Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing
Bachelor of Health Care and Social Services, 240 ECTS

Bachelor of Health Care

Academic year 2024 - 2025

Advanced Nursing I USS21FV01-3001 26.08.2024-09.11.2024 8 credits (USS21F-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:

Can apply, reflect and deepen his/her expertise in clinical care work

Can argue for evidence based activity and care methods

Can apply ethical decision making in a variety of service environments and care situations

Masters person-centered/client-centered holistic care and medication management in different healthcare and service environments

Students can use health technology and digital solutions in in-depth care work

Can evaluate the guidance efficiency together with patient, close relatives and healthcare personnel

Can promote patient and client safety

Prerequisites

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Content of the study unit

In-depth care methods in internal medicine

In-depth care methods in surgical care

Ethical decision-making in complicated situations and in different service system

Advanced medication management

Person-centered/client-centered holistic care

Health technology and digital solutions

Application of health science theories and research

Welfare economy

The effects of guidance and different gauges

Patient and client safety

Person(s) in charge

Michaela Jalava

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

Alahuhta, S. et al. 2010. Nestehoito
Andershed, B. et al. 2020. Palliativ vård: Begrepp och perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur
Bengstsson, M.& Lundström, U. 2015. Palliativ vård. Gleerups
Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. S 171-202.
Guldbransen, T. 2009. Intensivvård: avancerad omvårdnad och behandling.
Hjelmqvist, H. 2006. Vätsketerapi.
Jevon, P. & Ewens, B. (ed.) 2014. Att övervaka patienter med livshotande sjukdom. Studentlitteratur.
Lagercrantz, H. mfl. Neonatologi. 2015.Studentlitteratur.
Leino-Kilpi, H. & Välimäki M. 2014. Etiikka hoitotyössä.
Moell, C., Gustafsson, J. 2017. Pediatrik. Liber.
Niemi-Murola L. 2014. Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet.
Rubertsson et al. 2020. Intensivvård. Liber
Saarto, T. et al. 2016 Palliatiivinen hoito. Duodecim
Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
Suomen tehohoitoyhdistys. 1997. Suomen Tehohoitoyhdistyksen eettiset ohjeet.
Takkunen et al. 2006. Tehohoito-opas.
Terveysportti: Akuuttihoitotyön opas, Teho- ja valvontahoitotyön opas
samt aktuella ämnespecifika artiklar som läggs upp på Moodle
Wiklund Gustin,L. & Bergbom, I. 2017. Vårdvetenskapliga begrepp i teori och praktik (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsningar
Workshops
Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur
Inlämningsuppgift
Simulering
Seminarier (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Individuell inlämningsuppgift, bedöms med vitsord 0-5, feedback sker via Moodle
Etikuppgift, bedöms med GK/UK (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

26.08.2024 - 09.11.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024
- 8 credits
Group(s)
- USS21F-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg, Michaela Jalava, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Åbo - timlärare Vård

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Share of online studies

2 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Workshops, seminarier, obligatorisk närvaro
Simuleringar, obligatorisk närvaro
Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedöms med vitsord 0-5
Etikuppgift, bedöms med vitsord GK/UK (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Individuell inlämningsuppgift inlämnas på Moodle 6.11
Etikuppgift inlämning på Moodle 20.9 (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Workshops 4h
Föreläsningar 14h
Individuell skriftlig uppgift 30h
Etikuppgift 30h
Självstudier 126h
Seminarier 8h
Simulering 4h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Studerande svarar inte på uppgiftens alla delar och relaterar inte delarna till varandra. Studerande har mycket ytliga kunskaper i hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder, och studerande kan inte vårdplanering i relation till dessa. Studerande har inte kunskaper i patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och kan inte relatera det till sjukskötarens uppgifter eller i en vårdplan. Vårdplaneringen är mycket bristfällig. Studerande har mycket bristfälliga kunskaper i etik och patientsäkerhet (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar men har inte förmågan att relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper om olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder, men tillämpningen i form av vårdplanering är svag. Studerande har svårigheter att gestalta patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och har svårt att relatera den till sjukskötarens uppgifter och i en vårdplan. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, men kan inte tillämpa dem, och egna reflektioner fattas (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar och kan relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har djupa kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter och beaktar ett interprofessionellt arbetssätt och kan göra en helhetsmässig vårdplan. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna djupgående reflektioner (not translated)
Advanced Nursing I USS21FV01-3002 19.08.2024-30.11.2024 8 credits (USS21D-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:

Can apply, reflect and deepen his/her expertise in clinical care work

Can argue for evidence based activity and care methods

Can apply ethical decision making in a variety of service environments and care situations

Masters person-centered/client-centered holistic care and medication management in different healthcare and service environments

Students can use health technology and digital solutions in in-depth care work

Can evaluate the guidance efficiency together with patient, close relatives and healthcare personnel

Can promote patient and client safety

Prerequisites

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Content of the study unit

In-depth care methods in internal medicine

In-depth care methods in surgical care

Ethical decision-making in complicated situations and in different service system

Advanced medication management

Person-centered/client-centered holistic care

Health technology and digital solutions

Application of health science theories and research

Welfare economy

The effects of guidance and different gauges

Patient and client safety

Person(s) in charge

Michaela Jalava

Mode of delivery

88% Face-to-face, 12% Distance learning

Learning material

Alahuhta, S. et al. 2010. Nestehoito
Andershed, B. et al. 2020. Palliativ vård: Begrepp och perspektiv i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur
Bengstsson, M.& Lundström, U. 2015. Palliativ vård. Gleerups
Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. S 171-202.
Guldbransen, T. 2009. Intensivvård: avancerad omvårdnad och behandling.
Hjelmqvist, H. 2006. Vätsketerapi.
Jevon, P. & Ewens, B. (ed.) 2014. Att övervaka patienter med livshotande sjukdom. Studentlitteratur.
Lagercrantz, H. mfl. Neonatologi. 2015.Studentlitteratur.
Leino-Kilpi, H. & Välimäki M. 2014. Etiikka hoitotyössä.
Moell, C., Gustafsson, J. 2017. Pediatrik. Liber.
Niemi-Murola L. 2014. Anestesiologian ja tehohoidon perusteet.
Rubertsson et al. 2020. Intensivvård. Liber
Saarto, T. et al. 2016 Palliatiivinen hoito. Duodecim
Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
Suomen tehohoitoyhdistys. 1997. Suomen Tehohoitoyhdistyksen eettiset ohjeet.
Takkunen et al. 2006. Tehohoito-opas.
Terveysportti: Akuuttihoitotyön opas, Teho- ja valvontahoitotyön opas
samt aktuella ämnespecifika artiklar som läggs upp på Moodle
Wiklund Gustin,L. & Bergbom, I. 2017. Vårdvetenskapliga begrepp i teori och praktik (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsningar
Workshops
Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur
Inlämningsuppgift
Simulering
Seminarier (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Individuell inlämningsuppgift, bedöms med vitsord 0-5, feedback sker via Moodle
Etikuppgift, bedöms med GK/UK (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

19.08.2024 - 30.11.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 18.08.2024
- 8 credits
Group(s)
- USS21D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg, Michaela Jalava, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Åbo - timlärare Vård

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Workshops, seminarier, obligatorisk närvaro
Simuleringar, obligatorisk närvaro
Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedöms med vitsord 0-5
Etikuppgift, bedöms med vitsord GK/UK (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Individuell inlämningsuppgift inlämnas på Moodle 4.11.2024 (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Workshops 6h
Föreläsningar 32h
Individuell skriftlig uppgift 30h
Etikuppgift 30h
Självstudier 95h
Seminarier 8h
Simulering 4h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Studerande svarar inte på uppgiftens alla delar och relaterar inte delarna till varandra. Studerande har mycket ytliga kunskaper i hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder, och studerande kan inte vårdplanering i relation till dessa. Studerande har inte kunskaper i patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och kan inte relatera det till sjukskötarens uppgifter eller i en vårdplan. Vårdplaneringen är mycket bristfällig. Studerande har mycket bristfälliga kunskaper i etik och patientsäkerhet (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar men har inte förmågan att relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har ytliga kunskaper om olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder, men tillämpningen i form av vårdplanering är svag. Studerande har svårigheter att gestalta patientens komplicerade vårdprocess och har svårt att relatera den till sjukskötarens uppgifter och i en vårdplan. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, men kan inte tillämpa dem, och egna reflektioner fattas (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande svarar på uppgiftens alla delar och kan i viss mån relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem i viss mån i en vårdplan. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar och kan relatera dem till varandra. Studerande har djupa kunskaper i olika hälsohinder/sjukdomar, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, patientcentrerade vård- och rehabiliteringsmetoder samt kan tillämpa dem. Studerande kan beskriva patientens komplicerade vårdprocess i relation till sjukskötarens uppgifter och beaktar ett interprofessionellt arbetssätt och kan göra en helhetsmässig vårdplan. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna djupgående reflektioner (not translated)
Anatomy and Physiology USS22IV06-3005 05.09.2024-13.12.2024 4 credits (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- can explain human anatomy and physiology
- understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

The cell and tissues

Cardiovascular system

The respiratory system

The nervous system

The digestive system

The urinary system

The endocrine system

The musculoskeletal system

Person(s) in charge

Daniel Nenonen

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Course litterature:

Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended litterature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

On moodle give litterature.

Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.

"To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

Learning methods

Lectures on campus and via teams.

Interactive digital material.

Independent studying and assignments.

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)

Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

05.09.2024 - 13.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 09.09.2024
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-Å
- UHV24D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Daniel Nenonen

Additional information

Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.

Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Anatomy and physiology tests.

Assignments.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Anatomi och fysiologi tenter under hösten 2024:

Datum:

Deltentamen 1: Vecka 41
Deltentamen 2: Vecka 48

Två omtenter i varje del erbjuds.

Deltentamen 1: 25.10 och 22.11.2023
Deltentamen 2: 17.1 och 7.2.2024

Oblikatoriska workshops och seminarier med tillhörande oblikatorisk uppgift. (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Föreläsningstillfällen 32 h

Inlämningsuppgifter 40 h

Självstudier 38 h

Deltentamen 1 1.5 sp
Deltentamen 2 1.5 sp
Workshops och seminarier med tillhörande inlämningsuppgifter 1sp (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra. (not translated)
Anatomy and Physiology USS22IV06-3006 11.09.2024-13.12.2024 4 credits (USS24F-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- can explain human anatomy and physiology
- understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

The cell and tissues

Cardiovascular system

The respiratory system

The nervous system

The digestive system

The urinary system

The endocrine system

The musculoskeletal system

Person(s) in charge

Daniel Nenonen

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Course litterature:

Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended litterature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

On moodle give litterature.

Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.

"To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

Learning methods

Lectures on campus and via teams.

Interactive digital material.

Independent studying and assignments.

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Individuell tentamen i Anatomi och fysiologi, bedöms med vitsord 0-5 (2 st deltentamen)

Inlämningsuppgifter bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

11.09.2024 - 13.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 10.09.2024
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Daniel Nenonen

Additional information

Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle.

Alla inlämningar kontrolleras för text genererad med ai liknande programvara. (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Anatomy and physiology test.

Assignments.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Anatomi och fysiologi tenter under hösten 2024:

Datum:

Deltentamen 1: Vecka 46
Deltentamen 2: Vecka 49

Två omtenter i varje del erbjuds.

Omtentamen del 1: 13.12 och 17.1
Omtentamen del 2: 17.1 och 7.2

Oblikatoriska workshops och seminarier med tillhörande oblikatorisk uppgift. (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Föreläsningstillfällen 9 h

Inlämningsuppgifter 40 h

Självstudier 59 h

Deltentamen 1 1.5 sp
Deltentamen 2 1.5 sp
Workshops och seminarier med tillhörande inlämningsuppgifter 1sp (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Studerande kan inte beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan inte ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande kan inte förklara de olika organsystemens funktioner. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Studerande kan på ett mycket ytligt plan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan bara bristfälligt ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förklarar endast ytligt de olika organsystemens funktioner och förstår inte hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och latin. Studerande förstår i huvudsak organsystemens funktioner och förstår till en del hur de hänger samman. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande kan beskriva människokroppens uppbyggnad och kan ange anatomiska strukturer på svenska och på latin. Studerande förstår och kan förklara organsystemens funktioner, förstår helheter och hur de hänger samman. Studerande kan analysera hur olika system i människokroppen påverkar varandra. (not translated)
Bachelor's Thesis USS22UV03-3001 01.01.2025-15.06.2025 15 credits (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- can, under supervision and gradually independently, carry out a degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the degree project process and in projects
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
- can assess research ethics aspects in his / her degree project
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts
- can act as an opponent for another degree project
- can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing.

Prerequisites

120 credits. Courses Introduction to Academic Studies and Research Methodology.

Content of the study unit

Bachelor's Thesis within inter-professional groups

Oppose a Thesis

Maturity test

Person(s) in charge

Pia Liljeroth

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Litteratur i forskningsmetodik
Litteratur och forskningsartiklar enligt ämne (not translated)

Learning methods

På svenska
Självstudier
Studier i grupp
Grupphandledning
Seminarier
Närmare instruktioner finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=11771 (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Bedömningskriterierna finns publicerade på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=11771 (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

01.01.2025 - 15.06.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024
- 15 credits
Group(s)
- UHV22D-Å
- USS22D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Minna Syrjäläinen-Lindberg, Josephine Åberg, Pia Liljeroth, Johanna Wide, Michaela Jalava, Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell, Marika Rask

Additional information

Det är inte tillåtet för studerande att använda artificiell intelligens för att skapa innehållet i examinationerna. (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=11771 (not translated)

Practical training and working life co-operation

Arbetslivssamarbete enligt respektive examensarbetsuppdrag. (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Obligatorisk närvaro på handledningstillfällen under processen enligt tidtabellen som finns publicerad på Moodle.

Obligatorisk närvaro och presentation av det egna arbetet på mellanseminarium 19.3.2025:

Obligatorisk närvaro och presentation av det egna arbetet på slutseminarium antingen 26 eller 27.5.2025.

Mognadsprov 26, 27 eller 28.5.2025.

Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=11771 (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Närmare information finns på Moodle: https://moodlecourses.novia.fi/course/view.php?id=11771 (not translated)
Basic Vaccination Knowledge VÅV18BV09-3039 26.08.2024-31.12.2024 2 credits +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student will:
- know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
- know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
- know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
- know about vaccination in different groups
- have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

Prerequisites

Drug therapy 1

Content of the study unit

Knowledge about vaccinations
Vaccination skills

Further information

Efter genomgången och godkänd kurs i den nationella utbildningshelheten Grunderna i vaccinationskunskap har deltagaren grundläggande kompetens och färdigheter gällande vaccinering och själva vaccinationsprocessen.

Kursens innehåll:
-Förebyggande av sjukdomar genom vaccination
-Det nationella vaccinationsprogrammet
-Fördelarna med vaccination
- Information om potentiella biverkningar av vacciner
- Vägledning och stöd till klienter baserat på forskningsbaserad kunskap
- Grundläggande färdigheter för vaccination (not translated)

Person(s) in charge

Marie Hjortell

Mode of delivery

Distance learning

Learning material

National course in Moodle platform

Learning methods

Endast för Arcadas Studerande :Nationell kurs i vaccinationskunskap helt virtuellt via Novias Moodle (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

26.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024
- 2 credits
Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

2 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Portfolio + virtuell tent enligt inlämningsdeadline på Arcada (not translated)
Basics in Nursing Care VÅV22GV02-3015 09.09.2024-08.11.2024 6 credits (USS24D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
- has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
- can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
- can perform basic wound care
- can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
- can act aseptically and motivate the actions
- understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
- can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
- can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
- understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

The nursing process
Human basic needs and basic nursing care
Nutrition
Vital functions, measurements and examinations
Care hygiene
Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
Wound care and bandaging
ISBAR, FinCC
Ethics
Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Further information

I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

Person(s) in charge

Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

Mode of delivery

84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

Learning material

Vårdhandboken.se
Terveysportti

Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
Kap 5 Sond
Kap 15 Katetrisering
Kap 16 Puls
Kap 17 Blodtryck

Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.

FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE

Learning methods

Lectures,
discussions,
group-work,
demonstration, practice

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

The examination is assessed 0-5
Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK

Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
Knows the values and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
Can collaborate with others in the student group

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

09.09.2024 - 08.11.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 08.09.2024
- 6 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-V
Seats

10 - 50
Small group(s)
- Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Maria Berg, Marice Nedergård

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Examination
Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
Approved exercises in training classes

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Please see schedule
See peppi for re-examination

Student's schedule and workload

1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h
Basics in Nursing Care VÅV22GV02-3016 07.10.2024-13.12.2024 6 credits (USS24F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
- has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
- can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
- can perform basic wound care
- can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
- can act aseptically and motivate the actions
- understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
- can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
- can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
- understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

The nursing process
Human basic needs and basic nursing care
Nutrition
Vital functions, measurements and examinations
Care hygiene
Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
Wound care and bandaging
ISBAR, FinCC
Ethics
Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Further information

I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

Person(s) in charge

Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

Mode of delivery

67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

Learning material

Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
Kap 5 Sond
Kap 15 Katetrisering
Kap 16 Puls
Kap 17 Blodtryck

Vårdhandboken.se
Terveysportti

Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.

FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE

Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

Learning methods

Lectures,
discussions,
group-work,
demonstration, practice

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

The examination is assessed 0-5
Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK

Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
Knows the values and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
Can collaborate with others in the student group

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

07.10.2024 - 13.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024
- 6 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-V
Seats

10 - 40
Small group(s)
- Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Camilla Mattjus, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Carina Gädda, Marice Nedergård

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

2 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Examination
Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
Approved exercises in training classes
Approved objective structured clinical examination

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Tentamen sker online, vänligen se schema för datum

Omtentamen sker på allmänna omtentamenstillfälle se peppi.

Student's schedule and workload

1 sp =27 h
6sp=162 h
Basics in Nursing Care VÅV22GV02-3018 09.09.2024-08.11.2024 6 credits (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can work in accordance with the care profession's values, ethical principles and directives and can evaluate how they are realized in the daily care work.
- has knowledge of and can make a basic assessment of human basic needs and vital functions, has knowledge of central care methods in basic nursing care and can apply them in the holistic care of the patient
- can assess the patient's nutritional status and plan and implement nutritional treatment
- can perform basic wound care
- can identify, assess and manage the patient's pain
- can act aseptically and motivate the actions
- understands and masters the principles of infection control, ergonomic working methods, rehabilitative care and sustainable development as part of care
- can use the nursing process in the documentation of the patient's care and in an appropriate way document the patient's nursing process and master the care documentation system
- can assess, plan, implement and evaluate care in a simulation situation
- understands the importance of sustainable development in healthcare

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

The nursing process
Human basic needs and basic nursing care
Nutrition
Vital functions, measurements and examinations
Care hygiene
Ergonomics, kinesthetics and movement technology, aids
Wound care and bandaging
ISBAR, FinCC
Ethics
Cost and environmental awareness in healthcare

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Further information

I kursen ingår kliniska övningar och laborationer (not translated)

Person(s) in charge

Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Broman. L & Wikström.C 2019. Medicinsk teknink. Studentlitteratur.
Kap 3 Oxygenbehandling
Kap 4 Sugning i luftvägar
Kap 5 Sond
Kap 15 Katetrisering
Kap 16 Puls
Kap 17 Blodtryck

Vårdhandboken.se
Terveysportti

Som ”bredvid läsningslitteratur” på svenska kan användas: Anttila, K., Kaila-Mattila, Y., Kan, S., Puska, E-L. & Vihunen, Vård och välbefinnande.

FÖRELÄSNINGSMATERIAL PÅ MOODLE

Övrig aktuell litteratur eller forskning enligt lärares anvisningar

Learning methods

Lectures,
discussions,
group-work,
demonstration, practice

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

The examination is assessed 0-5
Clinical exercises are assessed UK / GK

Can receive feedback and shows willingness to develop practical skills
Can ask questions that are relevant to one's own learning
Can perform the practical tasks both under supervision and independently
Can follow directives and instructions and takes responsibility for tasks
Can make decisions concerning practical tasks
Knows the values and takes into account the principles of professional ethics
Can collaborate with others in the student group

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

09.09.2024 - 08.11.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024
- 6 credits
Group(s)
- UHV24D-V
- UBM24D-V
Seats

15 - 32
Small group(s)
- Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Maria Berg

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Examination
Mandatory attendance 100% during practical exercises
Approved exercises in training classes

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Please see schedule
See peppi for re-examination

Student's schedule and workload

1sp/27h this course 6 credits= 162h
Basics of Health Promoting Care VÅV22HF01-3014 28.10.2024-13.12.2024 3 credits (USS24D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
- understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
- can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
- can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
- can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
- has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
- can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
Prevention levels
Epidemiology
Health determinants
Ethical issues in health education
Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
Health promotion in different service environments
Artificial Intelligence

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Anna-Lena Nieminen

Mode of delivery

34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

Learning material

Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
Valda artiklar.
Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

Learning methods

Föreläsning, självstudier, grupparbete.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

28.10.2024 - 13.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 27.10.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-V
Seats

10 - 50

Teachers and responsibilities

Anna-Lena Nieminen

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

2 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Godkända individuella -och grupparbete.

Student's schedule and workload

3 sp
1 sp = 27 timmar
Basics of Health Promoting Care VÅV22HF01-3015 02.09.2024-18.10.2024 3 credits (USS24F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
- understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
- can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
- can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
- can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
- has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
- can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
Prevention levels
Epidemiology
Health determinants
Ethical issues in health education
Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
Health promotion in different service environments
Artificial Intelligence

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Anna-Lena Nieminen

Mode of delivery

Distance learning

Learning material

Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
Valda artiklar.
Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi (not translated)

Learning methods

Inbandad introduktion till kursen på Moodle, Power Point och hänvisning till aktuella websidor på Moodle, portfolio, individuella uppgifter samt rapport på moodle.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

02.09.2024 - 18.10.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 14.09.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-V
Seats

10 - 50

Teachers and responsibilities

Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

Additional information

Kursen är online och studierna förverkligas sjävständigt under tiden 2/9-18/10.

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

3 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Moodle tentamen 17 /10 klockan 09.00-11.00

Student's schedule and workload

3 sp
1 sp = 27 timmar (not translated)
Basics of Health Promoting Care VÅV22HF01-3016 18.11.2024-20.12.2024 3 credits (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
- understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
- can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
- can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
- can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
- has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
- can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
Prevention levels
Epidemiology
Health determinants
Ethical issues in health education
Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
Health promotion in different service environments
Artificial Intelligence

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Anna-Lena Nieminen

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
Valda artiklar.
Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

Learning methods

Föreläsning, självstudier, grupparbete och workshops.
Några lektioner är online, se moodle

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

18.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- UHV24D-V
- UBM24D-V
Seats

0 - 35

Teachers and responsibilities

Anna-Lena Nieminen, Pia Liljeroth

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Godkända individuella -och grupparbete samt tentamen (då kursen avslutas)

Student's schedule and workload

3 sp
1 sp = 27 timmar
Care Assessment and Health Technology VÅV22KV14-3004 21.04.2025-23.05.2025 3 credits (UBM23D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can work in different business environments within healthcare
- can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
- can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
- can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
- can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
- can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

Prerequisites

VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

Content of the study unit

Care assessment
ABCDE evaluation
Telephone counseling
Digital consulting
Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
Ethics
Sustainable Development

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Jannica Andtfolk

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Care Assessment:
Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432

Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630

Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974

Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255

Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3

Health technology:

Nordens välfärdscenter
https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/

Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/

Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-

Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324

Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658

A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z

Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

Learning methods

lectures, group discussion and seminar

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

1-5

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

21.04.2025 - 23.05.2025

Enrollment date range

02.07.2024 - 31.07.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- UBM23D-V
- UHV23D-V
Teachers and responsibilities

Jannica Andtfolk, Rika Levy-Malmberg

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Seminar and assignment
instruction will be given in Moodle

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

Student's schedule and workload

1 ECTS= 27 hours

Content scheduling

Care assessment 2 credits - grade from 0-5
Health technology 1 credit - grade pass/fail

Assessment criteria

Did not achieve any of the criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.

In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.

To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.
Care assessment and health technology VÅV22KV14-3001 07.10.2024-17.11.2024 3 credits (USS22F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can work in different business environments within healthcare
- can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
- can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
- can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
- can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
- can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

Prerequisites

VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

Content of the study unit

Care assessment
ABCDE evaluation
Telephone counseling
Digital consulting
Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
Ethics
Sustainable Development

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Rika Levy-Malmberg

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Care Assessment:
Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432

Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630

Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974

Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255

Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3

Health technology:

Nordens välfärdscenter
https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/

Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/

Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-

Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324

Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658

A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z

Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

Learning methods

lectures, group discussion and seminar

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

1-5

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

07.10.2024 - 17.11.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 04.10.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS22F-V
Seats

10 - 35

Teachers and responsibilities

Frida Gädda, Rika Levy-Malmberg

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Seminar and assignment
instruction will be given in Moodle

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

Student's schedule and workload

1 ECTS= 27 hours

Content scheduling

Care assessment 2 credits - grade from 0-5
Health technology 1 credit - grade pass/fail

Assessment criteria

Did not achieve any of the criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.

In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.

