Study Guide

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with the regional, national and international collaboration in crisis and disaster situations
- is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, assess the need for care, plan, perform and document sustainable emergency care
- has expertise in care in various service system
- can meet, support and mentor the critically ill patient and relatives
- masters sustainable medication management in emergency care
- deepens his/her knowledge of psychosocial support in crisis situations
- can start immediate rescue operations independently and act in emergency situations
- masters the basics of radiation protection

Content

Patient care in emergency care situations in an interprofessional team and befitting medication management and medication calculation

Psychosocial support in various crisis situations and application of evidence based sustainable working methods in emergency care and in different service environments

Regional, national and international cooperation in crisis and disaster situations

Assessment of the situation and rescue operations in crisis and disaster situations

The basics of radiation physics, radiation biology, radiation protection legislation, radiation safety measures in the workplace and medical use of radiation

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

Courses Medical Management I and Medical Management II and Pharmacology, Surgical and Perioperative Care, Nursing in Internal Medicine and Palliative care, Clinical Nursing

Objective

The student:
- can explain human anatomy and physiology
- understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

Content

The cell and tissues

Cardiovascular system

The respiratory system

The nervous system

The digestive system

The urinary system

The endocrine system

The musculoskeletal system

Location and time

Campus Åbo: 28.8.2024 - 8.12.2024

Materials

Course litterature:

Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended litterature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

On moodle give litterature.

Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.


"To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

Teaching methods

Lectures on campus and via teams.

Interactive digital material.

Independent studying and assignments.

Completion alternatives

Anatomy and physiology tests.

Assignments.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
- can explain human anatomy and physiology
- understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

Content

The cell and tissues

Cardiovascular system

The respiratory system

The nervous system

The digestive system

The urinary system

The endocrine system

The musculoskeletal system

Location and time

Campus Åbo: 6.9.2024-15.12.2024

Materials

Course litterature:

Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended litterature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

On moodle give litterature.

Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.


"To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

Teaching methods

Lectures on campus and via teams.

Interactive digital material.

Independent studying and assignments.

Completion alternatives

Anatomy and physiology test.

Assignments.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
- can explain human anatomy and physiology
- understands human structure, organs and the factors that influence them

Content

The cell and tissues

Cardiovascular system

The respiratory system

The nervous system

The digestive system

The urinary system

The endocrine system

The musculoskeletal system

Location and time

Campus Åbo: 2025

Materials

Course litterature:

Gunnar Nicolaysen och Per Holck (red) Anatomi och fysiologi
Henriksson och Rasmusson (2018) Fysiologi med relevant anatomi. Studentlitteratur, Stockholm.

Other recommended litterature:
Christensen R. (2012) Anatomi och fysiologi för sjuksköterskor. Pearson.
Aldskogius och Rydqvist (2018) Den friska människan. Liber, Stockholm
Sand, Sjaastad, Haug och Bjålie (2007). Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm eller dess äldre upplaga av Bjålie, Haug, Sand och Sjaastad (1998) Människokroppen. Liber, Stockholm

On moodle give litterature.

Other evidencebased litterature like for example: Medibas, Terveysportti.


"To guarantee that the competencies are achieved study material in other languages then swedish can be used during the course"

Teaching methods

Lectures on campus and via teams.

Interactive digital material.

Independent studying and assignments.

Completion alternatives

Anatomy and physiology tests.

Assignments.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of his/her own professional field and its basic concepts
- has an understanding of the structure, services, organisation and future vision of the social- and health care system
- has competencies in care in various
sustainable service environments
- has an understanding of the social and health care legislation
- has fundamental skills in inter-professional work

Content

Healthcare in Finland

The importance of nursing and health care profession

Management structures, different service environments and systems

Future visions

General legislation within social and health care, principles of patient and client safety

Interprofessional work

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of his/her own professional field and its basic concepts
- has an understanding of the structure, services, organisation and future vision of the social- and health care system
- has competencies in care in various
sustainable service environments
- has an understanding of the social and health care legislation
- has fundamental skills in inter-professional work

Content

Healthcare in Finland

The importance of nursing and health care profession

Management structures, different service environments and systems

Future visions

General legislation within social and health care, principles of patient and client safety

Interprofessional work

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
-shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
-master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
literature
-has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
-is aware of cultural differences in communication

Content

Working life related documents
Professional communication in working life

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
-shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
-master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
literature
-has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
-is aware of cultural differences in communication

Content

Working life related documents
Professional communication in working life

Materials

The teacher's material

Teaching methods

On campus

Exam schedules

Final exam

Student workload

27h/sp = 81 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Passed exam, approved assignments and oral presentation, participation in class

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the course material.
The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a basic understanding of the course material.
The contents of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates a good understanding of the course material and is able to draw on the literature.
The student can reflect on and motivate their point of view.
The student has almost or completely fulfilled the instructions of the assignments.
The contents of submitted assignments are good.
The student has participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment towards the course contents and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates an excellent understanding of the course material.
The contents of submitted assignments are excellent and the assignments have been executed exceptionally well.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment towards and interest in the course contents and course assignments.
The student has a deep understanding of the course contents and is able to use that knowledge in their future profession.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
-shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing
-master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional
literature
-has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills
-is aware of cultural differences in communication

Content

Working life related documents
Professional communication in working life

Materials

The teacher's material

Teaching methods

Self-study

Exam schedules

Portfolio

Student workload

27h/sp = 81 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved assignments and oral presentation

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student has not followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the course material.
The assignments are inadequate or lacking.
The student has not participated during the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student has partly followed the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates a basic understanding of the course material.
The contents of submitted assignments are satisfactory.
The student has participated in the course, but the commitment and activity have been low or satisfactory.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates a good understanding of the course material and is able to draw on the literature.
The student can reflect on and motivate their point of view.
The student has almost or completely fulfilled the instructions of the assignments.
The contents of submitted assignments are good.
The student has participated actively in the course and demonstrates commitment towards the course contents and course assignments.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student has fulfilled the instructions of the assignments and demonstrates an excellent understanding of the course material.
The contents of submitted assignments are excellent and the assignments have been executed exceptionally well.
The student has been active during the course and demonstrates extra commitment towards and interest in the course contents and course assignments.
The student has a deep understanding of the course contents and is able to use that knowledge in their future profession.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
- is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
- can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
- can life-saving first aid

Content

The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)

Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession

Ethics

Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)

Physical, social and symbolic environment

The patients' and relatives' participation in care

The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
Wound-care, chronic wound

Aid resource

Patient- and client safety

Aseptics

Vital functions, measurements and examinations

Life-saving first aid

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
- is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
- can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
- can life-saving first aid

Content

The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)

Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession

Ethics

Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)

Physical, social and symbolic environment

The patients' and relatives' participation in care

The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
Wound-care, chronic wound

Aid resource

Patient- and client safety

Aseptics

Vital functions, measurements and examinations

Life-saving first aid

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
- is able to, as part of an inter-professional team, plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on client-centered/person-centered basic care in collaboration with the patient and related persons, as well as demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has basic competence in clinical care and knowledge of evidence-based sustainable care methods within primary care and can apply them in the patient's overall care
- can perform clinical examinations and functional measurements
- can life-saving first aid

Content

The care process (care needs, care goals, care activities and evaluation)

Decision-making from the perspective of one's own profession

Ethics

Sustainable care (climate and environmental issues, future perspective)

Physical, social and symbolic environment

The patients' and relatives' participation in care

The most common measures in primary care: bedding and prevention of bed rest complications, patient personal hygiene, nutrition and excretion
Wound-care, chronic wound

Aid resource

Patient- and client safety

Aseptics

Vital functions, measurements and examinations

Life-saving first aid

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
- can, under supervision and gradually independently, carry out a degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can apply the research process systematically and flexibly in the degree project process and in projects
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
- can assess research ethics aspects in his / her degree project
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts
- can act as an opponent for another degree project
- can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing.

