/her own professional field and its basic concepts
  - has an understanding of the structure, services, organisation and future vision of the social- and health care system
  - has competencies in care in various
  sustainable service environments
  - has an understanding of the social and health care legislation
  - has fundamental skills in inter-professional work

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Healthcare in Finland
  
  The importance of nursing and health care profession
  
  Management structures, different service environments and systems
  
  Future visions
  
  General legislation within social and health care, principles of patient and client safety
  
  Interprofessional work

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Willman A. & Andersson Å. 2021. Sjuksköteska. Ett jobb för livet.
  Dahlborg-Lyckehage (red). 2018. Att bli sjuksköterska - en introduktion till yrke och ämne
  Klang et al. 2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnande. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Personcentering ...
  Crawford, K. 2012. Interprofessional Collaboration in Social Work Practice.
  Kline, R. & Preston-Shot, M. 2012. Professional Accountability in social Care and Health.
  Quinney, A. & Hafford-Letchfield, T. 2012. Interprofessional Social Work: Effective Collaborative Approaches
  Reeves, S., Lewin, S., Espin, S. & Zwarenstein, M. 2010. Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social
  Care.
  Thylefors, I. 2013. Babels torn - Om tvärprofessionellt teamsamarbete.
  Juslin E., Liljeroth P. & Vaartio-Rajalin H. 2013. Resursförstärkande mångprofessionell yrkespraxis; social- och hälsovårdsutbildning i utveckling
  Tuomela, K. 2017 Moniammatillinen oppiminen yhteistyöosaamisen edistäjänä terveydenhuollossa
  Källa: Hoitotiede. 29/4.
  Pohjola A. m.fl. 2017. Asiakkaasta kehittäjäksi ja vaikuttajaksi. Asiakkaiden osallisuuden muutos sosiaali- ja terveyspalveluissa.
  https://stm.fi/sv/social-och-halsotjanster
  övrig material som ges under kursen
  Artiklar och databaser
  Litteratur och material angående moodlekursen i lagstiftning anges skilt (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Intervju och seminarium, obligatorisk närvaro
  Föreläsningar
  Lagstiftningsdelen, huvudsakligen som Moodlekurs, men även handledningstillfällen med framföranden obligatorisk närvaro
  Interprofessionellt dag 21.11.2024 med socionomstuderande från Yh Novia. Obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Moodlekurs i lagstiftning. Bedömningsskala: 0 -5. Skilda anvisingar vid kursstart och på Moodle.
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - Inlämning av uppgifterna i den angivna tiden.
  - Mångsidig kunskap i lagstiftning och servicesystem inom social- och hälsovården i
  förhållande till givna uppgifter och case
  - Tillämpning av lagar till praktiken
  - Studerandes förmåga att lösa uppgifter och case ur ett helhetsperspektiv.
  - Ett gott etiskt förhållningssätt i relation till uppgifter och case skall tydligt framgå i den
  skriftliga delen
  - Studerandes förmåga till reflektivt tänkande
  - Arbetet skrivet enligt YH Novias skrivanvisningar
  
  2) Intervju och seminariet. Bedömningsskala GK/UK.
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - gjorda intervjufrågor och intervjuer
  - sammanställning av en presentation
  - presentation och deltagande i seminariet
  - inlämning till Moodle i angivna tiden.
  
  3) Interprofessionellt samarbete (med socionomstudernade). Bedömningsskala GK/UK.
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - studerande har deltagit i utformandet av grupparbetet
  - förmåga att sammanfatta och reflektera
  - professionellt och etiskt förhållningsätt (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  07.10.2024 - 15.12.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS24D-Å
  • UHV24D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Intervju och seminarium, obligatorisk närvaro
  Föreläsningar
  Lagstiftningsdelen, huvudsakligen som Moodlekurs, men även handledningstillfällen med framföranden obligatorisk närvaro
  Interprofessionellt dag 21.11.2024 med socionomstuderande från Yh Novia. Obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Moodlekurs i lagsftning är öppen under veckorna 43-49. Uppgifterna görs parvis. Inlämningar: 30.10.2024 och 5.12.2024.
  2) Interprofessionell dag 21.11.2024. Obligatorisk närvaro.
  3) Intervju av t.ex. en sjukskötare eller hälsovårdare; inlämning 17.11.2024. Muntlig respons under seminarium 19.1.2024 (gruppondelning till två). Intervjun görs parvis. (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar, handledningar, intervju och seminarium 1 sp
  Lagstiftningsdelen med handledningar, Moodlekurs 2,5 sp
  Interprofessionellt samarbete med socionomstuderande från Yh Novia 0,5 sp (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Arbetet är inte inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande har inte följt anvisningarna för uppgiften eller för det skriftliga arbetet och innehållsmässigt finns många fel och brister. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Arbetet är inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Studernade har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Arbetet är inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen och lagstiftningen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet . Studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Det skriftliga arbetet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt, tillämpning) (not translated)