To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.
Care assessment and health technology VÅV22KV14-3003 09.09.2024-13.10.2024 3 credits (USS22D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can work in different business environments within healthcare
- can assess and prioritize the patient's need for care
- can use patient- and client-oriented teaching and supervision methods
- can use various digital tools when assessing care and when supervising patient groups
- can describe opportunities and challenges with welfare technology solutions in healthcare
- can ethically reflect on the implementation of welfare technology solutions from both a patient and caregiver perspective

Prerequisites

VÅV22PR02 Practice: Medical and Surgical Nursing Care 1

Content of the study unit

Care assessment
ABCDE evaluation
Telephone counseling
Digital consulting
Welfare technology solutions in healthcare
Ethics
Sustainable Development

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Rika Levy-Malmberg

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Care Assessment:
Berk, T., Thalmann, M., Jensen, K. O., Schwarzenberg, P., Jukema, G. N., Pape, H.-C., & Halvachizadeh, S. (2023). Implementation of a novel nursing assessment tool in geriatric trauma patients with proximal femur fractures. PLoS ONE, 17(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.028432

Gasperini, B., Pelusi, G., Frascati, A., Sarti, D., Dolcini, F., Espinosa, E., & Prospero, E. (2021). Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital. PLoS ONE, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249630

Finch, T., Fay, M., Smith, J., Kleiser, H., Dews, D., Roberts, S., Shaw, F., Haining, S., & Oliver, L. (2022). Using care and support planning to implement routine falls prevention and management for people living with frailty: A qualitative evaluation. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275974

Puustinen, J., Kangasniemi, M., & Turjamaa, R. (2021). Are comprehensive and individually designed care and service plans for older people’s home care a vision or a reality in Finland? Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e144–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13255

Dufour, E., Bolduc, J., Leclerc-Loiselle, J., Charette, M., Dufour, I., Roy, D., Poirier, A.-A., & Duhoux, A. (2023). Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02089-3

Health technology:

Nordens välfärdscenter
https://nordicwelfare.org/valfardspolitik/valfardsteknologi/

Healthcare and care through distance spanning solutions
https://nordicwelfare.org/en/publikationer/distance-solutions/

Terveys- ja hyvinvointiteknologia - mitä yritysten ja sote-organisaatioiden tulee tietää?
https://thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-kehittaminen/tutkimukset-ja-hankkeet/kotona-asumisen-teknologiat-ikaihmisille-ohjelma-kati-/tapahtumat/terveys-ja-hyvinvointiteknologia-mita-yritysten-ja-sote-organisaatioiden-tulee-tietaa-

Tekoäly ja terveydenhuolto Suomessa
https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63324

Digitally engaged physicians about the digital health transition
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238658

A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-020-00333-z

Digital Health Technologies and Well-Being in the Future
https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2963121

Learning methods

lectures, group discussion and seminar

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

1-5

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

09.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 08.09.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS22D-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Ann-Louise Glasberg, Rika Levy-Malmberg

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Seminar and assignment
instruction will be given in Moodle

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Seminar and assignments See in Moodle

Student's schedule and workload

1 ECTS= 27 hours

Content scheduling

Care assessment 2 credits - grade from 0-5
Health technology 1 credit - grade pass/fail

Assessment criteria

Did not achieve any of the criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

In order to obtain 1 (satisfactory), the participants should have helpfully performed the tasks with answers that meet the learning objectives.

In order to obtain 2 (extremely satisfactory), the participant should, in addition to what is stated for grades 1, have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and shown activity and own initiatives.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

In order to obtain 3 (good), the participant should have completed the course in a satisfactory manner and in his / her answers shown proof that he / she has read the literature and on the basis of this presented well-thought-out answers and actively participated in the discussions.

To obtain 4 (extremely good) the same things are required as for the grade 3, but the participant's answers show a greater depth, further own reflections in the tasks and a more lively activity in the discussions.

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

To obtain 5 (praiseworthy) the participant should have completed the course and in their answers shown that he / she has read and understood the literature by presenting answers and comments that are excellent and include their own reflections. The participant should actively participate in the discussions, refer to a larger amount of scientific literature and be able to show how his / her knowledge has been deepened during the course.
Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology VÅV22GV04-3010 03.02.2025-21.03.2025 4 credits (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
- knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
- can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
- can name the most common pathogenic microbes
- understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
- understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
- understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
- understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
- can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
- can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
- have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
- can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
- understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Clinical microbiology
Immunology
Pathology

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Material på moodle

Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
Melhus, Å. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur 2019
Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Vitsord enligt tentamen, se kriterier nedan (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

03.02.2025 - 21.03.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 24.01.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- UHV24D-V
- UBM24D-V
Seats

0 - 40

Teachers and responsibilities

Vasa Vård 1

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Kursen examineras med tentamen i Moodle

Kurstentamen: 18.3

Omtentamina 4.4 (allmän omtentamen) samt 9.5 (allmän omtentamen) (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
2 sp är 54 h
3 sp är 81 h
4 sp är 108 h

Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)

Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter

Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella

Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)
Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology VÅV22GV04-3011 31.03.2025-11.05.2025 4 credits (USS24D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
- knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
- can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
- can name the most common pathogenic microbes
- understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
- understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
- understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
- understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
- can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
- can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
- have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
- can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
- understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Clinical microbiology
Immunology
Pathology

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Person(s) in charge

Maria Berg

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

Material på moodle

Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
Melhus, Å. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur 2019
Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsningar, diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Vitsord enligt tentamen, se kriterier nedan (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

31.03.2025 - 11.05.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 09.03.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Vasa Vård 1

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Kursen examineras med tentamen i Moodle

Kurstentamen: 5.5

Omtentamina: 23.5 (allmän omtentamen) samt 12.9 (allmän omtentamen) (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
2 sp är 54 h
3 sp är 81 h
4 sp är 108 h

Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)

Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter

Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella

Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)
Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology VÅV22GV04-3012 14.04.2025-25.05.2025 4 credits (USS24F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has knowledge of the biology of the different microbial groups in order to be able to understand and describe the risks of infection
- knows the different routes of infection in order to be able to assess and prevent infection risks in the event of infection
- can summarize and exemplify the human microbiota and can explain its role in health and disease
- can name the most common pathogenic microbes
- understand the basics of bacterial resistance development in order to protect patients
- understand the significance and consequences of the resistant bacteria for the patient
- understands the importance of reducing the presence of resistant bacteria for sustainable development
- understands one's own role in antibiotic stewardship
- can describe how the lymphocytes function in the immune system during health and illness
- can explain what happens during an immunization (infection, vaccination, rhesus immunization, passive immunization)
- have knowledge of human biological changes in pathological conditions
- can describe endogenous and exogenous etiologies of disease
- understand the significance of the acute inflammatory reaction

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Clinical microbiology
Immunology
Pathology

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The studentshows limited substance knowledge, can be essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The studentshows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

Person(s) in charge

Maria Berg

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

Material på moodle

Ericson, Ericson & Kan. Klinisk mikrobiologi. Liber 2018
Melhus, Å. Klinisk mikrobiologi för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur 2019
Brauner et al. Medicinsk mikrobiologi. Studentlitteratur 2021
Wold och Mölne. Infektionsimmunologi. Liber 2022
Bränden. Immunförsvaret och viruset. Celanders förlag 2021
Braun & Anderson. Patofysiologi. Studentlitteratur 2012
Karhumäki, Jonsson & Saros. Mikrobit hoitotyön haasteena. Edita 2021
Heikkinen, Järvinen & Vapalahti. Immunologia. Duodecim 2022
Holmström, Virtanen, Björn & Rissanen. Patofysiologia. SanomaPro 2020 (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsningar: Novia Campus vid närstudiedagar, online (online föreläsningar bandas in) eller förinspelade föreläsningar samt diskussioner, självstudier (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Vitsord enligt tentamen, se kriterier nedan (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

14.04.2025 - 25.05.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 05.01.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-V
Seats

10 - 50

Teachers and responsibilities

Vasa Vård 1

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Kursen kan tenteras (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Kursen examineras med tentamen i Moodle

Kurs tentamen, on-line: 21.5

Omtentamen, på det Novias campus man väljer göra omtentamen;
Omtentamen 1: 12.9 (Novias allmänna omtentamens-tillfälle)
Omtentamen 2: datum kommer senare (Novias allmänna omtentamen-tillfälle) (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

1 sp är 27 h arbete för studerande
2 sp är 54 h
3 sp är 81 h
4 sp är 108 h

Kursen är 4 sp (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)

Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter

Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella

Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt) (not translated)
Clinical Nursing USS22KV04-3002 12.08.2024-10.11.2024 5 credits (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- can, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
- can apply theoretical knowledge and guidance methods in different care contexts
- can apply the aseptic method
- can use the central evidence based care methods and perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
- can carry out care and patient monitoring using health technology and apply various directives regarding patient- and client safety and sustainable development
- can perform safe medication and fluid treatment

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

Resuscitation in hospital environment

Central examination methods

Central care methods

Aseptics/aseptic way of working

Teamwork

Clinical assessments

Patient monitoring

Guidance

Wound care

Documentation and reporting

Pre- and intra-operative preparations for surgery

Patient monitoring during anesthesia

Different roles in the operating theatre

Application of sustainable methods (cost-effectiveness, aseptics, work ergonomics, waste sorting)

Patient, client and occupational safety

Safe blood transfusion

Intravenous medication and fluid treatment

Person(s) in charge

Hanna Limnell

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Se kurslitteratur i förverkliganden:

Läkemedelsbehandling II
Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
Inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete

Medibas

På Moodle given litteratur

Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur

"För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

Learning methods

Självstudier
Simulationer
Kliniska övningar och test (videofilmning) (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Studerande:

Kan planera, utföra, utvärdera, dokumentera och rapportera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård i samarbete med patienten och närstående samt påvisar ett reflektivt och etiskt förhållningssätt i vården

Kan tillämpa teoretiska kunskaper och handledningsmetoder i olika vårdkontexter

Kan tillämpa aseptiskt arbetssätt

Kan använda de centrala evidensbaserade vårdmetoderna och kan utföra kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och behandlingar

Kan utföra vård och patientövervakning med hjälp av hälsoteknologi och tillämpa olika direktiv gällande patient- och klientsäkerhet och hållbar utveckling

Kan utföra säker läkemedels- och vätskebehandling (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

12.08.2024 - 10.11.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- USS23D-Å
- UHV23D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

Additional information

Kursen ska avläggas samtidigt med teorikurser Läkemedelsbehandling II, Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete, Inremedicinskt och palliativt vårdarbete

Examensstadga 4 §

"För att garantera den kompetens som behövs kan en studiehelhet, kurs, del av kurs eller kurslitteratur vara på annat språk än undervisningsspråket svenska. " (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Obligatorisk kursintro 29.8. online
Obligatoriska simulationer i läkemedelsbehandling, i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete och i inremedicinskt vårdarbete.
Obligatoriska kliniska övningar
Obligatorisk öppenklinik
Kliniskt test (Videofilmning) (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Obligatoriska simulationer och kliniska övningar samt tillhörande Quiz i Moodle.
Quiz 1 DL 1.9.
Quiz 2 DL 8.9.
Quiz 3 DL 22.9.
Quiz 4 DL 29.9.
Quiz 5 Dl 6.10.
Quiz 6 DL 20.10.

Obligatorisk öppenklinik v 44

Klinsikt test i form av videofilmning, paruppgift vecka 45 . DL 10.11. Mera information i Moodle. (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

5 sp = 135h

Simulationer och kliniska övningar: 35h

Självstudier inför simulationer och inför kliniska övningar (Quiz): 50h

Klinisk test med självstudier, övningar i kliniken samt filmning: 50h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

GK = Studerande delatar aktivt alla simualtioner och kliniska övningar och har svarat i Quiz inom utsatta tid före varje simulering. Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test (videofilmning).

UK = Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller kliniksa övningar eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerandehar inte svarat i Quiz i tid före varje simulering. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under Klinisk test (videofilmning). (not translated)
Clinical Nursing USS22KV04-3003 12.08.2024-15.12.2024 5 credits (USS23F-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- can, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach to care
- can apply theoretical knowledge and guidance methods in different care contexts
- can apply the aseptic method
- can use the central evidence based care methods and perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments
- can carry out care and patient monitoring using health technology and apply various directives regarding patient- and client safety and sustainable development
- can perform safe medication and fluid treatment

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

Resuscitation in hospital environment

Central examination methods

Central care methods

Aseptics/aseptic way of working

Teamwork

Clinical assessments

Patient monitoring

Guidance

Wound care

Documentation and reporting

Pre- and intra-operative preparations for surgery

Patient monitoring during anesthesia

Different roles in the operating theatre

Application of sustainable methods (cost-effectiveness, aseptics, work ergonomics, waste sorting)

Patient, client and occupational safety

Safe blood transfusion

Intravenous medication and fluid treatment

Person(s) in charge

Hanna Limnell

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Se kurslitteratur i förverkliganden:

Läkemedelsbehandling II
Kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete
Inremedicinskt vårdarbete
På Moodle given litteratur
Övrig valbar evidensbaserad litteratur (not translated)

Learning methods

Självstudier
Simulationer och kliniska övningar (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Studerande:

Kan planera, utföra, utvärdera, dokumentera och rapportera personcentrerad/klientcentrerad vård i samarbete med patienten och närstående samt påvisar ett reflektivt och etiskt förhållningssätt i vården

Kan tillämpa teoretiska kunskaper och handledningsmetoder i olika vårdkontexter

Kan tillämpa aseptiskt arbetssätt

Kan använda de centrala evidensbaserade vårdmetoderna och kan utföra kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och behandlingar

Kan utföra vård och patientövervakning med hjälp av hälsoteknologi och tillämpa olika direktiv gällande patient- och klientsäkerhet och hållbar utveckling

Kan utföra säker läkemedels- och vätskebehandling (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

12.08.2024 - 15.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 18.08.2024
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- USS23F-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Josephine Åberg, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Kursintroduktion online 12.8.
Obligatoriska:
- Kliniska övningar i läkemedelsbehandling
- Kliniska övningar i kirurgiskt och perioperativt vårdarbete samt i sårvård
- Kliniska övningar i inremedicinskt vårdarbete
- Öppenklinik
- Klinisk examination (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Obligatoriska simulationer och kliniska övningar samt tillhörande Quiz:
Kliniska övningar 27.8. DL för Quiz 22.8.
Kliniska övningar 16.9. DL för Quiz 12.9.
Kliniska övningar 3.-4.10. DL för Quiz 27.9.
Kliniska övningar 30.10. DL för Quiz 25.10.
Öppen klinik samt klinisk test i form av filmning DL 10.11. (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

sp = 135h

Kliniska övningar i klass 18 h

Självstudier inför kliniska övningar samt Quiz 109 h

Klinisk test i form av filmning 8 h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

GK = Studerande deltar aktivt alla kliniska övningar och har lämnat in kunskapstest inom utsatta tid. Kunskapstest skall vara GK för att studerande kan delta kliniska övningar. . Studerande påvisar tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under klinisk test.

UK = Studerande är frånvarande från kliniska övningar eller deltar inte aktivt. Studerande har inte lämnat in kunskapstest i tid eller är UK i test. Studerande påvisar inte tillräckliga kunskaper i klinisk vård under klinisk test. (not translated)
Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3007 02.09.2024-13.10.2024 5 credits (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
- can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
- can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
- can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
- has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Content of the study unit

Simulation exercises based on case
IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
Blood transfusions
PICC and CVK
Use of perfusor
Inhalation drugs
Fluid balance sheet
CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
Medical radiation and radiation protection

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Marice Nedergård

Mode of delivery

80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

Learning material

KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
Moodleföreläsningar.

RESUSCITATION;
Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
Moodleföreläsningar.

LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

Learning methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- UHV23D-V
- UBM23D-V
Seats

10 - 30
Small group(s)
- Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Mikaela Engvall, Katarina Vironen, Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

Additional information

Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
See Moodle for more information!

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Red Cross blood web-course made last
Clinical exam week
Resuscitation test according to schedule
Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

Student's schedule and workload

5 sp Totalt 135 h
Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.

KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
Teori: 4 h
Övningsstationer; ca 20 h/grupp
Hemuppgift: Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift och Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)/stud
Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination och filmning av examination, ca 3 h /studerande

RESUSKITATION: 1 sp =27 h
4 h teori (alla)
4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
7h Förberedande för examination.

LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1 sp = 40,5 h
Inblick i klinisk laboratorieverksamhet, grunder för venös provtagning och EKG, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 6 h
Hemuppgift: Preanalytiska faktorer, kunskapstest, förberedelser inför kliniska övningar
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO

STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Approved individual tasks and exercises.
Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
Radiation safety: Grade Approved/ Failed
Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3008 14.10.2024-01.12.2024 5 credits (USS23D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
- can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
- can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
- can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
- has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Content of the study unit

Simulation exercises based on case
IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
Blood transfusions
PICC and CVK
Use of perfusor
Inhalation drugs
Fluid balance sheet
CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
Medical radiation and radiation protection

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Marice Nedergård

Mode of delivery

80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

Learning material

KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
Moodleföreläsningar.

RESUSCITATION;
Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
Moodleföreläsningar.

LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

Learning methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

14.10.2024 - 01.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 20.10.2024
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- USS23D-V
Seats

10 - 44
Small group(s)
- Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Mikaela Engvall, Katarina Vironen, Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

Additional information

Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
See Moodle for more information!

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Red Cross blood web-course made last
Clinical exam week
Resuscitation test according to schedule
Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

Student's schedule and workload

5 sp Totalt 135 h
Obligatorisk närvaro introduktionsföreläsningen och vid alla övningar.

KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
Teori: 4 h
Övningsstationer; ca 20 h/grupp
Hemuppgift: Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift och Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)/stud
Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination och filmning av examination, ca 3 h /studerande

RESUSKITATION: 1 sp =27 h
4 h teori (alla)
4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
7h Förberedande för examination.

LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1 sp = 40,5 h
Inblick i klinisk laboratorieverksamhet, grunder för venös provtagning och EKG, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 6 h
Hemuppgift: Preanalytiska faktorer, kunskapstest, förberedelser inför kliniska övningar
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO

STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Approved individual tasks and exercises.
Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
Radiation safety: Grade Approved/ Failed
Clinical care measures, clinical diagnostics and radiation protection VÅV22KV08-3009 28.08.2024-11.10.2024 5 credits (USS23F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can, based on case descriptions and simulation exercises, assess (identify and analyze care needs), plan, implement and evaluate the patient's care, and as part of a team perform the necessary evidence-based care measures
- can use technical equipment and perform central care measures in medical and surgical care
- can resuscitate patients in simulated situations
- can perform different types of sampling and has insights into the importance of laboratory examinations in patient care
- has knowledge of the areas of use of medical radiation and radiation protection

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV06 First Aid and Emergency Preparedness
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Content of the study unit

Simulation exercises based on case
IV cannulation, iv drugs, iv antibiotics and infusion solutions
Blood transfusions
PICC and CVK
Use of perfusor
Inhalation drugs
Fluid balance sheet
CPR-D + (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillator and IV drugs for resuscitation, and monitoring during and after resuscitation)
Patient preparation and preanalytical factors, sampling and the most common laboratory examinations
Medical radiation and radiation protection

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Marice Nedergård

Mode of delivery

60% Face-to-face, 40% Distance learning

Learning material

KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER;
Boman, L. & Wikström, C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Röda Korsets ABO-nätkurs.
Moodleföreläsningar.

RESUSCITATION;
Käypä hoito - suositus: Elvytys https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi17010
www.terveysportti.fi: Akuuttihoito opas: Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito
Moodleföreläsningar.

LABORATORIEKUNSKAP
Laboratoriotutkimusten näytteenotto (2021, Friman, Tarja; Kuparinen, Marja; Lehto, Liisa & Liikanen Eeva)
Näytteenottajan käsikirja (2016, Matikainen, Anna-Mari; Miettinen Marja & Wasström, Kalle)
Klinisk kemi: Kortfattad analystolkning (2014, Lund-Egloff, D. & Löwbeer, C.)
Jorfeldt, L., & Pahlm, O. (2011). EKG: Grunder, handledning vid tolkning och 101 kliniska fall. Studentlitteratur.
Lind, Y., & Lind, L. (2010). EKG-boken, bok med eLabb. Liber.

RADIATION SAFETY: See Moodle

Learning methods

Lectures, discussions, demonstrations, individual assignments, problem solving.
Clinical exercises in laboratory class.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

28.08.2024 - 11.10.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 01.09.2024
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- USS23F-V
Seats

10 - 48
Small group(s)
- Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Mikaela Engvall, Jannica Andtfolk, Carina Gädda, Marice Nedergård

Additional information

Mandatory attendance at clinical exercises in laboratory class.
In clinical exercises, care clothes and slippers is used.
See Moodle for more information!

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

2 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Red Cross blood web-course made last
Clinical exam week
Resuscitation test according to schedule
Radiation safety: On-line examination, the date will be decided the first lecture

Student's schedule and workload

5 sp Totalt 135 h
Obligatorisk närvaro vid alla övningar.

KLINISKA VÅRDÅTGÄRDER, 2 sp = 54 h
Teori: 4 h
Övningsstationer; ca 20 h/grupp
Hemuppgift: Blodtransfusionscase hemuppgift och Webbkursen Blodtransfusionens ABO. 1 – 1½ h (60 – 80 min)/stud
Klinisk examination: Förberedelser inför examination och filmning av examination, ca 3 h /studerande

RESUSKITATION: 1 sp =27 h
4 h teori (alla)
4h Klinska övningar grupp 1 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
4h Kliniska övningar grupp 2 OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
4h Examination grupp 1 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
4h Examination grupp 2 (enligt skilld bokning) OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
7h Förberedande för examination.

LABORATORIEKUNSKAP 1 sp = 40,5 h
Inblick i klinisk laboratorieverksamhet, grunder för venös provtagning och EKG, teori, Grupp 1 och 2, 6 h
Hemuppgift: Preanalytiska faktorer, kunskapstest, förberedelser inför kliniska övningar
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h Blodprov, venös provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 1, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO
Kliniska övningar, Grupp 2, 4 h EKG provtagning OBLIGATORISK NÄRVARO

STRÅLSÄKERHET 1sp= 27t
Förverkligas digitalt (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Approved individual tasks and exercises.
Approved Red Cross ABO online course.
Passed clinical examination: Grade GK / UK
Radiation safety: Grade Approved/ Failed
Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3007 15.10.2024-20.12.2024 2 credits (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
- has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
- has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
- understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

Content of the study unit

Clinical pharmacology

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Sirkku Säätelä

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
Läkemedelsboken online

Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

Learning methods

Online 100%
Groupdiscussions/workshops online
selfstudes
recorded lectures
forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
Final online test / multiple choice

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

15.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024
- 2 credits
Group(s)
- UHV23D-V
- UBM23D-V
Seats

10 - 30

Teachers and responsibilities

Sirkku Säätelä

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
Final test online l

Student's schedule and workload

27h arbete /sp för studerande
totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

Content scheduling

Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr

Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade
Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3008 02.09.2024-13.10.2024 2 credits (USS23D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
- has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
- has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
- understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

Content of the study unit

Clinical pharmacology

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Sirkku Säätelä

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
Läkemedelsboken online

Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

Learning methods

Online 100%
Groupdiscussions/workshops online
selfstudes
recorded lectures
forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
Final online test / multiple choice

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 01.09.2024
- 2 credits
Group(s)
- USS23D-V
Seats

10 - 44

Teachers and responsibilities

Sirkku Säätelä

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
Final test online l

Student's schedule and workload

27h arbete /sp för studerande
totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

Content scheduling

Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr

Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade
Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3009 15.10.2024-20.12.2024 2 credits (USS23F-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
- has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
- has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
- understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

Content of the study unit

Clinical pharmacology

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Sirkku Säätelä

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
Läkemedelsboken online

Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

Learning methods

Online 100%
Groupdiscussions/workshops online
selfstudes
recorded lectures
forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
Final online test / multiple choice

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

15.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 15.10.2024
- 2 credits
Group(s)
- USS23F-V
- SSK23F-1
Seats

10 - 30

Teachers and responsibilities

Sirkku Säätelä

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
Final test online l

Student's schedule and workload

27h arbete /sp för studerande
totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

Content scheduling

Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr

Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade
Clinical pharmacology VÅV22KV07-3010 02.09.2024-13.10.2024 2 credits (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- has knowledge of clinical pharmacology
- has knowledge of drugs in the most common disease groups
- has knowledge of drugs that are common in several different disease groups
- understands and can follow up the effects, side effects and interactions of the drugs

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

Content of the study unit

Clinical pharmacology

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Sirkku Säätelä

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
Läkemedelsboken online

Articles, films and podcast according to instructions

Learning methods

Online 100%
Groupdiscussions/workshops online
selfstudes
recorded lectures
forumdiscusiion and supervisiononline
Final online test / multiple choice

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Assigmets and workshops Appr+ /Appr/ complete/not pass
Online test 0-5 /0% correct answers for pass

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

02.09.2024 - 13.10.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024
- 2 credits
Group(s)
- SSK23F-2
- USS23F-V
Seats

10 - 30

Teachers and responsibilities

Sirkku Säätelä

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Short micro assignments / week according to Novia digistrategy Workshops
Final test online l

Student's schedule and workload

27h arbete /sp för studerande
totalt 54 h arbete (not translated)

Content scheduling

Kursen är periodiserad på based av innehåll i mindre deluppgifter sk microinlärninsgmoduler
Deluppgifterna görs i kronologisk ordning så att den föregående uppgiften ska vara gjor för att kunna gå vidare till nästa sektion.
Sluttest online sista kursveckan schemalagd (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Assignment done according to instructions with critical and analytic approach = Appr + Can higher the testresult if near limit to higher grade
Assignment done according to instructions and handed in according to deadline= appr
Assignment incomplete and need to be completed : Complete
Assignment not handed in or handed in 4 week after course is finished : Not appr

Assigment handed in too late ( < 4 weeks) can lower grade
Degree Project 3 VÅV22EX03-3005 07.01.2025-08.06.2025 6 credits (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
- can act as an opponent for another degree project
- can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

Prerequisites

VÅV22EX02 Thesis 2
Ragarding student midwives: BM22PR06 Practice: Intrapartum Midwifery 4

Content of the study unit

The research process
Presentation of degree project and opposition
Maturity test

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Anita Wikberg

Mode of delivery

67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

Learning material

According to the topic of thesis

Learning methods

Independent work with support from the supervisor.
Seminar + maturity test.