Content

Bachelor's Thesis within inter-professional groups

Oppose a Thesis

Maturity test

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

120 credits. Courses Introduction to Academic Studies and Research Methodology.

Objective

Student:
- can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

Content

The research process
Work plan

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
According to schedule feed-back of research plan for thesis.

Teaching methods

Individual assignment
Research plan for thesis

Employer connections

Topics for thesis.

Exam schedules

See Moodle.

Completion alternatives

Approved research plan for thesis.

Student workload

27 h/cr = 81 h

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved: Approved research plan
Unapproved: Unapproved research plan

Qualifications

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

The course VÅV22UV01 Research Methodology and Care Theory must be completed in parallel with VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1.

Objective

Student:
- can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

Content

The research process
Work plan

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
According to schedule feed-back of research plan for thesis.

Teaching methods

Individual assignment
Research plan for thesis

Employer connections

Topics for thesis.

Exam schedules

See Moodle.

Completion alternatives

Approved research plan for thesis.

Student workload

27 h/cr = 81 h

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved: Approved research plan
Unapproved: Unapproved research plan

Qualifications

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

The course VÅV22UV01 Research Methodology and Care Theory must be completed in parallel with VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1.

Objective

Student:
- can independently produce a work plan for their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project

Content

The research process
Work plan

Location and time

May to October 2025
Alere, Novia

Materials

According to the topic of thesis.
See also literature in method course.
For inspiration to find a title:
Lundgren, I., Blix, E., Gottfredsdóttir, H., Wikberg, A. & Aagaard Nohr, E. (Eds.) 2022. Theories and perspectives for midwifery - a Nordic view. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Oscarsson M. & Gerorgsson S. (red.). (2021). Etik för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

An introduction lecture to the course will be held. The course is mainly done as selfdirected studies with possibility to group supervision.
Submission of the plan for the thesis is the examination.

The content of the work plan for thesis:
Novia titlepage
Table of content
Introduction
Background (description of the topic, at least 5 scientific studies)
Aim and problem definition
Method (data collection based on 2 references/ sources discuss method of selection)
Ethical consideration (based on references)
Timetable
Reference list
Minimum 6 pages and maximum 10 pages (excl. Title page and table of content)
Follow Novia’s instructions for writing Thesis.

1. You find Novia’s title page on Moodle
2. Table of content is done in Word, if you do not know how to do, choose ? (help) in the upper right corner and write list of content in the search field
3. The introduction should be about 1 p, where the reader is introduced to the topic and also to your interest and motivation of studying it.
4. Background should be 3 – 5 p and divided into chapters, where there is a description of concepts and the topic or field of study. In the background you also describe the previous research done on this topic or field of study.
5. Aim and problem definition can be short about ½ p.
6. The method can be described on 1-3 p. The chapter includes a description of the approach (qualitative/quantitative design), motivation for the choice and data collection method. References need to be included.
7. Ethical considerations are described on about 1 p and with the help of references ethical principles followed are discussed. Refer to relevant documents on Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK home page. (tenk.fi)
8. Time plan should estimate how the thesis project proceeds. Please do a realistic plan writing something for each month and write it also in your calender.
9. Works cited according to instructions for writing a thesis at Novia

Submit manuscript on Moodle

Employer connections

The thesis can be ordered but this is not necessary.

Exam schedules

Group supervision
Submission in October 2025.
Feedback per work

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia general instructions
Accepted plan för the thesis. Evaluated as pass or fail.
Taking part in individual feedback session online.

Student workload

The course is 3 credits which is equivalent to about 80 h work for the student out of which 8 are scheduled, the rest is individual work. No seminar. See time table.

Content scheduling

Individual planning is part of the process

Further information

Start well in advance!
Individual feedback after submitting the plan.
Read the implementation and the practical guide and other information available in Moodle.
You can do this individually or together, but note that if you for example are two students then the amount of work need to reflect a double amount of work.
AI is not allowed to be used.
The final thesis will be checked for plagiarism.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Approved: Approved research plan
Unapproved: Unapproved research plan

Assessment methods and criteria

For an approved Thesis plan the requirements stipulated above should fulfilled.
The plan fulfills the above stipulated requirements = GK, which mean PASS

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The plan does not follow the above mentioned criteria and does not include what is suggested above.

Qualifications

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

The course VÅV22UV01 Research Methodology and Care Theory must be completed in parallel with VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1.

Objective

Student:
- can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

Content

The research process
Intermediate seminar

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
Spring 2025

Materials

Kurslitteratur:
Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Self-studies
Seminar

Employer connections

Topic for thesis.

Exam schedules

Mid-seminar ccording to schedual.

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Student workload

27 h/cr = 162 h

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

Objective

Student:
- can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

Content

The research process
Intermediate seminar

Location and time

Seminar according to the time schedule in January-February 2025
Supervision according to individual schedule

Materials

According to the subject for thesis and literature for research method is free of choice
See VÅV22UV01-3002

Teaching methods

Individual work under supervision
Seminar for presentation of parts of thesis, discussion and supervision

Employer connections

The thesis can be ordered from a health organization

Exam schedules

See time schedule, seminar i January-Februry 2025

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

See Novia instructions for validation

Student workload

The hours counted for the course is 162 (6 cu) and contains mainly independent work but individual supervision is available during the course

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

pass/fail
According to criteria in the practical guide

Content scheduling

October to January-February

Further information

Approved work, consisting of theoretical framework to thesis, description of methodology used, collected datamaterial and the analysis of data has begun.
Use Instructions for writing a thesis and word template available on Novia homepage

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

The theoretical framework for thesis i suitable for the content and can be approved. The methodology is described and the data collection is almost done. The analysis of the data has begun. The thesis work is under construction.

Qualifications

VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

Objective

Student:
- can analyze the data material in their degree project based on the needs or problems of healthy or sick individuals and / or groups, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care institutions or in the community
- can assess research ethics aspects in their degree project
- has the ability to analyze scientific knowledge and can apply the knowledge in the care work
- can apply a care theoretical perspective in different care contexts

Content

The research process
Intermediate seminar

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
Spring 2025

Materials

Kurslitteratur:
Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Referenslitteratur:
• Alligood & Marriner Tomey (2018). Nursing theorists and their work, 9th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
• Backman, Y., Gardelli, T., Gardelli, V. & Persson, A., 2012. Vetenskapliga tankeverktyg: till grund för akademiska studier. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Dahlberg, K., 2014. Att undersöka Hälsa & Vårdande. Natur & Kultur (Kvalitativ metod).
• Denscombe, M., 2016. Forskningshandboken: för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Ejvegård, R., 2009. Vetenskaplig metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Friberg, F. (red.), 2017. Dags för uppsats – vägledning för litteraturbaserade examensarbeten. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Forsberg, C. & Wengström, Y., 2013. Att göra systematiska litteraturstudier. Värdering, analys och presentation av omvårdnadsforskning. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
• Granskär, M. & Höglund-Nielsen, B., 2012. Tillämpad kvalitativ forskning inom hälso- och sjukvård. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Jacobsen, D.I., 2012. Förståelse, beskrivning och förklaring: introduktion till samhällsvetenskaplig metod för hälsovård och socialt arbete. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Kristensson, J, 2014. Handbok i uppsatsskrivande och forskningsmetodik för studenter inom hälso- och vårdvetenskap. Natur och Kultur.
• Malterud, K., 2014. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Nehls, E., (2021). Nybörjarens guide till vetenskapligt tänkande. Lund: Studentlitteratur
• Nyberg, R. & Tidström, A., 2012. Skriv vetenskapliga uppsatser, examensarbeten och avhandlingar. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Olsson, H. & Sörensen, S., 2021 (även 2011). Forskningsprocessen. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa perspektiv. Stockholm: Liber.
• Parker, M.E., (2019). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Patel, R. & Davidson, B., 2011. Forskningsmetodikens grunder: att planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Smith, M., 2019. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company.
• Tjora, A. & Torhell, S-E., 2012. Från nyfikenhet till systematisk kunskap: kvalitativ forskning i praktiken. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Trost, J. & Hultåker, O., 2016. Enkätboken 5 upl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Self-studies
Seminar

Employer connections

Topic for thesis.