•   The Interprofessional Social- and Health Care USS22IV02-3010 03.12.2024-31.01.2025  4 credits  (USS242D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of his/her own professional field and its basic concepts
  - has an understanding of the structure, services, organisation and future vision of the social- and health care system
  - has competencies in care in various
  sustainable service environments
  - has an understanding of the social and health care legislation
  - has fundamental skills in inter-professional work

  Prerequisites

  No preliminary requirements

  Content of the study unit

  Healthcare in Finland
  
  The importance of nursing and health care profession
  
  Management structures, different service environments and systems
  
  Future visions
  
  General legislation within social and health care, principles of patient and client safety
  
  Interprofessional work

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Josephine Åberg

  Mode of delivery

  50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

  Learning material

  På svenska
  Willman A. & Andersson Å. 2021. Sjuksköteska. Ett jobb för livet.
  Dahlborg-Lyckehage (red). 2018. Att bli sjuksköterska - en introduktion till yrke och ämne
  Klang et al. 2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnande. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson.
  Personcentering ...
  Crawford, K. 2012. Interprofessional Collaboration in Social Work Practice.
  Kline, R. & Preston-Shot, M. 2012. Professional Accountability in social Care and Health.
  Quinney, A. & Hafford-Letchfield, T. 2012. Interprofessional Social Work: Effective Collaborative Approaches
  Reeves, S., Lewin, S., Espin, S. & Zwarenstein, M. 2010. Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social
  Care.
  Thylefors, I. 2013. Babels torn - Om tvärprofessionellt teamsamarbete.
  Juslin E., Liljeroth P. & Vaartio-Rajalin H. 2013. Resursförstärkande mångprofessionell yrkespraxis; social- och hälsovårdsutbildning i utveckling
  Tuomela, K. 2017 Moniammatillinen oppiminen yhteistyöosaamisen edistäjänä terveydenhuollossa
  Källa: Hoitotiede. 29/4.
  Pohjola A. m.fl. 2017. Asiakkaasta kehittäjäksi ja vaikuttajaksi. Asiakkaiden osallisuuden muutos sosiaali- ja terveyspalveluissa.
  https://stm.fi/sv/social-och-halsotjanster
  övrig material som ges under kursen
  Artiklar och databaser
  Litteratur och material angående moodlekursen i lagstiftning anges skilt (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Intervju och deltagande i Moodle diskussion
  Föreläsningar
  Lagstiftningsdel - huvudsak distansuppgifter och självstudier kring material som publicerats på Moodle (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Lagstiftninga uppgft. Bedömningsskala: 0 -5. Skilda anvisingar vid kursstart och på Moodle.
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - Inlämning av uppgifterna i den angivna tiden.
  - Mångsidig kunskap i lagstiftning och servicesystem inom social- och hälsovården i
  förhållande till givna uppgifter och case
  - Tillämpning av lagar till praktiken
  - Studerandes förmåga att lösa uppgifter och case ur ett helhetsperspektiv.
  - Ett gott etiskt förhållningssätt i relation till uppgifter och case skall tydligt framgå i den
  skriftliga delen
  - Studerandes förmåga till reflektivt tänkande
  - Arbetet skrivet enligt YH Novias skrivanvisningar
  
  2) Tankekartor kring olika lagar: Bedömningsskala: GK/UK
  - Gjorda uppgifter, där alla frågeställningar besvaras
  - Aktivt deltagande i seminarim på campus i januari
  
  2) Sjukskötarensprofession och interprofessionellt arbete. Bedömningsskala GK/UK.
  Bedömningskriterier:
  - gjorda intervjufrågor och intervjuer
  - Startat en diskussion på Moodle inom utsatt tid
  - Kommenterat andra anförande (minst tre stycken)
  
  Kursen är uppdelad i flera delar /inlämningar. DEL 1 i lagstiftningsuppgiften utgör för 100% av slutvitsordet i kursen För att få ett slutbetyg måste alla delar och uppgifter vara genomförda (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  03.12.2024 - 31.01.2025

  Enrollment date range

  15.11.2024 - 03.12.2024

  • 4 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS242D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig Josephine Åberg
  