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Thesis is assessed according to 5 criteria, scientific writing, theoretical framework, method, result and presentation. Each criteria ha a scale from 1 to 5. The assessment criteria is published on the Moodle page linked to this implementation plan.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

07.01.2025 - 08.06.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024
- 6 credits
Group(s)
- UHV22D-V
- UBM22D-V
Seats

10 - 30

Teachers and responsibilities

Marica Hinders, Terese Österberg, Marlene Gädda, Anita Wikberg, Marie Hjortell

Additional information

See practical guide and Moodle course.
Follow Novia instructions for thesis writing.
AI=Artificial intelligence is not allowed in the thesis = RED according to Novias instructions

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

RDI share

6 credits

Share of online studies

2 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Validation according to Novia general instructions.

Practical training and working life co-operation

The thesis can be ordered, then an agreement is needed
The data material can be collected from different health care or other organisations if ethical permissions are approved.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Presentation and maturity test in May or in week 47, see Moodle and time schedule.

Internationa connections

-

Student's schedule and workload

Students plan their time use themselves, see below

Content scheduling

154 hours mostly self-directed work, 6 hours seminar 2 hours maturity test.
Degree Project 3 VÅV22EX03-3006 20.01.2025-31.12.2025 6 credits (USS22D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
- can act as an opponent for another degree project
- can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

Prerequisites

VÅV22EX02 Thesis 2
Ragarding student midwives: BM22PR06 Practice: Intrapartum Midwifery 4

Content of the study unit

The research process
Presentation of degree project and opposition
Maturity test

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Ann-Louise Glasberg

Mode of delivery

84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

Learning material

Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - Från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Learning methods

Written assignments
Seminar

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Thesis: 0-5
Maturity test: uk-gk

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

20.01.2025 - 31.12.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 31.03.2025
- 6 credits
Group(s)
- USS22D-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Ann-Louise Glasberg, Sirkku Säätelä, Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marica Hinders, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Practical training and working life co-operation

Presentation of thesis public.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Spring v.20
Autumn v.47

Student's schedule and workload

27 h/cr = 162 h

Assessment criteria

Teoretisk grund:
Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.

Metod:
Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.

Resultat:
Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.

Presentation:
Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Teoretisk grund:
Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
Källkritiken är bristfällig.

Metod:
Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
Slutsatserna är triviala.

Resultat:
Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.

Presentation:
Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Teoretisk grund:
Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
En god källkritik.
Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
Källkritiken är god.

Metod:
Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.

Resultat:
Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.

Presentation:
Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Teoretisk grund:
Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.

Metod:
Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.

Resultat:
Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.

Presentation:
Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)
Degree project 1 VÅV22EX01-3001 07.10.2024-22.12.2024 3 credits (USS22F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

Prerequisites

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

The course VÅV22UV01 Research Methodology and Care Theory must be completed in parallel with VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1.

Content of the study unit

The research process
Work plan

Person(s) in charge

Ann-Louise Glasberg

Mode of delivery

34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

Learning material

Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Novia har licens att använda MOT Kielipalvelu:
• MOT Ordböcker: 29 ordböcker; allmänna och specialordböcker
• MOT Översättare: automatisk översättning, till 26 språk
• MOT Språkgranskare
• MOT Ordlistor: exempelvis ”Terveydenhuoltosanastoa”
Mera om innehållet: https://www.sanakirja.fi/legal/our-content.
Adressen fungerar när du är på campus, i Novias nät, medan följande adress fungerar på distans: https://www-sanakirja-fi.ezproxy.novia.fi/ (not translated)

Learning methods

Individual assignment
Research plan for thesis

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Arbetsplan för examensarbete: uk-gk.

Planen skall innehålla följande delar (för gk):
• Novia titelblad
• Innehållsförteckning
• Inledning (minst 1 sid): skall innehålla minst 2 källor
• Syfte och frågeställningar
• Bakgrund (minst 4 sidor). Skall innehålla: 1 stud. minst 6 källor, varav minst 2 vetenskapliga; 2 stud. minst 9 källor, varav minst 4 vetenskapliga; 3 stud. minst 12 källor, varav minst 6 vetenskapliga
• Metod (minst 1 sida): Urval; Datainsamling; Dataanalysmetod; Etiska överväganden och Tidsplan
• Källförteckning (över de källor som används i planen)
Omfattning min 6 sidor och max 9 sidor (exkl. titelblad, innehållsförteckning och källförteckning)
Skall följa Novias skrivanvisningar https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/ (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

07.10.2024 - 22.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 21.08.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS22F-V
Seats

10 - 35

Teachers and responsibilities

Ann-Louise Glasberg

Additional information

Enligt Novias processbeskrivning:
"Till studier som leder till yrkeshögskoleexamen ingår ett lärdomsprov som vid Novia kallas examensarbete. Examensarbetet är en analys av ett problem från verkligheten där du kan använda de kunskaper du fått under dina studier och specialisera dig inom ett ämnesområde. Det är viktigt att slutföra en kurs i forskningsmetodik före du börjar med examensarbetet."

Innebär att kurs i forskningsmetodik skall vara slutförd eller påbörjad och slutförs under processen med skrivandet av planen för examensarbetet. Motsvarande kurs i forskningsmetodik vid annan yrkeshögskola eller universitet kan beaktas.

Kursen är en av tre kursdelar för examensarbetet.
Den innebär självständigt arbete, skrivande av och feed-back av plan för examensarbete (EA). (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

RDI share

3 credits

Share of online studies

2 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Approved research plan for thesis.

Practical training and working life co-operation

Topics for thesis.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

See Moodle.

Student's schedule and workload

27 h/cr = 81 h

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Underkänd:
Struktur saknas, likaså vissa källor och källhänvisningarna.
Hänvisningar och källförteckning följer inte de skriftliga anvisningar för examensarbete.
Syfte och frågeställningarna är otydliga och saknar vårdperspektivet.
Metoden för examensarbetet är oklar.

Godkänd: Följer anvisningarna och alla delar finns med. (not translated)
Degree project 1 VÅV22EX01-3003 02.09.2024-22.12.2024 3 credits (USS22D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

Prerequisites

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

The course VÅV22UV01 Research Methodology and Care Theory must be completed in parallel with VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1.

Content of the study unit

The research process
Work plan

Person(s) in charge

Ann-Louise Glasberg

Mode of delivery

34% Face-to-face, 66% Distance learning

Learning material

Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Novia har licens att använda MOT Kielipalvelu:
• MOT Ordböcker: 29 ordböcker; allmänna och specialordböcker
• MOT Översättare: automatisk översättning, till 26 språk
• MOT Språkgranskare
• MOT Ordlistor: exempelvis ”Terveydenhuoltosanastoa”
Mera om innehållet: https://www.sanakirja.fi/legal/our-content.
Adressen fungerar när du är på campus, i Novias nät, medan följande adress fungerar på distans: https://www-sanakirja-fi.ezproxy.novia.fi/ (not translated)

Learning methods

Individual assignment
Research plan for thesis

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Arbetsplan för examensarbete: uk-gk.

Planen skall innehålla följande delar (för gk):
• Novia titelblad
• Innehållsförteckning
• Inledning (minst 1 sid): skall innehålla minst 2 källor
• Syfte och frågeställningar
• Bakgrund (minst 4 sidor). Skall innehålla: 1 stud. minst 6 källor, varav minst 2 vetenskapliga; 2 stud. minst 9 källor, varav minst 4 vetenskapliga; 3 stud. minst 12 källor, varav minst 6 vetenskapliga
• Metod (minst 1 sida): Urval; Datainsamling; Dataanalysmetod; Etiska överväganden och Tidsplan
• Källförteckning (över de källor som används i planen)
Omfattning min 6 sidor och max 9 sidor (exkl. titelblad, innehållsförteckning och källförteckning)
Skall följa Novias skrivanvisningar https://intra.novia.fi/studier/examensarbete/skrivanvisningar/ (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

02.09.2024 - 22.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 02.09.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS22D-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Ann-Louise Glasberg

Additional information

Enligt Novias processbeskrivning:
"Till studier som leder till yrkeshögskoleexamen ingår ett lärdomsprov som vid Novia kallas examensarbete. Examensarbetet är en analys av ett problem från verkligheten där du kan använda de kunskaper du fått under dina studier och specialisera dig inom ett ämnesområde. Det är viktigt att slutföra en kurs i forskningsmetodik före du börjar med examensarbetet."

Innebär att kurs i forskningsmetodik skall vara slutförd eller påbörjad och slutförs under processen med skrivandet av planen för examensarbetet. Motsvarande kurs i forskningsmetodik vid annan yrkeshögskola eller universitet kan beaktas.

Kursen är en av tre kursdelar för examensarbetet.
Den innebär självständigt arbete, skrivande av och feed-back av plan för examensarbete (EA). (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

RDI share

3 credits

Share of online studies

2 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Approved research plan for thesis.

Practical training and working life co-operation

Topics for thesis.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

See Moodle.

Student's schedule and workload

27 h/cr = 81 h

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Underkänd:
Struktur saknas, likaså vissa källor och källhänvisningarna.
Hänvisningar och källförteckning följer inte de skriftliga anvisningar för examensarbete.
Syfte och frågeställningarna är otydliga och saknar vårdperspektivet.
Metoden för examensarbetet är oklar.

Godkänd: Följer anvisningarna och alla delar finns med. (not translated)
Degree project 2 VÅV22EX02-3001 25.11.2024-31.05.2025 6 credits (USS22F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

Prerequisites

VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

Content of the study unit

The research process
Intermediate seminar

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Ann-Louise Glasberg

Mode of delivery

17% Face-to-face, 83% Distance learning

Learning material

Kurslitteratur:
Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Learning methods

Self-studies
Seminar

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium.
Datainsamlingen skall vara gjord och dataanalysen påbörjad för gk.
De som inte kan delta (eller kommit så långt i EA-processen) får gk i samband med att de presenterar det färdiga examensarbetet (EX03). (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

25.11.2024 - 31.05.2025

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 16.03.2025
- 6 credits
Group(s)
- USS22F-V
Seats

10 - 35

Teachers and responsibilities

Ann-Louise Glasberg

Additional information

Planen för examensarbetet (EX01) skall var godkänd innan man deltar i mellansemi. (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

RDI share

6 credits

Share of online studies

5 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Practical training and working life co-operation

Topic for thesis.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Mid-seminar ccording to schedual.

Student's schedule and workload

27 h/cr = 162 h

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Godkänd:
Strukturen följer anvisningarna
Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad.
Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete (not translated)
Degree project 2 VÅV22EX02-3002 07.10.2024-31.01.2025 6 credits (UHV22D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

Prerequisites

VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

Content of the study unit

The research process
Intermediate seminar

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Anita Wikberg

Mode of delivery

84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

Learning material

According to the subject for thesis and literature for research method is free of choice
See VÅV22UV01-3002

Learning methods

Individual work under supervision
Seminar for presentation of parts of thesis, discussion and supervision

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

The theoretical framework for thesis i suitable for the content and can be approved. The methodology is described and the data collection is almost done. the analysis of the data has begun. The thesis work is under construction.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

07.10.2024 - 31.01.2025

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 02.01.2025
- 6 credits
Group(s)
- UHV22D-V
- UBM22D-V
Seats

10 - 30

Teachers and responsibilities

Anita Wikberg

Additional information

Approved work, consisting of theoretical framework to thesis, description of methodology used, collected datamaterial and the analysis of data has begun.
Use Instructions for writing a thesis and word template available on Novia homepage

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

RDI share

6 credits

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

See Novia instructions for validation

Practical training and working life co-operation

The thesis can be ordered from a health organization

Exam dates and retake possibilities

See time schedule, seminar i January 2025

Internationa connections

-

Student's schedule and workload

The hours counted for the course is 162 (6 cu) and contains mainly independent work but individual supervision is available during the course

Content scheduling

October to January
Degree project 2 VÅV22EX02-3003 25.11.2024-31.05.2025 6 credits (USS22D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

Prerequisites

VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

Content of the study unit

The research process
Intermediate seminar

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Ann-Louise Glasberg

Mode of delivery

17% Face-to-face, 83% Distance learning

Learning material

Kurslitteratur:
Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Learning methods

Self-studies
Seminar

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Följer anvisningarna för mellanseminarium.
Datainsamlingen skall vara gjord och dataanalysen påbörjad för gk.
De som inte kan delta (eller kommit så långt i EA-processen) får gk i samband med att de presenterar det färdiga examensarbetet (EX03). (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

25.11.2024 - 31.05.2025

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 09.03.2025
- 6 credits
Group(s)
- USS22D-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Ann-Louise Glasberg

Additional information

Planen för examensarbetet (EX01) skall var godkänd innan man deltar i mellansemi. (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

RDI share

6 credits

Share of online studies

5 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Practical training and working life co-operation

Topic for thesis.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Mid-seminar according to schedual.

Student's schedule and workload

27 h/cr = 162 h

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Godkänd:
Strukturen följer anvisningarna
Bakgrunden är relevant och informativ, samt ger motivering till val av forskningsområde
Syfte och frågeställningar uppvisar en klar avgränsning med ett tydligt vårdperspektiv
Datainsamling och -analys är påbörjad.
Källorna är relevanta och aktuella för syfte och frågeställningarna
Källhänvisningarna är gjorda på korrekt sätt och källförteckningen följer anvisningar för examensarbete (not translated)
Degree project 3 VÅV22EX03-3001 20.01.2025-01.06.2025 6 credits (USS22F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
- can act as an opponent for another degree project
- can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

Prerequisites

VÅV22EX02 Thesis 2
Ragarding student midwives: BM22PR06 Practice: Intrapartum Midwifery 4

Content of the study unit

The research process
Presentation of degree project and opposition
Maturity test

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Mode of delivery

84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

Learning material

Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - Från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Learning methods

Written assignments
Seminar

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Thesis: 0-5
Maturity test: uk-gk

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

20.01.2025 - 01.06.2025

Enrollment date range

07.12.2024 - 31.03.2025
- 6 credits
Group(s)
- USS22F-V
Seats

1 - 35

Teachers and responsibilities

Ann-Louise Glasberg, Sirkku Säätelä, Camilla Mattjus, Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Ståhl-Levón, Marica Hinders, Jannica Andtfolk, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn, Marice Nedergård, Åsa Lågland, Marlene Gädda, Anita Wikberg

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

RDI share

1 credits

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Practical training and working life co-operation

Presentation of thesis public.

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Spring v.20
Autumn v.47

Student's schedule and workload

27 h/cr = 162 h

Assessment criteria

Teoretisk grund:
Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten för studien är irrelevant och källkritik saknas.

Metod:
Metodvalet beskrivs inte eller beskrivningen är bristfällig och irrelevant.
Samstämmigheten med metodbeskrivningen och hur studien har genomförts är mycket bristfällig/felaktig.
Den etiska diskussionen är inte relevant/saknas.
Studien/undersökningen är inte tillräckligt omfattande för ett EA.
Slutsatserna ologiska och följer inte på en analys av ett datamaterial Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.

Resultat:
Presentationen av resultatet är bristfällig/felaktig/ inte baserad på en analys av datamaterial.
Den logiska strukturen saknas och resultatdiskussionen är okritisk och intetsägande
Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.

Presentation:
Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
Inledningen inte relaterad till innehållet, syftet är oklart och frågeställningen/arna följer inte syftet.
Slarvig layout och källförteckningen är bristfällig/felaktig.
Presentationen är ostrukturerad, oförberedd och inte relevant, opponeringen är inte relevant utan baseras på ett subjektivt tyckande.
Omoget, osjälvständigt och problemfyllt arbetssätt. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Teoretisk grund:
Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis irrelevant litteratur och förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven
Ett osjälvständigt refererande skrivsätt används.
En viss källkritik kan uppfattas.
Den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är uppbyggd av företrädesvis relevant litteratur men förblir mycket allmänt och/eller kortfattat beskriven. Källorna är få, endast delvis relevanta och utgör en svag teoretisk ram för arbetet.
Förmågan att presentera en översikt av relevant forskning är svag.
Källkritiken är bristfällig.

Metod:
Metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och den etiska diskussionen är rudimentär och ofullständig. Resultat- och metoddiskussionen, innefattande en kritisk granskning av undersökningen/studien, är inte relevant med avseende på arbetet. Slutsatserna är outvecklade och triviala.
Delar av metodbeskrivningen, metoddiskussionen och/eller den etiska diskussionen är bristfällig. Resultat-, metoddiskussionen/den kritiska granskningen är mycket ytlig.
Slutsatserna är triviala.

Resultat:
Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande, samt är ofullständig med avseende på vad som är relevant för arbetets syfte.
Presentationens logiska stringens är svag.
Återkopplingen till syftet är synnerligen svag i slutledningen.
Resultatdiskussionen är huvudsakligen refererande och vissa aspekter som är centrala med avseende på arbetets syfte behandlas ofullständigt eller inte alls.
Presentationen är till vissa delar inte stringent. Återkopplingen till syftet är svag i slutledningen.

Presentation:
Sammanfattningen av arbetet är bristfällig (abstrakt).
Inledningen är kort, intetsägande och leder inte in läsaren på ämnet.
Syftet är otydligt/inte relevant och frågeställningarna relaterar inte till syftet/eller blir felaktiga.
Det finns felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
Presentationen är svag och osammanhängande, opponeringen visar oförmåga att kritiskt granska en text.
Delvis omoget, problemfyllt och osjälvständigt arbetssätt.
Sammanfattningen av studien/undersökningen delvis bristfällig.
Inledningen ger en delvis missvisande/otydlig bild av ämnet.
Syftet är otydligt beskrivet eller är oändamålsenligt för ett examensarbete. Frågeställningarnas logiska koppling till syftet är synnerligen svag.
Det finns vissa felaktigheter i källförteckning och referenser.
Presentationen är relativt osystematisk, opponeringen är enbart refererande.
Arbetsprocessen har präglats av vissa problem och ett osjälvständigt arbetssätt. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Teoretisk grund:
Det finns en grundläggande förmåga att syntetisera och den teoretiska bakgrunden och utgångspunkterna bilda en fungerande teoretisk helhet.
Litteraturen är relevant med avseende på temat och den teoretiska utgångspunkten lämplig.
En god källkritik.
Studien/undersökningen utgår från en god teoretisk helhet baserad på omfattande och relevant litteratur, samt en klar och adekvat teoretisk utgångspunkt.
Källkritiken är god.

Metod:
Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande, dock utan ingående diskussion av olika metodval.
Undersökningen/studien har en omfattning motsvarande ett EA och är väl genomförd.
Den etiska diskussionen är kortfattad men redovisar de relevanta etiska frågorna.
Den kritiska granskningen är omfattande men inte reflekterande.
Slutsatserna är rimliga och återknyter till syftet men påvisar ingen förmåga att reflektera utöver detta.
Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet.
Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor. Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade.

Resultat:
Resultatredovisningen är systematisk men resonemanget trevande och företrädesvis refererande.
Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är klar, men kortfattad och outvecklad, avsaknad av reflektion.
Resultatredovisningen är korrekt, systematisk och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande och påvisar styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet.

Presentation:
Bra sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
Inledningen ger en tillräckligt god bild för att läsaren ska förstå temat och syftet med studien/undersökningen. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra.
Layout, källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentation och opponering följer anvisningarna.
Arbetsprocessen har varit smidig och till stor del självständig.
Mycket bra sammanfattning av undersökningen.
Inledningen ger en klar bakgrundsbild av hur arbetet förhåller sig till tidigare forskning och därmed till syftet. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard. Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar på en god förmåga att sätta sig in det opponerade arbetets tema. Arbetsprocessen är mogen och till största del självständig. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Teoretisk grund:
Bakgrunden och utgångspunkten är mycket välgrundad och välskriven samt visar en förmåga att förstå temat ur olika perspektiv. Ett reflekterade förhållningssätt beträffande temat är synligt i arbetet. Den teoretiska utgångs-punkten är väl vald och skribenten förmår att kritiskt utvärdera dess förtjänster och begränsningar.
Källorna är omfattande och relevanta, samt visar på en påfallande förmåga till källkritik.

Metod:
Metodbeskrivningen ger en heltäckande bild av studiens genomförande och visar på medvetenhet om för- och nackdelar ifråga om metodvalet, samt visar förmåga att överväga olika alternativ.
Den etiska diskussionen är omfattande och uttömmande ifråga om relevanta etiska frågor.
Slutsatserna är omfattande och välgrundade; skribenten förmår också kritiskt värdera dessa och visa på nya perspektiv och frågor för fortsatt forskning.

Resultat:
Resultatredovisningen är välstrukturerad, innovativ och visar på förmåga till ett självständigt resonemang.
Återkopplingen till syftet i slutledningen är tydlig och omfattande. Styrkor och svagheter i genomförandet av studien/undersökningen diskuteras. Arbetet avslutas med en intresseväckande avslutning, välgrundad syntes och utvecklingsmöjligheter.

Presentation:
Utmärkt sammanfattning av undersökningen (Abstrakt).
Inledningen förmår problematisera tidigare forskning och kunskap i ämnet och sätter därför syftet i en vetenskapligt intressant kontext. Syftet och frågeställningarna är logiskt kopplade till varandra. Källförteckning och referenser följer standard.
Presentationen är systematisk och skribenten visar förmåga att utveckla och förtydliga sitt tema. Opponeringen är kritiskt och konstruktivt samt visar även på en god förmåga att problematisera och kritiskt reflektera över skribentens tema.
Arbetsprocessen är smidig, mogen och självständig.
Arbetet har det lilla extra som ger lyskraft. (not translated)
Development of Health Care Practice UHV20HV12-3002 01.01.2025-30.06.2025 5 credits (UHV21D-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:

Develops innovative healthcare work from a social and working life perspective (eg within projects)

Maintains and applies evidence based knowledge

Identifies his/her development needs and enhances their skills in their work as an expert in healthcare

Prerequisites

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Content of the study unit

Development of health care work

Future oriented healthcare work

Application of research and project results

Project expertise

Person(s) in charge

Jaana-Sofia Tengström

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Rekommendation:
- litteratur i vetenskapligt skrivande
- litteratur i projektarbete
- facktidskrifter, forskning inom det valda området, aktuella händelser i samhället via media
- litteratur från tidigare kurser och kommande kurser inom hälsovårdarutbildningen, se utförandeplaner/förverkliganden från tidigare kursser (not translated)

Learning methods

Introduktion av utvecklingsarbete 10.12.2024 obligatorisk närvaro
Studerande skriver utvecklingsarbete individuellt eller i par
Studerande lämnar in plan för utvecklingsarbete vecka 3, dl.17.1.25 kl:12.00
Grupphandledning x 1, 6.5.25 obligatorisk närvaro
Handledning två gånger per arbete (varav den ena grupphandledning)
Ev, praktiskt förverkligande av utvecklingsarbetet (förverkligandet kan variera beroende på projektets art).
Skriftlig produkt
Inlämning av arbetet 15.5.2025 kl.12.00
Seminarium 22.5.2025 där utvecklingsarbetet presenteras och diskuteras i samarbete med samarbetspartners, handledare och hälsovårdarstuderande. Obligatorisk närvaro (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Praktiskt förverkligande (om möjligt)
Skriftlig produkt bedöms med vitsordet 1-5
Studerande har förmåga att utnyttja tidigare kunskap från utbildning till sjukskötare som forskningsmetodik, vetenskapligt skrivande, argumentation, presentation och yrkesmässig hållning på ett berömligt, gott eller nöjaktig sätt.
Studerande har på ett berömligt, gott eller nöjaktigt sätt utvecklat sin utvecklingsidé och presenterar den muntligt och skriftligt.
Studerande kan utveckla det hälsofrämjande arbetet på ett berömligt, gott eller nöjaktigt sätt med stöd av utvecklingsarbetet för en vald målgrupp i hälsovårdskontextet.
Studerande har förmåga till kreativitet och innovation och grundar sin idé på evidens inom området.
Rapporten är inlämnad i tid, följer Novias skrivanvisningar, motsvarar minst 8 sidor skriven text ( vid individuellt arbete) exkluderat pärmblad, innehållsförteckning och innehållsförteckning + eventuella bilagor.
Obligatoriskt aktivt deltagande vid seminariet
Vitsordet är en sammanställning av presentation+ praktiskt förverkligande+seminarierapport (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

01.01.2025 - 30.06.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- UHV21D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Pia Liljeroth, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Practical training and working life co-operation