Exam schedules

Mid-seminar according to schedual.

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Student workload

27 h/cr = 162 h

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22EX01 Thesis 1

Objective

Student:
- can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
- can act as an opponent for another degree project
- can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

Content

The research process
Presentation of degree project and opposition
Maturity test

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
v.20 and v.47 2024

Materials

Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - Från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Written assignments
Seminar

Employer connections

Presentation of thesis public.

Exam schedules

Spring v.20
Autumn v.47

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Student workload

27 h/cr = 162 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Thesis: 0-5
Maturity test: uk-gk

Qualifications

VÅV22EX02 Thesis 2
Ragarding student midwives: BM22PR06 Practice: Intrapartum Midwifery 4

Objective

Student:
- can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
- can act as an opponent for another degree project
- can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

Content

The research process
Presentation of degree project and opposition
Maturity test

Location and time

Spring 2025, presentation in May or in week 47.
Alere, Vaasa

Materials

According to the topic of thesis

Teaching methods

Independent work with support from the supervisor.
Seminar + maturity test.

Employer connections

The thesis can be ordered, then an agreement is needed
The data material can be collected from different health care or other organisations if ethical permissions are approved.

Exam schedules

Presentation and maturity test in May or in week 47, see Moodle and time schedule.

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia general instructions.

Student workload

Students plan their time use themselves, see below

Content scheduling

154 hours mostly self-directed work, 6 hours seminar 2 hours maturity test.

Further information

See practical guide and Moodle course.
Follow Novia instructions for thesis writing.
AI=Artificial intelligence is not allowed in the thesis = RED according to Novias instructions

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Thesis is assessed according to 5 criteria, scientific writing, theoretical framework, method, result and presentation. Each criteria ha a scale from 1 to 5. The assessment criteria is published on the Moodle page linked to this implementation plan.

Qualifications

VÅV22EX02 Thesis 2
Ragarding student midwives: BM22PR06 Practice: Intrapartum Midwifery 4

Objective

Student:
- can produce a degree project that is to be based on healthy or sick individuals and / or groups' needs or problems, alternatively evidence-based care or teaching in health care for individuals and small groups at care facilities or in the community
- can reflect on how evidence-based knowledge can be applied in care work and suggest implications for care practice
- can act as an opponent for another degree project
- can account for the most important content of the degree project in a maturity test, as well as demonstrate the ability to express oneself in writing

Content

The research process
Presentation of degree project and opposition
Maturity test

Location and time

Novia Vaasa, Alere
v.20 and v.47 2024

Materials

Henricson, M. (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - Från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Teaching methods

Written assignments
Seminar

Employer connections

Presentation of thesis public.

Exam schedules

Spring v.20
Autumn v.47

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Student workload

27 h/cr = 162 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Thesis: 0-5
Maturity test: uk-gk

Qualifications

VÅV22EX02 Thesis 2
Ragarding student midwives: BM22PR06 Practice: Intrapartum Midwifery 4

Objective

The student:
- demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
- demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

Content

Finnish (oral and written)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of the central terminology within his/her field of study and can adopt the main content of specialised literature
- can present his/her education, work experience and knowledge
- is able to participate in professional and field-specific contexts both verbally and in writing

Content

Terminology concerning studies, working life and job applications in one's own professional field

Oral and written communication

Oral and written presentations

Language correctness and language planning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
- demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
- demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

Content

Finnish (oral and written)

Location and time

Spring 2025.

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Objective

The student:
- demonstrates ability to communicate in a natural and professional manner, in speaking as well as writing, in a work context, including customer service
- demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of the field and is able to benefit from research and literature in his/her professional development

Content

Finnish (oral and written)

Location and time

Spring 2025.

Materials

Material on Moodle.

Teaching methods

We read texts and discuss topics within our own field. We learn to use the terminology in both speech and writing.

Interactive lessons
Lectures
Oral and written exercises in pairs and in groups
Assignments
Own work
Vocabulary tests
Oral and written examination

Exam schedules

Oral and written examination at the end of the course.

Student workload

3 x 27h = 81 hours.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

According to the common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR).

Students receive grades for both oral and written skills.

The assessment is based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). Level B1.1 and B1.2 indicate satisfactory knowledge (grades 1–3), and level B2 or higher indicates good knowledge (grades 4–5). To complete the course with a passing grade (grade 1), the student should demonstrate the knowledge required for level B1.1.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Further information

Shows such skills in the Finnish language as are in accordance with the Act on the Knowledge of Languages Required of Personnel in Public Bodies (424/2003). This means that the student must show satisfactory (grade 1, 2 or 3) or good (grade 4 or 5) skills in speaking and writing Finnish. Written and oral skills are assessed separately
The ratings 4 or 5 are often required to get language supplements. In addition, some workplaces require that you have a good grade (4 or 5) in Finnish to get regular jobs.

Objective

See syllabus

Content

See syllabus

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

See syllabus

Objective

The student:

Bases the health care work on legislation, national and international governance documents

Can apply knowledge of public health, community analyses and municipal welfare reports in promoting the health of the population to reduce health disparities between different population groups

Can take into account various health promoting and hindering environmental factors in the health care work and deepen their knowledge in the promotional and preventive health care work in different business environments

Can cooperate in special and exceptional situations with other experts in environmental health care

Can use evidence based knowledge when planning, implementing and evaluating client-centered health promotion work

Can use resource enhancing business models and methods

Can through outreach healthcare work support clients, families and communities who are in need of special support

Can consider cultural factors to support the health and functional capacity of clients from different cultures

Can prevent accidents and master first aid

Master medication management

Can apply national and international guidelines for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases in health care work

Can implement the vaccination program and guide travelers

Can promote breastfeeding and create breastfeeding friendly cultures

Content

Legislation and health policies within the EU and WHO

Epidemiology

Prevention of common illnesses and identification of health risks

Promotional and preventive health care work

Resource enhancing work methods, client participation, client centering

Business models and working methods in health care work

Interprofessional healthcare work

Multicultural healthcare work

Networking

Environmental health care, legislation and service structure, global, national and regional environmental factors, sustainable development and environmental awareness

Breastfeeding Guide 1 sp

Pharmaceutical bill 0.5sp

First Aid 0.75 cr

Advanced vaccination course 1sp

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Objective

The student:
- knows the basics of research and development
- knows and understands basic research methodological concepts and the research process
- knows and understands central data collection, analysis and reporting methods and is able to apply them in his/her own field of science and profession
- can apply and evaluate research ethics in research and development activities
- can write and debate scientifically

Content

The significance of the development and research work and the research process for one's own professional field

Basic concepts of research methodology

Qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods

Scientific reporting

Research ethical principles

Scientific writing and reasoning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

Course Introduction to Academic Studies

Objective

The student:
- knows the basics of research and development
- knows and understands basic research methodological concepts and the research process
- knows and understands central data collection, analysis and reporting methods and is able to apply them in his/her own field of science and profession
- can apply and evaluate research ethics in research and development activities
- can write and debate scientifically

Content

The significance of the development and research work and the research process for one's own professional field

Basic concepts of research methodology

Qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods

Scientific reporting

Research ethical principles

Scientific writing and reasoning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

Course Introduction to Academic Studies

Objective

Student:
- knows basic knowledge and science theory
- can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
- can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
- understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
- know different research methods and how they are used
- has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
- can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
- can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
- is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

Content

Research methodology, research process and care theory
Qualitative methods
Quantitative methods

Location and time

Novia Vasa, Alere.
According to schedule in Peppi.