  Notera att alla närstudietillfällen är obligatoriska. (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Intervju
  Föreläsningar
  Lagstiftningsdelen, huvudsakligen som Moodlekurs, men även handledningstillfällen (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  1) Uppgifter kring lagstiftning Inlämning 6.1.2025.
  2) WS kring olika lagar, med förberedande uppgift. Inlämning 15.1.2025.
  2) Intervju; inlämning 19.1.2025. Diskussion online 21.1-28.1.2025
  
  Se på kursens Moodle sida, närmare information om examinationer och tidtabell (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar, handledningar, intervju kring sjusköskötarens profession och interprofessionellt arbete 1 sp
  Lagstiftningsdelen, 2,5 sp (Del 1: 2 sp och Del 2: 1 sp)
  
  En studiepoäng motsvarar ungefär 27 arbetstimmar (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Arbetet är inte inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande har inte följt anvisningarna för uppgiften eller för det skriftliga arbetet. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Arbetet är inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Studernade har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Arbetet är inlämnad inom den angivna tiden. Studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen och lagstiftningen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet . Studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella. Studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Det skriftliga arbetet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt, tillämpning) (not translated)

•   The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse HVV22GV01-3003 02.09.2024-25.10.2024  6 credits  (UHV24D-V) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  - has knowledge of their own professional field, the history and development of caring science
  - has knowledge of and can reflect on basic concepts in caring science
  - knows the basic competence requirements for their own profession
  - understand the importance of evidence-based care
  - can describe the organization of social and health care in Finland and the legislation that governs the activities
  - has knowledge of service systems and the patient's / client's social benefits
  - have basic skills in interprofessional work
  - understands and can reflect on ethical guidelines and profession-specific ethical codes and can in his future profession work on the basis of these
  - understands the importance of culture in healthcare and can take this in consideration in the encounters with clients/patients from different cultures
  - has knowledge about The Agenda for Sustainable Development 2030 and its implementation at Novia
  - is aware of the importance of internal sustainability based on the demands placed on the profession and can maintain good health

  Prerequisites

  No prior knowledge required

  Content of the study unit

  Caring science knowledge and evidence as a basis for care
  The importance of the nursing and public health nursing profession
  Work areas of nurse and public health nurse
  Health care in Finland
  Management structures, different sustainable service environments and service systems
  General laws in social and health care
  Interprofessional work
  The client's / patient's position and rights
  Ethical guidelines and codes
  Professional encounters
  Person centered care
  Intercultural care
  Internal sustainability in the profession

  Assessment criteria

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
  
  The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
  
  Assessment criteria for written work
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Criteria for evaluation of the exam
  The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
  
  Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)
  
  The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Anita Wikberg

  Mode of delivery

  67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

  Learning material

  NURSING SCIENCE
  Alligood, M. R. (2014). Nursing theorists and their work (Eighth edition.). Elsevier.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  kapitel 1-3, 5
  Erikssson, K. m.fl. 2012. Hoitotiede, Helsinki: Sanoma pro OY.
  Eriksson, K. 2018. Vårdvetenskap. Vetenskapen om vårdandet - om dettidlösa i tiden. (Samlingsverk.) Stockhom: Liber AB.
  Rehnsfeldt, A. & Arman, M. (red.). 2020. Klinisk vårdvetenskap. Vårdande på teoretisk grund. Stockholm: Liber Ab.
  Wiklund, L. 2003. Vårdvetenskap i klinisk praxis. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
  
  NURSING ETHICS
  Sandman.L. & Kjellström.S. 2013. Etikboken. Etik för vårdande yrken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Arman, M., Dahlberg, K. & Ekebergh, M., red. 2015. Teoretiska grunder för vårdande. Stockholm: Liber.
  kapitel 4.
  
  INTERCULTURAL NURSING CARE
  Abdelhamid, P., Juntunen, A. & Koskinen, L. 2009. Monikulttuurinen hoitotyö. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
  Ahmadi, F. 2008. Kultur och hälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ekblad, S, (red.).Hälsa och mångfald: ett kliniskt perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
  Hanssen, I. 2007. Omvårdnad i ett mångkulturellt samhälle. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Herlitz, G. 2006. Kulturgrammatik - hur du ökar din förmåga att umgås över kulturgränserna. Malmö: Liber.
  Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. 2011. Organisationer och kulturer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Holland, K. & Hogg, C. 2010. Cultural awareness in nursing and health care: an introductory text. London: Hodder Arnold.
  Kersey-Matusiak,G. 2015. Kulturkompetent omvårdnad. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  Ritter, L.A. & Graham, D.H. 2017. Multicultural Health. Burlington, MA, USA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M.F. & Bursey, E. (Eds.) 2017. World religions for healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Routledge: Oxon.
  Wellman
  + links on Moodle