Arbetet ska gärna göras i samarbete med arbestlivet/ svara till arbetslivets behov (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Inlämning av det skriftliga arbetet 30.5.2024
Seminarium 3.6.2024 (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Självstudier + handledning 135 h
Föreläsning och seminarium 10 h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Studerande har inte förmågan att utnyttjasin tidigare kunskap från utbildning till sjukskötare som forskningsmetodik, vetenskapligt skrivande, argumentation, presentation och yrkesmässig hållning.
Studerande kan inte utveckla sin idé och presentera den muntligt och skriftligt.
Studerande har svårigheter att utveckla det hälsofrömjande arbetet med stöd av utvecklingsarbetet för en vald målgrupp i hälsovårdskontextet.
Studerande visar ej kreativitet och innovation och grundar inte sin idé på evidens inom området.
Rapporten är inte inlämnad i tid, Rapporten följer inte Novias skrivanvisningar, motsvarar minst 8 sidor skriven text exkluderat pärmblad, innehållsförteckning och innehållsförteckning + eventuella bilagor. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Studerande har en svag förmåga att utnyttja tidigare kunskap från utbildning till sjukskötare som forskningsmetodik, vetenskapligt skrivande, argumentation, presentation och yrkesmässig hållning.
Studerande kan svagt utveckla sin projektidé och presentera den muntligt och skriftligt.
Studerande kan på ett nöjaktigt sätt utveckla det hälsofrämjande arbetet med stöd av utvecklingsarbetet för en vald målgrupp i hälsovårdskontextet.
Studerande har en svag förmåga till kreativitet och innovation och grundar sin idé på evidens inom området.
Rapporten är inlämnad i tid, följer Novias skrivanvisningar, motsvarar minst 8 sidor skriven text exkluderat pärmblad, innehållsförteckning och innehållsförteckning + eventuella bilagor. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande har förmåga till att utnyttja tidigare kunskap från utbildning till sjukskötare som forskningsmetodik, vetenskapligt skrivande, argumentation, presentation och yrkesmässig hållning på en god nivå.
Studerande kan väl utveckla sin projektidé och presentera den muntligt och skriftligt.
Studerande kan med stöd av utveckla det hälsofrämjande arbetet för en vald målgrupp i hälsovårdskontextet.
Studerande har förmåga till kreativitet och innovation och grundar sin idé på evidens inom området.
Rapporten är inlämnad i tid, Rapporten följer Novias skrivanvisningar, motsvarar minst 8 sidor skriven text exkluderat pärmblad, innehållsförteckning och innehållsförteckning + eventuella bilagor (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande har en god förmåga att utnyttja tidigare kunskap från utbildning till sjukskötare som forskningsmetodik, vetenskapligt skrivande, argumentation, presentation och yrkesmässig hållning på ett berömligt, sätt.
Studerande kan på ett berömligtt sätt utveckla sin projektidé och presentera den muntligt och skriftligt.
Studerande kanpå ett berömligt, utveckla med stöd av utvecklingsarbetet det hälsofrämjande arbetet för en vald målgrupp i hälsovårdsarbetet.
Studerande har förmåga till kreativitet och innovation och grundar sin idé på evidens inom området.
Rapporten är inlämnad i tid. Rapporten följer Novias skrivanvisningar, motsvarar minst 8 sidor skriven text exkluderat pärmblad, innehållsförteckning och innehållsförteckning + eventuella bilagor. (not translated)
Developmental Project in Public Health Nursing HVV14FU04-3008 02.09.2024-31.07.2025 5 credits (UHV21D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student
-shows the ability to deepen and develop their substance knowledge in public health care work

Prerequisites

Research methodology
Research methods and nursing theory
Degree thesis

Content of the study unit

Developmental project

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

se närmare separat dokument för bedömningskriterier ( finns i Moodle) (not translated)

Person(s) in charge

Anita Wikberg

Mode of delivery

80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

Learning material

According to the chosen theme

Learning methods

Lectures, seminars and independent work with supervision

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

The development work is evaluated 1-5
Criteria for evaluation
Starting point for and goal of the development work
The theoretical foundation of development work
Area of use for the development work
Critical review of development work, process and product

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

02.09.2024 - 31.07.2025

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- UHV21D-V
Seats

10 - 20

Teachers and responsibilities

Anna-Lena Nieminen, Terese Österberg, Marlene Gädda, Anita Wikberg, Marie Hjortell

Additional information

The lectures and seminars are compulsory
Novia instructions for writing thesis has to be used
AI is not allowed to use

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

RDI share

5 credits

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

-

Practical training and working life co-operation

The work may be ordered from Health Care Center, hospital or other care institution

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Presentation of development work week 47 year 2024 or in May 2025

Internationa connections

-

Student's schedule and workload

3 h lecture
6 h seminars
126 h individual work, with supervision

Content scheduling

-

Assessment criteria

The development work does not fulfill the criterion for achieving 1

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

The purpose of the development work is unclearly formulated and the objective is not relevant or unclearly explained. The work includes all relevant parts but they are inadequately described
The purpose and objectives remain somewhat unclear and relate poorly to existing knowledge in the thematic area. The relevance of the development work is described, albeit superficially, and the delimitation is deficient
Justification for choosing background material / frame of reference is missing or is scarce / inconsistent. Ability to source criticism is lacking
Students' choice of background material / frame of reference is partly relevant. The ability to critique sources is weak. The process description / method description is based on literature but it is not fully applied as described. The process / method is not well chosen considering the product
The product / study is inadequately presented, has a greater anchoring in the respondents' own perception than in theory and expectations from working life. It requires extensive processing to be able to be used / published / distributed
The product is well presented, but the anchoring in the needs of working life is weakly substantiated and the product / information can form the basis for further processing before a possible spread.The description and motivation for choosing a product / study is very deficient and not entirely appropriate in terms of purpose, issues and area of use.
The description of and motivation for choosing a product / study method is weak. There are some errors in the product / study and the discussion and reflection on the implementation of the study / product is deficient.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

he motivation for choosing a theme area is universal and the goal is clear but could be more clearly justified. The development work is clearly delimited.
The development work is clearly and logically structured and reflects purpose and objectives and a good ability to apply a scientific approach (with practical roots). The work includes all relevant parts and the parts are proportional in relation to each other
The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and sufficient basic material (eg data material for analysis) has been used
The process description / method description is based on literature and there is a clear approach to anchoring the product's development in the process description / method. The process / method is well chosen with the product in mind. The respondent / respondents can reflect on the choice of process / method and discuss this.
Background / frame of reference well described, motivated, relevant and forms a good basis for the development work. The ability to critique sources is good. The process description / method description is well chosen with the product in mind, well described and is well rooted in literature. The process is carried out in accordance with the description and well described. The respondent / respondents are able to reflect and critically examine the choice and the discussion concerning the choice and the description of the process / method is well implemented.

The product / study is carefully carried out but has little grounding in working life and requires processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life requires a certain amount of processing to be able to be used / published / disseminated
The choice and justification of the method for the product / study is appropriate. The use of traditional methods (for both product and study) is good. The critical review is weak.
The description of method and approach is good and based on a good motivation. The respondent (s) master their methods well, and there is a clear connection to the purpose of the product / study. In the critical review of planning and implementation, the respondents show awareness of the advantages and disadvantages of the product / study.

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

The development work is current and innovative and develops the student's professional knowledge. The purpose and objective are clear and well motivated. The development work has been carried out in such a way that the purpose and objective are fulfilled.
The chosen subject area is discussed and the respondents / n / s are able to reflect on their subject area and add something new to the discussion.
The purpose / objective is clearly described and the theoretical / pragmatic basis for the development work is clearly described and is based on sufficient basic material. There is a pronounced / described anchoring in the degree project / in a need that is based on the care area. Background / frame of reference forms a clear and logical basis for the development work. The rationale for the choices made is clear, unambiguous and relevant. The student has made a meritorious synthesis. The ability to critique sources is commendable. The product is ready for distribution
The product / study is carefully carried out, has a clear anchoring in working life and is well processed to be used in working life / published / disseminated
The description and use of the method and approach are excellent and based on an excellent motivation. The report has a clear connection to the purpose of the survey. The discussion and the critical review show an excellent ability to account in theoretical reasoning for the product / study's advantages and disadvantages regarding choice of method / process and implementation
Drug Treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3014 07.10.2024-20.12.2024 3 credits (USS24D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
- has basic knowledge of pharmacology
- masters the aseptics of drug treatment
- masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
- has skills in administration of injections
- can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
- has insight into theory for prescriptions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
- masters drug calculation at a basic level

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Legislation
Pharmacology
Aseptics and route of administration
Theory for prescriptions
Patient guidance and documentation
Drug calculation
Administration of injections

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Camilla Mattjus

Mode of delivery

67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

Learning material

STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
+ material on moodle

Learning methods

Lectures,
Group work, individual work
Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
Drug calculation exercises with case problems

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Web-based tasks approved
Virtual test 80 % correctly
Exam in drug calculation, 100% correct

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

07.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 06.10.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-V
Seats

10 - 50
Small group(s)
- Group 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Group 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Group 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Camilla Mattjus, Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

Additional information

Läkemedelsräkning innehåll:
Grundmatematik
Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram, Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
Infusionshastighet
Utspädningar (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Assignments
Virtual test
Exam in drug calculation

Student's schedule and workload

3 sp = 81 h
Class teaching 20 hours + 4 hours for the exam
Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

Assessment criteria

Webbaserade uppgifter: UK
Virtuellt test i teori 80 % inte korrekt, vitsord UK
Tentamen i läkemedelsräkning inte godkänt om inte 100 % är korrekt (not translated)

Approved / Failed

Web-based tasks not approved
Virtual test not 80 % correctly
Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly
Drug Treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3015 21.10.2024-20.12.2024 3 credits (USS24F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
- has basic knowledge of pharmacology
- masters the aseptics of drug treatment
- masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
- has skills in administration of injections
- can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
- has insight into theory for prescriptions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
- masters drug calculation at a basic level

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Legislation
Pharmacology
Aseptics and route of administration
Theory for prescriptions
Patient guidance and documentation
Drug calculation
Administration of injections

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Camilla Mattjus

Mode of delivery

67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

Learning material

STM 2020. Säker läkemedelsbehandling.
Social- och hälsovårdsministeriets publikationer https://stm.fi/sv/publikationer
Nurminen, M-L. 2008. ABC om läkemedelsbehandling. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
Kivela, S-L. 2006. Me, ikääntyminen ja lääkkeet, WSOY, Helsinki eller Fastbom, J. 2006. Äldre och läkemedel. Liber, Stockholm.
Ernvall, S et al 2006. Läkemedelsräkning. Utbildningsstyrelsen, Helsingfors.
Molin, B. Therborn, M., Andersson, I.2016. Träna läkemedelsräkning. Liber AB, Stockholm.
+ material on moodle

Learning methods

Lectures,
Group work, individual work
Self study and virtual tasks on the moodle page
Drug calculation exercises with case problems

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Web-based tasks approved
Virtual test 80 % correctly
Exam in drug calculation, 100% correct

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

21.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 20.10.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-V
Seats

10 - 50
Small group(s)
- Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Grupp 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Camilla Mattjus, Katarina Vironen

Additional information

Läkemedelsräkning innehåll:
Grundmatematik
Enhetsomvandlingar ( microgram, milligram, gram, Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
Infusionshastighet
Utspädningar (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Assignments
Virtual test
Exam in drug calculation

Student's schedule and workload

3 sp = 81 h
Class teaching 20 hours + 4 hours for the exam
Time for Web-based assignments, selfstudies, group work and tent reading 57 h.

Assessment criteria

Webbaserade uppgifter: UK
Virtuellt test i teori 80 % inte korrekt, vitsord UK
Tentamen i läkemedelsräkning inte godkänt om inte 100 % är korrekt (not translated)

Approved / Failed

Web-based tasks not approved
Virtual test not 80 % correctly
Examination in drug calculation not 100 % correctly
Drug Treatment 1 VÅV22GV05-3016 11.11.2024-20.12.2024 3 credits (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- has knowledge of and can apply legislation and directives regarding drug treatment
- has basic knowledge of pharmacology
- masters the aseptics of drug treatment
- masters pharmaceutical forms and their mode of administration
- has skills in administration of injections
- can observe the effects of drug treatment on the patient
- has insight into theory for prescriptions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has an understanding of the importance of drug treatment in patient safety
- masters drug calculation at a basic level

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Legislation
Pharmacology
Aseptics and route of administration
Theory for prescriptions
Patient guidance and documentation
Drug calculation
Administration of injections

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Nina Vestö

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

SHM 2021 Säker läkemedelsbehandling : Handbok för upprättande av plan för läkemedelsbehandling https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162848

Taam-Ukkonen, M. & Saano S. 2012. Lääkehoidon käsikirja. (Del 1 kap. 1-14)
eller
Nordeng, H, och Spigset, O. 2020. Farmakologi och läkemedelsandvändning (Del 1 kap. 1-6)

WHO.2010. WHO best praxis for injections and related proceduces toolkit. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599252_eng.pdf valda delar

Lääketietokanta, Lääkkeet ja hinnat och lääkeinteraktiot, finns tillänglig på Terveysportti
eller
FASS Vårdpersonal http://www.fass.se/LIF/startpage?userType=0

Molin et al 2016. Träna Läkemedelsberäkning Liber, Stockholm
eller
Björkman E. & Hagberg M. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning för sjuksköterskor. eller
Ernvall S.mfl. 2014 (eller äldre). Läkemedelsräkning.

Rekommenderad litteratur:
Iivanainen och Syväoja.2012. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma Pro. Helsingfors
Björkman, A-M. 2009. Läkemedelsberäkning och läkemedelshantering. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Aktuella artiklar och material enligt föreläsarens anvisningar på finska /engelska

Learning methods

seminars , lectures, groupwork
Selfstuides in moodle
Clinical exercises and examination on campus

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Assingmenst passed/not passed. Online test sclae 0-5 ( 70% for passing)
Calculation 100% according to natinal demands

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

11.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 15.09.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- UHV24D-V
- UBM24D-V
Seats

0 - 36
Small group(s)
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 3 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Katarina Vironen, Nina Vestö

Additional information

Läkemedlesräkning innehåll:
Grundmatematik
Enhetsomvandlingar ( mikrogram, milligram, gram Internationella enheter , läkemedels styrka i %
Dosberäkningar av fasta och flytande läkemedel
Infusionshastighet
Utspädningar (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Assignments and virtual online test according to instructions
Calcularion test in class after workshops
Re test on days for re test on campus
clinical examination in injections according to schedule

Student's schedule and workload

27 h/credit

Assessment criteria

Fyller inte kraven på en gk prestation (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Nöjaktig nivå:

Studerandes svara är på en ytlig nivå. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocess men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar på grundläggande nivå sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen, egna reflektioner fattas.

Studerande känner svagt till läkemedlens skeden i organismen

Studerande känner svagt till olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

God-synnerligen god nivå:

Studerandes svar är på god nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna reflektioner.

Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.

Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Berömlig nivå:

Studerandes svar är på djupgående nivå i alla tentens frågor. Studerande kan beskriva läkemedelsbehandlingsprocessen och relatera de olika delarna av processsen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt sjukskötarens ansvar och rättigheter i läkemedelsprocessen och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.

Studerande kan läkemedlets skeden i organismen.

Studerande kan olika läkemedelsformer och administrationssätt
På engelska (not translated)
Drug Treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3013 31.03.2025-02.05.2025 2 credits (UBM24D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
-has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
- has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
- masters advanced drug calculation

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

Content of the study unit

Advanced drug treatment
Cytotestatic treatment
Epidural pain relief
Fluid treatment
Blood transfusion
Patient guidance and documentation
Advanced drug calculation

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Katarina Vironen

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
Films and online material in moodle
Articles and research according to instructions

Learning methods

Online course
Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
Case and problem solving in workshops
Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
Assignmets pass/ rejected
Undone task =0
Active participation in workshops
one part rejected = course 0

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

31.03.2025 - 02.05.2025

Enrollment date range

02.07.2024 - 31.07.2024
- 2 credits
Group(s)
- UBM24D-V
- UHV24D-V
Teachers and responsibilities

Sirkku Säätelä, Katarina Vironen

Additional information

The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
task according to moodle in specific order
tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

Student's schedule and workload

27h/ cr
%4 h toal workload

Content scheduling

Task / week

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade
Drug Treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3014 17.03.2025-20.04.2025 2 credits (USS24D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
-has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
- has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
- masters advanced drug calculation

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

Content of the study unit

Advanced drug treatment
Cytotestatic treatment
Epidural pain relief
Fluid treatment
Blood transfusion
Patient guidance and documentation
Advanced drug calculation

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Sirkku Säätelä

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
Films and online material in moodle
Articles and research according to instructions

Learning methods

Online course
Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
Case and problem solving in workshops
Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Calculation 100% correct in test ( national criteria)
Theory test online 1.5 according to % scale
Assignmets pass/ rejected
Undone task =0
Active participation in workshops
one part rejected = course 0

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

17.03.2025 - 20.04.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 29.03.2025
- 2 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Sirkku Säätelä

Additional information

The course has e pedagogical frame work in the learning pyramid with interaction and discussions in groups.
Course is built in short module for self studies and with workshops in different subjects both online and in class according to Novia digital strathegy
Active participation in workshops is needed for passing the course

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

0.5 credits

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Calculationstest schedulded in agenda after alla workshops
task according to moodle in specific order
tests in theory 70% neede for approvment Re take after course ended according to peppi

Student's schedule and workload

27h/ cr
%4 h toal workload

Content scheduling

Task / week

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Approved = assigments handed in according to deadline, Analytical and critcal thining
Complete= ttaks not dne according to instructions
Rejected= task not done at all or handed in 3 weeks to late. Rejects the course
Forum discussion _: anlutic and critical thinlig can hgher the grade
Drug Treatment 2 VÅV22KV06-3015 27.01.2025-02.03.2025 2 credits (USS24F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
-has knowledge of advanced drug treatment
- has knowledge of the basics of chemotherapy, epidural pain relief, fluid therapy and blood transfusions
- masters patient guidance and documentation in connection with drug treatment
- has knowledge of the importance of drug treatment for patient safety
- masters advanced drug calculation

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1

Content of the study unit

Advanced drug treatment
Cytotestatic treatment
Epidural pain relief
Fluid treatment
Blood transfusion
Patient guidance and documentation
Advanced drug calculation

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Sirkku Säätelä

Mode of delivery

50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

Learning material

Inkinen et al. 2016.Turvallinen lääkehoito. STM julkaisuja http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/129969/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-577-6.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Ernvall et al. 2014. Läkemedelsräkning
Nordeng& Spigset. Farmakologi och farmakologisk omvårdnad eller
Koskinen et al. 2012. Lääketietoa ammatilaisille
Henriksson, O. & Lennemark, I. 2017. Värt att veta om vätskebalans. Lärobok om vatten-, elektrolyt- och syra-basbalans. Studentlitteratur.
Films and online material in moodle
Articles and research according to instructions

Learning methods

Hybrid course
Lectures, groupwork, discussion online
Case and problem solving in workshops
Virtual tasks, forum dicussion, onlinetests
Drug calculation using flipped classroom , test after sections endeed

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

calculation test t 100% correct t national criteria
Online test 1-5 according % scale
assgnments pass/ comlpete

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

27.01.2025 - 02.03.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 29.03.2025
- 2 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-V
Seats

10 - 50

Teachers and responsibilities

Sirkku Säätelä

Additional information

Den pedagogisk refensramen är enligt inlärninsgpyramiden och Feynmans teknik
Studerande jobbar i grupper under workshps och stöder även varnarda i inlärningen (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Calculationstest schedulded in agenda
re take after course ended according to peppi

Student's schedule and workload

27H /cr

Content scheduling

Teoridelen periodiserad enligt kronologisk ordning så föregående microdel gör före nästa
Läkemedlesräkningen delad i tre oliks kategorier (not translated)
Emergency Care and Radiation Safety USS22UV01-3002 06.01.2025-20.04.2025 4 credits (UHV22D-Å, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- is familiar with the regional, national and international collaboration in crisis and disaster situations
- is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, assess the need for care, plan, perform and document sustainable emergency care
- has expertise in care in various service system
- can meet, support and mentor the critically ill patient and relatives
- masters sustainable medication management in emergency care
- deepens his/her knowledge of psychosocial support in crisis situations
- can start immediate rescue operations independently and act in emergency situations
- masters the basics of radiation protection

Prerequisites

Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Surgical and Perioperative Care, Nursing in Internal Medicine and Palliative care, Clinical Nursing

Content of the study unit

Patient care in emergency care situations in an interprofessional team and befitting medication management and medication calculation

Psychosocial support in various crisis situations and application of evidence based sustainable working methods in emergency care and in different service environments

Regional, national and international cooperation in crisis and disaster situations

Assessment of the situation and rescue operations in crisis and disaster situations

The basics of radiation physics, radiation biology, radiation protection legislation, radiation safety measures in the workplace and medical use of radiation

Person(s) in charge

Hanna Limnell

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Strålsäkerhet: enligt lärarens anvisning, Moodle
Akutvård:
God medicinsk praxis 2020. Posttraumatiska stressreaktioner och posttraumatiskt stressyndrom. https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/khr00125
God medicinsk praxis 2021. Psykosocialt stöd och tjänster (bild). https://www.kaypahoito.fi/sv/imk01307
God medicinsk praxis 2021. Återhämtning från posttraumatiskt stressyndrom och traumatyp hos vuxna (bild). https://www.kaypahoito.fi/imk01308
Hälso- och sjukvårdslag §38-40
https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/ajantasa/2010/20101326
Lennquist, S. (red.) 2017. Traumatologi.
Lennquist, S. (red.) 2009. Katastrofmedicin.
Lundberg, Lars; Bäckström, Denise; Andersson Hagiwara, Magnus 2022. Prehospital akutsjukvård.
Läkemedelsboken - Akutmedicin https://lakemedelsboken.se/
Räddningsväsendet 2016. Räddningsverksamhet. http://www.pelastustoimi.fi/raddningsvasendet/raddningsverksamhet
Saviluoto Anssi 2018. Luentosarja Ensihoidon lääkkeet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3UgziVBVHM
Statsrådets förordning om räddningsväsendet
https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/ajantasa/2011/20110407
SHM 2023. Prehospital akutsjukvård.
http://stm.fi/sv/prehospital-akutsjukvard

TERVEYSPORTTI:
Sairaanhoitajan tietokannat:
-Traumapotilaan hoito; hoito onnettomuuspaikalla ja kuljetuksen aikana och Vaikeasti loukkaantuneen potilaan hoito päivystyspoliklinikalla.
Akuuttihoidon tietokannat:
-Akuuttihoito-opas; Hätätilapotilaan hoito, Elvytys ja elvytetyn potilaan jatkohoito, Akuuttihoidon laitteet (Sairaalan ulkopuolisessa hoidossa käytettävät laitteet), Kuvat (Sairaalan ulkopuolisessa hoidossa käytettävät laitteet)
Akuuttihoidon lääkkeet
-Ensihoito-opas (not translated)

Learning methods

Självstudier 1,5 sp
Föreläsningar i pre-hospital och akutvård 0,5 sp
Simulationer med inlärningsuppgifter 1 sp
Strålsäkerhet 1 sp:
- Introduktionsföreläsning 2t, on-line
- Material, uppgifter och föreläsningar på Moodle
- On-line tent (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

På svenska
1. Obligatorisk föreläsning GK/UK

2. Obligastoriska kliniska övningar, simulationer och inlämmningsuppgifter GK/UK.

3. Tent i akutvård (0-5)

4. Strålsäkerhet : GK/UK (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

06.01.2025 - 20.04.2025

Enrollment date range

01.12.2024 - 06.01.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- UHV22D-Å
- USS22D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Katarina Vironen, Daniel Nenonen, Hanna Limnell

Additional information

Studerande får muntlig feedback av instuderingsfrågor, kliniska övningar och simulationer under övningar.
Studerande får skriftlig gruppfeedback efter hemtent. Individuell feedback vid behov (tiden bokas med lärare). (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

1.Obligatorisk introduktion och obliatoriska föreläsningar
2.Obligastoriska kliniska övningar med inlämningsuppgifter och simulationer . Gjorda och i tid inlämnade uppgifter är förutsättning för att studerande kan delta kliniska övningar.
3.Tent i akutvård
4. Strålsäkerhet: Uppgifter i Moodle (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Obligatorisk introduktion i akutvård 13.1. och i strålsäkerhet (online) 14.1.
Obligatoriska föreläsningar 14h Se schema
Inlämningsuppgifter inför de obligatoriska kliniska övningar enligt tidtabell i Moodle
Obligatoriska simulationer i två grupper. Se schema
Tent i akutvård (SEB) 17.4.. (omtent I 9.5. och omtent II 23.5. )

Strålsäkerhet: tentamensdatum planeras under första lektionen (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

4sp = 108h
Föreläsningar i akutvård 12 h
Instuderingsfrågor och simulationer 40 h
Tent i akut vårdarbete 31 h (Självstudier inför tent + tent 2 timmar)
Strålsäkerhet 1sp= 27t (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Godkänd:
Studerande har deltagit de obligatoriska föreläsningar. Vid frånvaro kompletterat föreläsningar enligt examinators anvisningar.

Studerande deltar aktivt kliniska övningar och simuleringar och påvisar kunnandet i akutvård.

Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: alla svar måste vara till 100% korrekt räknade för att studerande skall bli godkänd i examinationen.

Tent i akutvård:
Studerande känner till samarbete vid kris- och katastrofsituationer regionalt och nationellt.
Studerande kan i ett mångprofessionellt team bedöma vårdbehovet, planera, utföra och dokumentera akutvård
Studerande kan bemöta och handleda den kritiskt sjuka patienten och anhöriga
Studerande behärskar läkemedelsbehandling inom akutvård.

Underkänd:
Studerande deltar inte de obligatoriska föreläsningar och har inte kompletterat frånvaro enligt anvisningar.

Studerande är frånvarande från simulationer eller deltar inte aktivt simuleringar och påvisar inte kunnandet i akutvård.

Den skriftliga individuella läkemedelsräkningstentamen: resultat under 100% korrekt

Tent i akutvård: Studerande påvisar inte kunskap i kursens olika kompetensområden.