Materials

Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Other literature see Moodle.

Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

Teaching methods

Lectures
Self-studies
Assignments
Qualitative methods: lectures, self-studies, individual interview, group assignments and seminar
Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

Employer connections

Topics for thesis.

Exam schedules

See Peppi and Moodle.

Moodle-test in information search
Reflection report thesis
Scientific articles assignment
Written exam
Assignment in qualitative methods
Assignment in quantitative methods
Assignment in nursing theories

Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course.

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Student workload

27 h/cr = 189 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: based on the written assignments, the student's ability to understand and apply a theoretical approach in health care and selected qualitative research methods.
Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Written exam: points < 50%
Written assignment: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%
Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Written exam: The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views, points 70%-89%.
Written assignment:The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%
Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

Qualifications

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

Objective

Student:
- knows basic knowledge and science theory
- can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
- can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
- understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
- know different research methods and how they are used
- has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
- can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
- can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
- is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

Content

Research methodology, research process and care theory
Qualitative methods
Quantitative methods

Location and time

Autumn 2024
Alere, Novia + online

See timescedule

Materials

Qualitative methodology:
Alligood, M. (2022). Nursing Theorists and their work. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. (eller tidigare upplagor)

Birkler, J. (2022). Vetenskapsteori en grundbok. Stockholm: Liber.

Carlsson, T. & Georgsson, S. (2021). Forsknignsetik. Ingår i Oscarsson M & Gerorgsson S. (red.). Etik för barnmorskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur, s 293- 308.

Forsknignsetiska delegationens dokument tenk.fi

Henricson, M. red. (2023). Vetenskapliglig teori och metod. Från idé till examination inom vård och hälsovetenskaper. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (eller tidigare upplagor)

Lundgren I, et al. (Eds.). (2022). Theories and perspectives for midwifery a Nordic view. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Wiklund Gustin, L. (2012). Omvårdnadsteorier i klinisk praxis. Natur och kultur.

+ annan valfri relevant litteratur.


Quantitative methodology:
som bredvidläsning rekommenderas Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, samt av examinator anvisad litteratur

Teaching methods

Qualitative methods: lectures, written assignments, individual work and group work, tutorials home exam.

Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

Compulsory presence

Employer connections

The students make an interview on a common topic that is agree on in class.

Exam schedules

Deadlines for assignments and home exam in Moodle

International connections

Visit from a professor in midwifery from South Africa w 39.
Then the lectures will be in English

Completion alternatives

Qualitative methods:
4 assignments pass/ fail, see more details in Moodle
+ home exam 0-5
Validation according to Novia's general instructions.

Quantitative methods: written assignment (graded according to the scale 1-5)

See Novia's instructions for validation

Student workload

7 credits correspond to 189 hours of work for students.

Qualitative methodology 5cr:
Introduction 2h, lecture on interview including exercises 4h, research process 4h, qualitative content analysis including exercises 8h, midwifery, nursing or public health theory theory 2h. other: recorded lectures in Moodle, tutorials and individual and group work to be submitted in Moodle.

Quantitative research methodology is 1.5 cr which is equivalent to 40.5 hours work of which 8 are scheduled lectures and seminars and the rest is the students' own work. assignment is submitted on a agreed date after the lectures.

Content scheduling

-

Further information

The course is arranged with midwifery students and the public health nurse students together.
More information about content in Moodle course
Compulsory presence on some parts mentioned in Moodle.

General feedback to the whole group, individual feedback on request.
Use Novia instructions for thesis in the assignments.
AI is not allowed to use unless it is explicitly encouraged.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

For written assignment 1-4 the grading is Pass/Fail
See details in Moodle
For home exam grades 0-5

Quantiative assignment is graded 1-5

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

A written assignment is failed when it doesn't fulfill the requirements for a passed grade. The requirements for passed grade are available at the Moodlepage designed for the course
The examination is evaluated based on the answers given and if not the points all together reaches 50% of maximum the examination is failed.
The quantitative assignment is evaluated similarly, according to the relative proportion of correct answers.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

50-69% correct answers

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

70-89% correct answers

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

90-100% correct answers

Qualifications

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

Objective

Student:
- knows basic knowledge and science theory
- can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
- can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
- understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
- know different research methods and how they are used
- has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
- can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
- can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
- is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

Content

Research methodology, research process and care theory
Qualitative methods
Quantitative methods

Location and time

Novia Vasa, Alere.
According to schedule in Peppi.

Materials

Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Other literature see Moodle.

Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

Teaching methods

Lectures
Self-studies
Assignments
Qualitative methods: lectures, self-studies, individual interview, group assignments and seminar
Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

Employer connections

Topics for thesis.

Exam schedules

See Peppi and Moodle.

Moodle-test in information search
Reflection report thesis
Scientific articles assignment
Written exam
Assignment in qualitative methods
Assignment in quantitative methods
Assignment in nursing theories

Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course.

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Student workload

27 h/cr = 189 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: based on the written assignments, the student's ability to understand and apply a theoretical approach in health care and selected qualitative research methods.
Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Written exam: points < 50%
Written assignment: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%
Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Written exam: The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views, points 70%-89%.
Written assignment:The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%
Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

Qualifications

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

Objective

Student:
- knows basic knowledge and science theory
- can search for evidence-based knowledge and scientific articles
- can reproduce the research process, and apply the different phases of the research process
- understands and can describe qualitative and quantitative approaches and knowledge interests
- know different research methods and how they are used
- has knowledge of different care theories and care models, as well as their areas of application
- can use the most common methods for qualitative and quantitative data collection and data analysis in healthcare research
- can perform selected statistical calculations and tests
- is prepared to carry out a degree project at the bachelor's level (YH) under supervision and gradually more and more independently

Content

Research methodology, research process and care theory
Qualitative methods
Quantitative methods

Location and time

Novia Vasa, Alere.
According to schedule in Peppi.

Materials

Maria Henricson (red.) (2023). Vetenskaplig teori och metod - från idé till examination inom vård- och hälsovetenskap. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Other literature see Moodle.

Quantitative methods: following literature is recommended Holme, I.M. & Solvang, B.K. (1992). Forskningsmetodik. Kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Widjeskog, Ö. 1995 (eller nyare upplaga). Statistik. En introduktion. Åbo: W-statistik, as well as other literature suggested by the examiner.

Teaching methods

Lectures
Self-studies
Assignments
Qualitative methods: lectures, self-studies, individual interview, and group assignments
Quantitative methods: lectures, exercises in computer class, as well as written presentation

Employer connections

Topics for thesis.

Exam schedules

See Peppi and Moodle.

Reflection report thesis
Scientific articles assignment
Moodle-test in information search
Written exam
Assignment in qualitative methods
Assignment in quantitative methods
Assignment in nursing theories

Quantitative methods: the written assignment must be submitted within a month after the end of this part of the course.

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia instructions.