  Learning methods

  lectures, groupwork, tutorials, online tests, and workshops

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Nursing ethics assessed pass/fail
  
  The assignment (nursing science + interultural nursing) is assessed with grades 0-5
  21-24=1
  25-28=2
  29-32=3
  33-36=4
  37-40=5
  
  Criteria for evaluation Max score 40:
  - Have chosen a relevant term and described it 10
  - Referred to one of the recommended books on each subject of health sciences and
  intercultural care 2
  - Described the culture, ethnic group 10
  - Referred to a scientific article/study (peer reviewed) on the chosen culture and concept e.g. health of Vietnamese. Told about the result 3
  - Interviewed a person from a culture other than their own. Told about the result. The questions in Annex. 2
  - Reflection 3
  - Followed Novia's instructions for writing for thesis project, especially references 2
  - 9 pages of text on 3 stud., 5-6 on 2 stud. 1
  - Extra Literature 1
  - Something extra in addition to what was required, e.g. PP, film, theory 2
  - Comments on other people's work on Moodle 3
  - Submitted on agreed date 1
  
  The health care organization is assessed 0-5
  
  Own work if the profession is assessed pass/fail

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  02.09.2024 - 25.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024

  • 6 credits

  Group(s)

  • UHV24D-V

  Seats

  10 - 30

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Carina Gädda, Frida Gädda, Anita Wikberg

  Additional information

  Introductions, workshops and seminars have mandatory attendance.
  
  Group feedback, individual feedback on demand.
  The course has been updated from evaluation of previous courses.
  All assignments need to follow Instructions for writing thesis in Novia.
  AI is not allowed to use.

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  2 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Validation according to Novia's instructions

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Nursing and Midwifery associations in Finland
  Welfare county
  Interviews

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Nursing Ethics: Online Tests
  
  Nursing Sciences + Intercultural Care: assignment
  
  Health care organization: Sote, legislation: assignment
  
  Own profession and sustainable development: assignment
  
  See deadlines for assignments in Moodle

  Internationa connections

  interview

  Student's schedule and workload

  Nursing science and intercultural care: lectures and group exercises and discussions + team work with the exercise work = 54h.
  
  Nursing ethics 2h introduction, 25h own reading and implementation of tests and tasks
  
  Sote and legislation: lectures + group work and discussions = 54h
  
  Own profession and sustainable development: lectures and material other own reading and implementation + individual task = 27h

  Content scheduling

  -

  Assessment criteria

  Not reached criteria for grade 1

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  See above

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  See above

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  See above

•   Trends and Health Technology in Health Care USS20FV03-3003 05.09.2024-13.10.2024  3 credits  (USS21D-Å) +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  The student:
  
  Can the importance of continuously and digital learning and show social commitment
  
  Recognises and can analyze the health care industry's trends and future challenges
  
  Actively follows innovations and health technology in the healthcare industry

  Prerequisites

  It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

  Content of the study unit

  Continues learning
  
  Digital learning and digital patient guidance
  
  Social impact and debate
  
  Health technology innovations (eg AI, robotisation)

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet. Information som stöd för välfärden och de reformerade tjänsterna. Utnyttja social- och hälsovårdsinformation-strategi fram till 2020.
  Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet. Ett socialt hållbart Finland 2020. Stragei för social- och hälsovårdspolitiken.
  Terveys 2050. Neljä skenaariota ihmislähtöisestä terveydestä ja valinnanvapaudesta. DEMOS. Helsinki.
  Sairaanhoitajaliitto: Sairaanhoitajien uudet työnkuvat - laatua tulevaisuuteen ja sotepalveluihin.
  Kangasniemi, M. m.fl. 2018. Optimoitu sote-ammattilaisten koulutus- ja
  osaamisuudistus.
  Hoitotyön vuosikirja 2016. Teknologia soisaali- ja terveydenhuollossa. Sairaanhoitajat
  Vehko, T. et al, 2019. E-health and e-welfare if Finland. THL Report 7/2019
  Vehko, T. et al. 2019 Miten tietojärjestelmät palvelevat terveydenhuollon ammattilaisten työtä? Vaikutukset työhön ja hyvinvointiin.
  http/innokylä.fi
  https://soteuudistus.fi/sv/vad-ar-ett-valfardsomrade
  Övriga aktuella artiklar och publikationer (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Seminarium
  Tehys nätkurs https://www.soteosaajaksi.fi/sv/hemsida/
  Deltagande i konferens (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  1) Rapporten skala 1 - 5
  2) Seminarium uk - gk
  3) Tehys test uk - gk (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  05.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