Strålskydd: Har inte lämnat in uppgifter i strålsäkerhet/ UK i online-tent

Studerande påvisar inte kunskap i kursens olika kompetensområden och svarar till uppgifter på en allmän nivå (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Studerande känner till på en allmän nivå begrepp och grundläggande principer inom akutvård. Det finns ytlig samband mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande förstår och kan förklara begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Visar förmåga till att reflektera mellan teori och praktik. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande har förmåga att se samband och göra egna slutsatser mellan begrepp och de grundläggande principerna i akutvård. Kan reflektera bra mellan teori och praktik (not translated)
English VÅV22EN01-3011 11.11.2024-20.12.2024 3 credits (USS24D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
-shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
-master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
literature
-has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
-is aware of cultural differences in communication

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Working life related documents
Professional communication in working life

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Terese Herrgård-Backlund

Mode of delivery

67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

11.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 10.11.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-V
Seats

10 - 50

Teachers and responsibilities

Miranda Ekholm

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5
English VÅV22EN01-3012 28.04.2025-30.05.2025 3 credits (UBM24D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
-shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
-master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
literature
-has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
-is aware of cultural differences in communication

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Working life related documents
Professional communication in working life

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Åsa Fagerudd

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

The teacher's material

Learning methods

On campus

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Passed exam, approved assignments and oral presentation, participation in class

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

28.04.2025 - 30.05.2025

Enrollment date range

02.07.2024 - 31.07.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- UBM24D-V
- UHV24D-V
Teachers and responsibilities

Miranda Ekholm

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Final exam

Student's schedule and workload

27h/sp = 81 h

Assessment criteria

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the course material.
The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated during the course.

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a basic understanding of the course material.
The contents of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

The student demonstrates a good understanding of the course material and is able to draw on the literature.
The student can reflect on and motivate their point of view.
The student has almost or completely fulfilled the instructions of the assignments.
The contents of submitted assignments are good.
The student has participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment towards the course contents and course assignments.

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates an excellent understanding of the course material.
The contents of submitted assignments are excellent and the assignments have been executed exceptionally well.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment towards and interest in the course contents and course assignments.
The student has a deep understanding of the course contents and is able to use that knowledge in their future profession.
English VÅV22EN01-3013 20.01.2025-23.02.2025 3 credits (USS24F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
-shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
-master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
literature
-has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
-is aware of cultural differences in communication

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Working life related documents
Professional communication in working life

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Terese Herrgård-Backlund

Mode of delivery

67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

Learning material

The teacher's material

Learning methods

Self-study

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Approved assignments and oral presentation

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

20.01.2025 - 23.02.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 29.03.2025
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-V
Seats

10 - 50

Teachers and responsibilities

Miranda Ekholm

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Portfolio

Student's schedule and workload

27h/sp = 81 h

Assessment criteria

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the course material.
The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated during the course.

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a basic understanding of the course material.
The contents of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

The student demonstrates a good understanding of the course material and is able to draw on the literature.
The student can reflect on and motivate their point of view.
The student has almost or completely fulfilled the instructions of the assignments.
The contents of submitted assignments are good.
The student has participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment towards the course contents and course assignments.

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates an excellent understanding of the course material.
The contents of submitted assignments are excellent and the assignments have been executed exceptionally well.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment towards and interest in the course contents and course assignments.
The student has a deep understanding of the course contents and is able to use that knowledge in their future profession.
Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3010 21.04.2025-20.06.2025 7 credits (USS242D-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
- can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
- can life-saving first aid

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)

Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession

Ethics

Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)

Physical, social and symbolic environment

The patients' and relatives' participation in care

The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
Wound-care, chronic wound

Aid resource

Patient- and client safety

Aseptics

Vital functions, measurements and examinations

Life-saving first aid

Person(s) in charge

Josephine Åberg

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Kursböcker:
Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)

Övrig litteratur:
Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.

Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.

Artiklar och databas (not translated)

Learning methods

Självstudier
Föreläsningar
Simulationer obligatoriks närvaro
Smågruppsarbete (distans)
Reflektionsdagbok
Examinationer (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

1. Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete (distans), flippedlektion och simulationer . Bedöms: GK/UK.

2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK.

3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker GK/UK Skriftlig respons på Moodle

4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Muntlig respons efter examinationen.

Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle

5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Skriftlig respons och utvärdering på Moodle

6. Tystnadsplikt - inlämning på Moodle (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

21.04.2025 - 20.06.2025

Enrollment date range

21.03.2025 - 20.04.2025
- 7 credits
Group(s)
- USS242D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Josephine Åberg, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

Additional information

Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in till Josephine Åberg via e-ahot före den 30.4.2025 (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Diskussionsanteckningar
Smågruppsarbete
Simulationer
Praktisk examination
Individuell skriftlig examination
Förstahjälp (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Reflektionsdagbok lämnas in på Moodle inför varje flipped lektion / simulation
Simulation
Första hjälp,
Praktisk examination juni /2025 i form av filmning
Skriftlig individuell examination juni. Omtagningstillfälle: augusti och september 2025
Närmare information på kursens Moodle sida (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Självstudier inför examination 60 h
Självstudier, smågruppsarbete, reflektionsdagbok - inför varje simulation 70 h
Interaktiva föreläsningar och flipped lektion på campus 20 h
Simulation: 25 h
Första hjälp övning: 3 h
Studiebesök: 2 h
Praktisk examination: 2h - filmning av case

Examination: 4h
Tystandsplikt - inlämning

Livräddande första hjälpen 0,25 sp
Skriftlig individuell tentamen 2.5. sp
Simulering 1 sp
Refleksionsdagbok 2.25 sp
Praktisk examination 1 sp
Självstudier (moodle) och föreläsningar (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Nöjaktig nivå:
Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)
Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3006 05.09.2024-13.12.2024 7 credits (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
- can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
- can life-saving first aid

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)

Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession

Ethics

Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)

Physical, social and symbolic environment

The patients' and relatives' participation in care

The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
Wound-care, chronic wound

Aid resource

Patient- and client safety

Aseptics

Vital functions, measurements and examinations

Life-saving first aid

Person(s) in charge

Josephine Åberg

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Kursböcker:
Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)

Övrig litteratur:
Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.

Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.

Artiklar och databas (not translated)

Learning methods

Självstudier
Föreläsningar
Simulationer obligatoriks närvaro
Smågruppsarbete (distans)
Reflektionsdagbok
Examinationer (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

1. Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete (distans), flippedlektion och simulationer . Bedöms: GK/UK.

2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro GK/UK.

3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker GK/UK Skriftlig respons på Moodle

4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Muntlig respons efter examinationen.

Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Urkund via Moodle

5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Skriftlig respons och utvärdering på Moodle

6. Tystnadsplikt - inlämning på Moodle (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

05.09.2024 - 13.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 04.09.2024
- 7 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-Å
- UHV24D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Josephine Åberg, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Hanna Limnell

Additional information

Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in till Josephine Åberg via e-ahot före den 15.9.2024 (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Diskussionsanteckningar
Smågruppsarbete
Simulationer
Praktisk examination
Individuell skriftlig examination
Förstahjälp (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Reflektionsdagbok lämnas in på Moodle inför varje flipped lektion / simulation
Simulation
Första hjälp,
Praktisk examination december /2024 Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommlese med examinatorn
Skriftlig individuell examination 4.12. Omtagningstillfälle: Fre 17.1.2025 kl. 12-16; Fre 7.2.2025 kl. 12-16. Närmare information på kursens Moodle sida (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Självstudier inför examination 60 h
Självstudier, smågruppsarbete, reflektionsdagbok - inför varje simulation 70 h
Interaktiva föreläsningar och flipped lektion på campus 20 h
Simulation: 20 h
Första hjälp övning: 3 h
Studiebesök: 2 h
Praktisk examination: 2h - filmning av case

Examination: 4h
Tystandsplikt - inlämning

Livräddande första hjälpen 0,25 sp
Skriftlig individuell tentamen 2.5. sp
Simulering 1 sp
Refleksionsdagbok 2.25 sp
Praktisk examination 1 sp
Självstudier (moodle) och föreläsningar (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredställande nivå. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Nöjaktig nivå:
Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)
Evidence Based Primary Care USS22IV05-3007 10.09.2024-31.01.2025 7 credits (USS24F-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
- can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
- can life-saving first aid

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)

Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession

Ethics

Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)

Physical, social and symbolic environment

The patients' and relatives' participation in care

The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
Wound-care, chronic wound

Aid resource

Patient- and client safety

Aseptics

Vital functions, measurements and examinations

Life-saving first aid

Person(s) in charge

Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Kursböcker:
Edberg &Wijk 2019 Omvårnadens grunder, hälsa och ohälsa. kap. 3, 6, 7, 11-23
Klang et.al.2014. Sjuksköterskans omvårdnadskunnade. En praktisk och teoretisk grundbok. Pearson. Valda delar
Iivanainen & Syväoja. 2016. Hoida ja kirjaa. Sanoma pro. Valda delar
Ekman I (red). 2020 (eller äldre version). Personcentrering inom hälso och sjukvård.
Databaser ( främst: Tervysportti och Vårdhandboken)

Övrig litteratur:
Boman,L. & Wikström,C. 2019. Medicinsk teknik. Teori, planering och genomförande.
Gottlieb, B. 2013. Strengths-Based Nursing Care. s 15-34, 146, 170-171, 313-349 (finns som e-bok)
Hewitt-Taylor. 2018. Personcentrerad vård i praktiken.
Friberg, F et al. 2019.Omvårdnadens grunder. Perspektiv och förhållningssätt. Kap 14-17, 21-25.

Joninen & Virkkunen. 2018. Handbok för strukturerad dokumentation av patientuppgifter, Del 1. THL
Nykänen P. & Junttila K. 2012. Raportti 40. Hoitotyön moniammatillisen kirjaamisen asiantuntijaryhmän loppuraportti.THL. https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90814
Potilasasiakirjojen laatiminen ja käsittely. Opas terveydenhuollolle. Stm 2012. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/72897
Kinnunen, et al. 2020. Manual FinCC 4.0 för klassificeringshelheten FinCCFinnCC Vårdbehov 4.0. THL.

Artiklar och databas (not translated)

Learning methods

Självstudier
Föreläsningar/Workshopar (obligatorisk närvaro)
Simulationer (obligatorisk närvaro)
Smågruppsarbete (distans)
Reflektionsdagbok
Examinationer (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

1. Obligatorisk närvaro under smågruppsarbete (distans) och simulationer. Bedöms: GK/UK.

2. Livräddande första hjälp övningar obligatorisk närvaro. Bedöms: GK/UK.

3. Inom utsatt tid inlämnade individuella reflektionsdagböcker. Bedöms: GK/UK Skriftlig respons på Moodle

4. Praktisk examination bedöms i skalan GK/UK, enligt följande kriterier:
För godkänt bör studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar och vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerandes åtgärder och agerande äventyrar inte patientsäkerheten. Muntlig respons efter examinationen.

Alla inlämningar plagiatkontrolleras i Ouriginal via Moodle

5. Skriftlig examination bedöms i skalan 0-5 enligt följande kriterier:
Studerande påvisar evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter gällande patientens vårdprocess, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder inom grundvården. Studerande förstår betydelsen av interprofessionellt arbete inom grundvården. Skriftlig respons och utvärdering på Moodle

6. Tystnadsplikt - inlämning på Moodle (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

10.09.2024 - 31.01.2025

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 09.09.2024
- 7 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Josephine Åberg, Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa, Hanna Limnell

Additional information

Ev. anhållan om validering lämnas in till Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa via e-ahot före den 23.9.2024 (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Reflektionsdagbok
Simulationer
Praktisk examination
Individuell skriftlig examination
Förstahjälp (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Reflektionsdagbok lämnas in på Moodle inför varje simulation (dvs. v.40, 45 & 48)
Simulation (vecka 40, 46 & 49)
Första hjälp (januari 2025)
Praktisk examination (filmning) (januari 2025) Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommelse med examinatorn
Skriftlig individuell examination (hemtentamen) (januari 2025). Omtagningstillfälle: Enligt överenskommelse med examinatorn (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Självstudier inför examination 80h
Självstudier, smågruppsarbete, reflektionsdagbok - inför varje simulation 70 h
Föreläsningar på campus ca. 12 h
Simulation: 16h
Första hjälp övning: 4h
Examination: 4h
Tystandsplikt - inlämning

Livräddande förstahjälpen 0,25 sp
Skriftlig individuell tentamen (hemtentamen) 2,5 sp
Simulering 1 sp
Refleksionsdagbok 2,25 sp
Praktisk examination 1 sp
Självstudier (moodle) och föreläsningar (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Studerande når inte upp till kriterier för tillfredsställande nivå. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Nöjaktig nivå:
Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter inom grundvården men har svårt att relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande nämner etik och patientsäkerhet, egna reflektioner fattas.
Studerande har ytliga kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och tillämpningen är svag. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande kan beskriva patientens vårdprocess och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar etik, patientsäkerhet och kan i viss mån göra egna reflektioner.
Studerande har grundläggande kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem i viss mån. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande kan beskriva den patientens vårdprocess och relatera de olika delarna av processen till varandra och sjukskötarens uppgifter. Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etik, patientsäkerhet och kan göra egna mångsidiga reflektioner.
Studerande har djupa kunskaper i grundvård, kliniska undersökningar, funktionsmätningar, förebyggande och patientcentrerade vårdmetoder och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)
Finnish VÅV22FI01-3014 03.02.2025-14.03.2025 3 credits (UBM24D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
- demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Finnish (oral and written)

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Further information

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Material on Moodle.

Learning methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

03.02.2025 - 14.03.2025

Enrollment date range

02.07.2024 - 31.07.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- UBM24D-V
- UHV24D-V
Teachers and responsibilities

Anna Korhonen

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student's schedule and workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours
Finnish VÅV22FI01-3013 04.11.2024-20.12.2024 3 credits (USS24F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
- demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Finnish (oral and written)

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Further information

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Person(s) in charge

Anita Kvist

Mode of delivery

67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

04.11.2024 - 20.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 03.11.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-V
Seats

10 - 50

Teachers and responsibilities

Anna Korhonen

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5
Finnish VÅV22FI01-3015 07.01.2025-02.02.2025 3 credits (USS24D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
- demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Finnish (oral and written)

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Further information

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Person(s) in charge

Ellinor Granholm

Mode of delivery

84% Face-to-face, 16% Distance learning

Learning material

Material on Moodle.

Learning methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

07.01.2025 - 02.02.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 02.03.2025
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Anna Korhonen

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

0.5 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student's schedule and workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours.
First Aid and Emergency Preparedness VÅV22GV06-3014 18.11.2024-13.12.2024 2 credits (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- masters the basics of providing first aid
- can act in crisis and disaster situations

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

First aid
Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Marica Hinders

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Learning methods

Lessons, demonstration, practice

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

18.11.2024 - 13.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 11.11.2024
- 2 credits
Group(s)
- UHV24D-V
- UBM24D-V
Seats

0 - 37
Small group(s)
- Practise 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Practise 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Marica Hinders

Additional information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Practical tests and theoretic test

Student's schedule and workload

2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)
First Aid and Emergency Preparedness VÅV22GV06-3015 07.01.2025-02.02.2025 2 credits (USS24D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- masters the basics of providing first aid
- can act in crisis and disaster situations

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

First aid
Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Learning methods

Lessons, demonstration, practice

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

07.01.2025 - 02.02.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 03.01.2025
- 2 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-V
Seats

10 - 45
Small group(s)
- Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

Additional information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

0.5 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

Student's schedule and workload

2 x 27 timmar = 54 tim (not translated)
First Aid and Emergency Preparedness VÅV22GV06-3016 07.01.2025-19.01.2025 2 credits (USS24F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- masters the basics of providing first aid
- can act in crisis and disaster situations

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

First aid
Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

Mode of delivery

50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

Learning material

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Learning methods

Lessons, demonstration, practical training

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Virtual test: approved/failed
Group assignment: approved/failed
Individual written case studies: approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

07.01.2025 - 19.01.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 02.02.2025
- 2 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-V
Seats

10 - 50
Small group(s)
- Grupp 1 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 20. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Yvonne Sjöberg-Ehn

Additional information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Practical tests during lesson time, virtual test

Student's schedule and workload

2 x 27 h = 54 h
From Elderly to Geriatric Patient USS22KL02-3002 10.02.2025-16.03.2025 4 credits (USS23F-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has an understanding of normal aging
- can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
- can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
- master evidence-based and sustainable care methods and appropriate medication management
- can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient

Chain of care and service system

Coping/adaptation

Partnership and counseling

Caring for close relatives

Ethical decision making

The aged patient's health problems

Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
Care of chronic wound

Adequate medication management

Geriatric technology

Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder

Evidence-based care

Care chains and service types, elderly care

Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

Person(s) in charge

Michaela Jalava

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

Kursböcker:
- Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., Hylen Ranhoff, A., Bolinder-Palmér, I. & Olsson, K. (2018). Geriatrisk omvårdnad: God omsorg och vård till den äldre (Andra upplagan.). Liber AB.
- Dehlin, O. & Rundgren, Å. (2018). Geriatrik (3:4 upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
eller Arkkila, P., Pitkälä, K., Strandberg, T., Sulkava, R., Tilvis, R. & Viitanen, M. (2016). Geriatria (3., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim.
Gottlieb, L. N. 2012 Strengths-Based Nursing Care
Litteratur:
Drevenhorn, E. 2017. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur.
Ekstedt, M. & Flink, M. 2019. Hemsjukvård-olika perspektiv på trygg och säker vård
Ernsth Bravell, M. 2011. Äldre och åldrande.
Etene. 2008. Vårdetik på ålderns höst
Finlex 2012 Lag om stödjande av den äldre befolkningens funktionsförmåga och om social- och hälsovårdstjänster för äldre.
Hellström, I. & Hydén, L-C. (red). 2016. Att leva med demens.
Johansson, S: & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (red). 2016. Förändringsperspektiv på äldreomsorgen.
Jönson, H., & Harnett, T. 2015. Socialt arbete med äldre.
Kivelä, S-L. 2010. Vi äldre och våra mediciner.
Larsson, Å. (red) 2015. Vardagsteknik för äldre.
Lindqvist, E-L. 2016 Äldres hälsa och livskvalitet
NMR. 2015. Kvalitet i äldreomsorgen. Äldreomsorg i Norden Sid 55-90. Nordiskt välfärdscentrum.
Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
SHM 2020: Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen.
THL. 2020. Livskraft på äldre dar - kostrekommendationer på äldre personer.
Fimea. 2020. Medicin75+
Medibas (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsningar
Workshops
Simuleringar
Inlämningsuppgift
Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Examinationsuppgift bedömning 0-5
Tent i Geriatrik GK/UK
Deltagande i Föreläsningar, Workshops och Simulering bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

10.02.2025 - 16.03.2025

Enrollment date range

11.01.2025 - 09.02.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- USS23F-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Föreläsningar, Workshops och simulationer obligatorisk närvaro till 80%. Kompensationsuppgifter vid frånvaro.
Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedömd med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Tent i Geriatrik v. 10 Omtentamen 4.4 och 25.4. 2025
Examinationsuppgift inlämning senast 10.3 (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Föreläsningar 4h
Workshops och simulationer 6h
Självstudier i Geriatrik och tent i Geriatrik 28h
Individuell skrifltig uppgift, (examinationsuppgif) 27h
Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur 43h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte. Texten besvarar inte frågorna och är ofullständig, Litteratur och forskningar tillämpas inte och inga reflektioner görs, Brister finns i den tekniska utformningen (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial men har inte förmåga att göra egna reflektioner. Studerande har svårigheter med att redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial och förmår till en viss del göra reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och kan tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar. Studerande kan relatera de olika delarna av uppgiften till varandraoch använder kursmateriel, forskningar och föreläsningsmaterial som stöd för sina reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess och kan anlysera detta och göra egna reflektioner. (not translated)
From Elderly to Geriatric Patient USS22KL02-3004 10.02.2025-16.03.2025 4 credits (USS23D-Å, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has an understanding of normal aging
- can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
- can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
- master evidence-based and sustainable care methods and appropriate medication management
- can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient

Chain of care and service system

Coping/adaptation

Partnership and counseling

Caring for close relatives

Ethical decision making

The aged patient's health problems

Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
Care of chronic wound

Adequate medication management

Geriatric technology

Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder

Evidence-based care

Care chains and service types, elderly care

Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

Person(s) in charge

Michaela Jalava

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

Kursböcker:
- Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., Hylen Ranhoff, A., Bolinder-Palmér, I. & Olsson, K. (2018). Geriatrisk omvårdnad: God omsorg och vård till den äldre (Andra upplagan.). Liber AB.
- Dehlin, O. & Rundgren, Å. (2018). Geriatrik (3:4 upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
eller Arkkila, P., Pitkälä, K., Strandberg, T., Sulkava, R., Tilvis, R. & Viitanen, M. (2016). Geriatria (3., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim.
Gottlieb, L. N. 2012 Strengths-Based Nursing Care
Litteratur:
Drevenhorn, E. 2017. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur.
Ekstedt, M. & Flink, M. 2019. Hemsjukvård-olika perspektiv på trygg och säker vård
Ernsth Bravell, M. 2011. Äldre och åldrande.
Etene. 2008. Vårdetik på ålderns höst
Finlex 2012 Lag om stödjande av den äldre befolkningens funktionsförmåga och om social- och hälsovårdstjänster för äldre.
Hellström, I. & Hydén, L-C. (red). 2016. Att leva med demens.
Johansson, S: & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (red). 2016. Förändringsperspektiv på äldreomsorgen.
Jönson, H., & Harnett, T. 2015. Socialt arbete med äldre.
Kivelä, S-L. 2010. Vi äldre och våra mediciner.
Larsson, Å. (red) 2015. Vardagsteknik för äldre.
Lindqvist, E-L. 2016 Äldres hälsa och livskvalitet
NMR. 2015. Kvalitet i äldreomsorgen. Äldreomsorg i Norden Sid 55-90. Nordiskt välfärdscentrum.
Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
SHM 2020: Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen.
THL. 2020. Livskraft på äldre dar - kostrekommendationer på äldre personer.
Fimea. 2020. Medicin75+
Medibas (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsningar
Workshops
Simuleringar
Inlämningsuppgift
Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Examinationsuppgift bedömning 0-5
Tent i Geriatrik GK/UK
Deltagande i Föreläsningar, Workshops och Simulering bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

10.02.2025 - 16.03.2025

Enrollment date range

11.01.2025 - 09.02.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- USS23D-Å
- UHV23D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Michaela Jalava, Åbo - timlärare Vård

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Föreläsningar, Workshops och simulationer obligatorisk närvaro till 80%. Kompensationsuppgifter vid frånvaro.
Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedömd med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Tent i Geriatrik v.9, Omtentamen 4.4 och 25.4.2025
Examinationsuppgift inlämning senast 11.3 (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Föreläsningar 14 h
Workshops och simulationer 6 h
Självstudier i Geriatrik och tent i Geriatrik 28h
Individuell skrifltig uppgift, (examinationsuppgif) 27h
Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur 33h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte. Texten besvarar inte frågorna och är ofullständig, Litteratur och forskningar tillämpas inte och inga reflektioner görs, Brister finns i den tekniska utformningen (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial men har inte förmåga att göra egna reflektioner. Studerande har svårigheter med att redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial och förmår till en viss del göra reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och kan tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar. Studerande kan relatera de olika delarna av uppgiften till varandraoch använder kursmateriel, forskningar och föreläsningsmaterial som stöd för sina reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess och kan anlysera detta och göra egna reflektioner. (not translated)
From Elderly to Geriatric Patient USS22KL02-3005 01.12.2024-14.03.2025 4 credits (ÖH23REGUSS-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has an understanding of normal aging
- can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
- can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
- master evidence-based and sustainable care methods and appropriate medication management
- can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient

Chain of care and service system

Coping/adaptation

Partnership and counseling

Caring for close relatives

Ethical decision making

The aged patient's health problems

Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
Care of chronic wound

Adequate medication management

Geriatric technology

Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder

Evidence-based care

Care chains and service types, elderly care

Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

Person(s) in charge

Michaela Jalava

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

Kursböcker:
- Kirkevold, M., Brodtkorb, K., Hylen Ranhoff, A., Bolinder-Palmér, I. & Olsson, K. (2018). Geriatrisk omvårdnad: God omsorg och vård till den äldre (Andra upplagan.). Liber AB.
- Dehlin, O. & Rundgren, Å. (2018). Geriatrik (3:4 upplagan.). Studentlitteratur AB.
eller Arkkila, P., Pitkälä, K., Strandberg, T., Sulkava, R., Tilvis, R. & Viitanen, M. (2016). Geriatria (3., uudistettu painos.). Duodecim.
Gottlieb, L. N. 2012 Strengths-Based Nursing Care
Litteratur:
Drevenhorn, E. 2017. Hemsjukvård. Studentlitteratur.
Ekstedt, M. & Flink, M. 2019. Hemsjukvård-olika perspektiv på trygg och säker vård
Ernsth Bravell, M. 2011. Äldre och åldrande.
Etene. 2008. Vårdetik på ålderns höst
Finlex 2012 Lag om stödjande av den äldre befolkningens funktionsförmåga och om social- och hälsovårdstjänster för äldre.
Hellström, I. & Hydén, L-C. (red). 2016. Att leva med demens.
Johansson, S: & Taghizadeh Larsson, A. (red). 2016. Förändringsperspektiv på äldreomsorgen.
Jönson, H., & Harnett, T. 2015. Socialt arbete med äldre.
Kivelä, S-L. 2010. Vi äldre och våra mediciner.
Larsson, Å. (red) 2015. Vardagsteknik för äldre.
Lindqvist, E-L. 2016 Äldres hälsa och livskvalitet
NMR. 2015. Kvalitet i äldreomsorgen. Äldreomsorg i Norden Sid 55-90. Nordiskt välfärdscentrum.
Strang, P. 2020. Palliativ vård inom äldreomsorgen. Vårdförlaget
SHM 2020: Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen.
THL. 2020. Livskraft på äldre dar - kostrekommendationer på äldre personer.
Fimea. 2020. Medicin75+
Medibas (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsningar
Workshops
Simuleringar
Inlämningsuppgift
Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Examinationsuppgift bedömning 0-5
Tent i Geriatrik GK/UK
Deltagande i Föreläsningar, Workshops och Simulering bedöms GK/UK (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

01.12.2024 - 14.03.2025

Enrollment date range

01.11.2024 - 30.11.2024
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- ÖH23REGUSS-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Michaela Jalava

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Föreläsningar, Workshops och simulationer obligatorisk närvaro till 80%. Kompensationsuppgifter vid frånvaro.
Individuell skriftlig uppgift bedömd med vitsord 0-5 (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Tent i Geriatrik 13.1 Omtentamen 7.2.2025 och 7.3.2025
Examinationsuppgift inlämning senast 16.3 (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Föreläsningar 4h
Workshops och simulationer 6h
Självstudier i Geriatrik och tent i Geriatrik 28h
Individuell skrifltig uppgift, (examinationsuppgif) 27h
Självstudier i aktuell kurslitteratur 43h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Kriterierna för vitsord 1 uppfylls inte. Texten besvarar inte frågorna och är ofullständig, Litteratur och forskningar tillämpas inte och inga reflektioner görs, Brister finns i den tekniska utformningen (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial men har inte förmåga att göra egna reflektioner. Studerande har svårigheter med att redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande svarar på uppgiftens frågor genom att använda kurslitteratur och föreläsningsmaterial och förmår till en viss del göra reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och kan tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på uppgiftens alla delar. Studerande kan relatera de olika delarna av uppgiften till varandraoch använder kursmateriel, forskningar och föreläsningsmaterial som stöd för sina reflektioner. Studerande kan redogöra för och tillämpa vårdteori och annan evidensbaserad litteratur i den geriatriska patientens vårdprocess och kan anlysera detta och göra egna reflektioner. (not translated)
Gerontology and Emergency Geriatric Care VÅV22KV10-3008 03.03.2025-06.04.2025 4 credits (USS23D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
- has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
-has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
- has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
- has knowledge of various memory disorders
- masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
- has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
- masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
- can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
- has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
- has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Content of the study unit

Gerontology
Geriatrics
Acute geriatrics
Gerotechnology
Drug treatment for elderly
Nutrition for elderly

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Sirkku Säätelä

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

På svenska
Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.