Student workload

27 h/cr = 189 h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: based on the written assignments, the student's ability to understand and apply a theoretical approach in health care and selected qualitative research methods.
Quantitative methods: based on the written assignment, the student's ability to understand and apply fundamental statistical concepts, and to perform a statistical analysis, is evaluated.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Written exam: points < 50%
Written assignment: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has not followed the instructions and shows very week substance knowledge.
Quantitative methods: the student does not understand and cannot apply statistical concepts and cannot perform an adequate statistical analysis.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Written exam: The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject, points 50%-69%
Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions and shows limited substance knowledge.
Quantitative methods: notable weaknesses are found in the student's understanding and application of statistical concepts, or the statistical analysis is not adequately performed.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Written exam: The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views, points 70%-89%.
Written assignment:The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and master the substance of his work, but the application is limited.
Quantitative methods: the student predominantly demonstrates a good understanding of and can apply statistical concepts, and only minor errors are found in the statistical analysis.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Written exam: The student shows an in-depth knowledge, points > 90%
Written assignment: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance.

Nursing theories and quantitative methods: The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she/he has mastered the substance.
Quantitative methods: the student demonstrates a complete understanding of statistical concepts and makes only insignificant errors when applying them, and performs a statistical analysis without errors.

Qualifications

VÅV22IN01 Introduction to Academic Studies and Communication
VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse

Objective

The student:
- has an understanding of normal aging
- can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
- can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
- master evidence-based and sustainable care methods and appropriate medication management
- can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

Content

The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient

Chain of care and service system

Coping/adaptation

Partnership and counseling

Caring for close relatives

Ethical decision making

The aged patient's health problems

Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
Care of chronic wound

Adequate medication management

Geriatric technology

Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder

Evidence-based care

Care chains and service types, elderly care

Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
- has an understanding of normal aging
- can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
- can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
- master evidence-based and sustainable care methods and appropriate medication management
- can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

Content

The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient

Chain of care and service system

Coping/adaptation

Partnership and counseling

Caring for close relatives

Ethical decision making

The aged patient's health problems

Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
Care of chronic wound

Adequate medication management

Geriatric technology

Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder

Evidence-based care

Care chains and service types, elderly care

Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:
- has an understanding of normal aging
- can assess the elderly patient's health, abilities and resources as well as support the person's choices regarding health and well-being
- can as part of an interprofessional team plan, execute, evaluate, document and report on a person-centered/client centered care in collaboration with the patient and relatives and demonstrate a reflective and ethical approach in care
- has expertise in care of the elderly and has knowledge of central geriatric illnesses, care chains and service system
- master evidence-based and sustainable care methods and appropriate medication management
- can perform clinical examinations, functional measurements and treatments

Content

The needs, characteristics and quality of life of the elderly from the perspective of the person / patient

Chain of care and service system

Coping/adaptation

Partnership and counseling

Caring for close relatives

Ethical decision making

The aged patient's health problems

Nutritional needs, status and recommendations
Care of chronic wound

Adequate medication management

Geriatric technology

Geriatric illnesses, multi illness and memory disorder

Evidence-based care

Care chains and service types, elderly care

Systematic assessment of functional states, disabilities and health and the use of tests and gauges

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:

Can independently be responsible for the health care work in an elective context on the basis of previous practice

Identifies their developmental needs and strengthens their skills in their work as an expert in health care work

Content

Elective Internship within health care work

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Objective

The student:

Can apply, reflect and deepen his/her expertise in clinical care work

Can argue for evidence based activity and care methods

Can apply ethical decision making in a variety of service environments and care situations

Masters person-centered/client-centered holistic care and medication management in different healthcare and service environments

Students can use health technology and digital solutions in in-depth care work

Can evaluate the guidance efficiency together with patient, close relatives and healthcare personnel

Can promote patient and client safety

Content

In-depth care methods in internal medicine

In-depth care methods in surgical care

Ethical decision-making in complicated situations and in different service system

Advanced medication management

Person-centered/client-centered holistic care

Health technology and digital solutions

Application of health science theories and research

Welfare economy

The effects of guidance and different gauges

Patient and client safety

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Objective

The student:

Can apply, reflect and deepen his/her expertise in clinical care work

Can argue for evidence based activity and care methods

Can apply ethical decision making in a variety of service environments and care situations

Masters person-centered/client-centered holistic care and medication management in different healthcare and service environments

Students can use health technology and digital solutions in in-depth care work

Can evaluate the guidance efficiency together with patient, close relatives and healthcare personnel

Can promote patient and client safety

Content

In-depth care methods in internal medicine

In-depth care methods in surgical care

Ethical decision-making in complicated situations and in different service system

Advanced medication management

Person-centered/client-centered holistic care

Health technology and digital solutions

Application of health science theories and research

Welfare economy

The effects of guidance and different gauges

Patient and client safety

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Objective

The student:
- masters the basics of providing first aid
- can act in crisis and disaster situations

Content

First aid
Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

Location and time

Hösten 2024

Materials

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Teaching methods

Lessons, demonstration, practice

Completion alternatives

Practical tests and theoretic test

Further information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
- masters the basics of providing first aid
- can act in crisis and disaster situations

Content

First aid
Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu

Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Teaching methods

Lessons, demonstration, practice

Completion alternatives

Practical tests and theoretic test during lesson time

Further information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

You can bye Electronic First Aid card after completed course

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Theoretical test: approved/failed
Practical tests : approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
- masters the basics of providing first aid
- can act in crisis and disaster situations

Content

First aid
Acting in accident situations, crisis and disaster situations

Location and time

Våren 2025

Materials

Korte, H. & Myllyrinne, K. 2018. Första hjälpen. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy. Keuruu
Hedrenius, S. & Johansson, S. 2013. Krisstöd vid olyckor, katastrofer och svåra händelser. Natur och Kultur. Stockholm
Hugelius, K. & Tapani, J. 2017. Krishantering i praktiken. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Heide, M. & Simonsson, C. 2016. Krisen inifrån. Studentlitteratur. Lund.

Teaching methods

Lessons, demonstration, practical training

Completion alternatives

Practical tests during lesson time, virtual test

Student workload

2 x 27 h = 54 h

Further information

Compulsory attendance at all lessons

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment methods and criteria

Virtual test: approved/failed
Group assignment: approved/failed
Individual written case studies: approved/failed
Resuscitation: 90 % correct

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
- has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
-has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
- has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
- has knowledge of various memory disorders
- masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
- has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
- masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
- can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
- has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
- has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

Content

Gerontology
Geriatrics
Acute geriatrics
Gerotechnology
Drug treatment for elderly
Nutrition for elderly

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
- has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
-has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
- has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
- has knowledge of various memory disorders
- masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
- has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
- masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
- can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
- has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
- has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

Content

Gerontology
Geriatrics
Acute geriatrics
Gerotechnology
Drug treatment for elderly
Nutrition for elderly

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

På svenska
Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.

+ recommended articles at Moodle

Teaching methods

Obligatry introduction but most of course online
Pedagogic frame
Project learning, learning by doing
Self studies
Group work
Online exam

Student workload

1c =27h
4c=108h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
- has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
-has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
- has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
- has knowledge of various memory disorders
- masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
- has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
- masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
- can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
- has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
- has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

Content

Gerontology
Geriatrics
Acute geriatrics
Gerotechnology
Drug treatment for elderly
Nutrition for elderly

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

På svenska
Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.