  Enrollment date range

  15.06.2024 - 04.09.2024

  • 3 credits

  Group(s)

  • USS21D-Å

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Daniel Nenonen

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig lärare Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg (not translated)

  Responsible unit

  Faculty of Health and Welfare

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  Självstudier
  Interaktiva föreläsningar
  Seminarium
  Tehys nätkurs https://www.soteosaajaksi.fi/sv/hemsida/
  Deltagande i konferens (not translated)

  Practical training and working life co-operation

  Fackföreningar och olika regionala samarbetspartner (not translated)

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Individuell rapport XXX
  Seminarium
  Konferens 2.10.2024
  Tehys kurs vecka 38 (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  Föreläsningar 14 h
  Konferens 8 h
  Tehy 13 t
  Seminarium 3 h
  Rapport och självstudier 43 h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Kriterierna för vitsord 1 inte uppfylls. Underkänd rapport kompletteras enligt examinators anvisningar och lämnas in enligt överenskommelse. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Studerande besvarar frågeställningen kortfattat och vagt, med mindre förmåga till analys och reflektion. Sambandet mellan individcentrerad och samhällsrelaterad vård blir otydlig. Mindre del av källorna är vetenskapligt förankrade, relevanta och nya.Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Studerande besvarar frågeställningen på en god nivå, utnyttjar teoretisk och praktisk kunskap i frågor som rör vårdbranschens framtid nationellt och internationellt.Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns. Stora delar av källorna är vetenskapligt förankrade, relevanta och nya. Den tekniska utformningen är god. Uppgiften lämnas in i rätt form inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Studerande kan på en djupgående nivå och mångsidigt besvara frågeställningen, har förmåga att relatera svaret till en samhällelig och global nivå. Studerande kan på ett berömligt sätt föra en diskussion mellan teoretisk och praktisk kunskap. Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk. Källorna är vetenskapligt förankrade, relevanta och nya. Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig. Uppgiften lämnas in i rätt form inom utsatt tid (not translated)

•   Wound Care VAL21086-3001 06.01.2025-31.08.2025  3 credits +-
  Competence objectives of the study unit

  Students deepen themselves in theory and/or practice that supports professional development

  Prerequisites

  No prerequisites

  Content of the study unit

  Anatomy and physiology related to wounds
  Chronic and acute wounds
  Wound management and care of a patient with a wound

  ---

  Person(s) in charge

  Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Mode of delivery

  Face-to-face

  Learning material

  Juutilainen, V., & Hietanen, H.(2018). Haavanhoidon periaatteet (4., uudistettu painos.). Sanoma Pro Oy.
  Lindholm, C. (2018). Sår (Fjärde upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
  Terveysportti och föreläsningsmaterial på Moodle
  Studerande väljer själv övrig referenslitteratur som behövs för att klara av uppgifterna. (not translated)

  Learning methods

  Föreläsningar (online)
  Workshop (hybrid)
  Övningar / Simulationer (not translated)

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Alla delar bedöms GK-UK (not translated)

  Teaching language

  Swedish

  Timing

  06.01.2025 - 31.08.2025

  Enrollment date range

  07.12.2024 - 05.01.2025

  • 3 credits

  Seats

  0 - 25

  Small group(s)

  • Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 0. Open university: 0.)
  • Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 12. Open university: 0.)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Josephine Åberg, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

  Additional information

  Kursansvarig och examinator: Josephine Åberg
  Lärare: Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa
  
  Rekommenderas att kursen "Kliniskt vårdarbete" är avklard innan kursstart. (not translated)

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

  Assessment scale

  Approved/Rejected

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Kunskapstest på Moodle och skriftligt arbete - tidtabell bestäms 13.2 under kursintroduktionen
  
  Aktivt delagande i WS och simulationer (not translated)

  Student's schedule and workload

  3 sp = 81h
  
  Föreläsningar: 5h
  WS: 3h
  Simulationer: 6h
  Examinatoner: 30h
  Självstudier: 20h (not translated)

  Assessment criteria

  Approved / Failed

  1, Deltagande i workshops och simulationer bedöms GK-UK. Obligatorisk närvaro. För GK vitsord bör studerande aktivt deltagit i alla delar.
  2. Distansuppgiften bedöms i skalan GK-UK
  3. Individuell skriftlig kunskapstest GK-UK
  
  Kursvitsord: För godkänt kurs bör alla delar vara godkända.
  
  Närmare information om kursens examinationer publiceras på kursens Moodle. (not translated)