+ recommended articles at Moodle

Learning methods

Lectures
Self studies
Group work
Online exam

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

03.03.2025 - 06.04.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 09.03.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- USS23D-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Sirkku Säätelä

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Student's schedule and workload

1c =27h
4c=108h
Gerontology and Emergency Geriatric Care VÅV22KV10-3009 27.01.2025-07.03.2025 4 credits (SSK23F-2, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
- has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
-has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
- has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
- has knowledge of various memory disorders
- masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
- has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
- masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
- can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
- has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
- has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Content of the study unit

Gerontology
Geriatrics
Acute geriatrics
Gerotechnology
Drug treatment for elderly
Nutrition for elderly

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Sirkku Säätelä

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

På svenska
Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.

+ recommended articles at Moodle

Learning methods

Lectures
Self studies
Group work
Online exam

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

27.01.2025 - 07.03.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 16.03.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- SSK23F-2
- USS23F-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Sirkku Säätelä

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Student's schedule and workload

1c =27h
4c=108h
Gerontology and Emergency Geriatric Care VÅV22KV10-3012 14.04.2025-30.05.2025 4 credits (SSK23F-1, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
- has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
-has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
- has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
- has knowledge of various memory disorders
- masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
- has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
- masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
- can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
- has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
- has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Content of the study unit

Gerontology
Geriatrics
Acute geriatrics
Gerotechnology
Drug treatment for elderly
Nutrition for elderly

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Sirkku Säätelä

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

På svenska
Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.

+ recommended articles at Moodle

Learning methods

Lectures
Self studies
Group work
Online exam

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

14.04.2025 - 30.05.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 16.03.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- SSK23F-1
- USS23F-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Sirkku Säätelä

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Student's schedule and workload

1c =27h
4c=108h
Gerontology and emergency geriatric care VÅV22KV10-3006 14.10.2024-20.12.2024 4 credits (UHV23D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student:
- has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
- has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
-has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
- has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
- has knowledge of various memory disorders
- masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
- has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
- masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
- can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
- has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
- has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Content of the study unit

Gerontology
Geriatrics
Acute geriatrics
Gerotechnology
Drug treatment for elderly
Nutrition for elderly

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Marica Hinders

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

14.10.2024 - 20.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 25.08.2024
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- UHV23D-V
- UBM23D-V
Seats

10 - 30

Teachers and responsibilities

Sirkku Säätelä, Marica Hinders

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5
Health Care Practice Among Families with Children UHV20HV04-3002 01.08.2024-31.12.2024 5 credits (UHV21D-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:

Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of a child’s growth and development liaising with the family

Can support the parents in their parenthood and can guide, with resource promoting methods, the parents and their child towards a healthy lifestyle

Can assess the child’s and family’s need of additional support and further treatment

Prerequisites

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Content of the study unit

The service system and service environments for families with children

The child's growth and development

Health examinations, screenings, supervision

Guidance and resource enhancing methods

Group activities

Client / patient involvement

Multicultural work

Children in need of extra support and further investigations

Child protection

Person(s) in charge

Jaana-Sofia Tengström

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/stodmaterial/lagar-och-handbocker/arbetet-vid-modra-och-barnradgivningen/lagstiftning.
SHM 2005:12. Rådgivningsbyråerna för barnavård som stöd för barnfamiljerna. Handbok för personalen.
https://thl.fi/sv/web/handbok-for-barnradgivningar,
https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/stodmaterial/blanketter/blanketter-for-arbetet-vid-radgivningar,
Mäki, Wikström, Hakulinen m.fl. Hälsoundersökning vid barnrådgivning och inom skolhälsovård. Handbok 31/2018 (elektronisk),
http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-066-2,
https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/80049,
https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/80056,
Blair, M m.fl. 2013. Barnhälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur.
Haarala, P et al. Terveydenhoitajan osaaminen. 2015.
Magnusson,M.mfl. 2016. Barnhälsovård -att främja barns hälsa.
Arfman, S & Hujala, N. 2010. Ravitsemus neuvolatyössä. Edita.
https://www.livsmedelsverket.se/matvanor-halsa--miljo/kostrad-och-matvanor/barn-och-ungdomar
https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/116079,
Tillsammans kring matbordet, kostrekommendationer till barnfamiljer,
http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/130021/KIDE27_RUOTSI_WEB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y,
https://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/90855,
https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/73899/Es200810swe.pdf?sequence=1,
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta. Seksuaali- ja lisääntymisterveyden edistäminen. Toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Helsingfors.
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön selvityksiä 2008:24. Isien ja isyyden tukeminen äitiys- ja lastenneuvoloissa.
Ensi- ja turvakotien liitto. Tunnista vauvan hätä! Vauvan kaltoinkohtelun tunnistaminen ja siihen puuttuminen
Folkhälsoinstitutet. Vaccinatörens handbok. (www.thl.fi)
Korteniemi-Poikela, E & Cacciatore, R. 2010. Opas vanhemmille. Portaita pitkin. Lapsen ja nuoren seksuaalisuuden kehittyminen. WSOY.
Ryttyläinen, K. & Valkama, S. 2010. Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä. Edita.
SHM Publikation 2010:7. Slå inte barnet! Nationella handlingsprogrammet för att minska kroppslig aga 2010-2015.http://lapsiasia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/sla_inte_barnet.pdf
https://www.mll.fi/,
THL; Neuko tietokanta, https://www.terveysportti.fi/apps/dtk/nko

https://www.folkhalsan.fi/barn/,

Litteraturtips till de virtuella smågruppsarbeten:
Fossum 2019. Samtal och bemötande i vården. (eller tidigare upplaga).

Forsberg & Wallmark 2021. Nätverksboken - om mötets möjligheter (eller tidigare upplaga)

Hedström 2014. Barn som oroar - bemötande och metoder i förskolan och förskoleklass

Herz & Johansson 2019 Det professionella mötet (boken beställd till biblioteket)

Lundström 2019 Att förstå föräldrar - till barn med funktionsnedsättning (boken beställd till biblioteket)

Nilsson Tapper 2021 Professionella samtal med barn (boken beställd till biblioteket)

Ringborg 2020 Förändrade familjesamtal (boken beställd till biblioteket)

THL 2017 . Skapa förtroende . Skydda barnet.
https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/136182/Skapa%20f%c3%b6rtroende%20-%20Skydda%20barnet_2019_10_09.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

+ Annat material som laddas upp på kursens Moodlesida

Rikssvenskt material
https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/contentassets/3addb7a81de44a8b8a8f4bfa29b8306c/forskolans-paverkan-barns-halsa-01086.pdf,

http://www.vardgivarguiden.se/globalassets/behandlingsstod/barnhalsovard/bhv-rapporter/barns-ojamlika-forutsattningar.pdf?IsPdf=true,

https://www.livsmedelsverket.se/matvanor-halsa--miljo/kostrad-och-matvanor/barn-och-ungdomar.

Referenslitteratur :
Ahonen, L. 2017. Haastavat kasvatustilanteet. Lämpimän vuorovaikutuksen käsikirja. Juva: PS-Kustannus. Ur verket läses: Osa I Lapsen sosiaalisemotionaaliset taidot ja niiden tukeminen. Sidorna 16–5.

Mothander-Risholm P; Broberg;A. 2018. Att möta små barn och deras föräldrar I vården: om anknytning, utveckling och samspel.

MLL. Hur växer och utvecklas barn.

Hundeide, K. Vägledande samtal. 2008. WS Bokwell.

Aktuella facktidskrifter, forkningar och artiklar

Olsson,B.& Olsson, K. 2013. Att se möjligheter i svårigheter. Barn och ungdomar med koncentrationssvårigheter.

Observera att litteraturen kan uppdateras under kursens gång (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsningar, självstudier, smågruppsarbeten, pararbete, case-arbete
Gästföreläsningar, obligatorisk närvaro (se schema på Peppi).
Virtuellt interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete med socionomstuderande enligt instruktioner som finns på Moodle.
Simulering (obligatorisk närvaro)
Hälsovårdarutbildning fyller 100 år; festtillfälle 18.9.24 kl. 12-16.00 Obligatorisk närvaro
Möjlighet att delta på Hälsovårdardagar 15.11.2024 (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Samarbete med socionomstuderande:
1. Förhandsuppgift i grupp & smågruppsarbete med hälsovårdarstuderande samt deltagande i onlinetillfällen 1 sp
Bedömningskriterier:
- förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk sakkunskap i relation till det givna caset
- förmåga att arbeta utvecklingsinriktat i ett interprofessionellt team samt att kunna se nya utvecklingsmöjligheter i det gemensamma arbetet för barnets och familjens bästa
- förmåga till professionellt och etiskt förhållningssätt

Bedömning enligt skala 0-5. Vid validering bedömning enligt skala godkänd/underkänd.
Examinatorer: Susanne Davidsson och Jaana-Sofia Tengström
Studerande får muntlig feedback i samband med seminarierna. (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

01.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- UHV21D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Lilian Nordell, Jaana-Sofia Tengström

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Kursen består av fyra delexaminationer
1. Skriftlig parrapport och seminarium 1sp
Kurserna Resursförstärkande hälsovårdararbete, Hälsovårdarabete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdarabete med barnfamiljen examineras tillsammans i form av en parrapport. Studerande väljer (parvis) ett tema (t.ex. sömn, missbruk) och en metod (t.ex. motiverande samtal, resursförstärkande handledning) inom kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete. Temat och metoden ska synliggöras och tillämpas på den gravida familjen och i barnfamiljen (inom kurserna Hälsovårdarabete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdarabete med barnfamiljen). I rapporten ska fokus ligga på förebyggande och hälsofrämjande arbete, Tema- och parindelning görs på Moodle i kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete.
Rapporten ska basera sig på kurslitteraturen, relevanta webbsidor samt minst 3 vetenskapliga artiklar (en per kurs).
Paren ska boka in en handledningsgång med ansvariga lärare.
Bedöms enligt skala 1-5.

2. Muntlig examination 2sp
Kurserna Hälsovårdararbete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdararbete med barnfamiljen examineras gemensamt med en muntlig parexamination.
Gruppindelning, exakt tidpunkt och upplägg för examinationen meddelas senare (via Moodle under kursen Hälsovårdararbete med den väntande familjen).
Bedöms enligt skala 1-5

3.Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete 1 sp
Kursen är digital och inleds med en obligatorisk online kursintro, inspirationsföreläsning & studerandes presentationer av förhandsuppgift den 4.9 kl 8.15-12 och avslutas med obligatoriskt online seminarium och diskussion den 24.9 kl 14.30-16.
Interprofessionellt samarbete: Studerande jobbar online tillsammans med socionomstuderande i smågrupper och gör ett smågruppsarbete.
Självstudier:
Två schemalagda tidpunkter för smågruppsarbete online tillsammans med socionomstuderande finns insatta i gruppernas tidtabeller enligt följande: 13.9 14-16.00 pch 19.9 kl.14-16.00
Handledning fås digitalt i kursens handledningsforum.
Bedömning enligt skala 1-5

4. Simulering 0,5 sp GK/UK
5. Föreläsningar och uppgifter med seminarium + organisationsuppgift 0,5 sp vecka 45 GK/UK (not translated)

Practical training and working life co-operation

Online föreläsning med Annette Karlsson, Egentliga Finlands välfärdsområde, Chef för familjecenter (Kimitoön, Pargas, Åbo) och Hannele Nikander-Tuominen, Egentliga Finlands välfärdsområde, Chef för familjecenter (Reso, Rusko och Nådendal). (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

1. Skriftliga parrapporten laddas upp på Moodle (under kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete) Rapporten presenteras på seminarium. Seminariets upplägg laddas upp på Moodle efter deadline.

2. Muntlig examination i par v. 50.
Vid underkänd muntlig examination tenteras kursen individuellt skriftligt. Omtentamensdatum kommer man överen med examinatorn.

3. Interprofessionellt samarbete med socionomer online; smågruppsarbeten görs under vk. 36-40. Föruppgift 26.8-4.9.2024, Inledning 4.9.24 obligatorisk närvaro, handledning 16.9, inlämning och seminarium vecka 39/ 24.9 obligatorisk närvaro
Grupperna arbetar enligt de instruktioner som finns på Moodle och laddar upp examinationerna på Moodle.

5. Simulering, obligatoriskt deltagande, bedömning GK/UK enligt kursens kompetenser (not translated)

Assessment criteria

1. Skriftlig parrapport
Temaområdena behandlas fragmentariskt.
Litteraturen används inte.
Reflektioner framförs inte.
Brister i den tekniska utformningen.

2. Muntlig gruppexamination
Studerande deltar inte på eget initiativ i gruppens diskussion. Studerande kan inte besvara frågor som ställs till hen.

3. Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete
Smågruppsarbete 1:
Studerande har inte förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntligt format
Studerande har inte förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
Studerande har inte förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har brister i det professionella och etiska förhållningssättet

Smågruppsarbete 2:
Studerande har inte förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig format
Studerande har inte förmåga att kunna samarbete med olika professionella
Studerande har inte förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har inte förmåga att tillämpa givna metoder för att stöda barnet (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

1. Skriftlig parrapport
Temaområdena behandlas kort.
Litteraturen refereras
Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning.
Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig.

2. Muntlig gruppexamination
Studerande deltar sporadiskt i gruppens diskussion. Studerande använder enbart kurslitteratur eller enbart egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar.

3. Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete
Smågruppsarbete 1:
Vitsord 1
Studerande har en svag förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntlig form
Studerande har en svag förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
Studerande har svag förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har brister i det professionella och etiska förhållningssättet

Smågruppsarbete 2:
Vitsord 1
Studerande har en svag förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig form
Studerande har en svag förmåga att kunna samarbete med olika professionella
Studerande har svag förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har en svag förmåga att tillämpa givna metoder för att stöda barnet

Smågruppsarbete 1:
Vitsord 2
Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntlig form
Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga i det professionella och etiska förhållningssättet

Smågruppsarbet 2:
Vitsord 2
Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig form
Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att kunna samarbete med olika professionella
Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har en rätt svag förmåga att tillämpa givna metoder för att stöda barnet (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

1.Skriftlig parrapport
Temaområdena behandlas mångsidigt.
Litteraturen tillämpas.
Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns.
Den tekniska utformningen är god.

2.Muntlig gruppexamination
Studerande deltar i gruppens diskussion och bidrar med relevant kunskap. Studerande använder både kurslitteratur och sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar, men inte systematiskt.

3. Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete
Smågruppsarbete 1:
Vitsord 3
Studerande har god förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntlig form
Studerande har god förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
Studerande har god förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har ett gott professionellt och etiskt förhållningssätt.

Smågruppsarbete 2:
Vitsord 3
Studerande har en god förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig form
Studerande har en god förmåga att kunna samarbete med olika professionella
Studerande har god förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har en god förmåga att tillämpa givna metoder för att stöda barnet

Smågruppsarbete 1:
Vitsord 4
Studerande har en mycket god förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntlig form
Studerande har en mycket god förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
Studerande har en mycket god förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har ett mycket gott professionellt och etiskt förhållningssätt.

Smågruppsarbete 2
Vitsord 4
Studerande har en mycket förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig form
Studerande har en mycket förmåga att kunna samarbete med olika professionella
Studerande har en mycket god förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har en mycket förmåga att tillämpa givna metoder för att stöda barnet (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

1.Skriftlig parrapport
Temaområdena behandlas uttömmande och mångsidigt.
Litteraturen analyseras och tillämpas.
Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk.
Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig.

2. Muntlig gruppexamination
Studerande deltar aktivt i gruppens diskussion under examinationen och bidrar med relevant och korrekt kunskap. Studerande använder systematiskt både kurslitteratur samt sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar.

3. Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete
Smågruppsarbete 1:
Vitsord 5
Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga att sammanfatta teori i muntlig form
Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har ett utmärkt professionellt och etiskt förhållningssätt.

Smågruppsarbet 2:
Vitsord 5
Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga att sammanfatta teori i skriftlig form
Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga till kreativitet och utvecklingsinriktat arbete
Studerande har en utmärkt förmåga att tillämpa teoretisk kunskap i praktik
Studerande har ett utmärkt professionellt och etiskt förhållningssätt. (not translated)
Health Care Practice Among School Children, Adolescents and their Families UHV20HV06-3002 01.01.2025-09.03.2025 4 credits (UHV21D-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:

Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the growth and development of school children and adolescents in consultation with the family

Can, with resource promoting methods, support school children, adolescents and the family in health-promoting choices

Can evaluate the need for extra support and continued care for the school child, adolescents and the family

Can maintain and promote a safe growing, school and learning environment

Prerequisites

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Content of the study unit

The service system and service environments

Health examinations, screenings

Resource enhancement and health promotion guidance

Support for family resources

The participation of school children and adolescents in health-related issues

Early intervention, guidance, to address dozens of difficult things

Schoolchildren and adolescents in need of extra support and further investigations

Schoolchildren and adolescents in need of extra support and further investigations

Child protection services

Safe school and student environment

Person(s) in charge

Jaana-Sofia Tengström

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Bramhagen, A-K,Carlsson,A. 2014. Hälsofrämjande arbete för barn och ungdomar. Studenthälsan.
Clausson, Eva mfl. 2019. Skolsköterskans hälsofrämjande arbete. Studentlitteratur.
Guide för studerandehälsovården 2021, https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/163320/STM_2021_15_J.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Hakulinen- Viitanen, T mfl. Opas 22. THL. Laaja terveystarkastus. Ohjeistus äitiys- ja lastenneuvolatoimintaan sekä kouluterveydenhuoltoon, https://thl.fi/fi/web/lapset-nuoret-ja-perheet/peruspalvelut/opiskeluhuolto/kouluterveydenhuolto/terveystarkastukset/laajat-terveystarkastukset,
Kumpulainen,K.ym. (toim.) Lastenpsykiatria ja nuorisopsykiatria. Duodecim 2016.
Korteniemi-Poikela, E & Cacciatore, R. 2019. Rakkaus, ilo ja rohkeus. Seksuaalisuuden portaat.
(Korteniemi-Poikela, E & Cacciatore, R. 2010. Opas vanhemmille. Portaita pitkin. Lapsen ja nuoren seksuaalisuuden kehittyminen. WSOY.)
Leissner,M; Lundevall - Överby,H; 2020. Praktisk handbok för skolläkare och skolsköterskor. Studentlitteratur.
Larsson, B.2010. Konstruktiva samtal i svåra möten; mellan skola och hemmet.
Mäki, P., Wikström, K., Hakulinen-Viitanen, T. & Laatikainen, T. 2018. Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen & inom skolhälsovården Metodhandbok. THL. (delvis föråldrad)
Opiskeluterveydenhuollon opas 2021
https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/162957/STM_2021_14_J.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y,
Storvik-Sydänmaa,S; Talvensaari,H; Kaisvuo,T.&Uotila, N. (toim.). 2015. Lapsen ja nuoren hoitotyö. SanomaPro
SHM 2010:11. Rådgivningsverksamhet, skol- och studerandehälsovård samt förebyggande mun- och tandvård.
Vaccinatörens handbok. (www.thl.fi)
Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet, Finlands Kommunförbund. 2004. Kvalitetsrekommendation för skolhälsovården. Handböcker 2004:9.H:fors.
Aktuella lagar, direktiv och program och verksamhetsmodeller.

Referenslitteratur
Börjesson,M. 2019. Hälsofrämjande samtal med tonåringar och unga vuxna
Olsson,B-I & Olsson, K. 2015. Att se möjligheter i svårigheter. Barn och ungdomar med koncentrationssvårigheter.
Ryttyläinen, K. & Valkama, S. 2010. Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä. Edita.
Aktuella artiklar och facktidskrifter (Terveydenhoitaja tidskriften 2018-2023)
Neuko
www.folkhalsan.fi
www.mll.fi
www.thl.fi
www.thl.fi/kasvunkumppanit
www.stm.fi
www.ukm-instituutti.fi
www.vaestoliitto.fi
www.rfsu.se
http://tyttojenjuttu.fi/tjejernas-grej/
www.oph.fi (not translated)

Learning methods

1. Obligatorisk kursintroduktion 3.1
2. Självstudier
3. Föreläsningar, seminarium, simulering och Workshops obligatorisk närvaro
4. Gästföreläsningar
5. Interprofessionellt grupparbete och seminarium med socionomstuderande (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

1.Skriftlig examination, bedömning 1-5/UK
Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kursens kompetenserna och innehåll ), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap.