+ recommended articles at Moodle

Teaching methods

Obligaory introduction online course
Pedagogic frame: project learning Learning by donig
Self studies
Group work
Online exam
Seminars online obligatory

Exam schedules

According to schedule

Student workload

1c =27h
4c=108h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

Student:
- has knowledge of physiological gerontology, geriatrics and acute geriatrics and can apply them in care
- has knowledge of health risks, common symptoms and diseases in the highest age groups
-has knowledge of aging, multi-morbidity and the importance of acute conditions and can apply it in care
- has knowledge of chronic conditions and their significance in acute illness
- has knowledge of various memory disorders
- masters the management of acute conditions in the elderly
- has knowledge of and can apply the features of the elderly's drug treatment
- masters drug-related problems in the care of the elderly and can actively apply knowledge in the prevention of iatrogenic injuries
- can promote the functional ability of the elderly and has a rehabilitative approach to care
- has knowledge of digital technology and technical aids in geriatric care
- has knowledge of legislation and recommendations regarding the elderly population

Content

Gerontology
Geriatrics
Acute geriatrics
Gerotechnology
Drug treatment for elderly
Nutrition for elderly

Location and time

Spring 2025

Materials

På svenska
Wisten, A.,Rundgren, Å.& Larsson,B. 2020. Akut geriatrik. Studentlitteratur.
Fastbom Johan. 2015. Äldres läkemedel. Studentlitteratur
Kirkevold, M.,Brodtkorb, K.& Hylen Ranhoff, A. 2018. Geriatrisk omvårdnad. Liber.

+ recommended articles at Moodle

Teaching methods

Obligatory introduction
Pedagogic frame :Project learning, leaning by doing
Self studies
Group work
Online exam
AI can be used att help

Student workload

1c =27h
4c=108h

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV02 Basics in Nursing Care
VÅV22GV05 Drug Therapy 1
VÅV22PR01 Practice: Basic Care

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
- understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
- can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
- can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
- can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
- has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
- can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

Content

Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
Prevention levels
Epidemiology
Health determinants
Ethical issues in health education
Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
Health promotion in different service environments
Artificial Intelligence

Location and time

Novia, Vasa
Hösten 2024

Materials

Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
Valda artiklar.
Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

Teaching methods

Föreläsning, självstudier, grupparbete.

Exam schedules

Godkända individuella -och grupparbete.

Student workload

3 sp
1 sp = 27 timmar

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
- understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
- can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
- can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
- can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
- has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
- can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

Content

Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
Prevention levels
Epidemiology
Health determinants
Ethical issues in health education
Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
Health promotion in different service environments
Artificial Intelligence

Location and time

Hösterminen 2024, Novia

Teaching methods

Inbandad introduktion till kursen på Moodle, Power Point och hänvisning till aktuella websidor på Moodle, portfolio, individuella uppgifter samt rapport på moodle.

Exam schedules

Moodle tentamen 17 /10 klockan 09.00-11.00

Further information

Kursen är online och studierna förverkligas sjävständigt under tiden 2/9-18/10.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and curative care
- understands the meaning of the different levels of prevention and can apply them as a process in the health promotion and prevention work
- can explain the basics of epidemiology and understand the determinants of health determinants in the health and disease panorama
- can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
- can under supervision plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional ability together with individuals / groups in interprofessional teams
- has competence in care in various service environments within the health promotion work
- can treat clients / patients and relatives as experts in their own lives

Content

Principles of health and disease, public health and public diseases
Prevention levels
Epidemiology
Health determinants
Ethical issues in health education
Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and connection
Evidence-based health promotion and prevention measures and methods
Supervision of patients, motivational conversations
Health promotion in different service environments
Artificial Intelligence

Location and time

Novia, Vasa /Alére
Hösten 2024

Materials

Bringsén, Å., Lindström N.& Arnesson K. 2019. Hälsopromotion i teori och praktik: olika arenor och målgrupper. Liber AB.
Brylde, B. 2011. Folkhälsoarbetets etik. Studentlitteratur. Lund.
Elinder, L. & Kwak L. 2014. Evidensbaserat Folkhälsoarbete. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Larsson, C., Murdaugh, C., Persons, M & Pender , N. 2021 . Sjukskötarens hälsofrämjande arbete.
Pellmer, K., Wramner, B. & Wramner H. 2017. Grundläggande folkhälsovetenskap. Liber, Stockholm.
Svanström, L. 2017. Att mäta folkhälsa. Kriterier för bra folkhälsoarbete.
Valda artiklar.
Institutet för Hälsa och Välfärd www.thl.fi
Social- och Hälsovårdsministeriet www.stm.fi

Teaching methods

Föreläsning, självstudier, grupparbete och workshops.
Några lektioner är online, se moodle

Exam schedules

Godkända individuella -och grupparbete samt tentamen (då kursen avslutas)

Student workload

3 sp
1 sp = 27 timmar

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Objective

The student will:
- know the diseases prevented by vaccination both nationally and internationally
- know the composition, advantages and side effects of vaccines
- know the national vaccination programme and legislation in Finland
- know about vaccination in different groups
- have skills in counselling and preparation before vaccination, skills in vaccination techniques and measures after vaccination

Content

Knowledge about vaccinations
Vaccination skills

Materials

National course in Moodle platform

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

According to national criterias
Approved:
Approved portfolio
Passed virtual exam

Not approved:
Not approved portfolio
Not passed virtual exam

Qualifications

Drug therapy 1

Objective

Student
- can make use of key research and screening methods in health care work
- guides and supports clients on issues related to sexual health and family planning
- possesses the skills to realize family and parents preparation
- has readiness to carry out a safe vaccination for children
- has knowledge of different health-promoting working methods and has the skills to use these in the meeting with the family, the individual, the group and the society in change
- has knowledge of working with outreach activities and a resource-strengthening approach as well as identifying and supporting clients/patients in need of special/intensive support
- master safe drug management

Content

Examination and screening methods in health care work simulation exercises
Reproductive health and family planning
Family and parent preparation
Vaccination of children - simulation exercises
Different health promotion methods
Child protection
Educational sequences for children and adults
Tutorial

Location and time

Alere autumn 2024 contact teaching
Starting with own work with manual autumn 2024 continuing until february 2025

Materials

according to the lecturers instruction
see moodle platform

Teaching methods

Lectures
Simulations/practical exercises in the clinical training center
Recording and analysis of health talks
Virtual studies
Preparation of methodological manual in child health care

Exam schedules

Simulations/practical exercises in autumn 2024
Recording and analysis of health talks in autumn 2024
Deadline for submission of method manual in february 2025

Student workload

27h/cr

Further information

Mandatory attendance at simulations/practical exercises, recording and analysis of health talks and expert lectures in child protection and sexual health

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved participation in practical exercises in clinical training center
Approved participation in recording and analysis of health talks
Preparation of methodology manual in child counseling work, grades 1-5
Participation in expert lectures in child protection and execution of task Passed/Failed

Qualifications

Introduction to public health nursing
Public health nursing with the expectant family

Objective

The student
- masters the prevention of infectious diseases can provide expertise regarding vaccination programmes for children and adults
- knows about environmental health and can work to prevent accidents
- develops his/her abilities to teach and counsel
- develops his/her professional skills from a multidisciplinary perspective

Content

In-depth vaccination knowledge - national virtual course

Other expert knowledge

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and

Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Introduction to public health nursing
Health promotion skills in family health

Objective

The student:
- has knowledge of different health-promoting working methods and has the skills to use these in the meeting with the family, the individual, the group and the society in change
-has knowledge of working with outreach activities and a resource-strengthening approach as well as identifying and supporting clients/patients in need of special/intensive support
- can make use of key research and screening methods in health care work
- develops his/her abilities to teach and counsel
- has theoretical knowledge to be able to perform postpartum examination after normal delivery
- has readiness to carry out a safe vaccination for children and adults
- knows about environmental health and can work to prevent accidents
- master safe drug management

Content

Health and motivational intervju , lifestyle councelling
Supervision and teaching
Group supervision and group activities
Laborations in central examination and screening methods
Postpartum examination after normal birth
Environmental health
Digital solutions and welfare technology

Location and time

Contact studies at Campus Alere in Vaasa in spring and autumn 2025
Compulsory attendance at workshops, contact study days and Practical exercises/simulation
Recording and analysis of health conversations 9.4.2025

Teaching methods

- Lectures våren 2025
- Practical exercises/simulations in the clinical training center autumn 2025
- Workshops
- Recording and analysis of health conversations

Further information

Post-partum examination - lectures and practical exercises will be carried out in the spring of 2025 together with group UBM22

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and

Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Compulsory attendance at workshops, contact study days and practical exercises/simulation Pass/Fail
Recording and analysis of health conversations Pass/Fail

Qualifications

Study unit VÅV22IN : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22GV : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22HF : all courses approved
Study unit VÅV22KV : courses VÅV22KV01-KV14 approved
Study unit VÅV22PR: courses VÅV22PR01-PR05 approved

Objective

The student:
- understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
- can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
- can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
- can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
- knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
- has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
- knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
- can collaborate in interprofessional teams

Content

Human sexuality
The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
Development of children and young people
Follow-up of children's and young people's health
Adult health care and screenings
Health technology
Interprofessional collaboration

Location and time

Novia, Alere, Vaasa
Spring 2025

Materials

Maternity care:
Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
THL.2023. Data base Neuko (replace Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Tillgänglig från: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko

STM Arbetslivet 2023 (valda artiklar)
Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussion, demonstration, group work,video

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

Written exam last lecture

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Exam
Two retakes possible

Student workload

27 h/cr, 5 cr= 135h

Content scheduling

-

Further information

-

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

Objective

The student:
- understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
- can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
- can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
- can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
- knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
- has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
- knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
- can collaborate in interprofessional teams

Content

Human sexuality
The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
Development of children and young people
Follow-up of children's and young people's health
Adult health care and screenings
Health technology
Interprofessional collaboration

Location and time

Spring term 2025, Novia

Materials

På svenska
Alaluhta R. & Valkamaa-Hietamäki S (toim.) 2016. Maahanmuuttajien sexuaaliterveyden edistäminen. Jyväskylän ammattikorkeakoulun Julkaisuja.
Bergman S & Blomqvist , C. 2011. Uppskattande samtalskonst. Om att skapa möjligheter i samtalets värld. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Borgfeldt m.fl. 2019. Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
Folkhälsolag 66/1972 Finlex
Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
Holm Ivarsson, B. 2016. MI Motiverande samtal Praktisk handbok för hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm: Gothia fortbildning.
Holmström, E. & Ohlsson, K. 2014. Människan i arbetslivet. Teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur AB, Lund.
Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. 2019. Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
Rosengren D.B. 2012. Motiverande samtal -Mi. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
THL. 2014. Edistä, ehkäise, vaikuta-sexuaali-ja lisääntymisterveyden toimintaohjelma 2014-2020. Opas 33
THL. 2023. We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
THL.2023. Data base Neuko (replace Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Available in Finnish and Swedish from: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko

Teaching methods

Lectures, discussion, demonstration, exercises, and video

Employer connections

-

Exam schedules

På engelska
Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Exam
Two retakes possible

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia's general instructions

Written assignments need to follow Novia instructions for writing

Student workload

27 h /cr
5 cr = 135 h

Content scheduling

-

Further information

-

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

Objective

The student:
- understands the importance of human sexuality and can consider sexuality as an integral part of man, health and care
- can account for basic knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth and postpartal period
- can account for children's and young people's normal physical and mental development and health to distinguish abnormalities
- can apply a health-promoting approach to work with children, young people, adults, pregnant or new parents
- knows and can identify health problems, health risks and risk environments that affect children, adolescents and families
- has basic knowledge of adult health care including various screening examinations and understands the importance of occupational safety and health
- knows health technology solutions in health-promoting care
- can collaborate in interprofessional teams

Content

Human sexuality
The normal pregnancy, childbirth and post partal period
Development of children and young people
Follow-up of children's and young people's health
Adult health care and screenings
Health technology
Interprofessional collaboration

Location and time

Spring term 2025, Novia

Materials

Borgfeldt m.fl. (2019). Obstetrik och gynekologi. För sjuksköterskor. Lund: Studentlitteratur. (ch. 1-8,12)
Tapanainen, J., Heikinheimo, O.,Mäkikallio, K.; Aaltonen, R. (2019). Naistentaudit ja synnytykset. Helsinki: Duodecim.
Lewis, L. Ed. (2015). Fundamentals of Midwifery A textbook for students. Wiley Blackwell. (chapters 5-10 for written exam, chapter 12 optional for family planning) Available on: http://ezproxy.novia.fi:2052/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=936288&site=ehost-live
THL. (2023). We're having a baby. Available on: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-575-9 (available online)
THL.(2023). Databasen Neuko (ersätter Guiden för mödrarådgivningar från 2015) Tillgänglig från: https://thl.fi/sv/web/barn-unga-och-familjer/social-och-halsovardstjanster/modra-och-barnradgivning/databasen-neuko
THLs material gällande screeningsundersökningar och
STM publikation 18:2014 Screening i Finland 2014. Nuläge för screening inom hälso- och sjukvården och framtidsutsikter
STM Arbetslivet 2023 (valda artiklar)
Företagshälsovård 1383/2001 Finlex
Hälso-och sjukvårdslag 1326/2010 Finlex
Förverkligandets alternativa prestationssätt

Employer connections

-

International connections

-

Completion alternatives

Validation according to Novia's general instructions
Written exam
Two retakes possible

Student workload

1cr = 27h
5 cr= 135h individual studies

Content scheduling

-

Further information

The course is online

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Qualifications

VÅV22GV01/BM22GV01/HVV22GV01 The Profession of Nurse, The Profession of Nurse and Midwife, The Profession of Nurse and Public Health Nurse
VÅV22HF01 Basics of Health Promoting Care

Objective

The student:
- is familiar with the theories and current research on health and sustainable development and can apply them in promotional, preventive and palliative care
- can identify health risks in patients and understand the importance of early support at the individual level
- can, under guidance, along with individuals/groups in inter-professional teams plan and implement interventions that promote health and functional capacity
- has expertise in care in various service environments within health promotion

Content

Principles of health and illness, public health and endemic diseases

Sustainable care at local and national level

Health determinants

Epidemiology

Evidence-based health promotion and prevention, methods, rehabilitation

Empowerment

Lifestyle factors and their impact on health, guidance on lifestyle issues, self-care and commitment

Different service environments

Ethical issues in health education

Disabilities/impairments, functional ability, measurement methods

Artificial intelligence

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

No preliminary requirements

Objective

The student:

Is familiar with the service system and the interprofessional collaboration within child health care and is able to use different resource promoting models and methods both individually and as part of a group

Can plan, implement and assess the follow-up of a child’s growth and development as well as support the family’s well-being

Can identify families with special needs and knows the process of referring a patient to further examinations and treatment

Can maintain and promote collaboration with the family and various stakeholders with a view to a safe growing environment

Can implement the vaccination program

Content

Internship information

Internship instructions

Confidentiality

Tutoring

Evaluation

Internship seminar

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Objective

The student:

Has an understanding of the service system and the interprofessional cooperation in maternal health care and can use various resource enhancing models and methods in health care work.

Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up and care of the woman, the fetus and the family, both during pregnancy and puerperium

Recognizes risk pregnancies, complications during pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium and can refer the client for further care

Can guide both individually and in groups on issues related to pregnancy, childbirth, puerperium, couple relationship and family planning

Content

Internship information

Internship information

Confidentiality

Tutoring

Evaluation

Internship seminar

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Objective

The student:

Knows about the service system and the interprofessional cooperation in school and student health care and can use various resource enhancing business models and methods in health care work.

Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the growth and development of school children and adolescents and support the family's well-being

Can supervise school children, adolescents and their families in a diverse way

Can maintain and promote collaboration with school children, adolescents and the family as well as various support groups with view to a safe school and learning environment and a resource enhancing learning climate

Content

Internship information

Internship instructions

Confidentiality

Tutoring

Evaluation

Internship seminar

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Objective

The student:

Knows the service system and interprofessional cooperation in occupational health care / adult health care and can use various resource enhancing models and methods in health care work

Is able to plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the employee and the health of the work community and support the maintenance of work ability

Can assess the effect of work, work society and the environment on health

Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the health and functional capacity of the unemployed and the elderly

Can identify and meet service needs of the elderly and unemployed in interprofessional working groups and networks

Content

Internship information

Internship instruction

Confidentiality

Tutoring

Evaluation

Internship seminar

Evaluation scale

Approved/Rejected

Qualifications

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Objective

The student:

Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the health of the employee and the work community and support the maintenance of work capacity and use a resource enhancing way of working

Can explain the principles of good interprofessional occupational health care

Can evaluate the effect of work, work society and the environment on health

Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of the elderly's health and functional ability with resource enhancing methods at the individual and community level

Can work in interprofessional working groups and networks as well as realise health care in a home environment

Content

The service system and service environments within occupational health care

Legislation in occupational health and occupational health and safety

Principles for good corporate health practice

Business plans, workplace mapping and follow-up of the work community

Work health surveys

Resources, supporting and burdensome factors in the work community and work environment

Work-related illnesses and occupational illnesses

Worker protection and ergonomics

Resource enhancing methods in working life

Occupational health-related health care

Health care for the unemployed

Health care in home environment

The service system

Health surveys for the elderly, health care and service plans

Resource enhancing working methods

Health advice

The elderly's own resources and functional ability, early support for participation and opportunities for influence

The use of new technology in health care in the home environment

Family support and challenging clients, violence prevention and recognition

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits

Objective

The student
- has knowledge of health care provided for people of working age and can apply current legislation and national policy documents
- has knowledge and readiness to provide good occupational health care
- can carry out health surveys and promote health and wellbeing among people of working age
- has basic knowledge of how to investigate health hazards at the workplace through a workplace survey and how to conduct risk assessment at the workplace. The student also ha insights into occupational medicine
- recognises the characteristics of health promotion among the elderly and can support the promotion of health and wellbeing of the elderly and their families
- respects the cultural affiliation of the clients/patients
- can work within various networks and teams to support people of working age, the elderly and their families

Content

Legislation and governance documents in occupational health and safety at work
Principles for good occupational health care practice
Health screening for working age population, maintenance of work- and functional capacity, follow-up of the working person during the various stages of working life, assessment of work capacity
Business plans, workplace surveys and follow-up of the work community
Medical issues
Health survey and health advice for older, resource-enhancing working methods
Multi-professional and multicultural health care work

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and

Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Introduction to public health nursing

Objective

The student
- masters methods to support and monitor the child’s growth and development
- recognizes and can intervene at an early stage in situations that may pose a risk to the child’s health and development
- has knowledge of relationships, parenting and early interaction
- is prepared to provide guidance and counselling to the family on issues regarding upbringing and health habits
- can respect the cultural affiliation of the child and its family
- can work within various networks and teams to support the child and its family
- masters the vaccination program offered at the child welfare clinic

Content

Couple relationship, parenting, early interaction
Methods to support and monitor the child's growth and development
Recurrent and comprehensive health examinations, screenings
Early intervention and recognition of situations that may pose a risk to the child's health and development including child protection
Supervision and counseling for the family in education issues and issues related to health habits
Multi-professional and multicultural health care work
Vaccination activities in child health clinics

Location and time

Autumn 2024 week 36-41

Materials

För study material : see also Moodle
Kurslitteratur:
NEUKO databas - lastenneuvola via THL/terveysportti, 2022
Hälsoundersökningar vid barnrådgivningen och inom skolhälsovården - Metodhandbok 31/2018. THL ( elektronisk) Mäki P.Wikström K., Hakulinen-Viitanen T., Laatikainen T
Institutet för hälsa och välfärd. www.thl.fi Webbsidan : Infektionssjukdomar och Vaccinationer
Tillsammans kring matbordet-kostrekommendationer för barnfamiljer. THL. förnyad upplaga 2019

Referenslitteratur ( barnhälsovård ) :
Barnhälsovård-att främja barns hälsa . 2016. red. Magnusson, Blennow, Hagelin, Sundelin. Liber:Stockholm
Barnrådgivningen som stöd för barnfamiljer. Handbok för personalen.
Handböcker 2005:12. Social och hälsovårdsministeriet
Bramhagen, A-C. och Carlsson, A. (red.) Hälsofrämjande arbete för barn och ungdomar. 2013. Studentlitteratur
Ensi- ja turvakotien liitto. Tunnista vauvan hätä! Vauvan kaltoinkohtelun tunnistaminen ja siihen puuttuminen
Hakulinen-Viitanen, Hietanen-Peltola, Hastrup, Wallin ja Pelkonen
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön selvityksiä 2008:24. Isien ja isyyden tukeminen äitiys- ja lastenneuvoloissa.
Halme, N. 2009. Isän ja leikki-ikäisen lapsen yhdessäolo. THL.
Kirjaamisopas: Lastenneuvola ja kouluterveydenhuolto. THL.2022
Korteniemi-Poikela, E & Cacciatore, R. 2010. Opas vanhemmille. Portaita pitkin. Lapsen ja nuoren seksuaalisuuden kehittyminen. WSOY
Laaja terveystarkastus. Ohjeistus äitiys- ja lastenneuvolatoimintaan sekä kouluterveydenhuoltoon. Opas 22/2012. THL
Mothander-Risholm P; Broberg;A. 2018. Att möta små barn och deras föräldrar I vården: om anknytning, utveckling och samspel.
MLL. Hur växer och utvecklas barn.
Ryttyläinen, K. & Valkama, S. 2010. Seksuaalisuus hoitotyössä. Edita.
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja 2010:7. Älä lyö lasta! Kansallinen lapsiin kohdistuvan kuritusväkivallan vähentämisen toimintaohjelma 2010-2015
Salpa, P. 2007. Lapsen liikkumisen kehitys, ensimmäinen ikävuosi. Tammi.
Silven, M. (toim.Ahonen, L. 2017. Haastavat kasvatustilanteet. Lämpimän vuorovaikutuksen käsikirja. Juva: PS-Kustannus.

Teaching methods

Lectures, demonstrations, simulations,
Own work in base groups

Exam schedules

Exam 11.10
Reexam 1 22.11.2024
Reexam 2 17.1.2025

Student workload

Students' work effort is expected to correspond to 27 hours per credit

Further information

Mandatory attendance at the start of the course, demonstrations, simulations and expert lectures

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.

The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views

Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional

Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Assessment methods and criteria

Approved exam, grade 1-5
Approved participation in simulations
Deltagit i expertföreläsning

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

Failed exam
Not participated in simulations
Not participated in expert lecture

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading)
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential.
The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential
Bedömningskriterier - goda-synnerligen goda (3-4)

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views
Assessment criteria for written work
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has mastered the substance of his work, but the application is limited.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam
The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional
Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups
The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and
Can lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponent ship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)

Qualifications

Introduction to public health nursing

Objective

The student:

Can plan, implement and evaluate the follow-up of a child’s growth and development liaising with the family

Can support the parents in their parenthood and can guide, with resource promoting methods, the parents and their child towards a healthy lifestyle

Can assess the child’s and family’s need of additional support and further treatment

Content

The service system and service environments for families with children

The child's growth and development

Health examinations, screenings, supervision

Guidance and resource enhancing methods

Group activities

Client / patient involvement

Multicultural work

Children in need of extra support and further investigations

Child protection

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

It is recommended that students have completed 180 credits