2. Workshops, simuleringar med intervju GK/UK

2.Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete med rapport och produkt.
Rapporten bedöms med GK/UK med följande kriterier:
- tydlighet
- att instruktionerna och skrivanvisningarna har följts
- källorna är relevanta och tydlig utskrivna
- att innehållet är täckande i relation till uppgiften
Produkten bedöms med GK/UK med följande kriterier:
- Tydlig beskrivning av produkten
- Användbarhet
- Tydlig beskrivning av hur teorin har tillämpats vid utformningen av produkten (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

01.01.2025 - 09.03.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 01.01.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- UHV21D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Åbo - timlärare Vård, Carolina Silin

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Practical training and working life co-operation

Föreläsare och alumn från arbetslivet (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Kursen består av 2 delexaminationer

1. Skriftlig examination (2 sp), omtentamen/ komplettering enligt överenskommelse med examinator

2. Workshops, simuleringar och intervju uppgift med seminarium (1 sp)

2. Interprofessionellt grupparbete, skriftlig rapport och seminarium med socionomer (1sp) v.3. Närmare information på Moodle plattformen. (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Undervisning 27h
Interprofessionellt smågruppsarbete 27h
Självstudier med uppgifter 54h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Skriftlig examination
Studerande svarar delvis på examinationens frågeställningar och använder sporadiskt kurslitteratur och andra källor och tillämpning av materialet är på en ytlig nivå.
Studerande kan beskriva men kan inte reflektera kring skolelevens och studerandes hälsa i relation till det förebyggande arbetet som sker inom skolhälsovården.
Studerande beaktar inte etiken.
Studerande har mycket ytliga kunskaper inom skol- och studerandehälsovården och tillämpar sin kunskap på en mycket ytlig nivå (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Skriftlig examination
Studerande svarar på examinationens frågeställningar och använder delvis kurslitteratur samt andra källor men användning av materialet är på en ytlig nivå.
Studerande kan beskriva och delvis reflektera kring skolelevens och studerandes hälsa i relation till det förebyggande arbetet som sker inom skolhälsovården.
Studerande beaktar delvis etiken.
Studerande har ytliga kunskaper inom skol- och studerandehälsovården och tillämpar sin kunskap på en ytlig nivå (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Skriftlig examination
Studerande svarar på examinationens alla frågeställningar och använder kurslitteratur samt andra källor men användning av materialet är inte mångsidigt.
Studerande kan beskriva och reflektera kring skolelevens och studerandes hälsa i relation till det förebyggande arbetet som sker inom skolhälsovården.
Studerande beaktar etiken.
Studerande har kunskaper inom skol- och studerandehälsovården och tillämpar delvis din kunskap. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Skriftlig examination
Studerande svarar på en djupgående nivå på examinationens alla frågeställningar och använder mångsidigt kurslitteratur samt andra evidensbaserade källor.
Studerande kan på en fördjupad nivå beskriva och relatera till skolelevens och studerandes hälsa i relation till det förebyggande arbetet som sker inom skolhälsovården.
Studerande beaktar mångsidigt etiken.
Studerande har fördjupade kunskaper inom skol- och studerandehälsovården och kan tillämpa dem. (not translated)
Health Care Practice Among the Working Population and the Elderly UHV20HV08-3002 10.02.2025-30.04.2025 4 credits (UHV21D-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:

Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the health of the employee and the work community and support the maintenance of work capacity and use a resource enhancing way of working

Can explain the principles of good interprofessional occupational health care

Can evaluate the effect of work, work society and the environment on health

Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the elderly's health and functional ability with resource enhancing methods at the individual and community level

Can work in interprofessional working groups and networks as well as realise health care in a home environment

Prerequisites

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Content of the study unit

The service system and service environments within occupational health care

Legislation in occupational health and occupational health and safety

Principles for good corporate health practice

Business plans, workplace mapping and follow-up of the work community

Work health surveys

Resources, supporting and burdensome factors in the work community and work environment

Work-related illnesses and occupational illnesses

Worker protection and ergonomics

Resource enhancing methods in working life

Occupational health-related health care

Health care for the unemployed

Health care in home environment

The service system

Health surveys for the elderly, health care and service plans

Resource enhancing working methods

Health advice

The elderly's own resources and functional ability, early support for participation and opportunities for influence

The use of new technology in health care in the home environment

Family support and challenging clients, violence prevention and recognition

Person(s) in charge

Jaana-Sofia Tengström

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Arbetsföras hälsovård:
Edling, C. Mfl. (red.) 2019. Arbets- och miljömedicin. Studentlitteratur
Haarala et al. 2015. Terveydenhoitajan osaaminen.
Hakanen, J. et al. Upptäck dina kraftkällor: ABC i arbetshälsa.
Hakanen, J. 2011. Työn imu. TTL
Helldán, Helaskorpi. 2014. Suomalaisen aikuisväestön terveyskäyttäytyminen ja terveys.
Härmä,M.mfl. 2020. Må bra i skiftarbete. TTL
Karvala,K; Leino,T mfl. Arbetshälsoinstitutet. 2019 Exponeringsbaserad uppföljning av hälsa i arbetet.
Martimo, K-P, Uitti, P, Antti-Poika M. 2018. Työstä terveyttä. Duodecim
Michelsson, T, Rejula, K, Ala-Mursula L, Räsänen, K, Uitti J. 2018. Työelämän perustietoa. Duodecim
Manka M-L mfl. Työn iloa ja imua työhyvinvoinnin ratkaisuja pientyöpaikalla.
Rautio,M & Michelsen,T. 2013. AFM: så här använder du arbetsförmågeindex och enkäten. Arbetshälsoinstitutet.
Taskinen mfl. 2011. Terveystarkastukset työterveyshuollossa. TTL
Uitti, J.(red.) 2016. God företagshälsovårdspraxis. Arbetshälsoinstitutet
Jouttimäki, L. & Leino, T. 2008. Kvalitetsnyckel för företagshälsovården, Arbetshälsoinstitutet
Juutilainen 2004. Työterveyshoitajan käsikirja.
Pietiläinen,R. 2003 Työturvallisuuslaki:soveltamisopas TTL
SHM. 2013:14. Osaajia työterveyshuoltoon! Työterveyshuollon koulutuksen turvaaminen ja osaamisen vahvistaminen.
Lagen om företagshälsovård 1383/2001
Lagen om företagshälsovårdhandbok för tillämpning SHM.
Arbetarskyddslagen 738/2002
Arbetarskyddet i Finland SHM 2010
www.tyosuojelu.fi
www.aluehallintovirasto.fi
Sinervo,L.& Hietapakka, L. 2013 Työttömien terveyspalvelut. Valtakunnallisen terveyskeskuskyselyn 2013 tulokset.
Työttömän terveystarkastus; https://thl.fi/fi/web/sote-uudistus/tulevaisuuden-sosiaali-ja-terveyskeskus/toimivia-toimintamalleja-hankkeiden-tueksi/tyottoman-terveystarkastus,
https://stm.fi/sv/halsotjanster-for-arbetslosa
Artiklar och nätbaserad material

Vuxenhälsovård :
Kvalitetsrekommendation för att trygga ett bra åldrande och förbättra servicen 2020-2023: Målet är ett åldersvänligt Finland , https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162456
Cancerföreningen,
https://www.cancerforeningen.fi/organisationen/cancerforeningen-i-finland
Nationellt åldersprogram fram till år 2030: För ett ålderskunnigt Finland
https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/162464
Plan för att stödja den äldre befolkningen 2015–2030 (Korsholm, pdf 2,4 Mt)
Vasa stads plan för att stöda seniorbefolkningen – Åldersvänligt åtgärdsprogram för åren 2020-2025 (pdf 3,4 Mt)
Työttömien terveystarkastukset,
https://thl.fi/fi/web/sote-uudistus/tulevaisuuden-sosiaali-ja-terveyskeskus/toimintamalleja-ja-menetelmia-tyon-tueksi/osallisuus/tyottoman-terveystarkastus,
Työttömien terveyspalvelut
https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/110751/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-049-8.pdf?sequence=1,
Hälsovårdstjänster för arbetslösa
https://stm.fi/sv/halsotjanster-for-arbetslosa,
Vuxenbefolkningens hälsa,
https://thl.fi/sv/web/thlfi-sv/forskning-och-utveckling/undersokningar-och-projekt/nationella-undersokningen-finsote/tidigare-undersokningar#EVTK,
Eide, H. 2009. Omvårdnadsorienterad kommunikation: relationsetik, samarbete och konfliktlösning.
Miehen terveys: https://www.miesklinikka.com/miesklinikka
Mannens hälsa: https://www.manshalsafordig.se/
Artiklar och övrig material (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsningar
Verkstad (obligatorisk närvaro)
Smågruppsarbeten
Seminarium
Självstudier (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Hälsovårdararbete med arbetsföra:
Verkstäder och grupparbeten GK/UK
Examination/ hemtentamen vitsord 1-5
Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar.
Vuxenhälsovård:
Semiariearbete med seminarium vitsord 1-5
Kompletteringar enligt examinators anvisingar. (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

10.02.2025 - 30.04.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- UHV21D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Jaana-Sofia Tengström, Daniel Nenonen

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Arbetsföras hälsovård:
Verkstad, grupparbete och föreläsningar (1 sp) enligt schema
Hemtentamen (2 sp) inlämning den 13.4.25 kl.20.00

Vuxen
Seminariearbete samt seminarium 1 sp; Seminarium 6.3.2025 (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Kursen 4 sp= 108 h
Föreläsningar, seminarium, workshops 45 h
Självstudier med uppgifter 68 (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Studerande har inte lämnat in uppgiften och/ eller deltagit i seminarium
Studernade har inte deltogit i verkstaden
Examination: Studerande har inte lämnat in hemtentamen (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)

Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.

Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter

Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella
Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och

Kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)

Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)
Health Care Practices Among Expecting Families UHV20HV02-3002 01.08.2024-31.12.2024 5 credits (UHV21D-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:

Can plan, implement and assess the follow-up of health, well-being and resources of expecting families as well as of families with infants

Recognises risks and complications related to pregnancy and childbirth and can, if necessary, consult other experts in the field of maternal health care

Is familiar with the course of childbirth and can manage an emergency childbirth

Can, by use of resource promoting methods, advise clients in aspects related to pregnancy, childbirth, puerperium, couple relations and family planning

Prerequisites

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Content of the study unit

The service system

Health examinations, screenings

Normal pregnancy and puerperium

Health risks and complications during pregnancy

Social awareness (current challenges)

The normal and complicated delivery process, pain relief and examination

Resource enhancing methods in working with the family who have had a children

Guidance and support for the pregnant and the family

Family planning

Family planning, sexual and reproductive health, couple relationship

Socio-economic security when the family has children

Early interaction

Families from different cultures at child health clinics

Person(s) in charge

Pia Liljeroth

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

OBLIGATORISK LITTERATUR:
Paananen, U., Pietiläinen, S., Raussi-Lehto, E. & Äimälä, A-M. 2015. Kätilötyö. Edita. Kapitlen 3-11.
ELLER
Kaplan, A., Hogg, B., Hildingsson, I. & Lundgren, I. 2009. Lärobok för barnmorskor. Studentlitteratur. Kapitlen 3-8.
ELLER
Lindgren, H., Christensson, K. & Dykes, A-K. Reproduktiv hälsa - barnmorskans kompetensområde. Studentlitteratur. Kapitlen 15-29.

OCH
Klemetti, R. & Hakulinen-Viitanen, T. (red.). 2015. Handbok för mödrarådgivningen. Nationell rekommendation.
https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/126655/2015_THL_OPA040_web.pdf?sequence=3
OCH
THL: Mödra- och barnrådgivning. OBS! På finska finns mera omfattande information!
https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning
https://thl.fi/fi/web/lapset-nuoret-ja-perheet/sote-palvelut/aitiys-ja-lastenneuvola
OCH
Fosterscreening. SHM. https://stm.fi/sv/screeningar/fosterscreening
OCH
NEUKO-tietokanta: https://www.terveysportti.fi/apps/dtk/nko
OCH
Blodtjänst, Undersökningar som görs under graviditeten. https://www.veripalvelu.fi/sv/for-proffs/undersokningar-som-gors-under-graviditeten/

REFERENSLITTERATUR:
Deufel, M. & Montonen, E. 2016. Lapsivuodeaika. Helsinki: Duodecim.

Ensitieto vastasyntyneen vanhemmille. Vammaispalvelujen käsikirja. THL.
https://thl.fi/julkaisut/kasikirjat/vammaispalvelujen-kasikirja/asiakasprosessi/neuvonta-ja-ohjaus/ensitieto/ensitieto-vastasyntyneen-vanhemmille

Eviras näringsrekommendationer. https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/sv/

Främjande av sexuell hälsa. SHM. https://stm.fi/sv/halsoframjande/sexuell-halsa

Gravida - råd om bra mat. Livsmedelsverket. https://www.livsmedelsverket.se/matvanor-halsa--miljo/kostrad/gravida

Hakulinen, T., Laajasalo, T. & Mäkelä, J. 2019. Vanhemmuuden ja parisuhteen tuen vahvistaminen: Teoriasta käytäntöön Ohjaus: 2019: 9. THL.

Lähisuhdeväkivalta. THL. https://thl.fi/fi/web/vakivalta/vakivallan-muodot/lahisuhdevakivalta

Ryttyläinen, K. & Valkama, S. 2010 (eller 2020). Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä. Helsinki: Edita.

Sekusaalisuus puheeksi. THL. https://thl.fi/fi/web/lapset-nuoret-ja-perheet/kehittyvat-kaytannot/seksuaalisuus-puheeksi

Stenman, M. 2016. Liikkuvan äidin hyvinvointi. Raskausaika ja äitiys. Fitra Oy.

Täckman, A. & Tiiri, J. Sivuvaunu – Opas vammaisille äideille ja äitiydestä haaveileville sekä ammattilaisille. https://www.rusettiry.fi/sivuvaunu/

Våld i nära relationer och inom familjen. Social- och hälsovårdsministeriet. http://stm.fi/sv/forebyggande-av-vald-i-nara-relationer

Material som ges under föreläsningarna och laddas upp på Moodle.
Aktuella artiklar i Terveydenhoitajalehti & Kätilölehti
Övriga aktuella nätsidor

Observera att litteraturen kan uppdateras under kursens gång! (not translated)

Learning methods

1. Föreläsningar
Inför vissa föreläsningar får studerande material att läsa in sig på, alternativt delas materialet ut under föreläsningen. Under föreläsningarna behandlas case utgående från förhandsmaterialet och/eller material som delas ut på föreläsningen.

2. Gästföreläsningar (obligatorisk närvaro) i samarbete med kursen Hälsovårdarabete med barnfamiljen (se schema)

3. Simuleringar (obligatorisk närvaro)

4. Självstudier (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

1. Diagnostiskt test
Bedömning gk/uk.
Testet består av flervalsfrågor och ja-nej-frågor. För godkänt vitsord ska testet vara gjort.

2. Skriftlig parrapport, bedömning 1-5/uk
Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kompetenserna och innehåll i de angivna kurserna), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap.

3. Muntlig gruppexamination, bedömning 1-5/uk.
Bedömning: substanskunskap (se kompetenserna och innehåll i de angivna kurserna), integrering av teoretisk och praktisk kunskap, reflektionsförmåga. Studerande bedöms individuellt enligt substanskunskap (se kompetenser och innehåll) och förmåga till reflektion.

4. Simuleringar gk/uk
Obligatotiskt deltagande. (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

01.08.2024 - 31.12.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 31.07.2024
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- UHV21D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Pia Liljeroth

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Kursen består av fyra delexaminationer.

1. Diagnostiskt test (0,25 sp)
Diagnostiskt test om normal graviditet och förlossning på Moodle. Bedöms gk/uk.

2. Skriftlig parrapport och seminarium (2 sp)
Kurserna Resursförstärkande hälsovårdararbete, Hälsovårdarabete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdarabete med barnfamiljen examineras tillsammans i form av en parrapport.

Studerande väljer (parvis) ett tema (t.ex. sömn, missbruk) och en metod (t.ex. motiverande samtal, resursförstärkande handledning) inom kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete. Temat och metoden ska synliggöras och tillämpas på den gravida familjen och i barnfamiljen (inom kurserna Hälsovårdarabete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdarabete med barnfamiljen).

I rapporten ska fokus ligga på förebyggande och hälsofrämjande arbete, Tema- och parindelning görs på Moodle i kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete.

Rapporten ska basera sig på kurslitteraturen, relevanta webbsidor samt minst 3 vetenskapliga artiklar (en per kurs).
Paren ska boka in en handledningsgång med ansvariga lärare.

Arbetet bedöms enligt skalan 1-5.
Studerande får skriftlig feedback efter seminariet.

3. Muntlig examination (2 sp)
Kurserna Hälsovårdararbete med den väntande familjen och Hälsovårdararbete med barnfamiljen examineras gemensamt med en muntlig examination i grupp.

Gruppindelning, exakt tidpunkt och upplägg för examinationen meddelas senare (via Moodle under kursen Hälsovårdararbete med den väntande familjen).
Bedöms enligt skala 1-5.
Studerande får skriftlig feedback efter examinationen.

4. Simuleringar (0,75 sp)
Obligatoriskt deltagande och förhandsuppgifter. (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

1. Diagnostiskt test om normal graviditet och förlossning på Moodle. Görs efter kursintroduktionen och före första föreläsningen.

2. Skriftliga parrapporten laddas upp på Moodle (under kursen Resursförstärkande hälsovårdarbete) och presenteras på seminarium 5.11.2024. (seminariets upplägg laddas upp på Moodle efter deadline), se Moodle för närmare uppgifter.

3. Muntlig examination i grupp v. 50.
Vid underkänd muntlig gruppexamination tenteras kursen individuellt skriftligt. Omtentamensdatum 17.1.2025, 7.2.2025.
.
4. Simuleringar (se schema) (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Diagnostiskt test 1 h
Undervisning 20 h
Simulering 10 h
Examination (parrapport/seminarium och muntlig examination) 10 h
Självstudier 94 h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Skriftlig parrapport:
Temaområdena behandlas fragmentariskt.
Litteraturen används inte.
Reflektioner framförs inte.
Brister i den tekniska utformningen.

Muntlig gruppexamination:
Studerande deltar inte på eget initiativ i gruppens diskussion. Studerande kan inte besvara frågor som ställs till hen. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Skriftlig parrapport:
Temaområdena behandlas kort.
Litteraturen refereras
Reflektioner framförs endast i begränsad utsträckning.
Den tekniska utformningen är nöjaktig.

Muntlig gruppexamination:
Studerande deltar sporadiskt i gruppens diskussion. Studerande använder enbart kurslitteratur eller enbart egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Skriftlig parrapport:
Temaområdena behandlas mångsidigt.
Litteraturen tillämpas.
Texten är reflekterande och kritiska synpunkter finns.
Den tekniska utformningen är god.

Muntlig gruppexamination:
Studerande deltar i gruppens diskussion och bidrar med relevant kunskap. Studerande använder både kurslitteratur och sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar, men inte systematiskt. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Skriftlig parrapport:
Temaområdena behandlas uttömmande och mångsidigt.
Litteraturen analyseras och tillämpas.
Reflektionen är vetenskapligt analytisk.
Den tekniska utformningen är berömlig.

Muntlig gruppexamination:
Studerande deltar aktivt i gruppens diskussion under examinationen och bidrar med relevant och korrekt kunskap. Studerande använder systematiskt både kurslitteratur samt sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar. (not translated)
Health Promoting Care at Different Ages VÅV22HF02-3005 21.04.2025-30.05.2025 5 credits (UBM23D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
- can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
- can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
- can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
- knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
- has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
- knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
- can collaborate in interprofessional teams

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

Content of the study unit

Human sexuality
The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
Development of children and young people
Follow-up of children's and young people's health
Adult health care and screenings
Health technology
Interprofessional collaboration

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Anna-Lena Nieminen

Mode of delivery

80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

Learning material

Maternity care:
Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
THL.2023. Data base Neuko (replace Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Tillgänglig från: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko

STM Arbetslivet 2023 (valda artiklar)
Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter

Learning methods

Lectures, discussion, demonstration, group work,video

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

50% för godkänt, jämt fördelat mellan vitsord 1-5
50-60%=1 60-70%= 2 etc. (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

21.04.2025 - 30.05.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- UBM23D-V
- UHV23D-V
Seats

10 - 30

Teachers and responsibilities

Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

Additional information

-

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Exam
Two retakes possible

Practical training and working life co-operation

-

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Written exam last lecture

Internationa connections

-

Student's schedule and workload

27 h/cr, 5 cr= 135h

Content scheduling

-
Health Promoting Care at Different Ages VÅV22HF02-3006 27.01.2025-09.03.2025 5 credits (USS23D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
- can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
- can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
- can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
- knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
- has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
- knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
- can collaborate in interprofessional teams

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

Content of the study unit

Human sexuality
The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
Development of children and young people
Follow-up of children's and young people's health
Adult health care and screenings
Health technology
Interprofessional collaboration

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Anna-Lena Nieminen

Mode of delivery

80% Face-to-face, 20% Distance learning

Learning material

På svenska
Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
Holmström, E. & Ohlsson, K. 2014. Människan i arbetslivet. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
THL.2023. Data base Neuko (replace Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Available in Finnish and Swedish from: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko

Learning methods

Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

27.01.2025 - 09.03.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 26.01.2025
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- USS23D-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

Additional information

-

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Validation according to Novia's general instructions

Written assignments need to follow Novia instructions for writing

Practical training and working life co-operation

-

Exam dates and retake possibilities

På engelska
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Exam
Two retakes possible

Internationa connections

-

Student's schedule and workload

27 h /cr
5 cr = 135 h

Content scheduling

-
Health Promoting Care at Different Ages VÅV22HF02-3007 10.03.2025-13.04.2025 5 credits (USS23F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
- can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
- can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
- can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
- knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
- has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
- knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
- can collaborate in interprofessional teams

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

Content of the study unit

Human sexuality
The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
Development of children and young people
Follow-up of children's and young people's health
Adult health care and screenings
Health technology
Interprofessional collaboration

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Anna-Lena Nieminen

Mode of delivery

Distance learning

Learning material

Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
THL.2023. Databasen Neuko (ersätter Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Tillgänglig från: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko
THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
STM Arbetslivet 2023 (valda artiklar)
Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Learning methods

Inbandade föreläsningar på Moodle, individuella uppgifter samt tentamen på moodle vid Alere. (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

10.03.2025 - 13.04.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024
- 5 credits
Group(s)
- USS23F-V
Seats

10 - 45

Teachers and responsibilities

Anna-Lena Nieminen, Anita Wikberg

Additional information

The course is online

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

5 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Written exam
Two retakes possible

Practical training and working life co-operation

-

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Tentamen sista tillfället, klockan 9-11.30 (not translated)

Internationa connections

-

Student's schedule and workload

1cr = 27h
5 cr= 135h individual studies

Content scheduling

-
Health Promoting Care in Sustainable Environment USS22GV01-3007 07.01.2025-30.03.2025 4 credits (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- is familiar with the theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and palliative care
- can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
- can, under guidance, along with individuals/groups in inter-professional teams plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional capacity
- has expertise in care in various service environments within health promotion

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

Principles of health and illness, public health and endemic diseases

Sustainable care at local and national level

Health determinants

Epidemiology

Evidence-based health promotion and prevention, methods, rehabilitation

Empowerment

Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and commitment

Different service environments

Ethical issues in health education

Disabilities/impairments, functional ability, measurement methods

Artificial intelligence

Person(s) in charge

Pia Liljeroth

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Kurslitteratur:

Bonita, R., Beaglehole, R. & Kjällström T, (2010). Grundläggande epidemiologi. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Sid. 17 - 66 och 147 - 250.

Bringsén, Å. & Nilsson Lindström, P. (red.). (2019). Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Stockholm: Liber.

Brulde, B. (red). (2011). Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Edberg, A-K. &Wijk, H. (red.) (2019). Omvårdnadens grunder: Hälsa och ohälsa. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Gottlieb, L.N. (2013). Strengths-Based Nursing Care. New York: Springer. Sid. 56 - 103 (finns också som e-bok).

Iivanainen, A. & Syväoja, P. (2016). Hoida ja kirjaa. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.

Klang Söderqvist, B. & Kneck, Å. (red). (2018). Patientundervisning. Ett samspel för lärande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

Artiklar

Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi

Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

En av följande böcker i folkhälsovetenskap:
Kauhanen, J. mfl. (2013). Kansanterveystiede. Helsinki: Sanoma Pro.

Pellmer, K. et.al. (2017). Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Stockholm: Liber.

Svanström, L. (2012). En introduktion till folkhälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur

Referenslitteratur:
Ejlertsson, G. & Andersson, I. (2013). Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Eriksson, M. (red). (2015). Salutogenes - om hälsans ursprung. Stockholm: Liber.

Skolin, I. (2018). Näringslära för sjuksköterskor. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur.

Schäfer Elinder, L. & Kwak, L. (red) (2014). Evidensbaserat folkhälsoarbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsning
Litteraturstudier
Flipped learning med verkstäder
Simulering (obligatorisk närvaro)
Schemalagt grupparbete (obligatorisk närvaro)
Seminarium (obligatorisk närvaro) (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Individuell skriftlig inlämningsuppgift 0-5:
Skriftlig inlämningsuppgift bedöms enligt skalan 0-5. I uppgiften ska studerande påvisa evidensbaserade kunskaper och färdigheter i resursförstärkande metoder i det hälsofrämjande och förebyggande arbetet. Studerande ska ta i beakatande hållbarheten i omgivningen. Studerande ska visa kunskaper i handledning av individer och grupper till ett hälsofrämjande levnadssätt. Studerande visar att hen förstår betydelsen av mångprofessionellt arbete inom folkhälsoarbetets kontext. Den skriftliga uppgiften ska göras enligt Novias skrivanvisningar (layout och källhantering).
Komplettering enligt examinators anvisingar.
Försenad inlämning leder att studerande inte kan delta i grupparbetet och seminariet.

Seminarium GK/UK
Underkänt:
Prestationen är underkänd om något av följande uppfylls:
- Studerande har inte lämnat in sin individuella inlämningsuppgift innan grupparbetet ska göras
- Studerande identiefierar inte de grundläggande aspekterna i uppgiften
- Studerande fungerar inte som en ansvarsfull (bär inte sitt ansvar som) gruppmedlem
- Studerande deltar inte i seminariet

Godkänt (alla kriterier uppfylls):
- Studerande känner till de grundläggande aspekterna och principerna i uppgiftens syfte
- Studerande bär sitt ansvar som gruppmedlem och kan bevisa deltagandet
- Studerande arbetar ansvarsfullt och aktivt kring seminariearbetet och dess framförande
- Studernade deltar aktivt på seminariet

Simulering GK/UK
Underkänt:
Studerande har inte förberett sig inför simuleringen
Studerande deltar inte i simuleringen eller/och
Studerande är inte en aktiv deltagare under simuleringen

Godkänt:
Studerande har förberett sig inför simuleringen
Studernade både deltar i simuleringar samt deltar aktivt under simuleringstillfället (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

07.01.2025 - 30.03.2025

Enrollment date range

07.12.2024 - 05.01.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-Å
- UHV24D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Pia Liljeroth

Additional information

Det är inte tillåtet för studerande att använda artificiell intelligens för att skapa innehållet i examinationerna. Artificiell intelligens får dock användas för idéer, planering och granskning av språkdräkt. (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

1. Flipped learning med verkstäder 1,5 sp
Aktivt deltagande i verkstäder kring kursens teman (epidemiologi, etik, AI, funktionsförmåga, aktörer inom folkhälsoarbete). Studerande läser in sig på de olika temana enligt anvisningar och kommer förberedda till verkstäderna.
Frånvaro från verkstäderna kompenseras med kompensationsuppgifter.

2. Simulering (obligatorisk närvaro) 0,5 sp
Förhandsuppgift inlämnad inom utsatt tid och obligatorisk närvaro på plats på Henriksgatan vid simulering. Uppgifter om gruppindelning och exakt tidtabell publiceras i Moodle.

3. Individuell skriftlig inlämningsuppgift 1,5 sp
Uppgiften utgör material för grupparbete och -presentation.

4.Schemalagt grupparbete och presentation på seminarium 0,5 sp
Obligatorisk närvaro på grupparbete och seminarium. (not translated)

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Simulering vecka 10
Obligatorisk närvaro.

Skriftlig inlämningsuppgift, inlämning vecka 12
Inlämning på Moodle innan grupparbetet. Studerande får individuell skriftlig respons på sitt arbete på Moodle.

Grupparbete (schemalagt) vecka 12
Obligatorisk närvaro. För att kunna delta i grupparbetet och seminariet ska studerande ha lämnat in sin individuella inlämningsuppgift innan grupparbetet. Utgående från de skriftliga inlämningsuppgifterna sammanställer studerande i grupper presentationer inför seminarium.

Seminarium vecka 13
Obligatorisk närvaro. Muntlig respons ges vid seminariet. (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Föreläsningar 2 h
Litteraturstudier 75 h
Verkstäder 15 h
Simulering 4 h
Schemalagt grupparbete 6 h
Seminarium 6 h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Fyller inte kriterier för vitsordet 1. Underkänd skriftlig inlämningsuppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

I examinationen besvaras alla examinationens delar utgående från få källor, men de olika delarna kan inte relateras till varandra eller innehållet är på en ytlig nivå.
Studerande använder kurslitteratur smalt eller enbart egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar.
Layouten och källhanteringen följer huvudsakligen YH Novias skrivanvisningar.
Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Studerande svarar på alla examinationens delar utgående från källor men de olika svaren kan inte helt relateras till varandra.
Studerande använder både kurslitteratur och sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar, men inte systematiskt.
Studerande använder sig inte av andra evidensbaserade källor.
Layouten följer YH Novias skrivanvisningar och det finns enstaka fel i källhanteringen.
Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Studerande svarar på djupgående nivå på alla examinationens delar utgående från olika evidensbaserade källor och kan relatera de olika delarna av examination till varandra. Studerande använder systematiskt kurslitteratur, andra evidensbaserade källor samt sina egna reflektioner som grund för sina svar.
Källhanteringen och layouten följer givna anvisningar.
Examinationen är inlämnad inom utsatt tid. (not translated)
Health Promotion Methods in Public Health Nurse´s Workfield HVV22HA02-3002 10.03.2025-12.10.2025 4 credits (UHV22D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has knowledge of different health-promoting working methods and has the skills to use these in the meeting with the family, the individual, the group and the society in change
-has knowledge of working with outreach activities and a resource-strengthening approach as well as identifying and supporting clients/patients in need of special/intensive support
- can make use of key research and screening methods in health care work
- develops his/her abilities to teach and counsel
- has theoretical knowledge to be able to perform postpartum examination after normal delivery
- has readiness to carry out a safe vaccination for children and adults
- knows about environmental health and can work to prevent accidents
- master safe drug management

Prerequisites

Study unit VÅV22IN : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22GV : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22HF : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22KV : courses VÅV22KV01-KV14 approved
Study unit VÅV22PR: courses VÅV22PR01-PR05 approved

Content of the study unit

Health and motivational intervju , lifestyle councelling
Supervision and teaching
Group supervision and group activities
Laborations in central examination and screening methods
Postpartum examination after normal birth
Environmental health
Digital solutions and welfare technology

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and

Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Person(s) in charge

Marie Hjortell

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Magnusson, A-S. 2014. Om kommunikation - för personal i vårdande yrke. Liber
Sandberg, H. 2014. Sjuksköterskans samtal. Professionalitet och medmänsklighet. Studentlitteratur.
Berglund,M. &Ekebergh, M. (red.).2015. Reflektion i lärande och vård, en utmaning för sjuksköterskor. Studentlitteratur.
Barth, T; & Näsholm, C. 2006. Motiverande samtal. MI att hjälpa en människa till förändring på hennes egna villkor. Studentlitteratur.
Eriksson,E & Arnkil, T.2006 Ta upp oron. En handbok i tidiga dialoger. Stakes, handböcker 64
Killén, K. 2011. Professionell utveckling och handledning, ett yrkesövergripande perspektiv. Studentlitteratur.
Kostenius,C & Lindqvist, A-K. 2009. Hälsovägledning. Från ord till handling. Studentlitteratur.
Kyngäs, Kääriäinen, Poskiparta, Johansson, Hirvonen & Renfors. 2007. Ohjaaminen hoitotyössä. WSOY.
Patja Kristiina (toim) mfl. 2022 Terveyden edistäminen .

Aktuella artiklar i yrkes- och vetenskapliga tidskrifter 2018-2024

Se även Moodle angående litteratur (not translated)

Learning methods

- Lectures våren 2025
- Practical exercises/simulations in the clinical training center autumn 2025
- Workshops
- Recording and analysis of health conversations

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Compulsory attendance at workshops, contact study days and practical exercises/simulation Pass/Fail
Recording and analysis of health conversations Pass/Fail

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

10.03.2025 - 12.10.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- UHV22D-V
Teachers and responsibilities

Terese Österberg, Frida Gädda, Marie Hjortell

Additional information

Post-partum examination - lectures and practical exercises will be carried out in the spring of 2025 together with group UBM22

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

Approved/Rejected
Health Promotion Skills and Expert Knowledge HVV14HA07-3008 07.01.2025-09.02.2025 3 credits (UHV21D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student
- masters the prevention of infectious diseases can provide expertise regarding vaccination programmes for children and adults
- knows about environmental health and can work to prevent accidents
- develops his/her abilities to teach and counsel
- develops his/her professional skills from a multidisciplinary perspective

Prerequisites

Introduction to public health nursing
Health promotion skills in family health

Content of the study unit

In-depth vaccination knowledge - national virtual course

Other expert knowledge

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and

Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Further information

I kurshelheten avlägger studeranden den nationella kursen i Fördjupad Vaccinationskunskap 1 sp (not translated)

Person(s) in charge

Marie Hjortell

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

se moodlekurser:
- Hälsofrämjande färdigheter och expertkunskap
- Fördjupad vaccinationskunskap 1 sp (övriga kurser : gemensam Novia Vasa, Åbo, Arcada) (not translated)

Learning methods

Expertföreläsningar
Kliniska övningar på KTC ( postpartum, första hjälp)
Workshop ( fördjupad vaccinationskunskap)
Eget arbete (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Fördjupad vaccinationskunskap portfolio GK/UK virtuell tentamen : GK/UK
Deltagande i föreläsningar gällande efterundersökning Post Partum: GK/UK
Metodhandbok : vitsord 1-5 ( kursens helhetsvitsord utgörs av vitsordet för metodhandboken) (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

07.01.2025 - 09.02.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 07.01.2025
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- UHV21D-V
Teachers and responsibilities

Terese Österberg, Nina Vestö, Marie Hjortell

Additional information

I kurshelheten ingår den virtuella kursen :
Fördjupad vaccinationskunskap (not translated)

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Portfolio+ virtuell tentamen enligt tidtabell i moodlekursen fördjupad vaccinationskunskap:
Portfolio deadline : 20.1.25 Virtuell tentamen deadline 14.2.25

Inlämning av metodhandbok:3.3.2025 (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Approved / Failed

Fördjupad vaccinationskunskap portfolio GK/UK virtuell tentamen : GK
Deltagande i föreläsningar gällande efterundersökning Post Partum: GK
Metodhandbok : vitsord 1-5 (not translated)
Health promotion skills in family health HVV21HA08-3001 02.09.2024-02.02.2025 3 credits (UHV21D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

Student
- can make use of key research and screening methods in health care work
- guides and supports clients on issues related to sexual health and family planning
- possesses the skills to realize family and parents preparation
- has readiness to carry out a safe vaccination for children
- has knowledge of different health-promoting working methods and has the skills to use these in the meeting with the family, the individual, the group and the society in change
- has knowledge of working with outreach activities and a resource-strengthening approach as well as identifying and supporting clients/patients in need of special/intensive support
- master safe drug management

Prerequisites

Introduction to public health nursing
Public health nursing with the expectant family

Content of the study unit

Examination and screening methods in health care work simulation exercises
Reproductive health and family planning
Family and parent preparation
Vaccination of children - simulation exercises
Different health promotion methods
Child protection
Educational sequences for children and adults
Tutorial

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)

Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.
Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter

Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och
kan leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)

Person(s) in charge

Marie Hjortell

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

according to the lecturers instruction
see moodle platform

Learning methods

Lectures
Simulations/practical exercises in the clinical training center
Recording and analysis of health talks
Virtual studies
Preparation of methodological manual in child health care

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Approved participation in practical exercises in clinical training center
Approved participation in recording and analysis of health talks
Preparation of methodology manual in child counseling work, grades 1-5
Participation in expert lectures in child protection and execution of task Passed/Failed

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

02.09.2024 - 02.02.2025

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 01.09.2024
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- UHV21D-V
Seats

10 - 18

Teachers and responsibilities

Vasa - timlärare Vård, Carita Blomström, Marie Hjortell

Additional information

Mandatory attendance at simulations/practical exercises, recording and analysis of health talks and expert lectures in child protection and sexual health

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Simulations/practical exercises in autumn 2024
Recording and analysis of health talks in autumn 2024
Deadline for submission of method manual in february 2025

Student's schedule and workload

27h/cr
Human Development USS22GV03-3005 10.01.2025-06.04.2025 3 credits (USS24F-Å) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- understands the importance of health
- understands the human physical, mental, cognitive and social development at different ages
- have knowledge of human needs (spiritual, existential, sexual)
- can offer support in developmental and traumatic crises

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

The dimensions of health and sustainable development

The human life cycle

Human physical, mental, cognitive and social development

Accessibility

Spiritual needs

Existential needs

Sexual needs

Gender diversity

Attachment theory

Developmental Psychological Theories

Crises, traumatic crises and crisis relief

Coping

Person(s) in charge

Michaela Jalava

Mode of delivery

67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

Learning material

Angelöw B & Jonsson T. 2015. Introduktion till socialpsykologi.
Bowlby J. 2010. En trygg bas.
Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytningsteori. Betydelsen av nära känslomässiga relationer.
Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytning i praktiken. Tillämpning av anknytningsteori.
Grina, T. 2015. Den livsviktiga anknytningen: teori, utredning och behandling.
Eysenck M. (red.) 2000. Psykologi. Ett integrerat perspektiv.
Espen J (red.) 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier.
Hwang, P & Nilsson B. 2019. Utvecklingspsykologi.
Giddens A. 2014. Sociologi (kap. 2,4,5,9,11,17)
Meeuwisse A. & Swärd H. (red). 2015. Prespektiv på sociala problem.
Repstad P. 2016. Sociologiska perspektiv i vård, omsorg och socialt arbete.
Sundbeck M. 2013. Sexuell hälsa i vården.
Sivonen K. 2000. Vården och det andliga. En bestämning av begreppet andlig ur ett vårdvetenskapligt perspektiv.
Geels A. & Wikström O. 2012. Den religiösa människan. En introduktion till religionpsykologin.
Drakos G. & Hydén L. 2011. Diagnos & identitet.
Övrig ändamålsenlig litteratur. (not translated)

Learning methods

Workshops
Seminarier
Inlämningsuppgift (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

1. Workshops och seminarium. Bedöms som GK/UK. Kriterier för GK är deltagande i Workshop och seminarium
2. Individuell inlämningsuppgift. Inlämning på Moodle Bedöms enligt vitsordsskala se nedan. Feedback på inlämningsuppgiften sker via Moodle plattformen (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

10.01.2025 - 06.04.2025

Enrollment date range

07.12.2024 - 05.01.2025
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Michaela Jalava

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Workshops och seminarier enligt läsordning
Individuell inlämningsuppgift, Inlämning på Moodle 11.4 (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Kursintroduktion 2h
Workshops 2h
Seminarier 4h
Workshops uppgift 10h
Individuell inlämningsuppgift 63h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Inlämningsuppgiften svarar endast delvis eller ytligt på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övrig facklitteratur. Inlämningsuppgiften har delvis relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat beskrivs ytligt och ensidigt. Egna reflektioner förekommer inte eller beskrivs kort. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Inlämningsuppgiften svarar på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och en tillämpning av det egna temat syns. Egna reflektioner förekommer. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Inlämningsuppgiften svarar mångsidigt på frågeställningar och är skriven utgående från fakta, artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat syns tydligt. Egna reflektioner och analys beskrivs väl. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)
Human Development USS22GV03-3006 27.01.2025-13.04.2025 3 credits (USS24D-Å, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- understands the importance of health
- understands the human physical, mental, cognitive and social development at different ages
- have knowledge of human needs (spiritual, existential, sexual)
- can offer support in developmental and traumatic crises

Prerequisites

No preliminary requirements

Content of the study unit

The dimensions of health and sustainable development

The human life cycle

Human physical, mental, cognitive and social development

Accessibility

Spiritual needs

Existential needs

Sexual needs

Gender diversity

Attachment theory

Developmental Psychological Theories

Crises, traumatic crises and crisis relief

Coping

Person(s) in charge

Michaela Jalava

Mode of delivery

67% Face-to-face, 33% Distance learning

Learning material

Angelöw B & Jonsson T. 2015. Introduktion till socialpsykologi.
Bowlby J. 2010. En trygg bas.
Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytningsteori. Betydelsen av nära känslomässiga relationer.
Broberg A, Mothander P, Granqvist P & Ivarsson T. 2008. Anknytning i praktiken. Tillämpning av anknytningsteori.
Grina, T. 2015. Den livsviktiga anknytningen: teori, utredning och behandling.
Eysenck M. (red.) 2000. Psykologi. Ett integrerat perspektiv.
Espen J (red.) 2008. Utvecklingspsykologiska teorier.
Hwang, P & Nilsson B. 2019. Utvecklingspsykologi.
Giddens A. 2014. Sociologi (kap. 2,4,5,9,11,17)
Meeuwisse A. & Swärd H. (red). 2015. Prespektiv på sociala problem.
Repstad P. 2016. Sociologiska perspektiv i vård, omsorg och socialt arbete.
Sundbeck M. 2013. Sexuell hälsa i vården.
Sivonen K. 2000. Vården och det andliga. En bestämning av begreppet andlig ur ett vårdvetenskapligt perspektiv.
Geels A. & Wikström O. 2012. Den religiösa människan. En introduktion till religionpsykologin.
Drakos G. & Hydén L. 2011. Diagnos & identitet.
Övrig ändamålsenlig litteratur.
På engelska (not translated)

Learning methods

Föreläsningar
Smågruppsarbete
Seminarier
Inlämningsuppgift (not translated)

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

1. Smågruppsarbete och seminarium. Bedöms som GK/UK. Kriterierna för GK är deltagande i
smågruppsarbete och seminarium. Professionellt förhållningssätt, obligatorisk närvaro.
2. Individuell inlämningsuppgift, inlämning på Moodle 13.4.2025 Bedöms enligt vitsordsskala 0-5
3. Familjecenterkörkort, avläggs på Moodle genom en separat länk, utförande 45 minuter, studerande erhåller ett intyg som visas för kursansvariga. (not translated)

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

27.01.2025 - 13.04.2025

Enrollment date range

28.12.2024 - 26.01.2025
- 3 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-Å
- UHV24D-Å
Teachers and responsibilities

Michaela Jalava

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing

Share of online studies

1 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Inlämningsuppgift på Moodle 13.4.2025 (not translated)

Student's schedule and workload

Föreläsningar 8h
Seminarier 4h
Handlett grupparbetet 4h
Självstudier grupparbete 8h
Övriga självstudier 10h
Individuell inlämningsuppgift 47h (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Inlämningsuppgiften uppfyller inte kriterierna för vitsord 1, Underkänd uppgift kompletteras enligt examinators feedback och enligt överenskommen tidtabell. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Inlämningsuppgiften svarar endast delvis eller ytligt på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övrig facklitteratur. Inlämningsuppgiften har delvis relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat beskrivs ytligt och ensidigt. Egna reflektoner förekommer inte eller beskrivs kort. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Inlämningsuppgiften svarar på den ställda frågan med stöd av artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och en tillämpning av det egna temat syns. Egna reflektioner förekommer. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Inlämningsuppgiften svarar månsidigt på frågeställningar och är skriven utgående från fakta, artiklar och övriga fackkällor. Inlämningsuppgiften har relevant innehåll och tillämpningen av det egna temat syns tydligt. Egna reflektioner och analys beskrivs väl. Inlämningsuppgiften är inlämnad inom utsatt tid på Moodle. (not translated)
Human Physiology and Anatomy VÅV22GV03-3011 09.09.2024-08.11.2024 4 credits (USS24D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
- will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
- will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
- will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
- will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Physiology of the human body
The anatomy of the human body

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Camilla Ribacka

Mode of delivery

50% Face-to-face, 50% Distance learning

Learning material

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended literature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Learning methods

Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
Självständiga studier.

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

09.09.2024 - 08.11.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 08.09.2024
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-V
Seats

10 - 50

Teachers and responsibilities

Camilla Ribacka

Additional information

Additional information on the Moodle platform

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

2 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Examination

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Course examination 11.11.2024
Re-examination 13.12.2024, 07.02.2025 and 09.05.2025

Student's schedule and workload

Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

Assessment criteria

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Human Physiology and Anatomy VÅV22GV03-3012 06.09.2024-15.11.2024 4 credits (USS24F-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
- will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
- will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
- will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
- will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Physiology of the human body
The anatomy of the human body

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Camilla Ribacka

Mode of delivery

25% Face-to-face, 75% Distance learning

Learning material

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended literature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2021, 2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Learning methods

Föreläsningar, diskussioner och övningsuppgifter.
Självständiga studier.

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

06.09.2024 - 15.11.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 07.09.2024
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- USS24F-V
Seats

10 - 50

Teachers and responsibilities

Camilla Ribacka

Additional information

Additional information on the Moodle platform

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Share of online studies

3 credits

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Examination

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Course examination 13.11.2024
Re-examination 13.12.2024, 07.02.2025 and 09.05.2025

Student's schedule and workload

Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

Assessment criteria

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Human Physiology and Anatomy VÅV22GV03-3013 23.09.2024-22.11.2024 4 credits (UHV24D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- will master the basic principles, concepts and terminology of anatomy and physiology
- will be familiar with the basic types of tissue, their structure and function, as well as the structure and function of the skin
- will be able to describe the structure of the nervous system and understand how the nervous system regulates physiological processes in our body
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the sense organs
- will have knowledge of the structure the endocrine system and understand how different hormones regulate body functions
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the reproductive system
- will have knowledge of the structure and function of the locomotor system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the blood, heart and blood circulation, and the structure and function of the lymphatic system and the respiratory system
- will be able to describe the structure and function of the digestive system
- will have knowledge of the urinary system and understand the concept of regulation of body electrolyte, fluid and acid-base levels"

Prerequisites

No prior knowledge required

Content of the study unit

Physiology of the human body
The anatomy of the human body

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Sanna Gunell

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

Course literature:
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended literature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

Learning methods

Lectures, tasks and discussions.
Selfstudies.

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

The course is graded 0-5 based on result in individual exam. On line quizzes are graded passed or failed.
In order to pass the course all parts (exam and quizzes) have to be passed.

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

23.09.2024 - 22.11.2024

Enrollment date range

15.06.2024 - 24.09.2024
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- UHV24D-V
- UBM24D-V
Seats

0 - 40

Teachers and responsibilities

Sanna Gunell, Terese Österberg

Additional information

Additional information on the Moodle platform

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

Examination

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Course examination tba
Re-examination tba

Student's schedule and workload

Lectures, self studies and digital teaching methods 108 h

Assessment criteria

Inadequate knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Weak knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Good knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Excellent knowledge of fundamental Anatomy and Physiology
Internal Medicine and Surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3011 03.02.2025-28.03.2025 4 credits (UBM24D-V, ...) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
- can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
- has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
- can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
- has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
- can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

Content of the study unit

Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Jannica Andtfolk

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Learning material

ENDOCRINOLOGI
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.

RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.

Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4

Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
(vård vid lungsjukdomar)

Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle

Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma

KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Kapitel. 8.
Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
Referenslitteratur:
www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

Learning methods

Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
Written exam is graded 0-5

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

03.02.2025 - 28.03.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- UBM24D-V
- UHV24D-V
Small group(s)
- Grupp 1 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
- Grupp 2 (Size: 15. Open university: 0.)
Teachers and responsibilities

Jannica Andtfolk, Marice Nedergård

Additional information

Mandatory attendance at the introductory lecture
Mandatory attendance at the SimMan exercises.
Uniform and slippers at SimMan exercises.

Responsible unit

Faculty of Health and Welfare

Degree Programme(s)

Degree Programme in Nursing, Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing, Degree Programme in Midwifery

Assessment scale

H-5

Exam dates and retake possibilities

Common exam for all parts

Student's schedule and workload

1 sp/ 27h denna kurs är 4sp 108h

Endokrinologi 3/4 sp = 6 h teori

Respiratoriska Sjukdomstillstånd
Teori 12h
Praktiska 8 h x 2 gånger (indelade i två grupper, alltså 8 h per grupp)

Kardiologiska sjukdomar och hjärtrytmer 1 sp
12h teori
2 x 4 h SimMan övningar
Hjärtarytmitest 1 h

Sammanlagt
30h teori
12h praktisk övning
2 + 2 h tent
62 h för sammanställning av uppgifter och tent läsning. (not translated)

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande har en ytlig kunskap i ämnet (utantill läsning)

Bedömningskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna och hens kunskap om de andra studerandes arbeten är bristfällig. Den studerande visar begränsad substanskunskap, kan det väsentliga.

Den studerande visar bristfällig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet. Hen har en bristfällig kunskap i substansen även berörande det väsentliga. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande kan redogöra för litteraturen, kan reflektera och motivera sina ståndpunkter

Bedömingskriterier för skriftliga arbeten
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbete och visar otillräcklig kunskap angående de andra studerandes skriftliga arbeten. Den studerande behärskar substansen i sitt arbete men tillämpningen är begränsad. (not translated)

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Kriterier för utvärdering av tentamen
Den studerande visar i sitt svar en fördjupad kunskap och mognad utöver det traditionella

Kriterier för utvärdering av skriftligt arbete individuellt eller i grupp
Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas skriftliga arbeten samt kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. Det skriftliga arbetet och det eventuella opponentskapet visar på någonting utöver det vanliga (tekniskt utförande, muntligt framförande, mogna reflektioner, självständigt arbetssätt)

Den studerande har följt anvisningarna för det skriftliga arbetet och visar att hon behärskar substansen. Hen har läst de övriga deltagarnas arbeten och kan ställa relevanta frågor och leda en diskussion vid seminarietillfället. (not translated)
Internal Medicine and Surgery 1 VÅV22KV01-3012 14.04.2025-25.05.2025 4 credits (USS24D-V) +-
Competence objectives of the study unit

The student:
- has knowledge of, is able to account for and is able to assess the most common cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders and their underlying pathophysiology, as well as care and treatment
- can account for cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological anatomy and physiology
- has knowledge of and can account for the medical terminology and drug treatment in cardiovascular, respiratory and endocrinological disorders
- can apply caring science, evidence-based knowledge and develop critical thinking as a basis for nursing care and care in clinical practice
- has the ability to assess the need for care in patients and can, through adequate clinical assessments, classify care needs and can prioritize and document these according to national classification systems
- can understand the importance of and integrate health promotion , health prevention and rehabilitation and apply patient-centered care

Prerequisites

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care

Content of the study unit

Care of the patient with cardiovascular disorders
Care of the patient with respiratory disorders
Care of the patient with endocrinological disorders

Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (except reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and her knowledge of the other students' work is deficient. The student shows limited substantive knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows a lack of knowledge regarding the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. Hen has a lack of knowledge in the substance also concerning the essentials.

Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Person(s) in charge

Jannica Andtfolk

Mode of delivery

75% Face-to-face, 25% Distance learning

Learning material

ENDOCRINOLOGI
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Grönseth, R. (red) (2018). Klinisk omvårdnad, del 2. Kap 17 och 18. Liber AB, Stockholm.
Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red) 2020. Medicinska sjukdomar. Kap. 11 och 12. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.

RESPIRATORISKA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
Almås, H., Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R. (2016). Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. 2ed Liber Stockholm.
Kapitel 4 omvårdnad vid lungsjukdomar.

Cox, C. (red) 2015. Klinisk undersökningsmetodik för sjuksköterskor. Kap. 4

Ericson, E., & Ericson, E. Medicinska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur. Lund. Sid. 319-365
(vård vid lungsjukdomar)

Föreläsningsmaterialet på moodle

Motsvarande material hittar ni från:
Sairaanhoitajan käsikirja, Terveysportti (Här kan ni söka material om allt som vi gått igenom på lektionerna) t.e.x. Astma

KARDIOVASKULÄRA SJUKDOMSTILLSTÅND
Stubberud, D-G., Gronseth, R., Almås, H. (red). 2020. Klinisk Omvårdnad 1. Tredje upplagan. Liber AB, Stockholm. Kapitel 7 och 8.
Andersson, R. Regnér, S., Rogmark, C. 2021. Kirurgiska sjukdomar. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Kapitel. 8.
Ericson, T. & Lind, M. (red.) 2020. Medicinska Sjukdomar. Femte upplagan. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Kapitel 1, 2 och 3.
Ambu: 2012. Handbok i de vanligaste arytmierna. Tolkning och behandling.
Föreläsningssmaterial på moodle
Referenslitteratur:
www.terveysportti.fi Sairanhoitajan käsikirja: Sydän- ja verisuonitauti potilaan hoito

Learning methods

Lectures, tutorials, groups work, workshops
SimMan exercises, mandatory attendance

Objects, timing and methods of assessment

Passed cardiac arrhythmia test
Approved practice tasks that are carried out during the course.
Practical exercises are assessed GK/UK
Mandatory attendance at SimMan exercises
Written exam is graded 0-5

Teaching language

Swedish

Timing

14.04.2025 - 25.05.2025

Enrollment date range

02.12.2024 - 02.03.2025
- 4 credits
Group(s)
- USS24D-V
Seats

Degree Programme in Public Health NursingBachelor of Health Care and Social Services, 240 ECTS

Bachelor of Health Care

Academic year 2024 - 2025

Degree Programme in Public Health Nursing
Bachelor of Health Care and Social Services, 240 ECTS